Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Since 2013, Since Two Thousand and Thirteen
0:02
Bomb has donated over one hundred million socks,
0:04
underwear and t shirt the facing homelessness if
0:07
we counted those on air. this ad would
0:09
last over one thousand, One hundred and fifty
0:11
seven days. But if we counted the time
0:13
it takes to make a donation possible, it
0:16
would take just a few clicks because every
0:18
time you make a purchase, Mambas donate an
0:20
item to someone who needed. Got
0:22
a Bomb as.com/a cast and use Code
0:24
A Cast for twenty percent off your
0:27
first purchase. That's Bomb as.com/a Cast Code
0:29
A. Cast: As a person with
0:31
a very deep voice, I'm hired all
0:33
the time for advertising campaigns. But a
0:35
deep voice doesn't sell B2B, and advertising
0:37
on the wrong platform doesn't sell B2B
0:40
either. That's why if
0:42
you're a B2B marketer, you should
0:44
use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has the
0:46
targeting capabilities to help you reach
0:48
the world's largest professional audience. That's
0:50
right, over 70 million decision makers
0:52
all in one place. All the
0:54
bigwigs, then mediumwigs. Also smallwigs who
0:57
are on the path to becoming
0:59
bigwigs. Okay, that's enough about wigs.
1:01
LinkedIn ads allows you to focus on getting
1:03
your B2B message to the right
1:05
people. So, does that mean you should use
1:08
ads on LinkedIn instead of hiring me, the
1:10
man with the deepest voice in the world?
1:13
Yes, yes it does. Get started today
1:15
and see why LinkedIn is the place
1:17
to be, to be. We'll even give
1:19
you a $100 credit
1:21
on your next campaign. Go
1:23
to linkedin.com/results to claim your
1:26
credit. That's linkedin.com/results. Terms
1:28
and conditions apply. Hello,
1:32
I'm Matt Kelly. And I'm Matt D'Ancona. And
1:34
this is the two mattes for the week ending Friday
1:36
the 16th of February. A podcast
1:39
with a beautiful view, at least for this week. And
1:41
that's because I am up in
1:43
Scotland on my holidays. And we're having a
1:45
fantastic time in Aberdeen. Well,
1:48
I am in southeast
1:51
London looking at the
1:53
beautiful townscape of the borough of
1:55
London. Of the
1:57
borough of Lotion. I... Why
1:59
would I... I need to move. Exactly.
2:03
Is it good up there? Is it
2:05
lovely? It's fantastic. It's lovely. We've
2:08
been in Ballator where the King and
2:10
Camilla have got a place and all
2:12
the local shops in
2:14
the high street have got the biroil
2:17
appointment crests. Of course they have.
2:19
So there's a takeaway called the
2:21
new Shanghai takeaway and it's got
2:23
this massive biroil appointment crest on
2:26
it. So that's clearly where Charles gets his
2:28
chow mein which is good to know. And
2:31
then we went up to Inverness. Inverness, what
2:33
a fantastic town Inverness is. Loads
2:35
of great restaurants, pubs, beautiful river, lovely
2:37
islands, you can go for a walk
2:40
in. Thoroughly recommend it. And
2:42
to get here we took the
2:44
magnificent Caledonian sleeper from Houston. Oh
2:46
really? All the way to Aberdeen.
2:48
Ah it was wonderful. And we're
2:50
going back down tonight sadly. But
2:52
we've had a terrific time and
2:54
we saw the most amazing football
2:56
game at Petodsery last night where
2:58
Aberdeen were three nil down after
3:00
25 minutes to Motherwell and
3:03
then Neil Warnock who is now the
3:05
temporary manager of Aberdeen made a
3:08
few substitutions having messed up the
3:10
initial starting formation and scored
3:12
two goals in quick succession. And then after
3:14
half time scored an equaliser.
3:16
So it ended 3-3 but it was
3:19
an enthralling spectacle and a great advert
3:21
for Scottish Premier League football. So well
3:23
done. The Dons. So what
3:26
did we talk about this week Matt?
3:28
Well we talked about that inimitable duo
3:30
Keir Starmer and Bob Marley. So
3:33
I'm not quite sure how to
3:35
make the two of them.
3:38
But I suppose we talked
3:42
primarily about the
3:44
difficulties that Labour has been having
3:47
over anti-Semitism and candidate selection
3:49
and so on. So that was the
3:51
main issue. And then in the second half we
3:53
came and talked about fantastic music biopics didn't we?
3:55
Because you've just seen the Bob Marley film. Yes
3:58
exactly. The pegs for the Bob Marley movie. So
4:00
what should we call this issue? I mean, I think we've
4:02
got to park Bob Marley
4:04
in the title probably in focus on
4:06
on the crisis in labor right now.
4:09
Yes. Is
4:11
crisis too strong a word? I think it's
4:14
labor forever war. Labor's forever war.
4:16
That's quite intriguing. And we'll induce
4:19
some clicks, I think, which is
4:21
the whole point, isn't it, to
4:23
be totally cynical about it? No,
4:25
we disdain clickbait. We love it.
4:27
That's our motto. We disdain it
4:30
and depend on it. We disdain
4:32
it. Exactly. Okay, so
4:34
this is the two mats,
4:36
episode 33, labor's forever war.
4:39
Enjoy. So
4:56
Matt, what are
4:59
we talking
5:01
about this week? Well, I think
5:04
we have to talk about labor's
5:06
problems over anti-Semitism and the conflict
5:08
in the Middle East. Obviously, we're
5:10
recording this on Thursday. And
5:14
so we don't know the results of
5:17
the Wellingborough and Kingswood by-elections. But I
5:19
think that the labor shambles
5:21
this week is something that will outlast
5:24
the results, whatever they are. Maybe
5:27
we could sort of kick
5:29
off and get into the subject
5:31
by playing a clip
5:34
of Starmer in October 2020. I
5:37
don't know if producer Matt can help us out with that. If
5:40
you're anti-Semitic, you should be nowhere near this
5:42
party. And we'll make sure you're not.
5:46
And if, after all
5:48
the pain, all the
5:50
grief, and all the evidence
5:52
in this report, there are still those
5:54
who think there's no problem with anti-Semitism
5:57
in the Labor Party, but it's all
5:59
exaggerated. or a factual attack, then
6:02
frankly, you are past the problem too. And
6:04
you should be nowhere near the Labour Party either.
6:07
So that's going
6:10
back to October 2020 and it's
6:12
Stama's response to the Equality
6:14
and Human Rights Commission report
6:17
into Labour's handling of anti-Semitism under
6:19
Jeremy Corbyn. And why is that
6:22
relevant to this week? Well, because
6:25
it's kind of the core
6:28
backdrop to all the problems
6:30
that Labour has been having
6:32
this week. So just to recap for
6:34
listeners who maybe haven't been following it
6:36
as obsessively as we have. Last
6:39
Saturday night, the mail-on Sunday dropped
6:41
and it revealed that Azar Ali,
6:44
the Labour Party's candidate
6:47
in Rochdale, which is
6:49
having a by-election thanks to the very
6:51
sad death of Tony Lloyd, who died
6:53
in January, had said, this is Ali,
6:56
had said at a meeting shortly after
6:58
the October the 7th massacres
7:00
that the Israelis had connived
7:04
in what turned out to be
7:06
the worst day of slaughter for Jews since the
7:08
Holocaust. And his words were, they
7:10
deliberately took the security of, this
7:12
is the Israelis, they allowed that
7:14
massacre that gives them the green light to
7:17
do whatever they bloody want. They, in that
7:19
case, being hammers. Now, this
7:21
is obviously a bonkers conspiracy theory,
7:24
but it's also without a shadow
7:26
of a doubt and under any definition,
7:28
anti-Semitic. Why? Because
7:31
it uses the classic example of
7:34
the ancient trope that Jews invite
7:37
or conspire in their own persecution.
7:40
This is a slam dunk case
7:42
of anti-Semitism. There's no need to
7:44
get into the sort of nuance and detail.
7:46
It really is. And
7:49
in that context, it's worth sort of
7:51
just putting into the conversation at this
7:54
point that this week,
7:56
the Community Security Trust, which
7:58
monitors anti-Semitism has reported. reported
8:01
a 589% increase in
8:04
the number of incidents of anti-Semitism compared with 2022,
8:08
two-thirds of which in
8:10
2023 occurred after October
8:12
the 7th. So this
8:15
isn't just an abstract question or
8:17
a matter of semantics or politics
8:20
or faction. This has
8:22
real world consequences. It
8:27
seems to me, Starmer
8:29
should have withdrawn support from Ali
8:32
there and then. But instead, he
8:34
waited until Monday evening when
8:37
the Daily Mail revealed more.
8:40
The Mail revealed that Ali had defended
8:43
the Labour MP Andy
8:45
McDonald, who's the MP for Middlesbrough,
8:49
who was suspended in October after he
8:51
used the controversial phrase between the river
8:53
and the sea at a rally that
8:55
refers to the area between the river
8:57
Jordan and the Mediterranean. And
9:00
of that, Ali complained and then
9:02
said at a meeting, the same
9:04
meeting it seems, I'm quoting, the media
9:06
and some of the people in the
9:08
media from certain Jewish quarters were giving
9:11
crap about what he McDonald said. Again,
9:14
that's explicitly anti-Semitic. The
9:17
standard definition of anti-Semitism for
9:20
people who are interested is
9:22
the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance
9:26
definition, which Labour has incorporated in full. Corbyn
9:28
didn't want to incorporate it in full, but
9:30
it did in 2018. And
9:34
the second example it gives is
9:37
an example of anti-Semitism is the
9:39
myth about a world Jewish conspiracy
9:41
or of Jews controlling the media,
9:43
economy, government or other societal institutions.
9:45
So again, Ali was
9:47
clearly anti-Semitic. So
9:50
there was a second Labour
9:53
candidate who has been suspended
9:55
Graham Jones on Wednesday. But I
9:59
think it's worth. I don't know what
10:01
you think about it, but I think that there
10:03
are two questions first of all is, you know,
10:05
what is and what isn't anti-Semitic in this context?
10:08
And I think off the bat, it's
10:10
really, really, really important to say not
10:13
every criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
10:16
You know, it really isn't. It's emphatically
10:18
not. It's really not anti-Semitic
10:20
to say that Benjamin Netanyahu is
10:22
a terrible prime minister. It's
10:26
not anti-Semitic to
10:29
say that Israel's response to October the 7th
10:31
has been excessive. It's
10:33
not anti-Semitic to support the
10:37
SMP's motion coming up next week
10:39
calling for an immediate ceasefire in
10:41
Gaza. But
10:44
the things that Ali said
10:46
were anti-Semitic. And
10:49
that is clear. Where
10:51
I'm not clear is where
10:54
the things Graham Jones said,
10:56
where he said, quote, fuck
10:58
Israel. Now,
11:01
that is open to interpretation.
11:04
What does he mean by that? Does he
11:06
mean the state of
11:08
these people, what they're doing is terrible,
11:10
or does it mean fuck the entire
11:13
Israeli concept of Israel? That
11:15
was- I don't think it's the
11:17
latter. That's
11:19
sort of open to interpretation, I
11:21
guess. The bit of what Jones
11:24
said that's undoubtedly anti-Semitic
11:26
is when he gets into the question of
11:29
people who have dual nationality going off
11:31
to fight for Israel. He said it's
11:34
against the law and you should be
11:37
locked up, right? Yeah. But is that
11:39
anti-Semitic? Yes. Yes, it is. Is it
11:41
not possible- and I'm just-
11:43
I'm asking the question through ignorance. Is it
11:45
not possible that he was ignorant of the
11:47
law and thought it was a little bit
11:49
like going off to fight for a foreign
11:51
force of any kind and it
11:54
was a criminal offense? It's
11:57
become such a- I mean, Labour has been
11:59
de-evident. dealing with these questions now for
12:01
many years. So I would have thought
12:03
it hoves a Labour candidate to acquaint
12:05
themselves with the law in these issues
12:08
before opening them out. Secondly,
12:10
again, going back to that definition
12:13
from the International
12:15
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which really is
12:17
the global standard, it is anti-Semitic
12:20
to accuse Jewish citizens of being
12:22
more loyal to Israel or to
12:24
the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide and then
12:27
to the interests of their own nations. So
12:29
he was playing again into an anti-Semitic trope,
12:32
which is, you know, what
12:34
are Brits doing going off fighting for Israel?
12:37
Slam dunk. And I
12:40
know that there's a kind of feeling
12:42
of, well, you know, this is all
12:44
very complicated, but actually it's not. And
12:46
people can go to the IHRA website
12:48
and he could have done and
12:51
every Labour candidate and counsellor should do
12:53
and just acquaint
12:55
themselves with the rules. They're really
12:57
very, very straightforward. They're a lot
12:59
more straightforward than the rules governing
13:01
Islamophobia, I have to say, which
13:04
is not to defend Islamophobia. But, you know, it
13:06
really isn't it isn't as difficult
13:08
as everyone is currently
13:11
pretending that this is sort of, you
13:13
know, terribly complicated. You just have to
13:15
acquaint yourself with the with
13:17
the distinction between the Israeli government
13:20
and the nature of Israel as
13:22
a Jewish homeland. And it
13:25
is very, you know, if Labour is serious
13:27
about driving anti-Semitism out of its
13:30
ranks, it has to be very,
13:34
very clear about this now. Well, let me just
13:36
before you go on, let me just let me
13:38
just say that I, for me,
13:41
having read about it and thought about it,
13:44
with Azar Ali, the comments to me,
13:47
you use the phrase slam dunk. I
13:49
agree completely. I think there's no room
13:51
for any kind of explanation
13:54
beyond anti-Semitism with
13:57
the with the comments made by Graham Jones. And
13:59
the reason I'm. exploring this is because I
14:01
think it's coming to a bigger question about
14:03
Labour's reaction with the comments about Graham Jones.
14:05
I think there is some context there that
14:08
he could say I was
14:10
expressing frustration, I was ignorant
14:12
of the law, I did actually think it was illegal
14:14
to go out and fight, you know, he could just
14:16
say I just didn't know and I got it completely
14:18
wrong and there was no
14:21
motivation of anti-Semitism there. So that's my
14:23
view and I recognize that it's different
14:25
to your view on that. But
14:27
the question that I think is interesting
14:30
is this one of a factionalism
14:32
or the accusation that Labour is
14:34
still driven by factionalism? Okay
14:36
well this is where we get
14:38
into the really interesting sort of
14:41
Labour internal party politics. So the
14:43
Labour left as alleged double standards
14:46
and it said that the delay
14:48
in taking Ali off, you know,
14:51
disavowing Ali as a Labour candidate
14:53
is a reflection of his alleged
14:56
factional affinity to Keir Starmer
14:58
because he was a advisor
15:00
to Brown on to Blair
15:03
and you had people like Owen Jones going out
15:05
and saying look what happens, you know, the Labour
15:08
right get treated specially, the Labour left don't. I
15:10
think this is complete nonsense. The
15:13
reason that they delayed and they shouldn't have delayed
15:15
by the way, it was terrible
15:18
error, was because
15:21
the deadline for the
15:23
ballot papers had passed in
15:25
Rochdale and so if they disavowed
15:29
Ali there would be no Labour candidate
15:32
and the problem with that
15:34
and here we really get to the specific
15:39
is that Labour fears that
15:41
it is handing Rochdale to George
15:43
Galloway who's standing there and George
15:46
Galloway has a sort of kind of
15:49
symbolism in the Labour universe
15:51
that Nigel Farage has in
15:54
the Tory universe. You know,
15:56
he is famous for beating
15:59
the sitting Labour MP Una King
16:01
in Bethnal and Green in 2005 and
16:03
then more spectacularly winning the 2012 Bradford
16:07
West by-election with a
16:09
36% swing. And
16:11
so what you've got now
16:13
is a very, very unsatisfactory situation
16:16
where Ali is still on the
16:18
ballot paper, he could
16:20
win and sit as an independent or
16:23
nightmare scenario for Labour.
16:26
Galloway wins and
16:29
there is a kind of
16:31
neuralgic feeling around Galloway
16:33
that if he wins he'll have a seat
16:36
in Parliament, he'll be able to use
16:38
his very impressive powers of oratory to destabilise
16:41
Stalmer and they are
16:44
disproportionately sensitive to that.
16:46
So that was the real background. This
16:48
idea of Ali as being somehow
16:50
in the inner Stalmerite circle is
16:53
just nonsense. I mean he'd very
16:55
early on expressed
16:57
and written petitions expressing
17:01
grave dissatisfaction with
17:04
Stalmer's position on the
17:06
wall. So it's just not, it
17:08
doesn't hold water this idea that it's
17:11
a return to factionalism. What
17:13
this was was a very
17:15
bad piece of political management. Yeah
17:17
and I think it's clear to
17:20
me that people who are driving
17:22
the factionalism are the people like
17:24
Owen Jones and who it suits
17:26
them to have a very kind
17:28
of far spectrum position
17:31
that they can keep hammering. He
17:33
clearly has nothing but contempt for
17:35
Keir Stalmer. I've always been suspicious
17:37
of people like Owen Jones because
17:39
I think they're driven by how
17:42
close they feel to the centre of power
17:44
and if the centre of power keeps them
17:47
distant then they feel resentful and bitter about
17:49
that. I just feel like there's this sense
17:51
that everybody is on one end
17:53
of a spectrum and that's not the case at
17:55
all. You know most people are sitting much
17:58
more in the middle of these. issues and
18:00
think that they're complicated and nuanced. And
18:03
I certainly think if you extend
18:05
that out to the general electorate, I
18:07
think, well, we'll find out when
18:09
the Rochdale by-election comes about. But I suspect that
18:12
the people of Rochdale are much more interested in
18:14
the fact that the NHS is falling to bits
18:17
and that the local education system is falling to
18:19
bits and the Hughes at food banks,
18:21
and they are about the
18:23
issue of Gaza. And I also think
18:25
it's really condescending when people
18:28
say, well, you know, 28% of the electorate
18:32
in Rochdale is Muslim, so you can expect a
18:34
massive, you know, pro-Palestine
18:37
vote and a rejection of this kind
18:39
of ambivalence that Stama has been accused
18:41
of. The Muslims
18:44
are as affected by
18:46
the general issues inflicted
18:49
on this nation as everybody else. And
18:52
I can't, maybe I'm completely wrong. Maybe it
18:54
will be a Gaza by-election, but I
18:56
hope it's probably an election based more
18:58
on the troubles of this country than
19:00
it is on the sort of inter-Nissen
19:04
problems that the Labour Party's got on this
19:06
Palestine or Israel issue. Well, I
19:08
think that's true. I also think, though, that
19:10
the reason the factionalism
19:12
charge has been revived
19:16
is because the Labour left
19:18
always maintained that there wasn't
19:20
really an anti-Semitism problem, that
19:23
it was simply a device used by the
19:25
Labour right to beat
19:27
the Labour left and specifically
19:29
Jeremy Corbyn's leadership with. And
19:32
they are rolling this out as evidence
19:35
that, you know, in fact, when someone
19:37
that they see is not of the
19:39
left, i.e. Ali says anti-Semitic
19:41
things, it takes the leadership a long
19:43
time to disavow him. But
19:46
in fact, there's a sinister
19:48
side to that, which is the
19:50
Labour left has never reconciled itself
19:52
to the idea that anti-Semitism is
19:54
a form of racism. They really
19:56
haven't. I mean, and that
19:59
problem remains. remains
20:01
a part of Labour culture and you
20:04
know Starmra has gone a very long way to
20:07
rooting the problem out. He sacked
20:10
Rebecca Long-Bailey as Shadow
20:12
Education Secretary very early
20:14
on in his leadership when
20:16
Corbyn didn't respond in the
20:19
right way to the EHRC
20:21
report. He stripped the whip
20:23
of him and has said that Corbyn will
20:25
not stand again as a Labour candidate which is
20:27
a big thing to say about your predecessor. So
20:30
you know props to Starmra for taking it
20:32
on but the problem culturally in the Labour
20:34
Party that a huge number
20:37
of Labour people do not regard
20:39
because they see everything in terms
20:41
of power and power less they
20:44
do not regard anti-Semitism of a
20:46
form of racism and that
20:48
will persist
20:50
and the reason it's interesting and
20:53
important is because if Starmra is
20:56
heading for Downing Street and Labour is heading
20:58
for government these will continue to
21:00
be issues and although I
21:02
agree with you that I think you know
21:05
right now most voters are much more you
21:07
know concerned with the fact that we've just
21:09
heard that today that Britain's been
21:11
in a recession inflation is slightly down
21:13
but you know still prices are very
21:15
high that the NHS is in great
21:18
trouble these are big issues but
21:22
the Middle East has always been a massive
21:25
problem for Labour and I
21:27
think it has been especially
21:30
so since October the
21:33
7th because Starmra always
21:35
you know Starmra chose to make anti-Semitism
21:37
I think rightly the sort of frame
21:40
of his imposition of
21:42
discipline upon the party and the
21:44
break with the Corbyn era but
21:46
obviously since October
21:48
the 7th sensitivities and feelings
21:51
and emotions and passions around
21:53
the issue have have escalated
21:55
to an extraordinary degree especially
21:58
in the Labour Party party, not
22:00
only the Labour Party, I mean, let's
22:02
not forget that yesterday, the Conservative
22:05
Mayor of Salisbury was
22:08
expelled from the party for
22:10
making anti-Semitic remarks. There are
22:12
divisions within the Conservative government
22:14
about where to go on
22:16
this. So it's not just Labour, but
22:19
it is particularly marked
22:21
in Labour. And this is the number,
22:24
the problem for Labour is that they're
22:26
out of sync with the general population,
22:28
I think, on this issue. They're
22:31
more polarised than the general population is
22:33
on this issue. The general population, poll
22:35
after poll, since October the 7th
22:38
has shown, and it's been fairly static,
22:41
is that there's a degree of sympathy with
22:44
Palestinian people, there's a degree of sympathy
22:46
with Israeli people, but the great both,
22:48
two thirds of people, find
22:50
it complicated and nuanced and have sympathy
22:52
with both parties or none. And
22:56
that's a reasonable position to hold. I think
22:58
it's a logical position to hold, really, as
23:00
a bystander. Well,
23:03
I suppose, full disclosure, I'm probably
23:05
more pro-Israel and always have been,
23:07
but I totally
23:09
accept, I mean, to look at Stalmer's
23:11
specific problem is that his
23:14
position is unpopular with many in
23:16
his party. So
23:19
you've got independent candidates now
23:21
starting to target sitting MPs
23:24
like West Streeting
23:26
in Ilford North, Stephen
23:28
Timms in East Ham, Lynne
23:30
Brown in the new Stratford seat on the
23:33
grounds that the Labour Party is
23:35
being too pro-Israel. So he's got
23:37
another electoral management problem
23:40
coming down the line. In November,
23:42
56 Labour
23:45
MPs defied the Labour
23:47
whip on a ceasefire
23:49
vote and 10 frontbenchers
23:51
quit, including Jess Phillips, who's quite
23:53
a significant figure. In
23:57
January, Kate Azamah had the
23:59
MPs for everybody. and had the whip
24:01
suspended, following comments about Gaza
24:04
being included as
24:06
a genocide on Holocaust Memorial Day,
24:08
all these sensitivities. So
24:11
it's not going to go away. And now,
24:13
next week, we have the SNP
24:16
calling for an immediate ceasefire. Now, Starmer
24:19
has said he wants a sustainable ceasefire.
24:22
They're not the same. And he's got
24:24
a really, really big political call to
24:26
make here, which is, does he give
24:28
MPs a free vote? Does he
24:31
try and amend the amendment so that
24:33
it says something more to his liking?
24:36
What I think about this conflict generally is
24:38
that it is turning into
24:41
the equivalent of the Vietnam War
24:43
for this generation. It is, you
24:46
know, I agree with you, Matt, that it is
24:48
for a lot of people, you know, a bit
24:50
of this, a bit of that. But I think also
24:53
that was probably true of Vietnam for a lot of people
24:55
as well. It has extraordinary
24:58
adhesive quality in that it
25:01
brings other issues into it, into it
25:03
sort of immediate precincts,
25:05
like social justice, like the
25:07
oddity of hearing people saying reproductive
25:10
rights, or Palestinian rights, or
25:12
trans rights, or Palestinian rights. It's
25:15
suddenly become the kind of
25:17
maypole around which a lot
25:19
of political issues dance. And that's
25:22
not going to change because clearly the
25:24
conflict is going to go on in
25:26
various forms for quite a lot longer.
25:28
And you know, one hopes
25:30
not, but may well yet escalate into a
25:32
regional conflict. And it is, it is
25:35
everywhere. You know, you see it in,
25:38
there was a story this week about a
25:40
Soho theatre where a comedian
25:42
had been aggressive towards
25:44
a Jewish audience member who refused
25:46
to join in the Salutation
25:49
of the Palestinian Flag and the theatres
25:51
had to ban the comedian. And there
25:53
are just these incidents everywhere, which
25:56
means that it sort of
25:59
stretches from you know, the hootie
26:01
attacks in the Red Sea to Ivy
26:03
League campuses, to the
26:06
bill that Biden's been trying to get
26:08
through Congress, you know, it's just, it's
26:12
very hard to, to, to avoid
26:14
it, it's becoming one of those
26:16
defining issues, which I always
26:18
think that things like this are
26:20
very important in proving that actually,
26:24
politics isn't just about the economy and
26:26
public services. You know, I'm not, I'm
26:28
not saying everyone in Britain is walking
26:30
around thinking about this all the time,
26:32
or indeed any of the time, but
26:35
the actual practice of politics, and the
26:37
fact that people who shape
26:39
politics often have strong views, and
26:42
always have, this is not just
26:44
the social media era, means that
26:46
it will have a role. For
26:48
Starmer, there's the problem that there's
26:51
just been a poll, just one
26:54
poll, Savannah poll, saying that the lead
26:56
has been cut to seven points. Now,
26:59
by seven points, yeah. But
27:01
yeah, the narrows to seven
27:04
points, it may be that's probably just a
27:06
one off and the Savannah
27:08
said as much, you know, don't read too
27:10
much into one poll. But we also
27:13
know, do we
27:15
not, that Starmer is incredibly sensitive
27:17
to power elections. I mean, he
27:19
nearly resigned after the Hartley
27:22
pool by election, after the
27:24
Uxbridge by election, which the Tories held on
27:26
to, he panicked way
27:28
out of all proportion over
27:31
the Ules emission scheme
27:33
in London. And this led
27:35
to, you know, where we are now with
27:37
him on, you know, taking
27:39
a step back on climate change
27:42
policy. So I
27:44
think that he's panicking over Rochdale,
27:46
it's on February the 29th, and
27:50
it will trouble him deeply that all this
27:52
is happening. Yeah, and I think that it
27:55
again, returns to the theme that we've
27:57
both visited frequently on this podcast about
28:00
The depth of Stalmer, how much
28:02
depth is there? And is he
28:04
a man blowing
28:07
in the wind, you know, the political winds?
28:09
Or is he a man who once
28:12
elected, and let's, for the sake of argument,
28:14
carry on assuming, although I think it's, you
28:17
know, perhaps part of the problem that there is
28:19
a complacency around the assumption of a
28:21
Labour victory, but let's assume that
28:23
he gets into power. And
28:25
again, where is the boldness? Where are
28:28
the big ideas? Where is the sense
28:30
that they can defy a
28:33
Tory fiscal policy that
28:35
stretches all the way back to George Osborne, you
28:37
know, and this idea that there's no
28:39
money, you know, as Rachel Reeves
28:41
said the other day, the credit cards maxed
28:43
out, you know, they're gonna, well,
28:47
as I read Yanis Van
28:49
Nifarrak is saying, you know, who I'm not a big
28:51
massive auto fan of, but
28:53
he did make the point that this
28:56
analogy between a nation's finances
28:58
and your personal credit card
29:01
is completely fallacious because your
29:05
personal income has no correlation
29:07
to what you spend it on.
29:10
But the income of a nation
29:12
has a direct correlation with how you
29:14
spend and invest, you know, if you
29:16
don't invest, then you will
29:18
not generate more income. And this
29:20
is now, it seems utterly
29:22
befuddling to me that this is has
29:25
become Labour's default position is that
29:27
we haven't got the money to do it. And I think they
29:29
need to make the money they need. And
29:31
it, you know, we've seen time and time
29:33
again, where economies can
29:36
invest through various different fiscal devices,
29:38
but you can find the money
29:41
and you they need to
29:43
be bold now and say, we're going to
29:45
spend our way and invest in Britain now
29:47
to create a better Britain in 10 or
29:49
15 years. And what I've seen lately is
29:51
is an indication
29:53
that they are more
29:56
small c conservative than the bloody
29:58
conservatives right now. Yes. that. But
30:01
also I think, circling
30:03
back to Gaza, is that if
30:07
if Stama does become Prime Minister,
30:09
he won't be able to, or
30:12
no one in government will be able to
30:14
talk about Gaza or Ukraine or anywhere as
30:16
a far away country of which we know
30:18
little, you know, he will be the
30:21
leader of a G7, senior
30:23
NATO nation at
30:25
a time of grave geopolitical disorder. He
30:28
may be dealing with President Trump, and
30:31
he needs to have his internal
30:34
intellectual ducks in a row before
30:37
he becomes Prime Minister, because as
30:39
nuanced and difficult as these questions
30:42
are, ministers decide, you
30:44
know, it is in
30:46
the nature of being a
30:49
Prime Minister that you take decisions. And
30:52
this crisis in the Middle East
30:54
is not going to go away. And one of the
30:56
things that I think there
30:59
is a certain amount of naivety about is,
31:02
of course, it would it would be
31:04
fantastic if the shooting stopped tomorrow, there
31:06
was a ceasefire. But that
31:09
is not the end of the story. And
31:11
if Stama does become Prime
31:13
Minister, he's going to have to deal with, I
31:16
mean, let's say, you know, that there's a
31:18
ceasefire of some duration, that will not solve
31:21
the problem of Hamas is complete incapacity
31:23
to be, you
31:26
know, a good faith actor in future
31:28
talks. And I think there's a
31:30
there's a sort of, especially on the labour side, there's
31:32
this view that if there's a ceasefire,
31:34
we move straight to two state
31:37
solution talks. No, no. And I'm
31:40
not sure that Stama has
31:42
got anywhere along
31:44
that journey. And unfortunately,
31:47
yes, you do have to devote a
31:49
lot of your time as Prime Minister, and
31:51
hopefully most of your time to domestic problems.
31:54
But but if you're the
31:56
leader of an advanced industrial economy
31:58
with a major military. capacity.
32:00
You are thrown into
32:02
these issues daily and
32:04
you spend, you know I
32:06
remember Blair saying to me once, you know you
32:09
spend 50% of your day talking to foreign leaders
32:11
and discussing intractable geopolitical
32:13
problems, is he ready? I mean
32:15
what this suggests is that he
32:17
hasn't thought this side of the,
32:21
this hemisphere as it were, the Prime Ministerial
32:23
brain is still developing. I think
32:25
what it suggests to me and again
32:27
you know we're playing cod psychology now or
32:30
at least I am, but is that in
32:33
his deep heart's core he is risk averse
32:35
and I think he's demonstrated it with
32:38
his response to the changing finances
32:40
with the £28 billion. Climate
32:43
pledge, he's demonstrated it with his
32:46
reaction to this Ruchdale crisis
32:48
is that he's tried to find
32:51
a way through. Now you
32:53
could easily argue, well he showed great
32:55
courage in coming out and
32:57
stamping down on anti-Semitism as
32:59
he did in 2021.
33:01
Yes so I might be completely wrong but I am
33:03
troubled that the closer he gets to the finishing line
33:06
he's starting to show where I
33:09
would be looking for expansive courage and
33:11
ambition, he's starting to show signs
33:13
of conservatism and that worries me. Yes
33:15
and I think also that he's got
33:17
to be willing to upset people in
33:19
his own party in a way that
33:21
isn't just sort
33:24
of predictable. I mean you know
33:26
Blair was destroyed not by Iraq,
33:28
people forget this, but by Lebanon.
33:31
Prime Ministers in the end on
33:33
foreign policy often
33:35
end up seriously at odds
33:38
with their parties. Now I'm
33:40
not suggesting Stalmer has
33:42
to go all in
33:45
with Israel but he will
33:47
have to take very very difficult
33:49
and unpopular decisions either way in
33:52
this particular crisis because this crisis is
33:54
going to be defining, it's going to
33:56
go on for years, this
33:59
is not. It's gonna be
34:01
over by December, you know, even
34:03
if there is a ceasefire, you know,
34:05
this is gonna be Something that
34:08
we'll be talking about for a
34:10
long time to come I'm sure you're absolutely a
34:12
hundred percent right on that and we are going
34:14
to thank you for listening so far dear listeners
34:16
We're gonna be back in a brief
34:19
moment and we the discussion will change
34:21
tempo massively and we're Much
34:23
more fun much more
34:25
fun. So Much more fun in a moment. See
34:28
you in a moment So
34:35
retrospectors what historical events are we ticking off
34:38
on this week's run of today in history?
34:40
Well Monday's the anniversary of Jarvis Cocker's
34:42
stage invasion of Michael Jackson's performance at the
34:44
Brits Then on Tuesday, we tell the
34:46
story of the Spaniard who named Florida on
34:48
Wednesday the birth of instant photography the Polaroid
34:51
camera Thursday was the day Dolly became
34:53
the world's most famous sheep and on
34:55
Friday The foiled 19th century plot to
34:57
kill the entire British cabinet We
34:59
discuss this and more on today
35:01
in history with the retrospectors 10
35:04
minutes every weekday wherever you get
35:06
your podcasts Matt
35:08
I've got a question for you. Do you
35:10
know on our fabulous range of merchandise? What
35:12
is the most popular thing? We've sold on
35:14
the New Europeans shop. I Think
35:17
I know but you tell me I'll tell you what
35:19
it is. It's a bollocks to brexit passport cover I
35:21
imagine you know how many we've sold in the last
35:23
two years Two
35:26
and a half thousand brilliant. They're
35:28
terrific vegan leather. It's called which actually
35:30
does look like leather. It's
35:32
burgundy Is it
35:34
a pleasure? I don't know. Yeah, we actually vegan leather
35:36
may be more cool than more leather
35:38
even yeah Yeah, anyway, it's been nowhere
35:40
near a cow. That's the main thing.
35:42
No, no bovine mutilation was in no
35:44
So it looks passingly like a like
35:46
an old-fashioned European passport
35:49
burgundy and it's got that gold
35:51
embossed crest on it Except
35:53
on the crest it says bollocks to brexit.
35:55
Love is a little very subtle
35:57
and nice and funny anyway them,
36:00
people love them and guess what it's going
36:02
to be our subscription offer for the next
36:04
few weeks. Happy days. When
36:06
new subscribers join the new European
36:09
for as little as a pound a week for
36:11
which you get all of our digital
36:13
content, all of your brilliant culture newsletters,
36:15
everything we do online and full archive
36:18
of newspapers and great features or
36:20
if they spend another pound a week they
36:22
get the newspaper which has a retail price of
36:24
£4.50 you can get it for an extra
36:26
pound a week delivered to
36:28
your door every week for just one
36:31
pound a week you'll get a free
36:33
bollocks to Brexit passport cover. Fantastic. What
36:35
could be better? I don't think anything.
36:38
Imagine standing in the queue to passport
36:40
control. Imagine instantaneously waving bollocks
36:42
to Brexit passport cover. The sheer sense of national
36:44
pride and international pride
36:47
and joy. Anyway if you
36:49
want to take up this
36:52
fantastic offer go to the
36:54
new european.co.uk/two mats that's the
36:57
number two M-A-T-T-S.
36:59
Do it now while
37:01
stocks last. As
37:05
a person with a very deep voice,
37:07
I'm hired all the time for advertising
37:09
campaigns. But a deep voice doesn't sell
37:11
B2B, and advertising on the wrong platform
37:13
doesn't sell B2B either. That's
37:16
why if you're a B2B marketer,
37:18
you should use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn
37:20
has the targeting capabilities to help
37:22
you reach the world's largest professional
37:24
audience. That's right, over 70 million
37:26
decision makers all in one place.
37:28
All the bigwigs, then mediumwigs. Also
37:30
smallwigs who are on the path
37:33
to becoming bigwigs. Okay, that's
37:35
enough about wigs. LinkedIn ads allows you to
37:37
focus on getting your B2B message to
37:39
the right people. So, does that mean you
37:42
should use ads on LinkedIn instead of hiring
37:44
me, the man with the deepest voice in
37:46
the world? Yes, yes it does.
37:48
Get started today and see why LinkedIn
37:51
is the place to be, to be.
37:53
We'll even give you a $100 credit
37:56
on your next campaign. Go
37:58
to linkedin.com/results to claim your
38:00
credit. That's linkedin.com/results. Terms
38:03
and conditions apply. Wow
38:06
nice Yeah What
38:08
you're hearing are the sounds of people
38:11
everywhere putting on bomba socks underwear and
38:13
t-shirts made from absurdly soft materials that
38:15
feel like plush clouds Yeah
38:18
that plush and the best part for
38:20
every item you purchase bombas donates another
38:22
to someone facing homelessness Bombas
38:25
big comfort for everyone go to bombas comm
38:27
slash locked on and use code locked on
38:29
for 20% off your first
38:31
purchase That's bombas comm slash locked on
38:33
code locked on Ryan Reynolds here
38:35
from Mint Mobile. I'm proud to offer premium wireless
38:38
for just $15 a month. And
38:40
I'm proud that we have thousands of five
38:42
star reviews from customers like Dan D in
38:44
New York, who writes, I am satisfied customer.
38:46
How can this only be 15 bucks? He
38:49
wrote it in all caps. I needed you to
38:51
feel it like he feels it. I hope I
38:53
did that justice, Dan. And I hope that you
38:55
try Mint too at mintmobile.com/switch. Up front payment
38:58
of $45 for three months required. New subscribers
39:00
only. Renew for 12 months to lock in
39:02
savings. Additional taxes fees and restrictions apply to
39:04
be mintmobile.com. Finding your perfect home
39:06
was hard. But thanks to Burrow, furnishing it
39:08
has never been easier. Burrow's easy
39:10
to assemble modular sofas and sectionals are
39:13
made from premium, durable materials, including stain
39:15
and scratch resistant fabrics. So they're not
39:17
just comfortable and stylish, they're built to
39:20
last. Plus, every single Burrow order
39:22
ships free right to your door. Right
39:24
now, get 15% off your
39:26
first order at burrow.com/acast. That's
39:29
15% off at
39:31
burrow.com/acast. So
39:37
Matt, big week at the movies. Yeah,
39:39
and time for the joy. We had
39:41
a very serious, hardcore
39:45
first half. And
39:47
it had to, I think, because it's the big subject
39:49
of the week. But let's talk
39:52
about something joyous, which is the
39:54
new Bob Marley movie, One Love, which
39:57
I saw last night. And. And
40:01
although I am going to be contrarian again,
40:05
as is my want, because all the critics
40:07
have been dumping
40:09
on it, right? They've been dumping on
40:11
it. So snooty and,
40:13
you know, it's
40:16
too respectful. All I can
40:18
tell you is this, and imagine the scene,
40:21
your co-host and employee at a
40:24
East London cinema last
40:27
night, dancing and singing in the
40:29
aisles, right, with the audience along
40:31
to the songs of the great
40:33
man. It was a wonderful
40:36
experience. Were
40:39
you literally dancing in the aisles? Not in
40:41
the aisles, in the sea, but people were
40:43
in the aisles singing
40:45
along and dancing to one love. It's
40:48
directed by Ronaldo Marcus Green. Kingsley
40:50
Ben-Adir plays Marley. It covers the
40:52
period 76 to 78 when you
40:54
made Exodus, you know, which
40:57
is one of the great records of the 20th century.
41:00
And it is respectful. And it does portray
41:02
him as a legend, but he was a
41:04
bloody legend, you know, and it doesn't gloss
41:06
over his infidelities of some of claims. So
41:10
I loved it. And I was
41:12
completely perplexed by, you know, comparing
41:14
that with all the kind of
41:17
do me, oh, you know, it wasn't
41:19
it wasn't critical enough from film
41:21
writers who I know that if it had been
41:24
too critical of Marley would have
41:26
been saying, you know, what an outrage, you
41:28
know, how dare the white
41:30
supremacists of Hollywood come up, you know,
41:32
this is what makes me hate film
41:35
critics is not judging a thing on
41:37
what it's meant to do. This is
41:39
a celebration of one of the
41:41
great and and and
41:43
also it's what we need. It's what we need
41:46
right now. Where does this
41:48
sit in the great pantheon of music
41:50
biopics? Well, I
41:52
mean, this is I wanted to sort
41:55
of get your take on
41:58
what you what biopics you think. Pop
42:01
biopics are great and which ones
42:03
aren't. Let me kick off with one that it
42:05
came out and it's no exaggeration
42:08
to say that it helped mold me
42:10
as a person which was Oliver
42:13
Stone's The Doors. I
42:18
became entranced with Jim Morrison as many
42:21
teenage boys do and it
42:23
does veer you off a certain source
42:25
of, it clearly
42:28
found an affinity with my natural
42:30
disposition and I became very moody
42:32
and sulky and artistic and boho
42:34
and went off to Perla shares to
42:36
sip Jack Daniels at the graveside and all of
42:38
this stuff. But the interesting thing
42:40
about that film, if we put
42:43
Jim Morrison to one side, is I watched
42:45
the film again recently and I thought it
42:47
absolutely sucked. I thought it was terrible. It's
42:50
really interesting that this points to
42:52
a very important point about the
42:54
biopic, the pop biopic is that
42:57
you can love the subject and
43:00
be entranced by the movie and then come back
43:02
to it and think, hang on, did I really
43:04
like that? Just some undoubted
43:07
turkeys, okay. Dennis Quaidus,
43:09
Jerry Lee Lewis in Great Balls of
43:11
Fire. I mean it's
43:13
worth watching for the terribleness of it, okay.
43:17
Another one which I recommend to you
43:19
if you want to sort of fun
43:22
so bad it's good movie is called
43:24
Elvis and Nixon and
43:26
this has, that's brilliant and
43:29
wait, it's got Elvis played by
43:32
Michael Shannon and Nixon,
43:34
this is the genius played by
43:37
Kevin Spacey, right and it is
43:39
just a turkey
43:41
of Olympic
43:43
standards. The
43:46
other one I always think is just
43:48
unbelievably terrible is a movie
43:51
that came out four years ago called
43:53
Stardust which is about early David Bowie
43:55
but has no Bowie music in it.
43:57
It was awful, awful.
44:00
What did you think of the
44:02
other Bowie film, Moon Age Daydream? I'm
44:05
slightly conflicted on it. Yeah,
44:07
well, I like that but I think
44:09
documentaries are really different. So going back
44:11
to Bob Marley, the Kim McDonald
44:14
documentary that came out in I think 2012
44:18
is if
44:21
people feel that this movie
44:23
is too much of a pageant,
44:26
go back and watch that documentary
44:28
for a more
44:31
documentary approach to the subject.
44:35
I mean Moon Age Daydream I suppose was
44:37
an attempt to kind of turn,
44:40
make the medium the message, wasn't
44:42
it? Which was it's psychedelic, it
44:44
was very sort of the style
44:47
was very, very important to the
44:49
message. It wasn't just a sort
44:51
of talking heads movie that you'd expect. In
44:53
terms of one film that
44:55
really nailed it for me in terms of
44:58
a music biopic, it was Control
45:00
about Joy Division and Ian Curtis. I was
45:02
going to say the same, brilliant. Isn't
45:05
it? It's just majestic, isn't it? It
45:08
is, I mean, it might be my
45:10
favourite because Sam
45:13
Riley as Ian Curtis, Anton
45:15
Corbin as a director who had
45:18
been one, photographed the
45:20
band during their brief existence.
45:24
And I think it captures
45:28
in it sort of black
45:30
and white severity, something
45:32
very, very distinctive. But
45:35
it's also a very good drama. Yeah. And
45:38
in terms of like top two or
45:40
three biopic films then, if we've
45:42
got control towards the any
45:44
other recommendations, I've got a couple of them.
45:47
But you go. I have a
45:49
fondness for Sid and Nancy. I
45:52
know it's not great
45:54
on the other members of the band as
45:57
Mr Lydon has often
45:59
made very clear but I
46:01
think Gary Oldman's depiction
46:03
of Sid Vicious and Chloe Webb's,
46:05
the Nancy Spongian, brilliant. So
46:08
I like that and I think it has a sort of a
46:11
tragic elegiac feel about it which is very
46:13
powerful Alex Cox movie. So that's one. Yeah
46:15
and I'm going to broaden the genre
46:18
a little bit but he was a
46:20
pop musician of his time so I'm
46:22
going to say Amadeus. Oh
46:25
yeah, Amadeus is a rock and
46:27
roll movie. It's a great movie.
46:30
It may be the greatest actually. I mean
46:33
Tom Hulse, Tom Hulse may
46:36
be the greatest performance of
46:38
a rock star ever with
46:42
all the kind of Freudian father
46:45
fixation stuff thrown in and it's a
46:47
gorgeous film and of course the other
46:49
reason that this is kind
46:51
of something to be thinking about is
46:53
that there's much sort of big, big
46:55
drum roll going on at the moment
46:57
for the release of Back to
47:00
Black, Sam Taylor-Johnson's
47:03
biopic of Amy Winehouse starring
47:05
Marissa Abella and the
47:08
trailers look good. I don't know whether it will be,
47:10
I mean Amy
47:13
Winehouse is a subject
47:16
about which people get terribly prickly
47:18
and it feels quite recent and
47:23
so I don't know whether it will be
47:25
as good as some suspects. I
47:27
hope so. I really do.
47:29
Yeah well I mean it's
47:32
following one of the greatest music documentaries
47:34
Amy. Is that which one in Oscar?
47:36
Yeah. Yeah which is so
47:38
it's a tough act to follow. Also
47:41
I do feel like you know I mean
47:43
God bless her soul but you know at
47:45
least she's dead and people can start to
47:47
form an historic view of her whereas stuff
47:49
like the Elton John biopic
47:52
that came out. Rocketman. I just
47:54
thought he was up. Rocketman that's it.
47:56
I would put that in the dustbin of history
47:58
honestly I thought it was absolute. I
48:00
tell you what we haven't mentioned which has
48:03
slightly faded from memory but I thought
48:05
was absolute knock out was straight out
48:08
of Compton in 2015 about M.E.B.E.A. That
48:12
was a really good
48:15
film and
48:18
you know another
48:20
one which is forgotten is Sex
48:23
and Drugs and Rock and Roll
48:25
about the enduri with Andy Serkis
48:27
playing the great man and sometimes
48:30
he's lesser ones. So I
48:32
had a and this may be totally
48:34
unfair but I had a kind of
48:37
allergic reaction to Bohemian Rhapsody
48:40
because I just knew that it
48:42
had entirely been made to get Ramy
48:45
Malik and Oscar. Yeah that's absolutely right.
48:48
Everything around it there was a kind of caption underneath
48:50
you know you know vote now
48:52
vote now and he got on
48:54
Oscar and it was a very good, it
48:57
was a perfect impersonation of Freddie
48:59
Mercury. He couldn't knock the guy.
49:02
Whereas with One Love it probably
49:04
was a technically less remarkable
49:07
film than Bohemian Rhapsody but
49:09
I didn't know when I went to Bohemian
49:11
Rhapsody maybe I went to the wrong performance.
49:13
I didn't see anyone getting out of their
49:15
seats and dancing and singing
49:18
to One Love and Redemption Song
49:20
and you know Three Little Birds
49:22
you know you haven't seen
49:24
you know until you've seen me do Three Little Birds
49:26
you know. I'm
49:29
just going to throw one more in which
49:31
I don't even know if it fits the category but
49:34
I think of all the films we've mentioned it's the one
49:36
that if I had to watch again tonight
49:39
I would watch this one and it's 24, 24, so what was it 24, 24,
49:41
24, 24 people. It's
49:48
Steve Coogan as Tony Wilson.
49:50
Absolutely brilliantly funny as Tony
49:52
Wilson and of course a
49:55
big Joy Division connection with that one as well
49:57
but Tony Wilson I think the more I think
49:59
about him. What a remarkable guy he was,
50:01
you know, he was like he was when I
50:03
was growing up in Liverpool He was the BBC
50:05
Northwest TV guy and I'd go out and do
50:08
yeah, good. No, that's right. Good. No, sorry Not
50:10
BBC and he'd go out and do Vox Pops
50:12
in the streets of Manchester stuff And he was
50:14
he was living this bipolar life
50:16
where he was also the
50:18
impresario behind factory records, you know
50:21
I believe unbelievable incredible guy incredible
50:23
guy. Do you let me ask
50:25
you a really? Really,
50:28
I mean I I'll put my hands
50:30
up to start with to make it easier Do
50:33
you think our generation Matt are?
50:38
Hopelessly in love with
50:41
that era of Joy
50:44
Division factory record. Yeah,
50:46
I am I know I am we are
50:49
in that But they should I
50:51
remember that she in about in in Mad
50:54
Men when Don Draper's doing his
50:56
presentation about nostalgia and he and
50:59
he explains what nostalgia You know, it's the pain
51:01
of memory, you know The pain of never being
51:03
able to go back and I
51:05
feel it deeply about the the late
51:08
70s and the early 80s You know the
51:10
pay yeah of not being able to go
51:12
back because it was such a joyful time
51:15
even though you were surrounded by you know,
51:17
awful social deprivation and Economic
51:19
trash it was all before everything started turning
51:21
rosy again, you know, but there was something
51:23
beautiful about it I think
51:25
that's right. And I think that it's interesting
51:27
Bernard Sumner says about Joy Division that There
51:31
was the because there was so
51:33
little beauty around them They
51:36
found it themselves and he said we didn't
51:38
really know that at the time Yeah,
51:42
but that's what they were doing and
51:44
and the music stands up at least
51:46
I think so Oh hundred percent I
51:48
really do a hundred percent. Well, that's
51:50
a beautiful note a beautiful note upon
51:52
which to end this week's episode Go
51:54
see if you're feeling depressed by politics
51:57
go and see this movie really cheer
51:59
you up Brilliant.
52:02
So please, as ever, get
52:04
in your questions and any
52:06
feedback you've got to twomatsattepublishing.com.
52:09
That's the number two, m-a-t-t-s-at-t-n-e-publishing.com.
52:11
Or if you listen on
52:13
Spotify, you can just message
52:16
us there very simply. And
52:18
that's what Andy Smith did.
52:20
And he said, hi, Matt,
52:22
given the dwindling sales number
52:24
for daily print newspapers, why
52:26
is it that politicians seemly
52:28
continue to be fearful or
52:31
scornful of headlines and allow
52:33
that fear to influence policy? That, Andy
52:35
Smith, is a fantastic question. And I
52:37
think it's one we should address on
52:39
our Q&A on Tuesday. Q&A. Don't
52:42
you think? Yeah. Yeah, I do. Andy
52:44
and everybody else join us on Sunday morning
52:46
for a Q&A. Q&A Sunday. We'll
52:48
address that at the top of the show.
52:50
We're back on Sunday, as we've just said.
52:53
Remember our fantastic subscription offer. If you
52:55
like what you hear on the podcast,
52:57
you will love the New European newspaper.
53:00
So go to the new european.co.uk/two maps.
53:02
There's a link in the show notes
53:04
and you'll get a fantastic deal on
53:06
a subscription. Just tell them I sent
53:09
you. Thank you as ever to producer
53:11
Ollie Peart at Rethink Audio, assisted this
53:13
week by the brilliant Matt Hill. And
53:15
until next week, it's
53:18
goodbye from me and it's goodbye from him. Goodbye.
53:21
Goodbye. Have
53:36
you ever googled your own name? Prepare
53:38
for a shop because your personal info,
53:40
including addresses and phone numbers, is all
53:42
out there. It's all harvested by data
53:44
brokers and sold legally. Aura
53:47
is a personal digital security service that
53:49
scans the internet for your sensitive information
53:51
and provides a full suite of privacy
53:53
enhancing tools. For a limited time, Aura
53:55
is offering listeners a 14 day free
53:57
trial at aura.com/ safety. dura.com/safety
54:00
to learn more and activate
54:03
the 14 day training Acast
54:08
powers the world's best Here's
54:11
a show that we recommend Do
54:17
you love to read or listen to facts? It's
54:19
your nightstand overflowing with books. You just don't have
54:21
time to read listen to my podcast Mom's
54:24
don't have time to read books with Sibbi. I'm
54:27
an author publisher Podcaster bookstore
54:29
owner my own novel blank is
54:32
out March 1st And if you
54:34
love books, you're in the right place In fact, we
54:36
call it the Sibbi verse or rather at the LA
54:38
Times calls it the Sibbi verse check
54:41
us out Mom's don't have time to read books with
54:43
Sibbi Acast
54:47
helps creators launch grow
54:49
and monetize their podcast
54:51
everywhere acast.com
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More