Podchaser Logo
Home
Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Released Tuesday, 21st January 2020
 1 person rated this episode
Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Steven C. Hayes on Developing Psychological Flexibility

Tuesday, 21st January 2020
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Misery is actually our ally because

0:02

there's energy in there, there's carrying

0:04

in there, there's motivation in there. Welcome

0:14

to the One You Feed. Throughout

0:16

time, great thinkers have recognized the

0:18

importance of the thoughts we have. Quotes

0:21

like garbage in, garbage out,

0:23

or you are what you think ring

0:25

true. And yet for many of

0:27

us, our thoughts don't strengthen or empower

0:29

us. We tend toward negativity,

0:32

self pity, jealousy, or

0:34

fear. We see what we don't have

0:36

instead of what we do. We think

0:38

things that hold us back and dampen our

0:40

spirit. But it's not just about

0:42

thinking. Our actions matter. It

0:45

takes conscious, consistent, and creative

0:47

effort to make a life worth living. This

0:50

podcast is about how other people keep themselves

0:52

moving in the right direction, how they

0:54

feed their good wolf. Thanks

1:10

for joining us. Our guest on this episode

1:13

is Stephen Hayes, and this is his

1:15

second time on the One You Feed podcast.

1:17

He's a professor of psychology at

1:19

the University of Nevada Reno. Stephen

1:22

is also the author of forty three books

1:24

and more than six hundred scientific

1:26

articles. He's served as the president

1:29

of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive

1:31

Therapy and the Association

1:33

for Contextual Behavioral Science.

1:36

He is one of the most cited psychologists

1:39

in the world. His new book is A

1:41

Liberated Mind, How to Pivot

1:43

Toward What Matters. Hi,

1:46

Stephen, Welcome to the show. I am

1:48

good to be with you again again.

1:50

Indeed, yes, one of my favorite

1:52

interviews was our earlier interview, and

1:54

you have a new book out called A Liberated

1:57

Mind, How to Pivot Towards What

1:59

Matters. I'm really excited to jump

2:02

into that. But let's start like we always do,

2:04

with the parable. There is a grandfather

2:06

who's talking with his grandson. He says, in life,

2:09

there are two wolves inside of us that are

2:11

always a battle. One is a good wolf,

2:13

which represents things like kindness and

2:16

bravery and love, and the other

2:18

is a bad wolf, which represents things

2:20

like greed and hatred and fear. And

2:23

the grandson stops and thinks about it for a second.

2:25

He looks up at his grandfather. He says, well, grandfather,

2:27

which one wins? And the grandfather

2:30

says that the one you feed. So I'd

2:32

like to start off by asking you what that parable

2:34

means to you in the work that you

2:36

do and in your life. Well, it means a lot.

2:39

And I think it's becoming clear

2:41

to me that both of those wolves within

2:44

have a role. They both have a message

2:46

for us, and yes, we want

2:48

to feed one over the other, but

2:50

we want to kind of listen to both and

2:53

find even inside some of those

2:56

dark places that they go, that

2:58

we're yearning for something that is reflected

3:00

in the positive places that we know how to take

3:03

our lives wonderful. Yeah,

3:05

you're known for being one of the founders of

3:07

acceptance and commitment therapy,

3:09

which if I had to summarize, and

3:12

I'm summarizing a lot in a very

3:14

small amount, but a big piece

3:16

of act is not to eliminate

3:19

negative thought and emotion, but to learn

3:21

to live with them in a more skillful way

3:24

and then act sort of in a way that

3:26

is in accordance with our values. Yeah, exactly.

3:29

And that's been about a forty year journey of

3:31

both science and clinical practice and extending

3:33

it out almost any area that human

3:35

beings can think of, you know, in sports and

3:37

business and health matters and so forth.

3:40

So it's now sitting on top

3:42

of an enormous body of work, much larger

3:44

than when we talked, because it's happening so

3:46

fast now from the worldwide community.

3:49

But part of what I've not really

3:51

discovered, but that I've really kind of realized

3:53

going forward is that it

3:56

it's not so much just making

3:58

room for what's negative, but as

4:00

I said at the very beginning, even learning from

4:02

it, because there's something inside

4:05

our misery that is really

4:07

important to us if we know how to see it.

4:10

And it's basically, what is

4:12

the problem we're trying to solve or

4:14

trying to solve it in a way that creates

4:17

problems, huge problems, But

4:19

we're not trying to disturb ourselves.

4:21

We're not trying to get stuck and called a sex.

4:23

That's not the purpose. There's a there's

4:25

a good purpose buried in

4:27

there. And turns out those

4:30

are the same purposes that are

4:32

right inside the processes that we

4:34

now know sitting on more

4:36

than three thousand studies that lift

4:39

up and carry lives forward. And if you

4:41

see that, then you can be a little

4:43

kinder with yourself when you're struggling, because

4:45

you you realize there's actually something valuable

4:48

in there. It's just you can't

4:50

get there this way. And

4:52

that's what's the intelibrated mind is building

4:55

out that full realization which really sort

4:57

of makes the whole act work feel

4:59

a little more mature, and it

5:02

makes it a lot easier to apply to lots

5:04

of places that are beyond strictly mental

5:06

health or substance abuse problems. Right.

5:08

You say early in the book that the things that

5:10

have the power that causes the most pain

5:13

are often the things we care about most

5:15

deeply. The other directly linked. I mean,

5:17

it's easy to think about it. And

5:19

all you've got to do is take something you really struggle

5:21

with, start with the negative ones. It's one of

5:23

the most powerful ways in and

5:26

then just literally write it down a sheet of

5:28

paper, flip it over, and then write down what does

5:30

that suggest you care about? And yeah, you've

5:32

got a solution for it. You know, if you're really

5:34

feeling anxious given a talk, you know

5:36

your solution might be to get rid of the anxiety.

5:39

But when you flip over the sheet of paper and say,

5:41

what does that really care about? You know, if I could

5:43

just magically put fairy dust in your head

5:45

and you wouldn't have any anxiety, you

5:47

still wouldn't have accomplished what you came to accomplish.

5:50

And so maybe what you're anxious about, for example,

5:52

is being with people and being accepted in love.

5:55

Maybe it's making a contribution. Maybe

5:57

it's being genuine or authentic, or you

6:00

know, being a whole person, or being more mindful

6:02

and aware to be more present, to live your life

6:04

more fully. I don't know what it is, but I

6:06

know one way to find it

6:08

is to take what you're struggling with and just flip

6:10

it over and allow your

6:12

pain to speak to you. And it

6:15

will whisper to your messages about

6:17

your purpose. And it reverses

6:19

true too. If you think about where you really

6:22

really care about, you'll realize that those

6:24

are the places you're vulnerable. I

6:26

mean you can feel it. I mean, if you, if

6:29

you really care about being into intimate and

6:31

committed relationships, as soon as somebody

6:33

shows up where that might happen, you

6:35

find yourself, you know, squirm and

6:37

then creating fights for no reason,

6:40

and you know, not answering the phone, I

6:42

mean, what are you doing. What you're doing

6:44

is protecting yourself from her because

6:47

you know that, you know inside

6:49

the suite is the end of

6:51

it. You know we are going to

6:54

die. Life is limited, and

6:56

you know, just looking at your children in the face

6:59

or the eyes of your lover you feel it, you feel

7:01

vulnerable, and that's

7:04

the way it comes. That's the package.

7:07

And so Act is all about how

7:09

to take the whole of it and

7:11

to to learn from both sides of it

7:14

and to focus on what's important and create

7:17

a life worth living. So one of the

7:19

fundamental ideas at the heart

7:21

of this book is the idea of psychological

7:24

flexibility. So tell me

7:26

what psychological flexibility

7:28

is. Well, it's kind of like

7:31

a box with six sides, or

7:33

you can sort of break it up into three pillars.

7:35

It's really turns out it's one thing. It's like it's

7:37

one box even though it has six sides. But the

7:40

short version would be psychological

7:43

flexibility is to be able to come into this

7:45

moment consciously with your

7:47

thoughts and feelings and memories and bodily sensations

7:50

that that moment contains as they are,

7:52

not as what they say they are you fear

7:54

them to be, and then be able

7:56

to direct your attention and the flexible,

7:59

fluid, voluntary way towards

8:01

what brings meaning and purpose into your

8:03

life by choice, not by

8:05

shoods and knots and must and have two is

8:08

not by guilt and shame, not by mama

8:10

telling you it has to be so, but by the choices

8:12

you make, and then to build

8:14

out habits of action, actual things

8:17

you do with your life moments that contain

8:19

those qualities. So you could

8:21

say it more quickly, it's accepting,

8:24

showing up, and moving on. And

8:27

that combination of being open, aware,

8:29

and actively engaged in life hangs

8:32

together. They all fit together, just

8:34

like puzzle pieces. You feel

8:36

the missing if it's gone, it's

8:38

like taking two sides out of a box. It would

8:40

be a floppy box the same way.

8:43

And we think we've kind of cracked the code. We think

8:46

that those six things are the simplest

8:48

formulation that does the most

8:51

good in the most areas

8:53

of human life. And I can say that

8:55

not as a hope or a wish or a claim or

8:58

personal experience. I'm now

9:00

sitting on top of an enormous body

9:02

of work by a very large community over

9:04

nearly four years, and it comports

9:07

with our wisdom traditions, it comports

9:09

with our personal experience, but

9:12

it also fits good old fashioned

9:14

Western science. And that's a really cool

9:16

combination. Yeah, yeah, it definitely

9:19

is. And so psychological flexibility

9:22

shows up and really

9:24

correlates very well with people's ability

9:27

to be successful in different things

9:30

they're doing. You reference a ton of studies,

9:32

but one of them showed that the level of psychological

9:34

flexibility overweight people have

9:37

correlates directly with their ability to

9:39

lose weight, engage in exercise, and stop

9:41

binging. Conversely, the

9:44

opposite of psychological flexibility is

9:46

psychological rigidity, and

9:48

that predicts anxiety, depression,

9:51

substance abuse, eating disorder, on

9:53

and on and on. So what is psychological

9:56

rigidity, Well, when you get entangled

9:58

with your thoughts and they're of woidant of your feelings,

10:01

memories, bodily sensations, and

10:03

you allow your attention to be jerked

10:05

to the past or future through rumination

10:08

or worry, you sort of buy

10:10

into that story of who you are and how you're

10:12

different, special from other people, whether it's

10:14

especially disturbed or difficult, or

10:17

or needy, especially wonderful and

10:19

perfect either way, that kind

10:21

of storied self and

10:24

then harnessing all of that to

10:26

trying to get approval and achievement

10:29

instantly, without trial and error, without

10:31

failure, slipping, falling and learning springing

10:34

forth from the head of zeus. You're just gonna

10:37

march on with this uh competence.

10:40

That's going to give you not necessarily

10:43

a deep sense of values

10:45

and purpose, but applause,

10:48

money, fame, and all those kind

10:50

of superficial things that the mind grasps

10:52

after or just plain happiness

10:54

to find as a happy, happy joy joyce

10:56

Miley face button, not the real

10:59

kind of happiness, which is this life

11:02

well lived as a whole person.

11:04

So it's pretty much a direct

11:07

inverse. And those six processes

11:09

also hang out together. They feed on each

11:11

other. They are like more like a

11:13

pack of wolves than a single wolf, and

11:16

they will eat anything you put

11:18

in front of it. I mean, if you want to have relationships

11:21

at work, or you want to be able to have a successful

11:23

business, or lose weight or diet

11:25

or exercise, or get through cancer diagnosis,

11:29

or deal with a substance use

11:31

problem or anxiety or depression, on

11:33

on. It accounts

11:35

for a large share, and

11:38

compared to other sets of processes,

11:40

more than any other that science can

11:42

name. So it's the There's

11:46

a lot of other things we can add and you

11:48

can build on it, and I'm very friendly

11:50

to that and open to that, but let's get the basics

11:53

down first. If you can get a solid foundation,

11:55

it's a whole lot easier to then build on

11:58

that solid foundation. And these

12:01

flexibility processes are like

12:03

building a house on rock and build

12:06

it on inflexibility. It's like

12:08

building on sand near the ocean.

12:10

Good luck with that. So the six processes

12:13

that you're talking about map towards

12:16

a big part of the book, which you refer

12:18

to as six key pivots.

12:20

So before we start going into those, let's

12:23

talk about what you mean by pivot.

12:25

A pivot is a connection

12:28

between a negative and the positive

12:31

set of steps. That's why I call them a

12:33

process just as a word meaning a procession

12:35

like a parade. It's a series of things, but

12:37

it's integrated that you're going from here and

12:39

towards there. You have the

12:41

negative ones, you have the positive ones, and they're paired.

12:44

But you know, a pivot is a little pin

12:46

and a hinge. And what a pivot

12:48

does is it takes energy that's going in

12:50

one direction and it moves it in another direction.

12:54

And you know, if you want to move, you don't want to be standing

12:56

still inertially kind of has to be

12:58

overcome if you do that. If you're antsing with somebody,

13:01

even if you're going to swing them around in a completely

13:03

different direction, it would be a lot better

13:05

to have them moving than to have them standing

13:07

still. And in the same way, it

13:09

turns out that misery is actually our

13:11

ally because there's energy

13:13

in there, there's carrying in there, there's motivation

13:16

in there. I mean, there's being screwed up

13:18

in there too, but that's

13:21

not what the way it has to be.

13:23

And just like if you push on a door in

13:25

one direction, the hinges move the door

13:27

in another direction, that opens up who

13:29

you can move forward. And those

13:31

are the pivots that I talked about

13:33

in the book. And so those six

13:36

things end up being six pairs, and

13:38

underneath them are six what I call

13:41

yearnings. You could call them needs,

13:43

or you just could call them motives. Needs

13:46

sounds to me a little demanding, but

13:49

I call them yearnings because that's the way they

13:51

often show up. I think if you sort

13:54

of settle down and really listen to yourself,

13:56

you can kind of feel yourself yearning

13:59

for up. Can I give you a sad example,

14:02

sure, please, Well, this is one of the saddest,

14:04

it's one of the most basic because it's the kind of

14:06

monkey we are. We yearned to

14:08

belong where the tribal primates,

14:11

where the small group primates where the cooperative

14:13

primates, and we come

14:16

into the world in such a way that if others

14:18

don't kick care of us, we die. But even as

14:20

adults, we get cast out from the troop. Literally

14:23

when the wild monkey land, you get cast

14:25

out from the troop. Is in the hominid

14:28

species, you very likely are not going

14:30

to live very long. We're even

14:32

wired for it. Our brain

14:34

is wired for it. You know, if you look at the eyes of

14:36

a brand new baby, they start dumping

14:39

natural opiates in their brain as soon as your

14:41

eyes lock onto them. Your genetics

14:43

are basically saying, yeah, that that's what

14:45

you want. You want that, you want that, and

14:47

you need to because otherwise you're not going

14:49

to be able to connect with others around

14:51

you. Right, So we come into that naturally.

14:53

But then we've got this new thing on the block

14:56

that you and I are doing right now, symbolic reasoning,

14:59

language, and cognition, and that's

15:01

probably on late Golli two

15:04

two million years old. That's the best guesses.

15:08

And when you're not too old, not

15:10

when you're a baby, not when you're a one year old,

15:12

not when you're that sweet innocent thing where

15:14

you just know how to connect and care, you

15:16

start talking to yourself about how

15:18

you're going to belong, and for the first

15:21

time you start to lie. For the first

15:23

time, you put on a mask. The

15:25

Greek name for a mask is the root of our word

15:28

personality. That's how basic

15:30

it is, you know. The claimant unmovable masks

15:33

were called personas, and

15:35

what that is

15:37

is the logical mind trying to

15:40

belong by producing specialness.

15:44

I'm smart, I'm loving, I'm

15:46

kind. You're kind all

15:49

the time with everybody. No,

15:51

you're lying. Of course you're not kind

15:53

all the time with everyone, but you dare

15:56

not even admit it yourself. That

15:58

persona, that clay, a fixed

16:00

rictus of a mask you put on has

16:03

to be maintained or otherwise you're not going to be let

16:05

in. And sometimes people try

16:08

to get let in by having stories

16:10

that are all negative. Oh i'm

16:12

so help so we have been

16:14

abused. It's sad, help

16:16

me, help me. And yeah, people

16:19

will let you in if you claim that your guy

16:21

grand or the weakest of the week. Either

16:23

way, you do get brought in. But

16:25

very soon people tire of it. They

16:27

see that it's a clown suit you're wearing, that

16:29

it's not a real whole open person.

16:32

They don't feel uplifted when they're around it.

16:34

Plus they themselves are struggling with the same

16:36

issue. So when you produce

16:38

belonging that way, it hollows

16:41

out. I can give you a really sad statistic.

16:43

I mean it just made me roll my eyes when I saw

16:45

it. Something like one out

16:48

of four, one out of five of your conversations,

16:50

especially when you're young, contain at

16:52

least a little white lie and exaggeration.

16:56

Oh, I only slept four hours

16:58

last night when you show up to your meeting,

17:01

Now you slept four and a half and you know

17:03

it, but you said four. Why

17:06

because then you're special. You're

17:09

someone who can function no

17:11

sleep. Here's like that.

17:14

Well, the people you tell those

17:16

tiny little white lies too you

17:19

now are significantly less

17:21

interested in ever speaking to again.

17:23

So isn't it sad We're

17:26

trying to earn our way in by these

17:28

little pretense and masks

17:31

and all that kind of stuff. Afraid

17:33

if we're just seeing as whole persons, that

17:36

will be rejected, which is the exact opposite,

17:39

because people yearn for connections like

17:41

that. You wake up when you have connections

17:43

like that. When people put aside the pretense,

17:46

but it's almost like we can't stop it because

17:48

the logical mind says you have to be special,

17:50

you won't be included, especially bad, especially

17:52

good, And then it hollows

17:54

it out. Even if it works

17:56

and they applaud and say you're so wonderful, part

17:58

of you says yeah, but if they really knew

18:01

your fraud, if they saw through

18:03

it, they wouldn't want to be with you. So

18:06

here you're trying to produce belonging, and even if

18:08

you get it, you don't get it. So

18:10

what I do in the book is walk through how are

18:12

you going to get belonging? How can you

18:14

get a real experience of belonging? And

18:17

it turns out you can get it by kind of a birthright,

18:20

which is consciousness itself. You go back

18:22

to that moment when your mamma looked in your eyes

18:25

metaphorically, you belonged

18:27

at that moment that you're seen by another

18:29

conscious being who's bringing you into

18:32

consciousness. And if you stop

18:34

dancing and prancing, and you

18:36

know all of the stories that you're buying into

18:38

and trying to make other people believe, and

18:40

you just slow down, open your eyes and look in

18:42

the eyes of the other people around you.

18:45

You're gonna see people wanting to connect

18:47

with you, and you're gonna see consciousness

18:50

there and similarity

18:52

there. Why because you're

18:55

part of the troop, you belong by birthright, you're

18:57

one of us, You're one of the goofy

18:59

CONTs as people, and so you know, instead

19:02

of playing for the pretense

19:04

and then getting nothing, why don't we go for

19:06

the substance. It turns out to be a

19:08

lot easier, it's a lot more

19:10

off lifting, it's a lot more real, and

19:13

yeah, it's more vulnerable. It is more vulnerable,

19:15

but it's so important

19:17

how the real thing, and you can

19:19

feel your life shift when you get it. So

20:00

let's turn to the first pivot, and it's

20:03

one that we talked about a fair amount in our

20:05

previous conversation, but I think is a really important

20:07

one, which is this idea of

20:09

diffusion. So it requires

20:11

pivoting from cognitive fusion to

20:14

diffusion. So let's first talk about kind

20:17

of what that is, because it's a pretty

20:19

core part of all of this work.

20:21

It's key and underneath the acceptance

20:24

and commitment therapy work as a whole research

20:27

program on a thing called relational frame

20:29

theory. Geeky stuff but we

20:32

think we've kind of figured out what is the core

20:34

of human language and cognition, and so we've

20:36

taken the time to build

20:38

an edifice that includes a really active

20:40

basic science program about how

20:43

is the world different when you begin to do

20:45

what you and I are doing right now. You

20:48

know, even non human animals

20:50

want to understand. They want things to fit together,

20:52

They want them to be predictable. You know,

20:55

non human animals will work for signals

20:57

that tell them what's going to happen, even

21:00

if it's going to tell them that something bad is going to

21:02

happen. You would think

21:04

you would not want to know the bad news. Humans

21:06

often don't, but non human animals

21:08

will work and work for little signals

21:10

that will just tell them things like you're

21:13

hardly going to get any food over the next ten

21:15

minutes, or there's a shock coming,

21:18

uh, and it doesn't stop the shock, but at

21:20

least you kind of know the lay of the land, right

21:22

And you think of how important that would be to a non

21:25

human animal to be able to survive. To do

21:27

that, you can see why you would want to explore

21:29

your environments, know what's going on and how it fit

21:31

together, know how they all kind of relate

21:34

one to the other. Once we've

21:36

got language going, we want to do the same thing.

21:39

But here's the problem. Language

21:41

is something that isn't just learned by experience.

21:44

It's learned by derivation. Anything

21:46

can relate to anything in any possible

21:49

way. Let's see if we play

21:51

a little game. Let's see if we can do it. I want you to

21:53

think of a noun any now, but don't tell me what

21:55

it is. I'll think of one too. It's one of my desktop

21:58

here, and then I'm going to say mine,

22:00

and I'll ask you to say yours. But we'll think of a relationship.

22:03

Let's do a weird one, like is

22:05

the father of Okay? So,

22:08

how is a pen the father of

22:10

an apple? An apple? Okay? If

22:12

you can't come up with an answer, your

22:15

life is going to end. So Eric better,

22:18

you better produce pen drew the apple?

22:21

Awesome? Pretty apt fits

22:23

right? Perfect? Yeah, except

22:25

here's the problem. I've done this hundreds

22:28

of times and there's always

22:30

an answer. So

22:32

either God so arranged the world that everything

22:34

is related to everything else in all possible ways.

22:38

Let's just do it. How's the apple the father of a pen?

22:41

It produces the ink for the pen. Good?

22:43

Yeah, it's good. Actually, when they came in

22:46

my mind is that you ate from the tree of knowledge,

22:48

and that gave you the capacity to produce

22:51

things like pan Then you absolutely could

22:53

make apple based ink. Of course you could, so

22:56

you see the game. So now here's the problem

22:59

if language allows, is that there's a two

23:01

way street between everything, but not

23:03

just same as also

23:06

different from opposite to better

23:08

than every possible

23:10

relation you can think of, even goofy ones

23:12

like is the father of I mean, how often

23:14

do you say that you

23:16

can always come up with an answer and the answer is

23:19

good. I mean, it fits, it's right, it's

23:21

real. No, it's not real. You

23:23

made it up. And so how

23:25

are you going to rein in that kind of a

23:27

wild horse. If what you seek

23:30

is this experience of understanding

23:32

and everything fitting together, so

23:34

let me apply it. Think of something

23:36

that you're proud of, and

23:39

let's just do self esteem the way people

23:41

usually try to do it. I'm

23:44

and then say the rest of the sentence, that's

23:46

so great and you're proud about go

23:49

ahead, and let's do it. I'm kind,

23:51

I'm kind. Listen real carefully,

23:54

and what do you hear? Does your

23:56

mind just settle down on that say, yeah, you are, I'm

24:00

kind accept when

24:03

I'm not exactly

24:05

For example, when I you

24:08

may not want to share this one when

24:11

I get irritated with my girlfriend. Awesome,

24:15

But what that was right there earlier?

24:18

I just brought it out right? You

24:20

with me on this, okay.

24:23

So if you're yearning for coherence

24:25

and understanding, that's built into

24:27

you even before language shows up. But

24:29

then language gives you two opinions about everything.

24:32

Do you know four year olds understand goofy on

24:35

one shoulder with horns and goofy on the other shoulder

24:37

with halos. Four year olds

24:40

they understand that it means they've already got

24:42

the argument going on inside their head. So

24:44

how are you going to get to peace of mind? Never

24:47

mind? Purpose? And that's really

24:49

what people want. I think it's people peace of mind,

24:51

but purpose, that's what people really want, is

24:53

a big part of what they want. And

24:56

so what we teach an act is to

24:58

give up on coherence

25:00

in it all fitting together inside

25:03

the language world literally,

25:07

because there's always a yep, but there's

25:09

always a pro and con list. If you try

25:11

to go all pro will give you cons. If

25:13

you try to go all con, it'll give you pros I'm

25:16

the worst of the worst, the lowest, lower human scum.

25:18

No one's lowered me. No,

25:20

I'm not that bad. I mean,

25:22

you'll argue with both sides, right.

25:25

So what we teach instead is

25:28

to learn how to

25:30

be guided by language. Take what's

25:32

useful, allow that to be a

25:35

kind of understanding. It

25:38

works, it's helpful. This is useful.

25:40

And then the cacaphony continues and you

25:42

notice it. Thank you mind very much for

25:45

trying to figure this all out. And

25:47

I've got some other things to do. I've heard that story

25:50

before. But if it says something in

25:52

that cacaphony like, oh, by the way, uh,

25:55

the text headline is one week away, This

25:57

is a good thing, you might miss

25:59

it otherwise. Oh, by the way, you've gotta the

26:01

one you feed podcasts. Remember that

26:03

that that was right there in your Google candle. Thank

26:06

you mind. I appreciate that. But

26:09

a lot of stists say it's just useless

26:13

to live in your life. So can we instead

26:15

learn how to take what's useful

26:17

and leave the rest. It

26:20

turns out we can, and it's a

26:22

big part of what the mindfulness traditions are

26:24

doing. It's a big part of the wisdom traditions are

26:26

spiritual traditions, or prayer traditions

26:28

are psychotherapy traditions. And

26:31

when we've kind of cracked that code, we've created

26:33

several hundred goofy

26:36

little things that you can do in thirty seconds

26:38

that sort of bumping in that direction, Like take

26:41

a negative thought that really grabs way too much

26:43

attention and sing it, say

26:46

it in the voice of your least favored politician,

26:50

to still it down to a single word, to say it over

26:52

and over again rapidly on an articoast.

26:54

We have, you know, example after example

26:56

after example of ways that you can

26:59

essentially put a leash

27:01

on that word machine in between

27:04

your ears and allow yourself

27:06

to breathe even as it

27:08

keeps chattering. And so what we're trying to do

27:10

here with diffusion, then is

27:13

to I'm going to quote part

27:15

of what you said, seeing thoughts as they actually

27:17

are ongoing attempts

27:20

at meaning making, and

27:22

then choosing to give them power only to

27:24

the degree that they genuinely service. So what you're

27:26

basically saying is that our

27:28

whole thought process, as you described

27:31

in the relational piece before, we're

27:33

trying to make meaning, we're trying to make narrative

27:36

out of what's happening. And

27:38

it's easier to then

27:41

see through that process

27:44

than it is to untangle that process.

27:46

And the examples you just gave

27:48

of this is linked to this, which is linked to

27:50

this, you can create relationships, is

27:52

that that linkage is so vast and

27:54

so complex that when we start trying

27:57

to pull on part of it, we're

27:59

pulling on all of it. So it's easier

28:01

just to see through the whole mechanism.

28:03

Yeah exactly. I mean, suppose apples

28:06

really freaked you out for some reason.

28:09

Well, now we've got a whole another way

28:11

to get to it, and you and I just did it. All I

28:13

have to do is say pen you

28:17

know, so it's just helpless

28:20

that you're gonna be able to clean that mess up.

28:22

And when you go in and try to rearrange

28:25

this, it's like trying to rearrange a black

28:27

widow spidernest. Have you ever seen one of those

28:29

things? That they exist here in you know?

28:32

And I've taught my son to recognize

28:34

it when it's quite young, because babies

28:36

can be hurt by back back widows and

28:39

very old people. Maybe I could be heard, but

28:41

but they have a very characteristic web. It looks

28:43

like an insane web, you know, like they've been eating

28:46

their own poison or something, because it's

28:48

just a tangled nothing of

28:50

a well, welcome to the

28:52

human mind, and you're gonna

28:54

go in there and say, oh, I don't like this thread. No,

28:57

because when you we've one more thing,

29:00

the whole thing may rearrange like a fractal

29:02

disc. And

29:04

you've had that happen, you know, You've had things like

29:06

a bad experience and now everything

29:08

looks different or a dream even so

29:11

it's happening when you're not even controlling it, and then your

29:13

whole day is influenced by the freaking dream,

29:16

even if you can't remember, it has a felt sense

29:18

that goes with it, and things look different. So

29:21

instead of trying to, you know, rein

29:24

in that wild horse, let's learn to back

29:26

up a little bit and watch it. Take

29:29

what's useful and respectfully leave

29:31

the rest, not leave it like an eraser, like

29:33

getting rid of it. I don't want to put my hand

29:35

in that web to try to get rid of it. I'm

29:38

just going to make more of a mess of it, and

29:41

I'm going to be building lots and lots of connections

29:43

to things that I've hoped it would

29:45

be smaller in my life, thus making

29:47

them bigger in my life. Like I've just made apple

29:50

bigger for everybody who's listening, kind

29:52

of stupidly bigger and bigger. But

29:54

it's bigger now and in a way that is

29:57

not very useful. Pen Apple

29:59

is just not very full. But somebody in this

30:01

audience is going to think pan apple over the next

30:03

hour. In fact, many

30:06

many people, right, And in fact,

30:08

if you try not to, there's data

30:10

on this. It's really important

30:13

not to think apple,

30:15

pan or pan apple. I

30:18

now have doubled the likelihood that

30:20

you'll think that, Thank

30:22

you very much, professor, right.

30:26

But of course we do that inside our own struggles.

30:29

We try not to think about the betrayal

30:31

of a former lover, or the

30:34

traumatic experience we've had, or the painful

30:36

emotion we felt, the scary

30:39

thought that showed up. So

30:41

we need to learn to do something else with that,

30:44

meaning making engine in between

30:46

our ears. You gave a couple of strategies

30:49

for cognitive diffusion then, and

30:51

and the examples we just kind of walked through

30:53

are sort of one of the critiques of cognitive

30:56

behavioral therapy, which part of

30:58

cognitive behavioral therapy is is hey,

31:00

just change your thoughts in your life

31:03

will get better. My question for

31:05

you is is there a place for

31:07

that though if your thoughts that you're having

31:09

are clearly mistaken.

31:11

So as an example, let's say I say

31:14

Bob passed me in the halliday

31:16

and did not look at me, so Bob hates

31:19

me, when the truth is Bob had a stomach

31:21

ache. Isn't it helpful for me to know the truth

31:24

in that case? And I see your point about you start

31:26

to weigh into the web, But I'm kind of curious

31:28

when you think, like, sort of all right, it's

31:30

worth if our thoughts are just playing incorrect

31:33

to to sort of correct them versus

31:36

completely disengaging. Yeah,

31:38

there's two places. If you actually look at the data

31:40

on cognitive reppraisal, cogn modification,

31:43

etcetera. In cognitive therapy CBT,

31:46

CBT is the most powerful set

31:48

of techniques. Act as kind of part of that family,

31:50

part of that tradition. I've been president of those societies,

31:53

etcetera. We kind of play nice with that

31:55

larger tradition, but we have some different assumptions

31:58

than classics CBT. But

32:00

if you look at the data on it, when reappraisal

32:03

and cognitive modification of cognitive

32:05

restructuring is helpful. It's helpful

32:07

because of cognitive flexibility,

32:09

of being able to think multiple things and then be

32:11

guided by the ones that are useful. And

32:14

it's even there in classic CBT, for

32:16

example, to still down to an irrational thought,

32:18

do a behavioral experiment. This

32:21

is even before people are trained to the technological

32:24

errors and challenge the thoughts, and

32:26

already that's producing some

32:28

of the larger effects sizes that are in CBT,

32:31

and some of the most movements. So we

32:33

found in controlled research

32:36

that here the critical parts

32:38

of this. If you truly are ignorant, you truly

32:40

don't know, information can be helpful.

32:44

And if you're thinking too narrowly and

32:46

you're not staying open up, open enough

32:48

to be guided by experience, thinking

32:51

more flexibly is helpful. But

32:54

the problem is, and the reason I've always been a little

32:57

concerned about it, is not that traditional

32:59

CBT he is trying to make people get

33:01

into these artificial thought

33:03

loops. But boy,

33:06

you don't have to go very far on the internet before

33:08

you find a lot of people who have internalized

33:11

this rule in CBT kind

33:13

of messages, which is don't

33:15

think that, think this. Yeah,

33:18

But as soon as you say don't think that, you just thought

33:20

that again, yeah. And if

33:22

you link it to thinking this, thinking this will

33:24

remind you of that. And

33:26

so you're right

33:29

on the edge of these suppressive,

33:32

self amplifying, artificial processes

33:34

that are known in the literature. And

33:36

why go social close. It's like we're playing

33:39

on the edge of the cliff. Come back away

33:41

from the edge of the cliff. And the part

33:44

of reappraisal modification, now that's really

33:46

important is thinking flexibly.

33:48

So for example, if the person passes,

33:50

you know, one possibility is they're mad

33:52

at you. Another possibility could be they had

33:54

a bad sleepless night,

33:56

or they have gas, or they're thinking about something else.

33:59

And now the next time you've

34:02

got multiple possible

34:05

alternatives. Let's let experience

34:07

teach you which of these thoughts are most

34:09

workable, which one help you the most

34:12

move you forward? And you know,

34:14

not what's literally true, because

34:17

to get in there, we really have to get into

34:19

the pros and colm lists and all of that. I mean,

34:21

we're into fully into the spider web

34:24

when we really now there's times

34:26

there are times, I know, for figuring

34:28

out where the thoughts are really true.

34:31

But mostly it's holding them more

34:33

lightly and getting more evidence and allowing

34:35

to be guided by you, and also remembering

34:37

there's a lot more to you than your logical

34:40

mind. You know things

34:42

at the level of your guts, of your intuition.

34:45

It's not magic, it's not woo woo,

34:47

it's experience that goes beyond language.

34:51

Can I give you an example, please?

34:53

All right, there's a little exercise I

34:55

do in the book and Imagination that have done it actually

34:57

in a research study that's going to come out soon, to

35:00

ask people to picture something they struggle

35:02

with it's really difficult, and

35:04

then to show me with their body, them

35:07

at their worst with that issue,

35:10

as if their body is like a sculptor,

35:12

and the only thing people would get is not a story

35:15

from you, not a word, but just to see your body,

35:17

and then they would know what's going on inside. And

35:20

then they asked them to do the same thing you

35:22

at your best with that same exact issue.

35:25

Now here's what shows up. Almost

35:28

universally, you at your best, your

35:30

head is up, your eyes are open, your arms and hands

35:32

are out, it's an open posture. Almost

35:35

universally. You at your worst, your

35:37

head is down, your eyes that are closed. You may fall fold

35:40

it over like a fetal position, your arms and hands around

35:42

your fists, maybe clenched. You're in

35:44

a defensive posture. Okay,

35:47

we all know that, but

35:49

we all defend ourselves when these things show up. So

35:53

we have the knowledge, but

35:55

we don't know how to implement the knowledge. In fact, we don't

35:57

even know we have the knowledge, because when we say

35:59

we know it, we mean no. Verbally,

36:02

we mean can say the sentence. Well,

36:04

there's more to us than that.

36:06

That's what emotions are for, That's

36:08

what memory is for, that's what felt sense

36:11

is for. This is not woo woo. It's

36:13

other learning processes that are a thousand

36:16

times more ancient than what you and I are doing

36:18

right now. Let let them play too, and

36:21

they'll be helpful to you in producing

36:23

a real sense of coherence and understanding

36:25

and feelings and competence in

36:27

the other things that are inside the other

36:29

pivots. We don't have time to walk through all six,

36:31

but every one of them, every pair has

36:34

a deep yearning that everybody's

36:36

got, And if you mismanage

36:39

it, life gets screwed up. Maybe you manage

36:41

it while life opens up and the book walks

36:43

through the data on that and how to do it. Let's

37:14

pick another pivot to talk

37:17

about, because we are going to run out of time

37:19

here soon. What do you think self

37:21

acceptance values? Why

37:24

don't we take values just because it's so

37:26

central? Okay, it's really

37:28

close to a word evaluate,

37:31

and it's almost the exact opposite of that,

37:35

because values have to have this quality

37:37

of just because assume

37:40

if you don't like it, meaning

37:42

by choice between me and the person

37:44

in the mirror. It's informed by our culture,

37:47

it's informed by our family. It's informed

37:49

by I don't mean you alone

37:51

in the corner, but I mean taking

37:54

responsibility. This is what

37:56

I want, not what I want as an

37:58

outcome, but what I want

38:00

right now to be revealed in

38:03

my behavior. And

38:07

you know I mentioned earlier flipping over pain

38:09

and finding purpose there. You

38:11

can do it with sweet spots too, but

38:14

let me do one that's kind of neat. I think that

38:16

comes from this sense of

38:18

belonging and connection. Especially if

38:20

you can get some of the diffusion in there, you

38:23

begin to see people around you who you

38:25

respect, who you view

38:28

as heroes and as guides. So

38:31

take anything that you're struggling with, anything

38:34

that's difficult, any place where you're

38:37

you know, threatened by meaninglessness or depression,

38:40

or where you know this logical

38:42

thing that tells you you're going to die, the world

38:45

is going to die, et cetera. That's also doesn't

38:48

know how to channel that into a sense

38:50

of vitality and purpose. And

38:52

here's my question. If

38:54

you could pick anyone as a guide who

38:57

would help you in that anyone

39:00

ideally someone you know, but it could be a spiritual

39:02

leader or something you only read about. Who would

39:04

you pick? And then if you slow that thing

39:06

down, here's

39:08

one thing you're going to see. The way

39:11

that person carries themselves,

39:13

holds themselves, moves through the world,

39:16

contains things that reflect how

39:18

you want to be manifest

39:21

in the world. You pick

39:23

guides who are your heroes? Think

39:26

about it. I bet you did, and

39:29

I bet you it's kind of

39:31

what you would hope other people I

39:34

would see in you. And

39:37

there it is. There's that sense of meaning

39:39

and purpose by choice, the

39:41

whole of you, not just your mind telling

39:44

him you have to or mommy's

39:46

you know, shaking her finger at you. But

39:49

you're owning your own life

39:51

purpose, really

39:53

purposes, because we have many,

39:56

and that will lift you up.

39:59

We have so much day now that if you connect

40:01

to what brings meaning and purpose

40:03

into your life by choice, it's sometimes

40:06

called autonomous choice. I kind of don't

40:08

like that because it sounds too western and individualistic,

40:11

but but I know what they're getting to. What they really

40:13

mean is by choice, not

40:16

by shame and blame or have to. But

40:18

between you and the person in the mirror, these

40:21

are the qualities I want to what

40:23

I want to get as a result. Yeah, of course things will

40:25

happen, but these are the qualities I want to have reflected.

40:28

When you own that, everything lifts

40:30

up. Right. Examples of

40:32

that being things like being a caring parent

40:35

or a dependent friend, or being loyal

40:37

and honest. Right. Yeah, they're

40:39

not goals. They are, you say,

40:41

qualities of being and doing. Qualities

40:44

of being and doing. You can almost always find them by

40:46

could they easily be an adjective or an adverb?

40:49

So with your kids, you know, lovingly

40:51

I, or genuinely

40:54

I, or with

40:56

care I you

40:58

know? So what would take for

41:00

you to put lovingly in

41:04

your life? A part of what's cool about

41:06

that at the moment you say you want

41:08

that, you're already doing it. To

41:11

see it, I mean, at the very moment you own

41:13

that you're already doing it because

41:15

part of the doing it is to take

41:17

responsibility in

41:20

its original sense. Do you know the word responsibility

41:22

used to be two words. There's a response

41:24

space ability. You

41:27

have an ability to do this. You can respond.

41:30

I mean, if you're Nelson Mandela in a cage,

41:33

you can still decide the one thing

41:36

that captors can't take away. You can

41:38

decide what is

41:40

this about for you? And

41:43

if it's about hate and retribution, when they let

41:45

you out, you could produce a civil

41:47

war. If it's about justice

41:49

and caring and connection humanity,

41:52

when they let you out, you can produce something different. So

41:57

you know, life can conspire against you,

41:59

so you can't see what comes out. You

42:01

know, it's like water in a bowl. It's

42:03

contained. If you drill a hole in it, then you can

42:05

see that gravity matters and

42:08

the water kind of wants to go down. In the same

42:10

way, if I put you in a cage,

42:12

it's not very much loving you can do, except

42:15

maybe to your guards. I picked

42:17

Man Deevil, and it turned out he was pretty loving towards

42:19

his guards. You

42:22

know. In fact, some of the guards have written stories

42:24

about how it was to care for him and how that moved

42:26

They were by him and his dignity,

42:29

and that's an example of a hero, right, So why

42:32

did that come to mind? And why do we resonate

42:34

the heroes like that? Why

42:36

do these stories that we tell? But

42:39

when you started your podcast

42:41

with because right inside

42:43

those stories are our heroes,

42:47

our our our cultural guides as to

42:49

how to be whole and free, how to be

42:51

human. So in

42:53

the book, I kind of walked through how

42:56

to do that, what gets in the way, and show

42:59

the ginormous amount of data that

43:01

says, boy, this matters everywhere.

43:04

You want to hollow out a human life, turned

43:07

it into a valueless life, and you'll see

43:09

what happens, and you know, acceptance

43:11

and commitment therapy to sort of kind

43:13

of come back to it as a whole. Is this

43:16

idea of accepting

43:19

what we feel and what we think

43:21

and then committing to act according

43:24

to our values exactly? Sounds

43:27

like a simple formula, it's and it kind of

43:29

is simple, but it's not simple

43:32

in this way. It's tricky because you've got this

43:35

problem solving engine in between your ears

43:37

that claims it knows everything, and Mr

43:39

smarty Pants will just constantly

43:41

be tempting you into doing things that are give

43:44

you the short term gain and the long term

43:46

pain, and how to flip

43:49

that from smaller sooner at

43:51

the expense of larger later too. Now

43:53

I'm doing larger later and

43:56

you know, so, for example, there's research

43:58

on things like this. You make the values

44:00

choices, now people are more

44:02

willing to do emotionally hard things.

44:05

The smaller sooner problem is immediately there.

44:08

For example, let's say it's really your values,

44:11

in your values to be loving and caring, and

44:13

you've been noticing that you haven't talked

44:16

to a friend who's headed into an

44:18

addiction, and you can see him heading into

44:20

it, and you know it's not going to be a good conversation

44:23

to talk to him lovingly about your concerns.

44:26

Yeah, well you're just going to watch this train layer and

44:29

slow motion? Is that what

44:31

you want to be about? Well, it'll be

44:33

emotionally hard to have a conversation, Yeah,

44:36

it would. But if you go in there

44:38

in a posture of love and care, not

44:41

judgment and shaming and blaming,

44:44

who knows what you could do? And

44:46

if you don't, what happens

44:48

when you get that text message video? Did

44:51

so? You know, values it's not

44:53

a happy, happy, joy joy. None

44:55

of these things are. It's happiness

44:57

the way happiness really is, which

45:01

is the whole of us, sweet

45:03

and sour, all of us, you

45:06

know, never a cartoon. And

45:10

that empowering journey is

45:12

what people seek and

45:15

don't know how to get to. And

45:17

as I say, I think we've kind of cracked part

45:20

of the code um

45:22

and I'm really pleased to see that some of

45:24

these processes are inside lots of other traditions.

45:26

So I'm not here of saying act uberallis

45:29

we've got the answer. I'm saying, you

45:32

know, dealing with this mashup of

45:34

language and cognition and these other processes

45:37

is kind of our life's journey, and let's

45:39

use all the tools, all hands on deck.

45:42

No need to get grabby about credit or

45:44

naming. I don't care if you call act

45:47

anything or nothing. I

45:49

don't care if you call it act at all. But I

45:51

do care about whether or not you have what

45:53

you need to be lifted up and empowered.

45:56

I hope that the research work in the

45:58

book that I that I summarize there reaches

46:01

people that way. Whatever particular journey

46:04

there on, right, So much of what's

46:06

here does resonate

46:08

through or come through in

46:11

in lots of other traditions. I mean, if we just

46:13

look at the first few pivots,

46:15

you know, diffusion self and

46:18

you know, acceptance in presence. I'm a Buddhist

46:21

practitioner. Those things are right in the heart

46:24

of the whole thing about being

46:26

able to pivot on what those things are,

46:28

you bet you, And you know I'll take to the Buddhism

46:31

thing. You know, although I've been exposed to as

46:33

any hippie was you know, Suzuki

46:36

and Watts and people like that as a you

46:39

know, and I've lived on a religious commune

46:41

with a Yogi split

46:43

off from Paramahansi organanda, so I've

46:45

been exposed all that hippie dippie stuff. I'm old

46:47

enough to have been part of that are and lived in California.

46:49

But uh, you know, all of

46:51

the wisdom traditions, you know, whether it's Sufi's,

46:54

the Jewish mystics or the Christian mystics,

46:56

all mess around the literal, analytical,

46:58

judgmental thought. All

47:00

try to produce a quality of presence.

47:04

They all include some sort of contemplative

47:07

practice or dancing or repeated prayer,

47:09

cohens or something that messes around

47:11

with a logical problem solving mind. And

47:14

so the only thing that we brought

47:16

to the table really that's any different than anything

47:18

else is we took the time over nearly

47:20

twenty years of what looked to the world like

47:22

silence. I tell that story in the book, but

47:25

it wasn't. It was just we were off doing geeky

47:27

stuff that nobody cared about until later

47:29

on where it saw our atlant of

47:32

trying to create a psychology

47:35

more adequate to those questions so that

47:37

we can move them over into

47:39

Western science. And what it's really

47:41

good at Western science can validate

47:43

things that are out there, and that's good. You can do a

47:45

randomized trial on a meditation retreat,

47:48

that's good. That's fine. And you can put

47:50

the monks in an fMRI I and show how the

47:52

brains are different. That's fine. But I

47:54

wanted, not in a sacrilegious way,

47:56

but in a caring way to pull these things

47:59

at their joints and to find

48:01

what are the processes underneath, and

48:03

then see could I move it with other

48:05

processes? Uh.

48:08

You know John Kebot's in I had a conversation

48:10

with the years ago and I said, John, do you care more about

48:12

the process of the technique, you said, the process,

48:15

I said, And you want to put it out there in the world that

48:18

I can go right under the factory

48:21

floor with Joe six pack, or you only want

48:23

ten days silent retreats. They're mostly for

48:26

the educated elite or for the young.

48:28

And he said, I want it for everybody. I

48:30

said, Okay, John, You've

48:32

got me for the rest of your life. I'm with you, you

48:35

know, because if that's what we're up to, this

48:38

is cool work. Yesterday,

48:40

my colleague David Sloan Wilson, who's I've

48:43

written several books with, is kind of in this work,

48:45

and evolutionary biologists have a beautiful

48:47

conversation with the Dalai Lama.

48:49

And so you see these kind of coming together. A very

48:52

different Western science, evolution

48:54

science, you know, kind of geeky

48:57

stuff is now met up

48:59

for the first time the history of the planet with

49:02

these ancient wisdom traditions. And who

49:04

knows what we can create by doing that. Yep,

49:07

not in the sacrilegious way. We're not coming there to

49:09

tear down, pull apart in any kind of not

49:11

no, no, no, but but I you

49:13

know, I worked for many

49:16

years in the South and if somebody wants to run the other

49:18

way. If you say the word Buddhism, well then let's

49:20

not say the word Buddhism. Yeah. Yeah,

49:22

let's say another word, situational

49:25

awareness exactly. You

49:28

know. For me, I find this

49:30

time to be very exciting because we

49:32

are seeing some of

49:34

this more ancient wisdom

49:37

being validated by science.

49:39

And I find it when when I see those two

49:41

things sort of come together, I

49:43

feel like a sturdiness to it. Right.

49:46

If it's just some ancient wisdom and there's

49:48

nothing really on the science side,

49:50

then I'm like, Okay, it's interesting to explore it, but

49:52

it's it's not doesn't feel as sturdy. And

49:54

same thing if I see something scientifically that

49:56

sort of doesn't tie back into that. But when

49:59

I see those two things come together for me, but

50:01

this is just me personally, right, given my interests,

50:04

When I see these two things come together, it feels

50:06

really sturdy to me. Well, that's awesome,

50:09

And can I add a third thing please?

50:11

And we are part of the development of it. So

50:14

your ideas about new things

50:16

that have never been done before, but

50:18

that you think touched the deep processes

50:20

that are inside the things you know about

50:22

in the science actually, so it's helpful

50:24

to you. They have a place at the table too,

50:27

But we but we need to evaluate them. We need to

50:29

look at and giving a fair look, look at the data. Let's

50:31

see. You know, that third

50:33

piece is important because I don't want to

50:35

just live inside a traditional thing. I

50:38

can with my spiritual religious work. I'm

50:40

in a particular particular dharma

50:42

or whatever. But when we're

50:44

talking about the modern world, you know, the world

50:47

people are living in now, I'll give you

50:49

an example. We're living inside

50:51

a world where there's more prosperity

50:54

physically ever in the history

50:56

of the planet. If you had

50:58

to pick a time to be born on, and you can only decide

51:01

when, but not where, this

51:04

moment is the very best choice on

51:06

almost any measure health, violence,

51:09

malnutrition, starvation, you just make

51:11

it. Make a list, okay, except

51:14

anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and accept

51:17

mental well being. Those

51:20

things are going to the opposite direction. You

51:23

know, our young people are a standard deviation

51:25

worst than they were just a decade or two

51:27

ago. And it's not just

51:30

blah blah blah. They're actually killing themselves.

51:32

So don't just be telling me it's self report.

51:35

It is not in that

51:37

modern world. I think comes

51:40

that this fact that science and technology

51:43

has given us a huge exposure

51:46

to pain, to comparison,

51:50

and to judgment and

51:52

difference, and those put

51:54

together have attacked this the

51:57

core sense of we that

51:59

this you know, this tribal primate

52:01

relied on. We better invent

52:04

a new way, We better invent

52:07

things that have never been done on the planet, because

52:09

our challenges on the planet are different

52:11

than have ever been and

52:13

now we have the capacity to do things

52:15

like make the planet unlivable,

52:18

blow ourselves off, off off the planet,

52:20

etcetera. So you

52:22

know, time's up. You know, we've got to get

52:24

serious about it. So it's all hands on deck, and

52:27

that includes you know, folks

52:29

who are underneath the tree thousands of years

52:31

ago, but it also includes you. What

52:33

are your ideas? And I think

52:35

Western science is a cool way to vet

52:37

that we can't rely on the slow

52:41

traditions of religious

52:43

evolution, for example, that takes hundreds

52:46

of of years, and we need

52:48

some of these answers in a matter of tens of years.

52:50

So that's my little

52:52

rant, and it is what we've tried to do inside

52:54

the act work. Yep, yep. Well,

52:57

that is a great place for us to wrap

52:59

up. Thank you so much for coming

53:01

on the show against even It's been a real pleasure, been

53:04

awesome to talk to you again. And I do

53:06

want to say to the listeners when I said that includes

53:08

you, I'm talking to them too. So

53:11

what are your ideas and how can we move

53:13

the ball down the down the field?

53:16

Because humanity requires

53:19

something different. I think we all know it, we all

53:21

sense it, and Western

53:23

science can be of help, but it's not the whole answer.

53:25

It's going to take all of us. Amen to

53:27

that. Amen to that. Well, Thank

53:30

you Stephen, thank you bye.

53:48

If what you just heard was helpful to you, please

53:50

consider making a donation to the One you Feed

53:53

podcast. Head over to one you Feed

53:55

dot net slash support. The

53:57

One You Feed podcast would like to sincerely

54:00

you thank our sponsors for supporting the show

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features