Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:07
Hello, and welcome to The
0:09
Political Orphanage, a home for
0:11
plucky misfits and problem solvers.
0:14
I'm your host, Andrew Heaton, and
0:17
I hail from a part of the country where
0:20
people take neighbors very seriously.
0:23
And I've always fancied that the
0:26
cultural import we place on
0:28
neighbors, the sinus as sanctus,
0:31
is a remnant of our
0:33
not-so-distant frontier days. When
0:35
you were out on the range, hours from
0:38
town, and your barn burned down,
0:40
or your wife got bitten by
0:42
a rattlesnake, or bitten by a
0:44
vampire, or by a venomous
0:46
bear or something, or your
0:48
water pump broke, I don't know, stuff that happened
0:50
on farms, you had to
0:52
rely on your nearest neighbor or
0:54
you'd die. And so,
0:57
there developed an unspoken emphasis
1:00
on knowing neighbors, treating
1:02
them well, watching their property, and
1:04
when they fell on hard times,
1:06
you'd help them, because neighbors
1:08
were your insurance policy. That
1:12
could be nonsense. I don't think it is, but
1:14
it could be nonsense. It could well be that
1:17
everywhere there are people, there are
1:19
neighbors, and they take them seriously. And it's,
1:22
everybody likes neighbors, and I'm
1:24
looking to project or monopolize some
1:26
societal virtue which anybody could lay
1:29
claim to. But let's
1:31
try a different take. Let's
1:33
try a different take in terms of circumstances
1:37
affecting society. Let's
1:40
say you grew up in a
1:42
stand-alone house with your own yard, in
1:45
a suburban neighborhood or a rural
1:47
area. You have neighbors, but
1:49
you don't share walls with them, and
1:51
they're reasonably far away, far enough away that
1:54
you can play music however loud you want,
1:56
you can watch movies in your living
1:58
room with a booming subwoofer. for really
2:01
enjoy those explosions, you can smoke cigars
2:03
in your bedroom, you can brew beer
2:05
in your garage, you can even
2:07
work with some explosives in your garage, no one
2:09
really cares. Growing up and
2:12
living in that environment where your
2:14
personal activities are to a great
2:16
extent buffered by space
2:19
from the people around you, I
2:22
think it would be understandable if you
2:24
had a suspicious attitude towards being told
2:26
what to do. If
2:29
someone came around and told you to turn your music
2:31
down when you knew nobody could hear it, or
2:33
not to smoke in your house even though you knew
2:35
nobody could smell it, and even if
2:37
you burned down your house it probably wouldn't burn
2:39
down any neighbors houses, you might rightly tell them,
2:42
hey that's none of your business, you're
2:44
putting your nose where it doesn't belong, I'm not
2:46
hurting anybody so you can leave me alone. Would
2:49
you not feel at some visceral
2:52
level that the homeowners
2:54
association or the city council or
2:56
the governor or any type of
2:58
authority that tried to intervene in
3:00
the affairs of your garage was
3:04
unnecessary and impropriety?
3:09
Conversely, I lived
3:11
in New York City for about five years,
3:14
and let me tell you, you need
3:17
some kind of association
3:19
or HOA or government
3:22
to interfere with what people are doing
3:24
in their own home when
3:26
those homes are sardine-like
3:28
apartment complexes. My
3:31
first apartment in New York City was above
3:33
a bodega, which if you're unfamiliar with it
3:35
is a gas station minus the gas, and
3:38
the apartment I was in had very,
3:40
very thin walls. I think if I
3:42
just popped a screwdriver into it,
3:44
it would have gone through to the other side,
3:47
and the other side was shared
3:49
by a struggling band that
3:52
would, and I'm not exaggerating here, kick
3:55
off their extremely loud band
3:57
parties three or four
4:00
nights a week, starting around
4:02
midnight and ending around 7 a.m. And
4:05
they did that every
4:07
single week for about eight months. So
4:10
every night for eight months, I
4:13
would go by around midnight and I'd
4:15
knock on their door and they'd open it and I'd go, hey,
4:17
it's me, Heaton, I live next door. Can
4:20
you guys please turn it down because I have to go to
4:22
work tomorrow morning and I need to get some sleep? And
4:25
every single time,
4:28
they would look at me with
4:30
genuine surprise and go, oh, yeah, of
4:33
course, yes, sorry, man, sorry. And then they would turn
4:35
down the volume for
4:38
two or three hours until they got high and forgot
4:40
and then they would start it up again. Now
4:42
it's been a long time since those
4:44
days living above a bodega and I've
4:46
had time to reflect on this and
4:49
think about what it's like when you're young
4:51
and you're new to the
4:53
big city and you're a creative
4:55
person. And so with a little
4:57
bit of experience behind me, I'm happy to report
5:00
that after several years
5:02
of those guys working
5:04
hard and in
5:06
difficult circumstances and creative
5:08
obscurity, after several years,
5:11
everyone from that band is
5:13
now dead and rightly
5:15
so. Because
5:18
when you are sharing walls with
5:20
multiple other people, your
5:22
volume level does affect them. If
5:25
you smoke cigarettes, it'll float down from
5:27
the ceiling into the apartment below and
5:29
make their clothes reek. And
5:32
if you're doing something that's potentially
5:34
dangerous or explosive or flammable in
5:36
your apartment, that is a
5:38
real danger not just to you, but to
5:40
the whole building because it could catch fire.
5:43
So if you're growing up in an apartment
5:46
complex, would you not very
5:49
understandably feel on some visceral
5:51
level that society
5:53
is something which is overlapping
5:55
and interlocking, that no man is an
5:58
island and it's a bit strange? stupid
6:00
and selfish to think you can just do whatever you
6:02
want all the time because it happens to be in
6:04
your home? Might
6:07
somebody from the suburbs and
6:09
somebody from a dense urban area feel
6:13
very differently on some primordial level
6:16
about where we ought to place the bright line between
6:19
individual freedom and community
6:21
good? In
6:23
a nutshell, that kind
6:25
of phenomenon, that kind of circumstantial
6:28
explanation for how people
6:30
approach the role of
6:32
society is what we're going
6:34
to talk about today, but in
6:36
a much richer and longer time frame.
6:39
And for a while, this was meant to be an hour-long
6:41
episode. I believe this tops out at two hours, so you
6:44
guys get a double today. My
6:46
guests and I are going to tackle the
6:49
distinct regional cultures of
6:51
the United States, which
6:53
arose and developed under very
6:55
different pretenses and origins and
6:58
very different circumstances to
7:00
inform their different understanding
7:03
of the role of government and individual
7:05
and society today. We
7:07
are basically going to take a two-hour
7:10
trip through America's
7:12
regional DNA. It
7:14
is a fascinating conversation. I really enjoyed it.
7:16
You're really going to enjoy it, but
7:19
I do want to drop in a couple
7:21
of caveats before we go in. First, when
7:24
we start to talk about New England
7:26
was founded according to these ideals and
7:28
developed in these circumstances, which translates to
7:30
this worldview today, whereas Appalachia was
7:32
a very different group of people in
7:34
circumstances, so they think this today, I
7:38
think there's something to that. I
7:41
also think you can take it too far. As
7:44
in, broadly speaking, I
7:46
think there's something to our conversation today,
7:48
that there are flavors and veltechings to
7:50
America's regions and that there's something
7:52
to how that affects their polity.
7:55
But in a vague, very
7:58
general, messy kind of way. Because,
8:00
at some point, if you
8:02
get too granular and rigid
8:04
and confident in these assessments,
8:07
it ends up turning into a kind of
8:10
regional horoscope. Pisces
8:12
are hard-working, but fear reign, whereas
8:14
Capricorns are patient, but prickly. Or
8:17
it can get weirdly mythological. The
8:20
Hill people once sheltered forth, so they
8:22
are forever warriors, whereas the people of
8:24
the grotto are beloved by Frigga, so
8:26
they are by nature good weavers. At
8:29
some point, we go from broad
8:32
regional explanations to something which is
8:35
essentialist and
8:37
borderline mythological and fallacious.
8:42
So I partially believe the stuff that we're going
8:44
to talk about, but at some point
8:46
I start to get kind of squinty and
8:49
go, okay, now
8:51
it's a horoscope. But
8:54
I have yet to articulate where that
8:56
bright line is, so hopefully today's episode
8:58
can help flush that out. And patrons,
9:00
I very much welcome your comments today
9:02
in the comments section of the episode.
9:06
Because we had so much fun describing
9:08
all of the different cultures and how
9:10
they've interacted with each other, we
9:12
didn't have very much time for me to offer
9:14
pushback, which I would have done, but after two
9:17
hours he kept looking at his watch and then
9:19
asked me if he could leave, and we cut
9:21
that bit out of the bit. So anyway, I
9:24
would love to hear your thoughts on where you find
9:26
critiques and what we're going to talk about today. One
9:30
more caveat. We are
9:32
talking reductively about
9:35
large areas and broad
9:37
stereotypes, which means this
9:39
discussion is by nature reductive
9:43
and kind of offensive. So
9:45
there's two ways you could
9:47
approach that today. You can
9:49
get huffy and send me
9:51
angry emails and correct
9:54
me on what I am telling you right now
9:56
in advance. I do
9:58
not fully believe. and
10:00
acknowledge is inherently reductive and
10:03
overly broad. Or,
10:07
we can all roll up our sleeves and
10:10
jump into the mosh pit and
10:12
blow off some real regional grievances
10:15
which is what I'm excited to do. Jump
10:18
into that scrum and start swinging
10:20
at our fellow Americans just like
10:22
the Europeans do at football matches.
10:24
So, pick your course. But
10:27
to be clear, we're gonna say
10:29
some reductive things and only
10:31
send me angry letters if
10:33
you are a patron. patreon.com/Andrew
10:36
Heaton. If you're not a
10:38
patron, you send me an
10:40
angry message about how I have impugned the honor
10:43
and complexity of your region. I will
10:45
print it out and then I will shred it
10:47
and move on with my life. Patrons,
10:50
this doesn't apply to you. I read everything you send me.
10:52
Okay, this is a fun conversation.
10:54
This is a double episode, gang, and it's
10:57
worth it. So get ready for some awesome,
11:00
long-form discussion about America's
11:02
composite regions and the
11:04
DNA, the intellectual DNA,
11:06
which explains their root
11:08
differences and frictions. Let's
11:11
go! My
11:15
guest today is Rudyard William Lynch. He
11:17
is the host of the popular YouTube
11:19
channel What If Alt Hist. However, I'm
11:21
going to assume
11:24
that there's a portmanteau of What If Alt Hist.,
11:26
which is the roots of your YouTube channel. There's
11:29
lots of interesting videos on there. There's lots of interesting
11:31
content on there. I, myself, am
11:33
always attracted to big ideas and I'm
11:35
always attracted to ways to look
11:37
at the world to understand the world better. And
11:41
Rudyard and I hung out last week and
11:43
we got into a conversation about the
11:45
composite nations that compose
11:48
North America. So not the
11:50
states, but who are the underlying
11:53
groups culturally, ethnically, historically
11:55
that compose the country.
11:58
There's a rich... historical tradition of
12:00
this, I think most people that
12:03
are already kind of familiar with this theory
12:05
might know of Colin Woodard. He wrote a
12:07
book called The 11 Nations of
12:09
North America, or at least that was the basic
12:12
gist of it, was that there were sort of 11 groups
12:14
that comprised the North American
12:16
experience. I know that Rudyard
12:19
is very familiar with Joel
12:22
Burrough, am I saying that right? Who was a
12:24
1980s journalist as well as some others. So that's what we're
12:26
going to be talking about today. We're going to be talking
12:28
about these composite groups. Rudyard, hello, welcome.
12:30
Thank you so much for having me, Andrew.
12:33
I'm glad to be talking about this because
12:35
the thing I enjoy the
12:38
most in my channel is anthropology
12:40
and especially American anthropology. Great.
12:42
Well, then let's just kind of start at
12:44
the Northeast and work our way down. And
12:46
what I'm thinking is today we'll sort of
12:48
outline these various groups and then once we've
12:51
done that, I'll throw some counters at
12:53
you. So let's kick it off up
12:56
top Northeast, what Colin Woodard would call
12:58
Yankeedom, Yankees, but New England. Let's
13:00
talk about that for a minute. All
13:02
of these different American groups were established
13:04
by different diasporas from the British Isles,
13:07
which occurred during the colonial period. And
13:10
one of my favorite history books ever is
13:12
Albion Seed, which is a book written
13:15
by David Hackett Fisher to
13:17
outline these migrations. And the Yankees were
13:19
a single demographic who effectively
13:21
formed an ethno state in New England in
13:24
the first 200 years of the country. And
13:27
so this demographic were middle class
13:29
people from East Anglia and Eastern
13:31
England. They were people like harpenters,
13:33
like yeoman farmers, and they
13:36
were all religious fanatics. And that was the
13:38
unifying variable. And you weren't allowed to not
13:40
be part of the Puritan church in New
13:42
England. And so they all
13:44
moved together by a handful of preachers
13:46
over a 20 year period. The middle
13:48
class East Anglia people were the entire
13:50
population of New England who moved over
13:53
in this 20 year period because they
13:55
effectively cut off all immigration afterwards. That
13:58
was the entire demographic of New England. until
14:01
the middle of the 19th century when the
14:03
Irish and the Italians showed up. It was
14:05
a, it's a fanatical cult-like society. You had
14:07
to attend church for six hours a day.
14:09
There was a giant painted eye of God
14:11
that would stare you down. The way they
14:14
operated was that they had this very complex
14:16
legal code that was completely constrictive where if
14:18
you argued with your wife too loudly, you
14:20
could get, you would get fined for that.
14:22
If you were loitered and weren't constantly hustling,
14:25
you could get fined for that. It's a
14:27
society where they have
14:29
no concept of personal freedom,
14:32
but it's very constrictive. So it became one of
14:35
the wealthiest societies in the world, one of the
14:37
most technologically advanced, one of the best educated, because
14:39
it did maintain standards and those standards helped it
14:41
out a lot. This is a giant demographic group.
14:44
One of the biggest in America today, because they
14:46
would have 10 children and they'd have another 10
14:48
children. And so a couple, I'd say that 80,000,
14:50
100,000 people probably came over. Now they're a descendants
14:55
number in the tens of millions, stretching
14:57
out to Michigan, Utah, the
15:00
Pacific Northwest, across the entire Northern
15:02
tier of America. And that's who
15:05
the Yankees are. Yeah. I'm
15:07
glad you bring up the religious fervor, fervosity.
15:09
What is the word? Fervor. Thank you. The
15:11
religious fervor. Because I don't think you can
15:13
understate the effect of Calvinism on New England.
15:16
And I don't think it ever went away.
15:18
When I talk to my European friends, it's
15:20
fascinating to look at how they look at
15:22
America versus how we look at America. So
15:25
my European friends all view America as very
15:27
puritanical. And what they mean by that is
15:30
there are people that don't have sex till they get
15:32
married and are questioning of gays. That's what they mean
15:34
by that entirely. And I'm like, yes,
15:36
there is a traditionalist, religious
15:39
bent president in the United States in terms
15:41
of social mores that's not present in Europe
15:43
to a great extent. But when you
15:45
start looking at the worldview of
15:48
puritanical Yankees, I don't think
15:50
that's changed. Or let me
15:52
rephrase this. Let me drill down on this. The
15:54
worldview of how society opts to operate and the
15:56
role in society. Because you think about the
16:00
The Puritans that were up in New
16:02
England, the Yankees there were deeply
16:05
moralistic. They were
16:07
Calvinists that believed that being a
16:09
good person is determinant based on
16:11
what you believe and what you
16:13
say in public proclamations of faith.
16:16
This is a debate that was happening a very long time ago, the
16:18
British Isles, of the older Catholic
16:20
model, where the Catholic model in
16:22
Ireland was being a good person
16:25
is largely a
16:27
product of works and what
16:29
you are doing. And then
16:31
there was a newer, more
16:33
deinstitutionalized model of, no, it's a product of
16:35
faith. You cannot earn your way into heaven.
16:38
Salvation is not something that any person could ever
16:40
aspire to on their own merits. Therefore,
16:42
merits are not a part of the equation. What
16:45
determines whether you're a good person or not is
16:47
if you believe the right things. And
16:49
I don't think that went away in New England at all.
16:51
Yes. When I lived in
16:53
New York, which granted is not New England, but
16:55
is sort of historically allied with it culturally, if
16:58
I were looking at somebody from Oklahoma where I hail
17:00
from, who works
17:02
at a soup kitchen on weekends, donates a
17:05
lot of money to charity, takes
17:07
in kids as a
17:11
foster family, and thinks that homosexuality is a sin,
17:13
I would look at them and say, that is
17:15
a very good person who believes a bad thing.
17:17
My New England friends, to a large extent, would
17:19
go, no, they're a bad person. Yeah. Because I
17:21
believe and I say the right things. Then I'm
17:24
like, do you do charity? Again,
17:27
casting with a big brush, but it was there
17:29
was like a moralistic amount and there was this
17:31
like real sense and
17:33
that early puritanical colony of
17:36
utopianism, of we are we are leaving
17:38
the old corrupt world and we are
17:40
going to build a shining
17:43
city on a hill. We're going to build this utopian
17:46
settlement and we can do it
17:48
if we all get on the same page because it's selfish
17:50
if we're not on the same page. If we all get
17:52
on the same page and we give
17:54
the right tools to the right people,
17:57
we can socially engineer the perfect society.
18:00
That's really a great point, and I didn't
18:02
put every piece you had put together there.
18:04
You can see with Calvinism the prototype of
18:07
the modern left, where it's
18:09
this small group of anointed people who are part of
18:11
the saves, and they have to guide along the rest
18:13
of the world. And if you look
18:15
at the areas in UT that all the trends
18:17
that are very ardently
18:19
progressive today, it's areas of Yankee settlement.
18:22
Even in the West Coast, Portland, Oregon
18:24
is named after Portland, Maine. And they
18:26
nearly named it Boston. It was a
18:29
bunch of mass of
18:31
sailors. We can get into this later too, but
18:33
since we're talking about Yangingham, what
18:35
Colin Woodard would call the left coast, but the
18:37
West Coast from, I don't know. San Francisco
18:39
up. Yeah, I'd say Los Angeles
18:42
up, but all the way up
18:44
through British Columbia, all the way
18:46
to the base of Alaska, the
18:48
original groups that settled those pre-qualifying
18:50
statement were not talking about pre-Columbian
18:52
contact because they were woefully conquered
18:54
and destroyed and everything. The modern
18:57
continuity kicks off with Yankee
18:59
sailors and they go around the Tierra del Fuego
19:01
and they get there. And then the later secondary
19:03
wave is the people that take the hard way
19:06
across the middle of the country. But the ones
19:08
that kick off the party on the West Coast
19:10
are Yankees that come down from New England and
19:12
want to replicate New England. What do they do
19:14
when they get to Northern California? They start building
19:17
Berkeley and Stanford and other Ivy League type institutions
19:19
because they want to replicate the New England experience
19:21
of communitarian and utopian ideals.
19:23
One of the other things that I
19:25
think is built into that New England puritanical
19:28
experience is that because the
19:30
Protestants that came out of England and
19:32
in Scotland wanted to get rid of
19:35
the old institutional corruption, but also institutional
19:37
intermediary between God and man, and that
19:39
just you are going to read the
19:41
Bible and directly interpret the word of
19:43
God, that meant that there was a
19:45
huge emphasis on literacy. And so you
19:47
go back to like 1600, 1700,
19:49
I think fairly inarguably, New England was the most
19:54
literate society in the history of the world. And
19:57
I think that emphasis is still there. You look at like... the
20:00
first places in America that had universal
20:02
public education. Massachusetts is one of the
20:05
first places. There's a long-standing tradition of
20:07
literacy and education are really, really important
20:09
and that those initial values come out
20:11
of that puritanical, Adventist experience. Yes.
20:15
As of now, New England produces very
20:17
little, except universities. If you look at
20:19
the economy of New England, it's
20:22
dependent upon Harvard, it's dependent upon
20:24
Wellesley, it's dependent upon Brown. It's
20:26
completely driven off universities, as you said. Just
20:29
to give an example how Yankee culture works,
20:31
I spent a month in Massachusetts this last
20:33
year because I was speaking at a couple
20:35
conferences and I went to this town,
20:39
a rural town in Massachusetts and
20:41
there were a couple experiences that weirded me
20:43
out about the local culture. One is that
20:45
my friends and I, we went to a
20:47
local hotel to see if it was a
20:50
Sunday to see if the restaurant was open.
20:52
Everyone stared at us completely dumbfounded that we
20:54
had to ask if the restaurant was open.
20:56
I was thinking, how do I
20:58
know? Another time we were at a bar and
21:00
I had four friends with me. I asked this
21:02
guy, can you move over a seat to make
21:04
face for my friends? I was thinking, I'll buy
21:07
the guy a drink as basically a thank you.
21:09
Then he immediately said, I want you to know
21:11
how disrespectful that is. I'm a Marine and if
21:13
this wasn't Veterans Day, I'd beat your ass. I
21:16
wanted to buy him a drink. I said, hey,
21:18
can you move over a seat? Then the next
21:20
thing I was going to say was to buy
21:22
him a drink to say thanks. Then he almost
21:24
started a fight. I live in
21:27
Texas now. I'm from Pennsylvania, but
21:29
going to New England, there's this very strict
21:31
moral code of what is correct and incorrect
21:36
action. When I spent some
21:39
time up there, I was constantly off
21:42
about what the social code there was.
21:44
They Have a very rigid moral code,
21:46
which they believe as self-evidently superior to
21:48
the rest of America. There are many
21:51
benefits to this culture, such as education
21:53
rates. It was very prosperous, very industrious,
21:55
but in polls, it is by far
21:57
the least liked region of the world.
22:00
The of America California computing but
22:02
it is by far the least
22:04
like Region America by other Americans
22:06
to get. The rest of America
22:08
use the Yankees as arrogant, cold
22:10
and ah, Just not pleasant. Yeah,
22:12
you do. It was funny as of in preparation
22:14
for this. You. Know I've I've been reading
22:16
about these different groups of it was of watching
22:18
your videos rudyard as well as going through a
22:20
lot of college littered interviews. And.
22:23
The only group and the sits there it is
22:25
about eleven to fifteen groups of the course of
22:27
today free of time. Of. The only group that
22:29
I like skills or was yeah them. But I want
22:31
to clarify this. I've spot I've I've been to New
22:33
England three or four times. I've loved every time I've
22:36
gone. Yeah, I really like Boston. I think it's an
22:38
awesome city or I love the accent a better New
22:40
Hampshire. Couple times I've had a great time. I really
22:42
like it so I want to surf. I am what
22:44
I hate. I. Hate. New.
22:47
England's. Politicians.
22:49
I find politicians from New England.
22:52
To. Be the most. Smog.
22:54
This. Moralizing. Holier
22:56
than thou people that have
22:59
this inbuilt worldview. Our and.
23:01
Elizabeth Warren's Agree: it's. More so
23:03
because we grew up. Eight miles away from
23:06
each other. Granted, I'm younger, but like we grew up
23:08
in the same area my family as the same amount
23:10
of Native American blood, although we didn't make a career
23:12
out of it, And. I got no,
23:14
she's I think of a bib epitomise as that.
23:17
And and this idea that will the government's good
23:19
because we all vote for it kind of. Granted,
23:21
it's a two party duopoly and also we jury
23:23
rigged hell out of it. But. I
23:25
it it is the community coming
23:28
together. And we can.
23:30
Develop. Utopia if we just all get
23:32
on board and give the tools to the
23:35
right people who are people that went to
23:37
one of seven colleges. And if we
23:39
just given that it it. but it's it's it's. A
23:42
God just time. but politicians, listeners. I'm not talking
23:44
about you, I'm talking about the people you keep
23:46
electing. For some reason I see like. simultaneously.
23:49
all the moral smugness of puritans and
23:52
the practical workability of communism i just
23:54
i'm the it is it is not
23:56
i ate as an alien block to
23:59
me that know of my own intellectual
24:02
or cultural lineage descends from at
24:04
all. Every
24:06
other place, I'm kind of like, oh, I can see bits and
24:08
pieces, but the New England worldview of
24:11
how society works, I think is probably the
24:13
most communitarian and European,
24:16
and the least frontier, the least
24:18
individualistic of anywhere in America. To summarize
24:20
Andrew points, if you're listening from Rhode
24:23
Island, I want you to know that
24:25
he loads you. And he thinks that
24:27
you are representative of the politicians you
24:29
elected. Passing
24:31
by that joke, the
24:34
thing that annoys me the most about Yankee
24:36
Line is the intellectuals, because they think that
24:38
they're basically anointed by God
24:40
to save everyone. And
24:42
when we were talking last week, we both read one,
24:44
there are like four or five books that cover this
24:46
topic, and one of them is American
24:49
Nations by Colin Woodard. And Colin
24:51
Woodard's from Portland, Maine. And his
24:53
story of American history,
24:55
I frankly don't like
24:57
Colin Woodard's book, although I have taken a
24:59
significant amount from it, because in my opinion,
25:02
a lot of it comes across as Yankee
25:04
propaganda. Because the way he writes
25:06
it, I'm from Pennsylvania, which is Pennsylvania
25:09
and the greater Midwest, because as a
25:11
Pennsylvania, I see a lot more cultural
25:13
similarity with the Midwest than the rest
25:15
of the Northeast. It's a
25:18
very important part of America's history. He
25:20
treats Pennsylvania and the greater Midwest as
25:22
if it doesn't matter at all. He
25:24
says he literally just writes it in
25:26
as if they were Germans. And
25:29
then he treats the South as
25:31
basically savage and barbaric. He never
25:33
writes anything positive about the South.
25:36
He treats all of their institutions
25:38
as negative, which is something I
25:40
see a lot from people in
25:42
New England or New York or stuff. And growing
25:44
up in Pennsylvania, we were more sympathetic
25:46
to the South than we were to the the
25:49
rest of the Northeast. Or at least depends
25:51
where you are in Pennsylvania. Central Pennsylvania is
25:54
more looking
25:56
to the Midwest and the South, and
25:58
Philadelphia is more... to the northeast.
26:01
New England wrote the history of America so
26:03
that New England is the only important area
26:06
where the reason that the
26:08
Mayflower, and this was really big in World
26:11
War II era histories, if you read World
26:13
War II era histories they'll say the origin
26:15
of the American character is the Yankee because
26:17
the Yankees met in the public school system,
26:19
they wrote the histories so that they were
26:21
the creators of the American character. But
26:24
if you look at Albee and Seed, the book
26:26
I talked about, there were four different migrations from
26:28
the British Isles occurring in the colonial
26:30
period that all had roughly equal importance with
26:32
the Yankees being one of them. Yeah, I
26:34
have a couple of things to unpack there.
26:36
I mean, I do think New England has
26:38
been extremely important to the formation of the
26:41
United States and isn't part of the American
26:43
identity. So I'm not in any way writing
26:45
it off as small or
26:47
unimportant, but a lot of the
26:49
American mythology has been disproportionately using
26:51
New England as a touchdown. We're
26:53
taught very early in American public school, at least in
26:56
Oklahoma where I'm from, that the Puritans
26:58
came to America and they were the ones
27:00
that got the party started because of religious
27:02
freedom and it kind of goes into this
27:06
American exceptionalism model. But you
27:08
start reading history and you're like, James,
27:10
is it James Smith that married Pocahontas?
27:12
Yeah. Like John Smith. Excuse me, John
27:14
Smith predates the Puritans. The
27:17
kickoff for the British is in Virginia, and
27:20
Virginia has nothing to do with the religious
27:22
experience. Virginia is about hiking, but Virginia is
27:24
about money. And they're the first people to
27:27
come over and Virginia, Thanksgiving doesn't become a
27:29
national holiday and the United States tell what,
27:31
like World War II? Yeah, yeah.
27:33
It was a regional one. No
27:36
one in Ohio would have known about Thanksgiving
27:38
in the type of Abraham Lincoln. That was
27:40
not a- Ohio did have Yankees, though, like
27:42
up by Cleveland. Okay. So
27:44
it was a Yankee holiday, right? Yeah. And like
27:46
in a beloved American holiday, I'm glad we have it.
27:49
Good, again, I want to emphasize this, New England, I
27:51
hate most of your politicians. I don't hate you.
27:53
There's lots of good things about that. But
27:56
I also want to say real quick, though, I
27:58
do think the phenomenon you're doing describing of
28:00
that kind of high-handed looking down at
28:02
other regions, there is a whole
28:05
cottage industry amongst academics, some of whom I'm friends with
28:07
and I've had on the show, and the
28:10
narrative always goes like this. There's
28:13
two basic groups in America, and I'm
28:15
saying this completely objectively, I have no
28:17
dog in this fight. One of the groups
28:20
really prizes intelligence, rationalism,
28:22
and altruism, and the other group
28:25
is, I want to be very polite
28:27
here, an honor-based
28:30
culture that doesn't enjoy
28:32
thinking, and it's important to
28:35
me, both of these groups, one
28:37
of the groups is sort of the
28:39
natural leaders of society
28:41
and should be in charge. And the other
28:43
group we need them to are kind of
28:45
like the frontline people that get shot because
28:47
they're dumb. I
28:49
happen to be from the
28:51
former, like I've met these people many
28:54
times, and I can see, when
28:56
I bring them on, like blisters, I can hear the
28:58
eyes roll, whether or not a part of that particular
29:00
group. So, head out of the bag, I'm familiar with
29:02
Colin Woodard, I've not read his book in its entirety
29:04
so I can't speak to whether or not he is
29:06
hailing from this, we're all slightly better
29:08
than all of you model, but- He's one of the
29:11
biggest people in it. Is it? Okay.
29:14
He like fits the definition of it. Yeah. I've
29:16
read the whole thing. Turn
29:18
our attention south a little bit then to
29:22
what Colin Woodard would call New Netherlands. Yeah.
29:25
New York City. So, New York City
29:27
historically, I think by any map is
29:29
not New England, it's considered Atlantic. Fun
29:31
fact, New York City, the greater New
29:33
York City metropolitan area has a bigger
29:36
population than 38 US states,
29:38
which is mind blowing. Down more than
29:40
half the country is smaller than just
29:42
New York City. So, New York City
29:44
has always had a big population, even
29:46
though we're talking about one city, it
29:49
very much can be its own cultural city state
29:51
phenomenon, it doesn't have to be an appendage of
29:53
New England or an appendage of the mid-Atlantic. So,
29:56
Colin Woodard would call that the New Netherlands
29:58
because it starts out New Amsterdam before
30:01
it becomes New York. What do you
30:03
see as the features of that culturally
30:05
that define the New Netherlands experience, the
30:07
New York experience? There are three regions
30:09
of America in which the original Anglo
30:11
settlers got depopulated by later immigrants. Those
30:13
are Greater New York City, the Upper
30:15
Midwest, and California.
30:18
In New York City, it was settled by
30:21
the Dutch, and it was pretty unimportant in
30:23
the colonial period actually, where it was one
30:25
of the least populated parts of the American
30:27
Northeast. And then it got really big through
30:29
industrialization and the Erie Canal. And the native
30:31
Dutch don't exist
30:33
demographically in New York anymore. Van
30:37
Buren was the last Dutch, any
30:39
note in the American experience. There
30:41
are little Dutch capsules
30:43
in Wisconsin, in Iowa, in Michigan.
30:45
But the Dutch did establish what the
30:48
culture for New York would be, because
30:50
New York's culture is all about
30:52
making a lot of money. And New
30:54
York effectively acts like a city state,
30:57
like Singapore. It exists to funnel creativity
30:59
across the Atlantic into the rest
31:01
of America. And so New York
31:03
is constantly doing demographic turnovers. It's
31:06
had periods of Irish, Italian, Jewish,
31:08
Puerto Rican, Bangladeshi, probably
31:11
African groups now. It's this
31:14
vortex of creativity that
31:16
exists as a
31:18
way to basically channel
31:21
stuff from outside America to America, and
31:23
then disperse it across America. And if you
31:25
read an account of what people would
31:27
think about New York in the 18th
31:29
century, it would be a lot of
31:31
similar things to today of they're
31:34
completely materialistic, they're
31:36
incredibly disagreeable. It's
31:38
really fast. They talk really fast. Tocqueville talks
31:40
about that, if not mistaken. He's like, dad,
31:43
they talk really fast. They want to make
31:45
money. Yes, they talk really fast. It's ethnically
31:47
very diverse. And even though the individual people
31:49
has got replaced, that spirit of New York
31:51
has stayed the same since the 1600s. Yeah,
31:55
I think like, whereas New England
31:57
always had a moralistic communitarian bent
32:00
to it. We've got to be on the same team
32:02
and we can make the shining city on a hill
32:04
and your individual behavior is a part of that, so
32:06
get on board. New York, New
32:09
York, New Netherlands, that experience I think has
32:11
always been much more of a global
32:14
port city. It's
32:19
always been a part of global trade. It's always
32:21
been a part of a broader international community. Trade
32:24
has been a big part of it. Materialism
32:26
in terms of just go out and succeed
32:28
and make money. One of the
32:30
conversations I have when I'm getting to know people sometimes
32:33
is what is the currency where you're
32:35
from? What is important where you're from? In DC,
32:39
money is not the most important social currency.
32:41
Proximity to power is. People ask, what do
32:43
you do for a living? Who do you
32:45
work for is a very keen question there.
32:48
You get assessed in the pecking order based on your
32:50
proximity to power. New York
32:52
City, I think, is the place where
32:54
just straight up affluence speaks the loudest
32:57
of any place I've ever been. Everybody wants money,
32:59
by the way. There's no part of the country or
33:02
the world for that matter that doesn't not
33:04
care about money or that
33:06
doesn't care about money. The
33:10
sense of money is kind of good at
33:12
it and of itself. The other thing I'd
33:14
add in is I think New England has
33:16
that puritanical core to it. I think that
33:18
New York has always been a lot more
33:21
cynical, a lot more practical, where you
33:23
look at like, I have
33:25
a few friends tangentially that have been both in
33:27
big business in New York and have been in
33:29
local government in New York, and
33:32
it is a much more brazen, cynical environment than
33:34
much of the rest of the country where I
33:37
want to do this thing with the ex-department. Okay,
33:39
well, you know you're going to have to give
33:41
something to the sanitation department. By the way, the
33:43
sanitation department's in the pocket of the mob, so
33:45
they're going to want their cut too. The
33:48
way they look at it is not that it's corruption,
33:50
it's just look, this is how the world works everywhere.
33:52
It's just that we're being honest about it and
33:54
it's just the cost of doing business. The cost of
33:57
doing business is somebody's got to eat and somebody
33:59
that's going to be a good got some power here is
34:01
going to get a cut either through
34:03
largesse or through a bribe or something.
34:06
And it's just how it works. And I
34:08
think that that is more pronounced in New
34:10
York City. Yes. And I think
34:12
it kind of like explains a bit about Donald Trump. I
34:14
think that we look at a lot of like what
34:17
comes off as corruption, like he
34:19
was in that environment where like, look, you got to pay
34:22
off the manager. That's just like, he's going to take a
34:24
bribe and this is how this is done. If you want
34:26
to go buy that building and you want to get a
34:28
building permit, you got to bribe the guy. It's just cost
34:30
of doing business. Definitely. I think
34:32
that's pretty accurate assessment in New York
34:35
City. To move further down the East
34:37
Coast, the next group is the one
34:39
that I'm from and where I grew
34:41
up in. And people always forget where
34:43
if you look at Quaker, Pennsylvania, I
34:45
think of the big four Albion seed
34:48
cultures, and I do have some
34:50
bias here. I think it's the most important because
34:52
when you look at Quaker, Pennsylvania, and for
34:54
frame of reference, the Quakers were a group
34:56
from the northwest of England. When I took
34:58
a DNA test, my family's from this exact
35:00
part of England, they moved. My mom's side's
35:02
from Nebraska, so they moved to Pennsylvania and
35:04
they kept migrating west with the frontier. I
35:07
also grew up a Quaker and the way Quaker services
35:09
work is you sit in a room and you meditate
35:11
for an hour. And if you feel the will of
35:13
God move through you, you stand up and speak. And
35:16
Quaker, Pennsylvania, was an anarcho-capitalist society.
35:18
And it's weird to think about
35:21
this with religious fanatics, but
35:23
the Quakers were very capitalist and very
35:25
industrial. The Rust Belt in
35:27
both England and America was established
35:29
around Quaker areas where the people
35:31
from the English Rust Belt populated
35:34
the American Rust Belt and the
35:36
place that industrialized first in America
35:38
was Pennsylvania. And the Quakers
35:40
also founded the American and the British banking
35:42
system because if you didn't pay your debts
35:44
in the Quaker church, you were ostracized immediately.
35:47
They had incredibly high social trust. So
35:49
the influences you see in America from
35:52
the Quakers are they developed the idea
35:54
of multiculturalism where they're the only group
35:56
open immigration where they had lots of
35:58
immigrants from Germany and Scotland. in the
36:01
rest of England and they developed
36:03
the capitalist core. If you
36:05
think about middle America culture of just
36:08
people in small towns who are just trying to live
36:10
their life and not bother
36:12
other people, that comes from the
36:15
Quaker, Pennsylvania culture that eventually
36:18
formed the Midwest. And
36:20
they also formed the idea of
36:22
religious freedom. Them and Rhode Island
36:24
were the only American colony with
36:26
religious freedom. And they developed our
36:28
concept of freedom that if
36:31
you don't bother me, I'm not going to
36:33
bother you. Or pluralism. Yes. So this was
36:35
a deeply pluralistic society. So whereas like New
36:37
England is a, initially,
36:40
English puritanical ethnostate,
36:43
New Amsterdam is a global
36:45
port city. The
36:47
foundry, the Midlands, whatever
36:49
we want to call it, Pennsylvania, kind
36:51
of through Ohio going West. Yeah. That
36:53
the modern Rust Belt is
36:56
a much more open society in that
36:58
they are religiously pluralistic. They're open to
37:00
immigration. The Midlands has a, it has
37:04
a communitarian ideal to it of the
37:06
group is important, but it
37:08
doesn't have nearly as much faith in
37:10
top down governmental approaches as New England.
37:12
New England has a, the
37:15
government is society. Society is important. Therefore, these
37:17
are both good. Just make sure the right
37:20
people are in power. Whereas I think the
37:22
Midlands has a, community is really important, but
37:24
that community might be your church or it
37:26
might be your business or something
37:29
like that. So it's not a lookout
37:31
for number one individualistic society, but
37:33
it's also kind of skeptical of
37:35
power. Yes. The great
37:37
disadvantage of the Midlands culture is
37:39
it will always prioritize social stability
37:42
for progress. Where
37:45
in the 19th century, Philadelphia was called
37:47
the Great American City, because Philadelphia had
37:50
less immigrants than the other cities in
37:52
the North. Because in Philadelphia, they didn't
37:54
want more immigrants because it would lower
37:57
wages for the local people. And
37:59
Philadelphia, Philadelphia used to be the most populous and
38:01
important city in America and it lost that to New
38:03
York because New York was always
38:05
on top of each innovation. In
38:08
Quaker culture, and I grew
38:10
up hearing this in church, as an employer you
38:12
have a duty to your community and employees. And
38:15
so if you do various get
38:17
quick rich schemes, that's literally a sin in
38:19
the church. And so
38:21
it turned Philadelphia into a backwater
38:23
as all the industries left the
38:25
area because of that social ideal.
38:27
Pennsylvania is called the Keystone State
38:29
because that pluralist society
38:32
allowed coordination between New England
38:34
and the South. And in every era of
38:36
American history, every issue, New England and the
38:38
South are at odds. In the middle states
38:41
determine who wins in that conflict. So the
38:43
middle states will be the arbitrators between New
38:45
England and the South. The
38:47
problem with that entire society is
38:50
that it's very parochial, very
38:52
locally focused. Where I grew up in
38:54
Pennsylvania, almost everyone was from Pennsylvania. No
38:57
one thought about New England, no one
38:59
thought about DC or New York. And
39:02
let's paint the map a little bit more here.
39:04
So we talked about Yankidom. And
39:07
most of the American experience is populations
39:09
moving from East to West. So
39:12
Yankidom is New England, but then
39:14
it scrolls over into Michigan, maybe
39:17
into Wisconsin and that part, but there's also
39:19
a Nordic population we'll talk about in a
39:21
minute. And then also the quote unquote left
39:23
coast. So this is sort of like, this
39:25
isn't all the western states, this is the
39:27
coastal part of the western states. Like you
39:29
look at like Oregon, Portland
39:32
West, very, very blue, very,
39:34
very communitarian. I love Portland
39:36
and it feels to me like I'm
39:38
visiting Scandinavia. But I'm told by everybody
39:40
in Oregon that if you go East, you're immediately
39:43
in Idaho. Basically
39:45
the range there, so it's almost like two different
39:47
states. So Yankidom is the
39:50
northeast and then it kind of moves west
39:52
parallel and it does the left coast. Where
39:55
is the mid-west? So the mid-west is Pennsylvania. Is
39:57
it Pennsylvania? And then it just goes across to
39:59
Ohio? Pennsylvania straight west to
40:01
out by Nebraska. And
40:04
I'm a Midlander. One
40:06
of my ancestors is Matt Anthony
40:08
Wayne, and he's from Pennsylvania. And
40:12
the reason that's the case is that
40:15
my ancestors migrated west every generation of
40:17
Pennsylvania out to Nebraska. And
40:20
the Midlands established the culture
40:22
of middle America. And
40:25
standard American culture is a
40:27
combination of Yankee, Midlands,
40:30
and German influence. So if you think
40:32
about the most normie American,
40:35
that is western Pennsylvania, western
40:37
New York, and Ohio. Okay,
40:40
so we've got with Midlands,
40:43
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska,
40:45
a little bit of
40:49
Oklahoma, so basically it starts in Pennsylvania and
40:51
Ohio and it goes west and turns into
40:53
the Great Plains states. Yes, 40 degrees north.
40:56
And I relate to a lot of this because I
40:59
would add another part of this culture is being conflict
41:01
diverse. Yeah, not wanting to make waves.
41:03
I'm sure everybody listening to this program can tell
41:06
you that their state is actually two to five
41:08
different states and can tell you exactly where those
41:10
breakdowns are. Rhode Island. Yeah, but
41:12
yeah, like in Oklahoma, the northwest part
41:14
of Oklahoma sounds like this to me.
41:17
Like the Panhandle and like Woodward County
41:19
where the Heaton family seat is, is
41:22
very much gentle plains farmers
41:24
in small communities that talk quietly
41:26
and do not want to talk
41:28
people about politics or religion because
41:30
those are contentious issues and we
41:33
prize everybody being
41:35
happy. Everybody just stay happy
41:37
and let's not make waves and if there's
41:39
something bad going on, let's
41:41
quietly deal with it ideally anonymously because we
41:43
don't want to have any conflict here. Yes.
41:47
Like would you put Minnesota in there? I
41:50
think there are similarities. There are similarities
41:52
and the thing is this isn't like
41:54
Europe where there's a very strict liming
41:56
France and Italy. These groups blur
41:58
together and the Where you dry
42:00
the lines to a certain degree is arbitrary,
42:02
where Pennsylvania is clearly not
42:05
part of the Midwest, but there's a
42:07
lot of very Midwestern cultural traits. Is
42:10
Texas part of the South, the Great Plains,
42:12
or the Southwest? And the answer is yes.
42:16
And my right-hand man, the guy who manages my
42:19
business side, he's a Yankee, and he says that
42:21
to me where he says, Rudyard, you'll do things
42:23
without doing them. Like if you want to say
42:25
something, you won't say it directly. It's
42:28
exactly what you describe. And that's just the
42:30
culture I grew up in. And in Pennsylvania,
42:32
there's an attitude of, I'll call it don't
42:34
leave the farm, but that's not what it
42:36
actually is. It's you should be practical, you
42:38
should mind your own business, don't get too
42:40
carried away, stay down to
42:43
earth and practical on all
42:45
things. And I think that's a culture that would
42:47
probably go out to Oklahoma. Very much so. My
42:50
Uncle Dan is comedically
42:52
practical. Like he is amusingly practical, where
42:54
when I was probably in middle school,
42:56
I don't think I could drive yet.
42:59
We were visiting our Uncle Dan,
43:01
Karen, the cousins, and
43:03
we're in the car and we're driving
43:05
back from Blockbuster. And
43:07
Uncle Dan is looking at me in the mirror and he goes,
43:10
do you know some people
43:13
buy movies? And
43:16
I was like, what? And he's like, they'll
43:18
buy them and keep them at
43:20
their house. And I was like, I have
43:22
watched Back to the Future 3 50 times. Like
43:25
yes, of course. And he's like, no, I'm not explaining it.
43:28
They OK, they they've already seen
43:30
the movie and they
43:33
know the plot, but they'll buy it
43:35
anyway. And like from Uncle Dan, this
43:37
was just like you watch it one time and you're
43:39
done. Yes. And like then you
43:41
go milk a cow. And like like for him, having
43:43
a film you watch Ad Nausea was insane. Yes.
43:46
Growing up in I grew up in rural Pennsylvania and
43:49
I moved to Los Angeles and there were so many
43:51
cultural traits. I'm not as hard as Uncle Dan, but
43:53
there are certain traits where I'll see things in Los
43:55
Angeles. And I think, why are you doing that? I
43:59
imagine. therapy for influencers.
44:01
That's probably a business in Los Angeles. Sure
44:03
it is. Or plant, I
44:06
don't know, gardening spirituality where
44:09
you whisper Buddhist words to
44:11
your plant. That's like a
44:13
California thing. And I'd look at that and I'd think, what
44:16
is that for? So Midlands is, in
44:19
its infancy, the kind of ethos
44:21
to it, it is pluralistic, it
44:24
is about stability, it is
44:26
conflict averse, it is pro-community
44:29
but a little bit skeptical of
44:31
government. Something like that. Yeah. So
44:34
that is great. It's also, it sounds to me,
44:36
like much more moderate as opposed to being partisan
44:38
extreme. And as you say, it ends up being
44:40
the swing vote between the South and the North.
44:42
It's the kingmaker because it is much more moderate
44:45
and pendulous in its positions. Okay. What do you
44:47
want to talk about next? Would
44:49
you prefer to go to Nordic America or to the South? Why
44:51
don't we go South? I'm thinking we'll do this,
44:54
we'll go clockwise. So let's go South
44:56
now. So on your map,
44:58
you have it called Cavalier and
45:01
Colin Woodard would call it Tidewater. What
45:03
area is that? This is
45:05
Virginia. Maryland was historically it,
45:07
but Maryland has been eaten up by DC.
45:11
And Virginia was the state with the
45:13
largest diaspora of any state in America.
45:15
And so Virginians popped into the entire
45:17
upper South. They went out to Kentucky,
45:19
they went out to Missouri, they
45:21
went out to Texas, Tennessee. And
45:23
it's hard to map between the
45:25
Scots-Irish area and the Tidewater area
45:28
because they just mix so much.
45:30
And so this is an issue I've had where
45:32
I marked two areas of their settlement as being
45:34
an extension of that culture, which I said is
45:37
around Louisville, Kentucky and central
45:39
Missouri. But in some ways
45:41
it's arbitrary. The way I imagine it
45:43
is we have a space colony
45:46
and conservatives form one
45:48
space colony, progresses from another space
45:50
colony. They gain total power of
45:52
their colony. 400 years later, they're
45:55
a completely different society. And that's what
45:57
happened with the Cavaliers and the Yankees.
46:00
where one of my favorite historical authors, Wieland DeWitt
46:02
Baldwin, said you could say America is a side
46:04
effect of the English Civil War. The
46:07
parliamentarians of the Yankees were one faction
46:09
in the English Civil War, and the
46:11
Cavaliers or the royalists were
46:13
another faction. And each had a time when
46:15
they were in power, and when that one
46:18
faction was in power, the other
46:20
side fled England to populate America to get
46:22
rid of political, to
46:25
avoid political repression. And so the Yankees moved
46:27
in the 1620s to 1640s to avoid political
46:29
repression against
46:31
their religion by the royalists. The
46:33
royalists, after the parliamentarians won the
46:36
English Civil War, spoilers, they fled
46:38
to Virginia, and it was the
46:41
second sons of South English nobility, where
46:43
the first son can inherit, the second
46:45
son has to do something, and their
46:47
goal was to reestablish nobility in the
46:49
American South. They came from the southwest
46:51
of England, and the southwest of England
46:54
is the origin culture for the South of America.
46:57
So when you imagine traits like gentility,
47:00
honor, charm, a pre-established
47:05
status hierarchy, a rural
47:07
culture, that's all the southwest of England. The
47:09
people in that area talk like pirates. America
47:11
is such an open big country that they
47:14
couldn't get whites to work as their peasants.
47:16
To be a lord, you have to be
47:18
able to work for you. And what happened
47:20
in America was the whites who
47:22
immigrated from that area said, sorry, we're not doing
47:24
this. And they started importing blacks. And so that's
47:27
the origin of slavery in America. And one of
47:29
the things David Hackett Fisher said is he said,
47:32
the culture of slavery predates slavery
47:34
itself, and the slaves were brought
47:36
in to fit the pre-established
47:39
Southern culture. Because
47:41
this Tidewater Cavalier
47:43
area, and Cavalier, we're using
47:45
that as an English Civil
47:47
War term. They work Cavalier.
47:49
From Wellian Puritanical Republicans, we're
47:51
all up in New England,
47:55
supported the revolutionaries of the English Civil
47:57
War. Whereas the old let's
48:00
stick with the aristocracy, let's stick with the...
48:02
Yes. That was this
48:04
part. And the people that formed this
48:06
part of the American South were second
48:09
and third sons. And what they were
48:11
looking to do was, I can't inherit
48:13
the earldom of Shrewsbury because my brother's
48:15
going to get that. But what I can do
48:17
is I can move to Virginia
48:21
and I can have a thousand acre farm.
48:23
I can build it a state and it's
48:25
going to have livery and it's going to
48:27
have a crest and I am going to
48:29
reproduce this old semi-feudal, baronial
48:31
manner and I will be the head
48:33
of that manner. And this
48:36
gets turned in the American experience, I think,
48:38
it's like it does have the enlightenment, even
48:40
though... Yes. I
48:42
find this a fairly repulsive part of the American experience.
48:44
It does have the enlightenment in the sense that, at
48:46
least in the minds of these people, there's
48:49
a sense of no bless oblige. And
48:52
we need to have a hierarchy and
48:54
we need to have the old
48:59
Greek city state where there is
49:01
democracy for the elite and
49:04
there will be a much larger servant slave
49:06
class that will not participate because they are
49:08
incapable of it. But for those of us
49:10
that are in the elite, we do have
49:12
an obligation to take care of our inferiors
49:14
and... Yes. But it's this
49:17
attempt to basically import European feudalism and then
49:19
kind of infuse it with some veneer
49:22
of the enlightenment. Yes.
49:24
The flaw in this system, as Andrew was teasing
49:26
out, are self-evident. The reason it's very easy to
49:28
find the flaws of this system, but I don't
49:30
think a lot of Americans could immediately see the
49:32
flaws in the Yankee system, is
49:34
because it's from a very older social order.
49:37
And I really loved Andrew's point where these
49:39
people... Slavery was abolished
49:41
from the Middle Ages and slavery was
49:43
getting started again in the early modern
49:45
period and the justification actually came from
49:47
the Renaissance. The ancient Greeks and Romans
49:49
had a better society than us, they
49:51
owned slaves. Thus we need to start
49:53
owning slaves to have a better society.
49:56
And it was in opposition to the
49:58
previous Christian anti-slavery society. But... The
50:00
flaws in the system are evident where the
50:02
South has the worst human development index stats
50:05
of almost of anywhere in America for
50:07
all of American history. The worst poverty,
50:10
the worst education, the highest
50:12
obesity are all in the South. And
50:14
so the flaws are self-evident. And the
50:16
South only industrialized in the last 60
50:19
years. But to
50:21
put a fine point on it, Andrew
50:23
and I both moved to Texas for
50:25
a reason. We're in the diaspora of
50:27
the Cavalier area, where I see Cavalier
50:30
place names everywhere in Texas, where
50:32
I like living in Texas. It's
50:34
really cool here. And not cool.
50:36
It's very hot. The culture is
50:38
pleasant. The good side of this
50:42
is that it doesn't get involved in
50:44
whatever. New England's will pick up on
50:46
whatever trend or fad is popular in
50:48
the rest of the world. And then
50:50
they'll immediately start try to do it
50:52
without critical thought. The South is more conservative.
50:54
And so in eras of history in which
50:56
the new fads are dumb, the South will
50:59
be better in an era in which the
51:01
new fads are useful. New England's will do
51:03
better or the Yankees will do better. And
51:05
in our current era, the reason the South,
51:08
the growth of the South has been absolutely stupendous
51:10
over the last 60 years is because
51:13
the latest fad being socialism
51:15
that actively degraded the functioning of the
51:18
societies and the economies in the South
51:20
by not doing that became popular. And
51:23
one of the points that people
51:25
often struggle with is dividing
51:27
Virginia from the Deep South because there are
51:29
some very similar, there are some similarities. Well,
51:32
they both had slavery. Yes. They both had
51:34
an aristocratic soldier. They were very defining of
51:37
the South historically. The difference
51:39
in the Deep South, which is Georgia,
51:42
Alabama, Mississippi, parts of
51:44
Texas, is that they weren't aristocrats.
51:46
There was no concept of aristocratic
51:49
noblesse oblige. And that concept in
51:51
Virginia created George Washington. It created
51:53
Thomas Jefferson. It created Robert E. Lee. And
51:56
there is Roe, all those guys. There's no
51:58
equivalent There
52:00
are very few important Americans from
52:02
Alabama, Mississippi, etc. And
52:05
Virginia was a two-thirds white, one-third
52:07
black. The Deep South was 80% black. And
52:11
the area around Charleston was one of the
52:13
wealthiest places in America, but it was just
52:15
an entirely black coastline with a handful of
52:17
whites. And it wasn't until
52:20
the last century that the Deep South
52:22
became majority white because half
52:25
of all the blacks immigrated to California or the
52:27
northern states. The culture of
52:29
the Deep South, it doesn't have a
52:31
parallel in any European society, which is
52:33
the case of the other Eastern American
52:35
cultures. It was healed from Barbados originally.
52:37
Right, because most of American migration is
52:39
east to west. But the Deep
52:42
South actually is from south to north because if
52:44
we were to get into the minds
52:47
of people living in 1550 or British people
52:49
in 1600, the wealthy populated part of
52:56
the British Empire and the Americas is
52:58
the Caribbean. Yeah, it's the West Indies.
53:00
That's where all of the money is.
53:02
That's where all of the both the
53:04
British colonists and the slaves are. And
53:07
the American seaboard is a much more
53:09
sparsely populated thing. And
53:11
so the way, if I'm understanding you correctly,
53:15
the difference between the Deep South and
53:17
Tidewater slash Cavalier is that
53:20
Tidewater is this re-microwave baronage. It's
53:22
a bunch of second and third
53:25
sons cosplaying as dukes. Whereas
53:27
the Deep South is nouveau
53:29
rich plantation owners from Barbados
53:31
just coming up and go,
53:34
yes, we figured out how to squeeze all the labor out of black
53:36
people. And they're not claiming to
53:38
be, I'm wealthy because I
53:40
am descended from Charlemagne. They're wealthy because they
53:42
own a bunch of people and they own
53:44
a bunch of land. Yes. And
53:47
they're moving back. They have so much money
53:49
that they're moving back to England where they're
53:51
reviled because there's
53:54
no finishing school element to this. This
53:56
is just, I went down there, I made
53:58
my fortune, I made a lot of money. It's self-evident
54:00
that because I made my fortune, I deserve it.
54:02
And the people that I owned were inferior to
54:04
me. Otherwise why wouldn't they own me? Yes, that's
54:06
a great way of putting it. And
54:10
this shift occurred because Barbados used to
54:12
be tobacco agriculture and Virginia agreed tobacco.
54:15
The Deep South grew cotton and
54:18
rice and indigo. And
54:20
Barbados in a 10 year period went from 80%
54:22
white to like 2% white because tobacco stopped
54:25
being the big crop and tobacco could be
54:28
local small farmers like Virginia. Then
54:30
sugar came in. You will die if you
54:32
are a white person trying to
54:35
grow sugar in the Caribbean. If you're a black
54:37
person, you will also die, but you'll survive for
54:39
a few weeks longer. And
54:41
so there was- Because of the mosquitoes and the
54:44
heat? What is the- It's
54:46
mostly disease where there's a great book
54:48
about this called Mosquito Empires. And
54:50
the reason the Caribbean became majority
54:52
black is something I don't know
54:55
is actually as many whites immigrated
54:57
to the Caribbean as North America
54:59
over the 16 and 1700s. Just
55:02
all the whites in the Caribbean died of disease.
55:04
Really? Fascinating. There was
55:06
literally like an 80% mortality rate. Yeah. I
55:09
mean, like we're living in the year of our
55:11
Lord 2024 and I'm here in Austin, Texas and
55:13
I can get mosquitoes in December. Like there's literally
55:15
no part of the year. It's great because we
55:17
all get to wear t-shirts all year round into
55:19
our 50s. What a glorious
55:21
climate. One of the downsides of said
55:24
climate is there are always mosquitoes. You
55:26
can always get mosquito bites in Texas.
55:28
Yeah. Pennsylvania or Philadelphia is as far
55:31
south as you can go without malaria
55:33
or yellow fever. And
55:35
Philadelphia would briefly have like a phase
55:37
of malaria and yellow fever. And
55:39
it was shocking because everyone thought, oh my God, we're
55:42
in the safe area. But in the
55:44
south and in the Caribbean, it was totally normal
55:46
for two thirds of the white people who showed
55:48
up to just die of disease in the first
55:50
six months. So I have never lived in the
55:52
south. The closest I've lived and wanted in Texas.
55:54
Well, okay. Sure. From
55:57
where I'm at in modern America. view
56:00
Texas as its own thing. And it's allied
56:02
with the South, but I don't... When you're
56:05
traveling abroad as a Texan, you don't
56:07
go, I'm from the South, you say
56:09
I'm from Texas. Especially Austin, like Houston,
56:11
or if you're out by Louisiana, it's
56:14
more Southern. But where we are now, it's Austin as
56:16
Austin. So noting that, yes, Texas was a part of
56:18
the Confederacy. I mean, it's the size of France, I
56:20
just kind of view it as its own thing. I've
56:23
never lived in the deep South, I've never lived in
56:26
Tidewater. I did live in Washington, DC, which wonderfully
56:28
described by some very funny pundit as
56:31
northern warmth and manners coupled with
56:33
Southern efficiency. Washington,
56:36
DC is more Northern than Pennsylvania
56:38
is. Now it is. It used to be.
56:40
I mean, like really, within living memory, into the 60s, it was the
56:43
Southern, it was the top of the South, not
56:45
when I was there instantly. So me never
56:48
having lived in Tidewater or in the deep
56:50
South, I do not
56:52
know the differences between these two in a modern capacity. If
56:54
we were to go back weirdly to like 1700, I could
56:56
spot the difference, which is cosplaying
56:59
second sons pretending to be
57:01
Dukes and nouveau rich who
57:03
own giant sugar plantations, just
57:05
making ungodly amounts of money.
57:07
How do these translate today? How are
57:10
they culturally different today? So the deep
57:12
South is just significantly blacker, where in
57:14
the colonial period, the deep South was
57:16
like 80% black and Virginia was two
57:18
thirds black. And those demographic factors still
57:20
exist today. The Northern,
57:22
the deep South is, it's just
57:24
the penultimate South. There's no way you
57:26
can think Georgia, South
57:28
Carolina are not Southern. Virginia, Kentucky,
57:30
people argue about it. And so
57:32
in the Tidewater South, you run
57:34
into the question, is this the
57:37
South? And Tidewater culture
57:39
is more muted than the deep
57:41
South is. And Tidewater culture is
57:43
taking a huge hit by a
57:45
combination of mixing with
57:47
the Scots, Irish and DC. Yeah. Because
57:49
Baltimore, I mean, like Maryland would have
57:51
gone for the Confederacy. Yes. It was
57:53
close enough to Washington DC that Lincoln
57:56
was sending a fleet to Baltimore and
57:58
went, we're going to burn the city to the ground and let... should
58:00
join the union. But culturally, Maryland
58:02
was a slave-owning state,
58:05
but the proximity to D.C. forced it into the
58:07
northern orbit. And then you look at like,
58:09
you brought up Robert E. Lee a minute
58:11
ago, you can see his estate from D.C.
58:13
You could almost throw a frisbee
58:16
from it. But having
58:18
a big biggest
58:21
source of federal funding in the
58:24
country right next to Tidewater,
58:26
that is going to have effect. Because now you're
58:28
having people coming in to work for the federal
58:30
government who are going to live in all of
58:32
those neighboring Virginia counties. And so it's kind of
58:34
getting sucked into the D.C.
58:36
orbit. Going back to the
58:39
founding groups of these, and when we say
58:41
about the founding groups, obviously the South is
58:43
predominantly of African
58:46
slaves. So I'm
58:48
not demographically dismissing them, but the people
58:50
in power were not African slaves. So
58:52
when we're looking at the people in
58:54
power that are establishing the kickoff culture
58:56
and the founding elements,
58:59
I would assume the South would be very
59:01
pro-government. The South is cavalier,
59:04
as you point out. It's on the side of the royalists
59:06
and the king during the English Civil War. And
59:08
it is a much
59:10
more establishment, aristocratic friendly,
59:13
deference to authority, deference to tradition, deference
59:16
to social hierarchy. It's a deferential culture.
59:19
Why is it so hostile to government?
59:21
Because I would think that that deference
59:23
would translate. Because the American government was
59:25
established by Yankees, where if you look
59:27
at the government bureaucracy and the executive
59:29
branch, it was all founded by New
59:31
England, the Yankees. Yankees became
59:34
the bureaucracy of the business of
59:36
government. And so everything the government
59:38
did effectively became a Yankee endeavor,
59:40
and the South has to hate
59:42
everything the Yankees do. And
59:45
there is slavery involved in this,
59:47
where a big factor was the
59:50
Civil War got
59:53
mixed up with states rights. And so saying
59:55
you wanted to have slavery, it
59:58
got mixed up with state identities, and I
1:00:00
think that that's another factor there. So
1:00:03
if you are living the
1:00:05
Tidewater dream, you have
1:00:07
a 40,000 acre estate, you've got field
1:00:09
hands and all that, you
1:00:11
know that the singular threat to your wealth
1:00:14
is somebody outlawing slavery, and that's going to
1:00:16
be the government. And so what you want
1:00:18
to do is have a kind of like,
1:00:22
like basically a feudalist state. You would
1:00:24
rather America function as a feudalism where,
1:00:26
look, I am the king of my
1:00:28
little domain, take me to hell alone,
1:00:30
and the government is a sort of
1:00:32
outside emperor, very well- Finalized deal with.
1:00:35
Yes. Okay. And
1:00:37
how does that translate today? Like, because again,
1:00:39
it's still very skeptical of government authority. Perhaps
1:00:42
somebody a little bit more progressive and cynical
1:00:44
than myself would say that the antipathy towards
1:00:46
taxes is the same thing, that that part
1:00:48
of the country is just pro-aristocrat and wants
1:00:51
to leave money in the hands of the
1:00:53
elite. One of the things I find interesting
1:00:55
is the conservatism of Pennsylvania is very different
1:00:57
from the conservatism of the Deep South, where
1:00:59
I grew up, 10% of the population were
1:01:02
a libertarian party. And-
1:01:04
Really? Yeah, yeah. Wow. Like,
1:01:07
not for the whole state, but like- In my
1:01:09
county, 10% of the population were
1:01:11
card-carrying libertarians. Wow. Yes. Huge
1:01:14
and unknown travels to America. Yes. And
1:01:16
that's what the culture is. There's two guys at Adennii's
1:01:18
arguing with each other very loudly to the point that
1:01:20
no one wants to associate with them, but having 10%
1:01:22
a lot. Yeah. I mean, I
1:01:24
assumption when you meet someone's dad is they'll be a libertarian.
1:01:27
So that was kind of the culture. And if you look
1:01:29
at the Rust Belt, they
1:01:31
tend to be economically libertarian,
1:01:33
but abortion just turns off
1:01:35
the Rust Belt. And so a reason
1:01:38
the red wave didn't happen in 2022
1:01:40
was Roe v. Wade pissed off
1:01:42
the Rust Belt. And if you
1:01:44
look at the South, it's very socially conservative. And
1:01:48
the culture in the Deep South especially, because it
1:01:50
was 20% white, every single white person
1:01:53
had to own a gun and constantly be a
1:01:55
part of a militia to keep the blacks down.
1:01:58
And so that was a major story. subconscious fear
1:02:00
in the South for centuries was the blacks
1:02:02
will rise up and kill us. Yes. For
1:02:05
good reason. Yeah. I mean,
1:02:07
you had like, you had Thomas Jefferson writing about how evil slavery was, but
1:02:10
he would say like, we can't free these people
1:02:12
because they'll murder us for what we did to
1:02:14
them. Yeah. Part
1:02:16
of his reasoning was he would be pleasantly surprised to
1:02:18
learn that black Americans went, we want
1:02:20
to be a part of this experience too, as
1:02:23
opposed to murder everybody in black agents. Also
1:02:25
do you think there was a scenario where that
1:02:27
happened? Just look at Haiti, where in Haiti, the
1:02:29
slaves did rise up and kill the masters
1:02:31
and you had a giant Yankee army forcibly occupy
1:02:34
the South and that
1:02:36
created incentive structure that didn't occur. But
1:02:39
if you look at the districts for the
1:02:41
most war hawkish people, it's all the deep
1:02:43
South. All of the politicians who
1:02:45
want to start a war with Iran are
1:02:47
from South Carolina, Alabama, those
1:02:49
States. Why do you think of it as a military
1:02:52
bent to that part? Because it was the old
1:02:54
Marshall. Yeah. I mean,
1:02:56
partly the South's culture is Marshall due to
1:02:58
the Scots-Irish and the English nobility. But
1:03:00
also, as I said before, every white man had
1:03:02
to own a gun and be part of a
1:03:05
militia to keep blacks down. And the
1:03:07
South was a geographic based culture. And
1:03:09
what that means is in New England
1:03:11
or in the Midlands, you
1:03:13
succeed by building a factory, which
1:03:17
is technological development inside the society.
1:03:19
In the South, the South was an
1:03:22
incredibly rural society and it was until
1:03:24
like a few years around and it
1:03:26
was almost an interior mercantilist state within
1:03:28
the United States of low development,
1:03:30
agricultural in the South, but it's manufactured in the
1:03:32
North and exporting from the North. Yes.
1:03:35
And what you did with that is
1:03:38
you had to conquer more territory to get
1:03:40
wealth. And so before the Civil War, the
1:03:43
South wanted to ... The
1:03:45
Southern states were constantly pushing for
1:03:47
this. At the time of
1:03:49
the Mexican-American War, the Southern days wanted to chop
1:03:51
off another top third of Mexico because
1:03:54
their goal was we're going to make fillet
1:03:56
with slaves and more Southern states. They put
1:03:58
golden arc. I mean, you'd PQ Buds. Yucatan.
1:04:01
You can see maps of
1:04:03
these southern Lordlings who wanted
1:04:06
to just keep going west
1:04:08
and south and their thinking
1:04:10
was eventually the south and
1:04:12
America by proxy will go from
1:04:15
Kansas all the way to the base of
1:04:17
Mexico and possibly Costa Rica. We'll need that
1:04:20
Panama Canal too. So they were planning to
1:04:22
just going down and pushing. Do you know
1:04:24
William Walker? No. He was this guy and
1:04:26
20 of his buddies took
1:04:28
over Nicaragua in the 1850s. Whereas if these 20
1:04:32
American dudes got guns in literally
1:04:34
launched a coup, have read about
1:04:36
him, disease control of Nicaragua. And
1:04:39
the depressing thing for the Nicaraguan
1:04:41
nation is the reason he lost
1:04:43
had nothing to do with Nicaragua.
1:04:45
William Vanderbilt, a New York like
1:04:48
financier, he didn't like this
1:04:50
because he owns the shipping
1:04:52
company for Nicaragua and
1:04:54
he didn't want to lose control of the shipping company.
1:04:56
So he hired mercenaries to drive them out. But
1:04:59
there are a lot of timelines where
1:05:01
Nicaragua or the Yucatan where the Yucatan
1:05:03
appealed to join Yucatan. Yucatan is the
1:05:06
bottom part of Mexico. I lived there
1:05:08
for six months and they
1:05:10
appealed to join America in the 1840s because
1:05:13
they had a white ruling class who were
1:05:16
scared of the majority Maya populations. The ruling
1:05:18
class that- No, that there was like a
1:05:20
push to join the United States as a
1:05:22
state? Because the Yucatan was independent from the
1:05:24
rest of Mexico at the time and they
1:05:26
set papers, hey, we'd like to become an
1:05:28
American state. Because the ruling class of the
1:05:30
Yucatan were all these white Spanish landowners. And
1:05:32
they thought, if we join a country of
1:05:34
white American landowners, we can keep our lands
1:05:36
and keep the native Maya population down. So
1:05:38
they were looking to the South going, hey,
1:05:41
are you all a bunch of white dudes
1:05:43
that have a ton of land and a
1:05:45
bunch of poor people that work for you
1:05:47
and they're nominally slaves or not. They're basically
1:05:49
slaves. We would love to get in
1:05:51
on that and have an affend us from an
1:05:53
uprising. And what happened was the Northern States didn't
1:05:56
want that because at the time America, it was
1:05:58
a tit for tat. where every state,
1:06:01
the south or the north, added they had to
1:06:03
add another. Right, so this Missouri Conference, right? Yeah,
1:06:05
yeah. It's like, all right, you guys get a
1:06:07
slave state, but we get a non-slave state. This
1:06:09
is fascinating by the way. So there was a
1:06:12
period where, like, if you were to talk to
1:06:14
people in the deep south, they're like, why can't
1:06:16
we just let Mexico join America? It'd be great
1:06:18
if there were more Mexicans in America. These goddamn
1:06:20
Yankees always stopping us from having more Mexicans in
1:06:22
our country. The factor that
1:06:24
changed is they wanted to add the Yucatan
1:06:27
and Baja California to America. Those
1:06:29
were very, very close. And then for both
1:06:31
of them, the north was like, not gonna
1:06:33
happen. They knew those had become
1:06:35
slave states. And the deciding factor that changed
1:06:38
is almost all of Mexico was
1:06:40
unpopulated in that time period.
1:06:43
So the entire, in the same way
1:06:45
that the western US was all Native
1:06:47
Americans, northern Mexico and the Yucatan were
1:06:49
all Native Americans too. So when the
1:06:51
south wanted to conquer these areas, they
1:06:53
were conquering areas which they saw as
1:06:55
Native Americans who they would replace, not
1:06:58
areas that were populated by Mexicans. We're
1:07:00
gonna break our clock format for a
1:07:02
minute just because we've been spending a
1:07:04
lot of time talking to English populations,
1:07:06
talking of English populations. So let's
1:07:09
now switch to Greater Appalachia. Yes. Appalachia
1:07:13
today, I think would be what, West
1:07:15
Virginia and Kentucky, and basically south
1:07:18
adjacent mountainous regions. That
1:07:21
would be, but Greater Appalachia is much larger than
1:07:23
that. And again, these groups all go from east
1:07:25
to west. So what all is Greater Appalachia? Geographically,
1:07:27
and what does it mean? Greater
1:07:30
Appalachia is country music America.
1:07:33
When people, where people talk like
1:07:35
they do in country songs is
1:07:37
Appalachia. It started in the eastern
1:07:39
Appalachian Mountains and it went west
1:07:41
out to Texas, Kansas, Kentucky,
1:07:44
Tennessee. Oklahoma, because I'd say like Northwest
1:07:46
Oklahoma is very much Midlands based on
1:07:48
what we talked about today. But
1:07:51
kind of Oklahoma City going east and
1:07:53
south is definitely Greater Appalachia
1:07:55
culture. Yes, and it came from the
1:07:58
Scots-Irish and the Scots-Irish. Irish,
1:08:01
Irish. My family lived in Ireland,
1:08:03
and the Northern Irish were people
1:08:05
from the Scottish-English borderland who
1:08:08
depopulated Northern Ireland. They kicked the native
1:08:10
Irish off Ireland, moved them to West
1:08:13
Ireland. They transplanted a bunch of Protestants
1:08:15
to Ireland to try to colonize Ireland
1:08:17
as a Protestant part of the world.
1:08:19
The goal was to genocide the native
1:08:21
Irish like the Native Americans, but that
1:08:23
didn't work. What happened, though, was these
1:08:26
Scottish Protestants in Northern Ireland, they were
1:08:28
in deep poverty because this all existed
1:08:30
to benefit the English landowners who owned
1:08:32
the land. And then they
1:08:34
integrated to America afterwards, and they went
1:08:36
to Philadelphia first, and the Quakers kicked
1:08:39
them out. So they populated
1:08:41
an entire area from Southern
1:08:43
Pennsylvania all the way to Georgia. And
1:08:46
if you drive across Pennsylvania, as I've
1:08:48
done several times, the cultural
1:08:50
difference is so stark. In a
1:08:52
10-mile difference, you'll see these quaint
1:08:54
Midwestern towns where everyone talks like
1:08:56
me, and then 10 miles
1:08:58
south, everyone talks
1:09:00
like a Southerner. There's Mountain Dew
1:09:02
everywhere, Monster Truck, Mr. Pibb. Exactly.
1:09:04
NASCAR. Yes. You
1:09:07
go from hamburgers to barbecue over a
1:09:10
10-mile period, and Pittsburgh
1:09:12
is part of that Midwestern culture
1:09:14
immediately south of Pittsburgh as Appalachia.
1:09:16
I'm Irish, and so I have
1:09:18
a tremendous amount of cultural similarities
1:09:20
with the Scots-Irish, even though they
1:09:22
hate each other. And the
1:09:25
culture is very honor-based, where when I
1:09:27
grew up, my father said, the only
1:09:29
thing that matters in life is honor.
1:09:31
Honor-based culture is developed in warrior societies
1:09:34
where you have to
1:09:36
prove that you're a badass to everyone, so
1:09:38
they don't mess with you. Where if you're
1:09:41
just such a powerful, important guy, and your
1:09:43
sense of pride is so strong, no one
1:09:45
will mess with you. It's always this warrior
1:09:47
culture, and we talked before about Yankees treating
1:09:49
it, saying it's barbaric, and it
1:09:51
is barbaric, but America also needs
1:09:54
some barbarism so we don't become Canada.
1:10:00
Malcolm Gladwell talks about this. This is also,
1:10:02
it does dovetail with the whole like,
1:10:04
you know, there's a smart society and a dumb society that
1:10:07
I mentioned earlier that a lot of academics do. I hear
1:10:09
the same trope come up for them, but to
1:10:11
explore the trope a bit, the idea would
1:10:13
be that if you are a landed
1:10:16
agricultural society, you have some
1:10:18
recourse to law or army.
1:10:21
Whereas if you were a border society like
1:10:23
the Scots, like some of
1:10:25
the most fierce raiders in history are right
1:10:28
around the lowland Scots area. We're getting really
1:10:30
deep into history this episode. When we're talking
1:10:32
about Scottish history, everybody talks about the Highlanders
1:10:34
as fierce warriors. The people living in the
1:10:37
lowlands that were raiding cattle across the border
1:10:39
were some of the fiercest horse people in
1:10:41
the world. But if you're on either side
1:10:43
of the border where the military is
1:10:45
usually going over to France or something
1:10:47
and like, yeah, I'm going to send
1:10:50
them to the hinterlands just to guard
1:10:52
cattle, you have to guard the cattle
1:10:54
on your own. It's a mobile property, which means that
1:10:56
like if your neighbor comes and takes your farm, you
1:10:58
can go to the courthouse and go, that guy pushed
1:11:00
me off my land with a gun. I want you
1:11:02
to come push them out. And they look at the
1:11:04
contracts and go, oh, okay, it is your land. But
1:11:06
if you steal your cattle, the cattle
1:11:08
is not there anymore. So you have to be able to
1:11:10
defend your cattle and you have to have enough of a
1:11:12
deterrence to show that you should not come get my cattle
1:11:14
because we'll kill you. And so
1:11:17
this greater Appalachia is Ulster
1:11:19
Scots or Northern Irish, how we want to say, Protestants
1:11:21
that are sent to Ireland. I think that there's also
1:11:23
a significant amount of just Scots
1:11:26
that come over from the
1:11:28
clearances in Britain where they're Highlanders. The English
1:11:30
have decided that you're no longer going to
1:11:32
be a croft around your land because we
1:11:34
can make more money from sheep. And so
1:11:36
the Scots in mass start coming over to
1:11:39
America a little bit later than the English.
1:11:41
And they end up going
1:11:43
to these mountainous areas where
1:11:45
they can be sheep herders. They
1:11:48
can't own slaves or I should say it's not
1:11:50
economically advantageous to do it because it's real difficult
1:11:52
to grow cotton in the mountains. You
1:11:54
want to have flat plains for that. So you're
1:11:57
going to have people that are fur trappers and.
1:12:00
that are doing things like as a family
1:12:02
unit as opposed to big plantation style economic
1:12:04
models and you're going to have people that
1:12:06
are living in the hills that are kind
1:12:08
of out with the laws, a little bit
1:12:10
more banditry, a little bit more outlawry. And
1:12:13
I would think also that there would be
1:12:15
a very deep skepticism of government there because
1:12:17
whereas the New Englanders are going, this is
1:12:19
our government. We came over here to establish our
1:12:21
own government and therefore the government is us. It's
1:12:23
good. The Scots-Irish are coming
1:12:26
over going, we've been oppressed by these
1:12:28
fucking feudal people for the last 10,000
1:12:30
years. It's always rich
1:12:32
people and they always tell us that it's not
1:12:34
for their benefit. It's because God put them in
1:12:36
charge. The government is full of lies. What we
1:12:38
want is the government to stay the hell away
1:12:41
from us and we will work this out as
1:12:43
clans. It'll be me and my cousins and we'll
1:12:45
go rough up those dudes, but we'll work it
1:12:47
out, leave us alone. And we'll have
1:12:49
family units and clans and that'll be our thing.
1:12:52
One of my friends worked for the
1:12:54
libertarian party and he mapped a narco
1:12:56
capitalist and it very closely matched Appalachia
1:12:58
or the greater Appalachia region. The
1:13:01
culture of honor where if someone kills your
1:13:03
brother, you have to kill them back. And
1:13:05
so you'd have these clan feuds across Appalachia.
1:13:07
I think the Hatfields and the McCoy's are
1:13:10
an example of that. Appalachia is
1:13:12
one of the poorest regions in America
1:13:14
and people talk a lot about disparities
1:13:16
between races. People don't talk about the
1:13:18
income disparity between the Scots-Irish of
1:13:21
West Virginia or Arkansas and then
1:13:23
Yankees, which are truly vast. And
1:13:27
it's a very decentralized society where the
1:13:29
saying went, if I
1:13:31
can see the smokestack, my neighbor's smokestack,
1:13:33
things are getting too crowded. And
1:13:36
so is this incredibly rural
1:13:39
herding society where the Scots-Irish didn't really
1:13:41
farm. They'd have herds of pigs and cows
1:13:43
and live off that. Right. Yeah,
1:13:45
they're herders and also they are for good
1:13:48
reason because for again, about 10,000 years,
1:13:51
the authorities were always just rich people
1:13:53
stealing your money. And for most of
1:13:55
human history, I mean,
1:13:57
I'm not going to say all, but most of human history, The
1:14:00
government is at best a protection racket. Yes.
1:14:03
It is a mob style protection racket, but
1:14:05
there's a crown in it so we can all pretend
1:14:07
it's ordained by God. But it's really a bunch of
1:14:09
thugs that are coming by your house going, give us
1:14:11
some of your money and we promise to protect you
1:14:13
from other thugs. And that's the whole deal. And
1:14:16
the folks that are moving in here are the
1:14:19
impoverished perder people from Britain. They're not
1:14:21
the landed gentry. They're
1:14:23
not even pretending to be landed gentry. They
1:14:25
are the poor people that were living in
1:14:28
the, what would you call the,
1:14:30
not the moors like
1:14:32
the marches. They're looking around the
1:14:34
borders, that area that is along
1:14:36
borders and is therefore not very safe where
1:14:38
you have to be dependent on yourself for
1:14:41
safety. Yes. You have to
1:14:43
work things out one on one with your neighbors as opposed to
1:14:45
appealing to an authority. And the authorities
1:14:47
are usually corrupt and oppressive
1:14:49
and exploitative. And so there's a deep
1:14:51
distrust of authority there. The thing I
1:14:53
like the most about culture is it
1:14:55
keeps it real, where I've
1:14:57
lived in Canada and Canada
1:15:00
is such an absurdly agreeable
1:15:02
culture. Appalachia is
1:15:04
kind of that exemplified,
1:15:06
I'm going to live in a cabin and do
1:15:08
my own thing. You can piss off and fight
1:15:11
you if you try to interfere with my stuff.
1:15:13
Agreed. Okay. And
1:15:15
that would extend like kind of
1:15:18
an arc from Kentucky
1:15:20
and Tennessee and
1:15:22
West Virginia, all the
1:15:24
way kind of Southwest down into
1:15:26
Texas. Yes. Yeah. And
1:15:29
if I, this is an argument that's controversial.
1:15:31
I personally do believe the Civil War was
1:15:34
about slavery. And the reason I say
1:15:36
that is if you graph a map of slave owning
1:15:38
areas to support for the Confederacy, it's
1:15:40
the same thing where the parts of
1:15:42
Appalachia, which didn't own slaves supported the
1:15:44
union. Right. And West Virginia
1:15:46
is completely off of Virginia. Exactly. Eastern Tennessee.
1:15:48
A mountainous area where nobody owns slaves. Yeah.
1:15:51
A bunch of poor white people that are
1:15:53
suspicious of the aristocrats down South. Yes.
1:15:57
And Appalachia is part of the South
1:15:59
yet. It's not where I grew up
1:16:01
in a state near West Virginia, and
1:16:04
it's unclear if West Virginia is part of the South
1:16:07
because it is kind
1:16:09
of Southern, but it has
1:16:12
lots of traits you don't see in the rest
1:16:14
of the South. And that's why I call it
1:16:16
the cowboy country music South. You've
1:16:19
got like the plantation South, and you've
1:16:21
got like cowboy hat South. And
1:16:23
Appalachia is cowboy hat South.
1:16:26
Yes, plantation South was majority
1:16:28
black, and there were
1:16:31
basically no black people in Appalachia. It
1:16:34
was all white. Right. Okay.
1:16:37
Well then let's turn our attention to a couple of
1:16:39
other places in the South, Southern Florida. I
1:16:41
think one of the great coups of the United
1:16:43
States that we don't celebrate is that the capital
1:16:45
of Latin America isn't in Latin America. It's in
1:16:47
Florida, Miami. Hats off to you Floridians,
1:16:49
Miami is the capital of Latin America, and it's located
1:16:51
in Latin America. You
1:16:54
go down to Miami, that's the
1:16:56
only part of America I've ever been in where
1:16:58
I felt guilty speaking English, where I would go
1:17:00
into a place and they'd talk to me, and
1:17:02
I'd be like, Los
1:17:04
Siento, mi espanolos mado, but that
1:17:07
was very much the dominant culture
1:17:09
down there. Is this a late in
1:17:11
the game Cuban exiles
1:17:13
from the Castro regime? Is
1:17:15
this remnants of the Spanish colonists that
1:17:17
are there that get taken over by
1:17:20
Jackson or whoever? What group is
1:17:22
down there or what groups are down there? It's
1:17:24
ironic, the three most populous states
1:17:26
in America, Florida, California, and Texas,
1:17:28
they got as big as they
1:17:31
did because they were
1:17:33
uninhabitable before. That
1:17:36
happened with Florida, where Florida had almost,
1:17:38
or the Northern Panhandle of Florida, that's
1:17:40
part of the South. The
1:17:43
peninsula of Florida, that
1:17:46
was all swamplands, and the longest war
1:17:48
in American history was in Afghanistan or
1:17:50
Iraq. It was against the seminal natives
1:17:52
of Florida. We fought them for 30
1:17:54
years, but it was alligators and
1:17:57
swampland and that stuff into the mid-
1:18:00
into the mid-20th century. And I see
1:18:03
a lot of cultural similarities between California
1:18:05
and Florida because they were both populated
1:18:07
in the post-World War II era. And
1:18:09
I call California imperial American culture.
1:18:12
Like, what's the culture in Orlando? What's the
1:18:14
culture in St. Petersburg? I don't
1:18:16
know. It's, um... Well,
1:18:19
Florida's an interesting state in
1:18:21
that within the microcosm of
1:18:23
Florida, the further south you go, the
1:18:25
further north you go. Yeah, so like
1:18:27
the northern part of Florida is the
1:18:29
deep south. It is Georgia, it is
1:18:31
the Florida panhandle. But you go south
1:18:33
in Florida and you now
1:18:35
get to these colonies from Ohio,
1:18:38
the Midwest, and colonies from New
1:18:40
England and New York that retired down there. And
1:18:43
then you go even further south and now you
1:18:45
go south again where you're hitting Cuba. Yes. I
1:18:47
put central Florida
1:18:49
in the same bracket as California,
1:18:51
although it was populated from the
1:18:54
north because it's a culture disconnected
1:18:56
from the previous cultures and
1:18:58
it's a very modern society. The
1:19:01
bottom of Florida is just Latin America.
1:19:03
And I agree with Andrew's point that wealthy
1:19:06
Latin Americans, they do business in Miami,
1:19:08
they shop in Miami, they have houses
1:19:11
there to escape once their
1:19:13
dictatorship fails. It's a lot more
1:19:15
stable in Miami than in, you
1:19:17
know, Venezuela. Yes. And
1:19:19
that happened in the 1960s
1:19:22
where when Castro seized power,
1:19:24
the Cuban elite fled across
1:19:26
the straits to Miami. And
1:19:29
that community was predominantly upper class and
1:19:31
it was business owners in Cuba. And
1:19:34
so they had these pre-established skills. They
1:19:36
rose to power and turned Miami into
1:19:39
an economic base. And Miami
1:19:41
is the only place in Latin America
1:19:43
with stable property rights. And
1:19:45
so the Latinization of Miami is something
1:19:47
which has occurred in the last 60
1:19:49
years. Okay.
1:19:51
Now, we're
1:19:54
rapidly getting outside of my even
1:19:57
peripheral knowledge of cultural groups now. Miami,
1:20:00
but I really don't know Miami very well. Would
1:20:02
we put Miami and the Cuban exiles
1:20:05
in a different cultural category than the
1:20:07
old Spanish communities we would find today
1:20:09
around like the southern Texas border up
1:20:11
through New Mexico? Yes. The
1:20:14
Spanish empire had significantly more cultural diversity
1:20:16
inside of it than the British empire
1:20:19
in America in the 13 colonies. I've
1:20:21
lived in Peru and Mexico. Those
1:20:24
countries are incredibly different from each other.
1:20:27
In America, all these regional cultures
1:20:29
were different. In Latin
1:20:31
America, what occurred was the elite
1:20:33
was all ethnically exactly the same.
1:20:35
If you were wealthy in Mexico
1:20:37
City or Lima, your culture was
1:20:39
the same, but the natives
1:20:42
in Peru were an entirely
1:20:44
different civilization from those in Mexico.
1:20:47
Places like Argentina were all white.
1:20:49
Dominican Republic was black. The Spanish
1:20:52
empire had these massive differences. Even
1:20:54
inside Mexico, Mexico was a much
1:20:56
more culturally distinct country
1:20:58
than America. You brought up ...
1:21:00
I just went down to the Yucatan a couple years
1:21:03
ago, was amazed to discover Mayans are still around. Yes.
1:21:06
Because I thought the Mayans were destroyed
1:21:08
the same time the Aztec empire was. Yes.
1:21:11
The Aztecs were an empire. They're not around anymore.
1:21:13
There's like seven to 20 million Mayans still around
1:21:15
today. They're an ethnic group. They have a language.
1:21:17
They were conquered by the Spanish and integrated into
1:21:19
Mexico to some extent, but they're still around. The
1:21:23
Yucatan has a different cultural base to it
1:21:25
than other parts of Mexico, which I'm totally
1:21:27
unfamiliar with. Millions of people still speak the
1:21:29
Aztec language being the Jual. That
1:21:33
Mexican culture is very different from
1:21:35
the culture you see in Miami,
1:21:37
where the Miami culture is this
1:21:39
elutination ... I call it
1:21:41
the islands, or Joe Garo calls it the islands,
1:21:44
of all of this random people
1:21:46
who showed up from the
1:21:48
neighboring seas. For example, lots of
1:21:51
all the Latin music is based
1:21:53
out of Miami, and that includes
1:21:55
Spanish singers. Julio Iglesias, he's Spanish,
1:21:57
like from the country of Spain.
1:22:00
Enrique Iglesias is half Spanish, half
1:22:02
Filipino. Shakira lives in
1:22:04
Miami. She's from Colombia. Regaton
1:22:08
is based out of Miami. The culture
1:22:10
in Miami is this, there's the Spanish
1:22:12
base. Then beneath that,
1:22:14
you throw in Brazilians, you throw in
1:22:16
Puerto Ricans, you throw in Spaniards, you
1:22:19
throw in Venezuelans, where it's this sea-based
1:22:21
culture rather than the Mexican culture of
1:22:23
the Southwest. Got it. Okay. The sea
1:22:26
base makes a lot of sense. It's
1:22:28
islands. Whereas if we're going
1:22:30
into today El Paso in
1:22:32
Texas, El Paso has always been,
1:22:35
has deep cultural ties to Northern Mexico,
1:22:37
and that's much more like haddle,
1:22:40
railroads, big open plains, a
1:22:42
hacienda, cowboy hat, and I
1:22:44
speak Spanish. It's a different
1:22:46
element of sea-based culture there.
1:22:50
A Woodard in his book would call that
1:22:52
area El Norte. And he would say that
1:22:55
historically within Mexican history, the Northern part
1:22:57
of Mexico, even not even talking about
1:22:59
America, but just the Northern part of
1:23:01
Mexico has always been considered more entrepreneurial
1:23:04
as the Southern part of Mexico. And he
1:23:07
would say that that kind of extends
1:23:09
from Northern Mexico up through the Southern
1:23:11
borders of Texas, parts of
1:23:13
Arizona, and it kind of climbs up through
1:23:15
New Mexico and even hits the very bottom
1:23:17
of Colorado. Like Puebla Indians
1:23:19
and things like that. And there's
1:23:21
a community in New Mexico that still
1:23:24
speak Spanish and speak
1:23:27
Spanish because they were a literal Spanish colony.
1:23:29
They were Mexican. They'll tell you that
1:23:31
today if you talk to them, that they're, no, we're
1:23:33
from this one region of Spain. And so that's the
1:23:35
kind of El Norte Spanish
1:23:38
Americana Mexican
1:23:40
American culture. Yes. Another
1:23:43
important difference is that Mexico is 50% European,
1:23:45
50% Native, and
1:23:48
the culture of the Spanish Caribbean is
1:23:50
80% European with basically no Native and
1:23:53
some Black. And so it's also
1:23:55
a completely different ethnic makeup. So it's sort of
1:23:57
like how like Argentina, for example, as I understand
1:23:59
it, Argentina. Argentina was much more European
1:24:01
colony as opposed to like Chile,
1:24:03
which was much
1:24:06
more native. And so this is
1:24:08
kind of a similar thing where Miami and all of
1:24:10
that is Europeans who settled, Spanish speaking Europeans who
1:24:12
settled in the new world, whereas El
1:24:15
Norte is Native American
1:24:18
slash Spanish culture, the Spanish living
1:24:20
in the agrarian area. Yeah. Cuba
1:24:23
is 80% white, 20% black. Same
1:24:25
as Puerto Rico. Okay. So
1:24:28
if we're talking about El Norte
1:24:30
culture of Mexican
1:24:33
American communities in South Texas, New
1:24:35
Mexico, little bits of Colorado, what
1:24:38
is that kind of culture? It's strange where
1:24:40
those areas were the first European colonies of
1:24:42
anywhere in America. The
1:24:45
English settled in Virginia in 1607. The
1:24:48
Spanish established their colony in New Mexico in 1591. And
1:24:52
it was this tiny outpost of Spanish
1:24:54
civilization. The thing we forget about when
1:24:56
we look at the Spanish, the Mexicans
1:24:59
running the Southwest is the
1:25:01
modern Mexicans in the Southwestern states like
1:25:03
Texas or California or New Mexico, they're
1:25:06
not the descendants of the original inhabitants. There was
1:25:08
a total of 7,000 people
1:25:10
in Texas when the US conquered it, or 7,000
1:25:12
Hispanics, and
1:25:16
they were completely overrun by Europeans. And for a
1:25:18
frame of reference, Philadelphia at
1:25:20
the exact same time had like
1:25:23
half a million people, or New
1:25:25
York at half a million people. So there's 7,000 people in all
1:25:27
of Texas? 7,000 Hispanics in
1:25:29
all of Texas in 1840, New York City
1:25:31
at over half a million people. Right. Okay.
1:25:34
So it was a very, very unpopulated part of them. And
1:25:36
then the Anglos steamrolled it. And so if you're looking in
1:25:38
1970, Texas, California, they're
1:25:40
all 80% Anglo-American. And
1:25:43
then there was a giant wave of immigration from 1980 until
1:25:45
today from Latin America. And
1:25:49
that has flipped the demographics of the
1:25:51
region. And so when people think of
1:25:53
Los Angeles, they normally think of just
1:25:55
surfer bros in Hollywood, but
1:25:57
the vast majority of Los Angeles.
1:26:00
as ethnically Hispanic. You
1:26:02
could say Los Angeles
1:26:04
by majority of people is a
1:26:06
Latin American city. There is this
1:26:08
underlying southwestern culture, but rapid demographic
1:26:11
flip-flopping in the southwest. Okay. So
1:26:13
the natives also got wiped out
1:26:15
too. Okay. And then
1:26:17
we talked about the left coast, that
1:26:19
kind of west of the
1:26:21
mountains hugging the beach
1:26:24
thing. It was settled by
1:26:26
New Englanders that were largely replicating that
1:26:28
same worldview, but it is distinct. I
1:26:30
mean, I wouldn't say that like Oregon
1:26:32
is the same as Maine. So how
1:26:35
would you phrase that cultural? It's
1:26:37
more individualistic where there's
1:26:40
not this communitarian spirit at all. And I
1:26:42
was watching this TikTok, or I don't have
1:26:44
TikTok, I was watching a TikTok video on
1:26:47
Twitter, where was this lady being,
1:26:49
I do alternative weddings and it's
1:26:51
all stuff like, do you want to bring a goat
1:26:53
to your wedding? Do you want to have a gay
1:26:55
themed Kate? Do you want to pause play
1:26:57
at your wedding? I think this is the
1:27:00
most Pacific Northwest thing I've seen in my life. It's
1:27:02
an incredibly individualistic culture and incredibly
1:27:04
creative. And the positive side of
1:27:07
this is it created things like
1:27:09
it created the modern tech world
1:27:11
that created Silicon Valley. It created
1:27:13
Microsoft. It created Netflix.
1:27:16
It created Boeing, Nike.
1:27:19
The Pacific Northwest
1:27:22
is all of these important companies. And I
1:27:24
talk about this a lot in my video
1:27:26
on the topic. The negative of that is
1:27:28
just sheer delusion, where you look
1:27:30
at this culture, that
1:27:32
entire area. And one of my friends
1:27:34
is an anthropologist calls Northern California granola
1:27:36
land. And as a Pennsylvanian,
1:27:38
it's all people. It was a society
1:27:41
inhabited by people who would be outcasts
1:27:43
in Pennsylvania. Like if you're like, I
1:27:45
want to make a granola tech company
1:27:48
based upon meditation, you'd get laughed
1:27:51
at in Pennsylvania. But they
1:27:53
formed an entire society on the West Coast.
1:27:56
I've spent a lot of time in Portland and I like Portland
1:27:58
but yes, Portland has a lot of that. vibe of
1:28:00
like, we're a coffee company that
1:28:03
also talks
1:28:06
to the beans and thanks them for
1:28:08
giving a sacrifice to us because we
1:28:10
believe that all plant life has spiritual
1:28:12
... Not everywhere, but
1:28:14
that's definitely more pronounced there than anywhere I've
1:28:16
ever been. Is
1:28:18
that individualistic element, is this synergistic where
1:28:20
you look at the western part
1:28:22
of Oregon is initially
1:28:25
these New England sailors who come and colonize
1:28:27
that, but the eastern part of Oregon is
1:28:30
these Appalachians that are just walking across the
1:28:32
country and they get there later for that
1:28:34
reason. Now, is it that there are these
1:28:36
two societies side by side and they're vying
1:28:38
for each other electorally or is it that
1:28:41
they merge and you get the social
1:28:44
engineering utopian, we can make the world better. We
1:28:46
can make the world great, optimism
1:28:48
from the New England bit coupled with
1:28:50
the kind of leave
1:28:52
me alone in the realism of Appalachia
1:28:54
or does something else happen that causes
1:28:57
this individualism to come in? As you
1:28:59
go further west to the east coast,
1:29:01
cultures break down and so Texas and
1:29:03
the Midwest don't belong to any of
1:29:05
these cultural groups, but Texas and the
1:29:07
Midwest are very much real places and
1:29:10
you can trace all these groups genetically, but
1:29:12
they stop at the Great Plains. California has
1:29:14
very ... You can't trace an east coast
1:29:16
culture there and so you do see a
1:29:18
lot of this Yankee influence, but it also
1:29:21
becomes its own thing. The
1:29:23
Appalachians in Oregon are a different
1:29:26
demographic from the people in the
1:29:29
west coast and a very
1:29:31
interesting fact is they stayed outside of
1:29:33
the south in the mid-20th century with
1:29:35
the highest KKK membership is
1:29:38
Oregon. This
1:29:40
area flip-flops really hard. It used to be
1:29:42
very racist, now it's very progressive. It's like
1:29:45
New England. It has to believe in whatever
1:29:47
popular ideology is popular at the time to
1:29:49
the fullest. It wouldn't surprise me if in
1:29:51
30 years they turned very hard right. If
1:29:54
you're in a world where the new popular
1:29:56
ideology is right wing, they'll flip there. It's
1:29:58
a culture that's ... very high
1:30:01
in a trait called neoteny, which
1:30:03
is culture related to child-likeness. It's
1:30:05
naivete, creativity, imagination,
1:30:09
friendiness. It's a very
1:30:11
young culture, but
1:30:13
the problem there is Auguste just goes insane. And
1:30:16
if you look at the West Coast, they're actively
1:30:18
shooting themselves in the foot. I'm working on
1:30:20
a video, The Rise and Fall of California,
1:30:22
and the big thesis of the video is
1:30:25
California is an example of how much
1:30:27
culture can kill an area. It's very
1:30:29
wealthy, it has perfect geography, a lot
1:30:32
of largeness, title, yeah, it's perfect and
1:30:34
everything except the culture of the people
1:30:36
who live there and they're just killing
1:30:39
that area and businesses are leaving the
1:30:41
West Coast and the cities aren't safe.
1:30:44
I visited Vancouver. Downtown
1:30:46
Vancouver is not
1:30:48
safe. It's like the Walking Dead. And I thought to
1:30:50
myself, if you messed up Vancouver,
1:30:53
you are an idiot. Vancouver is one
1:30:55
of the wealthiest places in the world.
1:30:57
It's in Canada. If you've
1:30:59
made that unsafe, that's just
1:31:01
you failed. Backtrack a
1:31:04
little bit. Let's spend just a minute
1:31:06
talking about New France. I would say
1:31:08
New France is Quebec and Louisiana.
1:31:12
It's New Orleans. I don't think it's had as
1:31:14
much of an influence on America as it has
1:31:16
in Canada. Quebec's had massive
1:31:18
influence on Canada because the
1:31:21
whole Canadian country is bilingual and
1:31:23
the idea of consensus and perpetual
1:31:25
negotiation are an attempt to accommodate
1:31:27
Quebec and keep it from leaving.
1:31:29
And so if we're
1:31:32
looking at North America rather than
1:31:34
America, I would say New Canada
1:31:36
has been, excuse me, New France
1:31:38
has been extremely influential. What
1:31:41
does it look like? What values does it have as
1:31:43
opposed to other regions? There's a handful of differences in
1:31:45
my map and Colin Woodard's, one of
1:31:47
which is I split New France in
1:31:49
two because he has Louisiana and Quebec
1:31:52
be the same. But
1:31:54
people in Quebec, they were people from Normandy
1:31:56
and Brittany, which is in the northwest of
1:31:58
France. Louisiana is people
1:32:01
from Poitiers on the west coast of
1:32:03
France. In the same manner,
1:32:05
we talk about the different parts of England, finding different
1:32:07
cultures in America. That happened for
1:32:09
France. And Louisiana was the least
1:32:11
healthy place for white immigrants. You just die
1:32:13
of disease. And it was 80% black
1:32:16
until the American colonization. So
1:32:19
it's useful to view old Louisiana as
1:32:21
almost an extension of Haiti, which
1:32:23
is also a French colony. If
1:32:25
I'm not mistaken, so like, New Orleans is
1:32:28
like an extension of Haiti. New Orleans is
1:32:30
Caribbean French culture with a very large black
1:32:32
population. But when Quebec is taken over by
1:32:34
the English, they kick out the
1:32:37
Arcadians, or maybe it's not Quebec, but the
1:32:39
Acadians. The Acadians. And they moved down to
1:32:41
Louisiana at times. So there
1:32:43
is like, Louisiana has two different French cultures.
1:32:45
It has the Caribbean, Haitian,
1:32:48
black French culture in New Orleans. But
1:32:50
then there's the kind of like fur
1:32:52
trapper. I
1:32:54
married a local woman, but I speak French
1:32:56
a bit. That's the Acadians that are down
1:32:58
there. The Acadians, they were from Poitiers on
1:33:00
the west coast of France. The Quebecers are
1:33:02
from Normandy and Brittany. And the
1:33:05
difference was that there wasn't the fur trapper culture
1:33:07
among the Acadians because they were out on the
1:33:09
coast. It was all local farmers. And
1:33:11
they lived by the ocean, go fishing,
1:33:14
farm. This very subsistence
1:33:16
lifestyle. And the English kicked them out
1:33:18
so they could populate the region because it was
1:33:21
just too difficult to have that many French
1:33:23
people there. At the
1:33:25
time of the French and Indian War, there
1:33:27
were, I think, 4 million
1:33:29
people in British America and
1:33:32
70,000 in all of French America. It was very
1:33:34
easy just to evict everyone and bring in tens
1:33:36
of thousands of Brits. And when
1:33:39
they went to Louisiana, it completely
1:33:41
changed their culture where they could
1:33:43
no longer do that farming lifestyle.
1:33:45
And so they had to switch over
1:33:48
to slaveholding. And
1:33:50
so in this capacity, like New Orleans, which is
1:33:52
what we're most familiar with in America, we're generally
1:33:54
more familiar with that than Quebec. That
1:33:56
is more of a Caribbean culture. It is, yeah. French
1:33:59
fur trapper culture. Yes, and that crew, because I
1:34:01
love New Orleans. I've only been there one of
1:34:03
my favorite places. Wonderful place. But I would say,
1:34:05
I don't know whether it's the heat or the
1:34:07
culture or what, but it strikes me as a
1:34:09
much more work-life balance play for the rest of
1:34:11
the country. Like wake
1:34:13
up at 10 o'clock, have yourself an
1:34:15
eye opener, maybe get to work round
1:34:18
11, then it's lunchtime, then you have
1:34:20
a drink, then maybe a little bit more work from
1:34:22
1.30 to 3, then go home. It's
1:34:26
not that wake up at 5
1:34:28
a.m. and go feed the cows kind of culture. It's a much
1:34:30
more like work to
1:34:32
live rather than live to work kind of thing. Yeah,
1:34:35
that's accurate. It's
1:34:39
definitely an interesting place. Louisiana
1:34:41
State University had a talk
1:34:43
that I watched on YouTube where they compared Louisiana
1:34:46
to a third world country, and they went through
1:34:48
all of the traits of a third world country.
1:34:50
And the speaker said, Louisiana would effectively be a
1:34:52
third world country without being attached to the U.S.
1:34:55
Just due to these like slave slavery? Yeah,
1:34:59
slave societies don't turn out well. It
1:35:01
would be like a Caribbean
1:35:03
country, like Barbados or Jamaica. You
1:35:07
can look at like, I mean, even after
1:35:09
you emancipate, the lingering
1:35:12
effects, socioeconomically, educationally, and health-wise,
1:35:14
like slavery takes such a
1:35:16
human toll for centuries. You
1:35:18
can see it in America where the states of
1:35:20
the south, the deep south are all the
1:35:22
poorest parts of America, Georgia,
1:35:25
Alabama, et cetera. And
1:35:27
like Texas, Tennessee, Virginia, those are southern
1:35:30
cultures that are doing incredibly well, but
1:35:32
they weren't the ones that were completely
1:35:35
dependent upon slavery. And I
1:35:37
know we don't have a
1:35:39
lot of time, but there's a couple different
1:35:41
cultures I added in from after Colin Woodard.
1:35:43
I made Los Angeles independent, which was a
1:35:46
culture that formed around Hollywood in the mid-20th
1:35:48
century. And I mean, if you, LA is
1:35:50
kind of its own city-state akin to New
1:35:52
York. Like it's not quite, it's allied with
1:35:55
that El Norte Mexican-American thing, and
1:35:57
it's allied with the left coast.
1:36:00
It's its own thing. Yes. And
1:36:02
it's a culture, ironically, I did a
1:36:04
DNA test. The city ride, the most relatives
1:36:06
is Los Angeles. Because those people from Nebraska,
1:36:10
white Los Angeles is all people from
1:36:12
the Midwest. And it's ironic to their
1:36:14
culture to a 160, because Los Angeles
1:36:16
culture now is the opposite of the
1:36:18
Midwest in America or inside the American
1:36:21
context. And it's a culture that developed
1:36:23
around Hollywood of being popular. It's probably
1:36:25
the most feminine culture in the entire
1:36:27
world. It's
1:36:30
very driven by status, materialism.
1:36:33
I lived there for like four to
1:36:35
five months. And it's frankly my
1:36:38
least favorite place I have ever been to in the world.
1:36:41
I'll be honest. I'm going to give you, if I have
1:36:43
a spare, I'll give you a copy of a book I
1:36:45
wrote called Los Angeles is Hideous Palms of an Ugly City
1:36:48
that I wrote about three years ago now. One
1:36:51
of my best friends in the world lives in LA. There's lots of good
1:36:53
things about it. It's not for me. Yeah, Hideous
1:36:55
City. And just aesthetically, I should say. Yeah,
1:36:58
I agree with that. And
1:37:01
it's remarkable to see. And
1:37:05
I've lived in three third world countries. I've
1:37:07
lived in Peru, Thailand, and Mexico. And I've
1:37:09
been to other third world countries. Los
1:37:12
Angeles looks the most third world of
1:37:14
any of those four places. In
1:37:17
my opinion, the locals are so happy
1:37:19
to have sunlight that it compensates for
1:37:21
everything. You could have an apartment
1:37:23
building that's just a big, ugly,
1:37:26
cement center block with eyes gouged
1:37:28
out in it like skull sockets.
1:37:30
Yeah. But as long as
1:37:32
there's sunlight, it's beautiful. But
1:37:34
I'm going to hold back. I'm just talking aesthetically.
1:37:37
I'm just talking aesthetically here. I don't like it.
1:37:39
I'm talking about the quality of the people there.
1:37:41
Okay. Yeah, that's right. Well,
1:37:43
I know we are running up on time, but there's a very
1:37:45
large portion of the country we've not talked about. Yes. We
1:37:49
do need to cover this. And this would be the far
1:37:51
west or the west or whatever. It's
1:37:53
rugged miles and miles of nobody,
1:37:55
and then a dude with a gun part of the country.
1:37:58
So what is this? One of my best friends. friends
1:38:00
from Sioux Falls, South Dakota, which is the
1:38:02
western part of South Dakota, and it's
1:38:05
just the middle of nowhere. And it's
1:38:07
a very cowboy culture where this part
1:38:09
of the country is, was completely,
1:38:11
it's slightly populated today. I
1:38:14
think the entire northern
1:38:16
tier of America, Wyoming, the Dakotas, Montana,
1:38:18
area the size of western Europe has
1:38:21
less people than New York City, usually.
1:38:23
I mean, again, New York City has
1:38:25
more than 38 states individually. Yeah,
1:38:28
individually. In aggregate. I'm
1:38:31
sure that there's more people in New York City than
1:38:33
there are in Wyoming, Montana. I mean, a lot of
1:38:36
the states have one at-large representative. Some
1:38:38
of them have less than a million people, some are about a million people.
1:38:41
And it does strike me as a very, very
1:38:43
different, even if the people that populated it are
1:38:45
the same, the circumstances are very different, and that
1:38:48
you look at Appalachia, that is
1:38:50
border people from Scots-Irish
1:38:53
that are going to mountainous
1:38:57
areas and kind of spreading
1:38:59
down. But the west
1:39:01
isn't populated in any capacity beyond
1:39:03
very, very low level distance until
1:39:05
we have the engineering capacity to
1:39:07
actually build canals and things. It
1:39:10
was just because it's beautiful. It's a beautiful
1:39:12
part of the country. But if you were
1:39:14
to remove electricity and hydraulic projects and feed
1:39:16
engineering that weren't around until maybe, I don't
1:39:19
know, 1880, 1860, you can't have large populations
1:39:23
out there without modern technology. The only
1:39:26
state in the Intermountain West with a
1:39:28
significant population is Colorado. And
1:39:32
across the Intermountain West, you see
1:39:34
a very individualistic culture. And this
1:39:36
straddles the line from Colorado to
1:39:38
Montana, where Colorado's left wing, Montana,
1:39:41
the Dakotas are right wing. But it's both this...
1:39:44
It's very much a Ted Gazzinski culture, and it's
1:39:46
not a coincidence that Ted Kay lived in
1:39:48
Montana. And it's, leave
1:39:50
me alone. I want to have my own
1:39:54
land in the mountains. Don't bother me.
1:39:56
I don't like the modern world. And it goes
1:39:58
between let me smoke weed in peace. Will that
1:40:00
be own 30 guns in peace? Yeah. I
1:40:03
think that it has a very individualistic
1:40:05
libertarian bent to it. I think even
1:40:07
more so than Appalachia in that like
1:40:09
if you ... I love Colorado. I think Colorado
1:40:12
is a wonderful state. When you
1:40:14
go there, you find that the Democrats that
1:40:16
are in power like Jared Polis, Kicken Looper,
1:40:20
those guys tend to be pretty pro-business Democrats that
1:40:22
have to write it as neoliberals by progressives in
1:40:25
the rest of the country. And then you look
1:40:27
at the Republicans and they tend to be fine
1:40:29
with pot and gays. They're
1:40:32
much more religious, but broadly
1:40:34
speaking, I find that the Republicans
1:40:36
and the Democrats both are much
1:40:38
more libertarian on their outlets than other
1:40:41
states are. A big reason that happened
1:40:43
was this area got completely shafted by
1:40:45
big companies where the Robert Barron era,
1:40:48
the railroad companies had
1:40:51
complete dominance over this area. There's no other way we
1:40:53
could get to them. A
1:40:55
big political sticking point of the
1:40:57
late 19th, early 20th centuries was
1:40:59
they would charge vastly higher shipment
1:41:01
fees to the intermountain west than
1:41:03
even shipping something from California to
1:41:06
the East Coast. And
1:41:09
so this area got messed over
1:41:11
by these big governments. And
1:41:13
so it's a society by these big companies. It's
1:41:15
a society that distrusts both the
1:41:17
big companies and the big government.
1:41:20
And a difference I have within
1:41:23
Garo and mine in Woodard and my systems is
1:41:25
I split the Mormons off as a completely independent
1:41:27
culture. Real quick, just to finish up on the
1:41:29
far west, would it be fair to say that
1:41:31
there's a much more populist vibe there for that
1:41:34
reason? Yes. Because there is a
1:41:36
historical element to the far west of kind
1:41:38
of internal economic
1:41:41
imperialism of yeah, you
1:41:43
guys are the colonists and it's the people back
1:41:46
East that run the show. I
1:41:48
for that reason, I think that like today, the
1:41:50
far west states with the exception of Colorado are
1:41:53
reliably red states. I don't think that that's
1:41:55
a foregone permanent conclusion. I think that they
1:41:58
are presently allied with the Republican Party. party
1:42:00
because they're skeptical of the government. Great. But
1:42:02
they're also pretty skeptical of big corporations and
1:42:05
just in general being pushed out by outsiders.
1:42:08
And so I could see them pivot and go
1:42:10
a different direction. Yeah. Depending
1:42:12
on which, what rallies the populist sympathies
1:42:14
more? The South and New England will
1:42:16
always be at war. The intermountain West
1:42:18
and the Midlands will flip between them.
1:42:21
And they share that trade with
1:42:23
Nordic America. Where Nordic America and
1:42:26
the intermountain West, they are always
1:42:28
allied. They're always both populists. But
1:42:31
in Nordic America, it's... Nordic
1:42:33
America is a culture I split off because
1:42:35
in those top states... It's just like Wisconsin
1:42:37
and Minnesota. Wisconsin, Minnesota, top of Iowa, parts
1:42:39
of... You know in Fargo,
1:42:41
they've got the accent. That's an accent
1:42:43
from Swedish immigrants to America. And
1:42:46
that culture is different from a lot of the rest
1:42:48
of America because you look at genetics, ethnography, that sort
1:42:50
of thing. And
1:42:52
across most of America, British Americans
1:42:54
predominate. But in those Northern
1:42:56
states, it's 80% Germanic. It's
1:43:00
80% German, Scandinavian, Finnish.
1:43:03
The Finns are a majority of Upper
1:43:05
Peninsula and in Michigan. And
1:43:07
so it developed this very communitarian culture
1:43:09
where in the same manner you look
1:43:11
at Germany or Sweden or the Netherlands
1:43:13
and see today they have socialism, they
1:43:16
have big government.
1:43:18
They develop this communitarian feel because they
1:43:20
come from societies that feel that they
1:43:22
have a large responsibility to take care
1:43:25
of the population. And
1:43:29
they often vote blue, but
1:43:31
it's not wokeness. They're very
1:43:33
union, very communal. Yeah,
1:43:35
I think that's where you look at Wisconsin,
1:43:37
Minnesota. These are states
1:43:39
that are agricultural and have
1:43:42
a sense of traditional
1:43:44
rural small town values, but it's very
1:43:47
much coupled with a kind of agricultural
1:43:49
cooperative thing of course,
1:43:52
where we're all part of the local
1:43:54
co-op and there's I think it's rural
1:43:56
and a
1:44:00
more traditional, but also way less
1:44:02
skeptical of the community
1:44:04
as exemplified through the government. Yeah, I
1:44:06
definitely agree with that. It
1:44:09
shares a lot with the West Coast, where I think
1:44:11
it's a naive culture. And
1:44:15
I think that's why George
1:44:17
Floyd started Minnesota. You see
1:44:19
Elon Omar, based out
1:44:21
of Minnesota, where it's a very...
1:44:24
It also shares
1:44:26
some traits with New England, and a
1:44:29
culture that's also similar is the Mormons, where
1:44:31
the Mormons were all ethnic
1:44:33
transplants from New England. The Mormons are
1:44:35
identically identical to New Englanders, but then
1:44:38
they do have this utopian community spirit,
1:44:40
same as the Yankees, but it went
1:44:42
hard right. Interesting. And
1:44:45
how so? Because like you... Mormons, Joseph Smith's
1:44:47
from what, upper New York state?
1:44:49
Yeah, Vermont and up in New York. And he starts
1:44:51
the Mormon movement, and they kind of just keep getting
1:44:53
kicked out and pushed further and further west. So like
1:44:56
the Garden of Eden is in
1:44:58
Missouri, and that's a temple of great renown
1:45:00
there, but then they got the x out of
1:45:02
there, and they ended up settling in Utah. And
1:45:05
we're kind of functionally their own country for a little
1:45:07
bit. And now,
1:45:10
like run... Well, I've run Utah.
1:45:12
There's a lot of businesses there that are owned by the
1:45:14
church, where the people that run the
1:45:16
business are very much a part
1:45:18
of the church. So it is a
1:45:20
community unto itself, and like Utah,
1:45:23
parts of Idaho, and I would imagine there's some
1:45:25
other states that I don't know, but like Utah
1:45:27
and Idaho, like the Mormon training facilities in Idaho.
1:45:30
So like, how would you describe them? Like, what
1:45:33
would a right wing Yankeedom look like in that
1:45:35
context? It's fascinating to see,
1:45:37
because you see different
1:45:39
archetypes of cultures and different geographies.
1:45:41
And what
1:45:44
normally occurs in desert irrigation
1:45:46
based societies is their top
1:45:48
down theocracies. And it's interesting
1:45:50
to see an Anglo-American culture
1:45:52
evolve into that to fit
1:45:55
with the geography, where there's a lot of similarities
1:45:57
between the Middle East and the Mormons. where
1:46:00
it's this theocratic society and the Mormons,
1:46:02
the way they populated the west was
1:46:04
the central Mormon commands told Mormons, you
1:46:06
will settle in Arizona, you will settle
1:46:08
in Nevada. And they did like a
1:46:10
strategy game or a chess game to
1:46:12
populate the strategic points in the west.
1:46:15
And it's all this top down hierarchy
1:46:17
from the central Mormon government. And they
1:46:19
run Utah where I'll hear
1:46:21
stories from friends of people who move out to
1:46:23
Utah, and they can't get a
1:46:25
job because they're not Mormon. And everyone
1:46:27
will blacklist hiring non-Mormons in that area.
1:46:29
And so it's a very
1:46:31
communal, and the reason Mormons are so
1:46:33
well-liked is their religion demands
1:46:36
that they be good Americans. If you're
1:46:38
Mormon, they'll say, you need to work
1:46:40
hard, you need to be friendly to
1:46:42
other people. It's your duty to put
1:46:45
up a good front for the Mormon community. Well, I
1:46:47
mean, like I grew up with a lot of Mormons
1:46:49
and I was a dick to them back in high
1:46:51
school because I was religious and I wanted to pick
1:46:53
religion. Now that I'm not, I look and I go,
1:46:55
these are great members of the community. They work hard,
1:46:57
they've got good families, they take care of each other,
1:47:00
they avoid vices like drinking, like,
1:47:03
I like Mormon communities tremendously. Yeah.
1:47:07
And that's all true. The negative
1:47:09
is they share the cultishness of
1:47:11
the Yankees. And so it's an
1:47:13
evolution from the Puritans that just
1:47:15
kept going west. But because they're
1:47:17
a stronger religion, I think normal
1:47:19
Protestants except outside the
1:47:21
south, they kept this
1:47:23
conservative feeling because they
1:47:26
didn't want to get rid of the religion.
1:47:28
And also they're in a part of the country
1:47:30
that's conservative. You
1:47:32
said that they responded to these desert
1:47:36
deprivations through theocracy. What do you mean
1:47:38
by that? Like, this
1:47:40
is a difficult environment to be
1:47:42
in and the human response is,
1:47:45
it can't just be an authority, it
1:47:47
needs to be religious because that is
1:47:49
social trust. Or like, why theocracy as
1:47:51
opposed to just authority? If you look
1:47:53
at Pakistan, Iraq, Egypt, Syria,
1:47:57
climates that are pretty similar to Utah.
1:48:00
in that it's irrigation-based societies, those countries
1:48:02
have been theocracies for their entire history.
1:48:04
If you want to look at Egypt,
1:48:07
ancient Egypt was a theocracy. They're a
1:48:09
theocracy under Islam now. And
1:48:12
the case for that is
1:48:14
irrigation-based societies develop strange
1:48:17
power relationships, in which
1:48:20
if you're the pharaoh of Egypt
1:48:22
and someone rebels against you, you
1:48:25
can just cut off their water
1:48:27
supply and their farm will die
1:48:29
immediately. And so irrigation-based societies always
1:48:31
become authoritarian. And what occurs is
1:48:33
because there are natural geographic geepers,
1:48:35
they're literal resource gatekeepers. Yes. So
1:48:37
there's no way to distribute that
1:48:40
power. Exactly. And if you look
1:48:42
at Scotland at the exact opposite
1:48:44
example, Scotland is in Appalachia too.
1:48:46
They're a deeply mountainous society. It's
1:48:48
hard to control mountains. You can't
1:48:50
do it. In Egypt, it's
1:48:52
dead flat. There aren't even trees
1:48:54
to block people. And so Egypt
1:48:57
has been politically centralized for
1:48:59
almost all of the last 5,000 years. And Utah is similar.
1:49:04
And so when you create an irrigation-based
1:49:06
society, it will very
1:49:08
naturally turn into a theocracy because power
1:49:10
has to be centralized. And once you
1:49:12
centralize the power, you make it divine
1:49:15
right as a way to justify
1:49:18
the power. And I would also
1:49:20
believe to create some moral tethers
1:49:22
upon complete despotism. Before
1:49:26
we wrap up, you mentioned that you make
1:49:28
a distinction with, say, Los Angeles, that's kind
1:49:30
of its own cultural city state. Are there
1:49:32
any other carve-outs you want to
1:49:34
make that provides us? I said New York
1:49:36
and Los Angeles. I think Washington, DC is.
1:49:39
We spoke with Miami before, but Washington, DC,
1:49:42
it's imperial American culture. You are in DC
1:49:44
because you have a job for the government,
1:49:46
not because you like DC. And
1:49:48
I also put Toronto
1:49:50
as a carve-out. And we don't have
1:49:53
time to get to Canada, but Toronto
1:49:55
is a combination of Canadian, New
1:49:58
York, and Washington, DC. Okay,
1:50:00
interesting. Great. Well, I've enjoyed
1:50:02
talking to you about all these different things and note
1:50:05
that we are collapsing so
1:50:08
much history into about
1:50:10
two hours. So we didn't
1:50:12
spend a whole lot of time on the far west
1:50:14
or on the west coast. That is not because we're
1:50:16
trying to deride anything. It's merely where
1:50:18
we are and we kind of front loaded the
1:50:20
conversation. I want
1:50:22
to turn away from the descriptive element of this to,
1:50:24
I don't know, push back on
1:50:26
it a little bit in that I find
1:50:28
myself, Rudyard, in a place where I mostly
1:50:31
agree with this, but
1:50:33
every once in a while it turns
1:50:36
into almost like a mythological explanation of
1:50:38
the universe of like, well, Sparta is
1:50:40
permanently militaristic because Hercules
1:50:42
and Mars took that, but Athens
1:50:45
shall forever be a city of scholars
1:50:47
because Athena, you know, okay, at some
1:50:49
point this stuff changes. So, like,
1:50:51
for one thing, why are all
1:50:54
of these, we talk about cavaliers, we talked about
1:50:56
these, I understand why these would be dominant factors.
1:50:58
Why would they be there in perpetuity? How do
1:51:00
they become an essentialist element of a coastal forever?
1:51:02
One of the, I develop
1:51:04
a bunch of mental heuristics I do for my
1:51:06
job and one of them is don't let your
1:51:09
definitions control you and look at it, see what
1:51:11
it is, but don't let it get stupid. And
1:51:13
an example of this is a lot
1:51:16
of these authors, they treat New England
1:51:18
as permanently intellectual and superior, but
1:51:20
look at the advances of the south in the last 60 years.
1:51:23
The south completely turned around as a
1:51:25
society, it's become wealthy, it's become educated,
1:51:28
it's become the most successful region in
1:51:30
America. There's a lot of really smart
1:51:32
people in Austin right now and
1:51:35
these do change and so
1:51:37
you have, but it's hard to make
1:51:40
distinctions and principles that apply
1:51:42
everywhere. And to compare
1:51:45
America to Europe, you can see
1:51:47
the French have maintained certain
1:51:49
cultural traits for the last 2000 years,
1:51:51
the English have maintained certain cultural traits,
1:51:53
the Germans have. And I
1:51:56
view America as the same where you
1:51:58
can find similarities across German history. But,
1:52:00
Germany has done a lot of big pivots
1:52:03
as a society, where they went nationalist
1:52:05
and then anti-nationalist. And that
1:52:07
happens to America, but
1:52:09
you do see cultural commonalities across
1:52:11
it in the same manner you
1:52:14
can for any society. I
1:52:16
think it's more useful to view these
1:52:18
sub-nations in America with the same degree
1:52:20
of subtlety with which you would view
1:52:22
China or India or Nicaragua. So,
1:52:25
that is to say that they are organic,
1:52:27
they are changing, they are in a state
1:52:29
of flux, but just because they're in
1:52:31
a state of flux does not mean they're going to homogenize
1:52:33
this. Yes. You
1:52:35
might have a person that, you know, like a
1:52:37
kid changes over the course of their life, but
1:52:39
there might be certain traits that remain there or
1:52:41
linger there where families change, but
1:52:44
maybe this family was always more
1:52:46
authoritarian in how it raised itself and that's
1:52:48
going to linger for a while. Yes.
1:52:52
One really big thing that we've not brought up
1:52:54
today is immigrants. America is a nation of immigrants.
1:52:56
Yes. Go back to like 1880, I don't have the
1:52:58
data in front of me, but I want to say in 1880 that
1:53:00
like a quarter of all Americans were
1:53:02
either from another country or one of their parents
1:53:04
were just from another country. So,
1:53:07
it's not as if these people came
1:53:09
over and then the door slammed shut and like
1:53:11
Yankees have always just been Yankees. We
1:53:13
look at like Boston that we mentioned earlier today, I
1:53:16
think of Boston as an Irish town. I don't think
1:53:18
of Boston as an English town. So
1:53:20
like what happens? Do the immigrants like, are we
1:53:22
just not pawning them or do they get completely
1:53:25
absorbed or is there just outside influence
1:53:27
that the founders get of a particular
1:53:29
area in setting up the trappings of
1:53:31
the paradigms? It depends on what part
1:53:33
of America you're in and to what
1:53:35
degree. One factor is Americans
1:53:37
massively over count immigrant ancestry, where if you
1:53:39
look at, this is one of the topics
1:53:41
I've studied a lot. If you look at
1:53:44
genetics, if you look at last name analysis,
1:53:46
if you look at sentences over the 19th
1:53:48
century, you find that about two thirds of
1:53:50
white American ancestry is from the British Isles.
1:53:53
In the average year, someone's ancestors came
1:53:55
to America as 1790. And
1:53:58
so half of American ancestors came to America as 1790.
1:54:00
before the revolution, half of it's after, and that's as
1:54:02
of 2010. It
1:54:08
depends on what part of the country you're from,
1:54:10
where the South had almost no immigration. The
1:54:14
vast majority of the South's population is
1:54:16
people whose ancestors were here before the
1:54:18
revolution. The
1:54:22
three areas of the country that's a
1:54:24
complete demographic replacement are New York City,
1:54:29
the Upper Midwest, and California.
1:54:31
If you look at, like you said, Boston
1:54:34
is an Irish town, demographically
1:54:36
there is much more English ancestry
1:54:38
in Boston, but if you
1:54:40
go to Boston, they will automatically write
1:54:42
out English ancestry when they say what they are.
1:54:44
They'll say they can be 60% English, 20% Italian,
1:54:46
20% Irish. They'll
1:54:50
say that they're Irish and
1:54:52
Italian. This is something I've seen myself,
1:54:54
where I'm half Irish, I'm like 40%
1:54:56
English, I'm like 10% Scottish
1:54:58
and German. I'll say I'm Irish and
1:55:01
English. Someone will often repeat
1:55:03
back to me in the same conversation, you're
1:55:05
Irish and Scottish, right? And
1:55:07
so we subconsciously substitute the
1:55:10
colonial ancestry out even though it's the
1:55:12
biggest. And- And you
1:55:14
say, is this just a mediacy bias of
1:55:16
whatever the most recent group is who I
1:55:18
identify with or is it I
1:55:21
want to be special and so whatever is
1:55:23
novel I gravitate towards as opposed to the
1:55:25
general background culture? It's both. It's
1:55:27
not a diversity thing where you want to be
1:55:30
special because if you have a genetics test saying
1:55:32
you're 100% white, people say you're bland, they won't
1:55:34
say you're spicy, they won't say, there is a
1:55:36
real bias against it. But secondly,
1:55:39
if you know you had an ancestor
1:55:41
come over from Germany in 1920, but you're mostly
1:55:44
English ancestors in the 1600s, you
1:55:47
will at least know about that ancestor from And
1:55:50
when you think back, you'll think, oh, I had
1:55:52
a grandpa who came, my great grandpa came over
1:55:54
and you won't think how great grandpa married a
1:55:57
local American and they married another local American. Partly
1:56:00
that. That resonates for me. Heaton
1:56:03
is an English surname. My mom's maiden
1:56:05
name is Barbara, which is Scottish. But
1:56:08
on my mom's side of the family, her grandmother was
1:56:10
a German immigrant,
1:56:12
or she grew up speaking German.
1:56:15
Her father, my mother's great grandfather was German.
1:56:17
So like the, we
1:56:19
don't know much about the people that at the beginning of
1:56:22
the family that came over to the States. We have no
1:56:24
idea when the Heatons came over, probably
1:56:26
because we were illiterate horse thieves or something.
1:56:29
But we do know with my mom's family, like we can point
1:56:31
to those specific Germans that came over. They
1:56:33
came over from Hanover. We had correspondence with
1:56:35
them for a while for the folks back
1:56:37
home. So that the immigrant experience is something
1:56:39
that is easier to intellectually gravitate towards in
1:56:42
the modern capacity. Whereas the further back you
1:56:44
go, it just sort of recedes into time.
1:56:46
And so you don't have any hook
1:56:49
to hang that family on. Yes. And
1:56:51
this is a process you also see
1:56:53
in Argentina and Brazil, where the colonial
1:56:57
population is there, the Portuguese and Spanish.
1:56:59
Looking at genetics, those are massively
1:57:02
under counted versus later Italian or
1:57:04
German ancestry. And the
1:57:06
question I would ask for these regional cultures is
1:57:09
what evidence would you need to see? Because
1:57:12
I always ask that question, it sets
1:57:14
a metric that you can go for
1:57:16
where these genetic groups still exist today. If
1:57:18
you look at a genetic map of America, 60%
1:57:22
of Americans belong to one of these
1:57:24
genetic groups we talk about that came
1:57:26
over with the British or Africans, et
1:57:28
cetera, in the colonial period. And
1:57:31
you can trace these different
1:57:33
regions between voting patterns, between
1:57:35
genetics, between accent, between
1:57:37
architecture styles. And
1:57:40
there's a lot of books and things
1:57:42
that have covered this where Americans
1:57:45
purposely under count their internal diversity
1:57:47
because our project as a nation
1:57:49
has been towards unification. And
1:57:52
it's inside the self-interest of the large corporations
1:57:54
and the government to pretend America is more
1:57:57
unified than it is. California
1:58:00
based out of where we are now in
1:58:02
Texas. It's hard to think
1:58:04
of almost any similarities in the culture
1:58:06
between California and Texas. The architecture is
1:58:08
different, the accent is different, the
1:58:11
religious structure is different, the demographics
1:58:13
are different, the social
1:58:16
consensus and the codes
1:58:18
of politeness are different. I would
1:58:20
argue that the social consensus on
1:58:22
the role of society and government,
1:58:25
there's a greater intellectual gap between
1:58:28
Yankee, New England and Appalachia than there
1:58:30
is between any European Union member state.
1:58:33
They are- Or at least in Western Europe.
1:58:35
In Western Europe, yeah. I would agree with that. The
1:58:38
reason I spend a lot of time talking
1:58:40
about these cultures is we
1:58:42
treat Belgium as a real country. Belgium
1:58:45
doesn't exist. It should be the
1:58:47
Dutch and the French. Same as Austria. The
1:58:50
differences inside these American cultures are bigger
1:58:53
than the differences inside Scandinavia, but no
1:58:55
one would say that Danish isn't a
1:58:57
real culture. These
1:59:01
different genetic groups we've talked about, they
1:59:03
have tens of millions of people, which
1:59:05
is something Europeans can forget where, let's
1:59:08
say the Scots-Irish diaspora, that has 40
1:59:10
to 50 million people inside of it. That's
1:59:13
larger than the population of England. Okay.
1:59:16
Well, going back to Boston, for example.
1:59:20
If we're talking about these foundational immigrant
1:59:22
groups that come over, and New England
1:59:24
is Puritanical Yankees, that is a very
1:59:26
different group than Irish Catholics coming over
1:59:28
to work at the docks or whatever.
1:59:31
What happens to that group? It
1:59:34
sounds like, basically what you said earlier, that it
1:59:36
just gets diluted into the overall English
1:59:38
drug argument. They maintain claims of Irishness.
1:59:40
Or is it that ... Do
1:59:43
the kickoff people set up the paradigms and then
1:59:45
everybody gets absorbed into the paradigms? This
1:59:48
is another thing where I talk about
1:59:50
the complication, where it's easy to get
1:59:52
wrapped up in your ideas, where everything
1:59:54
you're talking about happens. Where I'm Irish-American,
1:59:56
I'm from Philadelphia, I'm culturally much more
1:59:58
similar in most ways. to a
2:00:01
German or an Italian or an English
2:00:03
American from Philly than to another Irish
2:00:05
American in Boston. Got it. And
2:00:07
in the same way that me being an English
2:00:09
Scottish German American from Oklahoma, I probably
2:00:12
have more in common with somebody
2:00:14
who's German in Tennessee, or ethnically
2:00:17
German in Tennessee that I do
2:00:19
with an English surname
2:00:21
person from Vermont. This
2:00:23
is one of the disagreements I have over
2:00:25
race and IQ, for an example. The IQ
2:00:28
gap between English Americans in the South and
2:00:30
New England is so huge that it's almost
2:00:32
effectively an argument in some ways against race
2:00:35
and IQ. I'm
2:00:37
glad to hear that. I don't really want
2:00:39
IQ and race to be correlated.
2:00:41
That strikes me as a bad thing. This
2:00:44
is a two-hour argument where I have like 10
2:00:46
different sub points, but that's one point you can
2:00:48
use out of that two-hour argument. But
2:00:54
that also does occur where if you're a
2:00:57
pure Yankee descendant
2:00:59
from like
2:01:01
the Mayflower and then you're
2:01:04
just like some super Italian guy,
2:01:06
from Rhode Island, you are going
2:01:08
to be different. These
2:01:10
cultural differences between ethnicities do happen.
2:01:12
One of my favorite anthropology books
2:01:14
is Thomas Sowell's book on different
2:01:16
American ethnicities. I made a great
2:01:19
video about this where Italians,
2:01:22
Irish, Germans went
2:01:24
into different industries. They had different cultures. It
2:01:27
depends based off what part of
2:01:29
the country you're from, or even
2:01:31
locally, where South Jersey is very
2:01:33
Italian, it's very Irish, it's very
2:01:35
Catholic. In Pennsylvania, it's
2:01:38
much more of that original Quaker
2:01:40
culture. It's a gradient where you
2:01:44
see less assimilation. Generally,
2:01:47
the further you
2:01:49
get off Atlantic ports, the
2:01:51
more strong the traditional culture
2:01:53
is in the less immigrants
2:01:55
matter. Where if you're an Italian
2:01:58
guy in central Pennsylvania, you're going to be
2:02:00
like, lot less Italian than Italian guy in
2:02:02
New Jersey. I would
2:02:04
think also that if we were playing around with an
2:02:06
alternate universe model, let's say that all these different groups
2:02:08
we described today and we've hit 11 to
2:02:10
15, I think. Yeah. Let's
2:02:12
say theoretically they all spoke different languages. And lived in
2:02:14
peace with each other to the same
2:02:16
extent we have in American history, but spoke
2:02:19
different languages. I think it would
2:02:21
be very clear if that were the case, you'd
2:02:23
go, oh, well, those speakers over there, this is
2:02:25
what they think. Yes. If
2:02:27
we make the same language, there's a
2:02:29
presumption that we're more similar than we
2:02:31
are. Whereas it might well be that,
2:02:34
at least in terms of how you look
2:02:36
at government, it might be more similar in
2:02:38
Italy and in Greece or Italy and France.
2:02:40
Even though they speak different languages, they might
2:02:42
have a more common reaction to government.
2:02:45
Agreed. Say like within, I
2:02:47
don't know, Canada versus Louisiana. And another
2:02:50
point I'd throw in here is I read
2:02:52
a lot of older histories and there's a
2:02:54
myth that I only read books written before
2:02:56
1960. And that's insane. If
2:02:58
you go through my Goodreads, the vast majority of
2:03:01
us 21st century, but I do read lots
2:03:03
of old books and you see these changes in how
2:03:05
we write about American history. And for the
2:03:08
pre-World War II era, they never write America
2:03:10
as a single country. If you read a
2:03:12
history book written in 1940, they
2:03:15
say the South thinks this, the Northeast
2:03:17
thinks this, the West thinks this, and
2:03:19
they never, it doesn't occur to them
2:03:21
to treat America as a single society
2:03:23
in most cases. First World
2:03:25
War II, that changes very rapidly. I think
2:03:27
that's a proxy for the growth of the
2:03:29
centralized government that happened with the world wars
2:03:32
because it started
2:03:34
to become useful to treat America as
2:03:36
the same country politically and economically. And
2:03:39
once you move from an economy that's based around
2:03:41
the local family running the factory
2:03:44
to one where there's a McDonald's
2:03:46
in every town, a national TV,
2:03:48
then it appears,
2:03:50
I like to say America, it's
2:03:53
very, on the outside, it appears
2:03:55
very much like a strip mall country. You can
2:03:57
drive around a strip mall in Texas, California. New
2:04:00
Jersey, the strip mall looks the same.
2:04:03
The same. If you go into the
2:04:05
older towns or talk to the people about what they
2:04:07
think about the world, then it gets stranger and stranger.
2:04:10
It's a big thing we see today
2:04:13
where we purposely downplay cultural differences where
2:04:15
you, a Western and an
2:04:17
Indian person, see the world in
2:04:19
very different terms, but we wouldn't
2:04:22
talk about their underlying different philosophies.
2:04:24
We would focus upon how they're eating a hamburger together
2:04:26
or how they're going to the same university. I'll
2:04:29
push back a little bit on that. I don't think it's World
2:04:32
War II. I think it's World War I. I'd agree with that.
2:04:34
I think under Wilson, when
2:04:36
we're fighting World War I, there's
2:04:38
this massive push of, if
2:04:40
you remember like World War I, a significant
2:04:43
part of the country is German or
2:04:45
identifies as German. Yes. And
2:04:47
is rooting for either us to support the Germans
2:04:50
or neutrality. And
2:04:52
Wilson, our first fascist president, comes
2:04:55
in and goes, no, first of all, you're a
2:04:57
traitor. If you don't want to support the war,
2:04:59
and he literally throws Eugene V. Debs in prison
2:05:02
for opposing the draft. And
2:05:04
then he goes on this national campaign to say
2:05:06
anybody with a hyphen in their name is a
2:05:08
secret traitor waiting to happen. If you were a
2:05:10
German American or a Jewish American, anything hyphen
2:05:13
American means you have divided royalties and you
2:05:15
are bad American. And there's this attempt to
2:05:17
whitewash everybody and turn it into a kind
2:05:21
of bland Northeast
2:05:23
interpretation but specifically like
2:05:25
a white Anglo-American culture.
2:05:28
And thereafter, there's a much more intense
2:05:32
national identity, which I think we both agree
2:05:34
is misplaced. When I talk
2:05:36
to my European friends, I think it's the thing
2:05:38
I always bring up is would your
2:05:41
country want to quit having
2:05:43
national healthcare and have European healthcare run out
2:05:45
of Brussels? To date, out of about
2:05:47
300 conversations I've had, no one
2:05:49
has said, yes, that would be a good
2:05:51
idea. Nobody always says, well, no, you
2:05:54
guys are nuts and your healthcare system is insane. But like
2:05:56
Swedish healthcare is very good for Sweden, but we would not
2:05:58
have had a night A
2:06:00
better understanding for Europeans of America is
2:06:02
that we are European
2:06:05
Union 1.0 and that it's
2:06:07
an alliance of a bunch of different
2:06:09
countries. And we've really nationalized, I think,
2:06:11
too far, and it would be better
2:06:13
for us to go back a little
2:06:15
bit towards like the NATO NAFTA European
2:06:17
Union model, the way you guys are
2:06:20
doing. I would agree with
2:06:22
that. And for my American civilization video, one of
2:06:24
the points I made is that as a reaction
2:06:26
to the World War, you saw the creation of
2:06:28
American anti-culture. And that's a
2:06:31
society which existed to not be any
2:06:33
of the regional cultures. It's the culture
2:06:35
of the federal government. And
2:06:37
like this is the America's bad, it's always been
2:06:39
bad. Yes, yes. If only we could
2:06:41
be like the country I lost my virginity in
2:06:43
on my spring break trip to Europe when I
2:06:45
was in college where I was starving and felt
2:06:48
very sophisticated. Basically. And the problem
2:06:50
is that's the majority culture. And what they'll
2:06:52
say is white Americans don't have a culture.
2:06:55
And that's what they want to believe because that
2:06:57
culture is the biggest thing which keeps them from
2:06:59
seizing total social power. And it's
2:07:02
the culture of wokeness of American culture
2:07:04
is bad. And
2:07:07
that's what I call imperial American culture.
2:07:09
And it's very rare to see anti-culture
2:07:11
develop in a society. When the Romans
2:07:14
had their empire, they thought, we're Roman,
2:07:16
we're better than you. And that's what's
2:07:18
normal. Okay. I
2:07:21
think I will go ahead and stop it there.
2:07:24
This has been a fascinating conversation. I
2:07:26
need to apologize to you, Rudyard. I think I told
2:07:28
you we were going to talk for about an hour
2:07:30
and then do an unrelated bonus episode. And
2:07:33
we've now just hit the two hour mark
2:07:35
just discussing this initial topic. But
2:07:38
I found it so fascinating I could not wrench myself
2:07:40
from it and have very much enjoyed talking to you.
2:07:42
Where can people find you, Rudyard? First
2:07:45
of all, it was a pleasure having me and thank
2:07:47
you very much. You can find me in Whatifaltist. It's
2:07:50
a portmanteau of what if alternate
2:07:52
history. It's a single word. Look it
2:07:54
up on YouTube. It's all the contents
2:07:57
free online. And I will,
2:07:59
listeners, link to that in today's
2:08:01
episode show notes. So if you forget that,
2:08:03
just check the episode description
2:08:06
and you'll find a link and you'll be able to find any
2:08:08
of those videos. Any videos you'd
2:08:10
like to recommend for people? Kick off.
2:08:12
If you liked this video, my video
2:08:15
on American civilization covers this. I have
2:08:17
a two-hour series on regional American cultures,
2:08:19
or the nine nations of North America.
2:08:21
And I also have a video on
2:08:23
explaining America's identity through 10 ethnic
2:08:26
identities like German American, Italian American,
2:08:28
black American. So those three video
2:08:30
series are the things that if
2:08:32
you liked this video, you will
2:08:34
enjoy the most. Wonderful. All
2:08:37
right. Rudyard Lynch,
2:08:39
Rudyard William Lynch? Yes. Thank you very much for
2:08:42
coming on. It was a pleasure. Great
2:08:47
chat, Heaton. Well done.
2:08:49
Well moderated. You're good at your job.
2:08:52
Although it does occur to me, having
2:08:54
now completed that interview, that while
2:08:57
some of the most irritating politicians
2:09:00
I can think of are New England Democrats,
2:09:03
some of the best Republicans are
2:09:05
New England Republicans. So I'm
2:09:07
missing something there. And also
2:09:10
I just did an episode on New Hampshire where I
2:09:13
hung out with a bunch of folks that you
2:09:15
could bend horseshoes around their sense of
2:09:17
freedom, which is far more liberty loving
2:09:19
than moderate old Heaton. So perhaps I'm
2:09:21
missing something. We will cover that on
2:09:23
the next bonus episode of the program.
2:09:25
I will bring on a New Englander
2:09:27
to offer some polite pushback on
2:09:30
some of the hotcakes that were uttered today.
2:09:32
If you enjoyed today's program and you
2:09:35
want to hear more from our man
2:09:37
Rudyard, he
2:09:39
will be joining me for this
2:09:41
week's bonus episode. Rudyard
2:09:43
believes based on some particular historical metrics
2:09:45
that he has assembled, that
2:09:48
there will be an armed rebellion in the
2:09:50
United States within the next three years, which
2:09:55
I think is absurd. I think that's silly. In
2:09:57
fact, I think it's silly enough that I am
2:09:59
going to... openly goad him into,
2:10:01
I'm going to try to get him to bet me $1,000. I'm
2:10:05
going to take the position there's not going to be a
2:10:07
violent revolution within the next three years. I
2:10:09
think that's some Cormac
2:10:12
McCarthy wish fulfillment clickbait nonsense, but he doesn't.
2:10:14
He likes the other thing. So if
2:10:16
you enjoyed Rudyard's historical analysis and you want
2:10:18
to hear more from him, but you
2:10:20
want a different topic, what
2:10:22
he believes to be a rapidly impending
2:10:24
violent revolution in the United States and
2:10:27
why, go to
2:10:29
patreon.com/Andrew Heaton. This
2:10:33
is a Value for Value program.
2:10:35
If you enjoyed today's discussion, and
2:10:37
frankly, gang, it's
2:10:39
been two hours. If you're still here, can we
2:10:41
at least admit you enjoyed yourself? That
2:10:44
you weren't, I hope, chained
2:10:46
to a radiator in a basement or something.
2:10:48
You voluntarily sat here for two hours. If
2:10:50
that is the case, the show
2:10:53
is clearly giving you value. So
2:10:55
please consider sending some value
2:10:57
my way by going to
2:10:59
patreon.com/Andrew Heaton. We don't have
2:11:02
corporate sponsors. We don't have advertisers.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More