Podchaser Logo
Home
Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Released Tuesday, 12th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Should we stop calling it Long COVID?

Tuesday, 12th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Thinking about your next career

0:02

move in research and development

0:04

that it's time to make

0:06

your move to the Uk,

0:08

the nation that's investing twenty

0:10

billion pounds and are anti

0:12

over the next two years.

0:14

the nation does home to

0:16

for if the world's top

0:18

research universities, the nation where

0:20

right talent comes together. Visit

0:22

Gov.uk Forward/great Talents to see

0:24

how you can work. Live

0:26

and moved to the Uk.

0:35

Ball and run to to get

0:37

the well welcome show where we

0:40

bring science that was and he

0:42

means is discovering his goals at

0:45

least at technology and leave without

0:47

admitting this is the naked Scientists.

0:50

Hello welcome to this week's Naked

0:52

Scientists! This is the program that

0:54

brings you the latest breakthroughs in

0:56

science, technology, and medicine. And I'm

0:58

Chris Smith and today we're revisiting

1:00

Long Cove. It almost two million

1:02

people in the Uk are estimated

1:04

to be living with the condition,

1:06

so all we any closer to

1:08

finding out what is causing their

1:10

debilitating symptoms from Cambridge University's Institute

1:12

of Continuing Education. This is the

1:14

Naked Scientists. Four

1:24

years ago, the World Health Organization

1:26

officially recognized Cove It Nineteen as

1:28

a pandemic. Since. Then we've

1:30

seen the development of effective tests

1:32

and treatments a billions of vaccinations

1:34

administered which have reigned in the

1:37

disease and turned what was formerly

1:39

a death sentence for some into

1:41

a mild infection for the vast

1:43

majority. But while the global health

1:45

emergency acutely is over, the aftershocks

1:47

of the infections are still very

1:49

much reverberating around us and societal

1:52

and economic terms and also imposed

1:54

infection syndromes that a hitting some

1:56

people. In the Uk load

1:58

an estimated two million people are some

2:00

how long term symptoms that last least

2:02

four weeks after their first infection with

2:04

salt curvy to because of cove it

2:07

and some have now been living with

2:09

these problems for years. This

2:11

is known as Long Cove It

2:13

and today we're bringing you the

2:15

latest developments in our understanding of

2:18

it's pernicious and puzzling presentations. Sarah.

2:20

Taylor is university lecturer who first call

2:22

cove it in early twenty twenty two

2:24

when the I'm A Chrome wave of

2:26

the virus was at it's peak. The

2:30

headache. Lasted for

2:32

months. And

2:34

then other symptoms.

2:37

Appeared. Stiffness,

2:39

Getting. Up and down a. Staircase.

2:42

Was a share active well

2:44

as a lot. The Tin

2:46

Man. Just couldn't Really

2:48

thin likes. The. Figures issue

2:50

though was cognition. Spatial

2:53

reasoning is particularly. Problematic.

2:57

I go to chair base yo this.

2:59

I know I can only do half

3:01

the session. Because. Of just

3:03

so exhausted. But I'm not

3:05

just getting physically exhausted. The

3:08

ladies tell me where to put my

3:10

hands. And. As

3:12

time progresses, I'll get more and

3:15

more confused and unless the ability

3:17

to set of coordinates. My.

3:19

Hands and the Brain Fog. Starts.

3:22

Kicking in the So is actually

3:24

the brain fog more than the

3:26

physical. That is why I only

3:28

do half the session. The.

3:31

Ability to think is part and

3:33

parcel of my job. And.

3:37

In the face the months after getting cove it.

3:40

I couldn't think of couldn't

3:42

process. Information. Way.

3:46

I was on sick. Leave for

3:48

a year. Some. Days a

3:51

text message would be a

3:53

few words. I couldn't.

3:55

Write anything that makes sense.

3:58

And. Couldn't speak

4:00

to make sense either. When.

4:03

I got referred to the Long Povich

4:05

Clinic. I. Got

4:08

a swallow test and all that

4:10

kind of thing. Which

4:12

was very useful because swallowing was an

4:14

issue that has now. Been.

4:17

Largely resolved. But.

4:19

No one really worked with me on my.

4:21

Cognition. And the

4:24

sort of speech issues. So.

4:26

Retailer whose experience may well be

4:28

familiar to many. A

4:31

While many with long Cove like

4:33

Sarah have reported neurological symptoms including

4:35

brain fog, the has until recently

4:37

been no objective measurement of how

4:39

severely people are really affected. That

4:41

was until a new study from

4:43

Improve College London recently published in

4:45

the New England Journal of Medicine

4:47

found that people experiencing on cove

4:49

it so cognitive deficits equivalent to

4:51

a loss of six points of

4:53

I q. I've been speaking to

4:55

the lead author on the study, Adam Hampshire.

4:58

We. Bill on the back have

5:01

one of the largest epidemiological studies

5:03

that was running the Uk during

5:05

the Pandemic game's called React which

5:08

is the real time assessment of

5:10

community in transmission and that was

5:12

a project where they sampled someone

5:15

you'd have about three and half

5:17

million people. Randomly.

5:19

Within the general population to see

5:21

a different points in a pandemic.

5:24

Whether they had been infected with

5:26

the virus and where the had

5:29

peridot. So. Because of his

5:31

background on people's history of covert

5:33

If you like. And

5:35

what we did we we contacted

5:37

a hundred thousand of them and

5:40

often take part in an online

5:42

com with on a platform it's

5:44

called computer on. That. can

5:46

measure different aspects of cognitive

5:49

in memory ability through people's

5:51

laptops as smartphones an hour

5:54

of those people we contacted

5:56

as bad a hundred and

5:59

forty did at

6:01

least one of our tests and

6:03

about 112,000 completed the entire assessment. How

6:09

big are the differences that you're detecting? So if

6:11

I took an IQ test for example and I

6:13

was affected in the way that some of the

6:15

people you registered in the study were affected, how

6:18

many IQ points down would I

6:20

effectively be if I were affected

6:22

in that way? If we

6:24

treat the global score from

6:27

this assessment like an IQ

6:29

test then the

6:31

group with the largest cognitive

6:33

deficit is on average people

6:35

who were in intensive care

6:38

and so they showed difference of

6:41

around about minus 9 IQ

6:44

points. People who have

6:46

ongoing persistent symptoms that is the

6:48

ones who may have long COVID,

6:51

they perform at about minus 6 IQ

6:54

points and that's

6:56

enough that it could affect your

6:58

daily function. You're very

7:00

likely to be aware and

7:02

notice that change. The

7:05

larger number of people sitting in the

7:07

short-term symptom group and they

7:09

show a difference on average of about minus 3

7:11

IQ points and that's very small but

7:14

we are powered, we're able to detect

7:16

that because we measured so many people.

7:20

Were there any things that lept out in

7:22

people who got SARS-CoV-2 infection where

7:25

certain elements of cognition were consistently

7:27

impacted or is it just an

7:29

across-the-board reduction for at least a

7:31

period of time in everybody? In

7:34

terms of aspects of cognitive

7:37

ability we saw

7:39

the strongest relationships with having

7:41

had COVID-19 in

7:44

memory function, reasoning and

7:46

what we call executive function, things

7:48

like planning. That's the case if

7:51

we were looking at for example people who

7:53

had longer term sort

7:55

of ongoing persistent symptoms so what

7:57

some people would refer to as

7:59

long COVID. And

8:02

critically, when a person says

8:04

they get better, because we know that a

8:06

proportion of people have symptoms for a certain

8:08

period of time and then they get better,

8:11

when they get better, does their cognition

8:13

go back to normal, do you think?

8:15

We have to be very careful here in

8:18

terms of the inferences that we draw.

8:20

What we're looking at are essentially associations.

8:22

We're not looking at change because we

8:24

have only measured one time point. Nonetheless,

8:28

the pattern of results that we see shows

8:30

that people who have ongoing persistent symptoms,

8:33

they perform worse than

8:35

people who had shorter

8:38

duration symptoms. Whilst that's the

8:40

case, even people who had short duration

8:42

symptoms, on average, showed

8:45

slightly worse cognitive performance compared to

8:47

people who had not had COVID

8:49

at all. The really

8:52

interesting group are people who've had ongoing

8:54

persistent symptoms, but by the time we

8:56

cognitively tested them, those had

8:59

resolved. That set

9:01

of participants performed at the same

9:03

level as people who

9:05

had only short term symptoms.

9:08

That is only a small

9:10

cognitive deficit with still

9:12

evidence. Well,

9:14

that's slightly encouraging, isn't it? Because notwithstanding

9:17

the fact that this is an

9:19

association, would argue that there should

9:21

be an improvement in someone when

9:23

their symptoms overall subside.

9:26

Exactly. I think

9:28

on the face of it, our study has

9:31

some results that were quite

9:33

negative and not really what

9:35

we hope to see. For example, that

9:37

we see any association between

9:40

shorter duration COVID and

9:42

cognition. That's

9:44

somewhat worrisome. It's not what

9:46

we were looking for. We didn't predict that.

9:49

On the other hand, it does

9:51

appear to be the case that people

9:53

who have long term persistent symptoms, when

9:55

those symptoms eventually subside, they may

9:58

well have some degree of of

10:00

recovery in their cognitive and memory

10:02

abilities. Another really

10:05

quite promising result that we had is

10:08

that actually several of the results

10:10

in the study converge towards indicating

10:13

that this association between COVID

10:16

and cognition has reduced

10:20

throughout the pandemic. So the

10:22

association was larger for the

10:25

original virus and for

10:27

the alpha variant, but by

10:29

the time we get to Omicron, it seems to

10:31

have been diminished. So what do

10:33

you attribute that? Do you think that's because

10:35

by that time it's hitting people who've been

10:37

either infected before and

10:39

recovered or vaccinated before and are

10:42

therefore subject to a less severe

10:44

infection? Well, our

10:46

model takes all of these things into

10:48

account, but they're quite hard to disentangle

10:50

because they correlate across time. So

10:52

of course, if you think through the

10:55

course pandemic, different

10:57

virus variants were dominant,

10:59

right? And then in addition to

11:01

that, partway through, they started to

11:04

roll out vaccinations and

11:07

approaches to treatments probably

11:09

improved somewhat as well. Within the

11:11

model, it would appear to be the case

11:14

that if a person was vaccinated

11:16

at least twice prior

11:19

to their infection, they

11:21

have a small cognitive advantage

11:24

relative to people who had not

11:26

yet been vaccinated. So I think

11:28

that's one aspect that's probably coming into

11:30

play. And it's very likely that later

11:32

variants had a lesser impact

11:34

on cognition as well. So these

11:37

things aren't mutually exclusive. Imperial

11:40

College's Adam Hempshire. You're

11:48

Listening to The Naked Scientists with me, Chris

11:51

Smith. And This week we're looking at Long

11:53

COVID. Shortly, we'll hear how the immune system

11:55

might be driving some of the most common

11:57

signs and symptoms of this illness among those

11:59

who.. Have the condition. The. First, while

12:01

the robust evidence that infection with Cove

12:04

it can As and I'm Hampshire was

12:06

just telling us lead to a significant

12:08

reduction in cognitive ability, it's still just

12:10

a part of the overall picture when

12:12

it comes to what we come to

12:15

term Loan Cove It naturally midterm. It

12:17

is a pediatric Infectious diseases doctor from

12:19

King's College London. For her the

12:21

aftermath of what was at the time put

12:23

a mild case of cove it has been

12:26

significant. Disabling. And. Quite

12:28

different from some of the other things with heard

12:30

about so far. I. Was

12:32

working on the front lines during the

12:34

pandemic I started at Geico Mystery in

12:36

March has Twenty Twenty and I contracted

12:39

Cave it probably be A by the

12:41

end of March, Twenty Twenty fully recovered

12:43

from that, went back to work and

12:45

then at the end of May Twenty

12:48

Twenty. I seem to get an almost

12:50

identical illness again and following on from

12:52

that illness, I developed nerve pain in

12:55

my seat and then that seem. To

12:57

progress takes other neurological symptoms

12:59

and problems Walking. I

13:02

knew you straight away because I was watching you

13:04

on the television at the start of the pandemic.

13:06

You were a fit, healthy young woman by the

13:08

look of it. Is that true? Yes,

13:11

that's true. In fact, I think not. Even

13:13

two years before I just returned from a

13:15

massive fieldwork study in Sierra Leone, I used

13:17

to walk four miles a day. I would

13:19

run regularly. And. We.

13:22

Just walked into this office together and

13:24

you're using crutches and it's four years

13:26

since you contract it covered. You think?

13:29

Yes, so I've been using the Coaches Fair

13:32

probably about the little over three and half

13:34

years now, and I wouldn't say that my

13:36

sentences. Really improved during. That time

13:38

I think my ability to manage them deal

13:40

with them has improved, but the symptoms themselves

13:42

up pretty much the same. You

13:45

say you get some nerve pain and some

13:47

other neurological symptoms. So tell us what. Your.

13:49

Life is like than that, what's actually happening to.

13:52

I find it difficult. To walk listing my see off

13:54

the ground is what challenge certainly catches. I can

13:57

can I use my arms to propel my legs

13:59

of it? But I need crutches.

14:01

Her guys, you know, a few hundred

14:03

meters and anything beyond that. I generally

14:05

use him ability Skeeter to get around,

14:07

but it also affects my bladder and

14:09

my bow and leaves me with constant

14:11

pain in my legs and my faith.

14:14

Is he getting worse? Getting better?

14:16

Well, It's not. Clear.

14:19

At the moment it's not getting better. the

14:21

I can tell and I had some investigations

14:23

recently. You suggest maybe that's been a slight

14:25

listening, but I'm not sure yet. One

14:28

thing that people often say to me is that

14:30

it's really hard to get support. To.

14:33

See somebody who can listen to them?

14:35

To. Find out about this symptoms, offer

14:37

solutions to manage their problems that having

14:39

better is that improving? Or or is

14:42

this still a black hole for people

14:44

who find themselves in a bad state?

14:46

Posts Cove it. I

14:49

think there's some. Improvement in

14:51

people being more understanding of the

14:53

condition and trying to support people

14:55

in their recovery. But the problem

14:57

is, I think we don't. Have

14:59

any solutions. So while they might be

15:02

people to see in a clinic environments

15:04

I Health Care act has set my

15:06

assess you. I think the still long

15:08

waits that up but. There

15:10

are people who will assess you and

15:13

have a bit better understanding of the

15:15

the symptoms. We don't have any answers

15:17

as to how to manage that other

15:19

than take things easy and pacing and

15:22

so on. And another see that does

15:24

work to some people, some people have

15:26

fully recovered. But. We

15:28

tend to see that and people who

15:31

got kebede later on and they tend

15:33

to. Show signs of recovery within

15:35

the first year, and more or less a

15:37

complete recovery within the first twelve to eighteen

15:40

months. So those of us he's had kv

15:42

that the very beginning. And

15:44

have not really shown any signs of recovery.

15:46

Three and half he is it. And we

15:48

just don't know what the outcome is to

15:50

that. Because if you haven't improved and three

15:52

and a half years is something magically going

15:55

to change overnight, that's your body. Just seventy

15:57

says oh now I'll recover. I think we

15:59

want to believe. but I

16:01

can understand the desperation for various

16:04

treatments and people trying

16:06

different things even though there's no good evidence

16:08

to suggest they work. A powerful

16:11

story isn't it? Natalie McDermott there, we'll hear

16:13

more from Natalie a bit later on in

16:15

the programme. So the question

16:17

is why has this happened to some

16:19

people? Given the broad range of symptoms

16:21

from brain fog to fatigue, muscle pains

16:23

and signs of nerve damage it's

16:25

likely that long Covid is not

16:27

one single condition but an umbrella

16:29

term that unites a host of

16:31

different syndromes, all with different mechanisms,

16:33

outcomes and best treatments. I

16:36

went to see Cambridge University virologist Ben Krishna

16:38

who branched out into working on long Covid

16:41

during the pandemic. He agrees that

16:43

long Covid can be an unhelpful

16:45

term. So the problem with the

16:47

terminology of long Covid is just that it's

16:50

a very broad and umbrella term. You can

16:52

imagine three different people. You've had one person

16:54

who was very very sick with Covid-19 in

16:56

2020. They went into hospital,

16:59

they were put on oxygen, they were given

17:01

what we call mechanical ventilation. So they essentially

17:03

had a tube put into their lungs and then

17:06

their lungs were inflated artificially for a

17:08

certain amount of time and then eventually they've

17:10

recovered and they've been discharged from the hospital

17:12

and you're thinking six months later are they

17:14

feeding back to where they were

17:16

before Covid-19? The answer is probably no

17:19

but is that really long Covid or

17:21

is that really just them slowly recovering

17:23

from the initial infection? You

17:26

then have person two, they lost their taste and

17:28

smell, that hasn't come back for whatever reason. I

17:30

don't think we exactly know what causes that yet

17:32

but for whatever reason they can't go to restaurants

17:34

but at the same time they can go into

17:36

work and they do everything they normally

17:38

do is just the taste and smell that's gone. And

17:41

the third case, and these are perhaps in my

17:43

opinion the strangest cases where somebody got

17:45

sick with Covid-19, they had the similar symptoms

17:48

that a lot of people are familiar with so they were

17:50

in bed and feeling fatigued and

17:53

Most people got better and they went back to

17:55

their normal lives. And for these people, they just

17:57

didn't get better. And in some cases it's been.

18:00

A. Year been sometimes two years and these

18:02

people still feel like the first early days

18:04

of viral infection Alleges never covered. What?

18:08

Do we think the underlying mechanisms

18:10

of cases like that latter one

18:12

might be? So it's still quite

18:14

controversial what might be causing It's

18:16

there is a growing body of

18:18

evidence that the mean systems which

18:20

is on and then failed to

18:22

switch off what exactly is causing

18:24

That is not entirely clear. It

18:26

could be for example that people

18:29

got infected with the virus, the

18:31

virus has infected some pass their

18:33

body and is there with their

18:35

a very low level and it's

18:37

just. Continually making small about the virus and

18:39

as a result of this, their immune system

18:41

is still on and still fighting the virus.

18:43

And that's what's making them feel sick. Because

18:45

we know that a lot of what really

18:47

makes you feel sick when you've got a

18:50

virus is actually the mean systems response fight

18:52

the virus, not the virus itself. Alternatively that

18:54

could be something auto immune. so could be

18:56

that the mean system started are fighting. The

18:58

virus and now it's. Mistakenly

19:00

started attacking a part of the body the

19:02

it's not supposed to and actually a lot

19:04

of long time it does look a bit

19:07

like also mean it's a particularly many patients

19:09

say they have cycles of symptoms that they

19:11

get better than they had. Get worse than

19:13

they get better again. Oh finally it can be something

19:15

that which is. Not aware of like now. I

19:17

could be that the mean system is switched on,

19:19

it's not switching off and it for some reason

19:21

that we just don't know about yet. How

19:24

are you. Trying to get underneath that and

19:26

find out which of those or. Whether.

19:29

It's all of them are behind this. Of

19:31

research suggested that the immune system had switched

19:34

on and people who had type of nineteen

19:36

and the most people would switch off by

19:38

in this small group of patients with Long

19:41

Cove it it just was still with switched

19:43

on and a was thickly switched on it

19:45

was making one particular protein. this protein is

19:47

cool interferon. Gamma and If is known

19:50

to make you feel quite sick.

19:52

We tried. Looking for virus in these patients.

19:54

So what we did was we took blood samples

19:56

on these patients and that we just look for

19:58

signs that the vibes Still that's. The To

20:00

find anything in the patient's blood. We

20:02

were particularly interested in their intestines, so

20:04

there's some data out there showing that

20:06

patients continue hobbling the virus in their

20:09

intestines and it comes out and that

20:11

pay? that is that. See where we're

20:13

moving at the moment is trying to

20:15

understand that. Side effects. If

20:17

that is the case, the east of

20:20

the viruses tickled the immune system and

20:22

he stayed locked on in some way.

20:24

Or the viruses hiding somewhere and tickling

20:27

the mean system from a covert hiding

20:29

place possibly the got any. this nora.

20:31

the immune systems overactive. What can we

20:34

do? To. Turn it off. The

20:36

same is why the mechanism is so important

20:38

because he my approach those and completely different.

20:40

Nice if you're having a small about virus

20:42

somewhere in your body he might actually be

20:44

able to treat long favored by giving people

20:47

antivirals. Alternatively if it's auto meeting and I'm

20:49

people I was going. To do absolutely nothing and

20:51

watching what you want to do is sick. If. I

20:55

have heard that there were clinical studies looking at

20:57

both of those. I have seen any convincing results

20:59

on where the other yet, but that isn't. With.

21:02

The comic that people are very excited by. Do

21:04

you think this phenomenon is unique? A

21:07

two songs go be to the current

21:09

virus that causes Cozad. Would.

21:11

Have a friend of ours is do

21:13

this all mobile. They might or viruses

21:15

be capable of doing this. So if

21:18

we had a bad dose of flu

21:20

this could happen and. Is

21:22

it just that we got so many

21:24

people all at once catching source code?

21:26

Be to that it disclosed this phenomenon

21:28

and it's always been there. We.

21:30

Just didn't see it. Eve. But and

21:32

better. what? And I could have like that.

21:35

So yes, it's probably the case that you

21:37

had this new virus. It's hands up no

21:39

one has any immunity to it. Everybody gets

21:42

sick all at once and seen at this

21:44

big wave of people with what we call

21:46

like post survival syndrome instead just sick and

21:48

for long periods of time off the virus.

21:51

There is evidence from South Code one company

21:53

called Sars that was an outbreak. The happened

21:55

in East Asia sickly South Korea and Japan

21:57

and China back in two thousand three that

22:00

will patients there who got sick at the

22:02

time and they were reporting years later that

22:04

they still didn't feel better. I have seen

22:06

some evidence that Fleece can do this. They

22:09

had a patient you. Got Spanish flu and

22:11

nineteen nineteen and we're still seconds and twenty

22:13

and latest they want to do with this

22:15

person. So yeah there's this view now that

22:18

may be all viruses cause this and if

22:20

you have a brand new virus that springs

22:22

across from animal with and and course the

22:24

pandemic, you're gonna get a big wave of

22:26

posts viral illness. And of course that's very

22:28

worrying because we expect that will. Eventually. Be

22:31

another pandemic. And so trying to understand long

22:33

play with now might help prepare us for the

22:35

next one. Thing. Krishna.

22:37

They're. Not withstanding

22:39

some of these positive developments in our understanding

22:41

of long cope with a one size fits

22:43

all treatments for the verse ways it manifests

22:46

and people is therefore unlikely to materialize. and

22:48

it's a problem that could be with us

22:50

for many years to come. In the meantime

22:52

though some of those living with long covert

22:54

fill forgotten among the medical professionals who were

22:57

on the front line of the pandemic response.

22:59

Doctors. Like Nutley Mcdermott, whom we heard

23:01

from earlier feel that they were offered

23:03

insufficient protection for the danger they're exposed

23:05

to, and some like her are now

23:07

living with debilitating, long term health problems.

23:09

the impact on their ability to do

23:11

the job they originally trained for. Can.

23:14

You do your job, still you up on

23:16

the boards looking after little kids can use

23:18

to do that. Not

23:21

really are not in the way I

23:23

did before. I would like to keep

23:25

doing that. that even just to complete

23:27

my training which I just finished has

23:29

really cost me. From a health perspective.

23:32

Say I might be able to the

23:34

reset side of my job provided I

23:36

can get more funding, but the actual

23:38

full time clinical component is very difficult

23:40

for me. I'm. Looking. At

23:42

may be. Moderated. Still plans

23:44

but I can't be the doctor I

23:47

was hoping today and I also am

23:49

very passionate out disaster, an epidemic response,

23:51

and a well. I'm just not convinced

23:54

that many organizations would want to send

23:56

me out to disaster zone right now.

23:59

If you. You can't do your job

24:01

that you've been training to do, you're aspiring to

24:03

do, and you were good at it. Does

24:05

this mean that you basically

24:07

can't practice? How

24:09

is the NHS or your employer looking

24:11

after you because you were

24:13

effectively being exposed to a threat? You've

24:16

ended up with this problem almost certainly

24:18

because of that threat and

24:21

succumbed to damage because of it. What

24:23

do they say? Well,

24:25

unfortunately not a lot really. The

24:28

problem is that because I've come to the end

24:30

of my training, whilst I was in training, obviously

24:32

there was some degree of protection to help me

24:35

get to the end of my training. But

24:37

as with any doctor, when they finish their training,

24:39

they then need to apply for consultant posts. And

24:43

it's very difficult for me to apply for

24:45

a consultant post because I need modifications in

24:48

place to do that. So essentially I'm

24:50

applying for a job that I know

24:52

I can't do without adaptations and modifications

24:54

to the job plan. And that's

24:57

a very difficult thing to do. Otherwise

24:59

I can continue in research and I can

25:01

apply for research funding. But so far I

25:03

haven't been very successful at that either. But

25:06

is there nothing occupationally that you can do?

25:09

Because if I succumb to an injury at

25:11

work, then I have a reasonable

25:14

expectation that someone will make good on that. Well,

25:17

I think that the problem is that at the moment

25:20

there's a lot of toing and

25:22

froing between who made the decisions

25:25

about the personal protective equipment we were provided

25:27

with. I think a lot of

25:29

people don't realise that many of us were working

25:31

on COVID wards with nothing but a surgical mask.

25:34

I found it ironic that there would be people on

25:37

the underground who had better PPE on

25:39

than we were given working with known

25:41

cases of COVID. But no

25:44

one will quite acknowledge the decision

25:46

making chain that brought about

25:49

the blanket policy on PPE. And

25:52

I believe that our employer had a

25:54

duty of care to protect us as

25:56

best they could. I mean, nothing is

25:59

100% fair. but as

26:01

best they could and that they failed in

26:03

that regard. But unfortunately,

26:05

until we get a clear

26:07

understanding of the

26:09

pathway of decision making and

26:12

why those decisions were made, it's

26:14

very difficult to challenge. But

26:16

we are now trying to take legal

26:19

action on behalf of all healthcare workers

26:21

who may have been very negatively affected

26:23

by this virus to try

26:25

and get those answers, as well

26:27

as for some of my colleagues who are unable to

26:29

work at all to find some

26:32

kind of compensation for them because they've lost their

26:34

careers and their livelihoods. So

26:36

there's a bigger cost to living with long COVID

26:38

than just the direct health impacts, as is clear

26:40

there. Thanks again to Natalie McDermott.

26:42

And we approached NHS England to see if

26:44

someone was available to speak to us. They

26:46

told us long COVID remains

26:48

a new and complex condition and it

26:51

is important we continue to build an

26:53

evidence base of proven interventions that can

26:55

support people to manage their symptoms and

26:57

aid recovery. They go on to say

26:59

the NHS has established over 100 specialist

27:01

post COVID services across England which

27:03

offer a range of specialist multidisciplinary

27:06

support in managing and treating the

27:08

physical and psychological impacts of long

27:10

COVID. If you're concerned about ongoing

27:12

symptoms following COVID-19, please speak to

27:15

your GP team.

27:17

Meanwhile, might yoga have a therapeutic role

27:19

to play in helping to rehabilitate people

27:21

with long COVID? Nick stole the virtues

27:23

so we sent along James Titko to

27:26

the Yoga For Life Project's Claire Woolley

27:28

for some tips on his breathing. In

27:31

March 2020, my

27:33

husband got COVID and

27:36

it became apparent that he wasn't

27:39

getting better from it and it

27:41

was so early that the

27:43

word long COVID had been coined at

27:46

that stage. One thing he

27:48

really was struggling with was chest pain and

27:50

his breathing. And so I

27:52

decided to set up a breathing class

27:55

and we quite quickly got a

27:58

lot of people joining this. initially

28:00

through word of mouth and

28:03

it was on Zoom. And I

28:06

was teaching really people how to

28:08

breathe properly, possibly for the first

28:11

time in that we're never taught

28:13

that. And it's very

28:15

common for people who have had

28:18

COVID to get something

28:20

called breathing pass-in disorder,

28:22

where you breathe using

28:24

your upper respiratory muscle, so the

28:26

upper part of the chest, and out

28:29

through your mouth rather than breathing in

28:31

and out of your nose and into

28:33

your belly. And in correcting that, you

28:37

switch on your vagus nerve, which

28:39

in turn switches on your parasympathetic

28:41

nervous system, your system of rest

28:44

and digest. It's

28:46

a very interesting thought, teaching

28:48

people to breathe properly, something

28:51

we obviously all do unconsciously in order to

28:53

stay alive. I'm intrigued, Claire. Can you give

28:55

me a taste? Okay.

28:58

So you can do this practice lying

29:00

down, seated or standing, but

29:03

if you're doing it seated, if you

29:05

bring your feet underneath your knees, your

29:07

knees are hit with the part and

29:09

you just feel down into

29:11

the four corners of your feet. And

29:14

so that you start to feel really

29:16

centered and stable, you should very gently

29:18

inhale, draw the shoulders up to your

29:20

ears, and then as

29:22

you exhale, dropping your shoulders down your back, root

29:26

down through the four

29:28

corners of your feet, the sitting bones, and

29:30

reach up tall through the crown of your

29:32

head, and just start to feel

29:34

this sensation of space

29:37

in the front body. And

29:40

then very gently place

29:42

one hand on your belly, the other hand onto

29:44

your chest, and perhaps close

29:47

your eyes or take a soft

29:49

gaze, start

29:51

to come into your feeling body and

29:53

observe where you're feeling the breath in

29:55

your body. And

29:58

if you're feeling the breath, in

30:00

the upper hand, you're breathing using

30:03

the upper respiratory muscles. And

30:06

we want to descend the breath now down into

30:08

the lower hand. So

30:10

very gently start to breathe

30:13

into the lower hand, feeling the breath

30:15

expand with the belly, and as you

30:17

exhale, feel the navel drink back towards

30:19

your spine. And

30:22

then inhaling, belly

30:24

rising, exhaling, belly falling.

30:29

And keep going with this breathing

30:32

practice. And when you start

30:34

to observe some

30:37

stillness in the upper hand, drop

30:39

that hand down onto the lower

30:41

hand, keep focusing on

30:44

that breath, feeling the breath flowing in

30:46

and out of the nose and

30:50

in the belly. And return

30:52

to your gentle smile and

30:55

perhaps just take a moment to observe whether you

30:58

feel different how you did at the

31:01

start of the practice. Oh

31:04

Claire, that was wonderful. And I was able

31:06

to take part in

31:08

that brief exercise while sitting

31:10

down. I presume while yoga

31:12

is not an extremely

31:14

vigorous exercise, it still

31:17

takes some aerobic strength.

31:19

Is that an accommodation therefore that

31:22

you've made to bring this to

31:24

people with all sorts of presentations?

31:27

Yes, yes. So it's important that

31:29

what we teach people can do

31:31

also lying down and from a

31:34

bed. So the yoga

31:36

we teach, aside from the breath,

31:38

it's very, very calm and

31:40

restful. There are lots of pauses.

31:43

And we also encourage people

31:45

if they're really fatigued or it's difficult

31:47

for them to do is

31:49

instead of doing it, visualize themselves

31:52

doing it because there's a certain

31:54

amount of research to show that

31:56

this also can have physiological benefits.

31:59

The calming voice. of Claire Wally there

32:01

from the Yoga for Life project. Despite

32:04

all you've heard today about the

32:06

extremely serious illnesses that some people

32:08

living with long COVID experience after

32:10

infection missiles COV2 there is still

32:12

nevertheless a stigma around it and

32:14

perhaps that's because as we've heard

32:17

it's such a difficult thing to define

32:19

but scientists are tirelessly probing the pathology

32:21

of long COVID and there are thankfully

32:23

some green shoots beginning to emerge. We

32:26

encourage you to get in touch with us

32:28

to describe your experiences and please do keep

32:30

the conversation going. Our email address chris

32:33

at thenakedscientist.com. That's

32:36

it for this week. Do stay tuned for

32:38

our weekly roundup of science news this Friday

32:40

and be sure to join us next Tuesday

32:42

when we're going to talk ticks searching for

32:45

the source of the rise in tick related

32:47

diseases to be precise. We hope you'll join

32:49

us then. The Naked Scientist

32:51

comes to you from the University of

32:54

Cambridge's Institute of Continuing Education. It is

32:56

supported by Rolls-Royce. I'm Chris Smith and

32:58

from everyone here at the Naked Scientist

33:00

team thanks for listening. Thinking

33:22

about your next career move in research

33:24

and development? Then it's time

33:26

to make your move to the UK. The

33:29

nation that's investing 20 billion pounds in

33:31

R&D over the next two years. The

33:35

nation that's home to four of the

33:37

world's top research universities. The

33:40

nation where great talent comes

33:42

together. Visit gov.uk forward

33:45

slash great talent to see how you

33:47

can work live and move to the

33:50

UK

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features