Podchaser Logo
Home
Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Released Thursday, 15th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Are Super Bowl Ads Creative Anymore? Plus, a New Film Camera!

Thursday, 15th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

Everybody welcome to. The. Know if those two

0:10

point guess for the week a Valentine's

0:12

Day. New. On T Twenty

0:14

four not or Valentine's Day, we're going to

0:16

be talking about everyone's favorite love story: This

0:18

your Superbowl and the Superbowl commercials that went

0:20

with it. The. Cia marketing campaign

0:23

that brought to Us. We're.

0:26

Going to be talking about he can we

0:28

were to adding a new casting Academy award

0:30

which is. Really? Awesome and I

0:32

can't believe it's taken the song. And. We're

0:34

going to fall that up with a

0:36

limited news about the most anticipated new

0:39

camera of the year. We've been waiting

0:41

a long time on this one and

0:43

footage is finally out. You. Have to

0:45

wait till we get there for me to say what it is.

0:47

But. Most you nerds probably already know.

0:50

It's the camera. We've all been waiting the longest

0:52

on. That. Is this week on

0:54

the Know Film School podcasts. Okay,

1:05

First. Up. The. Love Story

1:07

of the Year Travis Calcium Taylor

1:09

Swift's like know rom com can

1:11

match it and. As. Many on

1:14

the internet are convinced it's an elaborate

1:16

Cm viral marketing scheme for the Superbowl

1:18

and they stuck the landing. The.

1:20

Ending works. The. Boyfriend in

1:22

the rom com won the Superbowl and

1:25

this year. But. All filmmakers really

1:27

care about our the Superbowl ads. It is

1:29

the excuse most filmmakers have made to go

1:31

to Superbowl parties so that we can watch

1:33

the ads. And can I get out

1:35

with a hot that I'm sure everybody else already

1:38

got to yell at? Serious. There.

1:40

Was a time when I remembered

1:42

that the Superbowl ads were about

1:44

cool, creative, an interesting visuals. And.

1:48

I. Was at a Superbowl party last night bros with my

1:50

daughter's I didn't really watch the game for she's five.

1:52

And. Will I watched a bunch of them this morning. I was

1:54

like. The. Creative isn't that interesting

1:57

individuals or that innovative. It's literally just.

1:59

what who, what famous people did

2:01

I get? That was it. It

2:04

was entirely celebrities. If

2:06

you compare that to the ad that launched at all,

2:08

the New York Times just did a great retrospective of

2:10

Ridley Scott's original 1984 ad, which

2:13

had a lot of amazing quotes, including Steve

2:15

Jobs didn't know what the Super Bowl was, and

2:17

someone explained it to him. He

2:19

apparently responded, I have never seen a Super

2:21

Bowl, and I do not think I know

2:23

anyone who has. Which is like- That's incredible.

2:25

Well, it's also a time when people were

2:27

much more segmented. If you were a Silicon

2:29

Valley nerd in the 80s, you

2:32

probably could have avoided the Super Bowl.

2:34

Yeah, you were in your garage building

2:37

things. Whereas now

2:39

everyone, all of the

2:42

silos are all gone. Everyone in tech also

2:45

is aware of the Super Bowl. Everyone

2:47

is like, culture is much more- Yeah, you're tracking it around 115

2:49

million viewers, it

2:52

seems like, as of this morning, and others

2:54

still putting together the numbers, but that's- The

2:57

talk to someone I follow on, Blue

2:59

Sky pointed out that China's Spring Festival

3:02

had 650 million viewers. So

3:05

when we think about the Super

3:07

Bowl and its cultural dominance, we should also

3:09

remember that, especially

3:11

the Super Bowl is just really cared about

3:14

in the United States of America, not even

3:16

North America in general. But going back

3:18

to the ads, like when you look at hiring Ridley Scott,

3:20

when you look at, although the New York Times

3:22

also had an interesting thing that they hired a bunch of Nazis

3:24

to be extras. So Nazis made money

3:26

off of that spot. National

3:28

front members, which are like English Nazis, might

3:31

even- Yeah. But all the shaved

3:34

head extras in the 1984 spot are

3:36

actual skinheads. Yeah, I don't know.

3:38

I was like- They

3:40

were gonna mark it down. In my lifetime, they were interesting, right?

3:43

They did a Martin Scorsese commercial last night for

3:45

Squarespace, but it was not like,

3:48

it didn't feel like an autor Scorsese moment, right?

3:51

Oh, is it the alien one? It's

3:53

the alien one, yeah. Hey, we're here.

3:55

And they- Yeah, they swooped down. Yeah,

3:57

it's all CGI until you get into

3:59

the- limo with Marty and he has

4:01

some funny lines, but it definitely,

4:03

as somebody who's worked on a handful of Super

4:05

Bowl commercials in the past, most recently

4:08

I did. I just wrote jokes for Intuit Turbo

4:10

Tax for the one where they had the live

4:12

robot. I don't know if you guys remember that

4:14

from four years ago. I was

4:16

a robot in the garage where it's like,

4:18

I have feelings. Anyway, fun job. Great playing

4:20

job. Commercials are such a

4:22

weird thing. I mean, Charles, I do think

4:24

going back to your point, it's just famous people. Everything's

4:27

become branding and who they can put in

4:29

and who they're going for. If you look

4:31

at the State Farm commercial, which I liked

4:33

with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Dan DeVito, obviously

4:36

targeting people of an older demographic who

4:39

maybe are buying versions of

4:41

insurance. If you look at some of the

4:43

younger skewing commercials, Mountain Dew

4:45

using Aubrey Plaza and then pulling in,

4:48

what's it called, Nick Offerman at the end, same deal. They're

4:50

like, okay, how do we get into this sort of older

4:53

millennial, but still younger than

4:55

40 demo that might

4:57

drink soda? It has become a famous faceless thing.

4:59

I think a lot of that's because the

5:02

Super Bowl has become a famous faceless thing. We

5:04

could joke about Taylor Swift, but for

5:06

the majority of the broadcast last night, we saw Taylor

5:08

Swift. We saw Beyonce. They cut to all

5:11

the other celebrities that are out there and walking

5:14

through the crowd. Justin Bieber, not

5:16

to mention the halftime show. So I do think marketing

5:19

has just gotten a little lazier. I mean, it is

5:21

a bummer because I think I'll

5:24

remember the Was Up commercial for the rest of

5:26

my life. I'll be on my deathbed doing that

5:28

voice. This is the

5:30

first year I remember, like, did we get a Clydesdale horses

5:32

Budweiser commercial? I don't think so. One

5:35

at the end. Right. Yeah. And then there

5:37

was a fun Bud Light one, but was it that

5:39

fun? I don't know. Remember, they've

5:42

had more fun ones in the past. Yeah. It felt like

5:44

there wasn't as much creativity this year or anything like that.

5:47

To me, it felt like this

5:50

is where all comedy goes to

5:52

die. There were very

5:54

few commercials that felt earnest.

5:57

I'll give a shout out to Poppy, which

5:59

I don't. think was a great commercial per

6:01

se, but at least they were just like,

6:04

hey, we are trying to make health.

6:06

This is soda, we're redoing

6:09

soda and it's healthy now. This

6:11

is our comeback and there was some

6:14

earnestness to it. Then there's

6:16

of course the Bizarro Tamu

6:18

commercial, which played quite

6:21

a few times and is very, shop

6:23

like a billionaire, but with some Disney thing.

6:28

But besides that, it was a lot of mullets

6:30

and Aubrey Plaza, tongue

6:35

in cheek stuff that just feels

6:37

so dismissive of audiences. It's

6:40

like, we're not even going to take ourselves seriously. I've

6:42

talked about this on the

6:45

podcast before, how a lot of comedy

6:47

and a lot of the underground comedy

6:49

seen here in LA, I see a

6:52

lot of people making things

6:54

that they're holding back on

6:57

ideas, because if they can be like,

6:59

we're not even trying that hard. So we're

7:01

kind of laughing at ourselves too. That

7:03

is a risk averse way of creating

7:06

comedy. I

7:09

also do feel like celebrity

7:12

gags. It's

7:15

not special anymore when literally everyone

7:17

is doing it except for Tamu,

7:20

which everything is either 99 cents or $9.99 or $6.99. They

7:24

are targeting me on all of the platforms and

7:26

I want to stay I'm terrified of that. But

7:29

yeah, I wish that there was

7:31

more pushing for fun

7:35

and innovative stuff. It was cool to

7:37

see some friends pop up in the

7:39

commercials, love it when a good

7:41

improviser gets their moment and I'm like, oh

7:43

good, they will have their bills paid for

7:46

a little bit. But yeah, the

7:48

comedy just was a myth for me

7:50

across the board. Google had that nice

7:52

sensitive commercial that Stevie Wonder narrated about

7:54

being blind. Yes, I did like

7:56

that one. Yeah, I like the Michael Sarah, Sarah

7:58

V1. But that's

8:00

real comedy, right? Like he is trying.

8:02

That's with well-written, it's whatever. Yeah. It's

8:04

well-written. It's a smart idea. It makes

8:06

sense for the brand and it was

8:08

like tongue in cheek, but it wasn't

8:10

like Michael Fara, like

8:13

winking at the camera about acting. They

8:17

committed to the bit. You committed to the bit.

8:19

That's all we ask. Yeah. But there'll be

8:21

an article in no film school this week about committing to the

8:23

bit. Literally called, what is, yeah, how to commit to the bit.

8:25

I love that. So yeah. I

8:27

also think that we're witnessing a world

8:30

that has accepted that accidental

8:32

virality is no longer a part of our

8:34

current internet. Like when you talk about

8:36

the What's Up ad, there were no famous,

8:38

I mean, I hope that none of those people went on

8:40

to be famous. I'm sorry to the people in the What's

8:42

Up ad, if you were famous and I didn't recognize you,

8:44

but like it was an ad

8:46

about common humanity and then it blew up

8:49

because the creative was legitimately good, creative and

8:51

very enjoyable and it worked. The same way

8:53

with the Budweiser Frogs shot by Conrad Hall.

8:56

Budweiser. But all

8:58

of those, there was a moment

9:00

in the internet where virality could occur organically

9:03

by people sharing things because

9:05

of the joy of it.

9:08

But if you've ever been

9:10

in a meeting with someone and they're like, you know what we should

9:12

do? We should do a viral video. Everybody

9:14

who actually understands the internet groans, it's

9:16

because we haven't actually had videos that

9:19

go viral without a network of effect for a

9:21

long time. One of the things you probably get,

9:23

I mean, I'm no longer on the hell site

9:25

that is Twitter, but I bet if you go

9:27

to Twitter right now, a lot of the celebrities

9:29

in those commercials have also tweeted the

9:32

commercial. Yeah.

9:34

Because if you get them. It's

9:36

contractual obligation. Dan DeVito live tweeted his own

9:38

commercial with the. Oh yeah. With our. Because

9:41

that is part of the negotiation because he

9:43

has those followers, because of Always Sunny, because

9:45

of that 80s show, then all goes back

9:47

to that 80s show, the source of all

9:49

modern culture. It's

9:52

this weird thing where it's like, Oh, the people who

9:54

will end up in these, like your

9:57

commercial will not be as effective, even though you paid

9:59

$7 million. for 30 seconds of Super

10:01

Bowl audience if it

10:03

is not also getting network effect

10:05

retweeted by Danny DeVito. So they're paying not

10:07

just to have Danny DeVito in the ad,

10:10

they're paying for Danny DeVito to tweet it.

10:12

And it is this weird moment

10:15

we are in culture. I wish

10:17

that we still could have some

10:19

things. And you know, to pivot to our next

10:22

subject, this factors in casting, right? Like when you're

10:24

casting actors at the high level, you are looking

10:26

at their social media presences. As we were just

10:28

talking, you were looking at the behind the scenes

10:30

dramas. There's a rom com that did well right

10:32

now because of the tabloid

10:35

attention it got during production probably

10:38

drove more ticket sales as has

10:40

happened since time immemorial. And

10:43

it is interesting to think about that as

10:45

filmmakers that, you know, when you are trying

10:47

to go out and make your independent production

10:49

and get attention to it, it

10:51

is no longer a world of I just want

10:53

the best people. It is a

10:55

world of I want the best people who can also help it

10:59

find its audience. That's a good, I

11:01

worked for and with Samuel Baer

11:04

for, you know, maybe the better part

11:06

of the last seven years. And

11:09

for those who don't know who that is up top

11:11

of their head, I describe him as the most famous

11:13

director you've never heard of. Sam has

11:15

done well over 1000

11:18

commercials, maybe 2000. He

11:20

did the Nirvana smells like Teen Spirit

11:22

music video, the Cranberry Zombie music video.

11:24

He did a bunch of Justin Timberlake.

11:26

And I mean, like you could go

11:29

to his website, like Samuel Baer for Baer pictures.com

11:31

and check it out. But he also did commercials

11:33

that were a land, you know, landmark commercials, either

11:35

the Toyota commercial where it climbed Mount Everest. That

11:37

was a Super Bowl commercial. He did a

11:39

bunch of Nike commercials. But the one

11:42

in particular that I just quickly will talk about,

11:44

which I think maybe to me

11:46

represents what a commercial can be. And maybe

11:48

it could possibly be in the arguments for

11:50

the greatest commercial of all time right up

11:52

with the 1984 Ridley Scott one.

11:55

It's from I think 2013. It

11:57

is the M&M Detroit

12:00

Chrysler commercial right where you have the thumping

12:02

drums and the feeling and then suddenly a

12:04

gospel choir comes out and is singing And

12:06

m&m is like we're back and we know

12:08

that like we've had this Tragic

12:11

mishap and detroit has fallen apart, but we're

12:13

bringing cars back and Chrysler is going to

12:15

come back You know with a vengeance. We're

12:17

going to bring jobs back in this place

12:19

and hopefully like the economic downturn

12:21

will You know turn around you

12:23

can watch that that you know, we'll put a link maybe

12:25

in The podcast article but for me

12:27

it's like every time I watch it I get goosebumps

12:29

and sam always tells a great story of like

12:32

Chrysler coming in and being like we don't know what we want

12:34

Can you help us get m&m blah blah and then it was

12:36

his idea to bring on this gospel choir because he was like

12:38

The only time i've ever cried in my life is like listening

12:40

to a gospel choir So he's like this is how you like,

12:42

you know Like bring this in

12:44

like I want everyone to feel this emotion. I do

12:47

feel like When that commercial aired

12:49

but like that had gravitas, right? It had the

12:51

celebrity But the celebrity wound up being like all

12:54

of us feeling like hey like Man,

12:56

this is an economic downturn Like the problems we're

12:58

having in america could be solved if we come

13:00

together we do this stuff if we like and

13:02

buy Buy a Chrysler car. Yeah, exactly like you

13:05

know, and it is it's such an

13:07

interesting world we're in now like I

13:09

feel like the celebrities become way more important than the

13:11

message and you know, the delivery

13:14

of The message is

13:16

what a commercial is about right? What can you do in a minute?

13:18

You know, like the Super Bowl spot I think was costing

13:20

seven million dollars a minute last night During

13:23

prime time. So it's like you're betting everything on it

13:25

and I do think It's

13:28

difficult for marketing everyone to come together But seeing

13:30

them bet on a face instead of bet on

13:32

a feeling Is really a bummer and the ones

13:34

will remember for a long time are the ones

13:36

that made us feel something And not the ones

13:38

that just had a celebrity walk out I

13:41

mean, I do feel like there's uh There's

13:44

there's one of the biggest learnings i've had in

13:47

In directing this first feature

13:49

is the power of like

13:51

trusting a feeling and trusting a gut feeling and

13:53

like And and and

13:55

specifically when it comes to casting

13:58

so i've talked very publicly about how we

14:00

had to recast one of the leads in

14:03

the movie. Two weeks before

14:05

we were going to Panama, and it

14:07

was really scary because I wrote it for my

14:09

friend who I knew could

14:12

handle the role and I wrote

14:15

it for someone. To

14:17

undo all that thinking and

14:20

all that vision of what I thought it would

14:22

be was horrifying. We

14:25

worked with the casting director, Alabama Blonde who we have

14:27

to have on the podcast at some point. I

14:31

remember getting a video or a

14:33

submission for the role, and it

14:36

was basically two weeks out down to

14:38

the wire, like to make a break for the

14:40

film. I saw this

14:42

guy's performance and I was like, oh my God, we

14:45

are going to be able to make the movie. This

14:47

is somebody who could be this role. It

14:49

was a very interesting process that I

14:51

had never gone through before of casting.

14:55

We also cast another character who's

14:57

one of the leads, and it

14:59

was very difficult to find this very

15:01

particular person. They're a very specific type,

15:04

they're non-binary, they have to have

15:06

chemistry with everyone. Also, our casting director was

15:08

able to source a bunch of

15:10

different people, but then ultimately brought on somebody who

15:12

is the person and is the character. It made

15:15

my job on

15:17

set incredibly not easy. It

15:19

wasn't an easy shoot, but

15:21

I trusted every day that

15:24

the people who we cast could carry

15:26

the scenes, and they showed up

15:28

and they were prepared, but they also had the chemistry

15:31

on camera and the chemistry

15:33

as a unit. It

15:36

just made me have this entire appreciation

15:38

for casting. Here we

15:40

are at a time where we're finally, and

15:43

a feeling about casting and trusting

15:45

that gut feeling that, I think you

15:47

can't engineer that. You can't engineer that

15:49

with just putting

15:51

the prettiest faces together. Casting

15:55

is just truly an art

15:57

and a science, and I'm so

15:59

glad. that's being recognized by the Academy

16:01

these days. It

16:04

is interesting that I think a lot of people, I think

16:07

with the Academy Awards, a lot of people do the same

16:09

thing that they do with the Olympics where they assume

16:11

it has been a fixed thing for a long time and

16:13

that there's no change. But what

16:16

we reward, what we award, what we think

16:18

of as being important as part of the

16:20

process is constantly and continually changing. And I

16:22

remember the fur, the big

16:24

drama, when it went from five films to 10

16:27

films for Best Picture and we

16:29

should constantly be striving to be better

16:31

in what we pay attention to. The

16:33

Olympics is added, is it skateboarding or

16:35

surfing or something? Some people I know

16:38

were like, that doesn't feel right. And I was like, I don't

16:40

know, why not? It's

16:42

already, it's always been chock full of

16:44

stuff that they didn't do in each increase. Why

16:48

not keep adding stuff people actually

16:50

care about? Yeah, I feel like,

16:53

you know, as we think about what the

16:55

job is of the Academy Awards, one of

16:57

the jobs of the Academy Awards is to

16:59

remind people that these things are jobs that

17:03

people do that require effort

17:05

and work. And I feel

17:07

like I'm going to go

17:09

on a limb as someone who's been teaching film for a long time

17:11

that like a lot of people

17:13

don't really appreciate what a casting director does at

17:15

the beginning of their film school journey and you're

17:17

teaching it to them and you're explaining to them.

17:20

And I feel like one of the reasons

17:22

for that is the lack of a major

17:24

public facing award. Like, I feel like

17:26

a lot of film students in high school watch a

17:28

thing, watch the Academy Awards, and

17:30

then end up googling all of the people. And

17:32

that's the first time a lot of them learn

17:35

what a cinematographer or production designer does because they

17:37

see the production designer from Mad Max Fury Road

17:39

get up and she's in an amazing

17:41

outfit and she has this presence and you're like 12 and

17:44

you're like, what the hell did that person do on this movie?

17:46

I have to find out more. And so

17:48

thinking about that, I'm really excited that

17:51

there will be casting director Academy Award. It

17:53

is a incredibly difficult complex job that is

17:55

a huge part of making a movie what

17:58

it is. And I've

18:00

always wondered if it didn't get an award

18:02

because people wanted to preserve the illusion that

18:05

that was all like the director and the

18:07

producer is doing, especially

18:09

the producer's doing. So I don't

18:11

think the director has a lot of like, Yeah, I was

18:13

going to say, I do think it's produced like producers peeing

18:15

on trees and saying they're mine, you know, like, like, why

18:17

hire that person? So shouldn't I get this Academy Award? Exactly.

18:21

The best cast is what you walk away talking

18:23

about, right? I think like, you know, if

18:25

it was around this year, like poor things would

18:27

be competing with Barbie would be competing with Oppenheimer,

18:30

you know, like, like you don't, these people don't

18:32

just magically show up in your movie. And I

18:34

like, there is something behind

18:36

it. Yeah, the trick will be

18:38

interesting, though, right in that, obviously,

18:41

Margot Roby as Barbie is like one

18:43

of the perfect castings of all time.

18:45

Yeah. But that wasn't the casting

18:47

director, Margot Roby put herself in that role by coming

18:49

on as a producer. And that will always be the

18:51

tricky part of this award. Yeah. Because

18:54

there are so many projects where the

18:56

star finds the material either at the

18:58

studio level or at the indie level

19:00

attaches themselves to it. And then a

19:02

casting director is hired for all of

19:04

the rest of the parts. So like

19:06

Oppenheimer, I think the director probably does.

19:08

I think Killian Murphy probably was a

19:10

Chris Nolan decision at the probably at

19:12

the point he was reading American Prometheus.

19:14

They have a long standing relationship. The

19:17

appearance is there. He can carry it off. But

19:19

like all of the other parts are where

19:21

the Academy, but will audiences understand

19:24

that distinction? Will people

19:26

watch a movie where all of the little

19:29

parts are perfectly cast? And yeah,

19:31

well, voters understand the distinction, you know,

19:33

that's the other like, it does Hollywood

19:35

truly understand how Hollywood works. No, no,

19:38

that's the theme of all of our

19:40

Academy Award coverage is no, they don't.

19:42

Whatever. I'm still so excited for this. I

19:44

think that it is also one of those

19:46

things, you know, as a film teacher, I always talk

19:48

about your journey in the industry. And

19:51

I try and tell people like one

19:53

of the unappreciated journeys is casting director.

19:55

If you are like interested in eventually

19:57

directing, there are many casting directors who

19:59

move over directing. most famous was Lee Daniels,

20:01

but there are some others who've made that leap. If

20:04

you want to know all of the talent

20:06

in town, like getting an assistant

20:08

job at a casting agency and then eventually casting

20:10

on your own, you will develop those relationships in

20:12

that network that you then need if you want

20:14

to go do your indie feature. Or

20:17

even if you're doing little shorts, I have a friend who

20:19

does little, I shouldn't say

20:21

little shorts, I have a friend who regularly make shorts and

20:23

often has people who are the next

20:25

coming up people in them. Two

20:27

years later, you see them in a TV show and you're like, you

20:29

really have a good track record. That person's

20:32

worked fantastic. So those

20:34

are good relationships to develop. So

20:37

I'm really excited about this. I think it's great news.

20:40

I recommend checking out our interview

20:42

with Sami Birch who wrote

20:44

May December, who came up in

20:47

the world of casting. Like her mom is

20:49

a casting director and she worked

20:52

as an assistant and was

20:54

very much had her finger on the pulse of

20:57

that world and that element of the

21:00

world and wrote this screenplay with

21:02

the intention of like none of these characters are

21:04

going to get cut in the

21:06

final edit because it's such an

21:08

extensive thing. Not only are

21:10

the characters in that movie so

21:12

rich and wonderful, but not

21:15

a single character was cut from the final

21:17

edit. I think it's a really great lesson

21:19

in screenwriting as well, if you want to

21:21

be in the screenwriter's seat. That's

21:25

awesome. Yeah,

21:27

I hadn't thought about that from a screenwriter's perspective,

21:29

but also one of

21:31

the things you want to do as a screenwriter is

21:34

write parts people would like to play. And

21:37

going through a period of casting

21:40

a project, like I've been

21:42

on castings where like you

21:44

can tell the actors are not excited about a

21:46

part or there's some derision or judgment of like

21:48

this. Oh my God, this wasn't a project. Like

21:50

I had a friend who was in an acting

21:52

class and they

21:55

were getting, it was taught by like a big castor, so

21:57

they were getting like big scenes from movies

21:59

that were currently. being cast, this was like forever

22:01

ago. They brought in a scene from a

22:03

movie that went on to be a big blockbuster that made a

22:05

lot of money, but the scene was ridiculously bad. You

22:07

could just tell as she was rehearsing it how disdainful

22:10

she felt of the scene. Yeah. They

22:13

ended up not getting a very big person for the parts. Yeah,

22:16

I think you will learn tremendous amounts about

22:18

what actors are interested in and what they

22:20

can do and what they are looking at

22:22

and how they break down a script. Yeah,

22:25

totally. I hadn't thought about that leap, but that is

22:27

another huge leap. That's great to think through. Yeah.

22:31

Then our last story

22:33

of the week. So this camera

22:35

was originally announced. Look, I'm actually excited

22:38

about this camera and want to play

22:40

with one. What I'm about to say is

22:42

going to be a little, because that mean,

22:44

I don't mean it to be mean. But

22:46

it was originally announced. Our first article about this

22:48

camera was January 7th, 2016 with

22:51

a price point between $400 and $750. It

22:54

was supposed to come out in the fall of 2016, and

22:56

then there would be a cheaper version in 2017. Then

23:01

they announced a new price points in

23:03

2018. Camera was still not out,

23:05

$2,500. They

23:08

have now released footage from this camera,

23:11

and it is at $5,495. They've

23:16

released footage, but we still don't have a shipping

23:18

date. Look, there has been inflation and

23:21

there's been supply chain issues and yada, yada, yada.

23:24

$5,500 is probably like $3,500 in 2018. God,

23:28

that's such a present. I sound so old when

23:30

I say that. Yeah. Boy, does that hurt. Yeah.

23:33

But true facts. Regardless,

23:37

we now have publicly announced footage

23:40

from, and it's supposed to be

23:42

coming out, the Super 8 camera

23:44

from Kodak. If half of

23:46

you have spent this whole ramp up being

23:49

like, I know exactly what you're talking about. Yeah.

23:51

The other half of you have been like, what could he possibly

23:53

be talking about? You're either waiting on this camera or you're not.

23:56

But it's a new film camera and Aries stopped

23:58

making new film cameras. 2011,

24:02

2012, 2013, there's a big hullabaloo when they made their last

24:04

Airycam. I think it was now Panavision has not made new

24:06

Panavision bodies in a while. We haven't had a new film

24:09

camera in a while. Part of it is

24:11

that I'm still regularly shooting on World

24:14

War II era film cameras. Like a film

24:16

camera lasts a long time. There are two

24:18

airy- Bring out the bollocks, baby. Oh,

24:21

yeah. I teach a similar type of class. We have

24:23

a Panaflex and an Airy 2B, and that Airy 2B

24:25

made in the early 50s. Still

24:29

hook and strong. Thank you, Steven Soderbergh,

24:31

for donating that. Also, if you want

24:33

to take my 35-millimeter class, brooklyn35millimeter.com, like

24:36

how I snuck that one in there. I didn't even know I

24:38

was going to- I was waiting for it. I was going to

24:40

bring it up. You knew it before I did. I forgot. Anyway.

24:44

I'm really pushing for this class. I

24:46

appreciate that. We've already got 40 percent of

24:48

the registration we need to run, so we're

24:50

really close. A couple more

24:53

people, and this far out, to have 40 percent of the people we need

24:55

to run, I feel like we're going to make it. I feel like we're

24:57

going to spend June shooting 35. Back

24:59

to the point of the Kodak. It's

25:02

a Kodak Super

25:04

8 camera that lets you roll

25:06

in sound, that has a microphone mount, that's

25:09

a modern camera with a digital viewfinder, so

25:11

you can see what you're shooting with estimated

25:13

exposure and shoot also to an SD card

25:15

at the same time. You can start editing

25:17

immediately and then get your footage back

25:19

later and cut your negative to match. All

25:22

of the stocks Kodak makes are currently available in

25:25

Super 8. It's going to be

25:27

great. It's exciting that

25:30

I'm excited they are making it. I'm also going to

25:32

go out on a limb and defend the price. Making

25:34

physical objects is really hard. Yes.

25:39

Frankly, when they originally said the price was going to be $500

25:41

to $750, I

25:43

was like, LOL, no it's not. I

25:47

know a lot of you are thinking, man, that's a

25:49

lot of money. For those of you

25:51

thinking, man, that's a lot of money, you can go on eBay right now and

25:53

buy a Canon 1014 XL for 400-500

25:56

bucks, get it fully refered for a couple

25:58

hundred bucks and be I'm completely happy

26:00

that camera flaps. I've shot so much on

26:02

the 1014 or the 814 XL, great cameras,

26:05

or the Ballew. There's a lot of great Super

26:07

8 cameras available. What the Kodak

26:09

is bringing is the video tap integration, which

26:11

is going to make it play better on

26:14

film sets. There's going to be an HDMI

26:17

output, which you can hook up to like

26:19

a Teradek Bolt, so that a client can

26:21

monitor it. And what this camera is really

26:23

going to offer is the ability to integrate

26:25

Super 8 into a modern set. Because

26:28

the biggest problem with something like the 1014 is

26:30

like, let's say I want to, at this point,

26:33

every client wants to watch what you're shooting,

26:35

music, video, commercial, studio, whatever. They want to

26:37

be able to integrate and see what's going

26:39

on. Video village is a

26:41

thing. And if I bring out the 1014, nobody

26:43

can see what I'm doing. This

26:45

camera's main place will

26:48

be bringing Super 8 into

26:50

client work, whatever client work

26:52

means for you, because it's going to

26:54

have the actual I.O. to

26:57

hook up a Teradek, so that you

26:59

can broadcast wireless video to people, so

27:01

they can see what's going on. And

27:03

that is the reason why I think

27:05

it is worth the scratch. Because

27:08

it'll honestly be a rental item for most of us, except

27:10

for those of us who end up shooting a lot of

27:12

Super 8, in which case, because of

27:14

client work and what it pays, you'll

27:16

end up paying it off. I actually think the price point

27:18

is fine. I think it's the right

27:20

price point, to be honest. That's great. Yeah,

27:23

I mean, look, not to be that guy, but

27:25

I think you're spot on with the inflation. It's

27:28

just like when you announce something so long ago,

27:30

and you keep putting money into it,

27:32

it just is. I

27:35

was happy that it's not 10 grand, especially because

27:37

it's not like film is cheap. Kodak

27:40

has a whole line of Super 8 film they're releasing

27:42

with it, which seems really cool. And the

27:44

footage, the diversity of

27:46

the footage they showed, I thought was

27:48

also worth mentioning, not just like concerts

27:50

or cityscapes, but they had done some

27:52

really cool stuff with LED lighting and

27:54

some other lights just really popped.

27:56

And it made me want to play with the camera, or at

27:58

least like, you know. Maybe we want to take

28:01

a course really but but it was

28:03

it was beautiful And I think

28:05

when you wait so long for something They

28:08

really have to pull out all the stops

28:10

and it does feel like oh you were

28:12

doing something for that amount of time You

28:14

weren't just ignore ignoring us and waiting to

28:17

release something I

28:20

Forgot to mention to you guys, but we have

28:22

a listener comment that I need to respond

28:24

to This is from our

28:26

episode two weeks ago interviewing

28:28

director lulu wong and In

28:32

the introduction. I reminded listeners

28:34

about How the

28:36

farewell opened and per

28:38

the theatrical ratio it had a

28:40

it outperformed and had a stronger

28:43

opening weekend than the avengers somebody

28:47

Commented on our spotify. Mr. Booth. They said

28:49

what do you mean? The

28:51

farewell made 23 million dollars avengers

28:53

endgame made 2.8 billion

28:56

dollars. Would one of you guys

28:58

mind explaining? What the

29:00

ratio is and what that

29:02

comment is and how the

29:04

farewell sort of famously exceeded

29:06

expectations by that ratio So

29:11

i'll jump in and jason correct me with what I get

29:13

wrong The only thing indie

29:15

filmmakers care about is our first screen ratio Like

29:18

in a typical year I would say

29:20

it's very rare if I see more than one or two

29:22

of the top 10 grossing films in a year This year

29:25

was really great the big box office earners like appenheimer and

29:27

barbie were movies that like I was excited about and I

29:29

saw In the theater opening week and it was great But

29:31

like a lot of times some of those top 10 earners

29:33

i'm a little bit aged out of that demographic But

29:36

I would say if you look at the list every year of

29:38

the top 10 per screen

29:41

Which is the ratio we're often talking about it's not how

29:43

much money does it make it's how much money it made

29:45

per screen Almost always have

29:47

seen eight or nine of the top

29:49

10 per screen movies because you know

29:51

That's when you know famously west anderson

29:53

is the reigning king Of

29:56

per screen averages over his lifetime. Like

29:58

I think he won for

30:01

Grand Budapest and also for, I mean,

30:03

pretty much every one of his recent movies was

30:06

the top first screen that year, except maybe the

30:08

one about the New Yorker, which I really enjoyed,

30:10

but I understand. I was not, it

30:12

was me and the New Yorker magazine who

30:14

liked that one, apparently. You know what, I

30:16

was right behind it, Charles. I thought it

30:18

was very endearing and beautiful at that. Ditto,

30:20

ditto. Yeah, okay, great. So we've got some

30:23

nerds on this podcast who like obscure stuff.

30:25

The Frankest Dispatch is the title. Yes, yes.

30:27

And not obscure stuff, because obviously it had

30:30

a huge marketing question. Bill Murray was in it, but the less,

30:34

you know, we like our movies. So the per

30:36

screen ratio is where the farewell did well. I

30:38

don't remember if it was a two or a

30:40

four screen opening, but it's usually

30:42

a good indication distributors that you've got a great

30:45

movie, that like even though you're not on a

30:47

lot of screens, it is packed

30:49

full of people who are excited to see it, who

30:51

want to see it in the theater. Whereas yes, Avengers

30:54

made $2.8 billion. But

30:56

I'm going to tell you what, they were on a lot more

30:58

screens. And there were a lot more

31:01

screens at once. So obviously

31:03

a lot more people ended up seeing

31:05

Avengers infinity acts or whatever than they

31:07

did. That would be a great name

31:10

for a movie, right? Yeah,

31:12

that was what it was, I believe. And

31:14

I don't mean to, I'm not like anti superhero

31:17

movies. I really love a lot of superhero movies.

31:19

I saw all of the three Iron Man movies

31:21

in the theaters. Like I enjoy a good superhero

31:23

romp. I just, I had a young

31:25

kid when adventures came out and I wasn't seeing anything in

31:27

the movie theater. So I maybe I would have enjoyed infinity

31:29

war. I'm not sure. I don't mean

31:31

to, I never want to yuck anybody's yum. If you

31:33

think that's the best movie ever made, that's great. I

31:36

have some movie choices. I still love the movie

31:38

blow, which everyone is convinced is terrible, but me.

31:40

So I'm not going to. I love the movie

31:43

bedazzled and everyone thinks it's horrible, but I'm

31:45

like, I loved it. I've not even heard of the

31:47

movie bedazzled. Oh, bro, for sure. I would make it

31:49

curly in the nineties. Yeah. It

31:52

was like one of five videos in rotation

31:54

that I had when I was visiting my

31:56

grandparents in Costa Rica. So anyway, we all

31:58

have our favorite weirdo. My

32:01

brain has been so corrupted by the video,

32:03

like the extended universe of products, that I

32:05

could only assume it was a movie about

32:07

someone using the bedazzler or about the backstory

32:09

of how the bedazzler was invented, or

32:12

the bedazzler as a character. It's a

32:14

remake of a 60s comedy too. It's

32:16

not a- Yes. Yeah. Pretty existing IP.

32:18

Yeah. One of my favorite per screen

32:20

averages stories is, I think,

32:23

2011 when Kevin Smith did Red

32:25

States, did the fake auction and then

32:27

took it on a road tour, Roadshow, which

32:29

I proudly went to see when

32:31

I was at BU, because he was

32:33

only on one screen a week and

32:35

rolling it out. His per screen average was like,

32:38

I think something crazy. It was crazy. It would attract for

32:40

like a $2 billion movie, but

32:42

you're on one screen. He was charging

32:44

$75 ticket because it came with a

32:46

three-hour Q&A afterwards, so you'd come watch

32:48

the movie. It's a five-hour event. I

32:50

remember I turned all my friends ago

32:52

in Boston, we went, we

32:54

bought our tickets, then you watch a 90-minute movie, and

32:56

then he comes out for two and

32:58

a half hours of talk and very fun. But that

33:01

was a crazy good, you're selling out theaters at

33:03

$75 a pop, doing

33:06

one theater a week, so

33:08

continuing his theatrical run at the

33:10

time, really smart, fun way

33:12

to do it. I think the movie cost four

33:15

and a half and you want to making seven

33:17

million total. So made his money back,

33:19

did whatever. But you completely

33:21

crushed the per screen average of that year, because

33:23

you're on one screen, so you're just going somewhere.

33:27

I think this is very, Lou

33:29

has talked about this in interviews,

33:32

but she premiered the film. It

33:35

premiered at Sundance. It was produced

33:37

by Big Beach, which is a New York-based

33:39

production company that got put on the

33:41

map via Little Miss

33:43

Sunshine. She

33:46

and her team were given an offer to go

33:49

straight to streaming with the film, much more

33:51

lucrative offer, and they chose for a

33:53

theatrical release. The

33:55

success of that opening

33:57

weekend, I think is kind of of

34:00

what created the buzz that ultimately led

34:02

it to be, you know, this award,

34:05

like it bolstered this award camp

34:07

campaign and success that like really just

34:09

launched a career. So I think there's,

34:12

there's something really powerful about like sticking

34:14

it in a theater. And, and even

34:16

if it means like not making as

34:18

much money as you're launching your career,

34:20

but now like Lulu

34:22

is a legend with a very successful

34:25

Nicole Kidman show. And if you listen to that podcast,

34:28

you'll hear how she said no to that

34:30

show. And then Nicole Kidman was like, no,

34:32

I'll give you all the creative power. So

34:35

like, I think that it's just a really

34:37

great story and of a second time filmmaker

34:40

sticking with what feels right for

34:42

their film and then having great success

34:44

with it. I mean, that's the movie that

34:46

she got off that was crazy. I mean, I felt

34:48

like it was in theaters here. You know, there was

34:51

Oscar buzz, you know, people were talking about Aquafina

34:53

and that performance and just whatever. Like, I

34:55

just think, look, I, as

34:58

someone who has made stuff for streamers and whatever, it's

35:00

just so easy to get lost and someone

35:03

gets to pay the bills. But if you have the

35:05

power to do it and you can see, and you

35:07

have, you know, hopefully the project that can launch that

35:09

stuff, there's no better way. And I do

35:12

think at the end of the day, like if

35:14

you can get into theaters, you can get people talking,

35:16

that's amazing. Because guess what? If the farewell didn't do

35:18

that well in theaters, it would have gone to a

35:20

streamer anyway, eventually, you know, like it would have shown

35:22

up. You get the same effect. So just the

35:25

ability for someone to go buy a ticket, brush

35:27

their teeth, hopefully, and then head out to the

35:29

theater and, you know, like feel like an adult

35:31

out there. I do think there's it's just such

35:33

a different feeling than than what I do,

35:35

which is like loaf on the couch in my

35:37

underwear and a sweatshirt and hopes of the best, you know,

35:39

so. OK,

35:43

well, that there

35:45

is no better summary than the mental image

35:47

of Jason hanging out in his underwear on

35:49

the couch watching movies. I did. That

35:51

was my vibe last week because I took last week off

35:53

to take a break from the movie,

35:55

which I'm getting back into now. And

35:58

I I watched The Virgin. at

36:00

like 11 a.m. on a Tuesday.

36:03

It was amazing. I did back-to-back features

36:05

at, via AMC Stubbs Pass. I did

36:07

put pants on for that, but might

36:10

I recommend anyone but you, followed

36:13

by poor things? Just two

36:15

delightful movies back to back. I

36:18

completely forgot about the first one after watching

36:20

the second one, but yeah, that time of

36:22

rest, very important. Indulge in the movies. I

36:26

only put clothes on to do work. That's like a

36:28

very famous, I think it was like Aileen Brash

36:30

McKenna in an interview. It was just like, when it's time to

36:33

be a screenwriter, I get completely, like I get dressed. I do

36:35

my hair, I do my makeup. I sit down and do it,

36:37

because she was like, I had a professor, was like, it's a

36:39

job tree, like a job. And that always stuck with me. So

36:41

it's like, if I have to do work during the day, screenwriting

36:45

work, I get dressed, I do whatever. But if

36:47

I'm just going to watch Red

36:49

Notice on Netflix, it's

36:52

hedonism too over here. Yes.

36:56

Respect. Yeah. The

36:59

life of the child. Yeah.

37:02

Once you have a kid, you no longer get to just hang out

37:04

all weekend. You've got to at

37:06

least put on pants. Fair

37:09

minimum. I mean, depending on what kind of parent you are. And

37:11

again, not going to judge, but

37:14

yes. All right, so that has been this

37:16

week's No Film School Podcast. I'm on the internet at

37:18

Blue Sky. I do some

37:20

articles on the film school. I've got a review coming

37:22

up of some stuff that I'm excited

37:24

to play with. And I can't wait to tell you more

37:27

about. You can always take a summer class with me, brooklyn35mm.com.

37:32

I am at Lost in

37:34

Graceland. Tomorrow we are releasing

37:36

our episode with Katie Burrell,

37:38

the star and director of

37:41

Weak Layers, which is this

37:43

hilarious ski comedy.

37:45

Very funny. It's streaming now. You can

37:48

loaf on the couch in your underwear

37:50

and watch it. Amazing trailer. Hilarious trailer

37:52

for that movie. Isn't it good? Isn't

37:54

it good? Also recommend doing it from

37:57

Tahoe in a cabin. Shout

37:59

out to. to all the Tahoe snowboarders

38:01

that I grew up with. I'm

38:05

at Jason Hellerman on Blue Sky, on Twitter, on

38:07

Instagram, Jason at nofilmskill.com. If you want to email

38:10

in a question or whatever. We've got some fun

38:12

articles coming out this week. Like I said, commit

38:14

to the bit. One of the most fun times

38:16

I've had sitting and writing, because I do think

38:19

at the end of the day, most

38:21

bad screenplays I read, the reason

38:23

they're bad, aside from formatting,

38:26

dialogue, whatever, is that they don't commit to their

38:28

own ideas. So commit to the bit. And

38:30

maybe we'll talk about that next week once the article's up.

38:32

I love that.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features