0:00

All right, thanks Scott Shannon, and thanks to

0:02

all of you for being with us. Right down

0:04

our toll free telephone number. You want

0:06

to be a part of this Extravaganza's

0:09

eight hundred and nine four one, Sean, if

0:11

you want to be with us, We're going to

0:13

get into the raid on Rudy

0:15

Giuliani's apartment

0:18

in his office. And the fact

0:20

that apparently Google same well

0:23

sorry not Google, Apple, the

0:25

same Apple that wouldn't allow the FBI

0:28

or help the FBI to get into

0:30

the iPhone of the San Bernardino shooter,

0:33

you know, didn't seem to have any problem

0:35

at all allowing the

0:38

investigators from whatever bureau get

0:41

to Rudy Giulianni's eCloud.

0:44

And apparently they did this in twenty nineteen

0:47

while he was representing President

0:49

Trump, at a point when presidential

0:52

privilege and attorney client privilege

0:55

was in full exist, and they knew everything that was going

0:57

on, at least everything that's uploaded to the cloud, which

1:00

a lot of people I think is everything. What

1:02

the hell do I know about a cloud? Don't come

1:04

to me for computer advice. I'm the worst guy

1:06

to ask. Barely can download

1:08

an app. Still, this

1:11

is not gonna be good. This should

1:13

be concerning to everybody here. So

1:16

we all followed the case of Officer

1:19

Chauvin and the guilty verdicts

1:22

in the George Floyd case. Now

1:26

he's waiting. It was about what I

1:28

think we were going to wait eight weeks till setting thing.

1:30

If I recall correctly and

1:33

anyway, there might be a new basis for an

1:35

appeal of that murder conviction because

1:37

a juror failed to reveal to the

1:40

court that he was

1:42

a supporter of Black

1:44

Lives Matter, and a photo

1:46

recently emerged online of one of the

1:49

jurors in this case wearing a

1:51

Black Lives Matter T shirt. It

1:53

has now sparked questions about his impartiality

1:56

and the juror, Brandon Mitchell, could

1:59

be seen in the photo wearing the T shirt

2:02

emblaze him with a picture of Martin Luther

2:04

King Junior and the phrases get your knee

2:06

off our neck and BLM. And

2:09

he's also wearing a Black Lives Matter hat

2:11

in the photo. Now, during the jury

2:14

selection process,

2:16

each prospective juror is

2:18

required to answer a questionnaire and

2:21

that includes questions about participation

2:24

and demonstrations and protests.

2:27

Did you or someone close to

2:29

you participate in any

2:31

of the demonstrations or marches against

2:34

police brutality that took place in Minneapolis

2:37

after George Floyd's death. That was one of the questions.

2:40

Another one was, other than that

2:43

you have already described above,

2:45

have you or anyone close to you participated

2:48

in protests about police use of

2:51

force or police brutality

2:54

now? He told the Star Tribune that he

2:56

replied no to both

2:58

questions, but he also admitted

3:00

that his t shirt the photo

3:03

was actually taken at a rally

3:05

in Washington, d C. Last

3:07

summer commemorating mlk's

3:10

famous nineteen sixty three

3:12

I have a dream speech. I think

3:14

I was being extremely honest, he says,

3:18

regarding the jury selection process,

3:20

I gave my views on everything on the case

3:23

on Black Lives Matter. Jury

3:25

consultant that

3:27

was questioned by The Washington Post that

3:31

his answers could lead to an appeal for Chauvin's

3:33

attorney and the judge could also call in

3:36

this particular juror for questioning

3:38

and yeah, quote, this could

3:40

change the outcome of things. If there's anything

3:43

that makes him seem that he was not forthcoming,

3:46

it could absolutely be an avenue for the judge

3:48

to reconsider the case. I

3:50

Meanwhile, civil rights attorney Brian Dunn

3:52

told The Washington Post that the photo was undeniably

3:55

suggestive of a possible

3:57

bias in this juror. He

4:00

said a more detailed review would be needed.

4:02

At the worst part of this is

4:05

that means, oh, this may not be over.

4:08

There's an Axios piece out there. What's

4:10

next? A violent summer on

4:12

America's streets? They're writing,

4:14

it appears to be likely given the homicides

4:18

already that appeared to be trending

4:20

above last year's record highs.

4:23

Homicide rates historically spiked during

4:25

summer months when the hotter weather puts more

4:27

people on the streets, and vaccination

4:30

coverage is increasing. In the pandemic

4:32

and all its knock on effects

4:35

won't be finished by then, Summer

4:37

at twenty twenty one is going to

4:39

be abnormally violent. I

4:42

hope to god that's not true. John

4:45

Roman, a senior fellow at

4:47

the Economics,

4:50

Justice and Society Group at

4:53

NRC at the University of Chicago,

4:55

writing, it's the new normal. Why

4:57

do we have to accept that as the new normal? Why?

5:00

Why should you know dozens

5:02

of shootings every weekend in Chicago

5:04

be acceptable? Why don't we hear? I

5:07

mean, why isn't we only hear from the high profile

5:10

cases or the case that involves

5:12

the cop, which is the slimmest majority

5:14

of cases. Why isn't

5:17

there a focus like a laser bead

5:20

on the most violent cities in America

5:23

and the weekly statistics, the

5:25

daily statistics. Sometimes you

5:28

should have seen this video that's out there, woman

5:30

randomly sucker punching and robbing,

5:33

you know, someone in the New York City subway. I mean

5:36

it was a harsh sucker punch

5:39

and robbery caught on video.

5:42

And you know, it's

5:45

just none of this is good. You get all these videos

5:47

that are out there. There's a video out there

5:50

of a woman spewing horrible

5:53

verbal attacks against an

5:55

La County Deputy sheriff. The driver

5:57

tell in the La County deputy calling

6:00

him a murderer and a racist

6:02

attack. Han on video. You'll you'll you'll

6:04

never be white because

6:07

you're a murderer. Yes, I started to record

6:09

because you can't be on your cell

6:11

phone while you're driving. Phone. I was recording

6:14

you because you can't use

6:16

your cell phone while you have

6:18

your driver's license. It's it's

6:20

at my apartment and

6:22

I'm perfect legal and

6:25

I'm a teacher. So then congratulations,

6:28

you're a murderer. It's only citing you

6:30

for using your cell phone and while you're driving. That's it

6:34

for him being a Mexican racist? What is

6:36

that name? Gas on the citation?

6:39

Man? Here you go, Mexican racist. You're

6:42

always going to be a Mexican. You'll never be white,

6:44

you know that, right? Well,

6:47

what is wrong with people? I

6:50

mean, who wants to who wants to be a cop?

6:53

Today? Get an employee

6:55

in Seattle fired after refusing to serve

6:58

a police officer at a

7:01

chocolate chop. An employee fired for refusing

7:03

to serve the officer last week, The store's owner

7:06

said, in an about face after initially

7:08

backing the worker's freedom of speech,

7:11

good grief. Now you got

7:14

this this image of this black

7:16

lives amount of a a T shirt in the show case. That's

7:18

just awful. Now we do have some numbers

7:21

Chicago shootings and murder murders

7:23

and now outpacing the

7:25

record high of

7:28

twenty twenty. It's

7:30

unbelievable. And

7:33

you know, you think, just when they can't get worse, it's

7:35

getting worse. Now, just

7:37

for give you the facts. The murders

7:39

and shootings are outpacing twenty

7:41

twenty eight hundred and thirty

7:43

two shootings in Chicago eight

7:46

hundred and thirty two as

7:49

of April thirtieth, from

7:51

which nine hundred ninety seven people

7:54

were wounded. In other words, eight hundred

7:56

and thirty two shooting events and

8:00

ninety seven wounded. Police

8:03

set announcing the statistics. The

8:05

year to date figures show a stark increase

8:08

compared to the last time this

8:10

time last year, where

8:13

there was only seven hundred and eighteen people

8:16

that were struck, only

8:18

six hundred thirty six and

8:20

twenty three shootings. Don't

8:23

you think that's record high? Is high

8:26

enough? Now we're now we're

8:28

up by a third, one

8:30

hundred and eighty seven people so

8:32

far killed from January first to April

8:34

thirtieth in Chicago. Here's

8:37

a question I have. Can any of you ask

8:40

yourself? Do you know the names of anybody

8:42

shot and killed in the city of Chicago?

8:45

Can you think of anybody? Can

8:47

you think of one name? Can

8:49

you remember one name? Because

8:51

we only hear about the names when it advances

8:54

a political agenda. Doesn't

8:57

every life matter many

8:59

case? I'm sure

9:01

some of these names are African Americans,

9:04

Every life does matter. Chicago

9:08

police have taken more than three thousand, six

9:10

hundred guns, including

9:12

one hundred and fifty so called assault

9:15

weapons, off the street as they call them. You

9:18

know the number of murders reported

9:21

in April, I mean fifty

9:23

three. Look,

9:26

I'm just giving you the numbers. Most

9:28

Portland Riots suspects won't be

9:30

prosecuted, according to a US attorney,

9:34

David Bouchard, admitting he

9:36

put a Customs Border Protection officer

9:38

in a chokehold and lo and

9:40

behold. Charles Comfort was indicted

9:42

by a grand jury of civil

9:45

disorder for twice charging

9:48

at the Portland Police Bureau

9:50

officers, hitting number the makeshift shield,

9:53

and then kicking a third officer while being

9:55

arrested. Both men faced federal

9:57

charges stemming from their actions during the

10:00

summer of more than one hundred knights of violent

10:02

protests. But Bouchard and Comfort, oh,

10:04

they're just among dozens of Portland federal

10:07

arrestees whose cases are dismissed,

10:11

being deferred. Not a

10:13

day behind bars, not one day for

10:16

attacking a police officer. Want to be

10:18

again? You want to be a cop? And

10:20

then the obvious question, God

10:23

forbid it happens to you who are you

10:25

going to call? And what are you going to

10:27

do? You ask me that question.

10:30

I'm going to keep my answer to myself except

10:32

to say that I take I will

10:34

defend myself and people that I care

10:36

about, and it's some people. It's

10:39

unbelievable. I

10:43

just can't get over this. We'll play this tape again

10:45

of this woman. Why would this teacher? Now,

10:48

if I was the head of a school district

10:51

and this teacher is on

10:53

tape talking to a cop this

10:55

way, I would think

10:57

that maybe that teacher is not qualified

11:00

a teacher. But maybe I'm maybe I'm overreacting

11:02

here. You you decide. I

11:04

pulled you over because you're a murderer. Yes,

11:06

I started to record because you can't

11:08

be on your cell phone while you're driving. Phone.

11:11

I was recording you because you

11:13

can't use your cell phone while you have

11:16

your driver's license. It's it's

11:18

at my apartment and

11:20

I'm perfectly legal and

11:23

I'm a teacher. So there, congratulations,

11:26

you're a murderer. It's only citing you

11:28

for using your cell phone and while you're driving. That's it

11:32

for him being a Mexican racist. What

11:34

is that name? Gas on the citation

11:37

man? Here you go, Mexican racist. You're

11:40

always going to be a Mexican. You'll never be white,

11:42

you know that, right, A

11:45

murderer, a Mexican racist,

11:48

you're always going to be. I

11:51

don't even know what to say. I feel so bad for

11:53

that cop. Guy's doing his job.

11:57

What what? What is wrong with people? Right

12:00

as we roll along eight hundred and nine one sean

12:03

you want to be a part of the program. Apparently

12:06

hot mic moment, and

12:08

it may be an indicator that Liz Cheney's

12:10

days are numbered as a member of the House GOP

12:13

leadership. Anyway, the newer

12:15

report that is out says

12:18

that Kevin McCarthy has done defending

12:20

Congresswoman Cheney, signaling

12:23

that, you know, the anti Trump

12:25

lawmakers days as House Republican Conference

12:28

chairwoman may be numbered. I know

12:30

from a lot of people that I know in Congress

12:33

that are Republicans, they don't want her in

12:35

that position. And he

12:38

said that he's lost confidence in Cheney

12:40

during an off air hot

12:42

mic moment with Steve

12:45

Doocey on Fox and Friends. According to Axios,

12:47

I think she's got real problems. I've I've

12:50

had it with her, you know, I've lost

12:52

confidence. Someone just has to bring

12:54

emotion, but I assume that will probably take

12:56

place. He stated in the interview

12:58

that with do see that House Republicans

13:01

are concerned about whether Cheney can continue

13:03

her leadership duties as she continues

13:06

to drive a wedge between Republicans

13:08

with her critical comments regarding former President

13:11

Trump. Look, I don't

13:13

really care that much. I've never got too

13:15

involved in this whole. You

13:17

know, if you want to call yourself a Republican

13:20

and you're not and help elect Joe

13:22

Biden liked the Lincoln Project, I'm

13:25

actually okay with that. I wish

13:27

you'd be a little more honest about it. You can't say

13:29

because Donald Trump governed conservatively,

13:31

or say I like his policies, but I don't agree

13:33

with this style. Just be honest. But

13:36

they try and run around I wear a Republican,

13:38

they're not Republicans, and

13:40

I think this is where a lot of people. Well,

13:42

what's frustrating, though, is

13:45

Liz Cheney seems to just have her own

13:47

agenda over that

13:49

of the position that she holds.

13:52

She may run for president. I don't even think she

13:54

can get reelected. I don't think Mitt Romney can

13:57

get reelected. I'm not I don't even think Lisa

13:59

Murkowski, she's in trouble in Alaska.

14:02

Not that I disliked them, I'm just saying that

14:04

they're not where the base of this party

14:06

is at this moment. All right, twenty five

14:08

to the top of the hour, eight hundred and ninety four one,

14:11

Sean, you want to be a part of the program, here's

14:13

what I say. And

14:15

some people want me to be worked up, want

14:18

me to be angry, want me to be upset

14:20

over the Lincoln Project and Mitt

14:22

Romney's of the world than the Liz Chenneys

14:24

of the world. You know. The sad

14:27

thing in the case of both Say Romney

14:30

and Liz Cheney is

14:32

that the base of the party,

14:35

you know, they went all in

14:38

to support the Cheneys

14:41

and the Romney's. They went

14:43

all in, and many

14:45

people that knew, for example,

14:47

that maybe Mitt Romney wasn't as conservative

14:50

as them, they still saw

14:52

that he was a better option. In

14:54

twenty twelve, I was the same option as

14:56

two thousand and eight with John

14:59

McCain, and you just

15:01

you just don't have a choice. You go

15:03

all in. And I was warning of the

15:05

radicalism of Obama and

15:07

his background and his associations

15:10

and his black liberation

15:12

theology is the chum gang

15:15

Frank Marshall, Davis Olinsky

15:17

And you know what is

15:19

a community organizer The

15:21

Church of g D America airs

15:23

dorn unrepentant domestic terrorists.

15:27

Yeah, I'll support anybody over that.

15:29

That wasn't that hard and

15:32

uh and it was amazing because the people that

15:34

ran that campaign didn't have

15:36

the smarts, the wherewithal,

15:38

the fight in them to

15:41

do these things. You know, when

15:43

you know at the time, I've still

15:46

to this day believe that the battle

15:49

in the war on terror was justified

15:51

and needed and necessary

15:53

and based on the images of

15:56

weapons of mass destruction it used

15:58

on their his own

16:00

people of Saddam Hussein, I

16:03

still believe in the lead up to the war is probably

16:05

moved, but I can't prove it. So it's

16:08

it's a long ago discussion.

16:10

And the good news for our military

16:12

is military technological

16:15

advancement has made has transformed

16:18

future conflicts and how we're going to

16:20

fight them with pinpoint

16:23

accuracy. Guy in Tampa, Florida,

16:26

can you know, take out

16:28

anybody any place anywhere

16:30

in the world at any time. I

16:32

may look at the operation against Solomani,

16:35

the world's biggest terror from the world's

16:38

largest terror state of her own. It's

16:40

a pretty amazing thing. So I don't get worked up.

16:43

I do think that there is a

16:46

disconnect. It's

16:48

sort of like, and if Liz Cheney

16:50

wants to run for president, let to run for president.

16:53

But if she's going to

16:55

make it about her and her agenda

16:58

and her agendas at odds the

17:00

rest of the caucus, then

17:02

at that point I don't think

17:04

she warned some position and leadership. Well,

17:07

you conservatives are intolerant, you don't

17:09

take people of different points of view. I have no

17:11

problem with that. The

17:14

agenda being a Conservative, I keep

17:16

telling people, is very simple,

17:20

keep it simple, stupid. The

17:22

party of liberty, freedom,

17:25

capitalism, and our great

17:27

Constitution, including the First

17:29

and Second Amendment. It's the party

17:32

that believes in law and order and

17:34

safety and security for every

17:36

town and every city in America.

17:39

Conservatism is about choice

17:41

in public schools and breaking

17:44

up the unholy alliance of teachers

17:46

unions with the Radical Democratic Socialist

17:48

Party. It's also about free

17:51

market solutions for healthcare and

17:53

yes, protecting preexisting conditions.

17:56

In case you were wondering. We believe

17:58

in people that will

18:01

won't legislate from the bench, that are

18:03

constitutionalists

18:05

that they will serve their role only

18:08

as defined by what it means to be in

18:11

the judiciary. Original

18:13

Ism constitutionalists. We

18:16

believe in lower taxes, limited

18:19

government, less government bureaucracy

18:22

is possible so that we don't stifle

18:25

and put a stranglehold on business.

18:27

Same with taxes. You know, high

18:29

taxes prevents investment. We

18:32

believe in safe and secure borders

18:34

and legal immigration. We

18:36

believe in energy and dependence. We

18:39

believe in peace through strength, the

18:41

biggest badass military on the face

18:43

of this earth, and free and fair

18:45

trade. Tell me what

18:47

I'm missing, because

18:50

if you say you are a conservative,

18:54

then those are the things that I

18:56

have pretty much supported my entire career,

18:59

thirty three years on radio. I

19:01

can now just break it down into less than a minute.

19:04

And that is what conservatism

19:07

should be about. And

19:09

yeah, you're gonna have variations. Reagan

19:12

once said, if we agree eighty percent

19:14

of the time, you're not my enemy. But

19:17

they're making it personal now.

19:20

If they have a problem with

19:22

Donald Trump's style, state

19:25

it fine. You have a problem with

19:27

his style. He tweets too much, he's too

19:29

combative, not presidential, whatever

19:31

you want to say, I don't care. But

19:34

he also fought and fought hard,

19:36

something that prior to Trump many

19:38

Republicans did not do. Being

19:41

nice to Barack

19:44

Obama and his campaign and ignoring

19:46

Jeremiah Wright and airs

19:49

En Dorn didn't really serve

19:51

the McCain campaign. Well neither

19:54

did you know? What happened to Hurricane

19:56

Sandy did not help either. If

19:58

you remember, the economic down turn at that time

20:00

was rough, and that man, it became

20:03

inevitable as a bit of a movement. Okay, they

20:05

have wave elections all the time. That happens.

20:08

Twenty twelve could have been one. I don't whoever

20:11

advised Romney or if he's following

20:13

his own council, to take his foot off the gas

20:16

in that second and third debate. Especially

20:18

the third debate, I remember screaming

20:21

at his staff saying, what the hell have

20:23

you done here? You just lost the election. It

20:26

was such a bad debate

20:28

performance and he was not aggressive

20:31

enough, and that's what happens in elections.

20:34

I have no problem

20:36

whatsoever with some disagreement

20:39

within the Republican ranks. So

20:41

there's this three minute ad. We're gonna show

20:44

part of it tonight as a preview because

20:46

we'll be in California tomorrow. Caitlyn

20:50

Jenner is running.

20:52

It was a it's a fascinating Linda. Can you put

20:55

that one? I sent it to you guys earlier today. Put

20:57

it up on Hannity dot com. We'll tweet it

20:59

out at Sean Hannity. And

21:02

it's three minutes long, and

21:05

it's very reminiscent in

21:07

the lead up to this interview tomorrow night.

21:11

And I know, I'm guessing, I don't know for sure.

21:15

Caitlyn Jenner could have had an interview with anybody.

21:18

And I think the reason is

21:20

is because Caitlyn Jenner is serious about

21:23

substance policy governance.

21:27

And what really caught me in

21:30

this ad that they put out. It's really

21:32

well done. I mean this this thing

21:35

was killer. It was a great and

21:37

I look, I've looked at campaign ads my whole career,

21:40

and it's actually worth

21:43

playing. I wish you could see the

21:45

images of it. Will show

21:47

it tonight on Hannity.

21:49

But again, it's three minutes. I'll

21:52

run as long as I think you might be interested.

21:54

But I thought it was a phenomenal

21:56

ad. But just to finish

21:58

the circle here is I

22:00

think the reason that she

22:02

decided to come and do my show

22:06

is because she

22:08

wants us to be about substance, about

22:11

political substance and

22:13

specificity in plans for

22:16

a state that is way off course. The

22:19

state with thirteen and a half percent income attacks

22:22

is the highest in the country, a sanctuary

22:24

state, a state that was basically

22:27

shut down by a governor that was having

22:29

his own fun times and restaurants when nobody

22:31

else could listen. I've

22:34

always been a dreamer. California

22:37

was once the envy. We

22:40

had what everyone else wanted. The American

22:43

dream grew up here. Politicians

22:48

and their policies have destroyed

22:51

that dream. It's been locked

22:53

away, closed, shut

22:56

her, left in the dark, burned

22:59

down. The government

23:01

is now involved in every part

23:03

of our lives. They've taken our money,

23:06

our jobs, and our freedom.

23:10

California needs a disruption,

23:13

a compassionate discruction.

23:17

I came here with a dream forty

23:19

eight years ago to be the greatest

23:21

athlete of the world. Now I enter

23:23

a different kind of race. Are

23:25

you agree my most important

23:27

one yet? To save California.

23:31

I don't care if you're a Republican

23:33

Democrat. I'm ready to be governor for all

23:35

Californias, to

23:37

reflame our true identity,

23:40

to bring back the gold, to the Golden

23:42

State. Now

23:45

is the time to achieve that something, to be

23:47

the shining city on the hill, and together

23:50

we'll restore and renew

23:53

the California dream.

23:57

It's about what happens you're here.

24:00

It's not person

24:03

it's about all of us. So

24:10

it's it's well done. We'll put it up on Hannity

24:13

dot com. Um a

24:15

couple of interesting lines that

24:17

she makes in this head. California needs

24:20

a disruptor, a compassionate disruptor.

24:24

I came here with a dream forty

24:26

eight years ago to be the greatest athlete

24:28

in the world. But when you're when

24:31

that the cathalon that makes you the gold and

24:33

you you become the greatest athlete in the world.

24:36

There's so many different aspects to it. Um.

24:39

One thing I've known about every athlete I've

24:41

ever met in my life, any serious

24:43

athlete, is the amount of work, the

24:45

amount of commitment, what it takes

24:48

to be to take even if

24:50

you have natural talent to take it just even

24:52

a notch higher where you need to

24:54

be to be a super excelling

24:57

athlete. It's unbelievable discipline

24:59

and work. And you

25:01

know I'm saying I came here forty eight years

25:04

ago with a dream to be the greatest athlete in the

25:06

world. Now I'm entering a different kind of race, arguably

25:08

the most important one yet to save California.

25:12

So I'm actually very interested. And

25:17

I guess maybe thinking out

25:20

well, the people of California

25:23

recall Gavin Newsom and

25:27

can Caitlyn Caitlyn Jenner

25:30

win that race. There's probably

25:32

gonna be a lot of people that get in. She

25:36

must have what you

25:39

know, name recognition, and

25:42

it's but it's the substance. And

25:45

and that was the interesting part of you know, we

25:47

had a short call. I said, I'd love to interview

25:49

you and um

25:53

and I said, I want this

25:55

to be about real issues and

25:58

anyway, so I hope you'll too in tomorrow. It's

26:00

gonna be interesting. I'll show you some of us tonight on

26:02

TV. Oh, by the way, they

26:04

see a horrible video that came out, another

26:07

beating, brutal beating of

26:09

two Asian women, which has now become

26:13

it's been happening way too often, and

26:16

this time in Baltimore. A

26:19

guy's now behind bars. I guess we

26:21

should be thankful it didn't happen in New York because

26:24

they'd be out of jail by now anyway,

26:27

showing and pummeling two

26:29

female Korean store

26:31

owners with a cinder

26:33

block. How could

26:36

people treat other people like this in life?

26:38

What the hell is wrong with them? How

26:41

does that happen? So

26:43

sad? By the way, is that picture,

26:45

I'm sure it is if it's in the daily mail. It's a daily

26:48

mail picture of Joe and

26:51

Joe Biden maskless

26:54

while sitting, you know, on

26:56

top of like, right next to former

26:58

President Jimmy Carter ninety six years

27:00

old and his wife, Rosslyn ninety

27:03

three years old. It's such

27:05

a it's so phony, all of this coronavirus

27:08

Joe stuff. I'm wearing

27:10

to be extra careful outside. By the way, only

27:12

thirty six percent of Americans

27:15

Rasmussen called Biden's policy

27:17

successful, that's

27:20

it in his first hundred days of

27:22

office. Forty one percent say they've been a

27:24

failure. By

27:27

the way, school kids, this was an interesting thing on

27:29

Fox news dot Com. Students

27:31

at a Virginia fifth grade classroom

27:33

telling President Biden Joe Biden Virtual

27:36

learning gave them the chance to eat, take naps

27:38

at even fake technical glitches in order

27:40

to avoid answering questions. Wow.

27:44

Basically that Zoom calls

27:46

schools were a disaster, not

27:50

good at all. You have This is the most interesting

27:52

thing I saw today. Top Biden

27:54

economists urging the whole world to raise

27:56

corporate taxes. Now,

27:58

this is the second Biden appointee.

28:01

Remember Janet Yellen said it. In

28:03

this case, it's Cecilia Rouse, chair

28:05

of the Council of Economic Advisors

28:08

Biden administration, urging

28:10

trading partners to adopt a global

28:12

minimum tax on corporations

28:14

to offset the effects of Joe Biden's

28:17

domestic corporate tax increase. You

28:19

know what that is, Let's conspire

28:21

government to government against the people

28:24

of all of our countries so

28:26

that we can take as much money

28:28

as possible from one group of people

28:30

and redistributed to a larger group of

28:32

people who become dependent on

28:35

us, so we can stay in power and perpetuity.

28:38

That's what that proposal is

28:40

about. Another pole that

28:43

Americans believe the

28:45

country is more divided under Joe

28:47

Biden. I thought everyone loved Joe Biden. Yeah,

28:50

I guess not, Popsie Daisy. Sorry,

28:53

didn't work out that way. And he's

28:55

still lying. Anyone making less than fourter a

28:57

thousand dollars a year will not pay a single penny

29:00

taxes lie. If

29:02

one economist, University of Maryland

29:05

professor penning On op

29:07

ed Biden's woke economics will

29:09

lead to a disaster, I actually believe that

29:11

too. And Hunter

29:14

Biden still has a holdings

29:16

in a Chinese investment firm in

29:19

defiance of his father's promise.

29:21

That was in biz Pack Review right

29:23

an hour two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred

29:25

and nine for one Sean, you want to be a

29:27

part of this extravaganza.

29:30

By the way, amazing out. Three major

29:33

news organizations got

29:35

a story about Mayor Rudy Giulianni

29:38

wrong, you know, incorrect

29:40

information supposedly from government

29:42

sources that led let's

29:44

see New York Times, Washington

29:47

Post, NBC News to all get

29:49

it wrong as they reported that the

29:51

FBI had briefed Rudy

29:53

Giuliani that he was the target of a Russia

29:56

disinformation campaign during his

29:58

efforts to dig up unflattering

30:01

information about Joe Biden. You know the

30:03

worst part of all of this, Unless

30:06

you listen to a show like this, or

30:08

watch Hannity on Fox and a couple

30:10

of or listen to a couple of other shows, there's

30:13

not a lot of US and maybe

30:15

watch a couple of other shows, not a lot of us.

30:18

You wouldn't know that the person that bought

30:20

and paid for a dirty Russian

30:22

disinformation dossier was Hillary

30:25

Clinton. I know, maybe it just

30:27

sticks in my crawl a little bit bit.

30:29

The other utter hypocrisy of all

30:31

of this. So we had Rudy

30:34

on last night, and we spent a lot of

30:36

time talking about these

30:38

federal investigators that rated the apartment

30:40

any office of Rudy Giuliani, America's

30:43

mayor. And now we have

30:46

as we move forward with all of this,

30:49

a lot of unanswered questions that

30:51

really need to be resolved. You know, another

30:53

pre dawn raid. They're saying,

30:56

well, Rudy's under investigation

30:58

for a potential violation.

31:01

A fairer violation is when you don't

31:03

register fill out the proper government paperwork

31:06

for foreign work with the US

31:08

federal government. And I asked Rudy last

31:10

night, I said, well, my understanding is is that most

31:12

of your work, if not I found

31:15

all of it had to do with the

31:18

legitimate investigation into

31:20

zero experience Hunter. We played

31:23

it yesterday, you know, on Good Morning America.

31:25

Any experience in oil,

31:28

energy gaspe Nope,

31:30

Nope, any experience in Ukraine.

31:33

No, and then Joe bragging, You're

31:35

not getting the million dollars unless

31:37

you fire the prosecutor I got. Let's

31:39

see you got. You got six hours to fire

31:41

that prosecutor, and son of it be they

31:44

did it? Who was the prosecutor? Why would it a

31:46

vice president in the United States want

31:48

a prosecutor in freaking Ukraine.

31:51

I bet most people can't even find Ukraine

31:54

on a map, except you might know it's next to Russia.

31:56

Why would they want or Ukraine a Ukrainian

31:59

prosecutor to fire? Because they're investigating

32:01

Hunter Biden and Barisma Holdings,

32:04

that's why. And Joe's leveraging

32:06

taxpayer dollars to get it. So that

32:09

raises questions, Well, what about

32:11

zero experienced Hunter? How is

32:13

that possible? Remember the grass Lee Johnson

32:16

Senate report. We have gone into great detail

32:18

on this program because Barisma,

32:20

with no experience, was paying Hunter

32:23

Biden and his company millions of dollars

32:25

zero experience. Hunter made money from

32:27

them Ukrainian oil gas giant

32:29

owned by a sketchy

32:32

Ukrainian oligarch. Remember you got

32:34

the three and a half million dollars wired transfer

32:36

to his company from the Russian oligarch

32:39

no better known as the First Lady of Moscow.

32:42

Five million dollars from a state backed

32:44

Chinese company with ties to the Chinese

32:46

military. Got the hundred thousand

32:48

dollars shopping spreegue courtesy

32:50

of a prominent Chinese national. Hundred

32:53

thousand from a Kazakh

32:55

oligarch earmark for a brand new

32:57

car. You know, doesn't have any experience

33:00

any of this. Never mind the one point five billion dollar

33:02

deal. Nothing ever happens, and

33:04

I keep bringing up this issue. Is there a

33:06

dual justice system? Now? Let me play

33:08

Rudy Giuliani reacting to

33:11

The New York Times, Washington Post, NBC

33:13

retracting stories about him The New York

33:15

Times, Washington Post, and

33:19

NBC. I believe they had

33:21

to attract stories about you, your reaction,

33:25

my reactions the headline of the Washington

33:27

Post. Shuliani briefed on Russian

33:29

connection. They've been trying to make me a

33:31

Russian Asian for about three years, which

33:34

is totally nuts. I'm probably

33:36

the biggest anti communist you've ever met.

33:39

There's no way that I'm a Russian Asian or anybody

33:41

else's agent. I was a lawyer who was

33:43

representing a client who was innocent. The

33:46

biggest burden a lawyer can have is to represent

33:48

an innocent man. And I did it damn well,

33:51

and I have exposed that

33:53

our president as one of the biggest criminals in

33:55

the history of the country. All Right, So there

33:57

you go. That's Rudy's answer. Now you might

34:00

remember the San Bernardino shooter case.

34:02

Remember the FBI is asking Apple

34:05

if they can get into the iPhone

34:07

of the San Bernardino shooter.

34:10

This is Apple's Tim Cook answering

34:13

that question, do you really want to plant

34:15

the flag on privacy and safety

34:18

on side for Ruke's iPhone? I

34:20

think safety of the public is

34:23

incredibly important, safety

34:25

of our kids, safety of our families is

34:28

very important. The

34:30

protection of people's data is

34:32

incredibly important. And so the tradeoff

34:35

here is we know that doing

34:37

this could expose people

34:40

to incredible vulnerabilities.

34:43

This is not something that we would

34:45

create. This would be

34:47

bad for America. Bad for

34:49

America. Now here's the question.

34:52

Rudy was pointing out that

34:54

apparently, while he was representing the

34:56

president of the United States, that

34:59

in fact, investigators

35:02

were reading his iCloud

35:04

messages in twenty nineteen. This is all

35:07

in the lead up to impeachment. Well,

35:09

how is it that it's it's bad

35:11

for America when it's

35:13

the San Bernardino shooter, but not

35:15

bad for America. Again,

35:17

you're supposed to have privilege with your doctor,

35:20

you know, patient client privilege,

35:22

attorney client privilege as

35:24

the President of the United States not afforded

35:26

that. Apparently not Donald Trump. David

35:29

Shone Civil liberties attorney

35:31

Greg Jarrett hosts the two number

35:33

one best selling books and also hosts

35:35

of his podcast The Brief. Welcome

35:38

both of you back to the program. Greg,

35:40

I'll start with you. It's a lot to unpack

35:42

there. Yeah, in terms of accessing

35:45

Giuliani's iCloud, I

35:49

would hope that the government

35:51

followed the law, and that means they asked to obtain

35:54

either a subpoena or a search

35:56

warrant or some other court order, take

35:59

it to Apple and demand they

36:01

comply by opening up that account.

36:04

Apple would then have two courses

36:06

of action. They could capitulate

36:10

and it could have been done covertly so that

36:12

Giliani didn't even know, or

36:15

they could contest it in court. We have no evidence

36:17

that they ever did that. So the

36:20

question then becomes, well,

36:23

if they already access to his iCloud. Why

36:25

would they seize his electronic devices

36:28

and cell phone. Well, the answer is not everything

36:30

on your cell phone goes to the cloud.

36:33

It depends on how much you upload

36:36

and when you last uploaded

36:38

it. So you know they

36:41

as I said to you last night on your television

36:44

program, this smacks of political

36:46

persecution masquerading as

36:49

a potential criminal prosecution.

36:53

And you can't do it against

36:55

a lawyer who's not getting

36:57

paid by Ukrainian sources, but rather

37:00

his client is President of the United States.

37:02

He's acting at the direction that behest

37:04

to the president, making him a de fact

37:07

a member of the administration, which

37:10

means Ferret is an apply and also

37:12

as a lawyer, he's duty bound to

37:14

conduct investigations, fact

37:16

finding, obtaining of evidence,

37:19

collection of information

37:21

from sources, including sources

37:23

abroad, then conveying that to

37:25

his client. He's the president's advocate,

37:28

not a lobbyist. Well,

37:30

let me get to that question with David shown

37:33

here and to me, I think

37:35

Professor Dershowitz's analysis and Greg

37:37

I think agrees with this that

37:39

a subpoena would suffice in

37:41

this case not going to somebody's

37:44

eye cloud or not a pre dawn raid

37:46

on Rudy Giuliani, the president's attorney.

37:49

Yeah right. And by the way,

37:51

there are special subpoena rules when an attorney's

37:53

involved, and there has to be a tank team

37:55

in place to make sure they're not getting privileged

37:57

materials when they do it. But let's take a look at the bigger picture.

38:00

The bigger picture here is shameless vindictiveness.

38:03

Talk about turning things on their head Hunter

38:06

boden of evades meaningful

38:08

investigation when even the Wall Street Journal

38:11

had called for that, had talked about the scandal

38:13

years and years ago. But I'm going to suggest

38:15

this to you. This administration is

38:18

simply shamelessly vindictive. You know,

38:20

President Trump had every right and

38:22

through his Attorney general, to really

38:25

thoroughly investigate and go after Hillary Clinton

38:27

when he came into office. One would suggest

38:29

that she certainly committed a crime with

38:31

the destruction of the emails and the hard drive

38:33

and all that. But they made a decision, whether political

38:36

or otherwise, not to do that. This administration

38:38

is taking the opposite tack. And I'm

38:40

going to say this to you. You know, I don't want

38:42

to be a Johnny one note, But we've talked in the past

38:45

about Andrew Weisman, you have now in

38:47

place the Deputy Attorney General who signs

38:49

off on things now like surveillance,

38:51

warrens and that sort of thing. Lisa Monico,

38:53

who was an Andrew Weisman colleague,

38:56

she worked at the FBI under Mueller as

38:58

counsel like Weisman did. She was on

39:00

the Enron Task Force. These are the sort

39:02

of folks now being loaded into this administration.

39:05

And when we talk about you know, surveillance

39:07

tactics and now this partnership for

39:10

domestic terrorists, surveillance supposedly

39:13

circumventing the FIS accord and that sort

39:15

of thing, you have a cabinet and other

39:17

administration officials who were singly

39:19

the most anti ally, especially

39:22

anti Israel and pro Iran figures

39:25

we've ever had in government. Probably this

39:27

is a very scary situation we're facing. Well,

39:29

it's beyond scary. Now you

39:32

have to wonder where do you think they're going

39:34

with this? It doesn't sound like Farah to

39:36

me, Greg Jarrett. If

39:38

Verdi Giuliani as the President's attorney

39:41

is looking into what I thought

39:43

was a slam dunk

39:45

case about leveraging a billion

39:47

dollars to fire a prosecutor investigating

39:51

Joe Biden, then vice President's

39:53

son, for getting millions

39:56

with no experience. That

39:58

kind of sounds a syndicate to

40:00

me, it does. It sounds corrupt,

40:03

doesn't it, which is a classic

40:06

you know, FBI Department of Justice.

40:08

It's as if James Cummy, Andrew McKay

40:10

and Peter Struck never left

40:13

the vindictive actions.

40:16

As my friend mister

40:19

Shawen describes, it

40:22

is apparent for all to see

40:24

where are they going for it? I frankly think

40:26

that this, you know, the seizure of

40:28

the electronic devices, they

40:31

were using Farah as

40:33

a pretext. Farah doesn't apply to

40:35

Giuliani under these circumstances. So

40:37

what are they doing. They're trying

40:40

to dig up dirt. So they

40:42

used Farah as a pretext to get their hands

40:44

on Giuliani's electronic

40:46

communications, hoping to find some

40:49

other lawlessness

40:51

that might be evidence therein. Look, I've

40:53

known Giuliani for you know, twenty five

40:56

thirty years. He is a careful,

40:58

scrupulous law You may disagree

41:01

with his politics, some people do. I

41:03

haven't agree with his politics, but

41:06

I doubt that they'll find any evidence

41:09

of wrongdoing on those devices. Well,

41:11

I don't think so either. I mean Rudy's a good

41:13

lawyer on top of everything else. And

41:16

you know, this goes back to a lot of the other cases

41:18

too. I mean the pre dawn raid

41:20

with mantaphor, guns a blazon, pre

41:23

dawn raid for process

41:26

crime, lying to Congress, Rogers

41:28

Stone and uh, you

41:30

know, guns drawn frogmen in the backyard,

41:33

fake news, CNN cameras tipped

41:35

off for the I mean the whole bit for lying

41:37

to Congress, the very same referrals

41:40

that went to top officials

41:42

in the FBI, in the in the Horowitz

41:44

report, David Show, that's right, and same

41:46

people. And again you know Weisman's behind that. Now

41:49

you have this, Lisa Monica, as I say, but there

41:51

are a number of things driving this. And by the way, remember

41:53

we saw these opinion pieces by

41:55

Weissman and others a couple months ago

41:58

already saying how the government could should

42:00

go after President Trump, go after Roger

42:02

Stone. It's never any battle. Instead

42:04

of coming forward with positive policies,

42:07

it's this vindictiveness. It's

42:09

taking people out of the game. It's disenfranchising

42:12

voters who would have voted for President Trump. That

42:14

sort of thing. That's

42:16

what the impeachment was about, you know. And that's what the

42:18

effort to bar him from ever running again.

42:21

But you have here with Giuliani, you have

42:23

a couple of motivating factors.

42:25

You have his former clients to leave Parnis.

42:27

I spoke on a panel with his lawyer,

42:30

talking on two different subjects, but his lawyer was

42:32

telling the group about how actively

42:34

his client is trying to so call cooperate

42:36

with Congress to stick it to Giuliani.

42:39

So people have different political motivations

42:41

here all coming together. You know, well,

42:43

you do, people, I understand now. The

42:46

Biden administration, also, by the way, is

42:48

considering using outside firms to track

42:51

what they define as extremist chatter

42:53

by Americans online. That's

42:56

a little bit chilling to make. Greg Jarrett,

42:59

Yeah, it's idiotic and

43:01

a corrupt idea. It's classic

43:03

Joe Biden. I say corrupt because Biden

43:06

is deliberately seeking to circumvent the

43:08

law that limits the government from

43:11

covertly surveilling citizens

43:13

online, like assuming false

43:15

identities to gain access

43:17

to private messaging, hacking encrypted

43:20

apps to spy and tea people. Under

43:22

the law, the Feds can only browse unprotected

43:25

social media conversations. They're

43:27

not allowed to infiltrate private messaging

43:30

without a warrant based on

43:32

probable cause. So what is the

43:34

Biden administration now thinking about

43:37

doing well? Outsourcing delegating

43:39

the surveillance outside groups

43:41

who were not legally constrained

43:43

by the Constitution under the Fourth

43:45

Amendment search and seizure rules. This

43:47

is a sleazy maneuver. It

43:50

violates the spirit of federal law prohibits

43:53

that prohibits domestic spine

43:56

without a valid warrant. This

43:58

is another appalling example,

44:00

Sean, of the devious, malevolent

44:03

tactics that our intelligence

44:05

agencies employ

44:07

against its own citizens, violating

44:10

their privacy rights and their civil

44:12

liberties. It's smacks of facism,

44:14

all right, powerful words. David Show and

44:16

Greg Jarrett will continue to follow this.

44:19

It's amazing though none of the people

44:21

that got referrals, none of the people involved

44:24

a premeditated fraud, and the fires

44:26

a court, no consequences whatsoever.

44:28

Really sad and it makes you,

44:31

you know, feel like we don't have equal

44:33

justice or application of our laws. At

44:35

twenty five to the top of the hour, eight hundred nine

44:37

four one, Sean, you want to be a part of the program.

44:40

You know, I've said this before. It is amazing

44:42

the anger that has come out against

44:45

James Carville. James Carville, I've

44:47

had actually I've had fun debating him

44:49

a number of times. He's actually a

44:51

fun guy to be around. He loves I

44:54

mean, he loves LSU

44:56

Tiger football. Oh my gosh. Actually,

44:59

there was a speech before for a championship game

45:01

was supposed to be a debate between me and him

45:03

one year, and all he talked

45:05

about was football, football,

45:07

football, and that's all the crowd wanted to talk about.

45:09

So I'm like, all right, I give up. I just

45:12

sat down and I got entertained and paid

45:14

at the same time. It said, fine, I

45:16

don't have to work. It was It was pretty funny

45:19

moment. And but one thing that he is

45:21

not is stupid. The one thing that I

45:23

think Bill Clinton did that was smart his entire

45:25

campaign and his entire presidency

45:29

and his entire post presidency is

45:31

he had a kitchen cabinet

45:33

not people I agree with, some of whom I

45:35

don't even like. But it included

45:38

carvillho I do like. It included

45:40

Begala, and it included ram

45:43

Rambo, Deadfish, It included

45:45

Georgie Stephanopolis. And every

45:47

day they went over the message of the day and

45:50

had a deal with whatever controversy

45:53

might be emerging, especially during impeachment

45:56

Monica Lewinsky. I did not have

45:58

sex with that woman on a single time. I'm gonna

46:00

get back to work for the American people and

46:02

all that sort of thing. Here's Carvill. It's

46:05

fascinating to me because I think this is

46:07

going to be far bigger

46:10

in the minds of the American people in

46:12

terms of the backlash

46:14

against woke ism. Cancel

46:16

cultureism. Listen. In

46:19

my view, if you want to in politics,

46:21

you should speak the language of the people. You should

46:23

speak clear, direct English

46:26

and address people as they address each

46:28

other, not like the Humanities Department

46:31

at Amherst wants you to address everybody.

46:36

Is this the kind of an issue? Is

46:38

this the kind of an issue, James? That is impossible

46:41

to poll because people are gonna

46:43

lie to a poster, But when they go in there and they

46:45

close that curtain, they're going to do what they

46:47

want to do. I don't have to poll all

46:49

right. After the twenty twenty congressional

46:51

elections, it was a huge eruption in the

46:53

Democratic Caucus where people correctly

46:56

pointed out that this whole

46:58

defund the police cost

47:01

US congressional seats I can look at the voting

47:03

results and the Rio Grand

47:05

Valley, I can look at the voting results in Miami

47:07

day, I can relate conversations

47:10

that I have with people every day. People

47:13

want to live like they're scared to address

47:15

an issue because it might come out the

47:18

wrong way, and no

47:20

one is using their language except

47:22

for you know, some of our

47:24

people on television. If you go to and if

47:26

you need Walton, let's just go listen to NPR.

47:29

Yeah, I'll leave it out of my truck radio

47:31

so I'll never fall asleep. You gotta

47:33

admit that's pretty funny, and

47:36

James Carvel's not dumb, and I think, but

47:38

it's only getting worse. You know. It was very very

47:40

telling as we were leading into the

47:43

joint speech before Congress

47:45

of Joe Biden, how

47:48

every squad member, led by

47:50

Congresswoman Actio Quartez Alexandria

47:52

Cossio Quartez, the real Speaker of the House,

47:55

Pelosi speaker in name only, is

47:57

that they all took credit for jose

48:00

agenda. And the reality is the truth

48:02

is she's right, and so is Congresswoman

48:04

Omar and Congresswoman Pressley

48:06

and other squad members, and they're all

48:08

patting themselves on the back because they know they're

48:11

setting the agenda. Bernie Sanders knows

48:14

probably he couldn't have gotten his agenda

48:16

this far had he been elected.

48:19

And I think they're actually shocked by it. But

48:21

the backlash to it, all

48:24

the reckless spending, the

48:27

policies that are job killing, it's

48:31

never going to work, and it

48:33

is a guarantee whiplash

48:37

in terms of a political earthquake

48:39

in the other direction. That's what the result of

48:41

all of this is going to be. By

48:43

the way, Linda, you know what everyone keeps asking me

48:45

about, why does Why

48:47

is Linda? Why won't she let

48:50

her child be normal and have a happy

48:52

meal? Everywhere I go everyone's asking about

48:54

little Liam and why poor little Liam? And

48:57

it doesn't get a happy meal. Never had

48:59

a happy meal. It's five years old. Little

49:01

Liam wants a happy meal, and they're

49:04

actually asking me to see if

49:06

I can have an intervention with you, an

49:08

intervention. First of all, who wants

49:10

to be normal? Can we start there? Nobody

49:13

wants to be normal. My child is he's

49:15

exceptional. Well, exceptional

49:17

child does not when heat chicken nuggets from McDonald's.

49:20

He wants to eat my air fryer chicken. Okay,

49:22

but he's never he has nothing to compare

49:25

it to. There's no baseline comparison.

49:27

He's never had a McDonald's French fry

49:29

in his life. This poor kid. So do

49:31

you remember this from your parents When you were a kid, they

49:34

used to say, be happy with what you got,

49:36

and then when you get older, you realize that you were content

49:38

with those things because you never had the other things.

49:41

So if he makes a decision when he's, you know,

49:44

a teenager, that he wants to fill his body

49:46

with toxin, that's his decision.

49:49

Okay, So you're not going to let this kid

49:51

wat till he's twenty one make the

49:53

decision that he can have McDonald's.

49:55

Basically, yeah, an informed decision.

49:58

See, I know what goes in those chick and nuggets. I've

50:01

cut them open. It's disgusting. I'm

50:03

sorry. I think that the audience

50:05

agrees with me. They're just afraid to say it out loud. No,

50:07

that doesn't mean no, no, no, the audience did not

50:09

agree with you. We had a pole upon Hannity

50:12

dot Com. I want eighty five

50:14

to fifteen percent. I think that that

50:16

pole is biased. Do you want to know why the

50:18

poll was not biased. The pole

50:21

was on the Sean Hannity website based

50:23

up show. Okay,

50:26

you know against

50:28

me. Remember when I wanted to run the tape

50:30

of Leo two point z Terrell. Oh

50:33

that's true. You did lose that one time? Lost

50:35

it. I mean I wanted to run out

50:37

of the tapes when Leo used to I

50:39

used to piss him off so much that

50:42

he would rip off his mic and rip out his

50:44

earpiece and he'd walk off the

50:46

show. So funny story. So you know, Leo and

50:48

I are good friends. We've known each other as long as he's been coming

50:50

on the show, as long as I've been working here almost seventeen

50:52

years. Scary and uh, it was

50:54

really funny. I was talking to him the other day and he goes, remember

50:57

when I hung up on you. I'm like, oh, yeah, I remember

50:59

those days. I mean I used to like he'd have guest thing

51:01

that's he gets so many He's like, I can't even talk to you, Linda.

51:03

He'd hang up like so many times.

51:05

And now he's like, I'm so sorry I did. I'll

51:07

never do that again. Well, I mean it's

51:10

such a good dude. I bet you he doesn't need McDonald's

51:12

I bet she probably does he McDonald's.

51:14

I bet you he does not. Look we'll do a quick poll

51:16

here, all right, now, don't hang up after

51:18

we ask one question. John and Missouri, do

51:20

you like McDonald's Do you like fast Wendy's?

51:23

You like fast food? I try not to,

51:25

but it's not a matter

51:27

of try. I try not to too, but you do like

51:29

it. I should come

51:31

to it, and I enjoy it when I ask you. All

51:33

right, John, stay right there, we'll get back to it. Tony

51:36

and Iowa. Do you like fast food? Do you like McDonald's.

51:39

Well, I eat a one that it has all emo

51:41

teenagers working there. They call it the unhappy

51:43

meal, but a special No, I don't, but

51:47

you know that's funny, right. Do you like a quarter pounder

51:50

which cheese once in a while French fries? Yeah?

51:52

Yeah, I do. Well, I don't know why everyone's

51:54

so apologetic. It's not a big deal. I'm

51:57

admitting I love it. Lou in Florida,

51:59

do you like McDonald yay? Sean? Yeah,

52:01

As a kid, I loved it. I got a chance to eat

52:03

it. But now I'm a vegetarian. Oh,

52:07

she's probably side. Now. I'm so

52:09

sorry to hear about that. Hang on,

52:11

LOUI, we'll get back to you. Thomas in Texas,

52:13

do you like McDonald's fast food Wendy's

52:15

because I liked them all. I'm a physician,

52:19

part of the obesity pandemic and wish i'd never

52:21

eating fast food? Do you really want that?

52:23

For little Liam, who seems I think I

52:25

didn't ask about talking about an obesity

52:28

problem. I'm asking. He's a

52:30

physician. You can't argue with him.

52:32

Do you like to eat an occasional

52:34

quarter pounder with cheese or a

52:37

single or double with cheese from

52:39

Wendy's. We all like things we shouldn't

52:41

have. Thank you, doctor likes

52:43

it. That's another vote for me.

52:46

Becky in Michigan? Do you like fast

52:48

food like Wendy's, McDonald's

52:51

pizza, all the fun stuff? Yeah?

52:54

Absolutely? And Kentucky Fried Chicken

52:56

original recipe? Right, that's right?

52:58

Yeah, all that off once

53:01

in a while. Thank you. That is

53:03

five for five. I'm not gonna

53:06

go any further. I can, but I won't because

53:08

I already won't. It's a different question.

53:10

Nobody asking the questioning puke

53:13

green shakes that you're eating

53:15

every day or the disgusting orange shakes

53:17

that you eat every day. They're as discussed,

53:19

they're just as disgusting. First

53:21

of all, you're not asking the right question.

53:24

The question is not do we like you

53:27

know, fast food? The question is not you know,

53:29

do we like constant politans? Do we

53:31

like beer? This is not the question. The question

53:33

is is it good for you? And would you give it to

53:35

your kid? Well, it's

53:38

a different question. Well, hang on, it's

53:40

not. It's not a big deal for a kid to

53:42

have a stupid happy meal once in a while. Yes,

53:44

it is because your body. Did you

53:46

ever see that documentary Supersize

53:49

Me? Yeah, okay, I see.

53:51

That means I'm right stupid, but it's

53:54

stupid. That's the one where the guy ate

53:56

McDonald's morning every day for thirty

53:58

days. Okay, I'm not talking about

54:01

every meal every day for thirty days.

54:03

I gained forty five pounds if I ever

54:06

did that, right, So, what I'm saying is, though,

54:08

is if you can keep your kid's body pure

54:10

and not give them these things, their

54:12

body never ever wants it. They never acclimate

54:15

to it. You know, my son has no idea

54:17

what the stuff is. It's the best thing in the world. Okay,

54:20

quick break, we'll come back on the other

54:22

side. And now I'm in the mood

54:24

for a quarter pound of a cheese French fry

54:27

and a coke. All right, as we continue, or

54:29

a little discussion about McDonald's. Here.

54:31

One day, when you're not looking, I'm taking that kid.

54:33

I'm gonna I'm gonna snatch

54:37

did you air

54:40

really? Uncle Sean's gonna snatch

54:42

the kid for an hour and get him a

54:44

happy Meal and just

54:46

just gonna say, just don't tell mom, and he'll

54:48

be home playing with his happy Meal toy of Ronald.

54:51

See. Look, this is the difference between

54:53

you and me. Like when we were down and we

54:55

were in West Palm and we were doing the interviews, and I

54:57

was like, okay, I want to buy one toy for

54:59

my son. And you go in and you're like pulling

55:02

the whole shelf you and

55:04

sweet baby Book. No, that's not what happened.

55:07

It was me and sweet baby

55:09

James and we had finished the trip.

55:11

I'm exhausted, and you say,

55:14

and I said, you guys, stop a Target

55:16

and go get a toy for Liam. And I said, I

55:18

said, I'm stopping at Target. You

55:20

said you were, You said you wanted to stop at

55:22

Target. You had promised to get Liam a toy get

55:25

him a toy train. We stopped at Target. Okay,

55:28

we all go in, all four of us. Me. You No,

55:30

you're leaving out the part. Wait a

55:32

minute, you leave it out a critical part, which is where

55:34

I said, please don't come in with me,

55:37

go by.

55:38

I like to go shopping. No,

55:40

you like to rush people, just like you rushed inside.

55:45

We find the toy section. Then when we find

55:47

the toy section, it's got like twenty

55:49

different styles of trains, and

55:52

Linda has to pick up and touch

55:54

and play with and price out

55:56

every single freaking train

55:59

to that's right. Forty minutes

56:01

and finally I had had enough and

56:03

I've got a cart, and I bought

56:06

all the trains and I threw them in

56:08

the basket and I said, let's go. You

56:10

can decide later give them all to the kid.

56:12

Just so you know, America, forty

56:15

minutes in Sean Hannity Land

56:17

is like about three minutes. And everyone

56:19

else's he has the patience that I named my daughter

56:21

with Daddy Daughter Day. Of course,

56:23

I know, why don't you remind the audience? Okay,

56:27

the deal was she got to eat anywhere she

56:29

wanted. Daddy Daughter Day right, and then

56:31

we then we go to the mall.

56:34

I say, now you can pick one store. I

56:36

don't care what store it is. You have

56:38

ten if I was very patient that day, fifteen

56:40

minutes, get whatever you want. Then

56:42

we're leaving. We're getting out of here. You knew patience

56:45

is a virtue, right, that's patient. Some

56:47

days I had fifty, I gave fifteen minute and now it was funny.

56:49

She was like agonizing over picking out

56:51

one toy, one whatever it

56:54

was, and it would be like then finally

56:56

one day I brought her friends and said they can do it too,

56:58

and they're like, well, if you're gonna give them fifty's

57:02

full of crap and that like loading up.

57:04

They're not looking at anything except just as

57:07

much as they can touch in ten minutes. They

57:09

should have just gotten a gift card and maxed

57:11

it out. That

57:13

that's not fun,

57:16

Yeah, but it was. It's the fun part that they get to hand.

57:18

You should just make a Hannity happy meal, just

57:20

buy gifts, sent it to Linda's house and she

57:22

can give a gift with actual

57:25

edible food to Liam.

57:27

She always wanted to go to Subway, and

57:29

Subway's okay. I don't love a way.

57:32

But every time I'd be like, no, but

57:34

they have healthy options

57:36

nothing. She'd order a

57:38

real meal, I don't know, maybe a steak or whatever

57:40

she's eating. And then I said, well, what do you want

57:42

for dessert? She goes, Dad, They're too expensive. I'm like, good

57:44

grief. Did you eat McDonald's when you wear

57:46

a kitchln? Yes? Of course I did.

57:49

Did was opened in Franklin Square.

57:52

The local Penny Saver had

57:55

a free large

57:57

McDonald's french fries. And

58:00

this is terrible. I'm gonna confess these

58:02

statute of limitations along past. But me

58:05

and my friends we walked around

58:07

the neighborhood and stole every penny Saver we

58:09

could and we used that Oh

58:12

he did that freak large

58:15

McDonald's french fry.

58:17

I mean, I'm probably in the

58:19

course of three weeks that's all I lived

58:21

on was McDonald's french fries. And it was great.

58:24

I loved it. I have to say,

58:27

I'm looking up the stats on chicken

58:29

nuggets McDonald's chicken nuggets. Excuse

58:32

me, this is h stirical.

58:34

The burger happy meal.

58:37

No, kids, my son doesn't eat cheeseburgers.

58:39

He eats chicken nuggets. I don't know a lot of kids who eat

58:41

burgers, not at least not in my neighborhood. Not with my

58:44

kids. I mean they love chicken nuggets and

58:46

French fries and or pizza, pizza,

58:49

and that's it. And that's that's all

58:51

my child is eating. Occasionally I get cheesy broccoli

58:53

in there. So we're doing the interview with Caitlin Jenner tomorrow

58:56

and uh, are you gonna offer a McDonald's.

58:58

No, No, it's it's

59:01

all in and out burger. How long have

59:03

you worked for me for crying out loud? Too long? Well,

59:05

you didn't know it was in an outbreak. I'm gonna get off

59:07

the plane and just say, can you take me to the nearest

59:09

in and out burger? Please? You know it would be a

59:12

great video, you and Caitlyn going together

59:14

and ordering together. I'd be glad, Tod

59:17

that's good. Then I'll get get accused of the media

59:19

paying for an interview. Did you watchnes

59:22

Caitlyn Jenner? And

59:26

what's that? Where's the fec when

59:28

you need him? Right? Well, that's true, All

59:31

right, Well we wasted a lot of time anyway. All right,

59:33

we're gonna get to these calls. I promised John,

59:35

Tony, Lou Thomas, and Becky.

59:37

We're gonna get to you. I promise. Eight hundred and nine

59:39

four one Sean is our number. Quick break

59:41

right back, all right, duds, found up information

59:43

overload our Sean Hannity Show. I promise your

59:45

calls bottom of this half hour, eight hundred and nine

59:48

four one Sean. You want to be a part

59:50

of this extravaganza. Joe Concha is

59:52

with us? Well? I mean when

59:54

the Washington Post, NBC

59:57

News, New York Times get

59:59

this same story on Rudy wrong, and

1:00:02

they got it from the same source. What

1:00:04

does that tell you? Joe Concha, media expert

1:00:08

columnist at The Hill on the media,

1:00:10

and of course Fox News, a

1:00:12

fellow Fox News

1:00:14

employee, Sir amazing

1:00:17

Sean, that again and again we

1:00:19

have the Russian narrative rearing its ugly

1:00:22

head. We saw it, as you said, for three

1:00:24

years, with all those allegations of Russia

1:00:26

collusion, and even right before election

1:00:28

day remember that story about bounties

1:00:31

on US soldiers by the Russians

1:00:33

and the Taliband carrying that out.

1:00:36

And then later, only later, only after

1:00:38

all the votes were casting, did

1:00:40

we actually see any sort of retraction,

1:00:43

Because what does it matter at that point, right, Joe

1:00:45

Biden was able to use it as ammunitions

1:00:48

during that first debate and bringing it up repeatedly

1:00:50

as if it were fact. And

1:00:53

of course now we see this here with Juliani

1:00:55

again. The same media outlets only

1:00:57

make a mistake when it overwhelmingly

1:00:59

is negative towards Republicans or conservatives

1:01:02

or those who's appoint the support the

1:01:04

president, right and in this case, obviously Rudy

1:01:06

Giuliani. And here's the thing, the juice.

1:01:08

The allegation presented as absolute

1:01:10

fact always gets one hundred

1:01:12

times the coverage as the exoneration.

1:01:15

And do you think the other cable news networks

1:01:17

who went apocalyptic and reporting the allegations

1:01:20

against Rudy Giuliani marinated in a

1:01:22

healthy dose of piousness, by the

1:01:24

way, and sidenfreude, do

1:01:26

you think that they're going to now get on the air and cover

1:01:28

the retraction, the correction as

1:01:31

much as they did the allegation. It's rhetorical

1:01:33

Tuesday. You don't have to answer that, John, Okay,

1:01:36

I won't answer. I won't take debate.

1:01:38

But it's but it's so typical, you know, I

1:01:40

noticed that fake Jake Tapper over

1:01:42

at fake News CNN is

1:01:44

out there sanctimoniously declaring

1:01:47

that he's never going to interview

1:01:49

Republicans because they don't tell the truth.

1:01:51

That I'm like, do you have any

1:01:54

level of self awareness about how

1:01:56

screwed up your network is and what

1:01:58

a propaganda outlet it has been

1:02:00

exposed as? Are you that

1:02:02

out of touch with truth

1:02:05

and reality? Well, Jake Taffer,

1:02:07

then therefore never interview anybody on his

1:02:09

show again who pushed the Russia collusion

1:02:11

narrative for example, Right, So you know,

1:02:13

you better have some pretty consistent rules

1:02:15

across the board. And look, this is what CNN has

1:02:18

become. It's maybe to even

1:02:20

the left of MSNBC, which is a very

1:02:22

hard thing to do. But I think they think

1:02:24

by being a cheerleader for this administration, in

1:02:26

the Biden administration, and continuing

1:02:28

just to be the thesis dons against

1:02:31

Republicans, that that's somehow a winning formula.

1:02:33

And then I look at their ratings. They are down

1:02:36

since January sixty percent

1:02:38

in primetime. That means six out

1:02:40

of ten viewers who are watching your network

1:02:43

just earlier this year are gone because

1:02:45

they see through the BS. Well,

1:02:47

I mean that's all true, and

1:02:50

you know there's always a little dip after an election

1:02:52

year, and that

1:02:54

was predictable. It's always predictable. But

1:02:58

these things are now heating back up. Pull it and

1:03:00

you can see that the audience is back faster

1:03:03

than ever. So I had this interview tomorrow

1:03:05

with Caitlyn Jenner. They

1:03:08

came out with a three minute ad,

1:03:11

and political ads, generally

1:03:13

speaking, don't capture

1:03:15

my attention. They just that kind

1:03:17

of rolls off me. I don't know if he saw

1:03:19

the three minute ad, but I thought it was phenomenal.

1:03:22

Well, you know, here we have somebody who is

1:03:25

obviously very in tune with

1:03:27

how to connect with people, right, I mean, I think Caitlyn

1:03:30

Jenner is something like three million Twitter

1:03:32

followers. Just to put this in perspective, Davin

1:03:34

Newsom doesn't even have two million, and he's been the

1:03:36

governor of California for a couple of years. Right,

1:03:38

So there's definitely the name recognition

1:03:41

in Caitlyn Jenner. I mean give her

1:03:44

credit in terms of being true to her principles,

1:03:46

knowing that if she's transgender

1:03:49

that she at least according to

1:03:51

the rules, the unwritten rules, she absolutely has

1:03:53

to support Democrats. And she's saying, no, this is who

1:03:55

I've always been in terms of how I look at

1:03:57

the world and policies around

1:03:59

X, why and Z, primarily being

1:04:02

conservative. So yeah, if there's

1:04:04

a runoff, remember Sean in California,

1:04:06

you just need the most votes. It's not like Georgia

1:04:08

where he needs like a majority. That's how

1:04:10

you win, whoever gets the most votes.

1:04:13

If Newsom is recalled wins

1:04:15

the election, that makes the crap shot there

1:04:17

is. But there's two questions.

1:04:20

It's if he is recalled. That means

1:04:22

on the ballot enough people have to vote

1:04:24

to recall him, right, and then then it gets

1:04:26

the question two, which is, Okay,

1:04:28

of this list of people, who would you like to be governor?

1:04:31

Now you start out, Kaylin starts

1:04:34

out of my opinion with high name recognition.

1:04:37

The thing that was interesting to me m

1:04:40

and I called asked about

1:04:42

the interview, and I had a long discussion, and

1:04:45

I said, for me, this is about

1:04:47

this is about policy politics.

1:04:50

California is broken. You

1:04:52

know, where's your level of commitment here? Now

1:04:54

I don't want to give away too much of what

1:04:57

the answer was, but the answer, let me just put

1:04:59

it. The was a very good

1:05:01

answer. And I think I

1:05:03

think, like, for example, if

1:05:05

if this was about anything other

1:05:08

than really wanting to

1:05:11

serve as a governor. I don't think I would

1:05:13

be that interested in that interview, but I believe

1:05:15

it is about wanting to be the

1:05:17

governor of California and correcting

1:05:21

this draconian, radical

1:05:24

left wing wokeism,

1:05:27

you know, disaster. I mean from everything

1:05:29

from the environment out there. They won't even allow

1:05:31

these controlled burns

1:05:33

to stop the wildfires. They won't

1:05:35

even allow farmers to have water. They

1:05:38

put the priority of a little

1:05:40

fish called the delta smelt, which is not

1:05:42

even an endangered species, over

1:05:45

the rights of farmers

1:05:48

to have water so that they can raise their crops.

1:05:52

It's about a thirteen and a half percent

1:05:54

income tax. It's about illegal

1:05:56

immigration as out of control

1:05:58

as any other state, the sanctuary

1:06:00

state of California. I mean,

1:06:02

these are real issues here that you

1:06:05

know, I think every candidate that

1:06:07

is running for office is going to have to answer.

1:06:10

And there's so much to attack

1:06:13

right if you're a candidate looking to seeking

1:06:16

this office right in California, for your leaders

1:06:18

are think about the murderers row they have here.

1:06:20

It's not exactly the forty nine Yankees. When Gavin

1:06:23

Newson is your governor and Nancy Pelosi

1:06:25

is one of your congresswomen who happens to be the Speaker

1:06:28

of the House. And then you have Swallwell

1:06:30

and Shift Boy. That

1:06:32

is quite the lineup, isn't it. And you

1:06:34

don't forget Diane Feinstein. Feinstein

1:06:37

too right, and just think about everything

1:06:39

that's going on out there, the record, homelessness, the

1:06:41

exodus. The two states that have the biggest exodus

1:06:43

by far by a country mile, is California

1:06:46

and New York right now, that's according to United dan

1:06:48

Lines who did a big survey on

1:06:50

this and looked at their own data in terms of people

1:06:52

moving out of places, and the states that are getting

1:06:55

the most influx Idaho, Kentucky,

1:06:57

and Florida. What are those all have in common?

1:07:00

The red states? So yeah, people are getting taxed out

1:07:02

of a zoo. They don't feel safe anymore. The

1:07:04

migrant problem is a huge issue. So Caitlin

1:07:06

Jenner is going to have a lot of targets

1:07:08

that she can nail in this situation in

1:07:11

terms of this is what's wrong and here's

1:07:13

how I'm going to fix it. I'm telling

1:07:15

you you haven't need some serious trouble either way.

1:07:17

I don't disagree at all. I think, I think,

1:07:20

really serious trouble, and

1:07:22

and it just makes you wonder,

1:07:25

is it now possible that California

1:07:27

could go back to a

1:07:31

more fiscally conservative policies.

1:07:34

Now I'm not sure, and I'll find

1:07:36

out when I do the interview whether

1:07:39

this the ad that came

1:07:41

out said, this isn't about Republican a

1:07:43

Democrat. This is about what has happened

1:07:45

to this great state of California. That needs

1:07:47

to be open, that needs regulations

1:07:50

to go away, that needs taxes to go down,

1:07:52

that needs common sense environmental

1:07:55

policies. But

1:07:58

I think the radicalism of California,

1:08:00

you know, will it now begin

1:08:02

to adjust back to a more conservative

1:08:05

state now, one that a presidential

1:08:07

candidate can win. That's a stretch, but

1:08:10

maybe on the local level, I

1:08:12

actually think it might be possible. I'm

1:08:15

loving enough to remember a guy named Arnold Schwarzenegger

1:08:17

who came from the entertainment world. Everybody

1:08:19

gave him zero chance whatsoever. If I heard one

1:08:22

more joke in two thousand and three,

1:08:24

get to the chop off like everybody

1:08:26

thought. It was like a big joke, like come on, got please. The guy from

1:08:28

Terminator is going to be the governor of California. And

1:08:30

he won and that was a recall election

1:08:33

that you may recall, Sean. So that's interesting. And

1:08:35

we've had what Governor Jesse Ventura,

1:08:37

We've had Mayor Jerry Springer, We've

1:08:40

obvious had President Donald Trump. Yes,

1:08:42

you can come from the entertainment sector

1:08:45

and do quite well here because again, you don't have

1:08:47

to worry about brand recognition or marketing yourself.

1:08:49

For people getting to know you, they know already basically

1:08:52

who you are. And that gives her Hitlin

1:08:54

Jenner a huge head start here. So yeah,

1:08:57

I don't see why she couldn't

1:08:59

win in this situation because the competition

1:09:01

is just so blode, seems at this point.

1:09:03

Unless our friend Rick Renell jumped in, then we got

1:09:05

a whole new conversation. He's been reluctant.

1:09:07

I've had him on TV a number of times, and I happen

1:09:10

to like Rick a lot. I think he did a great job

1:09:12

as Director of National Intelligence, and

1:09:14

he's a real warrior. He's

1:09:16

a fighter. Um. I think he's smart,

1:09:19

principled. I think he'd do a great job

1:09:21

out there. But he's been reluctant

1:09:23

to even give me a hint that he has any interest in

1:09:25

running. Yeah, and that's a shame too, because

1:09:27

you tell me who has better

1:09:30

teeth in any political sphere,

1:09:32

right? I know he was an acting director of Director of

1:09:34

National Intelligence right before. That guy

1:09:37

has some tremendous choppers. I mean I'd

1:09:39

kill for those and not alone I think could

1:09:41

help him in this situation. Oh of course, Jeff.

1:09:43

And when do you get in your media show

1:09:45

on Fox? I am advocating this now

1:09:48

openly and publicly. I think you deserve

1:09:50

a media show on Fox because you

1:09:52

get that last last week, on last

1:09:54

Friday on the on the netigin, I got

1:09:56

more text by it have since I don't know, I

1:09:58

think senior year, right, I mean, so you

1:10:01

doing that situation,

1:10:04

we'll take, you know, I take anyhow at this point,

1:10:06

all right, quick break more with Joe Concho on the other side

1:10:08

than your calls final half hour eight

1:10:10

hundred nine four one sew on our number.

1:10:13

If you want to be a part of the program, And as we continue

1:10:15

with Joe Concho, then we'll get to your calls eight hundred

1:10:17

and nine four one Sean. You

1:10:19

know you follow. Look when I used

1:10:21

to be on social media, which now seems

1:10:24

like an entire lifetime ago. When I

1:10:26

used to be on it, and I would,

1:10:28

you know, engage with my public feuds

1:10:31

with the likes of Jimmy

1:10:33

kimmel um or Alec

1:10:36

Baldwin, a couple of them that I had, By

1:10:38

the way, they went down in history

1:10:40

some of the best Twitter brawls

1:10:42

ever. But when I had them, and

1:10:45

it does take too much of your time, I noticed

1:10:47

that there was this little cabal of

1:10:49

all these blue check media people

1:10:52

and they live in their own little bubble. Have you

1:10:54

noticed that two on social media and they

1:10:56

tweet out what the other one's doing, and what this

1:10:58

one's doing, and that one is doing. And if you

1:11:00

tweet my article or my piece

1:11:03

on TV, I'll tweet your piece on TV. It's

1:11:06

like they've got this left wing LoveFest

1:11:09

never ending, and it's all rooted

1:11:12

in the same radical left policies

1:11:14

that Trump is bad, Republicans

1:11:16

bad, Conservatives suck and we

1:11:19

are the enlightened ones, we know better

1:11:22

than the American people. It's like, you

1:11:24

know, in journalism, it's more

1:11:26

important for not just the media reporters

1:11:29

and commentators that are out there, but just journalists

1:11:31

in general. They are tickled if

1:11:33

they could get just one retweet from Maggie

1:11:35

Haberman or if you're like a Nicole Wallace

1:11:37

on MSNBC, or you're a Don

1:11:40

Lemon on CNN. It's not

1:11:42

about winning an Emmy or a politiczer or anything

1:11:44

like that. It's oh boy, you think that Stephen colbertil

1:11:47

or Jimmy Kimmel will have me on their show and we

1:11:49

get so excited about that. Yeah, so how

1:11:52

is that possible? Considering their ratings

1:11:54

are atrocious? On the worst

1:11:57

night rating night on Hannity,

1:12:00

we like double these people, And I'm

1:12:02

trying to understand, you

1:12:04

know, where are the media articles that actually

1:12:07

analyze, Like I noticed that who

1:12:09

what's that guy's name, Seth Myers? And

1:12:11

I noticed that, you know, I mean,

1:12:14

I started, I took a good shot back at

1:12:16

him after he said something about me I don't

1:12:18

even remember, and then I

1:12:20

had my team pull up his ratings. He gets under

1:12:23

a million viewers a night, and I'm like,

1:12:25

why am I even talking to this guy? Why am

1:12:27

I wasting my time? That's the old NBC

1:12:29

Letterman spot before Letterman became really political,

1:12:32

right twelve thirty NBC, and he would have

1:12:34

millions more people watching because you got

1:12:36

the escapism, you actually laugh, You watched

1:12:38

stupid pet tricks and Paul Schaefer, and he always

1:12:40

had great guests, and he just like it was a good

1:12:43

thing to fall asleep too when you were

1:12:45

in college. And now it's just like I'm hearing Seth

1:12:47

Myers and Stephen Colbert arguing

1:12:49

that the filibuster should be abolished and why

1:12:52

we should have fifty one states and adding

1:12:54

DC, and I'm like, wait a minute. If I wanted this, I'd

1:12:56

watched the banners. The problem is

1:12:59

hust Listen. If they were funny,

1:13:01

I'd say they're funny. Like I can

1:13:03

tell you that some of the people on

1:13:05

social media that make fun of me for whatever

1:13:07

reason, and some of the memes

1:13:09

and some of the things they say, I

1:13:12

mean, they literally they crack me up.

1:13:15

They're clever, they're funny, they're

1:13:17

smart, they're spot on

1:13:20

in terms of they're making a point

1:13:22

with however they're attacking

1:13:24

me. And I look at it, and you know, I

1:13:26

kind of on my hand, good job. I really like it.

1:13:28

It's funny. These guys don't make me laugh.

1:13:31

Jay Leno made me laugh. Letterman in

1:13:33

the old days he made me laugh.

1:13:35

Then Letterman became kind of a hardcore

1:13:38

lefty leto stayed down the middle, kind

1:13:40

of more in the tradition of Johnny Carson,

1:13:43

and I thought that served him

1:13:45

well all of those years. And what a

1:13:47

mistake it was to get rid of Jay Leno.

1:13:49

In my view, you'd still have a fastball Leno at

1:13:51

this point, right and now, Jimo, I'm

1:13:53

sorry, Jimmy Fallon. I mean, not even like one point

1:13:56

five million viewers with Trust me It on the network,

1:13:58

all the promotion that they give it at eleven thirties,

1:14:00

they're not paying them all that money to bring

1:14:02

in that sort of cash. And that's the shame about

1:14:04

Falon. Falon used to be somewhat down, not

1:14:07

down the middle, but he just did more entertainment. That's

1:14:09

right, because he has a lot of talent. But then once

1:14:11

Colbert and once Kimmel went completely

1:14:13

and totally political, balance felt like he

1:14:15

had no choice. And now he should have

1:14:17

stuck to his guns. He got he panicked

1:14:20

over the ratings for a short period of time.

1:14:22

He needs to get back to that if he wants any chance

1:14:24

in my view, All right, Joe Concho, thank

1:14:27

you as always eight hundred and nine four one sewn

1:14:29

you want to be a part of the program, quick break right back.

1:14:32

Your calls on the other side straight ahead.

1:14:34

All right, twenty five to the top of the hour. All

1:14:36

right, let's get to our phones. John Missouri,

1:14:38

you've been very patient, sir, thank you for being

1:14:40

with us. Glad you called. I'm glad you like McDonald's.

1:14:44

Well, thank you much for this opportunity. It's great

1:14:46

honor to be able to speak with you today. Yeah.

1:14:49

So I'm a teacher here in Missouri, and you

1:14:52

know, after hearing all the things have been going on, it's

1:14:54

it's really kind of struck

1:14:56

a fire within me about why people

1:14:58

aren't wanting to bring their chea it's back into the classroom.

1:15:01

Well, I think it should for a lot of

1:15:03

different reasons. Um, you know, I noticed

1:15:06

Biden is telling younger kids

1:15:08

that they need to get vaccinated. Now,

1:15:11

I'm not sure if this was a real picture or not.

1:15:13

It's in the Daily Mail. I trust

1:15:15

the Daily Mail, but they have a picture

1:15:18

of Jill and Joe Biden with Jimmy

1:15:20

Carter and his wife Rosalind.

1:15:24

Jimmy Carter's ninety six years old, Rosalind's

1:15:27

ninety three years old. They didn't have a mask

1:15:29

on. Um. Look, I

1:15:31

think you know there's

1:15:33

so much damage that people aren't really

1:15:35

even factoring in now these

1:15:37

kids, you know, wearing masks for eight hours

1:15:39

a day. Um, they're getting rashes

1:15:42

number one, number two. Um,

1:15:45

that's so that's a problem when they're even in school,

1:15:47

but being home they missed their friends, that

1:15:49

they don't have the socialization. Uh,

1:15:52

it's putting a stress on families. It's

1:15:54

it's it's it's not helping anybody.

1:15:57

And we've already proven in Florida because schools

1:15:59

they have been open since August that

1:16:02

it can be done safely and successfully.

1:16:04

I don't know what, Well, that's the

1:16:06

same thing we've gone on here. We've we've been open

1:16:08

since August, and we knew on the

1:16:11

onset that that we were trying to set

1:16:13

improve a point that you don't

1:16:16

have to go full distance learning. I mean,

1:16:18

we have absolutely offered it as an option.

1:16:20

But when we know what it takes to teach

1:16:23

children, it takes relationships,

1:16:25

It takes building academic

1:16:27

success through giving them

1:16:30

the accouragement, showing them what they can achieve.

1:16:32

And especially in these middle school age groups,

1:16:35

if you don't connect them to academic

1:16:37

success, you put them on a whole complete

1:16:39

path to failure later on down the road. Even

1:16:41

in which but that said, though I'm not against

1:16:43

online education for people to

1:16:46

choose it. I know, for example,

1:16:48

a lot of athletes do it so they can pursue

1:16:50

their their sports ambitions.

1:16:52

I'm fine with that, and that's

1:16:55

but it's got to be a choice, and it's got to be a rigorous

1:16:58

academic program. You just

1:17:00

can't, you know, skate on through school

1:17:03

and life without getting an education, because

1:17:05

it's the latter to success, and

1:17:07

an athlete's one injury away from you

1:17:09

know, needing that education, but badly

1:17:12

well. And one of the things that studies show is

1:17:14

is, you know, like you said, distance learning,

1:17:16

when you have the support at home and then

1:17:18

things are available, it can be a very productive

1:17:21

thing. But when you look at some of

1:17:23

the statistics, you know, when it comes to you

1:17:26

know, fostination, a lot of times schools are

1:17:28

having problems promoting reading in the classroom.

1:17:30

Kids are coming in the classroom about fifty percent

1:17:32

of the time not being able to read at

1:17:34

grade level. And even the studies on dyslexi,

1:17:37

it's not something that can easily be done over line. It

1:17:39

takes it takes that chance to meet

1:17:42

with the kid to see where that that hitch

1:17:44

is. The prison statistics

1:17:46

and even in Texas show that forty

1:17:49

eight percent of the prison population is dyslexic,

1:17:51

with two thirds of them struggling with reading

1:17:54

in the first place. And so

1:17:56

when you have these kids that have struggled

1:17:58

at home and can't really connect online

1:18:00

or they don't have that added support, they

1:18:04

very well take that path that really

1:18:07

sets them up for failure throughout life. And this was

1:18:09

a big part of broken communities. And

1:18:11

so when these teachers and these teachers unions

1:18:13

aren't wanting to be in the classroom, you

1:18:15

know, I mean that is the same. I mean, you

1:18:18

know, it all depends to the

1:18:20

outcome. There are great teachers

1:18:22

and great school districts, and they are allousy

1:18:24

teachers and a lousy school districts,

1:18:26

just as a matter of where you live. But

1:18:29

you're right. The ideal situation with

1:18:31

all the money we spend per capita pursudent

1:18:33

on education with the worst

1:18:35

results in the industrialized world. It's

1:18:38

mind numbing. But you sound like one of

1:18:40

the good ones. John, Thank you, my friend, and

1:18:42

keep up the good work. Chance our

1:18:44

kids need good teachers. Tony is

1:18:46

an Iowa. Hey Tony, thanks for being patient.

1:18:49

Hey Hendy, thanks for getting me in. You're

1:18:51

going to condense this the best they can, and hope

1:18:54

I don't end up on a watchless for seeing this.

1:18:56

But if any department has

1:18:58

warranted defunding and restructuring,

1:19:01

it's got to be the FBI, not the police.

1:19:04

I mean, this goes all the way back, well

1:19:06

way back. But I'm

1:19:08

just gonna go back to the Hillary email,

1:19:11

hard drive, Oh we lost our hard

1:19:13

drive and Kobe saying out we

1:19:15

don't got enough to prosecute him, you know, that kind

1:19:18

of thing, And it's just the one thing after the other

1:19:20

where it seems to be the FBI at the heart

1:19:22

of the Oh yeah, this is a ballot

1:19:25

investigation, and hopefully

1:19:27

you know, twenty twenty twenty

1:19:30

twenty two, excuse me, take back the House

1:19:32

and the Senate, then maybe we can make that possible,

1:19:35

where we you know, shake down the and

1:19:37

restructure and start some investigations

1:19:40

about, hey, what's going what's really going on the

1:19:42

FBI, Like when they were farming out

1:19:44

surveillance the third party, what

1:19:47

was it two thousand nine or ten when Obama

1:19:49

comes on and says, hey, everybody, we're gonna

1:19:52

protect you for whistle blowing, and then about

1:19:54

a week later, Snowdon Snowdon

1:19:56

drops the bomb about how you know, he

1:19:58

was one of the party people

1:20:00

who was being put on the you

1:20:03

know, watching people and going, hey, this isn't

1:20:05

right. You know, we shouldn't be doing this. This isn't

1:20:08

this isn't a private thing. This should be you know,

1:20:11

we're closely guarded. This is way too loose

1:20:13

for security. It's sad to

1:20:15

me that we had our opportunity

1:20:19

and Director Ray had his opportunity

1:20:21

to clean up the FBI, which I

1:20:23

think is one of the greatest law enforcement

1:20:25

institutions in the world. I

1:20:28

still you're never going to convince

1:20:30

me that it is the rank and file, because I

1:20:32

know too many rank and file FBI guys,

1:20:35

special agents, and

1:20:37

they are appalled at

1:20:39

what some of the upper echelon

1:20:42

seventh floor folks have been engaged

1:20:45

in. And we

1:20:48

missed our opportunity, or so it seems.

1:20:51

Unless Dorham is up to something

1:20:53

that none of us know, I have very

1:20:55

little faith and hope that he's

1:20:58

capable of doing the job that should be

1:21:00

done, that needs to be done to clean it up. But

1:21:03

you're right, it's dangerous for the country anyway.

1:21:06

Good call, Tony, Appreciate it. Lou and

1:21:08

Florida, Hello, Okay,

1:21:10

Sean. Listen, my mother was a delegate

1:21:12

Coronald Reagan in Arizona and

1:21:14

at a young age in the fifties, we learned a

1:21:16

lot about communism and

1:21:19

what's happening right now in DC at

1:21:21

the tip of the iceberg. I'm not talking your rank and

1:21:23

file if you just said, but all the

1:21:25

institutions, the intelligence, communities,

1:21:28

law enforcement, and certainly our congressional

1:21:31

bodies are all being headed

1:21:33

as a will to power government. Okay,

1:21:35

this is all will to power for

1:21:38

a globalist pay to play

1:21:40

agenda. That's exactly

1:21:42

what this is. And

1:21:47

there was a story today

1:21:49

that will back up what you're saying. And

1:21:52

it may not sound like a big deal or one

1:21:55

that you want to pay attention to, but it

1:21:57

really caught my attention. You have a top

1:21:59

a cost for Joe Biden urging.

1:22:02

Now this is on top of Janet Yellen the

1:22:04

whole world to raise the corporate tax rate.

1:22:07

And her name is Cecilia Rousse, chair

1:22:09

of the Council of Economic Advisors

1:22:12

for the Biden administration. And

1:22:14

what they're trying to do is

1:22:17

get every nation to

1:22:20

engage in redistribution socialist

1:22:22

policies. This way, there'll

1:22:24

be no place for the rich to go to

1:22:29

hide their money or save their

1:22:31

money, and that they'll have access

1:22:33

to it. When they have access to the

1:22:35

money and they have people dependent

1:22:37

on them, they have all the power. And

1:22:39

that's what this game has always been about. That's

1:22:41

never going to change. But see now they

1:22:44

have the power and the prize of the United

1:22:46

States now once they take the United

1:22:48

States down, but dominoes go global

1:22:51

all the way. What happened in Venezuela

1:22:53

was the playbook of our twenty twenty

1:22:56

election. That's a fact. And

1:22:59

you can look at Cuba right now, which is on a very

1:23:01

bad state. You look at all these

1:23:03

totalitarian governments. And my sister,

1:23:05

who's completely you know, she's a conservative,

1:23:08

but she's like, oh, with the pendulum, it'll switch

1:23:10

the other way. And I said, why does it switch the

1:23:12

other way in China? How about

1:23:14

Cuba. Let's run down the list.

1:23:16

You think it's going to switch the other way in Venezuela.

1:23:19

My proposal is that there'd be a name change

1:23:22

today to the Democrat Party

1:23:24

in this country to the Communist Democrat

1:23:27

Party of America, because

1:23:29

that's what Levin's new book is. You

1:23:31

know that they're Marxists,

1:23:34

and you know American Marxism.

1:23:36

And I'll tell you what. I got criticized in

1:23:38

the Jerusalem Post for calling Bolshevik

1:23:40

Bernie Bolshevik Bernie. And

1:23:42

I'm like the guy honeymooned in the former

1:23:45

Soviet Union. He's praised,

1:23:47

you know, regimes, murdering

1:23:49

regimes like in the Soviet Union

1:23:51

and Cuba's Castro and

1:23:54

Nicaragua and Venezuela.

1:23:57

I mean that that's

1:23:58

it. I'm just speaking of fact.

1:24:02

But anyway, good call Low. We appreciate

1:24:04

scary times. Thomas, Texas Next

1:24:06

Sean Hannity Show, It's up, Thomas. I'm

1:24:09

a huge fan. Tried multiple times to get you.

1:24:11

I want to segue off of Joe

1:24:13

Biden. First, I think, how are he gotten office?

1:24:15

In my opinion, should never be removed to

1:24:17

show all Americans than the emperor's

1:24:19

new clothes. As we say in Texas,

1:24:22

he must ride that crutter to the ground. He

1:24:24

placed an unconstitutional executive fiat

1:24:26

regarding mask on federal property. He is

1:24:28

the White House federal property. Now the

1:24:30

other reason I called I have also

1:24:32

a martial arts background as well as being a physician.

1:24:35

And you mentioned thumbholes, you

1:24:38

know, but humans on mind, body altering

1:24:40

chemicals don't respond to painful stimuli and

1:24:42

they don't behave Actually the police

1:24:44

drop him off. And you know, we've discussed this in the

1:24:46

past. That and that's a very good point

1:24:50

that other you know, students, So I

1:24:52

add one grand master actually

1:24:54

call one day and bring that point

1:24:56

up, and I agree with you. And

1:25:00

and there were people that aren't feeling pain because

1:25:02

they're on so much of this crap whatever is

1:25:04

out there, pain killers. But in the what

1:25:06

I saw, specifically in the case of

1:25:08

George Floyd I was speaking

1:25:10

specifically to, that was a

1:25:12

guy that clearly was feeling pain and

1:25:15

and being compliant and hadn't

1:25:17

already been handcuffed. And you know, if

1:25:20

you or how long have you been involved

1:25:22

in martial arts, that

1:25:24

was that was back in college. I didn't go all the way

1:25:26

to black belt just because of what it carried

1:25:28

with it. And I

1:25:30

don't want to do the work to be a black belt. It's too

1:25:33

much work, too much studying, too much, it's

1:25:35

too hard. I'm going to get the crap beat out of me

1:25:37

for eight hours. Yeah,

1:25:40

I was one stripe away. But

1:25:42

for us, the police pick up these people,

1:25:45

they drop them off with us to either

1:25:47

defeat the Graham Reaper or detox them.

1:25:49

They put out arrest lawrants for

1:25:51

them, and then when they're detox or sober,

1:25:53

we've released them. Is there something

1:25:56

that we can do to help the

1:25:58

police in hospital? D Crowdy? Yeah,

1:26:00

you got you gotta elect conservative politicians,

1:26:03

conservative governors, conservative legislatures.

1:26:07

You got conservatives to Congress, conservatives

1:26:09

in the Senate, and yeah we

1:26:11

need a conservative president. There you go, It's

1:26:13

the only answer. Amen.

1:26:16

Appreciate your brother, Iron Sharp, appreciate

1:26:19

it. Becky Michigan, Hey, Becky, how are you? Thanks

1:26:21

for being patient? Oh hey

1:26:23

Sean, thanks for having me here. I'm

1:26:25

just up here in lockdown, Michigan

1:26:28

with Whitmer, and I just wanted to let you know that

1:26:30

Fox seventeen put

1:26:33

out an article today announcing

1:26:35

that Governor Gretchen Whitmer is

1:26:38

going to be receiving a Profile

1:26:40

and Courage Award for her

1:26:42

service during the COVID

1:26:44

nineteen pandemic. So I went

1:26:47

online to just do a little research to find

1:26:49

out where the JFK Profile

1:26:51

and Courage Award comes from. It comes from

1:26:53

Massachusetts, so I was

1:26:56

not surprised to see below it that Tom

1:26:58

Romney also got the award

1:27:00

for being the Republican to commit

1:27:04

or to convict President Trump, and anyway, that's

1:27:06

neither here nor there. I just wondered

1:27:08

if they actually asked the people who

1:27:10

live in these states about

1:27:13

this type of thing in a face he think

1:27:15

that she should receive this type of award,

1:27:17

and what the people would say here in our state,

1:27:20

because I know most people would not

1:27:22

excuse me. Is this the same you

1:27:24

know, Whitlas Whitmer that was out there

1:27:27

lying to the people of Michigan saying

1:27:29

she never left the state, but she did go

1:27:31

down to Florida. The same

1:27:34

governor whose husband at

1:27:37

a time when nobody was allowed to

1:27:39

get out on their boats, whose

1:27:41

husband was out on his boat. Is

1:27:44

this the same person that

1:27:47

that screwed up this whole thing from

1:27:49

start to finish. You know, it's sort

1:27:52

of like, you know, Andrew Cuomo gets an m

1:27:54

and Barack Obama gets a Nobel Peace Prize.

1:27:56

I don't know what to tell you. Unbelievable.

1:28:00

Yeah, I don't even have words for it anymore.

1:28:02

So I just wanted to tell you because I know you feel

1:28:04

our pains. Oh I

1:28:07

do, and I have a lot of friends in Michigan. I'll tell

1:28:09

you it's rough. There anyway,

1:28:11

I appreciate the call. Thanks for your patients, Becky

1:28:13

eight hundred and nine for one. Sean, all

1:28:15

right, that's gonna wrap up things for today,

1:28:18

Hannity. Tonight. We got a lot to get to

1:28:20

tonight, including breaking news. We

1:28:23

have let's see Congressman Jordan

1:28:25

Ron Johnson all asking demanding

1:28:27

the FBI for answers on these

1:28:30

Fizer violations after new

1:28:32

FISA court opinion has been issued. And

1:28:34

of course the latest on the grass Lee Johnson

1:28:37

memos slamming intelligence for

1:28:39

partisan information leaks, and the

1:28:41

CIA recruitment videos slammed

1:28:44

as Wolke propaganda. I can't even believe we have

1:28:46

to debate these things. We'll

1:28:48

get into the horrible treatment of

1:28:50

police officers as well.

1:28:53

We'll show you the videotape, this horrible

1:28:56

tape of a woman just vicious

1:28:58

to this cop. So we'll get into that.

1:29:00

We'll have Josh Holly on as well.

1:29:03

He'll join us, Eric Trump from the Trump Organization,

1:29:06

and we'll give you a preview of

1:29:08

everything from California tomorrow in our

1:29:11

interview with Caitlyn Jenner. Thanks for being

1:29:13

with us as all you always see it tonight from

1:29:15

the Golden State Tomorrow,