Podchaser Logo
Home
Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Released Wednesday, 20th September 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Hakeem Oluseyi: An unexpected life in Science, and unpopular truths

Wednesday, 20th September 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

Hi, this is Lawrence Krauss

0:10

and welcome to the Origins podcast. For

0:13

this podcast I have my guest

0:16

Dr. Hakeem Oluseyi who is

0:18

an astronomer, physicist

0:21

and also president of the Black Society

0:23

of Physicists in the US. His

0:27

story is a remarkable

0:29

one. If you had to pick someone

0:32

who you would imagine would never get to college,

0:36

much less post college experience

0:38

and then becoming a faculty member at a university in

0:41

physics and astronomy, you would

0:43

have picked Hakeem. He's

0:46

written about it in a book that he produced

0:48

a while ago. We talked about his

0:50

origins and not only the things that got him

0:52

interested first in science but

0:55

the many, many challenges he had to overcome to become

0:59

a scientist. It's inspiring

1:01

and enjoyable and actually

1:04

also he's a

1:06

remarkably pleasant and jovial

1:09

fellow to talk to about this and other

1:11

things. We also talked about a more

1:13

recent experience of his and another challenge he had

1:15

to face in a remarkable piece

1:18

of work following the claims made

1:20

by some people that James Webb was

1:23

a homophobe and racist who

1:26

while administrator

1:28

of NASA had

1:30

excluded those people from

1:34

positions and also spoken out against

1:37

them. Hakeem did a

1:40

remarkable piece of what I would almost call investigative

1:43

journalism or historical journalism.

1:46

He was at NASA and he went

1:48

through all of the materials to see

1:51

if this was corroborated because he was quite

1:53

concerned when he heard it. And

1:56

what he discovered was that of course

1:58

the claims were untrue.

1:59

For that

2:02

he should have been celebrated. What happened

2:04

immediately afterwards was he was vilified by

2:06

the same people who had been promoting this

2:08

notion that the James Webb

2:10

Space Telescope name should be changed, who

2:13

acted in an anti-scientific manner in the

2:15

sense that they assumed the answer before

2:17

they had the evidence. He provided the

2:19

evidence and he didn't have a position

2:24

on this, he just wanted to find out what the truth was exactly

2:26

as a good scientist or scholar should do. And

2:29

he was vilified for it in ways we talked about

2:31

and unduly. And

2:34

so I think the lessons we

2:36

learned from this are that keep focused

2:39

on the truth, keep working hard

2:42

and that you can overcome a lot of difficulties and also

2:45

once again to be willing to change your mind

2:47

in the presence of evidence. It's a great

2:50

discussion, I really enjoyed talking with

2:52

Hakeem and I hope you enjoy the discussion as

2:54

well. You can watch it without

2:58

advertisements on our Critical

3:00

Mass or you can watch it after that on the YouTube

3:03

channel for the Origins Podcast. Either

3:05

way I hope you enjoyed, you can also of

3:07

course listen to it on any podcast site.

3:10

And by the way if you happen to be in Southern California

3:14

on

3:15

October 15th or 17th the Origins Project

3:18

will be having two events, one

3:20

in Santa Ana on the 15th and another in San

3:22

Diego. I'll be joined

3:25

by Brian Keating and we'll be filming

3:27

actually this podcast and his podcast at

3:29

the Air and Space Museum there on the 15th at the

3:32

Bowers Museum in Santa Ana. And

3:34

I'll also by the way be lecturing two days earlier

3:36

in Vancouver for those of you up north. So

3:38

I hope I get a chance to meet some of you in

3:41

person as well. With no further

3:43

ado our podcast with

3:45

Hakeem Olushehi.

3:55

Okay Hakeem Olushehi which I

3:58

think I got right.

3:59

It's really good

4:02

to have you on. I wanted to have you on, talk to you for

4:04

a while, as you know, we've been going back and forth. And

4:06

I have to say, in all honesty,

4:10

what originally I want to talk to you about, and we'll get to

4:12

it, is James Webb and the James S.A. Celskope

4:14

and the supposed controversy regarding

4:17

the naming of it, which you played a key

4:19

role in. And I also wanted

4:22

to talk to you, and I will talk to you, because you're

4:24

president of the National Society of Black Physicists. And

4:26

I wanted to have a frank conversation about that as well. But

4:29

this is the Origins podcast, and

4:31

I don't know if you've ever seen any of it, but what I try

4:33

and do is go into people's origins at the beginning to try

4:36

and find out what got them turned

4:38

on to what they're doing. And

4:40

I was

4:41

going to do that, and I have done

4:43

that, but you helped me in a way, because

4:45

what happened is, you said, by

4:47

the way, I got this book called The Quantum Life,

4:50

My Unlikely Journey from the Streets to the Stars.

4:53

And I asked for a PDF, and I spent the last four

4:55

days reading it. And so I

4:57

now know about your origins, which are even more

4:59

fascinating than I had assumed.

5:02

So I want to, before

5:04

we get to those things, and I

5:06

also want to talk about your work as well. I

5:08

want to talk about what sort of ultimately

5:11

led you to become the man and the scientist

5:13

and writer

5:14

that you are. And so the

5:17

first thing I knew was that before

5:20

age 13, you'd been to lived in a whole bunch

5:22

of places, 9th Ward

5:24

of New Orleans, Watts, South Park,

5:26

Houston, 3rd Ward

5:28

of...is that the 3rd Ward of New Orleans

5:30

or Houston? Houston, 3rd Ward. And all

5:33

awful places to be. And then rural

5:35

Mississippi. Yeah.

5:39

Your book begins when you were four years old,

5:42

when your family got busted apart for the first time.

5:46

And you

5:48

had this experience of growing

5:50

up in both what one might

5:53

call urban ghettos and the rollback

5:56

woods of New Orleans

5:58

and Mississippi and Maryland. particular.

6:01

And I found it obviously fascinating.

6:05

Your unlikely journey is indeed an unlikely

6:07

journey and a remarkable one, a truly

6:10

remarkable one. I found the read fascinating.

6:12

I also found it interesting.

6:15

I was wondering whether I had noticed specifically

6:17

when in your writing

6:22

when you quote yourself, when you're

6:24

younger, you're quoting yourself and

6:27

the way you speak is very different than when you quote yourself

6:29

when you're older. I shouldn't that was with Malice

6:32

and forethought or you,

6:34

the way. Right. So I wanted to be true

6:36

to my voice. Right. And so my voice evolved.

6:38

Like I showed up in graduate school.

6:41

So I was in Mississippi from the age of 13 to 24.

6:43

Yeah. Before that I was in inner

6:45

cities. Okay. Yeah. And you

6:48

know, all of these places have their unique

6:50

accents. New Orleans does. Right. So

6:53

man, I show up to Stanford

6:55

university at the age of 24 for graduate

6:57

school and no one can understand

7:00

a word I say. Okay. So

7:02

I, you know, I basically have to change

7:04

the way I speak in order for people to understand

7:07

me. Yeah. And, and I'll tell you what's funny

7:09

is that, you know, I love, you know, I, I

7:11

love the diversity of human cultures

7:14

and you know, America has so many subcultures

7:16

and my deep woods location.

7:18

I just love to take people there. Right.

7:21

And I do, they all react about

7:23

the same way around day two or three,

7:26

they'll put me to the side and they'll go,

7:28

Hakeem, do you really understand

7:30

what these people are saying? Are you faking it?

7:32

You know, you know, my ears trained,

7:35

you know, Yeah, no. And it's funny, you know, people

7:37

change the way they speak. And a lot of people think it's sort of

7:39

a feat and it really is not,

7:42

it's not the case. I remember my wife

7:44

lived in Australia and her accent,

7:46

she grew up in America, but her accent

7:49

was very difficult to place. And

7:52

what, and she worked for the government of Australia.

7:54

And what, what she said was at some point, it

7:57

wasn't a matter of wanting to suddenly have

7:59

an Australian

7:59

It was a matter of being understood by the people

8:02

you work with right? That was exactly that's exactly

8:04

is a hundred percent Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Well, I mean

8:06

I feel cursed on occasion, you know, but There's

8:10

so many different features of the of your upbringing

8:12

that want to hit on but one I want to start

8:14

right away Which is

8:16

before we get to the I mean and you know, there's so

8:18

many obstacles. There's there's parents

8:20

who break up. There's poverty a little

8:23

access to good education Drug

8:25

dealing so many and potential

8:27

violence all around you all of those things that you

8:29

might imagine for a

8:32

poor black man young man in

8:34

many places and for a poor person in many places

8:37

but one of the things I ask people who become scientists

8:40

is To what extent reading

8:42

impacted on there becoming scientists

8:44

and in your case You know

8:47

the first thing that comes out is is

8:49

is how Reading saved you and you

8:51

want to tell the story of the book of the month Club because I kind

8:54

of found that kind of Interesting one.

8:55

Yeah. So, you know, I discovered I fall in

8:58

love with books and I have

9:00

this older friend Darren Brown Yeah,

9:02

who is pretty successful in his own

9:04

right? He grew to be the highest ranking African-american

9:07

in the US Navy submarine fleet

9:09

and his last post was to

9:13

Run the the Navy base there at Ames in

9:16

San Jose, but you know Darren was

9:18

a couple years older than me He was a smart kid

9:20

and he was like Giving

9:22

me advice and so one of the things

9:24

he told me was that as a minor I

9:27

can't be held accountable to a contract.

9:29

Yeah, so I signed up for Time

9:31

Life books, you know And I received books

9:34

on you know, the weird stuff. Yeah, you know

9:36

what the irony of it is I grow up

9:38

to write a book with Time Life. Yeah,

9:41

and I confess to them. They're like, okay, we forgive

9:44

you By the way, I had

9:46

a subscription Time Life books when I was younger first year

9:48

book of the month But then yeah, I had all the timeline

9:50

books. In fact, it's it's not behind me But

9:52

but there's a bookcase you can see all that. I have

9:54

the 24 volumes or whatever it was It

9:57

took many years to get them and when I and

9:59

they were one I spent my entire allowance

10:01

on them, but oh that you'd book of the month,

10:03

but I think it's a great idea that you yeah now

10:06

But I forget what how

10:08

you knew you want it you love books because

10:10

there was the Bible in your house But was

10:12

there something else that you saw before

10:15

before the book of the month Club? I know that roots event. I'll

10:17

be able to play the role, but yeah, so long the fact.

10:19

Yeah, so long before that I was a seven-year-old

10:23

in Elementary school to my sister

10:25

was in middle school and she brought home

10:27

Edith Hamilton's Mythologies,

10:30

oh man. I just ate that

10:32

up. You know, I love everything superhero, right?

10:34

Yeah Yeah, and so a year later,

10:36

you know I'm living in New Orleans and there I am with Darren

10:39

Brown and you know Darren and I you know Darren

10:41

sees me everything He sees me how to play chess. He

10:43

sees me how to play football You know

10:45

and and we're in the woods But

10:48

the next year I get to Mississippi and

10:50

I'm introduced to comics Marvel and DC

10:52

Comics might say comics. That's right

10:55

Yeah, they have crates and crates of comics,

10:57

right so up until this time I'm not really,

10:59

you know, Edith Hamilton is as close as I've gotten

11:01

a reading in adult books Yeah, but

11:04

you know again, there were the time life books that

11:06

had you know, go You know Oak

11:08

Island Loch Ness Monster all this weird stuff.

11:10

I loved it, right? Yeah, and at

11:13

the same time, you know Once I moved

11:15

to the country once I moved to

11:17

rural Mississippi

11:18

man when winter hits, you know, it's

11:21

a lot more boring, right? I

11:24

live in Canada. I don't think rural Mississippi

11:26

is exactly the same. It's all

11:28

relative man It's all relative, you know, it gets down to 60 you're

11:31

free. No, we had a fire, you know 60 and

11:33

we got our T-shirts on anyway,

11:36

it would be 80 my aunt Minnie who I live with she'd be

11:38

like build a fire. Yeah But

11:41

man I

11:42

Was so bored this you

11:45

know at this time period and everybody was talking

11:47

about this book roots and lo and behold There it is

11:49

in the house. And this is the first time I really

11:51

read a novel Don't yeah,

11:53

and it really just blew my mind and

11:56

how vivid the pictures

11:59

in my mind were

11:59

how emotionally invested I

12:02

was in the story. And so, you

12:04

know, coming out of it, it was like awakening to

12:06

me like, you know, whoa, that's awesome. Let's do

12:08

it again. Yeah, absolutely.

12:10

I think well, you know, I want to come back then

12:13

a second, but you mentioned comic books and I'd forgotten

12:15

about that part. And, you know, I

12:17

again used to spend my weekly allowance where my brother

12:19

and my brother would get me to spend my weekly allowance

12:22

on comic books that we both read. But but

12:24

but, you

12:25

know, that's a great way of young

12:27

kids beginning to learn to read. And and

12:29

and and

12:30

and, you know, I encourage that, you know, who

12:32

cares what the subject matter is. It's a way

12:34

of getting gripping with stories. And

12:37

and then the root story. Yeah,

12:40

it's as far as I could tell, it was the first book that really grabbed

12:42

you and to go way ahead. I

12:44

was going to talk about the end, but it might as well in some

12:47

ways in the circularity

12:49

of Oregon, go on the story of your life. It had an

12:51

impact because ultimately you changed your name.

12:54

That's right. And to some extent,

12:56

it's because of, of course, the hero

12:58

of roots being forced to change his

13:01

name.

13:01

You know what, man? I did not have that

13:03

thought until I was writing this book. You know,

13:06

as I'm thinking about my life and,

13:08

you know, you know, I took a year to really like

13:10

think that, you know, Josh, the guy I wrote a book with, you

13:12

know, we spent a year just talking about these stories

13:14

to try to narrow it down. I had like a billion.

13:17

Yeah, not literally anecdotes.

13:19

But how do you create a weave, a narrative out

13:21

of it? What are the important stories? And,

13:23

you know, I started to see things that I had never seen before.

13:26

And once I, you know, I talked

13:28

about how big that story of Kunta Kinte

13:31

and being forced to change his name, the big emotional

13:34

impact it had on me. Yeah. And as I was

13:36

thinking, I was like, wait a minute, could that have influenced me

13:38

when I decided to change my name? I

13:41

can't say that it did not. I can't say that it did. But

13:43

it's about employment. Well, whether

13:47

an influence you're not. Yeah. Jumping

13:50

ahead. We might as well. So if we write up, you

13:52

did change your name rather late, right? In the last

13:55

years of graduate school. That's right. Yeah. And

13:57

your PhD. Yeah. It's nice to have a new I mean,

13:59

having your. So if you're going to, in some sense, reinvent

14:01

yourself, that's a good time. But

14:04

what was, was it more than that? What

14:06

caused it at that instant and nowhere

14:08

before after? You know, man, a big part

14:10

of it was that I felt like I

14:12

was a new person. Like that's the reality. But,

14:14

you know, when I showed up, you know, I had been

14:16

in, and this was

14:19

relevant for this time, right? Because

14:21

when I get to Stanford and I discovered their libraries, talk about

14:24

books, you know, creating libraries, you

14:26

know, I'm like, I'm not going to do any

14:29

library became my second home,

14:32

if not my primary home,

14:34

right? And so, you

14:36

know, we were born into this world and we're given

14:39

all these narratives. Yeah. And,

14:41

you know, I would hear all these narratives

14:43

about, you know, so there's like what school

14:45

is telling me, but there's what the older brothers in

14:48

the hood are telling me, right? You know, they

14:50

pull me to the side and they

14:51

say things like, well, you know, black men created

14:53

civilization, a black man, you know, and I'm like, what

14:55

the hell? And I felt like, you

14:57

know what? Let me find out for

14:59

myself. Let me get into this library

15:02

and unwind human history. I

15:04

want to under, I wanted to, you know, I used to play this game

15:06

with people, you know, tell me a year, tell

15:08

me a century, and I'll tell you what a dominant power is wearing

15:11

the world. What was happening in that? And, you know, pretty

15:13

much Eurasia and Africa at that

15:15

time, you know, the rest of the world, I really didn't have a good view

15:17

on, and I wanted to understand human

15:20

religions, right? I wanted to understand

15:21

the, not just the, the,

15:23

the Western traditions from

15:25

the fertile, from the Levant, right? Yeah. Judaism

15:28

and Islam and Christianity

15:32

or the Eastern philosophies of Hinduism

15:34

and Buddhism, but also, you know, what was going on

15:36

around Africa, what were the Native American beliefs? And

15:38

so I did all of this studying and at the

15:40

same time I'm learning everything

15:43

that humanity knows about the natural world

15:45

for the most part as a physicist. Right? So

15:47

this history, this physical

15:49

world, and man, let me tell you,

15:51

it was as if I took my head, poured

15:53

out a lot,

15:54

everything I was born with, right? Refilled

15:57

it. And I'm like, okay, now I'm this new dude. And,

16:01

you know, I want to claim, cause I

16:03

also did have that idea of self-determination.

16:06

And I'll tell you what's funny is funny,

16:08

not funny, but you know, I always saw

16:11

myself, I'm African-American, clearly

16:13

I'm descended from slavery. Well

16:15

it turns out that there's not that much in

16:18

my ancestry, right? You know, once we did our

16:20

family history, it turns out my mother's paternal,

16:23

or both my paternal lineage, my

16:25

father's paternal lineage and my mother's paternal lineage,

16:27

there was no slavery, but on the maternal

16:29

lineages there was, right? So

16:32

it's a, but even then, you know, my father's

16:35

mother is, you know, half

16:37

Choctaw Native American, right? Yeah.

16:40

So I'll tell you, you know, so as I'm doing this studying and

16:43

I find out my father's lineage, what's really crazy

16:45

about it is that both of his grandfathers were Irishmen,

16:48

white Irishmen.

16:49

Interesting. Right? Yeah. Get

16:53

this. His paternal grandfather,

16:55

his father's father had two families.

16:58

He had his white family and

17:00

he had his black family with which he had four

17:02

kids. One of whom

17:05

was my grandfather, Charlie

17:07

Plummer, right? But here's the crazy thing.

17:09

All right. My dad was born in 1933. I

17:12

don't know what year his dad was born, but

17:14

this white guy clearly is born at some point in

17:17

the mid 19th century. When

17:19

he died, he left us, his black

17:21

family, a ton of land in Mississippi.

17:24

That's the land I grew up on. Wow. The

17:26

Plummer land in Clark County, Mississippi. Wow.

17:29

That does go against the narrative, doesn't it? You're supposed to have been forgotten

17:31

when he dies. Yeah. You're supposed

17:34

to be like, Oh, I don't claim you. Right? But

17:36

no, he

17:37

provides the land that I grew up on. Well,

17:39

this is good. There are a number of times I want

17:42

to talk to you and sort of challenge

17:44

the

17:45

traditional narratives or at least ask questions

17:48

because the big thing, I mean, you got the right

17:50

guy. Well, and I hope, yeah, I

17:52

do. I think I do. And you got the right guy

17:54

for me in the sense that nothing is sacred for me. So

17:56

I'm going to ask questions. And some people say, how dare

17:59

you ask that question? Nothing sacred buddy.

18:01

Every question is Nerds

18:05

that you know feel like we're from another planet Okay,

18:07

good. Um, objectively not

18:10

like we're members of the human species Before

18:12

we leave the books which we and we sort of circled

18:14

around them for a while, but this is great I have no, you

18:17

know agenda in that sense You

18:19

went from the novels though The one thing that really

18:21

I was intrigued by and it was clear

18:23

to me that that was

18:24

Your desire to have an encyclopedic knowledge

18:27

came from the fact that the first Books you really

18:29

had access to were encyclopedias and you ate

18:31

them up You got this world book encyclopedia

18:34

and you started to read it from a to

18:36

z Absolutely. And as far as

18:38

I can tell been obnoxious to everyone around

18:40

you by telling absolutely Yeah,

18:43

mama, you know, my mom had to pull me to the side

18:46

and you know inform me, you know how

18:48

to interact with the humans Especially,

18:51

you know in the deep south man a kid correcting

18:54

an adult.

18:54

Yeah, they say something correct

18:56

You know that that's not gonna fly, you know that could

18:59

Especially if you correct a teacher and which which

19:01

I know you did and I remember I had that experience But

19:03

for you and especially I don't and there may have

19:06

been a different amix with correcting a white

19:08

teacher and we'll we'll talk about that I don't know

19:10

if yeah, I think most many teachers were offended

19:12

either way if a kid would correct them Right,

19:15

right, but there may have been even more if it

19:17

wasn't a white kid only at this one school, man

19:20

At this one school is one teacher in quitman,

19:22

Mississippi And you know, that's the that's the other thing about the

19:24

narrative that is, you know, that

19:26

is interesting is that You

19:28

know whatever group of people you you interact with they're

19:31

gonna be people that are gonna be great to you They're gonna be but are gonna be awful

19:33

to you. Yeah, most people gonna be a spectrum and

19:36

different You're gonna be a spectrum, right? So yeah, I

19:38

ran into that person that was awful

19:40

to me in that way That happened to sit

19:43

in a teacher's desk. Sure now if I

19:45

had to judge teachers as a whole

19:47

Love them teachers. We're gonna get to because

19:49

I as far as I can see teachers were incredibly important I

19:52

want to challenge the narrative because one of

19:54

the things I want to Look, I'll

19:56

I want to talk later about many claims of systemic

19:58

racism, which I don't buy And I want to

20:00

talk to you about them because I you know but

20:03

but But

20:06

yeah, there's so the world book encyclopedia you

20:08

you correct me you always you know You correct

20:10

people around you and that was great. That was I love

20:13

myself and and I you know cuz I

20:16

cuz even in my new book I point out that the

20:18

one thing that parents and teachers don't say enough

20:20

is I don't know which is right Oh,

20:22

you always got to seem to know when you're a teacher and

20:24

that's not the way it should be it should be you know

20:26

What I don't know. Let's discover that together. Let's

20:28

let's because that's discovery

20:30

but so so the world was a good idea, but the other

20:32

thing that Cyclopeia introduced you to when

20:35

you finally got to e and

20:36

I think was under e and not a Albert

20:39

Einstein Einstein absolutely

20:42

That was a huge profound

20:44

moment in your life. Am I am I right? Absolutely,

20:46

man It was you know, love at first

20:49

read love at first sight whatever have

20:51

you? You know, I because

20:53

think about it this way, right I was so in love

20:55

with the natural world, you know I was watching

20:57

jock who stole wild America.

21:00

I just lived in the woods in Mississippi Just

21:02

you know, I was just fascinated by everything fire.

21:04

I was a huge pyromaniac And

21:08

oh man in the country, you know, I had gunpowder

21:10

kerosene gasoline burnt I

21:12

trash had a fireplace we were

21:14

doing it all right the natural world and

21:16

weird stuff that I talked about earlier I get the

21:18

time life books, you know

21:20

What's that's relativity man? That's you

21:22

know, you bring those two things together weirdness and

21:25

the natural world and not only that I

21:27

now have this esoteric knowledge that nobody

21:29

around me know how it makes you that superpower

21:32

Which you've been craving in the comic books to some extent.

21:35

That's right. Yeah. Yeah, so it all came together

21:37

man But you know think for me though Is

21:39

that it was almost like a puzzle in a challenge at

21:41

the same time? Because I wanted to really

21:44

really get it and understand it. Yeah Yeah,

21:47

and I became obsessed with just reading reading reading

21:49

and quickly realize hey man, I'm gonna have to learn

21:52

some math here

21:53

Eventually,

21:55

if there's some math and you have a bunch of times

21:57

where people you were good at you were really good at certain

21:59

parts of math and your mother encouraged you to do that.

22:03

She was very excited when you could count well and

22:06

solve problems.

22:07

You know, to think about one of

22:09

my big discoveries

22:11

as an adult scientist who also

22:14

interacts with the education world, because

22:16

I've come to understand that you get well educated

22:18

in math by the time you graduate high school, in

22:20

one of two ways. Either it's

22:22

in your house or

22:24

you're lucky. I

22:27

was neither. Most Americans

22:29

are neither. But if you go to school and learn math well,

22:31

oh, you got lucky. Let me tell

22:33

you. But because the mathematics

22:36

of special relativity is so simple. Yeah,

22:38

really, it's high school. It's even, well,

22:41

depending on where you go. In Europe, it's

22:43

middle junior. It's public school. In the US, it's

22:45

high school or university. But I was able

22:47

to reason my way through it. And so by the time I'm like 14,

22:50

I'm getting it. I understand

22:52

it. And computers come out.

22:54

And I'm 16.

22:55

And I'm like, hey, I can code this

22:57

up. Yeah, we'll get to the science first. Because I'm trying

22:59

to think. In many cases, I want to

23:02

see what the key elements are that make

23:04

people scientists. But in your case, it's even

23:07

for the same reason you wrote the book. It's even

23:09

more interesting because it's such an unlikely journey.

23:12

These things is a factor that when

23:15

we think of the kind of things we can do to help

23:19

more kids climb out of a

23:22

future that's unfortunately determined for them when they're born

23:25

otherwise, think of what are the things that can

23:27

help? Well, obviously books are one

23:29

thing. The other, I'm a, they're

23:31

Jaron Brown,

23:33

man. Yeah, you're having a friend. A kid that's two years older than

23:35

me. One peer is all it takes. One peer.

23:37

All it takes, one peer.

23:39

I remember even when I was a kid was a son

23:41

of a neighbor who was an engineer who had a model

23:44

of an atom. My mother wanted me to be a doctor,

23:46

so I thought doctors were scientists. But when I saw the model

23:48

of the atom, I remember that. And then it was a book

23:51

on Galileo for me. But the

23:53

other thing, I'm trying to think of the other things that, you

23:55

know, some people might have think of are disadvantages

23:58

from having come where

23:59

But there were advantages, because everything

24:02

can be, you know, everything cuts

24:04

two ways. And in this world of everyone suddenly

24:06

being a victim, people realize that

24:08

sometimes, you know, what you think of as a victim, it can be an

24:10

advantage to you,

24:12

building a strength out of the building. I'll give you one example. Okay,

24:14

good. I'll give you one example. I arrive at Stanford

24:16

University,

24:17

and I spent the summer before

24:19

at Berkeley, working in Bernard Soutolle's research

24:22

group. Yeah, yeah. An

24:24

old friend of my colleague. Oh, nice, yeah. I worked

24:26

on some of the papers you were working on later, but anyway, it doesn't

24:28

matter. That was my very first physics research

24:30

of my life. So I knew

24:32

that I was vastly under educated, compared

24:34

to everybody else, from my Berkeley experience, right? I ran

24:36

the Sall Pearl Mudder, who was a buddy, but

24:39

you know, Sall, as a postdoc at the time,

24:41

was not pulling punches, let me tell you. Yeah,

24:43

okay, okay, okay. He was being pretty

24:46

frank, but anyway. Okay.

24:48

But I appreciate that, right? I appreciate,

24:51

I appreciate knowing where I need to shore things up.

24:54

So anyway, I show up at Stanford,

24:56

and I'm looking at different

24:59

things about the people around me. I'm looking at

25:01

their intelligence, and I'm looking

25:03

at their education. And I'm like,

25:05

oh,

25:06

what I see is that

25:08

you guys are, I would not consider you to be intrinsically

25:10

more intelligent than the people I knew that

25:12

were uneducated. Yeah, sure.

25:14

But you're way better educated, for

25:17

sure. But then I said, but you know

25:19

what? Can anyone in here outwork me?

25:22

Because, you know, I was forced

25:24

to do hard manual labor, like

25:26

this moment you hit double digits. And

25:29

you know, when you learn that resilience of,

25:31

I'm gonna, you know, the pain doesn't exist. I must

25:33

drive forward and get this done.

25:36

You, we both went to the same place. I was thinking,

25:38

I was thinking, I was reading, I'm looking at my notes, your

25:40

book, and you said that your rural backwards,

25:42

rural backwards Mississippi was a training

25:45

ground for life as a research scientist. Heck

25:47

yeah. You learned to work hard.

25:49

You learned to work hard, and you learned to

25:51

solve problems, man. You weren't, you know,

25:53

when you didn't have money, you weren't calling somebody to fix

25:55

anything. You were doing everything,

25:58

no matter how complicated it was. you know

26:00

the interesting thing is again one might think okay

26:02

your father was was ultimately an addict

26:05

your mother was you know Watch your mouth.

26:07

I'll kick your anyway Yeah, yeah,

26:09

and but they're both you know, they so they were both negative

26:12

influences one way But they're both incredibly positive influences

26:14

another way your mom Well,

26:16

let's go your dad first. Your dad was knew how

26:18

to do everything you okay, and

26:21

he and he and he and he taught you Yeah,

26:23

I think it's really a great thing and

26:25

often he you know, you can see that

26:28

influence in you and your mom For

26:30

all of her other, you know Pluses

26:32

and minuses was excited

26:34

for you

26:36

By because of your intelligence and

26:38

encouraged it. I mean there was a chemistry set at some

26:40

point. She bought a computer You

26:42

know, these are amazing things You

26:45

get me. Yeah, Ira it could go

26:47

the other way. I remember yeah, just to

26:49

give you an example. I remember when I was a

26:52

Chair of a physics department at cleveland. I tried

26:54

to get and my university we

26:56

donated Old scientific

26:58

equipment to some of the inner city schools that would because

27:00

they need it then cleveland There's nothing and there

27:02

was but there was a really neat school there called the cleveland

27:04

school for the arts Which was right next to the university and

27:06

I used to go there and I was a I think I

27:09

was I was involved with it Because we donated

27:12

old physics equipment to their science labs And

27:15

and I remember going to a play. I mean these were kids

27:17

that were gifted artistically and

27:20

I saw this girl young woman

27:23

Performance she was great and afterwards I

27:25

saw her come out and I just saw her mother

27:28

yelling

27:28

or why did you spend there? Why didn't you come home? And I thought

27:31

you know That's the difference between a parent

27:33

who you know When your kid does excel to

27:35

someone who just puts them down for excelling and

27:37

that's a and you know It's a really big difference

27:40

And so I was really pleased to see how tickled

27:42

your mother was at a variety of times In

27:44

your life and how for your father in spite of introducing

27:47

a drug dealing and ultimately

27:50

Ultimately becoming you know,

27:52

a unfortunate addict

27:54

Nevertheless

27:56

taught you how to work hard learn

27:58

things solve problems

27:59

And and those are there was another aspect

28:02

that I thought of that

28:03

of being in rural, Mississippi

28:05

You know, I'm gonna interrupt you here, man I'll

28:08

interrupt you you interrupt me. That's the way it works. You know

28:10

you say being a drug dealer There's

28:12

being an honest drug dealer He

28:15

taught me how to be straight. Yeah

28:18

where professional honest in that

28:20

world Oh, absolutely important things

28:22

like not go out in the street and sell, you know, all

28:24

sorts of things He you know, he gave you wise

28:26

street wisdom Exactly.

28:29

And don't treat people because you're gonna it's gonna come

28:31

back and get you in the end. Exactly No, no, it was it

28:33

was really he taught you to be in that sense.

28:35

He was an entrepreneur when he was absolutely

28:38

He was an entrepreneur. He was in a prize. He had

28:40

he brought money into the house That

28:42

was essential for living which which which

28:45

was uh, you know and buying that that

28:47

club, uh, the oh, yeah I would have called a nightclub

28:49

I guess and getting everyone working and it was Yeah, I mean

28:52

I was fascinated by that But the other thing that

28:54

it seemed to me that you got

28:55

out of that rural That one

28:58

some people might think it was a negative was the night

29:00

sky I remember the fact when

29:02

you came from a city To suddenly the

29:04

first time when you went saw the night sky when you

29:07

were in the country Again

29:09

a pivotal moment. I don't know if it determined

29:11

why you wanted to be an astronomer and astrophysicist,

29:13

but tell me about it

29:15

Man, listen, I look, you know, I

29:17

was amazed and I had no references

29:20

to know Okay, here's what you know, all I knew

29:22

was the big dipper and of course

29:24

Just like everyone else thought the pleiades was a

29:26

little dipper. Yeah, right. Yeah, but I'd

29:28

see the planets And I knew that there was something different

29:31

and amiss with them. Yeah, right. I

29:33

didn't figure it out until to go that those were planets

29:35

Yeah Meanwhile,

29:37

too, so it's okay You know

29:40

the cities where everything where they air is so bad You really

29:42

can't see the fact that they don't twinkle and you get yeah

29:44

Well, I didn't know this, you know, like like basically in

29:47

the country We had two channels channel seven channel 11

29:50

only channel seven came in for the most part until

29:52

people got to the point where you get that Antenna

29:54

outside your house where you go outside attorney antenna.

29:56

Yeah Like

29:59

we literally do

29:59

in a trailer in the woods, you know?

30:03

And so having information to

30:05

tell me here's what I'm seeing in the sky,

30:07

I did not have that. But as far as like

30:09

being there and just being fascinated by it,

30:11

right? But here's the funny thing is

30:13

that again, as I started to learn

30:16

once I went to Tougaloo, you know, I'd come home

30:18

because you know, they had a library, they had people that knew

30:20

things about astronomy. I took an astronomy class. Just for

30:22

people, just for people, our listeners, Tougaloo

30:24

was the first university you went to. Some of them may have not heard

30:27

of Tougaloo. Okay, but we'll get there. Tougaloo

30:29

College. I like to say it's so exclusive. We don't

30:31

even tell people to be there. Perfect.

30:33

But it's

30:35

funny because one of my good high school friends,

30:37

this guy named Jackie Pugh, he passed

30:39

in 2022. But he was hilarious,

30:42

man, because once I started learning, you

30:44

know, I wanted to tell everybody, you know, being annoying again.

30:46

Yeah. And Jackie, he would always

30:48

say, you know, if I see somebody, I'm like,

30:50

Hey, you see that right there? And Jackie

30:53

would always go, Oh, he go with

30:55

that shit again. Yeah, they would

30:57

tease me about

30:59

it, but

31:01

they love me for it. You know, well, you know, I never

31:03

I interesting thing is it really hit me

31:06

because it was a long I lived, I grew up in a city

31:09

and you know, I liked that I even had a telescope

31:11

and I remember once to a little show with

31:13

a friend of mine and we had just telescopes.

31:16

But I never really knew what the sky looked like

31:18

for years and years and years because I never went to the country.

31:21

And you know, and I and where I live now, it's just I've,

31:24

I've almost 360 degrees like living in a

31:26

planetarium. It's just dark. But

31:29

the first time you go out and see the night sky

31:31

without being in a city, it's just a different

31:33

experience. It's totally really because it's not just out

31:35

there. It's it's all around you. It

31:38

is almost it's almost it's if I

31:40

believed in the word spiritual, I'd say it's a spiritual

31:42

man. I mean, you know, you feel connected. Yeah, you feel connected.

31:45

I was just saying to someone, you know, I wrote in one

31:47

of my books in South America, you

31:52

understand why, you know, they used to view

31:54

the Milky Way as a river continuation

31:56

of Amazon. And the reason is why because

31:58

it's it's around you. It's not just out there. And

32:01

it's the kind of feeling you can't understand until

32:03

you've seen it yourself anyway.

32:05

Oh man, yeah. Okay,

32:08

so let's go to the next thing. I'm

32:10

trying to think of the things that I, from reading your

32:13

history,

32:15

that were important to developing

32:17

you. The encouragement to do math and your mom's encouragement

32:20

to at least be good accounting. And accounting.

32:23

You know, I'm from a world where nobody really

32:26

knows what math is. As a matter of fact, you

32:28

know, at Tougaloo College, you know, when I got there. So

32:30

first thing was, I went to the Navy after high

32:33

school. Yeah, yeah. And there, you know,

32:35

I was in this program that was designed

32:37

to take enlisted people and

32:39

turn them into officers, right? So the way it worked

32:42

is they gave you a year of academic

32:44

and really hardcore military

32:46

training run by the Marines, right? And

32:49

there were two math classes. The regular math

32:51

class and the remedial math class.

32:53

In the remedial math class, we

32:55

were taken from arithmetic

32:58

through calculus in one year. I

33:00

have atopic dermatitis, which you're not allowed

33:02

to be in the Navy with. Yeah, that's the reason you

33:04

had to leave.

33:05

Reason I had to leave. But luckily

33:08

I learned algebra right before I got kicked

33:10

out. That's what you said. The Navy gave

33:12

you algebra and also exposure

33:14

to systemic racism. But we'll get, maybe we'll get there. But

33:17

those are two things the Navy gave. But it was great.

33:19

I mean, it gave you, and a kind of a new kind

33:21

of discipline, although we'll get to the, I

33:24

love the definition of Mr. Cross's version of

33:26

this. Oh yeah. We're gonna

33:28

get to. Man, I almost already had a billion times. Yeah, well, it's

33:31

a wonderful phrase. And I think we'll repeat it right

33:33

now. Because the other thing I wanna talk about is the

33:36

other thing that was really important, and I've met, and I've

33:38

talked a lot of scientists and other people

33:40

about the importance of teachers. And I've been

33:43

amazed for some people, like

33:45

my friend Neil deRast-Seis, he said teachers didn't matter

33:47

to him. He had no good teachers. But for

33:49

the rest of us, we didn't. For you, you made

33:52

the beneficiary of a few key

33:54

good teachers. And the other thing was interesting,

33:56

was a number of them are white teachers, right?

33:58

Oh, absolutely.

33:59

And I remember later

34:02

on you were surprised when you went to the science, it's

34:04

a music camp,

34:05

and you got these prizes that people weren't,

34:07

that people respected you, you know, they weren't, they

34:10

were white, yet they gave you all the prizes, and you thought, why

34:12

should they be prejudiced against me? But you didn't

34:14

expect it in the scientists, which I thought was interesting.

34:16

So early on, you'd been, you had

34:18

this experience of these, and it's, you're

34:21

probably right, a bunch of these guys came down to the Freedom

34:23

March and decided to stay. Yeah,

34:25

yeah, that's right. But Mr. Cross, well, Dr.

34:27

Teal, the, yeah, the McGinnis,

34:30

Bruno, I

34:31

wrote the book, I'm

34:33

impressed by all of these teachers

34:35

who really not

34:37

only put their faith in you, but went out to bat

34:39

for you and, and really took you

34:41

under the wing and said, I see something in you,

34:43

and I'm going to help. And so, and

34:46

I think, man, you know, that's,

34:48

you know, that I hate where our country

34:51

is. So, Lawrence, I've been to 44 countries at

34:53

this point in my life. You know, I didn't, I didn't leave

34:55

until I was 32. Wow. All

34:58

right. Now I'm 27. Yeah.

35:01

Compared to me, I want you to know that. Okay.

35:04

So, um,

35:06

I see that every country has

35:09

these identity hierarchies. And so

35:11

the thing that, that, that was interesting to me,

35:13

you know, when you live in a single locale, you

35:15

buy into the, the,

35:17

the one of your location

35:21

and you buy into the one that's

35:23

recent, right? The ideas that are

35:25

recent, you know, and so it

35:27

gets painted with this brush. And

35:30

sometimes in your cultural narrative,

35:32

you're still living the fight of three,

35:34

four generations ago. Yeah. Right.

35:38

And, and, and so like, I'll be honest with you, you know, when you talk about narratives,

35:40

when I left, so we, we talk about the

35:43

Navy and systemic racism, I'll give you an

35:45

example of what it is, what it really has

35:47

to do with man. I think in large

35:49

part is character. Yeah. Yeah.

35:53

And here's what I mean by that. If

35:55

you're a bully, if you're somebody that's going to pick

35:57

on somebody, if you're somebody and they're around us.

36:00

Right. Most people are concerned with themselves.

36:02

There are a few people that are really good. There's a few jerk

36:04

stuff. Yeah, okay They're

36:07

looking for the vulnerable. Yeah or

36:09

the who those who are perceived to be

36:11

vulnerable. So let me give you an example of

36:13

myself Before

36:15

I left, mississippi Man, I was

36:17

pulled over by the cops. I left at the age of 24. Okay Dozens

36:22

of times yeah, you know between 15

36:25

and 24 like it was routine routine You

36:27

know by the time that to do is like lie down

36:30

search your pockets. All right, I go

36:32

to stanford. I start speaking differently

36:34

Yeah, okay. I dress differently. Yeah

36:37

Now I get pulled over by the police. Uh-huh.

36:40

It plays out completely different. Yeah the

36:42

second I start speaking they're like Oh, yeah,

36:44

I noticed that you swerved a little bit These are you

36:46

know because i'm no longer perceived

36:49

as vulnerable As as like a

36:51

late teenage kid who dresses like

36:53

he's from the hood and talks like he's from the hood Yeah, right,

36:56

you know, so The

36:58

the the and you know these people can be anybody

37:00

like man i've been forcing people's perceptions

37:03

in advance and people People, you

37:05

know, you we all whether we like or not make

37:07

quick assessments And one of the

37:09

first ways where they dress the way to speak. I mean, it's

37:11

just exactly

37:12

Exactly. Exactly. And and and

37:15

you know, that's what I say about too about going

37:17

to stanford One of the greatest lessons I learned

37:19

was class camouflage, right? People

37:21

would see me like five miles away Oops is one

37:23

of them. But now they're like, oh dr. Olu.

37:26

Shay. Come on in Think

37:28

to the president of the country the ceo, you know,

37:30

it's like hi there They're

37:32

like, oh i'm your big fan like oh P

37:35

crumpets But

37:38

you know the the the

37:41

But

37:42

I how you interpret things

37:45

is based on your narrative. Yeah, so when

37:47

I left the south Where

37:50

I did experience, you know because think

37:52

about it this way i'm having conflicts with

37:54

black guys and white guys Sure, right

37:56

i'm having black guys who love me and white guys

37:58

who love me. Yeah Right. But what

38:01

are they going to pick on you about when they come

38:03

at you? If they're trying to hurt you, right? So

38:05

the black dude might say something about my crooked teeth, my

38:07

nappy hair, my big lips, right? The white dude,

38:10

he's going there nine times out of 10, Mississippi,

38:13

right? That's where he's going to go with it. Yeah. So

38:15

what you do to, to self

38:18

survive, to manage your own mind, you don't

38:20

want to encounter those sorts of

38:22

statements, right? Because it hits you a certain way, right?

38:25

Yeah. So, you know, like, like, somebody

38:27

being like, I guess you say

38:29

you're Jewish, which I didn't know. But if somebody says

38:31

something anti-Semitic to you, it

38:34

hits differently than someone just saying something jerky.

38:36

Yeah. You know, for me, I guess it's just something, and that's

38:38

why I've said this before. It may be a

38:41

character flaw. All it did was make me think they

38:43

were stupid. Yeah. Well, I

38:45

grew into that, right? I grew into that,

38:47

right? Because what I'm praying to do is, Oh, if I

38:49

hear this certain word, I'm supposed to lose

38:51

my mind, get really angry and be violent.

38:54

Right? Yeah. And then after a certain point,

38:56

I'm like, why? That's your problem. That's the

38:58

problem. Yeah, exactly. So you

39:01

own how you react to things like that. You own how

39:03

you feel like a victim or whether you don't

39:05

in some sense. Right. But when

39:07

you're a young man, when that's the narrative

39:09

that you're in. So I leave Stanford University.

39:12

I mean, I leave Mississippi head to Stanford University

39:14

at the age of 24. And I'm like, Oh, every white person

39:16

is a racist. Yeah. So I had ample evidence

39:18

to the conference. Like I said, I had these white dudes that

39:20

love me. Yeah. Yeah. And all

39:23

the science fairs and the music camp

39:25

and all of the. And I had a black dude that

39:27

punched me in the face. You know, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

39:30

So anyway, what I learned though, you know,

39:32

cause you have

39:34

this racist radar to avoid

39:37

these people. And one of the things that trigger

39:39

it is when people talk to you like they're superior

39:41

to you. Okay. Well, guess how academics talk

39:43

to people quite often. Guess how physicists in particular

39:45

thought. Yeah. Yeah. So, so I

39:47

had to learn, Oh, you're not a racist.

39:50

You're an asshole. Right. And

39:53

it impacts me. You know, and so,

39:55

but you know, now as I mature and

39:57

as I age, right, I get to.

39:59

the humans with whom I interact.

40:02

And they run the gamut. And

40:05

what I see is, if we look at our narrative

40:07

publicly, you

40:10

think we're a country where everybody's at each other's throats

40:12

over partisan politics and race.

40:14

But in my everyday, man, that

40:17

is not what I experienced and see at all.

40:19

I interact with people

40:22

that are extremely liberal, extremely conservative,

40:25

and everything in between. People of all

40:28

races.

40:29

We're all getting along. Big reasons

40:31

we're all well-fed and housed, right? You

40:34

put us under some stress, things may change, but. You

40:37

know, again, I'll jump ahead, but

40:39

obviously what your second father figure was your

40:42

PhD, Art Walker. And

40:45

he said something which I think

40:47

was really important. When you talk about the experience

40:50

of having the

40:55

failure in the graduate

40:58

qualifying exams and what appears

41:00

to be people taking it out on you. And

41:03

I'll talk about that later. Because having been a professor,

41:05

I'm gonna put on the other hand and say why

41:07

one might have assumed that you were ready to fail.

41:10

But anyway,

41:11

what he said was an organization's like

41:13

a bell curve, but it's not just an organization, it's society.

41:15

It's the center of the vast majority.

41:18

They're indifferent. They're apathetic. They're self-centered.

41:20

That's what he just said. A small minority will help,

41:23

and there's a small minority that'll be hostile. Don't

41:25

let that small group of doubters derail you.

41:27

And I think that's the key point. If we

41:30

always, in any organization,

41:33

we're gonna find people who are assholes.

41:35

And if we label them

41:37

and nothing else, we're gonna say that there's a systemic

41:40

something in that thing, where in fact it's just a spectrum.

41:43

And part of being, whether you're African

41:45

American, whether you're Jewish, whether you have

41:48

red hair, whether you're a woman, whether

41:50

you're gay, or whatever, is to

41:52

recognize that if you assume

41:55

that everyone is

41:57

reacting because of a certain trait,

41:59

than just because who they are and

42:01

learn how to deal with

42:03

it

42:04

then the world just becomes this view of

42:07

power and

42:09

racism that just distorts it

42:11

and ruins it for you and everyone else it seems to

42:13

me.

42:14

No I see what you mean there

42:17

and I agree with it in large measure. You do

42:19

control how you react. You do need the

42:21

resiliency to say I'm not so fragile that

42:23

you being unkind to me

42:25

is not going to stop me. Yeah and

42:28

the resiliency is all

42:30

well behaved right yeah but

42:33

I'll tell you what a systemic part comes into

42:35

and I think I stated earlier. Yeah. It's what

42:37

is the default right so just like people buy

42:39

into narratives yeah there's

42:41

a lot of narratives about that are bought into so

42:43

if you look at African Americans in

42:46

physics right if there is a criticism

42:48

they seem to fall into typical

42:51

categories right that seem to be reminiscent

42:54

of how African Americans or how Black folks

42:56

were represented you know prior

42:59

to us being a more enlightened society and that

43:01

is you know not as good mathematically uh

43:03

not as creative and not as hard

43:05

working right. I mean you say that yeah I remember

43:07

you said that later on and it and it's

43:09

interesting to say that narrative I mean I guess I just

43:13

like for example I think about that experiment. I think

43:15

of being good at math do people buy into

43:17

it. I think of my friend Jim Gates who I knew when

43:19

I was at MIT and then Harvard. Yeah I just saw him at

43:22

MIT a few weeks ago. Okay and so Jim

43:24

Gates is pretty good in math

43:26

and and and and and so I

43:28

never I guess I never and everyone knew that. What

43:30

did Jim Gates say to me?

43:32

What was that?

43:33

Let me tell you what Jim Gates said to me. Okay. So

43:35

I left uh

43:38

academia and went to industry yeah

43:41

and then I decided this stuff is boring I want to come back I

43:43

want to do some cosmology yeah all right so

43:45

in 2004 I was at the University of Chicago and

43:48

I had been seeing Jim Gates since the 80s when

43:50

I was a undergraduate student 88. Yeah and

43:52

you made a big point that Jim was really good at trying

43:55

to mentor. Oh yeah well let me tell

43:57

you what he did. He walked up to me and my poster

43:59

there on the Super for Nova acceleration pro satellite if

44:01

you remember that. Like he had never met

44:03

me in his life and grilled me on

44:06

the hardware, the theory, the

44:08

systematics. And then

44:10

after I answer all of his questions, he goes,

44:14

good to see you, right? Good

44:16

to see you, right? So I say to him, I was like, hey

44:18

man, remember, Cauley Institute was new at

44:21

Stanford at the time. They were hiring

44:23

people, Roger Blantford, others. And I was like,

44:25

hey man, you think they're gonna hire you?

44:27

And Jim pauses. And

44:29

he goes, if you

44:31

think these people will,

44:35

can believe that a person descended

44:37

from Africa is capable

44:40

of a creative thought, you

44:42

have a few things to learn. Jim

44:44

said that. No, yeah, he said, no, I do not

44:46

expect that. I do not expect that

44:48

invitation. That's what Jim said.

44:51

So man, you know,

44:53

there are people in our field that don't even talk to

44:55

people that don't have a PhD.

44:57

I know what academia is like.

45:00

I know I'm always that good. The thing is,

45:02

is that you can't wipe it with a

45:04

broad brush. You have to say it's this individual,

45:07

that individual, this individual, right? And

45:09

the other thing that happens is, I'll

45:11

give you another example. I sat on the NSF

45:14

post-doc panel for many, many years.

45:18

And so at this time when I was doing it, it

45:20

was a lot of

45:22

planetary exoplanet science, right? And

45:25

so I see these same letters from these same professors

45:27

at these same top universities and they make comparisons,

45:29

right? It's like kind of the same every year. Oh, this

45:32

person is my top- Yeah, I use

45:34

those letters myself so I know. But

45:36

then they make comparison to other people in the field.

45:39

And I noticed that one person who

45:42

they were comparing with like, oh sure, they're

45:44

way better than this person, was one African-American

45:47

guy. You know what I'm just like, why

45:49

is he always the foil? You

45:52

know, but I didn't do a systematic study of

45:54

all the letters. It was a small sample. And

45:57

maybe I just happened to get a biased sample. But

45:59

in three- second of years, this guy was the,

46:02

you know, and this guy has top positions,

46:04

has had top positions at multiple institutions,

46:06

right? Multiple top institutions. So,

46:08

you know, in some people's

46:11

minds, man, just like there are people

46:13

that are anti Semitic, there are people that are misogynist,

46:15

there are people that are, you

46:18

know, James Webb, right? Dead white

46:20

man, you know, there, you know, there are

46:22

people that I

46:23

can't even be wearing a blue shirt. I hate blue shirts.

46:26

Think of this, how often do you see a scientist

46:29

on television that gets prominent like you and

46:31

me that has a strong southern accent?

46:34

Right? I mean, there's all these little biases

46:37

that people have. And I think that's the real story.

46:39

It's not that none of them exist, is that

46:41

they do exist, but they

46:43

exist more on and you know, you have to look

46:46

at things, you have to judge people individually,

46:49

you don't paint people with groups. And

46:51

so that group ideas

46:53

that we have, because let me tell you, man, you know,

46:55

I don't know if you ever done interracial dating, and got to live

46:57

with people of other cultures. What,

47:00

you know, who they talk about, you know, but

47:02

people have wild ideas. And even,

47:04

you know, in my youth, I would think about

47:07

people in groups, right, not as individuals,

47:09

you know. So, you know, when people say

47:11

they're colorblind, I hope

47:13

that's what they're saying is that I judge people

47:16

on an individual basis. I see, you

47:18

know, I love the culture, the diversity,

47:20

you know, I love to go to another country,

47:23

eat their food, hear their music,

47:25

do their thing and be them with them. I love

47:27

that richness, right?

47:30

And so I love

47:32

that, right? But we can't let

47:35

that, you know, especially here in America, man,

47:37

because as a pluralistic society, you

47:39

know, and again, here's another narrative,

47:41

right? How America's so torn apart, dude. Yeah.

47:45

The way our country is constructed is a recipe

47:47

for nonstop conflict. But yet we

47:49

are peaceful as hell.

47:50

Right? Well, I'm not sure I agree with the

47:53

last part. But you're right. I think the recipe

47:55

for nonstop conflict is built into the country.

47:57

We don't have militias running around.

48:00

We're not taking up arms against each other

48:03

in a systematic way. Not yet. It

48:05

happened once, right? And, you know, I'll

48:07

remind people that was white people versus white people.

48:10

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. If you think about

48:12

it, it sounds like it was a race war, right? But

48:15

it's not. Because if you look at modern

48:18

society in America, if you

48:20

listen to different groups talk

48:22

about their

48:25

politics,

48:28

it seems like it's a different reality

48:30

that each group is living in. Yeah,

48:33

yeah, I guess. And you're absolutely right. And

48:36

there's, and there's, and people, as I said,

48:38

people pick up, people are used to certain things.

48:41

People have stereotypes, not necessarily racist, but we all have

48:43

preconceptions

48:45

of things. And the great thing about being

48:47

a scientist that scientists should

48:49

train you to do is ultimately be suspicious of your preconceptions

48:52

as we'll talk about at the end. Just want to

48:54

learn over and over again. And it'd be great if more

48:56

people just more generally learn to

48:58

be suspicious of their preconceptions. But

49:02

I do worry about

49:03

labeling as Bob Broth. I mean,

49:05

not just, when I look at, and

49:08

you're pretty frank about your history

49:10

at Stanford, and I know all the people, because a lot of them are

49:12

colleagues, and I've known them for, I mean,

49:14

you're professors, I've known them for a long

49:16

time, one way or another.

49:19

And there were people who

49:22

were hard on you, and

49:25

maybe unfair to you. That

49:27

happens to everyone.

49:28

But on the whole, the community

49:31

you were in,

49:32

ultimately, and

49:34

it wasn't just art, I don't think, ultimately,

49:37

you know, treated you with respect, ultimately treated

49:40

you with respect as a scientist that you have ultimately

49:42

gained. And

49:45

so I don't, I guess it's not, I don't,

49:48

the question is, in what sense is there, were

49:51

there systemic barriers or are there systemic

49:53

barriers?

49:54

When I read your history,

49:57

I think of it as a, I mean, it's a heart-wrenching.

49:59

warming and such an

50:02

uplifting

50:03

story. It really is. There's no doubt about it. I

50:05

mean, throughout, I, you know, I would constantly

50:07

smile. You were crying. You were crying. Well,

50:10

you know, I don't want to cry. But I was but I was

50:12

I was I was smiling anyway.

50:15

My more usual case than crying, although it's

50:17

not. But anyway, so there were a lot of people,

50:19

you know, you were supporting a high school and then you know, the faculty.

50:23

Let's go. You know, why not? You know, you're absolutely right, man. There

50:25

was one person who was over the line.

50:28

Yeah,

50:32

over the line. And you talk about that one person, I think. But

50:35

but here's the other thing, right? The other thing is,

50:38

is that, you

50:40

know, as a as a mentor,

50:43

as a leader myself, yeah, I

50:46

have people that we oversee, not

50:48

oversee, that's maybe not a bad word. But

50:50

we, you know, we mentor, we look out

50:53

for them, we manage them. And one

50:55

thing that I had to figure out,

50:57

and it's hard to figure out is for this particular individual,

51:01

what is the best thing forward for them

51:03

encouragement or a kick in the pants?

51:05

Yeah. Right. So for me, I'm

51:08

the type of guy that if you tell

51:10

me, Oh, I don't think you can do it, or you're not good

51:13

enough.

51:13

Yeah, I'm like, I'll show you right. But

51:16

that's not how the average person in my experience

51:19

reacts. Yeah, that's right.

51:21

But I was reading your story. And I was, I

51:23

was looking at both ways. Because, you

51:25

know, when I was a student, I experienced some

51:28

things that were not too dissimilar in

51:30

one or two cases. Well, what I remember,

51:32

I just remember when I taught at Yale, I just remember,

51:35

there were some students that we all and I hate to have

51:37

to do it. So you know, what,

51:40

it's really appropriate you leave the program. And

51:42

then ultimately, you, you, you, you

51:45

really felt like you were doing them a favor earlier

51:48

rather than later. The earlier that

51:50

they learned that they weren't really, it

51:52

wasn't the right

51:54

road for them, it wasn't, shouldn't be the end of their life, it

51:56

just wasn't the right direction. And it was hard

51:59

to do.

52:00

And on paper, you know, after having

52:02

to having to take undergraduate courses

52:04

when you're

52:05

a graduate student and then and

52:07

then not doing well in the exam first time after

52:09

four years, I could see how independent

52:12

of color or anything else I would I

52:14

would be willing to say, you know, what is, you

52:16

know, maybe,

52:17

maybe this isn't the right. I'm gonna

52:21

go to the premise of this topic here. Yeah. Because

52:24

it's almost sounds to me like somehow

52:26

you read if you read my book,

52:28

I never level an accusation

52:31

of racism. No, no, no, no, no, no,

52:33

no, no, absolutely. No, no, you don't. And

52:36

it's right. And you never

52:38

do. In fact, and I think you take that attitude

52:41

of arts that some people are going to be. I

52:43

tell the story of here's what happened. And I don't go to

52:45

their motivations of why I think happened. And

52:48

some people in there, you know, and so I'll give you. And you're

52:51

great, by the way, let me just interrupt. I think

52:54

the person who was probably in charge of the

52:57

qualifying exams was the one who said to you, hey,

53:00

you're gonna fail it again, you should be prepared, you should

53:02

get a master. He was trying to do the right thing. And

53:04

then when you got a PhD, I know him

53:06

well, he's a man.

53:22

two

53:37

groups of faculty, there were the lower, the

53:39

younger faculty who were not in favor of this thing

53:41

that they had been doing of, you

53:44

know, because, you know, for people who don't know, between 79

53:47

and 89, Stanford graduated 30 black

53:49

PhDs in physics. Not

53:52

doing it through affirmative action, but basically recruiting

53:54

the top physics undergraduates who

53:56

were African American come to Stanford. And they were

53:58

motivated to do so because William Shockley

54:01

was an outspoken racist guy who made him look

54:04

bad. So that's what they were doing to

54:08

repair. But by the time

54:10

I show up, things are now changing. The

54:12

attitude has changed in the department. And here

54:14

is the thing. And

54:17

it has to do with gatekeepers

54:19

and how they draw judgments on who

54:22

is worthy to come through the gate and who isn't. So

54:24

here's something that I've struggled with as

54:26

an educator. So there was this

54:28

one young lady in my class when I first started teaching my

54:31

very first I was working in Silicon Valley teaching at a

54:33

junior college. And this young lady, her

54:35

first name was Teresa Latino young lady man,

54:37

she worked her butt off, sat

54:40

on the front row of the class asked me all

54:42

kinds of questions, did not

54:44

get it at all. Okay.

54:47

She earned a C and I gave her a C.

54:50

Okay. And I regretted it from that

54:52

moment until today. Right.

54:55

I should have get you know, I have that after that

54:58

I put in a bonus like,

55:02

you know, this sort of

55:04

class participation thing points. So

55:06

I could swing. Yeah, I know. But would

55:08

it have been a favor? No, I don't know. I mean, I've

55:11

I told look, you know, ultimately, you got

55:13

to grow to my growth. I'm

55:15

not saying college, she worked hard. Yeah.

55:18

I mean,

55:19

she grew. Yeah. So if you grow

55:22

from, you know, it's like American Idol

55:24

to show American Idol. Yeah. One of the worst

55:26

things that can happen to you is just killing it

55:28

on the first day. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

55:30

Right. Nobody, you know, they want to see you grow.

55:32

Yeah, yeah. So I was not taking

55:35

people's growth into account. Yeah,

55:38

I can understand that.

55:39

So when you're, when you're a gatekeeper,

55:41

you should be looking at I think resilience

55:44

and growth. It's like if you have a child, right,

55:46

you're concerned about their, you

55:49

know, Oh, is there something wrong neurologically?

55:51

Well, do they actually learn? Are they improving?

55:54

That's the question. And so in my case,

55:57

you know, my reputation was being super hardworking.

55:59

But I was coming from so deep a hole.

56:02

Sure. Right?

56:03

That, you know, that, that, that

56:06

if you saw my, my relentless, I

56:08

don't think it's a situation where you can't get there.

56:11

Your mind, Hakeem, your mind doesn't came because here's what Art

56:13

Walker, here's the other thing. There

56:15

are the people that work closely with you and what

56:17

they think of you. And some people on the committee

56:19

who never work closely with you and see how you

56:21

think. Yeah. Right? So if all the

56:23

people who work closely with you see you one way,

56:26

but then other people say, Oh, look at this number.

56:28

I don't like. Man, I got students

56:30

working in the community right now that were

56:32

terrible on paper. And I, and

56:35

I, you know, like one, you know, a couple that work

56:37

at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory is one here

56:39

in Charlottesville, one in New Mexico.

56:41

Yeah. And you know, the people called me up like,

56:43

Hey, and I'm like, dude, forget about the grades.

56:46

This person is amazing. And they, and they've kicked

56:48

butt, you know, in their, in their work life. Right?

56:51

Yeah. So

56:52

I was prejudged man by certain

56:55

people. Sure. Sure. I didn't blame it on

56:57

race. Yeah. It's not as

56:59

people just look at numbers as one way.

57:02

And it's, and, and, and the point is that everyone, you

57:04

know, stereotypes are just that and they're meant to be

57:06

changed. And you're absolutely right.

57:08

I've known, you know, we, we, it,

57:11

what's, it's not,

57:12

it's not, you're not an awful person for,

57:14

for having, having prejudgment. You're

57:17

awful person. If you don't want to ever change

57:19

that prejudgment, the face of evidence and

57:21

that, and that's, and that's the, that's the difference.

57:23

I think that's the difference. I

57:26

don't want to harp on that too much, but, but I think, you

57:28

know, and, and I think you, you

57:30

know, I relate to the fact that, you know, you

57:33

write in the, in the, in the book, whenever you did really

57:35

poorly, it was useful

57:38

for you to know you don't really poorly because it was a kick

57:40

in the pants. Absolutely. Say, Hey, I, this

57:42

is a reality check. Hey, I thought

57:44

I was cool. I thought I knew it. I would say, Hey,

57:46

I did, I got A's in high school and,

57:48

you know, and, and then, Hey, now

57:52

I have something to learn. Now other people, when they

57:54

get a board rate, that's it that they're

57:56

done. And so it, of course, it depends on how

57:59

you. You've got to be realistic with

58:01

people, but it's still encouraging and I think you know art

58:03

was clearly both when art was disappointed

58:05

with you He told you why but he oh, man,

58:08

I mean there's that episode where you with the Of

58:12

that of that rocket.

58:14

Yeah, when he when you were clearly it mattered

58:17

a lot

58:18

To you that he was disappointed

58:20

in you at the time. Oh, absolutely But

58:22

he was one when I when you quote him, however,

58:25

right?

58:25

Um

58:27

You quote he talks like he

58:29

dealt with racism much of his

58:31

academic life Yeah, that was a generation

58:34

or so before you that's right. And and and

58:36

I think things have changed Um, oh, yeah

58:38

things absolutely have changed things have changed drastically

58:41

over the course of my life Yeah, of course and mine too.

58:43

Yeah, and and uh, um, and

58:45

I feel I felt badly interestingly enough I

58:47

was surprised though when when he said that people

58:50

Still question his intelligence. They never

58:52

accepted a black man as their intellectual equal

58:54

or you can make an original

58:57

I was surprised when he said that because he was a full professor

58:59

at stanford

59:00

Yeah, which usually is again. It's a pre-judgment

59:03

When someone comes into room they're a full professor

59:06

at stanford You make some assumptions

59:08

about them and i'm surprised that

59:10

that didn't give him

59:11

A leg up or at least he didn't perceive

59:14

it as giving him a leg up at the time Well, you know what?

59:16

It was really weird because there was two things happening.

59:18

So it turns out that the very you know Private

59:21

students talk to each other. Right?

59:23

So

59:25

There was this one guy he's now a professor at north

59:27

western He comes

59:29

in and he works with this other professor,

59:31

but he had started working with art first Yeah, and

59:34

he comes back to the group. He's like, oh man, you should have heard

59:36

what this professor said about art now when

59:39

I Started in this world of physics,

59:42

right? You know you get accepted to some university

59:44

you go in there and you go and you talk

59:46

to every professor in the department You have a meeting with each one of

59:48

them, right? Then you go to silicon valley and you

59:50

go talk to every manager Then you

59:53

go to this other universe for how you talk to everybody

59:55

and you know at these top

59:57

tier places Subprecision folks,

59:59

maybe a quarter

59:59

a quarter or a half are going to talk trash about

1:00:02

their colleagues, about how they're not as smart,

1:00:04

how they're right. Yeah. And

1:00:06

so the thing about that sort of dynamic

1:00:09

is, is that certain groups of people feel like,

1:00:12

yeah, it happens to everybody. If you're a white dude,

1:00:14

heterosexual, you're involved in your great

1:00:16

grandpa, like Parker, of the Parker

1:00:18

Solar Probe. He would talk trash about Parker

1:00:20

in Solar Physics, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah,

1:00:23

and what he knows, right? The living people.

1:00:26

And so my point is, is that

1:00:29

if you're like from certain groups, it

1:00:31

almost always finds you. You

1:00:34

know what I mean? Like, like suppose you'll be like, oh, I was at

1:00:36

this one institution and somebody came at me with this craziness,

1:00:38

oh, I'm happy that didn't happen. But if you find

1:00:40

that the craziness happens to you at every institution,

1:00:43

but why is that it? Because

1:00:46

that person that wants to do a misdeed is

1:00:48

looking for the one they perceive as vulnerable.

1:00:51

And because you're an outlier, they

1:00:53

perceive you as vulnerable, right?

1:00:55

Now when people try that with me, they learn quickly.

1:00:58

So I have a rep, I've always had a reputation, right?

1:01:00

Because art, just like my dad taught me how to do

1:01:02

things properly, art taught me how to do things properly.

1:01:05

Right? So, so, you know, I've

1:01:07

had to confront, you know,

1:01:11

Yeah, yeah, absolutely. And

1:01:14

all it did was make you more, you know, more determined.

1:01:17

And that's because of the first work, which

1:01:19

was from your upbringing, which some people might say,

1:01:21

you know, having to deal with the dangers

1:01:23

and the street and everything else would say was

1:01:25

a disadvantage actually was an

1:01:28

advantage. Because academics

1:01:30

can't be anywhere near as scary

1:01:33

as a dope dealer on the street, no matter

1:01:35

how hard they try. And going

1:01:37

back to the beginning, this whole thing about web. Yeah,

1:01:40

the thing that was so crazy about this to me

1:01:42

is that when I released my article

1:01:44

in January 2021 on web,

1:01:47

and my colleagues

1:01:50

responded,

1:01:52

and then they tried to respond by bullying

1:01:54

me, you know, like cyberbullying me, I'm

1:01:57

like, you got the wrong guy. You got the wrong guy.

1:01:59

Well, I want to get

1:01:59

Because I I just want to I want I want I don't

1:02:02

want to be all about

1:02:04

What we're talking about now, although you know, you know

1:02:06

You did say when when art presented

1:02:08

his first full this solar image is

1:02:11

using his new technology Some celebrated

1:02:13

while is challenging on Fantasity

1:02:15

images

1:02:16

and doubts among some of his peers, but I think

1:02:18

I've seen that every I mean not always happen Let me

1:02:20

give you let me tell you what what you're absolutely right. It was

1:02:23

you know what it was It was one of these cases like

1:02:25

Einstein with the cosmological constant. Yeah. Oh,

1:02:28

I know what nature is doing Yeah,

1:02:30

because the data does not reflect that there

1:02:32

are something wrong with the data. Yeah.

1:02:34

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. No, I Actually,

1:02:37

well anyway that when I first proposed

1:02:39

dark energy in 95 I

1:02:41

proposed it but I was absolutely certain something was wrong

1:02:43

with the data and my proposal

1:02:46

I said basically the data only is me

1:02:48

and Mike Turner the data only With

1:02:51

things if if there's dark energy,

1:02:53

I tried to sell saw permutation wrong,

1:02:55

but you know what's interesting I had a very similar Conversation

1:02:59

with all striker. He's like, yeah, you know, I predict the dark

1:03:01

energy before you know, yeah Yeah, no,

1:03:03

I mean, you know, they you might get a read the paper and I

1:03:05

really did because of my point was to say Hey, some

1:03:08

of the observers there must be something wrong because this is so

1:03:10

crazy It's only consists with us and

1:03:12

no one was more surprised than me

1:03:14

when it turned out to be exactly what what we

1:03:16

predicted And in fact, as I say solid

1:03:18

come when I lectured at Berkeley on that he said what

1:03:21

pretty wrong and then didn't but it Was it was

1:03:23

mostly device from the data that the

1:03:25

data had to be wrong and it was shocking to see it Right,

1:03:28

but anyway, and that's and by the way, that's

1:03:30

the internal story in Berkeley and how Re

1:03:33

published before saw because yeah,

1:03:36

I was around during it all. I was trying to it's everyone I

1:03:38

was going around giving colloquia saying there's this dark energy

1:03:41

and and Caltech and Berkeley and and

1:03:43

I'm and I remember it Spent a term spent the summer

1:03:45

there and I'll be Ellen and and

1:03:48

everyone just slightly smile This was

1:03:50

between 95 and 97 and all

1:03:52

later on when in 98 when they discovered

1:03:54

it was I mean it was satisfying

1:03:56

but it was interesting to to see how But

1:04:00

you know, I understood myself because I didn't believe it. I proposed

1:04:02

it, but I thought it was really so ridiculous

1:04:05

That that it had to be because some

1:04:07

of those wrongs Now let me I want

1:04:10

to get to the science in a second. There's

1:04:13

one thing I want to ask you I can't help it Yeah,

1:04:15

I Still have to understand

1:04:17

this and and you can help me

1:04:21

And I know it's it maybe it's just I

1:04:23

don't know if it's an editorial decision and I've seen

1:04:25

it in a variety of publications um

1:04:29

So black is is capitalized everywhere

1:04:31

and white isn't I know that friend and

1:04:33

I wondered I gotta ask why cuz I

1:04:36

yeah You know, we asked the publisher that

1:04:38

right? So it's funny because Josh did that

1:04:40

to me. He's like Hakeem.

1:04:42

Why are you?

1:04:43

Capitalizing black but not the W

1:04:45

and white and I was like, that's how I've always seen.

1:04:48

Yeah I know and I've always seen it I'm wondering what the argument

1:04:50

is and so it goes to the publisher

1:04:52

and we write a specific little paragraph like yeah You

1:04:55

know, what is the story here? And

1:04:58

the publisher is like, yeah, that's the way it's done black is

1:05:00

capitalized W is it so it's sort of one of

1:05:02

those things like It's

1:05:04

just the story the lottery. Yeah. Yeah.

1:05:07

No, I know. I just think I know the way it is.

1:05:09

Yeah It

1:05:11

was probably the point of at one point, but I just

1:05:13

think here's the question Would you would you

1:05:15

would you capitalize a word like Caucasian?

1:05:18

Is that capitalized? I Think

1:05:20

yeah, because it's a label. I think it's a so

1:05:23

I think that the reason why is because

1:05:26

Black you know, there was

1:05:28

no You know Negro

1:05:31

fell out of favor. Yeah. Yeah, right, you know,

1:05:33

African-american is a mouthful. Yeah.

1:05:35

Yeah. Yeah And so whites

1:05:37

don't you know your race and it's

1:05:40

really interesting because I think when you say black you really

1:05:42

mean African-american Generally, you know, you

1:05:44

don't you don't mean although,

1:05:46

you know, I try to get a Someone

1:05:48

a job in mind when I was chair who was who

1:05:50

was black But he was an African-american

1:05:53

and and what amazed me was the

1:05:55

rules were so ridiculous

1:05:57

He was really good. He's a good physicist from from

1:05:59

Urbana

1:06:00

That I couldn't get him in because he wasn't minority

1:06:02

and I anyway If

1:06:07

you're from like I tell

1:06:09

my friends, you know So I have like I said all over

1:06:11

the the gamut and you know I have friends that are very

1:06:13

afrocentric, you know, and since I've been all

1:06:16

over Africa. Yeah, of course I know Great

1:06:18

jobs working with South. I mean the end of your book

1:06:21

talking working with the South African kids

1:06:23

is really for me well among the most heartwarming part of it

1:06:25

in the last part of your book where you see them

1:06:27

succeed and You know and I and I and

1:06:29

I just admire

1:06:30

what you did there so much. I just have

1:06:32

to thank you Thank you. Well, but the point is

1:06:34

is that I tell my friends like look man. I've been all over Africa

1:06:36

I can't find black a stand nowhere. Yeah,

1:06:39

because people have actual

1:06:41

identities. They have actual I'm an

1:06:43

evil I'm a luco. I'm a luya. I'm a

1:06:45

kissy. I'm a Zulu You know and

1:06:48

and you take that from them You know if you're

1:06:50

French or if you're Irish or if you're German

1:06:52

and you come to an America and you're white like, you know

1:06:55

I've been all over Europe. There's no white Linda in

1:06:57

Europe, you know, you have a you know, but but

1:07:00

here's the thing man I think

1:07:02

that you know, and I didn't think this in my youth, but we're freaking

1:07:04

Americans but that's you know, we're all in this

1:07:06

together and you know,

1:07:09

we whatever your

1:07:12

Recent ingredients are cuz you know, we think

1:07:14

of them as our origins, but they're really our ingredients

1:07:16

nobody Yeah, you know, we're all worms,

1:07:19

right? All that yeah and Petropod

1:07:23

right. Yeah, and we're also probably at some

1:07:25

very basic level all black at all white. But anyway,

1:07:28

right exactly Well, especially a mixed up

1:07:30

person like myself. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely

1:07:33

But but the thing is man is that

1:07:35

you know, I think that Give

1:07:38

you know having this I have a representative sample

1:07:40

of the planet. Yeah, you know I haven't

1:07:42

been all over the damn place And

1:07:45

and I think that what's going on in the US is really special

1:07:47

and it's somewhat miraculous And it needs

1:07:50

to be preserved and it needs to be protected

1:07:53

this pluralistic

1:07:55

peaceful

1:07:57

society that is

1:07:59

you know, it's

1:08:01

not to be taken for granted. And you know, we think

1:08:04

our infrastructure. It's as exceptional as you think it is, most Americans

1:08:06

do. I mean, I grew up in Canada, having lived in a few

1:08:08

different countries,

1:08:09

you know, I just. Have you been to the

1:08:11

developing world? I mean, you've been to the brand. Yeah, I've been

1:08:13

to the developing world, no, I know. Look, I'm lucky. I'm

1:08:16

accident,

1:08:17

every day, the accident of my

1:08:19

genes is lucky. I mean, the accident of my circumstances,

1:08:22

yeah, I could have been born, you know, in

1:08:24

so many places in the world where I wouldn't have had a chance.

1:08:27

Maybe you can appreciate it. I tell

1:08:29

my friends, I'm like, listen, man, America is so,

1:08:32

and the same of Canada, it's so prosperous. Our

1:08:34

houses just sit out in the open. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

1:08:36

Right? So in most places, right? You're either

1:08:39

in the slums or behind a wall. It has

1:08:41

razor wire and spikes, right? You

1:08:44

know, and- No, no, I know. Well, not most,

1:08:46

but a lot of them. Yeah, I mean, we just, we have

1:08:48

to be thankful. And that's the other thing. I

1:08:51

mean, I think a lot of this

1:08:53

sense, I hadn't planned to go here, but

1:08:55

I'll tell it. A lot of this ridiculous

1:08:57

sense of victimization that

1:08:59

we're seeing people, this identity

1:09:01

politics, it's people not having enough

1:09:03

to complain about. I mean, if they

1:09:05

were, if they, yeah,

1:09:08

I've been invited because of this one

1:09:10

little thing, but you go to most countries, my God,

1:09:12

you'd be killed. Or what, you know, it's- Yeah,

1:09:15

man, yeah, it's tough. Well,

1:09:17

you know, I think the other reason why there's a lot of victimization

1:09:20

that takes the character that it does,

1:09:22

there was a book I was reading several years ago. I forget

1:09:24

which one it was, but it gave the statistic.

1:09:27

When you have concentrated, tough

1:09:30

living situations. So minorities, you

1:09:33

know, it was something like, if you

1:09:35

are of this particular race and

1:09:37

you're below this particular income level, what's

1:09:40

the probability of your neighbors being

1:09:42

in the same demographic

1:09:45

boat? And so for minorities, it was

1:09:47

much higher than for a white person. When you concentrate

1:09:50

the sort of, you

1:09:53

know, the school issues, the

1:09:55

issues earning money, the issues with

1:09:58

violence and crime.

1:09:59

because you know it's not

1:10:01

when you live in the hood

1:10:03

it's also a Gaussian. Yeah sure

1:10:06

yeah right and those people are just you

1:10:08

know you go to any hood in the morning and you're

1:10:11

gonna see a train of people going to do their mental

1:10:13

waste job right yeah yeah

1:10:15

but

1:10:16

the cats that you see publicly out of the street

1:10:19

are the ones that are the really ends of the

1:10:21

Gaussian yeah are the ones that people

1:10:23

yeah just like on social media you see

1:10:25

the noisy and and and

1:10:28

they're the ones that and they

1:10:31

get and that's the unfortunate thing that you're

1:10:33

right right now is again really good people are before

1:10:36

they know they never you know you wouldn't ignore

1:10:38

them and now we still should ignore them but

1:10:41

they end up getting a voice that they didn't have before

1:10:43

yeah man twitter is that let me

1:10:45

ask you two other things um yeah uh

1:10:49

in this regard and then i wanna as i say i promise

1:10:51

i want to move first to science and then to yeah

1:10:53

web

1:10:54

um the

1:10:59

well let me add it's yeah just

1:11:01

it's because of the timing this i don't know when this will appear

1:11:04

but it's it's it's honest to say that yesterday

1:11:06

affirmative action was what the supreme

1:11:08

court you

1:11:11

know ended up in principle and i think

1:11:13

in practice it won't in academia yeah well

1:11:15

yeah but i think my own feeling is the university is

1:11:17

to get around it one way or another but but um

1:11:20

and i have to say i have mixed feelings about affirmative

1:11:22

action i and and

1:11:25

namely in the sense that

1:11:26

i think

1:11:27

if i think of your case and i want to present

1:11:29

it to you frankly and honestly

1:11:32

because i think we can do that and some people may be

1:11:34

shocked that i'm saying some of these things but i don't really care

1:11:36

um the so you

1:11:39

you went to tugolu

1:11:40

yeah

1:11:41

and it was a great it was a great

1:11:43

place for you and because you were able

1:11:45

to excel there yeah

1:11:47

okay

1:11:48

and if you had let's say if you

1:11:50

had somehow been aware and

1:11:52

this is the big problem you didn't even know your point

1:11:54

is was you said it somewhere when you

1:11:56

went to the navy you didn't even know about college

1:11:59

or how to get in and I think

1:12:01

that's part of the problem. I used to go into inner

1:12:03

city schools in Cleveland. My wife

1:12:05

at the time volunteered in them and I talked

1:12:08

to these kids about

1:12:10

the world. You know I tell them that Lake

1:12:13

Erie was right. They didn't even know they were two miles from the lake much

1:12:15

less than anything else but I talk about

1:12:17

being a son. They had no idea. I mean it was

1:12:19

just a different universe and they didn't see there was

1:12:21

any way to go from here to there. They

1:12:24

just didn't know how and you literally didn't

1:12:26

know how either. Absolutely. Had

1:12:28

no idea it existed. Yeah exactly and you

1:12:30

were lucky enough that some people somehow

1:12:32

showed those options to you. But had

1:12:35

you gone to Stanford as an undergraduate

1:12:38

instead as a graduate student

1:12:39

you would have just crashed

1:12:42

and burned. Exactly.

1:12:43

Yeah. And so

1:12:45

it's I think that's me. Well don't

1:12:47

extrapolate me to everyone else. But there are always tales

1:12:49

or people are gonna succeed no matter what. There are people

1:12:52

who aren't.

1:12:53

The question really is one of whether

1:12:56

when it comes to tertiary education.

1:12:59

Look there are inequities

1:13:02

in our society that I am aware of

1:13:04

as much as you and I become more aware

1:13:06

of when I read books like yours and others.

1:13:08

But

1:13:09

are we gonna solve it by at

1:13:13

that stage in a person? Shouldn't we not be

1:13:15

spending more if we're interested in affirmative

1:13:17

action? Should we not be spending more money making

1:13:19

sure young kids get the opportunities

1:13:22

and knowledge so that they know what

1:13:24

the options are for them in life and some education

1:13:27

and have good books in their schools and

1:13:29

have teachers that encourage them and environments

1:13:31

that encourage them. It seems to me that's the ultimate

1:13:34

only way out of the thing. That's a big ask. I know it's a

1:13:36

big ask but it's the ultimate. How are you

1:13:38

gonna construct that? I mean we haven't done it so

1:13:40

far. But does affirmative action solve

1:13:42

the problem? I'm not gonna solve it. I'm

1:13:46

being the devil's advocate here. I'm not scared. I ain't

1:13:49

scared Lawrence. No I know and I'm not scared

1:13:51

of asking. Let me go there. I'm

1:13:55

not scared of asking. I'm

1:13:56

not scared of asking. and

1:14:00

I, you know, you know how it is. Good people are hard to find.

1:14:02

Yeah, absolutely. And I have

1:14:05

had to hire lots of people. You know, my group

1:14:07

was typically, you know, 15 students

1:14:09

at a time, right? Undergrads, graduate students. And

1:14:11

there were these cats who would come to me, like some of the people

1:14:13

I mentioned to you at NRO, they're basically C

1:14:16

students. Now, if I, the one person,

1:14:18

for example,

1:14:19

I had met him because he was in nanotechnology

1:14:21

lab. Dude came across brilliant as hell.

1:14:24

He came across focus. He came across, and that's

1:14:26

exactly what he was. If you looked at his

1:14:28

transcript, it didn't reflect that at all. Yeah.

1:14:31

So if I am a gatekeeper, and

1:14:34

so that's what we're talking about. Affirmative action. It's probably the

1:14:36

gatekeepers. You're right. And I'm

1:14:38

looking at identifying talent.

1:14:41

What am I basing it on? Am

1:14:43

I basing it slowly, solely on grades

1:14:45

and test scores? Now I will tell you this.

1:14:48

I have been around the block enough to know that,

1:14:51

you know, I always wondered myself, Oh, why

1:14:53

is it black? Because

1:14:55

when I got to Stanford for the first time in my life,

1:14:57

the

1:14:58

black folks around me were not other poor

1:15:00

black folks. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And I'm

1:15:02

like, they're different. Yeah. That's the point.

1:15:05

You said it. There's a different from you. You joined the sorority

1:15:08

or whatever, or fraternity, and they're

1:15:10

different from you as anyone else. Right. Exactly.

1:15:12

And so I'm just like, yo, you know,

1:15:15

what about us back home in Mississippi? And,

1:15:17

and,

1:15:18

and so I think there's two things. I

1:15:20

also think that there's something you want for the

1:15:22

health of your society. And

1:15:25

that is, for example, here in America,

1:15:27

sometimes, you know, you hear conservatives talk about

1:15:30

the, uh, attacking

1:15:32

the, the, the, the safety net, the societal

1:15:34

safety net, the free money safety net, right? Yeah.

1:15:36

Yeah. Now

1:15:37

what our

1:15:39

ancestors in America had to deal with is

1:15:41

something that modern Americans have not had to deal with,

1:15:43

but we're starting to get there. And that is slums.

1:15:46

Yeah. Right.

1:15:47

You're in Johannesburg, South Africa,

1:15:50

just cause you live in the upper middle-class place,

1:15:52

you're not safe when you have slums. Yeah.

1:15:54

Yeah. Right. You're not going to be able to live without a

1:15:57

wall around your house. You're getting carjacked

1:15:59

in your own driveway.

1:15:59

Yeah, right. So that safety net

1:16:02

you might think is free money But what is doing

1:16:04

is that's protecting you from slums at

1:16:06

which point none of us are safe. Yeah, right. Yeah

1:16:08

Yeah, and so I

1:16:10

May I forgot the question?

1:16:13

Oh You

1:16:15

said but I remember that question

1:16:17

so here's the point though, right so take a

1:16:19

guy like me In

1:16:22

my community in rural Mississippi where I live going

1:16:24

to college people only did that to be teachers and

1:16:27

it rarely happened Alright, yeah, so

1:16:29

I have a nice I'll tell you the story of my niece Monique.

1:16:31

So I'm gonna tell you about the impact of you

1:16:34

know

1:16:35

how It

1:16:38

is that you can make an investment that

1:16:41

is is Pays off bigger

1:16:43

than you can imagine So my

1:16:45

niece was she was a sophomore in high school I

1:16:47

started encouraging her to attend college because

1:16:50

I saw how my life was transformed by my Stanford

1:16:52

education. Yeah, and She

1:16:54

wasn't hearing me man. She was like, no, I don't like school

1:16:57

I want to go to work and because we're in rural

1:16:59

America the job that she could get was working

1:17:01

at the chicken plant Alright, so after

1:17:03

three years working a chicken plant she announces

1:17:05

to me that she's now going to go to college

1:17:08

So

1:17:09

I go home for the holidays

1:17:11

This other family comes over and they

1:17:14

bring up the topic of how they're trying to encourage

1:17:16

their younger family member to go to college So

1:17:18

to poke fun at Monique, I said

1:17:21

hey just get him a job at the chicken plant

1:17:24

Playing got Monique to go to college And

1:17:26

Monique with her little attitude goes

1:17:28

that ain't why I'm going and I'm like

1:17:31

really why are you going? And she goes you

1:17:34

I see your life and that's what I want now.

1:17:37

Monique has a master's degree in education She's

1:17:39

an assistant principal to the leader in

1:17:41

education and people started

1:17:44

going to college From that community

1:17:46

because no one had ever seen anyone do it Yeah,

1:17:49

what was on the other side of that and even

1:17:51

though you see other people do it You

1:17:53

feel like you're so different from them Like

1:17:56

when I went to when I started college thinking

1:17:58

about becoming a medical doctor

1:17:59

See you to me like becoming president. Yeah

1:18:02

now that I've been through the education system I'm like, oh it's

1:18:04

super easy to become a medical doctor, right and way

1:18:06

easier to get the phd in physics

1:18:09

But

1:18:10

the average person doesn't see it that way. Yeah,

1:18:12

you just don't know you know and just like for

1:18:14

example as a as a Supereducated

1:18:17

phd scientist and I

1:18:19

looked at the mathematics I do every day to involve

1:18:22

numbers and i'm like, wait a minute All I ever do is

1:18:24

add subtract and multiply the single digit numbers.

1:18:26

That's you know, what is all this other stuff? You

1:18:29

know Well, you know,

1:18:31

but I think your point is right that it's nice Look,

1:18:34

I get the point. I think it's important for people to see

1:18:37

the possibility in themselves And

1:18:40

and and therefore giving some people

1:18:43

leg up, especially those who can succeed is

1:18:45

great Um is is

1:18:47

a good example for others, but one could also say

1:18:49

and again, i'm i'm to some extent taking the

1:18:51

devil's advocate position You're not entirely because I have

1:18:54

issues. I think my What

1:18:58

you said earlier actually really resonates with

1:19:00

my thinking which is hey what

1:19:02

we really got to do

1:19:04

Is

1:19:05

treat people as individuals and

1:19:07

try and look beyond the transcripts beyond

1:19:10

the but but that doesn't mean Labeling

1:19:13

them by race or by whatever

1:19:15

else is to see what is to is

1:19:17

to really look at them enough to say What

1:19:20

have they overcome? What what are

1:19:22

they really good in and what are the options?

1:19:24

And so In that sense, I kind

1:19:26

of agree with the screen court that having one

1:19:28

box that somehow gives you a leg up

1:19:31

Isn't the same because exactly what you said the

1:19:33

black kids who were at

1:19:35

stanford already had 10 legs up uh

1:19:39

before they got to stanford most of them and they

1:19:41

they didn't you know, so what you want to do is

1:19:43

give kids like you Who may not?

1:19:46

Well, actually look good on paper or

1:19:48

because you did well at tugaloo But but

1:19:50

I mean kids or like the kids you were talking about who

1:19:52

were really Intelligent and

1:19:55

hard working, but it may not be reflected

1:19:57

in a transcript or other things. You want to look

1:19:59

at those other?

1:19:59

Characteristics and schools are gonna end up doing that

1:20:02

which is they're gonna start giving more emphasis

1:20:04

to trying to see the life story and for me

1:20:07

The affirmative action should be to find

1:20:09

people who who for one reason

1:20:11

or another have had to overcome adversity Yeah,

1:20:15

you know and race isn't the only For

1:20:17

everyone not for everyone is race and adversity

1:20:20

there are other adversities and for some people race is an

1:20:22

adversity But take it on an individual

1:20:24

level Great

1:20:26

if we could but you know, there's so many biases

1:20:29

every way Yeah, you're in human minds that it's hard,

1:20:31

you know, even though we come up with these ideals. It's it's

1:20:33

hard to really

1:20:34

Implement them in real life. So I guess

1:20:37

what people were saying what affirmative action is like Okay,

1:20:40

even though we're trying to be objective about it.

1:20:42

We still like like like, you know, I'll

1:20:44

give you another example

1:20:45

Uh-huh

1:20:47

at the end of graduate school, you know, I had a NASA

1:20:49

GSRP fellowship It ended I was still

1:20:51

in graduate school. So I started teaching Kaplan

1:20:53

M cat Okay. All right. Okay,

1:20:56

and man, I it was so eye-opening.

1:20:58

I was like damn back at Tougaloo

1:21:00

We all just went and took these tests. Yeah,

1:21:02

right. Yeah. Yeah There's no way

1:21:05

someone could just walk it in could compete

1:21:07

against my students. I thought mcat physics my

1:21:09

students were

1:21:11

They were maxing the physics on mcat,

1:21:13

right? Yeah, exactly Because I remember

1:21:15

I when I was I grew up in Canada, I took the graduate

1:21:18

entrance exam I didn't I walked in I never

1:21:20

heard of it before then I learned that there, you know

1:21:22

Now I realize your kids taking classes

1:21:24

in it in advance to do it

1:21:26

Yeah, and so what you what's gonna happen is

1:21:28

is that if you base it on test scores if you base

1:21:30

it on Grades like like another

1:21:33

example my son, right? I have a son You

1:21:35

know, I homeschooled a kid till he was 10 But

1:21:38

you know, his sister is in large part responsible

1:21:40

for him learning to read All right, and this

1:21:43

kid could read like an adult when he was

1:21:45

three and a half. All right

1:21:47

So my mom says to me when he was very young,

1:21:49

you know, I think he's smarter than you are And

1:21:52

I was like no the hell he ain't his daddy

1:21:54

got a phd in physics He's one of my parents graduated

1:21:57

high school. It makes a difference. Yeah, it

1:21:59

looks like you want

1:21:59

to send your kids to the best school, having

1:22:03

parents who are educated in what

1:22:05

schools care about. Like, don't get me wrong,

1:22:07

right? We're all educated by our parents and

1:22:09

what they have to offer.

1:22:12

But not many of them have what's

1:22:14

going to get you into Harvard to offer, right? But

1:22:16

if they came from Harvard, they definitely do have it

1:22:18

to offer, right? Well, some

1:22:20

of them, or some of them's parents gave

1:22:23

a lot of money, but you never know. That's true too.

1:22:25

I get to Stanford. Three

1:22:27

guys in my research group, their father's a PhD physicist.

1:22:29

I know what he wrote about in the book. And I knew and I knew some

1:22:31

of their father. I rented a house from Bill Willis once

1:22:34

when I was a kid. Oh, no way. You know, I

1:22:36

got really, I got in contact with Tom Willis again.

1:22:38

We talked like back during the pandemic. Made me

1:22:40

feel old when I read your book because I knew the, I knew

1:22:43

the parents that you were talking about. Oh man,

1:22:45

that is wild. So did you know Max

1:22:47

Allen's father? Because he's from, I think he was at

1:22:49

McGill. Yeah, you know, Canada's a big

1:22:51

country. No, I didn't know. No, it ain't.

1:22:54

It's a big geography. It's a sliver. You

1:22:59

like Canadians early on. I read that. But anyway,

1:23:01

I still love Canadians, man. I work with these Toronto

1:23:04

production companies. Yeah. It's a blast up there.

1:23:06

Yeah. It's, it's, yeah, it has, it has,

1:23:08

anyway, it has advantage. I've now

1:23:10

sampled both back and forth and there's advantages.

1:23:12

Yeah, I love both. Exactly. And you said something

1:23:15

when you're talking about, about your son and, and,

1:23:18

and education. I was going to, I didn't want to interrupt

1:23:20

you, but I lost that train of thought now, but

1:23:22

I think, but the bottom line is, oh yeah,

1:23:25

look,

1:23:25

I, when I was at Yale, when I taught at Yale, I,

1:23:29

I never got involved in undergraduate missions, thank God. But,

1:23:31

but I taught students and I

1:23:33

thought,

1:23:34

these Yale students aren't any different than, I

1:23:36

mean, the mean, it's a distribution. The difference

1:23:38

was the tail, the distribution was really

1:23:40

long,

1:23:41

but the middle ones I taught, you know, they were, I remember

1:23:43

teaching them, we were football players. They stuck to me. They could

1:23:46

have been football players anywhere. I don't know how they got into Yale.

1:23:48

Yale got a football team? Yeah, probably.

1:23:50

And, and, when I liked about being

1:23:53

at MIT as they didn't, but anyway,

1:23:55

the, the, I always said,

1:23:57

when it came to even graduate school, you know,

1:23:59

people,

1:24:01

I was on some selection committees there and

1:24:03

you know, there are transcripts and there are these tests and

1:24:06

I always basically said, you know I think we could

1:24:08

just throw all the applications down the stairs and take

1:24:10

the ones that fell to the bottom We'd end up getting

1:24:12

you know, the ability to know in advance who's

1:24:15

gonna who's gonna succeed wasn't I'm Very

1:24:18

dubious about all of these details like

1:24:20

but nevertheless I think I think the whole approach

1:24:23

of trying to look at each kid and realizing

1:24:25

that adversity Isn't

1:24:28

you can't I'm so much against

1:24:30

identity politics You can't say in advance on

1:24:32

the bait necessarily the basis of someone's race

1:24:35

their religion or sometimes even

1:24:37

even their economic level Oh economic level

1:24:40

probably a better determiner. You can't really

1:24:42

say whether to what extent they've suffered Well,

1:24:44

they they've had to overcome things or benefited

1:24:46

from things but one thing that I want to ask you

1:24:48

both and then we're gonna leave I promise is

1:24:51

Some people say oh look you chose a black

1:24:55

advisor and

1:24:58

and

1:24:59

And the book in the way you describe

1:25:02

it you chose it because you're really turned on by what he was doing

1:25:05

Not because he's black

1:25:07

Is that true? Well, it's it's

1:25:09

uh

1:25:13

It's hard to unpack It's

1:25:16

hard to know in advance because here's

1:25:18

the thing that happened and I talked about this in the book

1:25:20

as well After doing my summer

1:25:23

research programs, I've met a lot of

1:25:25

disgruntled about to graduate

1:25:27

graduate students Yeah, yeah, and they armed

1:25:30

me with these questions to ask The

1:25:33

people now, here's the other thing about

1:25:35

this There is diversity in

1:25:37

the diversity. Yeah, right. I've

1:25:39

never met a black dude like Art Walker before.

1:25:41

Yeah, sure at that age

1:25:44

He I would have called him what

1:25:47

I have been called Which is white

1:25:49

wash. Yeah In the book you

1:25:51

thought he was white wash. Yeah. Yeah. I wasn't

1:25:53

like odd. He's my man, right? It wasn't

1:25:55

like that at all. But when I hit him with those questions,

1:25:58

dude, this dude came across so sincere

1:25:59

You know, and he came across

1:26:02

like he really did care about because that's what they were

1:26:04

saying make sure

1:26:06

Your advisor that you choose cares about

1:26:08

humans and yeah Great

1:26:10

thing to tell students because I've met so many advisors

1:26:13

who don't and I'm yeah, I'd to be an advisor

1:26:15

who does But yeah, and he

1:26:17

mailed that man and then I then I challenged

1:26:19

him was like, oh, yeah Well, what are your students doing

1:26:21

now? Yeah, yeah started with Hal Tompkins

1:26:24

that slack And then he goes and you may have heard of my other students

1:26:26

Sally ride Yeah, I should

1:26:28

have booked you. Yeah, that's all he had to

1:26:30

say for you. And then you Okay, you want

1:26:32

you overwrite that I'm like man, man.

1:26:34

We showed those solar photographs that yeah,

1:26:37

right with research class That's who that

1:26:39

that's yeah, then you clearly captured

1:26:42

you know, that's you Who's the photo

1:26:44

and I want to get to the solar photographs in a second? Yeah

1:26:46

the reason I'm saying is that some people say their

1:26:49

big problem is is they

1:26:51

don't see people that look like themselves

1:26:54

and Therefore they can't and

1:26:56

that's a big impediment

1:26:58

to going ahead and doing these I can understand

1:27:01

it to some extent Except I never saw people

1:27:03

that look to me. I always still felt

1:27:05

like an outsider and to free Frank.

1:27:07

Yeah, so and

1:27:10

my supervisor Was

1:27:13

a black PhD graduate from Stanford. Okay.

1:27:15

Yeah, whoo

1:27:16

Roscoe Giles his name I've

1:27:20

been talking to Roscoe all month. Yeah. Okay

1:27:22

Roscoe is and I chose Roscoe not

1:27:24

because You know, he looked like me cuz

1:27:27

he didn't but cuz he was really nice and

1:27:29

really smart And he

1:27:31

also said I was the kind of guy who had

1:27:33

to work on what I was interested in What someone

1:27:36

else was working and he did all of that and

1:27:38

he was a wonderful man and I didn't need so And

1:27:43

then us because for me I could have cared

1:27:45

what someone looked

1:27:46

like or where the back room was Let me ask you directly

1:27:48

man So so, you know, some people gonna hate me for

1:27:51

saying this but I noticed this when I was at to the loop

1:27:53

We would go to the summer research program. Yeah, and

1:27:55

I I said You

1:27:59

know

1:27:59

the students come back from the summer, so I'll

1:28:02

be like, oh, I went to this program. I was the only black student

1:28:04

there. It was horrible.

1:28:05

And I always joke that I'd be like, yeah, I was

1:28:07

the only black student there. It was great. Right? Not

1:28:10

because I was the only black student there. I'll give you an example.

1:28:13

My very first summer research program, I'm

1:28:15

going to admit this, man. It's in the book. I was a big pothead.

1:28:18

Right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I beat these white

1:28:20

dudes at University of Georgia. And

1:28:22

the next week, they get busted for selling pots.

1:28:26

But they're right back the next day. But

1:28:28

these guys were like, oh, man, you've

1:28:31

never done psychedelics? And I hadn't. Not that summer.

1:28:34

You don't know Pink Floyd. You don't know

1:28:36

Led Zeppelin. And they want to teach me. And every

1:28:38

day, I'm like hanging out with these dudes. I'm also

1:28:40

hanging out with my frat brothers. I'm also going to

1:28:42

play basketball. I go to the University of

1:28:44

Arizona, right, that summer. Same thing.

1:28:46

White dude takes me rock climbing

1:28:49

in Oak Creek Canyon and all this

1:28:51

kind of jazz.

1:28:53

And so I've always been a very curious

1:28:55

person. And I always knew this.

1:28:58

People of different cultures. So when I show up

1:29:00

at Berkeley in the summer of 91,

1:29:02

I'm very open about, I don't

1:29:05

know this. I don't know that. So I don't know if you know

1:29:07

Rebecca Bernstein at Carnegie Observatories.

1:29:11

So her and her Princeton classmate

1:29:13

and this guy from Haverford

1:29:15

were like, oh, man, we're going

1:29:17

to show you everything. Never had Thai food. Here's Thai

1:29:19

food. Never had an artichoke. Here's an artichoke. Never

1:29:21

had Indian food. Here's Indian food. And I was loving

1:29:24

it. And by the way, we're all Jewish. How come you didn't

1:29:26

know based on our names? I

1:29:28

didn't know. But

1:29:31

I understand, reading

1:29:33

about humans, that people come in a couple of times.

1:29:36

There are those of us that love nudists. And

1:29:38

there are those of us that hate nudists. They want everything

1:29:40

to be the same and that kind of thing. So

1:29:42

just like there are people, I don't understand, who

1:29:44

are like, oh, this person was not speaking

1:29:47

English in public. I'm angry at them. I don't

1:29:49

understand that.

1:29:50

One time I was saying. Yeah, but I guess

1:29:52

the question I'm asking is how important. And then I'm really

1:29:55

asking. Here's where it is important.

1:29:57

It's not important necessarily for inspired.

1:29:59

you into the field. Most of the black

1:30:02

astronomers and astrophysicists, I know in physicists,

1:30:04

they weren't inspired by a black physicist per

1:30:06

se, they were inspired by the universe or Einstein

1:30:09

or somebody like that, right? But where it

1:30:11

does matter is in mentoring,

1:30:13

right? That's what I'm wondering. You got

1:30:15

mentored, yeah, I was gonna ask about that. So

1:30:18

the way that art told me how, taught me how

1:30:20

to handle things, like I've had great mentors like Michael

1:30:22

Levy and Natalie Rowe at Berkeley,

1:30:24

right, were mentors. What they taught me was great mentors

1:30:26

in high school that were also mentored. Yeah,

1:30:29

Mr. Reed. And they were all white teachers. They were great

1:30:31

mentors. Oh yeah, Mr. Reed's, right,

1:30:33

our one white teacher. Yeah,

1:30:36

exactly. And so, you know, most of my adult,

1:30:38

most of my mentors this

1:30:40

century have been white women, actually,

1:30:43

right? Because a lot of it has been in media, and

1:30:46

to the extent that I have decided to like, okay,

1:30:49

I want to do something in another field, let me go find this

1:30:51

Croatian dude, I think he's Croatian, Joko

1:30:53

Ibezic. Oh, you know, I'm interested

1:30:55

in,

1:30:57

continue this project, who's the best at it? Oh,

1:30:59

Josh Bloom and Joey Richards, you know,

1:31:01

let me go work with them. Oh, now I'm interested

1:31:03

in this. Oh yeah, Dave McCammis

1:31:06

at Princeton. So for me, it's

1:31:08

like, I'm interested in a topic, and I'm looking

1:31:10

for a cool person to work with. I'm not looking for a

1:31:12

black person to work with. I'm looking for a cool person

1:31:14

to work with. But at the same time, because I

1:31:17

am a black dude, I'm like, yo, Stefano

1:31:19

Alexander, let's write a paper together, homie, right? You

1:31:21

know, right? Just like I did with my

1:31:23

friend, Dave Santiago, just like I did with my

1:31:25

friend, Nisha Turner, we're like, friends

1:31:27

like, hey, let's write papers together, right? Yeah, yeah.

1:31:29

You know, Lawrence, let's write

1:31:31

a paper together, man. But,

1:31:33

you know, and so I think, though, for

1:31:36

understanding the type of challenges that

1:31:38

you're going to have,

1:31:39

and how people perceive you, you

1:31:42

do have to operate in a certain way, right?

1:31:44

And so, art

1:31:47

taught me, so I'll give an example, in

1:31:49

Silicon Valley, after I left Stanford,

1:31:51

I got challenged. Here I am,

1:31:54

one day this guy, Korean dude,

1:31:56

Nam Han Kim, not Nam Han Kim, Won

1:31:59

Kyung.

1:32:00

whatever, Kim. He says, I

1:32:02

can't come here. I was terrorized

1:32:05

as a dude already. He was really serious. He

1:32:07

said, let me tell you something, man. I've been in this company

1:32:09

for many years. I want to have two black PhDs and

1:32:12

applied materials that had 3000 PhDs out of 22,000 total

1:32:15

employees worldwide. Right? One of two black

1:32:17

PhDs. He said, let me tell you something. Something

1:32:21

he's like, here's how I said it. I've been at this company

1:32:24

for a very long time, 15 years. I've

1:32:26

seen a lot of things. I've heard a lot of things. And

1:32:28

there are certain things I wish I hadn't seen and heard.

1:32:31

And I've heard something about you. And what I want

1:32:33

to let you know is that if you're a member of certain

1:32:35

groups, you get to hear certain things. And if you and

1:32:37

if you're not, you don't. And he was talking

1:32:39

about being a Korean guy. He said something

1:32:42

is about to happen to you. And it was about

1:32:44

to happen to you because you were black.

1:32:46

If I were you, I would go get an attorney

1:32:48

right now. Now, let me tell you how I've always

1:32:50

operated. Unless someone stands

1:32:52

up in a crowded room and starts yelling racial

1:32:55

explicit that I'm not bringing

1:32:57

it up. Yeah, right. So I don't see it

1:32:59

working out in my favor. Right. Yeah.

1:33:02

So when he says that to me, I'm like, Whoa,

1:33:04

dude, I have no idea what you're talking about.

1:33:06

I

1:33:07

don't want no parts of it. And it unfolded

1:33:09

exactly as he said it did. It was going

1:33:12

to.

1:33:12

But because I had Art Walker's training

1:33:15

and how to handle certain

1:33:17

types of injustices, I was already

1:33:19

prepared. And I survived that particular

1:33:22

event. Another thing that happened while

1:33:24

I was working at Applied Materials, I

1:33:27

get a call from the EEOC,

1:33:29

an attorney in

1:33:32

Washington, DC. And he says, Listen,

1:33:34

we have received strong evidence that you have been discriminated

1:33:36

against in hiring. So here's what

1:33:39

happened. I went to the Stanford career fair.

1:33:41

I gave out my CV to various

1:33:43

companies. And one of these Silicon Valley

1:33:46

companies north of

1:33:48

Stanford, not south like Applied Materials was.

1:33:50

Apparently I went and they were evaluating

1:33:52

and somebody in the room felt like I was being

1:33:55

discriminated against because of my race and they reported

1:33:57

it, right. I knew nothing about it. So again,

1:33:59

I'm like, dude,

1:33:59

I don't know anything about this. I can't say anything about

1:34:02

it, right? So this is in a way for me

1:34:04

here say Right not

1:34:07

you know, I don't know when people have come at me I

1:34:09

don't assume they're motivated by

1:34:12

anything other than what I can directly

1:34:14

observe They're being motivated by attitude.

1:34:17

Mm-hmm, right? But at the same

1:34:19

time I still have to handle this situation Yeah,

1:34:22

and I get it white dudes got to handle the situation

1:34:24

to women got it, you know, everybody, you know

1:34:26

It's a tough world out here,

1:34:28

right? Yeah, and so my attitude has

1:34:31

always been

1:34:32

so what but here's the thing

1:34:34

man. I Used to

1:34:36

have two ways of dealing with problems Right

1:34:39

before I met our Walker

1:34:40

moping and punching you in the face So

1:34:44

I needed that training Something

1:34:47

between those two that's not good. He knows

1:34:49

it right didn't the question I know I'm gonna

1:34:51

keep putting

1:34:52

he was a great mentor But

1:34:55

I like to think if I'd been your professor I might

1:34:57

have been able to give you that training too You

1:35:00

know what? It really depends.

1:35:03

It really really depends. Maybe you would have

1:35:05

or maybe you would not even know Yeah, yeah,

1:35:08

no to approach me and let me know

1:35:10

certain things in certain ways Right, like like

1:35:12

I anticipate you're gonna need this. So

1:35:14

let me show you how to do it the right way Yeah,

1:35:17

maybe that's why I'm trying to figure this I'm trying to yeah

1:35:19

I found it eye-opening to read your story because

1:35:22

I you know, I've had perceptions I've of

1:35:24

academia that I've seen and and and I

1:35:27

mean it's it it's it's It's

1:35:31

competitive and there's assholes and if there's

1:35:34

cowardice and there's all the rest at the same time It's

1:35:37

also more one of the more welcoming

1:35:39

enlightening environments And absolutely

1:35:42

and when I hear it talked about as if it's just like,

1:35:44

you know, but here's the thing No, man, it's

1:35:46

that whole vulnerability trick. Yeah Yeah When

1:35:48

you're when you're the vulnerable when there's someone looking to

1:35:50

make you know Like a new manager comes in they want to make

1:35:52

an example they're going right for the ball Yeah, and

1:35:55

I've been at the button of that and I probably for all

1:35:57

I know I've been at the other end too And when I was I

1:35:59

try never to be but but uh

1:36:02

well look let's i'm just gonna close this over here one

1:36:04

second i'm like fat joe y'all

1:36:06

talk that stuff i want that beef what

1:36:08

was that there's a uh line in uh you know there's

1:36:13

this dj college song called over

1:36:16

with all these rappers you know lil wayne and

1:36:19

one of them is fat joe

1:36:20

and he said y'all talk that ish i

1:36:22

want that beef right i

1:36:24

love you know bring me the beef i'll suited

1:36:27

to sleep but i enjoyed

1:36:30

this fight but not you know okay

1:36:32

no this is okay no this is great and i'm glad

1:36:34

we had that this particular frank conversation

1:36:36

about this because i think i think most

1:36:39

people would never yeah maybe people

1:36:41

talk about it i think and and

1:36:43

um

1:36:43

you know and it's it's just not black or white and

1:36:45

it's interesting for me to have seen my attitude towards

1:36:48

the affirmative action decision is different now than it would

1:36:50

have been a few

1:36:51

years ago as i've watched uh

1:36:53

people and but the key thing that art

1:36:55

told you and this was a great segue that

1:36:57

taught you this uh

1:37:00

is is you it's you say near the end of the book

1:37:02

art

1:37:03

art taught me the

1:37:04

the difference between what i believe to be true

1:37:07

and what i know as a scientist to

1:37:09

be true absolutely that's the final measure

1:37:11

of a researcher to be able to challenge one's

1:37:13

own beliefs and prejudices

1:37:15

let evidence tell the story and

1:37:17

like for me that's one of the most important lines in

1:37:20

the book believe or not because that's certainly what

1:37:22

i

1:37:23

i mean i spend most of my life trying to convince people

1:37:25

of is that that's the heart of science

1:37:28

and it's the nature of science and and if he

1:37:30

taught you that that's what really turned you into scientists

1:37:32

forget the mentoring and all the rest of stuff this

1:37:35

you know that's to get along with people he

1:37:37

taught you to get along with people and that's okay and

1:37:39

and it's a secret but scientists are actually people

1:37:42

but but but the really

1:37:44

important thing

1:37:45

that's just that's just wind addressing the really important

1:37:47

thing to be a scientist is that sentence

1:37:50

and that's the nature of science so what

1:37:53

so i want to talk to you about the nate because

1:37:55

i think all of this is also relevant to web we're

1:37:57

going to get to it right when i read this

1:38:00

It indicates to me your approach to James

1:38:02

Webb

1:38:03

was that of a scientist Absolutely

1:38:06

Which is to say the difference between what

1:38:08

I believe to be true and what I know to be true

1:38:10

and to be you know Challenged I

1:38:13

don't do believe Yeah, exactly I don't when

1:38:15

people say what do you believe I say belief isn't the

1:38:17

right no scientists should say that we're belief Things

1:38:19

are likely or unlikely and you can hear the

1:38:21

reasons why and hear the reasons why and yeah We'll

1:38:24

get there, but that's all what I when everyone says

1:38:26

belief and by the way Who hey,

1:38:28

would I ask the politician that what do you do

1:38:30

you believe who cares what you believe? Yeah,

1:38:32

exactly and yeah, and people have said you

1:38:34

believe in this of why it's just not the right word

1:38:37

for science And although I will say one of

1:38:39

the things I didn't cover. I was really amused by

1:38:41

your short career as a preacher. Oh Which

1:38:45

up and and and and Did

1:38:48

you ever come out by the way to the community is

1:38:50

not as not you know because I've

1:38:52

been with a lot of clergy There's a there's a clergy

1:38:54

project.

1:38:55

I've talked to logic clergy people who have

1:38:58

their jobs and they don't believe but they know they're trapped Right,

1:39:00

they can't they can't come out And

1:39:02

and when I saw that you were you were doing a great job

1:39:05

preaching, but there was one problem You didn't believe it

1:39:07

reminds me a lot of clergy people It

1:39:10

really especially with you know in

1:39:12

the book where I talk about my wife, you

1:39:14

know, I get married her dad was a hardcore

1:39:18

Believer man, and I would

1:39:20

you know in your youth, you know You have these

1:39:22

discussions about religions and politics and what's true

1:39:24

and what's not so yeah,

1:39:25

I did that back then So in

1:39:27

a way I did come out, you know, and I did you

1:39:30

never came out to the community that you preach to I assume

1:39:32

right

1:39:33

well But

1:39:36

here's here's the point it is how you define

1:39:39

coming out to them, right? On

1:39:41

the one hand it

1:39:42

was a situation where you know, I I

1:39:45

knew that I didn't know

1:39:46

And so in high school I would

1:39:48

have more been described as more agnostic.

1:39:51

Yeah anything I'm like, okay That's you know,

1:39:54

I don't know. I don't know And so it's not

1:39:56

until I really did the deep dive in

1:39:58

the history and knowledge and everything

1:39:59

in graduate school and I was like, okay, here's now

1:40:02

how I understand the world. Here's how

1:40:04

I understand the world of spirituality and humans

1:40:07

and their interface with it. Here's how I understand the

1:40:09

physical world. You know, and, and, and

1:40:12

came to a place though, where,

1:40:14

you know, I'm more forgiving of people,

1:40:17

you know, and the variation

1:40:19

and diversity of belief and ideas and this

1:40:21

sort of thing. I just want us to be well

1:40:23

behaved. I don't want us killing each other. Right.

1:40:26

You know, I, you know,

1:40:29

I also would like us to be able

1:40:31

to tell what's real

1:40:33

and what's not real. So I've often said, if you've

1:40:35

known me, like one of my biggest fears is going before

1:40:37

a jury of 12 of my peers. Yeah. I know

1:40:39

how I, the transformation I went

1:40:41

through to learn rigor and what

1:40:43

it is to know, you know,

1:40:45

and then I'm like, man, you know, had I

1:40:47

not gone through that, I was accepting

1:40:49

things that's true that I did not know to be

1:40:51

true. Yeah. Yeah. No, I agree. I mean, when

1:40:53

you look at what people do, I witnessed testimony

1:40:56

and I've seen him and her say

1:40:58

testimony. Well, I've seen it and I've, I've seen

1:41:00

it and I've been at various ends of it and it's really,

1:41:03

it's really scary. But, but, but,

1:41:05

so what turned you, so, so let's

1:41:07

talk about the science that he taught

1:41:09

you to, what did you,

1:41:12

what did you,

1:41:16

in your science, what did you most challenge your

1:41:19

prejudice? What was the most surprising result as

1:41:21

a solar physicist? Dude,

1:41:25

when your damn models matched actual reality.

1:41:27

That's right. That's right. The

1:41:30

same way it was with me with dark energy. I couldn't believe

1:41:32

it was right. Yeah, man. You know, you get this data

1:41:34

that you can barely analyze, right?

1:41:36

You build some model that's kind of like a toy

1:41:38

model and you put them one next

1:41:40

to the other and say, Oh, this thing we can't see.

1:41:43

It's more than likely this. Yeah.

1:41:45

And then somebody makes an actual measurement

1:41:47

and it turns out to be that. Right. So

1:41:49

I'll give you two good examples really early

1:41:52

on that turned out to be true. So one thing

1:41:54

is, is that if you look at the sun, you know, there's

1:41:56

the nascent slow speed solar wind

1:41:59

at 400. Columbus for second

1:42:01

there's a high-speed solar when it comes out of coronal holes

1:42:03

at 800 and you see these rate like structures

1:42:05

coming out That look like oh that

1:42:08

must be what's flowing they're called polar plumes out

1:42:10

of there They must be the source of high-speed solar wind

1:42:12

we do our analysis find out. Oh, no,

1:42:15

actually they're not we published that in 1997 the

1:42:17

sumer Spectrograph

1:42:20

on the so-called spacecraft that measures

1:42:22

the flows of these damn things

1:42:24

a few years later and they match exactly

1:42:27

But nobody cites that paper even

1:42:29

though we did it for her. It's probably like your dark energy Then

1:42:32

I say okay What is the nature

1:42:35

of because remember when I told you people

1:42:37

didn't believe arts data one thing they didn't

1:42:39

believe was that you know the higher energy

1:42:42

x-ray

1:42:43

Images that existed before

1:42:45

that you only saw this emission of

1:42:47

the corona in what are called active regions,

1:42:50

right? But now here he presents

1:42:52

this data at 171 angstroms You

1:42:54

know narrow band image and there's emission

1:42:57

covering the entire disk and the community

1:42:59

says dude Your pass

1:43:02

band must be way wider than you

1:43:04

think and you're getting some continuum emission Contamination

1:43:07

coming through because it should only be in the active regions.

1:43:10

So a big part of my PhD was like, oh,

1:43:12

let me model this stuff Oh what we've done

1:43:14

here is we found the nature of the upper

1:43:17

transition region structures and all these

1:43:19

little tiny loops and loop segments And you got

1:43:21

to wait all the way I published that in 98 and

1:43:23

you got to wait all the no 99 You have

1:43:25

to wait all the way to like 20

1:43:28

There's this rocket spectrograph

1:43:30

called iris imaging spectrograph.

1:43:33

I finally Resolved it in this exactly

1:43:35

the same and of course, nobody cites that paper

1:43:37

either. Oh, both of those Were

1:43:40

were pretty cool, but then I go to Silicon

1:43:42

Valley man I never saw a silicon

1:43:44

wafer had no idea how chips were being made. Oh,

1:43:47

yeah I remember time I learned that when I was when

1:43:49

he first developed volumetry

1:43:50

There you go. Right and so here I am The

1:43:53

first thing I do is I apply the

1:43:55

same type of astronomical spectroscopy

1:43:58

that I was doing to to semiconductor

1:44:00

manufacturing. And I developed all these

1:44:04

diagnostics, Institute Spectroscopic

1:44:07

Process Diagnostics that use me like

1:44:09

three different patents. And then I go into

1:44:11

the experimental lab and I actually developed

1:44:13

the techniques for the last generation of planar

1:44:15

transistors, right? I was able to

1:44:18

figure out because they were moving from silicon

1:44:20

or silicon dioxide to tungsten

1:44:23

or some other reactive refractory metal

1:44:25

on high K dielectrics or thin dielectrics.

1:44:28

And so I worked out those edge processes, right?

1:44:30

So

1:44:31

that stuff was

1:44:33

crazy. But then the other thing that happened was more

1:44:35

recent. My graduate student came

1:44:37

to me

1:44:38

and said, hey, I told them to look for

1:44:40

these scale invariant, self-similar

1:44:43

processes and make sure you

1:44:45

look to see

1:44:46

fields that are adjacent

1:44:48

to ours to see if you can apply what we know

1:44:50

to that field. And my graduate student

1:44:52

is like, Dr. O, I see this process

1:44:55

called torsional spine reconnection that

1:44:57

seems to be scale invariant. It happens

1:44:59

in galaxy cores, on star services,

1:45:02

planetary magnetosphere. If we can do

1:45:04

it in the lab, we can harness

1:45:06

this and we can have the world's fastest ion propulsion

1:45:09

technology. Well, guess what we did? We

1:45:11

worked up the theory and simulations for

1:45:13

his thesis. And now he founded a company

1:45:15

and we, you know,

1:45:17

I've just advised them over the last years, but they

1:45:19

built a prototype, a working prototype

1:45:22

in the lab. You know, so

1:45:25

that's also pretty cool. But any damn thing, you

1:45:27

know, I do a lot of lab work. So I also did the

1:45:29

first four-sided multiple packaging for large

1:45:32

detectors, like that's on the

1:45:35

dark energy camera and now going on. So when you consider

1:45:38

yourself, I mean, see my field, the field

1:45:40

of, well, which I came in particle physics, but I mean,

1:45:42

you were the theorist or an experimentalist. But

1:45:45

you consider yourself, I'm

1:45:47

a personary, I'm a science personary. Yeah,

1:45:49

based on both. I mean, it's great if you can do

1:45:51

both. I think it's, I wish I'd been able to do

1:45:53

more experiments or any

1:45:55

experiments. I love it. I love it. I love it. I love

1:45:57

it. But you know, I want to, you know what I want to do, man. I

1:45:59

want my, my, my.

1:45:59

First, you know, I'm getting older and I'm like, look, I want

1:46:02

to do something fundamental, groundbreaking,

1:46:04

cosmological in theory. Yeah. Right?

1:46:07

Yeah. OK. Good. You're telling me.

1:46:09

You're telling me. But you got to

1:46:11

find a good problem. You know, that's the thing. You got to find

1:46:13

a good problem to sink your teeth in. Yeah. And

1:46:15

a problem that's solvable. There are a lot of good problems with

1:46:17

what's the nature of dark energy, but that ain't going to be solved for

1:46:20

a long time. Wow. Yeah, you're telling me, man.

1:46:22

I have bets on that, although the people involved, including

1:46:24

one was Stephen Hawking, they never admitted they lost

1:46:27

their bet. I used to. Stephen

1:46:30

Hawking lost a bet to you? Yeah, but

1:46:32

actually a few other people, one or two noble

1:46:34

prisoners as well. They argued

1:46:36

at the time that they were sure we'd

1:46:39

know the nature of dark energy. This was in 90.

1:46:41

This was in 2004. They said in 10

1:46:44

years. I said, believe me, you're not going to know it in 10

1:46:46

years. You're not going to know it

1:46:47

for anyway. It doesn't matter. We know it, man. We got these crazy

1:46:49

big rammer at the cosmological constant. We're

1:46:51

good to go. Anyway, well,

1:46:54

look, it's this. You're absolutely

1:46:56

right, by the way. I remember once talking to

1:46:58

Stephen Weinberg about this. And

1:47:01

I think he's written about it, too. People don't realize

1:47:04

how intimidating it is. If you're a

1:47:06

theorist like we were, we are.

1:47:09

Certainly, Steve and I were in this field

1:47:12

of particle physics. It's incredibly intimidating to think

1:47:14

that something you're working on late

1:47:16

at night is any

1:47:20

relationship to what's actually out there. Right,

1:47:22

yeah. And it's so shocking

1:47:25

when it works out to be. But it really

1:47:27

is intimidating to think that somehow

1:47:29

the world is a bang, some

1:47:31

rule that you've argued it should be a bang. And

1:47:35

the one or two times in my life that's happened where

1:47:38

it's really been right, it's really kind of the most amazing

1:47:40

thing. And obviously, dark energy is the biggest surprise.

1:47:43

But

1:47:43

I mean, the biggest validation in a way.

1:47:46

But yeah, it's really kind of, if

1:47:48

you're a scientist,

1:47:50

people think that, I mean, you have to have faith.

1:47:52

And I don't like to use the word faith. But you

1:47:54

do have to have, in order to work on

1:47:56

something for a year, and some of my colleagues

1:47:59

have worked on something for

1:47:59

20 years. You have to, in

1:48:02

your heart, think that it's probably right, but

1:48:04

at the same time, there's

1:48:05

a part of you that thinks there's no way it can be

1:48:07

right. It's an interesting dichotomy, the

1:48:11

experience of science that way. And

1:48:13

it's great, and it's a humility, I think. And

1:48:16

people often say scientists are humble, but it's

1:48:18

the recognition, because most of the

1:48:21

time, you

1:48:22

know, I've written a lot of papers,

1:48:24

and most of the time,

1:48:25

the universe hasn't been smart enough to do what

1:48:27

I said it should be. Well, you know, that whole thing

1:48:30

about scientists being humble, too, you know, one of

1:48:32

the things that I always say is, when you look

1:48:34

at the layperson conversation about scientists,

1:48:37

I feel like

1:48:38

a lot of people think that every 50 years

1:48:40

or so, we go in a room, all the world's scientists,

1:48:43

and it's always the same topic. What's

1:48:45

the lie? We're all going to agree on. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:48:47

exactly. And the secret handshake. Yeah, climate

1:48:49

change. Yeah, we're in fact, people realize

1:48:52

that most people go to work trying to show their colleagues

1:48:54

wrong. Well, that's the Yeah, we Yeah,

1:48:57

you go you go talk in your own group,

1:48:59

and they just attack you nonstop. Right.

1:49:02

And that's great. And that's the problem with modern education

1:49:04

is people are, right, you know, if it's

1:49:06

that dialectic keeps science going, and yet

1:49:08

some people, how dare you question

1:49:12

my belief? Because I'm triggered.

1:49:14

And now I'm intimidated. Now I'm victimized.

1:49:16

And that's a real problem with undergraduate education. And I'm

1:49:18

in the country I see now is it you can't you

1:49:20

can't you can't have an open conversation

1:49:23

attacking ideas. And it's not people. It's

1:49:25

the idea. That's the idea. You got

1:49:27

to attack the idea, not the people. Yeah, yeah. But

1:49:29

you know, it's the thing. I think that when

1:49:32

you're talking about learners,

1:49:34

and you're talking about people coming in

1:49:37

with cultural, I don't

1:49:39

want to use the word baggage, but basically cultural

1:49:42

stories, right. And

1:49:44

you know, it's so hard to reveal

1:49:46

your ignorance. Like I've always been comfortable revealing

1:49:48

my ignorance, you know, like I will be

1:49:50

in a room at a table tomorrow.

1:49:53

And you use a word I don't know. I'm like, I

1:49:55

have what? Stop the presses.

1:49:57

What's that word? And nobody

1:49:59

treats

1:49:59

me like I'm an idiot for maybe behind

1:50:02

my back they're all saying it but you know to

1:50:04

my face everybody's like you're a smart guy right

1:50:06

but I but I

1:50:08

you know the

1:50:09

magnitude of what I don't know compared to

1:50:11

the tiny freaking sliver that I know

1:50:14

you know I feel like an idiot at all times you know

1:50:16

that's the right attitude yeah hey man

1:50:18

it's the reality right if you look at subtract

1:50:20

what you know from all there is to be known what

1:50:23

are you left with all there is to be known yeah I

1:50:25

have no

1:50:27

I like the new book is

1:50:29

essentially edge of knowledge it's what we know

1:50:32

we don't know but in fact what

1:50:35

the book I'd like to write is the unknown unknowns and

1:50:37

stuff we don't know we don't know but that'd be very short

1:50:39

books if we

1:50:41

knew it we'd call it known unknowns yeah anyway

1:50:44

look it's that training I wanted to know

1:50:46

that ain't oh go ahead yeah it's

1:50:48

a surprise that you're right the willingness

1:50:51

to be wrong yeah that is

1:50:53

so central to science and the and the

1:50:55

willingness to change your mind yeah

1:50:57

and and now I want to go to the what the

1:51:00

reason as I say the reason I first knew

1:51:02

about you the reason yeah I first asked

1:51:04

you to be on this a while ago yeah was this James

1:51:06

Webb story and I'm so happy that it expanded

1:51:09

into other things yeah but

1:51:11

it's an example of exactly that

1:51:14

of of of being of thinking you know

1:51:16

this is likely and this is probably the

1:51:19

case but you know what the evidence doesn't

1:51:21

support it I'm wanting to change my mind and then

1:51:23

coming up with with a reaction of people

1:51:25

who are supposedly scientists supposedly

1:51:28

who are who demonstrate

1:51:30

no characteristics of science

1:51:33

so let's talk about let's talk about James so a lot

1:51:36

of people aren't too aware of this of this controversy

1:51:38

even though even though um

1:51:40

um what what's his name who I liked

1:51:42

a lot uh at the New York Times wrote about it

1:51:45

and oh yeah Michael Powell yeah he's got a

1:51:47

great gig at the Times and I've written him I want to

1:51:49

do a podcast

1:51:50

but um so James Webb's space

1:51:52

telescope I remember when I first heard James Webb I'd never

1:51:55

he was I wasn't thrilled because he wasn't

1:51:57

a scientist but then I you know learned why it was named

1:51:59

and then

1:52:00

When, when do you just give us a quick,

1:52:03

a brief overview of the history starting with 2015 or whatever?

1:52:06

Yeah. Yeah.

1:52:08

So story, you know, I got to know certain people because of this,

1:52:11

the Webb family and the fact that just gave them COVID

1:52:13

and I recovered from

1:52:16

COVID. I had lunch, breakfast with last

1:52:18

week and I gave them COVID. Oh, isn't that nice of you? Well,

1:52:20

I gave my wife COVID. She said anyway. Yeah.

1:52:23

But also Sean O'Keefe and I have had some

1:52:25

dialogue about his reasoning for

1:52:28

naming

1:52:28

the Webb telescope and it's very compelling

1:52:31

man. Okay. And if you look into, I didn't

1:52:33

know anything about Sean O'Keefe, but if you look

1:52:35

into Webb who Webb is, Sean

1:52:37

O'Keefe is sort of like a baby Webb

1:52:39

in a way in the sense that he's a bureaucrat

1:52:42

nerd, administrative nerd, right?

1:52:45

Yeah. So anyway, in 2015,

1:52:47

the first article I read, read is the

1:52:50

one with the title, the problem naming observatories

1:52:52

for bigots. Yeah. By Matthew

1:52:54

Francis, who I understand as a physicist and also

1:52:56

a journalist. Supposedly. Yeah. He

1:52:59

doesn't write like one, but anyway. That's

1:53:01

all the articles I've ever read. I

1:53:03

know when reading that I wouldn't want to pick up any

1:53:05

others, but anyway. Okay. Yeah.

1:53:08

I know it's bad. It wasn't, it wasn't rigorous. Yeah.

1:53:12

But I read it and I was like, Oh, this is shocking

1:53:14

to me. Why would NASA

1:53:17

do that if that's true? So

1:53:19

now let me, you know, I'm the type of guy by

1:53:21

the way, who when I hear a result, you know, I'm

1:53:23

like, if this

1:53:24

holds, you know, I'm not accepting

1:53:26

anything. And let's not

1:53:28

judge the heart. So the claim was that to

1:53:30

step back. Well, here's the claim. Oh, okay.

1:53:33

Here's the claim. So the claim was first officer, the title that

1:53:35

the man is a homophobe. Yeah. The

1:53:38

second thing is, was that he oversaw

1:53:40

the purge

1:53:42

of gay people from federal

1:53:44

service in the late forties, early fifties,

1:53:46

and that he personally fired 92 or 91 employees

1:53:50

between 47 and

1:53:53

early 1950. And

1:53:55

then he had given this Senate testimony and

1:53:57

that he had made this a very

1:54:00

homophobic statement about gay people

1:54:02

not having the being perverted and not

1:54:04

having morals ocean of stability of normal person

1:54:06

or something like that right very specific right

1:54:09

so when I read this I'm like okay that sounds

1:54:11

pretty damning let me google and

1:54:13

see what else I can find and I found an article that

1:54:15

was written five months earlier by Dan Savage

1:54:18

where it basically said exactly the

1:54:20

same thing as that article and then you know that article referred

1:54:22

to as

1:54:25

Wikipedia

1:54:27

page so I went to the Wikipedia page the same quote

1:54:30

is there and then I turned

1:54:32

to our Facebook group that was called equity

1:54:34

and inclusion and science I see that people have been talking

1:54:37

about that and people are like oh someone should confront NASA

1:54:39

that's okay that's it let me clear that's a group

1:54:41

you're a part of then ask for Facebook it was a Facebook

1:54:44

group it's not a group that I was a part

1:54:46

of it was a closed Facebook group that somebody was like

1:54:48

hey join this right so I'm

1:54:50

a lurker right I don't you know yeah

1:54:54

I'm not reading emails I'm not contributing

1:54:56

to groups I'm over here thinking yeah all right

1:54:58

and handling business no I would

1:55:01

go there from time to time but I wasn't a big participant

1:55:04

right I'd go and see what they were talking about so I thought that

1:55:06

was a natural place to go sure yeah absolutely

1:55:08

so I go and look and discover that yeah they had been talking about

1:55:10

it for half a year and people were like someone

1:55:13

should confront NASA and everybody

1:55:15

seemed to accept it was true except this one guy

1:55:18

who said something along the lines of hey

1:55:20

before doing that you should make sure you have the full

1:55:22

story straight so what happens a

1:55:24

year and a half later I find myself working at

1:55:26

NASA headquarters and

1:55:29

once I figure out the lay of the land I go

1:55:31

right to the head of strategic communication I'm like yo

1:55:33

you know about this and they're like no

1:55:36

oh no this looks terrible

1:55:38

let's go talk to

1:55:40

the head of you know they assumed I knew who

1:55:42

Greg Robinson was let's go talk to Greg Robinson

1:55:44

I'm like who's that right they're like oh you know the head

1:55:46

of the web telescopes so we go talk to Gregory

1:55:48

Robinson you know he's a very sober very deliberate

1:55:50

dude yeah and he's like hmm not

1:55:53

very reactions like oh that's news I

1:55:55

came to send me everything you got I sent

1:55:57

it to him I sent the two articles in Wikipedia article

1:56:00

And he says to me a week later, he's

1:56:02

like, I came all I see here are accusations, man.

1:56:04

Can you look into it and see what actually happened? So

1:56:07

I started looking into it. And at

1:56:09

first I started by myself, you know, I discovered,

1:56:11

you know, there was a Truman Library

1:56:14

and there was a web papers and these sort of

1:56:16

things. And I'm looking for this specific

1:56:18

quote from Webb. I'm looking for this specific

1:56:21

congressional testimony from Webb and I can't

1:56:24

find it anywhere. So then I turned

1:56:26

back to the head of strategic communication. We have to be my

1:56:28

direct report. You know, I report directly to her

1:56:30

and she goes, well, you know, we got these great

1:56:33

historians and archivists and

1:56:35

librarians. So I go down there and I get to notice one guy

1:56:38

really well. And he turns me

1:56:40

on the people at Johnson Space Center, people

1:56:42

at, um, in Huntsville at Marshall.

1:56:44

And there is even a graduate student in

1:56:46

history at University of Alabama Huntsville,

1:56:49

who's doing his PhD dissertation on

1:56:51

Webb. And now with all these people give

1:56:53

me is I have no idea about this

1:56:56

stuff. I came, but we do, you know, about this

1:56:58

stuff he did at NASA with diversity. And

1:57:00

so, you know, what's really funny

1:57:03

is when I left NASA in,

1:57:06

uh, end of August, 2019,

1:57:09

I left everything behind. Cause I

1:57:11

was so like, you know, nervous

1:57:13

about government property. You

1:57:18

know who was too, but anyway, go on.

1:57:21

So big thing of the news, but you know what the thing was

1:57:23

this graduate student, man, everybody knows

1:57:25

about how Webb took on George Wallace.

1:57:28

He took on Wallace at the, um,

1:57:30

the governor in Alabama,

1:57:33

but what they didn't know that this guy gave me were

1:57:36

letters between Webb and these Mississippi

1:57:38

Congressman, black Congressman, where they were systematically

1:57:40

taken on segregation in Mississippi

1:57:43

as well. Um, so

1:57:45

now I'm really confused. I'm like, wait a minute, this dude

1:57:47

persecuted gay people. And now he's like

1:57:49

helping black people. Like what the kind of personality

1:57:52

is this dude? Right. So then

1:57:54

this archivist of me goes, Hakeem,

1:57:57

I think it may be a case of mistaken identity. Cause

1:57:59

he.

1:57:59

finds where John purifoy was the person

1:58:02

who had given the congressional testimony.

1:58:05

And then right after this, I find this document

1:58:07

from the Senate, what they talk about with purifoy's

1:58:09

name, when they talk about how they

1:58:12

created the security

1:58:14

apparatus in the Cold War right

1:58:16

after World War two. And you know,

1:58:18

and I find this book and now I'm starting to see the story

1:58:21

unfold. So I realized,

1:58:23

ah, every every every detail

1:58:26

that they had given for web did this web did this

1:58:28

web did this, all of them were actually

1:58:30

done by Carlisle Hubel sign and

1:58:33

john purifoy. Yeah.

1:58:34

All right. So I'm like there's zero

1:58:36

evidence. And if you look,

1:58:38

one of the main people who are pushing

1:58:40

this

1:58:41

had an article in physics today in 2019, where they

1:58:43

go on to say I know use the word

1:58:45

know, yeah, that web prevented gay

1:58:48

people from working at NASA

1:58:50

in the 60s, right? That's very specific web.

1:58:52

Yeah, I know. I it is there to say it

1:58:54

and I know it and I and then and then other people know it because

1:58:56

they wrote it. Yeah. Yeah.

1:58:59

And all of it is untrue. Right. So

1:59:01

I write this and I

1:59:03

expect that you know, not I

1:59:06

don't expect it to be big news. Excited.

1:59:07

You know, I expect it to be like, oh,

1:59:10

a few people are concerned with this, the gay people in the

1:59:12

community may be concerned with this. And now

1:59:14

everybody will be relieved to know that it turns

1:59:16

out it's not true. Yeah. But that is not

1:59:18

what happened. Yeah, I mean, you think that you wrote I remember

1:59:21

in your piece, when you wrote the piece on Reddit is basically,

1:59:23

hey, now finally, astronomers don't have to worry,

1:59:26

we can move on to other things. It should be a relief.

1:59:29

Yeah. In fact, the reaction is the opposite.

1:59:31

Well, I didn't know that there were members of our community

1:59:34

who were actually

1:59:36

had some personal

1:59:38

connection with this

1:59:39

rumor that that somehow was their

1:59:42

item, you know, I didn't I didn't know that if

1:59:44

I had known that I don't know what I would have done differently.

1:59:47

But maybe I would have expected the backlash

1:59:50

that occurred from those specific people.

1:59:53

And the crazy thing about it is this other astronomer

1:59:56

who knew the both of us who knew all

1:59:58

you know, all of us said, Hey, I keep my you guys

2:00:00

had a cordial relationship with one of the two leaders

2:00:02

of this thing. Yeah. One who wrote the article titled,

2:00:05

the straights are here to serve, save us. Yeah. And

2:00:07

I'm like, yeah, I thought we did too. Right. So

2:00:10

I go to that person. He says, why don't you apologize

2:00:13

to them for any hurt feelings you may have caused.

2:00:16

And on day one, I'm like, no way. Right.

2:00:18

But they too, I'm like, oh, I see how you phrase

2:00:21

that any hurt feelings I may have

2:00:23

caused.

2:00:24

So I did it. I wrote to them on Twitter

2:00:26

and my DM, which I still

2:00:28

keep private. And I said, Hey, you

2:00:30

know, I understand that this may have caused some hurt feelings.

2:00:33

Listen, that wasn't my intention.

2:00:35

And if you want, I will use my voice

2:00:38

since I'm somewhat of a public figure to bring

2:00:40

attention to the lavender scare. Yeah. And

2:00:43

man, they weren't having it. They kind of went in at

2:00:45

me and then they say the phrase of, if

2:00:47

you had submitted it to a journal, you'd be

2:00:49

retracting it. And at that point I was done with the conversation.

2:00:52

Right. Because,

2:00:54

you know, if I say

2:00:56

this, like, like, you know how I go home

2:00:58

and people confront me about being

2:01:00

a scientist or like, you know, the

2:01:02

big bang ain't real. And I'll say, okay, well tell

2:01:04

me what specifically is incorrect.

2:01:06

Yeah. A Hubble expansion data, the nuclear

2:01:08

synthesis data, or the college of microwave background radiation

2:01:11

data. Right. Yeah. So just telling me blank,

2:01:13

you know, you'll be retracting it. I'm like, okay, which part

2:01:15

of it is incorrect?

2:01:17

So what they do then is they start creating these

2:01:20

false narratives. Right.

2:01:23

So after this blog, let's make it clear.

2:01:25

They had already created a false narrative. There's

2:01:28

one about web, but it was the

2:01:30

thing that I'm going to work carefully.

2:01:33

Then they refuse to do is once that narrative was

2:01:35

shown to be false, what a real scientist

2:01:37

would do is say,

2:01:38

wow, okay.

2:01:40

That, I thought that was the case, but it's all, but

2:01:42

these people demonstrate that they're ideologues

2:01:45

and they're not scientists. Exactly.

2:01:47

No, we're doubling down. You can't be right.

2:01:50

You can't be right. I believe it's

2:01:52

true. So the evidence says otherwise the evidence

2:01:54

is wrong. Oh, no, no, no. But see, you have to look at their

2:01:56

relationship with evidence. Okay. So one

2:01:59

of the things I like tell people is,

2:02:01

you know, I go to these public talks just like you,

2:02:03

and people come after me, come to me after my talk

2:02:06

and they'll say, sir,

2:02:07

you said that science says

2:02:09

this, but you know, my holy book or

2:02:12

some other source says that. And I'm going to

2:02:14

correct them. I say, listen, that's not the,

2:02:17

you know, I don't talk to them about their face or whatever. I talk

2:02:19

to them about science and understanding how that

2:02:21

works. And the point I make is science

2:02:23

doesn't say anything. Science asks

2:02:26

science says universe, tell me what are you? So

2:02:29

what they went about doing is, let

2:02:31

me see if I can find some piece of evidence that

2:02:33

supports my perspective,

2:02:36

even tangentially. Yeah. And I will

2:02:39

say it does. So what do they do?

2:02:41

They find very quickly this, this

2:02:43

one astronomer associated with them who wasn't part of

2:02:45

their core crew, Adrian, Lucy is like, look, I found

2:02:47

this passage in David K. Johnson's

2:02:50

book. So David K. Johnson is a historian.

2:02:52

He's a gay historian, and he's the person

2:02:54

who actually coined the phrase, the lavender scare.

2:02:57

And in his book, he speaks of this meeting

2:02:59

between Truman and Webb.

2:03:01

And he uses this phrase saying that

2:03:04

human true, Webb had spoken to this

2:03:06

Senator who was going to oversee

2:03:08

the Senate committee

2:03:10

that was going to investigate whether or not, you

2:03:12

know, the way they call it, it was the problem with homosexuals

2:03:15

in federal government, right? And

2:03:18

they made it seem like Truman and

2:03:20

Webb had this special meeting and

2:03:22

that Webb was a planner and

2:03:25

leader of it, which was not the case, right?

2:03:27

Truman and Webb had met regularly for years

2:03:30

because Webb used to run his own agency,

2:03:33

the Bureau of the Budget, right? And one

2:03:35

thing that we all have heard that he created

2:03:38

at that time is called economic indicators,

2:03:40

right? Webb created that. So he's a star

2:03:42

administrative, you know, nerd.

2:03:44

And Truman is looking at what's happening globally.

2:03:47

And he tells his secretary of state, yo,

2:03:50

I'm going to install Webb as your number two, to

2:03:52

which Atchison is like,

2:03:54

who? No. And even Webb

2:03:56

is like, dude, I don't have any

2:03:58

experience in foreign affairs. like, yes, but

2:04:00

you have experience with organizations. That's

2:04:02

what we need, right? So what happens

2:04:04

is, Webb is the unconflicted

2:04:07

party in a battle that's been going

2:04:09

between the senators and the executive

2:04:12

branch. So when Senator Hoey runs

2:04:14

into Webb, he says, hey man, can you and

2:04:16

I talk about this? Because the Senate was

2:04:18

trying to get these personnel papers of

2:04:20

the people who had been investigated for disloyalty,

2:04:23

right, which include communists, which include gay

2:04:25

people, which include people who

2:04:27

were gamblers, who saw prostitutes,

2:04:30

who were cheaters, right? Anybody who could be looked

2:04:33

at as somebody who could be blackmailed

2:04:36

or something like that. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, exactly.

2:04:38

So

2:04:39

Webb

2:04:41

has his regular meeting with Truman

2:04:43

and he tells him at the end of the meeting, it has

2:04:45

several topics, right? At the end of the meeting,

2:04:47

he goes, oh, by the way, Senator Hoey asked me to attend

2:04:49

this meeting on the homosexual

2:04:51

problem.

2:04:52

Should I do it? He's like, oh yeah, tell him we'll find a

2:04:54

way to work

2:04:55

around the challenges with

2:04:58

working together, not finding the modus operandi.

2:05:01

Well, here's the crazy thing. When

2:05:03

they

2:05:04

find this piece,

2:05:05

the NARA, the National Archives

2:05:08

record reference is given.

2:05:10

And Adrian Lucy says, hey, because of the pandemic,

2:05:12

they're shut down. But they know that there

2:05:14

is that

2:05:16

Johnson has paraphrased a

2:05:19

real memo, but instead of waiting

2:05:21

to get the real memo, they go

2:05:23

out and says, this proves that Luea was

2:05:25

a leader and it's in their scientific, American articles and nature

2:05:28

articles.

2:05:28

It's all over the place. Yeah, that's how I first

2:05:31

heard of it from a,

2:05:32

by the way, let me say, you just

2:05:34

remind me, one of my favorite quotes, well,

2:05:36

a lot of favorite quotes from Richard Feynman

2:05:39

of mine. You know, I wrote a book

2:05:41

about him, but, Oh, I didn't know that.

2:05:43

Oh yeah, called Quantum Man, by the way. Well,

2:05:46

before Quantum Life was written, it was called Quantum Man.

2:05:49

There you go. Years ago, but

2:05:51

it's a scientific biography. So, got it, got it. But

2:05:54

as you

2:05:56

know, he said, what you have to do as a scientist is

2:05:58

if you have an idea, You try

2:06:00

and prove it right, but you try equally

2:06:03

hard

2:06:04

to prove it wrong. Prove it wrong. And

2:06:06

that's the thing. So you say, okay, I found this

2:06:08

bit of evidence, but is there evidence that

2:06:10

shows this wrong? And that's the exact,

2:06:12

what they did is the exact thing. We know

2:06:14

that he must have been home of them. We're going to find

2:06:16

anything that suggests he is, and we're not going to think

2:06:18

about anything else, and then we're going to promote it. And

2:06:21

I have to say, the first time I heard about

2:06:23

even a controversy was this Scientific American

2:06:26

article on Scientific American. Unfortunately,

2:06:28

I was on the board of it. It used to be a reputable

2:06:30

magazine. I used to love it. Yeah. I

2:06:32

mean, I wrote about six articles for it, and I

2:06:35

used to have a column, and I was on their board for

2:06:37

maybe 15 years, and now it's just, it's really

2:06:39

deteriorated. But it was, I, you know,

2:06:41

I, I recently talked about the dumbest

2:06:43

article I've read recently, but up to that point,

2:06:46

it was the dumbest article I'd read. I didn't know anything

2:06:48

about it. My first presumption was, well,

2:06:50

here's a guy in the 1950s and 60s, and

2:06:53

I'm assuming that he's no different than other people in the

2:06:55

1950s or 60s, and to impose upon, impose

2:06:59

modern sensibilities on a man at that time is

2:07:01

already silly. But I didn't even know

2:07:03

the details. But then I have

2:07:06

to ask you this, because I remember writing about

2:07:08

this and making fun of it, because

2:07:10

I thought it was the silliest thing I'd ever heard when

2:07:12

they suggested that the helicopter

2:07:15

called the Heriot Tubman. Why? Because

2:07:18

on the Underground Railroad, she must have looked

2:07:20

at the North Star, and I thought, are they serious?

2:07:23

Was that the stupidest, was that the dumbest thing? Yeah, that

2:07:26

was pretty, well, I'm not gonna call that dumb, but it was,

2:07:28

it was, yeah, I just couldn't understand, I just thought,

2:07:30

what? Yeah, it's ridiculous. If you want to make yourself

2:07:32

a caricature of ridiculousness, that's, that's a

2:07:34

good thing. Yeah, I mean, it's patronizing, I mean, look,

2:07:36

it's clear they wanted a person

2:07:39

of color to be, but

2:07:41

it's just, it's patronizing to do that. Look

2:07:43

how revealing it is though, right? So

2:07:46

after I showed that they, that Webb did not do what

2:07:48

he specifically did, they immediately go

2:07:50

to literally within 24 hours. Oh,

2:07:52

but he was complicit because he was in management. So

2:07:55

in their articles, they say, yes, we're

2:07:57

saying that anybody who was in management during this time.

2:08:00

Well guess who's in management at NASA with

2:08:03

Nancy Grace Roman. Yeah, Nancy you

2:08:05

made that point Nancy was a man

2:08:07

and no one's running against that telescope Yeah,

2:08:09

they're not arguing the Nancy Grace Roman

2:08:11

and the web telescope both both must

2:08:13

be renamed They didn't make that argument and if they were sincere

2:08:16

they would have made that are yeah And it's it's these counter

2:08:18

arguments when I said I guess I Discounted

2:08:20

the rest of the piece when I read about the suggestion that Harriet

2:08:22

Tubman Be

2:08:23

named it because I figured if there's that level

2:08:25

of seriousness or lack of seriousness

2:08:28

Then I've got us then the rest of the history is suspect.

2:08:30

So that's all I present I mean and I could've been wrong. I mean

2:08:32

I made a snap judgment and I could've been wrong

2:08:35

But I thought well This isn't the

2:08:38

article to trust and then I read you know I

2:08:40

read about your work and then the important

2:08:42

thing was that that your work was later

2:08:45

validated by an extra by an exhaustive

2:08:47

NASA so you wrote this piece and you thought okay

2:08:50

everyone's gonna hey got me on the back and say

2:08:52

you you know Thanks for doing the real

2:08:54

research to see what the real situation is instead

2:08:57

and we'll talk about you got Attacked not

2:08:59

just for what you were saying but who you were

2:09:01

and aspersions were

2:09:03

were oh absolutely Yeah, but the first I

2:09:05

heard of it was was really that

2:09:07

week, right? So the same person who wrote

2:09:09

the article is freights are here to save us when that

2:09:11

other astronomer attempted to mediate

2:09:14

He sent me he goes a man this

2:09:17

person said I should research why

2:09:19

you left Florida Tech So I called him up

2:09:21

and I'm like, what's that about and he said Oh

2:09:24

something about sexual harassment and a

2:09:26

title I literally laughed because

2:09:28

I'm like who's gonna believe that about me, dude. I'm the biggest nerd.

2:09:31

I don't come on anybody ever, right? This

2:09:33

is not how I roll. Yeah now

2:09:35

to be honest with you

2:09:37

Lawrence

2:09:38

Clearly, I

2:09:39

must be a very desirable dude because people are coming

2:09:41

on to me all the time And

2:09:43

that includes students man and so but

2:09:45

that's the reality of it is that here

2:09:48

I am

2:09:49

Kicking people back beat it get off me

2:09:51

back up I'm not you know, and then you're gonna be to

2:09:53

accuse the guy who behaves that way

2:09:56

as the one who's I'm like Give me a

2:09:58

break. Anyway, I didn't think anybody would believe it

2:09:59

But then I

2:10:01

start hearing it coming from everybody. Oh, Hakeem,

2:10:03

I was here and I heard someone say

2:10:05

this But let me tell you man, there's

2:10:08

real consequences. I will tell you what it is

2:10:10

so one of the people

2:10:12

Of the two leaders of it not the person who wrote

2:10:14

the article the straights are here to save us at

2:10:17

their university a professor

2:10:20

informed me that there was an internal discussion about

2:10:22

inviting me to be come there and be a speaker

2:10:25

or a major event and a paid speaker and

2:10:28

They didn't say exactly who it is, but it's the exact

2:10:30

same person

2:10:31

University They had a young

2:10:33

astronomy woman. Astronomy woman spoke

2:10:35

up and said oh we can't invite him because he

2:10:38

has these sexual um Misconduct

2:10:40

allegations

2:10:41

right the same person once

2:10:44

I got hired at george mason Actually

2:10:46

tweeted that phrase sexual misconduct with

2:10:49

respect to that hiring, right? But

2:10:51

then in the aftermath of

2:10:53

the new york times article and everything they've

2:10:55

gaslighted the world and said Oh,

2:10:57

I wasn't talking about him when they're writing

2:11:00

Yeah, someone should ask this guy why he left

2:11:02

his university the exact same thing

2:11:04

your colleague said The exact

2:11:06

same phrase you're happening to use

2:11:09

that with reference to me, but it's not about you

2:11:11

know, but

2:11:12

so it's it's

2:11:13

You know, they thought they knew something about web. They thought

2:11:16

they Similarity that's

2:11:18

that's the that's the I mean the ironic part about this is

2:11:20

that yeah making claims about

2:11:22

web And then making claims about

2:11:25

you in yeah, and

2:11:29

In either case the point is that that that

2:11:31

the the scientific thing to do is to

2:11:34

see Is to is to see the evidence

2:11:36

and the the similarity between the

2:11:38

two is kind of remarkable It's it's a it's

2:11:40

a proper and I don't want to criticize people

2:11:42

so much we have been but it's a thought Process

2:11:46

it's it's the ideology. That's the anti-this

2:11:50

Sorry antithesis of science,

2:11:52

which is instead of being upset When

2:11:55

you're wrong and refusing to be

2:11:57

and then attacking uh the people

2:11:59

you know, demanding that your narrative

2:12:02

be true,

2:12:03

under all circumstances, and finding

2:12:05

reasons to

2:12:06

denigrate or reduce

2:12:09

the credibility of those people this week, the

2:12:12

whole point of science is to say, hey, this is amazing,

2:12:14

I'm wrong.

2:12:15

And that's the great

2:12:17

thing about science. And, and, and,

2:12:21

you

2:12:21

know, I will say that, that the,

2:12:25

well, let's get to

2:12:27

the, let's end this and then, and

2:12:29

then end with one other thing.

2:12:31

The one I want to ask is, what can we do?

2:12:33

I'm seeing this so often,

2:12:35

to

2:12:36

step back from James Webb

2:12:38

to step back from the attacks on you, is

2:12:41

this mentality that we're seeing

2:12:43

of the intrusion that I've written about it for the Wall Street Journal,

2:12:46

and, and other places, the intrusion of ideology

2:12:49

into science. What can we

2:12:51

do?

2:12:52

You know, it's

2:12:55

a debate, right? It needs to be an open

2:12:57

debate. But the problem is, there's so many people that

2:13:00

wish to, what's the phrase,

2:13:03

performative,

2:13:05

virtue signaling. Virtue signaling,

2:13:08

yeah. I mean, they

2:13:11

think that they're on the right side.

2:13:13

So when someone comes to them with grievance,

2:13:15

so I'll tell you, there's another, the same

2:13:17

person, there was a, there's

2:13:19

a person who wanted MacArthur prize, who's

2:13:21

a famed current

2:13:24

black writer, also from Mississippi.

2:13:27

And that person agreed to blur my book. We

2:13:29

became buddies after we were both speaking

2:13:31

at Trinity College in San Antonio

2:13:34

in early 2020. I've spent a tragedy in

2:13:36

the old days, before you were born, maybe, but anyway,

2:13:39

I was born in the sixties. But anyway,

2:13:41

anyway, I know it's late, but anyway,

2:13:45

he says to me, you know, a week before he's like, Oh man,

2:13:47

I can't blurb the book. And I'm like, why not? He's

2:13:50

like, my friends say they'd be very hurt if I did

2:13:52

that. So that friend is the same person,

2:13:55

right? Yeah. Now, again, there

2:13:57

are two prominent female professors at

2:13:59

two major universities that both used

2:14:01

to reach out to me often. They

2:14:04

publicly are working with this person and

2:14:06

for the last year and a half they don't know

2:14:08

me anymore. I contact them no reply

2:14:11

and I'm like

2:14:13

okay I can't wait to see

2:14:15

one of them in person so I can say hey the reason why

2:14:18

you suddenly don't know me after this engagement

2:14:20

is because you know and that's the thing is

2:14:22

that if someone says to me

2:14:25

rumor about this person

2:14:27

always say to that person well you know

2:14:29

I'll find out for myself about that person. Yeah

2:14:31

but not many people are that way.

2:14:34

I mean I just wrote a piece and then I had a

2:14:36

guest post in my honor about

2:14:38

this guilt by association that's happening where

2:14:41

people and so that's why I think your

2:14:43

friends are acting that way and it's the

2:14:45

innate cowardice of academics which

2:14:47

is to keep your head low not get involved in

2:14:50

any any controversies better

2:14:52

better your virtue signal

2:14:54

and be safer

2:14:55

and if we if as long as as long

2:14:57

as you get

2:14:58

as long as the benefit of virtue signaling outweighs

2:15:01

the negatives of inappropriately

2:15:05

making claims then

2:15:08

it's going to continue and universities are going to virtue signal

2:15:10

and and and it's always going to be a

2:15:13

calculation what let's say so

2:15:15

is dropping Hakim as a friend is that going to be

2:15:17

more or or throw him under the

2:15:19

bus is that going to be a more negative

2:15:21

thing for me than to virtue signal

2:15:24

and and gain within the community

2:15:26

right some rights as opposed to being guilt by

2:15:28

association I know him and like him well

2:15:30

if you like him then you too must be and

2:15:32

so exactly so you know who suffered that will

2:15:35

kitty yeah yeah this third

2:15:37

party who doesn't know me ever yeah

2:15:40

tweeted right before the the the new york times

2:15:42

article came out because will kitty was like it's wrong

2:15:44

the way you guys are doing this

2:15:46

dakim this woman tweets oh

2:15:49

when you see people uh

2:15:50

protecting abusers

2:15:53

that usually means their abusers themselves

2:15:55

watch out for these two yeah yeah no

2:15:58

that's the kind of that and that but that's

2:17:53

triggers

2:18:00

me and therefore you take their name off

2:18:02

the bigger paper and that's just the antithesis

2:18:05

of science because you're saying I'm taking you

2:18:07

know, I'm not giving we used to call plagiarism if you

2:18:09

don't put someone's paper before and

2:18:11

so anyway, it is a problem and I think

2:18:13

it's important to talk about the problem because I think more

2:18:16

academics have to stand up

2:18:18

Ultimately, it's not going to be solved until the academic

2:18:20

community says

2:18:21

we won't put up with this nonsense anymore You're

2:18:24

empowering we care about the ideas

2:18:26

and you and and it's not and you we don't care

2:18:28

about We care about the ideas

2:18:31

and and that's what matters and and

2:18:33

and so I do want

2:18:35

to segue back to one question

2:18:37

I have for you and then it relates to to Interestingly

2:18:42

it covers also the the web because I

2:18:44

think I think Anyway,

2:18:47

you'll see what I mean in a second. All right, um, I

2:18:50

have to ask you and I understand

2:18:53

more having read your book and looking

2:18:55

at the organizations that

2:18:57

That impacted on you the the

2:18:59

black fraternities and the and and

2:19:01

the back professional organizations. Yeah

2:19:05

My attitude has always been skeptical of

2:19:08

groups like the National Society

2:19:10

of Black Physicists And

2:19:14

because you know, I would never I mean

2:19:16

obviously I would never become part of a National

2:19:18

Society of white physicists or for That matter

2:19:20

a National Society of Jewish physicists or

2:19:23

natural I mean, I just you know, I never

2:19:25

want to be a member of the HABBA is a member anyway

2:19:27

All right, but so why why

2:19:30

the National Society of Black Physicists? I think I understand

2:19:32

it more having ready to go But I'd like to hear you say right. Yeah

2:19:34

Well,

2:19:35

if you look at the inception of the

2:19:37

organization is written on the history of the website, right?

2:19:40

and so there was some event that happened national

2:19:42

event and the black physicists at the

2:19:44

time felt like the Professional

2:19:47

societies and organizations that existed on this

2:19:50

racial issue were not being

2:19:58

Sensitive their particular

2:20:01

concerns and what they needed

2:20:03

to felt like needed to be said. And

2:20:05

so they said, Okay, for this reason, we might need

2:20:07

to start our own organization.

2:20:09

But then it morphed,

2:20:11

right, it began to morph. Because

2:20:13

what it became was a gathering

2:20:16

where they get together annually, you know,

2:20:18

you don't see another black physicist for your whole

2:20:20

year and annually, hello, fellow black

2:20:23

person. And you know what,

2:20:25

again,

2:20:27

African Americans are a different

2:20:29

type of ethnicity. Like, when I

2:20:31

live in a community, I love to go to things like, oh,

2:20:33

the Greek church, you know, they have their annual thing,

2:20:36

and they do their traditional Greek dance. Or,

2:20:38

you know, we go to India week, and you see an Indian

2:20:40

culture and food. The fact

2:20:42

that you gather together,

2:20:44

culturally,

2:20:46

in order to celebrate yourselves,

2:20:48

and in order to, you know, look

2:20:53

at what may concern challenges

2:20:55

to your community specifically, and these

2:20:57

sort of things. I see that as

2:20:59

a good thing, no matter what it is, right?

2:21:01

If it's not an exclusionary, oh, we're

2:21:04

gonna get together and take over the world and hate and kill everybody

2:21:06

else. Okay, that's bad. But if it's like,

2:21:08

Oh, you know, we all are the great,

2:21:10

great grandchildren of George

2:21:13

Washington, and we're gathering together every year

2:21:15

to celebrate this, right? But what

2:21:17

happens is,

2:21:19

is that the African American population

2:21:21

is going through a different evolution

2:21:24

than the rest of America, right? Because it goes

2:21:26

from this evolution of being in the state

2:21:28

of race based shadow slavery,

2:21:31

then reconstruction, then Jim

2:21:33

Crow, and there's a relationship

2:21:35

with education and access to education,

2:21:38

right? And the other thing about

2:21:40

it is, is that all societies in

2:21:42

America, no matter what your race is,

2:21:44

nobody's interested in science, and no,

2:21:46

and certainly nobody's interested in physics. And

2:21:49

I like to point out that for a quarter of a century,

2:21:52

we've been pushing this STEM thing so hard,

2:21:54

because it's so important to national health.

2:21:56

Yeah.

2:21:57

But yet only 18% of our undergraduates

2:21:59

graduates today graduate with STEM degrees. And

2:22:03

so these black physicists at a certain time

2:22:05

started saying, hey, let's

2:22:08

use this to mentor each other, the

2:22:10

youth, but also now

2:22:12

around the nineties when I started, right?

2:22:15

They started in 77.

2:22:16

Let's start creating what people call

2:22:19

a pipeline. Let's start dealing with students

2:22:21

and mentoring students to bring them into

2:22:23

it. Because even if you're interested in this stuff,

2:22:25

you have no way of knowing

2:22:27

how to go about it. And I find that, I mean, I

2:22:30

get to appreciate more when I saw your life. And

2:22:33

also Jim Gates, who I saw at MIT,

2:22:35

Jim was mentored by someone and I saw him mentoring a graduate

2:22:37

student. Oh yeah.

2:22:39

Anyway. Yeah. And

2:22:41

so what happens is now, you know, I, on

2:22:43

the one hand is I do see the conflict. I

2:22:46

see things that people don't talk about, right? I

2:22:48

say a lot of things that are different.

2:22:50

Like I say like, oh yeah, I was abused

2:22:53

by black police and white police. I've had

2:22:55

guns put on me by black guys and white guys.

2:22:57

I'm lucky. I see that it's not a

2:23:00

race thing, you know, it's not a, you know,

2:23:02

it's a, you know, it's people

2:23:04

behaving badly thing.

2:23:06

But

2:23:07

historically it is a race

2:23:09

thing. Historically, if you

2:23:11

don't have somebody in your home who got

2:23:14

education,

2:23:15

you know, good luck

2:23:18

navigating that process. My

2:23:20

life, like, you know, I couldn't compete with my own

2:23:22

son,

2:23:23

you know, if, you know, his, him coming out

2:23:25

of high school and me coming out of high school, completely

2:23:27

different universes of people. But

2:23:30

again, I am what you would call

2:23:32

with a, you know, legacy heritage, African-American.

2:23:35

That's different from somebody who's coming from the Caribbean

2:23:38

or Africa. America

2:23:40

is the land of opportunity, right? They've

2:23:43

had a hardcore mathematics, English

2:23:45

system background

2:23:47

versus me in America, getting educated in Mississippi,

2:23:50

right? So you see a step on Alexander.

2:23:52

You see a, what's

2:23:54

my man's name at University of Illinois, right? Anadia

2:23:57

Mason, you know, you see Art Walker, right? He's from

2:23:59

that Caribbean tradition.

2:23:59

You know, you interface

2:24:02

differently.

2:24:03

And so

2:24:04

on the one hand, the NSVP serves

2:24:06

as a mentor network to

2:24:10

help people navigate

2:24:13

making it into this field. But here's the

2:24:15

thing,

2:24:15

we are not exclusionary. What do I

2:24:18

do as an NSVP mentor? I say, hey,

2:24:20

yo, Lawrence, you're an expert on this.

2:24:22

I got this great student, they're interested in that co-work.

2:24:25

So when we have our mentor networks,

2:24:27

we're not all connected with black businesses. We're

2:24:29

connecting with the top business in the field.

2:24:31

So who do we have relationships with? The

2:24:34

Simon Foundation, the Heisen Simon Foundation.

2:24:38

Our students aren't working with black scientists, they're

2:24:41

working with scientists that are the top

2:24:43

in the field at what they do. So

2:24:46

I am a big tent

2:24:48

guy, I am a not exclusionary.

2:24:50

You know, I'm a like,

2:24:52

let's build bridges, let's do this. But you have to

2:24:54

recognize that just like when they created

2:24:57

that

2:24:57

welfare state to prevent us from falling

2:25:00

in the slums and all of that, we

2:25:02

still have to

2:25:04

go to every community that identifies

2:25:06

as a community and get these people engaged

2:25:09

for one, if I was running the country, right?

2:25:12

If I had a nation and I'm like, you know, I'm

2:25:14

Hakeem. So if I am running a nation, I'm

2:25:16

looking at taking over the world than the galaxy.

2:25:18

What

2:25:21

do I want my nation to be? The galaxy just won is a hundred billion.

2:25:23

You know, it's a million. And in the universe, right?

2:25:25

Give me the, I want the infinity

2:25:27

gauntlet. But, and

2:25:29

Thanos was wrong. He shouldn't have killed 50%

2:25:32

of everybody. That's one doubling time, right?

2:25:34

He should have killed the minimal viable population.

2:25:36

That's what should remain. But anyway, the point

2:25:40

is that, you know,

2:25:45

if you isolate yourself as a people,

2:25:48

that is a recipe for death.

2:25:50

For disaster, diversity

2:25:52

shouldn't be exclusionary. That's not

2:25:54

what we're doing. We're making

2:25:56

part of an operative with all the best. You

2:25:58

forget what I see it as.

2:25:59

And I think I understood it more reading the book

2:26:02

is as a saying. Hey,

2:26:03

we have an opportunity

2:26:05

To mentor to help and

2:26:07

we're gonna use that opportunity and if you want to have

2:26:10

a group I mean, it

2:26:11

wouldn't be acceptable But I mean we know but I

2:26:13

guess

2:26:14

you know There'd be any other group that wants to

2:26:16

use a common cultural

2:26:18

or ethnic hook as

2:26:20

a way to help people

2:26:23

It's great. Of course from my point of view. I

2:26:25

just rather help everyone without an ethnic hook, but that's

2:26:27

just the way I am but But well, here's the thing.

2:26:29

It's like black colleges, right black colleges

2:26:31

don't exclude white people from attendees I had black

2:26:33

white students at my black college, right?

2:26:35

But the thing is that if that black college

2:26:38

isn't there and there's no black there's

2:26:40

no place for a lot That's the

2:26:42

point is to provide an opportunity

2:26:44

Yeah And I see that and and the reason and the

2:26:47

reason I'm saying believe it or not that it connects

2:26:49

in the end and up to To

2:26:51

the James Webb thing

2:26:52

is it's I think the same people

2:26:54

that were arguing about this

2:26:57

Ideology at Jim Webb

2:26:59

produced when it comes to physics kind of

2:27:01

the

2:27:01

same kind of hate exclusionary

2:27:05

Attitude and the one person who wrote I think

2:27:07

wrote one of these pieces Wrote

2:27:10

a piece, you know on on white epistemology

2:27:13

Which I made fun of in a different point of view somehow

2:27:15

saying that that that the

2:27:18

problem with physics is it wasn't it's not objective

2:27:20

because they don't value black women and

2:27:22

it was somehow it would be and I was shocked

2:27:24

and one of the examples that was Used was string

2:27:26

theory,

2:27:28

you know, they're willing to believe in 11 dimensions,

2:27:30

but not believe in black women I felt like saying well, you know,

2:27:32

Jim Gates is a great drink there and

2:27:34

I you know it demonstrated an extreme a

2:27:37

willingness to throw out this was a physics

2:27:39

article to throw sensible physics

2:27:42

to make an Ideological point and

2:27:44

to be exclusionary. Oh Dark

2:27:47

matter is somehow racist. Yeah. Yeah

2:27:49

whiteboards are somehow racist. There's no articles on

2:27:51

it, but but the same That

2:27:54

somehow these people get academic positions that

2:27:56

are willing to throw out physics

2:27:58

for the sake of ideology

2:27:59

before, before

2:28:02

there was woke, there

2:28:04

was, you know, this thing called being Afrocentric.

2:28:07

Yeah. And within the black community

2:28:09

of America, they started to make fun

2:28:12

of certain types of ways of thinking, right?

2:28:15

You know, the guys who will be like, why

2:28:17

are the black olives in a can when you can't see

2:28:19

them with the green olives are in a glass,

2:28:21

right? Yeah, if you look at like Wayans Brothers movies

2:28:24

and stuff, they make fun of these guys, right? And

2:28:26

this is that exact same type of thinking

2:28:28

that people make fun of within the

2:28:30

black community.

2:28:31

But for some reason, in this

2:28:34

modern era, you know, and

2:28:36

if you look at that, that, that sort

2:28:39

of

2:28:40

philosophy, you know, it's sort of like an

2:28:43

activist

2:28:44

philosophy. And that is, oh, I must

2:28:46

find something to activate about.

2:28:49

So you go about looking

2:28:51

for evidence. And if there's, you know, I

2:28:54

just don't understand coming up with these

2:28:58

sort of narratives that are just like so

2:29:01

ridiculous, they're ridiculous, but they're being

2:29:03

empowered, the people are afraid to say it because

2:29:06

then but they empower them. And it and

2:29:10

empowers that kind of exactly

2:29:12

it empowers people and and you feel

2:29:14

it if you don't virtue signal, if you don't say, Oh, well, this,

2:29:17

these people have something to say, then,

2:29:19

then,

2:29:20

then you're gonna be attacked. And

2:29:22

we need to, we need to, we need to point

2:29:25

out nonsense where it's nonsense, regardless

2:29:27

of who says it.

2:29:28

And, and,

2:29:31

and yet the same time be positive. I mean, I think

2:29:33

that I think that I want to end on a positive

2:29:35

note, but you can talk about ideas

2:29:38

and their validity and you can attack

2:29:40

ideas, attacking ideas and attacking

2:29:42

people are very different. Very handy.

2:29:45

And, and there's no way well,

2:29:47

I won't even go when people say somehow they're vulnerable. How

2:29:49

dare Hakeem attack

2:29:51

me as a senior. Oh, man, I've been attacked.

2:29:54

Some those people have have they

2:29:56

have their their megaphones and they're not

2:29:58

vulnerable. But, but the, but

2:30:01

I think the whole point is that we need to

2:30:03

look forward and to try and overcome

2:30:05

this two shall pass. It is

2:30:07

the problem. We have to speak about it and I'm glad you

2:30:10

and I spoke about it and I'm sure we're going to raise

2:30:12

hackles by having spoken about it.

2:30:14

But yeah, absolutely. But one thing I want to say, man,

2:30:16

is again, if you look at what's happening

2:30:18

in the labs in the, on the everyday

2:30:20

level, you know, when I go into, you know,

2:30:23

university of Washington lab, right? I went to my university

2:30:25

of Berkeley lab, right? I went to my Princeton lab with the

2:30:27

people I work with. Yeah. I've selected

2:30:29

to work with people like Art Walker said that

2:30:32

are, you know, like, like one joke

2:30:34

I used to tell when I talked to students to be provocative

2:30:37

was the day I forgot I was black. Yeah.

2:30:39

Right. Why did I tell this joke? Because

2:30:42

man, it's on your mind, right? When I met Stanford,

2:30:45

you know, class is an issue, you know, race

2:30:47

is an issue. I go to Silicon Valley is

2:30:49

completely different character, but it's

2:30:52

an issue, right? You know, because it's

2:30:54

more of an immigrant community type thing and more of people,

2:30:56

you know, more as, you know, we're going to stick together. It's

2:30:59

not, I hate you because you're something different, right?

2:31:01

Just like, cause you're something different, but you know,

2:31:03

we're going to gather together and keep our knowledge

2:31:05

proprietary because we're the same. Right. But

2:31:09

then one day I met Berkeley and I'm sitting in the colloquium

2:31:11

like, Oh my God, I forgot I was black. I was sitting

2:31:13

here looking at the science and listening,

2:31:15

right? Because that was the first time

2:31:18

that I was among a group of other professionals where

2:31:22

never really came up like that. Right.

2:31:24

We were, you know, very diverse

2:31:26

group of people from all over the world. And we would focus

2:31:28

on cosmology. And I think that's the important thing

2:31:30

to point also to point out is

2:31:32

that for the most part in

2:31:35

science and in spite of what some

2:31:37

of these noisy people are saying about their inability

2:31:39

to do this or the presence of racism here,

2:31:41

there. Most of the time you're in a, in a scientific

2:31:43

meeting and you're debating and, and, and,

2:31:46

and, and, and for the, and, and happily

2:31:49

science still works because 95% of the time. That's

2:31:53

what it's all about is the ideas and people don't

2:31:55

care. And, and, and it's these fringe

2:31:57

things where people are claiming that all.

2:33:59

come to me and sometimes they say, Oh, something's

2:34:02

going on. This, that, and the other say that. And the

2:34:04

first thing I want to say is what don't be so damn

2:34:07

soft, right? Don't let somebody be real.

2:34:10

Worrying is being punished twice. It's the same

2:34:12

thing. But if you don't feel victimized and

2:34:15

probably, and then that's a huge way

2:34:17

to not be victimized. I'm not saying don't

2:34:19

feel victimized, but if you do feel victimized,

2:34:22

use that as fuel for your fire. Yeah. Yeah.

2:34:24

Say it,

2:34:25

respond, or just say that guy's an idiot. There's

2:34:27

a whole bunch of tools. I'm all about kicking

2:34:29

ass, Lawrence. Yeah. Well, it's

2:34:31

all about going back negative. I

2:34:35

want to go positive. Oh yeah. That's right. Go positive.

2:34:37

That's right. That as I

2:34:40

said, this is your past and science proceeds

2:34:42

and I think it's going to continue to believe because

2:34:44

it does teach us to question ourselves. And

2:34:46

it also teaches us there's

2:34:49

so much more to learn. And I love that. I

2:34:51

think the end of, I think you said

2:34:53

somewhere, the closest thing to infinity. I've

2:34:55

ever observed this hope. I've seen infinity in the

2:34:57

hope, in the faith of hope in the faces and imaginations

2:35:00

of myself,

2:35:01

African students.

2:35:02

And I think what you and I both hope is that,

2:35:05

is that we will see what drives

2:35:07

both of us, I think is the hope that we

2:35:09

can get by turning someone on

2:35:12

so that they can feel amazing

2:35:15

wonder and awe in the universe that you were

2:35:18

lucky enough in spite of a very unusual

2:35:21

beginning to be able to experience. And I've experienced

2:35:24

in many ways also. I mean, neither of my parents

2:35:26

finished high school, but the hope is what

2:35:29

we, what we,

2:35:31

what the message I want to give is that the universe

2:35:34

is too fascinating to get

2:35:35

wrapped up in the nonsense

2:35:37

and let us, let us focus

2:35:39

on the low character people, you know, look at focus

2:35:42

on the low character. It's that I thought the statement

2:35:44

of your advisory had to resonate

2:35:45

with me a lot. There's always going to be a distribution

2:35:48

and if you focus and if we give too much attention

2:35:51

to the low character people, it distorts

2:35:53

the whole thing. And we don't realize how

2:35:56

many people of good will there are and how

2:35:59

interesting and wonderful.

2:35:59

the universe can be

2:36:02

and how lucky we are to be here. I'm

2:36:04

lucky to be able to talk to you.

2:36:06

And I'm lucky you spent the time with me. You sure

2:36:08

are lucky to talk to me. Anyway, I'm... Hey,

2:36:11

by the way, I first met you on

2:36:13

How the Universe Works, man, not in person, but

2:36:16

I saw you. That's how I first discovered that you exist.

2:36:18

And I was like, who is this guy? He's taking

2:36:20

my whole... He explains stuff so well. There

2:36:23

you go. But then I joined you on season three.

2:36:25

Yeah, that's right. That's right. And

2:36:28

now, of course, what that does is, of course, make

2:36:30

me feel old, but I don't mind. I don't

2:36:32

mind. Hey, here's what you got to do, man. You

2:36:34

got to invite me to your backyard

2:36:37

telescope sometime and pay for me to get

2:36:39

there. All right. Okay. Anyway,

2:36:41

it's been great. You take care. I'm really

2:36:43

happy we got to have this chance to talk. I look forward to

2:36:45

doing it in person sometime. You take care. Hey,

2:36:48

man.

2:36:58

I hope you enjoyed today's conversation. This

2:37:01

podcast is produced by the Origins Project

2:37:03

Foundation,

2:37:04

a non-profit organization whose

2:37:06

goal is to enrich your perspective of

2:37:09

your place in the cosmos by providing

2:37:11

access to the people who are driving

2:37:13

the future of society in the 21st century and

2:37:16

to the ideas that are changing

2:37:18

our understanding of ourselves and

2:37:21

our world.

2:37:22

To learn more, please visit originsprojectfoundation.org.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features