Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:08
Everybody welcome to. The. Know if those two
0:10
point guess for the week a Valentine's
0:12
Day. New. On T Twenty
0:14
four not or Valentine's Day, we're going to
0:16
be talking about everyone's favorite love story: This
0:18
your Superbowl and the Superbowl commercials that went
0:20
with it. The. Cia marketing campaign
0:23
that brought to Us. We're.
0:26
Going to be talking about he can we
0:28
were to adding a new casting Academy award
0:30
which is. Really? Awesome and I
0:32
can't believe it's taken the song. And. We're
0:34
going to fall that up with a
0:36
limited news about the most anticipated new
0:39
camera of the year. We've been waiting
0:41
a long time on this one and
0:43
footage is finally out. You. Have to
0:45
wait till we get there for me to say what it is.
0:47
But. Most you nerds probably already know.
0:50
It's the camera. We've all been waiting the longest
0:52
on. That. Is this week on
0:54
the Know Film School podcasts. Okay,
1:05
First. Up. The. Love Story
1:07
of the Year Travis Calcium Taylor
1:09
Swift's like know rom com can
1:11
match it and. As. Many on
1:14
the internet are convinced it's an elaborate
1:16
Cm viral marketing scheme for the Superbowl
1:18
and they stuck the landing. The.
1:20
Ending works. The. Boyfriend in
1:22
the rom com won the Superbowl and
1:25
this year. But. All filmmakers really
1:27
care about our the Superbowl ads. It is
1:29
the excuse most filmmakers have made to go
1:31
to Superbowl parties so that we can watch
1:33
the ads. And can I get out
1:35
with a hot that I'm sure everybody else already
1:38
got to yell at? Serious. There.
1:40
Was a time when I remembered
1:42
that the Superbowl ads were about
1:44
cool, creative, an interesting visuals. And.
1:48
I. Was at a Superbowl party last night bros with my
1:50
daughter's I didn't really watch the game for she's five.
1:52
And. Will I watched a bunch of them this morning. I was
1:54
like. The. Creative isn't that interesting
1:57
individuals or that innovative. It's literally just.
1:59
what who, what famous people did
2:01
I get? That was it. It
2:04
was entirely celebrities. If
2:06
you compare that to the ad that launched at all,
2:08
the New York Times just did a great retrospective of
2:10
Ridley Scott's original 1984 ad, which
2:13
had a lot of amazing quotes, including Steve
2:15
Jobs didn't know what the Super Bowl was, and
2:17
someone explained it to him. He
2:19
apparently responded, I have never seen a Super
2:21
Bowl, and I do not think I know
2:23
anyone who has. Which is like- That's incredible.
2:25
Well, it's also a time when people were
2:27
much more segmented. If you were a Silicon
2:29
Valley nerd in the 80s, you
2:32
probably could have avoided the Super Bowl.
2:34
Yeah, you were in your garage building
2:37
things. Whereas now
2:39
everyone, all of the
2:42
silos are all gone. Everyone in tech also
2:45
is aware of the Super Bowl. Everyone
2:47
is like, culture is much more- Yeah, you're tracking it around 115
2:49
million viewers, it
2:52
seems like, as of this morning, and others
2:54
still putting together the numbers, but that's- The
2:57
talk to someone I follow on, Blue
2:59
Sky pointed out that China's Spring Festival
3:02
had 650 million viewers. So
3:05
when we think about the Super
3:07
Bowl and its cultural dominance, we should also
3:09
remember that, especially
3:11
the Super Bowl is just really cared about
3:14
in the United States of America, not even
3:16
North America in general. But going back
3:18
to the ads, like when you look at hiring Ridley Scott,
3:20
when you look at, although the New York Times
3:22
also had an interesting thing that they hired a bunch of Nazis
3:24
to be extras. So Nazis made money
3:26
off of that spot. National
3:28
front members, which are like English Nazis, might
3:31
even- Yeah. But all the shaved
3:34
head extras in the 1984 spot are
3:36
actual skinheads. Yeah, I don't know.
3:38
I was like- They
3:40
were gonna mark it down. In my lifetime, they were interesting, right?
3:43
They did a Martin Scorsese commercial last night for
3:45
Squarespace, but it was not like,
3:48
it didn't feel like an autor Scorsese moment, right?
3:51
Oh, is it the alien one? It's
3:53
the alien one, yeah. Hey, we're here.
3:55
And they- Yeah, they swooped down. Yeah,
3:57
it's all CGI until you get into
3:59
the- limo with Marty and he has
4:01
some funny lines, but it definitely,
4:03
as somebody who's worked on a handful of Super
4:05
Bowl commercials in the past, most recently
4:08
I did. I just wrote jokes for Intuit Turbo
4:10
Tax for the one where they had the live
4:12
robot. I don't know if you guys remember that
4:14
from four years ago. I was
4:16
a robot in the garage where it's like,
4:18
I have feelings. Anyway, fun job. Great playing
4:20
job. Commercials are such a
4:22
weird thing. I mean, Charles, I do think
4:24
going back to your point, it's just famous people. Everything's
4:27
become branding and who they can put in
4:29
and who they're going for. If you look
4:31
at the State Farm commercial, which I liked
4:33
with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Dan DeVito, obviously
4:36
targeting people of an older demographic who
4:39
maybe are buying versions of
4:41
insurance. If you look at some of the
4:43
younger skewing commercials, Mountain Dew
4:45
using Aubrey Plaza and then pulling in,
4:48
what's it called, Nick Offerman at the end, same deal. They're
4:50
like, okay, how do we get into this sort of older
4:53
millennial, but still younger than
4:55
40 demo that might
4:57
drink soda? It has become a famous faceless thing.
4:59
I think a lot of that's because the
5:02
Super Bowl has become a famous faceless thing. We
5:04
could joke about Taylor Swift, but for
5:06
the majority of the broadcast last night, we saw Taylor
5:08
Swift. We saw Beyonce. They cut to all
5:11
the other celebrities that are out there and walking
5:14
through the crowd. Justin Bieber, not
5:16
to mention the halftime show. So I do think marketing
5:19
has just gotten a little lazier. I mean, it is
5:21
a bummer because I think I'll
5:24
remember the Was Up commercial for the rest of
5:26
my life. I'll be on my deathbed doing that
5:28
voice. This is the
5:30
first year I remember, like, did we get a Clydesdale horses
5:32
Budweiser commercial? I don't think so. One
5:35
at the end. Right. Yeah. And then there
5:37
was a fun Bud Light one, but was it that
5:39
fun? I don't know. Remember, they've
5:42
had more fun ones in the past. Yeah. It felt like
5:44
there wasn't as much creativity this year or anything like that.
5:47
To me, it felt like this
5:50
is where all comedy goes to
5:52
die. There were very
5:54
few commercials that felt earnest.
5:57
I'll give a shout out to Poppy, which
5:59
I don't. think was a great commercial per
6:01
se, but at least they were just like,
6:04
hey, we are trying to make health.
6:06
This is soda, we're redoing
6:09
soda and it's healthy now. This
6:11
is our comeback and there was some
6:14
earnestness to it. Then there's
6:16
of course the Bizarro Tamu
6:18
commercial, which played quite
6:21
a few times and is very, shop
6:23
like a billionaire, but with some Disney thing.
6:28
But besides that, it was a lot of mullets
6:30
and Aubrey Plaza, tongue
6:35
in cheek stuff that just feels
6:37
so dismissive of audiences. It's
6:40
like, we're not even going to take ourselves seriously. I've
6:42
talked about this on the
6:45
podcast before, how a lot of comedy
6:47
and a lot of the underground comedy
6:49
seen here in LA, I see a
6:52
lot of people making things
6:54
that they're holding back on
6:57
ideas, because if they can be like,
6:59
we're not even trying that hard. So we're
7:01
kind of laughing at ourselves too. That
7:03
is a risk averse way of creating
7:06
comedy. I
7:09
also do feel like celebrity
7:12
gags. It's
7:15
not special anymore when literally everyone
7:17
is doing it except for Tamu,
7:20
which everything is either 99 cents or $9.99 or $6.99. They
7:24
are targeting me on all of the platforms and
7:26
I want to stay I'm terrified of that. But
7:29
yeah, I wish that there was
7:31
more pushing for fun
7:35
and innovative stuff. It was cool to
7:37
see some friends pop up in the
7:39
commercials, love it when a good
7:41
improviser gets their moment and I'm like, oh
7:43
good, they will have their bills paid for
7:46
a little bit. But yeah, the
7:48
comedy just was a myth for me
7:50
across the board. Google had that nice
7:52
sensitive commercial that Stevie Wonder narrated about
7:54
being blind. Yes, I did like
7:56
that one. Yeah, I like the Michael Sarah, Sarah
7:58
V1. But that's
8:00
real comedy, right? Like he is trying.
8:02
That's with well-written, it's whatever. Yeah. It's
8:04
well-written. It's a smart idea. It makes
8:06
sense for the brand and it was
8:08
like tongue in cheek, but it wasn't
8:10
like Michael Fara, like
8:13
winking at the camera about acting. They
8:17
committed to the bit. You committed to the bit.
8:19
That's all we ask. Yeah. But there'll be
8:21
an article in no film school this week about committing to the
8:23
bit. Literally called, what is, yeah, how to commit to the bit.
8:25
I love that. So yeah. I
8:27
also think that we're witnessing a world
8:30
that has accepted that accidental
8:32
virality is no longer a part of our
8:34
current internet. Like when you talk about
8:36
the What's Up ad, there were no famous,
8:38
I mean, I hope that none of those people went on
8:40
to be famous. I'm sorry to the people in the What's
8:42
Up ad, if you were famous and I didn't recognize you,
8:44
but like it was an ad
8:46
about common humanity and then it blew up
8:49
because the creative was legitimately good, creative and
8:51
very enjoyable and it worked. The same way
8:53
with the Budweiser Frogs shot by Conrad Hall.
8:56
Budweiser. But all
8:58
of those, there was a moment
9:00
in the internet where virality could occur organically
9:03
by people sharing things because
9:05
of the joy of it.
9:08
But if you've ever been
9:10
in a meeting with someone and they're like, you know what we should
9:12
do? We should do a viral video. Everybody
9:14
who actually understands the internet groans, it's
9:16
because we haven't actually had videos that
9:19
go viral without a network of effect for a
9:21
long time. One of the things you probably get,
9:23
I mean, I'm no longer on the hell site
9:25
that is Twitter, but I bet if you go
9:27
to Twitter right now, a lot of the celebrities
9:29
in those commercials have also tweeted the
9:32
commercial. Yeah.
9:34
Because if you get them. It's
9:36
contractual obligation. Dan DeVito live tweeted his own
9:38
commercial with the. Oh yeah. With our. Because
9:41
that is part of the negotiation because he
9:43
has those followers, because of Always Sunny, because
9:45
of that 80s show, then all goes back
9:47
to that 80s show, the source of all
9:49
modern culture. It's
9:52
this weird thing where it's like, Oh, the people who
9:54
will end up in these, like your
9:57
commercial will not be as effective, even though you paid
9:59
$7 million. for 30 seconds of Super
10:01
Bowl audience if it
10:03
is not also getting network effect
10:05
retweeted by Danny DeVito. So they're paying not
10:07
just to have Danny DeVito in the ad,
10:10
they're paying for Danny DeVito to tweet it.
10:12
And it is this weird moment
10:15
we are in culture. I wish
10:17
that we still could have some
10:19
things. And you know, to pivot to our next
10:22
subject, this factors in casting, right? Like when you're
10:24
casting actors at the high level, you are looking
10:26
at their social media presences. As we were just
10:28
talking, you were looking at the behind the scenes
10:30
dramas. There's a rom com that did well right
10:32
now because of the tabloid
10:35
attention it got during production probably
10:38
drove more ticket sales as has
10:40
happened since time immemorial. And
10:43
it is interesting to think about that as
10:45
filmmakers that, you know, when you are trying
10:47
to go out and make your independent production
10:49
and get attention to it, it
10:51
is no longer a world of I just want
10:53
the best people. It is a
10:55
world of I want the best people who can also help it
10:59
find its audience. That's a good, I
11:01
worked for and with Samuel Baer
11:04
for, you know, maybe the better part
11:06
of the last seven years. And
11:09
for those who don't know who that is up top
11:11
of their head, I describe him as the most famous
11:13
director you've never heard of. Sam has
11:15
done well over 1000
11:18
commercials, maybe 2000. He
11:20
did the Nirvana smells like Teen Spirit
11:22
music video, the Cranberry Zombie music video.
11:24
He did a bunch of Justin Timberlake.
11:26
And I mean, like you could go
11:29
to his website, like Samuel Baer for Baer pictures.com
11:31
and check it out. But he also did commercials
11:33
that were a land, you know, landmark commercials, either
11:35
the Toyota commercial where it climbed Mount Everest. That
11:37
was a Super Bowl commercial. He did a
11:39
bunch of Nike commercials. But the one
11:42
in particular that I just quickly will talk about,
11:44
which I think maybe to me
11:46
represents what a commercial can be. And maybe
11:48
it could possibly be in the arguments for
11:50
the greatest commercial of all time right up
11:52
with the 1984 Ridley Scott one.
11:55
It's from I think 2013. It
11:57
is the M&M Detroit
12:00
Chrysler commercial right where you have the thumping
12:02
drums and the feeling and then suddenly a
12:04
gospel choir comes out and is singing And
12:06
m&m is like we're back and we know
12:08
that like we've had this Tragic
12:11
mishap and detroit has fallen apart, but we're
12:13
bringing cars back and Chrysler is going to
12:15
come back You know with a vengeance. We're
12:17
going to bring jobs back in this place
12:19
and hopefully like the economic downturn
12:21
will You know turn around you
12:23
can watch that that you know, we'll put a link maybe
12:25
in The podcast article but for me
12:27
it's like every time I watch it I get goosebumps
12:29
and sam always tells a great story of like
12:32
Chrysler coming in and being like we don't know what we want
12:34
Can you help us get m&m blah blah and then it was
12:36
his idea to bring on this gospel choir because he was like
12:38
The only time i've ever cried in my life is like listening
12:40
to a gospel choir So he's like this is how you like,
12:42
you know Like bring this in
12:44
like I want everyone to feel this emotion. I do
12:47
feel like When that commercial aired
12:49
but like that had gravitas, right? It had the
12:51
celebrity But the celebrity wound up being like all
12:54
of us feeling like hey like Man,
12:56
this is an economic downturn Like the problems we're
12:58
having in america could be solved if we come
13:00
together we do this stuff if we like and
13:02
buy Buy a Chrysler car. Yeah, exactly like you
13:05
know, and it is it's such an
13:07
interesting world we're in now like I
13:09
feel like the celebrities become way more important than the
13:11
message and you know, the delivery
13:14
of The message is
13:16
what a commercial is about right? What can you do in a minute?
13:18
You know, like the Super Bowl spot I think was costing
13:20
seven million dollars a minute last night During
13:23
prime time. So it's like you're betting everything on it
13:25
and I do think It's
13:28
difficult for marketing everyone to come together But seeing
13:30
them bet on a face instead of bet on
13:32
a feeling Is really a bummer and the ones
13:34
will remember for a long time are the ones
13:36
that made us feel something And not the ones
13:38
that just had a celebrity walk out I
13:41
mean, I do feel like there's uh There's
13:44
there's one of the biggest learnings i've had in
13:47
In directing this first feature
13:49
is the power of like
13:51
trusting a feeling and trusting a gut feeling and
13:53
like And and and
13:55
specifically when it comes to casting
13:58
so i've talked very publicly about how we
14:00
had to recast one of the leads in
14:03
the movie. Two weeks before
14:05
we were going to Panama, and it
14:07
was really scary because I wrote it for my
14:09
friend who I knew could
14:12
handle the role and I wrote
14:15
it for someone. To
14:17
undo all that thinking and
14:20
all that vision of what I thought it would
14:22
be was horrifying. We
14:25
worked with the casting director, Alabama Blonde who we have
14:27
to have on the podcast at some point. I
14:31
remember getting a video or a
14:33
submission for the role, and it
14:36
was basically two weeks out down to
14:38
the wire, like to make a break for the
14:40
film. I saw this
14:42
guy's performance and I was like, oh my God, we
14:45
are going to be able to make the movie. This
14:47
is somebody who could be this role. It
14:49
was a very interesting process that I
14:51
had never gone through before of casting.
14:55
We also cast another character who's
14:57
one of the leads, and it
14:59
was very difficult to find this very
15:01
particular person. They're a very specific type,
15:04
they're non-binary, they have to have
15:06
chemistry with everyone. Also, our casting director was
15:08
able to source a bunch of
15:10
different people, but then ultimately brought on somebody who
15:12
is the person and is the character. It made
15:15
my job on
15:17
set incredibly not easy. It
15:19
wasn't an easy shoot, but
15:21
I trusted every day that
15:24
the people who we cast could carry
15:26
the scenes, and they showed up
15:28
and they were prepared, but they also had the chemistry
15:31
on camera and the chemistry
15:33
as a unit. It
15:36
just made me have this entire appreciation
15:38
for casting. Here we
15:40
are at a time where we're finally, and
15:43
a feeling about casting and trusting
15:45
that gut feeling that, I think you
15:47
can't engineer that. You can't engineer that
15:49
with just putting
15:51
the prettiest faces together. Casting
15:55
is just truly an art
15:57
and a science, and I'm so
15:59
glad. that's being recognized by the Academy
16:01
these days. It
16:04
is interesting that I think a lot of people, I think
16:07
with the Academy Awards, a lot of people do the same
16:09
thing that they do with the Olympics where they assume
16:11
it has been a fixed thing for a long time and
16:13
that there's no change. But what
16:16
we reward, what we award, what we think
16:18
of as being important as part of the
16:20
process is constantly and continually changing. And I
16:22
remember the fur, the big
16:24
drama, when it went from five films to 10
16:27
films for Best Picture and we
16:29
should constantly be striving to be better
16:31
in what we pay attention to. The
16:33
Olympics is added, is it skateboarding or
16:35
surfing or something? Some people I know
16:38
were like, that doesn't feel right. And I was like, I don't
16:40
know, why not? It's
16:42
already, it's always been chock full of
16:44
stuff that they didn't do in each increase. Why
16:48
not keep adding stuff people actually
16:50
care about? Yeah, I feel like,
16:53
you know, as we think about what the
16:55
job is of the Academy Awards, one of
16:57
the jobs of the Academy Awards is to
16:59
remind people that these things are jobs that
17:03
people do that require effort
17:05
and work. And I feel
17:07
like I'm going to go
17:09
on a limb as someone who's been teaching film for a long time
17:11
that like a lot of people
17:13
don't really appreciate what a casting director does at
17:15
the beginning of their film school journey and you're
17:17
teaching it to them and you're explaining to them.
17:20
And I feel like one of the reasons
17:22
for that is the lack of a major
17:24
public facing award. Like, I feel like
17:26
a lot of film students in high school watch a
17:28
thing, watch the Academy Awards, and
17:30
then end up googling all of the people. And
17:32
that's the first time a lot of them learn
17:35
what a cinematographer or production designer does because they
17:37
see the production designer from Mad Max Fury Road
17:39
get up and she's in an amazing
17:41
outfit and she has this presence and you're like 12 and
17:44
you're like, what the hell did that person do on this movie?
17:46
I have to find out more. And so
17:48
thinking about that, I'm really excited that
17:51
there will be casting director Academy Award. It
17:53
is a incredibly difficult complex job that is
17:55
a huge part of making a movie what
17:58
it is. And I've
18:00
always wondered if it didn't get an award
18:02
because people wanted to preserve the illusion that
18:05
that was all like the director and the
18:07
producer is doing, especially
18:09
the producer's doing. So I don't
18:11
think the director has a lot of like, Yeah, I was
18:13
going to say, I do think it's produced like producers peeing
18:15
on trees and saying they're mine, you know, like, like, why
18:17
hire that person? So shouldn't I get this Academy Award? Exactly.
18:21
The best cast is what you walk away talking
18:23
about, right? I think like, you know, if
18:25
it was around this year, like poor things would
18:27
be competing with Barbie would be competing with Oppenheimer,
18:30
you know, like, like you don't, these people don't
18:32
just magically show up in your movie. And I
18:34
like, there is something behind
18:36
it. Yeah, the trick will be
18:38
interesting, though, right in that, obviously,
18:41
Margot Roby as Barbie is like one
18:43
of the perfect castings of all time.
18:45
Yeah. But that wasn't the casting
18:47
director, Margot Roby put herself in that role by coming
18:49
on as a producer. And that will always be the
18:51
tricky part of this award. Yeah. Because
18:54
there are so many projects where the
18:56
star finds the material either at the
18:58
studio level or at the indie level
19:00
attaches themselves to it. And then a
19:02
casting director is hired for all of
19:04
the rest of the parts. So like
19:06
Oppenheimer, I think the director probably does.
19:08
I think Killian Murphy probably was a
19:10
Chris Nolan decision at the probably at
19:12
the point he was reading American Prometheus.
19:14
They have a long standing relationship. The
19:17
appearance is there. He can carry it off. But
19:19
like all of the other parts are where
19:21
the Academy, but will audiences understand
19:24
that distinction? Will people
19:26
watch a movie where all of the little
19:29
parts are perfectly cast? And yeah,
19:31
well, voters understand the distinction, you know,
19:33
that's the other like, it does Hollywood
19:35
truly understand how Hollywood works. No, no,
19:38
that's the theme of all of our
19:40
Academy Award coverage is no, they don't.
19:42
Whatever. I'm still so excited for this. I
19:44
think that it is also one of those
19:46
things, you know, as a film teacher, I always talk
19:48
about your journey in the industry. And
19:51
I try and tell people like one
19:53
of the unappreciated journeys is casting director.
19:55
If you are like interested in eventually
19:57
directing, there are many casting directors who
19:59
move over directing. most famous was Lee Daniels,
20:01
but there are some others who've made that leap. If
20:04
you want to know all of the talent
20:06
in town, like getting an assistant
20:08
job at a casting agency and then eventually casting
20:10
on your own, you will develop those relationships in
20:12
that network that you then need if you want
20:14
to go do your indie feature. Or
20:17
even if you're doing little shorts, I have a friend who
20:19
does little, I shouldn't say
20:21
little shorts, I have a friend who regularly make shorts and
20:23
often has people who are the next
20:25
coming up people in them. Two
20:27
years later, you see them in a TV show and you're like, you
20:29
really have a good track record. That person's
20:32
worked fantastic. So those
20:34
are good relationships to develop. So
20:37
I'm really excited about this. I think it's great news.
20:40
I recommend checking out our interview
20:42
with Sami Birch who wrote
20:44
May December, who came up in
20:47
the world of casting. Like her mom is
20:49
a casting director and she worked
20:52
as an assistant and was
20:54
very much had her finger on the pulse of
20:57
that world and that element of the
21:00
world and wrote this screenplay with
21:02
the intention of like none of these characters are
21:04
going to get cut in the
21:06
final edit because it's such an
21:08
extensive thing. Not only are
21:10
the characters in that movie so
21:12
rich and wonderful, but not
21:15
a single character was cut from the final
21:17
edit. I think it's a really great lesson
21:19
in screenwriting as well, if you want to
21:21
be in the screenwriter's seat. That's
21:25
awesome. Yeah,
21:27
I hadn't thought about that from a screenwriter's perspective,
21:29
but also one of
21:31
the things you want to do as a screenwriter is
21:34
write parts people would like to play. And
21:37
going through a period of casting
21:40
a project, like I've been
21:42
on castings where like you
21:44
can tell the actors are not excited about a
21:46
part or there's some derision or judgment of like
21:48
this. Oh my God, this wasn't a project. Like
21:50
I had a friend who was in an acting
21:52
class and they
21:55
were getting, it was taught by like a big castor, so
21:57
they were getting like big scenes from movies
21:59
that were currently. being cast, this was like forever
22:01
ago. They brought in a scene from a
22:03
movie that went on to be a big blockbuster that made a
22:05
lot of money, but the scene was ridiculously bad. You
22:07
could just tell as she was rehearsing it how disdainful
22:10
she felt of the scene. Yeah. They
22:13
ended up not getting a very big person for the parts. Yeah,
22:16
I think you will learn tremendous amounts about
22:18
what actors are interested in and what they
22:20
can do and what they are looking at
22:22
and how they break down a script. Yeah,
22:25
totally. I hadn't thought about that leap, but that is
22:27
another huge leap. That's great to think through. Yeah.
22:31
Then our last story
22:33
of the week. So this camera
22:35
was originally announced. Look, I'm actually excited
22:38
about this camera and want to play
22:40
with one. What I'm about to say is
22:42
going to be a little, because that mean,
22:44
I don't mean it to be mean. But
22:46
it was originally announced. Our first article about this
22:48
camera was January 7th, 2016 with
22:51
a price point between $400 and $750. It
22:54
was supposed to come out in the fall of 2016, and
22:56
then there would be a cheaper version in 2017. Then
23:01
they announced a new price points in
23:03
2018. Camera was still not out,
23:05
$2,500. They
23:08
have now released footage from this camera,
23:11
and it is at $5,495. They've
23:16
released footage, but we still don't have a shipping
23:18
date. Look, there has been inflation and
23:21
there's been supply chain issues and yada, yada, yada.
23:24
$5,500 is probably like $3,500 in 2018. God,
23:28
that's such a present. I sound so old when
23:30
I say that. Yeah. Boy, does that hurt. Yeah.
23:33
But true facts. Regardless,
23:37
we now have publicly announced footage
23:40
from, and it's supposed to be
23:42
coming out, the Super 8 camera
23:44
from Kodak. If half of
23:46
you have spent this whole ramp up being
23:49
like, I know exactly what you're talking about. Yeah.
23:51
The other half of you have been like, what could he possibly
23:53
be talking about? You're either waiting on this camera or you're not.
23:56
But it's a new film camera and Aries stopped
23:58
making new film cameras. 2011,
24:02
2012, 2013, there's a big hullabaloo when they made their last
24:04
Airycam. I think it was now Panavision has not made new
24:06
Panavision bodies in a while. We haven't had a new film
24:09
camera in a while. Part of it is
24:11
that I'm still regularly shooting on World
24:14
War II era film cameras. Like a film
24:16
camera lasts a long time. There are two
24:18
airy- Bring out the bollocks, baby. Oh,
24:21
yeah. I teach a similar type of class. We have
24:23
a Panaflex and an Airy 2B, and that Airy 2B
24:25
made in the early 50s. Still
24:29
hook and strong. Thank you, Steven Soderbergh,
24:31
for donating that. Also, if you want
24:33
to take my 35-millimeter class, brooklyn35millimeter.com, like
24:36
how I snuck that one in there. I didn't even know I
24:38
was going to- I was waiting for it. I was going to
24:40
bring it up. You knew it before I did. I forgot. Anyway.
24:44
I'm really pushing for this class. I
24:46
appreciate that. We've already got 40 percent of
24:48
the registration we need to run, so we're
24:50
really close. A couple more
24:53
people, and this far out, to have 40 percent of the people we need
24:55
to run, I feel like we're going to make it. I feel like we're
24:57
going to spend June shooting 35. Back
24:59
to the point of the Kodak. It's
25:02
a Kodak Super
25:04
8 camera that lets you roll
25:06
in sound, that has a microphone mount, that's
25:09
a modern camera with a digital viewfinder, so
25:11
you can see what you're shooting with estimated
25:13
exposure and shoot also to an SD card
25:15
at the same time. You can start editing
25:17
immediately and then get your footage back
25:19
later and cut your negative to match. All
25:22
of the stocks Kodak makes are currently available in
25:25
Super 8. It's going to be
25:27
great. It's exciting that
25:30
I'm excited they are making it. I'm also going to
25:32
go out on a limb and defend the price. Making
25:34
physical objects is really hard. Yes.
25:39
Frankly, when they originally said the price was going to be $500
25:41
to $750, I
25:43
was like, LOL, no it's not. I
25:47
know a lot of you are thinking, man, that's a
25:49
lot of money. For those of you
25:51
thinking, man, that's a lot of money, you can go on eBay right now and
25:53
buy a Canon 1014 XL for 400-500
25:56
bucks, get it fully refered for a couple
25:58
hundred bucks and be I'm completely happy
26:00
that camera flaps. I've shot so much on
26:02
the 1014 or the 814 XL, great cameras,
26:05
or the Ballew. There's a lot of great Super
26:07
8 cameras available. What the Kodak
26:09
is bringing is the video tap integration, which
26:11
is going to make it play better on
26:14
film sets. There's going to be an HDMI
26:17
output, which you can hook up to like
26:19
a Teradek Bolt, so that a client can
26:21
monitor it. And what this camera is really
26:23
going to offer is the ability to integrate
26:25
Super 8 into a modern set. Because
26:28
the biggest problem with something like the 1014 is
26:30
like, let's say I want to, at this point,
26:33
every client wants to watch what you're shooting,
26:35
music, video, commercial, studio, whatever. They want to
26:37
be able to integrate and see what's going
26:39
on. Video village is a
26:41
thing. And if I bring out the 1014, nobody
26:43
can see what I'm doing. This
26:45
camera's main place will
26:48
be bringing Super 8 into
26:50
client work, whatever client work
26:52
means for you, because it's going to
26:54
have the actual I.O. to
26:57
hook up a Teradek, so that you
26:59
can broadcast wireless video to people, so
27:01
they can see what's going on. And
27:03
that is the reason why I think
27:05
it is worth the scratch. Because
27:08
it'll honestly be a rental item for most of us, except
27:10
for those of us who end up shooting a lot of
27:12
Super 8, in which case, because of
27:14
client work and what it pays, you'll
27:16
end up paying it off. I actually think the price point
27:18
is fine. I think it's the right
27:20
price point, to be honest. That's great. Yeah,
27:23
I mean, look, not to be that guy, but
27:25
I think you're spot on with the inflation. It's
27:28
just like when you announce something so long ago,
27:30
and you keep putting money into it,
27:32
it just is. I
27:35
was happy that it's not 10 grand, especially because
27:37
it's not like film is cheap. Kodak
27:40
has a whole line of Super 8 film they're releasing
27:42
with it, which seems really cool. And the
27:44
footage, the diversity of
27:46
the footage they showed, I thought was
27:48
also worth mentioning, not just like concerts
27:50
or cityscapes, but they had done some
27:52
really cool stuff with LED lighting and
27:54
some other lights just really popped.
27:56
And it made me want to play with the camera, or at
27:58
least like, you know. Maybe we want to take
28:01
a course really but but it was
28:03
it was beautiful And I think
28:05
when you wait so long for something They
28:08
really have to pull out all the stops
28:10
and it does feel like oh you were
28:12
doing something for that amount of time You
28:14
weren't just ignore ignoring us and waiting to
28:17
release something I
28:20
Forgot to mention to you guys, but we have
28:22
a listener comment that I need to respond
28:24
to This is from our
28:26
episode two weeks ago interviewing
28:28
director lulu wong and In
28:32
the introduction. I reminded listeners
28:34
about How the
28:36
farewell opened and per
28:38
the theatrical ratio it had a
28:40
it outperformed and had a stronger
28:43
opening weekend than the avengers somebody
28:47
Commented on our spotify. Mr. Booth. They said
28:49
what do you mean? The
28:51
farewell made 23 million dollars avengers
28:53
endgame made 2.8 billion
28:56
dollars. Would one of you guys
28:58
mind explaining? What the
29:00
ratio is and what that
29:02
comment is and how the
29:04
farewell sort of famously exceeded
29:06
expectations by that ratio So
29:11
i'll jump in and jason correct me with what I get
29:13
wrong The only thing indie
29:15
filmmakers care about is our first screen ratio Like
29:18
in a typical year I would say
29:20
it's very rare if I see more than one or two
29:22
of the top 10 grossing films in a year This year
29:25
was really great the big box office earners like appenheimer and
29:27
barbie were movies that like I was excited about and I
29:29
saw In the theater opening week and it was great But
29:31
like a lot of times some of those top 10 earners
29:33
i'm a little bit aged out of that demographic But
29:36
I would say if you look at the list every year of
29:38
the top 10 per screen
29:41
Which is the ratio we're often talking about it's not how
29:43
much money does it make it's how much money it made
29:45
per screen Almost always have
29:47
seen eight or nine of the top
29:49
10 per screen movies because you know
29:51
That's when you know famously west anderson
29:53
is the reigning king Of
29:56
per screen averages over his lifetime. Like
29:58
I think he won for
30:01
Grand Budapest and also for, I mean,
30:03
pretty much every one of his recent movies was
30:06
the top first screen that year, except maybe the
30:08
one about the New Yorker, which I really enjoyed,
30:10
but I understand. I was not, it
30:12
was me and the New Yorker magazine who
30:14
liked that one, apparently. You know what, I
30:16
was right behind it, Charles. I thought it
30:18
was very endearing and beautiful at that. Ditto,
30:20
ditto. Yeah, okay, great. So we've got some
30:23
nerds on this podcast who like obscure stuff.
30:25
The Frankest Dispatch is the title. Yes, yes.
30:27
And not obscure stuff, because obviously it had
30:30
a huge marketing question. Bill Murray was in it, but the less,
30:34
you know, we like our movies. So the per
30:36
screen ratio is where the farewell did well. I
30:38
don't remember if it was a two or a
30:40
four screen opening, but it's usually
30:42
a good indication distributors that you've got a great
30:45
movie, that like even though you're not on a
30:47
lot of screens, it is packed
30:49
full of people who are excited to see it, who
30:51
want to see it in the theater. Whereas yes, Avengers
30:54
made $2.8 billion. But
30:56
I'm going to tell you what, they were on a lot more
30:58
screens. And there were a lot more
31:01
screens at once. So obviously
31:03
a lot more people ended up seeing
31:05
Avengers infinity acts or whatever than they
31:07
did. That would be a great name
31:10
for a movie, right? Yeah,
31:12
that was what it was, I believe. And
31:14
I don't mean to, I'm not like anti superhero
31:17
movies. I really love a lot of superhero movies.
31:19
I saw all of the three Iron Man movies
31:21
in the theaters. Like I enjoy a good superhero
31:23
romp. I just, I had a young
31:25
kid when adventures came out and I wasn't seeing anything in
31:27
the movie theater. So I maybe I would have enjoyed infinity
31:29
war. I'm not sure. I don't mean
31:31
to, I never want to yuck anybody's yum. If you
31:33
think that's the best movie ever made, that's great. I
31:36
have some movie choices. I still love the movie
31:38
blow, which everyone is convinced is terrible, but me.
31:40
So I'm not going to. I love the movie
31:43
bedazzled and everyone thinks it's horrible, but I'm
31:45
like, I loved it. I've not even heard of the
31:47
movie bedazzled. Oh, bro, for sure. I would make it
31:49
curly in the nineties. Yeah. It
31:52
was like one of five videos in rotation
31:54
that I had when I was visiting my
31:56
grandparents in Costa Rica. So anyway, we all
31:58
have our favorite weirdo. My
32:01
brain has been so corrupted by the video,
32:03
like the extended universe of products, that I
32:05
could only assume it was a movie about
32:07
someone using the bedazzler or about the backstory
32:09
of how the bedazzler was invented, or
32:12
the bedazzler as a character. It's a
32:14
remake of a 60s comedy too. It's
32:16
not a- Yes. Yeah. Pretty existing IP.
32:18
Yeah. One of my favorite per screen
32:20
averages stories is, I think,
32:23
2011 when Kevin Smith did Red
32:25
States, did the fake auction and then
32:27
took it on a road tour, Roadshow, which
32:29
I proudly went to see when
32:31
I was at BU, because he was
32:33
only on one screen a week and
32:35
rolling it out. His per screen average was like,
32:38
I think something crazy. It was crazy. It would attract for
32:40
like a $2 billion movie, but
32:42
you're on one screen. He was charging
32:44
$75 ticket because it came with a
32:46
three-hour Q&A afterwards, so you'd come watch
32:48
the movie. It's a five-hour event. I
32:50
remember I turned all my friends ago
32:52
in Boston, we went, we
32:54
bought our tickets, then you watch a 90-minute movie, and
32:56
then he comes out for two and
32:58
a half hours of talk and very fun. But that
33:01
was a crazy good, you're selling out theaters at
33:03
$75 a pop, doing
33:06
one theater a week, so
33:08
continuing his theatrical run at the
33:10
time, really smart, fun way
33:12
to do it. I think the movie cost four
33:15
and a half and you want to making seven
33:17
million total. So made his money back,
33:19
did whatever. But you completely
33:21
crushed the per screen average of that year, because
33:23
you're on one screen, so you're just going somewhere.
33:27
I think this is very, Lou
33:29
has talked about this in interviews,
33:32
but she premiered the film. It
33:35
premiered at Sundance. It was produced
33:37
by Big Beach, which is a New York-based
33:39
production company that got put on the
33:41
map via Little Miss
33:43
Sunshine. She
33:46
and her team were given an offer to go
33:49
straight to streaming with the film, much more
33:51
lucrative offer, and they chose for a
33:53
theatrical release. The
33:55
success of that opening
33:57
weekend, I think is kind of of
34:00
what created the buzz that ultimately led
34:02
it to be, you know, this award,
34:05
like it bolstered this award camp
34:07
campaign and success that like really just
34:09
launched a career. So I think there's,
34:12
there's something really powerful about like sticking
34:14
it in a theater. And, and even
34:16
if it means like not making as
34:18
much money as you're launching your career,
34:20
but now like Lulu
34:22
is a legend with a very successful
34:25
Nicole Kidman show. And if you listen to that podcast,
34:28
you'll hear how she said no to that
34:30
show. And then Nicole Kidman was like, no,
34:32
I'll give you all the creative power. So
34:35
like, I think that it's just a really
34:37
great story and of a second time filmmaker
34:40
sticking with what feels right for
34:42
their film and then having great success
34:44
with it. I mean, that's the movie that
34:46
she got off that was crazy. I mean, I felt
34:48
like it was in theaters here. You know, there was
34:51
Oscar buzz, you know, people were talking about Aquafina
34:53
and that performance and just whatever. Like, I
34:55
just think, look, I, as
34:58
someone who has made stuff for streamers and whatever, it's
35:00
just so easy to get lost and someone
35:03
gets to pay the bills. But if you have the
35:05
power to do it and you can see, and you
35:07
have, you know, hopefully the project that can launch that
35:09
stuff, there's no better way. And I do
35:12
think at the end of the day, like if
35:14
you can get into theaters, you can get people talking,
35:16
that's amazing. Because guess what? If the farewell didn't do
35:18
that well in theaters, it would have gone to a
35:20
streamer anyway, eventually, you know, like it would have shown
35:22
up. You get the same effect. So just the
35:25
ability for someone to go buy a ticket, brush
35:27
their teeth, hopefully, and then head out to the
35:29
theater and, you know, like feel like an adult
35:31
out there. I do think there's it's just such
35:33
a different feeling than than what I do,
35:35
which is like loaf on the couch in my
35:37
underwear and a sweatshirt and hopes of the best, you know,
35:39
so. OK,
35:43
well, that there
35:45
is no better summary than the mental image
35:47
of Jason hanging out in his underwear on
35:49
the couch watching movies. I did. That
35:51
was my vibe last week because I took last week off
35:53
to take a break from the movie,
35:55
which I'm getting back into now. And
35:58
I I watched The Virgin. at
36:00
like 11 a.m. on a Tuesday.
36:03
It was amazing. I did back-to-back features
36:05
at, via AMC Stubbs Pass. I did
36:07
put pants on for that, but might
36:10
I recommend anyone but you, followed
36:13
by poor things? Just two
36:15
delightful movies back to back. I
36:18
completely forgot about the first one after watching
36:20
the second one, but yeah, that time of
36:22
rest, very important. Indulge in the movies. I
36:26
only put clothes on to do work. That's like a
36:28
very famous, I think it was like Aileen Brash
36:30
McKenna in an interview. It was just like, when it's time to
36:33
be a screenwriter, I get completely, like I get dressed. I do
36:35
my hair, I do my makeup. I sit down and do it,
36:37
because she was like, I had a professor, was like, it's a
36:39
job tree, like a job. And that always stuck with me. So
36:41
it's like, if I have to do work during the day, screenwriting
36:45
work, I get dressed, I do whatever. But if
36:47
I'm just going to watch Red
36:49
Notice on Netflix, it's
36:52
hedonism too over here. Yes.
36:56
Respect. Yeah. The
36:59
life of the child. Yeah.
37:02
Once you have a kid, you no longer get to just hang out
37:04
all weekend. You've got to at
37:06
least put on pants. Fair
37:09
minimum. I mean, depending on what kind of parent you are. And
37:11
again, not going to judge, but
37:14
yes. All right, so that has been this
37:16
week's No Film School Podcast. I'm on the internet at
37:18
Blue Sky. I do some
37:20
articles on the film school. I've got a review coming
37:22
up of some stuff that I'm excited
37:24
to play with. And I can't wait to tell you more
37:27
about. You can always take a summer class with me, brooklyn35mm.com.
37:32
I am at Lost in
37:34
Graceland. Tomorrow we are releasing
37:36
our episode with Katie Burrell,
37:38
the star and director of
37:41
Weak Layers, which is this
37:43
hilarious ski comedy.
37:45
Very funny. It's streaming now. You can
37:48
loaf on the couch in your underwear
37:50
and watch it. Amazing trailer. Hilarious trailer
37:52
for that movie. Isn't it good? Isn't
37:54
it good? Also recommend doing it from
37:57
Tahoe in a cabin. Shout
37:59
out to. to all the Tahoe snowboarders
38:01
that I grew up with. I'm
38:05
at Jason Hellerman on Blue Sky, on Twitter, on
38:07
Instagram, Jason at nofilmskill.com. If you want to email
38:10
in a question or whatever. We've got some fun
38:12
articles coming out this week. Like I said, commit
38:14
to the bit. One of the most fun times
38:16
I've had sitting and writing, because I do think
38:19
at the end of the day, most
38:21
bad screenplays I read, the reason
38:23
they're bad, aside from formatting,
38:26
dialogue, whatever, is that they don't commit to their
38:28
own ideas. So commit to the bit. And
38:30
maybe we'll talk about that next week once the article's up.
38:32
I love that.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More