Podchaser Logo
Home
Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Released Monday, 15th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Ep. 542: Trump, Biden, and Wildlife: How Elections Shape Conservation

Monday, 15th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

This is the meat Eater Podcast

0:11

coming at you shirtless, severely,

0:13

bug bitten, and in my case, underwear listeningcast.

0:18

You can't predict anything. The meat

0:20

Eater Podcast is brought to you by First

0:22

Light. Whether you're checking trail cams, hanging

0:24

deer stands, or scouting for el, First

0:27

Light has performance apparel to support

0:29

every hunter in every environment. Check

0:31

it out at first light dot com. F

0:33

I R S T L I t

0:35

E dot com.

0:40

Everybody's damn near your tax day and we're gonna

0:42

do There's two things that are gonna happen

0:44

on this episode. We're gonna get into two things you never want

0:46

to bring up to anybody. We're

0:48

gonna talk about finances, and we're gonna

0:51

talk about politics. But

0:54

we're gonna start with we're gonna talk about politics,

0:56

kind of politics and the intersection

0:59

of politics and conservation with Becky

1:01

Humphries, who's

1:03

been on the show a couple times before, and we're gonna

1:05

we're gonna dig in with her. She's here in the studio,

1:07

but joining us from not in the studio is

1:10

Susie Orman, and she just

1:12

was saying that we need to change start a podcast

1:15

called money Eater and

1:18

We wanted to catch up with her for a couple of reasons. One because it's

1:20

tax day and we want to get some financial advice.

1:23

And two because there's some things I became

1:25

aware of now. If

1:28

you're wondering, or if you you know, you've been out of touch,

1:30

or you're a little youngster.

1:32

Uh.

1:32

Susie Orman is an American financial

1:34

advisor, author of How Many Books,

1:36

A Lot of Books?

1:38

Ten ten ten,

1:40

number one New York Times bestseller, and

1:42

I am just not a financial advisor,

1:45

sir. I am a financial icon

1:47

of America. And you're young and you

1:49

don't know about me. That's why

1:51

you're financially screwed.

1:53

Yes, if

1:55

you don't, yeah, if you don't have a big old

1:57

boat, If you don't have a big old boat yet, it's because

1:59

you haven't been listening to Susie.

2:02

So in nineteen

2:04

eighty seven, she founded the Susie Ormand Financial

2:06

Group, and her work as a financial advisor

2:09

gained notability

2:11

notoriety with Susie Orman Show, which

2:13

ran on CNBC and for

2:17

thirteen years, and does.

2:19

A podcast, I'll tell

2:21

You My Brief History, which is

2:24

two time Emmy Award winner, twice

2:26

named by Time magazine as

2:28

one hundred most influential person in the world.

2:31

Recently just named as one of the fifty over

2:33

fifty women who have changed this world.

2:35

And I could go on and on, but who cares.

2:37

About them over fifty?

2:40

No, it's true.

2:42

I actually said, well, it took you so long because

2:44

I'm mopped to be seventy three?

2:46

Are you really what?

2:47

Yeah, look it up, you google it.

2:49

Why this is part

2:51

of your research?

2:52

Well, no, I might have known. I might have read

2:54

that and then thought that's impossible because she looks

2:56

too great.

2:57

But that's why it happens when you have a

2:59

lot of money. I

3:01

haven't got any work done, but that's besides the

3:03

point as well.

3:05

Now, okay, you might

3:07

be wondering, like, well, how why this

3:09

show? Because I found now I've known

3:13

once upon a time Susan

3:15

and I for a brief period overlap

3:17

with our book publishers. But she's

3:21

the reason she's on the show right now is she's

3:23

a mega fisherman,

3:27

like I got photos here of her

3:30

with a stack of wah who manages

3:33

to live in Bahamas, which I need to ask how that

3:35

goes down? And when I first reached

3:37

out to her about coming on the show,

3:39

I see a picture of her where she's standing next

3:41

to a and

3:44

electric reel, like a deep drop reel.

3:47

Now, normally if you meet, like you know, when

3:49

you're talking to a famous person in a fish and you

3:51

get their fishing picture, you're gonna

3:53

get a picture of them holding

3:55

a fly rod with a rainbow trout

3:58

in big sky Montana, with a guide

4:01

holding the net, or.

4:03

It's a marlin.

4:04

Yeah. But that was like old that she's standing

4:06

with a deep drop rig,

4:09

and I was like, this is a legit fisher

4:12

person. Have you always fished?

4:15

No?

4:15

So when I was sixty five,

4:18

many years ago now, I

4:20

had decided what would Susie

4:23

Orman be if she didn't have

4:25

the number one show on CNBC for

4:27

thirteen years or how many of her years it was.

4:30

If she didn't have you know, standing

4:32

ovations of fifty thousand people at a time,

4:35

if she didn't have this, What

4:37

would I be if all of that went away?

4:40

So one day I decided to sell five

4:42

homes, quit my show, stop writing for Oprah,

4:45

stop being on TV BAM,

4:47

and we got a boat. And

4:50

then we started to go all around on

4:52

the boat and our captain of the

4:54

boat because the insurance

4:56

company made sure that I had a captain. They wouldn't

4:58

let me captain of myself I could have, which

5:01

did not go well with me, but I didn't have

5:03

a choice. Was an avid fisherman,

5:07

and so he would sit on the dock

5:09

with us and we'd have these little fishes,

5:11

and that's all he thought these two women could

5:13

do. So finally we fired him. We got

5:15

him out of there right. I started

5:17

to take over everything myself, and

5:21

little by little we had moved to

5:23

the Bahamas, this little

5:25

tiny island where we would

5:27

watch everybody bring in these

5:30

big fish. We didn't know what they

5:32

were because we wanted to also

5:34

filley our fish ourselves. We were

5:36

like, we are not going to be women who

5:39

the help does this? The help does that. We're

5:41

going to do it ourselves. We're going to fish, we're gonna

5:43

captain our boat, we're going to clean our boat, and

5:45

we're gonna, you know, clean our

5:47

fish.

5:49

And little by little we

5:51

would.

5:51

Be asking questions like

5:54

how do you catch a wahoo?

5:55

What's a wahoo?

5:57

And before you know it, we

5:59

got the equipment and we went out and

6:01

we would try, and before

6:04

you know it, we started to catch And

6:06

at first we didn't know the difference between a barracuda

6:09

and a wahoo, so we'd have to bring

6:11

the fish in and ask somebody on

6:13

the island is this.

6:14

A barracuda or is this a wahoo?

6:17

And little by little

6:20

we got it down really well,

6:23

and it was I think it was just a few years

6:25

ago, maybe two thousand and eighteen,

6:28

not whatever it was, but a few years

6:30

ago there was a wahoo contest

6:33

on the island and there were

6:35

nine boats that went out, huge

6:38

fishing vessels with captains

6:41

and all these lines. And we had our little,

6:43

you know, thirty two foot Boston wayler

6:45

were just two poles.

6:47

That was it, the two.

6:48

LPs, and we won not only

6:50

the contest, but we won the largest fish

6:52

as well. Oh

6:55

and now all the

6:57

men were and who had been wahooing

6:59

and everything for years, we became

7:01

their targeters if they wanted to catch us.

7:04

They never quite have, but we've.

7:06

Now I'm no longer known as

7:08

the money Lady, which was my nickname. We're

7:11

now known on the island KT and myself

7:13

as the fishing girls. And when

7:16

we go out, you see the

7:18

boats start to follow us because

7:20

they want to know where are we going, what are

7:22

we doing? And things like

7:24

like the birds, Yeah right,

7:27

they're watching for us. Or we'll

7:29

be somewhere and they'll come up just

7:31

to kind of say hi, and I know they're marking my

7:34

spot.

7:37

So I'm always like, really, you have to pretend

7:39

you want my numbers, you can have it.

7:41

You're still not going to catch here. I love

7:43

them, I love it.

7:45

Right right, But anyway,

7:47

and that's how it started, little

7:49

by little. Now I have a massive

7:51

lure collection, a massive rod

7:54

in real collection, and

7:57

we use them all the time.

7:58

How many reason are you

8:01

good at cleaning fish?

8:01

Yeah, it's actually KT that

8:04

cleans them, right, because that's what

8:06

she wanted to do. I didn't care one way

8:08

or the other, to tell you the truth. She is

8:10

magnificent at it. She

8:13

does like cleans. You hold up the thing

8:15

and you.

8:15

Could see through it. She's fabulous

8:18

at.

8:19

It, right, and she's and

8:21

then we cry back it and then we

8:23

also share it with all the other people on the

8:25

island, the islanders that work there.

8:27

Oh excellent, Now I got a question for

8:29

you. You mentioned getting up to a

8:31

position where you got a nice boat.

8:33

Now, one of our colleagues Chester, we

8:36

used call him Chester the Investor. His

8:39

plan to get a walleye boat

8:42

was to throw in on bitcoin.

8:46

Yeah, good, I hope he did.

8:48

Well. He did, and he got out a

8:52

couple of years ago.

8:54

Right, there's still a time

8:56

for him to get in a little bit now because

8:58

on April twentieth there will

9:00

be a halving a bigcoin, so

9:02

we should see it if the technical stay

9:04

the same, for bitcoin to probably go up

9:07

into the eighty thousand or so

9:09

area. Obviously it's in the seventy

9:12

thousand area now. It might be a little bit expensive

9:14

to get in for a lot, but he

9:16

can always buy the etf I bit

9:19

ib it and make some

9:21

money, not what he would have made if

9:24

he had gone in when it was at its loan, not

9:26

that long ago, at twenty thousand dollars a

9:28

bitcoin.

9:28

Well, I make sure he tunes in. Yeah,

9:31

how do you what's your take if

9:33

someone how do you advise

9:35

someone like Karn had found a segment where a guy

9:37

was trying to figure out if he could justify the purchase

9:40

of a twenty thousand dollars fishing boat. When

9:42

it comes to fishing boats, how

9:45

do you instruct people to think about

9:47

what's too much?

9:49

Yeah, he should go on. I can't I afford it segment

9:51

on the Women in Money podcast because

9:53

it's the hand of every podcast we have that And

9:56

I'll tell him, first of all, there

9:58

is nothing that it's more expensive,

10:00

and I don't care what size it

10:03

is than a boat.

10:05

Your engines are either breaking. Everything

10:07

on a boat today has a three

10:10

year lifespan.

10:10

That is it.

10:11

Your batteries will go, your your

10:14

switches will go, your everything

10:16

will go. And so it's

10:19

hard to look at a boat with something

10:21

not breaking on it as you're looking at it.

10:23

So it's not can you afford to buy a

10:25

boat? Can you afford the

10:28

upkeep on the boat? Can you afford

10:30

the insurance on the boat? Can

10:32

you afford the gasoline on the

10:34

boat to really do things?

10:37

Because gasoline now is far more

10:39

expensive than.

10:40

It was years ago. So

10:43

where you're going to house the boat?

10:45

Are you living like in Florida or someplace

10:47

that a hurricane could get the boat?

10:50

So there's all these things that go into

10:52

it.

10:52

However, bottom line, you better

10:54

have at least an eight to twelve month emergency

10:57

fund of what it would cost you

10:59

to live and pay your must

11:01

pay expenses, your mortgage or your

11:03

rent, you're in, whatever it is,

11:06

so that if you got sick, you were in an accident,

11:08

you got laid off, you would be able to pay those

11:10

for eight months. You better not have any

11:12

credit card debt whatsoever.

11:14

You better be fully.

11:16

Funding your retirement accounts to the

11:18

max. You better be

11:21

really so good when it comes

11:23

to money. And then if

11:26

you have that, you already bought a home, whatever

11:28

it is, you can have a boat.

11:30

Good luck, man. I don't know if

11:33

there's a lot of boat owners list.

11:39

It's always a good idea to roll the dice on a

11:41

big boat, because

11:43

you never.

11:43

Know what's funny.

11:44

You guys, We've had a thirty

11:46

two foot boat now for

11:49

since twenty sixteen. We

11:52

are going on eight years with the same boat.

11:54

The men on the island, and

11:58

of course they would. They think bigger is better, all

12:00

right. So they have to go from

12:03

two engines to three engines to

12:05

four engines. They have to go from

12:07

a three hundred to a four point fifty to

12:09

a six hundred.

12:11

They're nuts. If one of them

12:13

gets a.

12:13

Bigger boat, the others

12:15

all get a bigger boat. I

12:18

have never seen anything like it.

12:20

And then they say to me, why do

12:22

you keep the same boat?

12:25

What is wrong with you?

12:27

One reason I keep the same boat

12:30

is one of the reasons that I think that we

12:32

are so successful in fishing,

12:34

especially catching wahoo. Is

12:37

the wahoo, in my opinion, like

12:39

the wash off the engines

12:42

of our boat, our

12:44

engines.

12:45

And you get to stay out of what we call a boat

12:47

measuring contest, right.

12:50

But you know, I also just love beating

12:52

them in a smaller boat anyway, So what's

12:54

the difference?

12:55

Well, that brings up a great point

12:57

though, like when you go to in

13:00

vest in something recreationally,

13:03

do you measure in

13:05

the mental benefit of

13:07

being able to go do something you love? Is

13:10

that a factor?

13:11

Yes? And no?

13:12

It depends, Like obviously for somebody

13:14

like me. I'm a seriously wealthy

13:17

woman, and if I wasn't, I

13:19

shouldn't be who I am.

13:20

To this day.

13:22

So I don't measure bigger

13:24

necessarily being what can I

13:26

cannot do. I like to

13:29

buy exactly what

13:31

I need, not what I can afford,

13:34

because I can afford more than what I need.

13:37

I don't need more than a thirty

13:39

two foot boat, I don't, you

13:41

know. It's just me and Kate. It's

13:44

what I need it for. So

13:46

just because I can afford it doesn't

13:48

mean that I want to buy it.

13:52

You used to be down. You used to advise people

13:54

that eating dinner

13:56

out was a real financial.

13:59

Drain, such a drain it

14:01

was.

14:02

Actually in two thousand and nine, I

14:04

came out with a book called the two

14:06

thousand and nine Action Plan because

14:08

the economy was a mess. I was on the Oprah

14:10

Winfrey Show with it. We actually gave

14:12

it away for free, millions

14:15

of copies we gave away for free. But there

14:17

were a few things that I asked everybody

14:19

in there to do, and that was to

14:21

stop eating out for at least six

14:24

months. I thought the

14:26

restaurant industry was

14:28

going to explode.

14:31

They could not believe that I said

14:33

that. However, there was a

14:36

white paper done from Mint, which

14:38

was a finance app and the

14:40

number one debt that

14:42

people had when they had a lot of credit card

14:44

debt, the number one thing they actually spent

14:47

money on to be in debt was eating

14:49

out. So that's

14:52

when that started with me. For

14:54

me myself, sure, I'll ead

14:57

out if it's a business thing or we're away

14:59

and I don't have whatever. But even

15:01

when we travel, it's very funny.

15:04

Maybe we'll go somewhere to do a speaking

15:06

engagement and we go on a private plane.

15:08

Okay, And now

15:11

we bring our food with us

15:14

and we check into the hotel, and even though

15:16

the sponsor will pay for our food, we cook

15:18

in our hotel room.

15:21

So we have a little hot plate. We do this so

15:23

I.

15:23

Personally don't enjoy

15:26

eating out at a restaurant

15:29

just to go out and eat out only

15:31

because I just I don't know.

15:33

I think the food's better at home and healthier.

15:36

Well, you don't even have to use a hot plate. If

15:38

you got wahoo with you all the time.

15:40

Yeah, well we bring that as well because

15:42

we love wahushashimi.

15:44

Yeah yeah, so a

15:46

lot.

15:46

But if you're there for a long time, because

15:49

sometimes you're a place for a while, then

15:52

we had a little hot plate. We had a

15:54

little you know, fry pan, a little this in

15:56

a that, and we go to the grocery

15:58

store if we roun on.

15:59

A food and bring it.

16:00

So it was always people would always laugh

16:02

at us as.

16:02

They would see us checking into a hotel.

16:05

Susie, I saw a photo where it looks

16:08

like you I

16:10

might be looking at it wrong, but I feel like there's

16:12

a photo where you're sitting there with a rockfish

16:16

with a link cod that

16:18

looks like it came up with

16:22

like you caught the rockfish, but landed a link caught

16:24

and a rockfish.

16:25

Yeah, So there we are because every year

16:27

we also like to eat salmon, so we

16:30

usually go to either Alaska or British.

16:32

Columbia to catch our own salmon.

16:35

Great, and so there we were

16:37

and I was fishing, and I was

16:39

actually fishing. I didn't even you

16:41

know, we had caught our quota of

16:44

salmon and halib it. So

16:46

I was just kind of fishing and I caught something

16:49

and I'm bringing it up, and I'm like saying to kt

16:51

KT this is I don't know what

16:53

I got here, but I don't think this is just a

16:55

rockfish, because we wanted a rockfish

16:58

in order to make tacos out of it. And

17:00

all of a sudden, I bring it up and it's a link.

17:03

God that bid it

17:05

would not let go, and so we caught

17:08

both and we bought growth homes.

17:14

Okay, give us a couple, give people

17:16

a couple we'll let you go after this, but give

17:18

people a couple tips on how

17:21

they should handle their tax refunds. I'm guessing.

17:23

I'm guessing that you

17:26

don't advise people to go with the play

17:28

where you get the refund later as

17:31

good as that field.

17:32

Right, when interest rates

17:34

were at zero percent and

17:36

there was nobody was making any money on

17:39

CDs or money market accounts or anything,

17:41

then I didn't have a problem with

17:44

people getting a refund because they

17:46

really weren't losing any money that way,

17:48

truthfully.

17:49

However, now that.

17:51

Interest rates in money market funds and this

17:53

will change, are at about four and a half

17:55

or five percent, or there's places

17:57

that you can put money that are safe

17:59

and down and get a high

18:02

interest rate. Who wants to give

18:04

the government an interest

18:06

free loan over a year's period

18:08

of time of about five percent?

18:10

You have to be out of your mind. So

18:13

you would be far better.

18:14

Off now getting no

18:17

refund, paying what you need

18:20

to pay and not paying over it. So

18:22

just come out so it's a zero, and

18:24

in the long run you're actually

18:27

making more money. So that's how

18:29

you make more out of less,

18:31

to tell you the truth. So it's

18:34

less of a refund, but in the long

18:36

run, that extra money.

18:38

That they're keeping, you would just be able

18:40

to take.

18:40

That money and put it in an account

18:42

for yourself, maybe buy some bitcoin

18:45

with it.

18:45

Just joking, all.

18:49

Right, Susie Orman, thank

18:51

you so much for coming on. Good look on your next fission

18:54

trip. I really appreciate you joining us. And that's gonna

18:56

get everybody really pepped up and ready to do

18:58

their taxes.

18:59

All right, talk to you.

19:05

All right? Oh you know what's funny? So

19:07

Becky, we're gonna how you doing.

19:09

I'm good.

19:10

Did you learn anything there?

19:13

No, I

19:18

don't own a big boat. I don't

19:21

just little boats, and and

19:24

I try and balance my taxes so it comes

19:26

out even at the end of the year. But I do have

19:29

advice for people that do get a refund and

19:31

they need to donate it to conservation.

19:34

Oh there you go, yep.

19:36

And Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership

19:38

would be a great place to put it too.

19:41

That's excellent. We're going to talk about that a whole

19:43

bunch, but I gotta run. I'm going to run a couple

19:45

of Michigan things by it, and an a neighboring thing

19:47

and a neighboring thing from

19:49

a neighboring thing from Wisconsin. Handful

19:52

things we're gonna talk about. But just

19:54

a funny letter that came in so Pat Dirk,

19:56

and it

19:59

comes on the show a lot the

20:01

last Outdoor columnist. He

20:03

wrote a newspaper column last week. This

20:06

is a while ago. Now I'm looking at an old line.

20:08

But uh, Dirkin

20:11

wrote a piece about to continued decline

20:13

in Wisconsin's deer hunting population,

20:17

meaning the number of people buying deer licenses

20:19

in Wisconsin is

20:23

going down, down, down. You might be sitting, well,

20:25

why isn't my why aren't my permissions

20:27

going up up up? Which is a very long, complicated

20:29

story, but those things do not walk

20:32

in tandem. Anyways, he gets a letter

20:36

from a guy who is

20:38

of my favorite letters. And

20:41

the reason I like this letter so much is just so happens

20:43

that I'm leaving in two days

20:45

to participate in Wisconsin's

20:49

youth turkey season. But

20:53

a guy writes in, Who's who write?

20:55

In response to Dirkin's column, writes in, and it's

20:58

signed Dave Michigan

21:00

pissed hunter. He

21:05

goes on to say, though,

21:08

Wisconsin, just like Michigan, has

21:10

the same problem. And I'll tell you what from

21:13

a guy that has hunted all his life. When you turn

21:15

over a gun to a kid and they're allowed

21:18

to shoot any bucks that they want, and I've been hunting

21:20

for the past forty years, and I have

21:22

to settle for what's left over. And you

21:24

wonder why people are quitting. You take all

21:26

the hunt away before the season

21:28

gets to the big hunt of the big opening

21:31

day, most of the big bucks are already gone.

21:33

You have so many hunts, kids, special

21:36

hunts, ex bo regular bow. The

21:38

regular opening day big hunt is

21:40

a big flop. Kid hunts and they

21:42

early hunts and stuff. Take the big

21:44

bucks before the day gets here, and you might

21:46

think the big day is just about the

21:49

meat, and it's not. It's the racks. Michigan

21:51

prove that with given dough tags

21:53

twelve total, but at a cost, and

21:55

hunters let them walk, want more hunter

21:58

cut the bull crap. Give the big bucks

22:00

back to the opening day big hunts. You

22:03

might start to see some other people come back,

22:05

if it might already be too late.

22:09

Dave,

22:19

that is one impassioned.

22:21

That is one.

22:22

I assume you read it as it was punctuated.

22:25

I tried to pat

22:27

was taken to be a great T shirt.

22:30

I have this T shirt of the guy that wrote

22:32

in Yeah, the

22:34

guy that wrote in the story about the just some

22:37

unseemly behavior he was seeing among

22:40

turkeys in his neighborhood, and

22:42

I think that that might be a great T shirt. You've

22:46

met Dave.

22:47

I'm sure I've met Dave all through your

22:49

career through there

22:52

are more than one Dave in Michigan

22:55

family.

22:56

I'll translate that. I'll

22:59

translate that and be that they've

23:04

done so much do I need to translate

23:06

it?

23:07

I think, yeah, yeah,

23:09

yeah, yeah.

23:11

Now you got the archery season, and you

23:13

got the crossbow season, and you

23:15

got the youth. See really the kids. And

23:17

by the time it comes down to opening

23:19

day in Michigan November fifteenth, the Big

23:22

Hunt, I like he calls it the big Big Hunt.

23:24

Ye.

23:24

By the time the Big Hunt starts

23:27

opening day of General Firearm, the

23:29

kids have killed off all the big bucks. So

23:33

if you're trying to wonder what happened all the hunters, that's

23:35

it.

23:37

By providing special experiences

23:40

for everyone, you

23:42

may be diluting a

23:44

singular experience that used to be for everybody.

23:48

That was that saying, he who is a friend

23:50

to all his friend to mine.

23:52

Oh and our memory

23:54

gets a little cloudy too. Yeah,

23:56

you know, I have a deer on the

23:59

wall of one of the bedrooms in my home that

24:01

my dad's first buck my dad shot

24:03

in Michigan and it was a huge

24:06

buck by his standards, it

24:08

was a nine point about this big,

24:11

you know, and the and the success

24:13

rate back at that time when he shot that for

24:16

firearm deer hunting in Michigan is

24:18

about it was below thirty

24:20

percent for the

24:22

entire deer season. You know, Michigan

24:24

has been over forty percent for quite a while

24:27

now for firearm hunters in terms of

24:29

success. So and our

24:32

deer heard. You know, the antler

24:34

size has also gone up. But

24:37

you know, the majority of bucks

24:39

out there, you guys know this, or young bucks.

24:42

I mean, we exploit deer

24:45

pretty heavily in this country, especially

24:48

in the Midwest where you have an open

24:50

entry system, so

24:53

people take a lot of deer, there's no doubt about

24:55

it. But the majority of your deer are those younger

24:57

deer. And I think sometimes

25:00

our memory gets a little feaded on the glory

25:02

years and what it looks like,

25:04

not that that happened to Dave or anything.

25:08

But you know, the other part of it is we

25:10

are losing more and more hunters

25:12

as a percentage of the population. And you guys

25:15

know this, and you know it threatens

25:17

our our acceptance

25:19

out there. It threatens our clout

25:23

as in politics and voting

25:25

and regulations, and

25:27

quite frankly, I you know, I'm

25:29

more than willing to give up that big buck

25:32

for a youngster. You

25:35

know, by the time you get to Dave's

25:37

age, hopefully he's taken a few nice

25:39

bucks. I

25:41

don't know if Dave has either, but

25:43

you know, hopefully you have and you've had

25:45

that opportunity. But it is

25:48

about maximizing opportunity out

25:50

there for a lot of folks. And

25:53

Michigan during those glory years, Michigan

25:55

had over a million hunters.

25:59

They're down under a half million now

26:01

what. And so with

26:03

that, your you know, your competition

26:06

out on the landscape overall

26:08

is down from what it had been.

26:10

Yeah, but I.

26:11

Think greater fragmentation of the landscape

26:14

right which is.

26:15

Yeah, a greater fragmentation we

26:17

used to see in Michigan. Michigan

26:19

carried most of their deer herd

26:21

in the Upper Peninsula and the northern Lower Peninsula

26:24

and everybody had their little hunting camps and the

26:26

rest of it. Now the majority we

26:28

kill more deer in southern Michigan than

26:31

the up and Northern Michigan combined.

26:33

It's just you know, we've seen this, you

26:36

know, and not only Michigan. You see a lot of

26:38

deer down in Indiana, Illinois. The

26:40

deer population, quite frankly,

26:42

is much higher than it had been fifty

26:45

years ago.

26:46

Beg, you adn't do a good job. I introduce you. Yep, I'm

26:48

gonna do that right now. Becky

26:50

Humphreys is a long time biole.

26:53

Just started her career at the US Fish and Wildlife Service,

26:56

then worked her way up through

26:58

the Michigan DNR too, became the director the

27:00

Michigan Department of Natural Resources, spent

27:03

time at Ducks Unlimited, ran

27:08

National Ran an

27:10

NWTF as the CEO for how many years?

27:13

CEO for five years?

27:14

So five years heading the National Wild Turkey

27:16

Federation, and then right now

27:18

and I owe you big thanks on this has

27:21

stepped in as the interim

27:24

CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt

27:28

Conservation Partnership and

27:31

there's a permanent search underway,

27:33

but you, very graciously, at

27:35

very short notice, came

27:37

on board to run the organization

27:40

during the interim. So oh, your huge thanks there.

27:42

Well, thank you. It's a

27:44

great organization. As you know, we both sit

27:46

on the board and you

27:49

know when we lost our CEO and pretty

27:51

you know, short order last last winter.

27:54

It's one of those organizations you don't want

27:56

to see flounder. You want them to have

27:58

a great CEO and you want to to have great

28:01

leadership. So it was an honor

28:03

to be asked and ain't quite

28:05

Frankly, I was feeling retirement pretty

28:08

much. I'm

28:10

gonna try again, Try try.

28:13

You'll you'll get to retire again. The

28:17

last last call on Live tour

28:19

tickets. So the live tour starts next week.

28:21

You're listening to this right around tax Day. The live tour

28:23

starts on on the twenty third. Live Tour

28:26

starts on the twenty third. Hang

28:30

on second, me pull this up? Yeah,

28:32

who's got the who's got the dates? Hand here? I got

28:34

it? One minute? One

28:37

minute, damn it? Okay,

28:39

ready April

28:42

twenty third, we're gonna be in Mesa, Arizona, free

28:45

people. Not from Arizona. That means Phoenix but

28:48

not. April

28:51

twenty four, San Diego, California,

28:54

April twenty five, Anaheim,

28:56

California, April twenty seven, Sacramento

29:00

twenty nine, Salt Lake City April

29:02

thirty, Boise, Idaho. Then

29:05

May one, Missoula, Montana, May two

29:07

Spokane, Washington, May for Portland,

29:09

Oregon, and then closing out the

29:12

show Sinco Tomayo. Is that right?

29:14

Yes, those trees Sinco

29:16

to Mio. May fifth, Tacoma,

29:19

Washington.

29:21

Yeah. A couple of things for folks

29:23

searching for tickets, be sure

29:26

to either go through the meteater dot com

29:28

events page yep and hit

29:30

those links, or the

29:33

venues the venues only those

29:35

two places. If you just type in these

29:38

shows in the Google machine.

29:39

You'll want you want the resellers, and

29:42

it.

29:42

Is grossly expensive. Yeah,

29:44

so go go through the media dot com events

29:47

page or directly to the

29:50

theater that is hosting the show. And

29:53

then, on top of that, if you want to

29:55

try to win some tickets, there

29:58

are pint nights hosted by b HI

30:02

that proceed all of

30:04

these shows where you can actually participate

30:06

in meat Eater trivia. You can win

30:09

a bunch of free stuff, including seats

30:11

to the show.

30:12

And including a seat on

30:15

stage playing the game

30:17

right.

30:18

Well, yeah, but we got to find did we finalize the

30:20

game?

30:21

Yeah?

30:21

Oh okay, yeah, get on stage,

30:24

match your wits.

30:26

Uh oh. Also, when you

30:28

buy a ticket, here here's the here's the ur Tidbut I'll

30:30

throw in the last little thing. You can see

30:32

it both ways, but when you buy tickets it comes

30:34

bundled with the Meat Eater Outdoor Cookbook Wild Game

30:36

Recipes for the Grill, smoke or camp stoven, Campfire

30:39

Brand Spicketty new outdoor cookbook that

30:41

we have out right now, And I've been struggle a little

30:43

bituse I'm starting to put some pictures from the book up

30:45

on Instagram, and I'm like, I

30:47

put one up about I'm putting one

30:49

up about. In the beginning of the book,

30:51

we talk about like all this ancient cooking methods

30:55

stuff dating back to the Ice Age and ways

30:57

people dissingc So when you open the book, I realized

30:59

that one of the first things you see is a marmot

31:04

who's had all of his hair burned off,

31:07

which is like how small.

31:09

It's like how small game was cooked at

31:12

a time. You'd burn all his hair off and roast

31:14

it whole, and then its skin would

31:16

turn like a case. Then you

31:18

open it up and the meat inside was steamed. And

31:21

I wonder when people see that, if

31:25

they can picture that, they're also going to eventually

31:27

wind up later in the book reading about a charred

31:29

lemon gin and tonic, So

31:32

they think they're like.

31:33

What the hell.

31:34

Don't judge your book by its covering. Don't judge your

31:36

book by the first spread.

31:38

Don't judge a book by the intro photos.

31:42

Don't judge a book by the singed marmint.

31:44

I've been thinking about I've been waking up in the middle of the night

31:46

and think about those fish cakes we made last

31:48

week from the cookbook. And now I think I'm gonna

31:50

wake up in the middle of the night and have this vision

31:52

of a charred marmot.

31:54

Well, think about charred lemon gen and Tonics

31:56

washing that charred marmot. Back, Becky,

32:09

what you take on the gray wolf that just got killed in

32:11

southern Michigan? How that transition?

32:14

That's a quick view turn. I don't

32:16

you know, I don't know enough about that particular

32:18

animal to speak to you. Just yeah,

32:22

But I mean it wouldn't surprise me we wound up

32:24

having a gray wolf that we had

32:26

collared the Upper Peninsula that walked to Missouri.

32:29

Yeah.

32:29

Yeah, So I mean we'll.

32:31

That suck across the Mississippi.

32:33

Yeah, I mean it crossed a hell

32:35

of a lot of territory between.

32:36

Do you think it ran on a bridge ice swim.

32:39

That's a big swim.

32:40

It could be a big swim, but you know,

32:44

who knows, you know, whether it probably

32:46

you know they can swim, well, we know that, and

32:50

we know they cross ice bridges whenever they're

32:52

ice dams, and we know we

32:54

know they'll cross bridges

32:57

too, you know, when they when it's low activity

32:59

and the rest of us.

33:00

So, but.

33:03

We've had we've had wolf sightings

33:05

in the Northern Lower Peninsula during heavy

33:08

freeze over you know, across across

33:10

the ice.

33:10

Yeah.

33:11

Yeah, and so they come across the ice. We just

33:13

haven't been able to see find a dinner

33:15

or anything, you know, in the Northern Lower

33:17

while I was still there. So it

33:19

doesn't surprise me. I mean, we've had black bear

33:21

in southern Michigan for well

33:24

thirty years now.

33:25

Yeah, we've got a lot of black bears in

33:27

central and northern Michigan.

33:28

You know, we do, we do.

33:32

The wolf was killed by a.

33:35

U.

33:35

The wolve's killed by a This is odd.

33:37

Was killed by a guided coyote hunter. There

33:40

was a guy on a guided coyote hunt killed

33:45

an eighty seven pound gray

33:48

wolf. They're holding

33:50

the body. You know, grey wolves are federally

33:52

protected Yeah, in

33:54

there and they're holding

33:57

the body for ANEE cropsy, and I think someone said,

33:59

I think that we'll find that it was shot, but

34:03

also checking its parasite

34:05

load and maybe try to get some idea where it

34:07

came from.

34:08

Yeah, they'll probably do DNA testing on.

34:10

It too, I'm sure DNA

34:13

database, right, so they can tell who's breeding

34:15

with who and where the kids

34:17

go.

34:18

Before the show started, you and I talked about another

34:20

Michigan thing I'd like you to speak

34:22

to, and you said you were disappointed on it. I've

34:25

communicated with folks

34:29

from Michigan Nited conservation clubs on this. Is

34:31

that that explain how

34:34

coyote management just changed in

34:37

Michigan?

34:37

Well, the Commission Natural

34:39

Resources Commission just voted

34:41

to close down the coyote season for several

34:44

months of the year. Up until now, coyotes

34:46

have been legal to be taken at any time.

34:49

But how far back does that go?

34:52

Oh, let's see. I

34:54

probably we

34:56

probably made that change in the

34:58

eighties or nineties as

35:00

coyotes moved into southern Michigan

35:02

and populations, we really

35:04

saw a big increase across you

35:07

know, most of Michigan and across most

35:09

of the Midwest coyote populations

35:12

took off and people were

35:14

seeing damage from them, depredation,

35:17

and so with that we

35:19

opened up, you know, the ability to take

35:22

coyotes just about any

35:24

time, all year round, and so

35:26

this shuts it down for a period of the year.

35:28

Now here's let me give you my two different

35:30

ways of looking at it. One hand.

35:33

On one hand, I had a hard time getting worked

35:35

up about it the change because

35:38

I was sinking to myself. They

35:43

are at they are pursued

35:48

as a fur bear by travers,

35:51

okay, travers and hunters, and

35:53

if you go back any length of time, I mean

35:55

before the real biggest population explosion

35:58

in the South, I mean they were just like a state

36:00

people for bear and we're

36:02

viewed as such.

36:03

Right, that's true?

36:04

Uh, Red Fox, Oh,

36:08

what season opens October fifteenth,

36:10

whatever the hell it is. There's a season raccoon.

36:12

Depending on where you're at in the state, you might have

36:15

a November one opener

36:17

on raccoon.

36:20

Quick content, Well, we have a beaver, beautiful

36:23

coyote hide

36:26

oh in in prime condition at

36:29

like seven hundred and fifty bucks on the auction

36:31

house oddities.

36:32

Right now, yep, right off this wall.

36:34

But to the point that you

36:37

were making. It's taken during

36:39

a season where that hide is

36:41

prime prime, it's it's full

36:43

of for because it's cold out December

36:46

January.

36:46

Is that yours from Montana?

36:48

It's mine from Montana, from the winter

36:50

season, from the wall to the studio.

36:53

It makes you realize that one of those is seven to fifty.

36:55

Good chunk of money.

36:56

Right now they're one, But there's

36:58

there's are there?

37:00

Crianzy canna start now?

37:01

I'm going to start.

37:03

There's a time in the season

37:05

where that high does not prime

37:08

because it's warm and it's

37:10

much more thin, and it would not command

37:12

the same amount of value on like an open

37:14

fur market.

37:15

Yes, and so I won't argue

37:17

with you there. You don't want

37:20

two points, Okay, all right? Number one?

37:22

That's the number one point. I couldn't get

37:24

worked up about it because of that. But here's

37:26

what I do get worked up about, because

37:28

I do get worked out about it of when

37:33

when they start, when people start changing

37:35

rules, and I don't necessarily agree with why they

37:38

changed it, Meaning if it had been

37:40

the trappers or hunters

37:42

or the fur people saying

37:44

what gives why

37:47

are you guys killing kyot's in the spring

37:50

when it's with pop

37:52

season and then they're not worth anything than anyone

37:54

anyways, why not leave them for people

37:56

that that that wanna you

37:59

lie or make a few bucks on them

38:02

later in the year. But so

38:06

in your explanation of this, who was

38:08

pushing for the change, like was it coming from

38:11

them or no?

38:12

It was not coming from the hunters and the trappers,

38:15

So you know it was coming from individuals

38:17

who do not like the idea of year round

38:19

killing of coyotes, and

38:22

I think the commission was uncomfortable with that.

38:26

But like you said, you held

38:28

the same opinion I do. It's

38:30

not coming from the segment that wants

38:32

to have that population managed

38:36

for maximum value out there.

38:39

It's being taken because we don't like

38:41

the thought of taking coyotes

38:43

at that time of year. So what's happening now

38:46

is for individuals who have chickens

38:48

or individuals who who are

38:50

out there and have deprivation issues.

38:53

Now they've got to go through getting a permit

38:55

in order to take those animals

38:57

out of season, and I assume they'll

38:59

be able to do it. But every time you do that, you're

39:02

you're tying up a biologist time

39:04

and energy to issue a permit for

39:07

what had been going on where

39:09

they could be actively managing some habitat

39:12

so that you would have better habitat

39:15

on the landscape, you'd have better population

39:17

management.

39:18

You know, it's and it's a species that

39:20

we really can't Yeah, it's put

39:22

a dent down.

39:23

No, it's super abundant, and so

39:26

you know, let's be realistic

39:29

about it. You know,

39:31

it's it's one of those situations

39:33

where people might not like the thought of it,

39:35

but it's it's part of reality

39:38

that coyotes do get in trouble, they

39:40

do cause depredation issues

39:42

for people out there.

39:45

Doug Durren points out correctly,

39:48

so that the

39:50

pro argument for year round coyote

39:52

hunting is it's a superabundant resource,

39:57

and the anti argument

40:00

it overlaps with that also where

40:02

it's like it's a superabundant

40:04

resource and

40:07

hunting hasn't been proven to dent that resource,

40:09

So why are you hunting it? Because

40:12

hunting isn't managing the population.

40:15

Whatever you're doing is not working, right, I

40:17

can see that are Yeah, Yeah, that's

40:20

one of the that's like a little bit of a tongue twister

40:22

when it comes to coyotes is

40:26

you'll often have people

40:28

point out that that with

40:32

when you're hunting coyotes, you'll

40:35

offset pack dynamics

40:39

and it'll actually lead to fragmentation

40:41

and more put production, meaning you'd

40:43

have this this hierarchy that had some

40:45

sort of limit on who's reproducing.

40:48

And then as you if you kill dominant

40:50

animals, you cause these like splintering factions

40:53

and it generates more put production. So

40:58

kind of being a smart ass, you might say,

41:00

well, if you love coyotes, why

41:05

would you not want kyote hunting

41:07

because you love coyotes and it seems to be

41:09

really making a lot more of them,

41:12

you know, meaning I love deer. If

41:14

I found that there was some thing hunters were doing that

41:16

was like producing tons of giant bucks,

41:18

I would be like, please continue,

41:22

let's continue this because I love these giant

41:24

bucks. But they're saying, like I love kyotes,

41:26

don't kill kyos because it just makes more coyotes,

41:29

which is, like I said, it's an intellectual tongue twister.

41:32

I think it's less they love coyotes

41:34

and they don't love the idea of killing.

41:36

K Yeah, I think so too. And

41:39

it's not just coyotes, it's canines. I mean

41:41

we see it with the wolf population too. We've

41:44

listed in d lifts listed wolves

41:47

over and over again in Michigan

41:49

and the western Great Lakes population. And

41:52

you know, the solution when

41:54

we had depredating or when we had

41:56

problem wolves that were getting in and causing

41:59

problems, when we couldn't do lethal

42:01

take, and there was a time when we couldn't,

42:04

was to trap those wolves and

42:06

move them. And where

42:08

are you.

42:08

Moving them, Colorado?

42:11

You're moving them into the territory of another

42:13

pack where.

42:15

They're going to get brutally.

42:19

It's a brutal death sentence.

42:21

You know.

42:22

I think, what interesting

42:25

thing we just just saw it with this uh

42:28

wolf that that got killed in southern

42:30

Michigan is the

42:34

success of the anti

42:37

killing of wolf party is the

42:41

death of an individual animal is

42:45

a paper thin degree away

42:48

from the extirpation of the species as

42:50

a whole. So when you talk to

42:52

somebody, well they just killed the wolf, they're going to kill all

42:54

the wolves. Where it's like you

42:56

just whacked a white tailed deer with your bumper

42:59

for the seventh time this year. That

43:03

doesn't equate to killing all the white tails.

43:05

No, And

43:07

those charismatic species are

43:12

special.

43:13

So who you going to vote for for president?

43:19

When you when you were at when you were Charisma,

43:22

when you were at when

43:24

you ran the the.

43:27

Fishing Game Department in Michigan. In

43:32

a role like that, how do you grab like in

43:34

a role like that, how do you how do you how

43:37

do you got to handle partisan politics?

43:39

Well, you know, first of all, is a

43:42

as a state employee, which I was.

43:44

You've got to be real careful. You can't get engaged

43:46

in partisan politics. You can't do you

43:49

know, you can't do partisan fundraisers

43:51

that tie your name into

43:55

you know, advocating for one party or

43:57

one candidate or another. You've got to be

43:59

really careful with the Hatch Act

44:01

that you don't engage in

44:04

in advocating for certain issues

44:07

that go to the public.

44:08

Do you stop did you just do you stop

44:10

voting?

44:11

No?

44:11

You still vote?

44:12

No?

44:12

I still vote, Yeah, And I vote. I

44:15

vote primaries the whole nine

44:17

yards and always

44:20

have always will. You know, it's it's

44:22

my right to help decide who

44:24

gets elected. And I

44:27

think everybody should engage and

44:29

vote how they feel most you know, the

44:32

candidates that best represent their

44:34

views.

44:35

But you keep quiet about it. Yeah, you

44:37

know when you're in when you're in wildlife management

44:39

at the state level.

44:40

Yeah, you really can't. You know, well,

44:44

I'll be honest with you. I worked for both Republican

44:46

and Democratic administrations, and

44:49

you know, it's tough because there's a lot of fundraising

44:52

that goes on as you get into campaigns

44:54

and get ready for election years, and you and

44:56

you wind up happening to

44:58

be very careful. I was. I was

45:01

lucky. I had a commission that helped do fundraising,

45:04

you know, for gubernatorial elections

45:06

when it was expected that cabinet members would

45:08

do that, which I was a cabinet member. But

45:11

as you know, as an employee, I can't

45:13

do that. I can't get into the partisan so

45:16

very much bipartisan you try and work with

45:19

both parties. Unfortunately,

45:21

that middle ground is disappearing

45:24

and it's it's hard. And I tend

45:27

to be a moderate in my political views, you know,

45:29

I step on both sides of the aisle.

45:31

I tend to be fiscally conservative and a little more

45:33

liberal on some of the social issues, and

45:36

so between those trying

45:38

to find that common ground. You

45:40

know, it's really hard

45:43

because the parties have We've lost the

45:46

we've lost the conservative Democrats

45:48

and the and the more liberal Republicans.

45:51

They're just fading away.

45:54

Yeah, I

45:57

wanted something spicier in that, Steve.

45:58

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I'm not. I'm

46:01

not frustrating anything you're saying. I just I

46:03

feel that they're faded away. They're

46:06

faded away from the

46:08

areas where you hear from people.

46:13

I think they're faded away in our elected

46:15

representation because you

46:18

know, yeah, I don't

46:20

think you know. And I think we hang

46:22

with people that tend to share our views. You

46:24

know, they share our activities. So I

46:26

agree with you. I think there are a lot of folks out there

46:29

that are like me. You know, when I

46:31

talk to folks, they they express

46:33

similar views. And I don't

46:35

think it's just because they're trying to impress me that

46:37

we're so much alike. I think they probably

46:39

do. But both parties

46:42

have taken over so such

46:46

non overlapping issues. It

46:48

makes it really difficult.

46:50

I hang with people that share my activities,

46:53

but then not

46:56

the views.

46:57

Oh, I will agree with you there.

46:59

Yeah, some of my dear dear

47:01

friends I feel have some just ridiculous

47:03

viewpoints. I

47:06

forgive him it because they like to

47:08

fish.

47:11

Well.

47:11

It mixed for interesting conversations.

47:14

And the older I get them more Now when I hear one,

47:16

I don't even like I used

47:18

to be like I'd want to argue it. No,

47:21

No, I'm just like, that's funny.

47:25

Once you start that argument, it's ending the argument

47:28

that becomes the problem.

47:29

Yeah, no, I look for I

47:32

look for. I sort of am running this

47:34

thing in my head. I was like, when

47:37

you cut all the bullshit out, I

47:40

think a good person, and

47:42

you know, I'm like, yeah, man, they're a great person.

47:45

Well do I trust them? Do I trust them

47:47

to leave the country or the state, or to

47:49

make to make wise decisions?

47:52

Yeah? But then am I going to go ask them

47:54

where I think where they think COVID

47:56

came from or whatever? Now like I might ask

47:59

where that fish they call came from? So

48:03

in the so now right

48:05

like you you've ran, you ran

48:07

a big national conservation

48:11

organization which everybody's heard of, Nation Wild

48:13

Turkey Federation. You're at the helm right

48:15

now of another federal policy conservation

48:18

group TRCP.

48:20

Yep uh,

48:24

How does an organization? How do these organizations

48:27

handle the partisan question? Meaning,

48:30

here we are, we're coming up on an election

48:32

cycle, which I feel like it's already been going on for

48:34

three years, but it's it's

48:36

I guess starting, it started starting.

48:39

It's gonna heat up, it's gonna be the most well, we're gonna

48:41

have the most expensive.

48:42

It's just going to be a wonderful year.

48:43

We're gonna have the most expensive presidential election

48:46

ever. And I don't know if that really says anything

48:48

about that just might say

48:50

something about the fact that every four years it's more

48:52

expensive. I don't know, most expensive,

48:54

hotly contested.

48:55

There are some records that I don't

48:57

really pay much at times

49:00

too, and when everything is like the most expensive

49:02

we've had yet, I think that's sort of a function.

49:04

Of advertising

49:07

expensive. In four years, it'll be the most expensive.

49:10

It's every everyone has been the most expensed.

49:12

I don't think we're going get to a point in my adult life where

49:14

we're like, man, this election is half the cost of last

49:16

one, the least expensive election we ever

49:18

had.

49:19

I think though, in state politics,

49:22

especially some of these western

49:24

states that do not have large

49:27

populations comparatively, that's

49:29

where those those numbers matter. Like I look

49:31

at the amount of cash that's going to be spent and

49:34

is being spent on the governatorial race

49:36

right now relative

49:39

to our size, Like the

49:41

dollars per person, the dollars per

49:43

person, and it's and they're going to spend

49:45

it. Yeah, it's dollars, yes,

49:48

not proportions, not fractions of dollars. And

49:50

they're going to spend it, which means we

49:53

are going to get robo calls,

49:56

texts in you know,

49:58

just like those political ads are going

50:00

to be served to us every which

50:03

way possible for in an

50:05

increasing manner like it does

50:08

not bode well for the mental health

50:10

of Montana's Now.

50:12

No, when Davy Crockett was

50:14

running for Congress, he would do a little

50:16

thing where if you came down and voted for him,

50:19

you'd get a shot of whiskey. You

50:23

could with the money they're spending, you could they could hand

50:25

out bottles of whiskey.

50:27

Yeah, it is.

50:31

Expensive, and and elections

50:33

and campaigns have gone to micro targeting,

50:36

so they've segmented.

50:38

You know.

50:38

They can tell now how

50:41

you vote. You know, even if you're in a state that you

50:43

don't have to declare your party, they

50:45

can tell by your voting record what

50:47

you when you vote, which party

50:50

you're most likely to vote for, and

50:52

they know, you know, is it

50:55

you know, are you a big fan of police protection

50:58

or not? Are you where

51:01

do you stand on right to life. They have all that

51:03

information. So when they go out and start walking

51:05

for candidates, knocking doors, which

51:08

they do in hotly contested areas,

51:10

they're pulling literature that

51:13

pertains to your interest.

51:15

That's really interesting you bring it up because the other day

51:17

one of the we had a Senate a

51:19

representative from a Senate candidate

51:23

knock on the door wanting

51:26

to speak to my wife. And

51:28

when I informed him that she wasn't there, I

51:30

thought, well, now I'm going to get the pitch. He

51:34

just walked off.

51:35

That's amazing.

51:36

He knew, he knew who he.

51:38

Was there, he knew who he was there to

51:40

talk to.

51:41

That's right.

51:43

So as you look at this, as you look at

51:45

the landscape, like, how do you guys, how does

51:47

the game work? Because here at TRCP

51:50

yep uh speak

51:53

from that seat or the NWTF seat whatever, no

51:55

matter what administration comes in, you

51:58

need to come. You're gonna need to go to the administration,

52:01

right or to appointees

52:03

or however, you're going to need to go there

52:05

and and and say,

52:08

uh, let's

52:10

work together.

52:11

That's right.

52:12

So uh, but

52:14

you can't you can't make a big bet

52:16

in one direction and then when they

52:19

lose you'd be like, I guess we're out of the game for four

52:21

years.

52:21

Well you can't.

52:22

So you're what are you doing? Like, how are

52:24

you? How are you doing this?

52:25

Well, a couple of things.

52:26

You know.

52:26

First, we and others in the conservation

52:29

community, we being TRCP, sit

52:32

down and identify our policy

52:35

objectives. What are real priorities for us,

52:37

you know, for the next administration, be it Biden

52:40

to be at Trump too, and

52:43

write those up so that we can share those

52:45

with those those campaigns,

52:48

because you're this next year is

52:50

they're campaigning, they're forming their policy

52:52

planks for their administration. By

52:54

the time they they have

52:57

identified candidates for those cabinet

52:59

posts, they will identify people

53:02

based on some of the objectives they want to achieve.

53:04

So we want to get into them before they're elected,

53:07

and we do that with both parties. We

53:10

share those information. We try and go over

53:12

that information with those campaigns so

53:15

they understand why why it's

53:17

important to us. And then

53:19

as we move forward and you have

53:21

an election and administration comes

53:24

on board, you need to get in there and

53:26

build relationships. You won't

53:28

always agree with everything. It doesn't matter

53:30

what the administration is, you're going

53:32

to disagree on certain things. But you

53:34

need to have a working relationship and

53:37

you build that trust that they will

53:39

share information on what's coming out so

53:42

that you can prepare for it. You can look for it.

53:45

You can let them know where you see

53:47

that's going to be problematic, that it

53:50

hasn't been well thought out. You

53:52

can ask them

53:54

to hold it over for more comment so that

53:56

you can they can get a more robust view

53:59

on some of the issues that you think are have

54:02

been not taken into consideration,

54:06

or even hold off on a rule or piece

54:09

of legislation that you think is bad for it.

54:12

And by

54:14

doing that, you try and build that working relationship

54:16

and trust with that administration, and

54:19

then you know you're careful in

54:21

terms of being true to your

54:24

positions, so that if you disagree

54:27

with something, you do it in a manner where you don't

54:29

surprise them. You know, it's

54:31

okay to disagree on stuff, but nobody

54:33

likes being surprised, So let them know

54:35

why you don't like it, and bring

54:39

the information on why you think it hasn't

54:41

been well thought out. Make the ask, and

54:43

then if you have to do editorials or

54:46

sign on letters or you know,

54:49

come out strongly on it, they know they

54:52

know that you don't agree with it.

54:54

They knew it was going to happen. New to

54:57

thinking on it.

54:57

Yep.

54:58

What do you run? You

55:01

talk about like you have your plan for the next administration.

55:04

You have to run like parallel two

55:06

paths, right, because you might be looking at

55:08

like let's say you're looking at you're

55:11

talking about Biden too, Okay with

55:14

that, you'd say, well, there's

55:17

a clearer pathway

55:19

to climate issues, there's

55:21

a clearer pathway to wildlife

55:24

overpasses through infrastructure

55:26

spending, right yep.

55:28

But there was in the Trump administration too, Is

55:30

that right?

55:30

Yeah?

55:31

Trump administration was very supportive

55:33

of those migration corridors and

55:35

they actually dedicated some funding to it. So

55:38

both administrations are on that. But

55:41

like Biden, we're looking at alternative

55:44

energy. But the BLM

55:46

solar plan, this is one that we have an editorial

55:48

coming out on Joel's Gutten editorial on it.

55:51

We're a bit concerned with Church with what

55:53

they're identifying in terms of

55:55

placement in those migration corridors

55:57

for solar do.

55:58

You might talk to a lot of Idaho folks

56:00

who are real, real fire out because the BLM

56:03

plan in Southwest Idaho uy

56:06

he downwhere Snort got bit. But there's

56:08

also California big horn sheep super

56:11

like the genetics for like that really

56:14

wide ass mule deer buck that

56:16

down in that country, and big old

56:18

pronghorn sage grouse. It's

56:21

a very sensitive area.

56:22

We're not opposed to alternative energy by

56:24

any stretch of the imagination. I mean, we need

56:26

to move into alternative energy. We just

56:28

want it to be carefully thought out. You

56:30

know, we need we need working

56:33

landscapes that provide great habitat

56:36

but also provide you know, clean water,

56:38

clean air, food that we like to

56:40

enjoy an energy and so, but

56:42

it's about doing the pre work

56:45

to make sure it's being placed in the appropriate

56:48

locations that aren't going to have big,

56:51

big ramifications for some of the species

56:53

that we hold near and dear.

56:55

And I think there's a huge misconception that if

56:57

you're supportive of alternative

57:00

energy, that you're supportive

57:03

of it anywhere. And I think,

57:05

like from someone who as

57:07

a former TIERCP staffer, like the some

57:12

of the like the sessions I remember

57:14

of people really hand ringing and pulling their hair

57:16

out or looking at maps of solar

57:19

placement, and like there's people

57:21

on the ground working for you know that we're supportive

57:23

of alternative energy, but recognize

57:26

the threat and the danger of citing it improperly.

57:29

And so I think like there's a

57:31

lot of back and forth. If you follow the discourse

57:34

about you know, it's either one way

57:36

or the other way, and there's people on the ground

57:39

that are really diligently thinking

57:41

about how do we stop this in places where it's

57:43

going to have a huge impact on wildlife and how

57:46

do we do it responsibly?

57:48

And we can have both. I mean that's

57:50

the thing when you look at the acreage requirements,

57:52

we have more enough acreage outside those corridors.

57:55

Now there might be other species and concerns

57:57

or landscape characteristics, historical

58:01

significance, you know, a range of issues,

58:04

but nonetheless we need to

58:06

take into account these really critical

58:08

areas. We saw the same thing in

58:10

Michigan with wind power. You

58:12

know, when we were putting up wind turbines the

58:15

areas they had the greatest wind potential

58:17

where right where birds migrated,

58:20

and it was that's going

58:22

to be problematic. I mean, if you're killing birds

58:25

like crazy when they're and we got wind

58:27

turbines located all down on the east side

58:29

of the state, which is a major

58:32

flyway corridor for migratory birds.

58:35

That's a problem, you know, so we you

58:38

know, in that situation, it was about

58:40

pulling the right expertise together, mapping

58:42

it out and looking at those

58:44

wind maps and looking at that where

58:47

those migration corridors were, and finding

58:49

solutions to it. So you're placing alternative

58:52

energy where it's going to be beneficial

58:55

and not harmful to those species.

58:58

Let me back up on the thing, and

59:00

I'm not trying to drive you to give a drive

59:03

you to give an answer you're not comfortable with, but I'm

59:06

just not clear on it. Yeah, we

59:09

talk about this this like

59:11

administration planning. Do

59:15

do you develop two or do you develop

59:18

one? And like you develop one plan for

59:20

the next four years and you're presenting it to

59:22

each campaign.

59:23

No, we do two. I

59:25

mean, for one thing, parties talk different

59:28

language, They use different

59:30

phraseology, even though they might have

59:34

the same issue, but they talk

59:36

about it in different terms. And so you

59:38

want you want the particular

59:41

party that you're going towards

59:43

to embrace this and use it. I

59:45

mean, you want it to be their recipe

59:47

book coming out, So you want it

59:49

to be put in terms that resonate

59:53

with other parts of that

59:55

party plank and what they're doing, and

59:58

so and there, there's and

1:00:00

elements are going to be more attractive to one

1:00:02

party over the other.

1:00:05

They just are.

1:00:06

I mean, you know, by and large, you'll

1:00:08

see more emphasis put on renewables

1:00:10

with the Democratic Party, and

1:00:15

security with oil security that's

1:00:17

talked about more in Republican Now.

1:00:19

In reality, we just we've

1:00:22

produced more oil and gas in this country

1:00:24

with each administration despite the party,

1:00:27

in recent years, is that right,

1:00:29

Yep, it's been ramping up.

1:00:31

I get a record high, right, yeah, in terms of oil

1:00:33

produced in the US.

1:00:35

And people don't recognize

1:00:37

that, but it's true. We have as part of

1:00:39

our national security plan.

1:00:41

Gotcha, I understand what you're saying with tailoring

1:00:44

it in that.

1:00:45

Yeah.

1:00:45

And there also and there's probably cases where you're

1:00:47

gonna there's probably cases where you're

1:00:49

going to drive at there's

1:00:53

probably cases where you're you're asking for the same

1:00:56

thing, but you're phrasing it as a different priority.

1:00:58

Yeah.

1:01:00

There was also issues you

1:01:02

know, we tend to the Republican Party tends

1:01:04

to be a little more states rights. Then

1:01:06

the Democratic Party looks for national

1:01:08

solutions on those issues.

1:01:11

So you know, that's another way that

1:01:13

you're taking a look at it. You know, during

1:01:15

the Trump administration, we saw a nice

1:01:17

expansion and hunting and fishing on national

1:01:20

refuge lands. And not

1:01:23

only did they do that, but speaking as

1:01:25

a state director, one of the things I really liked

1:01:27

is they put out a mandate

1:01:30

with that the regulations were

1:01:32

going to be as close to the state regulations

1:01:34

as they could be. So before

1:01:36

you had if you were going to hunt on

1:01:40

you know, refuge land, you might have different shell

1:01:42

limits, you might have different days of the week

1:01:44

that there was hunting, you might have all

1:01:46

kinds of different requirements that were a little

1:01:49

different season requirements

1:01:51

than what you had at the state on the state

1:01:53

land. And that just gets complex,

1:01:56

you know that, I know that, and so

1:01:58

they tried to simplify that bring

1:02:00

the federal lands closer in

1:02:03

alignment with the state regulations.

1:02:15

Do you feel is there any rumor

1:02:18

or anything around would

1:02:22

Trump return to Barnhardt as his

1:02:24

Interior secretary? Barnhart

1:02:27

Bernhart, Sorry, it was David?

1:02:29

Is that David?

1:02:30

Yeah?

1:02:31

I don't know.

1:02:32

Hey, I do know that David has

1:02:34

stayed very engaged in natural resource

1:02:36

issues, and you

1:02:39

know, he was very loyal to Trump throughout

1:02:42

the administration and even afterwards. So you

1:02:45

know, I I don't know, but I would assume

1:02:47

he'll have some role in the administration.

1:02:50

I heard a a

1:02:54

person very involved in conservation.

1:02:56

I'm not trying to be like, you know, secret

1:02:59

about someone, Uh take

1:03:01

a private conversation and apply it to someone, but

1:03:04

someone very involved in conservation had

1:03:07

said to me that what they what they liked

1:03:09

about Trump's Interior secretary

1:03:12

Part two, the second Interior Secretary,

1:03:15

was that he would save you a lot of time by

1:03:20

saying, uh, buddy,

1:03:23

you're not going to get anywhere on this with me, and

1:03:26

it would allow you to focus on the areas where

1:03:28

he said, let's have a conversation and

1:03:31

would tell you what's going to happen.

1:03:34

Yeah, and then and then stick with that.

1:03:36

Yeah.

1:03:37

And he said it was it just was. It was

1:03:39

efficient. Yeah,

1:03:41

I mean to to to spend time and resource

1:03:43

there because you never wound up being that you wasted a

1:03:45

bunch of time on something that you didn't

1:03:47

know that all of a sudden you're gonna read the newspaper that things

1:03:49

went in the direction you didn't anticipate.

1:03:51

He was an honest broker in terms of telling

1:03:54

you where issues were going if

1:03:56

there was already a thought on it, so and

1:04:00

and he he had researched issues

1:04:02

also, so he had a pretty good handle on

1:04:05

a lot of the conservation issues out there

1:04:08

in that administration. You

1:04:11

know, one of the things people probably don't realize

1:04:14

is a lot of the staff support

1:04:16

that comes in are the

1:04:19

same folks. So you'll have administrations

1:04:23

where you know a particular

1:04:25

individuals in the administration they're

1:04:27

a staff person, and you

1:04:29

might switch parties for four years or

1:04:32

eight years, but then you'll bring

1:04:34

back a lot of those people that had worked

1:04:36

during the previous Republican or Democratic

1:04:39

administration because they kind of

1:04:41

know the party priorities. And

1:04:43

also they are very helpful in

1:04:45

getting new candidates

1:04:47

and new administrations in place

1:04:51

and off to an effective

1:04:54

start to move that agenda forward,

1:04:57

because it's it's hard, especially

1:05:00

if somebody comes in from outside government.

1:05:03

You've got to make an awful lot of appointments,

1:05:05

You've got an awful lot to do, to

1:05:08

have executive orders written, and we've

1:05:10

all seen there are more

1:05:12

and more things being done by executive authority

1:05:15

now and administrations

1:05:17

kind of flip flop and reverse

1:05:19

each other's executive order right out

1:05:22

of the gate. And they do that by bringing

1:05:24

back people who are knowledgeable, know how

1:05:26

to write executive orders, and are

1:05:28

familiar with the topic and have

1:05:31

experience in it.

1:05:32

We recently had a guest on talking about offshore

1:05:35

wind offshore

1:05:38

when you know electriacy generation, how

1:05:41

do you yeah, wind power, wind power.

1:05:44

At the end of the interview, I said, so, you

1:05:46

know, when Trump wins in November,

1:05:49

where is all this sit And

1:05:52

he didn't have a great answer, but I felt

1:05:54

like you could spend a lot of time working

1:05:56

on something if you weren't being

1:05:59

shrewd. You spend a lot of time working

1:06:01

on something and then just have the rug

1:06:03

ripped out from underneath you every

1:06:05

four years.

1:06:06

Oh yeah. And that's why administrations

1:06:09

work so hard to get re elected and have at

1:06:11

least an eight year runway, because

1:06:13

it takes, you know, it takes really

1:06:16

a couple of years to get administration in and

1:06:18

rolling, to get all your your appointments

1:06:21

confirmed and in there, and

1:06:24

start to implement that policy direction, and

1:06:26

by then you're into the next election cycle.

1:06:28

In your campaigning, the administration

1:06:30

is and so you

1:06:33

know, and and quite often what

1:06:35

we'll also see is at the end of the administration

1:06:38

that's when the promises that were made when

1:06:40

they came into office get run

1:06:43

through, and some of those, quite frankly,

1:06:45

can be quite ugly.

1:06:47

That's what I was going to ask is when, because

1:06:49

both candidates would be their their last term,

1:06:52

last four yep, right, So that's

1:06:55

typically when, as you just said, like

1:06:57

you get to capitalize on the earth

1:07:00

promises, some of the campaign promises

1:07:02

they got them elected in the first place, that's right, or

1:07:04

one that independent

1:07:07

constituency. Right, We're

1:07:13

like, is

1:07:15

there going to be such a restart if

1:07:18

Trump were to win? Would

1:07:20

it hinder that last

1:07:23

four years of getting ship done?

1:07:25

Oh?

1:07:26

Like as yours? Yeah? With

1:07:28

does the does the break? Does

1:07:32

the four year vacation

1:07:34

sabbatical interrupt

1:07:36

the momentum that you would have had your second

1:07:39

term momentum?

1:07:40

Yeah? Because what we saw right was

1:07:42

like I think, like clean

1:07:44

Water Act is always a great ping

1:07:47

pong ball, right, Like God

1:07:49

forbid we have somebody be like, yeah, some

1:07:51

of that was okay, so we're just gonna return

1:07:54

the pendulum to the middle, But instead

1:07:56

you watch that pendulum go yeah,

1:08:00

and it's it's.

1:08:01

We're seeing more more of that.

1:08:03

Yeah. Yeah, So like that's

1:08:05

what I'm I'm wondering, right, is like the

1:08:08

first two years are just going to be like knocking those

1:08:10

ping pong balls all the way back over to

1:08:13

one side.

1:08:14

Yeah, you know, yes, and no, I

1:08:16

mean they're gonna if a new administration

1:08:18

comes in, or even the current administration,

1:08:21

they're going to have some individuals who do not

1:08:23

you know, cabinet members and other appointees

1:08:26

under secretaries who will not persist

1:08:29

through the second term of the administration or

1:08:32

with a new administration, they'll have to name a

1:08:34

whole new cabinet and all those

1:08:37

other appointed positions, and quite

1:08:39

frankly, that takes a lot of time and

1:08:42

energy.

1:08:42

So they'll

1:08:46

or, as we've seen in the past, not appointing

1:08:49

positions.

1:08:50

Yeah, that's right, right, that's right. Not appointing

1:08:52

positions is also a tactic out

1:08:54

there, having interim

1:08:56

folks and acting folks.

1:08:58

That's an interesting tactic when you have divisions.

1:09:01

When you can't get somebody confirmed.

1:09:03

Well no, no, I mean that also, but when you just

1:09:05

have areas in which you're not that interested,

1:09:09

I think you'd like to see downsize it's

1:09:11

just the appointment, that's

1:09:14

right, and.

1:09:15

Leave lots of vacancies in the organization.

1:09:19

Is there.

1:09:22

Is there an area potentially

1:09:24

with say renewables

1:09:27

or energy production nationally.

1:09:31

UH that that both administrations

1:09:35

kind of have more of an intersection

1:09:38

or similar thinking on that you'd see

1:09:40

as that uh as

1:09:42

that issue might have

1:09:46

national security concerns for

1:09:48

example with solar or

1:09:50

offshore or well.

1:09:52

Both administrations have been ramping up,

1:09:54

you know, hydrocarbon production

1:09:57

in the United States, so we're more self sufficient

1:09:59

there. So that has been an

1:10:02

ongoing trend as we talked

1:10:04

about. You know, I

1:10:07

think yes and

1:10:09

no think. I think

1:10:11

you're gonna see both administrations

1:10:14

wanting to get into market based incentives

1:10:17

that are out there. I mean, we've got to be able

1:10:19

to make carbon part of the economy

1:10:22

in order to treat it effectively. This is

1:10:24

my two cents. I mean, it doesn't

1:10:26

make any sense to have national forests that are

1:10:28

going up in flames and burning

1:10:31

fiber and causing tremendous

1:10:33

degradation of habitats out there, rather

1:10:36

than removing some of that fiber,

1:10:39

mimicking natural processes and using

1:10:41

that fiber and actually

1:10:44

storing that carbon. So

1:10:46

we've got to find ways that we can rebuild

1:10:49

these local economies to have working landscapes.

1:10:51

And we've lost a lot

1:10:54

of that local rural economy. I mean,

1:10:56

we don't have mills in much

1:10:58

United States anymore in order to to even

1:11:01

handle that fiber. Part

1:11:03

of our problem with you

1:11:05

know, there's been concerns with prescribed fire

1:11:08

on the landscape because there have been a couple of fires

1:11:10

that have gotten away from the Forest Service

1:11:12

or state agencies that have been using it.

1:11:15

But are we're using

1:11:17

prescribed fire sometimes in cases

1:11:20

where it's very

1:11:22

different today than it used to be, where you know,

1:11:24

you might run fire through an oak savanna or

1:11:26

a pine savannah and one day, you

1:11:29

know what the conditions are going to be, we can

1:11:32

go out there and see what the humidity

1:11:34

is. We have good weather satellite

1:11:36

data. Now we've

1:11:39

got big piles of logs that we have no mill

1:11:41

to run it to. We've got no log haulers

1:11:44

to haul it too. So you've got this huge

1:11:46

pile of logs that are been cut and

1:11:49

they're just stacked on the landscape, and

1:11:52

we're using prescribed fire then to burn that pile

1:11:55

of logs. What happens to

1:11:57

that prescribe fire window? You know,

1:11:59

anybody's had bomb fire, you know, it goes

1:12:01

from a one day fire.

1:12:03

Eventually you're standing around being like, oh my gosh,

1:12:07

it's.

1:12:07

A multi day fire,

1:12:09

and then your chance of having

1:12:11

fire escape from that. You know, you have winds

1:12:14

come up in unexpected weather situations.

1:12:17

When you have a big, big inferno

1:12:20

going like that, you can't just kill it, you

1:12:22

know, and so it's very difficult.

1:12:24

You're talking about disposing of of

1:12:27

stuff from thinning operations because there's nowhere

1:12:29

to go, there's nowhere to use, there's no way to use it economically.

1:12:31

Yeah, it might be to you, so it just has to get

1:12:34

torched.

1:12:34

It might be a salvage cut that goes in. You might

1:12:36

have a severe ice storm that comes in and

1:12:39

closes roads and closes trails.

1:12:41

You need to get that down material

1:12:44

out of there. It might be win throw. I

1:12:46

mean, we have tremendous areas in the Upper

1:12:48

Peninsula and Lower Peninsula Michigan

1:12:51

where winds race across those lakes

1:12:53

and they will you know, certain

1:12:55

events will throw trees down.

1:12:57

Yeah, it's like an avalanche path on relative

1:13:02

you know.

1:13:02

Or it could be a thinning operation where you're degrading

1:13:05

that forest. You're getting so much fiber

1:13:07

and so much ladder fuel that's

1:13:10

creating fire damage, you know, fire hazard

1:13:13

and damage for the future of that forest.

1:13:16

So at that point you want to remove it, but

1:13:19

you know, you want to remove it and be able

1:13:21

to use that product if possible, And

1:13:24

that's where we need to rebuild that infrastructure

1:13:26

in some manner.

1:13:28

How do you as a as

1:13:30

a federal policy

1:13:32

organization or you know, or

1:13:35

a conservation group

1:13:37

with federal scope, national, national level scope,

1:13:41

how do you guys come in and uh, is

1:13:44

it okay to come in and weigh in on appointments?

1:13:48

Oh?

1:13:48

Yeah, I mean we're talking about like interior

1:13:50

secretary like that that an administration

1:13:53

when they when when when a when an administration

1:13:55

picks it's it's secretary

1:13:59

of the Interior. You're sort

1:14:01

of like looking at just

1:14:04

this hugely impactful appointment. It's

1:14:07

going to be that's going to be your enemy, that's

1:14:09

going to be your ally. Right?

1:14:13

Is it Is there a pathway

1:14:15

to come in and say, hey, that that choice ain't

1:14:18

gonna work.

1:14:20

Yes, there have been in the past with the

1:14:23

going in and saying, you know, this is just not an

1:14:25

appropriate appointment given you know what

1:14:27

this person has done previously or what they

1:14:30

are saying publicly on it, or we have

1:14:32

concerns about working with it.

1:14:34

But typically what we try and do

1:14:36

is way in early in terms

1:14:38

of the types of expertise

1:14:41

or major issues that we think are coming

1:14:44

up that that the administration

1:14:47

should look at and consider

1:14:49

for appointments out there. And quite

1:14:51

frankly, most administrations coming

1:14:54

in they ask key partner

1:14:57

groups out there, who do you know

1:15:00

good?

1:15:00

Yeah, so you get a chance,

1:15:03

you could like slide a resume over. Yeah,

1:15:07

are you are you up for that job?

1:15:08

No?

1:15:08

No, you're not.

1:15:13

No, But you know, I

1:15:16

went in and interviewed for Director

1:15:19

of the Fish and Wildlife Service years ago, and

1:15:22

that's how it was. I kept saying I wasn't interested

1:15:24

in it, and it was like, we really want to talk to

1:15:27

you, just come in and talk to us.

1:15:29

So I flew in, talked to him for a day

1:15:31

and told him who I thought would be really good, But

1:15:34

it wasn't me. You know, we needed to make

1:15:37

deep cultural change in that organization

1:15:39

at that time, and I really thought it needed to come

1:15:42

from somebody within the organization, and

1:15:46

and they did. That person

1:15:49

came in. Sam Hamilton came in and was very

1:15:51

effective while he was there. Unfortunately

1:15:53

he died of a heart attack lead

1:15:56

too early in life.

1:15:59

Uh, before

1:16:02

we start recording you're talking about we

1:16:07

were talking about when

1:16:09

you hit you uh,

1:16:13

you ran the you ran the DNR

1:16:16

in Michigan. And then later we're

1:16:18

asked would you like to be a commissioner, and

1:16:21

you felt that that was inappropriate

1:16:24

to have like a former, like a

1:16:27

former department head sitting

1:16:29

on the commission and having I

1:16:32

don't know, what's a confused power dynamic.

1:16:35

Well, I think it's difficult. I think it's difficult

1:16:38

for private organizations or

1:16:40

nonprofits to have their past CEO

1:16:42

sit on their border directors. Your border

1:16:45

directors is your boss, and

1:16:47

to have your predecessor be your boss puts

1:16:50

you in an uncomfortable situation when you know

1:16:52

there are key initiatives or changes

1:16:54

that person made and you're recommending something

1:16:57

different. I

1:17:01

didn't have to deal with that when I was director. I

1:17:03

didn't have any past directors. In fact, there haven't

1:17:06

been past directors on the commission before

1:17:08

until the person that followed

1:17:10

me was named on

1:17:12

the commission for a short time. And quite

1:17:15

frankly I talked to him about it. He said it was awful.

1:17:17

Oh okay, you know, and the groups try and

1:17:20

use you also, you

1:17:22

know, I get called now on issues

1:17:24

where the sportsman's groups don't

1:17:26

necessarily agree with the decision, and they want

1:17:29

me to come out and publicly weigh in on it. Oh

1:17:31

and you know, I'm

1:17:34

not so sure my opinion at this point is any more

1:17:36

important than anybody else's opinion out

1:17:39

there. But the other part of it is,

1:17:43

you know, I think those jobs are really tough,

1:17:45

and I don't want to make it tougher that

1:17:47

person that.

1:17:50

I was more bringing that up to tea up to another

1:17:53

thing, is you would said

1:17:56

before we started recording to day, you're talking about what

1:17:58

you're seeing in general. I'll

1:18:03

have you put in your own words, but like a general erosion

1:18:06

of commission authority?

1:18:11

Can can you explain? Can you real quick tell people,

1:18:14

you know, speaking from that you got fifty of

1:18:16

these things like what are commissions

1:18:18

and what do you mean by commission authority?

1:18:20

Well, commissions natural resources

1:18:22

commissions, and they sometimes are called fishing

1:18:24

game commissions, but typically they are appointed

1:18:27

positions appointed by the governor

1:18:30

and then they are the body that either hires

1:18:33

the director of the Department Natural Resources

1:18:35

or fishing Game or whatever it's called in that

1:18:38

state, or they

1:18:41

are the decision maker on hunting

1:18:44

and fishing regulations. So you've got

1:18:46

this this public commission

1:18:49

with appointed people to help

1:18:51

help insulate the departments

1:18:54

directly from the governor's office.

1:18:56

So even though you're part of the executive branch,

1:18:59

you know you don't. You have a little bit of buffer

1:19:01

in there. And they also

1:19:04

provide some real transparency because

1:19:06

typically those commissions don't

1:19:09

pass regulations, they don't hire directors

1:19:12

without public input. When I was hired,

1:19:14

my interview was televised, so

1:19:17

it was you know, it was a very

1:19:20

public process that went

1:19:22

through in terms of selection.

1:19:24

Did they ask what your spirit animal was?

1:19:25

No, they didn't ask what my spirit animal was.

1:19:28

They asked an awful lot of other questions, So I

1:19:30

got to tell you. And but

1:19:34

you know, that process of gathering

1:19:36

public input on various regulations

1:19:38

is really important, and we are seeing now

1:19:41

more and more directors

1:19:45

are selected not by the commission but by the

1:19:47

governor. They become gubernatorial appointments,

1:19:49

which occurred in Michigan when

1:19:52

I was there. I was the last commission appointed

1:19:54

and the first gubernatorial appointed director.

1:19:58

So the commission of the director, the governor

1:20:00

in the state passed an executive order that made

1:20:04

that appointment her appointment rather

1:20:06

than the commissions.

1:20:07

Because they just didn't like what they were getting from the

1:20:09

Commission because they wanted to be just like more an

1:20:12

instrument of the administration.

1:20:13

Like, what is the push I think, you

1:20:16

know, I think they you know, what I heard

1:20:18

was you want direct accountability of your

1:20:20

cabinet members. But I really think when

1:20:23

you get into office and

1:20:25

you name your cabinet, you want to

1:20:27

be able to name those cabinet members

1:20:30

so that they're all people that are affiliated

1:20:32

in helping move your agenda forward.

1:20:35

And what the second thing that has happened

1:20:37

with that, though, is the tenure

1:20:39

of agency directors has shortened.

1:20:41

Now the average tenures less than three years.

1:20:45

Well, it's hard to manage natural resources

1:20:47

that have you know,

1:20:49

long history lifespan, scientific

1:20:53

the whole nine yards on really

1:20:55

short rotation. So yes,

1:20:57

I hear governors want that direct accountability.

1:21:00

But having some some

1:21:04

transition and having directors

1:21:06

span various parties, it's

1:21:09

not all bad. It's

1:21:11

good, I mean in my opinion, and I

1:21:13

think having the Commission in there and

1:21:15

most of your commissions are required to be bipartisan,

1:21:19

so they have the call for in various states.

1:21:21

You know, commissioners either represent a geographic

1:21:24

location or they represent

1:21:27

political party.

1:21:28

Yeah, or or uh in

1:21:33

or factions of industry meaning

1:21:36

commercial guides and guides and outfitters,

1:21:38

commercial interests, agriculture.

1:21:41

You need where you're.

1:21:41

Trying to strive for some level. And I think that

1:21:44

and I've heard and

1:21:46

maybe it's just a tradition in Washington,

1:21:49

but regionality, Yeah, I

1:21:51

think you see specified regionality as well. Yeah, because

1:21:54

so many from the you know, west of the Cascades,

1:21:56

East of the Cascades, that's right.

1:21:59

Sorry, But with that, what we're seeing is those

1:22:01

commissions are both their authorities

1:22:04

getting nit back, you know, sometimes through

1:22:06

state law that you know, legislators

1:22:09

are trying to enact laws on

1:22:11

taking of game and fish species

1:22:14

or the method of take, and then the other way

1:22:16

is they're losing their authority to a

1:22:18

point, also a point

1:22:21

a point your director.

1:22:22

The director, Yeah, got him? And you

1:22:25

generally are uneasy

1:22:28

with this, I am.

1:22:29

I think it creates more partisan politics

1:22:31

into the natural resource

1:22:33

arena, and I think it creates

1:22:35

more of these shifts. And just like we talked

1:22:38

about with executive orders that swing so

1:22:40

far one way and then the other way, you

1:22:43

know, that's that you waste a lot of time and energy.

1:22:46

Yeah, like ladies and gentlemen, we're all

1:22:48

in on renewables. Then ladies

1:22:50

and gentlemen, we're all in on high.

1:22:53

Slow down the pendulum a little bit.

1:22:54

Yeah.

1:22:55

Uh, just I

1:22:57

got a last question for you that's a little more

1:23:00

oplicated, but uh, just an observation about

1:23:02

the wild pendulum swings

1:23:04

on. I mean, people like the bitch

1:23:06

about gridlock, but

1:23:09

I always like to remind folks that this is quite intentional.

1:23:14

You know, we could be like Venezuela.

1:23:17

You know, hey we're communists, and

1:23:20

then like a couple months later, hey we're ultra right,

1:23:24

Hey we're back to communists. I mean,

1:23:26

those are you know, when people bitch about gridlock,

1:23:28

I can have a.

1:23:28

Little effect on your bank account.

1:23:30

When people bitch about gridlock and all this, it's

1:23:32

like it's this is intentionally

1:23:36

constructed that we don't go down wild

1:23:38

ass that you can't harness

1:23:40

the moment and going wild directions

1:23:43

all the time. Right, And so I don't like, I

1:23:45

get aggravated about the things that I want

1:23:47

to happen that don't happen quickly. But in general,

1:23:50

it's like it's as

1:23:52

some stability.

1:23:53

The other people's stuff is going just as slow.

1:23:55

It's better. Yeah, So if I don't

1:23:58

get what I want and they don't get what they want, I

1:24:00

feel okay about it.

1:24:01

Our issues tend to do really well though,

1:24:03

during gridlock. So you know, here's the other

1:24:05

part of it is, we might get frustrated,

1:24:08

but we are usually highly

1:24:11

effective when Congress or state

1:24:13

legislatures cannot agree on issues.

1:24:16

Our conservation issues usually

1:24:19

do really well because.

1:24:21

You can be the awesome person who

1:24:23

says, hey, I got something that everybody

1:24:25

like, Yeah, exactly right.

1:24:28

There's no like hot button

1:24:31

social issue wrapped up into it.

1:24:32

Well, that's right. I mean in DNR,

1:24:35

we used to call ourselves the Department of Fun that

1:24:37

doesn't want to support the Department of Fun. I

1:24:39

mean, you have hunting, you have camping, you've got

1:24:42

timber industry, you've got fishing and

1:24:45

hunting and wildlife viewing. So

1:24:47

I mean, but most of

1:24:49

our legislation we work

1:24:52

in a bipartisan manner. Anyhow to

1:24:54

try and get things so that you

1:24:56

have both sponsors of bills on the right and

1:24:58

the left, and and introduce thos

1:25:01

and try and keep them fairly evenly matched.

1:25:03

So those we tend to be highly successful

1:25:06

during periods of gridlock when Congress

1:25:08

can't deal with the other stuff, and.

1:25:10

They need to have something that they

1:25:15

need to bring you. I supported

1:25:17

this bill.

1:25:19

That's right.

1:25:20

Uh, here's the one is here's one. It's more

1:25:22

complicated. It's not complicated. Answers is complicated

1:25:25

to ask.

1:25:27

Uh.

1:25:29

Everyone loves to talk to Gripe

1:25:31

about ballot box biology,

1:25:34

ballot box initiatives. And

1:25:36

also I find this is an area

1:25:38

that really accentuates a lot of hypocrisy.

1:25:41

Meaning I'm

1:25:44

very supportive of the ballot initiatives

1:25:46

that guarantee the right to hunt trap

1:25:48

and fish. Okay, So I'll

1:25:51

be like, hell, yeah, vote yes,

1:25:54

this is November for your

1:25:56

states right to hunt

1:25:58

fish. Okay. Then

1:26:00

the next time some a ballot initiative comes

1:26:03

up that I don't like, I'll be like, there you

1:26:05

go, damn it, ballot box

1:26:07

biology, right,

1:26:10

putting it to the voters. That's

1:26:12

not how you do it. But a minute ago, I was

1:26:14

just avid, you know what I mean. A minute ago, I was

1:26:16

just saying, Oh, you.

1:26:17

Can get the uninformed mass to vote

1:26:20

your way. It's a great thing.

1:26:22

So people love right, like

1:26:25

everybody complains about it, But they complain about

1:26:27

it only when there's a ballot box initiative

1:26:29

that they hate. And when

1:26:31

there's ones they support, they're getting out the vote.

1:26:33

Well, it's like people don't really complain about

1:26:35

judicial activism when the courts are

1:26:38

finding in their favor.

1:26:39

Sure, you know. Yeah, So

1:26:42

here's the question that's that was

1:26:44

just the observation. Is it really

1:26:47

is there more of this now than there

1:26:49

was? Or is it just always been this way? I mean,

1:26:51

is it really more ballot

1:26:53

box biology and ballot

1:26:56

box?

1:26:58

What what?

1:26:59

Wildlife?

1:26:59

Man?

1:27:00

Yeah?

1:27:00

I think we go through waves, to be honest

1:27:03

with you, I think there are periods. You

1:27:05

know, when I think back through my career, there were

1:27:07

periods where we had ballad

1:27:09

initiatives that we fought and that we

1:27:12

supported, and then you'll have a quiet

1:27:14

period for a while, and then it creeps

1:27:17

back up again. So it's usually when there's an action

1:27:19

and a reaction that's

1:27:21

out there and.

1:27:23

Oh, like, I'll show you that's

1:27:25

right, I'll give you a ball.

1:27:28

But we have seen some of the national

1:27:31

challenges towards hunting and fishing. We

1:27:33

have seen those been direct

1:27:35

campaigns that are now being fought at the state

1:27:38

level. So I think you see

1:27:40

more activity to

1:27:43

try and restrict and also

1:27:45

promote hunting and fishing at

1:27:48

that state level than we used to do. Where

1:27:51

it used to be, you know, we had more

1:27:53

national legislation and the rest of it, and

1:27:56

so there's more activism at that state level.

1:27:59

So that is thing. Yeah, I think so,

1:28:01

because you were saying earlier that big box,

1:28:04

all the giant big box and no one after

1:28:06

him might have been a bat might be faulty,

1:28:08

memory might be faulty. But the days

1:28:11

back when they weren't ballot

1:28:13

box initiating wildlife decisions is

1:28:15

new ish. Yeah, I you

1:28:18

know, it's expanded.

1:28:19

You know, I remember we had we had some

1:28:21

back in the seventies, but then really in

1:28:24

the nineties it really came alive and then we've

1:28:26

kind of seen it dining down and now it's

1:28:29

you know, we had periods

1:28:31

across the country where there was a big push to

1:28:34

to do ballot initiatives to protect

1:28:36

the right to hunt and fish, and now

1:28:39

you're seeing challenges again.

1:28:41

Yep.

1:28:42

So and we're seeing

1:28:44

a big push right now in several

1:28:47

states for trying to advocate

1:28:49

for these commissions to have appointments that

1:28:51

are non hunters and even anti

1:28:53

hunters, an angler.

1:28:55

Zoo keepers.

1:28:56

Yeah, we got a uh, everybody's

1:28:59

got an test in the state's wildlife, so

1:29:01

we need to have those interests represented on

1:29:04

the board. Unfortunately,

1:29:06

like that, never you never get

1:29:08

to ask the question, well are

1:29:11

there interests not being represented currently

1:29:14

by our current management plan? We

1:29:17

never get to ask that. So

1:29:19

what what is the impetus?

1:29:20

Right?

1:29:21

M hm?

1:29:23

Well, yeah, I mean they're managing far

1:29:25

more species that aren't one hundred

1:29:27

and fished than are

1:29:29

and have been for quite some time. Yeah,

1:29:34

let me give you one last question, and then these guys

1:29:36

might have a last question. You're not going to do the who are you voting

1:29:38

for? Again? How

1:29:41

do you handle that?

1:29:42

I'm voting for my daughter, she's running for county

1:29:44

commissioner?

1:29:49

Nepotism?

1:29:50

How do you handle that question? Let let let's let's roll play

1:29:52

for a minute. I'm uh okay,

1:29:55

I'm I'm uh running

1:29:58

for president okay. And

1:30:00

and some we're having a meeting about agenda.

1:30:03

He said, hey, I want to hear from the big conservation groups

1:30:05

about what you guys are thinking. And I'm crafting

1:30:07

my thing. And we finished out the meeting,

1:30:09

and and like you and I meet in the hallway

1:30:12

and I'm like, well, can I plan on your support this

1:30:14

November? Becky? Now

1:30:16

you do your part. I just did my part. Can

1:30:19

I plan on your support this November?

1:30:21

If it's a candidate that I was already planning

1:30:23

to support and I felt was the best candidate,

1:30:26

I would probably let that individual know that I was

1:30:28

going to support them personally.

1:30:37

First, I don't have your vote. I don't have

1:30:39

your votes to do that.

1:30:41

No, I'm still deciding, but at

1:30:43

this point I'm not leaning towards this.

1:30:45

But you know, that's what you'd say.

1:30:47

It depends on the situation.

1:30:50

If I was in representing

1:30:52

TRCP at the meeting, I wouldn't

1:30:54

answer it at all.

1:30:55

But how how okay, how

1:30:58

do you answer it? That's why I'm trying to the

1:31:00

role play here. We are, You're representing

1:31:02

TRCP, and I say I'd like to know that I could

1:31:04

count on your support this November. I'm just like,

1:31:07

how do you do it?

1:31:08

I'm interim CEO of the Theodore

1:31:11

Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, which is

1:31:13

a nonprofit. Legally, we cannot

1:31:16

support partisan candidates.

1:31:18

Hard argu trap me. Okay,

1:31:21

that's good, that's good. I'm just helping you rehearse

1:31:23

because this might happen to you. Oh, I know,

1:31:28

here's the last one. The last one I got from you, Where

1:31:31

should people Where

1:31:34

should people be paying the most attention in

1:31:37

the next four years If we're

1:31:39

talking about just conservation with a big

1:31:41

c right like not not local,

1:31:44

not necessarily local issues like oh they messed

1:31:46

with our elk management plan, but like big

1:31:50

picture your kids are going to feel the impacts

1:31:53

of this. Where should

1:31:55

people be paying attention?

1:31:56

Well, a couple of things I think they really need to

1:31:58

pay attention to. Number one one is we

1:32:00

talked about it earlier, those working landscapes.

1:32:03

As this country moves

1:32:05

into renewables and we

1:32:07

have more and more pressure on the landscape, livestock

1:32:10

and close proximity to wildlife in the

1:32:13

whole nine yards, we need to

1:32:15

make sure that we are planning for that and

1:32:18

putting together good overall policy

1:32:20

and policy direction that accommodates

1:32:25

both both renewable energy,

1:32:27

people, livestock, food

1:32:30

and wildlife, and great hunting

1:32:32

access out on the landscape and fishing.

1:32:36

The other part of it is, I

1:32:38

would say, on the accessibility issues

1:32:41

to making sure that our public lands remain

1:32:43

public and that the tools

1:32:46

that we have in the toolbox for incentivizing

1:32:48

private land management remain

1:32:51

there and remain effective. We're

1:32:53

trying to get a farm bill through. You guys

1:32:55

know, the last farm bill expired in

1:32:58

September of twenty three as one your

1:33:00

extension. It's going to expire again

1:33:02

in twenty four later

1:33:05

this year. And that is the biggest

1:33:07

piece of conservation legislation usually

1:33:10

that we ever pass. It's huge.

1:33:12

Sixty percent of these country is in private

1:33:14

land, and you

1:33:17

know that farm bell provides tremendous

1:33:19

incentives for people to farm

1:33:23

the best and leave the rest. You know, it's kind

1:33:25

of one of the catchphrases that we say out there,

1:33:27

but really helps people steward

1:33:30

that landscape and wildlife. They

1:33:33

don't recognize property boundaries.

1:33:36

I mean, the bottom line is we need great

1:33:38

public land management and we need great

1:33:40

private land management. And I

1:33:43

personally believe we need very good active

1:33:46

management. We can't just draw

1:33:48

a line around it, leave it alone

1:33:52

and call it good unless we're willing

1:33:54

to wait centuries for you

1:33:56

know, restoration after major wildfires

1:33:59

or you know, for big

1:34:02

storms and you know the huge

1:34:05

blowdowns and and you can't

1:34:07

even use that particular land

1:34:09

for a while.

1:34:11

Got it all

1:34:13

right? So thank you for sharing.

1:34:17

You want to ask vote for me November.

1:34:24

I will tell you you know what you

1:34:26

wouldn't do it for me. But I'm gonna tell you right now you can count

1:34:28

on my support, all right.

1:34:30

All right, I hope Terry's support.

1:34:36

Anything else, guys, thanks

1:34:38

for thanks for coming on and thanks for all the work

1:34:40

that you're doing.

1:34:41

My pleasure. We've got a great team at t r

1:34:44

c P, which you certainly know and and

1:34:46

all of you do, and they

1:34:48

do great work, and they and

1:34:50

they tackle the big problems, you know. I think

1:34:52

that's the thing that tr CP I feel

1:34:55

most strongly about. A lot of organizations play

1:34:57

offense or defense on law

1:35:00

some policies, but TRCP

1:35:02

really builds this think tank model

1:35:04

where they pull all the groups together and do

1:35:07

the energy to try and build good

1:35:09

policy direction and then build that campaign

1:35:12

from the ground up. That's pretty special

1:35:14

and it takes lots of time and effort.

1:35:17

Well, what, sorry, what do we gain

1:35:19

by supporting a group like TRCP,

1:35:21

Because it's not a membership organization.

1:35:23

No, it's not.

1:35:24

It's not a membership organization. Most

1:35:26

of our funding, about two thirds of it comes

1:35:29

through grants and foundations and

1:35:31

then personal donors and

1:35:34

family foundations that donate

1:35:36

on restricted revenue. But what

1:35:39

you're bringin from it I think is the

1:35:41

coalition pulling the organizations

1:35:44

together around

1:35:46

common ideas, big picture ideas,

1:35:49

and then doing the legwork to really

1:35:51

invest and figure out how we're going to solve

1:35:53

those problems.

1:35:55

Well, I appreciate the life

1:35:58

you've spent in conservation, and I appreciate

1:36:01

you're measured, rational,

1:36:05

well articulated perspectives on things.

1:36:07

And then well thank you sir.

1:36:09

Yeah, oh that'll that'll. This will inoculate

1:36:12

us from some of the nonsense

1:36:14

that we're going to hear between now, from

1:36:17

all directions it's between.

1:36:21

I know, I know it's it's going to be a

1:36:23

tough year in that regard. It really is going

1:36:25

to be a tough year.

1:36:26

Well, hang in there. Well, maybe after the election

1:36:29

you can come back and then tell us what you think.

1:36:30

No, I'm I'm hopeful after the election, I'm going

1:36:32

to be retired. That's

1:36:35

right, you re retired, retired, retired,

1:36:38

I get it right.

1:36:38

This time we'll pipe you in like Susie

1:36:41

or from.

1:36:45

Your thirty five football that's

1:36:47

right, all right, thank you very

1:36:49

much, beg you special.

1:36:53

Lot of hard praise the

1:37:02

seand pattern. Hey,

1:37:05

they they

1:37:09

always chant to love

1:37:11

me all

1:37:13

throughout the fall.

1:37:17

When it comes to springtime,

1:37:20

they start dropping luck.

1:37:23

They they

1:37:27

only want for my hunt, and

1:37:30

they only want before a fish.

1:37:33

And.

1:37:34

They only want before the mouth. It's

1:37:39

they come around and.

1:37:43

They only want fort and

1:37:47

they only want before the sand

1:37:49

tail crank. They

1:37:51

want before the lactail buck,

1:37:54

sandering neck, the real

1:37:57

grand They only

1:38:00

want forma hunt in.

1:38:08

Only end hunt and seize

1:38:11

me. They always

1:38:14

found a reason to

1:38:17

love me and leave me for

1:38:19

the next. In love, they'll

1:38:25

say that they're sorry

1:38:29

that you just don't have time.

1:38:33

Oh, it's kind of funny,

1:38:36

I guess if I, Oh,

1:38:41

we shot the book, have

1:38:44

been waiting for my time.

1:38:50

They only want forma hunt. They

1:38:54

only want for a fish. They

1:38:58

only want before.

1:39:00

Oh, there's bot they

1:39:02

come around Acra.

1:39:06

They only want before night. They

1:39:10

only want before the same to print.

1:39:14

They only won't before the oct

1:39:16

up.

1:39:17

By sound green maccas

1:39:21

prints. They only

1:39:23

want for fight. I

1:39:32

know it took me a while

1:39:36

to find leach

1:39:40

after they tagged

1:39:42

out that they.

1:39:49

But now I know.

1:39:52

They're gone on and Smile.

1:39:56

They're gone on Smile, shallow

1:39:59

wolves, they're gone on.

1:40:01

Stove smut.

1:40:02

There's pups come

1:40:04

around Everca.

1:40:08

They're going on in smile family.

1:40:12

They're gone on the stove, Santo

1:40:15

cran Bocco. They're gone, snow

1:40:18

waped.

1:40:18

Down Samarineck

1:40:21

spoery of gran So

1:40:24

they're going.

1:40:25

On the smile over

1:40:30

my honey,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features