0:00

This

0:00

episode is brought to you by Direct TV

0:02

stream. Direct TV stream brings you

0:04

the live TV you love. That means

0:07

you can stay up to the minute on twenty four

0:09

hour live news. from entertainment to

0:11

current events wherever you are in the US,

0:13

whether that's at home on your TV or

0:15

streaming on the go. And you get your favorite

0:18

live sports, so you can catch this season's

0:20

biggest games. Get the best of

0:22

live TV with direct TV stream.

0:24

Get your TV together at direct tv

0:27

dot com. Joe Biden is

0:29

not known for his consistency. Over

0:31

the years, Joe has changed his

0:33

views on just about every issue

0:35

under the sun, from crime to

0:37

abortion, to foreign policy, to marriage,

0:40

to pretty much everything else. Unprincipled

0:43

politicians such as Joe Biden,

0:45

sometimes refer to this kind

0:47

of flip flopping as evolving.

0:50

And now it seems Joe Biden

0:53

has evolved into

0:54

a Puerto Rican.

0:56

I was sort of raised in

0:59

the Puerto Rican community at home politically.

1:02

And so we and we came here for a long time

1:05

both for business and pleasures.

1:07

Richard Lavin is a woman.

1:10

Elizabeth Warren is an Indian. Joe

1:13

Biden is a Puerto Rican.

1:15

And I'm Michael Knowles, and this is the Michael

1:18

Knowles show.

1:26

Welcome back to the show. You know, it's amazing,

1:28

just I was gonna say I'm the only one who's remained consistent

1:31

here. Everyone else is turning into something.

1:33

But that's not true. Last night, I actually was Candice

1:35

Owens. because Candace was supposed

1:37

to give a speech at the University of Delaware.

1:39

And instead, she flew to Paris

1:42

to set

1:44

the Internet on fire with Kanye West.

1:46

And so I I actually okay. Joe Biden's a Puerto

1:48

Rican, Liz Warren's an Indian. I'm Candice

1:50

Owens. My favorite comment yesterday is from

1:52

David McCalister who says, I'm

1:55

so glad YouTube added abortion

1:57

context to this video. Otherwise,

1:59

I would have just kept believing it was doctors killing

2:02

defense babies for profit. I

2:04

I actually had a few other people write into me

2:06

about this. So in my episode yesterday,

2:09

which touched on a ton of subjects, Though

2:11

it did mention abortion and

2:13

AOC's stupid commentary on abortion,

2:16

YouTube added a a warning,

2:18

a sort of a context warning and

2:20

it just shows you that

2:22

COVID was not a unique emergency

2:25

that required extraordinary measures

2:28

COVID was a test run for all

2:30

new sorts of power grabs by the left.

2:32

Because during COVID, the Lib

2:34

said, well, we need to add warnings

2:36

about medical misinformation and

2:39

the masks and the social distancing and

2:41

the vaccines. And so they would add these

2:43

little these little context bubbles

2:45

to our videos to basically just

2:47

push the liberal line on COVID and

2:50

and discourage people from listening to

2:52

different points of view. But now now

2:54

COVID's over and they're doing it on topics

2:57

that are completely unrelated to COVID. Now they're

2:59

doing it on abortion. So I come out and I yeah, AOC

3:01

said a dumb thing about abortion. They say, abortion

3:03

actually is really great and you shouldn't have any

3:05

questions about it. It's a it's a perfectly

3:07

fine medical procedure and okay. Right. They're gonna

3:09

do gonna do it with any anytime anyone criticizes

3:12

Joe Biden pretty soon. Actually Joe Biden's

3:14

a really great guy and you should not you should

3:16

stop insulting him. That's not nice. It's crazy.

3:19

It may it gets my blood pressure up.

3:21

I don't think that

3:23

people believe that Joe Biden is a

3:25

Puerto Rican. I don't

3:27

think I don't think people

3:29

believe Joe Biden, period.

3:32

I think Joe Biden is

3:35

not persuasive. And I think

3:37

the reason that he and and all the

3:39

other lips are not really persuasive is

3:42

because they keep being proven

3:44

wrong. It's

3:45

the fool me one shame on you,

3:48

fool me twice, shame on me, or as

3:50

George W. Bush put it, fool me twice.

3:52

The point is you're not gonna fool me again. And

3:55

with the lips, it's fool me three times, fool me, four

3:57

times, fool me five times, COVID

4:00

certainly accelerated that trend. And

4:02

so it's just it's

4:04

not persuasive, especially when you

4:07

compare Biden and the Democrats with

4:09

the political alternative. You

4:11

wanna talk about persuasive, you wanna talk about

4:13

in charge. Ron DeSantis down

4:15

there in Florida in the

4:17

wake of this horrible hurricane that

4:19

destroyed so much of Florida, killed a lot of

4:21

people, destroyed a lot of property. CNN

4:24

is using this as an opportunity to

4:26

really grill the governor and make it

4:28

seem like he's not competent that this is

4:30

somehow his fault, which of course is absurd.

4:33

Listen to how Rhonda Santos knocks

4:35

the CNN reporter down.

4:37

Why do you stand behind Lee County's

4:39

decision to not have that mandatory

4:41

evacuation until the

4:42

day before the storm? Well, did

4:44

you where was your industry stationed

4:46

when the storm hit? Were you guys in

4:48

Lee County? No. You were in Tampa.

4:50

So that's here. They were following the weather

4:52

track. and they had to make

4:54

decisions based on that. But, you know, seventy

4:56

two hours, they weren't even in the cone, forty

4:58

eight hours, they were on the periphery. so you

5:00

gotta make the decisions the best you can.

5:02

I will say, you know, they delivered

5:04

the message to people. They had shelters

5:06

open. You know, everybody had adequate

5:09

opportunity to at least get to a shelter within the

5:11

county. But, you know, a lot of the residents

5:13

did not did not want to do that. I think,

5:15

for probably for various reasons, some people don't

5:17

wanna leave their home period, their island people, whatever.

5:19

But I think part of it was so much attention

5:21

was paid to Tampa that I think a

5:23

lot of them probably thought that they wouldn't get the

5:25

worst of it. So, you know, they but they

5:27

did. And and I think it's it's easy to second

5:29

guess them, but they were ready for the whole time

5:31

and and and made that call when when

5:33

they were justifiable to do so. By

5:35

the

5:35

way, this goes on for about another minute,

5:37

and DeSantis goes, he's just citing

5:40

facts. He's citing hour by

5:42

hour weather trends. He's pointing

5:44

out that CNN also thought that

5:46

the storm was gonna move in a particular way. And

5:48

then after the storm shifted, then Florida

5:50

shifted resources down. And so you just

5:52

you leave that conversation

5:55

with the impression. This

5:57

guy knows what he's doing.

6:00

Okay. If if they had asked a Joe Biden, that

6:02

question, what would he have done? He would have

6:04

started drooling. He would have started

6:06

talking about corn pop in the Delaware public

6:08

pool. He would it's

6:10

it's not you can't even compare the two. It's not that that

6:13

Joe Biden might not have been able to cite all of

6:15

those facts. Joe Biden wouldn't have known what state

6:17

he was in. And so when people are comparing

6:19

Republican leadership right now, to Democrat

6:21

leadership, It it doesn't

6:23

take a a political nerd. You

6:25

know, someone following all the trends to see.

6:27

Oh, the Republicans basically have their

6:29

act together. the Democrats have no idea what's going

6:31

on. You can see this. There was a video that went viral

6:33

yesterday of a guy who, I don't

6:35

think he's a political consultant, I

6:38

don't think that this is a guy who's

6:40

constantly keeping up refreshing the page on

6:42

real clear politics every day. He's a

6:44

regular Florida citizen who says,

6:46

look, I'm a Democrat. I've always considered

6:49

myself a Democrat. But DeSantis seems

6:51

so competent. I'm voting for that guy.

6:53

That gas is yeah. Yeah. I gave

6:56

you. He yeah. I told him I'd arrest y'all,

6:58

but he's here and I gave you. So y'all

7:00

we vote for. Yeah. This is

7:02

all about rescue my I'm vote for

7:04

the Senate. And I'm a Democrat.

7:06

Yeah. We ought to call him when oh

7:11

well

7:14

There's just a real

7:16

persuasive aspect to

7:18

competence, to

7:20

just a basic degree of competence. We

7:22

tend to think of politics as this ideological

7:25

struggle between the leftist and

7:27

the conservatives and the Marxists

7:30

and the fascists and the

7:32

desists and the but for a

7:34

lot of people, politics comes down to,

7:36

hey, are you gonna show up? Can

7:38

you just like show up when bad stuff

7:40

happens and try to make it better? Hey,

7:42

can you reduce crime in my neighborhood?

7:45

hey, can you keep the economy kind of

7:47

going along? Hey, can you fill

7:49

my potholes? Fill my potholes?

7:52

is a really important political

7:56

tactic. Okay? Fill

7:58

my potholes goes a long,

7:59

long way. And

8:02

and DeSantis is doing it. He's doing it on

8:04

every single level. You even heard in that

8:06

clip DeSantis, he said, you know, there

8:08

are misleading narratives you

8:10

guys are you guys are pushing misleading

8:13

narratives. And I I've noticed that Ron

8:15

DeSantis, I don't know if it was in that specific, but

8:17

it was it was certainly in the CNN interview.

8:19

and he keeps coming back to his misleading narratives.

8:21

Why? Because misleading narratives is the

8:23

Ron DeSantis version of fake

8:25

news. Right? Donald Trump says you're

8:27

fake news. Ron DeSantis is saying the exact

8:29

same thing, but he uses a synonym because he

8:31

doesn't wanna just be seen as a copycat of

8:33

Trump. He wants he he adopts a lot

8:35

of Trump's characteristics

8:38

and habits. He uses the Trump

8:40

hands, the sort of like New York Italian

8:42

hands, really. But he uses the Trump hands. He

8:44

uses some of the Trump diction

8:46

and and cadence, but he

8:49

changes it. He makes it his own. And that I

8:51

think that competence goes a long way,

8:53

especially if if DeSantis

8:55

does choose to run, in

8:57

twenty twenty four, presidents

9:00

tend to be the opposite

9:02

of their predecessors. Right?

9:04

You you think

9:06

of George

9:08

w Bush. Go go all the way back

9:10

to George w Bush. Bill Clinton

9:12

is marked by this kind of

9:14

liberal, skisy, you

9:17

know, completely iralicious, immoral

9:19

White House full of scandal.

9:21

and then George W. Bush, whatever you think of

9:23

the guy. He's he's pretty upright man.

9:26

Born again Christian, you know,

9:28

there's there's no no sex scandals

9:30

coming out of the George W. Bush,

9:32

White House. Then after Bush, what do

9:34

we get? We get Barack Obama. So

9:36

the Bush is old,

9:38

white establishment, vaguely

9:41

conservative, Barack

9:43

Obama young, fresh,

9:45

newcomer, leftist, first black

9:47

president. Then when do you get after Obama?

9:49

After Obama who's this young,

9:51

fresh, radical, we're gonna fundamentally

9:53

transform America. We hate the old America.

9:55

Obama's wife says the first time I was ever proud of my country

9:57

was when it elected my husband. What happens? You get

9:59

Donald Trump who says, now, we're bringing back the

10:01

old America. Make America great again.

10:04

Right? Donald Trump, this older guy,

10:06

kinda more old school, right

10:08

wing style. Then after Trump,

10:10

who was relatively pretty effective,

10:13

actually, even in just one German office, even with the

10:15

deep state trying to undermine him. What

10:17

do you get? You get? And this guy who's

10:19

a total populous, Bolen of China

10:21

shop upending the establishment. What do you get? You

10:23

get the most establishment boring

10:25

guy in the entire world, Joe Biden.

10:27

So what comes after Biden? Maybe

10:29

you get Trump again? But

10:32

DeSantis is putting himself in a position where

10:34

he could be a

10:36

good alternative. There's no question about

10:38

it. and it's not just DeSantis, by the

10:40

way. You're seeing Republicans

10:42

around the country who are showing this kind

10:44

of energy and clarity competence. Carrie

10:46

Lake, we haven't gotten to talk about her very

10:48

much on this show, but we absolutely should

10:50

Carrie Lake running for governor of Arizona.

10:53

Listen to how adeptly SHE

10:55

FENDS OFF A REPORTER'S DISHONEST

10:58

RADICULOUS QUESTION ON ABORTION. Adrienne:

11:00

ABORTION IS ADCEPTIVE lay

11:02

bands in the state right now.

11:04

Tell me, do you is that something that you support?

11:06

I support saving as many lives

11:08

as possible. and what I really wanna know and I've

11:10

been waiting. I tune into you guys all the

11:12

time. I wanna know where Katie Hobbs stands, but I

11:14

never hear you guys ask for I'm

11:16

pro life. My plan would

11:18

be that every woman who

11:20

walks into an abortion clinic know that

11:22

there are options out there. They don't have to

11:24

choose that here. there's families who would love

11:26

to adopt a baby. And right now, the way it's

11:28

been going,

11:29

they go in and they they only have one option.

11:31

That's it. Nobody tells them that there's

11:33

other options. We wanna help

11:35

our women. If they're afraid, we wanna help them.

11:37

We wanna give women healthcare, and I

11:39

wanna help people. But I really challenge

11:41

you. And I'm happy to get back to you on this.

11:43

When you find out where Katie Hobbs stands, because let me tell you

11:45

where she stands. She supports

11:48

abortion right up until birth and now we have

11:50

her. That's right. She supports a

11:52

baby survives a botched

11:54

abortion, that that baby die

11:56

on a cold metal

11:57

tray. True. And none of

11:59

you

11:59

ever try to get her to talk about her stance.

12:02

So

12:02

get back to me after you do. Thank

12:04

you. Tell her. fabulous.

12:07

Exactly how it's done.

12:10

Okay? Carrie Lake obviously

12:12

is on the right side of the issue. She's on the

12:14

pro life side of the issue. but it's not

12:16

just about ideology or political

12:19

views or or policies

12:21

even. There is a

12:23

role for just a basic political

12:25

confidence. And we kind of forget this because we're living

12:27

in the Biden era, but this woman

12:29

expertly flipped this

12:31

question back on the reporter. this is dishonest

12:34

question. Said, hold on. What you're pushing me on all this

12:36

ridiculous kind of these these

12:38

cases that barely ever happen, that you're

12:40

framing the issue from this ridiculous place.

12:42

Why don't you ever ask my opponent? I'll tell you what she thinks

12:44

she wants to let babies born alive die

12:47

in in cold metal trays. That's the

12:49

way to do it. And after such

12:51

dysfunction and incompetence for the

12:53

past couple of years now. I

12:55

think voters are hungry

12:57

for people who can actually do

12:59

the job. or not don't just have the right

13:01

opinions, but the opinions that they prefer that can

13:03

actually do a

13:05

job. as

13:07

the elites prove themselves to be

13:10

incompetent. People begin

13:12

to look elsewhere. People

13:15

begin to doubt the authority of

13:17

these elites look no further than

13:19

the Federal Bench. Federal

13:22

Judge James Caho,

13:25

who is on the fifth Circuit Court of

13:27

Appeals, has just said that he

13:29

will no longer hire law

13:31

clerks from Yale Law School. He's

13:34

right to do it. He says that Yale Law School

13:37

is not what it once was.

13:39

He says Yale not

13:41

only tolerates the cancellation of

13:43

views, it actively practices

13:45

it. Starting today, I will no

13:47

longer hire law clerks from

13:49

Yale Los school I hope that other judges will

13:51

join me as well.

13:54

He's smart he's smart to say

13:56

that. some people are complaining.

13:58

Well, what about the good kids at Yale Law

14:00

School? Yeah, maybe. But

14:02

Yale Law School is considered the top school in

14:04

the country. yell law

14:06

school sends all of its

14:08

students out to extremely prestigious

14:10

posts. If you have Yale law school

14:12

on your resume, you you can pretty much

14:14

go wherever you want. Why?

14:17

Well, because of the prestige and

14:19

the tradition and it goes

14:21

along with that name.

14:23

by but

14:23

does a Yale Law School degree

14:26

today represent

14:28

what it used to represent

14:30

ten twenty, thirty, forty

14:32

years ago? No,

14:34

I don't think it does. The caliber

14:36

of students who are coming out of Yale Law

14:38

School is is inferior today

14:40

than it was twenty, thirty,

14:43

forty years ago. The things

14:45

that they're being taught at Yale Law

14:47

School are inferior

14:49

to they're less true. They're

14:51

less good than the things that they were taught twenty,

14:53

thirty, forty years ago. And so if

14:55

you're a a judge hiring clerks, I think

14:57

it's perfectly rational to say, you know, look,

14:59

I know this place has a good reputation. I know it's

15:01

been the top of the heap for many years

15:03

now, but It's just decayed.

15:05

Okay? And the lips have gone

15:07

in. They've cut it open. They've emptied

15:09

out the the body of Yale Law

15:11

School like that month's in the first

15:13

scene of the empire strikes back. Right? They've just

15:15

taken the guts out of Yale law school. And then they've

15:17

crawled inside of Yale law school and

15:19

animated it like night of the living dead.

15:22

and they kind of hobble around in it, but it's

15:24

not it's not actually what it once was.

15:26

And so I'm gonna stop giving it this

15:28

special privilege if we always hire the

15:30

YLS people And I'm gonna start looking around

15:32

to other law schools. Of course.

15:34

And it's not just about Walklar because it's

15:36

not just about Yale. It

15:38

used to be Again, ten,

15:40

twenty, thirty, forty years ago,

15:42

that if if you had

15:45

Harvard Yale Princeton, Stanford,

15:48

these big fancy schools on your

15:50

resume. That really meant something and employers

15:52

really looked for that. Is that

15:54

still true today? I'm not

15:56

so sure. Certainly,

15:58

if I were hiring people, I

16:00

would, you know, maybe I'd say, okay, maybe that means you

16:02

got a decent SAT score. No. Maybe

16:04

it doesn't. I'm not even sure. I mean, the schools

16:06

for a while weren't even looking at SATs.

16:09

And we're not even giving

16:11

high priority SED. So it's III don't even know

16:13

that it means you got a basic level of kind of

16:15

intelligence. Forget about if you know

16:17

anything or have the right the right

16:19

opinions or you know, I have the right values

16:21

or anything like that. But

16:23

does it does it mean anything anymore? I

16:25

don't know. If I got a resume today from

16:27

a kid from Hillsdale and a kid from Princeton,

16:29

I'm probably going

16:31

to just immediately suspect that

16:33

the kid from Hillsdale is better

16:36

educated than the kid from Princeton.

16:38

The from Princeton could surprise me. But

16:40

this would be an unthinkable opinion

16:42

twenty years ago. But it's just

16:44

the the the the authorities,

16:46

the elites, can't coast on

16:48

their reputation forever after they

16:50

have done their dam burst

16:52

to destroy that credibility and to

16:54

destroy that reputation. The

16:57

clearest example of this is COVID. But

17:00

before COVID, I

17:03

generally believed what the public

17:05

health authorities said, not a hundred percent, but

17:08

I I thought, okay, they probably know more about

17:10

epidemics and stuff than I

17:12

do. So, I guess, I'll generally follow their advice.

17:14

I'll generally believe what they think.

17:16

Whether they're talking about vaccines,

17:19

whether they're talking about epidemics

17:22

that come around. I think I don't know anything

17:24

about it. I guess they probably do so I'll believe

17:26

them. After COVID, I don't believe a word they

17:28

say. After COVID, if doctor Fauci came up

17:30

to me, and said, we've got an

17:32

epidemic coming, and you all need to take this

17:34

shot. And then I had an African shaman,

17:36

which doctor come to me and say, actually, we

17:38

just need to boil three

17:40

kidneys of goat and the eye of newt, and

17:42

then then the pandemic will

17:44

pass. I will believe the African witch

17:46

doctor shaman. I think he's got more medical

17:48

credibility than doctor Fauci. after

17:50

these people in our public health

17:52

establishment have lied to us and

17:54

intentionally deceived us

17:56

and Furthermore, when they weren't intentionally

17:58

deceiving us, just more completely

18:01

incompetent and made stupid errors and got

18:03

things wrong. going all the way back to

18:05

the origin of the virus by the

18:07

way. So they've

18:09

they've squandered their credibility. They keep they

18:11

continue to squander it by the way. whether I don't know

18:13

if you caught this doozy of a headline.

18:16

So, there's a new

18:18

new report out, new scientific medical

18:20

report an mRNA

18:23

spike protein has

18:25

been detected in the

18:27

brain and the heart of

18:29

a me dead man. This

18:31

is a case report published in vaccines,

18:33

which is a really top well

18:35

respected journal. Quote, quoting

18:38

from the report, the findings corroborate previous

18:41

reports of encephalitis and

18:44

myocarditis caused by gene based

18:46

COVID-nineteen vaccines. So,

18:48

what do we take away from this? One,

18:50

the vaccines cause myocarditis.

18:52

We already knew that. Well, initially, we were

18:54

told that's horrible scientific misinformation. It

18:56

was a big big banner warning

18:59

every time you would talk about this on the video, sometimes they

19:01

would take my shows down for saying things like

19:03

this. This is probably gonna put a banner

19:05

on YouTube right now. But nevertheless,

19:07

The CDC now admits that the COVID vaccines

19:09

do cause in some cases, at least,

19:12

myocarditis. Apparently, they cause encephalitis

19:14

as well. So problems not just with

19:16

the heart but with the brain. But

19:18

we were also told

19:20

that the spike proteins remained

19:23

localized. We were also told the way mRNA

19:25

vaccines work is they go in and you

19:27

get this little shot and then your

19:29

body produces spike proteins

19:31

kind of mimic the COVID virus, and this is supposed to

19:33

give you an immunity to the virus. And

19:36

it's actually supposed to stop you from getting the

19:38

virus, which is what Biden and

19:40

Fauci and Walensky, the CDC director all

19:42

told us, and then that didn't happen at

19:44

all. So then they had to change their story entirely.

19:46

anyway, that was the theory of what it was going to do. But they

19:48

said, don't worry, these spike proteins that are

19:51

being produced. They're not gonna go all over your body.

19:53

They're not gonna end up in your ovaries. They're not gonna

19:55

end up brain. They're not gonna end up in your heart. They're just gonna stay where they're

19:57

supposed to stay. And at the time, I

19:59

said that's obviously BS. They're completely

20:01

lying to us. And they said, no, that's medical

20:03

misinformation. Well, here it is. Here it

20:05

is. They found the spike protein there. They didn't

20:07

find any other part of the COVID virus, though, you

20:09

can't blame it on the virus. They said no, we found the

20:11

spike protein from the vaccine.

20:13

in this dead brain and heart three weeks after

20:15

he got the shot.

20:18

So we were

20:20

right. We were right. You know I

20:22

hate to say I told you so. And it's not

20:24

just that I told you so. You told lots of other

20:26

people so as well. We

20:28

were right. And yet, and

20:31

this gets back to what we were talking about a little bit

20:33

yesterday. Nothing's gonna

20:35

happen to the Fauci's and the Walenski's and and

20:37

big pharma, especially nothing's gonna happen.

20:39

These guys are totally protected. Nothing's gonna

20:41

happen to the big tech social

20:44

media oligarchs who censored all of this

20:46

true information a year

20:48

ago. Nothing's gonna happen to the

20:50

politicians who downplayed these

20:52

risks. Nothing is gonna happen. They're completely

20:55

protected. Legally, politically,

20:58

too bad because they've got the power.

21:00

And now not only do they have the power to mandate these

21:02

kinds of shots, in a lot

21:04

of cases, still even after courts have struck

21:06

it down, not only do the the power

21:10

to encourage people through the

21:12

culture to take all these shots even if they don't

21:14

necessarily need the shots. They have

21:16

the culture to censor the

21:18

information. And and they they have the

21:20

power

21:20

to

21:21

erase some information at least or

21:23

make it much harder to find information that

21:25

was previously out there. They can they can rewrite

21:27

all the records, you know. It is I know the

21:29

word Orwellian is overused, but it

21:32

is Orwellian. they can rewrite the records, they

21:34

can retcon the past. We

21:36

were totally right though. Don't forget

21:38

that. And speaking of being right, I've gotten

21:40

a lot of flack. I've gotten a lot of flack from a

21:42

lot of quarters since the beginning of the war

21:44

in Ukraine because I

21:47

have refused to

21:49

approach the issue of the war in Ukraine

21:51

as a kind of simplistic moral

21:53

crusade. With the clear good guy and the

21:55

clear bad guy and it's so totally

21:57

clear. Even if they were a clear good guy and a clear

21:59

bad guy, it's so totally clear exactly

22:01

what we should do in this war. I my

22:03

opinion on the war in Ukraine, I've gotten flack from the

22:05

people who have the Ukraine flag in their bios

22:07

because they think I'm not sufficiently pro

22:09

Ukraine. And then I've gotten flack from the

22:11

people who are fairly chinarian who were

22:13

actually supporting Russia in the war. And they're saying

22:15

Michael, you're you're you're a shield for the

22:18

decadent west because you're you're you're

22:20

two pro Ukraine. I don't know. I'm

22:22

too pro Ukraine. I'm not pro Ukraine enough. But you know what my

22:24

opinion has been on the war from the beginning.

22:26

This is my shocking hot

22:28

take. complicated.

22:30

That's my opinion. It's got it

22:33

didn't it didn't start six months ago or

22:35

eight months ago. It

22:37

at the very least started eight years ago

22:41

when there was a color

22:43

revolution, when there it it it called the

22:45

Midan revolution. in Ukraine that

22:47

ousted a pro Ukrainian

22:49

leader and installed a more pro western

22:51

leader, and we know that there was American

22:53

support for this kind of thing, and we know

22:55

that that CIA officials, including the top dog at the

22:57

CIA landed in Ukraine not that long

22:59

after that occurred. And, okay, that's

23:01

fine. All sorts of big

23:03

powerful countries interfere

23:05

in the affairs of all sorts of nations and pursue

23:07

their own interests. Of course, that's what happens.

23:09

But we do know that Russia saw that as

23:11

a provocation. We Russia saw the expansion of

23:13

NATO as a provocation. And so

23:15

Russia used that as an opportunity to do

23:17

what it had wanted to do for a while and exert more

23:19

influence over Ukraine. And so that

23:21

was a situation that America and the West could

23:23

not tolerate. And so you've had this

23:25

steadily escalating war. So

23:27

Well, everyone's been yelling at me because I'm not

23:30

sufficiently simplistic about my

23:32

view of this work. Turns out Elon Musk

23:34

agrees with me. His Elon Musk just tweeted out,

23:36

quote, Ukraine Russia peace,

23:38

redo elections of annexed regions under UN

23:41

supervision, Russia leaves if that is the will of the

23:43

people, Crimea formally part of Russia

23:45

as it had been since seventeen eighty three until cruise

23:47

ship's mistake, water supply to

23:49

Crimea assured Ukraine remains

23:51

neutral. That is almost exactly what I

23:53

have suggested. from the beginning of this

23:55

war or it certainly

23:57

certainly before the war

23:59

even broke out as a as a sort of way to

24:01

maybe stave off a war. That

24:04

has been largely

24:06

speaking my view. And

24:08

the end now you've

24:10

got Elon Musk, who everybody seems to love.

24:12

He's got exactly the same view, and

24:15

the reaction from

24:17

some prominent Ukrainians has

24:19

not been so nice. Now, do you want win a

24:21

McLaren or quarter million dollars in

24:23

cash? I'm talking to all the dads

24:25

right now as a father. We all want what's best

24:27

for our children and their education. That's

24:29

why we sometimes speak grudgingly, but still

24:32

enthusiastically, participate in school

24:34

fundraisers. From buying magazines to

24:36

baking cookies to paying a bunch of kids,

24:39

to half wash our vehicles at the team car wash? Well,

24:41

what if you could spearhead the biggest fundraiser

24:43

in your school and community's history with

24:46

less effort than a walkathon?

24:48

By now, you have heard of Jeremy's razors

24:51

contest for the car where you might

24:53

become the winner of Jeremy's McLaren.

24:55

Now, sure, you could a five ninety two

24:57

horsepower super roar to your school's bus

24:59

fleet, or you could opt

25:01

for the quarter million dollar

25:03

cash prize instead. You and

25:06

all the other dads and moms could do a lot

25:08

of good for your kids with that money just

25:10

by reviewing a few referring

25:12

rather a few non woke

25:14

razors. Imagine a quarter million dollars to

25:16

resurface the gym, build a computer

25:18

room, put up some Friday night lights.

25:20

Right now, most of the top players in the

25:22

contest still have not hit the ten referrals

25:24

mark, So the field is

25:26

wide open for you to win it all. Go

25:28

to the principal's office. Get him or her involved.

25:30

Just head to jeremy's razors dot

25:32

com slash play to get your referral

25:35

link and get in the

25:37

game. Elon

25:40

Musk

25:41

proposes a solution.

25:44

on the Ukraine conflict. And

25:46

it's a solution that would not make Ukraine

25:48

totally happy, would not make Russia

25:51

totally happy, but it's a

25:53

solution that he says is

25:55

probably the most likely resolution to it

25:57

anyway and will would

25:59

in

25:59

fact deescalate the war, which is which

26:02

is just steadily increasing

26:04

toward now. We've got people in the press trying

26:06

to normalize the prospect of tactical

26:08

nuclear weapons being used. So Elon puts

26:10

out a suggestion that I think is

26:13

extremely moderate and reasonable.

26:16

This this guy named Erestovitch.

26:19

Erestovitch, who's a blue check on Twitter, and

26:21

he's a retired Ukrainian

26:24

colonial and intelligence

26:27

officer, and he he tweets

26:29

out a picture of

26:31

a guy being tortured. I think it was

26:33

probably a Russian soldier or something. He's

26:35

he's plugged in. He's he's handcuffed. He's

26:37

got some wires all around him

26:39

sitting in small chair, and it's it's Elon

26:42

Musk's face, superimposed on this

26:44

poor guy being held prisoner.

26:46

and then it just says, we work

26:49

promptly. That's that's

26:51

the translation. We work promptly. So it's a

26:54

threat. against Elon

26:56

Musk saying, we're gonna arrest you and probably

26:58

torture you if you suggest any

27:01

kind of moderate resolution to this war,

27:03

which is not great. That's

27:05

not the kind of behavior you want to see

27:07

from our allies, the people that we're

27:09

funding. You don't want them to threaten to

27:11

arrest and torture our citizens. Okay?

27:13

especially someone like Elon Musk who has helped Ukraine, who

27:15

has given lots and millions and millions

27:17

of dollars worth of StarLink

27:20

equipment, to the

27:22

Ukrainians to help fight this war.

27:24

Kind of complicates the picture of this

27:27

war. But more importantly than that, I don't,

27:29

you know, I'm not I'm not even paying particularly

27:31

close attention to the war in Ukraine,

27:33

which despite really bubbling up in the

27:35

press and accelerating in recent months, has been

27:37

going on for years now. and there's

27:39

been some kind of conflict between Ukraine and Russia

27:41

for about a thousand years now. So I I'm not

27:43

paying granular attention to

27:45

it. However, I

27:48

have to I wish I had my nostradamus

27:50

hat in my desk right now. We

27:52

were talking about this, what yesterday?

27:54

And two days ago,

27:56

the idea that corporations

27:59

now can

28:01

wage war.

28:03

Ian Bremer, very well respected

28:05

foreign policy writer. He said that

28:08

specifically with regard to the war in Ukraine,

28:10

corporations are becoming literal

28:12

belligerence in the war.

28:15

Google, but he gigantic corporations

28:17

can play a role in the war. And

28:19

he he referred to Elon Musk specifically.

28:21

But then the the hazard here, of course, is

28:23

that If corporations and CEOs

28:25

can become literal belligerence in the war,

28:27

then they become literal targets

28:29

in the war. just as

28:32

this Ukrainian military blue check dude

28:35

proved because he says, yeah, you're a target

28:37

Elon Musk. we're gonna arrest you you

28:39

keep suggesting that we wind this word down right

28:42

now along lines that we don't

28:44

favor or that I don't favor. That's

28:48

what he's saying. He's saying your you corporations are

28:50

gonna become a target. So what do we do

28:52

then? What do we do then if the

28:54

corporations can literally wage

28:56

the war? become the targets of the

28:58

war, hard military

29:00

targets. China's looking at American

29:03

Americans as soft and hard military American

29:05

corporations has hard and soft military targets

29:08

too. What does that mean? And if the

29:10

corporations can make the

29:12

policies about the war, and if the corporations

29:14

can censor people will a nilly as they've

29:16

censored this show very often in the

29:18

public square. What does that mean? It means the

29:20

corporations are the government. That's

29:23

what it means. It means privatized ourselves all

29:25

the way out of self government.

29:29

And it wasn't just the Liberals that did that. It was

29:31

the conservatives who did that too.

29:33

And conservatives did that with some good reason. In

29:35

the latter part of the twentieth century, the

29:37

conservatives wanted to to revive

29:40

the economy, that conservatives wanted to

29:42

draw a clear distinction between us and the

29:44

west and the communists and the Soviet

29:46

Union. And so we we

29:48

moved to toward an intense

29:50

campaign of privatization. Well,

29:52

that's all well and good. But if you

29:54

privatize too much, well, then you've

29:56

just privatized away your whole government.

29:58

And now you've got people who are even who

30:01

are frankly just as bureaucratic as the

30:03

deep state. We we only talk about the

30:05

bureaucracy of the government. We never have you ever

30:07

tried to call and change your cell phone plan, do you call AT

30:09

and T or Verizon or something? I'd rather deal

30:11

with the DMV than I would deal with

30:13

AT and T and Verizon. But those are

30:15

private companies. We're about the airlines. So in all,

30:17

those are those are private companies. What about I

30:19

don't know. Even just Walmart

30:21

or something. You know, you you call these

30:24

companies. You end up in this business oh my gosh,

30:26

a bank Oh, calling the bat, it's the that's the worst

30:28

bureaucracy I've ever dealt with. That's

30:30

way worse than the DMV. So it's not as

30:32

though bureaucracy is just

30:34

a problem with the government. It's problem with privatization too.

30:36

The only difference is that a lot of times

30:38

when you give your government away at the corporations,

30:40

the corporations are even less accountable to

30:42

you than Washington is. and

30:44

that's damning with faint praise because Washington's barely accountable

30:46

at all. But that be So

30:49

then where is the line? Where

30:51

do you draw the line? Again, it goes back

30:53

to my unsatisfying answer on the

30:55

Ukraine war, and Elon Musk's

30:58

identical unsatisfying answer on

31:00

the Ukraine war. But it's -- but it's -- it's -- it

31:02

is the normal response. I think it's the

31:04

response that the vast majority of people would

31:06

understand. If they're not

31:08

political eggheads who are refreshing

31:10

the crazy political blogs all day long. They would realize that

31:12

we need prudence. Yeah. How

31:14

do you decide the the limits

31:17

between the government

31:19

and the private sector and the limits to

31:21

privatization. How do you decide prudence?

31:23

You you you be reasonable.

31:25

Be normal. That's how you decide. How

31:27

do we decide exactly how to resolve this war

31:29

in Ukraine? Oh, the first major war in Europe

31:31

since World War two, a war that has already

31:34

had threats on both sides to

31:36

go nuclear How do you

31:38

resolve that? Delicately and carefully and you use your prudence

31:40

and you'd be normal. Goodness gracious

31:42

me. Goodness gracious me. Idiologues are gonna

31:44

have a lot of trouble with that answer.

31:46

But that's that's what you do. Of course, that's what

31:49

you do. Speaking of private interests

31:51

taking over our government, another

31:53

told you some moment, Here's

31:56

a report out now that

31:58

the labs worked with

32:00

the feds through

32:04

state backed, but still technically

32:06

kind of private means to rig the

32:08

election. As we've said for a long time,

32:11

probably gonna be another warning banner because I said that.

32:13

This this episode today is gonna have, what, like,

32:15

seven warning banners under it on YouTube. I don't

32:17

know if they have the the technological

32:19

infrastructure to put that many warning banners. This

32:22

report just came out. There's a coalition

32:25

of NGOs and sort

32:27

of non profit organizations and

32:29

academic institutions and a private

32:31

company that worked with arms of

32:33

the federal government. and with

32:35

Democrat activist organizations, to

32:38

censor news websites in the run

32:40

up to twenty twenty. They

32:42

also plan to do that again in twenty twenty

32:45

two. How did they do it? Do you

32:47

think they censored the lids just the same as

32:49

they censored the conservatives? Of

32:51

course not. They all teamed up the

32:53

government and the

32:55

academy and private business and

32:57

the nonprofit organizations that are usually

32:59

just the enforcement wing of the American Liberal

33:02

Empire, they all teamed up

33:04

to rigged the election against the

33:06

conservatives. Great report by Alembicari

33:09

in Alan Baccari. I don't know why I called him. I actually really liked

33:11

the guy. He's a friend of mine. But Alan Baccari

33:14

the had a has

33:15

a great report. I suggest you read it at Breifort.

33:18

It's called the Election Integrity

33:21

Partnership. And this is made up

33:23

of the Stanford Internet Observatory

33:25

the University of Washington Center for an informed public, the

33:28

Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research

33:30

Lab, and Graphica, a

33:32

social media analytics company. And then it

33:34

teams up with things like common cause in the

33:36

NAACP, which are really just front groups

33:38

for the Democrat Party, teamed

33:40

up with the Department of Homeland Security the State Department. The whole

33:42

point of it was to

33:44

censor conservatives on Twitter and

33:46

to censor conservatives on Facebook and Google and

33:48

just the whole social media platform.

33:50

we're talking about the New York Post,

33:52

epoch times, Charlie Kirk, Tom Fit, and

33:54

Jack Pacific was with last night.

33:57

Mark Levin James O'Keefe, Sean

33:59

Hannity, and let's go on and on and on.

34:01

Donald Trump, Eric Trump, Donald

34:03

Trump Junior, and they and they flagged these

34:05

posts. And sometimes they delete the posts, and sometimes

34:07

they just put a little warning label on it. According to this

34:09

report that came out, the EIP, the

34:11

election integrity project,

34:14

which is just the sensor of

34:16

the conservatives project, was pretty successful. In

34:18

twenty one percent of cases, one

34:21

percent of cases the the social

34:23

media platforms labeled content identified by this group

34:25

as potentially misleading and they flagged it.

34:27

You gotta really watch out

34:30

for this. Then in thirteen percent of cases, they just remove the content from the

34:32

platforms. It's very, very

34:34

successful stuff.

34:37

Who elected these people? Who elected common cause

34:39

and the NAACP and the Stanford

34:42

Group? And who I didn't elect these people?

34:44

Who elected Mark Zuckerberg? who

34:46

elected Jack Dorsey,

34:48

who elected Google. No,

34:51

nobody. But this

34:53

is the way our government is run now. They just don't call it

34:55

a government. But if my rights are being taken away,

34:58

if my traditions and my way of life is

35:00

being taken away, by some

35:02

woke, unholy alliance of

35:04

corporations and nonprofits. It

35:06

doesn't make me feel better because I say, well, at

35:08

least it's not the government that's doing

35:10

it. No. a way it

35:12

is the government. The people who govern are the government. Now speaking of a rules

35:16

based order, This

35:18

week, I was I was playing

35:20

mister Matt Walsh at Game

35:22

of Fantasy Football and the middle of

35:26

Bet beforehand And the bet what we could the bet

35:28

was that whoever it whoever

35:30

loses, you know, has

35:32

to do certain things. Right?

35:35

And so Matt said, you can go back

35:37

to Matt's member block. Matt said that if

35:39

he loses, he would have to call

35:41

me sweet daddy Knowles I would have to

35:43

take title perpetuity until I beat until he beats

35:45

me again at Fantasy

35:48

Football. And if I

35:50

lose, I would have to eat some

35:52

disgusting sort of, you know, food or something

35:54

that the audience picks.

35:56

Now it would appear Not only

35:59

is Joe

35:59

Biden identifying

36:00

as a Puerto Rican, not

36:03

Walsh is identifying as

36:06

Welsh because he's trying to welch on his bet.

36:08

Jake says, Matt, what

36:08

did you and Michael decide for your bet? Yeah. We talked

36:11

about this in the in the members block

36:14

on Friday. gonna have because we're we're we're facing off against each other for fitness football this

36:16

week, and we were trying to figure out what our bet would be. So

36:18

the loser would have to

36:20

do something. and we

36:22

never decided on it. So I don't think we ever

36:24

decided what the bed is, which is good because I

36:26

believe I lost, and we never

36:27

decided I'm with the bed. So I don't have to do anything. I'm off

36:30

the hook. It

36:31

is off the

36:33

hook. We never made a bet. Is

36:35

that true? Is that true

36:36

producers? That's not what I saw in the

36:39

member block. I think we need go back to his tape. And

36:41

I think what all of you need to do, all

36:43

of you faithful listeners out there, you need

36:45

to tweet need to tweet at mount walsh at

36:48

Mount Walsh. And you need to get

36:50

him to start calling me by my properly, well earned, hard fought

36:52

title, sweet daddy Knowles.

36:56

That's what I am now. That's my title. I didn't ask for that title.

36:58

I earned that title. That title

37:00

was given to me because I triumped

37:04

in the Fantasy Football Battle. So I

37:06

learned this morning when I came into work. So

37:08

make sure you check that out.

37:11

It's really, it's crooked. Matt

37:13

is crooked if he's not gonna make good

37:15

on his bet. Speaking of

37:18

crooked plans, crooked plans to

37:20

reorder the political system.

37:22

It's a great a great boost

37:24

just came out from a Democrat

37:27

voter mobilization specialist His

37:30

name is Antonio Arolano is

37:32

a blue check on Twitter. He

37:36

says, quote,

37:37

new US Census Bureau

37:38

data indicates

37:40

that Hispanic Texans are now

37:42

the state's largest demographic route. Latinos

37:46

can turn Texas blue. k?

37:50

You you see what he's saying?

37:52

He's saying

37:54

that The more Latinos

37:56

there are in Texas, the greater the

37:58

chance that Texas will become a

37:59

Democrat a democrat state state.

38:02

And Because the Democrats

38:04

are flooding Texas with Latinos intentionally

38:06

by opening up the borders, this is

38:08

really good news for Democrats and the

38:11

Census Bureau data reflect that. they

38:13

show that Hispanic Mexicans are now the largest demo group in the

38:15

state great news we're about to

38:18

go blue. This

38:20

echo something Joe Biden said, at the Hispanic heritage

38:22

reception, he said, think about it.

38:25

No joke. When in when

38:27

in American history, has there been a

38:29

circumstance where one ethnicity potential to make such a profound impact on a

38:32

country? Twenty six percent of

38:34

every

38:34

single child

38:36

who's in school today

38:37

to speak Spanish. We've had large waves of immigration before, but

38:39

the thing is you just have enormous opportunity

38:41

to make this country so

38:44

much better. I really

38:45

mean it, as my father

38:46

would say, let's go get him. Come

38:49

on, Jack. Let's go get him. So

38:51

what's he saying? He say, Look,

38:53

we've had big migration before, but never like this. And

38:55

it's all the Latinos, and that's

38:57

really gonna help our

38:59

political agenda. It's gonna make the country better by

39:02

which we mean it's going to make the

39:04

country more democrat. It's gonna make the

39:06

country more liberal. It's gonna make the country

39:08

more leftist. kinda

39:10

sounds to me and

39:13

I don't wanna kinda sense

39:15

to me like a

39:17

like a theory that if

39:19

you replace the the

39:22

population of the country

39:24

with

39:25

Latino immigrants, in

39:27

a really big way, like a really large

39:29

way, like a really great

39:32

way that then the

39:34

democrats will have enduring

39:36

political advantage. What can we call this

39:38

theory? So so it's a

39:40

theory that's being

39:42

posited by well known

39:44

established democrats, not just democrat strategists,

39:46

but even the president himself. It's

39:49

a theory being advanced about

39:51

how if there were some sort of

39:53

great replacement of the people

39:56

in

39:57

America with immigrants

39:59

from Latin America

40:02

that the democrats would get a lot more

40:04

power. Can you

40:05

I can't think of a

40:07

name for this theory. If you

40:08

think of a name for this theory about how there could be a great

40:11

replacement, just let me know maybe in

40:13

the comments because I can't I

40:15

don't know. My brother, just haven't slept very well this week,

40:18

but but I think

40:20

whatever we call it, that's

40:22

the theory that the democrats are

40:25

advancing. Now, of course, the Democrats think this

40:27

is good. And so if you

40:29

observe this trend, the

40:32

idea that mass migration is intended to just give the to

40:34

to displace the people of the United States

40:36

and give the Democrats more of an advantage. If

40:38

you if you say that's good,

40:42

then the theory is true and you are allowed to say it.

40:44

But if you think that's bad, that that

40:46

is happening, that that what the Democrats are

40:48

saying is happening is happening. If you think

40:51

that's bad, then it's not true. It's false.

40:53

It's a dangerous conspiracy theory and it's got

40:55

to be censored. It's the same thing. You'd

40:57

be saying the

41:00

same thing. But if you

41:02

say Democrats

41:04

are flooding the country with migrants to gain

41:06

a political advantage, whoa. and

41:09

say, okay. Very good. Yes. Very good. Let's

41:11

let's promote that post on social media. Yes.

41:13

You're right. You could say that on the morning shows. You got

41:16

but if you say Democrats are flooding the

41:18

country with foreign nationals to gain a

41:20

political

41:21

advantage. They say no,

41:24

false, you're a racist, You're a racist

41:26

Nazi. You're a white

41:28

supremacist, bigot, conspiracy, tin

41:30

foil hat. I just

41:32

I said the same thing. I just I

41:34

just changed my cadence at the very end. I just

41:36

changed it. Yeah. Right. That's what

41:38

makes all the difference. Speaking of

41:40

things you're not allowed to say,

41:43

I mentioned earlier that I was in

41:45

Delaware last night pinch hitting for

41:47

Candice Owens or a speech he was supposed to

41:49

give. These Candice flew

41:52

to Paris to open a fashion show with Kanye West, which

41:54

is the sort of thing that Candice does. And

41:56

so I didn't hear any more details

41:58

than this other than I get a call. Candice is on

42:00

the Tar Mac,

42:02

which is okay, this is what's happening, and that's it.

42:04

Okay? Then I tune in.

42:06

I wait for the international trending news and

42:08

I see

42:10

it. the shirt that Candace and Kanye wore. This is a

42:12

shirt. You can see the photo from the back. It says,

42:15

white lives matter. Canvas

42:18

there with a white shirt and black print,

42:20

white lives matter. Kanye

42:22

there, black shirt, white

42:24

print, white lives matter. I love

42:27

it. I absolutely love

42:29

it. They're getting some pushback. Obviously,

42:31

they're getting pushback from the ribs because the ribs

42:33

want to say black

42:36

lives matter. And they're getting some pushback from the people in the

42:38

middle because they say, oh, you shouldn't say black lives matter

42:40

or white lives matter. You should just say,

42:42

all lives

42:44

matter. But Kanye and Canvas get it.

42:46

Okay? They get it. Obviously, they're being

42:48

intentionally provocative. It's a fashion show. That's

42:50

what you do at fashion shows.

42:54

but they get the point here. Why

42:56

would you say white lives matter? Well,

42:58

from a racial standpoint, as long as private

43:00

black lives or all lives or

43:02

white lives, From a racial standpoint, what they're saying

43:04

is, I think I don't wanna speak

43:06

for Canvas, but this is just my interpretation

43:08

of

43:10

the shirt. Right now,

43:12

we have been told for years

43:14

that black people are marginalized and discriminated

43:16

against and insulted and pushed to

43:18

the margins of society. And that's why we need

43:20

to say, Black Lives Matter. But

43:22

that's not true. Actually, there

43:24

is no legal discrimination or

43:27

systemic discrimination or really discrimination

43:30

at all, certainly not at a large scale against

43:32

black people. In fact, there's discrimination

43:34

in favor of black people through

43:36

things like affirmative action, through certain applications of

43:38

the civil rights laws, through the

43:41

culture, certainly, through

43:43

the popular media. The

43:45

only group that you are

43:48

actually legally both legally

43:50

allowed to discriminate against and

43:52

culturally encouraged to

43:54

discriminate against and insult

43:56

and mock and push to the fringes of

43:58

society. The only racial group is white

44:00

people. That's what happens. It's the only group you're

44:02

allowed to make fun of on TV. It's only a

44:04

group. White people in Asians are allowed to

44:06

discriminate against in college admissions.

44:08

And so, I don't know, it's unfortunate for

44:10

the Asians that they got limped in with the

44:12

white people. But that's

44:14

that's her in in jobs,

44:17

in employment, and

44:19

all sorts of things. It's the

44:21

white people. And so their Kanye and Candace are coming out

44:23

there and provocatively saying putting racial

44:26

issues aside, they're they're saying as they

44:28

frequently have,

44:30

The narrative that you are being fed

44:32

by the liberal establishment

44:34

is not only false,

44:36

it's the opposite of true.

44:40

If they're actually presenting a

44:42

vision of reality, the LeBron James black

44:44

black men can't walk out their doors without being

44:46

hunted down by racist cops. It's just

44:48

completely made up. The only people who

44:50

are being hunted down by the government right now

44:52

because of their identity are white

44:54

conservatives. They're like

44:56

Midwestern grannies. who have the

44:58

audacity to raise some questions

45:00

about the twenty twenty election. Okay? Or pro

45:02

life activists on

45:04

the sidewalk. or parents of all

45:06

races who don't want their

45:08

kids to be taught CRT and

45:10

transgenderism in

45:12

schools. Okay. But

45:14

then it's even more interesting with the Kanye shirt

45:16

because you couldn't see it in the picture, but on the

45:18

front of the Kanye shirt is a picture of

45:21

John Paul the second. And it

45:24

says, we will follow your

45:26

example. John Paul

45:28

the second. It says it in I

45:30

think it might be written in Spanish. I don't

45:32

have it in

45:33

front of me.

45:35

so

45:36

So what? lives matter on

45:38

the back. John pulled the second on the front, and then

45:40

it hit me. Again, maybe I'm reading

45:42

too deeply into it.

45:44

But

45:45

it hit

45:46

me at a higher level than just this kind of silly talk about

45:49

race, is the point that Kanye

45:51

is making a little deeper than that because the

45:53

pope wears white. John Paul the

45:55

second wore white Benonik wore white. Francis wears

45:57

white. The the pope wears white a white tuxedo, a

46:00

white mozzata, a white

46:02

casserick, a white that's just the symbol

46:05

of the pope. And is he suggesting something a little

46:07

deeper here that when we're talking about

46:10

white lives matter, we're not just

46:12

talking about race.

46:14

We're talking about something

46:17

deeper. We're talking about a

46:19

symbol, not of a particular

46:21

racial group, but of purity, a

46:23

symbol of the soul, a symbol of the soul after

46:25

baptism, and a a symbol of a

46:27

soul wearing a, you know,

46:30

sort of white garment, these images that we see in

46:32

paradise. We know that Kanye has had

46:34

a conversion or reversion sort

46:36

of experience Christianity. We know he

46:38

talks about religious themes a lot. We know he has an

46:40

album called Jesus as

46:42

King. Is there maybe a suggestion here

46:44

on this

46:46

provocative shirt? that actually not only is the BLM

46:48

narrative, bogus. We're gonna

46:50

debunk and own that with facts and logic

46:52

and provocation. But

46:54

the whole racial narrative is kind of a distraction from

46:56

what we should really be talking about,

46:59

which is deeper.

47:02

not just cultural, but actually ultimately religious because ultimately

47:04

all human conflict is theological. That

47:06

that's my read on. Again, I

47:10

don't know. I don't know that that's what was going through Kanye's head. I don't

47:12

really care. Very often, the greatest

47:14

artists are not critics of

47:16

their own work. Very often, the greatest artists

47:19

don't even consciously know what they are doing.

47:21

And this has been written about going all the way

47:23

back to ancient Greece. The the idea that the artists

47:25

are just sort of receiving

47:28

inspiration from the muses, and then they're

47:30

just doing stuff. And the reason there's a difference

47:32

between artists and critics is because very

47:34

often the artists couldn't even articulate exactly what they're doing. They're producing

47:36

the art and it's up to the critics to

47:38

interpret that sort

47:40

of art. Speaking

47:43

of lives mattering, speaking speaking of a popular disregard for

47:45

human life, new details are emerging. And

47:47

I mentioned this a few days ago,

47:49

maybe last week, this

47:52

shooting of the eighty four year old pro

47:54

life lady in Michigan, this

47:56

retired nurse Joan Jacobson,

47:59

and shot by this

48:02

crazy man, a seventy four year old guy named

48:04

Richard Harvey, who says he

48:06

fired off a warning shot from his twenty two

48:08

caliber rifle when he heard his

48:10

wife arguing with his pro life canvassed her

48:12

lady. And then he says

48:14

he tried to push away Jacobson's

48:16

clipboard and said he accidentally

48:18

shot her in the front of her shoulder accidentally fires a warning shot. He knows gun

48:20

is loaded. He's brandishing his gun and pushing this eighty

48:22

four year old lady away and shoots her in the shoulder.

48:26

And she says, I do think that he knew what he was

48:28

doing. She says, I think it was intentional.

48:30

This woman is a hundred twenty pounds

48:33

and five feet tall. didn't

48:36

refuse to leave their property when they asked.

48:38

She says she never she didn't threaten anybody

48:40

or anything like that. Certainly

48:42

though, there

48:44

is no reason to be brandishing a gun and an eighty

48:46

four year old woman who's five feet

48:48

tall. Ever. Even even if

48:49

she's coming at

48:51

you with a hammer, Okay. There

48:53

was no reason to to have a gun, certainly not a loaded gun and a shooter. So why do

48:55

I bring this up? Because there

48:58

there was you wanna make sure you

49:00

get getting the full story here. We still

49:02

don't really know the full story.

49:04

But what we do know is,

49:06

as the full story is

49:08

coming out, it is continuing to look terrible for this

49:10

guy. And and the way you know

49:12

this, by the way, is that the left

49:14

wing media are not covering

49:16

the story. if the story really

49:18

were, you know, this awful woman was threatening

49:20

him and you'd be hearing about it from the

49:22

media. But you're you're seeing the media cover up this

49:24

story. And so as the details come maybe complication

49:26

maybe the maybe the pro life lady

49:28

was arguing with the woman though, I'm not

49:30

even sure that that's

49:32

the case. But as

49:34

the details come out, we

49:36

continue to look right. Okay.

49:38

Right and right and right and right and

49:40

right and I do think people are

49:44

starting to notice that whether they can

49:46

take that noticing and

49:48

take that desire and channel it

49:50

into better government. That remains to be seen.

49:53

The rest of the show is continuing now. You do

49:55

not want to miss it. If you are

49:57

not a member, click the link in

49:59

the description and join us. We have a great

50:01

interview coming up. It's with

50:04

Michael Schellenberger. Michael Schellenberger

50:06

is a really, really important

50:08

voice on environmental issues. and

50:11

Michael Schellenberger is shedding

50:14

some light on what I think

50:16

are not only the

50:18

ludicrous, but downright fensive Democrat

50:20

claims about Hurricane Ian and

50:22

and all the destruction down

50:25

in Florida, which they they

50:27

they blame on global warming and

50:29

those mean old don't recycle or or whatever

50:31

drive of Tesla's. And Schellenberger

50:34

brings a little bit of science to that. So we will get to

50:36

him in just

50:38

one second. See

50:40

you over

50:43

the

50:45

member block.