Podchaser Logo
Home
IN COURT:  Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

IN COURT: Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

Released Monday, 22nd April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
IN COURT:  Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

IN COURT: Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

IN COURT:  Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

IN COURT: Erin Patterson fights to keep case local, appoints new lawyer

Monday, 22nd April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

We can on an errand. adam politically

0:04

correct time. We already know that

0:06

the braces evidence against yours voluminous to. There's

0:08

a lot in a. Of course current

0:11

person. Has a presumption of innocence.

0:13

And a court will decide. What?

0:16

Happened. And did not have. I'm

0:18

driving up till the Trade Value

0:20

Magistrates Court. It's the first time

0:23

I see Erin Pannison in five

0:25

months. I'm Brooke Gray but Crane

0:27

and this is the Mushroom. Cook.

0:33

So I'm driving to Gibbs Land. It's

0:35

an hour and a half from Melbourne

0:37

Cbd. It's about eight am. I've been

0:40

on the right for about an hour.

0:43

I'm meeting my colleague Ashok going

0:45

down at the Colts. Your

0:48

destination is on the right. Time

0:53

pops in. Producer

1:01

and dryer annihilate the car

1:04

and walked towards pool where

1:06

ashes waiting for us. Hello!

1:09

Ah, focus the odd. So we

1:11

just standing outside the court. We're

1:14

not going to go in yet.

1:16

We can't record inside the courtroom

1:18

an ash. Can you explain to

1:20

our audience why this is so?

1:22

Yeah? So it's actually a fence

1:24

in Victoria? To record anything inside a

1:26

court building. With that they've videos,

1:28

photos, or any audio so we can't actually

1:30

record anything in the courtroom to get up

1:33

a transcript or anything like that. We've got

1:35

a real I now know it's completely everything

1:37

that we say in here. so gotta be

1:39

the eyes and ears to the community in

1:41

what can sometimes be very. Short court

1:44

hearing. Sometimes just minutes. So outside

1:46

of the court building, but just through

1:48

the glass. What we can say, it

1:50

almost looks like going inside an airport.

1:52

A large number of security guards. There's

1:55

an x ray machine, there's a walk

1:57

through security and swipe stick as well.

1:59

So. because you can't take anything

2:01

inside a court. Sometimes I've had

2:03

cans of tuna taken off me in a

2:05

court because they've considered that

2:07

a weapon, which seems bizarre. So

2:10

we have to be very careful not to take any

2:12

metal drink bottles or anything like that. We have seen

2:14

a couple of journalists stream in, courts only open at

2:17

9 o'clock for about a 9.30 or a 10 o'clock

2:19

start. So it

2:21

can be quite quiet, but this will get

2:23

quite bustling and busy in the morning because

2:25

matters are always listed from about 10 o'clock

2:28

and it'll be a very busy courtroom after that. It's

2:30

still kind of quiet outside. It's 9.20 now. I

2:33

thought it would be a little bit busier. So

2:36

you were at Aaron Patterson's filing hearing, weren't you?

2:38

Yes. It was a media

2:40

circus. Yeah, okay. So because this

2:42

is more of a procedural hearing

2:44

and also Aaron Patterson is appearing

2:47

via video link, a lot

2:49

of journalists will think, well, maybe it's easier for me

2:51

to be able to see and hear things and then

2:54

relay that if I'm also in a video link.

2:56

And it's easier to do that from say the

2:58

comfort of their office or the comfort of their

3:00

home. So what's going to happen with us when we

3:03

walk into the court building, there's going to be a

3:05

video screen up in the corner. It's going to be

3:07

a bit more difficult for us to see. We're going

3:09

to aim to have that video on a laptop that

3:11

we can see as well. We thought

3:13

it was important to be here today to make sure that

3:15

we can talk to anyone who might also appear

3:17

for the court hearing. But

3:20

it's not going to be anywhere near as busy as it was

3:22

that day in the filing hearing when you saw that

3:25

media circus. More

3:28

journalists start to arise and Ash and I

3:31

walk inside and turn off the mic. So

3:59

Aaron Patterson's here. has just happened and

4:01

all the media have rushed outside.

4:03

We are waiting for anyone to

4:05

speak. Erin Patterson's lawyers

4:08

did not appear in person. They appeared

4:10

via an online link. So

4:12

I don't really know why

4:14

everyone is standing out here

4:16

but there are

4:19

three camera people, a

4:22

photographer and about

4:26

eight or so journalists standing

4:28

outside. Ash is currently

4:30

filing the story for online and

4:32

then I'll speak to her afterwards in more detail

4:34

about what happened. So it

4:39

was interesting, Erin appeared via the video link.

4:42

She had a blue prison

4:44

jumper on, she had reading glasses and

4:47

her hair was pulled back in a

4:49

scrunchie. She looked quite emotionless.

4:51

She was staring into the camera blinking

4:53

and looking down at her hands. In

5:03

the end no one came out to meet the

5:05

media. There were no friends or family present at

5:07

the hearing or at least not in

5:09

person. There were a lot

5:12

of people on the video link.

5:14

Some people were anonymous. There were

5:16

also other journalists including international media.

5:19

Let's just go to the car so we

5:22

can get somewhere a bit quieter. So

5:28

Ash and I and our producer

5:31

are sitting in the car opposite

5:33

the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court. We've

5:36

got two microphones set up on the

5:39

car console while our producer is in the

5:41

back checking audio levels. So

5:43

Ash, what happened in court? So

5:46

we just learned some pretty interesting

5:48

detail. Erin Patterson is really

5:50

keen for her case to progress in Gippsland.

5:52

She doesn't want it to go to the

5:55

city. She wants it to proceed

5:57

in the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court and

6:00

she's willing to have the

6:02

case delayed potentially months for

6:04

that to happen. So Magistrate Tim

6:07

Walsh opened up the session after

6:09

a slight hiccup because her defence lawyers actually

6:11

appeared on the wrong link and

6:13

he said that he'd brought on the hearing

6:15

a week early because he's going on leave

6:17

next week and he just wanted to talk

6:19

to the lawyers about how this case is

6:21

going to progress. He said that there's no

6:23

time for the case to be heard in

6:25

the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court this year and

6:28

even though that was the case, Erin

6:30

Patterson's defence lawyer Colin Mandy

6:33

Essie said she knows that

6:35

and she still wants it to proceed here

6:37

even if that means she's on remand for

6:39

14 to 15 months until her case can

6:41

be heard in the local court. And

6:44

is that unusual that she is very adamant

6:46

that she wants her case heard at Latrobe

6:48

Valley? Not really. I

6:50

mean it might be easier to have it in Melbourne because they

6:53

have time for it, there's more courts

6:55

available and the lawyers are

6:58

often based there but for the

7:00

accused who wants the case to proceed

7:02

in their local area where they live and also

7:04

for the ease of witnesses to be able to travel

7:06

to the court, if it

7:09

was moved to Melbourne all of the people who

7:11

have to give evidence in the case may also

7:13

have to go down to Melbourne and

7:15

often there's a lot of delay in calling

7:17

witnesses. It might take a couple of days.

7:20

So for the ease of witnesses it

7:22

might be better to have it locally

7:24

and also because defence often want to

7:26

question witnesses in person. They don't really

7:29

like to do that process via video

7:31

link because you don't have as much of a connection

7:33

with that person. So that

7:35

may be the reason for it or they might have an

7:37

ulterior reason that either way they want it

7:40

heard in the Gippsland area. What

7:42

did Magistrate Welsh say about the legal

7:44

process? He said that he'd

7:46

seen the brief of evidence and he described it

7:48

as quite voluminous. So what's

7:50

happened is Aaron Patterson's defence lawyer,

7:53

new defence lawyer who's replaced Philip

7:55

Dunn, Casey, it's now a defence

7:57

barrister called Colin Mandy, S.A. He

8:01

has sought a particular timeframe

8:03

from the court for when they want

8:05

this Committal hearing to be heard in the

8:07

local court. A Committal hearing is where all

8:09

the witnesses come along and they test all

8:11

the evidence against Erin Patterson to determine whether

8:14

there's enough evidence to send her up to

8:16

trial in a higher court being the Supreme

8:18

Court in Victoria. So what we learned in

8:20

the court hearing just then is that they

8:22

expect the Committal hearing to take three weeks

8:24

so that sounds like there's a decent number

8:27

of witnesses that are expected to be called.

8:29

So Magistrate Walsh said that the case

8:32

couldn't be heard in the Boletrope Valley

8:34

Magistrates Court before the end of the year

8:36

so he said you've got two options. One

8:38

option was to send it to the Melbourne

8:40

Magistrates Court where they have about 30 courtrooms

8:42

at La Trobe Valley. They only have six

8:44

or they could fast track the case up

8:46

to the Supreme Court. What that means is

8:49

Erin Patterson could forego the right

8:51

to have the evidence tested against

8:53

her in the lower court and just have that

8:55

sent straight up to the Supreme Court where they

8:57

would prepare the case for trial. So

9:00

it means that a magistrate would not

9:02

hear the evidence and at a Committal sometimes

9:04

what happens is a magistrate says there's not

9:06

enough here for her to face a trial

9:09

or there's not enough here for her to

9:11

face a trial on these charges. We've seen

9:13

charges withdrawn on a regular basis in the

9:16

Magistrates Court so that they're no longer facing

9:18

them at trial when they get to Supreme

9:20

or if it gets fast-tracked then a jury

9:22

decides whether or not there's enough

9:25

there for her to be found guilty on

9:27

those offences. News

9:31

doesn't have to be boring. The Brits have

9:33

given Prince Harry a new nickname after yet

9:35

another tell-all interview. Oh god is it the

9:37

ginger wind up? Met

9:39

the team at news.com.au get you up to

9:42

speed each day with their podcast from the

9:44

Newsroom. A couple were busted joining the Mile

9:46

High Club. Well I guess I can't

9:48

fly Virgin anymore. Politics for red

9:50

carpets, royals. Get all the goth in

9:53

just a few minutes. Follow from the

9:55

Newsroom wherever you get your podcast from. So

9:58

why would she choose to have her case?

10:00

in a local court rather than in Melbourne? Well,

10:03

consider it from a defence position. You

10:06

are cross-examining witnesses, most

10:09

of whom live in the local area. You

10:11

don't want them to travel necessarily all the

10:13

way to Melbourne, two hours, to be called

10:15

to give evidence. They could be waiting

10:17

a couple of days to be called.

10:19

It's a really lengthy process. And

10:23

it's much easier for defence lawyers

10:25

to cross-examine a witness in person

10:27

rather than via video link. They're

10:30

there, they're in the flesh. You get

10:32

a better feeling of their

10:34

reactions and things. And from

10:36

a defence perspective, it's quite important to be

10:39

able to see

10:41

and hear people right there, to be

10:43

able to really

10:45

get the evidence out of them that you're looking

10:48

for. So what's the benefit

10:50

in doing what Erin Patterson is doing?

10:53

Well, if she has a committal hearing,

10:55

her defence lawyers are going to know what

10:57

the prosecution case is. They're going to know what

10:59

the witnesses have to say. It all has to be

11:02

tested before a magistrate. And then they also get the

11:04

opportunity for a magistrate to go, there's

11:06

not enough in this, so I'm going to scrap that

11:08

charge, and it's not going to go up to

11:10

supreme. So it's an

11:12

opportunity to reduce the number

11:14

of charges or even potentially have the whole case

11:16

thrown out before it goes up to a high

11:19

court and also to learn more

11:21

about who's going to say what, how are

11:23

they going to say it, and basically

11:26

just test the case before it goes to

11:28

trial. And is it

11:31

unusual for accused to change

11:33

lawyers throughout the legal process? Yeah,

11:35

I mean, in a case like this, it's going to take

11:38

a really long time for it to get up, I think.

11:40

So the committal process that we're talking about here, where

11:42

you test the evidence in a lower court, that

11:45

can take a year maybe. I mean,

11:47

if you're on a lower offence, if you're

11:49

in like an assault or something, maybe a

11:51

couple of months, a triple murder and a

11:53

five-time attempted murder, it's going to

11:55

take a while. Like the witness list is going to be long.

11:58

There's going to be a lot to be done. go through we already know

12:01

that the brief is evidence against her as voluminous

12:03

so there's a lot in it. There's

12:05

a potential that this case will not be heard at

12:07

trial before a jury until 2026. So

12:11

you want to make sure that everyone who's

12:13

involved from the get-go is going

12:16

to persist through it for the next couple of

12:18

years. So you

12:20

want to make sure that your defence law

12:23

is available, has

12:25

the willingness to sit off something for two

12:27

years and the determination

12:29

to stick with it. Like it's their

12:32

high stress scenarios these cases

12:34

and the trial will take, I mean

12:36

the committal hearing is going to be three weeks. Imagine how

12:38

long the trial is going to be. So

12:46

while I was trying to get down everything that

12:48

we were hearing in court you were focusing

12:50

on what we were seeing. Why is that important for

12:53

the community to be aware of what was going on

12:55

inside the court from a visual perspective? Yeah

12:57

look because Camara's can't actually go into the

12:59

courtroom it's up to the journalist to describe

13:02

what the accused looks like at the

13:04

time. It paints a picture to the community,

13:06

it gives people an idea

13:08

of what Erin looks like, what she's

13:10

wearing, what emotion she might

13:12

be showing on her face and I

13:14

guess if she did say something substantial

13:16

that would be of interest to readers.

13:20

And do her lawyers have to appear in person

13:23

in court? No so

13:25

what we saw today is the

13:27

only people in court were journalists pretty

13:29

much, a police prosecutor

13:31

for a different case and a

13:33

couple of local witnesses, people

13:35

who were just coming to observe or were waiting

13:38

for their own matter. All of

13:40

the lawyers appeared via video link so

13:43

the court provides people permission to do

13:46

that. If they don't want to

13:48

travel two hours from Melbourne, Erin

13:50

Patterson was also on a video link so all the

13:52

parties who were appearing were on the video. They've been

13:55

given permission again to do that on May 7

13:57

so we're going to see similar similar stuff. things

14:00

at that stage. So Ash, on May 7th,

14:03

what will happen in court? So

14:05

it's another Committal Mention, which is a

14:07

preliminary hearing before the evidence can get

14:09

tested against Aaron. We'll come

14:11

back, we'll learn if there's been any

14:13

decision by Magistrate Walsh about whether or

14:15

not to send the case to Melbourne,

14:17

whether he's willing to list it in

14:20

the La Trobe Valley Magistrates Court potentially

14:22

next year, which means that Aaron could

14:24

choose to stay on remand for a

14:26

longer period of time. On remand basically

14:28

just means that she'll remain behind bars

14:31

until her criminal case can be heard.

14:33

So we'll get a bit more of

14:35

an idea on the timeline that this case will run

14:37

and where everyone is

14:39

at too. They've got to file some formal

14:41

documents to say what witnesses, the defence, want

14:43

to call. They're going to do

14:46

that in the next two weeks and then on

14:48

May 7th we'll really just get an update on

14:50

where everything is and how this case is going

14:52

to unfold. It's not going to be a major

14:54

hearing on May 7th. So

14:56

it'll be another preliminary hearing where we're

14:58

going to continue to have these preliminary

15:00

Committal Mentions where they get all of

15:02

their ducks in a row pretty much to

15:05

prepare for the Committal Hearing and

15:07

hopefully that happens this year if

15:10

it goes to Melbourne or it

15:12

might happen next year or it might

15:14

not happen at all because it's possible it could

15:17

be fast-tracked to the Supreme Court. But

15:19

it sounds like Aaron Patterson would choose to

15:21

have a Committal first. He doesn't

15:23

necessarily want to be fast-tracked. So

15:27

on May 7th, what will

15:29

likely take place in court? So Magistrate

15:31

Walsh has asked that the

15:33

case come back before him in two weeks' time.

15:36

In the meantime, he wants the defence

15:38

to file what's called a Form 32.

15:40

So it's a formal application for

15:42

witnesses. They've already provided a witness list

15:45

to the prosecution of who they expect

15:47

to call but they have

15:49

to formalise that with a Form 32 and describe

15:51

why they want these witnesses before the court to

15:53

give evidence, what the reason for that is. The

15:56

purpose of doing that is to ensure that

15:59

there's no... court time that's wasted.

16:01

I don't want witnesses that aren't necessary to the

16:03

case to be called on and take

16:06

up a day or two's evidence when they're not required. So

16:09

the court is aware of everything before the

16:11

case goes to committal stage and then before

16:13

it gets to trial. They know all of

16:15

the witnesses, what they're going to say, what

16:17

their statements say. And with the barrister for

16:19

Erin Patterson changing, we asked Crime Writer and

16:21

host of the Life and Crimes Podcast, Andrea

16:24

Rule, to dial in from Melbourne and

16:26

explain who Colin Mandy is. Well,

16:31

Colin Mandy, the Senior Counsel, would have been

16:33

called the Queens Counsel in the good old

16:35

days. Colin Mandy, Senior

16:37

Counsel, has been at the bar since

16:39

the year 2000. So he's had 24 years experience at the

16:44

top end of the Victorian

16:46

bar and that work has

16:49

taken him all over Australia. He

16:51

defended murdering Perth. He defended

16:54

an alleged drug dealer in

16:56

Sydney. He's done trials in

16:58

Brisbane and Darwin. He's figured

17:00

in a terrorism trial defending an

17:02

alleged terrorist and he's done

17:05

fraud and white collar work. So as

17:07

a barrister, Colin Mandy

17:09

is a total all-rounder.

17:12

He was admitted as a barrister back in 1992

17:14

and as I said to the bar in the

17:16

year 2000. Now that

17:19

means he's done about 30 years less at

17:22

the bar than Phil Dunn, the man

17:24

he replaces as Erin

17:26

Patterson's barrister. But I'd suggest

17:29

that 24 years

17:31

experience at that level is

17:33

probably sufficient to make

17:35

up for Mr Dunn's, you know, extra

17:38

30 years because I think Phil Dunn

17:40

has been at the bar about 54

17:42

years, which is a monumental effort. Clearly,

17:44

Colin Mandy is one of

17:47

the eminent members of the Melbourne bar. He

17:50

is Vice President of the Victorian bar

17:53

and he is Chairman of

17:55

Parnell's Barruses. Clearly, he's a barrister that

17:58

believes in the power of law. because

18:01

he represented Antoinetta Manella

18:06

and if that name seems familiar it's because she is the

18:08

daughter of basically an Italian gangster

18:10

that was pretty big around

18:12

Carlton around Melbourne until he met a

18:14

sticky end. Later on Antoinetta

18:17

took up with George Moroggi

18:19

who is currently doing

18:21

more than 30 years jail I think 32 years

18:23

for murdering

18:27

another alleged drug

18:29

dealer and column

18:31

Mandy said that she'd

18:33

assisted Moroggi while he's

18:35

in jail with importing 55 million

18:38

dollars worth of drugs and

18:41

Mr. Mandy's explanation for this and

18:44

I thought it was lovely he

18:46

said that she was hugely

18:48

in love with George Moroggi and that

18:51

a fog descended on her and

18:54

he said that love is blind and

18:56

that Antoinetta was blinded

18:59

and there is

19:01

a barrister who believes in romance and

19:04

so Aaron Patterson can look forward to

19:06

someone who A. knows

19:08

his law B. is

19:11

vastly experienced in all forms of

19:14

criminal and alleged criminal behaviour and

19:17

C. believes in the power of

19:19

love. What more could you want in

19:21

a barrister? This

19:25

series was reported by me Brooke

19:27

Griebert Craig it was written and

19:29

produced by me and Jonty Burdett

19:31

it was edited by Andrea Teese

19:33

Evanson our executive producers

19:35

Genevieve Allison and Jordie Atkinson

19:37

for The Herald Sun and

19:40

Nina Young for Newscast you

19:42

can read all about my reporting on

19:44

this case along with a special series

19:47

of features at the mushroomcook.com.au The

20:00

podcast Faith on Trial looks into

20:02

Hillsong, both in Australia and the

20:05

US, and takes both the listener

20:07

and hosts on unexpected twists and

20:09

turns in the story of Brian

20:12

Houston and the singing preachers. There

20:14

are two incidents involving Pastor Brian.

20:16

The Australian journalists uncovered a litany

20:19

of alleged criminal behavior in the

20:21

megachurch. Financial gifts were being given

20:23

to the leaders of the church.

20:26

Listen to Faith on Trial Hillsong

20:28

ad-free on Cry Next Plus on

20:30

Apple Podcasts today or wherever you get

20:32

your podcasts.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features