Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Introducing Wonder Sweet from Blue
0:02
hosts.com. Website. Creation is
0:04
hard, but now with Blue Host
0:06
you can answer a few simple
0:08
questions about your business and get
0:10
a unique Wordpress website or store
0:13
right away. From there you can
0:15
customize your design, colors and content
0:17
and Blue House to automatically helps
0:19
you get found in search engine
0:21
like Google and then from step
0:23
by step guidance to suggested plugins.
0:25
Blue Host makes Wordpress wonderful for
0:27
everyone! Go to bluehosts.com/wonder Sweet. Higher.
0:32
Maybe we've never Fox News and Cnn
0:34
each other. and guy and current cable
0:36
news Conscientious objector. I'm a former Libertarian
0:39
who now sits comfortably on the left.
0:41
Hi I'm Danielle Moody, former educator
0:43
and were covering lobbyist. But today
0:45
I'm an unapologetic woke a commentator
0:48
on America's threats to democracy. And
0:50
I'm producer Jesse Canada and I'm here to
0:52
make sure things don't go too far off
0:55
the rails. We're here to have fun and
0:57
smart conversations with some of the most knowledgeable
0:59
and entertaining people in politics, media, and beyond.
1:01
Our goal is to try and
1:03
make sense of our current crazy
1:05
world, our new abnormal and hopefully
1:08
even make you laugh through the
1:10
tears. What an excellent show we
1:12
are. Today there are Federal Prosecutor and
1:14
Msnbc we go and it was
1:16
when Kirschner is your to update us
1:18
on all the goings on Donald Trump's
1:21
oh so many members that Texas Observer
1:23
Special Investigator correspondence do you in modest,
1:25
he enjoys to talk about a new
1:28
social network built on a vision
1:30
of Christian supremacy and America that's gaining
1:32
traction with your P politicians. But first,
1:34
let's have some fun. Well turn. Yeah,
1:37
we're now on the other side
1:39
of Super Tuesday and. What it
1:41
basically means is that although Donald
1:43
Trump has an officially clinch the
1:45
Republican nomination, we are pretty much
1:48
in general election territory. Now, if
1:50
we weren't before, this basically anything
1:52
that's left is a formality and
1:55
Trump will probably next week passed
1:57
a number of delegates he needs.
2:00
The coins denominations and Nikki
2:02
Haley has dropped out and
2:04
Joe Biden last American Samoa
2:06
in a in a shocking
2:08
and stunning turn of events
2:11
that will forever alter American
2:13
electoral politics. Where do
2:15
we go from here? Daniel? I feel
2:17
like I'm already and house and it's
2:19
hard to figure out where else would
2:22
drill Down to luck. I will say
2:24
this about Nikki Haley I'm glad that
2:26
she decided to hang on to rule
2:29
out a Super Tuesday. I will say
2:31
that seems probably would have fared a
2:33
lot better side C O I don't
2:35
know. Realize that she was in a
2:38
primary is against Donald from from the
2:40
beginning and started acting like she started
2:42
acting at the end in the beginning
2:45
and actually going after and. Asking Republicans:
2:47
Is this the best that you can
2:49
fucking do? A man that's been indicted
2:51
for times is guilty of rape and
2:53
has ninety one felony counts against. Is
2:55
that the best that you think the
2:57
country can do? Smoke? I think that
2:59
she could have positioned herself and better.
3:02
And let me, just to be very
3:04
clear, I don't like Mana, but I
3:06
think that she could have presented a
3:08
better case and given herself a lot
3:10
more runway than she did as it
3:12
pertains is annulled Trump. It's just like,
3:14
is this the best that Republicans can
3:16
Fucking. Do. It's like the
3:18
people that they have decided
3:21
to put ah as like
3:23
Bear, Save the Earth to
3:25
America are like from the
3:27
scene where I mean just
3:30
like Donald Trump on paper.
3:32
Couldn't get a job at fucking
3:34
Walmart didn't I'm saying like smack
3:37
to insult workers at Walmart. Finish
3:39
is not supposed to be as
3:41
as elevated. As. The President of the
3:44
United States. and yet he couldn't
3:46
get a job and resale with
3:48
the record that he has but
3:50
somehow is still able to run
3:52
for president and clinch the Republican
3:54
nomination and get a fuckin' endorsement
3:56
from the Tortoise himself. on the
3:58
way out. It's just beyond
4:01
me. It's beyond me. Yeah.
4:04
You said, can the Republican Party do any better
4:06
than this? I mean, no, they can't. We know
4:08
that. Right now, he's got 1,060 delegates.
4:12
Nikki Haley has 91. She
4:14
does have a not insignificant
4:16
number of actual votes. Mm-hmm.
4:19
That's true. Look, I don't know how that
4:21
plays out when we move to a general
4:24
election. I don't know what percentage of that
4:26
vote is never Trump for real for real,
4:28
and how much of it is never
4:30
Trump until it comes down to it.
4:32
That seems to be the case a
4:35
lot of times. I mean, we even
4:37
saw this past week, Mitch McConnell endorsed
4:39
Donald Trump. There's a lot of leeway
4:41
in the word never for a lot
4:43
of never Trump people. You know, I
4:45
hope a chunk of those go to
4:47
Joe Biden or at the very least
4:49
stay home. And there was a super
4:51
PAC that was for Haley called Primary
4:53
Pivot, and it's now changed its name
4:55
to Haley Voters for Biden. Mm-hmm. So
4:58
there's that. And then, you know, we
5:00
saw Joe Biden get up and give a speech
5:02
and say that, you know, he said Donald Trump
5:04
made it clear he doesn't want Nikki Haley supporters.
5:06
I want to be clear there was a
5:08
place for them in my campaign. I'll be honest,
5:11
I saw some griping on the left about this,
5:13
which I think is incredibly misplaced because we're talking
5:15
now about full-on cutthroat electoral
5:17
politics. You take the votes where you
5:20
could get them. I don't think Biden
5:22
should move to the right to get
5:24
those votes, but I think he should
5:26
welcome them and he should
5:28
explain to them that we cannot
5:30
have an insane person like Donald Trump as
5:32
president. So we'll see what happens. But I
5:35
agree with you. I'm glad she stayed in
5:37
as long as she did. Not a big
5:39
fan of hers, but it was good that
5:41
someone stuck around and at least towards the
5:43
end was hitting Trump as a Republican. Just
5:45
one quick note before we move on to
5:48
the other fucking crazy, which is that I
5:50
think that Donald Trump openly
5:53
saying that he don't
5:56
want those Haley voters is a
5:58
huge mistake because the point
6:00
that you made, it is not an insignificant
6:02
amount of votes that she got. You know,
6:05
he wasn't beating her by 70, 80 percentage
6:07
points. That
6:09
was not the case. And so
6:12
what that should show is
6:14
that there are still some
6:16
Republican voters that are like, yeah,
6:18
we don't want him and did so
6:20
enough to turn out in a primary.
6:23
And unlike, you know, Mitch McConnell
6:25
and the rest of the fucking, you
6:27
know, Republican Rockies, I'm watching interviews on
6:29
Sky News and other places with Republicans
6:32
saying, it's too much. I voted for him
6:34
in 2016 and 2020, but now it's too much. I
6:38
watched a white man say, I wouldn't
6:40
trust Donald Trump in my house with
6:43
my wife or my daughter. So I damn sure
6:45
I'm not going to trust him in the White
6:47
House. That's what he said.
6:49
A Republican white man, 60 something
6:51
year old voter. And I would
6:54
love to believe that there may
6:56
be enough to make up the
6:58
difference. Right. That was not
7:00
huge. We're not talking about huge margins
7:03
in the states that matter that
7:05
decide the election. So yeah,
7:07
absolutely. States like Michigan, states like North
7:09
Carolina, even say Georgia, Arizona, all the
7:12
states were very familiar with now. And
7:14
every four years we become super familiar
7:16
with, you know, where again, 10, 20,000
7:18
votes could make
7:20
the difference. If enough of those people like
7:23
the guy you just described, if
7:25
they either cross over to Biden or just say, you
7:27
know, I don't like Biden much either. It's not worth
7:29
getting out of the house to do this. Who knows?
7:32
It could make a difference. So again, in complete
7:34
agreement with you that I am no
7:36
fan of Nikki Haley, particularly a lot of
7:38
the things that she did early on in
7:40
this campaign. But I, I hope
7:43
maybe she did a service by staying in
7:45
so long and at least showing Republicans who
7:47
might be on the fence that there is
7:49
a different way to go. Mm hmm. Would
7:51
you like to talk about the
7:54
real crazy that we witnessed and
7:56
super Tuesday? Because it's hard to
7:58
imagine hard to. imagine
8:00
that there is somebody worse
8:03
that the Republican Party could nominate other
8:06
than Donald Trump. But
8:08
my God, yeah, this
8:10
is a guy this Mark Robinson, who first
8:12
came on the radar for people outside of
8:14
North Carolina anyway, for a bunch of things
8:17
he said he's been the lieutenant governor there.
8:19
And he's now the Republican nominee for governor.
8:21
The list of insane things that he has
8:24
said is Legion anywhere from
8:26
saying that gay people are
8:28
maggots, that they are the
8:30
equivalent of what cows leave
8:32
behind, that COVID was a
8:34
globalist conspiracy to destroy Donald
8:37
Trump. He said,
8:39
I'm looking at a Guardian article
8:41
right now, because you could read 30 articles
8:43
on this guy and just find different examples of crazy
8:46
shit. He said he referred to
8:48
the movie Black Panther, we're talking about
8:50
a Marvel Cinematic Universe movie or superhero
8:52
movie. He said it was quote
8:54
created by an agnostic Jew and put
8:56
to film by a satanic Marxist and
8:58
was only created to pull
9:00
the shekels out of your schwarza
9:03
pockets, schwarza being a Yiddish derogatory
9:05
term for black people. You know,
9:07
he has quoted Hitler approvingly. I
9:09
mean, this guy is the real
9:11
deal in terms of just batshit.
9:14
And this is now the Republican choice
9:16
to be on the ballot for the
9:18
governorship of the state of North Carolina.
9:20
Like, I will say this, and everyone hold
9:22
on to your house. I didn't think that
9:25
it was ever going to be possible. But
9:27
I miss Herschel Walker. I don't
9:31
understand. Where do
9:33
they go to find black people like this?
9:35
I don't know. I don't know.
9:39
But like when they pulled out
9:41
Herschel Walker in Georgia, I said,
9:43
huh, okay. And then go
9:45
find this piece of shit
9:47
in North Carolina. The man
9:50
is on camera saying that women
9:52
shouldn't be allowed to vote. He
9:55
said only white men's vote that you're
9:57
trying to court. But I you know, here's What
9:59
I say to the people. the
10:01
North Carolina Ball. He won't be
10:03
enough to just like beat this
10:06
man by like a percentage or
10:08
two points. Like you all need
10:10
to show the fuck out because
10:13
this is absolutely insane. Like he
10:15
is a bigot, He is a
10:17
homophobe, a trans folk, He is
10:19
an anti semite, He is a
10:22
Massage units t is someone who
10:24
should not be trusted with any
10:26
type of power what so fucking
10:28
ever and all. He is is
10:31
probably well funded like Clarence Thomas
10:33
and arrested the black man. That's
10:35
a fine to be able to
10:37
shuck and jive and smile behind
10:39
Donald Trump the same it so
10:41
North Carolina, please stand all the
10:43
way up. Yeah, I want to
10:45
talk. About that women saying because what
10:47
he said was very weird and where he
10:50
said it was pretty weird In twenty twenty
10:52
while he was running for lieutenant governor he
10:54
said he would definitely return to the days
10:56
in America where women couldn't vote and then
10:59
the reason he gave was he said quotes.
11:01
Because. In those days we have people who
11:03
fought for real social change in they were
11:05
called republicans. So. I don't really know
11:07
what that means out. maybe give him
11:09
the benefit of the doubt and he's
11:12
not saying that he believes women shouldn't
11:14
vote but that is given the choice
11:16
he would return to those days because
11:18
it meant to other thing he said
11:20
which again I don't understand. He also
11:22
went on to say that Republicans and
11:24
to Jim Crow which will come is
11:26
a huge surprise to the descendants of
11:28
Lyndon Johnson I would think and he
11:30
said this whole bizarre thing about going
11:32
back to the days when we couldn't
11:34
vote. He said this are at. An
11:36
event hosted by the Republican Women of
11:39
Tommy North Tower. So. I
11:41
don't know what's don't even know what to
11:43
make it is it's like read the room
11:45
is an overused express in days but body.
11:48
I mean, but did they applaud. Apparently
11:50
not. Apparently they were pretty quiet about
11:52
it and did not applaud. On the
11:54
other hand, he got elected governor, so
11:56
what's out? There is no bottom for
11:58
them, but this may. I
12:00
mean again personal walker of looks
12:03
like a great pair in comparison
12:05
to this guy which is a
12:07
while thing to say but I
12:09
don't know friends but when somebody
12:11
is out white telling you that
12:14
they don't want women to vote,
12:16
that any marginalized group is vermin.
12:18
Or Excrement board. That. You want
12:20
to take him a are fifteen and be
12:22
able to shoot your opponent's seats. The United
12:25
Nations of Red Flags. Did on
12:27
I'm saying. So pay attention
12:29
while we have more robinson
12:31
to kick around and hopefully
12:33
we won't come November. Someone
12:35
we will not have around
12:37
to kid around anymore is
12:39
your favorite Senator Daniel. Houston
12:42
Cinema. Yeah
12:44
see announced that she is retiring
12:46
of as You Will Not run
12:48
for reelection in what would have
12:51
been a three person race because
12:53
remember that cinema left the democratic
12:56
party's and Rubin day ago is
12:58
t democratic nominee there and the
13:00
most I counted carry Lake is
13:03
the republican nominee Endymion. Multi talented
13:05
because she comes axiom. He and
13:07
vastly at a podium Adnan a
13:10
while using a very soft filter.
13:14
Pearson cinemas retirement. Even though she was
13:16
only senator for one term, it is
13:18
very clear that it's unfortunate because it
13:20
was one term too many. Yes,
13:24
it was. My understanding is that she's
13:26
retiring to spend more time with her
13:28
lobbyists. I don't have enough bad things
13:30
to say about your and Cinema. This
13:32
is a woman who started out as
13:34
sort of a left wing you know,
13:36
social activists. And you know was
13:38
very into issues like the environment than and
13:40
things like that. As and then she got
13:42
elected to the senate and then something clicked
13:44
in her head and she said i don't
13:47
want to be that person anymore. Oh it
13:49
didn't click and ahead and see it puts in.
13:51
our pockets or that's an excellent point
13:53
yes someone put on her venmo and
13:56
suddenly she was is sort of joe
13:58
manchin asked center right, I guess, would
14:00
be the nicest way to say it.
14:03
You know, she'll always be remembered for
14:05
doing a little curtsy as she gave
14:07
a thumbs down to raising the federal
14:10
minimum wage. And she
14:12
will probably be remembered by the voters
14:14
of Arizona for them never seeing her
14:16
because she very rarely met with constituents
14:18
but had plenty of time for lobbyists
14:20
and people of that nature. Wine tastings.
14:22
Yes, and wine tastings. I forgot about
14:24
the wine tastings. And she had the
14:27
gall to get up there and give
14:29
her a little retirement speech. And this is
14:31
what she said. She said, because
14:34
I choose civility, understanding, listening, working
14:36
together to get stuff done, I
14:38
will leave the Senate at the
14:40
end of this year. Pick whatever
14:43
word you want, the gall, the
14:45
chutzpah, the nerve. None
14:47
of those words seem strong enough, to
14:49
be quite honest. And we're talking about
14:52
her in this section. So she is
14:54
not either of our fuck that guy
14:56
for today. But that's an all time
14:58
statement for someone. And I think she
15:00
needs to be put on the fuck that guy wall
15:03
of shame for that. I mean, but
15:05
will her peplum sleeves? First
15:08
of all, the video that she did,
15:10
somebody said it so accurately on social
15:12
where they're just like, this could have
15:14
been an email. No one needed
15:17
her video with her like
15:19
condescending tone about civility and
15:21
about these things. It's just
15:23
like, I can't wait to
15:26
see her on Fox, because
15:28
I'm certain that that's where
15:30
she's going or on some
15:32
oil persons like board of
15:34
directors. But she got into
15:36
the Senate and realized that there was
15:38
money to be made. And that's what
15:41
she decided. Because I remember when she
15:43
first came on to the political scene
15:45
on Bisexual, I live in
15:47
Arizona, like all of these things. And
15:49
I was just like, Oh, wow, look
15:51
at this. Like she's progressive. And like
15:54
look at the state of Arizona putting
15:56
this this woman forward. And Then it
15:58
was like she did a complete. Total
16:00
one early. So I feel like why?
16:02
And you're not leaving because of civility.
16:05
You're leaving to do not have a
16:07
constituency. You're leaving because you sold out.
16:09
The very people who elected you like
16:11
you got reelected am undecided. You know
16:14
you were elected as a democrat and
16:16
then decided to do it to step
16:18
in like change parties And I'm telling
16:21
you, we've seen this happen before and
16:23
I honestly think that there should be
16:25
a rule that you can not do
16:27
that because it is. It is fraudulent.
16:30
It is thought you once campaign
16:32
on the one set of beliefs
16:35
and one set of ideology and
16:37
then turn around. Get a Latina.
16:39
Be like just kidding, I'm a
16:41
Republican party. What? I'm very happy
16:43
that see recognize that she had
16:46
no path forward and that this
16:48
will be a two person breeze.
16:50
But like Sieges she did that
16:52
state herself. A complete and total
16:54
disservice about. like you know, maybe
16:57
hi Manson. Team up and go
16:59
someplace I'm. Hoping it's overseas because
17:01
I don't ever want to see
17:03
either one of them again. The
17:06
way that the two of them
17:08
were just said: blockade for climate
17:10
for minimum wage For all of
17:12
the things that democrats. Supposedly
17:14
stand for. These two were
17:16
able to get those things in the
17:19
water me or persona non grata to
17:21
me by don't let the Door hit
17:23
you don't wanna hear from you I
17:25
hope you enjoy. Your mansions and your
17:27
Montserrat is yeah, maybe they can go on
17:30
my big brother Uk or something like that.
17:32
Just go to England and be on one
17:34
of those shows and we must alone on
17:36
have actually starting to wonder if the people
17:38
of Arizona kind of prompt us and they
17:40
just wanted her on the other side of
17:43
the country. So that's why me made me
17:45
some lesser thanks Arizona. I mean she was
17:47
in third place in a three person race
17:49
as the incumbent that is never good sign.
17:51
Also, I misspoke little early when I said
17:54
to carry linked with the Republican nominee not
17:56
yet but. i mean she has issues
17:58
we'd over again mark lambs So I
18:00
don't think that's gonna be an issue, but
18:02
I just wanted to correct that. Don't even
18:05
get me started on the performative, the
18:07
outfits and the glasses. And I think
18:09
maybe we've talked about this before, I can't remember,
18:11
but like I'm all for people expressing themselves and
18:13
you know, dress the way you want and all
18:16
that. I never got the sense with her that
18:18
that's what it was. I got the sense with
18:20
her that it was much more, look at me,
18:22
look at me, yeah, it was completely performative. It
18:25
was stolen Riz as far as I'm
18:27
concerned. And she
18:29
can't go far enough away. Stolen Riz, is
18:31
that a higher or lower offense than
18:33
stolen Valor? I think it's a little
18:35
bit lower, but I'm not positive. I
18:37
need to draw a chart. I
18:40
need to draw a chart. It'll be in the show notes
18:42
that don't exist everywhere. Go there and look for it. Mm-mm.
18:49
Introducing Wonder Sweep from
18:51
bluehost.com. Website creation is
18:53
hard, but now with Bluehost, you can
18:56
answer a few simple questions about
18:58
your business and get a unique WordPress website or
19:01
store right away. From there, you
19:03
can customize your design, colors and content.
19:06
And Bluehost automatically helps you get found
19:08
in search engines like Google and VIN. And
19:10
step by step guidance to
19:13
suggest a plugin. Bluehost makes
19:15
WordPress wonderful for everyone. Go
19:17
to bluehost.com/Wonder Sweep. A
19:19
lot can happen in three years, like
19:22
a chatbot may be your new best
19:24
friend. But what won't change? Needing health
19:26
insurance? UnitedHealthcare Tri-Term Medical Plans, underwritten by
19:28
Golden Rule Insurance Company, offer flexible, budget-friendly
19:30
coverage that lasts nearly three years in
19:32
some states. Learn more at uh1.com. When
19:38
picking a commerce platform for your business,
19:41
you have two choices. You
19:43
absolute, I cannot believe
19:48
there has to be a better way.
19:50
Frustration or sales. I
19:55
prefer. Don't
19:57
you? That's the sound you'll hear when you switch
19:59
your. business to Shopify, the global
20:01
commerce platform that supercharges your selling,
20:04
wherever you sell, online, in person,
20:06
on social media and beyond. Shopify
20:08
is the best all in one
20:11
commerce platform capable of handling your
20:13
business's complexity, no matter how big
20:15
you grow. Step up to
20:17
Shopify and harness the best converting checkout
20:19
and the same intuitive features, trusted apps
20:22
and powerful analytics used by the world's
20:24
leading brands like Brooklyn in the Yum
20:26
Yum tweet and Todd Snyder. You're
20:28
probably thinking, sure, but migrating is
20:30
going to be a headache. Shopify's
20:33
app store has the migration apps
20:35
you need to migrate your products,
20:37
orders, customers and more from every
20:40
major e-commerce platform to Shopify. If
20:42
you're anything like me, and let's face it,
20:44
you probably are, you're one of those don't
20:47
put me in a box people. And thankfully,
20:49
Shopify never will because with Shopify control of
20:51
your brand and business is always in your
20:53
hands from your storefront look to your back
20:56
office operation. When I'm making possibly
20:58
questionable purchase decisions late at night,
21:00
I hate having to find my
21:02
wallet and putting credit card information
21:04
and my address for every single
21:06
site for every single purchase. Shopify
21:09
remembers your information across its whole
21:11
network. Stop leaving sales on the
21:13
table, switch your business to Shopify and
21:15
discover why millions trust Shopify as they're
21:17
all in one commerce platform to build,
21:20
grow and run their businesses. Sign up
21:22
today for your $1 per
21:25
month trial period
21:27
at shopify.com/abnormal all
21:29
lowercase. That's one month for just $1
21:32
at shopify.com/abnormal
21:36
shopify.com/abnormal. Folks,
21:44
I am so happy to welcome
21:46
back to the new abnormal my
21:48
friend Glenn Kirchner, you know him
21:51
as the host of justice matters
21:53
as an MSNBC legal analyst and
21:55
he has been inside multiple courtrooms
21:57
alongside Donald Trump to figure out
22:00
Now, what is happening with these
22:02
foreign indictments and 91 charges
22:05
that we are seeing against him? We
22:07
just saw Glenn, I believe it was
22:09
this week, but I don't know where
22:11
time is going. Alan Weisselberg,
22:14
let's start there. Alan Weisselberg,
22:16
former CFO of the Trump
22:18
Organization, who had already served
22:21
time in Rikers for his
22:23
involvement in the fraudulent schemes
22:25
that the Trump Organization has
22:28
now been found liable for
22:30
their mishandling their lives and
22:32
their scheming to inflate the values
22:34
of their businesses in order to
22:36
recoup bigger loans from banks. They
22:39
say, oh, it's no fault because
22:41
the banks say, yeah, we got
22:43
our money, so we're good. But
22:46
Judge Angoran said, yeah, no, you now
22:48
owe hundreds of millions of dollars and
22:51
hundreds of millions of dollars in interest.
22:53
This is the only good news that
22:55
we have so far, Glenn, but then
22:57
Donald Trump's lawyers came out right after
23:00
and said, but he's broke and said that they
23:02
could give $100 million, but
23:04
that's all. So is he a
23:07
multi-billionaire or is he broke? Is
23:09
this going to be the thing
23:11
that brings him down in the
23:13
way that tax evasion brought down
23:15
other mobsters or not? What's your
23:17
read on this financial bind that
23:19
Trump has himself in? Yeah,
23:22
Danielle, you're right. There's not a lot
23:24
of good news on the criminal cases
23:26
front. There's a little bit of good
23:28
news on the civil cases front. I'm
23:30
always looking for that silver lining that
23:32
is lurking behind the big dark orange
23:34
cloud that is Donald Trump. And
23:36
I think we can find some good
23:39
news on the civil case front because,
23:41
you know, his lawyers like Elena Haber
23:43
in one breath are telling everyone and
23:46
the courts he's worth $14 billion. In
23:50
the next breath, she's saying, please, please
23:52
judge. Don't make him put
23:55
up the full amount that
23:57
has been awarded against him
23:59
because He really doesn't have it
24:01
and he would really like to file
24:03
an appeal, but you can't perfect your
24:05
appeal unless you put up the full
24:07
amount of the judgment or you get
24:09
some knucklehead to file a bond on
24:11
your behalf, some insurer to say Donald
24:13
Trump's good for it. If he loses
24:16
the appeal, he'll pay out the full
24:18
half a billion. They can't find anybody
24:20
to do that. I mean, who would
24:22
do that? So the good news is
24:24
on the civil front, it looks like
24:26
we are very close to the end
24:28
game for Donald Trump where Tish
24:30
James and Eugene
24:33
Carroll and her lawyers will be
24:35
able to begin seizing his
24:37
assets. We are very close to that
24:39
right now because first of all, he
24:41
put up $5 million in the first
24:44
Eugene Carroll case because that's what was
24:46
awarded. He couldn't even put up a
24:48
bond for that. It looks like he
24:51
couldn't get anybody to issue a bond
24:53
and guarantee that he would pay out
24:55
on even the $5 million. I'm inferring
24:57
that because he took $5 million of
24:59
his own money where it could have
25:01
been out there earning interest or being invested and
25:03
he gave it to the court, actually 5.5 with
25:06
interest and the court is holding it in an escrow
25:08
account. Next, 83.3
25:10
million and that doesn't account for interest.
25:12
You know what Elena Haber and his
25:14
lawyers are doing going into the court
25:17
and asking Judge Kaplan, please, please let
25:19
him put up a bond for 24
25:21
million. The
25:23
answer is no. This is not
25:26
a flea market at which you
25:28
faggle over the price of your
25:30
appeal. No. So he
25:32
can't make that full bond and
25:34
then half a billion dollars in
25:37
the New York fraud trial and
25:40
they're asking their begging Judge Angoraan because
25:42
they've been so polite and civil to
25:45
Judge Angoraan all along, right? They're asking
25:47
Angoraan to do him a solid, do him
25:49
a favor. You know, don't you all have
25:52
a fraud forgiveness program, Judge? Come on now.
25:55
They're asking to put up just a
25:57
hundred million dollar bond, not even that
25:59
amount. amount in cash and yet he's
26:01
got to put up more than half
26:04
a billion dollars if he wants to
26:06
appeal that case. So listen, he's about
26:08
to hit a financial brick wall and
26:10
he's going to hit it hard, I
26:12
predict. And then the next move is
26:14
for E.G. Carroll and Tish James to
26:16
begin seizing his assets to try to
26:19
satisfy these money judgments. That's a
26:21
little bit of good news. So I mean that
26:23
is because I think that at the end
26:26
of the day, so basically his attorneys, to
26:28
your point, were saying he's worth $14 billion.
26:32
So if he was worth $14 billion,
26:34
then one would assume he puts up
26:37
what he owes, he would still be
26:39
worth $13.5 billion, still making him a
26:41
multi-billionaire. And
26:45
because I don't know if you've seen them,
26:47
Glenn, but he has these hot sneakers on
26:49
the market. So, you
26:51
know, that's got to account for something.
26:53
They're selling like hotcakes. They're
26:55
already discounted. So I'm wondering,
26:58
is this the thing that
27:00
if Donald Trump's buildings are
27:03
seized and now we
27:05
know what the actual evaluation is
27:07
for these billions, there isn't a
27:09
billion that is worth half a
27:11
billion dollars? No, you know why?
27:13
Because if he had just one property,
27:16
one of his third rate resorts
27:18
or third rate golf courses, just
27:20
one that was actually worth the
27:23
billion dollars, he would have bondsmen
27:25
and insurers beating down his door.
27:27
Why? Because all he would
27:29
have to say is I am pledging to you
27:31
as collateral my $1
27:33
billion property and
27:35
I'm going to give it to you to secure a half
27:38
a billion dollar bond so
27:40
that I can pursue my
27:42
appeal and if I
27:44
lose, you know, you get all
27:47
of your money back and then some because
27:49
you have to pay these people a fee
27:51
to actually go out on a limb and
27:53
guarantee you a bond and
27:56
it would all be there for the taking. So
27:58
no worries, but he doesn't have it. I
28:00
don't believe a property worth a
28:02
billion dollars or half a billion dollars because
28:04
then he could easily get a bond But
28:06
he can't get a bond That's why his
28:08
attorneys keep going over and over again at
28:11
in hand to these judges saying please Reduce
28:14
the amount that he has to put up so
28:16
he can appeal these cases So
28:18
what's the time frame that we're working
28:20
on before we see Donald Trump panhandling
28:22
in the subway? I
28:25
think this week his time is up
28:27
on the 83 million dollar E.G.
28:30
Okay to so we're gonna
28:32
know within days whether E.G.
28:35
Carol's lawyers will begin the process of trying
28:37
to seize assets I think he has about
28:40
another two weeks in the big one the
28:42
half a billion dollar, New York fraud case
28:44
So all of this is about to
28:46
come to a head and as I say he's gonna
28:48
hit a financial brick wall And
28:51
I don't know whether that impacts him
28:53
moving forward in all of his many
28:55
Criminal cases that he has pending against
28:57
him, but it can't help if you're
28:59
going down the drain financially You're not gonna
29:01
have money to pay your lawyers You know We
29:03
have felt like it's the beginning of the end
29:05
for Donald Trump for a very long time and
29:08
somehow He keeps wiggling out
29:10
of accountability. The question is does he
29:12
run out of rope or He
29:14
managed to stave off all of the
29:17
consequences Until November and then
29:19
if horrifically he gets elected president again
29:21
He makes it all go away and
29:23
he will have considerable power and ability
29:25
to make it all go away What
29:28
gets me Glenn about the financial
29:30
cases about these civil cases is?
29:33
That I believe that Donald and you
29:36
tell me but I believe that Donald
29:38
Trump is more dangerous now Than
29:41
he was when we started talking
29:43
years ago When he
29:45
swore his hand on the Bible
29:47
in 2017 and started his first
29:49
term as president I think that
29:51
the financial bind these two cases
29:53
have put him in Makes
29:56
him more dangerous and more of
29:58
a target of who are
30:00
supposedly our foreign adversaries,
30:03
but would very easily
30:05
become Donald Trump's cronies
30:07
if the Saudis or Putin or Orban
30:10
were to say, you know what, we
30:12
got you. You know, we'll put up
30:14
the bond. We'll put up, you know,
30:16
whatever it is. You do
30:18
us a favor, though. He's even
30:21
more, potentially even more
30:23
financially compromised and a
30:25
cornered rat is going to attack. It's
30:28
going to try to chew their way
30:30
through everything. The reason I think and
30:32
I think the financial leverage that people
30:34
could use against him is considerable. I
30:36
also feel like the reason he will be
30:38
more dangerous in a second term, God forbid,
30:41
is because at least in the first term,
30:43
his instincts were just as bad and just
30:45
as cruddy and just as evil. But
30:48
he made the fatal mistake of
30:50
surrounding himself with at least some
30:52
people who cared about what happened
30:54
to American democracy like Jim Mattis
30:57
and Kelly, one of his many
31:00
chiefs of staff. And those people really
31:02
did try to control him and keep him
31:04
from doing as much damage as I think
31:06
his inclination was to do to the
31:08
United States and to our democracy. Gone
31:10
are the days when he has a
31:12
single, legitimate, democracy-loving cabinet member.
31:15
For all we know, he'll put
31:17
Stephen Miller in as the attorney
31:19
general because Donald Trump has said,
31:21
among other things, I'll be
31:23
a dictator on day one. Well, you
31:25
know what? No dictator on day one
31:27
ever voluntarily relinquishes dictatorial power on day
31:30
two. They don't do it, right? And
31:32
he has already said, I'll use the
31:34
Department of Justice to go after my
31:36
enemies. I mean, this will be an
31:38
unhinged and unchecked Donald Trump in a
31:40
second term. And I do. I
31:42
mean, it's not hyperbole to say the
31:45
man has announced that he will virtually
31:47
end our democracy. He'll terminate portions of
31:49
the Constitution. He is an aspiring
31:51
dictator. You know, take him in his word. He
31:53
will do these things. And
31:56
then it's a question of how do you
31:58
defeat a dictator? Well, unfortunately, the only
32:00
way you can defeat a dictator is with
32:02
a revolution. Oh dear. Let's switch
32:05
gears to the criminal cases. The last
32:07
time we spoke, I had high hopes.
32:09
Glenn, I had high hopes that while
32:12
the calendar was not working with us,
32:14
I had hopes of it being able to
32:16
move through. The Supreme Court, however, had other
32:19
plans. They have decided to
32:21
take up the immunity case that Jack
32:24
Smith had wanted them to deal with
32:26
months ago and brought it directly to
32:28
the Supreme Court to say, just handle
32:30
this once and for all so that
32:33
we can move forward. And they
32:35
said, nah, we'll wait for it to go up
32:37
through the lower courts. Goes up
32:39
through the lower courts. They issue
32:41
their opinion. You are not immune.
32:43
The Supreme Court then had an
32:45
opportunity to say, we let the
32:47
lower court's decision stand. We're not
32:49
interfering. Move forward. Now, because they
32:51
are not to be trusted, and
32:53
those are my words and not
32:55
yours, the Supreme Court is not
32:57
to be trusted, has decided now,
32:59
oh, we'll take up the case.
33:02
And we'll take it up in April. We'll start hearing
33:04
arguments. This is putting the
33:06
immunity case in the center
33:08
of the election without the
33:10
ability of Jack Smith to
33:12
be able to move forward
33:14
on his timeline and the
33:16
judge's timeline. Talk to me
33:18
about this corrupt, bought and
33:20
sold, grifting Supreme Court. Yeah, your
33:23
words are the Supreme Court is not
33:25
to be trusted. My words are the
33:27
Supreme Court is not to be trusted.
33:29
They're not honest brokers of the
33:31
law. First of all,
33:33
you're absolutely right. They should not
33:36
have taken this case for review.
33:38
There's no federal law. There's no
33:40
statute on the books that says
33:42
a president is immune from prosecution
33:44
for the crimes he commits against
33:46
the American people while in office.
33:49
There's no precedent. There is no
33:51
appellate court opinion that stands for
33:53
that proposition. And there's no constitutional
33:55
provision that stands for that proposition.
33:58
The Supreme Court should not. have
34:00
taken this case for review. But if they
34:02
were going to, because they're the
34:05
big dogs and they want to, you
34:07
know, put their stamp on whatever it
34:09
is that will live in the law
34:11
books moving forward, they didn't want the
34:13
lower appellate court to have that, you
34:15
know, honor and that privilege, they wanted
34:17
to be the big dogs and announce
34:19
an opinion, what they should have done
34:21
was done this months ago, because they
34:23
could have and they should have in
34:25
the event they knew they were going
34:27
to exercise jurisdiction over this and accept
34:29
it for review, but they didn't. Then
34:32
when they did a few weeks ago,
34:34
they could have set a two week briefing
34:36
and argument schedule. And it could be resolved
34:38
like right now, but they didn't. They said,
34:40
you know what, we'll put it on the
34:42
calendar for the week of the 22nd
34:44
of April. And just yesterday, I think they said,
34:47
you know what, we don't want to rush it.
34:49
We're going to put it even later in the
34:51
week. We're going to hear arguments on the 25th
34:53
of April, right at the dead end of this
34:55
Supreme Court's term. Right? So then do they decide
34:57
it on the last day of the term, June
34:59
30th, maybe they don't have to they could carry
35:02
it over to the next term if they really
35:04
wanted to screw democracy. And it appears
35:06
that they're entirely willing to screw democracy.
35:08
So if they do this, let's play
35:10
this out. If they decide the
35:12
case on the last day of the term, June 30, let's
35:15
hope that they say a president is not king,
35:18
a president can't kill or order SEAL
35:20
Team Six to kill his political opponent
35:22
with impunity and immunity against prosecution. And
35:24
so they say no, no absolute immunity
35:26
for Donald Trump. And they hand the
35:28
case back to Judge Tanya Chutkin and
35:30
direct her to put it back on
35:32
the trial track. Now, she
35:35
has already pledged that she would give them 88 days,
35:38
let's say three months from the time she
35:40
gets the case back until the time it
35:42
goes to trial, because there were about three
35:44
months between the time it was paused originally
35:46
and the March for trial date, she could
35:49
cut that down. That's not precedent. That's not
35:51
law. It wouldn't be wrong or improper for
35:53
her to cut that timeframe down. But basically,
35:55
as you say, he's going to be in
35:58
trial, you know, for trying to criminal. ultimately
36:00
overturn the results of a presidential election
36:02
while people are going to the polls.
36:04
Yeah. Remember, that seems unwise
36:06
in the extreme. We should have finished
36:09
this up well in advance of the
36:11
election. But I have even worse news
36:13
than all of that, if you can
36:15
imagine. Please. Judge Tannen
36:17
down in Florida on
36:20
Donald Trump's illegally retaining
36:22
classified information, obstructing justice
36:24
and violating our nation's
36:26
espionage laws. She's
36:28
still playing with this case and has not
36:30
yet set a trial date. Here's
36:33
what she's going to do. I'll bet a buck. That's
36:35
my betting limit. I'm not a high roller. I'm not
36:37
a gambling man. I'll put the full buck on this.
36:40
She told Jack Smith last week, July
36:42
8th, which Jack Smith was requesting as
36:44
a trial date. No, that sounds unrealistic.
36:47
She's going to set a trial date
36:49
right around September 1st, give or take.
36:51
That's not going to be a legitimate
36:53
trial date. You know what it's going
36:56
to be? It's going to be a
36:58
trial date blocker. So that if that
37:00
is on the books in Florida for
37:02
September 1st, if Judge Chutkin
37:04
gets her case back on June
37:06
30th, she's going to say, set
37:09
a trial date now until after
37:11
that trial is complete. And then
37:13
September 1st is going to approach
37:15
the sham Florida trial date. Donald
37:17
Trump's attorneys will waltz in and
37:20
say, judge, we just got a
37:22
late disclosure from the prosecutors. They'll
37:24
make some excuse up. Now you
37:27
have to continue the September 1st trial
37:29
date until after the election.
37:31
And I predict Judge Cannon will be
37:33
receptive to that argument. Now
37:35
we have no federal trials,
37:38
even starting November. That's
37:41
the nightmare scenario I see
37:43
on the horizon. Our
37:45
only hope is Alfen Bragg's criminal
37:47
case in New York, in
37:50
Manhattan, which is scheduled to kick off
37:52
on March 25th. And it
37:54
looks like a hard trial date. Judge
37:56
Michonne is not messing around when Donald
37:59
Trump's lawyers. literally started
38:01
sounding like they were drafting
38:03
a post for Donald Trump to put up in
38:05
court. The lawyers are like, judge, this
38:07
should never happen in this country. This is,
38:10
judge said, uh, uh, uh, legal
38:12
argument. I will see you on March
38:14
25th for jury selection. It
38:16
looks like judge Marchand is going to force
38:19
them to go to trial based
38:21
on the evidence, including an audio
38:23
recording of Donald Trump and Michael
38:25
Cohen conspiring to commit the crimes.
38:27
He's going to be convicted. And
38:29
then the question will be what
38:31
does judge Marchand do? Does he
38:33
have it in him to order
38:35
him into incarceration, which is what
38:38
would happen to pretty much anybody
38:40
else whose name wasn't Donald Trump
38:42
or not. So at this
38:44
point, that seems like our best hope
38:46
to get Donald Trump convicted, held accountable
38:48
for some of his crimes before the
38:51
November election. Absolutely obscene. We will
38:53
have to leave it there today, Glenn.
38:56
But my God, I hope
38:58
that when we speak again,
39:00
that there is some movement
39:02
towards justice because right now
39:05
I am so disgusted that I'm
39:07
just, I pray that Donald Trump
39:09
was worth maybe $600 million.
39:13
And this decision by Ingore
39:15
and others, and maybe that
39:18
will be
39:21
the beginning of the end.
39:23
But as always, my friends, thank you
39:25
so much for your analysis and making
39:27
time for the new abnormal. I appreciate
39:29
you. Great talking with you, Daniel. Have
39:32
you heard of the Nexus Mountain Network?
39:35
What about the Seven Mountains mandate? Well,
39:38
maybe you have, but I hadn't until
39:40
now when I read about them in
39:42
an article published at the daily dot
39:45
com. Here to explain what the hell
39:47
these things are and why we should
39:49
very much care is the author of
39:52
that piece. Texas Observer's special investigative correspondent
39:54
and publisher of the nonprofit literary publication,
39:56
Protean Magazine, Steve Monticelli. Steve, thanks
39:58
so much for being here. Great to
40:00
be here. here, Andy? I guess first
40:02
we need to know what the Seven
40:04
Mountains Mandate is. So please tell us.
40:07
So the Seven Mountains Mandate is effectively
40:11
an ideological concept that can
40:13
be drawn back to the
40:15
mid-1970s when a group of evangelical pastors
40:20
came up with this idea called
40:22
the Seven Spheres, which effectively is
40:24
a breakdown of
40:26
all of the different aspects of
40:28
society that matter to these
40:31
particular pastors. So things like
40:33
government, media, business, family, education.
40:35
Each mountain, which is how
40:37
they describe them in the
40:40
modern context, is meant to
40:42
be dominated by Christians. The
40:44
term Seven Mountains Mandate was
40:46
first really pushed forth by
40:48
this particular pastor who's based
40:51
in Keller, Texas named Lance
40:53
Walnau. And he put out
40:55
a book in 2013 called
40:57
Invading Babylon,
41:00
The Seven Mountain Mandate. Critical scholars
41:02
have described it as a program
41:05
for Christian supremacy.
41:07
And it has been connected and
41:09
linked to a number of high-ranking
41:11
officials who have espoused support for
41:14
the notion. Okay. So what is
41:16
then the other thing I mentioned,
41:18
the Nexus Mountain Network. So the
41:21
Nexus Mountain Network is a project
41:23
of this 501c3 called
41:26
Nexus Mountain Mission, which their tax
41:28
filings remain hidden Thanks to a
41:31
church exemption. It is effectively based around
41:33
the notion of the Seven Mountains Mandate.
41:35
They list the Seven Mountains in their
41:37
mission. They specifically describe the purpose is
41:40
to bring people together with the common
41:42
goal of achieving God's purpose. Within the
41:44
Seven Mountains of Influence. So, it's a
41:46
social media platform for a particular subset
41:49
of what I think could be fairly
41:51
described as Christian nationalists, many of whom
41:53
seek to either break down the separation
41:56
of church and state or to rise
41:58
to the. The tarp
42:00
load of the mountain and install
42:02
policies that reflect their Christian values.
42:05
Their particular Christian values I should
42:07
write. So basically the Nexus Mountain
42:09
Network combines the two worst things
42:11
in the world: religious supremacy and
42:13
the Internet. That's one way to
42:15
put it and assists and consequences
42:17
of this ideology or tough to
42:20
exaggerate. I'm sure many of your
42:22
listeners this as heard about the
42:24
Alabama Supreme Court decision that effectively
42:26
put an end to in vitro
42:28
fertilization. One of those judges. Who
42:30
helped make that decision? Tom Parker
42:33
is found to have a spouse
42:35
support for the Seven Mountains mandate
42:37
as or has the Speaker of
42:39
the House, Mike Johnson says pop
42:42
may be relatively small, but it
42:44
represents an ideology that has reached
42:46
some pretty high offices. As you
42:48
note, in your peace, there are
42:51
a bunch of of candidates running
42:53
as Republicans who have recently one
42:55
primaries who are sort of under
42:57
the rubric of this nexus Mountain.
43:00
Or network that's correct. Of the now,
43:02
I think four thousand something members of
43:04
this network, I found thirteen of them
43:06
were either actively running or had run
43:09
for office in the past. Two of
43:11
those are congressional candidates in North Carolina
43:13
who have on their primaries. One of
43:15
them is named Pat Harrison is a
43:18
Us Army veteran in a C O
43:20
Done distribution company and I He's drawn
43:22
some pretty big donors and an endorsement
43:24
from the Koch Brothers network. He previously
43:26
run in or Twenty Twenty Two, But
43:29
now as finally. clinched the nominations
43:31
and so he will be on
43:33
the general ballot in november i
43:35
did get in touch with his
43:37
campaign and his wife confirmed that
43:39
she had treated his account i
43:41
think either see or someone on
43:43
the campaign and promptly blocks me
43:45
after offering an interview so i
43:47
was never able to schedule that
43:49
interview with them much he did
43:51
also confirmed that she's personal friends
43:53
with the wife of the founder
43:55
of nexus mountain network chat holly
43:57
jolly as posted also on the
43:59
nexus mountain network and and was
44:01
interviewed on a religious political show
44:04
called Flashpoint, which is a product
44:06
of Kenneth Copeland Ministries, which is
44:08
the ministry of the wealthiest pastor
44:10
in America near Fort Worth, Texas.
44:12
And Hawley effectively said he had heard
44:15
from several politicians who had gotten a
44:17
comment request from me and viewed it
44:19
as an attempt to create a smear
44:21
campaign around the Nexus Mountain Network and
44:24
what they're trying to do. But he
44:26
also acknowledged that there are many politicians
44:29
who have accounts on the network
44:31
and in a way have, at the
44:33
very least, identified government as their primary
44:36
mountain that they seek to conquer. Talk
44:38
a little more about Chad Hawley. What's
44:40
his background? How did he come to
44:42
be the head of this network? Chad
44:45
Hawley is a former pharmaceutical industry
44:47
executive who I believe he had
44:50
some health issues that he describes
44:52
as a part of the journey
44:54
that led him to receiving a
44:57
message from God that he should
44:59
create the Nexus Mountain Network.
45:01
He is effectively a mentee
45:03
of Lance Wallnau, who is
45:06
the main proponent of the
45:08
Seven Mountains mandate
45:10
or the Seven Mountains theology.
45:13
They have spoken at conferences
45:15
together, one in particular being
45:17
the Morningstar Conference, where a
45:19
lot of luminaries in this movement
45:21
that has been described as the New
45:24
Apostolic Reformation participated in. Without going down
45:26
that rabbit hole, basically, the Seven Mountains
45:28
mandate came out of this network
45:30
of self-appointed apostles and
45:33
prophets, which make up
45:35
what is called the New Apostolic Reformation.
45:40
Things that characterize that movement are things
45:42
like the belief in the power of
45:44
the Holy Spirit to perform miracles such
45:46
as healing. The Seven Mountains mandate in
45:48
particular, or the necessity to conduct spiritual
45:51
warfare in order to bring about Christian
45:53
dominion over all aspects of society. As
45:56
far as I understand, Mr. Hawley, who did not
45:58
respond to my Work. Comment As
46:01
you know, a bit of a
46:03
history in this particular sort of
46:05
sect of Christian nationalism and is
46:08
closely linked to some of the.
46:10
Biggest. Luminaries of that movement. So talk
46:13
about the influence that the Seven Mountains
46:15
which I guess is also known as
46:17
as Seven Am Yes prefer the influence
46:19
of they've had on school boards in
46:21
that they're seeking Dallas Cowboys to. This
46:24
seems important. So a one of the
46:26
elected officials that I found on the
46:28
Nexus Mount Network is a school board
46:30
member in Charleston County in South Carolina,
46:32
and one of the things that she's
46:35
tried to push for is requiring prayer
46:37
before the beginning of each board meeting
46:39
as she tried to. Ban a local
46:41
pastor and activist from attending board meetings
46:43
after they made an outspoken the critical
46:46
post about Mom's for Liberty and the
46:48
group which organized this particular school board
46:50
member her name's Leah Watley And then
46:52
it'll shed Holly himself in an interview
46:54
on his podcast with one of the
46:56
political candidates for lieutenant Governor in North
46:59
Carolina where they're at and do I
47:01
actually don't know how to say her
47:03
last name, some just not even gonna
47:05
try to off that primary. So yeah,
47:07
that that is not a silly a
47:09
victory for this. Movement. But nonetheless,
47:11
during that interview, Chad Holly spoke
47:14
about how members of the Nexus
47:16
About Network were able to mobilize
47:18
at a local school board meeting
47:20
in North Carolina and basically push
47:22
back against what they described as
47:25
the promotion of pedophilia and rape
47:27
and incest. the context being a
47:29
book that they did not like
47:31
that was available for students. Mr.
47:33
Holly himself was quoted in a
47:36
local airport using the words of
47:38
pedophilia and Rape and incest. They
47:40
are also. you know targeting the
47:42
school boards and other state level offices
47:44
other state level offices where you know
47:46
they think that they can mobilize a
47:49
significant number of people to support them
47:51
ennis you know this dovetails their efforts
47:53
on school boards basically dovetail with this
47:56
larger trend that we've seen all across
47:58
the country some whichever party in
48:00
a series of investigative articles here
48:03
in Texas where, you know, large
48:05
funders and outside interests end up
48:07
pairing up with, you know, local
48:09
far-right activists to make fodder of
48:11
books and other things that they
48:14
don't like that they would seek
48:16
to ban, all under the sort
48:18
of rubric of morality or decency,
48:20
regardless of whether the content is
48:22
actually, as defined by
48:25
many legal cases, actually pornography or if it's
48:27
just in their mind is something that they
48:29
don't like. This network of people, it
48:31
spans the country. There
48:33
are probably many more examples on this social
48:35
media app of people who have, you know,
48:37
shown up to school board meetings and made
48:40
a big issue out of books that they
48:42
don't like. You say it spans the country.
48:44
I have absolutely no doubt that's true. But
48:47
I do notice that you keep coming
48:49
back to or we keep coming back
48:52
to whether it's talking about the federal
48:54
offices or school boards or whatever the
48:56
Carolinas seem to be like. Are
48:58
they just fertile ground for this movement or are
49:00
they ground zero? Is this something that
49:02
they're doing purposely or is it a
49:04
coincidence? So, great question. Part of
49:07
it is that Chad Holly and his family
49:09
live in North Carolina. Okay. So,
49:11
they are based there. And that
49:13
consequently is why there
49:15
are so many personal connections amongst
49:17
these various politicians. Several of the
49:19
politicians named in the article also
49:22
were interviewed by Chad and described
49:24
as friends. So, that is
49:26
one main reason why we're seeing so
49:28
many officials in the Carolinas popping up
49:30
on this network. Another one of those
49:33
officials who is not a member of
49:35
the network but has been interviewed
49:37
on the podcast is the North
49:39
Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robison who
49:41
just won the North Carolina Republican
49:43
gubernatorial primary. And he has said
49:45
many, many, many colorful things to
49:47
put it politely. Yeah. Regarding,
49:50
you know, his belief that we should return
49:52
to a time when women couldn't vote or
49:54
that he believes that this is a Judeo-Christian
49:56
country and, you know, Christians must lead and
49:58
be at the forefront of leaving the
50:01
nation. You know, there is definitely a lot
50:03
of activity in this direction in North Carolina,
50:05
but there are also some examples
50:07
of people in other states. There is
50:09
one state house candidate and a current
50:12
county commissioner in Lohman County, Michigan is
50:14
among the politicians that I found on
50:16
this website. Soon, I hope to have
50:19
a more comprehensive view of, you know,
50:21
the distribution of these accounts across the
50:23
country in terms of, you know, where
50:25
the largest concentration of membership is. So,
50:28
you know, I think that's why we're
50:30
seeing so much in North Carolina,
50:32
but I've also found people in
50:34
Dallas. I've also found people in
50:36
California and other states. So exactly
50:38
what the distribution of membership is,
50:40
is something that I hope to
50:43
have more clarity on in the coming days.
50:45
So I have to say, as I was
50:47
reading your article, probably the least surprising thing
50:49
in it was when you got to the
50:52
little graph about how some
50:54
of these folks were there on January 6th.
50:56
And I was like, well, of course they
50:58
were. How big a presence was there? Because
51:00
I know, I think you linked
51:02
to a piece that basically said
51:04
this new apostolic reformation drove the
51:06
January 6th riots. Right. So there
51:08
are several scholars
51:11
and journalists who have
51:13
made, I think, relatively convincing cases
51:15
that the new apostolic reformation and
51:17
things like the Seven Mountains Mandate
51:19
were one of the animating forces
51:22
behind January 6th. And then if you
51:24
look closely at photos and
51:26
at videos, you begin to see
51:28
iconography that is associated with this
51:31
movement, such as the flag that
51:34
the speaker of the house, Mike
51:36
Johnson, hung outside of his office,
51:38
the Appeal to Heaven flag. That
51:40
was something that was clearly visible
51:42
during the January 6th riots. The
51:44
day before, during the Freedom Plaza
51:46
rally, there were speeches
51:48
from luminaries in
51:50
this movement, such as Cheyenne.
51:52
There were people who were
51:55
arrested who had specifically posted
51:57
about the Seven Mountains Mandate.
52:00
And so while I don't think we
52:02
could convincingly argue that the New Apostolic
52:04
Reformation or the Seven Mountains Mandate was
52:06
the thing that caused January 6th, I
52:08
would say that it was one of
52:11
the factors that mobilized people and animated
52:13
the motivations for people to show up
52:15
in the first place, given that so
52:17
many of the leaders in that movement
52:19
have aligned themselves behind Donald Trump. Yeah,
52:21
exactly. And that's, like I said, that's
52:24
why when I got to it, I
52:26
was like, Oh, of course they were.
52:29
It would have been a surprise there. It would have been a surprise
52:31
to me if there hadn't been. Exactly. So
52:33
I kind of got, because of your
52:35
article, I got sucked into the Nexus
52:37
Mountain Network website, and it's just got
52:39
some stuff on there that's just, they
52:41
have this whole section on it's a
52:43
Seven Mountains overview. And so they break
52:46
down these Seven Mountains, religion,
52:48
business, arts and entertainment, family, government,
52:50
education, media. They explain what it
52:52
means to have conquered this, you
52:54
know, each particular mountain. And they
52:56
list examples of people who have
52:58
done so and they give biblical examples and
53:01
modern day examples. Some of these
53:03
were unreal, like under government, they
53:05
have Harriet Tubman, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and
53:08
Ronald Reagan. We all know who
53:10
Harriet Tubman was. We all know who Ronald Reagan
53:12
was. Bonhoeffer was executed
53:14
by the Nazis because he had a
53:16
plot to, he was part of a
53:18
plot to take down Hitler. I'm looking
53:21
at this, I'm going, do you really
53:23
think these people? Yes, if you're going
53:25
to say they conquered the mountain of
53:27
government, but to list these people as
53:29
if they would have approved of what
53:31
you're doing is just, it's so insane.
53:33
But again, it's like, it's not surprising
53:35
at this point. That's what these groups
53:37
do. Right. I don't think it
53:39
is the first time we've seen sort
53:41
of this retroactive claim on particular people.
53:44
I mean, there's the whole practice
53:46
in certain religious sects of retroactive
53:49
baptism, where you basically are baptizing
53:51
dead people against their will because
53:53
they can't consent because they're dead.
53:56
So yeah, I saw that and I found it
53:58
to be truly a wide. for
54:00
them to make those claims. But then on the
54:02
other hand, they would cite people like Candace Owens.
54:05
And while she does not have an
54:07
account on the platform, she's listed as
54:09
one of their influencers. So it appears
54:11
she does have some sort of connection
54:14
to this program, this
54:16
platform. Yeah, the media section
54:18
for that mountain was also
54:20
like, I want to read
54:22
what it says. It says,
54:25
the media mountain Christian prioritizes
54:27
information integrity. They value persuasion,
54:29
communication, presentation, influence, truth, mass
54:31
distribution, and journalism. And then
54:33
it lists as modern day
54:36
examples of this Paul Revere,
54:38
Rush Limbaugh, Kaylee McEnany, and
54:40
Candace Owens. Now three
54:42
of those people are or were inveterate
54:45
liars. And then there
54:47
was Paul Revere. It's my understanding
54:49
that being an inveterate liar usually
54:51
doesn't fit well with quote unquote
54:53
information integrity or valuing truth. That
54:55
does not seem to make sense
54:57
to me either. But the consistency
55:00
of this stuff, I don't I
55:02
don't think we should really expect
55:05
much. I mean, yeah, it's clearly
55:07
a highly ideological platform that aims
55:09
to push a specific agenda. And
55:11
so consequently, you know, we're seeing
55:14
ridiculous things like the attempt to
55:16
pre butt the story was really
55:18
interesting to me. We saw Chad
55:20
Hawley make a post about it.
55:22
He was interviewed on Flashpoint. And
55:25
then Lance Walnau himself posted a
55:27
video. It was so fascinating to
55:29
see Walnau recast the seven mountains
55:31
into what he now says is
55:33
like a description of how the
55:35
left has taken over the country.
55:37
Right. So it
55:39
went from, you know, being a book that
55:41
he published in 2013 targeting Christians
55:45
to motivate them to, you know, take
55:47
over their mountain of influence. To now
55:50
it's somehow a blueprint for how the
55:52
left did that. It's this really interesting
55:54
rhetorical jujitsu where they turn themselves into
55:57
the victim as a way to sort
55:59
of rally the troops around them.
56:01
I don't expect a lot of consistency when
56:03
we see stuff like that. No, not at
56:05
all. But it's still just wild to me
56:07
like under the education mountain as people who
56:10
have conquered the mountains, they list Betsy DeVos
56:12
and Booker T. Washington, two people I always
56:14
think of in the same breath. And
56:19
to be clear, like if you go onto
56:21
the actual platform and you click their influencer
56:23
section, they list Candace Owens. They have a
56:26
whole little thing for her where they link
56:28
to all of her other social media, but
56:30
they don't link to her account on the
56:32
platform because she doesn't even have one. So
56:34
they can't even get their own influencers to
56:37
get on board and be consistent. Unreal.
56:39
Well, Steve, I want to thank you for
56:42
giving me yet another group that should just
56:44
be a little fringe thing that
56:46
we don't really have to worry about.
56:48
But thank you for identifying them as yet
56:50
another one of these that we actually do have
56:52
to worry about because they're gaining influence in politics.
56:55
The piece is great. It's over at daily.com for
56:57
people who want to read the whole thing. Steve
56:59
Monticelli, thank you so much for being here. Always
57:01
a pleasure, Andy. Danielle
57:04
Moody. Andy Levy. Danielle,
57:06
who are you closing out the week
57:08
with for your f*** that guy? Well,
57:11
let me tell you something. If you've
57:13
been following me on social this week,
57:15
it should be very clear who my
57:17
f*** that guy is. So New
57:19
York City has decided to
57:22
roll out something new. Thanks
57:24
to Governor Hochul and
57:26
Mayor Eric Adams, our
57:28
subway systems are now
57:30
flooded with national guardsmen
57:33
and cops with
57:35
AR-15s, a nice folding table
57:37
set up to harass
57:40
the people of New York
57:43
City at various subway stations
57:45
for apparently our safety. So
57:47
Governor Hochul and Mayor Adams,
57:49
their response to what they
57:52
are seeing as growing violence
57:54
and crime isn't about, you
57:56
know, doing what every single
57:59
f***ing report... or
58:01
every single type of advocacy
58:03
group says, which is invest
58:05
in social services, invest in
58:08
education. No, they decide instead
58:10
to balloon police budgets and
58:12
to invest into the militarization
58:15
of New York City. And
58:17
I have to tell
58:19
you that I am fucking outraged. I
58:21
have said it on social a million
58:23
times that I want the ACLU and
58:26
other legal groups to be looking into
58:28
this because if I recall, stop
58:31
and frisk was deemed unconstitutional.
58:33
And I'm just curious as
58:35
to who, whose bags
58:38
are going to quote unquote
58:40
be randomly checked. How many
58:42
black and brown and
58:44
Muslim appearing people are
58:47
going to be subjected to harassment
58:50
on a regular basis by
58:53
a pumped up fucking militarized
58:55
police department. Mayor Adams went
58:58
ahead and cut what? I
59:00
think the budget of the New
59:02
York City Public Education by tens
59:04
of millions of dollars gave additional
59:06
tens of millions of dollars that
59:08
he cut from education, from social
59:10
services, from parks, from the libraries,
59:12
to where his buddies at the
59:14
NYPD. And now has to justify
59:17
what that looks like to give them what
59:19
busy work to throw people up against the
59:21
wall. I'm just so fucking sick. So my
59:23
fuck that guy because I will keep going
59:26
is a double header of
59:29
Kathy Hogle, the governor, and
59:32
Mayor Adams who are going to
59:34
do their best to turn New
59:37
York City into the fucking militarized
59:39
zone that the far right has
59:41
wanted to do for quite some
59:44
time. But these two pseudo Democrats
59:46
are doing the job of the
59:48
right for them. Bravo, bravo. So for
59:50
that reason, fuck those guys. This is
59:53
not good. There's so many things wrong
59:55
with this. Look, I've seen speculation
59:57
because I don't think we know.
1:00:00
know this for a fact, that
1:00:02
what Hochul's doing is a response to
1:00:04
the transit workers union and the MTA,
1:00:07
the Metropolitan Transit Authority, an
1:00:09
MTA worker was recently hurt,
1:00:11
I think stabbed, which is
1:00:14
horrible, obviously. And basically, this
1:00:16
is sort of throwing a
1:00:18
bone to the unions. There's so many
1:00:20
problems here. First of all, I
1:00:22
guess there's some way this doesn't violate
1:00:24
the Fourth Amendment and the right to
1:00:27
be free of unreasonable search and seizure.
1:00:29
I'm not sure what that is. I
1:00:31
don't understand the rule here, but I
1:00:33
ain't a lawyer. So maybe I don't
1:00:35
know what's going on. The bag searching,
1:00:38
I mean, this is political theater. Like
1:00:40
this is even bigger political theater than
1:00:42
a lot of what the TSA does
1:00:44
at airports. When there's crime on the
1:00:46
subway, and by the way, crime is
1:00:49
down in New York City, we have
1:00:51
to keep saying that because our politicians
1:00:53
and our elected officials won't say that
1:00:55
except for the tiny, every once
1:00:57
in a while it benefits them to say that and then they
1:00:59
say it, but then they spend the rest of the time running
1:01:02
on how bad crime is and how they're
1:01:04
going to solve it by throwing more money
1:01:06
at the police, etc. But if you're on
1:01:08
the subway in New York, you're not worried
1:01:10
about what someone has in a bag. Historically,
1:01:13
it's not like people are carrying a bunch
1:01:15
of weapons in a bag onto the subway
1:01:17
and then using them. When violence
1:01:19
happens on the subway, it's usually like
1:01:21
someone gets in a fight, or they've
1:01:23
got a knife on them, whatever. And
1:01:25
again, this stuff is fairly rare. I
1:01:28
don't want to even oversell that. My
1:01:30
only point is they're doing these bag
1:01:32
searches. And again, it is nothing but
1:01:34
theater. And the idea that you're asking
1:01:36
people to give up their constitutional rights
1:01:38
for theater, I know this is the
1:01:40
city of Broadway, but it's not the
1:01:42
same thing. And that just
1:01:44
really, really rankles that they do these things
1:01:47
and they know it won't have any
1:01:49
effect on what they're even claiming it's supposed
1:01:51
to have an effect on. So it just
1:01:54
I hate I hate hate this shit
1:01:56
so much because it's just all again,
1:01:58
it's just it's just performative and it
1:02:00
and it sucks. So yeah, fuck that guy.
1:02:03
So Andy, how are you
1:02:06
closing out this week?
1:02:08
Well, on the
1:02:10
last episode, Danielle, you talked about I'm
1:02:12
not blanking on what state it was.
1:02:15
So Kansas and
1:02:18
a whole bunch of legislation there and
1:02:20
things aimed at basically rolling back worker
1:02:22
protections. Oh, in this case, and in
1:02:24
your case, it was basically saying businesses
1:02:27
don't have to provide a lunch break.
1:02:29
So I'm going to take us down
1:02:31
to Florida because Florida, I think Florida's
1:02:33
attitude is basically they are never going
1:02:36
to be out done. And,
1:02:39
you know, Texas wants to do
1:02:41
something really stupid or Kansas or
1:02:43
Missouri or Nebraska. And
1:02:45
Florida is like, hang on, hang on.
1:02:48
We need to get our names back
1:02:50
on the list at the top. Earlier
1:02:52
this week, the Florida State Senate approved
1:02:55
a bill that would ban
1:02:57
cities and counties in the
1:02:59
state from having requirements
1:03:02
for mandatory water breaks and other
1:03:04
workplace protections against extreme heat. This
1:03:06
is as reported by NBC News.
1:03:09
The Senate voted 2811.
1:03:12
Basically, local governments in Florida
1:03:14
can now not determine workplace
1:03:16
heat standards that might
1:03:18
go beyond those required by federal law.
1:03:20
And as Denise Shower reports at nbcnews.com,
1:03:22
in effect, the bill would strip cities
1:03:25
and counties of the ability to require
1:03:27
water breaks for workers and time to
1:03:29
rest in the shade throughout the day.
1:03:31
Can they tell you any more clearly
1:03:33
that they don't care if you die?
1:03:35
Tell me you love slavery without telling me
1:03:37
you love slavery. I mean, we joke a
1:03:40
lot, particularly in New York, about, you know, people,
1:03:42
old people going to Florida to die. And this
1:03:44
is Florida basically saying, oh, it's not just
1:03:46
old people, you know, send us your young people
1:03:48
to we'll kill them. It's just unreal to me.
1:03:51
And again, Texas passed similar legislation. I
1:03:53
think we talked about it on the show
1:03:56
back in 2023. And again, this is just
1:03:58
Florida saying you can't be us. We
1:04:01
will always be the home of Florida
1:04:03
man. And we will always be the
1:04:05
state that takes it one
1:04:07
level higher or lower, I guess, depending
1:04:10
on how you're looking at it. You
1:04:12
think about all workers in Florida in
1:04:14
a super hot state that by the
1:04:16
way, not for nothing, just had its
1:04:19
hottest year and recorded history in
1:04:22
2023, along with the rest of the planet,
1:04:24
by the way, and the Florida legislature's response
1:04:26
to this is, oh, we
1:04:28
got to take away some water from
1:04:30
workers. Fuck these guys. I mean,
1:04:32
they're just, again, everything
1:04:35
like we need to stop looking at
1:04:38
these policies that are being put
1:04:40
out in silos. Like we see
1:04:43
them and we're just like, okay,
1:04:45
well, oh, look what
1:04:48
Florida did here. Look what Kansas is doing here.
1:04:50
Look at what Alabama is doing. They
1:04:52
are eroding worker
1:04:54
protections. They are
1:04:57
pushing forward with rolling
1:04:59
back child labor laws. They
1:05:02
are creating a climate that
1:05:05
is ripe for authoritarianism, that
1:05:07
is ripe for oppression, with
1:05:09
people having no way to
1:05:12
fight back. And they
1:05:14
are doing it in these states as
1:05:16
testers for what they want to nationalize
1:05:19
if Donald Trump were to become president
1:05:21
again. This is the thing that I
1:05:23
want people to like wake the fuck
1:05:26
up to. That you can't
1:05:28
say to yourself like, oh, well,
1:05:30
at least I'm not in Kansas
1:05:32
or, oh, I would never live
1:05:34
in Florida because if Donald Trump
1:05:36
becomes president again or any Republican
1:05:38
becomes president again, the shit that
1:05:40
they are doing state by state,
1:05:42
taking over the South and bringing
1:05:44
back Jim Crow 2.0 will be
1:05:46
nationalized. Fuck those guys. Hope
1:05:49
you enjoy checking out this episode of the
1:05:51
new abnormal. We're back every Tuesday, Friday and
1:05:53
Sunday. If you enjoyed it, please share
1:05:55
it with a friend and keep the conversation
1:05:57
going. This podcast is a daily beast with
1:06:00
production by Jesse Cannon and
1:06:02
Seamus Calder. For
1:06:30
more information on UnitedHealthcare,
1:06:32
visit unitedhealthcare.com
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More