Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Support for this podcast and
0:02
the following message come from
0:04
Korea and Korean provides wealth
0:06
management services centered around you.
0:08
As one of the largest
0:10
integrated V only registered investment
0:12
advisors in the U S,
0:14
Korea has experience teams who
0:16
can craft custom solutions designed
0:18
to help you reach your
0:21
financial goals no matter how
0:23
complex real wealth requires. real
0:25
solutions. Connect with a wealth
0:27
advisor today at korean.com that
0:29
korean.com. Hello
0:34
and welcome to the Ram and
0:36
review I'm Gideon Rachman Tree Foreign
0:38
Affairs Commentator of The Financial Times.
0:41
This week's podcast is about Russia
0:43
and Security and your my guest
0:45
is Anne Applebaum. Pulitzer prize winning
0:47
Historian of Russia and Right From
0:50
World Affairs for the Atlantic. So
0:53
how serious is the Russian
0:55
security threat to Europe? I
1:06
would like suing was a new
1:09
chin and all. That
1:12
was yeah everybody will pregnancies and
1:14
his not his government so I
1:16
want is analyst.know the last night
1:18
strangling be punished fox why he
1:20
wanted the way they have done
1:22
with us I am also I
1:24
will listen to my family and
1:26
he just did that with my
1:28
habits. I thought that they will
1:30
be brought you're chatting dislike. That.
1:33
Was union about me, the widow of
1:35
Alexei in the Valley. Speaking to the
1:37
Munich Security Conference just hours after the
1:39
death of the Russian opposition leader was
1:41
announced. The found
1:43
these fierce and brave opposition to
1:46
prove inspired enormous admiration across Europe
1:48
and indeed in much Russia. But.
1:51
It didn't save him from death in a
1:53
remote prison. Novell. Needs
1:55
refusal to back down is, in
1:57
all probability, What? sealed his
1:59
fate Navalny's
2:02
death contributed to the dark atmosphere
2:04
at the Munich Security Conference, and
2:07
so did the news that Russian
2:09
troops in Ukraine are now making
2:11
territorial gains as Ukraine runs low
2:13
on ammunition. Several
2:16
European politicians have warned that
2:18
Putin's ambitions do not stop at Ukraine, and
2:21
that the Russian leader could well attack a
2:23
NATO state in the coming years. And
2:26
Applebaum was at the Munich Conference, along with
2:28
much of the West's security elite. So
2:31
I began our conversation by asking Anne about
2:33
the mood in Munich. I
2:37
have been going to Munich on and off for
2:39
about 15 years, and this
2:41
was the worst version
2:43
of that security conference that I have
2:45
ever been to. And there isn't
2:47
a close second. I
2:49
think maybe the best way to explain it
2:52
is to say that I talked to a
2:54
German MP, a member of the Bundestag,
2:57
who said to me, we've suddenly come to
2:59
realize in Europe that we may wake up
3:02
to face a world in which
3:04
we are competing with three autocracies,
3:07
China, Russia, and the United States.
3:11
And he wasn't joking. I mean, the fear is
3:13
that a second
3:16
Trump administration would not be
3:18
exactly isolationist. It would be
3:21
aggressively anti-European, and
3:23
it would seek to damage Europe. And
3:26
I think it might not be wrong. And
3:29
the behavior of Trump out
3:31
of office, he has
3:33
no power right now. He's no formal job
3:35
in the American government. And
3:37
yet it seems that he controls
3:39
this minority in the House
3:42
of Representatives that is now
3:44
able to dictate U.S. policies. And
3:47
in the summer, for months
3:49
now, they have been blocking aid
3:51
to Ukraine successfully. Even
3:53
though a majority in Congress supports it, a majority
3:55
in the country supports it, the White House
3:57
supports it, this pro-Trump minority has succeeded.
4:00
successfully done that. And
4:02
it feels like a very bad omen
4:04
for the future. It feels that Trump wants
4:06
Ukraine to lose. He
4:08
wants Russia to be empowered. And
4:10
that's very, very dangerous for Europe. And
4:13
in fact, as well as that news
4:15
about Trump's statements about letting Russia do
4:17
whatever the hell it likes, which was
4:19
just a few days before the Munich
4:21
conference, you then also had the incredibly
4:24
grim, sad news just on the
4:26
brink of the conference of the death
4:29
of Navalny. How does
4:31
that affect the mood, but also just the
4:33
calculations? Does it tell us anything new
4:36
about Russia? The added element
4:38
of the death of Navalny was that the
4:40
leader of his organization and his wife were
4:42
in Munich. They'd come to
4:44
make a presentation or do some kind of
4:46
event at the security conference. And
4:49
it was almost eerie. I mean, Yulia
4:51
Navalnya minutes probably after she'd learned this
4:54
news, stood up in front of a room full of people
4:57
and said a few words. I
4:59
think it's another illustration of the
5:01
level of impunity that Russia enjoys
5:04
and the level of aggression
5:06
that Putin feels towards his own
5:09
opposition, as well as
5:11
towards us. He believes or says
5:13
he believes that the Russian
5:16
opposition is somehow funded or paid for
5:18
by the Western world. His
5:20
vision of how he should be able to rule,
5:22
that he decides what the law is, he decides
5:24
what the rule from here. He sees
5:26
that the opposition to that comes both from
5:28
inside his country, from people like Navalny, and
5:30
from outside his country, from the US and Europe.
5:33
And he's determined to destroy both. So I
5:35
think there was a way in which the
5:37
death of Navalny reinforced some of the other
5:39
messages. And frankly, the fact that Trump has
5:42
been unable to express sympathy
5:44
for the family, anything like that. And
5:47
not only that made a weird posting on
5:49
his own social media called Truth Social,
5:52
in which he compared himself to Navalny. I'm
5:55
a victim of the Biden regime, which
5:57
is so sick and perverted. it's
6:00
hard to know how to cope with it. I
6:02
mean, it just reinforced the larger
6:04
message, which is that the United States could be
6:06
on the brink of becoming a very different kind
6:09
of player in the world. You
6:11
wrote a classic history of the Gulag.
6:14
Does the news of Nubalni's death make
6:16
you think that those
6:18
events aren't entirely in the past?
6:21
So it's very weird. I mean, I've written
6:23
three books about Soviet history and all three
6:25
of them. I genuinely believed I was writing
6:27
about things that would never happen again. And all
6:30
three of them in different ways. The themes
6:32
of them have reemerged. I don't think Putinism
6:34
is Stalinism. And actually, it's quite important to
6:36
understand what the differences are. Putin doesn't
6:39
do mass arrests. What he
6:41
likes to do instead is single out particular
6:43
people to set an example for others. And
6:46
obviously, he chose Nubalni because of Nubalni's bravery.
6:49
But some of the seeds of the old system
6:51
are clearly still there. The main one being that
6:53
the law is what the person in charge says
6:55
it is. That's the total control of the court
6:57
system, the total control of the media, the
7:00
use of really vicious, ugly propaganda,
7:02
contradictory propaganda in the case of
7:04
Putin. That's a little different from
7:06
Stalin as well. So it's almost
7:08
as if the seeds of Putinism you can
7:10
find in the Stalin regime, they're not exactly
7:12
the same. But yeah, I mean, we see
7:14
abuse of prisoners or torture of
7:16
prisoners through putting them in very cold places
7:19
and giving them very bad food. These
7:21
are things we know from the Soviet past. And
7:24
to add to the sort of litany
7:26
of gloom and actually quite frightening news,
7:29
you also have the sense that
7:31
this inaction by Congress, the
7:33
failure to supply Ukraine with ammunition is now
7:35
having an effect on the battlefront. Russia
7:38
beginning to make gains. And
7:40
Zelensky too was in Munich. How does that
7:42
news from Ukraine affect the atmosphere? I
7:45
mean, it's part of the same story. Yeah, I
7:47
mean, the Ukrainians are short of ammunition. I
7:49
hear different statistics. The Russians have four
7:51
bullets for every one that Ukraine has
7:54
that is overwhelming, superiority and
7:56
artillery. The Ukrainians still have a
7:59
lot of tools. in the toolbox. They're still
8:01
better at asymmetric warfare. They're still
8:03
better at drones. There's been a problem in the
8:05
last few months of the Russians
8:08
learning how to use electronic warfare to block
8:10
Ukrainian drones and Ukrainian guided missiles, and the
8:12
Ukrainians are working on overcoming that. So I
8:14
wouldn't say there's necessarily a big collapse coming,
8:16
but yeah, they did just lose a kind
8:18
of fortress city that they would not have
8:20
expected to lose earlier on. And
8:22
it is directly related to the lack
8:24
of weapons and it's directly related to
8:27
this blocking of Congress. Clearly,
8:29
Trump has inspired this group of Congressmen,
8:31
and particularly the Speaker of the House,
8:33
Mike Johnson, to block this aid.
8:35
And you can see the effect of that
8:37
decision on the ground and everyone knows it.
8:40
So it's part of the bigger story. Trump wants
8:43
Ukraine to lose, or wants Ukraine to become
8:45
weak so that he can, when he takes over
8:47
in January, which he thinks he will, that he
8:49
will be able to dictate terms. And I
8:51
think that's the game right now. Now,
8:53
Munich always hosts a very
8:55
big congressional delegation, a bipartisan
8:57
delegation, and usually
9:00
the message is pretty clear. America is
9:02
committed to European security and so on.
9:05
But given everything you've described, what
9:08
was the reception of the Americans like and
9:10
what was their behavior like? Most
9:12
of the Americans in Munich were
9:15
people who support aid for Ukraine,
9:17
support NATO. Remember, the majority of
9:19
Congress supports Ukraine and supports NATO.
9:21
So we had several
9:23
senior Republicans in the House and
9:25
the Senate saying very positive, encouraging
9:27
things. Hakeem Jeffries, who
9:30
is the minority leader of the House
9:32
of Representatives, the Democrat leader in
9:34
the House, was joking with somebody saying, I've
9:37
never had so many Europeans sidle up to
9:39
me and ask me to explain discharge motions.
9:41
This is a kind of parliamentary procedure
9:44
in the U.S. Congress that would allow
9:46
Congress to vote on the aid bill,
9:49
even if the Speaker doesn't put it on the floor. I'm
9:51
told that's how some civil rights legislation was passed
9:54
in the past, how you can
9:56
get around the Speaker. So most
9:58
of the ones who were there were very Very positive,
10:00
an enthusiastic and welcome did so on.
10:02
There was one exception which was date
10:04
events. Who. Is the senator from
10:07
Ohio. Who has identified himself
10:09
as trumpet. He was playing it
10:11
somewhat. Weird games be a very few
10:13
others appearances he may one where he
10:16
said. Well. It's all because we
10:18
need to visit to China in a we're not interested
10:20
in Europe anymore and there were a lot of. Inconsistencies
10:22
with what he said of it grow organs of
10:24
given a lot of different versions for why they
10:26
can't pass the aid and for long time it
10:29
was of because we need to deal with our
10:31
border crisis first. But. When. The
10:33
senate came up with a border crisis bill
10:35
that was very tough. day turned. Down.
10:38
A Now they're saying oh no it's to the we
10:40
need to deal with China firsts. But. This
10:42
all feel like excuses. I mean they're hiding the
10:44
basic story which is that Trump wants something to
10:46
deal with two ton and I can't Exactly how
10:48
he's going to end of the he wants to
10:50
end the war in Ukraine by letting food and
10:52
wins. Your back in the States now
10:55
And so Biden is condemned. What? Trump?
10:57
As soon as seems to me from
10:59
a distance to be trying to make
11:01
this into an Alexa, listen to say
11:03
that what Trump is doing is. Disgraceful
11:06
and against the American history
11:08
and will America's interests. Do.
11:11
You think there's any chance that that have
11:13
passed through and max the make a difference
11:15
in the election soon. As it will mean the
11:18
election is still far away. A lot
11:20
will happen between now and. November.
11:23
Their of course many other. Issues that move
11:25
people. You know, abortion, women's rights,
11:27
other kinds. Of civil rights issues that people
11:30
feel very strongly about. The. American
11:32
electorate seems to be only just waking up
11:34
to the realization that Trump is the candidates
11:36
and they're going to have to think about
11:38
him again. I think up until.
11:40
A few weeks ago, people still imagine
11:42
there was some kind of Republican contests
11:44
and people were watching. Trump in the
11:46
past has been a very polarizing figure
11:48
in that he brings out his base
11:50
which again is a minorities, but he
11:52
also inspires people to vote against him.
11:55
And Twenty twenty, we had the largest
11:57
number of voters ever. And more people.
11:59
voted for Biden than anyone else ever in
12:01
history. And that's because Trump inspires a huge negative
12:03
reaction. And it's so very possible that we'll get
12:05
to that. And I know plenty of people who
12:08
do think that will be the outcome. I
12:10
think these issues will play depending on
12:12
how well they're framed or described. They
12:14
play when they're connected to larger issues
12:16
in the U.S. about democracy,
12:19
about America's role in the world. What
12:21
is America? What kind of a country
12:23
are we? Although these are so-called foreign
12:25
policy issues, they are pretty tightly
12:27
bound up with America's self-definition. I
12:29
mean, are we a good country? Are we a bad
12:32
country? Are we a country that is aligned with
12:34
decatorships? Are we a country that's aligned with
12:36
democracies? I mean, I think, again, those sound
12:38
like foreign policy issues, but they're also issues
12:40
of identity. I think those will be at play
12:43
once the campaign really gets underway. Back
12:46
to Europe now. You mentioned
12:48
that when we started this very bleak
12:51
comment from the German politician about facing
12:53
three autocracies, I had
12:55
the feeling until quite recently that many
12:57
Europeans were saying, well, yeah, sure, we're
13:00
worried about the possibility of
13:02
a Trump presidency, but
13:04
it's too soon to start planning, too difficult
13:06
to start planning. Do you think that's
13:08
changed now? Yeah, I do think so. I
13:10
think people are planning. There's
13:13
a dilemma that people have
13:15
between talking about it too much
13:17
in public and then therefore somehow making
13:19
it a self-fulfilling prophecy and taking seriously
13:21
the need to prepare. So there's both
13:23
going on. There have been
13:25
a few big weapons donations
13:27
just in the last few days. The
13:29
Danes gave all of their artillery to
13:32
the Ukrainians, I think everything. And the
13:34
Swedes have just come up with another
13:36
big package. You know, there are a number
13:38
of European packages coming. I mean, the
13:40
countries that feel most threatened are
13:42
Eastern Europe, obviously, but also Scandinavia,
13:44
particularly Sweden and Finland, who have just
13:46
joined NATO. So the awareness
13:49
is pretty high in those places and
13:51
people are beginning to think about alternatives.
13:53
Everybody still hopes Biden will win and everybody still
13:55
hopes that aid package will pass. It's still might,
13:58
I should say. motion
14:00
might work, there's a lot of pressure being put on
14:02
Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker from different
14:05
directions. So it could still
14:07
go the other way, but yeah, I think people
14:09
are aware and they're preparing in a way that
14:11
they haven't in the past. Remember
14:14
also that during the previous Trump administration,
14:16
the military threat from Putin still
14:18
seemed very distant. It didn't
14:20
seem like something that was going to be of concern for
14:22
Germany. Now it is. You
14:25
know, there's a real war in Ukraine, you
14:27
know, there's been a massive use
14:29
of horrible violence against cities and
14:31
the awareness that the Russians really are
14:33
willing to destroy modern European cities is
14:35
now with us. And that's
14:37
also a part of the explanation of the different mood. Yeah.
14:41
And what's the atmosphere like in the other country? You
14:43
know very well Poland, and I should
14:46
add your husband Radak Sikorsky has just
14:48
been made Polish foreign minister
14:50
in the new government. Much to my surprise, but
14:52
yes. Well, congratulations. But
14:54
it struck me that in
14:57
that now fairly notorious Tucker
14:59
Carlson interview with Vladimir Putin,
15:02
that Putin almost went out of his way
15:04
to kind of make threatening noises towards
15:06
Poland and bizarrely accuse them of starting
15:09
the Second World War. Did the Poles notice
15:12
that and feel
15:14
that he was deliberately threatening them? Yes.
15:17
And Putin has said this before. It's
15:19
not the first time he came up with that
15:21
weird formulation. I mean, I think it's
15:24
a way of justifying
15:26
his war in Ukraine. You know,
15:28
Ukrainians brought it upon themselves. I'm
15:30
attacking them because they inspired me to attack
15:32
them in that same kind of argument. It's
15:34
also a way of writing the Soviet Union
15:37
out of the history of the Second World
15:39
War, because in 1939, the Germans invaded Poland
15:41
on September the 1st and the Soviet Union
15:43
invaded on September the 17th. And
15:46
they actually partition Poland. And
15:48
there was a period when there was a
15:50
Soviet German pact. And I think he's
15:52
trying to write that piece of history out. So
15:55
in Poland, the war in Ukraine has
15:57
always felt very present. You
15:59
know, Ukraine. looks like Poland and the
16:01
images on television look like things we
16:03
know. I went to Ukraine,
16:06
I'm part of a group that has
16:08
been driving aid to the frontline, and I went with
16:10
a Polish friend of mine a few months ago and he
16:13
said to me, you know, it was only when I got here I
16:15
thought this landscape could be my landscape.
16:17
It looks very familiar, the photographs look like pictures
16:20
from the Second World War and so it
16:22
feels very close and of course there are
16:24
a lot of Ukrainians in Poland now, they've
16:26
actually integrated pretty well mostly. There aren't refugee
16:28
camps or anything like that, they're mostly working
16:31
in supermarkets or indeed in banks.
16:34
I was in a radio studio in Warsaw a few
16:36
months ago and there was a radio engineer from Donetsk,
16:38
you know, that's just kind of normal now. So
16:41
they're there, it feels very close and yes
16:43
the Poles are preparing,
16:45
I mean there are Russian information operations in
16:47
Poland too and there's been a farmer's strike
16:49
to do with grain from Ukraine that has
16:52
some real roots but may also
16:54
have some roots in
16:56
Russian agitation. So there's some
16:58
conflict inside Poland as well but overwhelmingly
17:00
the population is in favor of aiding
17:02
Ukraine and is aware that they would
17:04
be next on the list. Well
17:07
to summarize then, do you think by
17:09
the end of the year that
17:12
it's not only possible but really quite
17:14
likely that Europe will be facing a
17:16
full-scale security crisis because if
17:18
you combine a
17:21
potential Trump victory with
17:23
Russia making progress in Ukraine,
17:26
the atmosphere in Europe could go
17:28
from apprehension to something
17:30
much closer to a sense of crisis
17:32
really quite soon. I don't want
17:35
to say that it's likely because there are a lot
17:37
of things that could happen that would make it less
17:39
likely, you know, there are clearly some cracks inside
17:41
Russia. I mean Putin, if
17:43
he felt really secure and confident he
17:45
wouldn't be killing his political opponents, right?
17:48
The money could pass, it's possible a lot of people want
17:50
it to pass, it might pass, you know, in the next
17:52
few weeks and that could make a difference. Trump
17:54
might lose, I mean there are many reasons to think
17:57
that that won't happen but it is a
17:59
scenario out there that has to be taken
18:01
into consideration. Yes, we could be a year
18:03
from now facing a security crisis on a
18:05
new scale if we aren't able to prevent
18:07
it, either by making sure Biden wins the
18:10
election or by making sure
18:12
that Ukraine wins the war. That
18:18
was the historian Anne Applebaum ending this edition
18:21
of the Rackman Review. Thanks
18:23
for listening and please join us again next
18:25
week. Support
18:37
for this podcast and the
18:39
following message come from Coriant.
18:41
Coriant provides wealth management services
18:43
centered around you as one
18:45
of the largest integrated fee-only
18:47
registered investment advisors in the
18:49
U.S. Coriant has experienced teams
18:51
who can craft custom solutions
18:53
designed to help you reach
18:55
your financial goals no matter
18:57
how complex. Real wealth
18:59
requires real solutions. Connect with a
19:02
wealth advisor today at coriant.com. That's
19:05
coriant.com. At At
19:07
Airbus, our products make the world
19:10
a safer place and help nations
19:12
protect their sovereignty. Whether
19:15
it's air ambulance services at home or
19:18
evacuations overseas, our
19:21
technology protects citizens, safeguards security,
19:23
safeguards security, and
19:25
aids responses to crises. At
19:28
Airbus, we're pioneering sustainable aerospace
19:30
for a safe and united
19:33
world. Learn more
19:35
at airbus.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More