Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:08
This is the meat Eater Podcast
0:11
coming at you shirtless, severely,
0:13
bug bitten, and in my case, underwear listeningcast.
0:18
You can't predict anything. The meat
0:20
Eater Podcast is brought to you by First
0:22
Light. Whether you're checking trail cams, hanging
0:24
deer stands, or scouting for el, First
0:27
Light has performance apparel to support
0:29
every hunter in every environment. Check
0:31
it out at first light dot com. F
0:33
I R S T L I t
0:35
E dot com.
0:40
Everybody's damn near your tax day and we're gonna
0:42
do There's two things that are gonna happen
0:44
on this episode. We're gonna get into two things you never want
0:46
to bring up to anybody. We're
0:48
gonna talk about finances, and we're gonna
0:51
talk about politics. But
0:54
we're gonna start with we're gonna talk about politics,
0:56
kind of politics and the intersection
0:59
of politics and conservation with Becky
1:01
Humphries, who's
1:03
been on the show a couple times before, and we're gonna
1:05
we're gonna dig in with her. She's here in the studio,
1:07
but joining us from not in the studio is
1:10
Susie Orman, and she just
1:12
was saying that we need to change start a podcast
1:15
called money Eater and
1:18
We wanted to catch up with her for a couple of reasons. One because it's
1:20
tax day and we want to get some financial advice.
1:23
And two because there's some things I became
1:25
aware of now. If
1:28
you're wondering, or if you you know, you've been out of touch,
1:30
or you're a little youngster.
1:32
Uh.
1:32
Susie Orman is an American financial
1:34
advisor, author of How Many Books,
1:36
A Lot of Books?
1:38
Ten ten ten,
1:40
number one New York Times bestseller, and
1:42
I am just not a financial advisor,
1:45
sir. I am a financial icon
1:47
of America. And you're young and you
1:49
don't know about me. That's why
1:51
you're financially screwed.
1:53
Yes, if
1:55
you don't, yeah, if you don't have a big old
1:57
boat, If you don't have a big old boat yet, it's because
1:59
you haven't been listening to Susie.
2:02
So in nineteen
2:04
eighty seven, she founded the Susie Ormand Financial
2:06
Group, and her work as a financial advisor
2:09
gained notability
2:11
notoriety with Susie Orman Show, which
2:13
ran on CNBC and for
2:17
thirteen years, and does.
2:19
A podcast, I'll tell
2:21
You My Brief History, which is
2:24
two time Emmy Award winner, twice
2:26
named by Time magazine as
2:28
one hundred most influential person in the world.
2:31
Recently just named as one of the fifty over
2:33
fifty women who have changed this world.
2:35
And I could go on and on, but who cares.
2:37
About them over fifty?
2:40
No, it's true.
2:42
I actually said, well, it took you so long because
2:44
I'm mopped to be seventy three?
2:46
Are you really what?
2:47
Yeah, look it up, you google it.
2:49
Why this is part
2:51
of your research?
2:52
Well, no, I might have known. I might have read
2:54
that and then thought that's impossible because she looks
2:56
too great.
2:57
But that's why it happens when you have a
2:59
lot of money. I
3:01
haven't got any work done, but that's besides the
3:03
point as well.
3:05
Now, okay, you might
3:07
be wondering, like, well, how why this
3:09
show? Because I found now I've known
3:13
once upon a time Susan
3:15
and I for a brief period overlap
3:17
with our book publishers. But she's
3:21
the reason she's on the show right now is she's
3:23
a mega fisherman,
3:27
like I got photos here of her
3:30
with a stack of wah who manages
3:33
to live in Bahamas, which I need to ask how that
3:35
goes down? And when I first reached
3:37
out to her about coming on the show,
3:39
I see a picture of her where she's standing next
3:41
to a and
3:44
electric reel, like a deep drop reel.
3:47
Now, normally if you meet, like you know, when
3:49
you're talking to a famous person in a fish and you
3:51
get their fishing picture, you're gonna
3:53
get a picture of them holding
3:55
a fly rod with a rainbow trout
3:58
in big sky Montana, with a guide
4:01
holding the net, or.
4:03
It's a marlin.
4:04
Yeah. But that was like old that she's standing
4:06
with a deep drop rig,
4:09
and I was like, this is a legit fisher
4:12
person. Have you always fished?
4:15
No?
4:15
So when I was sixty five,
4:18
many years ago now, I
4:20
had decided what would Susie
4:23
Orman be if she didn't have
4:25
the number one show on CNBC for
4:27
thirteen years or how many of her years it was.
4:30
If she didn't have you know, standing
4:32
ovations of fifty thousand people at a time,
4:35
if she didn't have this, What
4:37
would I be if all of that went away?
4:40
So one day I decided to sell five
4:42
homes, quit my show, stop writing for Oprah,
4:45
stop being on TV BAM,
4:47
and we got a boat. And
4:50
then we started to go all around on
4:52
the boat and our captain of the
4:54
boat because the insurance
4:56
company made sure that I had a captain. They wouldn't
4:58
let me captain of myself I could have, which
5:01
did not go well with me, but I didn't have
5:03
a choice. Was an avid fisherman,
5:07
and so he would sit on the dock
5:09
with us and we'd have these little fishes,
5:11
and that's all he thought these two women could
5:13
do. So finally we fired him. We got
5:15
him out of there right. I started
5:17
to take over everything myself, and
5:21
little by little we had moved to
5:23
the Bahamas, this little
5:25
tiny island where we would
5:27
watch everybody bring in these
5:30
big fish. We didn't know what they
5:32
were because we wanted to also
5:34
filley our fish ourselves. We were
5:36
like, we are not going to be women who
5:39
the help does this? The help does that. We're
5:41
going to do it ourselves. We're going to fish, we're gonna
5:43
captain our boat, we're going to clean our boat, and
5:45
we're gonna, you know, clean our
5:47
fish.
5:49
And little by little we
5:51
would.
5:51
Be asking questions like
5:54
how do you catch a wahoo?
5:55
What's a wahoo?
5:57
And before you know it, we
5:59
got the equipment and we went out and
6:01
we would try, and before
6:04
you know it, we started to catch And
6:06
at first we didn't know the difference between a barracuda
6:09
and a wahoo, so we'd have to bring
6:11
the fish in and ask somebody on
6:13
the island is this.
6:14
A barracuda or is this a wahoo?
6:17
And little by little
6:20
we got it down really well,
6:23
and it was I think it was just a few years
6:25
ago, maybe two thousand and eighteen,
6:28
not whatever it was, but a few years
6:30
ago there was a wahoo contest
6:33
on the island and there were
6:35
nine boats that went out, huge
6:38
fishing vessels with captains
6:41
and all these lines. And we had our little,
6:43
you know, thirty two foot Boston wayler
6:45
were just two poles.
6:47
That was it, the two.
6:48
LPs, and we won not only
6:50
the contest, but we won the largest fish
6:52
as well. Oh
6:55
and now all the
6:57
men were and who had been wahooing
6:59
and everything for years, we became
7:01
their targeters if they wanted to catch us.
7:04
They never quite have, but we've.
7:06
Now I'm no longer known as
7:08
the money Lady, which was my nickname. We're
7:11
now known on the island KT and myself
7:13
as the fishing girls. And when
7:16
we go out, you see the
7:18
boats start to follow us because
7:20
they want to know where are we going, what are
7:22
we doing? And things like
7:24
like the birds, Yeah right,
7:27
they're watching for us. Or we'll
7:29
be somewhere and they'll come up just
7:31
to kind of say hi, and I know they're marking my
7:34
spot.
7:37
So I'm always like, really, you have to pretend
7:39
you want my numbers, you can have it.
7:41
You're still not going to catch here. I love
7:43
them, I love it.
7:45
Right right, But anyway,
7:47
and that's how it started, little
7:49
by little. Now I have a massive
7:51
lure collection, a massive rod
7:54
in real collection, and
7:57
we use them all the time.
7:58
How many reason are you
8:01
good at cleaning fish?
8:01
Yeah, it's actually KT that
8:04
cleans them, right, because that's what
8:06
she wanted to do. I didn't care one way
8:08
or the other, to tell you the truth. She is
8:10
magnificent at it. She
8:13
does like cleans. You hold up the thing
8:15
and you.
8:15
Could see through it. She's fabulous
8:18
at.
8:19
It, right, and she's and
8:21
then we cry back it and then we
8:23
also share it with all the other people on the
8:25
island, the islanders that work there.
8:27
Oh excellent, Now I got a question for
8:29
you. You mentioned getting up to a
8:31
position where you got a nice boat.
8:33
Now, one of our colleagues Chester, we
8:36
used call him Chester the Investor. His
8:39
plan to get a walleye boat
8:42
was to throw in on bitcoin.
8:46
Yeah, good, I hope he did.
8:48
Well. He did, and he got out a
8:52
couple of years ago.
8:54
Right, there's still a time
8:56
for him to get in a little bit now because
8:58
on April twentieth there will
9:00
be a halving a bigcoin, so
9:02
we should see it if the technical stay
9:04
the same, for bitcoin to probably go up
9:07
into the eighty thousand or so
9:09
area. Obviously it's in the seventy
9:12
thousand area now. It might be a little bit expensive
9:14
to get in for a lot, but he
9:16
can always buy the etf I bit
9:19
ib it and make some
9:21
money, not what he would have made if
9:24
he had gone in when it was at its loan, not
9:26
that long ago, at twenty thousand dollars a
9:28
bitcoin.
9:28
Well, I make sure he tunes in. Yeah,
9:31
how do you what's your take if
9:33
someone how do you advise
9:35
someone like Karn had found a segment where a guy
9:37
was trying to figure out if he could justify the purchase
9:40
of a twenty thousand dollars fishing boat. When
9:42
it comes to fishing boats, how
9:45
do you instruct people to think about
9:47
what's too much?
9:49
Yeah, he should go on. I can't I afford it segment
9:51
on the Women in Money podcast because
9:53
it's the hand of every podcast we have that And
9:56
I'll tell him, first of all, there
9:58
is nothing that it's more expensive,
10:00
and I don't care what size it
10:03
is than a boat.
10:05
Your engines are either breaking. Everything
10:07
on a boat today has a three
10:10
year lifespan.
10:10
That is it.
10:11
Your batteries will go, your your
10:14
switches will go, your everything
10:16
will go. And so it's
10:19
hard to look at a boat with something
10:21
not breaking on it as you're looking at it.
10:23
So it's not can you afford to buy a
10:25
boat? Can you afford the
10:28
upkeep on the boat? Can you afford
10:30
the insurance on the boat? Can
10:32
you afford the gasoline on the
10:34
boat to really do things?
10:37
Because gasoline now is far more
10:39
expensive than.
10:40
It was years ago. So
10:43
where you're going to house the boat?
10:45
Are you living like in Florida or someplace
10:47
that a hurricane could get the boat?
10:50
So there's all these things that go into
10:52
it.
10:52
However, bottom line, you better
10:54
have at least an eight to twelve month emergency
10:57
fund of what it would cost you
10:59
to live and pay your must
11:01
pay expenses, your mortgage or your
11:03
rent, you're in, whatever it is,
11:06
so that if you got sick, you were in an accident,
11:08
you got laid off, you would be able to pay those
11:10
for eight months. You better not have any
11:12
credit card debt whatsoever.
11:14
You better be fully.
11:16
Funding your retirement accounts to the
11:18
max. You better be
11:21
really so good when it comes
11:23
to money. And then if
11:26
you have that, you already bought a home, whatever
11:28
it is, you can have a boat.
11:30
Good luck, man. I don't know if
11:33
there's a lot of boat owners list.
11:39
It's always a good idea to roll the dice on a
11:41
big boat, because
11:43
you never.
11:43
Know what's funny.
11:44
You guys, We've had a thirty
11:46
two foot boat now for
11:49
since twenty sixteen. We
11:52
are going on eight years with the same boat.
11:54
The men on the island, and
11:58
of course they would. They think bigger is better, all
12:00
right. So they have to go from
12:03
two engines to three engines to
12:05
four engines. They have to go from
12:07
a three hundred to a four point fifty to
12:09
a six hundred.
12:11
They're nuts. If one of them
12:13
gets a.
12:13
Bigger boat, the others
12:15
all get a bigger boat. I
12:18
have never seen anything like it.
12:20
And then they say to me, why do
12:22
you keep the same boat?
12:25
What is wrong with you?
12:27
One reason I keep the same boat
12:30
is one of the reasons that I think that we
12:32
are so successful in fishing,
12:34
especially catching wahoo. Is
12:37
the wahoo, in my opinion, like
12:39
the wash off the engines
12:42
of our boat, our
12:44
engines.
12:45
And you get to stay out of what we call a boat
12:47
measuring contest, right.
12:50
But you know, I also just love beating
12:52
them in a smaller boat anyway, So what's
12:54
the difference?
12:55
Well, that brings up a great point
12:57
though, like when you go to in
13:00
vest in something recreationally,
13:03
do you measure in
13:05
the mental benefit of
13:07
being able to go do something you love? Is
13:10
that a factor?
13:11
Yes? And no?
13:12
It depends, Like obviously for somebody
13:14
like me. I'm a seriously wealthy
13:17
woman, and if I wasn't, I
13:19
shouldn't be who I am.
13:20
To this day.
13:22
So I don't measure bigger
13:24
necessarily being what can I
13:26
cannot do. I like to
13:29
buy exactly what
13:31
I need, not what I can afford,
13:34
because I can afford more than what I need.
13:37
I don't need more than a thirty
13:39
two foot boat, I don't, you
13:41
know. It's just me and Kate. It's
13:44
what I need it for. So
13:46
just because I can afford it doesn't
13:48
mean that I want to buy it.
13:52
You used to be down. You used to advise people
13:54
that eating dinner
13:56
out was a real financial.
13:59
Drain, such a drain it
14:01
was.
14:02
Actually in two thousand and nine, I
14:04
came out with a book called the two
14:06
thousand and nine Action Plan because
14:08
the economy was a mess. I was on the Oprah
14:10
Winfrey Show with it. We actually gave
14:12
it away for free, millions
14:15
of copies we gave away for free. But there
14:17
were a few things that I asked everybody
14:19
in there to do, and that was to
14:21
stop eating out for at least six
14:24
months. I thought the
14:26
restaurant industry was
14:28
going to explode.
14:31
They could not believe that I said
14:33
that. However, there was a
14:36
white paper done from Mint, which
14:38
was a finance app and the
14:40
number one debt that
14:42
people had when they had a lot of credit card
14:44
debt, the number one thing they actually spent
14:47
money on to be in debt was eating
14:49
out. So that's
14:52
when that started with me. For
14:54
me myself, sure, I'll ead
14:57
out if it's a business thing or we're away
14:59
and I don't have whatever. But even
15:01
when we travel, it's very funny.
15:04
Maybe we'll go somewhere to do a speaking
15:06
engagement and we go on a private plane.
15:08
Okay, And now
15:11
we bring our food with us
15:14
and we check into the hotel, and even though
15:16
the sponsor will pay for our food, we cook
15:18
in our hotel room.
15:21
So we have a little hot plate. We do this so
15:23
I.
15:23
Personally don't enjoy
15:26
eating out at a restaurant
15:29
just to go out and eat out only
15:31
because I just I don't know.
15:33
I think the food's better at home and healthier.
15:36
Well, you don't even have to use a hot plate. If
15:38
you got wahoo with you all the time.
15:40
Yeah, well we bring that as well because
15:42
we love wahushashimi.
15:44
Yeah yeah, so a
15:46
lot.
15:46
But if you're there for a long time, because
15:49
sometimes you're a place for a while, then
15:52
we had a little hot plate. We had a
15:54
little you know, fry pan, a little this in
15:56
a that, and we go to the grocery
15:58
store if we roun on.
15:59
A food and bring it.
16:00
So it was always people would always laugh
16:02
at us as.
16:02
They would see us checking into a hotel.
16:05
Susie, I saw a photo where it looks
16:08
like you I
16:10
might be looking at it wrong, but I feel like there's
16:12
a photo where you're sitting there with a rockfish
16:16
with a link cod that
16:18
looks like it came up with
16:22
like you caught the rockfish, but landed a link caught
16:24
and a rockfish.
16:25
Yeah, So there we are because every year
16:27
we also like to eat salmon, so we
16:30
usually go to either Alaska or British.
16:32
Columbia to catch our own salmon.
16:35
Great, and so there we were
16:37
and I was fishing, and I was
16:39
actually fishing. I didn't even you
16:41
know, we had caught our quota of
16:44
salmon and halib it. So
16:46
I was just kind of fishing and I caught something
16:49
and I'm bringing it up, and I'm like saying to kt
16:51
KT this is I don't know what
16:53
I got here, but I don't think this is just a
16:55
rockfish, because we wanted a rockfish
16:58
in order to make tacos out of it. And
17:00
all of a sudden, I bring it up and it's a link.
17:03
God that bid it
17:05
would not let go, and so we caught
17:08
both and we bought growth homes.
17:14
Okay, give us a couple, give people
17:16
a couple we'll let you go after this, but give
17:18
people a couple tips on how
17:21
they should handle their tax refunds. I'm guessing.
17:23
I'm guessing that you
17:26
don't advise people to go with the play
17:28
where you get the refund later as
17:31
good as that field.
17:32
Right, when interest rates
17:34
were at zero percent and
17:36
there was nobody was making any money on
17:39
CDs or money market accounts or anything,
17:41
then I didn't have a problem with
17:44
people getting a refund because they
17:46
really weren't losing any money that way,
17:48
truthfully.
17:49
However, now that.
17:51
Interest rates in money market funds and this
17:53
will change, are at about four and a half
17:55
or five percent, or there's places
17:57
that you can put money that are safe
17:59
and down and get a high
18:02
interest rate. Who wants to give
18:04
the government an interest
18:06
free loan over a year's period
18:08
of time of about five percent?
18:10
You have to be out of your mind. So
18:13
you would be far better.
18:14
Off now getting no
18:17
refund, paying what you need
18:20
to pay and not paying over it. So
18:22
just come out so it's a zero, and
18:24
in the long run you're actually
18:27
making more money. So that's how
18:29
you make more out of less,
18:31
to tell you the truth. So it's
18:34
less of a refund, but in the long
18:36
run, that extra money.
18:38
That they're keeping, you would just be able
18:40
to take.
18:40
That money and put it in an account
18:42
for yourself, maybe buy some bitcoin
18:45
with it.
18:45
Just joking, all.
18:49
Right, Susie Orman, thank
18:51
you so much for coming on. Good look on your next fission
18:54
trip. I really appreciate you joining us. And that's gonna
18:56
get everybody really pepped up and ready to do
18:58
their taxes.
18:59
All right, talk to you.
19:05
All right? Oh you know what's funny? So
19:07
Becky, we're gonna how you doing.
19:09
I'm good.
19:10
Did you learn anything there?
19:13
No, I
19:18
don't own a big boat. I don't
19:21
just little boats, and and
19:24
I try and balance my taxes so it comes
19:26
out even at the end of the year. But I do have
19:29
advice for people that do get a refund and
19:31
they need to donate it to conservation.
19:34
Oh there you go, yep.
19:36
And Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership
19:38
would be a great place to put it too.
19:41
That's excellent. We're going to talk about that a whole
19:43
bunch, but I gotta run. I'm going to run a couple
19:45
of Michigan things by it, and an a neighboring thing
19:47
and a neighboring thing from
19:49
a neighboring thing from Wisconsin. Handful
19:52
things we're gonna talk about. But just
19:54
a funny letter that came in so Pat Dirk,
19:56
and it
19:59
comes on the show a lot the
20:01
last Outdoor columnist. He
20:03
wrote a newspaper column last week. This
20:06
is a while ago. Now I'm looking at an old line.
20:08
But uh, Dirkin
20:11
wrote a piece about to continued decline
20:13
in Wisconsin's deer hunting population,
20:17
meaning the number of people buying deer licenses
20:19
in Wisconsin is
20:23
going down, down, down. You might be sitting, well,
20:25
why isn't my why aren't my permissions
20:27
going up up up? Which is a very long, complicated
20:29
story, but those things do not walk
20:32
in tandem. Anyways, he gets a letter
20:36
from a guy who is
20:38
of my favorite letters. And
20:41
the reason I like this letter so much is just so happens
20:43
that I'm leaving in two days
20:45
to participate in Wisconsin's
20:49
youth turkey season. But
20:53
a guy writes in, Who's who write?
20:55
In response to Dirkin's column, writes in, and it's
20:58
signed Dave Michigan
21:00
pissed hunter. He
21:05
goes on to say, though,
21:08
Wisconsin, just like Michigan, has
21:10
the same problem. And I'll tell you what from
21:13
a guy that has hunted all his life. When you turn
21:15
over a gun to a kid and they're allowed
21:18
to shoot any bucks that they want, and I've been hunting
21:20
for the past forty years, and I have
21:22
to settle for what's left over. And you
21:24
wonder why people are quitting. You take all
21:26
the hunt away before the season
21:28
gets to the big hunt of the big opening
21:31
day, most of the big bucks are already gone.
21:33
You have so many hunts, kids, special
21:36
hunts, ex bo regular bow. The
21:38
regular opening day big hunt is
21:40
a big flop. Kid hunts and they
21:42
early hunts and stuff. Take the big
21:44
bucks before the day gets here, and you might
21:46
think the big day is just about the
21:49
meat, and it's not. It's the racks. Michigan
21:51
prove that with given dough tags
21:53
twelve total, but at a cost, and
21:55
hunters let them walk, want more hunter
21:58
cut the bull crap. Give the big bucks
22:00
back to the opening day big hunts. You
22:03
might start to see some other people come back,
22:05
if it might already be too late.
22:09
Dave,
22:19
that is one impassioned.
22:21
That is one.
22:22
I assume you read it as it was punctuated.
22:25
I tried to pat
22:27
was taken to be a great T shirt.
22:30
I have this T shirt of the guy that wrote
22:32
in Yeah, the
22:34
guy that wrote in the story about the just some
22:37
unseemly behavior he was seeing among
22:40
turkeys in his neighborhood, and
22:42
I think that that might be a great T shirt. You've
22:46
met Dave.
22:47
I'm sure I've met Dave all through your
22:49
career through there
22:52
are more than one Dave in Michigan
22:55
family.
22:56
I'll translate that. I'll
22:59
translate that and be that they've
23:04
done so much do I need to translate
23:06
it?
23:07
I think, yeah, yeah,
23:09
yeah, yeah.
23:11
Now you got the archery season, and you
23:13
got the crossbow season, and you
23:15
got the youth. See really the kids. And
23:17
by the time it comes down to opening
23:19
day in Michigan November fifteenth, the Big
23:22
Hunt, I like he calls it the big Big Hunt.
23:24
Ye.
23:24
By the time the Big Hunt starts
23:27
opening day of General Firearm, the
23:29
kids have killed off all the big bucks. So
23:33
if you're trying to wonder what happened all the hunters, that's
23:35
it.
23:37
By providing special experiences
23:40
for everyone, you
23:42
may be diluting a
23:44
singular experience that used to be for everybody.
23:48
That was that saying, he who is a friend
23:50
to all his friend to mine.
23:52
Oh and our memory
23:54
gets a little cloudy too. Yeah,
23:56
you know, I have a deer on the
23:59
wall of one of the bedrooms in my home that
24:01
my dad's first buck my dad shot
24:03
in Michigan and it was a huge
24:06
buck by his standards, it
24:08
was a nine point about this big,
24:11
you know, and the and the success
24:13
rate back at that time when he shot that for
24:16
firearm deer hunting in Michigan is
24:18
about it was below thirty
24:20
percent for the
24:22
entire deer season. You know, Michigan
24:24
has been over forty percent for quite a while
24:27
now for firearm hunters in terms of
24:29
success. So and our
24:32
deer heard. You know, the antler
24:34
size has also gone up. But
24:37
you know, the majority of bucks
24:39
out there, you guys know this, or young bucks.
24:42
I mean, we exploit deer
24:45
pretty heavily in this country, especially
24:48
in the Midwest where you have an open
24:50
entry system, so
24:53
people take a lot of deer, there's no doubt about
24:55
it. But the majority of your deer are those younger
24:57
deer. And I think sometimes
25:00
our memory gets a little feaded on the glory
25:02
years and what it looks like,
25:04
not that that happened to Dave or anything.
25:08
But you know, the other part of it is we
25:10
are losing more and more hunters
25:12
as a percentage of the population. And you guys
25:15
know this, and you know it threatens
25:17
our our acceptance
25:19
out there. It threatens our clout
25:23
as in politics and voting
25:25
and regulations, and
25:27
quite frankly, I you know, I'm
25:29
more than willing to give up that big buck
25:32
for a youngster. You
25:35
know, by the time you get to Dave's
25:37
age, hopefully he's taken a few nice
25:39
bucks. I
25:41
don't know if Dave has either, but
25:43
you know, hopefully you have and you've had
25:45
that opportunity. But it is
25:48
about maximizing opportunity out
25:50
there for a lot of folks. And
25:53
Michigan during those glory years, Michigan
25:55
had over a million hunters.
25:59
They're down under a half million now
26:01
what. And so with
26:03
that, your you know, your competition
26:06
out on the landscape overall
26:08
is down from what it had been.
26:10
Yeah, but I.
26:11
Think greater fragmentation of the landscape
26:14
right which is.
26:15
Yeah, a greater fragmentation we
26:17
used to see in Michigan. Michigan
26:19
carried most of their deer herd
26:21
in the Upper Peninsula and the northern Lower Peninsula
26:24
and everybody had their little hunting camps and the
26:26
rest of it. Now the majority we
26:28
kill more deer in southern Michigan than
26:31
the up and Northern Michigan combined.
26:33
It's just you know, we've seen this, you
26:36
know, and not only Michigan. You see a lot of
26:38
deer down in Indiana, Illinois. The
26:40
deer population, quite frankly,
26:42
is much higher than it had been fifty
26:45
years ago.
26:46
Beg, you adn't do a good job. I introduce you. Yep, I'm
26:48
gonna do that right now. Becky
26:50
Humphreys is a long time biole.
26:53
Just started her career at the US Fish and Wildlife Service,
26:56
then worked her way up through
26:58
the Michigan DNR too, became the director the
27:00
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, spent
27:03
time at Ducks Unlimited, ran
27:08
National Ran an
27:10
NWTF as the CEO for how many years?
27:13
CEO for five years?
27:14
So five years heading the National Wild Turkey
27:16
Federation, and then right now
27:18
and I owe you big thanks on this has
27:21
stepped in as the interim
27:24
CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt
27:28
Conservation Partnership and
27:31
there's a permanent search underway,
27:33
but you, very graciously, at
27:35
very short notice, came
27:37
on board to run the organization
27:40
during the interim. So oh, your huge thanks there.
27:42
Well, thank you. It's a
27:44
great organization. As you know, we both sit
27:46
on the board and you
27:49
know when we lost our CEO and pretty
27:51
you know, short order last last winter.
27:54
It's one of those organizations you don't want
27:56
to see flounder. You want them to have
27:58
a great CEO and you want to to have great
28:01
leadership. So it was an honor
28:03
to be asked and ain't quite
28:05
Frankly, I was feeling retirement pretty
28:08
much. I'm
28:10
gonna try again, Try try.
28:13
You'll you'll get to retire again. The
28:17
last last call on Live tour
28:19
tickets. So the live tour starts next week.
28:21
You're listening to this right around tax Day. The live tour
28:23
starts on on the twenty third. Live Tour
28:26
starts on the twenty third. Hang
28:30
on second, me pull this up? Yeah,
28:32
who's got the who's got the dates? Hand here? I got
28:34
it? One minute? One
28:37
minute, damn it? Okay,
28:39
ready April
28:42
twenty third, we're gonna be in Mesa, Arizona, free
28:45
people. Not from Arizona. That means Phoenix but
28:48
not. April
28:51
twenty four, San Diego, California,
28:54
April twenty five, Anaheim,
28:56
California, April twenty seven, Sacramento
29:00
twenty nine, Salt Lake City April
29:02
thirty, Boise, Idaho. Then
29:05
May one, Missoula, Montana, May two
29:07
Spokane, Washington, May for Portland,
29:09
Oregon, and then closing out the
29:12
show Sinco Tomayo. Is that right?
29:14
Yes, those trees Sinco
29:16
to Mio. May fifth, Tacoma,
29:19
Washington.
29:21
Yeah. A couple of things for folks
29:23
searching for tickets, be sure
29:26
to either go through the meteater dot com
29:28
events page yep and hit
29:30
those links, or the
29:33
venues the venues only those
29:35
two places. If you just type in these
29:38
shows in the Google machine.
29:39
You'll want you want the resellers, and
29:42
it.
29:42
Is grossly expensive. Yeah,
29:44
so go go through the media dot com events
29:47
page or directly to the
29:50
theater that is hosting the show. And
29:53
then, on top of that, if you want to
29:55
try to win some tickets, there
29:58
are pint nights hosted by b HI
30:02
that proceed all of
30:04
these shows where you can actually participate
30:06
in meat Eater trivia. You can win
30:09
a bunch of free stuff, including seats
30:11
to the show.
30:12
And including a seat on
30:15
stage playing the game
30:17
right.
30:18
Well, yeah, but we got to find did we finalize the
30:20
game?
30:21
Yeah?
30:21
Oh okay, yeah, get on stage,
30:24
match your wits.
30:26
Uh oh. Also, when you
30:28
buy a ticket, here here's the here's the ur Tidbut I'll
30:30
throw in the last little thing. You can see
30:32
it both ways, but when you buy tickets it comes
30:34
bundled with the Meat Eater Outdoor Cookbook Wild Game
30:36
Recipes for the Grill, smoke or camp stoven, Campfire
30:39
Brand Spicketty new outdoor cookbook that
30:41
we have out right now, And I've been struggle a little
30:43
bituse I'm starting to put some pictures from the book up
30:45
on Instagram, and I'm like, I
30:47
put one up about I'm putting one
30:49
up about. In the beginning of the book,
30:51
we talk about like all this ancient cooking methods
30:55
stuff dating back to the Ice Age and ways
30:57
people dissingc So when you open the book, I realized
30:59
that one of the first things you see is a marmot
31:04
who's had all of his hair burned off,
31:07
which is like how small.
31:09
It's like how small game was cooked at
31:12
a time. You'd burn all his hair off and roast
31:14
it whole, and then its skin would
31:16
turn like a case. Then you
31:18
open it up and the meat inside was steamed. And
31:21
I wonder when people see that, if
31:25
they can picture that, they're also going to eventually
31:27
wind up later in the book reading about a charred
31:29
lemon gin and tonic, So
31:32
they think they're like.
31:33
What the hell.
31:34
Don't judge your book by its covering. Don't judge your
31:36
book by the first spread.
31:38
Don't judge a book by the intro photos.
31:42
Don't judge a book by the singed marmint.
31:44
I've been thinking about I've been waking up in the middle of the night
31:46
and think about those fish cakes we made last
31:48
week from the cookbook. And now I think I'm gonna
31:50
wake up in the middle of the night and have this vision
31:52
of a charred marmot.
31:54
Well, think about charred lemon gen and Tonics
31:56
washing that charred marmot. Back, Becky,
32:09
what you take on the gray wolf that just got killed in
32:11
southern Michigan? How that transition?
32:14
That's a quick view turn. I don't
32:16
you know, I don't know enough about that particular
32:18
animal to speak to you. Just yeah,
32:22
But I mean it wouldn't surprise me we wound up
32:24
having a gray wolf that we had
32:26
collared the Upper Peninsula that walked to Missouri.
32:29
Yeah.
32:29
Yeah, So I mean we'll.
32:31
That suck across the Mississippi.
32:33
Yeah, I mean it crossed a hell
32:35
of a lot of territory between.
32:36
Do you think it ran on a bridge ice swim.
32:39
That's a big swim.
32:40
It could be a big swim, but you know,
32:44
who knows, you know, whether it probably
32:46
you know they can swim, well, we know that, and
32:50
we know they cross ice bridges whenever they're
32:52
ice dams, and we know we
32:54
know they'll cross bridges
32:57
too, you know, when they when it's low activity
32:59
and the rest of us.
33:00
So, but.
33:03
We've had we've had wolf sightings
33:05
in the Northern Lower Peninsula during heavy
33:08
freeze over you know, across across
33:10
the ice.
33:10
Yeah.
33:11
Yeah, and so they come across the ice. We just
33:13
haven't been able to see find a dinner
33:15
or anything, you know, in the Northern Lower
33:17
while I was still there. So it
33:19
doesn't surprise me. I mean, we've had black bear
33:21
in southern Michigan for well
33:24
thirty years now.
33:25
Yeah, we've got a lot of black bears in
33:27
central and northern Michigan.
33:28
You know, we do, we do.
33:32
The wolf was killed by a.
33:35
U.
33:35
The wolve's killed by a This is odd.
33:37
Was killed by a guided coyote hunter. There
33:40
was a guy on a guided coyote hunt killed
33:45
an eighty seven pound gray
33:48
wolf. They're holding
33:50
the body. You know, grey wolves are federally
33:52
protected Yeah, in
33:54
there and they're holding
33:57
the body for ANEE cropsy, and I think someone said,
33:59
I think that we'll find that it was shot, but
34:03
also checking its parasite
34:05
load and maybe try to get some idea where it
34:07
came from.
34:08
Yeah, they'll probably do DNA testing on.
34:10
It too, I'm sure DNA
34:13
database, right, so they can tell who's breeding
34:15
with who and where the kids
34:17
go.
34:18
Before the show started, you and I talked about another
34:20
Michigan thing I'd like you to speak
34:22
to, and you said you were disappointed on it. I've
34:25
communicated with folks
34:29
from Michigan Nited conservation clubs on this. Is
34:31
that that explain how
34:34
coyote management just changed in
34:37
Michigan?
34:37
Well, the Commission Natural
34:39
Resources Commission just voted
34:41
to close down the coyote season for several
34:44
months of the year. Up until now, coyotes
34:46
have been legal to be taken at any time.
34:49
But how far back does that go?
34:52
Oh, let's see. I
34:54
probably we
34:56
probably made that change in the
34:58
eighties or nineties as
35:00
coyotes moved into southern Michigan
35:02
and populations, we really
35:04
saw a big increase across you
35:07
know, most of Michigan and across most
35:09
of the Midwest coyote populations
35:12
took off and people were
35:14
seeing damage from them, depredation,
35:17
and so with that we
35:19
opened up, you know, the ability to take
35:22
coyotes just about any
35:24
time, all year round, and so
35:26
this shuts it down for a period of the year.
35:28
Now here's let me give you my two different
35:30
ways of looking at it. One hand.
35:33
On one hand, I had a hard time getting worked
35:35
up about it the change because
35:38
I was sinking to myself. They
35:43
are at they are pursued
35:48
as a fur bear by travers,
35:51
okay, travers and hunters, and
35:53
if you go back any length of time, I mean
35:55
before the real biggest population explosion
35:58
in the South, I mean they were just like a state
36:00
people for bear and we're
36:02
viewed as such.
36:03
Right, that's true?
36:04
Uh, Red Fox, Oh,
36:08
what season opens October fifteenth,
36:10
whatever the hell it is. There's a season raccoon.
36:12
Depending on where you're at in the state, you might have
36:15
a November one opener
36:17
on raccoon.
36:20
Quick content, Well, we have a beaver, beautiful
36:23
coyote hide
36:26
oh in in prime condition at
36:29
like seven hundred and fifty bucks on the auction
36:31
house oddities.
36:32
Right now, yep, right off this wall.
36:34
But to the point that you
36:37
were making. It's taken during
36:39
a season where that hide is
36:41
prime prime, it's it's full
36:43
of for because it's cold out December
36:46
January.
36:46
Is that yours from Montana?
36:48
It's mine from Montana, from the winter
36:50
season, from the wall to the studio.
36:53
It makes you realize that one of those is seven to fifty.
36:55
Good chunk of money.
36:56
Right now they're one, But there's
36:58
there's are there?
37:00
Crianzy canna start now?
37:01
I'm going to start.
37:03
There's a time in the season
37:05
where that high does not prime
37:08
because it's warm and it's
37:10
much more thin, and it would not command
37:12
the same amount of value on like an open
37:14
fur market.
37:15
Yes, and so I won't argue
37:17
with you there. You don't want
37:20
two points, Okay, all right? Number one?
37:22
That's the number one point. I couldn't get
37:24
worked up about it because of that. But here's
37:26
what I do get worked up about, because
37:28
I do get worked out about it of when
37:33
when they start, when people start changing
37:35
rules, and I don't necessarily agree with why they
37:38
changed it, Meaning if it had been
37:40
the trappers or hunters
37:42
or the fur people saying
37:44
what gives why
37:47
are you guys killing kyot's in the spring
37:50
when it's with pop
37:52
season and then they're not worth anything than anyone
37:54
anyways, why not leave them for people
37:56
that that that wanna you
37:59
lie or make a few bucks on them
38:02
later in the year. But so
38:06
in your explanation of this, who was
38:08
pushing for the change, like was it coming from
38:11
them or no?
38:12
It was not coming from the hunters and the trappers,
38:15
So you know it was coming from individuals
38:17
who do not like the idea of year round
38:19
killing of coyotes, and
38:22
I think the commission was uncomfortable with that.
38:26
But like you said, you held
38:28
the same opinion I do. It's
38:30
not coming from the segment that wants
38:32
to have that population managed
38:36
for maximum value out there.
38:39
It's being taken because we don't like
38:41
the thought of taking coyotes
38:43
at that time of year. So what's happening now
38:46
is for individuals who have chickens
38:48
or individuals who who are
38:50
out there and have deprivation issues.
38:53
Now they've got to go through getting a permit
38:55
in order to take those animals
38:57
out of season, and I assume they'll
38:59
be able to do it. But every time you do that, you're
39:02
you're tying up a biologist time
39:04
and energy to issue a permit for
39:07
what had been going on where
39:09
they could be actively managing some habitat
39:12
so that you would have better habitat
39:15
on the landscape, you'd have better population
39:17
management.
39:18
You know, it's and it's a species that
39:20
we really can't Yeah, it's put
39:22
a dent down.
39:23
No, it's super abundant, and so
39:26
you know, let's be realistic
39:29
about it. You know,
39:31
it's it's one of those situations
39:33
where people might not like the thought of it,
39:35
but it's it's part of reality
39:38
that coyotes do get in trouble, they
39:40
do cause depredation issues
39:42
for people out there.
39:45
Doug Durren points out correctly,
39:48
so that the
39:50
pro argument for year round coyote
39:52
hunting is it's a superabundant resource,
39:57
and the anti argument
40:00
it overlaps with that also where
40:02
it's like it's a superabundant
40:04
resource and
40:07
hunting hasn't been proven to dent that resource,
40:09
So why are you hunting it? Because
40:12
hunting isn't managing the population.
40:15
Whatever you're doing is not working, right, I
40:17
can see that are Yeah, Yeah, that's
40:20
one of the that's like a little bit of a tongue twister
40:22
when it comes to coyotes is
40:26
you'll often have people
40:28
point out that that with
40:32
when you're hunting coyotes, you'll
40:35
offset pack dynamics
40:39
and it'll actually lead to fragmentation
40:41
and more put production, meaning you'd
40:43
have this this hierarchy that had some
40:45
sort of limit on who's reproducing.
40:48
And then as you if you kill dominant
40:50
animals, you cause these like splintering factions
40:53
and it generates more put production. So
40:58
kind of being a smart ass, you might say,
41:00
well, if you love coyotes, why
41:05
would you not want kyote hunting
41:07
because you love coyotes and it seems to be
41:09
really making a lot more of them,
41:12
you know, meaning I love deer. If
41:14
I found that there was some thing hunters were doing that
41:16
was like producing tons of giant bucks,
41:18
I would be like, please continue,
41:22
let's continue this because I love these giant
41:24
bucks. But they're saying, like I love kyotes,
41:26
don't kill kyos because it just makes more coyotes,
41:29
which is, like I said, it's an intellectual tongue twister.
41:32
I think it's less they love coyotes
41:34
and they don't love the idea of killing.
41:36
K Yeah, I think so too. And
41:39
it's not just coyotes, it's canines. I mean
41:41
we see it with the wolf population too. We've
41:44
listed in d lifts listed wolves
41:47
over and over again in Michigan
41:49
and the western Great Lakes population. And
41:52
you know, the solution when
41:54
we had depredating or when we had
41:56
problem wolves that were getting in and causing
41:59
problems, when we couldn't do lethal
42:01
take, and there was a time when we couldn't,
42:04
was to trap those wolves and
42:06
move them. And where
42:08
are you.
42:08
Moving them, Colorado?
42:11
You're moving them into the territory of another
42:13
pack where.
42:15
They're going to get brutally.
42:19
It's a brutal death sentence.
42:21
You know.
42:22
I think, what interesting
42:25
thing we just just saw it with this uh
42:28
wolf that that got killed in southern
42:30
Michigan is the
42:34
success of the anti
42:37
killing of wolf party is the
42:41
death of an individual animal is
42:45
a paper thin degree away
42:48
from the extirpation of the species as
42:50
a whole. So when you talk to
42:52
somebody, well they just killed the wolf, they're going to kill all
42:54
the wolves. Where it's like you
42:56
just whacked a white tailed deer with your bumper
42:59
for the seventh time this year. That
43:03
doesn't equate to killing all the white tails.
43:05
No, And
43:07
those charismatic species are
43:12
special.
43:13
So who you going to vote for for president?
43:19
When you when you were at when you were Charisma,
43:22
when you were at when
43:24
you ran the the.
43:27
Fishing Game Department in Michigan. In
43:32
a role like that, how do you grab like in
43:34
a role like that, how do you how do you how
43:37
do you got to handle partisan politics?
43:39
Well, you know, first of all, is a
43:42
as a state employee, which I was.
43:44
You've got to be real careful. You can't get engaged
43:46
in partisan politics. You can't do you
43:49
know, you can't do partisan fundraisers
43:51
that tie your name into
43:55
you know, advocating for one party or
43:57
one candidate or another. You've got to be
43:59
really careful with the Hatch Act
44:01
that you don't engage in
44:04
in advocating for certain issues
44:07
that go to the public.
44:08
Do you stop did you just do you stop
44:10
voting?
44:11
No?
44:11
You still vote?
44:12
No?
44:12
I still vote, Yeah, And I vote. I
44:15
vote primaries the whole nine
44:17
yards and always
44:20
have always will. You know, it's it's
44:22
my right to help decide who
44:24
gets elected. And I
44:27
think everybody should engage and
44:29
vote how they feel most you know, the
44:32
candidates that best represent their
44:34
views.
44:35
But you keep quiet about it. Yeah, you
44:37
know when you're in when you're in wildlife management
44:39
at the state level.
44:40
Yeah, you really can't. You know, well,
44:44
I'll be honest with you. I worked for both Republican
44:46
and Democratic administrations, and
44:49
you know, it's tough because there's a lot of fundraising
44:52
that goes on as you get into campaigns
44:54
and get ready for election years, and you and
44:56
you wind up happening to
44:58
be very careful. I was. I was
45:01
lucky. I had a commission that helped do fundraising,
45:04
you know, for gubernatorial elections
45:06
when it was expected that cabinet members would
45:08
do that, which I was a cabinet member. But
45:11
as you know, as an employee, I can't
45:13
do that. I can't get into the partisan so
45:16
very much bipartisan you try and work with
45:19
both parties. Unfortunately,
45:21
that middle ground is disappearing
45:24
and it's it's hard. And I tend
45:27
to be a moderate in my political views, you know,
45:29
I step on both sides of the aisle.
45:31
I tend to be fiscally conservative and a little more
45:33
liberal on some of the social issues, and
45:36
so between those trying
45:38
to find that common ground. You
45:40
know, it's really hard
45:43
because the parties have We've lost the
45:46
we've lost the conservative Democrats
45:48
and the and the more liberal Republicans.
45:51
They're just fading away.
45:54
Yeah, I
45:57
wanted something spicier in that, Steve.
45:58
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I'm not. I'm
46:01
not frustrating anything you're saying. I just I
46:03
feel that they're faded away. They're
46:06
faded away from the
46:08
areas where you hear from people.
46:13
I think they're faded away in our elected
46:15
representation because you
46:18
know, yeah, I don't
46:20
think you know. And I think we hang
46:22
with people that tend to share our views. You
46:24
know, they share our activities. So I
46:26
agree with you. I think there are a lot of folks out there
46:29
that are like me. You know, when I
46:31
talk to folks, they they express
46:33
similar views. And I don't
46:35
think it's just because they're trying to impress me that
46:37
we're so much alike. I think they probably
46:39
do. But both parties
46:42
have taken over so such
46:46
non overlapping issues. It
46:48
makes it really difficult.
46:50
I hang with people that share my activities,
46:53
but then not
46:56
the views.
46:57
Oh, I will agree with you there.
46:59
Yeah, some of my dear dear
47:01
friends I feel have some just ridiculous
47:03
viewpoints. I
47:06
forgive him it because they like to
47:08
fish.
47:11
Well.
47:11
It mixed for interesting conversations.
47:14
And the older I get them more Now when I hear one,
47:16
I don't even like I used
47:18
to be like I'd want to argue it. No,
47:21
No, I'm just like, that's funny.
47:25
Once you start that argument, it's ending the argument
47:28
that becomes the problem.
47:29
Yeah, no, I look for I
47:32
look for. I sort of am running this
47:34
thing in my head. I was like, when
47:37
you cut all the bullshit out, I
47:40
think a good person, and
47:42
you know, I'm like, yeah, man, they're a great person.
47:45
Well do I trust them? Do I trust them
47:47
to leave the country or the state, or to
47:49
make to make wise decisions?
47:52
Yeah? But then am I going to go ask them
47:54
where I think where they think COVID
47:56
came from or whatever? Now like I might ask
47:59
where that fish they call came from? So
48:03
in the so now right
48:05
like you you've ran, you ran
48:07
a big national conservation
48:11
organization which everybody's heard of, Nation Wild
48:13
Turkey Federation. You're at the helm right
48:15
now of another federal policy conservation
48:18
group TRCP.
48:20
Yep uh,
48:24
How does an organization? How do these organizations
48:27
handle the partisan question? Meaning,
48:30
here we are, we're coming up on an election
48:32
cycle, which I feel like it's already been going on for
48:34
three years, but it's it's
48:36
I guess starting, it started starting.
48:39
It's gonna heat up, it's gonna be the most well, we're gonna
48:41
have the most expensive.
48:42
It's just going to be a wonderful year.
48:43
We're gonna have the most expensive presidential election
48:46
ever. And I don't know if that really says anything
48:48
about that just might say
48:50
something about the fact that every four years it's more
48:52
expensive. I don't know, most expensive,
48:54
hotly contested.
48:55
There are some records that I don't
48:57
really pay much at times
49:00
too, and when everything is like the most expensive
49:02
we've had yet, I think that's sort of a function.
49:04
Of advertising
49:07
expensive. In four years, it'll be the most expensive.
49:10
It's every everyone has been the most expensed.
49:12
I don't think we're going get to a point in my adult life where
49:14
we're like, man, this election is half the cost of last
49:16
one, the least expensive election we ever
49:18
had.
49:19
I think though, in state politics,
49:22
especially some of these western
49:24
states that do not have large
49:27
populations comparatively, that's
49:29
where those those numbers matter. Like I look
49:31
at the amount of cash that's going to be spent and
49:34
is being spent on the governatorial race
49:36
right now relative
49:39
to our size, Like the
49:41
dollars per person, the dollars per
49:43
person, and it's and they're going to spend
49:45
it. Yeah, it's dollars, yes,
49:48
not proportions, not fractions of dollars. And
49:50
they're going to spend it, which means we
49:53
are going to get robo calls,
49:56
texts in you know,
49:58
just like those political ads are going
50:00
to be served to us every which
50:03
way possible for in an
50:05
increasing manner like it does
50:08
not bode well for the mental health
50:10
of Montana's Now.
50:12
No, when Davy Crockett was
50:14
running for Congress, he would do a little
50:16
thing where if you came down and voted for him,
50:19
you'd get a shot of whiskey. You
50:23
could with the money they're spending, you could they could hand
50:25
out bottles of whiskey.
50:27
Yeah, it is.
50:31
Expensive, and and elections
50:33
and campaigns have gone to micro targeting,
50:36
so they've segmented.
50:38
You know.
50:38
They can tell now how
50:41
you vote. You know, even if you're in a state that you
50:43
don't have to declare your party, they
50:45
can tell by your voting record what
50:47
you when you vote, which party
50:50
you're most likely to vote for, and
50:52
they know, you know, is it
50:55
you know, are you a big fan of police protection
50:58
or not? Are you where
51:01
do you stand on right to life. They have all that
51:03
information. So when they go out and start walking
51:05
for candidates, knocking doors, which
51:08
they do in hotly contested areas,
51:10
they're pulling literature that
51:13
pertains to your interest.
51:15
That's really interesting you bring it up because the other day
51:17
one of the we had a Senate a
51:19
representative from a Senate candidate
51:23
knock on the door wanting
51:26
to speak to my wife. And
51:28
when I informed him that she wasn't there, I
51:30
thought, well, now I'm going to get the pitch. He
51:34
just walked off.
51:35
That's amazing.
51:36
He knew, he knew who he.
51:38
Was there, he knew who he was there to
51:40
talk to.
51:41
That's right.
51:43
So as you look at this, as you look at
51:45
the landscape, like, how do you guys, how does
51:47
the game work? Because here at TRCP
51:50
yep uh speak
51:53
from that seat or the NWTF seat whatever, no
51:55
matter what administration comes in, you
51:58
need to come. You're gonna need to go to the administration,
52:01
right or to appointees
52:03
or however, you're going to need to go there
52:05
and and and say,
52:08
uh, let's
52:10
work together.
52:11
That's right.
52:12
So uh, but
52:14
you can't you can't make a big bet
52:16
in one direction and then when they
52:19
lose you'd be like, I guess we're out of the game for four
52:21
years.
52:21
Well you can't.
52:22
So you're what are you doing? Like, how are
52:24
you? How are you doing this?
52:25
Well, a couple of things.
52:26
You know.
52:26
First, we and others in the conservation
52:29
community, we being TRCP, sit
52:32
down and identify our policy
52:35
objectives. What are real priorities for us,
52:37
you know, for the next administration, be it Biden
52:40
to be at Trump too, and
52:43
write those up so that we can share those
52:45
with those those campaigns,
52:48
because you're this next year is
52:50
they're campaigning, they're forming their policy
52:52
planks for their administration. By
52:54
the time they they have
52:57
identified candidates for those cabinet
52:59
posts, they will identify people
53:02
based on some of the objectives they want to achieve.
53:04
So we want to get into them before they're elected,
53:07
and we do that with both parties. We
53:10
share those information. We try and go over
53:12
that information with those campaigns so
53:15
they understand why why it's
53:17
important to us. And then
53:19
as we move forward and you have
53:21
an election and administration comes
53:24
on board, you need to get in there and
53:26
build relationships. You won't
53:28
always agree with everything. It doesn't matter
53:30
what the administration is, you're going
53:32
to disagree on certain things. But you
53:34
need to have a working relationship and
53:37
you build that trust that they will
53:39
share information on what's coming out so
53:42
that you can prepare for it. You can look for it.
53:45
You can let them know where you see
53:47
that's going to be problematic, that it
53:50
hasn't been well thought out. You
53:52
can ask them
53:54
to hold it over for more comment so that
53:56
you can they can get a more robust view
53:59
on some of the issues that you think are have
54:02
been not taken into consideration,
54:06
or even hold off on a rule or piece
54:09
of legislation that you think is bad for it.
54:12
And by
54:14
doing that, you try and build that working relationship
54:16
and trust with that administration, and
54:19
then you know you're careful in
54:21
terms of being true to your
54:24
positions, so that if you disagree
54:27
with something, you do it in a manner where you don't
54:29
surprise them. You know, it's
54:31
okay to disagree on stuff, but nobody
54:33
likes being surprised, So let them know
54:35
why you don't like it, and bring
54:39
the information on why you think it hasn't
54:41
been well thought out. Make the ask, and
54:43
then if you have to do editorials or
54:46
sign on letters or you know,
54:49
come out strongly on it, they know they
54:52
know that you don't agree with it.
54:54
They knew it was going to happen. New to
54:57
thinking on it.
54:57
Yep.
54:58
What do you run? You
55:01
talk about like you have your plan for the next administration.
55:04
You have to run like parallel two
55:06
paths, right, because you might be looking at
55:08
like let's say you're looking at you're
55:11
talking about Biden too, Okay with
55:14
that, you'd say, well, there's
55:17
a clearer pathway
55:19
to climate issues, there's
55:21
a clearer pathway to wildlife
55:24
overpasses through infrastructure
55:26
spending, right yep.
55:28
But there was in the Trump administration too, Is
55:30
that right?
55:30
Yeah?
55:31
Trump administration was very supportive
55:33
of those migration corridors and
55:35
they actually dedicated some funding to it. So
55:38
both administrations are on that. But
55:41
like Biden, we're looking at alternative
55:44
energy. But the BLM
55:46
solar plan, this is one that we have an editorial
55:48
coming out on Joel's Gutten editorial on it.
55:51
We're a bit concerned with Church with what
55:53
they're identifying in terms of
55:55
placement in those migration corridors
55:57
for solar do.
55:58
You might talk to a lot of Idaho folks
56:00
who are real, real fire out because the BLM
56:03
plan in Southwest Idaho uy
56:06
he downwhere Snort got bit. But there's
56:08
also California big horn sheep super
56:11
like the genetics for like that really
56:14
wide ass mule deer buck that
56:16
down in that country, and big old
56:18
pronghorn sage grouse. It's
56:21
a very sensitive area.
56:22
We're not opposed to alternative energy by
56:24
any stretch of the imagination. I mean, we need
56:26
to move into alternative energy. We just
56:28
want it to be carefully thought out. You
56:30
know, we need we need working
56:33
landscapes that provide great habitat
56:36
but also provide you know, clean water,
56:38
clean air, food that we like to
56:40
enjoy an energy and so, but
56:42
it's about doing the pre work
56:45
to make sure it's being placed in the appropriate
56:48
locations that aren't going to have big,
56:51
big ramifications for some of the species
56:53
that we hold near and dear.
56:55
And I think there's a huge misconception that if
56:57
you're supportive of alternative
57:00
energy, that you're supportive
57:03
of it anywhere. And I think,
57:05
like from someone who as
57:07
a former TIERCP staffer, like the some
57:12
of the like the sessions I remember
57:14
of people really hand ringing and pulling their hair
57:16
out or looking at maps of solar
57:19
placement, and like there's people
57:21
on the ground working for you know that we're supportive
57:23
of alternative energy, but recognize
57:26
the threat and the danger of citing it improperly.
57:29
And so I think like there's a
57:31
lot of back and forth. If you follow the discourse
57:34
about you know, it's either one way
57:36
or the other way, and there's people on the ground
57:39
that are really diligently thinking
57:41
about how do we stop this in places where it's
57:43
going to have a huge impact on wildlife and how
57:46
do we do it responsibly?
57:48
And we can have both. I mean that's
57:50
the thing when you look at the acreage requirements,
57:52
we have more enough acreage outside those corridors.
57:55
Now there might be other species and concerns
57:57
or landscape characteristics, historical
58:01
significance, you know, a range of issues,
58:04
but nonetheless we need to
58:06
take into account these really critical
58:08
areas. We saw the same thing in
58:10
Michigan with wind power. You
58:12
know, when we were putting up wind turbines the
58:15
areas they had the greatest wind potential
58:17
where right where birds migrated,
58:20
and it was that's going
58:22
to be problematic. I mean, if you're killing birds
58:25
like crazy when they're and we got wind
58:27
turbines located all down on the east side
58:29
of the state, which is a major
58:32
flyway corridor for migratory birds.
58:35
That's a problem, you know, so we you
58:38
know, in that situation, it was about
58:40
pulling the right expertise together, mapping
58:42
it out and looking at those
58:44
wind maps and looking at that where
58:47
those migration corridors were, and finding
58:49
solutions to it. So you're placing alternative
58:52
energy where it's going to be beneficial
58:55
and not harmful to those species.
58:58
Let me back up on the thing, and
59:00
I'm not trying to drive you to give a drive
59:03
you to give an answer you're not comfortable with, but I'm
59:06
just not clear on it. Yeah, we
59:09
talk about this this like
59:11
administration planning. Do
59:15
do you develop two or do you develop
59:18
one? And like you develop one plan for
59:20
the next four years and you're presenting it to
59:22
each campaign.
59:23
No, we do two. I
59:25
mean, for one thing, parties talk different
59:28
language, They use different
59:30
phraseology, even though they might have
59:34
the same issue, but they talk
59:36
about it in different terms. And so you
59:38
want you want the particular
59:41
party that you're going towards
59:43
to embrace this and use it. I
59:45
mean, you want it to be their recipe
59:47
book coming out, So you want it
59:49
to be put in terms that resonate
59:53
with other parts of that
59:55
party plank and what they're doing, and
59:58
so and there, there's and
1:00:00
elements are going to be more attractive to one
1:00:02
party over the other.
1:00:05
They just are.
1:00:06
I mean, you know, by and large, you'll
1:00:08
see more emphasis put on renewables
1:00:10
with the Democratic Party, and
1:00:15
security with oil security that's
1:00:17
talked about more in Republican Now.
1:00:19
In reality, we just we've
1:00:22
produced more oil and gas in this country
1:00:24
with each administration despite the party,
1:00:27
in recent years, is that right,
1:00:29
Yep, it's been ramping up.
1:00:31
I get a record high, right, yeah, in terms of oil
1:00:33
produced in the US.
1:00:35
And people don't recognize
1:00:37
that, but it's true. We have as part of
1:00:39
our national security plan.
1:00:41
Gotcha, I understand what you're saying with tailoring
1:00:44
it in that.
1:00:45
Yeah.
1:00:45
And there also and there's probably cases where you're
1:00:47
gonna there's probably cases where you're
1:00:49
going to drive at there's
1:00:53
probably cases where you're you're asking for the same
1:00:56
thing, but you're phrasing it as a different priority.
1:00:58
Yeah.
1:01:00
There was also issues you
1:01:02
know, we tend to the Republican Party tends
1:01:04
to be a little more states rights. Then
1:01:06
the Democratic Party looks for national
1:01:08
solutions on those issues.
1:01:11
So you know, that's another way that
1:01:13
you're taking a look at it. You know, during
1:01:15
the Trump administration, we saw a nice
1:01:17
expansion and hunting and fishing on national
1:01:20
refuge lands. And not
1:01:23
only did they do that, but speaking as
1:01:25
a state director, one of the things I really liked
1:01:27
is they put out a mandate
1:01:30
with that the regulations were
1:01:32
going to be as close to the state regulations
1:01:34
as they could be. So before
1:01:36
you had if you were going to hunt on
1:01:40
you know, refuge land, you might have different shell
1:01:42
limits, you might have different days of the week
1:01:44
that there was hunting, you might have all
1:01:46
kinds of different requirements that were a little
1:01:49
different season requirements
1:01:51
than what you had at the state on the state
1:01:53
land. And that just gets complex,
1:01:56
you know that, I know that, and so
1:01:58
they tried to simplify that bring
1:02:00
the federal lands closer in
1:02:03
alignment with the state regulations.
1:02:15
Do you feel is there any rumor
1:02:18
or anything around would
1:02:22
Trump return to Barnhardt as his
1:02:24
Interior secretary? Barnhart
1:02:27
Bernhart, Sorry, it was David?
1:02:29
Is that David?
1:02:30
Yeah?
1:02:31
I don't know.
1:02:32
Hey, I do know that David has
1:02:34
stayed very engaged in natural resource
1:02:36
issues, and you
1:02:39
know, he was very loyal to Trump throughout
1:02:42
the administration and even afterwards. So you
1:02:45
know, I I don't know, but I would assume
1:02:47
he'll have some role in the administration.
1:02:50
I heard a a
1:02:54
person very involved in conservation.
1:02:56
I'm not trying to be like, you know, secret
1:02:59
about someone, Uh take
1:03:01
a private conversation and apply it to someone, but
1:03:04
someone very involved in conservation had
1:03:07
said to me that what they what they liked
1:03:09
about Trump's Interior secretary
1:03:12
Part two, the second Interior Secretary,
1:03:15
was that he would save you a lot of time by
1:03:20
saying, uh, buddy,
1:03:23
you're not going to get anywhere on this with me, and
1:03:26
it would allow you to focus on the areas where
1:03:28
he said, let's have a conversation and
1:03:31
would tell you what's going to happen.
1:03:34
Yeah, and then and then stick with that.
1:03:36
Yeah.
1:03:37
And he said it was it just was. It was
1:03:39
efficient. Yeah,
1:03:41
I mean to to to spend time and resource
1:03:43
there because you never wound up being that you wasted a
1:03:45
bunch of time on something that you didn't
1:03:47
know that all of a sudden you're gonna read the newspaper that things
1:03:49
went in the direction you didn't anticipate.
1:03:51
He was an honest broker in terms of telling
1:03:54
you where issues were going if
1:03:56
there was already a thought on it, so and
1:04:00
and he he had researched issues
1:04:02
also, so he had a pretty good handle on
1:04:05
a lot of the conservation issues out there
1:04:08
in that administration. You
1:04:11
know, one of the things people probably don't realize
1:04:14
is a lot of the staff support
1:04:16
that comes in are the
1:04:19
same folks. So you'll have administrations
1:04:23
where you know a particular
1:04:25
individuals in the administration they're
1:04:27
a staff person, and you
1:04:29
might switch parties for four years or
1:04:32
eight years, but then you'll bring
1:04:34
back a lot of those people that had worked
1:04:36
during the previous Republican or Democratic
1:04:39
administration because they kind of
1:04:41
know the party priorities. And
1:04:43
also they are very helpful in
1:04:45
getting new candidates
1:04:47
and new administrations in place
1:04:51
and off to an effective
1:04:54
start to move that agenda forward,
1:04:57
because it's it's hard, especially
1:05:00
if somebody comes in from outside government.
1:05:03
You've got to make an awful lot of appointments,
1:05:05
You've got an awful lot to do, to
1:05:08
have executive orders written, and we've
1:05:10
all seen there are more
1:05:12
and more things being done by executive authority
1:05:15
now and administrations
1:05:17
kind of flip flop and reverse
1:05:19
each other's executive order right out
1:05:22
of the gate. And they do that by bringing
1:05:24
back people who are knowledgeable, know how
1:05:26
to write executive orders, and are
1:05:28
familiar with the topic and have
1:05:31
experience in it.
1:05:32
We recently had a guest on talking about offshore
1:05:35
wind offshore
1:05:38
when you know electriacy generation, how
1:05:41
do you yeah, wind power, wind power.
1:05:44
At the end of the interview, I said, so, you
1:05:46
know, when Trump wins in November,
1:05:49
where is all this sit And
1:05:52
he didn't have a great answer, but I felt
1:05:54
like you could spend a lot of time working
1:05:56
on something if you weren't being
1:05:59
shrewd. You spend a lot of time working
1:06:01
on something and then just have the rug
1:06:03
ripped out from underneath you every
1:06:05
four years.
1:06:06
Oh yeah. And that's why administrations
1:06:09
work so hard to get re elected and have at
1:06:11
least an eight year runway, because
1:06:13
it takes, you know, it takes really
1:06:16
a couple of years to get administration in and
1:06:18
rolling, to get all your your appointments
1:06:21
confirmed and in there, and
1:06:24
start to implement that policy direction, and
1:06:26
by then you're into the next election cycle.
1:06:28
In your campaigning, the administration
1:06:30
is and so you
1:06:33
know, and and quite often what
1:06:35
we'll also see is at the end of the administration
1:06:38
that's when the promises that were made when
1:06:40
they came into office get run
1:06:43
through, and some of those, quite frankly,
1:06:45
can be quite ugly.
1:06:47
That's what I was going to ask is when, because
1:06:49
both candidates would be their their last term,
1:06:52
last four yep, right, So that's
1:06:55
typically when, as you just said, like
1:06:57
you get to capitalize on the earth
1:07:00
promises, some of the campaign promises
1:07:02
they got them elected in the first place, that's right, or
1:07:04
one that independent
1:07:07
constituency. Right, We're
1:07:13
like, is
1:07:15
there going to be such a restart if
1:07:18
Trump were to win? Would
1:07:20
it hinder that last
1:07:23
four years of getting ship done?
1:07:25
Oh?
1:07:26
Like as yours? Yeah? With
1:07:28
does the does the break? Does
1:07:32
the four year vacation
1:07:34
sabbatical interrupt
1:07:36
the momentum that you would have had your second
1:07:39
term momentum?
1:07:40
Yeah? Because what we saw right was
1:07:42
like I think, like clean
1:07:44
Water Act is always a great ping
1:07:47
pong ball, right, Like God
1:07:49
forbid we have somebody be like, yeah, some
1:07:51
of that was okay, so we're just gonna return
1:07:54
the pendulum to the middle, But instead
1:07:56
you watch that pendulum go yeah,
1:08:00
and it's it's.
1:08:01
We're seeing more more of that.
1:08:03
Yeah. Yeah, So like that's
1:08:05
what I'm I'm wondering, right, is like the
1:08:08
first two years are just going to be like knocking those
1:08:10
ping pong balls all the way back over to
1:08:13
one side.
1:08:14
Yeah, you know, yes, and no, I
1:08:16
mean they're gonna if a new administration
1:08:18
comes in, or even the current administration,
1:08:21
they're going to have some individuals who do not
1:08:23
you know, cabinet members and other appointees
1:08:26
under secretaries who will not persist
1:08:29
through the second term of the administration or
1:08:32
with a new administration, they'll have to name a
1:08:34
whole new cabinet and all those
1:08:37
other appointed positions, and quite
1:08:39
frankly, that takes a lot of time and
1:08:42
energy.
1:08:42
So they'll
1:08:46
or, as we've seen in the past, not appointing
1:08:49
positions.
1:08:50
Yeah, that's right, right, that's right. Not appointing
1:08:52
positions is also a tactic out
1:08:54
there, having interim
1:08:56
folks and acting folks.
1:08:58
That's an interesting tactic when you have divisions.
1:09:01
When you can't get somebody confirmed.
1:09:03
Well no, no, I mean that also, but when you just
1:09:05
have areas in which you're not that interested,
1:09:09
I think you'd like to see downsize it's
1:09:11
just the appointment, that's
1:09:14
right, and.
1:09:15
Leave lots of vacancies in the organization.
1:09:19
Is there.
1:09:22
Is there an area potentially
1:09:24
with say renewables
1:09:27
or energy production nationally.
1:09:31
UH that that both administrations
1:09:35
kind of have more of an intersection
1:09:38
or similar thinking on that you'd see
1:09:40
as that uh as
1:09:42
that issue might have
1:09:46
national security concerns for
1:09:48
example with solar or
1:09:50
offshore or well.
1:09:52
Both administrations have been ramping up,
1:09:54
you know, hydrocarbon production
1:09:57
in the United States, so we're more self sufficient
1:09:59
there. So that has been an
1:10:02
ongoing trend as we talked
1:10:04
about. You know, I
1:10:07
think yes and
1:10:09
no think. I think
1:10:11
you're gonna see both administrations
1:10:14
wanting to get into market based incentives
1:10:17
that are out there. I mean, we've got to be able
1:10:19
to make carbon part of the economy
1:10:22
in order to treat it effectively. This is
1:10:24
my two cents. I mean, it doesn't
1:10:26
make any sense to have national forests that are
1:10:28
going up in flames and burning
1:10:31
fiber and causing tremendous
1:10:33
degradation of habitats out there, rather
1:10:36
than removing some of that fiber,
1:10:39
mimicking natural processes and using
1:10:41
that fiber and actually
1:10:44
storing that carbon. So
1:10:46
we've got to find ways that we can rebuild
1:10:49
these local economies to have working landscapes.
1:10:51
And we've lost a lot
1:10:54
of that local rural economy. I mean,
1:10:56
we don't have mills in much
1:10:58
United States anymore in order to to even
1:11:01
handle that fiber. Part
1:11:03
of our problem with you
1:11:05
know, there's been concerns with prescribed fire
1:11:08
on the landscape because there have been a couple of fires
1:11:10
that have gotten away from the Forest Service
1:11:12
or state agencies that have been using it.
1:11:15
But are we're using
1:11:17
prescribed fire sometimes in cases
1:11:20
where it's very
1:11:22
different today than it used to be, where you know,
1:11:24
you might run fire through an oak savanna or
1:11:26
a pine savannah and one day, you
1:11:29
know what the conditions are going to be, we can
1:11:32
go out there and see what the humidity
1:11:34
is. We have good weather satellite
1:11:36
data. Now we've
1:11:39
got big piles of logs that we have no mill
1:11:41
to run it to. We've got no log haulers
1:11:44
to haul it too. So you've got this huge
1:11:46
pile of logs that are been cut and
1:11:49
they're just stacked on the landscape, and
1:11:52
we're using prescribed fire then to burn that pile
1:11:55
of logs. What happens to
1:11:57
that prescribe fire window? You know,
1:11:59
anybody's had bomb fire, you know, it goes
1:12:01
from a one day fire.
1:12:03
Eventually you're standing around being like, oh my gosh,
1:12:07
it's.
1:12:07
A multi day fire,
1:12:09
and then your chance of having
1:12:11
fire escape from that. You know, you have winds
1:12:14
come up in unexpected weather situations.
1:12:17
When you have a big, big inferno
1:12:20
going like that, you can't just kill it, you
1:12:22
know, and so it's very difficult.
1:12:24
You're talking about disposing of of
1:12:27
stuff from thinning operations because there's nowhere
1:12:29
to go, there's nowhere to use, there's no way to use it economically.
1:12:31
Yeah, it might be to you, so it just has to get
1:12:34
torched.
1:12:34
It might be a salvage cut that goes in. You might
1:12:36
have a severe ice storm that comes in and
1:12:39
closes roads and closes trails.
1:12:41
You need to get that down material
1:12:44
out of there. It might be win throw. I
1:12:46
mean, we have tremendous areas in the Upper
1:12:48
Peninsula and Lower Peninsula Michigan
1:12:51
where winds race across those lakes
1:12:53
and they will you know, certain
1:12:55
events will throw trees down.
1:12:57
Yeah, it's like an avalanche path on relative
1:13:02
you know.
1:13:02
Or it could be a thinning operation where you're degrading
1:13:05
that forest. You're getting so much fiber
1:13:07
and so much ladder fuel that's
1:13:10
creating fire damage, you know, fire hazard
1:13:13
and damage for the future of that forest.
1:13:16
So at that point you want to remove it, but
1:13:19
you know, you want to remove it and be able
1:13:21
to use that product if possible, And
1:13:24
that's where we need to rebuild that infrastructure
1:13:26
in some manner.
1:13:28
How do you as a as
1:13:30
a federal policy
1:13:32
organization or you know, or
1:13:35
a conservation group
1:13:37
with federal scope, national, national level scope,
1:13:41
how do you guys come in and uh, is
1:13:44
it okay to come in and weigh in on appointments?
1:13:48
Oh?
1:13:48
Yeah, I mean we're talking about like interior
1:13:50
secretary like that that an administration
1:13:53
when they when when when a when an administration
1:13:55
picks it's it's secretary
1:13:59
of the Interior. You're sort
1:14:01
of like looking at just
1:14:04
this hugely impactful appointment. It's
1:14:07
going to be that's going to be your enemy, that's
1:14:09
going to be your ally. Right?
1:14:13
Is it Is there a pathway
1:14:15
to come in and say, hey, that that choice ain't
1:14:18
gonna work.
1:14:20
Yes, there have been in the past with the
1:14:23
going in and saying, you know, this is just not an
1:14:25
appropriate appointment given you know what
1:14:27
this person has done previously or what they
1:14:30
are saying publicly on it, or we have
1:14:32
concerns about working with it.
1:14:34
But typically what we try and do
1:14:36
is way in early in terms
1:14:38
of the types of expertise
1:14:41
or major issues that we think are coming
1:14:44
up that that the administration
1:14:47
should look at and consider
1:14:49
for appointments out there. And quite
1:14:51
frankly, most administrations coming
1:14:54
in they ask key partner
1:14:57
groups out there, who do you know
1:15:00
good?
1:15:00
Yeah, so you get a chance,
1:15:03
you could like slide a resume over. Yeah,
1:15:07
are you are you up for that job?
1:15:08
No?
1:15:08
No, you're not.
1:15:13
No, But you know, I
1:15:16
went in and interviewed for Director
1:15:19
of the Fish and Wildlife Service years ago, and
1:15:22
that's how it was. I kept saying I wasn't interested
1:15:24
in it, and it was like, we really want to talk to
1:15:27
you, just come in and talk to us.
1:15:29
So I flew in, talked to him for a day
1:15:31
and told him who I thought would be really good, But
1:15:34
it wasn't me. You know, we needed to make
1:15:37
deep cultural change in that organization
1:15:39
at that time, and I really thought it needed to come
1:15:42
from somebody within the organization, and
1:15:46
and they did. That person
1:15:49
came in. Sam Hamilton came in and was very
1:15:51
effective while he was there. Unfortunately
1:15:53
he died of a heart attack lead
1:15:56
too early in life.
1:15:59
Uh, before
1:16:02
we start recording you're talking about we
1:16:07
were talking about when
1:16:09
you hit you uh,
1:16:13
you ran the you ran the DNR
1:16:16
in Michigan. And then later we're
1:16:18
asked would you like to be a commissioner, and
1:16:21
you felt that that was inappropriate
1:16:24
to have like a former, like a
1:16:27
former department head sitting
1:16:29
on the commission and having I
1:16:32
don't know, what's a confused power dynamic.
1:16:35
Well, I think it's difficult. I think it's difficult
1:16:38
for private organizations or
1:16:40
nonprofits to have their past CEO
1:16:42
sit on their border directors. Your border
1:16:45
directors is your boss, and
1:16:47
to have your predecessor be your boss puts
1:16:50
you in an uncomfortable situation when you know
1:16:52
there are key initiatives or changes
1:16:54
that person made and you're recommending something
1:16:57
different. I
1:17:01
didn't have to deal with that when I was director. I
1:17:03
didn't have any past directors. In fact, there haven't
1:17:06
been past directors on the commission before
1:17:08
until the person that followed
1:17:10
me was named on
1:17:12
the commission for a short time. And quite
1:17:15
frankly I talked to him about it. He said it was awful.
1:17:17
Oh okay, you know, and the groups try and
1:17:20
use you also, you
1:17:22
know, I get called now on issues
1:17:24
where the sportsman's groups don't
1:17:26
necessarily agree with the decision, and they want
1:17:29
me to come out and publicly weigh in on it. Oh
1:17:31
and you know, I'm
1:17:34
not so sure my opinion at this point is any more
1:17:36
important than anybody else's opinion out
1:17:39
there. But the other part of it is,
1:17:43
you know, I think those jobs are really tough,
1:17:45
and I don't want to make it tougher that
1:17:47
person that.
1:17:50
I was more bringing that up to tea up to another
1:17:53
thing, is you would said
1:17:56
before we started recording to day, you're talking about what
1:17:58
you're seeing in general. I'll
1:18:03
have you put in your own words, but like a general erosion
1:18:06
of commission authority?
1:18:11
Can can you explain? Can you real quick tell people,
1:18:14
you know, speaking from that you got fifty of
1:18:16
these things like what are commissions
1:18:18
and what do you mean by commission authority?
1:18:20
Well, commissions natural resources
1:18:22
commissions, and they sometimes are called fishing
1:18:24
game commissions, but typically they are appointed
1:18:27
positions appointed by the governor
1:18:30
and then they are the body that either hires
1:18:33
the director of the Department Natural Resources
1:18:35
or fishing Game or whatever it's called in that
1:18:38
state, or they
1:18:41
are the decision maker on hunting
1:18:44
and fishing regulations. So you've got
1:18:46
this this public commission
1:18:49
with appointed people to help
1:18:51
help insulate the departments
1:18:54
directly from the governor's office.
1:18:56
So even though you're part of the executive branch,
1:18:59
you know you don't. You have a little bit of buffer
1:19:01
in there. And they also
1:19:04
provide some real transparency because
1:19:06
typically those commissions don't
1:19:09
pass regulations, they don't hire directors
1:19:12
without public input. When I was hired,
1:19:14
my interview was televised, so
1:19:17
it was you know, it was a very
1:19:20
public process that went
1:19:22
through in terms of selection.
1:19:24
Did they ask what your spirit animal was?
1:19:25
No, they didn't ask what my spirit animal was.
1:19:28
They asked an awful lot of other questions, So I
1:19:30
got to tell you. And but
1:19:34
you know, that process of gathering
1:19:36
public input on various regulations
1:19:38
is really important, and we are seeing now
1:19:41
more and more directors
1:19:45
are selected not by the commission but by the
1:19:47
governor. They become gubernatorial appointments,
1:19:49
which occurred in Michigan when
1:19:52
I was there. I was the last commission appointed
1:19:54
and the first gubernatorial appointed director.
1:19:58
So the commission of the director, the governor
1:20:00
in the state passed an executive order that made
1:20:04
that appointment her appointment rather
1:20:06
than the commissions.
1:20:07
Because they just didn't like what they were getting from the
1:20:09
Commission because they wanted to be just like more an
1:20:12
instrument of the administration.
1:20:13
Like, what is the push I think, you
1:20:16
know, I think they you know, what I heard
1:20:18
was you want direct accountability of your
1:20:20
cabinet members. But I really think when
1:20:23
you get into office and
1:20:25
you name your cabinet, you want to
1:20:27
be able to name those cabinet members
1:20:30
so that they're all people that are affiliated
1:20:32
in helping move your agenda forward.
1:20:35
And what the second thing that has happened
1:20:37
with that, though, is the tenure
1:20:39
of agency directors has shortened.
1:20:41
Now the average tenures less than three years.
1:20:45
Well, it's hard to manage natural resources
1:20:47
that have you know,
1:20:49
long history lifespan, scientific
1:20:53
the whole nine yards on really
1:20:55
short rotation. So yes,
1:20:57
I hear governors want that direct accountability.
1:21:00
But having some some
1:21:04
transition and having directors
1:21:06
span various parties, it's
1:21:09
not all bad. It's
1:21:11
good, I mean in my opinion, and I
1:21:13
think having the Commission in there and
1:21:15
most of your commissions are required to be bipartisan,
1:21:19
so they have the call for in various states.
1:21:21
You know, commissioners either represent a geographic
1:21:24
location or they represent
1:21:27
political party.
1:21:28
Yeah, or or uh in
1:21:33
or factions of industry meaning
1:21:36
commercial guides and guides and outfitters,
1:21:38
commercial interests, agriculture.
1:21:41
You need where you're.
1:21:41
Trying to strive for some level. And I think that
1:21:44
and I've heard and
1:21:46
maybe it's just a tradition in Washington,
1:21:49
but regionality, Yeah, I
1:21:51
think you see specified regionality as well. Yeah, because
1:21:54
so many from the you know, west of the Cascades,
1:21:56
East of the Cascades, that's right.
1:21:59
Sorry, But with that, what we're seeing is those
1:22:01
commissions are both their authorities
1:22:04
getting nit back, you know, sometimes through
1:22:06
state law that you know, legislators
1:22:09
are trying to enact laws on
1:22:11
taking of game and fish species
1:22:14
or the method of take, and then the other way
1:22:16
is they're losing their authority to a
1:22:18
point, also a point
1:22:21
a point your director.
1:22:22
The director, Yeah, got him? And you
1:22:25
generally are uneasy
1:22:28
with this, I am.
1:22:29
I think it creates more partisan politics
1:22:31
into the natural resource
1:22:33
arena, and I think it creates
1:22:35
more of these shifts. And just like we talked
1:22:38
about with executive orders that swing so
1:22:40
far one way and then the other way, you
1:22:43
know, that's that you waste a lot of time and energy.
1:22:46
Yeah, like ladies and gentlemen, we're all
1:22:48
in on renewables. Then ladies
1:22:50
and gentlemen, we're all in on high.
1:22:53
Slow down the pendulum a little bit.
1:22:54
Yeah.
1:22:55
Uh, just I
1:22:57
got a last question for you that's a little more
1:23:00
oplicated, but uh, just an observation about
1:23:02
the wild pendulum swings
1:23:04
on. I mean, people like the bitch
1:23:06
about gridlock, but
1:23:09
I always like to remind folks that this is quite intentional.
1:23:14
You know, we could be like Venezuela.
1:23:17
You know, hey we're communists, and
1:23:20
then like a couple months later, hey we're ultra right,
1:23:24
Hey we're back to communists. I mean,
1:23:26
those are you know, when people bitch about gridlock,
1:23:28
I can have a.
1:23:28
Little effect on your bank account.
1:23:30
When people bitch about gridlock and all this, it's
1:23:32
like it's this is intentionally
1:23:36
constructed that we don't go down wild
1:23:38
ass that you can't harness
1:23:40
the moment and going wild directions
1:23:43
all the time. Right, And so I don't like, I
1:23:45
get aggravated about the things that I want
1:23:47
to happen that don't happen quickly. But in general,
1:23:50
it's like it's as
1:23:52
some stability.
1:23:53
The other people's stuff is going just as slow.
1:23:55
It's better. Yeah, So if I don't
1:23:58
get what I want and they don't get what they want, I
1:24:00
feel okay about it.
1:24:01
Our issues tend to do really well though,
1:24:03
during gridlock. So you know, here's the other
1:24:05
part of it is, we might get frustrated,
1:24:08
but we are usually highly
1:24:11
effective when Congress or state
1:24:13
legislatures cannot agree on issues.
1:24:16
Our conservation issues usually
1:24:19
do really well because.
1:24:21
You can be the awesome person who
1:24:23
says, hey, I got something that everybody
1:24:25
like, Yeah, exactly right.
1:24:28
There's no like hot button
1:24:31
social issue wrapped up into it.
1:24:32
Well, that's right. I mean in DNR,
1:24:35
we used to call ourselves the Department of Fun that
1:24:37
doesn't want to support the Department of Fun. I
1:24:39
mean, you have hunting, you have camping, you've got
1:24:42
timber industry, you've got fishing and
1:24:45
hunting and wildlife viewing. So
1:24:47
I mean, but most of
1:24:49
our legislation we work
1:24:52
in a bipartisan manner. Anyhow to
1:24:54
try and get things so that you
1:24:56
have both sponsors of bills on the right and
1:24:58
the left, and and introduce thos
1:25:01
and try and keep them fairly evenly matched.
1:25:03
So those we tend to be highly successful
1:25:06
during periods of gridlock when Congress
1:25:08
can't deal with the other stuff, and.
1:25:10
They need to have something that they
1:25:15
need to bring you. I supported
1:25:17
this bill.
1:25:19
That's right.
1:25:20
Uh, here's the one is here's one. It's more
1:25:22
complicated. It's not complicated. Answers is complicated
1:25:25
to ask.
1:25:27
Uh.
1:25:29
Everyone loves to talk to Gripe
1:25:31
about ballot box biology,
1:25:34
ballot box initiatives. And
1:25:36
also I find this is an area
1:25:38
that really accentuates a lot of hypocrisy.
1:25:41
Meaning I'm
1:25:44
very supportive of the ballot initiatives
1:25:46
that guarantee the right to hunt trap
1:25:48
and fish. Okay, So I'll
1:25:51
be like, hell, yeah, vote yes,
1:25:54
this is November for your
1:25:56
states right to hunt
1:25:58
fish. Okay. Then
1:26:00
the next time some a ballot initiative comes
1:26:03
up that I don't like, I'll be like, there you
1:26:05
go, damn it, ballot box
1:26:07
biology, right,
1:26:10
putting it to the voters. That's
1:26:12
not how you do it. But a minute ago, I was
1:26:14
just avid, you know what I mean. A minute ago, I was
1:26:16
just saying, Oh, you.
1:26:17
Can get the uninformed mass to vote
1:26:20
your way. It's a great thing.
1:26:22
So people love right, like
1:26:25
everybody complains about it, But they complain about
1:26:27
it only when there's a ballot box initiative
1:26:29
that they hate. And when
1:26:31
there's ones they support, they're getting out the vote.
1:26:33
Well, it's like people don't really complain about
1:26:35
judicial activism when the courts are
1:26:38
finding in their favor.
1:26:39
Sure, you know. Yeah, So
1:26:42
here's the question that's that was
1:26:44
just the observation. Is it really
1:26:47
is there more of this now than there
1:26:49
was? Or is it just always been this way? I mean,
1:26:51
is it really more ballot
1:26:53
box biology and ballot
1:26:56
box?
1:26:58
What what?
1:26:59
Wildlife?
1:26:59
Man?
1:27:00
Yeah?
1:27:00
I think we go through waves, to be honest
1:27:03
with you, I think there are periods. You
1:27:05
know, when I think back through my career, there were
1:27:07
periods where we had ballad
1:27:09
initiatives that we fought and that we
1:27:12
supported, and then you'll have a quiet
1:27:14
period for a while, and then it creeps
1:27:17
back up again. So it's usually when there's an action
1:27:19
and a reaction that's
1:27:21
out there and.
1:27:23
Oh, like, I'll show you that's
1:27:25
right, I'll give you a ball.
1:27:28
But we have seen some of the national
1:27:31
challenges towards hunting and fishing. We
1:27:33
have seen those been direct
1:27:35
campaigns that are now being fought at the state
1:27:38
level. So I think you see
1:27:40
more activity to
1:27:43
try and restrict and also
1:27:45
promote hunting and fishing at
1:27:48
that state level than we used to do. Where
1:27:51
it used to be, you know, we had more
1:27:53
national legislation and the rest of it, and
1:27:56
so there's more activism at that state level.
1:27:59
So that is thing. Yeah, I think so,
1:28:01
because you were saying earlier that big box,
1:28:04
all the giant big box and no one after
1:28:06
him might have been a bat might be faulty,
1:28:08
memory might be faulty. But the days
1:28:11
back when they weren't ballot
1:28:13
box initiating wildlife decisions is
1:28:15
new ish. Yeah, I you
1:28:18
know, it's expanded.
1:28:19
You know, I remember we had we had some
1:28:21
back in the seventies, but then really in
1:28:24
the nineties it really came alive and then we've
1:28:26
kind of seen it dining down and now it's
1:28:29
you know, we had periods
1:28:31
across the country where there was a big push to
1:28:34
to do ballot initiatives to protect
1:28:36
the right to hunt and fish, and now
1:28:39
you're seeing challenges again.
1:28:41
Yep.
1:28:42
So and we're seeing
1:28:44
a big push right now in several
1:28:47
states for trying to advocate
1:28:49
for these commissions to have appointments that
1:28:51
are non hunters and even anti
1:28:53
hunters, an angler.
1:28:55
Zoo keepers.
1:28:56
Yeah, we got a uh, everybody's
1:28:59
got an test in the state's wildlife, so
1:29:01
we need to have those interests represented on
1:29:04
the board. Unfortunately,
1:29:06
like that, never you never get
1:29:08
to ask the question, well are
1:29:11
there interests not being represented currently
1:29:14
by our current management plan? We
1:29:17
never get to ask that. So
1:29:19
what what is the impetus?
1:29:20
Right?
1:29:21
M hm?
1:29:23
Well, yeah, I mean they're managing far
1:29:25
more species that aren't one hundred
1:29:27
and fished than are
1:29:29
and have been for quite some time. Yeah,
1:29:34
let me give you one last question, and then these guys
1:29:36
might have a last question. You're not going to do the who are you voting
1:29:38
for? Again? How
1:29:41
do you handle that?
1:29:42
I'm voting for my daughter, she's running for county
1:29:44
commissioner?
1:29:49
Nepotism?
1:29:50
How do you handle that question? Let let let's let's roll play
1:29:52
for a minute. I'm uh okay,
1:29:55
I'm I'm uh running
1:29:58
for president okay. And
1:30:00
and some we're having a meeting about agenda.
1:30:03
He said, hey, I want to hear from the big conservation groups
1:30:05
about what you guys are thinking. And I'm crafting
1:30:07
my thing. And we finished out the meeting,
1:30:09
and and like you and I meet in the hallway
1:30:12
and I'm like, well, can I plan on your support this
1:30:14
November? Becky? Now
1:30:16
you do your part. I just did my part. Can
1:30:19
I plan on your support this November?
1:30:21
If it's a candidate that I was already planning
1:30:23
to support and I felt was the best candidate,
1:30:26
I would probably let that individual know that I was
1:30:28
going to support them personally.
1:30:37
First, I don't have your vote. I don't have
1:30:39
your votes to do that.
1:30:41
No, I'm still deciding, but at
1:30:43
this point I'm not leaning towards this.
1:30:45
But you know, that's what you'd say.
1:30:47
It depends on the situation.
1:30:50
If I was in representing
1:30:52
TRCP at the meeting, I wouldn't
1:30:54
answer it at all.
1:30:55
But how how okay, how
1:30:58
do you answer it? That's why I'm trying to the
1:31:00
role play here. We are, You're representing
1:31:02
TRCP, and I say I'd like to know that I could
1:31:04
count on your support this November. I'm just like,
1:31:07
how do you do it?
1:31:08
I'm interim CEO of the Theodore
1:31:11
Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, which is
1:31:13
a nonprofit. Legally, we cannot
1:31:16
support partisan candidates.
1:31:18
Hard argu trap me. Okay,
1:31:21
that's good, that's good. I'm just helping you rehearse
1:31:23
because this might happen to you. Oh, I know,
1:31:28
here's the last one. The last one I got from you, Where
1:31:31
should people Where
1:31:34
should people be paying the most attention in
1:31:37
the next four years If we're
1:31:39
talking about just conservation with a big
1:31:41
c right like not not local,
1:31:44
not necessarily local issues like oh they messed
1:31:46
with our elk management plan, but like big
1:31:50
picture your kids are going to feel the impacts
1:31:53
of this. Where should
1:31:55
people be paying attention?
1:31:56
Well, a couple of things I think they really need to
1:31:58
pay attention to. Number one one is we
1:32:00
talked about it earlier, those working landscapes.
1:32:03
As this country moves
1:32:05
into renewables and we
1:32:07
have more and more pressure on the landscape, livestock
1:32:10
and close proximity to wildlife in the
1:32:13
whole nine yards, we need to
1:32:15
make sure that we are planning for that and
1:32:18
putting together good overall policy
1:32:20
and policy direction that accommodates
1:32:25
both both renewable energy,
1:32:27
people, livestock, food
1:32:30
and wildlife, and great hunting
1:32:32
access out on the landscape and fishing.
1:32:36
The other part of it is, I
1:32:38
would say, on the accessibility issues
1:32:41
to making sure that our public lands remain
1:32:43
public and that the tools
1:32:46
that we have in the toolbox for incentivizing
1:32:48
private land management remain
1:32:51
there and remain effective. We're
1:32:53
trying to get a farm bill through. You guys
1:32:55
know, the last farm bill expired in
1:32:58
September of twenty three as one your
1:33:00
extension. It's going to expire again
1:33:02
in twenty four later
1:33:05
this year. And that is the biggest
1:33:07
piece of conservation legislation usually
1:33:10
that we ever pass. It's huge.
1:33:12
Sixty percent of these country is in private
1:33:14
land, and you
1:33:17
know that farm bell provides tremendous
1:33:19
incentives for people to farm
1:33:23
the best and leave the rest. You know, it's kind
1:33:25
of one of the catchphrases that we say out there,
1:33:27
but really helps people steward
1:33:30
that landscape and wildlife. They
1:33:33
don't recognize property boundaries.
1:33:36
I mean, the bottom line is we need great
1:33:38
public land management and we need great
1:33:40
private land management. And I
1:33:43
personally believe we need very good active
1:33:46
management. We can't just draw
1:33:48
a line around it, leave it alone
1:33:52
and call it good unless we're willing
1:33:54
to wait centuries for you
1:33:56
know, restoration after major wildfires
1:33:59
or you know, for big
1:34:02
storms and you know the huge
1:34:05
blowdowns and and you can't
1:34:07
even use that particular land
1:34:09
for a while.
1:34:11
Got it all
1:34:13
right? So thank you for sharing.
1:34:17
You want to ask vote for me November.
1:34:24
I will tell you you know what you
1:34:26
wouldn't do it for me. But I'm gonna tell you right now you can count
1:34:28
on my support, all right.
1:34:30
All right, I hope Terry's support.
1:34:36
Anything else, guys, thanks
1:34:38
for thanks for coming on and thanks for all the work
1:34:40
that you're doing.
1:34:41
My pleasure. We've got a great team at t r
1:34:44
c P, which you certainly know and and
1:34:46
all of you do, and they
1:34:48
do great work, and they and
1:34:50
they tackle the big problems, you know. I think
1:34:52
that's the thing that tr CP I feel
1:34:55
most strongly about. A lot of organizations play
1:34:57
offense or defense on law
1:35:00
some policies, but TRCP
1:35:02
really builds this think tank model
1:35:04
where they pull all the groups together and do
1:35:07
the energy to try and build good
1:35:09
policy direction and then build that campaign
1:35:12
from the ground up. That's pretty special
1:35:14
and it takes lots of time and effort.
1:35:17
Well, what, sorry, what do we gain
1:35:19
by supporting a group like TRCP,
1:35:21
Because it's not a membership organization.
1:35:23
No, it's not.
1:35:24
It's not a membership organization. Most
1:35:26
of our funding, about two thirds of it comes
1:35:29
through grants and foundations and
1:35:31
then personal donors and
1:35:34
family foundations that donate
1:35:36
on restricted revenue. But what
1:35:39
you're bringin from it I think is the
1:35:41
coalition pulling the organizations
1:35:44
together around
1:35:46
common ideas, big picture ideas,
1:35:49
and then doing the legwork to really
1:35:51
invest and figure out how we're going to solve
1:35:53
those problems.
1:35:55
Well, I appreciate the life
1:35:58
you've spent in conservation, and I appreciate
1:36:01
you're measured, rational,
1:36:05
well articulated perspectives on things.
1:36:07
And then well thank you sir.
1:36:09
Yeah, oh that'll that'll. This will inoculate
1:36:12
us from some of the nonsense
1:36:14
that we're going to hear between now, from
1:36:17
all directions it's between.
1:36:21
I know, I know it's it's going to be a
1:36:23
tough year in that regard. It really is going
1:36:25
to be a tough year.
1:36:26
Well, hang in there. Well, maybe after the election
1:36:29
you can come back and then tell us what you think.
1:36:30
No, I'm I'm hopeful after the election, I'm going
1:36:32
to be retired. That's
1:36:35
right, you re retired, retired, retired,
1:36:38
I get it right.
1:36:38
This time we'll pipe you in like Susie
1:36:41
or from.
1:36:45
Your thirty five football that's
1:36:47
right, all right, thank you very
1:36:49
much, beg you special.
1:36:53
Lot of hard praise the
1:37:02
seand pattern. Hey,
1:37:05
they they
1:37:09
always chant to love
1:37:11
me all
1:37:13
throughout the fall.
1:37:17
When it comes to springtime,
1:37:20
they start dropping luck.
1:37:23
They they
1:37:27
only want for my hunt, and
1:37:30
they only want before a fish.
1:37:33
And.
1:37:34
They only want before the mouth. It's
1:37:39
they come around and.
1:37:43
They only want fort and
1:37:47
they only want before the sand
1:37:49
tail crank. They
1:37:51
want before the lactail buck,
1:37:54
sandering neck, the real
1:37:57
grand They only
1:38:00
want forma hunt in.
1:38:08
Only end hunt and seize
1:38:11
me. They always
1:38:14
found a reason to
1:38:17
love me and leave me for
1:38:19
the next. In love, they'll
1:38:25
say that they're sorry
1:38:29
that you just don't have time.
1:38:33
Oh, it's kind of funny,
1:38:36
I guess if I, Oh,
1:38:41
we shot the book, have
1:38:44
been waiting for my time.
1:38:50
They only want forma hunt. They
1:38:54
only want for a fish. They
1:38:58
only want before.
1:39:00
Oh, there's bot they
1:39:02
come around Acra.
1:39:06
They only want before night. They
1:39:10
only want before the same to print.
1:39:14
They only won't before the oct
1:39:16
up.
1:39:17
By sound green maccas
1:39:21
prints. They only
1:39:23
want for fight. I
1:39:32
know it took me a while
1:39:36
to find leach
1:39:40
after they tagged
1:39:42
out that they.
1:39:49
But now I know.
1:39:52
They're gone on and Smile.
1:39:56
They're gone on Smile, shallow
1:39:59
wolves, they're gone on.
1:40:01
Stove smut.
1:40:02
There's pups come
1:40:04
around Everca.
1:40:08
They're going on in smile family.
1:40:12
They're gone on the stove, Santo
1:40:15
cran Bocco. They're gone, snow
1:40:18
waped.
1:40:18
Down Samarineck
1:40:21
spoery of gran So
1:40:24
they're going.
1:40:25
On the smile over
1:40:30
my honey,
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More