Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello there.
0:00
Thank you for joining us. I'm
0:02
Tarah Schwartz and this is
0:02
Health Matters on CJAD 800.
0:07
Before I dive into today's show,
0:07
I just want to extend a personal
0:12
thank you to Kelly Albert, who
0:12
has been sitting in this chair
0:15
and hosting the show for many,
0:15
many weeks now. It is much
0:18
appreciated. She is a wonderful
0:18
host, and we were thrilled to
0:21
have her in the chair. So thank
0:21
you so much, Kelly. On today's
0:25
show, April is organ transplant
0:25
Awareness Month, it's time to
0:29
bring attention to the lives
0:29
that are saved every day, thanks
0:32
to signing the back of your
0:32
Medicare card. But there are
0:35
still some misconceptions about
0:35
consenting to donation of your
0:39
organs, and some roadblocks that
0:39
can prevent your wishes from
0:42
being fulfilled. Later in the
0:42
show, we speak with a transplant
0:45
surgeon about why deciding to
0:45
donate your organs is more than
0:49
just a signature. To begin
0:49
today, Quebec is so fortunate to
0:53
have the MUHC which is one of
0:53
the top hospitals in the
0:56
country. And the Research
0:56
Institute of the McGill
0:59
University Health Center has
0:59
recently been voted one of the
1:02
top three research hospitals in
1:02
Canada. It is an incredible
1:07
recognition for the researchers
1:07
and staff who work diligently to
1:11
push the boundaries of
1:11
innovative health and medical
1:14
research. Dr. Rhian Touyz is the
1:14
Executive Director and Chief
1:18
Scientific Officer of the
1:18
RI-MUHC and she joins us today.
1:22
Thank you so much for being here. Dr. Touyz.
1:25
Thank you very
1:25
much, Tarah and it's a pleasure.
1:28
Dr. Touyz, I
1:28
remember our very first
1:31
interview when you first
1:31
accepted the position as
1:34
Executive Director and Chief
1:34
Scientific Officer, I'm feeling
1:36
it's about a year and a half ago
1:36
now. So what has the experience
1:40
been like for you so far? What
1:40
is this last year and a half
1:43
been like?
1:45
Yes indeed,
1:45
Tarah. It has been about one and
1:48
a half years, and the time has
1:48
certainly gone by very, very
1:52
quickly. The experience has been
1:52
one of great excitement, of joy,
1:58
and certainly enormous pride. As
1:58
I've gotten to know the
2:03
institution over the past one
2:03
and a half years, it's really
2:07
become incredibly clear to me
2:07
just what an extraordinary
2:11
community of hardworking,
2:11
creative, talented people who
2:16
are so committed and dedicated
2:16
to performing transformative
2:20
biomedical research, really to
2:20
improve the quality of life for
2:24
all. So it's been a fabulous
2:24
experience for me, and one that,
2:29
as I said, allows me to have
2:29
huge honor and feel very
2:34
privileged to do so. Indeed, an
2:34
exciting and busy time, Tarah.
2:40
Now Dr. Touyz,
2:40
how do you explain to people
2:43
when we're talking about
2:43
innovative medical research? How
2:47
do you explain to people what is
2:47
actually being done at the
2:50
Research Institute? How do you
2:50
explain that work in a way that
2:54
people will understand it?
2:57
That's really
2:57
an important question to ask
3:00
because we focus very much on
3:00
trying to understand the causes
3:06
of disease. We are a
3:06
hospital-based research
3:10
institute. So our prime interest
3:10
is to research what is
3:17
underlying disease. And we have
3:17
amazing researchers, both basic
3:23
scientists and clinicians, who
3:23
are working hand-in-hand to
3:28
unravel mechanisms to understand
3:28
better how to prevent disease,
3:34
and also to allow for the
3:34
discovery of new diagnostics,
3:39
and new therapeutics.
3:42
Now, the fact
3:42
that the Research Institute is
3:45
integrated with the hospital
3:45
with the MUHC, I can only
3:49
imagine that that's a huge benefit.
3:53
Not only is it
3:53
a huge benefit, but it's a huge
3:56
privilege. Because in order to
3:56
really understand patients, to
4:02
really understand what
4:02
clinicians have to deal with, in
4:06
terms of trying to manage
4:06
patients with disease. Having
4:10
the scientists close by really
4:10
allows the doctor, the clinician
4:16
and the scientist to ask
4:16
provocative questions that can
4:20
allow for the research that will
4:20
be fundamental in terms of
4:24
having impact and answering the
4:24
unknown questions. So indeed,
4:30
having the patients, having the
4:30
scientists, and having the
4:34
students all working close by
4:34
really does allow for the
4:39
transformative research that at
4:39
the end of the day will have
4:43
impact at the level of the
4:43
patient.
4:46
We're speaking with Dr. Rhian Touyz, who is the Executive Director and Chief
4:48
Scientific Officer of the
4:51
Research Institute of the McGill
4:51
University Health Centre. Dr.
4:55
Touyz, I'm curious about what is
4:55
most exciting, most inspiring to
4:59
you in terms of your position.
4:59
You talk about it with great
5:03
passion, what is the greatest
5:03
point of inspiration?
5:08
When I hear of
5:08
a small discovery or a big
5:11
discovery; no matter what that
5:11
discovery is something new,
5:16
something adding to knowledge,
5:16
something that is going to push
5:20
the boundaries of those unmet
5:20
needs, or those questions that
5:25
they haven't been able to answer
5:25
previously. That's what excites
5:30
me. And to be in an environment
5:30
where we have got young students
5:35
who have been taught by the
5:35
brightest scientists, and the
5:39
clinicians who work at the
5:39
bedside of the patients, working
5:44
in that type of a community is
5:44
honestly, so exciting, Tarah.
5:49
Having that intellectual
5:49
capacity, both within the
5:52
hospital and in the Research
5:52
Institute is really what brings
5:57
a smile to my face every day.
6:01
Dr. Touyz, it
6:01
feels like in every single
6:04
field, everywhere around the
6:04
world, things are moving so much
6:08
faster these days. Is that the
6:08
case in medical research as
6:12
well? Are things advancing
6:12
faster than they have in the
6:15
last 10-15 years?
6:18
This has been
6:18
an extraordinarily exciting time
6:21
in biomedical sciences, in
6:21
health research; you are
6:25
correct. There has been so much
6:25
innovation, whether this is
6:29
related to technologies, to
6:29
nanomedicine, to methodologies.
6:35
We know today, for example, that
6:35
artificial intelligence, machine
6:39
learning is having a huge impact
6:39
in the way we may diagnose
6:43
patients' diseases. Also, in
6:43
terms of therapeutics, the
6:49
technologies that we use today
6:49
are so different to what we used
6:54
10 years ago. But this is at the
6:54
level of both the clinical side,
7:00
but also, of course, within the
7:00
research laboratories. So
7:04
indeed, a very exciting time,
7:04
when there's been huge
7:09
advancements in these areas that
7:09
have really propelled discovery
7:14
to a whole new level.
7:17
Dr. Touyz, I
7:17
know during COVID, and
7:19
post-COVID, we talked a lot
7:19
about how the collaboration
7:22
between doctors, scientists,
7:22
researchers, research institutes
7:27
changed because there needed to
7:27
be that global collaboration in
7:30
order to deal with this pandemic
7:30
that nobody had dealt with
7:33
before. Does that kind of
7:33
collaboration still exist, and
7:37
has it grown in terms of
7:37
collaborating with research
7:39
institutes and researchers
7:39
around the world, outside of
7:42
Quebec, Canada?
7:44
Indeed, I think
7:44
we've realized more than ever,
7:47
and certainly this was
7:47
highlighted with the COVID
7:50
pandemic that we've just gone
7:50
through. We cannot do science
7:54
alone; we need to work
7:54
collaboratively. The more
7:59
brilliance we have around the
7:59
table, the more brainstorming,
8:02
the more expertise, the skills
8:02
that we bring to the table, that
8:07
is what is going to allow for
8:07
the advancement of science, for
8:11
the discovery of new knowledge.
8:11
And importantly, at the end of
8:18
the day, this is what will allow
8:18
us to really help our patients
8:22
both in the prevention of
8:22
disease, and also for better
8:25
quality of life. And more than
8:25
ever, we saw that through COVID,
8:31
where countries were working
8:31
together, researchers working
8:34
together with their clinician
8:34
and counterparts, and
8:37
industries, pharma, governments,
8:37
we were all working together.
8:42
And through those incredible
8:42
collaborations, we were allowed
8:45
to get through the incredibly
8:45
challenging times of the
8:49
pandemic. So yes, that ethos
8:49
continues. And certainly, we
8:55
need to continue to support that
8:55
collaborative effort.
8:59
Dr. Rhian Touyz
8:59
is the Executive Director of the
9:02
Research Institute of the MUHC,
9:02
which was just voted one of the
9:05
top three research hospitals in
9:05
Canada. What was it like to
9:10
receive that recognition, Dr. Touyz?
9:12
Oh, it was
9:12
wonderful. As I said, I'm
9:15
extremely proud to be leading
9:15
this amazing Research Institute
9:21
of over 3000 trainees,
9:21
researchers, clinicians, and
9:25
admin staff. And we will
9:25
continue to work hard so that
9:29
our finest and our contributions
9:29
remain the best with our
9:33
aspirations of really being at
9:33
the top in our field. So indeed,
9:38
enormous pride and much joy.
9:41
And, philanthropy. Dr. Touyz, final question for you. How
9:43
significant is that in terms of
9:47
the research that's conducted at
9:47
the Research Institute?
9:51
Research is
9:51
expensive, and we do need
9:55
funding in order to allow us to
9:55
do the science that we do.
10:00
Without the support that we get
10:00
through our granting agencies,
10:05
and especially without the
10:05
generosity, the commitment, the
10:10
support, and of course, the
10:10
interest that we get through
10:14
philanthropy, we would not be
10:14
able to do what we do. And
10:18
certainly we would not be able
10:18
to go that extra mile to ensure
10:23
that we remain and continue to
10:23
be at the front line in
10:27
research. So indeed,
10:27
philanthropic support is very,
10:31
very important. And this is
10:31
something that we certainly as
10:35
researchers do not take for
10:35
granted. It is with huge
10:39
appreciation that we know that
10:39
there is philanthropy that is
10:45
supporting our science.
10:47
Congratulations
10:47
once again on this award, Dr.
10:49
Touyz, and thank you so much for
10:49
joining us on the show.
10:52
Thank you so much, Tarah.
10:54
Next up on Health Matters, finding new treatments for young adults with
10:56
a rare but life-threatening
10:59
cancer. I'm Tarah Schwartz,
10:59
welcome back to Health Matters
11:02
on CJAD 800. Sarcoma is a rare
11:02
but life-threatening cancer that
11:08
endangers the lives of young
11:08
adults between the ages of 18
11:12
and 40. Many patients are
11:12
diagnosed with sarcoma in
11:16
Quebec, they're treated at the
11:16
MUHC. A team of doctors is
11:20
hoping to create a Centre of
11:20
Excellence in Sarcoma Care at
11:23
the hospital to unite
11:23
specialists and give patients
11:27
access to more treatments. Dr.
11:27
Ramy Saleh is a medical
11:30
oncologist at the MUHC, and the
11:30
Medical Director of oncology
11:34
clinical trials at the Research
11:34
Institute of the McGill
11:37
University Health Centre. Thank
11:37
you so much for joining us, Dr.
11:39
Saleh.
11:40
Thank you for having me.
11:42
So why don't we
11:42
start at the beginning? Can you
11:44
explain to us what exactly is
11:44
sarcoma?
11:49
Of course,
11:49
sarcoma is, as you mentioned, a
11:51
very rare type of cancer. It is
11:51
less than 1% of all cancers in
11:55
adult and around 50% of those in
11:55
children. It mostly involves the
12:01
muscle or the bone or the fat.
12:01
And it is not that common or
12:07
prevalent in Quebec.
12:09
And so when you
12:09
say that it mostly involves the
12:11
muscle, the bone or the fat, is
12:11
it that the cancer starts there?
12:15
Because I think we understand
12:15
cancers. Like we understand
12:17
breast cancer, we understand
12:17
lung cancer, colon cancer,
12:20
sarcoma is a bit harder to
12:20
understand. How can you explain
12:22
it so that we can understand it a little bit?
12:24
It is an
12:24
excellent question. So it can
12:26
arise from any bone in the body
12:26
or any muscle in the body, which
12:30
makes it a more complex cancer
12:30
in nature. So you're right,
12:33
breast cancer always starts in
12:33
the breast. So it's a very known
12:37
area where we can look out and
12:37
watch out for. The hard part,
12:41
for example, in osteosarcoma,
12:41
which is a type of sarcoma, it
12:44
can happen in any bone in the
12:44
person's body, and then from
12:48
there, it can spread around. So
12:48
instead of having one kind of
12:51
sarcoma, there's actually 100
12:51
subtypes of sarcoma, which makes
12:55
it extremely challenging for us.
12:58
Absolutely. I
12:58
know that some cancers are
13:01
genetic, is this one of them?
13:03
You're right,
13:03
some are actually genetic. It's
13:07
not that common. It does arise
13:07
from there. As you mentioned, in
13:12
the most vulnerable population,
13:12
the one between 16 and 40, I
13:18
would say probably 5-10% are
13:18
genetic, the other ones are just
13:23
the buddy predisposed to have cancer.
13:27
And do you know
13:27
at this point, why it targets
13:30
that age group?
13:33
We don't really
13:33
know. But we do know that it
13:36
either comes early on; so
13:36
between the ages of 16 to 40. Or
13:40
it comes very late, around the
13:40
60s or 70s. Usually in that
13:45
population it's patients who
13:45
already had cancer in the past,
13:49
or had some kind of cancer
13:49
treatment, for example, like
13:51
radiation. We expect that they
13:51
can have a sarcoma after
13:55
radiation. So there's two
13:55
populations that are at risk for
13:59
sarcoma. The reason as to why it
13:59
happens, we still don't know,
14:04
given that it is very rare. So
14:04
it's very hard to do research on
14:07
that.
14:08
And is there a
14:08
population you mentioned- one
14:11
population, people have had
14:11
radiation from previous cancer
14:14
treatments. Is there another
14:14
vulnerable population? Like why
14:17
targeting children like it seems
14:17
to it seems to be very broad.
14:21
You're right, it
14:21
is very broad, because what
14:24
we're talking about is 300 cases
14:24
a year. So we don't have that
14:28
much experience. It's not like
14:28
breast cancer with tens of
14:32
thousands of cases a year. We
14:32
only have a very small
14:35
population to study or to try to
14:35
observe and pick up on the
14:39
science of why we're having
14:39
sarcoma. It's not related, for
14:43
example, to food as some people
14:43
think, with other types of
14:46
cancers. We think it could be an
14:46
exposure to radiation in the
14:50
past. Some it's because of
14:50
previous malignancy or the
14:54
previous treatment, but that is
14:54
also rare. Most of the time when
14:57
we see those patients in our
14:57
clinics we don't know the reason
15:00
why it started.
15:02
We were speaking with Dr. Ramy Saleh and we're talking about sarcoma.
15:04
Considering that you've now
15:08
helped us understand how rare
15:08
this cancer is that there are
15:10
less than 300 cases... is that
15:10
less than 300 cases in Quebec or
15:13
Canada?
15:15
In Canada, it's
15:15
about 1000 cases of new
15:18
diagnosis of sarcoma a year. In
15:18
Quebec, our average is between
15:22
250 to 300 cases a year.
15:26
Considering that
15:26
that it is a relatively small
15:29
number, are there signs or
15:29
symptoms? How do you diagnose
15:31
this cancer?
15:33
Most of the
15:33
time, patients come in with
15:36
extreme bone pain or a fracture
15:36
that's unexplained. In others,
15:41
it is just a mass that occurs in
15:41
the belly, where we have a lot
15:45
of fat and this is the typical
15:45
presentation when they come.
15:49
It's not that common to catch
15:49
them super early on. And this is
15:54
why sarcoma tends to be more
15:54
malignant and more aggressive,
15:57
because some of the times when
15:57
we detect those cancers, they
16:00
already started spreading around.
16:03
Yeah, I know
16:03
that we hear that a lot; that
16:05
the earlier you catch a cancer,
16:05
the easier it is to treat. And
16:07
it sounds like are most of these
16:07
cases caught in, in late stage
16:12
because of how tough they are to
16:12
diagnose?
16:15
The challenge in
16:15
sarcoma is what kind of
16:18
treatment that exists. So let's
16:18
focus on that. If you come in
16:22
with an early stage sarcoma, the
16:22
treatment is still very
16:26
aggressive in nature. And what I
16:26
mean by that is, sometimes it
16:30
requires an amputation of a
16:30
limb. As you can imagine, if
16:36
you're between the ages of 16
16:36
and 40, this is extremely
16:38
traumatic at the peak of your
16:38
life. So our treatments in
16:43
sarcoma are not as easy as in
16:43
different kinds of cancers. The
16:48
surgeries can be quite
16:48
extensive, and sometimes can
16:52
limit mobility later on. In
16:52
terms of chemotherapy, most of
16:57
the time, the treatment is
16:57
around 40 weeks, in total. So it
17:02
requires a lot of patience and a
17:02
lot of visits to the hospital.
17:05
And that's the complexity of
17:05
that sarcoma.
17:09
Well, Dr. Saleh,
17:09
you're working on a project with
17:13
Dr. Nathaniel Bouganim to form
17:13
the Sarcoma Research Consortium,
17:17
Quebec, SARCQ. Tell us how you
17:17
hope this consortium will help?
17:22
The purpose is
17:22
we want to help our patients in
17:28
Quebec more. When you have a
17:28
sarcoma that is localized, that
17:34
is treated with chemotherapy and
17:34
surgery, that is great news. But
17:37
what happens to the people with
17:37
advanced sarcoma where the
17:40
cancer started spreading, or
17:40
what we call metastasis? In
17:44
those patients, the treatment
17:44
options are quite limited. We're
17:47
talking about three or four
17:47
options at best. And a lot of
17:51
times, with those treatment
17:51
options we have less than a 50%
17:55
chance that they actually work.
17:55
Recently, over the last couple
17:59
of years, there's been a lot of
17:59
new medications that are
18:03
offering patients much more
18:03
options. And with more options,
18:06
obviously, the longer that you
18:06
can live, and we can give them
18:10
more time and better quality of
18:10
life. Unfortunately, the only
18:13
way to access those drugs is
18:13
through clinical trials. And we
18:17
need to encourage the
18:17
pharmaceutical companies to come
18:20
to Quebec so we can do those
18:20
clinical trials. And we also
18:23
have to get all the patients to
18:23
be seen and to ensure that we
18:26
don't leave anybody behind. It's
18:26
unfair, if we cannot help a
18:31
patient just because they don't
18:31
live on the Island of Montreal.
18:34
So the project came out by
18:34
multiple doctors across the
18:38
province of Quebec, where we
18:38
already know each other, and we
18:41
decided to form this consortium,
18:41
where we will discuss all the
18:47
patients among each other. And
18:47
they will be able to have access
18:52
to any clinical trial that we
18:52
have in Quebec, and at the same
18:55
time to encourage all companies
18:55
who have clinical trials to come
18:59
and invest in our province, so
18:59
we can offer those newer
19:02
medications to our patients.
19:04
I also wonder,
19:04
Dr. Saleh, when you're diagnosed
19:06
with a cancer that is so
19:06
challenging as this one seems to
19:10
be an it's such a rare cancer,
19:10
there must be some kind of
19:15
comfort having an organization
19:15
that is focusing on it because
19:18
patients must feel very alone
19:18
when they're diagnosed with
19:21
this. Is there going to be some
19:21
form of patient support that's
19:24
going to be included in SARCQ as well?
19:26
Yes, that's
19:26
actually an excellent question.
19:29
Sarcoma cannot be treated in any
19:29
hospital. Sarcoma everywhere in
19:33
the world is treated in what we
19:33
call Centres of Excellence. It's
19:37
where you have an oncologist who
19:37
has training in sarcoma and
19:41
orthopedic doctors who know how
19:41
to treat this disease by very
19:45
specific surgeries; as well as
19:45
radiation oncologists. In
19:49
Quebec, the two largest
19:49
hospitals are Hopital
19:53
Maisonneuve Rosemont and the
19:53
MUHC. So we sat all together and
19:56
we decided to merge forces so we
19:56
can merge our experiences
20:00
together so we can offer the
20:00
best quality of care for our
20:03
patients. In SARCQ, the patients
20:03
will have access to not only the
20:07
doctors with the most experience
20:07
in sarcoma in Quebec only, but
20:11
also we'll try to plug them to
20:11
clinical trials as fast as
20:14
possible. We have a coordinator
20:14
that will be helping us match
20:18
those patients to trials. As
20:18
well as to provide- just as we
20:22
do to all our cancer patients at
20:22
MUHC- provide them with a nurse
20:27
as well as psychosocial support,
20:27
and all the services that we can
20:30
offer them in order to alleviate
20:30
the pain that they're going
20:33
through.
20:34
Dr. Saleh, I just want to congratulate you on this incredible project. And to
20:36
say that it feels comforting to
20:39
know that you rally behind it,
20:39
because you're clearly very
20:42
passionate about this cause. So
20:42
congratulations, and thank you
20:45
so much for coming on to talk to us about it.
20:47
Thank you very much. Thank you for having me.
20:50
Coming up on the
20:50
show, deciding to donate your
20:52
organs is so much more than
20:52
signing the back of your health
20:56
card. I'm Tarah Schwartz and
20:56
this is Health Matters. April is
21:00
organ transplant Awareness
21:00
Month. It's heartbreaking for
21:04
those who lose loved ones, but
21:04
donating organs saves lives. But
21:09
there's more to deciding to
21:09
donate your organs than just
21:12
signing the back of your health
21:12
card. Dr. Prosanto Chaudhury is
21:16
a surgeon and the interim
21:16
Director of the multi organ
21:18
transplant program at the MUHC,
21:18
and an associate investigator at
21:22
the Research Institute of the
21:22
McGill University Health Centre.
21:25
Thank you so much for joining us.
21:27
Thank you very much, Tarah for having me on air.
21:30
Dr. Chaudhury,
21:30
organ transplant seems to have
21:33
many facets to it. What drew you
21:33
to this area of medicine I'm
21:37
curious?
21:39
Well,
21:39
that's a tough question. I
21:45
didn't actually start out in
21:45
life wanting to be a transplant
21:47
surgeon. It's something that the
21:47
experiences that I had working
21:51
at the Royal Victoria Hospital,
21:51
before our move on the
21:54
transplant service really opened
21:54
my eyes to. It is really one of
21:59
those remarkable, life changing
21:59
operations. Particularly when
22:05
you're doing liver transplants
22:05
on extremely sick individuals,
22:09
and then get a chance to see
22:09
them returning to normal lives.
22:12
And the same thing for patients
22:12
who receive kidney transplants.
22:14
It's really life changing
22:14
operations. And it's a real
22:18
opportunity to make an impact on
22:18
someone.
22:21
Wow, that sounds
22:21
wonderful. So what is it like to
22:24
be in the operating room for an
22:24
organ transplant operation? Tell
22:28
us a little bit about that setting?
22:31
It's something that I've been doing for 15-20 years almost. And it's
22:32
still as exciting now as it was
22:38
when I first started doing it.
22:38
There's something really
22:40
miraculous about seeing an organ
22:40
that you've taken out of an
22:43
icebox; putting it back into
22:43
someone and seeing it come back
22:47
to life. In the case of the
22:47
kidneys, start making urine. In
22:50
the case of a liver, picking up
22:50
and really taking over all those
22:53
vital functions again. It's a
22:53
really miraculous moment. It has
22:57
its moments of stress. Of course, these are not simple operations, but really, really a
22:59
rewarding experience from the
23:03
surgical side.
23:04
I think a lot of
23:04
us see on television, this sort
23:07
of idea of this box being rushed
23:07
from an ambulance or a
23:12
helicopter into a hospital and
23:12
it goes into the operating room.
23:14
And like is there some truth to
23:14
that that mystique that we see
23:18
in various hospitals shows?
23:21
Well, as
23:21
is often the case, TV tends to
23:23
exaggerate things. But there is
23:23
a certain amount of urgency to
23:26
it. We're fortunate enough in
23:26
Quebec to the benefit from an
23:30
association called ACDO the
23:30
Association canadien des dons
23:35
d'organes. And they actually are
23:35
an organization of volunteers,
23:39
primarily from the police forces
23:39
of the province who drive organs
23:46
around when we're on our way
23:46
from one hospital to another.
23:48
And so there is that urgent
23:48
aspect to it. And we do arrive
23:54
in hospitals with those red
23:54
boxes that you see on TV and
23:56
then bring those red boxes back
23:56
to the hospitals. The time that
24:00
we have to put an organ in
24:00
varies by the type of organ and
24:03
so some are really urgent heart
24:03
and liver we will do immediately
24:09
on arrival. Often the recipients
24:09
are already in the operating
24:12
room when we arrived back at the
24:12
hospital. With kidneys we have a
24:15
little bit more time.
24:17
Interesting. I
24:17
think when most people hear
24:19
about organ transplants, it's
24:19
hard to wrap your head around
24:21
the fact that someone has to
24:21
pass away for someone else to
24:25
live. I'm sure it's very
24:25
different from your perspective
24:28
as a surgeon, how do you see
24:28
that element of it?
24:33
The two
24:33
elements for that. One- the
24:36
members of the transplant team
24:36
are never in direct contact with
24:39
the donors and their families.
24:39
So we don't have that firsthand
24:43
experience of it. We are however
24:43
always cognizant of the fact
24:47
that this is an immense gift
24:47
that someone or some family is
24:52
choosing to give at the end of
24:52
life. And so it is one of those
24:57
unique moments where you have
24:57
that bittersweet mix of a death
25:03
that leads to saving and
25:03
influencing up to eight other
25:07
lives. It's a really remarkable
25:07
moment. And we are always
25:13
thankful and grateful to the
25:13
donors and their families who in
25:16
moments of great crisis, and
25:16
grief are able to make that
25:22
ultimate gift.
25:24
Beautifully
25:24
said, Dr. Prosanto Chaudhury is
25:28
an organ transplant surgeon,
25:28
associate investigator at the
25:32
Research Institute at the MUHC.
25:32
Are they're still misconceptions
25:36
about organ donation, do you
25:36
think?
25:40
Absolutely.
25:40
There are misconceptions about
25:44
people thinking that they are
25:44
not potential donors. Because of
25:49
their age, because of some of
25:49
the medical illnesses they may
25:51
have. And in fact, most of those
25:51
preconceived ideas about who can
25:58
and can't be an organ donor
25:58
aren't always the case. And
26:02
certainly, there's also the
26:02
donation of tissues, which is
26:04
even more broadly applicable,
26:04
has fewer restrictions in some
26:08
senses than then than whole
26:08
organs. So I would say never
26:12
rule yourself out. Someone may
26:12
be able to benefit. The other is
26:19
sometimes the urgency of it. So
26:19
once an organ donor is
26:22
identified, it may take several
26:22
days to completely work them up
26:27
and allocate the organs to the
26:27
best possible recipient. So
26:32
there is urgency, but it is not
26:32
the extreme urgency that we see
26:36
on television.
26:37
Okay, Dr.
26:37
Chaudhury, I wonder how
26:40
important is it to discuss this
26:40
decision to donate your organs
26:44
in advance. Is it as simple as
26:44
okay, we sign the back of our
26:46
health card, if something
26:46
happens to us, our wishes are
26:50
made clear, or is there
26:50
something more that's required?
26:54
It's always best to have the discussion about your wishes to
26:56
be an organ donor, with the
26:59
people who will be making
26:59
decisions and speaking for you.
27:02
When that situation arises,
27:02
unfortunately, when one becomes
27:06
an organ donor, one is usually
27:06
not... one of the dead. So one
27:10
isn't able to express one's
27:10
wishes. And so it's really
27:12
important, in fact, to have the
27:12
discussions with the people
27:16
around you so that they know
27:16
what your wishes are. Signing
27:19
the card is an indication. But
27:19
it's really difficult for the
27:23
people around you to make that
27:23
decision. They're being asked to
27:27
make the decision. If they know
27:27
what your wish is and what your
27:31
decision is beforehand, and
27:31
makes the whole process much
27:34
much easier on them.
27:36
You mentioned in
27:36
a previous answer that up to
27:40
eight lives can be saved. Dig
27:40
into a little deeper with that.
27:45
When you're donating your
27:45
organs, what is it that can be
27:47
given as this beautiful gift you
27:47
mentioned to other people?
27:52
So we're
27:52
looking at the potential to give
27:54
lungs; that may go to one or two
27:54
recipients. A heart, a liver
27:59
which may go to one or two
27:59
recipients, pancreas, two
28:03
kidneys, small intestine, and
28:03
tissues as well.
28:08
Wow, it's
28:08
incredible. As you mentioned, it
28:10
really does sound like the gift
28:10
of life. It really is the gift
28:14
of life, isn't it?
28:14
It really is the gift of life. Absolutely.
28:17
What kind of innovative research in transplants is being done at the
28:19
MUHC and the RI-MUHC now?
28:24
So we're
28:24
involved in a broad range of
28:27
activities in research around
28:27
transplantation right now. Into
28:30
the immunology of transplant and
28:30
how to prevent and treat
28:33
rejection. In terms of
28:33
understanding the changes that
28:37
happen to an organ when it is
28:37
removed from a living body and
28:42
stored and then put back in, and
28:42
how we can lessen the damage
28:47
that occurs during that period
28:47
of time. As well as clinical
28:50
trials of new drugs and
28:50
immunosuppressants that will
28:54
hopefully decrease the side
28:54
effects that patients'
28:57
experience from their
28:57
maintenance immunosuppression.
29:01
So a whole gamut of research
29:01
currently underway here at the
29:04
MUHC
29:06
Dr. Chaudhury, you mentioned that you've been doing this for the past 15
29:07
years. Things move so quickly
29:11
now; it's something we've talked about on the show a couple of times already. But you must have
29:13
seen significant changes in the
29:16
last 15 years.
29:19
One of
29:19
the biggest changes that we see
29:21
is in the donors themselves and
29:21
the kinds of donors and organs
29:26
that we're using. The population
29:26
getting a little bit older and
29:30
still having excellent outcomes
29:30
with those organs. Also, the use
29:34
of preservation technologies;
29:34
machine perfusion is becoming
29:39
increasingly important in the
29:39
way we manage the organs so that
29:43
they go not necessarily right
29:43
from a red box into someone but
29:47
go through a stage where they
29:47
are reconditioned or put through
29:51
processes that allow them to be
29:51
better conserved. I think that's
29:56
something that's going to grow
29:56
enormously in the near future.
30:00
I have another
30:00
question for you. And we only
30:05
have a minute left and I'm
30:05
curious about this Dr.
30:07
Chaudhury, you mentioned that
30:07
the preservation. Is it getting
30:11
easier for bodies to be able to
30:11
accept transplants now? It's
30:15
something I don't know much
30:15
about it but I feel like
30:17
something I've heard is that sometimes people reject their transplants. Is that getting
30:19
better?
30:21
So we've made great strides in the treatment of acute rejection. So
30:23
we rarely have episodes of an
30:27
organ going in and being
30:27
rejected immediately. The more
30:31
problematic issue is one of
30:31
chronic rejection, which
30:34
develops over years and maybe
30:34
quite silent and present only
30:39
when it's too late to treat. And
30:39
so we're really actively
30:43
involved in looking at ways to
30:43
decrease that kind of rejection
30:46
and detect it earlier so we can
30:46
treat it earlier.
30:49
Dr. Prosanto
30:49
Chaudhury, thank you so much for
30:52
joining us on Health Matters. I
30:52
feel I've learned a lot of new
30:55
and wonderful information today
30:55
about your area of expertise. So
30:58
thank you so much.
30:59
Thank you so much, Tarah, for having me on here.
31:02
Next up on the
31:02
show, an early career researcher
31:04
shares how receiving an award
31:04
will help further an exciting
31:08
project. I'm Tarah Schwartz,
31:08
you're listening to Health
31:11
Matters. There are groups that
31:11
are underrepresented in health
31:15
and medical research. Like in
31:15
many fields, researchers from
31:18
diverse backgrounds can have
31:18
difficulties acquiring resources
31:22
to pursue their work. To address
31:22
the lack of diversity, the
31:25
assets management firm Fiera
31:25
Capital and the MUHC Foundation
31:30
founded the Fiera Capital Awards
31:30
for Diversity, Equity and
31:34
Inclusion in Health Care. Fiera
31:34
Capital has committed $120,000
31:39
per year for the next three
31:39
years to support researchers who
31:42
are in their early career
31:42
stages. Annabel Wing-Yan Fan is
31:47
one of this year's recipients.
31:47
She is a PhD student in the
31:49
Baldwin Vision Lab. Annabel,
31:49
thank you for joining us.
31:53
Hello, Tarah. Thanks for inviting me today.
31:55
So Annabel, you
31:55
are a doctoral student in the
31:58
Baldwin Vision Lab at the
31:58
Research Institute at MUHC,
32:02
which we've heard about quite a
32:02
bit today. Tell us a little bit
32:04
about what you're studying. What
32:04
are you doing? What's involved
32:07
in the Baldwin Vision Lab?
32:09
Great,
32:09
thanks for asking. So the
32:12
Baldwin Vision Lab takes a look
32:12
at visual information
32:15
processing. And specifically, I
32:15
look at how that changes in
32:18
aging. And whether it impacts
32:18
older adults in their daily
32:21
lives with a bit of a focus on
32:21
their driving ability.
32:26
So what specifically are you looking at in terms of vision?
32:30
Specifically, in terms of vision, we are really looking at how people are
32:32
able to see faint signals when
32:36
there are noisy backgrounds. So
32:36
when I talk about visual noise,
32:40
you can imagine that like TV
32:40
static, and when participants
32:43
come into the lab, we asked them
32:43
whether or not they could find
32:46
faint patterns in these noisy
32:46
backgrounds. And we're really
32:49
looking at how people are
32:49
processing these visual signals
32:52
in terms of space and also over time.
32:53
And so what are
32:53
you hoping to learn from it?
32:57
What is the goal of this kind of
32:57
study?
33:00
One of the
33:00
interesting things that is more
33:03
talking on the clinical
33:03
application side, is that when
33:07
it comes to age-related changes
33:07
in cognition, we find that there
33:10
are a lot of related things. So
33:10
different areas of cognition
33:13
change, or decline together was
33:13
this isn't the case in vision.
33:17
And that kind of leads to the
33:17
question of why vision changes
33:19
differently, in different
33:19
aspects, and whether or not that
33:22
translates to how aging impacts
33:22
people's daily lives. So one
33:27
aspect of your vision might get
33:27
better as you get older, one
33:30
aspect of revision may get
33:30
worse. So we're really doing
33:32
this research to find if we can
33:32
have a general measure of aging
33:35
that will kind of track how
33:35
declining aging may impact daily
33:38
activities.
33:40
I think most of
33:40
us know that as we get older,
33:43
you reach that point where
33:43
you're like, Okay, I've had
33:46
super vision my whole life and
33:46
now I need reading glasses. So
33:49
that's the one that everyone
33:49
understands in terms of how
33:52
their eyes change as they get
33:52
older. What are some other ways
33:54
that eyes change as we age?
33:57
One of the things that you were talking about there is in terms of
33:59
visual acuity. So as we get
34:02
older, maybe faint things are
34:02
harder to see. But there are
34:05
also other aspects of our vision
34:05
that aren't super obvious. Like
34:08
as we get older, there's parts
34:08
in your visual field that is in
34:11
front of you- how much you can
34:11
see without turning your head.
34:14
And in this visual field, there
34:14
are sometimes places where we
34:17
can't see anymore because as we
34:17
age, the neurons might change.
34:21
And that's not obvious to us,
34:21
because our brain kind of fills
34:24
it in. In the back of your eye,
34:24
you have this blind spot where
34:27
the optical nerves are coming
34:27
out. And we were technically
34:31
blind in that area of our visual
34:31
field, but we can't see that
34:34
because our brain fills in the
34:34
information. So similar things
34:37
may happen as we age in
34:37
different visual degenerations,
34:43
and because we don't notice that
34:43
it can be really dangerous for
34:45
driving. So that's one of the
34:45
things that we should be mindful
34:47
of.
34:48
We're speaking
34:48
with Annabel Wing-Yan Fan; she
34:50
is one of this year's recipients
34:50
of the Fiera Capital Award for
34:53
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
34:53
in Health Care and we're talking
34:56
about her research now. I know
34:56
Annabel that you're passionate
34:59
about extended reality
34:59
technologies, and we've created
35:03
a web and mobile app for your
35:03
work. Tell us a little bit about
35:05
that.
35:06
For sure.
35:06
For extended reality is in case
35:09
people are not familiar with the
35:09
term; it encompasses virtual
35:12
reality, which is typically a
35:12
screen inside of a headset, and
35:15
augmented reality, which is like
35:15
a digital overlay over the real
35:19
world, such as like Pokemon Go.
35:19
And mixed reality, which really
35:22
is a mix of these two
35:22
technologies. So I've worked
35:25
with many different groups in
35:25
these sorts of technologies. So
35:29
for example, I worked with a
35:29
graduate level software
35:31
engineers to turn lab
35:31
experiments into these fun
35:34
mobile games for children.
35:34
Before starting my PhD at
35:37
McGill, I've worked on a
35:37
research collaboration with the
35:40
pharmaceutical company Novartis,
35:40
Ubisoft, a gaming company, and
35:43
McGill, to develop digital
35:43
treatments for lazy eye. And in
35:47
the past, I've also created
35:47
these prototypes with the
35:50
Microsoft HoloLens, which is a
35:50
mixed reality device to kind of
35:54
assess its use as a research
35:54
tool in vision.
35:57
So these are
35:57
obviously tools and techniques
36:00
that are very new, because this
36:00
is not something that we were
36:03
doing 10-15 years ago. How is it
36:03
changing the landscape of doing
36:08
this kind of research, your
36:08
research and research of your
36:11
colleagues as well?
36:13
Yeah, I'm really excited about where this kind of area is headed in.
36:15
Because like you mentioned,
36:17
these are very new technologies.
36:17
And I think one of the most
36:20
beneficial aspects of them is
36:20
that they're really letting us
36:23
test the scientific paradigms
36:23
inside of a more naturalistic
36:27
setting. People are able to have
36:27
people do locomotion tasks
36:31
inside natural virtual
36:31
environment, we can show people
36:33
more realistic visual stimuli to
36:33
see whether or not our lab tests
36:37
really translate in the real
36:37
world. And even though it's not
36:40
like obviously the same as the
36:40
real world, we are bringing the
36:42
research a bit closer, which
36:42
means hopefully better
36:45
applications and mobilization
36:45
for scientific research.
36:48
So obviously,
36:48
this kind of technology, which I
36:51
also find so fascinating, I see
36:51
the impact being enormous on
36:55
medicine and research in
36:55
general. How does it impact the
36:59
patient in terms of your work?
36:59
Like how does it dribbled down
37:02
to get to having an effect on
37:02
the patient?
37:06
Well, this ties into that work I was talking about with the Microsoft
37:08
HoloLens. So a reason why we
37:10
were looking at this mixed
37:10
reality technology is because
37:13
when people are doing visual
37:13
rehabilitation, for example, if
37:16
you have them come into the lab,
37:16
and they're just looking at a
37:19
screen for hours and hours, it's
37:19
super boring. It's hard to keep
37:22
people engaged It's hard for
37:22
them to make time out of their
37:25
day to do these sorts of really
37:25
important training to help
37:27
improve their vision. But when
37:27
you have mixed reality, perhaps
37:30
now you can have people doing
37:30
their day-to-day life. Obviously
37:33
not doing something like driving
37:33
or something that needs them to
37:36
be paying attention 100%. But
37:36
now you can start maybe doing
37:39
rehabilitation that's more
37:39
integrated into their lifestyle
37:42
without really taking people
37:42
away from their work.
37:45
Annabel Wing-Yan
37:45
Fan is a recipient of this
37:47
year's Fiera Capital Awards for
37:47
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
37:51
in Health Care. So what does it
37:51
mean to you to be one of this
37:54
year's five winners Annabel?
37:56
I'm very
37:56
grateful to Fiera Capital and
37:59
the MUHC Foundation for this
37:59
award. Personally, it means a
38:02
lot to me, because I feel
38:02
recognized for the first time
38:05
for some of the work I've been
38:05
doing to really help improve
38:08
equity, diversity and inclusion
38:08
in science. And it's also just
38:11
really exciting to see that
38:11
there are these awards happening
38:15
to motivate other BIPOC
38:15
researchers and make up for some
38:18
of the barriers and unique
38:18
challenges that we face in this
38:20
field.
38:21
Yeah, I want to
38:21
talk about that Annabel, in
38:24
terms of the unique challenges
38:24
you face in the field. What are
38:27
your thoughts on this award in
38:27
general, in terms of those
38:29
challenges, what do you see
38:29
those challenges being? Help us
38:32
to understand.
38:34
So I guess
38:34
I'll start by listing three of
38:36
the main challenges that come to
38:36
mind a lot for me, and then kind
38:40
of touch on why the word really,
38:40
I guess, discusses those things.
38:44
So I guess the first is really
38:44
lack of representation. Like
38:47
many other professions, this
38:47
really prevents minorities from
38:50
even considering research and
38:50
academia as a career path. And
38:54
then also in our area of
38:54
research, there are really merit
38:58
based assessments typically. And
38:58
these are based off the idea
39:01
that there's this even playing
39:01
field and really ignores the
39:03
experiences and barriers that
39:03
are faced by BIPOC researchers.
39:07
And then finally, and really
39:07
close to my heart is that there
39:10
is a lot of unrecognized and
39:10
uncompensated work in this area
39:13
as well. Where people of color
39:13
are often put in this position
39:17
of educating and advocating for
39:17
EDI, and it doesn't really
39:21
translate to how their
39:21
performance is assessed by the
39:23
university or funding agencies.
39:23
So even though they're
39:26
passionate, and they want to
39:26
help people; in some ways, it
39:29
even stands in the way of them
39:29
advancing in their careers. And
39:33
I think that's just really
39:33
heartbreaking. So it was really
39:35
exciting to me to see how the
39:35
Fiera Capital Award was really
39:39
implemented. Because I feel it
39:39
addressed this lack of
39:41
representation by giving
39:41
opportunities to speak on our
39:43
research. It also recognizes the
39:43
unique challenges we face
39:48
because in the application, they
39:48
asked us to be able to talk
39:51
about this and show that we are
39:51
mindful and excited about
39:55
promoting EDI practices in our
39:55
workplaces. So overall, I just
39:59
feel like I'm very excited for
39:59
this opportunity and I'm happy
40:01
that it'll be around to help
40:01
future researchers as well.
40:06
That is really,
40:06
really, really well said
40:08
Annabel. Really, really well
40:08
said. Thank you so much.
40:10
Congratulations like I said it
40:10
stem from that whole "if you can
40:13
see it, you can be it", right
40:13
Annabel? Thank you so much for
40:16
joining us on the show.
40:17
Thank you.
40:20
I'm Tarah Schwartz, thank you for tuning in. What would you like to hear
40:21
about on the show? Write to us
40:24
at
40:24
40:28
You can also follow the MUHC
40:28
Foundation on social media or
40:32
sign up for our newsletter at
40:32
MUHCfoundation.com. I hope
40:36
you'll join me again next
40:36
Sunday. Thank you so much for
40:38
listening to Health Matters and
40:38
stay healthy.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More