Podchaser Logo
Home
Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Released Friday, 26th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Jeff Booth on Bitcoin's Future: A Deep Dive into Decentralization and Innovation

Friday, 26th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

All right. Jeff Booth, the author

0:02

of the Price of Tomorrow, a book that has oh

0:05

Man really sent people into a different direction. Awesome

0:07

book, Price of Tomorrow and ego death Capital.

0:10

I don't know, maybe prolific tech investor

0:12

entrepreneur will see anyway. Jeff, thanks

0:14

so much for joining me today. Great

0:17

to see you, my friend man so much to talk about.

0:19

We were having fun catching up, just talking about

0:21

fun personal stuff snowboarding and surfing

0:23

and taking trips and things like that. But I

0:26

think we're both also thinking that a lot of this

0:28

bitcoin technology stuff is also fun

0:31

as well. So I want to dive into that the

0:34

technology is advancing

0:37

so fast and sort of imagining

0:39

where this goes in the world and how we're rebuilding

0:41

and changing things, how

0:43

lives can change, how humanity can flourish.

0:46

That's the exciting part to me. I've often said

0:48

that the price is sort of the least interesting

0:50

thing, but let's talk about that for a minute.

0:53

The Bitcoin ETF is the news. I mean, that

0:55

is just dominating the news. I

0:58

don't like that because it's mostly just about

1:00

an investment kind of a

1:03

viewpoint of it. The number go up technology,

1:05

if you will. But you know,

1:08

as a tech entrepreneur, you know, you have sort of this diffusion

1:10

of innovation and there's a cas and that has to be crossed.

1:12

Maybe we're doing that. What's your thoughts on

1:14

the bitcoin and t F. Let's dig into that a little bit.

1:17

Yeah, probably similar to you. I think if

1:20

you think about how

1:22

many people understand bitcoin

1:24

right now in the world, and you should

1:26

say, say that's a one percent,

1:31

and then how many people really understand

1:33

what it means and how things

1:36

are in a change to it. We can explore some of

1:38

that through this podcast if

1:40

you want, but that would be probably

1:43

five percent of the one percent of so

1:46

the how small a number

1:48

of people actually understand what's happening

1:50

here in this asset class. And then what's happening

1:53

is the technology is being built on top

1:55

of this asset class and what's going to happen

1:57

what it does to the existing system such

2:00

a tiny piece of the overall

2:02

market that no wonder

2:04

people are confused. And so now if you

2:07

put in perspective with that,

2:10

with what the ETF

2:12

is doing, it is bringing

2:14

more awareness to this asset class.

2:17

And what ends up happening in

2:19

this asset class is people start

2:22

to see, wait, I'm living in a system

2:25

with manipulated money, a manipulated

2:27

ledger, and that's the reason why prices

2:29

are going up. And then they learn

2:31

a little bit about bitcoin, and maybe they learn

2:34

about it because they think, Okay,

2:36

that'll protect me, It'll give me a hedge

2:38

against the system that's failing. Over time,

2:41

and then some of those people, over time learn

2:43

more and more about it and start

2:46

shifting more and more of their attention into

2:48

it as they understand it more. So if

2:50

you just look through that lens of the ATF,

2:52

you'd say it's great. It's just it's

2:56

marketing that is going to bring a whole

2:58

bunch more of awareness about what's happen happening

3:00

to money and

3:02

how you can protect

3:05

yourself from money being debased.

3:07

And people are going to protect themselves because

3:09

of that. From there,

3:12

the question is how many people remove

3:15

to self custody and as

3:18

well, and I think you have

3:20

to look at some of the things that you see

3:22

in the world today, is behind

3:24

the scenes being coordinated and whether

3:27

they are or not, I think it's worth thinking

3:29

that way. And why I

3:32

say that is is if you if you said

3:36

human nature, if you could if you could

3:38

get if you could steal the productivity

3:41

that should flow to society in the form of

3:43

lower prices. By controlling money.

3:47

Human nature says that will always

3:49

happen, right, Greed

3:51

will make that happen no matter what, and

3:53

we've always lived so all throughout.

3:55

His will make prices drop.

3:57

You're saying no, no, no, So

4:01

this natural state of a free market

4:04

is deflationary,

4:07

so there is no inflation

4:09

over a long enough time period because what we do

4:12

we use things that give us more value.

4:16

Why you're using riverside right now app

4:19

to create this podcast is it gives you more value.

4:22

And if something competed with riverside that didn't

4:24

give you more value and it costs more, you wouldn't use

4:26

You wouldn't use it. If something gave you more

4:29

value and costs less, you would use it.

4:32

So everything we use creates

4:34

more use. It gives

4:36

us more value, and that means the natural

4:39

state has to be deflationary.

4:41

Of a free market. The only reason things

4:44

are inflationary short

4:46

of short term cycles, right

4:48

with the supply constraint or something. But

4:50

then what ends up happening is the free mark. Because

4:53

of the margins of that supply constraint,

4:56

entrepreneurs attack it and create

4:58

a different way of a model

5:00

to great abundance. And so the natural

5:02

state over a longer term is always

5:05

of a free market is deflationary.

5:08

We've always lived in the opposite, and

5:11

we live in the opposite because effectively,

5:13

if you could steal a small

5:16

amount of money from everybody

5:19

over time, you can aggregate a

5:21

massive control for doing nothing. So

5:24

human society it always has

5:26

been wired. If you could game it,

5:28

you would, right. That's why gold

5:30

gets corrupted, That's why you fractionalize

5:33

systems. That's why eventually you

5:35

go back to you go to war, because it breaks

5:37

world so much that then somebody

5:39

says, I'm going to reset the system on

5:42

a new standard, and then it

5:44

goes through that again. So natural

5:47

state is free. We've always lived

5:49

in the opposite. That means every history book that

5:51

anybody has ever written has this error

5:54

code in it.

5:56

It also has the error code because we've never

5:58

had something decentral lives and secure

6:01

that could be decentralized and

6:03

secure throughout time, and the

6:06

winners write the history books. So

6:08

it means all of our previous history

6:10

to this point before bitcoin was

6:12

built with this aero code. And so it makes

6:15

total sense that people are

6:17

confused with what this

6:19

new insight drives

6:21

forward rather than looking through

6:24

the past. It makes perfect sense. Now

6:27

what are we up against? What does bitcoin

6:29

up against? If you have a system that's

6:31

ten thousand times bigger, that

6:34

gains its power by

6:36

stealing yours, by

6:38

stealing money,

6:41

then what is it up against. It's

6:43

up against all human action doing

6:46

that. And I'm going to get in specifically

6:49

how that works. And it is also

6:51

up against some coordination

6:53

of you could say, the ETF.

6:57

If the ETF and what Warren

6:59

is doing at the same time to

7:02

try to make self self

7:04

custodial illegal, right, and

7:08

the ETF can short

7:10

and create fractionalized

7:13

on top of bitcoin and then acquire more bitcoin,

7:17

then you could say, and it's

7:19

worth thinking that that could happen because

7:22

then you're immune from it. But

7:25

if that was coordinated, I'm not saying it

7:27

is, but if that was coordinated, what would happen

7:30

in that world is a whole bunch of

7:32

people would trade their bitcoin or the paper

7:34

bitcoin in is

7:37

the ets acquired more and more bitcoin,

7:40

and you could create that leverage to

7:43

suppress bitcoin's price, just

7:46

like just like gold has been suppressed,

7:50

right, And you could create effectively

7:52

unlimited leverage in that system over time

7:55

and paper contracts to bitcoin. But

7:59

for people that are aired of that, and

8:01

I'm not saying some of that won't happen in the short term

8:04

because an office

8:07

action by a Warren making it

8:09

will drive fear in the market. At the

8:11

same time people could short it could drive

8:14

price in the short term going down.

8:17

But what would that then, Cause

8:20

there's too many people in the world right now, and

8:22

bitcoin is self custodial, and every

8:24

year it gets more decentralized and secure.

8:27

There's too many people in the world that have looked

8:29

behind the curtain. And once

8:31

they've looked behind the curtain and how money works,

8:34

they're never going back. And

8:36

so you probably run a node. I

8:39

run a node. I'm not selling my bitcoin,

8:42

and every time price falls

8:44

we actually I buy it anyways. But

8:47

there's more and more people bitcoiners that understand

8:50

this that are going to take that into

8:52

self custody.

8:54

So the reaction to

8:57

the system driving to

9:00

financialize this creates

9:02

more self self

9:05

custody at certain prices, and

9:07

as that happens, eventually,

9:10

if it was coordinated,

9:12

if there was something again not saying

9:14

there is, but if it was and

9:17

that was an attack factor for a bitcoin.

9:19

What would it end up happening is it would cause the

9:22

biggest short squeeze the world's

9:24

ever seen eventually, and

9:27

on that short squeeze would liquidate

9:29

financial players that were not

9:35

acting with integrity

9:37

or honesty. Because bitcoin doesn't care.

9:40

It's imposing fair

9:42

rules on society rather than

9:44

it could care less. It could care less about you and

9:47

me everything else. It's just imposing

9:49

that discipline.

9:52

Wow, a lot to unpack right there. I was making

9:54

some notes. We can come back to them.

9:57

I asked you if to clarify

9:59

something, and it wrong, but it got me thinking.

10:02

I said, so, it's it's greed that drives

10:04

prices down. You said no, But if you think about

10:06

it, in a true free market, if we

10:08

could stay free and not be co opted and gamed.

10:12

So in a true free market, it almost would be greed

10:14

that would drive prices down, because if I

10:16

saw you were making a killing in a certain

10:18

category, my greed would say, well,

10:20

I want to step in in front of Jeff and I'll make a

10:22

little bit less, right.

10:24

Yeah, And so go

10:27

ahead and keep going.

10:28

Yeah. It's just you know, it's interesting when you kind of flip

10:30

it on its head, and you have to kind of put that in sort

10:32

of parentheses in a free market, because

10:34

you know, what we're being told by the leaders is it's

10:36

greed that's driving prices up. It's

10:38

these greedy gas stations that drive prices, et

10:40

cetera. But in a free market, greed

10:43

would actually drive prices down. It'd

10:45

be the opposite.

10:47

We only get paid. We get paid. Entrepreneurs

10:49

get paid when they create more value for

10:51

others, period, right, And

10:54

and that's a competitive process. And

10:56

so they see and

10:59

in a free market, that competitive process continues

11:02

to attack. And where would an entrepreneur go.

11:04

Would you go to create the next calculator app?

11:06

Yeah, it's already free or would

11:08

you or would you go create? Or would you

11:11

go attack an industry that had high margins?

11:13

Of course, agree, it makes perfect

11:15

sense.

11:16

So the free market is constantly

11:19

under attack. There is

11:21

no monopoly in a free market, Yeah,

11:23

there.

11:23

Can't be so in in you know, in

11:25

this diffusion of innovation, you know this bell curve,

11:27

and you have sort of the innovators, the true believers, and

11:29

then you sort of have this chasm. And the chasm is where

11:32

something has to shift, you know,

11:34

in the mindset of people to sort of bring that early

11:36

majority in. And there's lots of things that could

11:39

cause that shift to happen, that that chasm

11:41

to be crossed, if you will. I

11:44

think the ETF is a big piece of that. So

11:46

all these people who think, well, it's just magic

11:48

internet money. I don't trust it, it's a scam at the tulip

11:50

it's whatever, it's too difficult, I don't you know,

11:52

throw it fill in the blank. All of a sudden

11:54

they're like, well, shoot, if my financial

11:56

advisor tells me to buy it, if Blackrock has it, if

11:59

you know whatever, And so that creates

12:01

the chasm to be crossed. And also

12:04

there's also another paradigm. And so I

12:07

gave a presentation a big buck Boom and packpitcoin

12:09

on you know, technological

12:11

Revolutions. I talk about him quite quite often.

12:14

And I

12:17

got this from this book Technological

12:19

Innovations and Financial Capital by Carlata

12:21

Perez, and she talks about

12:23

sort of this change and the

12:26

reason the things that these technologies have to do

12:28

in order to sort of have this revolution, and some of

12:30

that is in the mindset and so sort

12:32

of we have this normalcy bias, it's recentcy bias.

12:35

Hey, money always has to go up. Hey,

12:37

this is just how it goes, and so

12:39

that has to change. But there's people

12:41

that are entrenched in that that don't want that to happen,

12:45

and so we have to sort of fight against that. That's sort

12:47

of this orange pill movement, if you will. But

12:50

you mentioned one more thing, and is

12:52

that Ledwig Guan Misis

12:54

called it the crackup boom. And

12:56

then he said, and then suddenly the people realize

12:59

that inflation is both permanent and

13:01

intentional. Yeah, so

13:04

all of a sudden, you know, maybe in the last

13:06

ten years, inflation has been sort of thrown into

13:08

the forefront of things. The Fed is sitting

13:10

there saying, our goal is to get it back down.

13:12

We only want two percent. Oh so

13:14

it's intentional that you want to steal from me, and

13:16

I think people are doing that. And so sort

13:18

of bringing this together, that chasm not

13:21

only being brought sort of legitimized

13:24

by Wall Street jumping in, but

13:26

then also the chasm being crossed where

13:29

people are suddenly waking up to the fact that inflation

13:32

is permanent, and you know, to the point

13:34

that you that you've made I think everybody realizes I

13:36

have to go protect my wealth and when

13:38

you add those two things together, I

13:40

mean it's a pretty big hopefully

13:43

it'll be a pretty big shift to get people to sort

13:45

of see that new world.

13:47

Yeah, so think about yourself and let's

13:49

let's go why does

13:51

this exist? And how

13:54

much do you know about bitcoin? And how much

13:56

of your time is in bitcoin? And then

13:58

play that forward and how and just that

14:00

say how much was it three

14:02

or four or five years ago as

14:04

you started to understand, and how much is it

14:06

now? And how much will it be? And

14:09

then let's walk through how this works

14:11

and so how this works. So

14:14

we've already we've already made a

14:17

point. The free market is

14:19

deflationary, right, The

14:22

natural state of the free market is deflationary.

14:24

So that means every single

14:26

person that says yep

14:29

and then goes on carries on their life in the other

14:31

world, is making the other

14:33

world stronger to their

14:35

own to their own demise. Every

14:39

single the amount of time that you're measuring

14:41

from the other system, if you can say

14:43

yes, and prices fall to the marginal cost

14:45

of production over time, and technology

14:48

is a lever on that, and it's an

14:50

exponential lever that makes prices fall

14:52

faster, then

14:54

what you're doing by trying to capture

14:57

wealth in the existing system. All

15:00

all of the things in the existing system are

15:02

making everything worse for you. And

15:04

let me just show you how that works. So,

15:07

so you know this mark

15:10

that the magnificent seven

15:12

the tech companies. Without

15:14

the return of the tech companies, SMP

15:16

would be negative, right, Okay,

15:20

So what everybody does? Everybody

15:24

you do. I'm not saying you do, but

15:27

many people listening to this call will

15:29

store their wealth in the tech tech companies, and

15:33

then they'll use the tech companies that

15:35

are using AI to reduce the labor

15:38

because they use the tech companies because if they

15:40

don't use the tech companies, they don't get the same value.

15:43

And so the tech companies are creating this artificial

15:45

and general intelligence the magni that

15:49

is reducing the labor. And you should

15:51

have a normal market, you would probably

15:53

have about five percent deflation

15:56

per year compound and getting

15:58

more and more. So even

16:01

at that, if you were at zero

16:03

percent inflation, you'd be getting five percent

16:05

stolen from you a year. And

16:08

you go and spend more

16:10

of your own money trying to protect

16:12

your money from losing value by putting

16:14

it in a tech company, and

16:17

they use that at creating the monopoly

16:19

and reducing more and more labor to make

16:23

to drive that faster to give you more value

16:26

fair And so

16:30

then you say, well, how is this monopoly doing

16:32

this? But if they increase

16:35

their labor rate and much more or

16:37

much more labor, you wouldn't use their service

16:39

anymore. Somebody else would beat them. So

16:42

and then the pension funds that

16:44

holds your retirement are

16:47

all indexed to the same thing. So

16:49

they're driving more and

16:51

more money into the thing that's

16:53

driving for faster and faster deflation,

16:56

and you're part of your Every

16:58

single person in the world is trying to store their wealth

17:01

in those things because if they don't,

17:03

they'll lose more money faster. Now

17:06

let's look at the same thing on

17:08

bitcoin. Bitcoin. All

17:10

of those companies priced in bitcoin are

17:13

losing value, every

17:15

one of them. All

17:18

your houses, all your real estate is losing

17:20

value against bitcoin, all of

17:22

it. But most people are

17:24

storing their wealth within the system

17:26

that's debasing, making

17:28

it stronger, thinking they're winning on a losing

17:31

game and bitcoin could care

17:33

less. It's so this system

17:36

is based on a manipulated ledger,

17:38

and it's manipulating currency units, and

17:40

everybody and your voting in that system

17:43

to who should win, who

17:47

should get more of the manipulated

17:50

currency units to put to

17:52

their group or the other group, And

17:55

society is breaking everywhere because of

17:57

this. But every single person, in fact, many

17:59

of the podcast you listen to, are

18:02

yelling at the same system,

18:04

and they don't know they're making it stronger

18:07

by yelling at it. Right, all

18:09

of their actions are making it stronger. And

18:11

so why we've

18:13

created ego death and why I just just tired

18:16

of it. I just said it's nonsense. I

18:18

wanted to spend instead of ninety percent of my

18:20

time in the system that was creating this, I wanted

18:23

to spend ninety five hundred percent of my time

18:25

in the system that was repricing it.

18:27

But if we so let's let's take that, we'll transition

18:30

to ego death. What ego death is a

18:32

fund that you're in that invests

18:34

into bitcoin companies that are building this

18:36

new world. But let's

18:38

just take that previous example. I

18:41

had a good conversation with a

18:43

good friend, mutual friend, Jimmy Song, many

18:46

conversations. We ended up at a lot of places at the same

18:48

time, but in la PEC Bitcoin

18:50

and we were talking about this specifically, and

18:53

you know, he's such a bitcoin purist,

18:55

Maximus that you should just buy bitcoin and not invest

18:57

in anything. But I'm like, you know, who's going to go build

18:59

this thing? Right, we have we have to invest our money.

19:01

But back to kind of the point that you just made, right, So we're

19:03

investing into Facebook to make

19:07

our lives better, Right, We're getting value

19:09

from that. It makes my communication cheaper,

19:11

easier, faster, et cetera. So I have more value

19:13

there. But I'm putting my money into that system

19:15

that's causing I'm

19:18

perpetuating that system that's actually causing

19:20

me to have this inflation of force.

19:22

And then I yell at other Then I yell at other people

19:25

because it's their fault.

19:26

Right, But but I do it. But

19:28

if I'm putting my if I'm investing my

19:30

money into Facebook in order

19:32

to protect my value, I'm hoping

19:35

that Facebook is going to go look faster than

19:37

the inflation that is

19:39

debasing my value at the same time, right.

19:42

And it's not it's it's

19:45

it's not it's going up at the same rate. So

19:48

if you look at the monitor, if you look at the monetary

19:50

easing of about the liquidity

19:52

about eight and a half percent per year compounded

19:55

and then so it or maybe

19:58

some of those companies beat it for a fair a short

20:00

period of time, but over the long term,

20:02

you're just matching your same as

20:04

housing, right, so exactly

20:07

the same as housing.

20:08

Well, I mean, the S and P five hundred is

20:10

like a perfect proxy for inflation. I

20:12

think, I think what we're saying, and the media and US

20:14

real estate is as well totally.

20:16

However, there are scarce assets

20:19

that then outperform inflation. So for example,

20:21

the median US real estate went up about forty

20:23

percent, Austin, the fastest growing city of the United States

20:25

for the last twenty years, went up about forty percent, but

20:27

homes on the lake Lakefront Lake

20:29

Lakefront on Lake Travis went up one hundred and fifty

20:31

percent. Yeah, right, So

20:34

sort of the S and P five hundred, which the manuf

20:37

is the seven sort of make up and drive that have

20:39

kept up with inflation. A few will outperform

20:41

it for certain periods of time if you're a really good

20:43

exactly right, exactly okay,

20:46

But then contrast that too, Okay.

20:48

So I am an investor or I'm

20:51

just a regular person. I'm a doctor or whatever. I'm

20:53

making money I have savings. I want to protect that

20:55

savings from BE and D based and so I

20:57

can put it into Nvidia

21:00

Book et cetera, and hopefully that will at least

21:02

keep up with it, potentially beat it. Or I could

21:04

put it into x y Z bitcoin company,

21:06

which is also a tech company, which is also

21:09

hopefully going to beat it. I mean, so what's

21:11

the million?

21:12

So what's

21:15

different here is the nine

21:17

hundred trillion dollars of global wealth. Imagine

21:20

you have a percentage of that ledger, right,

21:24

and you could say, if Mark Moss

21:26

has a million dollars, you could just calculate exactly

21:28

what percent you have of that ledger If

21:31

that ledger is one point five quadrillion

21:34

tomorrow, because there's a whole

21:36

bunch more manipulation of money and

21:38

you're part of that ledger doesn't

21:40

go up by that mount you lost money,

21:43

but you didn't know you lost money. That's what That's

21:45

what you're living in, and that's what everyone is

21:47

pricing their is en And when they

21:50

naturally say what is bitcoin price

21:52

in this ledger, they're making

21:55

that calculation error. When

21:57

I say it's saying decentralized and secure

22:00

on the on the base ledge,

22:03

then it is inevitable. If it

22:05

stay is decentralized and secure, it

22:07

reprices everything in the nine hundred

22:09

trillion. So you

22:11

could say, how much of a percentage of

22:13

twenty one million do I have for

22:17

all of time? And compare

22:20

and contrast how much do you need for your

22:22

living lifestyle? If

22:24

you can hold it decentralized and secure,

22:27

it will reprice everything else. So

22:30

then then your next question, I think,

22:32

is why would I invest

22:34

if I can invest in that asset?

22:37

Essentially, if I can own a new

22:40

if I can own the new Internet,

22:43

not just the value on top of it,

22:45

but I can own a piece of the new Internet,

22:47

and all future value accrues to me. Or

22:50

is said another way that I like to say it is if

22:52

prices should fall to the marginal cost

22:55

of production, if the free market is

22:57

is deflationary, then the anything

23:00

that can measure it as a fixed currency, So

23:04

in other words, all things forever if

23:06

you measure in bitcoin will fall in price at

23:08

the same rate they should fall in.

23:10

Price as long as it stays.

23:14

And so so now, and the only

23:16

reason I say, if it stays decentralized

23:18

and secure, I think it's

23:21

almost inevitable, or

23:24

points something one

23:27

probability that something could break

23:29

it. Why I say if it stays decentralized

23:32

and secure is so people do their own homework

23:34

on why that's inevitable. So

23:37

so because they need to understand this

23:39

asset class is different than anything

23:41

they've ever seen, and they're through

23:44

the through it the Fiat machine

23:46

of manipulating money, they

23:49

won't see what's unique. They

23:51

have to do the work because all

23:53

of the all of the information that

23:55

is in the Fiat machine would try

23:57

to stop this from from working.

24:01

So then, first

24:03

of all, for the listeners, of course,

24:06

Jeff and I agree on this. I've been an advisor for Trambill

24:08

Venture Partners for about two years, so I look at all the

24:10

bitcoin only VC stuff, and I'm a partner

24:12

with a Bitcoin Opportunity fund with our mutual

24:15

friends James and David and Larry and all those

24:17

guys. So we're also investing in the bitcoin

24:19

space as well. But just to kind of understand

24:21

this point for everybody who's listening, and even for

24:23

myself, to be honest with you, so we go back to sort

24:26

of investing into nvidiaoir Facebook and

24:29

hoping to beat inflation. But I'm perpetuating

24:31

the same system if you will so whatever, or

24:34

I could invest into X y z

24:36

bitcoin company anchor watch, I

24:38

mean whatever, you name it, right, you got on the line.

24:42

The mechanism is the same. I'm

24:44

still investing my money, whether

24:47

that be dollars or bitcoin into a company

24:49

hoping to beat inflation.

24:52

I'm guessing what you're saying is the difference

24:54

is how I'm measuring that money. Am

24:56

I measuring in US dollars or am measuring

24:59

my return in bitcoin?

25:00

Yeah? So in Vidia they're

25:02

free cash flows or in the dollars that are being

25:05

deluded, And

25:07

so your your your entire

25:09

investment is in the debasing currency,

25:12

and in this it is not so if

25:14

you can if you're creating So so

25:17

what I think is happening in our

25:19

companies and some of the companies if you see

25:21

that they and by the way, and this isn't

25:24

just our fund Let's say

25:26

there's lots of funds in this space, at

25:29

least the bitcoin only funds

25:31

that understand this your

25:34

venture. You can

25:36

actually get venture returns on

25:38

top of a venture asset.

25:42

So you're getting bitcoin returns

25:44

as opposed.

25:45

To exactly so our company, our companies

25:47

are are by creating the enabling

25:50

foundations of the things that just

25:52

similar to the like the Internet. But if

25:54

if you owned a piece of the Internet and

25:57

then and then there returns

25:59

and we're collect more bitcoin because

26:01

of the value that they were creating. And

26:03

if you see some of the rates of the growth of the companies

26:07

measure in their balance, sheees moving

26:09

up by acquiring more bitcoin

26:12

because there because it's denominated

26:14

in that and their transactions are based in it.

26:17

You you have an underlying asset that

26:20

I like to look at it as it's not going

26:22

up forever. All prices are falling against

26:25

it forever. But now you're

26:27

collecting more of that underlying asset,

26:29

so you can by by

26:32

having successful companies, so you I

26:34

believe we're going to have venture returns

26:36

on top of a venture type asset.

26:39

Right.

26:40

It's like so when I think

26:43

about that, I think, and I

26:45

can't believe everybody is not here. I

26:47

can't believe there's not more people understanding this

26:49

because because I

26:52

can prove what I just said, because

26:55

it's repriced every other

26:57

asset class over the less the

27:00

credit.

27:00

The critic could say over what time frame, Right,

27:03

obviously over the over the last fifteen years. It certainly

27:05

has over the last two years, it hasn't,

27:07

right, So.

27:08

But any four year any four year cycle,

27:10

it has, right.

27:12

And obviously as a venture

27:14

investor, like we're thinking long term seven to

27:16

ten years typically at a minimum, right, So to

27:18

your point, every four years it has. And

27:20

so if you're thinking, and I say all the time, I

27:22

mean, if you're if you're if you're marketing your portfolio

27:25

market on a monthly basis or a quarterly basis, like,

27:27

you're never going to make it. Like Charlie Munger

27:29

said, the big money is made not in the buying and the selling,

27:31

but in the waiting, right, So waiting

27:34

for that to develop.

27:35

Yeah, and keep and play and play that

27:37

forward. But we have a we have a system

27:40

that you're in measuring your returns

27:42

every every day in

27:44

the other system because it

27:46

forces you to do so, because it's debasing.

27:49

So people are trying to store their

27:51

wealth and most of their wealth is

27:53

stored in the system that's debasing.

27:56

It's it's insane, right. And

27:59

I think when I think about risk return, I

28:01

think even Sam is an entrepreneur.

28:05

I think the best entrepreneurs are actually aren't

28:09

risk takers like people think they are. I

28:11

think they're really great risk allicators,

28:13

and the difference is they

28:15

look at the risk of where they are now versus

28:20

the new and what they're going to do.

28:23

And so today when people are looking at bitcoin,

28:26

they're looking at the risk of the new and they haven't

28:28

done the work to understand it, and

28:30

they think their own system has no risk

28:33

when all of the risk is in the existing

28:35

system. So what

28:38

you're having is terrible risk

28:40

gllicators. And

28:42

then as they get more as

28:44

a system paralyzes them through more

28:46

fear right, and you hear

28:48

the WF and they yell at it

28:51

all the time, and all of these things are

28:53

capturing their attention, making

28:55

them even worse risk galicators

28:58

because they're trying to protect their money in

29:01

the exact same that's thing that's staying

29:03

being debased.

29:05

Right, So bitcoin

29:09

is repricing everything. I can go back another quote from

29:11

Letwoo Bonemesis, and I believe he said that in

29:14

economics, there's no such thing as a constant,

29:17

and so we always had like this commodity money,

29:19

and so whether we're measuring things in oil or gold,

29:21

there's no constant there, like the supply, the demand,

29:24

the technology changes that all constantly.

29:27

But now we have it right now Bitcoin has a

29:29

fixed, limited supply, So for the first time we have a neutral

29:32

asset that does have a fixed supply.

29:34

So he was right at the time. Now

29:36

it's different. And so to your point that you're making, it's starting

29:38

to reprice everything. And if you have a long

29:41

enough vision and you think at least in four year

29:43

cycles, if not longer, it is it

29:45

has been historically been repricing things,

29:47

you feel strong that it will as do I.

29:52

It looks like even Larry Fink thinks it will

29:54

as well, which is pretty interesting. But there's

29:56

one thing that you keep saying, nothing's

29:59

guaranteed in this life, and you keep saying, if

30:02

it stays decentralized and secure. I

30:05

listen to you sort of debate this

30:07

out with George Gammon, another

30:09

friend of mine, and

30:12

he has a little bit hard time sort of wrapping

30:14

his head around that part, I think. But you had

30:16

to keep saying over and over and over that decentralized and insecure,

30:18

So that seems to be the risk factor

30:21

in your mind. So purpose this

30:23

is almost certain as long as those two

30:25

things stay true. Ye.

30:27

So and if you say what

30:29

George would say, and George is fantastic,

30:32

and I think, really really sharp on how

30:34

the existing system works and sharp

30:36

on history as well of how

30:38

these things got co opted. And

30:40

he would he would use, well, human nature

30:42

won't let it. It will centralize

30:44

it. And the question

30:47

I have is how.

30:50

How?

30:52

Because because as more people understand

30:54

this, and remember this is a different

30:57

this is different than gold. It can't

30:59

get centralized gold is

31:01

so you can self custody this asset

31:03

yourself, and you can run your

31:05

own node. And so what

31:07

he says is, well, governments

31:10

will, we will take it over. And

31:13

the question you ask is how into.

31:15

To what end?

31:17

Because because let's

31:19

let's just imagine this place forward as

31:22

it's plain, because you really have to think about

31:24

if that's true, what would specifically

31:27

happen to be able to break that. And

31:29

so the governments, let's say they're going to print

31:32

more money to be able to make

31:34

their currency, and they're going to lock the doors

31:37

and they're going to Janet Yellen and

31:39

Warren and everything else, and they're going to conspire

31:42

and make bitcoin self

31:44

custody illegal in the US. So

31:49

if that happened, and it happened all over the world

31:51

at the same time, yes, then

31:53

that would slow It would for

31:55

a time that price would fall a bitcoin.

31:58

But what it would signal to the world

32:01

everyone is you better

32:03

move faster on bitcoin, and

32:05

as price fell, more and more people would

32:07

self custody. And

32:10

I think it would be just like in other regions

32:13

where you lock down a currency and you

32:15

say there's capital controls on my currency.

32:17

The currency goes underground and there's

32:19

a black market currency that actually moves faster

32:21

and it is the real price. The free market is the

32:24

real price, and you have a ponzie.

32:27

So every single one of these things

32:30

can't actually happen by the free market

32:32

unless everyone in the world says,

32:35

yep, I want to live in a cage. Right,

32:39

nobody would do that. It just wouldn't happen.

32:42

So and then, so

32:44

now let's say that what does it look like

32:47

to George's point or to

32:49

other people who question, so,

32:51

what that would mean is as

32:54

the currency units inflate faster,

32:58

Bitcoin is still re pricing the world. Right

33:02

and then and then what ends up happening is

33:05

every every country competes

33:08

for labor and capital, the

33:11

best people in investment, and so as

33:13

it starts to happen around the world, why

33:16

would it look any different in the future

33:18

than it's always looked competing for labor

33:20

and capital. It's just more

33:23

of the bitcoiners will have the capital, yeah,

33:26

and more of the great talent will be on the bitcoin

33:28

layer, building kind of abundance for the future

33:31

on an on at sledger, which would

33:33

be high demand in regions

33:36

that say we're going to we're going to

33:38

build a free market here.

33:41

The game theory, right, and that the chance,

33:44

the odds, the probability of all

33:46

the governments of the world all coopting and deside

33:48

at the same time is very slim. I

33:51

thought it would be actually impossible. Obviously,

33:54

seeing what happened during the COVID pandemic lockdown

33:56

made me unfortunately think a little bit. Otherwise, it

33:58

was pretty well coordinated across the world simultaneously,

34:01

so that that was a that was that was a

34:03

shock to my thinking. So I have to kind of keep that

34:05

in mind. But game theory

34:08

is there. And so to your point, and if they did it

34:10

in the West, if you will Canada, the US, you

34:12

know, UK, et cetera, you

34:14

still might have El Salvador or you know,

34:16

Argentina now at this point or whatever, and

34:18

then they're going to attract the best and the brightest kind

34:20

of to the point that you're making so you sort of have that, but

34:24

maybe some of the other risk factors

34:26

if we just kind of want to play this out a little bit, because again

34:28

trying to think it, will it stay decentralized and secure?

34:32

You know, potentially you know, Blackrock

34:35

taking over Bitcoin Core developers putting

34:38

you know, bad malicious code in something

34:41

like that. Now we run notes, so we don't have to accept

34:43

those updates, right, so

34:45

so.

34:46

Yeah, so so, but again I

34:48

think all of these things like that there

34:52

were used to thinking these giant

34:54

organizations that control us, and they're going

34:56

to control us, and you make them

34:58

stronger with your own thinking by allowing

35:00

that to happen. And the people that are

35:02

moving to Bitlin and spending their time in

35:05

this and by the way, I'm not even talking about what's

35:07

being built on top. If

35:10

you were some of those people trying to do

35:12

this, you have no

35:14

idea what's coming, no

35:16

idea how fast this is exploding.

35:19

If you think about fetiment and some

35:22

of this stuff, the regulation

35:24

is chasing where this might have been four or five,

35:26

six, eight years ago.

35:28

Yeah, they can't keep up, not where

35:30

it is today.

35:31

And what's happening and is the more and more

35:33

people who understand why freedom

35:35

matters start

35:38

to vote with their time and

35:40

money and energy for freedom

35:42

instead of saying

35:45

I can't do anything because those

35:47

other people are going to control me. They

35:50

take the power from those people. That's

35:54

the repricing event that is happening.

35:56

So Blackrock looks so big because

36:00

because our pension funds hold their money into black

36:02

Rock, because Blackrock has inside

36:04

ball on the financial system and it's the only

36:06

way they can have a return because

36:10

of the inside ball. And without

36:12

inside ball and the financial system, black

36:14

Rock gets smaller. And where does the

36:16

money go to. It goes to you. It

36:19

goes to Bitcoin holders that are

36:21

repricing black Rock too. And so,

36:26

for the life of me, I

36:28

can't understand people that

36:30

say I can't do

36:32

this and I'm going to spend all my time for fear.

36:35

Well, they make the thing that they want to

36:37

happen they don't want to happen happen

36:39

faster to them. It's ludicrous

36:42

where they are a node in the network. They're a node in

36:44

this network, and good luck convincing

36:47

me otherwise.

36:49

And they're literally giving money to a company

36:51

that's working against their own best interess.

36:53

We're working. And I'm not talking about

36:55

in the ETF, I'm not talking about anything

36:58

else, but through the pension

37:00

fund, through all of their actions and everything

37:02

else they're there.

37:05

All of the people at w UF right

37:07

now right are

37:10

funded by this extraction

37:13

of wealth from the same people

37:15

that are yelling at it.

37:16

Yeah, yeah,

37:19

think about it. Yeah, to your point, all the people

37:21

that are online screaming, to your point

37:23

that you're making, screaming about how bad this is, they want

37:25

to take away our rights all these things. Well, why

37:28

are you giving them your money? Your money is sitting in there in their pension

37:30

fund, in their account, and that's what they're using to go to

37:32

fly to Davos to make these types of regulations.

37:35

In your in your housing that you're trying to do

37:37

that, in all of these instruments

37:39

that you're trying to do that, you're making it

37:42

stronger, and then yelling at them saying saying,

37:44

well you are

37:46

so it's not there is no day, it's us

37:49

and if you take your time and move

37:51

it to the system, it's

37:53

going to happen. Anyways, This new system

37:56

is expanding because once this insight

37:58

is has found as

38:01

free, people want to build into a

38:03

free market. And allow

38:06

what the free market should look like. It's

38:09

going to impose that because there's

38:11

a wall of people moving into that, spending

38:14

their time and energy. And that's why I just

38:16

cannot believe I get to do this. Yeah,

38:18

I get to the smartest people I've ever met.

38:22

Yeah. So I think a couple of things. Just

38:24

so back to the decentralized and secure. Some

38:27

of it really comes down to, I

38:30

don't know, I guess to your point, the education

38:33

or the desire for freedom. Right. So if we look at it

38:35

from the standpoint, the war on drugs

38:37

has been a pretty big failure. I mean, since nineteen seventy

38:39

one, they've spent you know, over three trillion dollars and drugs

38:42

is the number one killer in America right today,

38:44

right, And so the war on drugs has done nothing. And that's like a

38:46

physical product that's been you know, grown,

38:49

cultivated, package, ship, process, distribute, et

38:51

cetera. Big one is decentralized

38:53

more importantly digital, so it can't be technically

38:56

seen or you don't have to carry it, et cetera. But

38:59

the point more in the incentive mechanism.

39:01

When they don't tell you not to do heroin, it doesn't make

39:03

you want to do heroin. But when they tell you

39:05

that you don't have a right to store your wealth in a way they can't

39:07

steal from you, it sort of makes you want

39:10

to do that. Right. That's why in America,

39:13

when they start talking about gun control laws,

39:15

gun sales go through the roof, right, Oh,

39:17

you're going to take away my freedom, Well, then I'm going to go act

39:19

right now. So they're only really speeding

39:22

that mechanism up. And so you

39:24

know, I would say I was thinking as

39:26

you were talking, so really what we need is

39:29

more education to educate

39:31

people about this. But

39:33

the reality is is that we are

39:35

driven by self action and

39:37

self determination. And so when

39:40

I have a problem, I go look for a solution. And

39:42

so when I see my freedom as under attack,

39:45

I'm going to go find the solution to preserving

39:47

myself from that freedom. And so I

39:50

mean, I suppose sure education to

39:52

continue to kind of keep that in the forefront. But as

39:55

and this is what I tell people all the time, do you think governments print

39:57

more or less money in the future, And of course answer

39:59

is more. And do you think governments become more authoritarian

40:02

or less in the future? And I think the answer is of course more

40:05

authoritarian until they can't be anymore.

40:07

And so I think those things are driving it. And as long

40:09

as we can keep those answers in front of people, they're

40:12

naturally going to be incentivized to

40:14

go find those I want

40:16

to jump into ego death. So

40:19

you said, if people only

40:21

knew what was being built, and

40:24

they would realize that the government's years behind

40:26

where you know these builders are going. So

40:29

I want to talk about that. Let's talk about ego death. You

40:31

just announced that you're starting a fun number

40:33

two, one hundred million dollars, big number.

40:38

So one, I'm guessing that there's

40:41

massive appetite for that

40:43

that you're seeing that, So tell me about the appetite. Two,

40:46

there's massive opportunity. So

40:49

there's more opportunities that you want to get into. And

40:51

then maybe three you can tell us about some of these

40:53

and you don't have to name specifics, but what are some of these

40:55

things that maybe are running light years

40:58

in front of where these regulators are.

41:00

Yeah. So,

41:03

so one, the thesis of the First Fund,

41:05

like many of the other bitcoin

41:07

only ventures, but the thesis

41:10

of the First Fund was I thought there was this

41:12

massive asymmetry of

41:14

knowledge that bitcoin was this decentralized

41:17

and secure bedrock that

41:19

couldn't scale for

41:21

a long time, and that is what made

41:23

the value. So all you had to do is hold on

41:25

to it, and it created and you were

41:28

creating value. So obviously in

41:30

a free market that if that's all it

41:32

was decentral utralized and secure

41:34

and you couldn't scale it, and

41:37

everyone was getting rich by holding bitcoin,

41:39

everyone else would naturally create other

41:41

coins, saying

41:45

using bitcoin's growth to say my

41:47

coin is better than that coin because

41:49

it does x, it's a totlet

41:51

natural that would be what the market would look like

41:54

it's playing out, and again it still probably

41:57

looks like that today. So the thesis

41:59

at the time was people

42:01

haven't done the work on bitcoin and why it's a

42:03

different asset class completely and it's repricing

42:06

everything else, and until

42:08

they do that work, they're at a massive disadvantage

42:11

and they're going to invest in all of this coins

42:14

and nonsense, and all

42:16

of those things over time will go to zero. Every

42:19

other thing other than Bitcoin will go to zero because

42:22

you would never use a blockchain, essentially

42:25

a high cost database, if it wasn't decentralized

42:27

and secure, you'd just use a database, right,

42:31

So you'd never do that. And then at the

42:33

same.

42:33

Time, because a

42:35

blockchain is a slow, inefficient

42:37

database, and exactly why the.

42:39

Only the only thing, the

42:41

only thing, the only use case is the decentralized

42:44

insecurity, essentially the ledger of

42:46

money and is the biggest

42:48

use case on the planet because money is manipulated.

42:51

It's the biggest thing. They say. So when people say it

42:53

doesn't have a use case, have you

42:55

looked at how big and bloated governments are. Have

42:57

you look at regulation, If you looked at

42:59

all of the things that extract wealth from

43:01

you, that's what it gives back to you. It's

43:04

the biggest use case that every world has ever

43:06

seen, and you can't see it right before

43:08

her eyes.

43:09

Jamie Diamond at Davos,

43:11

he said, you know, bitcoin has no use case. I'm tired

43:13

of talking about blah blah blah. He said, it's only

43:16

used for basically

43:18

crime, right, he said, it's avoiding sanctions,

43:21

a M l K y C. Stuff. I

43:24

think, he said, you know, sex, trafficking, fraud,

43:27

and it's

43:29

just a bunch of people trading between themselves.

43:32

Yeah, that's exactly that's exactly right. It's

43:35

the work outside of the sanctioned. You know, basically

43:38

everything is sanctioned at this point, and yes,

43:40

so we can trade between

43:42

ourselves exactly.

43:44

So I suspect Jamie

43:46

Diamond is just a highly paid actor, and

43:49

he's highly paid from the money that he skims

43:52

off the top from that should be in your pockets.

43:55

That's what ends up happening because he sits at the top

43:58

of a system that must steal productivity

44:00

that should flow to society in the form of

44:02

lower prices right by his

44:05

space and the system. So what would

44:07

a highly paid actor in

44:09

that system say about a

44:11

system that gives you back your freedom

44:13

and power, right because it takes

44:16

it so of course.

44:18

But my point is is he was basically

44:20

saying the only use case for bitcoin would

44:22

be so you could have freedom and power that

44:24

the state couldn't have. I mean, he was making the

44:26

case for it inadvertency, right, But

44:28

anyway, I'm taking you sort of off your thesis

44:30

for for ego death and going

44:33

the first.

44:34

But again, that's that's what you're up against,

44:36

and that's what the world is looking at with

44:38

all of that. And it's not just Jamie Dinmond, it's

44:41

all of the system that So if you think

44:43

about regulation if you think, if you think about

44:45

regulation today, I've said this many times, but

44:48

you have regulation to protect

44:50

your money on top

44:53

of a system designed to steal your money. Yeah,

44:56

right, what would that look like? Right?

44:59

Just be let's be really honest,

45:01

Like the free market is deflationary, and

45:03

that's a big topic. The natural state of free market

45:06

is deflation It's so big it breaks

45:08

your brain. So if you can say that and understand

45:10

that, and then go back and say, but I'm going to

45:12

live in this other world in price from that other world,

45:15

then it's your own fault that the world looks.

45:17

Like it is from that. I mean, the regulation

45:20

doesn't protect your money from a system trying to steal

45:22

it. The regulation actually protects

45:24

them to be able to continue to steal your money.

45:26

Because why forces me to keep

45:29

us my money in a system that's rent seekers

45:31

in every area as opposed to letting me use it freely?

45:34

Do you think?

45:35

Why do you think big tech is

45:37

trying so hard to regulate AI? Why

45:41

do you think why do you think why

45:45

do you think drug companies look like they do? Why do you think

45:47

food companies look like the big agriculture?

45:49

Why do you think it's been co opted?

45:52

By regulation, because regulation protects

45:54

the monopoly, it doesn't protect you. Why

45:57

do you think regulation is on top of money, Because

45:59

it protects a monopoly of money, not you.

46:02

The entire system is and just

46:04

look at the evidence. Every single industry

46:06

has been driven this

46:08

way. Why because prices fall

46:11

to the marginal cost of production and free in

46:13

a free market. What is the what

46:16

is the marginal cost of production of a line of code

46:19

zero? What's the marginal cost of production

46:21

of a line of code created by other code? Lines

46:23

of code? Where AI is going zero,

46:26

The only way they can drive the prices

46:28

up and create the monopoly is through regulation,

46:31

scaring you that they will protect

46:33

you from the very same thing

46:35

that steals the thing becoming

46:37

free for you. So

46:40

that is the free market, That's what it looks like.

46:42

And the regulation on top of it makes it

46:44

not a free market. And that

46:47

whole thing is getting worse and worse and worse,

46:50

and people are stuck in that fear loop making

46:52

it worse. The only thing that can stop it is

46:54

something that has no counterparty risk to

46:56

the existing system outside decentralized

46:59

and secure. So that was our take.

47:02

People were so misunderstanding this asset

47:04

class. They hadn't done the work. They hadn't understand

47:06

how this is the first time in history that

47:09

this is something like this has existed, and

47:12

we felt sure that it would become

47:14

more decentralized and more secure over

47:16

time, which it is. And

47:18

then we said, now

47:21

there's with lightning and other things

47:24

emerging on top. You can scale

47:26

in layers like protocol,

47:30

like the like the Internet scaled and layers,

47:33

and there is going to be more and more

47:36

ability to be built on top, and

47:38

that's going to turn into that overtime

47:41

is going to turn into a peer to peer internet

47:44

bounded by energy that

47:46

creates an entirely a new world.

47:49

And so I selfishly I

47:51

wanted to be involved in that. When

47:54

I think about I wanted to. I

47:57

knew that bitcoin was repricing everything

47:59

else, but so

48:02

at first I had a hedge in bitcoin,

48:04

and I was spending most of my time in

48:07

what we just described, and

48:11

I thought, I'm a hypocrite,

48:14

right, yeah,

48:17

I'll be protected, but I'm spending

48:19

my time and energy on a whole

48:21

bunch of company boards in the existing space,

48:26

and every time a company wins there money

48:29

has to be manipulated faster to

48:32

be able to drive up prices,

48:37

and so I thought, if I know this

48:39

and I can see it coming, and I can see

48:41

similar to what I saw in the Internet,

48:44

it's kind of the best and the brightest we're moving in

48:46

this space. What am I doing spending

48:49

ninety percent of my time in the FIAT world.

48:52

I'm going to spend it all in

48:56

this And I'll tell you it's

48:58

been. It's been remarkable

49:01

because you get to see that

49:04

it's I didn't think i'd have another chance

49:06

to do this. Like in the early days

49:08

of the Internet, I remember thinking, Wow,

49:11

people don't see this, people don't see what's

49:13

coming, and

49:17

and the type of talent that existed

49:19

there, it was just it was your

49:22

brain was on fire all the time because it

49:24

was just you're learning at such a rate from

49:26

some of the really some super

49:28

smart and dedicated

49:31

entrepreneurs and such and capital. This

49:34

is bigger. This is

49:37

this is way bigger because

49:40

because it's the same as the Internet, but the best prayers,

49:42

but it's aligned with where humans are

49:44

going and so it's

49:46

more meaningful. And

49:48

so the type of people, the type of integrity

49:51

that is built into the space, the

49:53

type of people that actually understand this and are building

49:55

it's so much more powerful than than

49:57

than the Internet was.

49:59

Yeah, yeah, would agree. You know, I talk about it all

50:01

the time, and you see it if you go to a bitcoin conference.

50:04

You know, the mainstreams to tell us

50:06

that we align on identities, you know,

50:08

black, women, male, straight, gay, whatever it

50:10

may be, but we align on values.

50:13

And there's some values that I think are more

50:15

important than others, like freedom and human flourishment,

50:18

for example. And so to the point that you're making sort

50:20

of bitcoin has attracted the people that care about

50:22

those types of topics. And when you're

50:24

in some of these bitcoin events, I mean

50:26

you can just feel it. You can just feel the vibration,

50:29

you can feel the energy in the room, so

50:31

to speak. And so to your point, you

50:33

know, it's attracted the best and the brightest, and really

50:36

maybe crypto has almost sort of helped that right

50:38

as this great filtering mechanism, because if you

50:41

only care about the money, you're

50:43

going to go to the crypto side, and

50:45

if you go to the bitcoin side, you're basically

50:48

admitting to take less money and

50:50

to go the long, hard way. And

50:53

so only.

50:55

There isn't an entrepreneur in our portfolio,

50:57

or I don't think in the bitcoin space that

51:01

would take money from vcs

51:03

that were crypto vcs because

51:08

you don't want to. You don't want a shareholder that's

51:11

misaligned with your at

51:13

that level, at an integrity

51:16

level, or or

51:18

that you have to teach about a protocol

51:20

that's so different. Can you imagine

51:22

trying to take money from somebody who had no clue

51:25

about what we're talking about right now? Your

51:28

values aren't aligned and so

51:30

so why this is expanding and why it's just such

51:33

a beautiful space. And if

51:35

you just look at thefolio, the portfolio

51:37

of success and what's happening in the

51:40

companies that we funded already, Like,

51:44

I literally can't believe I get to do it.

51:47

I can't believe I get to work with these brilliant

51:49

people creating this value

51:51

for other people, and they and they're creating

51:54

value for themselves in the companies out

51:56

of creating staggering value for other people

51:58

and bringing on billions of people to this asset

52:00

loss. That's what's going to happen.

52:02

Yeah, And I in this presentation,

52:05

I gave as I said it, a bit block boom in and Packpitcoin.

52:07

I was sort of at Packpitcoin.

52:09

I put a slide in where I had said

52:11

sort of I showed oil like a cann of

52:13

oil or barrel of oil, and so you

52:16

have oil like an asset, but

52:18

then you have the oil industry, so like

52:20

who made the sonar for the oil tanker

52:22

to sell across the ocean, or who made the

52:24

satellite tracking to track you know, or who made the

52:27

new drill head to go horizontal or whatever it may be.

52:29

Right, so you have the asset bitcoin, but

52:31

you have this whole industry of all these

52:33

things that have to be built. And if we don't invest

52:35

into that, basically we have a model t in

52:38

our front yard sitting on blocks because we have

52:40

no tire shops and no gas stations and

52:42

no roads to drive it on. And so the sort

52:44

of the challenge was to the bitcoiners in that in

52:46

that presentation, was that cool,

52:48

you bought your bitcoin, you're hoddling on a hill,

52:51

but just like your modeltes on blocks,

52:53

But if you don't go and help build out

52:56

this ecosystem, then you don't

52:58

have roads to drive it on. And so there's

53:00

this entire ecosystem that needs to be built.

53:02

And so that's obviously we're hoping

53:04

to return better capital, but it's also potentially

53:07

like hey, we just need to build this world that we believe

53:09

in.

53:10

Yeah, but and just building

53:12

on that. I just think, So there's

53:15

an asymmetry and knowledge just on the asset

53:17

layer, right, So probably

53:19

less than one percent I really understand

53:22

the asset layer really

53:24

a lot less than one present. Even people that hold

53:26

it don't really understand

53:28

how it's reprising everything else. Now,

53:31

there's a massive asymmetry of knowledge in

53:34

what you can build on top. And

53:37

then you look at this world and you say, there's

53:39

all these problems. Right,

53:42

What entrepreneurs do is they race

53:44

for the hardest to solve problem because

53:47

that's where the return is is by

53:49

solving it, they'd solve it for

53:53

millions or billions of others and

53:55

they create something really magical. That's

53:57

what. So every time you hear a problem,

54:01

I just go, Okay, that's

54:03

screaming at me. Here's

54:06

how how would you? How would you solve

54:08

that? So when you think about this kind

54:11

of the the today you could

54:13

call it. Bitcoin might

54:15

not, but on top

54:18

of bitcoin, it might look like a backcountry

54:22

roads, gravel roads. The

54:24

super highways are coming, right,

54:27

and all of the stuff that's being built on

54:30

on top of, on top of this is

54:32

coming and it's going to provide incredible

54:34

value to those entrepreneurs and society

54:37

by by solving those problems. So

54:41

I when I when I see a

54:43

big, hairy problem like that, I think that's

54:45

where I want to go.

54:47

Yeah, I love it. I love

54:49

it. So and you're doing it. You're

54:51

building the world that you want, and

54:53

you're helping other people do the same. So ego

54:56

death Bitcoin, Ego death.

54:58

Fun number two open and ready for business,

55:00

and just maybe this last question will

55:02

just transition out. I mean, I

55:05

think I think it's already sort of self explanatory.

55:07

But this is obviously a much bigger fund number two,

55:10

and so it's not just the demand to get

55:12

into this from the investor side, but you're also

55:14

seeing an explosion of opportunities

55:16

that need funding to grow as well. So I mean,

55:18

we've seen it on both sides. Yeah.

55:20

So that so that's why So we actually

55:23

our first fund we kept small,

55:25

specifically because the ecosystem was

55:27

small, and that would allow us way more time

55:30

to be really kind

55:32

of helping the entrepreneurs and spend

55:34

more time inside some of those companies

55:37

that would be enablers

55:39

of what would come. Now those enablers

55:41

are growing, some of them are growing extraordinarily

55:44

fast, like

55:47

blow me away completely, like

55:50

the crazy

55:52

fast and you

55:55

and now in those you think about

55:57

the next step their Series A or Series

56:00

BE and everything else and now. But

56:02

there aren't a lot of Series A funds and bitcoin

56:04

only their Series A

56:06

funds broadly and everything else. And those

56:09

entrepreneurs don't want to go to somebody

56:11

who doesn't understand bitcoin for

56:14

capital because that means teaching

56:17

about bitcoin and everything else and their business.

56:19

So that's why the bigger

56:22

fund. The entire ecosystem

56:24

is maturing as you would expect it

56:26

would mature, and not

56:28

just in our portfolio companies. You

56:31

know this from broadly in the industry. There's

56:34

a bunch of things that are starting to catch

56:36

fire.

56:38

Yeah yeah, well, it's an

56:40

exciting time to be in the space.

56:42

I agree. We have lots of fireworks. The ETF

56:44

catalyst obviously the having cycle

56:47

that's coming back around

56:49

as well, But more importantly,

56:51

it's the explosion of this technology

56:53

is going to perpetuate and really more importantly

56:56

help foster a new era of

56:59

human advancement, human flourishment, et cetera,

57:01

and freedom. Hopefully, I

57:03

think with that will go ahead and sign it off unless there's

57:05

anything else that you want to add or we missed.

57:07

No, no, just awesome catching up

57:09

with your markets again. Our friendship

57:12

has come from the exact same same thing

57:14

that you see in this, in this ecosystem,

57:16

and we'd say, looking

57:19

outside in it'd say, okay,

57:20

there's

57:25

there's these fights in bitcoin and everything

57:27

else, and you don't have to

57:29

agree with everybody, but but

57:31

I and and that's and I think

57:33

a free market makes it stronger by the

57:35

debates and everything else. And so

57:38

so it's okay to be different, different and

57:40

have different views on this. But what

57:42

but what you see in this is the really

57:44

important things are

57:47

aligned. And that's why, why why

57:50

Again, you can create a

57:52

type of people that you meet in this you just

57:54

you know they're going to be lifelong friends.

57:58

Jeff, so good, So good. I love that,

58:01

look forward to catching up with you sometime soon.

58:04

But that was signed off. I'm gonna put in the show notes down below.

58:06

Of course, we'll link to Ego Death, your book

58:08

as well anything else that people should be paying attention

58:11

to.

58:13

One quick thing, Jeff Booth dot ca

58:15

is my website. And the only reason I say that

58:17

is if you're going to follow me on social

58:19

media. Make sure the social media

58:22

that I'm on is on that website, because

58:24

there's just too many fake accounts.

58:26

Yeah, all right, all right, Jeff, thanks so much, Thanks

58:28

buddy,

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features