Podchaser Logo
Home
Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Released Saturday, 14th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Roundup: Congress Still Stalled, Republicans Can't Agree On Leader

Saturday, 14th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Support for NPR and the following message

0:02

come from Bombas, making socks, underwear,

0:04

and t-shirts that feel good and do

0:07

good, giving 100 million items

0:09

of clothing to people who need them. Go

0:11

to bombas.com slash NPR

0:14

and use NPR for 20% off

0:16

your first purchase.

0:18

Hi, this is Carl from Boston along with

0:20

my guide and I, Dog Merrick, who

0:22

has been my navigator and best friend

0:25

for the last eight and a half years. He

0:27

has guided me all over Europe, the

0:30

United States, and in particular

0:32

my hometown in Boston. We are getting

0:34

ready to take my last commute to

0:36

work as I am going to retire him today

0:39

from working. This

0:41

podcast was recorded at 5 29 p.m. on Friday the

0:43

13th of October. Things

0:48

may have changed by the time you hear this, but

0:52

I will be taking a long way home tonight.

0:54

Here's the show.

0:58

Man, it's been a long week and I feel very emotionally

1:01

touched by that time stamp right now. I

1:04

have a friend who had to retire his seeing eye

1:06

dog and it was like a really, really

1:08

very emotional. Yeah. Hey

1:11

there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast.

1:13

I'm Tamara Keith. I cover the White House. I'm

1:15

Susan Davis. I cover politics.

1:17

And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political

1:19

editor and correspondent. And we are

1:21

here with you late today because we were

1:23

waiting to see if House Republicans could settle

1:25

on a new speaker. And, well,

1:28

there's been plenty of action, plenty

1:30

of drama, but there is still no

1:33

elected speaker of the House. Last

1:35

night, Louisiana Republican Steve Scalise,

1:38

who had been chosen by his conference, dropped

1:41

out.

1:42

A new man rose up. That man is

1:44

Jim Jordan. Sue, where

1:47

are we? It's been a bit of a roller coaster

1:49

the past 24 hours, and Republicans are now

1:51

heading into the weekend still with no speaker

1:53

and still no clear plan out of this. As you

1:56

noted, Steve Scalise dropped out of the race last night.

1:58

This morning, Republicans met.

1:59

behind closed doors and decided that they would move

2:02

forward again with a second round

2:04

of nominating and votes to find a speaker nominee.

2:07

Jim Jordan, the judiciary chairman who challenged

2:09

Steve Scalise in that first election and

2:11

lost, immediately declared today

2:14

that he would run again. He was

2:16

for a bit, you know, maybe about

2:18

an hour, the only candidate in the race. And

2:21

before Republicans went in to vote, another

2:22

lawmaker, a guy by the name of Austin

2:25

Scott, a Republican from Georgia,

2:26

announced that he would challenge

2:28

Jordan. And they went in and they had nominating

2:31

meetings and then they had a secret ballot. And Jim

2:33

Jordan, surprisingly, didn't

2:35

do all that well on a secret ballot against

2:38

Scott, who literally was in the race for like

2:40

six minutes. Jordan got 124 votes, Scott

2:42

got 81. In

2:45

his race against Scalise, Jordan had 99 votes. So

2:48

even after all that drama, not a

2:51

significant gain, Republicans

2:53

then went and had a second ballot where the

2:55

question was merely, would you support

2:57

Jim Jordan on the floor? That was also

2:59

a secret ballot. And he upped

3:01

his numbers. He got 152 votes to support. But 55

3:05

Republicans are still at least on

3:07

a secret ballot saying they will not vote

3:10

for him for speaker. The remarkable thing

3:12

with Austin Scott is many

3:14

of us did not really know who he was before

3:17

he decided to run for speaker. And he didn't

3:19

seem to necessarily even really want to

3:21

be speaker as much as he was

3:23

just like there as a vessel as an alternative

3:26

to Jim Jordan. Yeah, he was really just a proxy

3:28

vote for people that didn't want to vote for Jordan.

3:30

And he had voiced a lot of frustration, not

3:32

specifically necessarily about Jim Jordan,

3:35

but about this entire process, about how Kevin McCarthy

3:37

was removed, about the fact that Republicans didn't

3:39

rally around Scalise, and even that Jordan

3:41

was going to try to do it, you know, unchallenged today.

3:44

So it was really more of a protest run. He

3:46

was pretty clear he doesn't actually want to be speaker. He

3:48

just didn't want Jim Jordan to go unchallenged. But

3:50

look, like at the end of this meeting, they told

3:53

members to go home and that the next

3:55

step is Republicans will meet again in the Capitol

3:57

on Monday, and they're still trying I

4:00

had a lot of conversations with Republicans

4:03

coming out of that meeting, you know, talk to

4:05

some Jim Jordan allies like Clay Higgins

4:07

who say they think he can get there and, you know,

4:10

talk to other members like Vern Buchanan who

4:12

are like, look, he's just not going to be able to get the 217. And

4:15

if Jim Jordan can't do it, I

4:17

can't tell you who it's going

4:18

to be. Yeah, and it's really interesting how

4:20

the

4:22

dynamics on Capitol Hill have

4:24

shifted, you know, just thinking back to the

4:26

Tea Party and thinking to when, you

4:29

know, John Boehner was the Speaker

4:31

of the House and Jim Jordan is

4:33

somebody who John Boehner called a political terrorist.

4:36

You know, this was somebody who was the hard

4:38

right before Matt Gaetz defined

4:41

the hard right of this era. He's the

4:43

founder of the Freedom Caucus. Yeah, I mean, he

4:45

was Matt Gaetz before Matt Gaetz became so Matt

4:48

Gaetz, right? The

4:50

congressman who essentially torpedoed Kevin

4:52

McCarthy out of being

4:54

Speaker of the House. And this is

4:56

where the Power Center now is in the Republican

4:59

Party. Well, I do think that Jordan

5:01

has gone from playing

5:04

the outside game to playing

5:06

a little bit more of an inside game. Sure.

5:09

He's got a seat at the table now. Absolutely. You

5:11

know, not only does he have the friendship and

5:13

he was an ally of Speaker Kevin McCarthy

5:16

who was removed, but he's a close ally

5:18

of Donald Trump. He's the committee chairman of

5:20

the Judiciary Committee. He's leading the

5:22

impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. I

5:24

mean, he is he has gone from outsider

5:27

to mainstream party elder.

5:30

There are multiple problems for Jim Jordan.

5:31

One,

5:32

his record is mostly as a

5:34

hard right based conservative. And if you are a moderate

5:37

lawmaker or a Republican in a swing seat,

5:39

you might be looking at him with a bit of a side eye like

5:42

this guy is not going to help me or understand

5:44

my politics or my districts. He

5:46

also doesn't have much of a record of actually

5:48

enacting legislation. You know, I

5:50

can't even really point to you any legislative

5:53

victories. Jim Jordan has had in

5:55

his career here. I can point to a lot of things he helped

5:57

derail, you know, a lot of spending

5:59

bills. a lot of government shutdowns that he played a

6:01

role in trying to be like the combative

6:03

right, but he's not really someone

6:05

who can build consensus across

6:08

the aisle. And maybe a lot of Republicans wouldn't say

6:10

that on the record, but a lot of them are looking forward and it's like,

6:12

look, they still have to do spending bills. Like there's still a

6:14

lot of things you have to do that require

6:16

you to work with Democrats. And Jim Jordan

6:18

doesn't really have a track record of all, not

6:20

to say he can't, but there's not a lot of track record

6:23

he can point to. I also think that Jordan

6:25

has a choice to make now I talked to Jody Arrington,

6:27

he's the chairman of the budget committee. And, you know, I said,

6:29

it seems pretty clear that no one's going to be able

6:32

to get to two 17, which is the magic

6:34

number

6:34

on the house floor. If all members are voting

6:36

on the first ballot, like it still seems

6:38

like some Republicans going to have to fight it out on the floor.

6:41

And Jordan is going to have to make a decision

6:43

over whether he wants to take this to the floor

6:45

and see if he can win it there. And the argument

6:47

that Jordan supporters will say is that it

6:49

would be very hard to publicly

6:52

cast a vote against him, Jordan, because

6:54

he is a uniquely popular figure among

6:56

the conservative base in a way that Steve Scalise

6:58

was not. And also that Donald

7:00

Trump has endorsed him for Speaker and

7:02

that Trump would be watching that vote and be able to bring

7:04

some pressure to bear on Republican

7:06

holdouts. That's a tough way

7:08

to get your get for your path into the speakership

7:11

to be seen as sort of trying to publicly strong

7:13

arm or bully people into it. You know, Speaker

7:16

is a consensus job, as I said, and it's

7:18

a decision he's going to have to make. But you know, if he's within

7:20

striking distance, sure, can you can you flip

7:23

a couple of votes on the House floor? But do Republicans

7:25

really want to go through another pretty brutal

7:27

battle? I don't know the answer to that. Republicans

7:30

didn't know the answer to that coming out of there. I think they're

7:32

very frustrated and nobody

7:35

has any idea how this will be resolved. All right, we're

7:37

going to take a quick break and we'll be back

7:39

in a second.

7:40

It's the start of a new term at the Supreme Court.

7:43

For our legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg,

7:46

it's kind of like opening day. So I

7:48

drown myself in legal briefs.

7:51

I read and read and

7:53

read go behind the scenes with Nina as she prepares

7:55

for a new term.

7:56

But in July, after the

7:59

battalion.

9:37

As

10:00

far as the US role here, President

10:02

Biden continues to express steadfast

10:05

support for Israel. Today, though,

10:07

he also advocated for humanitarian

10:10

support to get to Gaza.

10:11

We can't lose sight of the fact that

10:13

the overwhelming majority of Palestinians

10:15

had nothing to do with Hamas and

10:18

Hamas's appalling attacks, and

10:20

their suffering as a result as well.

10:23

Domenico, let's talk about the

10:25

politics of all this. We've gotten results

10:27

from a new NPR, PBS NewsHour,

10:29

Marist poll that was conducted

10:32

after the attacks on Israel

10:35

last weekend. And what did you find?

10:37

Well, overall, about two-thirds

10:40

of people say that they want the US

10:42

government to show strong support publicly

10:45

for Israel in their

10:47

war against Hamas. There were

10:49

some pretty big divides, though,

10:51

when you look by age and by race. For

10:54

people who are over 45 years

10:57

old, 78 percent said

10:59

that they wanted a strong

11:01

public show of support from the United States. But

11:03

for those under 45, it was only 48 percent,

11:06

a big 30-point drop in that

11:09

case. When it came to race,

11:11

whites, 72 percent said that they

11:13

want a strong show of support for Israel,

11:15

but only 51 percent of non-whites

11:18

said so. So this is something we've sort of seen

11:20

as a trend over time, where

11:23

the Democratic Party, for example, according

11:25

to Gallup this year, has for the

11:27

first time been more sympathetic

11:29

toward Palestinians in

11:31

this long tension with Israel

11:34

and Palestinians. But we

11:37

have to realize that this is also not just

11:39

about Palestinians. It's a totally different

11:41

situation because you have Hamas, a terrorist

11:44

organization that had perpetrated

11:46

these heinous attacks that Israel

11:48

is now going to war with and trying to

11:51

unravel Hamas operatives

11:54

and activists who are really entangled

11:57

with the Palestinian population in Gaza.

11:59

Biden, as we said, has been, he's

12:02

come out very strongly in support

12:04

of Israel. Is he

12:07

seeing any sort of an approval rating

12:09

bump from that?

12:11

Nope. Not yet.

12:13

Anyway, you know, the thing is, our partisanship

12:16

is just like this massive shield, and

12:18

it's not being pierced right now at all,

12:21

even in this situation, at least not yet.

12:23

You know, I mean, this news sort of has

12:25

to, it takes a while sometimes for it to trickle

12:28

down for people to really formulate their thoughts. But 52%

12:31

of people said that they disapprove

12:34

of Biden's handling of

12:36

this situation. That also

12:38

reflects exactly the disapproval

12:41

rating for Biden's job overall. So

12:43

when you think about that, even though two thirds of people

12:45

are saying that they want a strong show of support for

12:48

Israel, you know, the people who are

12:50

saying that who are Republicans or Republican-leaning

12:52

independents who don't like the job

12:54

Biden's doing overall just at this point

12:56

don't seem ready to be

12:59

able to say that they are. And that's also a proof

13:01

of how Biden's talking about the

13:03

situation with Israel and Hamas.

13:05

Sue, the White House was up on

13:08

Capitol Hill today briefing key congressional

13:10

leaders about what they say is the gravity of

13:12

the situation in Israel and also with

13:14

Ukraine's ongoing war to defend itself

13:16

against Russia. And they are

13:19

planning next week to send up a new

13:21

emergency funding request. Spokesman

13:24

John Kirby said that they're basically

13:26

running out of time to

13:29

get that military assistance to U.S.

13:31

allies. But how

13:34

well is that likely to be received on

13:36

the Hill where there is not a speaker?

13:38

Well, it's complicated. There is already

13:41

a division among lawmakers over the idea

13:43

of whether you should couple aid to

13:45

Ukraine with aid to Israel or keep it as

13:47

a standalone measure. Obviously,

13:49

it is immediately going to be met with

13:51

a problem of not having a speaker of the House. The House

13:53

cannot move anything until they resolve

13:56

the speaker impasse. And we don't know when it

13:58

will end. So the urgency gets. the

14:00

urgency intensifies, especially as the

14:02

Senate returns next week. The other

14:04

problem is that I think it's

14:06

fair to say that a support aid package

14:09

for Israel could probably pass very fast and

14:11

with a lot of bipartisan support, but

14:13

I imagine that the White House and party

14:15

leaders, because it's so popular,

14:17

may see an interest in trying to tack

14:20

on things like Ukraine aid or border

14:22

money, things that some House Republican

14:24

lawmakers have suggested to get it through. I can't

14:27

imagine they get it done next week. That just doesn't

14:29

seem politically possible, but

14:31

there's other legislation that Congress is looking at as

14:33

well about this that they're tied up about. House

14:35

Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul has

14:38

a resolution. It's bipartisan condemning

14:40

Hamas for the attack. That's also

14:42

something that Congress generally likes to go on the record

14:44

with and very quickly after events like

14:46

this, and they're also seem incapable

14:48

of moving. And he's been really candid that

14:51

the speaker impasse at

14:53

this moment looks

14:55

very bad on the world stage. You know,

14:57

democracies are being tested, US alliances

15:01

are being tested, and a US

15:03

government that cannot resolve itself

15:06

is a bad message to send to the world. But

15:08

I do think the McCauls are hoping that

15:11

the urgency of the situation will

15:14

sort of incentivize Republicans to figure it

15:17

out. But I have to say, I thought that all this

15:19

week and the weekends, and it has not

15:21

been resolved. The political dysfunction

15:23

that the House Republicans have created

15:26

has paralyzed Congress, while really bigger,

15:28

literally life or death problems are happening

15:31

overseas. And it just strikes me that it's emblematic

15:33

of the chaos that the US system

15:35

has really devolved into over the last

15:37

several years that we've heard about over and over

15:39

again abroad from allies,

15:42

thinking that this is a big problem in the United

15:44

States. They've pinpointed this, and it's really

15:47

been a shift away from when the United

15:49

States was really seen as the moral leader in

15:51

the world after World War II. It's really

15:53

striking.

15:54

So I think we're going to take a quick break,

15:57

and when we get back, it is time for Ken.

16:00

it let it go.

16:02

This message comes from NPR sponsor Honeywell.

16:05

Built upon their own ESG efforts of

16:07

the past decades, unmatched experience,

16:09

and innovative technologies, Honeywell offers

16:11

a portfolio of solutions that can help

16:14

you achieve your sustainability goals wherever

16:16

you are in the journey. Learn more at Honeywell.com

16:19

slash NPR.

16:21

This message comes from NPR sponsor

16:23

BetterHelp. Do you ever feel like

16:25

your brain is getting in its own way?

16:28

Like you know what you should do, what's

16:30

good for you, but you just can't

16:32

do it? Therapy can help you figure out

16:35

what's holding you back so you can work

16:37

for yourself instead of against yourself.

16:40

Make friends with your brain with BetterHelp.

16:43

Visit BetterHelp.com slash NPR

16:45

today to get 10% off your first

16:48

month.

16:49

Support for NPR and the following message

16:52

come from W. W. Norton and Company,

16:54

publishers of Going Infinite by Michael

16:56

Lewis, the number one best-selling

16:58

author of The Big Short, Flash Boys,

17:01

Moneyball, and Liars Poker had

17:03

unparalleled access to the rise and fall

17:05

of a new tycoon, Sam Bankman Freed.

17:08

Going Infinite is available now wherever

17:11

books are sold.

17:12

Here at Planet Money, we

17:14

bring complex economic ideas down

17:17

to earth. We find weird, fun, interesting

17:19

stories that explain the way money shapes

17:22

our lives. Inflation, recession,

17:24

the price of gas, we've got you. Listen

17:26

now to the Planet Money podcast from NPR.

17:32

And we are

17:34

back and it is time to end the show like we

17:36

do every week with Can't Let It Go

17:38

where we talk about the things that

17:40

we just cannot let go of politics

17:43

or otherwise and I think we

17:45

could use a little joy this week. So Sue, what can't

17:47

you let go of? I don't know if I can bring joy but I

17:49

can bring weird, okay? Because weird

17:52

has just been the theme of this week.

17:54

We're already sort of through the looking-glass

17:56

with speaker politics and how this might play out

17:59

and I would say The person who acts like everything

18:01

is normal is George Santos,

18:04

the Republican lawmaker from New York. And

18:07

I admit that I have been somewhat

18:09

amused by his business

18:12

as usual attitude. He attends

18:14

all of these conference meetings. He

18:16

talks to reporters. He's weighing in on the speaker's

18:19

race. Meanwhile, his fellow Republican

18:21

lawmakers are saying that they might try

18:24

to expel him from the house.

18:27

People don't want to talk to him. He's the guy that doesn't

18:29

get that everybody wants him to leave the party and he just

18:31

keeps showing up. And it was just this sort

18:33

of cherry on top of a very, very weird

18:36

cake. He's facing what, like two dozen

18:38

felony counts on these

18:41

chart cards, card fraud

18:44

and law.

18:45

But he'll tell you this, he walks those halls

18:47

like not a care

18:48

in the world. Domenico, what can you let go of?

18:50

You know, let me just ask you guys this. I think

18:52

this is not a trick question. Mississippi,

18:55

red or blue state? Red. Red.

18:59

So if you want to be elected governor of Mississippi, you're

19:01

probably going to have to have some Republicans vote for you,

19:03

right? Seems reasonable, if you're a Democrat. Well,

19:06

the Democrat who's running for governor is a man

19:08

named Brandon Presley. He released

19:10

an ad this week that really stood out to me. Now,

19:12

you know, at first it stood out because of how he had

19:14

all these Republicans in the ad. I'm

19:17

a Republican. I'm a former Republican congressman from

19:19

the state of Mississippi and I'm supporting Brandon

19:22

Presley. He comes back to him and he says, and

19:24

I have three words for you. Let's go Brandon.

19:27

Rebranding, trying to rebrand. I get

19:29

what he's doing there. I got to say when I'm in the motorcade

19:31

following the president, a lot of let's go Brandon

19:34

banners out there.

19:34

And it's all

19:36

for Brandon Presley, obviously. Yeah,

19:39

clearly. Clearly. Tim, what about you?

19:41

What can you let go of? So as

19:43

you might remember, leading into the possible

19:46

government shutdown that didn't actually happen

19:48

because they passed a short term spending

19:50

bill that, oh gosh, is going to run out again in

19:53

just about a month. There was

19:55

great concern that if the government

19:57

had shut down, it would cancel.

20:00

Bear Week. Oh no. Right?

20:02

Well, Fat Bear Week did not

20:05

get canceled. Fat Bear Week went

20:07

on and there is now a

20:10

crowned champion Fat

20:12

Bear and her name is Grazer.

20:16

Bear number 128. She is a fierce mother

20:18

and expert angler. I'm looking

20:21

at a picture.

20:25

She's beautiful. In

20:28

the Instagram announcing this,

20:31

heavy is the rump that wears the

20:33

crown. Has anyone considered

20:35

nominating this bear for Speaker of the House? Because

20:38

maybe she could win it. We could have a female,

20:40

another female Speaker of the House.

20:42

He did get a hundred and eight thousand votes.

20:44

I think that's more than you need for Speaker. Let's

20:47

leave it there

20:47

for today. Our executive producer

20:49

is Muthani Maturi. Our editor is Eric

20:51

McDaniel. Our producers are Elena Moore and

20:54

Casey Morrell. Thanks to Krishna Depp Talamur

20:56

and Lexi Schapittle. I'm Tamara Keith.

20:58

I cover the White House. I'm Susan Davis. I cover

21:00

politics.

21:01

And I'm Domenica Mazzanaro, Senior Political

21:03

Editor and Correspondent. And thank

21:05

you for listening to the IPRP

21:15

Did you know you are physically adapting

21:18

to all your swiping,

21:19

scrolling, and tapping?

21:21

We're changing our bodies and

21:23

what they're able to do through our habits.

21:26

NPR's Body Electric, a special

21:29

interactive series investigating how

21:31

to fix the relationship between our tech

21:33

and our health. Listen in the TED

21:35

Radio Hour feed wherever you get your podcasts.

21:40

Support for NPR and the following message

21:42

come from Bombas, making socks, underwear,

21:45

and t-shirts that feel good and do

21:47

good.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features