Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The. Friendship is sharing deal because I want
0:02
one of your Mcnuggets. In I need some of
0:04
you called upon. There's a deal for everyone
0:06
at Mcdonalds. get one favorite like ten piece Chicken
0:08
Mcnuggets a quarter pounder are a Big Mac and
0:10
yet another for just about price and participation. Mayberry
0:13
valid for item of equal or lesser value. Hello!
0:23
Everyone and welcome to this week's edition
0:25
of the Spanish report Cross with me
0:27
feel keeps really days and my friend
0:29
doctor said hello hello Sydney how I
0:31
feel how you I'm good thank you
0:34
How are you not about things at
0:36
We're Recovery or. Enjoying. The
0:38
fallout from the Spanish Super Cop which
0:40
took place over the past few days
0:42
The Find That which was played in
0:44
Riyadh. Saudi. Arabia. For
0:46
more on that listen to a bonus
0:49
podcast and which was over. a patron
0:51
to come forward/to Sfp on Friday we
0:53
discussed the sensitivities of holding it in
0:55
Saudi Arabia. We're not going to do
0:58
that now because we're going to talk
1:00
about the actual football. Which
1:02
so round Madrid beat Barcelona by four
1:04
goals to one in an extraordinarily one
1:07
sided game. Will then talk about much
1:09
day twenty into league it because there
1:11
were several matches which took place in
1:13
the Spanish Top flight and will also
1:15
talk about if we got time. The.
1:18
Fact that Vol Audio was released for
1:20
the first time and the latest on
1:22
the Nigger data case. There was some
1:24
more leaks of from my last week's
1:26
had lots for us to get through
1:28
Sydney. If we don't talk about what
1:30
you want us to talk about, send
1:32
us a question and will talk about
1:34
it. Will try to answer it on
1:36
our Q and A podcast which will
1:38
can be out tomorrow for patrons. Remember
1:40
patron.com forward/to us Fp: It's about four
1:42
Euros a month and it's pretty good
1:45
value. You get loads of extra Spanish
1:47
football content raw. Budget for Barcelona one
1:49
I rummaged would tune it up inside
1:51
ten minutes. Sits beneath us. Would have
1:53
first half Hatrick it was. Extraordinarily
1:56
comfortable for L. Madrid?
1:58
Yes, Yeah. i really was Surprisingly,
2:01
so I think obviously once
2:03
Madrid had taken a two goal
2:06
lead you felt that it was quite
2:08
likely to be comfortable because not just of the lead
2:10
itself but the nature of the two teams, the way
2:12
in which they play, the qualities that they have and
2:14
Madrid's willingness to allow Barcelona to have the ball in
2:16
certain areas of the pitch and know that they can
2:18
still catch them on the break
2:21
because they're so much quicker a team
2:23
and so much more athletic a team which is
2:25
not to reduce it only to speed and athleticism
2:27
because of course there's a huge amount of quality
2:29
as well. When
2:32
Barcelona scored, when Levan Dosti scored perhaps there was half
2:34
a chance and of course we talked endlessly
2:36
this season about Barcelona's ability to,
2:39
or their failings in other words that
2:41
they can see the lot of early goals that
2:43
they tend to turn them around but those games
2:45
weren't against Real Madrid, a team that's good and
2:47
yesterday they didn't really ever find a way to
2:49
get themselves back into the game. There are a
2:51
couple of chances in the second
2:53
half, there's a France or as one that's saved
2:55
and there's obviously the Pedri shot that goes just
2:58
past the post a little bit before
3:00
half time but I think fundamentally this was a
3:02
game that really once those first
3:04
two goals ago gone in, maybe even once the first
3:06
had gone in never felt like it was ever going
3:08
to go any other way. No
3:11
it didn't and you mentioned once again
3:13
Barcelona conceding early on which is something
3:15
that they have done consistently throughout
3:18
the season. We've spoken about the
3:20
statistic where if matches
3:23
lasted 45 minutes in
3:26
La Liga Barcelona would
3:29
be 15th in the table, obviously they
3:31
don't but that just gives you an idea of
3:33
how poor they've been in the first half of
3:35
games. There's also this extraordinary stat, which we saw
3:37
on Twitter there so you're pointing
3:39
this out. 19 matches
3:41
Barcelona played in La Liga, they've been
3:43
ahead after 75 minutes
3:45
in three of those games. It's
3:48
really quite extraordinary how they've managed to pull it
3:50
out of the bag at the end and I
3:52
guess that kind of ties in with the feeling
3:55
we have about Barcelona both on
3:57
and off the pitch. It feels like
3:59
they're teetering. On the precipice just
4:01
about putting things often, just about getting
4:03
it's over the line and at managing
4:05
to win games where they didn't really
4:07
convincing managing to make the signings by
4:10
selling something off. It just doesn't feel
4:12
very comfortable for Barcelona tour and it
4:14
feels him in stark contrast around the
4:16
dude. I don't know if I'm reading
4:18
too much into this may be given
4:21
more sort of nuanced view, but it
4:23
does feel like real Madrid auction site,
4:25
the polar opposite of Barcelona both on
4:27
and off the pitch, institutionally the Us.
4:29
so. Much more balanced. So much so
4:32
much so much calmer around and asks
4:34
Osu like was seeing that reflected on
4:36
the pitch. I don't know. maybe that's
4:38
us as a simplistic countries Now I
4:40
think it's the I think his that
4:42
absolutely right one nine one one way
4:44
of looking at this would this would
4:47
be to say that Ramage it I'm
4:49
prompted law school swaths of season is
4:51
a goalkeeper and is difference and we
4:53
can argue And indeed we have argued
4:55
about whether kappa is a is a
4:57
decent alternative but a sign and pretty
5:00
quickly. And with very little fuss they've
5:02
had injuries are at centre backs at a
5:04
many towel and then and of course recently
5:06
you've you've had done it. Oliver get injured
5:08
as well. I'm afraid of than nothing. And.
5:11
The hasn't been a sense of panic now
5:13
a it's true that it would be. I'm
5:16
i think over opportunistic of meat say that to
5:18
says it's great when maybe in a month on
5:20
I'll be saying they really should have more sense
5:22
but as badly portable but just that sense that
5:24
it's okay. So. right? It's okay,
5:26
we're not. We're not on the edge, we're
5:29
not about to fall when not. Yeah, we're
5:31
not panicking about this and or worse Barcelona
5:33
A feels almost by the up to a
5:35
off and the my amazing sadistic hundred and
5:37
bring out now because I always have really
5:39
trouble is I hadn't fully fourth of July
5:42
This a loss is Super Cup final. Unfair.
5:45
My the concepts to this. Is.
5:47
The boss honor the team of these two with
5:49
no money. No matter, don't have a huge amount
5:51
of money or think we've We need to be
5:54
clear about this. but they had the money to
5:56
buy the place they wanted suits and allegra. Hundred
5:58
million years of Bellingham others been. I think it
6:00
was sad eighty million there's on so many ah
6:03
they they signed the players that they felt that
6:05
they needed side but his last year's final. of
6:07
the fifteen players the Ancelotti use last year twelve
6:09
of the missed in the squad. I'm
6:12
trying to think through the free the on our bench.
6:14
the Mars one of them I can't think of. The
6:16
other two are a must. I must be missing Alice.
6:18
Been missing them of the seven seen players that savvy
6:20
using the phone or last year. Eleven.
6:23
Have already gone. Now
6:25
we talk a lot about boss and a
6:27
having difficulty bringing people him. But.
6:29
What that's telling us is that some of the
6:32
ones that they bring in our souls have solutions
6:34
other necessarily have a problem with that in some
6:36
cases because course we talked about the awareness that
6:38
people like Adama Traore a for example were short
6:40
term solutions that the has issues that they felt
6:43
they needed to responses and media. The Up on
6:45
the Young was a short term solution. They knew
6:47
that was something to respond to immediately and that's
6:49
okay. but if you got this much of a
6:51
turnover and what does, it's hundred and sixty million
6:54
Euros worth of the players in terms of just
6:56
transfer fees. allies above on offense. In the last
6:58
two years at the time. Of Financial Crisis.
7:00
Now the Financial crisis is what makes
7:03
this happen. In part. But.
7:05
It's also what makes it difficult to understand that
7:07
is happening quite like this. At
7:10
it doesn't feel like there's a huge amounts of
7:12
as he had the impact of what there's almost
7:14
no split seats and hobby in theory is the
7:16
embodiment of what boss I want to be in
7:18
full in terms resort. Huge amount of evidence of
7:20
that either. There. Really is a
7:22
bit but not huge amount of
7:24
them. Verizon and Tabby been questioned
7:26
quite quite heavily after at this
7:28
defeats am. Fairly. So I
7:31
mean that it is just another person's building. No I
7:33
don't think is going to be sucked with the end
7:35
of the season. I really don't Even if they lose
7:37
that would your knees does on Thursday. I mean that
7:39
just as it's feel like that is a decision of
7:41
going to be take it's before the end of the
7:43
same at but if he doesn't win anything this this
7:46
been as he was nothing now I think he some
7:48
purpose of liquor to be out in the summer. Let
7:50
me play the Doomsday Road here. Are
7:52
this is a that is not what I'm perfectly
7:55
happy with been I'm going to don't really like
7:57
to see to nor do they Kournikova his his
7:59
of the. They roll here in an
8:01
unrelated to tie it directly to to
8:04
to Chavis you chance which is to
8:06
say. I'd actually whole have a lot of
8:08
my this point five was a really good when they
8:10
were talking about based on are improving and you know
8:12
what can change as a noun in the season and
8:14
and how they can improve and than what it into
8:16
different stuff invalid I suppose. But.
8:20
What changes? But for them to say
8:22
something? how they play? What changes? Because.
8:24
The Poconos dollar signs. They've admitted the council on
8:26
any one at the moment. Now maybe they'll find
8:28
ways to generate enough money to sign the defensive
8:30
midfielder. They think they need a partner? What changes
8:32
And the only thing you can think of that
8:35
can change the change of manager? I'm
8:37
and so maybe that's the scenario. And the other
8:39
thing is you just said if they don't win
8:42
anything, he probably doesn't continue next year. And this
8:44
is where I get the doomsday scenario thing for
8:46
you. What? If they start to
8:48
worry that is not just about not winning something.
8:51
Wasn't. Start to worry that the situation at
8:53
the moment in which. Even athletic or
8:55
ahead of them. Who. Is
8:58
not something that's going away. Is
9:00
not something that just naturally gets turned around. What if
9:02
they look at they start thinking. Hang
9:05
on. We may not make the Champions League this
9:07
year. Now we all making the assumption that Trump's
9:09
they get a top four at my actually be
9:11
because the coefficients of the new structure. But as
9:13
a top five. In. Which case I would say
9:15
that probably should buy the champions league but you look at
9:17
it from the from if you like how just kind of
9:19
our people position which the look at the top four. And
9:23
is not. Don't see that they make the
9:25
Champions League next year. I'm so maybe if
9:28
if they do for themselves that for every
9:30
to the momentum really starts to go against
9:32
them. That's the one scenario which I can
9:34
see them deciding as he saw it as
9:36
a voices any point in get military because
9:39
what changes but if they start to get
9:41
a cheap the wheels of really coming off
9:43
fifth then maybe they do. Or
9:45
communize. yeah, real doomsday scenario for case.
9:47
And yeah, humming the the only potential
9:49
replace would be rough A Marcus I'm
9:51
in a literary don't think they can
9:54
be or anyone else insists and and
9:56
if let's say let's revert to down
9:58
the that the doomsday paths. Back
10:00
to the game and Vinicius is going
10:02
that far South executes semi a second
10:04
Ever had sex for a Real Madrid
10:06
he's him when he's had an injury
10:08
he played season so far it's and
10:10
it's been relatively quiet. Yes miss ten
10:12
weeks though or this is a terrific
10:14
side effects for amateur that he's back
10:16
and I was listening to them and
10:18
would have any to on the radio
10:20
know snippets from around which had player
10:23
and and used in coaches. I was
10:25
on the radio here and he said
10:27
think i think the any Sussex foster
10:29
shudder at them. Before he seem to have
10:31
never seen him look this as Sparky and
10:33
as yeah. I mean if he does it
10:35
look really good in the first on. Yeah
10:39
did I ask? Us what I'm
10:41
pretty know how to just that the death because
10:43
they can see that really really fast a foreign
10:45
and if you look pretty far off not think
10:47
we thing that before but there were a couple
10:49
times last night when he out run people and
10:51
and you know of us and we seen in
10:54
previous games that one about a hose pipe very
10:56
well against not on all of them are in
10:58
some of them and that thing by some physical
11:00
condition and speed and last night he didn't seem
11:02
going to much when he says i suppose suggests
11:04
one or two conclusion soon and I was not
11:06
as fast food of an Asus his confidence and
11:08
until last I can accept the argument have two
11:10
points. The other thing I would say it to
11:13
give this is correct context is that why the
11:15
off on a plate invited it. Even
11:17
more than other teams have done against Ramadan
11:19
fat far more think than I can remember
11:21
am a team doing against Roms And nothing
11:24
is partly about Barcelona offering that structure in
11:26
in fact I think Venetian said post and
11:28
last night did neither Ancelotti had told him.
11:31
Off. I will give assessments to running since
11:33
we gotta be ready for some when the school
11:35
bus the second am I have already been the
11:37
third. I already had to wanna one's even before
11:40
the thermometers effects they want to long as you
11:42
got. Been about Riga running for as well and
11:44
and on. Iraq has nothing is and yet depend
11:46
you make the sights on and off of Venice
11:49
is a brilliant at to put this into the
11:51
contacts you started with and I think this is
11:53
really important. We've watched a rounded seeing this year.
11:56
Where. we thought i played really well as
11:58
a handful of i They've
12:01
played quite well a lot of times and they've been just
12:03
sort of all right quite a lot
12:05
of the time But they've won lots and lots
12:07
of games And
12:09
I must admit I've sort of felt all the way
12:11
through the season that I'm not sure If
12:15
they're quite there yet, and one of
12:17
the key pieces missing has been Venetius Partly
12:19
because as you say because he's been injured he's missed ten
12:21
games And if he comes back into this kind of form
12:24
a team that over the last six or seven weeks
12:26
I think we started to think has started leaning into
12:28
that pretty good territory more than previously I think they're
12:31
playing better now than they were four or five weeks
12:33
ago if you add Venetius to
12:35
that They are
12:37
genuinely going to be really really good and honestly for
12:39
a lot this season. I thought I felt Okay,
12:42
Tony Cruz is playing brilliantly. Yes, Bellingham
12:45
is playing brilliantly Yes, and Rudiger is
12:47
playing brilliantly And I wasn't
12:49
really sure if I thought anyone else was in the last
12:51
five or six weeks wrote yeah cover how
12:53
that's true Yeah fair point and I was gonna say in
12:55
the last five or six weeks I've started to think Rodriquez
12:57
is in there as well having not had a good start
13:00
But if you're adding to that team
13:02
that is already starting to look like
13:04
it's getting there if you're
13:06
now adding a Venetius like this This
13:08
is now a properly good team Well,
13:11
let's see. Let's see how far they go this
13:13
season, but they are Spanish
13:15
Super Cup champions their first piece of
13:17
simple work and Congratulations
13:19
to them winning the trophy for the 13th time.
13:22
We're gonna move on But like
13:24
I say like I always say and if you want
13:26
to ask us a question do so on Real Madrid or
13:28
Barca and we will answer it tomorrow It
13:33
feels like said we should probably mention the
13:35
latest leaks in the Negleada case last
13:38
week What did you what did you make of them?
13:40
What you know explain? Explain
13:42
what we found out and how much you
13:45
think it changes the panorama? Yeah I'm
13:48
not sure that it changes it enormously
13:50
looking perfectly honest with you Let's
13:52
try and explain this as simplistically as
13:54
can essentially what happened was that the
13:57
the I Don't
13:59
know what you call it María de Cecreto, I suppose you call
14:01
it the kind of the secrecy around the case has
14:03
been lifted. So the
14:06
media has had access to essentially
14:08
the document that is prepared to
14:11
try and take this to court.
14:13
Effectively the way it works in Spain is you have kind
14:16
of an investigating judge who leads the case and
14:18
I suppose then you get to a point of
14:20
a public prosecutor who says, okay, we now take
14:23
this to court and this actually becomes a
14:25
full on case. Now we were told that the
14:27
documentation, I can't claim to have this thing
14:29
in my hand, is 1300 pages
14:31
long. And of course what the media
14:33
do, because pieces are short, this is
14:36
what we do, we've only got so
14:38
much space in the paper, is in
14:40
theory pick out the most interesting parts,
14:42
the most striking parts, the most eye-catching
14:45
and probably when we're talking about a
14:47
legal case, the most damning elements of that
14:49
case that's been brought forth against Barcelona. So
14:51
what we've seen in the last week is
14:53
quite a lot of quoting the opinion of
14:56
the judge and in
14:58
particular quoting elements of
15:00
the conversations, well the conversations, the interrogations
15:02
I suppose you could call them although
15:04
none of these people have been charged.
15:07
The interrogations between the investigators, the police,
15:09
investigators, Guadias, civil investigators and the referees.
15:12
And I actually think that most of what we've
15:15
seen in the media has largely been kind of
15:17
tittle-tuffle about those referees. It's largely been let's hear
15:19
what those referees have to say. I don't
15:22
feel like there's a
15:24
huge amount of hard and fast evidence, but
15:26
what has emerged from this in some cases
15:28
is some of those referees who
15:31
had previously said well Negreja wasn't that
15:33
important, now saying things which suggest at
15:36
the very least there was more contact with him.
15:38
I wouldn't say more important. I mean one of
15:40
the big stories to be leaked has been about
15:42
Iturale Gonsalves, a former referee who you know, full
15:44
disclosure here, I know I've worked with
15:46
and I get on very well with, having
15:48
changed his story dramatically about Negreja because
15:50
he previously had said Negreja is not
15:53
very important, didn't have much contact with
15:55
him really and now it emerges
15:57
through one of his assistant referees that they...
16:00
dinner with him I'm not sure how many times
16:02
four times or something after games in Barcelona. Now
16:05
for what it's worth I don't think well
16:07
first of all one of those games being the flying shuttle.
16:10
Yes but the five well I mean the five nil is a great
16:12
example of this really but there's absolutely no where's
16:14
the refereeing scandal in a five nil when
16:17
Barcelona completely destroyed Real Madrid. There
16:19
really isn't one. Now you might be able
16:21
to find a decision in fact I think
16:23
there might be a potential penalty at two
16:25
nil I'm not sure. But anyway the point
16:29
of this is the point I'm
16:31
trying to make is that so I think the
16:33
fact that a referee goes for dinner with a
16:35
referee and the head of the referees
16:37
committee or the vice-heller referees committee who lives in
16:39
Catalonia when he goes and referees a game in
16:42
Catalonia doesn't seem particularly amazing to me and it's
16:44
certainly no evidence of wrongdoing. What it is evidence
16:46
I think of is of a
16:48
referee building relationship with other referees. There
16:51
are suggestions from a lot of the referees in these discussions
16:55
about what they assume Barcelona were trying
16:57
to achieve. None of them showing evidence of
16:59
it but some of them saying well I imagine they
17:01
were trying to get influence. All of those
17:03
referees are saying and again this doesn't prove anything certainly
17:05
doesn't prove that they none of them were bought. All
17:08
of them saying you can't buy decisions and there's
17:10
no evidence they did buy decisions but I imagine
17:12
they were trying to curry influence and
17:14
have some favor. And
17:17
all of them have kind of said yeah
17:19
Naglay was quite active he was involved in
17:21
which referees got promotion or not so that
17:23
suggests a degree of potential power. The
17:25
problem is that none of this evidence
17:28
demonstrates moments in which
17:30
that power was abused but here's
17:32
my point in all of this
17:34
the fundamental fact still remains Barcelona
17:36
paid someone they absolutely shouldn't have
17:38
paid and that stinks and
17:41
some of these little anecdotal bits of evidence
17:43
don't look very good but none of them
17:45
I think in terms of the case really
17:48
push it on very far. Now what the
17:51
court document is saying the preparation for court
17:53
document is saying in other words the people
17:55
trying to bring a prosecution is saying is
17:58
the very fact of Barcelona paying this money
18:00
is evidence of wrongdoing. Now I personally would
18:02
agree with that. What I don't
18:04
know that we can actually do definitively and I think
18:06
from the point of view of the case it seems
18:09
quite weak to me is demonstrate
18:11
that. Which is of course
18:13
why and we talked about this before there
18:15
was a suggestion of well there has been in
18:17
fact a changing of the charge from sporting corruption
18:19
in which you would have to demonstrate the games
18:21
that have been brought to um
18:24
what's the phrase I'm looking for bribery
18:26
coetio is called in Spanish in other
18:28
words you're trying to curry favour with
18:30
a public official and in a situation like
18:32
that the very fact of paying them for
18:35
a service that can't be justified in this case
18:37
refereeing reports and so on is
18:40
in itself a crime regardless of whether you
18:43
have any benefit from it. The trouble is
18:45
of course a referee may not be able you may not be
18:47
able to prove that a referee is a public official. Yes
18:50
that's true um okay
18:52
well um I thought it was
18:54
important to to mention that we
18:56
will continue to mention the ongoing
18:58
investigation into this ongoing
19:00
case and we'll see whether or not we
19:02
get some resolution or not which we bloody
19:04
hope that we do um because
19:07
it would be beneficial to everyone. I think
19:09
I think I think it will be if
19:11
it goes to court I
19:13
think there's a very good chance unfortunately there will be
19:15
a long and tedious and not very interesting case. I
19:17
would love to think that one day someone
19:20
would turn up and provide the smoking gun but
19:23
I suspect that that's not going
19:25
to happen. Here's what happened in match
19:28
day 20 in La Liga Friday
19:30
night saw Sevilla suffer yet another
19:32
defeat one of the most damaging
19:34
of the season they were beaten
19:36
3-2 at home by Alaves. Alaves
19:38
hadn't won away to Sevilla since
19:40
1954 there were two nil up
19:42
and Sevilla managed to get themselves
19:44
back into the game drawing 2-2
19:46
before conceding in the 90th
19:48
minute to Ruben Duarte a massive win for
19:51
Alaves and a catastrophic result
19:53
for Sevilla. Then on Saturday
19:55
Las Palmas added more
19:57
problems to Villarreal who keep seeding
20:00
goals. Last time I scored three of
20:02
them. The second one was scored by
20:05
the fabulously named Juan Mahertsonk, who
20:07
was making his debut in La
20:09
Liga. Centabac is called a terrific
20:11
header. Kirian Rodriguez got the other
20:13
two. Mallorca and Seltzer played out
20:15
a 1-1 draw. Sid Urine
20:17
Bilbao to watch the Bar Stabi between
20:19
Athletic Club and La Real, which is
20:21
Athletic 1, by two goals to
20:23
one, thanks to a brose from Alex Berengue.
20:25
And Betis Biklanada by a goal
20:27
to nil, scored by Isco with 15
20:29
minutes to go. Then on Sunday, something of
20:32
a surprise, or not,
20:34
as Girona drew nil-nil away to
20:36
Al-Maria. Al-Maria had previously drawn their
20:38
last two home games, nil-nil,
20:40
so continuing that run. But two points
20:42
dropped for Girona, who do go top
20:44
of the table, a point clear of
20:46
Real Madrid, having played a game more.
20:48
And then the other game on Sunday
20:50
saw Cadiz beaten 4-1 by
20:53
Valencia at home. Another
20:55
clearable result at the time of
20:58
recording, Seifo Gonzalez is still the
21:00
manager of Cadiz, but it feels like
21:02
he is very much
21:04
facing a possible sack.
21:06
We'll start by reflecting on that game,
21:08
Sid. Not so much
21:10
what happened in the game, but the fact that
21:13
we had VAR audio being released for the first
21:15
time this week, so from the Sevilla game, and
21:17
when there was a penalty given, which I don't
21:19
think it was a penalty, and the Valencia game,
21:21
where a penalty was given, which I don't think
21:23
was a penalty, but we've got the video, the
21:25
audio and subtitles on the incidents
21:28
where the referee did an on-field review.
21:31
Firstly, what do you think of this, and then tell us
21:34
about Fylee's very good assessment.
21:36
Yeah, and
21:38
what I think about this is that there
21:41
is a slight misconception, although in fairness I
21:43
don't think everyone's going
21:45
down the route of this misconception. I think most
21:47
people recognise it, what it is. I think there
21:50
is a misconception that this is about improving the
21:52
refereeing, and it doesn't. I think it helps
21:54
us maybe understand, and it offers transparency
21:56
at a time, and we've already talked
21:58
about the negator case. when the
22:00
desire for transparency I think is quite high. But
22:03
I must admit, I personally think this is something
22:05
the media quite fancies, rather than
22:07
something that necessarily will help refereeing. You know,
22:09
there's another bit of information. And obviously I'm
22:11
fundamentally in favour of knowing more and seeing
22:13
more from the inside. I think that's not
22:16
a bad thing. My
22:18
concern with it is that I think it leads us
22:20
down even more of a track where even more of
22:22
our focus will be referees rather than the football itself.
22:25
I mean, so much so that here we are. But I won't say that.
22:27
Yeah, what I was going to say, so much so that here we are. But
22:31
the other part of this that I think is
22:33
really interesting is that I think there's two things
22:35
here. I think one of them is actually the
22:37
evidence of these two decisions and these two sets
22:39
of conversations. We should point out, by the way,
22:42
that this isn't put out live while it's happening.
22:44
No. They're not allowed to. In
22:46
fact, in theory, they're not even supposed to
22:48
do it the same day. But basically, the
22:50
recordings will be released to the TV companies
22:52
with the rights, rather than this being put out
22:54
by the Federation or by the referees committee. And it's
22:56
not going out live. But it's then being added, if
22:58
you like, to the highlights package shows or the postgame
23:01
shows. In both of
23:03
these cases, I actually thought there was a bit
23:05
of a problem
23:07
in terms of what we've
23:11
been told the VAR is for. We were
23:13
told that in these conversations, the
23:16
VAR guy would only
23:18
really have a conversation that said, I
23:20
recommend you go and see it. And
23:23
I will now provide
23:25
it for you. I
23:28
will now provide you with the images. So
23:30
the conversation would be, hello, Mr. Referee.
23:33
I'm Mr. VAR. Obviously, they won't actually say
23:35
that, because they know that. Go
23:37
and have a look at this. Mr. Referee would go
23:39
to the screen and say, can I have the reverse angle, please?
23:41
Can I have it from the other side? Can you stop it
23:43
there? Can you show me the contact? In
23:46
these cases, and in particular in the
23:48
severe one, actually, no. No, actually,
23:50
in both of them, the VAR guy
23:52
was saying, come and have a look at
23:54
it. And it's a penalty. And I'll tell you why,
23:56
basically. He was saying, look at this. Look, he does
23:58
the contact. And essentially, the guy. the field was
24:01
sort of being told what to give
24:03
and we'd been told that actually
24:05
however much he's provided with the tools he will
24:07
still now he still does have the authority to
24:10
give a decision difference the one the guy in
24:12
the room is saying but if we hear it
24:14
like this we're basically being shown why
24:16
when a VAR calls you you're going to agree with
24:18
them now obviously that's natural because they wouldn't in theory
24:20
call you unless it's obvious but
24:23
I think both of these cases were not that
24:25
clear and obvious no and I thought there was
24:27
a degree of leaning on the principal referee by
24:29
the VAR referee in both conversations one
24:32
of them is a handball where the VAR referee is
24:34
saying look look he moves his hand towards it a
24:36
bit and the other one is a foul where the
24:38
VAR referee says if you notice he takes him from
24:40
behind and then will show you the other angle and
24:42
basically the conversation is basically the first referee saying can
24:45
I have it from the back please okay show me
24:47
the point of contact freeze it there for me let
24:49
me see it now show me the front the front's
24:51
really clear and they have a conversation and they decide
24:53
on the penalty what I thought
24:55
was interesting you asked me to mention it is Fali
24:58
and I really like this because Fali post game now
25:00
you can be you can agree by the way with
25:02
Fali or disagree with that. Fali is the Cadiz centre
25:04
back yeah yeah so Fali post
25:06
game was played this footage and this footage by
25:08
the way producer Al just pointed out to us
25:10
has been put on social media as well this
25:14
this footage was played to him
25:16
and Ugo Duro one
25:18
Cadiz player one Valencia player and Fali was
25:20
really interesting because he went off on one
25:22
and he went on a bit of a
25:24
rant and he said look the referee
25:26
has seen this it's right in front of it
25:28
he's seen it live and now you've got a
25:30
guy in the studio saying to him come
25:33
and have a look at it again you're wrong because the arm
25:35
moves and look at this and he says and we're looking at
25:37
it and the arm does move a little bit but hardly anything
25:40
and the first referee has been staring it live and
25:42
he has seen it and that's never a
25:44
handball in my view that's never ever a
25:47
handball and this is why he hasn't got
25:49
the penalty. Exactly exactly I was
25:51
building to that. I'm sorry
25:53
I'm sorry I
25:56
Shouldn't know. So so so basically
25:58
he's He's He's. Going on about
26:01
this and saying this is all sorts of
26:03
always never a handball, it should never be
26:05
any even if it is a humble it's
26:07
not clear and obvious clattering manifestoes they say
26:10
Spanish for the vast be making this decision
26:12
is all sorts of wrong and as you
26:14
say adjusted benefit him and I thought you
26:16
know what even if I disagreed with him
26:19
at the same good on you for giving
26:21
us an arnold and analysis I said your
26:23
conceptualization of how the should work rather bison
26:25
your self interest and I was is really
26:28
impressive and I'll just for good on you.
26:31
Sit. On the seats and is kind of
26:33
punjab very difficult situation at that their
26:35
lives and pull off an enormous that
26:37
is now it doesn't doesn't experiences Obama
26:39
Sydney's you want to see the best
26:41
team in La Liga right now Athletic
26:43
Club not my words the words of
26:45
a banal I was still there but
26:47
also feed a manager who posts game
26:49
despite having been beaten to on and
26:51
he said defeat the the hurts philosophy
26:53
that and it's who said a feat
26:55
that the damages them quite badly leaves
26:57
and nine points behind athletic him and
26:59
you know it's early still. But
27:01
that's obviously a very big.and he said post game
27:03
it was released because he was he was giving
27:05
mouse is not a by the way necessarily disagree
27:08
with our put up what was unusual for managed
27:10
give his house and he said look if you'd
27:12
look at the game. They.
27:14
Only had two shots they scoop I from
27:17
they actually had three on target or in
27:19
whole game we only have one on we
27:21
only school that one not used to on
27:23
target was three one shots it that to
27:25
others are it's they are team if you
27:28
look at their numbers in recent weeks are
27:30
producing huge numbers of crosses. Pricing loves musicals
27:32
is of we limited them and we stop.
27:34
I'm doing that and in that sense we
27:36
should be reason be satisfied with how he
27:39
plays overseas and then besides or we'll get
27:41
to face and death decisions that defeated even
27:43
but we we actually played arrives. Had because
27:45
this is athletic club who are the best
27:47
team in Spain at the moment. Some somehow
27:50
the planes the number so that the way
27:52
they're playing shows that and so this isn't
27:54
so bad. I
27:56
already lights. At s of of
27:58
others response they side. Valverde even and
28:01
he came in after him at all. as Adler
28:03
Image also said you're the best team in Spain
28:05
and he said well rounded. It's employees head of
28:07
a specific six. There. Are
28:10
six hundred and zero to nine?
28:12
second? One
28:14
of the other way round nothing is never know
28:17
the I've tried in L Eleven right? you're not
28:19
early on he got no one points. oh save
28:21
with her in mass or amateurs only seven points
28:23
above athletic out because I just one sorry I
28:25
want to have been to and yet the cold
28:27
again that's why yes are so yes yes It.
28:32
Up to stay clear of numbers. Out
28:35
next on which I mention any kind of
28:37
number said it House of Janata are a
28:39
point care of the top of Lalita. That's
28:42
the positive for then. I think the positive for
28:44
them to put in the worst performance of the
28:47
season and actually get something out again because they
28:49
were really really poor. Guess I'll maria i'm a
28:51
really rough are all over them, really should have
28:53
ones and yet you're to somehow managed to get
28:55
something out the game Yet in fact Ah Mitchell
28:58
described as a naughty see on a great piece.
29:00
A great news is to gripe is news that
29:02
we got something in a game like this and
29:04
I'm poor old Almeria who really haven't been as
29:06
bad as their numbers suggest as you. They don't
29:09
good on them to claim a good by any
29:11
means but they. Have mean, as bad as
29:13
they I'm. About
29:15
as you say oh please. Seven and enough or in
29:17
in the concepts of match fixing. My gosh shouldn't uses
29:19
these outcomes. I the kumbaya rid of the moment. maybe
29:22
they should try for maybe that's what that is it
29:24
the do now for him by a when I'm because
29:26
they just come on and I think it is. I
29:28
do think this is a really really bad results with
29:30
your owner but you're right. Given the concept to the
29:33
guy in the white was played the number of chances
29:35
that doesn't in got the site for example. This.
29:38
Actually turned out to be in Iraq.
29:40
Result: Guess it it and they are
29:42
a point player at the top the
29:44
table. Real Madrid skating hands he sat
29:46
next thursday gets hit ss and see
29:48
how they I get on with that.
29:50
Before that we've got Copa del Rey
29:52
last sixteen as a sweet. The.
29:54
football is really is quite relentless in
29:56
in january it's our tuesday by hit
29:58
us a severe athletically Alves and
30:00
Tenerife at Mallorca, the only second
30:03
division side left in the competition.
30:05
Then on Wednesday Valencia, Seltar, Ososuna,
30:07
L'Areal and Girono-Rio. And then on
30:09
Thursday Unionistas, third tier Unionistas at
30:12
home to Barcelona and that Madrid
30:14
derby at the Metropolitana, Atletico Madrid
30:16
against Real Madrid. So that's what's
30:18
coming up this week. Enjoy
30:21
that football guys. We will be back
30:23
later on in the week to analyse
30:25
it over at patreon.com/TSFP. We'll also be
30:27
doing a Q&A
30:30
pod, which I think I've mentioned several times
30:32
tomorrow. So send us your questions. If you
30:34
don't want to pay for it, don't worry.
30:36
We'll be back here giving it away for
30:38
free next Monday. Adios. Cheerio.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More