Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Misery is actually our ally because
0:02
there's energy in there, there's carrying
0:04
in there, there's motivation in there. Welcome
0:14
to the One You Feed. Throughout
0:16
time, great thinkers have recognized the
0:18
importance of the thoughts we have. Quotes
0:21
like garbage in, garbage out,
0:23
or you are what you think ring
0:25
true. And yet for many of
0:27
us, our thoughts don't strengthen or empower
0:29
us. We tend toward negativity,
0:32
self pity, jealousy, or
0:34
fear. We see what we don't have
0:36
instead of what we do. We think
0:38
things that hold us back and dampen our
0:40
spirit. But it's not just about
0:42
thinking. Our actions matter. It
0:45
takes conscious, consistent, and creative
0:47
effort to make a life worth living. This
0:50
podcast is about how other people keep themselves
0:52
moving in the right direction, how they
0:54
feed their good wolf. Thanks
1:10
for joining us. Our guest on this episode
1:13
is Stephen Hayes, and this is his
1:15
second time on the One You Feed podcast.
1:17
He's a professor of psychology at
1:19
the University of Nevada Reno. Stephen
1:22
is also the author of forty three books
1:24
and more than six hundred scientific
1:26
articles. He's served as the president
1:29
of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive
1:31
Therapy and the Association
1:33
for Contextual Behavioral Science.
1:36
He is one of the most cited psychologists
1:39
in the world. His new book is A
1:41
Liberated Mind, How to Pivot
1:43
Toward What Matters. Hi,
1:46
Stephen, Welcome to the show. I am
1:48
good to be with you again again.
1:50
Indeed, yes, one of my favorite
1:52
interviews was our earlier interview, and
1:54
you have a new book out called A Liberated
1:57
Mind, How to Pivot Towards What
1:59
Matters. I'm really excited to jump
2:02
into that. But let's start like we always do,
2:04
with the parable. There is a grandfather
2:06
who's talking with his grandson. He says, in life,
2:09
there are two wolves inside of us that are
2:11
always a battle. One is a good wolf,
2:13
which represents things like kindness and
2:16
bravery and love, and the other
2:18
is a bad wolf, which represents things
2:20
like greed and hatred and fear. And
2:23
the grandson stops and thinks about it for a second.
2:25
He looks up at his grandfather. He says, well, grandfather,
2:27
which one wins? And the grandfather
2:30
says that the one you feed. So I'd
2:32
like to start off by asking you what that parable
2:34
means to you in the work that you
2:36
do and in your life. Well, it means a lot.
2:39
And I think it's becoming clear
2:41
to me that both of those wolves within
2:44
have a role. They both have a message
2:46
for us, and yes, we want
2:48
to feed one over the other, but
2:50
we want to kind of listen to both and
2:53
find even inside some of those
2:56
dark places that they go, that
2:58
we're yearning for something that is reflected
3:00
in the positive places that we know how to take
3:03
our lives wonderful. Yeah,
3:05
you're known for being one of the founders of
3:07
acceptance and commitment therapy,
3:09
which if I had to summarize, and
3:12
I'm summarizing a lot in a very
3:14
small amount, but a big piece
3:16
of act is not to eliminate
3:19
negative thought and emotion, but to learn
3:21
to live with them in a more skillful way
3:24
and then act sort of in a way that
3:26
is in accordance with our values. Yeah, exactly.
3:29
And that's been about a forty year journey of
3:31
both science and clinical practice and extending
3:33
it out almost any area that human
3:35
beings can think of, you know, in sports and
3:37
business and health matters and so forth.
3:40
So it's now sitting on top
3:42
of an enormous body of work, much larger
3:44
than when we talked, because it's happening so
3:46
fast now from the worldwide community.
3:49
But part of what I've not really
3:51
discovered, but that I've really kind of realized
3:53
going forward is that it
3:56
it's not so much just making
3:58
room for what's negative, but as
4:00
I said at the very beginning, even learning from
4:02
it, because there's something inside
4:05
our misery that is really
4:07
important to us if we know how to see it.
4:10
And it's basically, what is
4:12
the problem we're trying to solve or
4:14
trying to solve it in a way that creates
4:17
problems, huge problems, But
4:19
we're not trying to disturb ourselves.
4:21
We're not trying to get stuck and called a sex.
4:23
That's not the purpose. There's a there's
4:25
a good purpose buried in
4:27
there. And turns out those
4:30
are the same purposes that are
4:32
right inside the processes that we
4:34
now know sitting on more
4:36
than three thousand studies that lift
4:39
up and carry lives forward. And if you
4:41
see that, then you can be a little
4:43
kinder with yourself when you're struggling, because
4:45
you you realize there's actually something valuable
4:48
in there. It's just you can't
4:50
get there this way. And
4:52
that's what's the intelibrated mind is building
4:55
out that full realization which really sort
4:57
of makes the whole act work feel
4:59
a little more mature, and it
5:02
makes it a lot easier to apply to lots
5:04
of places that are beyond strictly mental
5:06
health or substance abuse problems. Right.
5:08
You say early in the book that the things that
5:10
have the power that causes the most pain
5:13
are often the things we care about most
5:15
deeply. The other directly linked. I mean,
5:17
it's easy to think about it. And
5:19
all you've got to do is take something you really struggle
5:21
with, start with the negative ones. It's one of
5:23
the most powerful ways in and
5:26
then just literally write it down a sheet of
5:28
paper, flip it over, and then write down what does
5:30
that suggest you care about? And yeah, you've
5:32
got a solution for it. You know, if you're really
5:34
feeling anxious given a talk, you know
5:36
your solution might be to get rid of the anxiety.
5:39
But when you flip over the sheet of paper and say,
5:41
what does that really care about? You know, if I could
5:43
just magically put fairy dust in your head
5:45
and you wouldn't have any anxiety, you
5:47
still wouldn't have accomplished what you came to accomplish.
5:50
And so maybe what you're anxious about, for example,
5:52
is being with people and being accepted in love.
5:55
Maybe it's making a contribution. Maybe
5:57
it's being genuine or authentic, or you
6:00
know, being a whole person, or being more mindful
6:02
and aware to be more present, to live your life
6:04
more fully. I don't know what it is, but I
6:06
know one way to find it
6:08
is to take what you're struggling with and just flip
6:10
it over and allow your
6:12
pain to speak to you. And it
6:15
will whisper to your messages about
6:17
your purpose. And it reverses
6:19
true too. If you think about where you really
6:22
really care about, you'll realize that those
6:24
are the places you're vulnerable. I
6:26
mean you can feel it. I mean, if you, if
6:29
you really care about being into intimate and
6:31
committed relationships, as soon as somebody
6:33
shows up where that might happen, you
6:35
find yourself, you know, squirm and
6:37
then creating fights for no reason,
6:40
and you know, not answering the phone, I
6:42
mean, what are you doing. What you're doing
6:44
is protecting yourself from her because
6:47
you know that, you know inside
6:49
the suite is the end of
6:51
it. You know we are going to
6:54
die. Life is limited, and
6:56
you know, just looking at your children in the face
6:59
or the eyes of your lover you feel it, you feel
7:01
vulnerable, and that's
7:04
the way it comes. That's the package.
7:07
And so Act is all about how
7:09
to take the whole of it and
7:11
to to learn from both sides of it
7:14
and to focus on what's important and create
7:17
a life worth living. So one of the
7:19
fundamental ideas at the heart
7:21
of this book is the idea of psychological
7:24
flexibility. So tell me
7:26
what psychological flexibility
7:28
is. Well, it's kind of like
7:31
a box with six sides, or
7:33
you can sort of break it up into three pillars.
7:35
It's really turns out it's one thing. It's like it's
7:37
one box even though it has six sides. But the
7:40
short version would be psychological
7:43
flexibility is to be able to come into this
7:45
moment consciously with your
7:47
thoughts and feelings and memories and bodily sensations
7:50
that that moment contains as they are,
7:52
not as what they say they are you fear
7:54
them to be, and then be able
7:56
to direct your attention and the flexible,
7:59
fluid, voluntary way towards
8:01
what brings meaning and purpose into your
8:03
life by choice, not by
8:05
shoods and knots and must and have two is
8:08
not by guilt and shame, not by mama
8:10
telling you it has to be so, but by the choices
8:12
you make, and then to build
8:14
out habits of action, actual things
8:17
you do with your life moments that contain
8:19
those qualities. So you could
8:21
say it more quickly, it's accepting,
8:24
showing up, and moving on. And
8:27
that combination of being open, aware,
8:29
and actively engaged in life hangs
8:32
together. They all fit together, just
8:34
like puzzle pieces. You feel
8:36
the missing if it's gone, it's
8:38
like taking two sides out of a box. It would
8:40
be a floppy box the same way.
8:43
And we think we've kind of cracked the code. We think
8:46
that those six things are the simplest
8:48
formulation that does the most
8:51
good in the most areas
8:53
of human life. And I can say that
8:55
not as a hope or a wish or a claim or
8:58
personal experience. I'm now
9:00
sitting on top of an enormous body
9:02
of work by a very large community over
9:04
nearly four years, and it comports
9:07
with our wisdom traditions, it comports
9:09
with our personal experience, but
9:12
it also fits good old fashioned
9:14
Western science. And that's a really cool
9:16
combination. Yeah, yeah, it definitely
9:19
is. And so psychological flexibility
9:22
shows up and really
9:24
correlates very well with people's ability
9:27
to be successful in different things
9:30
they're doing. You reference a ton of studies,
9:32
but one of them showed that the level of psychological
9:34
flexibility overweight people have
9:37
correlates directly with their ability to
9:39
lose weight, engage in exercise, and stop
9:41
binging. Conversely, the
9:44
opposite of psychological flexibility is
9:46
psychological rigidity, and
9:48
that predicts anxiety, depression,
9:51
substance abuse, eating disorder, on
9:53
and on and on. So what is psychological
9:56
rigidity, Well, when you get entangled
9:58
with your thoughts and they're of woidant of your feelings,
10:01
memories, bodily sensations, and
10:03
you allow your attention to be jerked
10:05
to the past or future through rumination
10:08
or worry, you sort of buy
10:10
into that story of who you are and how you're
10:12
different, special from other people, whether it's
10:14
especially disturbed or difficult, or
10:17
or needy, especially wonderful and
10:19
perfect either way, that kind
10:21
of storied self and
10:24
then harnessing all of that to
10:26
trying to get approval and achievement
10:29
instantly, without trial and error, without
10:31
failure, slipping, falling and learning springing
10:34
forth from the head of zeus. You're just gonna
10:37
march on with this uh competence.
10:40
That's going to give you not necessarily
10:43
a deep sense of values
10:45
and purpose, but applause,
10:48
money, fame, and all those kind
10:50
of superficial things that the mind grasps
10:52
after or just plain happiness
10:54
to find as a happy, happy joy joyce
10:56
Miley face button, not the real
10:59
kind of happiness, which is this life
11:02
well lived as a whole person.
11:04
So it's pretty much a direct
11:07
inverse. And those six processes
11:09
also hang out together. They feed on each
11:11
other. They are like more like a
11:13
pack of wolves than a single wolf, and
11:16
they will eat anything you put
11:18
in front of it. I mean, if you want to have relationships
11:21
at work, or you want to be able to have a successful
11:23
business, or lose weight or diet
11:25
or exercise, or get through cancer diagnosis,
11:29
or deal with a substance use
11:31
problem or anxiety or depression, on
11:33
on. It accounts
11:35
for a large share, and
11:38
compared to other sets of processes,
11:40
more than any other that science can
11:42
name. So it's the There's
11:46
a lot of other things we can add and you
11:48
can build on it, and I'm very friendly
11:50
to that and open to that, but let's get the basics
11:53
down first. If you can get a solid foundation,
11:55
it's a whole lot easier to then build on
11:58
that solid foundation. And these
12:01
flexibility processes are like
12:03
building a house on rock and build
12:06
it on inflexibility. It's like
12:08
building on sand near the ocean.
12:10
Good luck with that. So the six processes
12:13
that you're talking about map towards
12:16
a big part of the book, which you refer
12:18
to as six key pivots.
12:20
So before we start going into those, let's
12:23
talk about what you mean by pivot.
12:25
A pivot is a connection
12:28
between a negative and the positive
12:31
set of steps. That's why I call them a
12:33
process just as a word meaning a procession
12:35
like a parade. It's a series of things, but
12:37
it's integrated that you're going from here and
12:39
towards there. You have the
12:41
negative ones, you have the positive ones, and they're paired.
12:44
But you know, a pivot is a little pin
12:46
and a hinge. And what a pivot
12:48
does is it takes energy that's going in
12:50
one direction and it moves it in another direction.
12:54
And you know, if you want to move, you don't want to be standing
12:56
still inertially kind of has to be
12:58
overcome if you do that. If you're antsing with somebody,
13:01
even if you're going to swing them around in a completely
13:03
different direction, it would be a lot better
13:05
to have them moving than to have them standing
13:07
still. And in the same way, it
13:09
turns out that misery is actually our
13:11
ally because there's energy
13:13
in there, there's carrying in there, there's motivation
13:16
in there. I mean, there's being screwed up
13:18
in there too, but that's
13:21
not what the way it has to be.
13:23
And just like if you push on a door in
13:25
one direction, the hinges move the door
13:27
in another direction, that opens up who
13:29
you can move forward. And those
13:31
are the pivots that I talked about
13:33
in the book. And so those six
13:36
things end up being six pairs, and
13:38
underneath them are six what I call
13:41
yearnings. You could call them needs,
13:43
or you just could call them motives. Needs
13:46
sounds to me a little demanding, but
13:49
I call them yearnings because that's the way they
13:51
often show up. I think if you sort
13:54
of settle down and really listen to yourself,
13:56
you can kind of feel yourself yearning
13:59
for up. Can I give you a sad example,
14:02
sure, please, Well, this is one of the saddest,
14:04
it's one of the most basic because it's the kind of
14:06
monkey we are. We yearned to
14:08
belong where the tribal primates,
14:11
where the small group primates where the cooperative
14:13
primates, and we come
14:16
into the world in such a way that if others
14:18
don't kick care of us, we die. But even as
14:20
adults, we get cast out from the troop. Literally
14:23
when the wild monkey land, you get cast
14:25
out from the troop. Is in the hominid
14:28
species, you very likely are not going
14:30
to live very long. We're even
14:32
wired for it. Our brain
14:34
is wired for it. You know, if you look at the eyes of
14:36
a brand new baby, they start dumping
14:39
natural opiates in their brain as soon as your
14:41
eyes lock onto them. Your genetics
14:43
are basically saying, yeah, that that's what
14:45
you want. You want that, you want that, and
14:47
you need to because otherwise you're not going
14:49
to be able to connect with others around
14:51
you. Right, So we come into that naturally.
14:53
But then we've got this new thing on the block
14:56
that you and I are doing right now, symbolic reasoning,
14:59
language, and cognition, and that's
15:01
probably on late Golli two
15:04
two million years old. That's the best guesses.
15:08
And when you're not too old, not
15:10
when you're a baby, not when you're a one year old,
15:12
not when you're that sweet innocent thing where
15:14
you just know how to connect and care, you
15:16
start talking to yourself about how
15:18
you're going to belong, and for the first
15:21
time you start to lie. For the first
15:23
time, you put on a mask. The
15:25
Greek name for a mask is the root of our word
15:28
personality. That's how basic
15:30
it is, you know. The claimant unmovable masks
15:33
were called personas, and
15:35
what that is
15:37
is the logical mind trying to
15:40
belong by producing specialness.
15:44
I'm smart, I'm loving, I'm
15:46
kind. You're kind all
15:49
the time with everybody. No,
15:51
you're lying. Of course you're not kind
15:53
all the time with everyone, but you dare
15:56
not even admit it yourself. That
15:58
persona, that clay, a fixed
16:00
rictus of a mask you put on has
16:03
to be maintained or otherwise you're not going to be let
16:05
in. And sometimes people try
16:08
to get let in by having stories
16:10
that are all negative. Oh i'm
16:12
so help so we have been
16:14
abused. It's sad, help
16:16
me, help me. And yeah, people
16:19
will let you in if you claim that your guy
16:21
grand or the weakest of the week. Either
16:23
way, you do get brought in. But
16:25
very soon people tire of it. They
16:27
see that it's a clown suit you're wearing, that
16:29
it's not a real whole open person.
16:32
They don't feel uplifted when they're around it.
16:34
Plus they themselves are struggling with the same
16:36
issue. So when you produce
16:38
belonging that way, it hollows
16:41
out. I can give you a really sad statistic.
16:43
I mean it just made me roll my eyes when I saw
16:45
it. Something like one out
16:48
of four, one out of five of your conversations,
16:50
especially when you're young, contain at
16:52
least a little white lie and exaggeration.
16:56
Oh, I only slept four hours
16:58
last night when you show up to your meeting,
17:01
Now you slept four and a half and you know
17:03
it, but you said four. Why
17:06
because then you're special. You're
17:09
someone who can function no
17:11
sleep. Here's like that.
17:14
Well, the people you tell those
17:16
tiny little white lies too you
17:19
now are significantly less
17:21
interested in ever speaking to again.
17:23
So isn't it sad We're
17:26
trying to earn our way in by these
17:28
little pretense and masks
17:31
and all that kind of stuff. Afraid
17:33
if we're just seeing as whole persons, that
17:36
will be rejected, which is the exact opposite,
17:39
because people yearn for connections like
17:41
that. You wake up when you have connections
17:43
like that. When people put aside the pretense,
17:46
but it's almost like we can't stop it because
17:48
the logical mind says you have to be special,
17:50
you won't be included, especially bad, especially
17:52
good, And then it hollows
17:54
it out. Even if it works
17:56
and they applaud and say you're so wonderful, part
17:58
of you says yeah, but if they really knew
18:01
your fraud, if they saw through
18:03
it, they wouldn't want to be with you. So
18:06
here you're trying to produce belonging, and even if
18:08
you get it, you don't get it. So
18:10
what I do in the book is walk through how are
18:12
you going to get belonging? How can you
18:14
get a real experience of belonging? And
18:17
it turns out you can get it by kind of a birthright,
18:20
which is consciousness itself. You go back
18:22
to that moment when your mamma looked in your eyes
18:25
metaphorically, you belonged
18:27
at that moment that you're seen by another
18:29
conscious being who's bringing you into
18:32
consciousness. And if you stop
18:34
dancing and prancing, and you
18:36
know all of the stories that you're buying into
18:38
and trying to make other people believe, and
18:40
you just slow down, open your eyes and look in
18:42
the eyes of the other people around you.
18:45
You're gonna see people wanting to connect
18:47
with you, and you're gonna see consciousness
18:50
there and similarity
18:52
there. Why because you're
18:55
part of the troop, you belong by birthright, you're
18:57
one of us, You're one of the goofy
18:59
CONTs as people, and so you know, instead
19:02
of playing for the pretense
19:04
and then getting nothing, why don't we go for
19:06
the substance. It turns out to be a
19:08
lot easier, it's a lot more
19:10
off lifting, it's a lot more real, and
19:13
yeah, it's more vulnerable. It is more vulnerable,
19:15
but it's so important
19:17
how the real thing, and you can
19:19
feel your life shift when you get it. So
20:00
let's turn to the first pivot, and it's
20:03
one that we talked about a fair amount in our
20:05
previous conversation, but I think is a really important
20:07
one, which is this idea of
20:09
diffusion. So it requires
20:11
pivoting from cognitive fusion to
20:14
diffusion. So let's first talk about kind
20:17
of what that is, because it's a pretty
20:19
core part of all of this work.
20:21
It's key and underneath the acceptance
20:24
and commitment therapy work as a whole research
20:27
program on a thing called relational frame
20:29
theory. Geeky stuff but we
20:32
think we've kind of figured out what is the core
20:34
of human language and cognition, and so we've
20:36
taken the time to build
20:38
an edifice that includes a really active
20:40
basic science program about how
20:43
is the world different when you begin to do
20:45
what you and I are doing right now. You
20:48
know, even non human animals
20:50
want to understand. They want things to fit together,
20:52
They want them to be predictable. You know,
20:55
non human animals will work for signals
20:57
that tell them what's going to happen, even
21:00
if it's going to tell them that something bad is going to
21:02
happen. You would think
21:04
you would not want to know the bad news. Humans
21:06
often don't, but non human animals
21:08
will work and work for little signals
21:10
that will just tell them things like you're
21:13
hardly going to get any food over the next ten
21:15
minutes, or there's a shock coming,
21:18
uh, and it doesn't stop the shock, but at
21:20
least you kind of know the lay of the land, right
21:22
And you think of how important that would be to a non
21:25
human animal to be able to survive. To do
21:27
that, you can see why you would want to explore
21:29
your environments, know what's going on and how it fit
21:31
together, know how they all kind of relate
21:34
one to the other. Once we've
21:36
got language going, we want to do the same thing.
21:39
But here's the problem. Language
21:41
is something that isn't just learned by experience.
21:44
It's learned by derivation. Anything
21:46
can relate to anything in any possible
21:49
way. Let's see if we play
21:51
a little game. Let's see if we can do it. I want you to
21:53
think of a noun any now, but don't tell me what
21:55
it is. I'll think of one too. It's one of my desktop
21:58
here, and then I'm going to say mine,
22:00
and I'll ask you to say yours. But we'll think of a relationship.
22:03
Let's do a weird one, like is
22:05
the father of Okay? So,
22:08
how is a pen the father of
22:10
an apple? An apple? Okay? If
22:12
you can't come up with an answer, your
22:15
life is going to end. So Eric better,
22:18
you better produce pen drew the apple?
22:21
Awesome? Pretty apt fits
22:23
right? Perfect? Yeah, except
22:25
here's the problem. I've done this hundreds
22:28
of times and there's always
22:30
an answer. So
22:32
either God so arranged the world that everything
22:34
is related to everything else in all possible ways.
22:38
Let's just do it. How's the apple the father of a pen?
22:41
It produces the ink for the pen. Good?
22:43
Yeah, it's good. Actually, when they came in
22:46
my mind is that you ate from the tree of knowledge,
22:48
and that gave you the capacity to produce
22:51
things like pan Then you absolutely could
22:53
make apple based ink. Of course you could, so
22:56
you see the game. So now here's the problem
22:59
if language allows, is that there's a two
23:01
way street between everything, but not
23:03
just same as also
23:06
different from opposite to better
23:08
than every possible
23:10
relation you can think of, even goofy ones
23:12
like is the father of I mean, how often
23:14
do you say that you
23:16
can always come up with an answer and the answer is
23:19
good. I mean, it fits, it's right, it's
23:21
real. No, it's not real. You
23:23
made it up. And so how
23:25
are you going to rein in that kind of a
23:27
wild horse. If what you seek
23:30
is this experience of understanding
23:32
and everything fitting together, so
23:34
let me apply it. Think of something
23:36
that you're proud of, and
23:39
let's just do self esteem the way people
23:41
usually try to do it. I'm
23:44
and then say the rest of the sentence, that's
23:46
so great and you're proud about go
23:49
ahead, and let's do it. I'm kind,
23:51
I'm kind. Listen real carefully,
23:54
and what do you hear? Does your
23:56
mind just settle down on that say, yeah, you are, I'm
24:00
kind accept when
24:03
I'm not exactly
24:05
For example, when I you
24:08
may not want to share this one when
24:11
I get irritated with my girlfriend. Awesome,
24:15
But what that was right there earlier?
24:18
I just brought it out right? You
24:20
with me on this, okay.
24:23
So if you're yearning for coherence
24:25
and understanding, that's built into
24:27
you even before language shows up. But
24:29
then language gives you two opinions about everything.
24:32
Do you know four year olds understand goofy on
24:35
one shoulder with horns and goofy on the other shoulder
24:37
with halos. Four year olds
24:40
they understand that it means they've already got
24:42
the argument going on inside their head. So
24:44
how are you going to get to peace of mind? Never
24:47
mind? Purpose? And that's really
24:49
what people want. I think it's people peace of mind,
24:51
but purpose, that's what people really want, is
24:53
a big part of what they want. And
24:56
so what we teach an act is to
24:58
give up on coherence
25:00
in it all fitting together inside
25:03
the language world literally,
25:07
because there's always a yep, but there's
25:09
always a pro and con list. If you try
25:11
to go all pro will give you cons. If
25:13
you try to go all con, it'll give you pros I'm
25:16
the worst of the worst, the lowest, lower human scum.
25:18
No one's lowered me. No,
25:20
I'm not that bad. I mean,
25:22
you'll argue with both sides, right.
25:25
So what we teach instead is
25:28
to learn how to
25:30
be guided by language. Take what's
25:32
useful, allow that to be a
25:35
kind of understanding. It
25:38
works, it's helpful. This is useful.
25:40
And then the cacaphony continues and you
25:42
notice it. Thank you mind very much for
25:45
trying to figure this all out. And
25:47
I've got some other things to do. I've heard that story
25:50
before. But if it says something in
25:52
that cacaphony like, oh, by the way, uh,
25:55
the text headline is one week away, This
25:57
is a good thing, you might miss
25:59
it otherwise. Oh, by the way, you've gotta the
26:01
one you feed podcasts. Remember that
26:03
that that was right there in your Google candle. Thank
26:06
you mind. I appreciate that. But
26:09
a lot of stists say it's just useless
26:13
to live in your life. So can we instead
26:15
learn how to take what's useful
26:17
and leave the rest. It
26:20
turns out we can, and it's a
26:22
big part of what the mindfulness traditions are
26:24
doing. It's a big part of the wisdom traditions are
26:26
spiritual traditions, or prayer traditions
26:28
are psychotherapy traditions. And
26:31
when we've kind of cracked that code, we've created
26:33
several hundred goofy
26:36
little things that you can do in thirty seconds
26:38
that sort of bumping in that direction, Like take
26:41
a negative thought that really grabs way too much
26:43
attention and sing it, say
26:46
it in the voice of your least favored politician,
26:50
to still it down to a single word, to say it over
26:52
and over again rapidly on an articoast.
26:54
We have, you know, example after example
26:56
after example of ways that you can
26:59
essentially put a leash
27:01
on that word machine in between
27:04
your ears and allow yourself
27:06
to breathe even as it
27:08
keeps chattering. And so what we're trying to do
27:10
here with diffusion, then is
27:13
to I'm going to quote part
27:15
of what you said, seeing thoughts as they actually
27:17
are ongoing attempts
27:20
at meaning making, and
27:22
then choosing to give them power only to
27:24
the degree that they genuinely service. So what you're
27:26
basically saying is that our
27:28
whole thought process, as you described
27:31
in the relational piece before, we're
27:33
trying to make meaning, we're trying to make narrative
27:36
out of what's happening. And
27:38
it's easier to then
27:41
see through that process
27:44
than it is to untangle that process.
27:46
And the examples you just gave
27:48
of this is linked to this, which is linked to
27:50
this, you can create relationships, is
27:52
that that linkage is so vast and
27:54
so complex that when we start trying
27:57
to pull on part of it, we're
27:59
pulling on all of it. So it's easier
28:01
just to see through the whole mechanism.
28:03
Yeah exactly. I mean, suppose apples
28:06
really freaked you out for some reason.
28:09
Well, now we've got a whole another way
28:11
to get to it, and you and I just did it. All I
28:13
have to do is say pen you
28:17
know, so it's just helpless
28:20
that you're gonna be able to clean that mess up.
28:22
And when you go in and try to rearrange
28:25
this, it's like trying to rearrange a black
28:27
widow spidernest. Have you ever seen one of those
28:29
things? That they exist here in you know?
28:32
And I've taught my son to recognize
28:34
it when it's quite young, because babies
28:36
can be hurt by back back widows and
28:39
very old people. Maybe I could be heard, but
28:41
but they have a very characteristic web. It looks
28:43
like an insane web, you know, like they've been eating
28:46
their own poison or something, because it's
28:48
just a tangled nothing of
28:50
a well, welcome to the
28:52
human mind, and you're gonna
28:54
go in there and say, oh, I don't like this thread. No,
28:57
because when you we've one more thing,
29:00
the whole thing may rearrange like a fractal
29:02
disc. And
29:04
you've had that happen, you know, You've had things like
29:06
a bad experience and now everything
29:08
looks different or a dream even so
29:11
it's happening when you're not even controlling it, and then your
29:13
whole day is influenced by the freaking dream,
29:16
even if you can't remember, it has a felt sense
29:18
that goes with it, and things look different. So
29:21
instead of trying to, you know, rein
29:24
in that wild horse, let's learn to back
29:26
up a little bit and watch it. Take
29:29
what's useful and respectfully leave
29:31
the rest, not leave it like an eraser, like
29:33
getting rid of it. I don't want to put my hand
29:35
in that web to try to get rid of it. I'm
29:38
just going to make more of a mess of it, and
29:41
I'm going to be building lots and lots of connections
29:43
to things that I've hoped it would
29:45
be smaller in my life, thus making
29:47
them bigger in my life. Like I've just made apple
29:50
bigger for everybody who's listening, kind
29:52
of stupidly bigger and bigger. But
29:54
it's bigger now and in a way that is
29:57
not very useful. Pen Apple
29:59
is just not very full. But somebody in this
30:01
audience is going to think pan apple over the next
30:03
hour. In fact, many
30:06
many people, right, And in fact,
30:08
if you try not to, there's data
30:10
on this. It's really important
30:13
not to think apple,
30:15
pan or pan apple. I
30:18
now have doubled the likelihood that
30:20
you'll think that, Thank
30:22
you very much, professor, right.
30:26
But of course we do that inside our own struggles.
30:29
We try not to think about the betrayal
30:31
of a former lover, or the
30:34
traumatic experience we've had, or the painful
30:36
emotion we felt, the scary
30:39
thought that showed up. So
30:41
we need to learn to do something else with that,
30:44
meaning making engine in between
30:46
our ears. You gave a couple of strategies
30:49
for cognitive diffusion then, and
30:51
and the examples we just kind of walked through
30:53
are sort of one of the critiques of cognitive
30:56
behavioral therapy, which part of
30:58
cognitive behavioral therapy is is hey,
31:00
just change your thoughts in your life
31:03
will get better. My question for
31:05
you is is there a place for
31:07
that though if your thoughts that you're having
31:09
are clearly mistaken.
31:11
So as an example, let's say I say
31:14
Bob passed me in the halliday
31:16
and did not look at me, so Bob hates
31:19
me, when the truth is Bob had a stomach
31:21
ache. Isn't it helpful for me to know the truth
31:24
in that case? And I see your point about you start
31:26
to weigh into the web, But I'm kind of curious
31:28
when you think, like, sort of all right, it's
31:30
worth if our thoughts are just playing incorrect
31:33
to to sort of correct them versus
31:36
completely disengaging. Yeah,
31:38
there's two places. If you actually look at the data
31:40
on cognitive reppraisal, cogn modification,
31:43
etcetera. In cognitive therapy CBT,
31:46
CBT is the most powerful set
31:48
of techniques. Act as kind of part of that family,
31:50
part of that tradition. I've been president of those societies,
31:53
etcetera. We kind of play nice with that
31:55
larger tradition, but we have some different assumptions
31:58
than classics CBT. But
32:00
if you look at the data on it, when reappraisal
32:03
and cognitive modification of cognitive
32:05
restructuring is helpful. It's helpful
32:07
because of cognitive flexibility,
32:09
of being able to think multiple things and then be
32:11
guided by the ones that are useful. And
32:14
it's even there in classic CBT, for
32:16
example, to still down to an irrational thought,
32:18
do a behavioral experiment. This
32:21
is even before people are trained to the technological
32:24
errors and challenge the thoughts, and
32:26
already that's producing some
32:28
of the larger effects sizes that are in CBT,
32:31
and some of the most movements. So we
32:33
found in controlled research
32:36
that here the critical parts
32:38
of this. If you truly are ignorant, you truly
32:40
don't know, information can be helpful.
32:44
And if you're thinking too narrowly and
32:46
you're not staying open up, open enough
32:48
to be guided by experience, thinking
32:51
more flexibly is helpful. But
32:54
the problem is, and the reason I've always been a little
32:57
concerned about it, is not that traditional
32:59
CBT he is trying to make people get
33:01
into these artificial thought
33:03
loops. But boy,
33:06
you don't have to go very far on the internet before
33:08
you find a lot of people who have internalized
33:11
this rule in CBT kind
33:13
of messages, which is don't
33:15
think that, think this. Yeah,
33:18
But as soon as you say don't think that, you just thought
33:20
that again, yeah. And if
33:22
you link it to thinking this, thinking this will
33:24
remind you of that. And
33:26
so you're right
33:29
on the edge of these suppressive,
33:32
self amplifying, artificial processes
33:34
that are known in the literature. And
33:36
why go social close. It's like we're playing
33:39
on the edge of the cliff. Come back away
33:41
from the edge of the cliff. And the part
33:44
of reappraisal modification, now that's really
33:46
important is thinking flexibly.
33:48
So for example, if the person passes,
33:50
you know, one possibility is they're mad
33:52
at you. Another possibility could be they had
33:54
a bad sleepless night,
33:56
or they have gas, or they're thinking about something else.
33:59
And now the next time you've
34:02
got multiple possible
34:05
alternatives. Let's let experience
34:07
teach you which of these thoughts are most
34:09
workable, which one help you the most
34:12
move you forward? And you know,
34:14
not what's literally true, because
34:17
to get in there, we really have to get into
34:19
the pros and colm lists and all of that. I mean,
34:21
we're into fully into the spider web
34:24
when we really now there's times
34:26
there are times, I know, for figuring
34:28
out where the thoughts are really true.
34:31
But mostly it's holding them more
34:33
lightly and getting more evidence and allowing
34:35
to be guided by you, and also remembering
34:37
there's a lot more to you than your logical
34:40
mind. You know things
34:42
at the level of your guts, of your intuition.
34:45
It's not magic, it's not woo woo,
34:47
it's experience that goes beyond language.
34:51
Can I give you an example, please?
34:53
All right, there's a little exercise I
34:55
do in the book and Imagination that have done it actually
34:57
in a research study that's going to come out soon, to
35:00
ask people to picture something they struggle
35:02
with it's really difficult, and
35:04
then to show me with their body, them
35:07
at their worst with that issue,
35:10
as if their body is like a sculptor,
35:12
and the only thing people would get is not a story
35:15
from you, not a word, but just to see your body,
35:17
and then they would know what's going on inside. And
35:20
then they asked them to do the same thing you
35:22
at your best with that same exact issue.
35:25
Now here's what shows up. Almost
35:28
universally, you at your best, your
35:30
head is up, your eyes are open, your arms and hands
35:32
are out, it's an open posture. Almost
35:35
universally. You at your worst, your
35:37
head is down, your eyes that are closed. You may fall fold
35:40
it over like a fetal position, your arms and hands around
35:42
your fists, maybe clenched. You're in
35:44
a defensive posture. Okay,
35:47
we all know that, but
35:49
we all defend ourselves when these things show up. So
35:53
we have the knowledge, but
35:55
we don't know how to implement the knowledge. In fact, we don't
35:57
even know we have the knowledge, because when we say
35:59
we know it, we mean no. Verbally,
36:02
we mean can say the sentence. Well,
36:04
there's more to us than that.
36:06
That's what emotions are for, That's
36:08
what memory is for, that's what felt sense
36:11
is for. This is not woo woo. It's
36:13
other learning processes that are a thousand
36:16
times more ancient than what you and I are doing
36:18
right now. Let let them play too, and
36:21
they'll be helpful to you in producing
36:23
a real sense of coherence and understanding
36:25
and feelings and competence in
36:27
the other things that are inside the other
36:29
pivots. We don't have time to walk through all six,
36:31
but every one of them, every pair has
36:34
a deep yearning that everybody's
36:36
got, And if you mismanage
36:39
it, life gets screwed up. Maybe you manage
36:41
it while life opens up and the book walks
36:43
through the data on that and how to do it. Let's
37:14
pick another pivot to talk
37:17
about, because we are going to run out of time
37:19
here soon. What do you think self
37:21
acceptance values? Why
37:24
don't we take values just because it's so
37:26
central? Okay, it's really
37:28
close to a word evaluate,
37:31
and it's almost the exact opposite of that,
37:35
because values have to have this quality
37:37
of just because assume
37:40
if you don't like it, meaning
37:42
by choice between me and the person
37:44
in the mirror. It's informed by our culture,
37:47
it's informed by our family. It's informed
37:49
by I don't mean you alone
37:51
in the corner, but I mean taking
37:54
responsibility. This is what
37:56
I want, not what I want as an
37:58
outcome, but what I want
38:00
right now to be revealed in
38:03
my behavior. And
38:07
you know I mentioned earlier flipping over pain
38:09
and finding purpose there. You
38:11
can do it with sweet spots too, but
38:14
let me do one that's kind of neat. I think that
38:16
comes from this sense of
38:18
belonging and connection. Especially if
38:20
you can get some of the diffusion in there, you
38:23
begin to see people around you who you
38:25
respect, who you view
38:28
as heroes and as guides. So
38:31
take anything that you're struggling with, anything
38:34
that's difficult, any place where you're
38:37
you know, threatened by meaninglessness or depression,
38:40
or where you know this logical
38:42
thing that tells you you're going to die, the world
38:45
is going to die, et cetera. That's also doesn't
38:48
know how to channel that into a sense
38:50
of vitality and purpose. And
38:52
here's my question. If
38:54
you could pick anyone as a guide who
38:57
would help you in that anyone
39:00
ideally someone you know, but it could be a spiritual
39:02
leader or something you only read about. Who would
39:04
you pick? And then if you slow that thing
39:06
down, here's
39:08
one thing you're going to see. The way
39:11
that person carries themselves,
39:13
holds themselves, moves through the world,
39:16
contains things that reflect how
39:18
you want to be manifest
39:21
in the world. You pick
39:23
guides who are your heroes? Think
39:26
about it. I bet you did, and
39:29
I bet you it's kind of
39:31
what you would hope other people I
39:34
would see in you. And
39:37
there it is. There's that sense of meaning
39:39
and purpose by choice, the
39:41
whole of you, not just your mind telling
39:44
him you have to or mommy's
39:46
you know, shaking her finger at you. But
39:49
you're owning your own life
39:51
purpose, really
39:53
purposes, because we have many,
39:56
and that will lift you up.
39:59
We have so much day now that if you connect
40:01
to what brings meaning and purpose
40:03
into your life by choice, it's sometimes
40:06
called autonomous choice. I kind of don't
40:08
like that because it sounds too western and individualistic,
40:11
but but I know what they're getting to. What they really
40:13
mean is by choice, not
40:16
by shame and blame or have to. But
40:18
between you and the person in the mirror, these
40:21
are the qualities I want to what
40:23
I want to get as a result. Yeah, of course things will
40:25
happen, but these are the qualities I want to have reflected.
40:28
When you own that, everything lifts
40:30
up. Right. Examples of
40:32
that being things like being a caring parent
40:35
or a dependent friend, or being loyal
40:37
and honest. Right. Yeah, they're
40:39
not goals. They are, you say,
40:41
qualities of being and doing. Qualities
40:44
of being and doing. You can almost always find them by
40:46
could they easily be an adjective or an adverb?
40:49
So with your kids, you know, lovingly
40:51
I, or genuinely
40:54
I, or with
40:56
care I you
40:58
know? So what would take for
41:00
you to put lovingly in
41:04
your life? A part of what's cool about
41:06
that at the moment you say you want
41:08
that, you're already doing it. To
41:11
see it, I mean, at the very moment you own
41:13
that you're already doing it because
41:15
part of the doing it is to take
41:17
responsibility in
41:20
its original sense. Do you know the word responsibility
41:22
used to be two words. There's a response
41:24
space ability. You
41:27
have an ability to do this. You can respond.
41:30
I mean, if you're Nelson Mandela in a cage,
41:33
you can still decide the one thing
41:36
that captors can't take away. You can
41:38
decide what is
41:40
this about for you? And
41:43
if it's about hate and retribution, when they let
41:45
you out, you could produce a civil
41:47
war. If it's about justice
41:49
and caring and connection humanity,
41:52
when they let you out, you can produce something different. So
41:57
you know, life can conspire against you,
41:59
so you can't see what comes out. You
42:01
know, it's like water in a bowl. It's
42:03
contained. If you drill a hole in it, then you can
42:05
see that gravity matters and
42:08
the water kind of wants to go down. In the same
42:10
way, if I put you in a cage,
42:12
it's not very much loving you can do, except
42:15
maybe to your guards. I picked
42:17
Man Deevil, and it turned out he was pretty loving towards
42:19
his guards. You
42:22
know. In fact, some of the guards have written stories
42:24
about how it was to care for him and how that moved
42:26
They were by him and his dignity,
42:29
and that's an example of a hero, right, So why
42:32
did that come to mind? And why do we resonate
42:34
the heroes like that? Why
42:36
do these stories that we tell? But
42:39
when you started your podcast
42:41
with because right inside
42:43
those stories are our heroes,
42:47
our our our cultural guides as to
42:49
how to be whole and free, how to be
42:51
human. So in
42:53
the book, I kind of walked through how
42:56
to do that, what gets in the way, and show
42:59
the ginormous amount of data that
43:01
says, boy, this matters everywhere.
43:04
You want to hollow out a human life, turned
43:07
it into a valueless life, and you'll see
43:09
what happens, and you know, acceptance
43:11
and commitment therapy to sort of kind
43:13
of come back to it as a whole. Is this
43:16
idea of accepting
43:19
what we feel and what we think
43:21
and then committing to act according
43:24
to our values exactly? Sounds
43:27
like a simple formula, it's and it kind of
43:29
is simple, but it's not simple
43:32
in this way. It's tricky because you've got this
43:35
problem solving engine in between your ears
43:37
that claims it knows everything, and Mr
43:39
smarty Pants will just constantly
43:41
be tempting you into doing things that are give
43:44
you the short term gain and the long term
43:46
pain, and how to flip
43:49
that from smaller sooner at
43:51
the expense of larger later too. Now
43:53
I'm doing larger later and
43:56
you know, so, for example, there's research
43:58
on things like this. You make the values
44:00
choices, now people are more
44:02
willing to do emotionally hard things.
44:05
The smaller sooner problem is immediately there.
44:08
For example, let's say it's really your values,
44:11
in your values to be loving and caring, and
44:13
you've been noticing that you haven't talked
44:16
to a friend who's headed into an
44:18
addiction, and you can see him heading into
44:20
it, and you know it's not going to be a good conversation
44:23
to talk to him lovingly about your concerns.
44:26
Yeah, well you're just going to watch this train layer and
44:29
slow motion? Is that what
44:31
you want to be about? Well, it'll be
44:33
emotionally hard to have a conversation, Yeah,
44:36
it would. But if you go in there
44:38
in a posture of love and care, not
44:41
judgment and shaming and blaming,
44:44
who knows what you could do? And
44:46
if you don't, what happens
44:48
when you get that text message video? Did
44:51
so? You know, values it's not
44:53
a happy, happy, joy joy. None
44:55
of these things are. It's happiness
44:57
the way happiness really is, which
45:01
is the whole of us, sweet
45:03
and sour, all of us, you
45:06
know, never a cartoon. And
45:10
that empowering journey is
45:12
what people seek and
45:15
don't know how to get to. And
45:17
as I say, I think we've kind of cracked part
45:20
of the code um
45:22
and I'm really pleased to see that some of
45:24
these processes are inside lots of other traditions.
45:26
So I'm not here of saying act uberallis
45:29
we've got the answer. I'm saying, you
45:32
know, dealing with this mashup of
45:34
language and cognition and these other processes
45:37
is kind of our life's journey, and let's
45:39
use all the tools, all hands on deck.
45:42
No need to get grabby about credit or
45:44
naming. I don't care if you call act
45:47
anything or nothing. I
45:49
don't care if you call it act at all. But I
45:51
do care about whether or not you have what
45:53
you need to be lifted up and empowered.
45:56
I hope that the research work in the
45:58
book that I that I summarize there reaches
46:01
people that way. Whatever particular journey
46:04
there on, right, So much of what's
46:06
here does resonate
46:08
through or come through in
46:11
in lots of other traditions. I mean, if we just
46:13
look at the first few pivots,
46:15
you know, diffusion self and
46:18
you know, acceptance in presence. I'm a Buddhist
46:21
practitioner. Those things are right in the heart
46:24
of the whole thing about being
46:26
able to pivot on what those things are,
46:28
you bet you, And you know I'll take to the Buddhism
46:31
thing. You know, although I've been exposed to as
46:33
any hippie was you know, Suzuki
46:36
and Watts and people like that as a you
46:39
know, and I've lived on a religious commune
46:41
with a Yogi split
46:43
off from Paramahansi organanda, so I've
46:45
been exposed all that hippie dippie stuff. I'm old
46:47
enough to have been part of that are and lived in California.
46:49
But uh, you know, all of
46:51
the wisdom traditions, you know, whether it's Sufi's,
46:54
the Jewish mystics or the Christian mystics,
46:56
all mess around the literal, analytical,
46:58
judgmental thought. All
47:00
try to produce a quality of presence.
47:04
They all include some sort of contemplative
47:07
practice or dancing or repeated prayer,
47:09
cohens or something that messes around
47:11
with a logical problem solving mind. And
47:14
so the only thing that we brought
47:16
to the table really that's any different than anything
47:18
else is we took the time over nearly
47:20
twenty years of what looked to the world like
47:22
silence. I tell that story in the book, but
47:25
it wasn't. It was just we were off doing geeky
47:27
stuff that nobody cared about until later
47:29
on where it saw our atlant of
47:32
trying to create a psychology
47:35
more adequate to those questions so that
47:37
we can move them over into
47:39
Western science. And what it's really
47:41
good at Western science can validate
47:43
things that are out there, and that's good. You can do a
47:45
randomized trial on a meditation retreat,
47:48
that's good. That's fine. And you can put
47:50
the monks in an fMRI I and show how the
47:52
brains are different. That's fine. But I
47:54
wanted, not in a sacrilegious way,
47:56
but in a caring way to pull these things
47:59
at their joints and to find
48:01
what are the processes underneath, and
48:03
then see could I move it with other
48:05
processes? Uh.
48:08
You know John Kebot's in I had a conversation
48:10
with the years ago and I said, John, do you care more about
48:12
the process of the technique, you said, the process,
48:15
I said, And you want to put it out there in the world that
48:18
I can go right under the factory
48:21
floor with Joe six pack, or you only want
48:23
ten days silent retreats. They're mostly for
48:26
the educated elite or for the young.
48:28
And he said, I want it for everybody. I
48:30
said, Okay, John, You've
48:32
got me for the rest of your life. I'm with you, you
48:35
know, because if that's what we're up to, this
48:38
is cool work. Yesterday,
48:40
my colleague David Sloan Wilson, who's I've
48:43
written several books with, is kind of in this work,
48:45
and evolutionary biologists have a beautiful
48:47
conversation with the Dalai Lama.
48:49
And so you see these kind of coming together. A very
48:52
different Western science, evolution
48:54
science, you know, kind of geeky
48:57
stuff is now met up
48:59
for the first time the history of the planet with
49:02
these ancient wisdom traditions. And who
49:04
knows what we can create by doing that. Yep,
49:07
not in the sacrilegious way. We're not coming there to
49:09
tear down, pull apart in any kind of not
49:11
no, no, no, but but I you
49:13
know, I worked for many
49:16
years in the South and if somebody wants to run the other
49:18
way. If you say the word Buddhism, well then let's
49:20
not say the word Buddhism. Yeah. Yeah,
49:22
let's say another word, situational
49:25
awareness exactly. You
49:28
know. For me, I find this
49:30
time to be very exciting because we
49:32
are seeing some of
49:34
this more ancient wisdom
49:37
being validated by science.
49:39
And I find it when when I see those two
49:41
things sort of come together, I
49:43
feel like a sturdiness to it. Right.
49:46
If it's just some ancient wisdom and there's
49:48
nothing really on the science side,
49:50
then I'm like, Okay, it's interesting to explore it, but
49:52
it's it's not doesn't feel as sturdy. And
49:54
same thing if I see something scientifically that
49:56
sort of doesn't tie back into that. But when
49:59
I see those two things come together for me, but
50:01
this is just me personally, right, given my interests,
50:04
When I see these two things come together, it feels
50:06
really sturdy to me. Well, that's awesome,
50:09
And can I add a third thing please?
50:11
And we are part of the development of it. So
50:14
your ideas about new things
50:16
that have never been done before, but
50:18
that you think touched the deep processes
50:20
that are inside the things you know about
50:22
in the science actually, so it's helpful
50:24
to you. They have a place at the table too,
50:27
But we but we need to evaluate them. We need to
50:29
look at and giving a fair look, look at the data. Let's
50:31
see. You know, that third
50:33
piece is important because I don't want to
50:35
just live inside a traditional thing. I
50:38
can with my spiritual religious work. I'm
50:40
in a particular particular dharma
50:42
or whatever. But when we're
50:44
talking about the modern world, you know, the world
50:47
people are living in now, I'll give you
50:49
an example. We're living inside
50:51
a world where there's more prosperity
50:54
physically ever in the history
50:56
of the planet. If you had
50:58
to pick a time to be born on, and you can only decide
51:01
when, but not where, this
51:04
moment is the very best choice on
51:06
almost any measure health, violence,
51:09
malnutrition, starvation, you just make
51:11
it. Make a list, okay, except
51:14
anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and accept
51:17
mental well being. Those
51:20
things are going to the opposite direction. You
51:23
know, our young people are a standard deviation
51:25
worst than they were just a decade or two
51:27
ago. And it's not just
51:30
blah blah blah. They're actually killing themselves.
51:32
So don't just be telling me it's self report.
51:35
It is not in that
51:37
modern world. I think comes
51:40
that this fact that science and technology
51:43
has given us a huge exposure
51:46
to pain, to comparison,
51:50
and to judgment and
51:52
difference, and those put
51:54
together have attacked this the
51:57
core sense of we that
51:59
this you know, this tribal primate
52:01
relied on. We better invent
52:04
a new way, We better invent
52:07
things that have never been done on the planet, because
52:09
our challenges on the planet are different
52:11
than have ever been and
52:13
now we have the capacity to do things
52:15
like make the planet unlivable,
52:18
blow ourselves off, off off the planet,
52:20
etcetera. So you
52:22
know, time's up. You know, we've got to get
52:24
serious about it. So it's all hands on deck, and
52:27
that includes you know, folks
52:29
who are underneath the tree thousands of years
52:31
ago, but it also includes you. What
52:33
are your ideas? And I think
52:35
Western science is a cool way to vet
52:37
that we can't rely on the slow
52:41
traditions of religious
52:43
evolution, for example, that takes hundreds
52:46
of of years, and we need
52:48
some of these answers in a matter of tens of years.
52:50
So that's my little
52:52
rant, and it is what we've tried to do inside
52:54
the act work. Yep, yep. Well,
52:57
that is a great place for us to wrap
52:59
up. Thank you so much for coming
53:01
on the show against even It's been a real pleasure, been
53:04
awesome to talk to you again. And I do
53:06
want to say to the listeners when I said that includes
53:08
you, I'm talking to them too. So
53:11
what are your ideas and how can we move
53:13
the ball down the down the field?
53:16
Because humanity requires
53:19
something different. I think we all know it, we all
53:21
sense it, and Western
53:23
science can be of help, but it's not the whole answer.
53:25
It's going to take all of us. Amen to
53:27
that. Amen to that. Well, Thank
53:30
you Stephen, thank you bye.
53:48
If what you just heard was helpful to you, please
53:50
consider making a donation to the One you Feed
53:53
podcast. Head over to one you Feed
53:55
dot net slash support. The
53:57
One You Feed podcast would like to sincerely
54:00
you thank our sponsors for supporting the show
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More