Podchaser Logo
Home
England v South Africa special from Paris

England v South Africa special from Paris

Released Friday, 20th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
England v South Africa special from Paris

England v South Africa special from Paris

England v South Africa special from Paris

England v South Africa special from Paris

Friday, 20th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The Telegraph

0:03

Podcasts

0:09

Evening

0:15

everybody from a very wet, windy

0:18

Paris. We're delighted to be hosted

0:20

for this podcast special in

0:22

the Old Metro Bar by Pastor,

0:25

our good friend of the Telegraph Republic Podcast, as

0:28

we look ahead to South Africa against England on Saturday

0:31

night. Delighted to be joined by

0:33

Charlie Morgan. Hi Charlie. Hi Colesley.

0:36

Also here with Charles Richardson.

0:38

Hi Colesley. And a special guest, the

0:40

Chief Sports Writer of the day at the Telegraph, Olly Brown. Hi Olly.

0:42

Hi Ben. Olly,

0:46

how do you feel about England going into this week? It's

0:48

quite an interesting vibe around the team.

0:51

You were there at the press conference earlier. What did you

0:54

make of them? I

0:56

don't feel especially confident. I always

0:59

feel there's a slight air of joylessness

1:02

around England. But

1:05

C. Borthwick wasn't giving

1:07

a huge amount away. But he

1:09

seemed to think that there were ways

1:12

in which they could trouble South Africa.

1:14

He seemed very effusive about

1:17

Freddie Stewart and his composure

1:19

under the high ball. We've

1:22

seen England defy expectation

1:24

before. Obviously,

1:26

we think of four years ago. And 2019

1:29

seems to be the subject that England

1:31

are prohibited from speaking about at

1:33

all, because obviously rugby moves on a lot in

1:36

four years. But they

1:38

confounded

1:39

every assumption against

1:42

the All Blacks then. And

1:44

they seem to believe that they can do the same

1:46

again as the only unbeaten team. Sitting

1:49

on the fence, Olly, tell us what you really think. An

1:51

air of joylessness ahead of a World

1:53

Cup semi-final. I was going to say that's quite

1:56

a strong way in. And I like it, actually.

1:59

Eddie Jones four

2:02

years ago, a psychological masterclass

2:04

out in Tokyo. He was accusing

2:07

the Kiwi journalists of being fans with

2:09

laptops. He even

2:12

detonated a spying row while he was out there.

2:15

Crusher was chasing the All Blacks down the street as

2:17

well, wasn't he? Yeah, exactly.

2:19

I'm not sure Steve Boorfoot operates

2:22

from quite the same playbook, a

2:26

fairly faceless high performance centre

2:28

outside the periphery. It didn't

2:30

quite seem like the same

2:33

setting, but we are two days out from a

2:35

World Cup semi-final. There's no downplaying

2:39

that. And

2:41

for all the inscrutability

2:43

of Borkwick,

2:46

this is a

2:47

test of colossal magnitude, and England

2:49

seems to think that they have some tricks at their sleeve. They're

2:52

certainly going to find out very soon if they do. We

2:55

had lots of dices on the match in terms of

2:57

team selections. But Charles, I just want

2:59

to come to you for a bit of a

3:01

taste of what it's been like in Paris

3:03

the last few days. Since

3:05

I arrived Wednesday morning, you've been here all week, and I arrived

3:08

Wednesday morning, and there's been a

3:10

steady stream of rain ever since. And

3:13

that feels to actually reflect

3:15

the mood in the country after Sunday's defeat

3:18

to South Africa. How does

3:20

everyone seem to be coping with that? Well,

3:22

you chat to the French public here, you chat to the Prisians, you

3:24

chat to the host of the bar here in

3:26

which we're in and which we're recording, and it's just still

3:29

complete

3:32

disappointment, and they

3:35

can't believe it. They still can't believe that

3:37

the stars

3:39

had aligned. They believed for them to be

3:41

ground World Cup champions. They have the best player in the

3:43

world, the best league in the world, the best youth set up in the

3:45

world. They thought they had the best team in the world.

3:48

And they were stung by the reigning champions on Sunday night

3:50

in Paris. And really,

3:54

we could have been building up to the crunch. We've said

3:56

this, we could have been building up to a massive England V France

3:58

semi-final. the restaurant,

4:00

the bazai, which we're in now as good as it is, is

4:03

sort of half full and

4:06

we were debating earlier, weren't we, about, you know,

4:08

if it had been the crunch on Saturday night,

4:10

how much, how much, how much more bouncy

4:13

and jumping this place would be, and the

4:16

city, the rain hasn't helped, but

4:19

the city is flatter, the city is flatter and

4:21

the tournament is worse off for it.

4:23

Charlie, you are minutes

4:26

off the Eurostar and out of

4:28

a taxi, so you, so you're, you're

4:30

the latest person who's had boots on the ground

4:33

in England. What's the mood like?

4:35

So what kept me final on, on

4:37

Saturday? It's a

4:39

few, a few rungs up from Joyless

4:42

for sure, but it's kind of, it's, it's,

4:45

yes, I would say, I would say

4:47

subdued. I think England, England have been desperate to

4:49

go under the radar, have a native, this whole tournament and they've

4:51

managed to do that. It's kind of a tournament where

4:53

all four semi-finals are quite pleased with

4:57

themselves for sort of arriving at

4:59

this stage under the radar. I think that might change

5:02

over the next four to eight hours, seven to two hours,

5:06

but no, I'm, I'm, I'm fascinated as to

5:08

what Ollie, what Ollie mentions there, that how England

5:10

go about troubling this South Africa side, because

5:12

that's where they've got to start, and as much as Steve

5:15

Orsick isn't Eddie Jones in, in some

5:17

ways, he's not the same showman.

5:19

He probably doesn't have the media

5:21

kind of on tentix

5:24

as to what he's going to say next, but what he does, what he

5:26

does do is he tailor selections

5:28

to big games. He's done that again, which we'll get

5:30

into, and he's very, very,

5:32

very good at tailoring tactics also

5:34

to big games, and that's, that's what he's, that's

5:36

what we're about to, about to see on Saturday.

5:39

This isn't our first episode of the week, as you'll know,

5:42

we sort of recapped what happened with those two

5:44

epic quarterfinals last weekend, and had a long

5:47

chat about New Zealand, Argentina

5:49

as well, where we are just going to focus in this special

5:51

on, on Saturday night, how

5:54

England can beat South Africa. So without

5:56

further ado, let's dive into

5:58

it. Charles,

6:02

just to kick off if I come to you, so we've

6:05

had the teams are announced, so that's going to run unchanged.

6:07

England have made three changes,

6:11

one at Fullback which we kind of expected, we've

6:13

given the news around Marcus Smith and his concussion,

6:16

two in the pack, and I know that one

6:18

in particular has got us excited.

6:20

Tell us about Jo Marlow and him

6:22

coming in at Lusso Prop. Well,

6:25

on Monday I was given the slightly unenviable task

6:27

of writing a piece about how England

6:31

could possibly scale this mountain, how

6:33

they could defeat the Springboks against all odds,

6:35

and two of the things that I said

6:37

were that Freddie Stewart had to come back, which

6:40

he has done, and that Jo Marlow had to start. It

6:42

was only this morning really that we found

6:44

out that Marlow was in the mix to start,

6:46

at least, he had to come back in

6:49

to give, he's the best Scrimager in

6:51

that squad, and

6:53

we know that that is an area of real, real strength, of

6:55

world-class strength for South Africa.

6:58

In terms of the South Africa team

7:00

selection, I've been following them all this week, and

7:02

just on what Charlie said about horses, Steve

7:05

Borthwick tailoring selections

7:07

for specific opponents and horses for courses,

7:10

ironically this week South Africa have not done

7:12

that. The great strategists, the great

7:14

tacticians this week have

7:17

decided to go completely unchanged

7:21

because they felt that the starting 50 and

7:24

the bench, the bomb squad as they call them, is

7:26

completely settled and after such a

7:28

strong performance against France. I wonder

7:31

if that's an error, I wonder if that's an error

7:34

of complacency creeping in, especially

7:37

with the certain

7:39

selection quandaries that they

7:43

had, and especially the fact that they rarely

7:46

keep the same starting 15 for two years.

7:49

I think this is the second time in 64 tests

7:52

under Razny Erasmus and Jacques Nienaba

7:54

that they've named an unchanged side,

7:56

so it was it was okay just a surprise when I

7:58

rocked announcement

8:00

this morning to find an unchanged side and

8:02

I did wonder whether have

8:05

they believed their own hype too early almost

8:07

I'm not saying they have they're obviously still rank

8:10

favorites but you know there is always

8:12

that sort of thought in the back of the mind because it's

8:15

it's an 80 minute rugby match against with two very good teams

8:17

so it could you know South Africa are

8:19

favorites but stranger

8:21

things have happened just on the South

8:23

Africa press conferences for a bit of color

8:26

have they basically been in like a village hall or the

8:28

equivalent of quite a low

8:30

key setting but they've basically been in a village

8:33

hall red velvet trim

8:35

red velvet curtains and

8:39

seating there was some jazz music playing

8:41

on Tuesday as Razi Erasmus

8:44

emerged stage right to

8:47

as the pantomime villains when you veil what

8:49

he thought would be England starting 15 I mean it was

8:51

a great piece of sporting theatre really in

8:53

sporting psychology but

8:56

it yeah they're sort of

8:58

the jars it just

9:00

it doesn't it doesn't sort of juxtaposed very well

9:02

no it doesn't expose very well with the surroundings which

9:05

is it a nothing suburb

9:07

of the wider Paris region

9:09

it's very quiet and very residential

9:11

and then you have Razi Erasmus

9:13

strolling in on Tuesday afternoon

9:15

giving it big licks Oli and I meanwhile

9:18

today were at the Institute to Spore

9:20

or whatever at the full-time lives which I've just butchered

9:23

outside France we're just gonna hear the

9:25

audio for his people we're just talking about

9:27

how he sort of used the game and at

9:29

England's status as underdogs in this match

9:31

we've concentrated very much upon us what we've

9:33

done every single week how do we develop

9:36

and how do we progress as a team and

9:38

I think that's the central thing I think this team has

9:40

progressed and through each

9:43

each week we've had through this tournament we've built

9:45

and we've built and we've built and whatever

9:47

situation the players have found themselves in in the

9:49

game is the players have found a way

9:51

to get the result the one at the end of it and

9:54

we know this weekend is

9:56

different every game is different

9:57

but

9:58

I also know we've got a a great group of players

10:01

who care deeply about representing England.

10:04

I want to make sure the crew and their performance are

10:06

all proud of and our supporters are proud of on Saturday

10:08

night. That was Steve Borth from Save the Table. Oli,

10:12

that underdog tag, I

10:14

get the impression that England will actually not mind

10:16

one bit. I think Charlie actually did

10:19

earlier in the week. So Africa were about 13-point

10:22

favourites or something. So being

10:24

that far out of it,

10:26

that's who's England's entity? I

10:29

tasted a certain sourness in

10:31

the press conference on Sunday

10:34

night with Steve Borthwick. It was after

10:37

a lot of cordiality with the journalist,

10:41

he always started to

10:43

turn on us slightly. And basically,

10:46

you guys are Britoners all off and

10:49

we're in the semi-final. So we've at the very least

10:51

reached par for what everybody

10:54

expected of us. The one

10:56

area where I think Borthwick might spring

11:00

a surprise is he

11:02

is incredibly meticulous by a

11:04

reputation, filling all those copious

11:07

notebooks. And I think Ebonette

11:09

Stavrid said something earlier today that

11:11

he hadn't actually watched any

11:14

England games. You can't really imagine

11:16

that Borthwick would allow such a casual

11:19

preparation. Maybe

11:24

this is more mind games from the Springboks,

11:27

but I think this painstaking approach

11:29

of Borthwick might actually make the

11:31

scoreline on Saturday night closer than a

11:33

lot of people think. Absolutely.

11:36

And the draw has been spoken

11:38

about a hell of a lot. But what that means is

11:40

that it means, as Olly said, England have reached

11:43

par, but it means that they've also seen

11:45

this coming for a fairly long

11:47

way. I think they were fairly sure

11:49

that it would be... Clearly

11:51

there was a range of opponents that they could have played, but

11:54

they would have had plans for those teams.

11:57

I have a theory about how they're going to go about

11:59

it.

11:59

which is, which is,

12:01

they, we know from at the time, they really

12:03

studied how New Zealand went about beating South

12:06

Africa in Auckland at the start of the rugby championship

12:08

and that was by kicking off 10 a lot. I

12:10

think Alex Mitchell retaining his place in

12:12

the starting side is among the most interesting

12:15

things about that lineup because he's made

12:17

a few kicking errors. That could be

12:19

a little way to lure South Africa

12:21

into pressurizing Mitchell when actually a lot of the kicking

12:23

is gonna come off farrell and wider. I

12:26

think Stewart's return plays into

12:28

that because he's gonna be used on the front foot as opposed

12:30

to just in this defensive,

12:32

defensive mode and I think that's where they go.

12:35

I think they look to win that aerial battle

12:37

and go from there.

12:39

The student selection is quite interesting,

12:41

isn't it? Because I wonder if

12:43

Smith have been available,

12:45

whether they might have tried to make Stewart back anyway

12:48

on the wing just to add a bit more security to

12:50

the, to the back three under the kicking

12:52

area in particular because we saw, we saw France get

12:54

out of the area, didn't we, on Sunday

12:57

with what South Africa would do with

12:59

those crossroad kicks

13:00

and that was, that had a big impact on the game. So I wonder

13:02

if he would have gone to Stewart anyway.

13:06

The Marler one I love partly because the first thing made

13:08

me think of was Eddie Jones' book in 2019,

13:11

which came out what about 10 days

13:13

after the final or 12 days, it was fresh

13:16

off the printing presses where

13:18

he said, oh yeah, I should have picked Joe

13:20

Marler to start in the final against

13:23

South Africa. And you look at the South Africa back and actually

13:25

apart from Beast and Ludi

13:28

Argonov being there, same set of

13:30

players, same type of probably friends

13:32

about Herbert. Is

13:33

it wild to say that he might have been thinking of

13:37

the danger of having Cole on the bench in case

13:39

there was another early injury like there was in a 2019 final? Because

13:43

that really

13:45

exposed Dan Cole. I was going 75 minutes against

13:47

effectively two elite packs. And

13:50

that is not the case with Sinclair and Gens,

13:52

you've probably got two guys more suited to going

13:54

that distance. And we've

13:56

voted the idea and we're sort of joking while we're before.

14:00

if they do it the other way around. They can

14:02

leave out a South Africa's book ironically and go half

14:04

an hour for the starting. Well yeah,

14:06

or the Italy book. When they were actively

14:09

starting, obviously with South Africa the margin

14:11

between their starting and second choice is

14:13

so small, but with Italy where they were starting

14:16

their sort of genuine second

14:18

choice front row, letting them play the first half

14:20

an hour of the game when it's a little bit tighter and they're a little

14:23

bit fresher and bringing the first choice on

14:25

for the last 50. And it actually

14:27

didn't, it wasn't a disaster for them, you

14:29

wouldn't say. We've said that maybe they might

14:31

do that with Cole, they might do

14:33

that this weekend. Cole might play 30 minutes and then Sincla

14:36

comes up 10 minutes before half time and plays

14:38

the whole of the second half. And realistically

14:41

he's up there with one

14:43

of the best bench tight heads in the tournament.

14:46

Many teams with a better second choice tight

14:48

head than Carl Sincla.

14:49

You mentioned the second row selection as well

14:51

with George Martin over Ollie Chess and so

14:54

Paul Fries had a couple of things. One of them was

14:56

he'd sort of been looking at conditioning with

14:58

the six day turnaround and assessing

15:01

the general sort of fitness of the squad and he thought

15:05

that having Martin given to start made

15:07

sense. Martin and Chess are actually the

15:09

exact same weight which I find quite interesting.

15:12

They're both 118kg which

15:14

I think is about 18.5 stone

15:17

in old money. But

15:19

what he said was that Martin had sort of had

15:21

more positive feedback from the England front

15:23

row about what he honestly did as crumb,

15:26

i.e. he gives them quite a lot of heft and power behind

15:28

in a scrum. I think it was Joe Marlow in particular

15:30

who'd given that feedback and said naturally

15:33

we appreciate having

15:34

someone like this in the second row who's giving us a lot of shout. Two

15:37

big Midlands lumps but they do play

15:39

the game very differently. Chessham

15:42

is more of a sort of second row who could

15:44

be a six. He's a very similar player really

15:47

to Itoje and Laws and actually one

15:49

criticism of England so far in this tournament

15:51

perhaps is that Itoje, Chessham and Laws are

15:54

all too similar to all feature in the same pack.

15:57

Martin comes in that he might weigh

15:59

the same but he doesn't. play the same way. He's

16:01

a more traditional enforcer,

16:03

tight second row. He can play

16:05

six of course but in the same way that all the best players

16:08

have a little bit of versatility to them. I mean

16:11

Martin is going to be chop, scrum, chop,

16:13

scrum, chop, scrum. Whereas that necessarily

16:15

hasn't been Chessum's remit. He's

16:17

been given a bit more license

16:20

to roam in the loose. You remember that try against

16:22

Samoa where he's tramlining Tom Croft

16:25

style down the flank. Don't expect that from

16:27

George Martin. His work will be in the

16:30

tight, in the thick of it, trying to get into

16:32

this fantastic springbok pack at

16:34

the heart of which is obviously Evan Edspeth and

16:37

Frank Amosto in the second row. Yeah and it's been

16:39

the World Cup hasn't it? A big sort of forward

16:41

roaming out on the wings.

16:43

Trying to affect things later on. We saw Ireland trying to

16:45

do that against New Zealand on Saturday doing that with Jack Owen

16:47

and Tyburn sort of out on the wings looking

16:49

to be creating mismatches.

16:51

Chessum could potentially do that quite well. Just

16:54

to very quickly wrap up

16:57

on England, just a quick follow-on around

16:59

the table. Is there a selection

17:01

that you don't like at all or

17:03

a player you might have thought about differently? Charles

17:05

will come to you first. Yeah I think I'd have gone fourth farrel.

17:08

I'd have gone fourth farrel with no Smith at 15

17:12

and with Stewart coming back in I'd have gone fourth farrel

17:14

for the extra playmaking and also

17:17

for a more

17:19

varied kicking game and also for

17:21

two players who can kick drop goals and it

17:23

might come down to that. And to keep

17:25

that scoreboard ticking like they did against Argentina

17:28

I'd have gone fourth farrel.

17:29

Charlie anything for you?

17:30

Nine, just really interests me. I think Alex

17:33

Mitchell needs to just

17:36

be as accurate as he possibly can. And

17:39

Ollie any selections you might have tweaked if you look

17:41

at that side? The marginalising

17:43

of George Ford mystifies me somewhat

17:45

having been there for that first game where he was obviously

17:48

instrumental and I really don't understand

17:51

Steve Bortley when he corrected a

17:53

reporter the other week for suggesting

17:55

he'd been dropped for the bench and was saying he's actually

17:58

just changed his role for the bench. You

18:00

can't really imagine George Ford ringing his

18:02

dad with great enthusiasm saying, you

18:04

know, I've just changed my role to the bench

18:08

I'm not I don't really like the fact that

18:10

Ford has been shoved to the periphery so

18:13

much to make way for Farrell as Accomplished

18:16

as Farrell is Changed his role.

18:18

I think he's an eddyism which is sort of been

18:20

left over I'm not mad

18:23

about the lack of pace on the wings compared

18:25

to Colby and Curly are in terms

18:27

of how England can get turned in that area,

18:29

but that's a good

18:29

segue Actually into chatting

18:32

more now about Alaska their

18:34

selection and why they're just massive

18:36

favorites and they're gonna win this comfortably

18:42

Right the turn box and unchained side Charles has

18:44

been hanging around their camp a week hearing a lot

18:47

from Razi Erasmus actually He was up on

18:49

Monday

18:50

and Monday

18:52

buys zugu and then Tuesday in person

18:55

and then tomorrow Probably

18:58

have an assistant coach tomorrow Maybe Don human would not

19:01

have too much from him and then it was Jack Nianaba

19:03

this morning with the team announcement And

19:05

yeah, well, we've already gone over the

19:07

the sort of pantomime Volderville

19:10

aspects of his press conference on

19:13

Tuesday. It really was something to behold We've

19:15

got a bit of audio now from Jack Nianaba just talking

19:17

about Some of the physical toll

19:19

on his squad and then stick with that same

19:21

selection and looking ahead to England So

19:23

here's the South ahead coach if you

19:26

talk about physicality I think that

19:28

dongle game was probably one of the most physical

19:30

games that that our players told

19:32

us they played him so so

19:35

I think so

19:37

in terms of a Physicality point

19:40

of view the one group got nicely

19:42

exposed to it against Island

19:46

and then the following week the other group

19:48

over the other part of our squad got exposure

19:50

to it in the in the Tonga game

19:53

and and So physicality is like

19:55

any any conditioning component. You have

19:57

to you have to get used to

19:59

it you have to condition yourself with. So

20:02

I think from that point

20:05

of view, it put us up nicely

20:08

for the game against France. And obviously the French

20:10

game was physical. But

20:12

like I said, listen, we went out, you

20:15

know our policy in terms of training. If you can't

20:17

train on Monday, you can't play. So

20:20

everybody was good and ready and

20:22

they could train. So there wasn't any medical

20:24

issues. So from a physical point of view,

20:26

we got a nice stimulus from a physical point of view.

20:30

Against France and we will, that

20:33

exposure we'll need that experience going

20:35

into England because I think it will be the same

20:37

like Sia mentioned now. If you look at their performances

20:41

and their build up during this competition, they

20:45

improving every single game,

20:47

they're getting better. And then

20:49

where do I think they're gonna challenge us? Yeah,

20:52

like any team, I think like I've

20:54

mentioned last time with

20:57

the French team, they've

20:59

got a unique kicking game that they employ.

21:02

The same with the English team.

21:06

I think they're a team that's comfortable not playing

21:08

with a ball. I think if you look at them, I think they're

21:10

the team that kick the most and they

21:13

like to suffocate and strangle you, kick the

21:15

ball in your off and wait for you to make and

21:17

apply pressure there and wait for you to make a mistake.

21:19

So we, from a tactical

21:22

point of view, we

21:24

know what's coming our way and we must just make

21:26

sure that we execute on the day. What

21:28

do you think is the strongest

21:30

part of the Snackin team? Either

21:32

from a tactical point of view or in terms of a

21:34

positional group, where do you think they are

21:37

just headed shoulders above

21:38

the rest, Charlie's bike? It's

21:41

a big compliment because England have strength as

21:43

well, but even Etsavet

21:46

has just gone from strength to strength and he was

21:48

just awesome in that, in

21:50

what was a monumental quarterfinal. But

21:52

everywhere really, the pace,

21:55

I will mention the pace outright, why

21:57

with Colby and Arendz, they're just

21:59

so... dangerous in transition as they showed

22:02

against France. Someone like Jesse

22:04

Creel would potentially be seen

22:06

as a little bit of a weak

22:08

link maybe in years gone by. He's been

22:10

really assured this tournament. Likewise,

22:13

Libach and with that

22:16

contingency on the bench in Pollard, that's

22:19

a really interesting one. How they've ordered their halfbacks

22:21

is really interesting because

22:23

Váthokáp brought so much energy from the bench didn't he?

22:26

It's cliche and it's a bit boring but I'll go

22:28

with the bench. I'll go with the bench and

22:31

not necessarily the bomb squad but just

22:34

the bench and the depth that this South Africa

22:36

squad has and the ability for

22:38

them to be able to pivot into any strategy

22:40

and any tactic that they want to play and to

22:43

adapt the circumstances of each game with

22:45

their eight replacements and

22:48

how versatile it all is and how

22:50

harmonious it all is. In terms

22:52

of depth and in terms of 23,

22:55

they have the best 23 in the tournament and I think most people

22:57

would have said that from the start. It's

22:59

just I think most people thought that other

23:02

teams starting 15s were better and then

23:05

we didn't potentially realise how much of an

23:07

impact that 23, that whole

23:10

aspect would have. I really appreciate

23:12

it. I'm now coming to you third on this and they've

23:14

chosen Ed to bet on the bench but

23:16

what sticks out to you? What impressed you about

23:18

the South Africa side? Not just in rugby but in

23:21

sport I guess as well. I

23:23

think collectively the Springboks

23:25

class of 2023, ominously

23:28

for England, seems even more complete than

23:30

the class of 2019 and I totally

23:33

agree with Charlie about the point out wide.

23:36

That was what most struck

23:39

me about the win over

23:41

France. Colby

23:43

and Arenti just both awesome

23:46

and the way that Colby has clear

23:48

I think of another who's not exactly

23:51

sluggish the way he just had

23:53

clear. I think he's a 10.700m runner in his youth and

23:55

it's just

23:59

aside to behold and it just shows that they're far

24:02

from one dimensional. Right, James, to finish

24:04

off, England against South Africa and Saturday night

24:06

for a place in the Rugby World Cup

24:08

final, to do a quick round of predictions.

24:11

Charlie, you're closest to me in this

24:14

lovely restaurant that we're in, so I'm going to come to you first.

24:17

Who's winning? Nobody's

24:19

going to go. I feel like nobody's going to go England, so it

24:21

should maybe balance out, but I

24:24

still think a lot closer

24:27

than the bookies have it, but South Africa

24:29

by

24:30

three. Sodd it, I'll go England. I'll

24:32

go England, I'll go England by three. It'll

24:36

be tight no matter what. I think

24:38

they've got a chance. I think the

24:42

emotional toll could be a lot

24:44

for the Springboks to back up from last weekend.

24:47

There's an element of surprise and

24:50

the unknown with Borthwick's England.

24:55

Stranger things have happened. It's 80 minutes of knockout

24:57

rugby. Let's go. Someone's got to

24:59

go England. I'll go England by three. I'm

25:01

going to go South Africa by nine, which

25:04

I have seen predictions

25:07

earlier this week that South Africa by 35 or 40,

25:10

but one dimension

25:13

is that they have a player such as Mauro

25:15

Itoje who seems

25:17

unbothered by the aura of opposition,

25:20

as he showed four years ago,

25:22

and when we spoke to him earlier

25:24

on, he seemed particularly focused

25:27

and he said how everything about this week in

25:29

terms of the atmosphere seemed very heightened.

25:31

There was a very clear awareness of

25:34

what they needed to do in the same way

25:36

as there was in 2019. I think with him

25:38

at the

25:41

helm, England at

25:43

least have a shot at making it close, but I don't

25:45

think they have a shot at victory.

25:47

No, I think that's right. I think if Mauro

25:49

had been quite head-up and

25:51

emotional, then I would have been more concerned, but the

25:53

fact that he seemed quite focused and relaxed was

25:56

definitely interesting. South Africa are definitely

25:58

going to win. But I do find

26:00

it interesting how, if you'd

26:03

asked me in the middle of France, Africa

26:05

last Sunday, I would have said that France or South Africa would

26:07

have been in this England side by about 30 points. World

26:11

Cup's a weird. Part

26:13

of me now would not be shocked. But

26:17

I just feel like, if we're

26:19

going to get a true reflection of

26:21

the quality of the two sides and how much further ahead

26:23

in their developments in Africa rather than England,

26:26

it's going to be in the final score. So for that reason,

26:28

I'm almost certain South

26:31

Africa will win. But we'll find out

26:33

very, very, very soon. We're looking

26:35

forward to it. Thanks for following all the coverage. Plenty on the website.

26:38

We'll be brief next week and find out who's in the final.

26:41

Bye.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features