Podchaser Logo
Home
Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Released Friday, 3rd May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Election special: How bad is it for Tories?

Friday, 3rd May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

This is a global player.

0:04

Original Podcast Was it bad?

0:06

Yeah, it was pretty awful.

0:08

If you're a conservative and

0:10

thinking, do we have any

0:12

chance of winning the next

0:15

General election Yes, there were

0:17

little glimpses of sunlight for

0:19

conservatives in a few places.

0:21

But do they tell us

0:23

anything about the coming general

0:25

election? When surely the narrative

0:27

after last night is that

0:29

Labour seem well on course

0:31

towards victory. Wouldn't be taking you

0:33

through. These. Results and explaining how

0:35

it can be that while these elections,

0:38

like all the we've had over the

0:40

past few years, show us that Labour

0:42

do seem to be on course to

0:44

form the next government, that there is

0:46

a danger that the Tory party not

0:48

only lose, but get wiped out, but

0:51

at the same time it can be

0:53

that there are just a few. Little

0:55

clouds on the horizon for the Labour

0:57

party for political troubles, not just for

1:00

the general election. But. For the politics

1:02

of the next parliament as well. Welcome to

1:04

the news agency. The

1:09

News Agency. Is. John

1:11

is Louis, it's Emily I once upon

1:13

a time you do the aftermath of

1:15

a local council election of Friday Border.

1:17

You'd know everything. It is now Friday

1:19

two o'clock in the afternoon and we

1:22

know something's and there's still a lot

1:24

more to come tomorrow. What we do

1:26

know is that Labour. If. This

1:28

is a benchmark for how well

1:30

they're going to do in a

1:32

general election. Have a lot of

1:34

course to feel satisfied. Although some

1:36

little clouds in the sky which

1:38

will come to for the tories

1:40

it was pretty dismal. And if

1:43

you're rishi soon that you just

1:45

go round say hello. How Jean

1:47

Harlow How Jean Harlow, how should

1:49

because in Hollow in Essex Conservatives

1:51

held on about How Chin the

1:53

Mayor of Teas Valley also one

1:55

on one. Pretty convincingly. I would

1:57

never dream taking. The public I represent

1:59

for granted the inner workings hear me

2:01

out of last few months since a

2:03

very very tiring time am and I'm

2:05

just delighted to see Get over the

2:07

line a real actors and continue to

2:09

represent my my community and keep making

2:11

things better for our local or if

2:13

the next four years. But again the

2:15

question is how much was that down

2:17

to the Conservative party, how much was

2:19

sat down to the individual and how

2:21

to who was almost running independent of

2:23

the Conservative party? I mean when

2:25

Hudson axes. The cops I mean for got

2:28

to where his blu rays access to the

2:30

count of when he was also the he

2:32

was trying to come across as a non

2:34

conservative as he just said oh no I

2:36

just forgot. But I think if

2:38

you're one of the Tory pundits,

2:40

commentators, and peas doing the rounds

2:43

today, then you are trying to

2:45

make a census of the public

2:47

as narrow as you possibly can.

2:49

So it is Just as he

2:51

said. John on what happened in

2:53

that Tease Valley Merrill Seats On:

2:55

Whenever somebody talks about the council's

2:57

they've lost the seats they've lost

2:59

We don't know the full time

3:01

yet. Because. We've only had between a

3:04

certain half of them three, so. Far

3:06

that they just want to point to

3:08

this talismanic when or rather a hold

3:10

of. Been out since two games and

3:13

two percent of the vote last time

3:15

round has gone down this time around

3:17

but actually still managed to make more

3:19

than the first time and in a

3:22

perfect conservative world they just say. Of

3:24

stop took him so everything. Else just

3:26

look at Ben these done brilliantly to

3:28

stop talking about what the other stuff

3:30

and really trying to keep your attention.

3:32

on that one when of the night

3:35

yeah we should i think first maybe

3:37

about the council elections as we were

3:39

saying earlier in the week before he

3:41

gets the merrill's is in many many

3:43

ways for sorts of reasons we can

3:45

discuss the council election results on indeed

3:47

the by election result in blackpool south

3:49

which i think we're there is a

3:52

danger of overlooking all more indicative probably

3:54

of where we're heading for the general

3:56

election which is ultimately why most people

3:58

are particularly interested in these election results.

4:00

And what is interesting about

4:02

these results in particular, I think the ones

4:05

that we have so far sat down at

4:07

two o'clock on Friday afternoon, is that they

4:09

are definitely at the lower end of expectations

4:12

for the Conservative Party. They're basically losing on

4:14

average about 50% of the seats that they're

4:16

standing in, of a thousand or so that

4:18

they were up for in this election cycle.

4:21

And in particular, Labour are doing very

4:23

well, and this is something that I

4:25

know from conversations with Labour sources they

4:28

are very pleased about. They are doing

4:30

well in exactly the sort of places that they

4:32

need to win in a general election. Just before

4:34

we came and sat down, news

4:36

came in from Swindon, for example. Absolutely two

4:38

classic kind of bellwether seats in Swindon, exactly

4:40

the sort of seats you need to win

4:42

if you're going to get a majority for

4:44

either Conservatives or Labour. They've now got their

4:46

biggest majority on that council since the 1990s.

4:50

They're doing well overnight. They won the

4:52

Redditch council, again, similar sort of thing.

4:54

Their vote is proving to be very

4:56

efficiently distributed, and what they think that

4:58

where they are putting resources in particular,

5:01

Milton Keynes just come in as I'm

5:03

sat here now, they think that where

5:05

they are putting in resources and the

5:07

get out the vote operation is proving

5:09

particularly successful. These are absolutely central questions

5:11

for a general election outcome. The other

5:13

thing that I thought was interesting about

5:15

overnight, on this podcast, you may

5:17

have heard us at times talking about our

5:19

heroic figure since we launched the podcast who

5:21

we put on Mount Rushmore, you know, the

5:24

sort of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss, because

5:26

they're always so good for business. What we've

5:28

never talked about on this podcast is

5:30

Rushmore council and Rushmore borough

5:32

council, which takes in Farnborough

5:35

and Aldershot in Hampshire,

5:37

also Turning Labour, which

5:40

is one of those places that, you

5:42

know, I kind of started my career.

5:44

I worked in Hampshire. I Mean, you'd

5:46

have never said Labour, Aldershot or Labour,

5:48

Farnborough. That again is showing that they

5:51

are making gains across the country. Add

5:53

into that Norwich, Hartley pool, yeah, Thurrock,

5:55

all places that they need to make

5:57

advances in a general election. What

6:00

other striking thing that I've just

6:02

seen is that you now have

6:04

a situation. The alternate songs in

6:06

the Big City So let's say

6:08

Sheffield joined Liverpool and Manchester in

6:10

having not a single to be

6:12

counselor on them at all So

6:14

there's almost becomes no go zones

6:16

for the Conservative party. When we

6:18

were talking in the week to

6:20

Luke Trills or Pulsar from More

6:22

in Common he was saying watch

6:24

what happens in the East Midlands.

6:27

Because this is a brand new Merrill Seats

6:29

in other words, doesn't have an incumbent, doesn't

6:31

have a person? Of So Sing and

6:33

he thought this would be a pussy

6:35

Chrissy! Cool place for us to keep

6:38

an eye on and sure enough in

6:40

the last few minutes as just been

6:42

called. For labour, Claire would has

6:44

one that over Ben Bradlee. A

6:46

why this is so interesting is

6:48

a it doesn't have the big

6:50

personalities that we were talking about.

6:52

Another Merrill tease: The Police's like

6:55

the West Midlands with empty. Streets

6:57

open house, and in his

6:59

family, we don't really know

7:01

what this will look like

7:03

in a sort of personality

7:05

shapes Mayoralty. But the other

7:07

reason is that it covers

7:09

a twelve parliamentary would area.

7:11

In other words, there are.

7:14

Critical seats. In

7:16

this part of the world

7:18

that labour will now start

7:20

feeling pretty upbeat. About

7:22

because it suggests. If

7:24

there is a feeling let's say a

7:26

feeling in the water that Labour is

7:29

preferred over the Conservatives and they don't

7:31

particularly know either Canada as their math

7:33

the for now than they will start

7:36

thinking that this is a good basis

7:38

on which to stop building seats. And

7:40

as he said, you know when you're

7:43

looking the difference between somewhere like. Surratt

7:45

and Rushmore Summer like Reddit

7:47

and Richmond. He was seeing

7:49

completely different, not just geographically

7:52

different, but sort of demographically

7:54

different made up places. And

7:56

I think that's where labour

7:58

will take some. From tonight

8:00

he annual seeing the in that exact way

8:02

you're seeing the Twenty Nineteen Coalition and even

8:05

the Twenty Twenty One Coalition where the consensus

8:07

did very well when the seats were less

8:09

formed. Basically for the way a both ends

8:11

and as part of that picture we should

8:13

just talk little bit about Blackpool South because

8:16

of assessing to that. But zombie gets a

8:18

Saturday. you might be listening to this. it

8:20

will be probably forgotten, but it ought not

8:22

to be forgotten. not least because minutes. A

8:24

striking result in of itself was a conservative

8:26

Sea Salt Benson forced to resign because of

8:29

a corruption scandal. And it can

8:31

Conservative and twenty nine seen. There was

8:33

a sous twenty six percent swing to

8:35

Labour. That is the third biggest swing

8:37

to Labour from the Conservative in history,

8:39

and we've become quite a customs to

8:41

these big big swings now away from

8:43

the Conservatives, but because this parliament has

8:45

had tantalizingly in such a fun way.

8:48

so my daughter elections in great fun

8:50

for all of us who were, that's

8:52

where we got a cakes a pot

8:54

is result recall petitions if you take

8:56

the long sweep of those by elections

8:58

basically from Twenty Twenty one. Twenty Two,

9:00

You see a pattern that is not

9:03

a basis which is sued Swings away

9:05

from the Conservatives under both Boris Johnson.

9:07

And then Rishi soon. Actually, costs didn't have

9:10

any because as we know from there was

9:12

only September October. Really time for any of

9:14

that. But you know, initially to the Liberal

9:16

Democrats seats like chess from an Amish Him

9:18

Northrop said Civets in on us. It's huge

9:20

swings of, you know, twenty five, thirty percent

9:22

and then latterly to the Labour party. Cel

9:24

be an angsty twenty three percent, mid beds,

9:26

twenty percent, Tamworth, twenty four percent, and latterly

9:28

Welling Breath are now Blackpool as well. There

9:30

was no sign. I mean, really seem like

9:32

is fond of saying governments I get a

9:34

kick in the mid term. This is mid

9:36

term in the sense. That like late November

9:39

is middle of the year right? It's

9:41

not. This is towards the very sad

9:43

guys that as of this parliament and

9:45

if there is no sign and these

9:47

by elections have at least a trend

9:49

starting to close it's just catastrophic curtains

9:51

for the conservative both. Yeah and what

9:54

I think is interesting about that is

9:56

the effect it has in Westminster because

9:58

of how to has one. Well

10:00

done, fine. How can you more

10:02

popular? As Emily's pointed out, very

10:04

conspicuous standing on that stage. When

10:06

the Labour guys go is Red

10:08

Rosetta. The Liberal Democrat has the

10:10

orange rosetta a bad house and

10:13

as know Rosetta, you know he

10:15

run independent of the Conservative party.

10:17

just as as the streets has

10:19

done in the West Midlands surely

10:21

tories and come away sick while

10:23

look we held Tease Valley. Everything's

10:25

fine for the election. Surely Tories

10:27

go back to Westminster. The end of is

10:29

A. It's every bit as bad as we

10:31

thought it was. His has an

10:33

interesting point that the tests for

10:35

the last few months we've been

10:37

holding out this weekend. This says

10:39

of elections as the moment when

10:42

his things get really badly. They

10:44

see rebels. Might become slightly greater

10:46

number and decide that there is still

10:48

one more chance to depose. Rishi. Scenic

10:50

and. I guess if you want

10:52

that in numbers terms, anywhere up

10:54

to. A. Loss: As I guess above

10:57

five hundred seats are the conservative

10:59

starts to look notice really bad.

11:01

that's more than half that. Pretty

11:03

catastrophic. And I've been sort

11:05

of trying to get a sense

11:07

of Mps. Who are reading the

11:09

room a little bit and asking

11:11

how they are ceiling this sort

11:13

of growing body of rebellion and

11:15

quite interesting. The first thing I

11:18

was told was that they were

11:20

Mississippi. This is not like it's

11:22

all going fine but they said

11:24

the test so they're sizes to

11:26

stay calm and message rather than

11:28

case the nuclear option or there's

11:30

some will try. And they

11:32

said that they will. Probably be a

11:35

reshuffle issue cause and that maybe

11:37

the Police and Crime Commissioner results

11:39

will offer more helpful intelligence? Is

11:42

there a bit more distance? That

11:44

the other person. I. Spoke to tell me one thing

11:46

that I think will be quite critical going

11:48

forward to it says that. The

11:51

M P's won't be meeting. again until tuesday

11:53

and on tuesday there is only

11:55

a one line whip in other

11:57

words a three line whip is

11:59

when have to be there. You have

12:01

to be in the Commons, you have to be

12:03

in Westminster. A one-line means essentially, you

12:06

can stay at home if you want. So

12:08

I think in sort of like in COVID

12:10

terms, Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, is actually

12:13

slightly saying, hands face space, you know,

12:15

stay at home, save the PM.

12:17

The last thing we want is all the

12:19

MPs gathering in one place to talk to

12:21

each other. It's a bit what we

12:23

saw for the Rwanda vote just before

12:25

Easter, but they basically want to keep

12:27

people far away for a bit longer

12:29

to stop any sense of a rebellion

12:31

fermenting. Yeah, I just think the idea

12:34

of keep calm and carry on is

12:36

such an interesting one, because of course,

12:38

it sounds stoical. It just says we

12:40

mustn't lose our heads when all around

12:42

are losing theirs, etc, etc, etc. Yet,

12:44

surely, the rational response is to lose

12:46

your head, given, you know, it's

12:48

you're saying it's November, and people

12:50

saying that's the middle of the year. No,

12:53

it's two minutes to do them though. It's two

12:55

minutes to doomsday. And just to keep calm and

12:57

say, no, everything is going fine. We're just the

12:59

25 points behind in the

13:01

polls. Everything is going exactly to plan.

13:04

Looks like it's complacent. But equally to

13:06

defenestrate another Conservative Party leader also looks

13:09

like it's total lunacy. Well, maybe let's

13:11

listen to Rishi Sunak, who obviously had

13:13

to respond today to what has been,

13:15

you know, a deeply disappointing night in

13:18

terms of counselors, at least is what

13:20

he said. Obviously, it's disappointing to lose

13:22

good, hardworking Conservative counselors, and I'm grateful

13:24

to them for all their service in

13:26

local government, keeping council tax low and

13:28

delivering services for local people. But we

13:30

still got lots of results to come

13:32

as well, just for example, and there

13:34

are also things that I would point

13:36

to. If we're thinking about Sunak's position,

13:39

we've been saying all year, basically, that

13:41

these local elections were a point of

13:43

maximum political peril for him, that

13:45

if there were to be a challenge, surely

13:47

it would come around now. What is striking,

13:50

despite the fact that these two things are true

13:52

at once, despite the fact that these results are

13:54

bad for the Conservative Party, they are objectively very

13:56

bad, and they support all of the rest of

13:58

the evidence that we've had. from all the

14:00

other elections that we've had that the Conservative Party has

14:03

been a substantial swing to Labour since 2019 and

14:05

Labour one way or another at the very

14:07

least on their way to be the biggest

14:10

party. Despite all of that, Sounak, as things

14:12

stand, looks safer now than we might have

14:14

thought that he would. It looks like that

14:16

challenge, which rebels have been trying to orchestrate,

14:18

is disappearing. And the reason for that, we're

14:20

often fed in the show and I think

14:23

there's some truth to it, that Rishi Sounak

14:25

and number 10 are bad at politics. But you know

14:27

what, to give some credit about this, they've played the

14:30

politics around expectation management for

14:32

these elections in a

14:34

blinding fashion, beautifully. Because what they've done is they've

14:36

channeled it all towards these merities. They say, if

14:38

we win these, this is fine, just look at

14:41

that. And to be honest, most of the media

14:43

has accepted it. And so we're in a position

14:45

now where, partly as well, because I think most

14:47

Tory MPs do recognise that they get rid of

14:49

him again without anyone having a particularly alternative prospectus,

14:52

would be a bad move. But they've played it

14:54

pretty well. I think that slightly

14:56

flutters, number 10. I think it's partly

14:58

that the rebels don't really, as you

15:00

say, have any focal figure to sort

15:02

of rebel around. But I think

15:04

if you listen to the MPs on

15:07

the sort of doing the rounds this morning,

15:09

the conservatives, the message that

15:11

seems to be coming through is give

15:13

us time, give us time. You know, we

15:15

are turning things around. We are just starting.

15:18

We have just got the legislation through. You

15:20

are going to feel inflation coming down. Rwanda

15:22

is going to take off. The underlying message

15:24

is give us time. So if anything, I

15:27

would expect that election to be

15:29

pushed back till, I'm going to

15:32

say, December at this point, because

15:34

I think if they can try and convince people

15:36

that the wins are there, that nobody's in love

15:39

with Labour, that, you know, it's not that Labour

15:41

has won your hearts, it's just that you're a

15:43

bit cross with us, give us

15:45

time will be the phrase, and it might

15:47

push the election back another six months. But

15:50

there's one other factor which is buttressing, or buttress, Sunak, and

15:52

make him slightly safer than he might, we might have thought

15:54

he could have been. And that is

15:56

again going back to Blackpool, which is reform. votes

16:00

or so of knocking the Conservative party into third

16:02

place. It's only a hundred votes,

16:04

what does it matter? Psychologically in politics things matter.

16:06

If they'd overcome that, it would have had an

16:08

extra effect. And there's a lot of

16:10

talk, particularly on Twitter or last winter, Friday morning,

16:13

about how well reform are doing in some of

16:15

these council results, particularly in places like Sunderland. And

16:17

there's been a bit of that. The truth is

16:19

what we can see from these results so far

16:21

is reform are generally scoring about six to seven

16:23

percent of the vote versus the sort of 15

16:25

percent of the vote they're getting in the polls.

16:27

So on one level, that's bad for the Conservatives

16:29

because even if they get six to seven percent

16:32

of the vote, the general election, it could cost

16:34

them a slew of seats in Conservative seats

16:36

with now majorities they have against Labour. But

16:38

at the same time, the fact they've not

16:40

done substantially better kind of UKIP type performance

16:42

that you might have seen in the mid 2010s

16:44

at least allays some of the problems around

16:46

soon up. Because if they'd done spectacularly well

16:48

in these elections, and it's hard for them to

16:50

break through in first pass the post, but

16:52

if they'd done better still, it would have enhanced

16:55

those voices on the right of the Conservative Party,

16:57

saying we need a substantial move to the

16:59

right. Well, let's listen now to Richard Tice, the

17:01

leader of the Reform Party. What's rapidly becoming

17:03

clear is basically, as more people

17:05

hear us about reform, we're becoming

17:07

the real opposition to the Labour

17:10

Party in the north, in the

17:12

Midlands, in Wales. We're

17:14

on the way up and it's quite clear

17:16

that the Tories are on the way down.

17:19

Well, if you say you're becoming the real

17:21

opposition to the Labour Party in some areas,

17:23

isn't the electoral truth that if people vote

17:25

reform, they take votes away from the Conservatives

17:27

and they get Labour. So vote reform, get

17:30

Labour. The more people who vote reform, then

17:32

the more reform we've got the opportunity to

17:34

get. There's no difference between the main two

17:36

parties. The variants of socialism, the highest taxes

17:38

for 70 years, the highest government spending for

17:41

seven years, 70 years, the worst public sector

17:43

outcomes, the lowest growth per

17:45

decade for 70 years, and the

17:47

longest per person recession we're currently

17:49

in, it's two years long. That's

17:51

the longest per person recession for

17:53

70 years. This is

17:55

an economic catastrophe and Labour

17:57

Party's plans Will not

17:59

achieve. any economic growth whatsoever. We had

18:02

nothing on that. We've got a bold

18:04

plan to make what pay. We got

18:06

an ambitious plan to get zero waiting

18:08

lists on healthcare, which is absolutely essential.

18:11

So there's so many areas at all

18:13

British lives that frankly need fundamental reform,

18:15

and that's what we stand for. Wichita

18:17

Isis whistle messy. Those of other

18:20

old sauce and assumption here that

18:22

Reform doesn't. Want to damage the

18:24

conservatives? The only wants. To damage

18:26

labor. That is ridiculous because if

18:28

you look at who. Reform is

18:30

comprised of it's people who have

18:32

quite frankly less the conservative party

18:34

or less the conservative party behind

18:37

Cat does lightly and since he

18:39

got thrown out still. Has his

18:41

anything a sort of a personal

18:43

vitriol? Towards the party that's click the

18:45

mouse that's a light is is their vote

18:47

has the conservatives but I think the real

18:50

question at sea for a form is when

18:52

the pool Costas and. Scenes of us

18:54

start asking them questions, not just about

18:56

he's gonna stand, not just that he's

18:58

gonna lead their parties that six sleep,

19:00

What their policies, Are but as we

19:02

know very, very little about. What the actual

19:05

policies? All and com the general elections. I think

19:07

we do need to into a. Say that

19:09

slightly more firmly. Yeah, Another thing to

19:11

say about the form of maybe not

19:13

having done as well as perhaps they

19:15

had hoped is that the game changer

19:17

would be of course or potentially would

19:19

be if Nigel Farage says Ahmed I'm

19:21

going to lead the party hinting at

19:23

when we is had to your gets

19:25

face an endless tantalize isn't it is

19:27

endless kind of means of getting publicity

19:29

with are actually necessarily getting your hands

19:31

dirty in the process. But we have

19:33

talked about. Read on this podcast how

19:35

you have got married in various places

19:37

around the country. The. A much

19:39

more popular than that parties

19:41

and you just wonder whether

19:44

actually far as reentering the

19:46

phrase in a central role

19:48

might do it. For. Reform

19:50

will be back. Also the boat. This

20:00

is the news agency. right?

20:05

So we have covered. In

20:07

a way what went really well for labour

20:09

overnight and as as we said we should

20:11

on the school that lots of things did

20:14

go well. There was some problems I've and

20:16

we refer to become an already which is

20:18

the marathon says honesty that Los T the

20:20

Valley Manhattan resounding superstore victory for him and

20:23

winning an absolute majority fifty three percent of

20:25

the vote. I'm not been speaking see Labor

20:27

sources in the West Midlands all morning who

20:30

are pretty pessimistic about the West Midlands mental

20:32

contests and the streets and which had Parker

20:34

We can get some of the reasons for

20:36

that. And they're all individual

20:38

councils across the country. Places

20:40

like Oldham. Blackbirds, etc and

20:43

some of the big cities well where

20:45

you can sought to see a significant

20:47

patrician of the Labour vote in particular

20:50

in areas with large Muslim populations. and

20:52

indeed is this Birmingham Labor source

20:54

put it to me if we lose

20:56

in the West Midlands it is lousy

20:59

gonna be was parties is going mean

21:01

streets, personal popularity but and seek effects

21:03

at will be around the Gaza war

21:06

and labor and in particular case

21:08

Thelma's initial reaction to the Gaza war

21:10

which is suppressing the Muslim. Votes

21:12

in seats and areas which have

21:14

large muslim population. Yeah. And

21:16

that is something that yeah, We

21:19

talked about the after the Rochdale

21:21

by election when George Galloway one

21:23

his sort of famous victory and

21:25

was on the rampage. It seemed

21:27

about how Labour had been let

21:29

the Muslim population down in this

21:31

country. The question, I guess is,

21:33

how much does that translate into

21:35

a general election? How many parliamentary

21:37

seats are vulnerable. For labour,

21:39

Because of that sizable Muslim population

21:41

a massive think of probably half

21:43

a dozen A dozen. and so

21:46

I don't know whether how much

21:48

of a problem or how much

21:50

that should concern Kiss Salma. I

21:52

mean, It was concerning a

21:54

bit and the situation in Gaza is

21:56

not doing him any favors. The to

21:58

whereas it doesn't see. to be hurting the

22:01

Conservative Party at all. Well, there

22:03

are several key Shadow Cabinet ministers. Shabbat and Mahmoud

22:05

is one where Streeting is another. There are others

22:07

as well who have constituencies with big Muslim populations.

22:10

And there is doubtless concern within the Labour Party

22:12

about the effect that the Gaza War is having

22:14

in terms of an attrition on the Labour vote,

22:16

and not just for this general election, but in

22:18

the future as well. I mean, you're right, John,

22:21

there aren't that many seats where it could be

22:23

absolutely crucial in the general election. And the fact

22:25

of the matter is, as well, right now, the

22:27

size of the Labour lead overall is so massive

22:29

that it doesn't matter that much, because you're basically

22:32

getting compensating factors from other bits of the population.

22:34

But there are those around Gistama, and there are

22:36

those within the Labour Party who are saying, you

22:38

know, in a sort of post-general election situation, if

22:40

we haven't done something to try and recover, you

22:42

know, the Muslim vote is a big part of

22:44

the Labour coalition. It's not just Muslims as well,

22:46

we should say, as other people who are concerned

22:49

about the Gaza War and are unhappy with the

22:51

Labour Party's reaction to it, you can see the

22:53

kind of seeds being sown for

22:55

a politics of discontent with the Labour government that

22:57

could become a problem, if not now for the

22:59

general election, because the overall poll lead is so

23:01

big, then in the future. Yeah, there

23:03

was real pushback, actually, from one

23:05

Labour source who was reported

23:07

to say, if we lose the West Midlands,

23:09

it will be the Middle East, not the

23:11

West Midlands. And that was deemed to be,

23:13

you know, sort of a racist assumption that

23:16

everyone living around the Birmingham area was

23:18

more interested in Gaza than what was

23:20

happening on their streets. But I think

23:22

when you actually look at the breakdown

23:24

and the places where there

23:26

are highest Muslim populations, you

23:28

are seeing that Labour vote heard. It is down

23:30

16 percent. The Greens are picking

23:33

up 14 percent, which suggests

23:35

that maybe people are going to

23:37

the Greens this time round in

23:39

those sorts of places, but for a

23:41

protest vote, you know, simply because they

23:44

don't like what is happening within

23:47

the Labour Party on that one issue.

23:49

Now, the curious thing is that Labour's

23:51

not really fighting this. They're saying, yeah,

23:53

we know we have to win back

23:56

trust amongst our left, essentially. And that

23:58

is, I suppose, what's really interesting. about

24:00

Kistama's whole philosophy over the last

24:02

six months, maybe year, it's all

24:04

been about wrapping yourself in the

24:07

flag, talking about patriotism, not scaring

24:09

the horses, not talking about spending

24:11

money too much, not going really

24:14

hard on big green issues. Maybe

24:16

he has forgot his left flank and

24:18

that is going to be more evident

24:20

in the months ahead. And I think

24:23

what's interesting is that you now hear

24:25

the sort of, you know, the Labour

24:27

Fund, it's coming out and saying, just

24:30

to remind you, we did vote for a

24:32

ceasefire, just to remind you, and they will

24:34

give you the entire wording of that ceasefire

24:36

motion that was in the Commons last month,

24:39

because they think that they have gone as

24:41

far as they could go. They think they've

24:43

gone pretty much to where George Galloway would

24:45

go, but nobody's heard it. Nobody has actually

24:48

heard that change. And so they're kind of

24:50

thinking, is this a comms problem? Or is

24:52

it just people kind of like Galloway trying

24:54

to make political capital after the fact that

24:57

they were a bit late? But then again,

24:59

in terms of the kind of split between mayors

25:01

who are being reelected and those who haven't, I

25:03

mean, as we're sat here, we find

25:05

out that Labour has won North York,

25:07

the new North Yorkshire mayoralty, which includes quite literally

25:09

whose constituency? I believe it is an occupant of

25:11

number 10 Downing Street, John. Yeah. And you know,

25:14

at the start of this campaign, I think a

25:16

lot of people would have thought that would be

25:18

a long shot for the Labour Party. And this

25:20

is one of the really interesting things about these

25:22

mayoralties, right? As we've touched on already with the

25:24

East Midlands, it looks like, and maybe

25:26

we can touch on London at the end, because

25:28

there are some pretty fetid rumors going on around

25:30

London. But it looks like probably

25:33

that every incumbent

25:35

mayor who was standing for re-election

25:38

is going to get reelected, that they will

25:40

win again. In places where there are no

25:42

incumbents, you're seeing the pattern being more typical

25:44

to the national poll. And there is something

25:47

I think about the kind of institutions, the

25:49

institutions of these mayoralties, it's interesting, that

25:52

they become so synonymous with their areas. They

25:54

do become Mr or Mrs, you know, like

25:56

North Yorkshire or Manchester or Liverpool or

25:58

London or wherever. wherever it happens to be,

26:01

West Midlands. They become so synonymous with the politics

26:03

and just kind of regional identity

26:05

of their area that they do, as

26:07

George Osborne wanted to do when he

26:09

created them, they kind of end up

26:11

transcending party lines and they do get

26:13

a big, big incumbency factor in a

26:15

way that other politicians, particularly MPs, simply

26:17

don't. It'll be really interesting to see

26:20

when we get all the results tomorrow if

26:22

every incumbent mayor has won

26:24

their race and that you've got no change

26:27

whatsoever and yet you've got this febrile atmosphere

26:29

in politics in Britain, across Europe, where no

26:31

government can win re-election. More like the US

26:33

actually, we're starting to develop that flick ticket

26:35

type voting that we never really had before.

26:37

We've never had that before in British politics

26:40

but you love your mayor, he seems to

26:42

be a good guy, he blames it on

26:44

the government, he's banging the drum for you

26:46

and it's great for charismatic political figures to

26:48

be out there doing their stuff and

26:51

you can see that the incumbency

26:53

factor is really strong whereas

26:55

in general elections you could have

26:57

the most fantastic constituency MP but

26:59

if the tide is running against

27:01

your party, it's not going to

27:03

say. Not enough people know that.

27:05

And also, I mean, you could put one of the

27:07

slightly less charitable interpretations as well is that you could

27:09

say as well like actually these mayors, particularly outside London,

27:12

at the moment they've got a lot of authority, they've

27:14

got a lot of influence, they've got a lot of

27:16

profile, they don't actually have that much power. They can't

27:19

actually be directly blamed for that much, right, in a

27:21

way that the council can MP to some extent, certainly

27:23

the government. They want more power by the way so

27:25

it's not like they're happy with this but it does

27:27

mean that they kind of get a lot of the

27:30

benefits of the notoriety without some of the traditional drawbacks

27:32

of incumbency. I suppose the one thing we haven't spoken

27:35

about that much yet on this podcast is

27:37

the Liberal Democrats and normally on kind of

27:39

local council election nights you talk endlessly about

27:41

the Liberal Democrats because of the sweeping gains

27:43

that they've made in all these councils. Normally

27:46

Ed Davey would have turned up somewhere smashing a massive

27:48

blue wall down with a comedy mallet. Exactly

27:50

and that hasn't happened and I

27:53

wonder whether that is an underperformance

27:55

of the Liberal Democrats or whether

27:57

it's just that. Democrats

28:00

are going to do really well haven't

28:02

declared yet. I think it is that well I

28:04

should just say that we're recording this at 2.30 this

28:06

afternoon. It's always hard to try and find the right

28:08

sort of zone where you're not too late and

28:10

you're not too early because this is as

28:13

I think we said a three-day affair at least.

28:15

It's basically like a big fancy royal

28:17

wedding and at any one point

28:19

in time you can find a very different narrative

28:21

but I think we are going to hear more

28:23

from the Greens and more from the Lib

28:25

Dems the later it gets this afternoon. Greens

28:27

have had generally very good local election results

28:29

over multiple cycles now and you can see

28:31

them they're going to do the same this

28:33

time and the Lib Dems look they think

28:35

if you talk to them internally they think

28:37

that again where it matters come the general

28:40

election when you've got efficient tactical

28:42

voting that they'll be able

28:44

to score you know 20-30 seats. I

28:46

mean who knows there is a general concern for Lib

28:48

Dems and this is more for the general election than

28:51

the locals probably. The damage the post office scandal did

28:53

with their Devi and the fact he ended up being

28:55

associated with it at that time a failure or unfairly

28:57

or whatever but there is a sort of I was

28:59

talking to a Labour person not long ago about this

29:01

they they were saying they thought that

29:04

the Lib Dems would be a bigger factor in

29:06

their calculations right now than they might have been

29:08

and they don't feel they are maybe that'll change

29:10

between now and the general election but they've sort

29:12

of slightly gone into the background. The

29:28

other thing we haven't spoken about yet

29:30

is a result which comes tomorrow Saturday

29:32

which is the result of who is

29:35

going to be Mayor of London and

29:37

of course that is the most powerful

29:39

directly elected person in

29:41

Britain because actually Sadiq Khan does

29:43

have some biggest mandate in Europe.

29:45

Yeah and and Sadiq Khan does

29:48

have real powers and I

29:50

think that there was an assumption in London that

29:53

Sadiq Khan was going to accrue this. Susan Hall

29:55

was a kind of you know kind of pretty

29:58

cranky kind of odd candidate. to

30:00

have for the Conservatives. And

30:02

yet last night I was picking up all

30:04

sorts of people in a state of some

30:06

panic on the Labour side thinking we may

30:08

not have this, we don't know. And

30:11

a real fear and terror going round

30:13

that Sadiq Khan could lose. It

30:16

would be astounding if Khan lost. I mean

30:18

I was talking to a Conservative London person

30:21

today and they didn't think it was going

30:23

to happen. They did think that, and did

30:25

point out which is true, it is actually

30:27

quite hard to poll London for different reasons.

30:30

It's such a complex diverse place and so

30:32

big and so electrically complicated that you can, the

30:34

way things have to be really precise and so

30:36

on. But it would basically, if Susan Hall won

30:38

despite the fact that her campaign was pretty threadbare,

30:41

threadbare, got very little support from CCHQ, it would

30:43

represent one of the biggest

30:45

polling errors in British political history. There will

30:47

be, I think, you know, this person was

30:49

also saying which I think is true, is

30:52

that it is true to say that for all sorts

30:54

of reasons Khan was a frail candidate. He was looking

30:56

for a third term, it hasn't happened before. There was

30:58

ULAERS, you can say it's politically courageous, whatever, but it

31:01

was clearly very unpopular in outer London boroughs. There is

31:03

the Gaza issue, maybe a little bit less pronounced because

31:05

he said Sadiq Khan and it would be in the

31:07

Midlands, but that's there as well. So if they had

31:09

run a better candidate and it's close to the Tories

31:11

that is and it is closer than people assumed, there

31:14

will be a bit of an inquest within CCHQ saying

31:16

we could have won this and imagine how much it

31:18

would shake the Labour Party if they

31:20

had beaten Sadiq Khan. Well, if

31:22

Sadiq Khan does lose and

31:25

Susan Hall is the next

31:27

Mayor of London, I think we

31:29

three will be together again tomorrow

31:31

for an unscheduled podcast. Such will

31:33

be the political upheaval of that

31:35

electoral move. We love to keep

31:38

you guessing because we know there's

31:40

nothing genuinely that you appreciate

31:42

more than an emergency podcast,

31:45

as indeed we all do. And talking

31:47

about emergencies, one of the strangest

31:50

exchanges of, I'm going to say the night, but

31:52

it was in fact the morning, was

31:54

between Joe Coburn of the BBC

31:57

and Andrea Ledson over that Tory

31:59

success. of Ben Houchin and I'm

32:01

going to say something I wasn't expecting to which

32:03

is that the Tories, senior

32:05

Tories are starting to sound just

32:08

genuinely hurt by the electorate. I

32:10

mean hurt in a very emotional

32:13

sort of time to go to

32:15

bed way. Just listen to

32:17

Andrea unable to take Jo who

32:19

is just literally giving her the

32:22

results of her word. This win

32:24

is down to his personal popularity,

32:26

Andrea. That must be worried. I

32:29

think that whole little bit

32:31

of discussion is absolutely pathetic

32:33

from the BBC. What is a superb all... You

32:36

and Vicky. No, but no one needs to cry. That

32:38

is pathetic. He's won. And all your fans have had

32:41

this big swing away from him. No, I'm sorry. No,

32:43

I am in sickness. No one is taking away from

32:45

Ben Houchin. You are, yes. Harry's

32:47

just tried to suggest that a three

32:49

billion bungs from the Treasury. He sure

32:51

he has. This is all credit to

32:53

a mayor who's done an absolutely brilliant

32:56

job in a key part of the

32:58

levelling up agenda for this government. You

33:00

are feeling under pressure. This is an

33:02

absolute testament for the conservative government and

33:04

the levelling up agenda that have

33:06

backed Ben Houchin. And it is an

33:08

absolute testament to him as a good

33:11

conservative, his focus on his area, his

33:13

support for his communities in negotiating to

33:15

win, to apply for the funding that

33:18

is available for the levelling up program.

33:20

You've made your speech, but actually we

33:22

can show exactly why it's not down

33:24

necessarily to the conservative government. If

33:27

you can't lose your shit on election night, when

33:29

can you? For God's sake. And let's be honest,

33:31

we've all done it. We

33:34

may or may not be back tomorrow. Bye bye.

33:36

Bye bye. Bye for now. The

33:38

News Agents with Emily Maitless, John

33:41

Sopell and Lewis Goodall.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features