0:00

Next , on the Sean Morgan Report , we have Joel Kast

0:02

and he was giving us his analysis on the

0:04

war in the Middle East . We are going to question the mainstream

0:06

narrative and expose media propaganda right

0:09

now . That's a great question . That's a good

0:11

question .

0:11

That's a great question . That's a great question . Well

0:13

, that's a really good question . It's a great question . Well

0:15

, you're right .

0:30

It is great to have Joel Kast and the editor of the

0:32

World Affairs Brief with us . So

0:34

, joel , I've read your analysis on the war

0:36

in the Middle East . It's very nuanced , including

0:39

the fact that it seems

0:41

pretty obvious that Israel

0:43

allowed this type of attack

0:46

to initiate this war . And

0:48

why would they do that you were mentioning

0:51

, I believe , a faction of

0:53

Israel has a deep state , just like

0:55

in our country we have a faction

0:57

of the US that is deep state , and so

0:59

they were the ones that allowed that attack

1:01

. Could you give us your analysis there ?

1:05

Yes , benjamin

1:08

Netanyahu , the prime minister , is

1:10

a globalist . He's

1:12

a Henry Kissinger protégé

1:14

. Henry Kissinger and associates paid

1:16

for his education in the United States . They

1:19

set him up in Wall Street for his

1:21

first job and then he set him up in politics

1:24

in Israel by allowing

1:26

him to create an anti-terrorism

1:29

worldwide conference in Israel to which

1:31

all the bigwigs

1:35

in US politics attended

1:37

. Anybody can do that in Israel as an instant

1:39

hero in Israeli politics . That's

1:41

how we got to start . So

1:44

marching to a globalist

1:46

agenda , which is a lot about creating wars

1:49

and conflicts so

1:51

that you can talk your own citizens

1:53

into something that they would otherwise not

1:57

accept is standard

1:59

, fair . And of course , this

2:02

Netanyahu

2:04

and Israel claims was their own 9-11

2:06

. It was different than

2:08

our 9-11 in the sense that

2:12

our own deep state actually created

2:14

. They hired the terrorists , they loaded the buildings

2:16

with explosives , they

2:19

used high-tech technology

2:21

to remote control airplanes that the

2:23

hijackers could not fly , and

2:26

I can tell you , as a fighter pilot , that you

2:28

wouldn't even know how to turn off the autopilot in an

2:30

airliner if you trained on a Cessna

2:32

and failed at that training to boot

2:34

. But in

2:36

this case , this was not

2:39

actually created . Hamas

2:42

has given funding and initially

2:45

helped create Hamas in the Gaza

2:47

Strip as a counterbalance to the PLO

2:49

under Yassir Erfatt . And

2:53

they continue to fund Hamas

2:55

through Qatar , which

2:58

houses the Hamas leaders in luxury

3:00

and five-star hotels which

3:02

they do nothing about to try to capture for

3:04

humanitarian purposes . But in

3:07

any case , hamas

3:10

had been planning this for over a year . In

3:13

fact , the New York Times got the leaked

3:15

intelligence that the Israeli

3:18

intelligence had for over a year , which

3:21

the Israeli intelligence claimed , in response

3:23

to the New York Times article that they dismissed

3:25

because it was quote aspirational

3:27

, meaning that they didn't think Hamas

3:30

could do it . Now they know better

3:32

than that . Hamas had 10 years

3:34

to prepare for this attack and there

3:37

was all kinds of other intelligence confirming

3:39

it was coming , including private

3:42

intelligence sources which the IDF provided

3:44

equipment to

3:47

over to eavesdrop

3:49

on cell phone conversations throughout Gaza

3:51

which he continued to warn Israel

3:53

that this attack was coming , and they

3:55

finally took his equipment away and told him

3:57

to shut up because they don't want to hear it . They

4:00

also moved the Israeli Gaza

4:04

battalion 80 percent of it . They

4:06

moved out of southern Israel

4:08

into the West Bank , now

4:10

putting Israeli quick response

4:13

troops more than seven hours away

4:15

from being able to respond , and

4:17

all of that confirmed that this was

4:19

in fact a stand down to

4:21

allow it to happen , so that they could not respond

4:24

in a timely manner . And that's

4:26

how they started . And I asked the question , sean

4:28

, about why . I

4:31

initially thought , in my World Affairs

4:33

Brief article covering this , that

4:35

it was to

4:38

provoke a wider war with Iran

4:40

, since Iran is the primary sponsor of

4:42

the military equipment in both Hezbollah

4:45

in Yemen , the Houthis

4:47

and in Gaza . But

4:51

Iran didn't take the bait . Even

4:53

though Israel has been attacking Iranian

4:56

militia in Syria for the

4:58

past two years , they've never

5:00

arisen to take retaliatory measures

5:02

against Israel because

5:05

they're not ready yet to tackle . They know that

5:07

the West will piggyback on that

5:09

attack , so

5:12

they're not ready to take on the entire West , so

5:14

they didn't rise to the bait . It has not expanded

5:16

into a wider war , so

5:18

that leaves Israel with the vow that

5:20

they're going into Gaza to eliminate

5:22

Hamas militarily , and

5:25

as a military expert , I don't think that's feasible

5:28

. Frankly , I think when you have the network

5:30

of underground tunnels that they have , which are over

5:33

400 kilometers , it's very difficult to

5:35

ferret out them all , though they have gotten

5:37

a great deal of them . But

5:39

you're talking about at most , 50,000

5:42

troops in Hamas in a sea of 2.3

5:44

million people in an urban jungle

5:47

, and that's very , very difficult to eradicate

5:49

. If you don't eradicate them all

5:51

, this war is going to create , of course

5:53

, many more thousands of Hamas activists

5:56

, which will then swell the ranks , and

5:58

there'll be another hiatus , like there

6:01

was last time , of five or six years

6:03

before another attack . So I think

6:05

the cost in

6:07

civilian life is not worth the

6:09

fact , though . You have to go after your

6:11

enemies , I mean to be sure , but clearly

6:13

they're choosing the route that

6:16

minimizes military

6:18

casualties and maximize civilian

6:20

casualties by using aerial bombardment

6:23

when Hamas is

6:25

generally underground .

6:27

Right and destroying the infrastructure

6:30

. Is it going to be a livable

6:32

place by the time Israel's done with it ?

6:35

Well , you know what happens in these things

6:37

the international community ends up footing the bill

6:39

of rebuilding all these countries

6:42

. So it's not livable right now , Only

6:45

about oh , I would say 20%

6:47

of the buildings are probably destroyed in

6:50

northern Gaza and they're now in southern Gaza

6:52

, doing a lot of destruction of infrastructure

6:55

. The

6:57

international community , including the US , will have

6:59

to rebuild

7:02

everything at great expense , and

7:04

you know they end up importing a lot of

7:06

explosives and other things under the guise of

7:08

construction and military equipment . So the

7:11

cycle of violence will continue

7:13

and what's worse is that the world

7:15

, one of the globalist agenda in creating

7:17

war in other countries , is to create

7:19

refugee flows so that

7:21

they can interdict in Western culture and

7:23

water it down with Muslim

7:25

culture and other conflicting

7:27

cultures , which don't lead to

7:29

greater peace , as we're finding out in Europe

7:32

and in the United States . So

7:35

there are left-wing refugee

7:37

organizations pushing for massive acceptance

7:40

of Palestinians within the United States

7:42

and that's going to bring in a lot of hatred against

7:45

the US for supporting Israel .

7:48

Right . It's a very divisive issue

7:51

in the US . It seems like the

7:53

left and the right can't really seem to

7:55

figure out which side they're on . They're

7:57

not united necessarily , although you have more of the

7:59

evangelical right besides with Israel

8:01

and you have more of the radical leftist

8:03

side with Hamas

8:06

basically . But it's not totally

8:08

united and you see Biden trying

8:11

to play both sides , which is very strange

8:14

to watch the president do . But

8:17

let's get back at the bigger picture that

8:19

Israel wants a war with Iran . They

8:22

tried to bait them . They didn't take the bait . So

8:24

Israel , or one faction of Israel

8:26

, thinks they're ready to take on Iran

8:29

. But you've had

8:31

a few neocons , a few people

8:33

talk about doing an unprovoked attack

8:35

, a first strike

8:38

on Iran . What's the likelihood

8:40

in your mind of that happening soon

8:42

?

8:44

Well , israel has been practicing

8:47

an attack on Iranian

8:49

nuclear facilities now for over two years

8:51

. They do simulated aerial

8:53

interdiction and bombardment using electronic

8:56

jamming techniques to be able to get through Iran's

8:58

radar early warning systems

9:00

. So we know they're actively

9:02

prepared for such an attack

9:05

. But I don't think they

9:07

want to have the image of

9:09

being the aggressor in this . So they've wanted

9:11

to have a provocation . They wanted to induce

9:14

or get Iran to retaliate so they

9:16

can go after them , and that hasn't happened . So

9:18

if you go in , they have to build a bigger

9:20

narrative

9:23

about the danger of Iran's nuclear

9:25

program . Now it's true that Iran is

9:27

building towards a nuclear weapon . Israel

9:29

already has nuclear weapons and they feel like

9:32

they need them to be able to counterbalance

9:34

that . But I think you'll

9:36

probably find a leak somewhere that

9:38

Israel will claim that they're about

9:40

ready to unleash a nuclear weapon and that

9:42

will justify a strike . They'll have to have some

9:44

rationale for going in

9:46

unprovoked and I think that's what it'll be

9:49

. It will be a nuclear threat .

9:52

And how might this ripple

9:54

effect occur throughout the

9:56

Middle East ? Which sides , which

9:59

countries will feel obligated to take

10:01

sides ? And let's

10:03

talk about the bigger players , like

10:05

Saudi Arabia , the United

10:08

States , of course . Where

10:10

do you think the EU and NATO would land

10:12

on this ?

10:14

Well , first of all , the United States

10:17

keeps troops in Iraq unnecessarily

10:20

and Syria to act as bait for

10:22

Iran , and

10:24

our American troops don't know that we're

10:26

really illegally in Syria

10:29

. There's no reason for us to be in Syria . Syria

10:31

has never been an antagonist . In fact , we

10:33

imported the terrorists into

10:36

Syria . That

10:39

was the effect of having bombed Libya

10:41

and Tunisia and going

10:43

after Gaddafi as we created a wave

10:45

of Muslim terrorists which we imported

10:47

and moved into Iraq . Then we took

10:49

50% of those and retitled

10:52

them as ISIS gave them priority . I'm talking

10:54

about we in the sense of the American deep state

10:56

. Isis was a total

10:58

American creation of the deep state

11:01

based upon 50%

11:03

of the Arab terrorists . And

11:05

so we've used terrorism

11:08

as an excuse to occupy the northern

11:10

oil fields of Syria , denying Syria

11:12

the money to be able to rebuild . And

11:15

we're continuing to occupy areas of Iraq

11:17

, even though the Iraqi Polar man has refused

11:19

to reauthorize that we're there in

11:22

spite of Iraq refusal

11:24

to agree . And so and

11:27

I think we're doing that to provide bait so

11:29

that our soldiers get bloodied by Iran

11:32

and therefore justifies a US intervention

11:34

. It's a US intervenes and

11:36

then Saudi Arabia

11:38

will probably intervene , because Iran and Saudi Arabia

11:40

don't have an amicable relationship

11:43

at all , and if Saudi

11:45

Arabia joins the battle against Iran , they'll

11:47

get attacked either . Now , iran will be a formidable

11:49

military it's

11:52

no pushover by any means as a formidable

11:55

Navy and it has a huge amount

11:57

of missiles and things . So

11:59

the US is going to take casualties in

12:01

this war , and so will Israel , and

12:04

Hezbollah will get involved as well , and

12:06

Hezbollah has not done

12:08

but token attacks on Israel , and they've got probably

12:11

300,000 missiles in Hezbollah

12:13

they can launch at Israel

12:15

and overwhelm the Iron Dome and

12:17

Arrow system , israel's

12:20

self-defense forces .

12:23

And you've got the BRICS nations with their economic

12:26

alliance , and it makes you wonder if

12:28

they really are a military alliance as well

12:30

, specifically , of course , russia

12:32

and China . Would they be on the sidelines

12:34

for this type of conflict ? Do you think they would play

12:36

a role , supplying intelligence

12:39

and munitions , at the very least

12:41

?

12:44

Well , right now Russia is

12:47

gearing up for a

12:50

full wartime economy . Right now

12:52

they've geared up to full missile

12:54

production and wartime artillery production

12:56

. Most of that's being used up in Ukraine

12:59

. So how much extra they would have

13:01

to add to Iran's ? But

13:03

remember , russia is using Iranian drones

13:05

already and some of their missiles . I

13:09

don't think China and Russia would want to get

13:11

drawn into this . I think they would like to see

13:13

this as a means of drawing

13:15

down US and Israeli military

13:18

capacity , as we're seeing

13:20

the Ukraine war sap Russia's

13:23

conventional military capacity rather

13:25

than join it actively . When

13:28

Russia and China do join or

13:31

get into an attack on the West , they're going to begin

13:33

not with a conventional military

13:36

armored attack on NATO

13:38

or Europe . They'll start

13:40

with a preemptive nuclear missile

13:42

strike on US and NATO military forces

13:45

, trying to blackmail the West into

13:47

submission .

13:50

That's a very bold prediction . I want

13:52

to ask you about that . We are going to take a quick break

13:54

and when we get back we'll dive into the

13:56

grand strategy of play .

14:23

The world's safest and most private assets

14:25

silver and gold . Call

14:28

Kirk Elliott PhD . 720

14:30

605 3900

14:32

.

14:39

We are talking to Joel Scousen of World

14:41

Affairs Brief about the conflict in the Middle

14:43

East and how that could play out perhaps

14:46

Russia and China getting involved

14:48

or maybe waiting it out . You

14:50

did mention the idea that

14:52

there could be a first strike

14:55

on US military bases , nuclear first

14:57

strike from Russia-China

14:59

. Why would they

15:01

choose to do that ? You mentioned blackmail

15:04

to get us to just submit right away . Do

15:06

you think that would work ?

15:09

Well , I don't think it will work . But let me go

15:11

through the rationale of my theory

15:13

on this . First of all , to

15:18

apply any conventional military strategy

15:20

to Russia and China is really not

15:22

wise . Why would they

15:25

use a recraine type

15:27

strategy , with tanks rolling

15:29

into Western Europe when they can't

15:31

even occupy Ukraine right now ? You

15:34

see , that's the big problem . Why not

15:36

use your nukes to neuter the

15:39

opposition's military and

15:41

then either try to blackmail and if they don't

15:43

respond to the blackmail , to give in ? Then

15:46

you can go to a conventional

15:48

warfare and the US and NATO would be

15:50

far less capable of waging

15:52

that war after absorbing a nuclear first

15:54

strike . That's the rationale for that . But

15:57

Russia and China have to have a trigger band . They don't

15:59

want to appear as the aggressors

16:03

. The most likely trigger events for World

16:05

War III are really Taiwan

16:08

or South Korea in a war

16:10

with North Korea . These have become

16:12

intertwined , since North Korea has threatened

16:15

that if the US tries to intervene and stop

16:17

China from taking back Taiwan , that they will

16:19

intervene in the war and attack

16:21

not only US forces in the Pacific

16:24

but South Korea as well . Seoul

16:26

is within artillery range of North Korean

16:29

artillery tubes , and so they

16:32

can really obliterate that city within

16:35

a matter of weeks with artillery fire

16:37

alone . And of course , north

16:40

Korea claims to have nuclear weapons as well , which

16:43

I don't doubt that they

16:45

don't have . So here's

16:48

how I think that might play out . Now

16:50

, a likely scenario is that

16:52

the US could be over committed

16:54

in Ukraine and in an

16:56

Iran war if that starts up and

16:58

that might induce China to start

17:01

their attack on Taiwan , knowing that the US

17:03

would be hard-pressed to be able to handle a

17:05

two or three front war . And

17:08

if they do intervene in North

17:10

Korea , then and

17:12

by the way , North Korea is a total puppet state of China

17:14

they won't start an attack , no matter what Kim

17:16

Young-un threatens to do , unless

17:19

China gives the go-ahead . But

17:21

if the North Koreans attack South

17:23

Korea , the US has now this is what's

17:25

different in Ukraine and in Israel

17:27

. The US doesn't

17:30

have troops in Israel and doesn't have troops

17:32

in Ukraine , at least except for a few secret

17:34

advisors . But we do have

17:36

26,000 troops in South Korea

17:38

and the US would be required

17:40

to come to their defense if North Korea

17:42

attacks South

17:45

Korea . And so if we attacks

17:47

North Korea in defense of South Korea

17:49

, that's an excuse

17:51

for China then to launch a preemptive

17:54

nuclear strike to stop those attacks , and

17:57

they would basically attack all of us . Yes

17:59

, that's

18:02

exactly what I was going to ask you . What would

18:04

be their objective ?

18:05

They're trying to destroy our equipment and our

18:07

men .

18:07

Right , they're not after attacking

18:09

cities because , you see , they want to occupy

18:12

both North or US

18:15

and Canada . China's run out

18:18

of living space . They've run out of agricultural

18:20

space . It's mostly desert in China . They

18:22

can hardly feed their people , especially with periodic

18:25

famines and floods and things that flood

18:28

the various agricultural lands . General

18:32

Hao Tian

18:34

, the former Defense Minister , in

18:36

a speech in 2011 , did threaten

18:39

Now this was leaked to the press

18:41

through the epic times , an anti-communist

18:43

Chinese outfit in the United States , telling

18:45

how they're going to be ruthless . They want to

18:47

cleanse the nation of people . If they

18:50

can't do it by biological warfare , they

18:52

want to do it by occupation in

18:55

order to have more living space . They said you

18:57

know , we're not going to be easy on the West like

19:00

the Nazis were . We're going to be ruthless . I

19:02

should understand

19:04

that the Chinese do have a ruthless

19:06

streak in them about treating

19:08

other conquered people , as anyone who's lived

19:11

under Chinese occupation has found

19:13

out . But

19:15

you see , the problem

19:17

that we're facing is that not only do

19:20

Russia which , as I've

19:22

explained to my World Affairs Brief subscribers

19:24

fake their own demise in 1989 and 1990

19:27

in order to get Western aid and trade and

19:29

put Russian peoples into Ukraine

19:32

, into the borders of Ukraine in the Baltic

19:34

states , to have an excuse to attack someday

19:36

in the future when they wanted to reconstitute the

19:38

Soviet Union . Both Russia

19:40

, china want this war and also

19:43

the Western globalists want this Third

19:45

World War . Your readers need

19:47

to understand that the US

19:50

globalists have been building communist

19:52

enemies for decades . They

19:55

gave $20 million to the Bolsheviks

19:57

to start the revolution . Britain gave

19:59

an additional $20 million in gold

20:01

to the Bolsheviks . We cut

20:04

off military aid to the White Russians to make

20:06

sure the Bolsheviks won . We

20:08

brought Mao Zedong to power by cutting

20:10

off military aid to Batey—to Chiang

20:13

Kai-shek . We brought Castro

20:15

to power by cutting off military aid to Bateysta

20:17

. We brought the Sandinistas to power in

20:19

Nicaragua by cutting off military

20:22

aid to Samosa , and

20:24

the list goes on and on about how we've undermined

20:26

Western countries in order to bring communists to

20:28

power . Not because the globalists

20:30

are communists . There are too many conservatives

20:33

talking about letting

20:36

the communists take over this country . No

20:38

, it's the globalists that are a threat . They're

20:41

using communists , and even BLM and

20:43

Antifa communists , in order to break

20:45

down the social order in

20:47

a Hegelian dialectic where they create

20:49

conflict and crises so that they come

20:51

in and save us with a solution that we would

20:53

not normally attend and the reason

20:55

for the globalists wanting this

20:58

preemptive nuclear strike on our military

21:00

so they can come out of their bunkers and say well

21:03

, we didn't know this was going to happen , which is

21:05

a lie , but

21:07

now that has happened . The only way that we can defend

21:09

ourselves and prosecute this war is

21:11

by joining an immilitarized global

21:13

government , and I believe this new EU

21:16

army that is being formed and

21:18

funded in secret in Europe is

21:20

the seed stock for a new

21:22

global military post-nuclear

21:26

strike . But I think you

21:28

might ask the question well , how does the US intend to

21:30

win a nuclear war when you absorb a nuclear

21:33

first strike ? And , by the way , we have

21:35

a military doctrine that was signed in 1997

21:37

during the Clinton administration Presidential

21:40

Decision Directive 60 , which specifically

21:42

dictates to our missile

21:44

forces to absorb a nuclear first strike

21:47

and not launch on warning . Now

21:49

, launch on warning is very important because if

21:51

you launch on warning

21:53

when our satellites detect a launch

21:56

by Chinese and Russian missile

21:58

forces , then their missiles hit

22:00

empty silos and our missiles

22:02

that launch hit legitimate

22:04

targets . So the one who launches on warning wins

22:07

the war , not the one who launches first

22:09

. And that's one of

22:11

the reasons why I think our pacifists

22:13

dictated such a suicidal

22:16

policy in 1997

22:18

. General Butch Neal of the Marine Corps said retaliate

22:20

with what Once you've absorbed a nuclear

22:23

first strike ? Now we have some

22:25

submarines out there . About half

22:27

of our 14 ballistic missile submarines

22:29

are on duty at any one time . The rest are important

22:31

and can be targeted , but

22:34

those warheads on the

22:36

Trident missiles are not capable of hitting

22:38

hardened underground targets like Yamato

22:41

Mountain and the 3,000

22:43

miles of underground Chinese military

22:45

targets . So

22:47

it's a difficult scenario . But

22:50

I think that the most likely

22:52

trigger event for World War III is going

22:54

to be a war in Taiwan or South

22:56

Korea and if you see that happen

22:58

within a week I think we'll be in

23:01

a third world war .

23:04

That could be the match that lights everything

23:06

on fire . That's

23:08

very interesting , and I do want to

23:10

do a follow up episode with you to get

23:12

into the Russia-China possibilities

23:15

. But going back to the war in the Middle East , I

23:17

find it really fascinating that

23:19

this whole anti-Semitic

23:21

college campus free

23:23

speech issue came to the fore , where

23:26

you have the majority of

23:28

the Ivy League schools actually have Jewish

23:30

presidents , and then the

23:32

few that are not Jewish

23:34

were put up on the stand and grilled

23:36

about why they allowed anti-Semitic

23:38

comments and protests

23:40

and speech on their campus , and

23:43

two of them stepped down or were fired

23:45

. And so I just

23:47

wanted to find out from you what

23:49

is the Israel lobby

23:51

like , the Israel power

23:54

structure like ? Is it embedded in the US

23:56

? What is that relationship

23:59

like ? Who's

24:01

the puppet master when it comes to the US and Israel

24:03

?

24:05

Well , it's a complex question

24:08

because it

24:11

goes clear back to the Holocaust and

24:14

why the

24:16

mainstream media

24:18

promoted to such an degree

24:21

the Holocaust and while it did happen

24:23

, and clearly they went after the

24:25

Jews unjustly . There

24:28

was some exaggeration about the numbers and about

24:30

the use of the gas chambers , et cetera , and

24:32

has been disputed . But

24:35

what I think wanted to happen is that because

24:37

there's so many intellectual

24:41

Jews in the hierarchy

24:43

of the globalist conspiracy against

24:45

national sovereignty and liberty

24:47

, the globalist wanted

24:50

to create a kind of immunity for

24:53

Jewish leaders involved

24:55

in those things so that any criticism would

24:57

be viewed as anti-Semitism . And

25:00

so you can't criticize Israel legitimately

25:02

without being called an anti-Semite and

25:06

you can't criticize the war without

25:09

being anti-Semitic . The Jewish lobby

25:11

is extremely powerful . Almost no politician

25:13

can get elected in the United States if

25:16

they don't at least give tacit

25:18

, verbal support to Israel . And

25:21

, as I say , no nation is completely free

25:24

of guilt in

25:26

wars that they create , let alone the United States

25:28

. But we've created

25:30

a mantra within Western society

25:33

that any criticism of Jews is anti-Semitic

25:35

, even if it's legitimate or

25:37

not . Now I don't pretend

25:40

. There's a lot of conservatives that talk about

25:42

the Zionists . Well , not all Jews

25:44

are Zionists and in fact Zionists

25:46

don't end up being religious

25:48

Jews at all . They could care less about their own

25:51

religion , but

25:53

I choose to criticize globalism

25:55

as the real entity . Now that includes

25:57

significant Jews like George Soros

26:00

and Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry

26:02

Kissinger , who just died , etc . There

26:04

have been a lot of Jews involved , especially

26:08

in the rise of the Soviet Union Leon Trotsky

26:10

, for example , and

26:13

others involved

26:15

in the Bolsheviks were Jews , and

26:17

even against their own people . But

26:20

it's not because that they are religious

26:22

Jews or defending the peoples because they are

26:25

part of a globalist

26:28

conspiracy . So I condemn globalist

26:30

leaders , and that includes what Jews

26:32

are involved there , not Jews in

26:34

particular . The world doesn't

26:36

run , not , a lot of people will

26:38

say . Well , the Jews

26:41

did 9-11 , and that isn't true at all . That

26:43

was our own deep state that

26:45

did 9-11 , from

26:47

the hiring of the terrorists to the loading of the

26:49

buildings with explosives , to the technology

26:52

that allowed them to remote control some of the airliners

26:55

.

26:57

Right , and so what you've said before

26:59

is that these globalists don't

27:01

have a communist ideology

27:04

. It's a convenient ideology for them to

27:06

use to weaken our

27:08

national sovereignty and the sovereignty

27:10

of other countries , and

27:13

so same deal goes for Judaism

27:17

. It's not necessarily their ideology

27:20

or their religion . It's something that

27:22

they can identify with as

27:24

a form of immunity , is the way you

27:26

described it . So , in that case , what

27:28

is the globalist ideology

27:30

? Is it just pure fascism

27:32

, that type of grandiose

27:36

, narcissistic , psychopathic kind of idea

27:39

, or is there a

27:41

religiosity to them , satanic

27:44

kind of thing ? What's your take on that ? You

27:46

only have a few minutes left , but

27:48

it's a big question .

27:49

But whatever you have , Well

27:52

, it is my belief that all three

27:54

globalist predator centers

27:57

Russia , china and the

28:00

Anglo-American globalists are

28:02

satanic based . There's

28:04

no way that these conspiracies can go on for

28:06

centuries , generations , without being

28:08

spiritually driven , and

28:10

this is not religion in the sense that it's anti-religion

28:13

being satan based

28:16

. But

28:18

there's no mafia chief that can establish

28:20

a 200 year plan for

28:22

his own conspiracy and expect

28:25

his family to continue that

28:27

. It just doesn't happen . You

28:29

have to have continual spiritual direction . So

28:31

, just as I believe in God , I think that there is

28:33

satanic revelation as well to his people , but

28:35

only at the very top . There's

28:38

a whole mix of globalists Most

28:40

of the globalists like in the world economic form

28:42

, klaus Schwab who consider

28:44

an AI robotic society . They

28:47

don't know that the top

28:50

level globalists are going

28:52

to give us a world war that's going to destroy

28:54

the ability to have an AI robotic society

28:56

. This war is going to be preceded

28:58

by about 15 , 20 minutes by an

29:00

EMP strike that's going to take down the grid for

29:02

over a year , because we

29:05

don't stockpile the long distance transformers

29:07

that allow you to they're

29:09

all made in China to get

29:12

the grid back up and running , and

29:14

so you can't have an AI robotic society

29:16

without a constant flow of electricity and

29:18

a constant flow of good , moral people to

29:21

keep order in society . We're losing that as

29:23

well , right

29:25

?

29:26

Well , this is fascinating . I definitely want to do a follow

29:28

up episode about World War III . So

29:31

thank you for your insight , joel

29:33

really appreciate it . And everyone can go to your website

29:36

sign up for World Affairs brief and this

29:38

is Sean Morgan signing out . You can go to get

29:40

my breaking news updates at Sean Morgan reportcom

29:42

. God bless all you patriots

29:44

. Good night , good

29:56

luck .