Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Aren't the Biden administration's new
0:02
year's goals of tax and spend
0:04
and turn a blind eye to inflation? Aren't
0:06
they at odds with your goals? Of
0:09
securing your savings. When you've
0:11
finally had enough of the Mimes government
0:13
is playing with your savings and retirement,
0:16
diversify into gold. With
0:18
Birch Gold, like you, I'm tired of
0:20
my money being impacted by
0:22
stupid decisions, by so called
0:25
leaders in Washington. For over five
0:27
thousand years, gold has withstood
0:29
inflation, geopolitical turmoil,
0:31
and stock market crashes, and here's
0:33
the great news. You can
0:35
still get it. In fact, you can own
0:38
gold and silver in a tax sheltered
0:40
retirement account. Birch Gold
0:42
makes it easy to convert an IRA
0:45
or 401K into an
0:47
IRA in precious metals.
0:49
Here's what you need to do. Text the word
0:51
Victor that VICT0R
0:54
Victor, 2989898
0:57
To claim your free info, gold
0:59
kit. With almost twenty
1:01
years experiencing converting IRAs
1:04
and 401s into precious metal
1:06
IRAs, birch gold, and
1:08
help you protect yourself with gold
1:10
today by texting Victor to
1:13
the number 989898
1:16
With an a plus rating from the Better Business
1:18
Bureau, thousands of happy customers,
1:21
and countless five star reviews,
1:24
Birch Gold can help you secure
1:26
your future with gold. Start
1:28
today with a free info
1:30
kit. There's zero obligation to
1:32
make this request just text Victor
1:35
to 989898
1:39
Hello, everyone. This is the
1:41
Victor Davis Hansen Show. Victor
1:44
is the Martin and Neely Anderson senior
1:46
fellow military history and classics at
1:48
the Hoover Institution. And Wayne
1:50
and Marsha Busk, a distinguished fellow
1:52
in history at Hillsdale College.
1:55
He is an author of a
1:57
approximately twenty seven or maybe twenty
1:59
eight books depending upon how you
2:01
count that. And he is
2:03
a political commentator, a
2:06
scholar and and sis.
2:09
And this episode, we're
2:11
going to look into culture. So we do
2:13
politics exam culture, but we're going to talk
2:16
about a lot of cultural
2:18
issues at the end of the year. And
2:21
some of his favorite movies
2:23
and actors
2:26
and novels and we'll get and
2:28
more and we'll get to that. Right
2:30
after these messages. Welcome
2:39
back Victor. So
2:41
we're this should be, for me, a
2:43
lot more interesting because I wanna hear
2:45
about your favorites on
2:47
all sorts of issues
2:49
and and not issues, but
2:52
on all sorts of cultural
2:54
phenomenon. And I I was hoping we could
2:56
start with actors because you
2:58
have talked before about actors
3:00
that you admire, but I was hoping
3:03
we could keep it to three and we might
3:05
go through several cultural topics
3:07
and and look at those either
3:11
works or actors that you
3:13
feel are actors. Sorry.
3:15
Either works or or people
3:17
that you feel are excel. In
3:20
those areas. And so what
3:23
who are your top three
3:25
favorite actors?
3:26
Well, you I think my favorite actor has beenzel
3:29
Washington. Codes. I mean, I know
3:31
that he's been in some bad movies, but
3:33
he was great in glory if
3:35
you remember him. He was that private trip
3:38
where he was sort of the troublemaker
3:41
or the person who was trying to voice how
3:43
hypocritical white America was at
3:46
the but he was he
3:48
comes around and he starts to
3:50
understand the purpose of the regiment
3:52
and everything. But he the way he that
3:55
he did it. And he was in a lot of he was in that
3:57
Pelican grief, so I know that and
3:59
he was good, but the two that I really thought
4:02
and I know that I've mentioned it before, but
4:04
man and fire is I
4:07
think it's a classic I really do and
4:10
that's seen that he got the most criticism when
4:12
he's do you remember when
4:14
the corrupt policeman says,
4:16
you know who I am? So, yeah,
4:18
you're a
4:19
the herment the brother
4:22
Herment daughter. Yeah. Herment daughter mispronounced it
4:24
like I just did, and the guy is being tortured
4:26
today. And wants to correct this pronunciation.
4:31
And then when he does the cat the whole
4:33
guy at the whole brotherhood's
4:35
leader when he
4:37
says, Mimes, you
4:40
you I have all the time in the world. You you
4:43
You have sixty seconds or whatever it was.
4:45
Yeah. You have forty eight seconds to think
4:47
of it. The way he played
4:49
that It was it was
4:51
so authentic. And I know
4:53
a lot of people didn't think the book of Eli
4:55
was but the way he did that
4:57
as well, there's something he gets in his certain
5:00
type of role, even at what it
5:02
wasn't well reviewed or received, the
5:04
the first equalizer, but there's just something
5:07
about him when he gets in a particular role
5:10
about, you know, when
5:12
he tries to re a person will say something
5:14
and he repeats it, and person
5:16
says, And I'm, oh, you remember the
5:19
the brotherhood? Oh,
5:20
yes. You and he just he he just
5:22
jumps in as a natural
5:24
person. And
5:26
Yeah. He's very natural in
5:28
in all three of those movies. He was in a
5:30
movie. I'm kind of it was called fake
5:33
Safe House. Do you remember that where he's that CIA
5:35
people they think has gone
5:36
rogue. Yeah. And he's he ends
5:39
up dying. But -- Yeah.
5:41
-- there's something about him about his
5:43
natural presence on the screen.
5:46
Another one is I
5:49
have to be careful about Gary Oldman because
5:51
we're all you know, he was just so brilliant as
5:54
Churchill, but I was
5:56
first exposed to remember that Tarantino
5:58
wrote the the screenplay for
6:01
true romance? Yes.
6:03
I I don't know what the was it was
6:05
he's supposed to be black, or was he supposed to
6:07
be a white guy that was acting
6:09
like he's a bracket, Doug?
6:11
Remember? I think it was the latter. I think he
6:13
was supposed to be a white guy that was had
6:16
some weird idea that he was a black guy
6:19
and he was trying to act like
6:20
that. But that's that was my interpretation
6:22
of the character. That that movie
6:24
was brilliant because of the people
6:27
that, you know, and when they had that Dennis Hopper,
6:29
they would never allow that when he installed
6:32
successfully in it. Ancestry
6:34
of Christopher Walker. And my
6:37
god, Gary
6:39
Oldman was one of the most frightening people and
6:41
imagine when he's in
6:43
that scene. And then he kind
6:45
of replayed that role in
6:48
that movie. Remember the professional where
6:50
he's that crooked DIA agent and
6:52
he's listening to the beethoven
6:55
when he's killing people. And he's on
6:57
drugs. Just
7:00
That's
7:00
one of my favorite movies. I love that movie.
7:02
Yes. Yeah. He's it's just eerie
7:04
how he he comes into he
7:07
comes into a role, and he was the same
7:09
thing. And speaking of book of
7:11
Eli, you remember he's also that
7:14
sinister but he has
7:17
a a way about him that makes a sinister
7:19
character in-depth,
7:22
even more sinister because he's he's
7:24
got some elements of his character
7:26
that's interested in literature or he's interested
7:28
in music. And even
7:30
he even made Dracula into
7:33
a complex character that we hadn't
7:35
seen
7:35
before. Brown Stoker
7:37
is Dracula. So I think he's probably
7:40
right now I
7:41
don't know. That's a hard thing to say,
7:44
the most accomplished English actor.
7:46
I really do believe
7:47
that. Well, he does you know what, though,
7:49
he seems to morph into his characters
7:52
because that Churchill's a completely
7:54
different character from those ones you just
7:56
mentioned. Yeah. I I would never even know that
7:58
would scare you all. I mean, physically
8:00
morphin to them as well
8:02
as, you know, any character that No.
8:04
He's just he's just amazing
8:07
and I think he'd said something.
8:09
And remember, he said something about was it
8:11
woke or something that they they went after. I mean,
8:13
it was it I don't know what it was. I can't
8:15
even remember. Maybe it was something out race,
8:18
but they they turned on
8:20
him and he so he's now
8:22
a popular actor in in the fashion he
8:24
was. I'm surprised they gave him the Academy Award
8:26
for Churchill, but the performance was so stunning.
8:29
Yep. And that getting back to that
8:31
true rollouts, you know, I would
8:33
just it's I have all this
8:36
there are some great character actors
8:38
that are working today, and one of them is
8:42
Christopher Walker. He was brilliant
8:44
in that. Man, Dennis
8:46
Hopper was a very good character actor,
8:48
almost a major actor. So
8:51
it was Alan Reichman that who passed away
8:53
not too long ago, a very left wing guy, but
8:55
there were certain roles Mimes him and quickly
8:57
down
8:58
under. He was as
9:00
the evil -- Yes.
9:01
-- cattle lord and
9:03
-- Yeah. -- I guess everybody can't
9:06
if you say who's your favorite
9:08
actor? There's something about Anthony
9:10
Hopkins that I think I mean,
9:12
everybody just deified
9:15
Mimes, but going way back in
9:17
his career, remember, he was in I
9:20
first I first
9:23
got I first came to
9:25
know of him. I remember it was not necessarily
9:28
Richard Attenborough did a bridge too far
9:31
Yeah. Which was a kind of a didn't
9:33
it was a very leveraged production. It had
9:36
some brilliant or
9:39
trails by Edward
9:40
Fox, I think. It had
9:42
a hope and showed -- No. -- doctors
9:44
in there. Every one of them Even Robert
9:46
Red that's not a good actor. Robert
9:48
Redford's not a good actor, but he'd he he
9:52
played that role perfectly. And even
9:56
Gina Hackman with that kind of phony accent
10:00
was wonderful. And I know that everybody got
10:02
to know Hopkins
10:05
through silence of the lambs, you
10:07
know, series. But
10:09
I I didn't think that was just I mean, it was
10:12
It was brilliant,
10:14
but I don't think that was the best. And
10:18
he went way, way back. I remember him in the
10:20
elephant man and Young
10:22
Winston and Wasn't
10:25
he in that AM Forrester novel
10:29
turn movie the
10:33
end of years or something, and I can't remember
10:35
the name of it. It was the end of
10:38
It was basically about the end of the
10:40
old culture in
10:42
Britain. And he and the
10:44
other servant Butler Oh.
10:47
Why they couldn't
10:47
-- Yes. -- and yes.
10:50
And the remainder
10:52
of the day and
10:53
remainder of the day. That's what I was saying.
10:56
He was in that. He was in a bad I mean, it wasn't
10:58
a great movie, but he did a good job in Legends
11:00
of Apollo with Brad Pitt. Yeah.
11:02
Well, he was the But I'd liked him
11:04
and you know what? It
11:06
was a huge production. It had good
11:08
soundtrack and it didn't really
11:11
catch on, but I really like that kind of
11:14
meat gel black that was a rerun of Heaven
11:16
can wait kind of those series of
11:18
movies. Yeah. And that was a
11:20
really good movie.
11:21
Yeah. He was excellent. Yeah. He was
11:25
he was he was brilliant
11:27
on that, and Everything he
11:29
does has got a level of professionalism.
11:32
And he's that tradition
11:34
of I think he's well well, like, Richard
11:37
Burton. They're all best best
11:39
I know that as a pro American, I mentioned
11:41
two out of three were
11:42
British. I
11:45
Anyway, those are accurate. Let's move on because I
11:47
don't Yeah. Let's go on to the novels
11:49
that you think are the best
11:52
all time novels.
11:54
Yeah. Let me think. So
11:57
I mentioned about I wrote a call not too long
11:59
ago about a novel that
12:02
is attributed to some person
12:04
called Petronious Arbitur. We
12:06
don't quite know who he is except catais
12:08
has description of a
12:10
patronus. I think it's the same patronus
12:13
who was a confidant, an arbiter,
12:16
elegantlyi, a taster of elegance.
12:19
Judge of elegance for the emperor,
12:22
who had him executed, apparently. But
12:25
he wrote novel and we have it was
12:27
twenty four books in the Epic tradition.
12:30
But we have the middle part, mostly,
12:32
I think fourteen, fifteen, and sixty. Maybe
12:34
the book was, you know, they closed it
12:36
and the outer it was kind of a dirty
12:38
book in the middle ages, so that that
12:41
was stored away in the the top and the bottom
12:43
rotted. Who knows? Why those three books? But
12:46
it is the most brilliant
12:49
analysis and description of
12:51
a affluent leisure western
12:53
society and toll decay
12:57
in the Neuronian period. And
12:59
it follows this odyssey of
13:01
this little bisexual
13:04
guy called Gaitan, and then this
13:06
supposedly impotent, Incopious, and
13:08
then this kind of criminal minded,
13:11
as Klitaz, and they're completely worthless
13:14
people. And there's this humatuses,
13:16
this old poet
13:18
who's a complete lecturer. But
13:20
the point is they go around the bay of Naples,
13:24
Pompeii, Herculean, probably
13:26
crotonne, down to the south,
13:29
and they describe what women's society,
13:31
food, dress, sex, and Petronias
13:35
is is it's beautifully
13:37
written Latin. And I
13:40
used to teach it in Latin, but it it's very
13:42
explicit obscene. But the point is
13:44
that he's trying to show you when
13:47
you have so much money as
13:49
the the wealth of the empire and slaves
13:51
poured into Rome in the first
13:54
centuries BC and AD, it's
13:56
inevitable that old traditional
13:58
agrarian values are completely
14:00
mocked destroyed, made
14:03
fun of. And yet he's
14:05
not he's not just a cardboard moralist.
14:08
He's trying to show you the complexities
14:10
of it, that the sheer
14:12
bringing together of all these people,
14:14
from gall, from numidia, from Greece,
14:17
and this turbulent one million person
14:20
city with all there are things
14:22
that happen in it that are quite extraordinary.
14:25
The level of intelligence. But it's it's
14:27
really an attack on the Newell rich, but the
14:29
people who are attacking them
14:32
from this sort of Italian
14:34
or aristocratic point of view are just
14:36
as bankrupt is what he's trying to tell you.
14:38
And it's it's one of the most sophisticated
14:41
analysis of a of a society
14:43
in full freefall I've ever read.
14:46
Just, you know, just the opposite is
14:49
that I have a that I have to be very careful
14:51
because he's a very controversial office. Newton,
14:53
he won the Nobel Prize right
14:56
before the war, and he was
14:58
in Norwegian. And
15:02
he wrote a you know, he looked he
15:04
was famous for his first book, Hunger
15:06
and Pan, and didn't quite like that. They're kind
15:08
of Kaufka like. Stream of
15:10
consciousness, you know, alternate realities,
15:13
but it all came together in this novel
15:16
growth of the soil. And it's about
15:18
this guy Isaac and
15:20
he reminded me of my Swedish grandpa
15:22
I mean, all he did was
15:25
work and he goes up to the wilderness.
15:28
And he carves out of farm, and a woman,
15:30
how the gate puts an ad, a woman of the hair
15:32
lip comes and becomes his
15:35
wife. And and it chronicles
15:37
his life, and then a neighbor comes
15:39
named Axel. And he's the second
15:41
part of the novel. And they're
15:43
very different, but out
15:46
of their work. And he has he has a guardian
15:48
angel. I thought this was really interesting
15:51
that he has somebody that has some
15:53
degree of power Guysler,
15:56
I think his name was. And he
15:58
he at each critical moment, Anali,
16:01
he helps out. He has no reason to help out,
16:03
Isaac, but he does. But it's
16:05
this idea that no matter what
16:07
happens, there's always a solution and
16:09
it's greater work. And as
16:11
this novel builds a carve out an entire
16:15
wilderness area of northern Norway
16:17
and they create a settlement and then becomes a town.
16:20
And nobody really recognizes. And
16:23
he carries things on his back. If he hears
16:25
there's a an iron stove that's
16:27
been abandoned. He goes out there and it on
16:29
his back and walks all the way back. It's
16:33
and, Samson, the reason I it's controversial
16:36
was because, obviously,
16:39
if you look at that novel and look at the values,
16:41
what he hated was urbanized,
16:44
powerful America.
16:47
In the nineteen, the roaring twenties, so
16:49
to speak. And he that
16:51
hatred of America and that
16:54
romantic idealization
16:56
of an earlier agrarian world.
16:59
And I think one of the guys is Swedish,
17:01
actually. So I've gotta
17:04
about a little
17:06
You got a bias. Yeah. But
17:09
anyway, my point is that he became
17:12
a megaphone for not seism to the degree
17:14
that he wasn't just kind of unmissed
17:16
throat, but he was not a very nice guy is what
17:18
I'm trying to say. And after the war, they put him
17:20
on trial. I think
17:22
he was finally acquitted or given a light
17:24
sentence, but he died in the early fifties.
17:27
But of all those novels
17:29
that he wrote, they were kind of the the
17:31
modern novel about what's inside
17:33
a man's
17:33
brain, psychological novel.
17:36
Yeah. It
17:36
was purely I'm sorry. What was he put on
17:38
trial for? After the war was
17:40
Well, and Nazi is that way he's concert
17:43
country.
17:43
Yeah. He he
17:45
went to Berlin when Hitler wanted
17:47
to meet him because Hitler that that novel and
17:50
thought that it had German
17:52
work values, you know, industriousness, and
17:54
he wanted to they tried to appropriate
17:57
him as a spokesman for Nazism and
17:59
then during the Queensland government in Norway.
18:02
And that was very difficult
18:04
Mimes. Remember the British had to evacuate and
18:07
all that far. During that whole period
18:09
and of the occupation, he was he was
18:12
very sympathetic to
18:14
and was a beneficiary of
18:16
special treatment by the public government
18:19
in Norway. And so when that government fell
18:21
during the liberation, he
18:23
was on the wrong side and
18:26
I don't know. There's a lot of a lot
18:28
of literature why he did that and
18:30
what what was it about Mimes, but he had
18:32
a path logical hatred of the English
18:34
speaking world for some reason. And
18:38
I in that book does
18:40
sign of decadence is when a Norwegian
18:42
or Scandinavian migrates to America.
18:45
I don't know what it's something about the
18:48
existential struggle in that cold
18:50
hard, stoney climate landscape
18:53
and what it does to people. It
18:55
makes them man
18:57
against nature. But it's a brilliant novel. It's
18:59
one of the best novels I think was ever written.
19:01
And then can't go
19:03
on too much, but everybody likes to I
19:06
guess there's six great novels besides
19:08
all the short stories like, you know, of
19:12
Conrad, but that one
19:15
book victory
19:17
is is just
19:19
it's a kind of an auto they're all
19:21
autobiographical, but this person who
19:23
is ostracized and
19:26
travels all over the world. And he
19:28
finally becomes content
19:31
with his separation from the world
19:33
when he sees there's this
19:35
young innocent woman and he's
19:38
not that he's a capable of affection, but he
19:40
has this relationship sort of
19:42
whether or then these people come there's
19:45
always evil people as you remember
19:47
a more gym that come up the river or
19:49
an instalment when they try
19:51
to and he finally makes it
19:54
choice to reenter the world for somebody
19:56
else's safety. And
19:59
it's sort of a description
20:02
of what the nineteenth century
20:05
European world was becoming and
20:07
why a person couldn't fit in that
20:10
and what are the wages when you don't fit
20:12
in that and that and it's almost a suggestion
20:14
you have to get back into the game. It's kind of
20:17
a homeric idea that you can't
20:19
be Achilles and nurture wounds
20:21
against the unfairness of the system, even
20:24
though it's warping. And
20:26
you like Achilles after the death of accomplish,
20:28
you've got to go back in there because you're going to have
20:30
to save the Aikians because they're going to lose to
20:32
Hector. And so it's
20:35
even though you're corrupted in the process, it's
20:38
a great novel. It really is
20:39
Yeah. I'll stop there since we started doing
20:42
threes. Okay. Let's
20:45
go ahead and take a break and come right
20:47
back and talk about musicians. We're
20:56
back. And I would like to remind
20:58
everybody that Victor can be found at vikker hansen
21:01
dot com. And you can
21:04
join us with a subscription,
21:07
either a free one to just get a newsletter
21:09
and the new things that are on the website.
21:12
Or you can subscribe so
21:14
you can read the VTH Ultra
21:17
material that is written exclusively for
21:19
the website and some great articles
21:22
that come out with really rich analysis
21:25
of our political culture
21:27
and our culture in general sometimes
21:29
farm life as well. So please
21:32
come join us. Victor, we are
21:34
on two threes here,
21:36
and I would like to talk with you about
21:38
your top or the best pop
21:41
music stars
21:43
that you appreciate their work.
21:46
We
21:46
know I I kind of grew up listening
21:49
to Van Morrison, and he
21:51
was kind of a Mimes of
21:54
the English a sort
21:56
of an English Irish dash
21:58
ballot ballot here, and then
22:00
he was very heavily influenced by
22:02
sold music in Black America, and
22:06
the blues, and he got some
22:08
of those songs. Tupelo Honey
22:10
was just amazing. And
22:13
that that appearance he did, I think it was in
22:15
the last Waltz.
22:18
The way he performed brown eyed girl
22:20
and all of those songs, he
22:22
was he's has a beautiful voice. He's
22:25
a wonderful entertainer. He
22:27
brings all these different music
22:29
traditions into one to one
22:32
Symphony, so to speak, and
22:34
he's still at it. He I I can remember
22:36
listening to him on AM radio in the
22:38
sixties, and he's still at
22:40
it. And so I
22:42
I have nothing, but I I think he's one of
22:44
the best pop singers that ever
22:46
existed. Another one is
22:49
And I think everybody knows Ray orberson.
22:52
He had kind of a tragic life because he died
22:54
before. I mean, he had he we
22:57
all grew up in high school and grammar school with
22:59
pretty woman and it was he was, you know,
23:01
on the charts and everything and he was
23:05
he was right up there with the big
23:07
sixties popular bands,
23:09
but think what people forget is
23:11
that my god.
23:14
He he endured and he endured
23:16
and he endured and
23:20
he had kind of a renewal in the
23:22
nineties And then, you
23:24
know, when he had that that one
23:26
book song, you got it, anything you want,
23:28
you got it, and love
23:30
hurts. Crying, falling,
23:33
all those blue bae you. They all had
23:35
the same thing for someone who's kind of a
23:37
shy person he had he wore
23:39
those sunglasses. He was pale white, kind
23:41
of pasty, but they all have
23:44
unrequited love. You know what I mean? That's
23:47
sort of like a sonnet
23:49
or something or out of that
23:51
period of English quote because he's
23:54
always you know,
23:57
silently suffering because this woman
23:59
has he's done everything where he wants to do
24:01
everything for a woman. And you don't
24:03
usually hear that from a male singer, but
24:05
he he the and he
24:08
he died right when his during
24:10
his renaissance, it was kind of tragic, so
24:12
I've always liked him. I should say
24:14
that I mentioned
24:18
black singers. I think the greatest black
24:20
singer of all time was
24:23
Otis Reading, my gosh. He
24:26
died so young and and
24:28
a car and a plane crash, but,
24:30
you know, I can't turn you loose, and I've been
24:32
loving you so long, try a little
24:35
tenderness, sitting on the dock of the
24:37
bay, my all
24:39
of those songs were wonderful, had
24:41
a beautiful voice, and
24:44
he should still be singing if he hadn't
24:46
been killed. Finally,
24:48
III don't I never
24:51
liked And
24:53
I like him even less now as Bruce brings
24:55
it to him because I think
24:57
he really overdid that
25:00
working class New Jersey thing he's
25:02
now a billionaire and he got involved in all
25:04
these political things. But when
25:06
you look listen to those that
25:08
album, they're rising after
25:10
nine eleven. Those songs he wrote
25:12
almost spontaneously, their wonderful songs
25:15
and then that Nebraska album. And
25:18
those are the two albums I thought were
25:20
just sheer genius. And that's
25:22
hard for me to say. And that's another issue
25:25
that all of our listeners deal with
25:27
actors and singers that
25:29
we, on the conservative or traditional side,
25:31
for the most part, and entertainment
25:34
being on the liberal side, we have to be very careful
25:36
because ours got a art it's, you know, it's
25:38
art for the sake of art, and
25:40
you have to suppress your personal
25:43
feelings or political or ideological leanings
25:45
when you see an artist. That
25:48
has antithetical views to your
25:50
own, but they have real
25:51
genius. And that's hard for
25:53
me, but I knew what I liked
25:56
that he did he he
25:58
did that album
26:01
with this the
26:03
Seger Sessions fan where they
26:05
did all those old
26:06
folktails, and they had,
26:09
like, John Henry. And although No.
26:11
He did. He did. John. He did.
26:13
He had American folk songs
26:15
from the nineteenth and early twentieth
26:17
century. He did them wonderfully.
26:19
Yeah. They were one he's got that raspy
26:21
boy. He he has a a raspy
26:24
boy. Because I can't I mean, I
26:26
may be cheating by going on three, but
26:29
I've always liked Bob Dylan. I've always
26:31
liked him. And, you
26:33
know, I did not like his politics.
26:35
I do I don't think he has
26:38
liberal politics anymore. I don't know what
26:40
they are, but he's a pretty he's
26:42
been come in his old age very
26:44
sensible. But if you look at all
26:46
of those songs,
26:49
you know, from blowing and the wind
26:51
to knocking on there no one wrote
26:54
more songs that were more successful and
26:56
and more pleasant to listen to than Bob Deal.
26:58
I'm not talking about his voice, but and that
27:01
just to end this conversation that gets sent
27:03
to Joan Baez. Everybody hated
27:05
Joan Baez. I know that. But I
27:10
think of all the great female singers
27:12
that came out of the sixties, Jordi Mitchell,
27:14
or Judy Collins, or
27:16
the rest of them, there was no one I
27:19
can't think of anybody who had
27:21
a better voice, you know, that one song
27:23
and they wore that one album when
27:25
she'd redid all of I think
27:27
she made Bob Dylan. We talked about that before,
27:30
made her famous, but that one song,
27:32
one too many mornings. And when you listen to
27:34
her do it versus Bob Dylan, or
27:38
restless for a well when, you know,
27:41
I pity that I I wrote a call when I had
27:43
a little quote from my pity the poor
27:45
immigrant.
27:46
Yeah. That song would be completely
27:49
outlawed today. And she
27:51
even did things like you're you ain't going nowhere
27:53
and that I don't know.
27:56
Place her Des that medieval song,
27:58
pleasure of of love, you know.
28:00
Yeah. That's beautiful song that she did.
28:03
And so she's just got a wonderful voice,
28:05
and she and
28:07
so you have to appreciate that. And I
28:11
I really do. So those were people
28:13
I grew up with, and I'm I'm not
28:15
acquainted with the latest songs, although
28:18
I've been trying to listen to some
28:21
strange you know, this
28:24
guy Nick Cave and he what was
28:26
the name that he did the soundtrack
28:29
that was a very funny song for that
28:31
one with about Australia.
28:34
Do you remember that?
28:35
Yeah. And that guy is fighting with his
28:37
brothers or something and And
28:39
I I remember the
28:40
movie. Like, I don't
28:42
know what the name of it was, but I just remember
28:45
it. Yeah. He he's
28:47
that was a that
28:49
was a really great song. And
28:52
remind me of that is kind of a one he's
28:54
very famous. He's got a whole repertoire of
28:57
good music, but that writer's song.
28:59
I guess that's what it
29:00
was. You know?
29:01
Yeah. That's what it was
29:02
about. The the whole nature is
29:04
answering back as wind and then Earth.
29:06
Yeah. But there was that one song,
29:10
I don't know if you and I talked about that one
29:12
song phenomena. I think we did long time
29:14
ago. The four non blondes
29:16
with that revolution song was kinda funny,
29:18
but it has a good tune, but also was that
29:21
soundtrack to the
29:25
hold on. You
29:27
know, the Turkish movie about GLPLEA
29:29
and he goes
29:31
Oh, the water diviner. The other water diviner.
29:33
That was Christopher Focal Mark Love was
29:35
My alibi.
29:36
Yeah. That's a great That was a good one.
29:39
Swedish Swedish guy, I think he is.
29:41
And didn't even I mean, that wasn't his
29:43
original
29:44
language. So anyway, those
29:46
are some some of the things
29:48
that you like. Yeah. So
29:50
let's turn then to
29:52
websites that you would recommend.
29:55
Websites. Yes. Prejudice
29:57
here because I know a lot of people that have
29:59
websites. Oh, yeah. So
30:02
I've mentioned this before. John
30:04
Henneker and Steve Hayward and
30:07
Scott Johnson. If you look
30:09
at PowerLine, they have you
30:12
know, they aggregate
30:15
alms of the day, but then they discuss in-depth
30:18
some of them are some things in their own experience.
30:21
And they just give a
30:24
level of sophisticated but accessible
30:26
analysis. They've drawn their own
30:29
specialties. Steve
30:31
Hayward is an expert on the history of the
30:33
conservative movement and great quotes. Stone
30:36
Henriker is one's the foundation. He's
30:38
got the most common sense of I
30:40
I you can imagine in a
30:42
person. So if you want somebody to give a
30:44
common sense, take on it,
30:46
and then Scott
30:49
Johnson is wonderful. He's their
30:51
lawyers, he and John and
30:54
and he he's got also
30:56
a really great repertoire of music, blues
30:59
music folk music that he brings into
31:01
that website. But when
31:03
I guess what I'm saying is if I want
31:06
to, you know, get some idea of
31:08
the absurdity of the left
31:10
in a very this
31:13
passionate fashion, and
31:16
then you go to power line. And I recommend
31:18
everybody does it. I'm very
31:20
fond of real clear politics. I
31:24
know John McEntire, one of the
31:26
co owners of it, but It's
31:30
kind of an interesting website. I mean, I
31:32
know now there's real clear education,
31:35
real clear defense. Real clear world,
31:37
everything. They're huge topics, but
31:39
I guess the flagship is
31:42
real clear politics. And as
31:44
everybody knows, they're Formula
31:46
is one article from the left, one from
31:48
the right, and then I guess they must
31:50
have some type of computer cabulation
31:53
and then the most frequent the
31:56
last week, the most frequent
31:58
that day. They highlight those, they
32:00
have polls. It's just all service
32:03
stop. And it's not I
32:05
think probably they're more
32:07
conservative they're on the conservative side,
32:10
but you wouldn't detect that when you go there.
32:13
So it's it's
32:15
those are the two that I try to go to first.
32:18
I try to but I, you know, I go to left
32:20
wing sites too. And the
32:24
other 1III had posted
32:26
an American greatness and my
32:30
colleague, Roger Kimball, writes I don't know
32:32
how he does it. He writes five or six a week
32:34
or they're very, very good.
32:36
He draws on the whole lifetime of
32:38
literary artistic criticism.
32:41
So he's got all of these
32:43
it's not He's not name
32:45
dropping. When you see him quote authors
32:47
and pieces of work, he's just bringing it out
32:49
of his head because those are his
32:52
frame of references as he gets
32:54
into his, you know, mid sixties, late sixties.
32:56
He's got this whole wealth of experience. And
32:59
that's fascinating. So I always try to read
33:01
there. And, you know,
33:03
I Conrad Black is not writing
33:06
for American greatness or national review, but
33:11
he he has what I would call the asiatic
33:13
style and remember and classical
33:15
rhetoric you would there was attic
33:17
simplicity exemplified, but
33:19
I say the order of Lisayette. And
33:23
then there was isocrates, gorgeous
33:28
gorgous the asiatic. That was
33:30
the elaborate ornate style.
33:33
And what would that mean? And far as grammar,
33:35
that would mean. Complex sentences,
33:38
independent and dependent clauses, pair
33:41
us a vocabulary deliberately
33:43
not to show off, but to
33:46
be more precise and it would be more
33:48
to Latin made than Anglo Saxon
33:50
English. And some, I
33:52
guess, when you would read fifteen hundred
33:54
words, there'd be one or two words that rarely
33:56
appear in the printed spoken
33:58
English language anymore. So
34:00
it's just a kind of a
34:02
delightful experience to read him
34:05
even. And so
34:07
I I try to read American greatness real
34:09
clear politics, power
34:11
line, And,
34:14
you know, it's it's just
34:17
off topic a little bit when was thinking of
34:19
these, it's very strange about how
34:24
I think Jack and I talked about this once, I
34:26
don't want to be repetitive, but some of the
34:29
old go to places
34:31
for conservative affirmation are
34:33
gone now. They've disappeared. And
34:37
one of them was a drudge report. Nobody
34:39
quite knows why he went from being
34:41
conservative, news aggregator to
34:43
far left. I don't know what happened,
34:45
but that thing is propagandistic
34:48
now. It's so hard left. And of
34:52
course, a weekly standard had good riders,
34:54
and it disappeared. I think one
34:56
of most talented riders in America's Christopher
34:59
called, well, he used to he writes for the Clairemont.
35:01
Review, but he was absolutely brilliant.
35:04
One of the most insightful writers on Europe
35:06
there there ever was. And -- Yeah.
35:08
And he you was the bowl I think
35:10
he was really the anchor of the weakening
35:13
standard in some ways that's
35:15
disappeared or it's gone to
35:17
the, like, bulwark or whatever that's
35:19
called. And then
35:22
If you want culture, if I just
35:25
Russia is gone. Russia is gone. We forget that
35:27
that three hours every day, and
35:30
and and Rush was an entertainer, a
35:33
news commentator, but he
35:36
had a brilliant insight
35:38
into the leftist mind. And he'd I used
35:40
I used to be driving to work, and I'd
35:42
always listen. And he'd say, now, stay with
35:44
me. Gotta remember what these guys are
35:47
doing now. Don't let if they
35:49
even analyze, you know, to the nth
35:51
level what the left was
35:52
doing. It was pretty funny. No.
35:55
He was a very good guy. There's
35:57
also if people are
36:00
I'm pretty sure you must read this because you
36:02
know the editors so well,
36:04
Roger Kimble. But every
36:06
time I want to read about some
36:08
cultural issue, his
36:11
new criterion is very
36:13
Frank about books
36:15
and the the evaluations,
36:18
you know, the analysis
36:21
of new books out there and what's in
36:23
them and Well, I didn't mention that there. Because
36:25
I had vested interest. That's why I
36:27
didn't wanna blow my own horn, but I was
36:29
a writer and rep residents last
36:32
year, and so that meant the
36:34
rioting residents was to produce
36:36
thirty thousand words. So I wrote I think
36:39
six, five thousand, four thousand
36:41
word essays, one on three
36:43
great classicists, one on
36:45
the destruction of plastics. One
36:48
on Roman society, and
36:50
I did mention the superior code there, one
36:52
on Black Lives Matter. And
36:56
then one on the striking
37:01
similarities between the left and the old
37:03
Confederate mentality, whether it was
37:05
sanctuary cities or federal nullification
37:08
or fixations on one drop racial
37:10
pedigrees. And
37:12
I just have one in this issue, and that's the
37:14
last of that tenure. It's
37:17
on It
37:20
just came out. It's on why study
37:22
military history, which is, you know,
37:24
it's an old topic. It's been done, but
37:26
I tried to have some new contours to it.
37:28
In the age of woke. And then I
37:30
signed out. Roger asked me to do it this year,
37:32
so I'm working right now as we speak
37:34
on the first of the second
37:37
year writers and residents requirement,
37:39
and the first essay is going to be on
37:41
when we've talked about this. It came
37:43
out of these podcasts. And
37:45
that is this this weird triangle
37:47
in Silicon Valley that
37:50
I think has destroyed California. And
37:53
it's about ready to consume America.
37:56
And on one of it is
37:58
an academic academia.
38:01
That gives the prestige or the veneer
38:04
or the sense that these people are
38:06
above politics. Are they scientific?
38:09
Are they analytical when they're not?
38:11
And it's embodied in a geographical
38:14
sense. This triangle is in the Bay Area, so
38:16
that's Stanford University. And
38:18
whether it's some kind of voter
38:21
true, the vote project, the Stanford
38:23
voting project, or It's
38:26
drawing on Stanford affiliated
38:29
faculty or fellows for Elizabeth
38:32
Holmes, the Stanford dropout.
38:34
Theranos Ponzi scheme or
38:37
whether it's a self righteous commentary
38:40
of the bankman,
38:42
freed law professor, mother
38:45
of Sam, Bankman, Fried, and
38:47
he's back on the Stanford campus now
38:49
apparently on his, like, I
38:51
guess, on the conditions of his
38:53
release from custody for
38:55
a while. And they
38:57
were very vocal, of course, she was a bundler
38:59
of Silicon Valley millions
39:02
And of course, I think they're gonna have a
39:04
tax problem when they try to explain how
39:07
much property is
39:09
under their name. And
39:12
what mister Benjamin
39:14
Fried is a tax expert and whether he
39:16
paid sufficient gift tax or
39:18
however that work. I'm sure you found a way
39:20
to evade them. And then in
39:22
that whole matrix, we had the Stanford
39:25
vocabulary list. You'd just see that
39:27
came out. Oh, yeah. This
39:29
and that was IT. As Jack pointed
39:31
out, it was not just the
39:34
humanity center on campus. This was
39:37
informational technology. These are supposedly
39:40
quote unquote scientists in computer
39:42
studies and things like that, but you can't use
39:44
American can't you citizen?
39:47
Just so Great. And they yanked that they
39:49
were so embarrassed, and then there was a Ben Shapiro
39:52
visit where they plastered the campus
39:54
with this picture of a raid
39:56
insect bottle, you know, then
39:59
be gone, and, you know,
40:01
plain on the Nazi gas, the Jew
40:04
get him out. Motif on
40:06
campus and the very liberal administration
40:09
did nothing until there was an outright. And
40:11
then we have the Stanford professor who's
40:13
under assault right now, assault in the
40:15
sense that the left
40:17
is investigating him about
40:20
or publications that may or may not
40:22
have been doctored by
40:24
him. I think they were mostly
40:26
computer generated illustrations
40:29
that reflected the argument of the article, but
40:31
maybe they didn't reflect the actual
40:33
article, but went too far in trying to
40:35
make a point. It's resurface.
40:37
Obviously, he's a white male right now. And
40:39
so in a period of woke up,
40:42
we're trying to make every college
40:44
president and identity politics profile.
40:47
Maybe that's one of the catalyst
40:49
behind it, but you put it all together and
40:52
you've got real problem. I'm not gonna get into
40:54
selling admissions by coaches and
40:57
business schools. It's just a mess.
40:59
Yeah. But it does give it it yeah.
41:01
It's a massive from a to z, and they
41:04
know it, and they've taken a wonderful
41:06
university. I'm the fit person,
41:08
my family, to go there's, I had some ostensible
41:11
loyalty to it, but they've taken
41:13
a once way university, and
41:15
they've ruined it. And the class
41:18
of two thousand twenty six had just been announced
41:20
twenty three percent white, fifty
41:22
two percent fifty one percent fifty
41:25
two percent women, there's only fifteen
41:27
percent white male. And
41:29
I don't understand it because they're apologizing
41:31
for their Jewish exclusionary policies.
41:35
Of the past, well, they're they're trumping that.
41:37
They just don't want they want Asians
41:40
not to be there in any any greater numbers.
41:42
Than their demographic proportions,
41:45
but they don't want any white males there at all.
41:48
They really don't. When you're getting down
41:50
to twelve or eighteen percent. They're thirty
41:52
five percent of the country. So
41:55
and then that's that leg. And then the
41:57
other leg is the corrupt Bay Area
42:00
politics that runs the state. Think
42:02
about it. Nancy Pelosi, Paul Pelosi
42:04
made a fortune on inside trader
42:06
and government projects
42:09
and real estate acquisitions that
42:11
her that his wife was right at
42:13
the beginning. And then we have Diane Feinsheim with
42:15
a Chinese spy and and then
42:18
we've got Gavin Newsom, nothing
42:20
more to be said or Camilla Harris.
42:23
Look at all those politicians that are Barbara
42:25
Boxer that Chinese, a registered
42:27
lobbyist, and then we go to
42:29
Silicon Valley, and what Elon
42:32
Musk, we see it's basically a subsidiary
42:35
for the FBI. That
42:37
it's the investigatory arm of
42:39
the FBI to suppress free speech
42:41
and get around the first amendment. And
42:44
whether it's Google arranging your
42:47
Internet searches on ideological criteria
42:50
or whether it's Facebook, using
42:52
its profits to award the election by
42:54
absorbing the work of state registrars or
42:57
whether it's Twitter suppressing free speech
42:59
at the back end call of the it's a pretty
43:01
corrupt world. And
43:03
it's got seven trillion dollars to
43:05
make that corruption pretty powerful.
43:08
You put all three together and you
43:10
get the big money and
43:12
the communications in the media. You
43:14
get the hardcore left wing
43:16
politics. And you plaster
43:19
it all over with nice
43:21
respectable academic prestige
43:23
and you get a very toxic mix.
43:28
Sounds like it's a tear cone to me.
43:32
That would be unfair to the
43:34
Roman, the lead, I think. Because
43:37
and they are I mean so I'm I'm writing
43:40
that right now. I think it'll be in I hope in
43:42
the March issue, but I'm very I mean,
43:44
I'm very honored to be asked to come back.
43:46
And I'm trying to do that. I just have
43:49
my last book of this contract
43:51
as late. That's the end of everything and about
43:54
how societies disappeared during
43:56
wars. Some work. So I better get that done.
43:58
Yeah.
43:59
Well, I just wanted to put in a plug for
44:01
the new criteria because I do think not just
44:04
for whatever
44:05
reason, but because I really do think that they
44:07
do great analysis. Not a great stuff.
44:10
A culture out there. Yeah. Well,
44:12
I I don't know how Roger Kimbell does it.
44:14
I do not know how he does it. He's the
44:17
editor and chief and publisher of encounter
44:19
books, which is just skyrocket it.
44:22
We at the Bradley foundation
44:24
help help it. But
44:27
help is is not the right word.
44:29
We support it. But my
44:31
gosh, it's selling
44:33
a record number of books. It's become the go
44:36
to place now for conservative authors.
44:39
That have been blackballed or alistracizer unfairly
44:42
treated by the main New York publishers.
44:44
And I don't mean woke ops. I'm talking
44:46
about you know, double day Alfred
44:48
Knapp, Simon and Schuster random house.
44:51
And so and then he's writing
44:53
four, five columns
44:56
a week for different venues, Americans, Spectator,
44:59
American greatness. You
45:01
name it. He's, you know, Epic Mimes.
45:03
He's all over there. And then he's the
45:06
as you say, they had a good chief publisher
45:09
of the new criteria. Yep.
45:12
Okay, Victor. Let's go ahead and take a
45:14
break, and then we'll come right back and we'll
45:16
talk. I'll give you a choice since
45:18
this is our New Year's episode.
45:21
And we have I will go either
45:23
admirable politicians or
45:25
non western movies that you thought
45:27
were really good. But give us little
45:29
bit we'll give it a little bit of time
45:31
to these important
45:33
messages. We're
45:41
back. Victor, which
45:44
one which which is your choice? Do
45:46
you wanna talk about politicians or
45:48
non western movies that you
45:49
like? I'm a glutton
45:53
famous politicians you said?
45:55
Well, the ones that you think are
45:57
this, you know, are are great politicians
46:00
in our current time, I think.
46:03
Well, I'll do it very quickly because we don't have
46:05
much time. Yeah. Tom
46:07
Cotton, I admire I might disagree
46:09
with him a little bit on foreign calls to,
46:11
but boy, he takes
46:14
these issues and he's dead
46:16
to rights. He's fearless. He's
46:18
our expert on the Pentagon. He's
46:21
worried about what's happened to the military. He's
46:23
effective. He's
46:25
he's just a wonderful senator. And
46:28
as I said earlier, I had my differences with
46:31
Ram Paul early on, but my
46:33
gosh, when his
46:35
dissection of Anthony Fauci was brilliant.
46:38
And he's done a lot of good on matters
46:41
fiscal and He's
46:43
a financial conservative, budget
46:45
conservative. And he's a
46:47
free I know he's a libertarian, but he's
46:49
a And I think he's just
46:52
evolved in a way that that is
46:54
is quite stunning. He's he's
46:56
doing a lot of good So I
46:58
I really admire him and, of course,
47:00
I'm prejudice because I'm a
47:02
neighbor and I've known him for years to have a noose
47:05
Nunez. But you take away Devin
47:07
Nunes out of the equation, there would be no
47:11
Russian collusion investigation
47:13
or we wouldn't really know about it. It would still
47:15
be parading. When he
47:18
found out what was going on and he had that
47:20
press conference, the whole weight
47:23
of the media, the political world,
47:25
the cultural landscape. They all went
47:27
after him. They tried it physically, I
47:29
mean, literally destroy him.
47:31
And even his own party when Paul
47:34
Ryan had that ethics Toni Epics investigation.
47:37
And when he had that majority
47:40
report, remember about the
47:42
whole Russian collusion, and then shift
47:44
gave that duplicitous and inexact
47:48
and error ridden minority report and yet
47:50
the New York Times and Washington Post and all of
47:53
the networks craze this
47:55
provokes provocateur shift.
47:58
And when I gloved up, I would drive down the
48:00
freeway, and I think I said that to Jack, you see those
48:03
Most posters, anti noonas,
48:05
with him, with Putin, are I go
48:07
in San Francisco and I'd see in windows
48:10
donate to and
48:13
get rid of Nunez and people were raising
48:15
money ten million dollars plus
48:18
to go after them. So and
48:20
he he kept going. My
48:22
only criticism of him is we need
48:24
him right now. It's not a
48:26
criticism, but my gosh, put
48:28
Devin Nunes at the head of ways and means
48:31
or if he could
48:33
find a consensus if he was if
48:35
Kevin McCarthy said I need another vote
48:37
or something Nunez would
48:39
be be the person to find it. So he would he
48:41
was a very gifted courageous politician.
48:44
As far as foreign movies, I talked
48:46
about it before, my favorite is gaspout. I
48:49
read the novel, you know, it was there was a novel
48:51
written by a guy in nineteen
48:53
seventy
48:53
three, gaspute. Who you
48:56
you remember you saw Dossbooth writes Sami?
48:58
Yeah. Oh, yeah. You you remember
49:00
the blond Nazi guy
49:03
who was supposed to write pup
49:05
pieces about the u boat crew.
49:08
Yeah. And they and he lives and
49:10
survives. Remember, but you kinda detest
49:12
him. He's but then he ends up to be anti
49:14
war after he sees
49:16
how wonderful these guys are and what a
49:18
bad cause they're fighting for. And
49:20
that they're all anti anti hit or supposedly.
49:23
But that that was based on a real person who
49:25
was a Nazi megaphone. Journalist,
49:29
and he did go on a
49:32
u boat. And I was in college
49:34
when he wrote Doss Boot, and it was it
49:37
was a best seller. It's a wonderful
49:39
mewy jurgen
49:40
Proctel. Is that how you pronounce it?
49:42
I
49:42
think it's Jurgen. Jurgen. Yeah. Yeah.
49:44
He's a wonderful actor that he
49:46
was in Dune, the first version of Dune.
49:49
Something about his face is kinda pockmarked
49:51
and the way he has a tragic look
49:54
about it, but that portfolio, the
49:56
captain was brilliant. Whether
50:00
we very quickly to finish, Australian
50:02
directors are just
50:05
wonderful. I mean, Bruce Beresford
50:07
and and others,
50:09
but I think
50:11
he did Brake or Marat
50:14
And that I know that was propaganda. It's
50:16
about the special unit
50:19
during the boar war that that
50:21
they lose a a beloved captain,
50:25
and he's apparently mutilated. They
50:27
don't know quite who does it, but they think that the
50:29
boars do it. He kinda goes on a rampage,
50:32
but he has
50:34
executed two or three in
50:37
a boar, and think maybe three or four people.
50:40
And Kitchener,
50:43
this is the this is well before World
50:45
War one. And
50:48
and after the great Modi expedition,
50:51
but he he decides that
50:53
he has to draw the line and have them execute
50:55
it. So it's kind of fake trial. I
50:57
think Jack Thompson's the lawyer. He was a brilliant
50:59
lawyer. And it
51:02
really an actor and and a role and
51:04
they try to deliver you make sure he gets a bad
51:06
lot lawyer with no experience, but
51:09
he's got intellect
51:11
and brilliance on his side. He just apps
51:13
slightly shreds the British Army's
51:16
prosecution. And
51:19
yet and even at during the
51:21
trial, there's an attack on the boars and these
51:23
guys in jail save everybody and still
51:25
doesn't save them. And breaker
51:27
Marant, you know, is is kind of an older
51:29
person in his mid
51:31
fifties, and he's getting
51:33
old. He's a poet. And
51:36
he's more or less says he he's
51:38
at the point where the things that made him famous
51:40
or legendary as a cavalry
51:43
officer or breaker of wild horses.
51:45
He can't do anymore to the same extent.
51:48
So he's not going to really fight it even
51:50
though he's very principled.
51:53
That's the movie version. And I
51:55
think it's based on a book of the third
51:57
person that was in the movie, the
51:59
young kid that they tried to execute, but they
52:01
they give him a amnesty. You
52:04
wrote a book later and I read that book
52:06
called scapegoats of the empire.
52:09
And it it was about they never
52:11
they never had trial that was lost, all the
52:13
transcript was mysteriously destroyed
52:16
or lost. But this guy
52:18
wrote, but how unfair it was and
52:20
that it became a cause to live because Australia
52:22
very quickly after became independent.
52:25
At least it was a commonwealth that not you
52:27
know, that when the war war took
52:30
place, if I'm not mistaken, if you were
52:32
a British subject whether you live in Australia
52:34
or not, the same. It was almost
52:36
a unity. And so once
52:38
Australia became a commonwealth in Sovereign,
52:41
then they really used this trial.
52:43
They were the only people really in the modern period
52:45
that had been executed for
52:49
reasons other than desertion or something.
52:52
For atrocities. The
52:54
problem with me is that it was
52:56
a brilliant movie. It's one of my favorite
52:58
movies. It's a foreign film, as you said,
53:00
but I don't think it my redscape
53:02
goes to the empire, but the more you read about
53:04
it, I think they were
53:06
guilty is what I'm trying to say.
53:10
I'm not sure that the captain was
53:12
mutilated by the boars. I'm
53:15
not sure that the minister
53:17
they executed or the other think there
53:19
was a German they executed weren't necessarily
53:25
traders or informants. I'm not sure
53:27
they needed to execute prisoners so
53:30
you get the impression. And then Waker morale
53:32
was kind of a Ladies
53:34
man, of course, he's that way in the in the
53:36
movie, but he he claimed he was a
53:39
because I remember he claimed that he was a long
53:41
lost son of a famous admiral Murant.
53:44
And he was he had perfect grammar and
53:46
diction, but he was kind of a fraud, but doesn't
53:48
mean he wasn't a great officer. But,
53:50
anyway, the Australian movie
53:53
is sort of in that sense propaganda from
53:55
the Australian point of view, but it's an absolutely
53:57
brilliant movie in. And
54:01
It's I don't know. It's
54:03
one of the I'm trying to remember the
54:05
actor's name, Woodward, that
54:08
played breaker Miranda. And
54:10
he he had his own he
54:13
had his own he was in the wicker
54:15
man. And it was a he's a brilliant
54:17
actor. He I sadly think
54:19
in his seventies from a heart attack. He was a
54:21
heavy smoker, and he actually
54:23
had a TV series for a year or
54:26
two. Maybe longer. But anyway,
54:28
he was a great actor. He was brilliantly
54:30
directed. Be a brilliantly acclaimed, it
54:33
it's a great movie.
54:35
And what about your American non
54:37
western? Non western? Yeah.
54:40
Why are you saying non western?
54:41
Because we could talk often or he
54:43
talked to us all about I know why you're
54:45
saying it -- Yeah. -- because because the
54:47
the listener right now, oh, no.
54:50
He's gonna see a change. Saying,
54:52
searching. Hey, researchers, high
54:54
noon, wild bunch,
54:57
man and shot liberty powered. Yeah.
54:59
No. Yeah. So Well,
55:02
there is a movie that
55:06
I like. A lot of people like it. It was
55:08
based on an actual answer to it with these bank
55:10
robbers in LA. You remember that they had a body
55:12
armor on it? They made heat, and so Michael
55:14
Mann did heat. And
55:17
that had that's
55:19
a very long movie, and I'm
55:21
not a big fan of Robert Inero, but he
55:24
was great in that movie. Our casino was
55:26
over the top. He, you know, he he went from
55:29
Michael Corleon in a very understated
55:31
and then kind of wild flamboyant at
55:34
Mimes, but he's he's
55:36
he is the interested in that
55:37
role. And then, God,
55:39
they had the woman who
55:42
was her name that
55:44
Ashley Judd. Yeah. Ashley Judd who
55:46
said, you know, I'm a dangerous woman. The
55:48
day Trump got nominated. Remember,
55:51
I mean, inaugurated That's
55:53
right. She she had all of
55:55
that. And it
55:58
it's they had he has a very, you
56:00
know, he did it with Miami, Bice,
56:03
and collateral with Tom
56:05
Cruise about assessing Yeah.
56:07
He has he Michael, he has a very
56:10
and he did that thief, that
56:12
first movie. He was he has an ability
56:15
to blend music and
56:20
and action. They're they're quite it's almost
56:22
realistic. It's really a fact active
56:24
that last scene in that movie when they're shooting,
56:27
and then Robert Nurel did not And
56:29
and he has that kind of strobe lights effect
56:32
from LAX when they have the music. It's
56:34
really well done. I like that movie.
56:36
It's I I watch it.
56:39
All the time. I'm afraid, you know, if
56:42
the other favorite movie is
56:44
and I've talked about that as the
56:47
best years of our lives. I really like Dana
56:49
Andrews. Along with Joel Macrae, I think
56:51
they were two of our best and truly
56:54
American
56:55
actors, you know. Yeah. That's
56:57
great movie. Yeah. Well, he Robert
57:00
Dennaro plays an interesting part, you
57:02
know, after you get tired of his
57:04
cape fear you
57:05
know, kind of act The problem with Mueller
57:07
and De Niro is. He's kinda like
57:09
Jack Nicholson, and that is his
57:12
best performance as you get or
57:14
when he's not acting, he's
57:16
playing himself. And I'm
57:19
I'm
57:20
Cape Frere, I think that's Robert
57:22
De Niro.
57:22
That's Robert De Niro. Yes. And
57:25
that's that's the problem
57:27
where then when he when
57:30
he is very brilliantly when he pro plays
57:32
a part brilliantly and he does and
57:34
he he's absolutely ruthless. This
57:36
is a guy who said he wanted to what beat
57:38
hit down trumping the mouth and
57:40
they asked
57:41
Mimes. He just said, f Trump and --
57:43
Yeah. -- just got carried away. And
57:46
Yeah.
57:46
He has an an interesting politics.
57:48
That's for sure. Yeah. That's
57:51
what's scary about certain actors that
57:53
are that When they play
57:55
a particular role, they're brilliant in
57:57
that particular role, but that's
58:00
because they're not acting. And
58:02
he's one of those people. And
58:06
and that's what's somebody
58:08
like Anthony Hopkins can play any role,
58:10
Gary Ohlman can play any role, Denzel
58:12
Washington can play any role, but
58:15
certain people maybe play that role
58:17
better than anybody else could possibly
58:19
because they're not they're not acting. They're
58:22
just themselves. And that's
58:25
what's frightening about
58:26
it. Well, thank you, Victor. This
58:28
will end our year twenty twenty
58:31
two. It's been a great
58:33
great year for your podcast and,
58:35
you know, everything that
58:38
we talk about you do always
58:40
say something different and something new.
58:42
I'm always astounded by the breadth
58:45
and depth of your conversation
58:48
in these podcasts. So III
58:50
thank you. I thank the audience for
58:52
always coming to us. To hear
58:55
usually the latest news or things on culture.
58:57
I hope you enjoyed this episode.
59:00
Yeah. I did. I I think next time in
59:02
the New Year, we'll talk once on an agriculture,
59:05
farming, and water. How's
59:07
that? But in a a way that's not just dry.
59:10
Yeah. That'll be good. That'll be good. And
59:14
thanks everybody for listening, and I'm
59:16
sure that we're all gonna thank that two
59:18
thousand twenty three will be better
59:20
than two thousand twenty two or something
59:22
about two thousand twenty
59:23
two. The border of the election
59:26
is just glad it's gone.
59:28
Yeah. We'll look forward to twenty twenty
59:30
three. Everybody have a good time tonight.
59:33
And we'll see you in two thousand
59:35
twenty three. Alright. This is Victor
59:37
Davis Hanson in Sami Week, and we're signing
59:39
off.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More