Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This episode is brought to you by Five Bullet Friday,
0:03
my very own email newsletter. It's
0:05
become one of the most popular email newsletters
0:07
in the world with millions of subscribers and
0:09
it's super, super simple. It does not
0:11
clog up your inbox. Every Friday, I send out
0:14
five bullet points, super short of the coolest
0:16
things I found that week, which sometimes
0:19
includes apps, books, documentaries,
0:21
supplements, gadgets, new self experiments,
0:23
hacks, tricks, and all sorts of weird
0:25
stuff that I dig up from around the
0:27
world. You guys, podcast listeners
0:29
and book readers, have asked me for something short
0:32
and action packed for a very long time. Because
0:34
after all, the podcast, the books, they can be
0:36
quite long. And that's why I created Five
0:38
Bullet Friday. It's become one
0:41
of my favorite things I do every week.
0:43
It's free. It's always going to be free. And
0:45
you can learn more at tim.blog forward
0:48
slash Friday. That's tim.blog
0:50
forward slash Friday. I get asked
0:52
a lot how I meet guests for the
0:54
podcast, some of the most amazing people I've
0:56
ever interacted with. And little known
0:59
fact, I've met probably 25% of them
1:01
because they first subscribed to 5 Bullet Friday.
1:04
So you'll be in good company. It's
1:06
a lot of fun. 5 Bullet Friday is only available
1:09
if you subscribe via email. I do
1:11
not publish the content on the blog or anywhere else. Also
1:14
if I'm doing small in-person meetups,
1:16
offering early access to startups, beta testing,
1:18
special deals or anything else that's very
1:20
limited, I share it first with 5 Bullet
1:22
Friday subscribers. So check
1:24
it out. Tim.blog forward slash Friday.
1:27
If you listen to this podcast, it's very
1:29
likely that you'd dig it a lot and
1:31
you can of course
1:33
easily subscribe any time So
1:35
easy peasy again, that's Tim dot
1:37
blog forward slash Friday And
1:40
thanks for checking it out if the spirit moves.
1:42
Yeah At
1:44
this altitude I can run flat out for a
1:46
half mile before my hands start shaking Can
1:49
I ask you a personal question?
1:51
No, I would have seen it in a perfect time. I'm
1:54
a cybernetic organism, living tissue over
1:57
metal and discovery.
1:58
Please do
2:00
Tim Ferriss Show. and
2:31
the guest and then you can always dig deeper by going
2:33
to one of those episodes. View this episode as a
2:35
buffet to whet your appetite. It's a lot of fun. We
2:37
had fun putting it together. And for the full list of
2:40
the guests featured today, see the episode's
2:42
description, probably right below where we press
2:44
play in your podcast app. Or
2:47
as usual, you can head to tim.blog
2:49
slash podcast and find all the
2:51
details there.
2:53
Please enjoy. First
2:58
up, Dr. Andrew Huberman,
3:00
neuroscientist and tenured professor
3:03
in the Department of Neurobiology at
3:05
Stanford University's School of Medicine.
3:11
I've doubled down on the
3:14
idea, which perhaps I stated last
3:16
time we spoke and perhaps not, But I certainly
3:19
believe that
3:21
our state of mind and body at
3:23
any point in time is strongly
3:26
dictated by our state of mind and
3:28
body in the hours and days
3:30
prior to that. And on the one hand,
3:33
people are gonna hear that and say, well, duh, if you're
3:35
sleep deprived, you're gonna feel like garbage. And if you're well
3:37
rested, you'll feel great. That's
3:39
kind of the top contour of it. But
3:42
when one looks at the neuroscience, for instance, of
3:44
sleep, you start to realize
3:46
that The amount of rapid eye movement sleep
3:49
that you're going to get in any 90 minute bout of
3:51
sleep, because
3:52
your sleep is broken up into these 90 minute segments
3:54
more or less,
3:56
strongly dictated by the
3:58
ratio of slow wave sleep.
4:00
aka deep sleep and
4:01
rapid eye movement sleep that you had in the previous 90 minute
4:04
bout. And then when you start
4:06
to look at the research in terms of
4:08
waking states, you start to find that
4:11
your ability to be focused, say
4:13
for about a work in the morning or the afternoon
4:16
or a creative brainstorm session, or I don't
4:18
know, to maybe drill into some personal
4:20
issue that you're dealing with during therapy or just on
4:22
a walk or while journaling is
4:25
not a square wave function. None
4:27
of us should sit down and expect ourselves to just drop
4:30
into that state. Much
4:32
of our ability to move into that state
4:34
effectively, whatever effective means, right?
4:36
Whatever the target
4:38
or goal of that bout, as I'm
4:40
calling it is, is going to be dictated
4:42
by what happened in the previous
4:44
moments and hours.
4:46
And so
4:47
when I zoom out from that, what I've doubled
4:49
down on is this idea that there
4:51
are just a core set of foundational
4:54
things that we have to re-up every 24 hours.
4:57
I think thanks to the incredibly
4:59
hard work
5:00
of
5:01
Dr. Matt Walker at Berkeley, the sleep
5:03
diplomat on Twitter, right? It's such a great
5:06
name because it's so appropriate. I mean, a
5:08
decade ago or so, you know, it was like,
5:10
I'll sleep when I'm dead. That was the dominant mentality
5:12
out there. And yeah, sleep's great. But you know, getting
5:14
stuff done is more important. I mean, Matt
5:16
has really impressed on everybody that our mental
5:19
health, our physical health, and our ability to perform
5:21
is so strongly dependent on
5:24
our ability to get quality sleep. Maybe
5:26
not every night of our life. I mean, we have to be realistic,
5:28
but that sleep is vital. So, you
5:31
know, a hat tip is insufficient. But,
5:34
so sleep is critical, but sleep
5:36
is just one of about, I would say five things
5:38
that really set the buoyancy
5:41
or the foundation upon which our nervous system
5:43
is able to accomplish these transitions that
5:45
I'm talking about at all. And
5:48
those five things are
5:51
sleep. In the absence of quality
5:53
sleep over two or three days, you're
5:55
just gonna fall to pieces. In the presence of quality
5:57
sufficient sleep over
5:59
two or three. you're gonna function at
6:01
an amazing level. There's
6:04
a gain of function and a loss of function there. It's
6:06
not just if you sleep poorly, you function less well. You
6:08
sleep better, you function much better.
6:11
So sleep, I would say is at the top
6:13
of the list. Nutrients,
6:17
and there you can think macronutrients.
6:19
And so your carnivores are only eating meat
6:21
and your vegans are only eating plants. And
6:23
your omnivores, which is I think probably 90%
6:26
of the world is eating a combination of those. but quality
6:30
nutrients, I think when I look at all
6:32
of the nutrition literature and arguments
6:34
out there, it seems that everyone can agree on one
6:36
thing, which is that probably 80%
6:37
or more of our nutrition
6:40
should come from unprocessed or minimally processed
6:42
sources. Minimally processed would require
6:44
some cooking, but could survive on the shelf, as opposed
6:47
to packaged foods or highly
6:49
palatable foods. So you've got sleep nutrients,
6:51
but then we should also put in micronutrients. And
6:54
this is where maybe we'll get into a discussion about
6:56
supplementation. I think that there's supplementation
6:58
or supplements as a bit of a misnomer because it
7:01
implies vitamin supplements and people say, well, can't
7:03
you get all that from food or that
7:05
whey protein, isn't that just food? Wouldn't you be better
7:07
off
7:07
with a chicken breast? Okay, well then when you talk about convenience
7:10
and the absorption, okay. But then there's this
7:12
huge category of things,
7:14
ranging from the kind
7:17
of esoterically named things like ashwagandha
7:19
and shilaji and tongali and fudoji aggressors,
7:21
right? I mean, it sounds exactly, all the herbal
7:23
stuff, right? You're not gonna get that from food. So
7:26
should we call them supplements at all? So let's
7:29
just say the second thing is nutrients and that includes macronutrients
7:31
and that includes micronutrients as well.
7:34
So those two things. Then the third would
7:36
be movement. And
7:38
this has also been an enormous transition in the last,
7:41
I think just five years, which is not just
7:43
for people interested in bodybuilding or powerlifting
7:45
or for competitive athletes, but now it seems
7:48
everybody,
7:49
including the elderly, understand
7:51
that you need a combination of cardiovascular
7:54
exercise and you need
7:56
resistance training, whether or not it's with body weight or weights
7:58
machines etc.
8:00
You need both. I mean, not a week goes by
8:02
without seeing an article in one of the major publications
8:04
out there, standard media, let's call it traditional
8:07
media, we'll be nice to them, traditional
8:09
media, that highlights some studies showing
8:11
that, you know, resistance training in elderly people
8:13
can offset Alzheimer's or as our friend
8:15
Peter Atiyah has pointed out so many times that many
8:18
of the end of life creating injuries
8:20
are due to people, older people stepping
8:22
down, the eccentric movements. Okay, so
8:25
you need movement, that's the third category. Fourth,
8:28
I will argue, and I like to think that maybe
8:30
I've helped this movement, if
8:33
you want to call it that, is light, in
8:35
particular sunlight in the early part and
8:37
throughout the middle of the day, and trying
8:39
to minimize the amount of artificial light that you're exposed
8:41
to in the evening and late night hours, most
8:44
of the time, because you have to live life.
8:47
Just fundamental. I think
8:49
the last category
8:50
that's important is
8:52
social connection, AKA relationships.
8:54
Let's just call it relationships, because that can include relationship
8:56
to self. So those things
8:59
set up the core foundation. And I think
9:02
one way to think about them is just as a list.
9:05
Another is to think about them in terms of a schedule
9:08
basis. And that's how I've really
9:10
doubled down is I realized that every 24 hours
9:13
I need to invest something into each one of those
9:15
things. So I think that 10 years
9:17
ago or five years ago or even two years ago, I used to think,
9:19
okay, like what's the workout split? Or
9:21
how am I going to eat for the
9:24
next couple of months? you know, what am I trying to optimize
9:26
for? Is it muscle? Is it fat loss? Is it
9:28
just maintaining? Is it energy? Is it focus?
9:30
That's all fine and good, but
9:33
sleep, nutrients, exercise,
9:35
light
9:36
relationships. Those really establish
9:39
the foundation of what
9:41
I consider to be all of the elements
9:44
that create our ability to move
9:47
as seamlessly as possible between the states
9:49
that we happen to be in and the states we desire
9:51
to be in. And when I
9:53
zoom out and I think about what are the major struggles
9:55
that I, and it seems most everyone deals with? It's
9:58
like how to get more focused. Okay, so we... we can
10:00
talk about what do you take? What's the supplement?
10:02
But you have to say, well, how are you sleeping? Have
10:04
you done any exercise? You really always find
10:07
yourself, or I find myself, taking 10 steps
10:10
back and then moving through the sequence of
10:12
five things before you can even begin to talk
10:14
about whether or not taking three or 600 milligrams
10:16
of alf GPC and how often to do that and
10:18
does it work and yes, it works, et cetera. But
10:21
those things really set the foundation. And so I
10:24
like to think of those five things every
10:26
single day. You have to re-up on sleep every 24 hours
10:28
or try to. You have to re-up
10:30
on movement every 24 hours. You can go a day
10:33
or so immobile, but you better
10:35
move the next day, right? And
10:37
ideally you're moving seven days a week. Doesn't necessarily
10:39
mean trying to failure and running marathon
10:42
seven days a week. You can Goggins your life or you can
10:44
not Goggins your life. For
10:46
those of you who don't know, I'm referring to David Goggins there,
10:48
by the way, who seems to never stop moving. Although
10:50
I just learned meditates two hours every
10:52
night,
10:53
every night. And I'm inclined to believe when he says that that
10:55
he indeed does that.
10:57
You need nutrients, even if they come from stored
10:59
sources, even if you're gonna fast, you're gonna
11:01
fast for a day or two, okay, fine. I've
11:04
done that, I know you've done that. I would put hydration
11:06
under nutrients too. So you can
11:08
derive nutrients from stored
11:10
fat, protein, et cetera, glycogen. Light
11:13
is, you're gonna need that every 24 hours.
11:15
You're going to need sunlight, even if through cloud
11:17
cover. And you're going to
11:19
want to avoid bright artificial lights at night,
11:22
not every night, but most nights of your life. And
11:24
then that relationships one is the one that maybe
11:26
we can go into in a little bit more depth at some point, but it
11:29
requires focus. It requires attention every 24
11:32
hours. Now that doesn't
11:34
necessarily mean you have to see friends, talk to friends,
11:36
text friends every 24 hours. Some
11:38
people are far more introverted than others,
11:41
but then you're working on your relationship to yourself in
11:44
that solo time. And hopefully when you're spending time with
11:46
others as well, that has some internal repercussions.
11:48
So if I've doubled down on anything,
11:50
it's the understanding that there is no
11:54
There is no
11:57
real interest, at least for me, in trying
11:59
to layer unless I'm paying
12:01
attention to each and every one of those things every 24
12:04
hours. You have to re-up on
12:06
each and every one of those five things every 24 hours. And
12:09
if you don't, you can get by for a day or
12:11
two,
12:12
but
12:13
pretty soon you're going to hit that wall where you won't
12:15
be able to do any of the things that
12:17
most people are actually seeking to do. And
12:20
the last thing I'll say about that is, you
12:22
know, I think people hear a list of those five things and they think,
12:25
okay, well, that must be nice for you, Andrew
12:27
and Tim. You know, you wake up, you look at sunlight,
12:30
you guys don't have kids, you don't have to worry about kids running
12:32
around, you don't have to, you know, you can exercise.
12:35
There are ways of layering in the protocols
12:37
that
12:38
re-up, as I'm referring to it, these five
12:41
things every 24 hours that also
12:43
include other people in your life, kids,
12:46
pets, et cetera. Exercise
12:48
certainly can include that as well. But
12:52
I would argue that there is no showing
12:54
up properly for yourself
12:56
and for the other people in your life unless these things
12:58
are being handled. And it's not
13:00
about becoming soft and cushy, it's about
13:02
becoming quite resilient and effective. It
13:05
seems so simple, but as our friend
13:07
Paul Conti said to me recently, he said, you know,
13:09
after all the analysis and pouring through things and
13:11
the complicated notions of the subconscious,
13:14
he's a psychiatrist after all, you know, in the end,
13:16
really great mental health is about simple
13:18
practices, like first principles
13:21
of self-care, to which I raised my hand
13:23
and said, well, what is a first principle of self-care?
13:25
I'm a biologist after all. And he said, aha, it's
13:27
basically the things that we were just talking about. There's
13:30
those five things. And so I'm doubling
13:33
down, I'm tripling down on those as
13:35
essential to
13:37
the point where nothing else really happens for
13:40
very long unless those five things are
13:42
tended to.
13:47
Next up, Dr. Peter Atiyah,
13:49
author of the new book Outlive,
13:52
The Science and Art of Longevity.
14:00
while we're on that topic is if I
14:02
drink something that doesn't taste incredible,
14:04
I pour it out. I'm never going to tolerate
14:07
a bad glass of wine ever. It's
14:09
just not worth it. So
14:11
since we're on it, I'm going to pull us back
14:14
to this question of data probably
14:17
through the lens of continuous glucose
14:19
monitors and the best uses
14:22
and maybe the most common misuses for people
14:24
who do not have type 2
14:27
diabetes or type 1 diabetes. But
14:29
let's just sit with the alcohol for a second.
14:31
So what are your personal
14:34
rules for alcohol consumption outside
14:36
of the if it tastes
14:38
mediocre or shitty, it gets
14:40
poured out, which is a great rule. But what
14:42
are your favorite types of alcohol? How
14:45
do you personally navigate that?
14:47
Well,
14:47
I'll start with like kind of quantity. Yeah, so
14:49
I would personally just say there's going to
14:51
be an insane reason to
14:53
have more than two drinks in a day. So
14:56
it's sort of somewhere between zero and two
14:58
and it's got to be a really
15:00
good reason to drink on more than three days
15:03
a week. So in the back of my mind
15:05
I'm keeping a tally which is I really shouldn't be
15:07
having more than about seven drinks in a
15:09
week.
15:10
And
15:11
again, seven drinks in one day is very
15:13
different than one drink a day for seven days. So
15:16
it's the frequency and it's the dose and
15:18
that defines the poison.
15:19
The second thing is I
15:21
really have to make sure that that drinking is
15:24
a
15:24
good three hours away from sleep.
15:27
Again, when I say these things, people say, Peter,
15:29
you must be a robot. No, I'm just saying these
15:31
are general principles. There are going to be
15:33
times when I violate that. I think I posted something on Instagram
15:36
a little while ago, which was like the most rancid
15:38
night of sleep. My sleep data were comically
15:41
bad. And the reason was we
15:43
had friends over. It was very late.
15:46
We drank, we ate. I
15:48
basically went to bed. By the time they left
15:50
at like 1030, I went to bed and we had just finished eating
15:52
sort of and not surprisingly my sleep sucked.
15:55
The
15:55
point I made in the post was,
15:57
I'd do it again. It was a fantastic night.
16:00
The four of us hadn't had dinner together in a long
16:02
time. So you just have to be
16:04
very thoughtful and deliberate about
16:06
the choices and trade-offs that you make. As
16:08
far as the type of alcohol, you
16:11
know, I think people, I think, love to,
16:13
this
16:13
isn't, again, an example of something I think we tend
16:15
to over index to. Oh, you know,
16:17
I drink a lot, but let me tell you, it's just vodka
16:20
and tequila. So it's got to be good for me, right? It's
16:22
like, no, alcohol is alcohol, right? So
16:25
I love tequila. I love Mezcal. I love
16:28
really good wine. and I love really
16:30
dark Belgian beer. I'm not deluded
16:32
to think that any of those are healthy. And I
16:35
know that there are some people who have, you know, a horrible
16:37
reaction to certain types of alcohol. Well, I would put
16:39
that in the same category as people who have a horrible reaction to
16:41
certain types of foods, don't consume them. But
16:44
I think mostly where I focused him is
16:46
on how much am I gonna drink?
16:48
How close is it gonna be to bed? And what's
16:50
the total tally per week and
16:52
never exceed a certain tally in a given day. Next
16:58
up, CEO coach Matt Moschari,
17:01
author of The Great CEO Within,
17:04
which is available on Amazon and
17:07
online as a free Google Doc. One
17:13
of the things I've noticed that I do different than others is
17:15
this what I call biased action. We're
17:17
not going to leave a conversation without
17:20
you having at least one, two or three
17:22
actions to take because I think this time
17:24
spent together is so expensive
17:27
for you, for me, frankly,
17:30
that if we're just going to think
17:32
deeply about things, come to
17:35
answers that are likely, very likely
17:37
to work, and then not
17:39
turn them into actions and do them, and me
17:42
not follow up and specifically see
17:44
if you did them, but then just go to another
17:46
meeting two weeks from now and start all over
17:48
of super expensive time and ideate,
17:51
but not have done anything in between to me
17:53
is just like
17:54
my stomach curls when I think
17:56
about that. So my coaching is is
17:58
all about driving towards. in action. And I
18:01
have a system and the system is all about
18:04
writing that down and checking to
18:06
make sure it got done. And that's it. And
18:09
I find it works with individuals, it works
18:11
with teams, it works with companies.
18:14
And it's called accountability. And
18:16
it can be done in a micromanage, a shameful
18:19
way, or it can be done in
18:21
a I'd like to help you succeed
18:23
way. And of course, as a coach, you
18:26
can stop coaching with me anytime, so
18:28
it's much easier for me to make it feel
18:30
like I'm trying to help you succeed way. If
18:33
I'm your boss and you're giving you a paycheck and you're
18:35
afraid to
18:36
let go of the paycheck, then it can easily
18:38
feel like I'm micromanaging you. But
18:41
there is no difference. When I coach
18:43
someone, I become their manager, period,
18:45
end of story.
18:46
And if by the third meeting, they feel more successful,
18:49
more engaged, more empowered, then
18:51
they know the system works. And it's all written out
18:53
so you can just copy, paste,
18:55
use with their team members. And then
18:58
it works with our team members as well. Let's
19:00
look a little more closely at accountability
19:03
because this is one of my favorite topics. And
19:06
I mean, the tools can be
19:09
rusty, they can be
19:11
even mediocre in a lot of cases. But if you
19:14
use them routinely, it's a lot better than the
19:16
person who has a pristine, perfectly sharpened
19:18
tool that never gets used. And
19:21
for me, and I've thought and
19:23
written about this a lot as it relates to behavioral
19:26
modification, which is what we're talking about in
19:28
many respects, whether that's diet, exercise,
19:31
quitting smoking, starting a new behavior,
19:34
whatever it might be, New Year's resolutions that
19:36
accountability beats
19:38
elaborate planning most of the time.
19:41
I would say all the time. All the time. Great.
19:43
So let me read something. And this is, I believe
19:46
this is either something written by you or your team.
19:49
And I'd love to hear you elaborate on it. If
19:51
we have to do something that isn't fun and we're alone,
19:54
it is painful. But if we're in the presence of another human,
19:56
then we're usually okay to do that thing, which isn't fun.
19:59
other human is. doesn't
20:00
matter too much. It can be our child, our EA,
20:02
or any other random person. Could
20:05
you give an example
20:07
of how this might work? Because I found
20:10
this to peak my curiosity.
20:13
I find that there are generally personality
20:15
types that I encounter when coaching. And one
20:18
big bucket is introvert versus
20:20
extrovert. And obviously, it's a sliding scale, but
20:22
people generally fall one side or the other. And
20:25
extroverts I've known, and I'm an extrovert,
20:28
just feel more comfortable around humans.
20:30
And there are these solo tasks.
20:32
This goes back to in the beginning, you talked about your anger,
20:34
your frustration around having to do these administrative
20:36
tasks that don't create any value, but
20:38
only you can do them because you're the investor, named
20:40
investor individually. So only you can get the K1
20:43
and your assistant can't get it because she's not you.
20:46
And what a pain in the ass. And
20:48
you've got to do it. And you're probably doing it alone.
20:51
And you're probably going, ugh. And
20:53
so I have things like that as well. And plenty
20:56
of extroverts have things. There's some amount of stuff
20:58
you just got to do. And so what I've
21:00
noticed is in my own life, and I've recommended
21:02
this to many people and they've done it like, oh my God, that's
21:04
amazing, is just having another
21:06
living, breathing human in the room
21:09
creates a sense of peace,
21:12
enough of a sense of peace that these
21:14
tasks no longer feel
21:16
so annoying because our body
21:19
is no longer so sensitized. We're sensitized,
21:22
extroverture sensitized when they're in the alone
21:24
position. But when they're not alone,
21:26
their bodies just aren't as sensitized. And so these
21:28
tasks become less onerous. And
21:31
I've literally hired people to
21:33
sit in my office with me on a couch
21:35
reading a book while I do administrative
21:38
tasks and it works. And
21:41
I've recommended this to dozens of people
21:43
and they now do it and it works for
21:45
them. Next
21:50
up, David Deutsch, visiting
21:53
professor of physics at the Center for
21:55
Quantum Computation, a part
21:57
of the Clarendon Laboratory at Oxford
21:59
University.
22:00
and Nival Ravikant,
22:03
co-founder of AirChat and AngelList,
22:06
and this interview's co-host. And
22:11
as an aside, one beautiful output of
22:13
that that I saw in one of your books was that if
22:16
you were to look at, there's
22:18
lots of ways to be wrong, but there's only
22:20
a few ways to be right, or there are certainly less
22:23
ways to be right than there are to be wrong. And
22:25
because the ways that that are right are likely to
22:27
be copied, if you were able to peek
22:29
at the entire multiverse at once, you
22:31
would see truth as a thing that is repeated
22:34
across the multiverse. So I took that in
22:36
a fanciful way as a meaning of life, which is I want
22:38
to be the version of myself that is successful
22:40
in the most instances of the multiverse,
22:43
because that contains the most truth.
22:45
We want to be multiversal crystals.
22:48
Yes, the closer you are to the truth, the
22:50
more of you that exists in the multiverse in
22:53
a very odd way. So there's your
22:56
practical application of multiverse
22:58
theory combined with epistemology. But
23:00
out of this also came all kinds of other interesting
23:03
outputs. I really encourage people to read the beginning of infinity,
23:05
at least the first three chapters, which I think are an easy
23:07
read before you even get in the physics part, where
23:10
you talk about wealth and resources.
23:13
Can you give us your definition of wealth? And
23:15
then as a follow-up to that, I think
23:17
naturally comes, are we running out of resources?
23:21
Wealth is not a number. I don't think it can
23:23
be characterized very well by a
23:25
number. It is a set. The
23:28
set of all transformations
23:30
that you are capable of bringing about, that
23:34
is your wealth. And
23:37
obviously, if optimism is true, then there's
23:39
no limit to wealth. And
23:42
at any one time, there
23:44
is a rough correlation between
23:47
the wealth
23:49
that is the set of
23:52
all transformations that you could bring about
23:55
and other things that aren't very fundamental,
23:57
the amount of money you have or the amount of energy
24:00
you control, or the amount of land you
24:02
control, or the amount of power you have,
24:04
and so on. But those are
24:08
not fundamental. They are all
24:10
outgrown eventually by the growth
24:12
of knowledge. So at
24:15
the moment, if you have a lot of gold, you
24:17
can bring things about by exchanging
24:21
the gold for knowledge
24:23
that other people have. If you want
24:26
a painting of yourself, you can hire
24:28
a painter to make the painting of yourself, even
24:30
if you couldn't. But in the
24:32
long run, gold
24:34
won't do that, because in the long
24:36
run, some other knowledge that is growing
24:39
will be able to get gold
24:41
from an asteroid, and then gold will
24:44
become cheaper and cheaper and cheaper, and
24:47
artists will no longer accept
24:49
gold. Ultimately,
24:53
what they will accept, and it's also true today
24:55
because the economy is
24:57
a rather imperfect
25:00
way of accounting
25:05
for knowledge creation. It's
25:07
true that it's rather imperfect, so people
25:10
can acquire money and power
25:12
and so on, sometimes without
25:15
creating much knowledge. But again, in
25:17
the long run, that is not
25:19
true. So in the long run,
25:21
the only thing you could pay the artist with
25:24
would be more
25:26
knowledge, kind of knowledge that
25:29
he's not good at creating.
25:32
And I love how deep this explanation is. I love
25:34
the reach of it, because it also
25:36
applies at the civilizational level. As
25:38
a civilization figures out how to make more and more
25:40
transformations, everybody gets wealthier. Wealth
25:43
is a byproduct of knowledge. And because
25:45
we can do anything and figure anything that's not constrained
25:48
by the laws of physics, that wealth is unlimited,
25:50
just like knowledge is unlimited. And
25:52
even things that before were not considered wealth,
25:54
we can transform into sources of wealth through
25:57
new knowledge. So this idea
25:59
has tremendous
28:00
dominate people. Next
28:05
up, Michael Mobison,
28:07
head of Consilient Research on CounterPoint
28:10
Global
28:11
at Morgan Stanley Investment Management.
28:17
Now, in addition to the
28:20
wisdom of crowds, there are a number of books that came
28:22
up in the process of doing research for this conversation
28:24
that you've mentioned. And I don't
28:28
mean to imply that we need to spend a ton of time on
28:30
all of these, but I would love to
28:32
at
28:33
least get your
28:35
take on two that have
28:37
popped up and there may be one or two
28:39
more, but I'll mention two.
28:42
One is Against the Gods, The Remarkable
28:44
Story of Risk, and this came to mind because you just
28:47
mentioned risk in
28:49
the context of Switzerland, and the other is
28:51
Complexity by Mitchell Waldrup from
28:53
getting that pronunciation right.
28:56
Why are either or both of these books
28:59
meaningful or
29:01
must-reads or important
29:04
in any way? So let's
29:06
start with Against the Gods. It's written by Peter Bernstein,
29:09
who was a brilliant economist and historian, and
29:12
it is the history of human understanding
29:14
of risk. So it's a fascinating
29:17
thing. Now I'll just say that,
29:19
broadly speaking, I think
29:21
understanding the history of ideas is incredibly
29:24
valuable and pedagogy, generally speaking, right?
29:26
So if I'm talking about an idea
29:28
or I'm using an idea today,
29:31
I think it's very helpful to understand
29:33
where it came from, who were the propagators,
29:36
what were their blind spots, where
29:38
did they take a turn one direction where they could have gone
29:41
a different direction and so forth. And so
29:43
Bernstein just brilliantly lays this
29:45
out in Against the Gods and he was a wonderful
29:47
writer.
29:48
It's a very interesting book. By the
29:50
way, he also wrote a book called Capital Ideas,
29:53
which basically does the same thing for the history of finance.
29:56
So, Peter Bernstein, that is money. And if anybody
29:58
is interested in the idea of how we understand the
30:00
and risk. And this goes back to the Bernoullis
30:02
in the 1700s up to relatively
30:04
modern times. It's a fabulous
30:06
book. I'll give one other backup, one
30:08
little step on this, which is, it's a book
30:11
I almost never talk about. But one day
30:13
when I was a food analyst, I was visiting a
30:15
money management firm. It was actually the state of Michigan,
30:18
the pension fund state of Michigan. And
30:20
I was in the waiting room, literally waiting for my meeting.
30:22
They had a bunch of books, and I just strolled over
30:25
there. And I picked up a book called Bionomics
30:27
by a guy named Michael Rothchild. I don't think anybody's
30:29
image is, I think it's a somewhat obscure
30:32
book. But as a name would indicate,
30:34
you know, and this book was written, I think, originally
30:35
in 1990, and as a name would indicate,
30:38
you know, what he was saying was the way to understand economics
30:40
is really through biology.
30:42
And, you know, starting really in the late
30:44
1800s, but
30:44
into the early 20th
30:47
century,
30:48
economics became very mathematically.
30:50
And in fact, there's a wonderful
30:52
book called More more heat than light by a professor
30:55
named Phil Murawski, which documents
30:57
how economists literally,
31:00
and I mean literally mapped over equations
31:03
from Newtonian physics
31:05
to basically give economics street cred.
31:08
So economics and finance went sort of this mathematical
31:11
slash physics envy route versus
31:14
going more biological. And I think
31:16
that you, in retrospect, you could sort of say that biological
31:18
way would have been a very logical way to go or as
31:21
logical, albeit not as mathematically
31:24
straightforward or tractable.
31:25
So I've read this book, Bionomics, and
31:28
I'm like, this is like so cool. And the guy sort
31:30
of opens the book by saying, hey, you can't
31:32
really understand economies unless you understand sort of
31:34
evolution and so forth. So I was very drawn
31:36
to all that. So that's the backdrop. I'm
31:38
like sort of primed and I'm thinking about this idea. And
31:40
then along comes Waldrop's book,
31:43
Complexity. And this is really the story
31:45
of the founding of the Santa Fe Institute. And
31:48
by way of background, who was founded
31:50
in 1984 by a number of scientists
31:53
who felt, and very prominent scientists, many
31:55
Nobel Prize winners who felt that academia
31:58
had become... to
32:00
siloed, right? So the physicists hung out
32:02
with the physicists and the economists with the economists
32:04
and the chemists with the chemists.
32:06
But again, most of the interesting problems in the
32:08
world were really at intersections of these disciplines.
32:11
And gee, wouldn't it be awesome if we got
32:13
these different scientists to hang out and
32:15
talk to one another? And
32:17
so this is how this thing got going
32:20
in some of the early conferences. For example, one of them was
32:22
the economy is a complex adaptive system, right?
32:24
So the idea of economics being in there early
32:26
on was early days. And
32:28
so why this book is so, I
32:30
think, still to this day kind of exhilarating
32:33
is because you read about
32:36
these scientists and how
32:38
they were coming up with ideas that were far from
32:40
the mainstream. And when we look
32:42
back on them now, many of them have become much more
32:44
mainstream ideas, but it's just, it was super
32:46
cool. And so one of the main protagonists,
32:48
I think the book does open with the story, is Brian
32:51
Arthur, who is an economist now. And,
32:53
you know, Brian was promoting this idea
32:55
of increasing returns. Now, if you've taken
32:57
economics, microeconomics at any point,
32:59
you learn about decreasing returns, right? So if
33:02
Tim's lemonade stands super profitable,
33:04
Michael will open up and let him stand right next door,
33:07
charge slightly lower prices, and so you'll become
33:09
less possible, and then you'll have to match my prices and so forth,
33:11
and we'll compete our way down to less
33:14
profitability, so decreasing returns. And
33:16
Brian pointed out that under certain circumstances,
33:18
there were these increasing returns, there were sort of these winner-take-all
33:21
effects. This is now, again, he was
33:23
writing about this in the 80s and 90s, completely
33:26
heretical, And by the way, like basically the
33:28
mainstream economists wanted nothing
33:30
to do with it. Waldrop and I think in a very engaging
33:32
way describes how all these ideas developed.
33:35
And so if you said the Santa Fe Institute, is
33:37
there a unifying theme? It would be sort of this idea of a complex,
33:40
adapting, evolving system is a way
33:42
of thinking about it. So those would be my answers.
33:45
Those are two wonderful things. And
33:47
my oldest son, before he went off to college,
33:49
he did a gap year.
33:51
And I thought, what would be a list
33:53
of books that would be really great for him to
33:56
read
33:57
internalized and you know I think we had a list of 15 or 20
33:59
books. but these were both on that list
34:02
because I just think it's super cool
34:04
to understand the history of ideas and it's by the way As
34:06
a teacher if you're ever teaching something, I think
34:08
it's just super helpful to know where it came from Like what
34:10
is the genesis of this by the way? There there are a couple
34:13
things that I'm actually trying to track down now These
34:15
are specific finance type of things and
34:17
I'm having a hard time finding the first person
34:19
that come up with it So it's kind of cool right to sort of go
34:22
on these little while goose chases
34:27
Last but not least Performance
34:30
coach, Dr. Kelly Starrett,
34:32
author of the new book, Built to
34:34
Move, the 10 essential habits
34:37
to help you move freely and live
34:39
fully, co-written with Juliette
34:41
Starrett. 800G,
34:47
I assume that doesn't mean $800,000, 800 grams. 800 grams,
34:53
so
34:54
food can be a little sensitive for
34:56
people. When we talk about
34:59
food with people and diets,
35:02
five percent is per performance. I'm
35:05
a cyclist runner, right? I
35:08
want to build muscle. And
35:10
the rest of it tends to be around
35:13
how do I change my body composition? So
35:16
we'll start with that assumption. Now
35:18
here is the non-trigger-trigger
35:21
warning. If you're a vegan, carnivore,
35:24
paleo, vegetarian,
35:26
I'm still talking to you.
35:27
Okay? It doesn't matter what you eat. We
35:31
found that when
35:34
I back up, didn't
35:37
want to ever get near nutrition for
35:39
all the reasons that it's complicated.
35:43
It's highly individualized. It's
35:45
cultural.
35:46
People have strong ideologies
35:49
around it and really personal identities around it. cool.
35:52
I think nutrition for a lot of people has become
35:55
almost like entertainment. It's a hobby. Or religion.
35:58
Sure. down
36:00
to you're working with me and I'm
36:04
worried about your tissue recovery
36:06
or tissue health or you're injured because again
36:08
a lot of times it comes through or we're
36:11
trying to keep
36:11
a lean body mass on you because
36:13
you're aging and it turns out maybe fat
36:16
is a problem but
36:19
keeping your lean body mass is a bigger problem.
36:22
When we actually get into how much
36:24
protein are you eating people
36:27
oftentimes do not get enough protein.
36:29
And so notice that I'm like, oh,
36:32
you want to eat raw bear steak, you knock yourself out.
36:34
You want to do plant P cricket protein,
36:36
you knock yourself out. I don't care. But
36:39
let's see if we can establish what
36:41
a reasonable amount of that is.
36:44
And again, what I really like in
36:46
my life is getting something for nothing. And
36:49
something for nothing in this situation is that we found
36:51
that when people start eating more protein,
36:54
guess what happened? There we got fuller. So 800 grams
36:56
protein today? No. Yes.
37:00
That would be great.
37:02
For the low low price of $69.95 per month
37:05
with a free dialysis machine. All you
37:07
need to do. That's right. So we
37:11
found that a reasonable
37:13
amount of protein was somewhere between 0.7 and 0.8 and
37:15
one gram per
37:17
pound body weight. That's a reasonable amount.
37:19
That's not crazy. We're not going to shock load
37:22
you. Remember a lot of times
37:25
if you're trying to change your body composition or
37:27
heal or grow, you need to make
37:29
sure you have enough protein on board.
37:31
One of the things that we found was this
37:33
was an easy way of controlling satiety
37:35
and actually making sure that people had
37:37
on board what they needed to recover
37:40
and to heal. What I'll ask
37:42
you is if you count the protein
37:44
that your grown children are eating, you might
37:46
be shocked to discover they're actually in some
37:48
pretty low to moderate protein diets
37:51
because it's hard to get kids to eat those things. Okay,
37:54
protein aside. Again, however
37:56
you want to do that is fine with me. vegetarian
37:59
it may be Harder to
38:01
hit your protein minimums. But
38:03
one of the things that we saw a lot
38:06
Was our vegetarian friends would come
38:08
in with these little tenonopathies and some of these issues
38:11
and when we asked them about the whole
38:14
sort of pantheon of potential behaviors
38:16
that went along with that we
38:18
found that they were really under protein and
38:21
the International track and field
38:24
folks everyone sports they
38:26
really have this one gram It hovers
38:28
around one gram per pound body weight. It really
38:31
ends up being a very reasonable number that a lot of
38:33
people agree on.
38:34
Okay. Which is still a lot more than most
38:36
people consider. Great. So guess
38:38
what? Now you have a vital sign. Yeah. Okay.
38:43
So where's the 800 coming? Okay. So
38:45
this is the magic. We have seen
38:47
a
38:48
dearth of fruits and vegetables
38:50
eating. And this 800 grams comes
38:53
from our friend, E.C.
38:55
Sinkowski. came up with this idea
38:57
that, hey,
38:58
what if instead of taking things out
39:00
of your diet, we expanded your diet? What
39:02
if I said, Tim, you want
39:04
to change your body composition, I'm going to have to have you eat a lot
39:07
more. You'd be like, well, sign me
39:09
up. So 800 grams is 800
39:12
grams of fruits and vegetables. And it
39:14
can be, they can be frozen,
39:16
they can be fresh, they can be cooked. It doesn't matter.
39:19
So four big apples is 800
39:22
grams. Right? So It's not as crazy as it
39:24
sounds. It's not as crazy as it sounds. Banana's about 100
39:26
grams, you can think of it that way. So what I'm asking you to
39:28
do is eat fruits and vegetables. And
39:31
what we find
39:32
is people don't really eat fruits and vegetables, they
39:34
talk about it a lot. And they have a little iceberg
39:37
lettuce salad. We've struggled to eat vegetables here
39:39
in Japan. Actually,
39:42
not only have we struggled, but we
39:45
went to a sushi restaurant
39:47
where one
39:50
of our guides, who's fantastic,
39:53
native Japanese and
39:54
I was overhearing and someone's like, why are you
39:56
laughing so hard Tim? And I was like, well, and
39:59
then the guy. explain. She said, well,
40:01
I just asked, where can we get
40:03
some vegetables? What are your vegetable options? Do
40:05
you have vegetables? And they're like, no. It
40:09
says sushi on the door. What's the question? It's
40:12
not a vegetable restaurant. This is a sushi restaurant.
40:14
So we're agnostic about how
40:16
you do that.
40:17
You're like, I'm a rutabaga guy. Cool.
40:19
You want to get 800 grams of rutabaga? But
40:22
buried in there are these things
40:24
called micronutrients, vitamins and minerals.
40:27
And what also bade in there is
40:29
crucial is this thing called fiber, which most
40:32
people don't get a lot of. And
40:34
one of the things we've seen when
40:37
we have gone into this diet
40:39
culture where we restrict and take out, it's
40:41
really not very sustainable. And
40:43
I have two daughters, full disclosure for
40:46
one who aren't, haven't always been the best
40:48
eaters. But if I pack them full of strawberries
40:50
and apples and whatever they want to eat,
40:53
fruits and vegetables wise, again, fruits or or vegetables,
40:55
if you're like, I don't eat vegetables, I'm like, down, cool.
40:57
Just, you do you, you do fruits, that's fun.
41:00
We found that there's a lot less
41:02
room for crap in our diet. And
41:06
all of the research is that 800 grams is
41:08
about this magic number where a lot of really
41:11
good things happen to you from a health perspective.
41:13
Fiber, micronutrients, should
41:16
you eat the rainbow? Sounds great, let's eat the rainbow. I
41:18
try to get six to eight kinds of fruits and
41:20
vegetables every day, it's kind of a game.
41:22
And guess what, tomorrow? six to eight servings. Six
41:24
to eight different types. Oh, types. Yeah,
41:26
so a grape is one, then I had some spinach, and
41:29
trying to eat this diversity. I
41:31
think it was Kate Shanahan of Deep Nutrition
41:33
who wrote that we used to eat roughly somewhere
41:36
between 40 and 50 different kinds of fruits and vegetables
41:38
every year, typical person, in
41:40
America. Now it's like three or four. But
41:43
we just don't eat a lot of fruits and vegetables. And
41:46
those two things, we
41:48
find that we have people focus on getting
41:51
more protein, getting more fruits and vegetables, there's
41:53
just not a lot of extra room for keto donuts.
41:56
You know what I mean? You're like, holy crap,
41:58
I'm really like, guess what?
42:00
everyone white potatoes, it's a vegetable. To
42:02
fried potato, not a vegetable, right? We should
42:04
probably do that. You have been advocating
42:06
for these very dangerous things called beans for a
42:08
long time. Oh boy. Internet,
42:11
you're gonna give me a Brian McKenzie, TED
42:14
Talk, and beans? No, beans
42:17
count towards your grams. I'm like,
42:19
how cool. Redemption. You're eating
42:21
a thing that's
42:23
a plant full of plant matter and fiber. That's so
42:26
great, let's eat more beans, right? And like,
42:29
I think,
42:30
yes, of course, if you're a person
42:32
who's like, beans cause me anxiety,
42:35
not trying to be beanist here, but
42:37
if that's you, you're excused from eating
42:40
beans. And that's what I wanna give people permission
42:42
is saying, hey, I understand you don't like these things.
42:45
What else can we open up to? 800 grams of kiwi
42:47
fruit, do it. Do it, do it. And you know
42:49
what we found is that,
42:51
if you are like, I'm
42:53
only gonna do this with apples, you'll do
42:55
that for four or five days and you're like, What else
42:58
is there? Like, you know, Kiwis
43:00
are super cool. Ah,
43:02
Kiwi every day is a little bit much. And
43:05
again, we're looking at through
43:07
this lens, this built to move lens of
43:09
durability.
43:10
If we keep lean muscle mass on you and get fiber
43:13
and micronutrients in you, you're probably
43:15
going
43:16
to feel better and do better along the hall. And
43:19
maybe we have all the things your
43:21
tissues are gonna need to repair and
43:24
heal. And sometimes that is one
43:26
of our friends described as supply chain
43:28
economics of your tissues.
43:30
There's a reason here in Japan, they eat everything.
43:33
All the collagen, all the skin, all the
43:35
bones, everything, brah, fah gah. Those
43:39
things have been part of our diet for a long time. Yeah,
43:41
totally. So, few
43:43
thoughts for folks also on top of that. So,
43:46
with getting an increased
43:49
volume of vegetables, fruits, vegetables,
43:52
fruits, it may
43:54
make sense if you have the
43:57
savings to do so in the cash flow.
44:00
Look at a list called Dirty Dozen. There
44:02
are certain plants that
44:05
have more pesticide exposure in
44:08
the United States. Totally. And so
44:10
you can use that
44:11
to selectively
44:13
either avoid certain things or
44:16
consider selectively buying
44:19
certified organic so that you're not dealing
44:21
with this. Like a strawberry is my understanding. It's like a sponge.
44:24
So maybe spend your money on better strawberries.
44:27
Yeah. Or like stick with bananas.
44:30
But you'll notice there, it's easy to demonize meat,
44:32
for example. And
44:38
I didn't even say eat organic meat. I just said, whatever
44:40
you can afford, whatever works in your
44:42
socioeconomic system is
44:44
going to be a better health outcome than
44:48
not getting enough protein and fruits and vegetables.
44:54
And now here are the bios for all the guests.
44:57
I am thrilled to have Andrew Huberman
44:59
here with me. So
45:01
great to have you here in person, Andrew. Andrew
45:04
Huberman, who is this Andrew Huberman? Dr.
45:06
Huberman, PhD on Twitter at
45:08
Huberman Lab is a neuroscientist and tenured
45:10
professor in the Department of Neurobiology at
45:12
Stanford University's School of Medicine.
45:15
He has made numerous important contributions to the fields
45:17
of brain development, brain function and neural plasticity.
45:20
Work from the Huberman Laboratory at Stanford
45:22
Medicine has been consistently published in top
45:24
journals, including nature, science,
45:27
and cell. For those who don't know, that's like having
45:29
a sweep at the Oscars. But
45:31
back to the bio, Andrew is the host of the podcast
45:34
Huberman Lab, which is often ranked as one
45:36
of the top five podcasts in the world by both Apple
45:38
and Spotify. The show aims to help viewers
45:40
and listeners improve their health with science
45:43
and science-based tools. New episodes
45:45
air every Monday on YouTube and all podcast
45:47
platforms. You can find all things
45:49
Andrew at HubermanLab.com on
45:52
YouTube. That is Huberman Lab. Instagram
45:54
Huberman lab and also on Twitter as mentioned
45:57
at Huberman lab.
46:32
PeterAtiaMD.com.
48:01
You can find links to the book and many
48:03
other things. And the practice
48:06
website is EarlyMedical.com.
48:12
My guest today, I would
48:15
say, is not only a world-class performer, but
48:17
also one who studies world-class
48:19
performers, advises world-class
48:22
performers. Matt Moschari, you
48:24
can find him on Twitter, at Matt Moschari,
48:26
M-O-C-H-A-R-Y, coaches
48:29
the heads of top Silicon Valley tech investment
48:31
firms and companies on how to be the best leaders
48:33
and build the best organizations possible.
48:36
There are some names you might recognize, including
48:38
my friend, Naval Ravikant, as well
48:40
as Brian Armstrong of Coinbase, Sam
48:43
Altman, perhaps best associated or most
48:45
associated with open AI these days.
48:47
Well done, Sam and many, many
48:49
others. His philosophy and method are captured in
48:51
both the most shari coaching methodology,
48:54
which is available as a free Google Doc and
48:57
in his book, the great CEO within,
48:59
which is available on Amazon and also online
49:01
as a free Google Doc. We will link to all
49:04
of those in the show notes at Timb.blog slash
49:06
podcast. And you can also find, I
49:08
imagine all of them, I believe under the top
49:10
right curriculum at MoschariMethod.com.
49:12
As a
49:15
former founder, CEO and investor, Matt
49:17
knows firsthand the challenges of those roles
49:19
as well as solutions to the most commonly encountered
49:21
problems. His coaching is not questions
49:24
only. There is real guidance. Matt specializes
49:26
in helping CEOs and their companies or
49:28
investment firms transition from freewheeling
49:30
startups to dominant enterprises.
49:37
First let me say that one
49:39
of the secret agendas, not so secret,
49:41
but I'm not sure I've stated it explicitly of
49:44
this podcast is to capture living
49:47
legends, people who have so much
49:49
to offer that I want to capture
49:51
their lessons for posterity. hopefully millions
49:54
can learn from them for decades and decades. That
49:56
is the intention with many of these conversations.
49:59
In this conversation- I should stress from the
50:01
beginning, it's not for professional philosophers nor
50:03
for physicists. It doesn't require
50:06
any hard scientific training.
50:09
This is for curious people who want to learn
50:11
to think more clearly, learn more effectively,
50:14
and perhaps just live more optimistically.
50:17
And I want to introduce first my co-host,
50:20
who is really the lead driver. He
50:22
is the host of this conversation. And
50:24
I do this when I think
50:26
it will be most helpful for the listener.
50:29
I've done it many times on this podcast, Naval
50:31
Ravikant. Close
50:32
friend, you can find him on Twitter at NavalNAVAL.
50:35
He's the co-founder of AirChat and AngelList.
50:38
He's invested in more than 100 companies, including
50:40
many mega successes, including Twitter,
50:43
Uber, Notion, OpenDoor Postmates, and
50:45
Wish. You can see his latest musings on AirChat
50:48
and subscribe to Naval, his podcast
50:50
on wealth and happiness on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
50:53
Overcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
50:55
You can also find his blog at nav.al.
50:59
For more conversations with Naval, you can check
51:01
out my wildly popular interview with him from 2015, which
51:04
was nominated for Podcast of the Year. You
51:06
can learn more about AirChat and Naval
51:09
and interact certainly at getairchat.com
51:12
slash Naval. The guest today
51:14
is David Deutsch. You can
51:16
find him on Twitter at DavidDeutschOxf.
51:20
Last name is spelled D-E-U-T-S-C-H.
51:23
David is a visiting professor of physics at the
51:25
Center for Quantum Computation, a part
51:28
of the Clarendon Laboratory at Oxford University,
51:30
and an honorary fellow of Wolfson College,
51:32
Oxford. He works on fundamental issues in physics,
51:35
particularly the quantum theory of computation
51:38
and information, and especially constructor
51:40
theory, which he is proposing as a new way of formulating
51:42
laws of nature. He is the author
51:45
of The Fabric of Reality and the Beginning of Infinity,
51:48
and he is an advocate of the philosophy of Karl
51:50
Popper. You can find him online
51:52
at DavidDeutsch.org.uk. And
51:55
I should return to what I stated
51:58
initially, that is preserve. the lessons
52:00
of a living legend. David is
52:03
truly a pioneer in multiple fields
52:06
and the hope is that
52:08
with the help of Naval, because
52:09
I am in the passenger seat, I
52:12
am largely silent in this conversation,
52:15
that Naval can help to tease out counterintuitive
52:18
learnings that you can apply to your life and
52:20
apply to your life in many, many different
52:22
areas. And to quote Naval, I
52:25
will say, Quote, I think understanding
52:27
David Deutsch and Karl Popper is the easiest
52:29
way to actually get smarter. Fix your epistemology
52:32
and fix your thinking. So what is epistemology
52:35
briefly because that term comes up a lot? Simple
52:37
definition of epistemology is the theory of
52:39
knowledge, especially with regards to its methods,
52:42
validity and scope. And perhaps this
52:44
is a key part you want to keep in mind, the distinction
52:46
between justified belief and opinion.
52:48
How do you separate fact from fiction? how do
52:51
you stress test your own beliefs? How
52:53
do you navigate reality, construct
52:55
reality in a way that
52:58
is helpful, optimistic,
53:00
and constructive?
53:05
My guest today is Michael Mobison,
53:07
spelled M-A-U-B-O-U-S-S-I-N.
53:11
You can find him on Twitter, MJ Mobison.
53:13
He is the head of Consilient Research on
53:15
CounterPoint Global at Morgan Stanley Investment
53:18
Management. Prior to joining CounterPoint Global, Michael
53:20
was Director of Research at Blue Mountain Capital, Head
53:23
of Global Financial Strategies at Credit Suisse, and
53:25
Chief Investment Strategist at Legg Mason
53:27
Capital Management. Michael originally joined Credit
53:29
Suisse in 1992 as a packaged
53:32
food industry analyst. Some of
53:34
you long-term listeners will perhaps recognize
53:36
some of that from my conversation with Bill Gurley
53:39
and was named Chief US Investment strategist
53:41
in 1999. Michael is the author
53:43
of many books including the success
53:46
equation, subtitle untangling skill
53:48
and luck in business, sports and investing, think
53:51
twice harnessing the power of counter
53:53
intuition which I've mentioned several times on this
53:55
podcast and more than you know finding
53:57
financial wisdom in unconventional places. More
54:00
Than You Know is named one of the 100 best
54:02
business books of all time by 800 CEO Read,
54:05
one of the best business books by Business Week, and
54:07
best economics book by Strategy and
54:09
Business. That's in 2006. Michael is
54:12
also co-author with Alfred Rappaport
54:14
of Expectations Investing, Reading
54:16
Stock Prices for Better Returns. Michael
54:18
has been an adjunct professor of finance at
54:20
Columbia Business School since 1993 and is
54:23
on the faculty of the Heilbrunn Center
54:25
for Graham and Dodd Investing. He received
54:27
the Dean's Award for Teaching Excellence in 2009 and 2016 and
54:29
the Graham and
54:32
Dodd Murray Greenwald Prize for Value
54:34
Investing in 2021. He earned
54:37
an AB from Georgetown University and
54:39
is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of
54:41
the Santa Fe Institute, a leading center
54:43
for multidisciplinary research in complex
54:46
systems theory. You can find all things
54:48
Michael at michaelmobison.com.
54:55
Dr. Kelly Starrett, who is he? He's
54:57
one of my favorite performance coaches. I've
54:59
spent a lot of time with him. When I have
55:01
problems other people cannot solve,
55:03
if I have aches and pains, injuries, performance
55:06
goals, perhaps, that people can't spec
55:09
out for me, makes sense of I call
55:11
Kelly. He's also a treasure trove of one-liners
55:14
and is hilarious. So I think you'll enjoy
55:16
our conversation. He has been on the podcast before,
55:19
is very, very popular. Kelly Star
55:21
at DPT, you can find him on
55:23
Twitter and Instagram at TheReadyState
55:26
is, along with his wife Juliet, co-founder
55:29
of TheReadyState. TheReadyState began
55:31
as mobility-wad in 2008. Just
55:34
a side note, Kelly's like 230 pounds
55:36
of pure muscle with quads bigger than
55:38
my chest and he is more
55:41
mobile and flexible than I am. Full
55:43
lotus, no problem. Couch stretch
55:46
until you think your hips would explode,
55:48
no problem. So he really walks
55:51
the talk and squats the talk, as
55:53
it were. All right, so the rate of state began as mobility
55:55
wad in 2008 and has gone on to transform
55:58
the field of performance therapy.
56:00
and self-care. You know, I'm going to keep
56:02
adding in little tangents. I think it was for
56:04
Kelly's 40th birthday he decided,
56:07
and he'll have to correct me if I get this wrong, that
56:09
he wanted to do a few things to celebrate
56:12
his 40th birthday and
56:13
market as a milestone.
56:16
And if my memory serves me, it
56:18
was a standing back flip. Remember
56:21
the dimensions that I mentioned. It
56:23
was running an ultra marathon,
56:25
the quadipsy.
56:27
So look at that up. It is no joke. Again,
56:29
remember his physical dimensions and then power
56:31
cleaning something like I have no idea 300 pounds, 350
56:34
pounds, something outrageous. So
56:36
that is Kelly Starrett. He is
56:39
the decathlete of power
56:41
and mobility. So let's get back to
56:43
the bio. His clients include professional
56:46
athletes in the NFL, NBA, NHL
56:48
and MLB. That's Major League Baseball
56:50
for folks outside the U.S. He also works
56:52
with Olympic gold medalists, tour de front
56:54
cyclists, world and national record
56:57
holding, Olympic lifting and power athletes,
56:59
CrossFit Games medalists, professional ballet
57:02
dancers, elite military personnel, and
57:04
much more. Kelly is the author of The
57:06
New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestsellers, Becoming
57:09
a Supple Leopard and Ready to Run. His
57:11
new book is Built to Move, subtitled
57:14
The 10 Essential Habits to Help You Move
57:16
Freely and Live Fully, co-written with
57:18
Juliette Starrett. Her
57:20
name has come up a few times now, and I've known
57:23
Juliette for a long time. Who is Juliette?
57:25
have to mention a few things before
57:27
we move on. So Juliette trained
57:30
as an attorney. She's done a million different
57:32
things, badass in business,
57:34
incredible operator, but also
57:37
she was the US national champion in extreme
57:40
whitewater racing from 1997 to 2000, world champion
57:44
from 97 to 98. She
57:46
returned to the sport in 2018
57:49
to become world champion in the master's division.
57:51
So she is also very smart, very
57:54
capable, very fit, and both
57:56
of them as a team have really thought
57:58
through what it. takes
58:00
to build yourself to
58:02
move. Hey guys,
58:04
this is Tim again. Just one more thing before you
58:06
take off and that is Five Bullet
58:09
Friday. Would you enjoy getting a short email
58:11
from me every Friday that provides a little fun before
58:14
the weekend? Between one and a half and two
58:16
million people subscribe to my free newsletter,
58:19
my super short newsletter called Five
58:21
Bullet Friday. Easy to sign up, easy
58:23
to cancel. It is basically
58:25
a half page that I send out
58:27
every Friday to share the coolest things I've have found
58:30
or discovered or have started exploring
58:32
over that week. It's kind of like my diary of cool
58:34
things. It often includes articles I'm reading,
58:36
books I'm reading, albums perhaps,
58:39
gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of
58:41
tech tricks and so on. They get sent to me
58:44
by my friends, including a lot of podcast guests.
58:47
And these strange esoteric things end
58:49
up in my field and then I test
58:51
them and then I share them with you. So
58:54
if that sounds fun, again, it's very
58:56
short, a little tiny bite of goodness
58:58
before you head off for the weekend, something
59:00
to think about. If you'd like to try it out,
59:03
just go to tim.blog slash Friday, type that
59:05
into your browser, tim.blog slash
59:08
Friday, drop in your email and you'll get the very next
59:10
one. Thanks for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More