Podchaser Logo
Home
Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Released Wednesday, 11th May 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Ep. 19: Amanda Kass - MA in Geography & PhD in Urban Planning & Policy Turned Public Finance Analyst

Wednesday, 11th May 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:24

Hey everyone. Thanks for joining me

0:25

for another episode. I'm your host, Jesse Butts.

0:29

Today, I'm chatting with Amanda

0:29

Kass, an MA in geography and

0:33

PhD in urban planning and policy

0:33

turned public finance analyst.

0:38

Amanda is now the associate

0:38

director of the Government

0:41

Finance Research Center

0:41

at the University of

0:43

Illinois at Chicago .

0:45

Amanda, welcome to the show. Thanks for joining me.

0:47

Hey, thanks so much for having me.

0:49

Absolutely. So before we dive into the

0:51

path from geography to urban

0:57

planning to public financing

0:57

or to public finance, excuse

1:00

me, I'm wondering if you could

1:00

tell us a little bit about

1:04

what you're doing at UIC now.

1:06

What is the Government Finance

1:06

Research Center's focus?

1:09

And how do you relate to that?

1:12

Yeah. So the center, the Government

1:12

Finance Research Center,

1:15

we were launched in 2018.

1:17

So we're still a relatively

1:17

kind of new center.

1:20

And we're a research unit

1:20

within UIC, within the

1:23

College of Urban Planning and

1:23

Public Affairs, specifically.

1:27

Um, and so our mission is to

1:27

shape and inform public policy

1:31

and scholarly discourse on

1:31

government and public finance.

1:34

Kind of, I think what that

1:34

means is, we do exactly

1:37

what our name says. We study and research,

1:39

government finance.

1:42

And we kind of disseminate that

1:42

research, I think, in a variety

1:45

of mediums, because we're really

1:45

interested in shaping public

1:47

policy and public discourse. So we write blogs, we

1:49

write research papers,

1:52

we write academic papers. We do interviews like this.

1:57

You're kind

1:57

of, or not kind of, you're

2:01

a non-partisan vehicle for,

2:01

for people who are trying to

2:04

figure out what exactly is

2:04

being spent and the efficacy of

2:09

that with public institutions?

2:11

Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And I think, you know, for me, I

2:12

came into kind of public finance

2:18

from a non kind of linear path. And so one of my interests

2:19

has long been like, How do I

2:22

explain to other people how to

2:22

research public finance issues?

2:27

How do I explain to someone

2:27

or help them get tools to

2:31

be able to understand how

2:31

their own community is

2:34

spending public dollars?

2:36

Is this at

2:36

all levels of government?

2:39

Or are you concentrated mostly

2:39

on like federal or state or

2:43

Chicago specifically or...?

2:45

We're pretty

2:45

focused on local governments,

2:47

not specific to Chicago, but

2:47

I'd say local governments

2:50

within the United States. Um, my kind of career

2:52

background is such that I also

2:56

kind of personally focus on

2:56

the state of Illinois, city

2:59

of Chicago, and other local

2:59

governments in Illinois.

3:03

Great. So now that we have a

3:05

better understanding of what

3:08

you're doing and what the

3:08

organization is all about,

3:11

can you tell us a little bit

3:11

about why you decided to go

3:18

to grad school for geography? What made you want to go

3:20

beyond your undergrad studies?

3:23

It's nice to, I don't know, I guess reflect on that a little bit.

3:26

So, I, when I went to

3:26

undergrad, when I started

3:29

undergrad, I actually had

3:29

a really strong interest in

3:32

international development

3:32

and international studies.

3:35

So I started out as an

3:35

international studies major

3:38

and I thought that I would go

3:38

on to do international work,

3:43

international development

3:43

work, but kind of found

3:46

that I wasn't totally

3:46

interested in, in doing that.

3:50

And was, you know, like many

3:50

undergrads kind of thinking

3:53

like, What else do I do? And a friend at the time

3:55

said, Hey, you should take

3:59

a geographic information

3:59

system, a GIS class.

4:03

Like GIS is some

4:03

software you can learn.

4:06

It's a practical skill. It'll open up a lot

4:07

of doors to you. And so that's, that was kind of

4:09

my introduction to geography.

4:13

And then I took some

4:13

other classes within the

4:17

geography department,

4:17

specifically, a class that

4:19

was about development. But it started with kind of a

4:21

philosophical question of, of

4:24

kind of, What is development? And introduced me to

4:26

kind of social theory.

4:29

And I just loved that class.

4:31

And that's, that's what set

4:31

me on the path for geography.

4:36

And I worked really

4:36

closely with the professor

4:39

who taught that class. And I did an

4:40

undergraduate thesis. And he really encouraged

4:41

me to kind of go on in and

4:45

pursue an academic route. And then I should say too

4:47

my, both my dad and my

4:51

brother work in academia.

4:53

So it, this was kind of like

4:53

a known career path for me.

4:58

of us, and I'm

4:58

definitely including myself

5:01

in this, who really aren't

5:01

that familiar with what one

5:04

studies in, in a geography

5:04

program, undergrad or graduate,

5:08

what kind of, of courses,

5:08

or emphases or, or focuses

5:15

can you study in geography?

5:18

Yeah. I think geography is a really

5:18

great discipline that has a

5:22

lot of sub specialties in it.

5:25

So let's say, if you're really

5:25

passionate about climate change

5:29

and issues of climate change,

5:29

there's physical geography

5:32

is one of the branches. I got to take a class

5:33

with one of the kind of

5:37

world premiere people on

5:37

climatology, who did ice

5:41

core samples as an undergrad.

5:44

There's also human geography. So if you're kind of

5:46

interested in societal

5:49

questions around, let's say

5:49

capitalism or the labor market.

5:54

Like, how does U.S. consumption impact

5:55

international issues?

5:59

You can study that in geography. And then there's also the kind

6:01

of spatial science aspect.

6:04

Like I said, doing geographic

6:04

information systems.

6:07

That I think of as kind of

6:07

more applied route with a lot

6:10

of kind of technical skills. So geography is a really big,

6:11

I think, umbrella with a lot

6:15

of really interesting branches

6:15

or sub-disciplines to it.

6:19

And you were

6:19

taking initially that more...

6:24

Is it GIS? That's an acronym for that

6:27

Yeah. Yeah. GIS. Yep.

6:29

Okay. And what are you, what are

6:29

you doing in that software

6:32

exactly, or broadly? Maybe not exactly as the

6:34

right way to phrase that.

6:37

I, the way I use

6:37

it is I think of it like a tool.

6:40

Like I think of Excel

6:40

or I think of R.

6:43

And it's a tool for

6:43

doing spatial analysis

6:46

and for map making.

6:49

So, let's say I wanna

6:49

make a map of all of the

6:55

municipalities that are

6:55

in Cook County, Illinois.

6:59

My interest is in

6:59

population growth.

7:02

So I want to be able to

7:02

visually see which communities

7:06

have seen their populations

7:06

grow and which ones have seen

7:08

their populations shrink. That's something I

7:10

can do in Arc GIS.

7:14

Is this also

7:14

like if there were...

7:17

Perhaps some like proposed,

7:17

I don't know, shopping center

7:20

or factory, is this type of

7:20

software you'd use to determine

7:23

like, you know, how big it

7:23

could be or how it would fit

7:26

or that type of thing as well?

7:27

Yeah, for sure. There's a lot you can

7:29

do in GIS software.

7:32

Think of it, like you can

7:32

put in a lot of different

7:34

layers and analyze those

7:34

layers all at once.

7:37

So let's say you, you're

7:37

considering lots of different

7:42

sites for, you said a mall or

7:42

a development, and you want

7:45

to take into consideration

7:45

transportation, environmental

7:49

impact, nearby population,

7:49

other businesses that might

7:54

feed into this new business.

7:56

You could layer all of that

7:56

in GIS and use kind of some of

8:00

the analysis tools to refine

8:00

the location and kind of narrow

8:04

it down from, let's say a

8:04

really big pool of locations

8:07

to more specified ones.

8:10

Got it. So, when you started your

8:10

master's and you were working

8:13

through that program, you

8:13

entered with this kind of, I

8:19

don't want to say GIS focus, but

8:19

maybe the route surrounding that

8:23

was what you were interested in. Did that change or evolve

8:25

as you, you engaged

8:28

more with the field?

8:30

I would say I

8:30

have kind of, um, I had dual

8:34

parts to myself at that time. So the GIS part was, I

8:36

think, rooted in a more

8:40

kind of practicality

8:40

of, I need job skills.

8:43

Cause I graduated undergrad

8:43

in 2008 when the financial

8:46

crisis was happening, right. So that was really

8:48

formative to me. And I really thought about

8:50

what kind of jobs can I get?

8:55

And I felt a real importance

8:55

of like having skills

8:58

that could land me jobs.

9:00

But then the other part of me

9:00

was, was really academically

9:03

inclined and really

9:03

interested in social theory.

9:08

Kind of critiques

9:08

about capitalism.

9:11

Um, and that was the kind of

9:11

side that I was pursuing when I

9:15

went to do the master's program. It was not kind of GIS,

9:17

rooted or practical at all.

9:20

It was really rooted in these

9:20

kinds of questions about

9:22

international development

9:22

and a kind of capitalism.

9:27

I'm sorry. I misunderstood that. As you were in your program

9:29

and you are finishing

9:32

up, did your interest in

9:32

international development,

9:36

the, you know, critiques and

9:36

questions about capitalism.

9:39

Did that intensify? Or were you leaving with kind

9:40

of a different perspective

9:43

than what you started?

9:45

Yeah, it's I

9:45

think I got kind of burnt

9:48

out in the master's program

9:48

to be totally candid.

9:50

So, again, I went there when I

9:50

started the master's program,

9:54

I thought I would continue

9:54

on into the PhD program.

9:58

So I, I kind of view

9:58

the master's as like a

10:00

stepping stone to the PhD.

10:04

And again, at that time I was doing more kind of internationally

10:05

focused research. My thesis for my masters was

10:08

about the post earthquake

10:11

reconstruction efforts in Haiti. I went to Haiti for just

10:14

about a week, and kind

10:17

of And I was particularly

10:17

interested in the kind of

10:22

outpouring of international

10:22

aid and particularly U.S.

10:26

aid that was pledged to

10:26

the reconstruction efforts.

10:29

And I was really interested in like, Where does that money actually go?

10:32

And then this, this kind

10:32

of brought up like lots of

10:35

ethical questions for me of

10:35

like, essentially, like, What

10:38

am I doing with this thesis?

10:40

Or would this work to

10:40

kind of actually make

10:42

the world a better place? And I just kind of felt like

10:44

what I was pursuing was not,

10:49

not what I wanted to do. But I didn't really know

10:51

what I wanted to do. But I just knew that the

10:53

path that I was on, wasn't

10:56

what I wanted to keep doing.

10:58

And just, just

10:58

timeframe wise, you finished

11:00

your master's in 2011.

11:02

Am I remembering that correctly?

11:04

Yep.

11:05

I know probably

11:05

technically we were out of The

11:08

Great Recession, but you know,

11:08

as far as I can recall, it

11:11

still felt like we were in the

11:11

throes or the aftershock of it.

11:14

But what did you end up

11:14

doing after you, you finished

11:17

your master's and knew that

11:17

you didn't want to pursue

11:19

the PhD in geography?

11:22

It's kind of a funny story. So I finished up my master's

11:23

at the same time that my now

11:27

husband was finishing up his

11:27

undergrad, and he was moving

11:32

to Chicago for graduate school.

11:34

So I moved, moved to

11:34

Chicago with him and

11:38

didn't really have a plan. I spent the first summer that we

11:39

were there writing my master's

11:44

thesis up and just applying to

11:44

every and any job that I could.

11:50

Because I had these GIS

11:50

skills that I developed

11:52

as an undergrad, I applied

11:52

to kind of anything

11:54

that had to do with GIS. I just applied to stuff that

11:56

had to do with public policy.

12:00

Initially, I worked

12:00

at a retail store.

12:03

I worked at Banana Republic when

12:03

we first moved there because

12:07

I really had, I had no idea,

12:07

you know, like, what's next?

12:10

What do I want to do? But I need a job.

12:13

First I want

12:13

to say that a summer in

12:15

Chicago, not knowing what

12:15

to do is a pretty good place

12:18

to be and good time of year. For anybody considering Chicago.

12:23

But, um, that plug aside. So how long were you working

12:25

at Banana Republic or, or

12:29

sorting things out before

12:29

you landed on, you know,

12:33

work that was more aligned

12:33

to, to what you were doing?

12:35

Or is that when you were

12:35

seriously considering

12:38

an urban policy PhD?

12:40

No, I wasn't. So when I came to

12:41

Chicago, I kind of knew.

12:45

I had an interest in like

12:45

some day maybe I'll, I'll

12:48

go back and pursue a PhD. There's no geography

12:50

PhD programs in Chicago.

12:55

So I was kinda like, I

12:55

don't know what's next.

12:57

I heard about the Urban Planning

12:57

and Policy Program at UIC and

13:02

thought of that as kind of

13:02

most aligned with my interests.

13:06

And actually CUPPA the college

13:06

has a job's board, just an

13:10

online kind of list of jobs. And I actually went to that

13:12

and, and looked at jobs on

13:16

there and applied to the job

13:16

that I got, which was as a

13:20

researcher for the Center for

13:20

Tax and Budget Accountability.

13:23

And I have like no idea

13:23

what was going on in my

13:27

brain that made me think I

13:27

was qualified for the job.

13:30

Because I'm like, wasn't,

13:30

it was for a position

13:34

researching Illinois'

13:34

public pension systems.

13:38

I didn't have a background

13:38

in fiscal policy or

13:43

public finance at all. I didn't know anything

13:44

about Illinois' politics.

13:47

Like I'd heard of who Rod

13:47

Blagojevich was but didn't

13:50

know anything past that. Had no awareness that

13:52

public pensions in Illinois

13:55

were underfunded or what

13:55

a huge issue this was.

13:57

Like just no idea what I

13:57

was getting myself into.

13:59

But like, there's something in

13:59

my brain that was like, Oh, like

14:03

I was interested in money when

14:03

it came to the reconstruction,

14:07

reconstruction efforts in Haiti,

14:07

this has to do with money.

14:10

This seems like an interesting

14:10

organization, I'll apply for it.

14:14

I'm lucky that I got it

14:14

and it ended up being a

14:18

really great fit for me. But I still, you know, I I'm

14:20

like, I don't know what was

14:23

going on in my brain thought,

14:23

I thought that I could do this.

14:27

I think this is a

14:27

really interesting point though,

14:30

is that we often feel that

14:30

we're not qualified or we're

14:34

far from the ideal candidate. And we let that hinder us.

14:38

But it can be taking these

14:38

chances like these that

14:41

changed the trajectory of

14:41

our careers and our lives.

14:44

Oh, Yeah. And it totally the other,

14:45

like, I don't know.

14:48

I think like funny thing that

14:48

I think back on is, I had

14:51

long said, like, I wasn't

14:51

interested in doing applied

14:56

work or public policy work. And then here I was after

14:57

my master's degree, like

15:00

gravitating towards jobs

15:00

that have direct kind

15:03

of public policy work. Or like that's really the

15:05

space that the work that

15:08

I've been doing is in. And so, yeah, it was like

15:09

not only a job that was not

15:13

quite aligned with my academic

15:13

training, but also kind of

15:17

in a field that I had long

15:17

thought is like, oh, not for me.

15:21

So what led

15:21

to that mind shift change?

15:25

That's such a good question. I wish I could like put

15:26

myself back in where I was at.

15:30

Like, I guess it was

15:30

like almost 10 years ago.

15:33

I think at the time I was

15:33

just applying to like any and

15:36

all jobs that I thought I was

15:36

remotely qualified for and that,

15:39

and that seemed interesting. And I was fortunate that the

15:41

job that I got at the Center for

15:45

Tax and Budget Accountability

15:45

was one that I really loved and,

15:48

and I think through that job,

15:48

learned how much I really do

15:52

like having a foot and kind of

15:52

the quote unquote, real world,

15:56

of impacting policy or being

15:56

able to weigh in on contemporary

16:01

policy political issues.

16:04

And so it was really like

16:04

through that job experience,

16:06

I think, that I uncovered that

16:06

what I'm really interested in.

16:11

And was that

16:11

the job prior to applying

16:16

to PhD programs and

16:16

going that route or...?

16:19

Yeah, it was. So I worked at CTBA for

16:20

several years before I

16:24

applied to the PhD program. And then when I started the

16:26

PhD program, worked there

16:30

part-time for a while.

16:32

As you

16:32

entered the urban planning

16:36

program, is public finance

16:36

typically a concentration?

16:41

Or was this kind of another

16:41

scenario of finding something

16:45

a little tangential and then

16:45

kind of making it your own?

16:49

I think it's definitely for me was a little... the latter.

16:52

Finding something that's

16:52

a little tangential and

16:54

like making it my own. Again, when I first moved to

16:56

Chicago, I had heard about CUPPA

16:59

and part of why I'd heard about

16:59

it is the person who became

17:03

my advisor, Brenda Parker, her

17:03

PhD is actually in geography.

17:07

So the urban planning and

17:07

policy program was long on

17:10

my radar as like the most

17:10

geograpyish program in Chicago.

17:18

And then there's scholars

17:18

like Rachel Weber and Phil

17:21

Ashton that their, their work

17:21

isn't kind of public finance,

17:28

but it's public finance ish. So Rachel Weber asks a lot

17:30

of questions about kind

17:33

of economic development. She does a lot of work around

17:34

tax increment financing.

17:38

And so I thought that the

17:38

program was a really good

17:41

fit with my interests. And then, I've kind of started

17:43

building up this career doing

17:46

public finance, and I wanted to

17:46

keep that, I guess, that, that

17:51

kind of career door path going.

17:53

So I kept working

17:53

throughout the PhD program.

17:57

And there are just a couple terms you mentioned that I want to

17:59

make sure that we understand.

18:02

So CUPPA, what is that?

18:04

Oh, CUPPA

18:04

is the, let me make sure

18:07

I get the acronym right. It's the College of Urban

18:09

Planning and Public Affairs.

18:12

So it's, the college at

18:12

UIC that I did my PhD in

18:15

and that I still work at. And so the college has

18:17

two different departments.

18:21

One is the public administration

18:21

department and the other is

18:25

the urban planning and policy. And so public finance

18:27

typically falls more in

18:31

public administration

18:31

departments than urban planning

18:34

and policy departments.

18:35

And you

18:35

mentioned, I actually can't

18:38

recall the definition.

18:40

I just know the acronym, TIF.

18:43

I know kind of what it is. It has to do something with

18:45

certain areas can spend

18:49

taxes in certain ways. But maybe you could give us

18:50

a real definition of that.

18:54

Uh, TIF is such a

18:54

thorny, thorny, thorny topic.

18:57

So TIF stands for tax

18:57

increment financing.

19:00

And so it's, it's an economic

19:00

development tool, basically.

19:06

So what happens is an area

19:06

gets designated a TIF district.

19:11

And so then all the properties

19:11

that are in that district, all

19:16

the properties within the TIF

19:16

district, then any growth that

19:19

is in their property value,

19:19

the taxes from the growth and

19:24

the property values is used to

19:24

finance development projects

19:28

within that TIF district.

19:30

Let's just

19:30

use Chicago as an example.

19:33

If Navy Pier expanded,

19:33

and that brought lot

19:38

of growth and revenue. Instead of that going back to

19:40

all of Chicago or for, know,

19:47

the mayor's office to figure

19:47

out how that spent that district

19:51

instead gets to decide where,

19:51

in its purview, that's spent,

19:57

versus the whole city saying,

19:57

Oh, we got a little extra money.

19:59

We can apply it in this

19:59

neighborhood five miles away.

20:02

Yeah, that's

20:02

roughly how it works.

20:05

And part of the argument

20:05

is that that extra money

20:09

wouldn't have happened

20:09

but for the development.

20:13

And so, but for this TIF

20:13

district, you wouldn't

20:16

have had that extra money. And the actual kind of mechanics

20:18

are a little more complicated.

20:20

I actually wrote, I think an

20:20

explainer about TIFs with Daniel

20:24

Kay Hertz a couple of years ago. And I think it's on my website

20:26

or it's on his website if

20:28

people are listening to this

20:28

and like scratching their

20:31

heads, like what's a TIF?

20:35

TIF and some of

20:35

these other things, these are

20:38

the kinds of things you're

20:38

interested in studying.

20:40

These implications of how how

20:40

tax revenue is collected and

20:45

how it's spent ...Are these

20:45

the things that you're diving

20:50

into more in both your PhD

20:50

program and the job that you

20:54

maintained during that time?

20:56

Yeah, definitely. And I think some of it

20:57

too was, was a desire to

21:01

provide information and

21:01

explanations to people.

21:04

So I think public finance is

21:04

often highly technical, somewhat

21:09

arcane, and there's like a

21:09

high barrier to be able to

21:14

kind of enter the conversation

21:14

in and discuss about it.

21:17

TIF is a good example of,

21:17

I think, there's a lot

21:20

of politics around TIF.

21:22

But there's also often a lot

21:22

of, kind of confusion about

21:25

the actual mechanics of TIF. How does it work?

21:28

What does it do?

21:30

As you are in

21:30

your PhD program and you're

21:36

simultaneously working full

21:36

time, what are you thinking

21:40

as you get close to your

21:40

dissertation or start working

21:43

on it as to what you want to do

21:43

after you finish the program?

21:48

That's uh,

21:48

that's a good question.

21:51

Again, as somebody who

21:51

graduated undergrad in the

21:56

last financial crisis, that

21:56

was really formative to me.

22:00

And also seeing the

22:00

kind of massive changes

22:03

I think in higher ed. So as a PhD student and somebody

22:04

in the PhD program, right, like

22:10

you're kind of trained that the

22:10

end goal is an academic job.

22:14

That the end goal is to get a

22:14

tenure track position at a R1,

22:18

you know, research institution. But those jobs are very,

22:21

very few and far between.

22:26

So I kind of, again, have this

22:26

mindset of like, I want to

22:29

keep a foot in a world outside

22:29

of academia to kind of try

22:34

and keep the maximum number

22:34

of career op the doors open.

22:39

And I was really fortunate that

22:39

the center that I'm currently

22:43

at launched in 2018, which

22:43

is around the time I think

22:48

that I started, I think I

22:48

passed my qualifying exams.

22:52

I was like all but

22:52

dissertation at that point.

22:55

And so I got the position

22:55

as the associate director.

22:58

And kind of helped launch

22:58

the center with the founding

23:02

director who is also the

23:02

Dean at the college of CUPPA.

23:06

And, I'll be like candid of

23:06

like I haven't really thought

23:09

much past my current position.

23:11

I'm fortunate that

23:11

I love this job.

23:14

We have a new director, Deborah Carroll, who started this past summer.

23:17

Who's amazing. I love working with her. We've got some really

23:19

interesting research projects that we've got going on.

23:23

So I've been fortunate though. Like, I don't really need to

23:24

think past my current job.

23:28

Nice. And just to, to clarify.

23:30

So you finished your

23:30

dissertation while working

23:34

at your current job?

23:36

Yes. Which I don't, if anybody's

23:37

interested in doing a

23:39

PhD, I don't totally

23:39

recommend doing that...

23:43

So just a

23:43

very practical question.

23:47

You were working and

23:47

going to school full time.

23:50

You finished your dissertation while you're at your full-time job.

23:53

What is it like now not

23:53

having an academic obligation

23:57

over you as you're working?

23:59

Oh, gosh. It's interesting. It took...

24:02

So, when I was working on

24:02

the dissertation, writing

24:05

it, I would start writing

24:05

at like 5.30 in the morning.

24:08

And spend a couple hours

24:08

writing and then switch over

24:11

to doing my full-time job.

24:14

And during that phase of like getting the dissertation done, there's

24:15

no work-life balance at all.

24:19

It was kind of like work

24:19

was all consuming.

24:22

And luckily my dissertation

24:22

and PhD interests somewhat

24:28

align or overlap a little

24:28

bit with my work interests.

24:30

So it wasn't like I was in

24:30

two totally different worlds.

24:34

But now that I'm done with

24:34

the dissertation, it's

24:36

been a little bit of... unlearning.

24:39

Like learning or relearning

24:39

how to have a life outside

24:44

of being a PhD student

24:44

and a full-time employee.

24:47

So like trying to

24:47

rediscover hobbies and

24:49

what to do with free time.

24:51

Are you still

24:51

like waking up at 5.30 out

24:54

of habit or have you...?

24:55

No. Oh my gosh. No. But it took, it took a little

24:57

while to like undo that, right.

25:01

And, and like undo this

25:01

feeling of like, Oh, I have

25:03

to be, I have to be like

25:03

waking up early and being

25:07

quote unquote productive. And if I'm not being quote,

25:09

unquote productive, then

25:11

I'm doing something wrong.

25:14

So reflecting back

25:14

a little bit, are there any

25:18

other areas from your study,

25:18

from your master's program

25:22

that you see a relationship

25:22

to your current work?

25:26

Like any skills or

25:26

just any of the topics

25:28

that you were studying?

25:30

Yeah. I think, some of the skills

25:30

that I developed as an undergrad

25:33

is thinking critically. So, taking a step back

25:35

and, and trying to see a

25:38

bigger picture or, engage

25:38

kind of like critically

25:41

with the question before

25:41

just like jumping into it.

25:44

I think the other big thing I

25:44

got, especially from the GIS

25:49

work was around data management

25:49

and data organization.

25:54

So I think that's like one

25:54

of my plugs for why people

25:58

should do GIS classes. In addition to learning how to

26:00

do geographic information system

26:03

work and learning that software,

26:03

you develop really good, at

26:07

least for me, you develop

26:07

really good habits for how you

26:11

organize and manage your data. And not just data, but

26:13

like any documents. Like how do you

26:15

organize Word documents? How do you deal with

26:17

version control?

26:20

That's super, I think, practical

26:20

and helpful and a skill

26:23

that you develop that can be

26:23

applicable to kind of any job.

26:27

What did, what did

26:27

you have to learn about yourself

26:29

to find work that would fit you?

26:32

Especially, ruling

26:32

out academic careers?

26:37

I wouldn't say I ruled it out. I think what I would say is

26:39

what I, what I did rule out

26:43

is viewing that as the only

26:43

path and the only marker of

26:47

success or a good career.

26:51

And I think what I had to learn

26:51

about myself, I think what

26:54

I had to learn in general is

26:54

that, is that there's lots of

26:57

other types of jobs and there's

26:57

other work that is fulfilling.

27:01

So, you know, one thing

27:01

that I learned again is

27:04

like, I really liked this

27:04

kind of more applied side.

27:07

I liked the side of doing public

27:07

policy work that was more in the

27:12

short term or in the immediacy. So as an example, Illinois,

27:14

the state of Illinois in the

27:18

state General Assembly, is

27:18

working on crafting the budget

27:21

for the upcoming fiscal year,

27:21

which will be fiscal year 2023.

27:25

And what I really enjoy during

27:25

budget season is being able

27:29

to read the proposed budget. I get asked by reporters

27:31

to kind of weigh in of,

27:34

you know, the governor put

27:34

forward his budget proposal.

27:37

What do you think about it? How's the state of

27:39

Illinois' fiscal situation?

27:42

Is it improving? Is it declining?

27:45

And I really like to

27:45

be being able to engage

27:47

in that kind of work. And I the nature of academic

27:48

work is often so longterm.

27:53

So for example, I just got

27:53

an article finally knock on

27:57

wood published, and it took

27:57

two years from the first

28:01

submission of the article

28:01

for that to get published.

28:04

And that's not even

28:04

counting the kind of data

28:06

collection and analysis time. So a two year process

28:08

for one article.

28:11

So I guess what I had to learn

28:11

a little bit about myself

28:13

too, was it was that I like... I don't like working on

28:16

just a very long term

28:19

timeline for projects. I like the mix of

28:20

short- and long-term.

28:24

I don't know if that makes any sense.

28:26

I think, I think it absolutely does. I'm wondering if we could

28:29

provide a little context for

28:31

listeners outside of Illinois.

28:34

When you talk about planning for

28:34

the state budget and that work.

28:38

Was it three, four

28:38

years that Illinois

28:41

went without any budget? I mean, just, if you could give

28:43

a little context to why this is

28:45

such a bigger deal in Illinois

28:45

than a lot of other states.

28:49

Yeah. So the, I mean, there are budget

28:50

battles in every state, and

28:54

every state has its own kind

28:54

of like fiscal year cycle.

28:57

And in some places they have

28:57

two year budgets, not an

29:01

annual budget like Illinois. But yeah, it's gosh,

29:02

long been contentious.

29:05

I think since I've been

29:05

working on Illinois finances,

29:09

which is since 2011, I think

29:09

it's always been contentious.

29:14

It kind of reached a peak during

29:14

the last governor's tenure.

29:18

So during Governor Rauner's tenure. Governor Rauner

29:20

was a Republican. There was a Democratic led

29:22

General Assembly, both in

29:27

the House and the Senate. And it was like a

29:29

loggerhead over the budget.

29:32

And so the state didn't

29:32

have a budget, a formal

29:34

budget for two fiscal years.

29:38

Again, this is why, I like

29:38

really like public finance

29:40

and love what I do is that

29:40

even saying that there was

29:43

no budget for two years,

29:43

isn't totally correct.

29:45

There's many aspects of the kind

29:45

of state's functions that are

29:49

on autopilot and that it doesn't

29:49

require the General Assembly and

29:55

governor to sign off on a budget

29:55

for spending to be occurring.

29:59

And the General Assembly

29:59

passed funding for K

30:02

through 12 education. And the governor signed

30:03

that into law, which is

30:05

one of the biggest chunks

30:05

for the state budget.

30:09

So, there was an impasse over

30:09

the budget for two years, but

30:12

not kind of all aspects of the

30:12

state's finances were affected.

30:16

And not all aspects of society

30:16

kind of felt the consequences

30:20

of the budget crisis.

30:22

You mentioned

30:22

that you love your job.

30:25

For you, how

30:25

important is job fit?

30:27

Do you need to find

30:27

a job that you love?

30:29

Or is it kind of serendipitous

30:29

for you that you have?

30:33

For me, it's huge

30:33

to find a job that I love.

30:36

And it's not just about

30:36

the work that I do.

30:39

It's also the people that I

30:39

work with, which is one of

30:43

the reasons I really love UIC. And I really love CUPPA.

30:46

And so it's been a really,

30:46

it's been a really great fit

30:48

of, I feel like I'm doing

30:48

meaningful work and I'm

30:51

getting to do that with people

30:51

I really enjoy working with.

30:55

With your

30:55

job, obviously what you do

30:57

is, is very public facing. And I don't know if it's a

31:00

step above and beyond, or

31:02

part of the job, but, I mean,

31:02

your writing has appeared

31:05

in, in Chicago Magazine,

31:05

Crain's Business Chicago.

31:09

I've seen you on uh, Chicago

31:09

Tonight, which is a show

31:14

on WTTW, which is Chicago's

31:14

PBS affiliate affiliate.

31:19

How did, did you start all that?

31:21

And how does that fit

31:21

into the job for you?

31:24

Is, is that an expectation

31:24

of your role or is that

31:27

just, I mean, your passion?

31:28

Yeah. I think that's, that's, I don't

31:29

know, nice of you to ask and

31:33

somewhat nice to reflect on. I don't, it's definitely

31:34

not a requirement of

31:36

the job, I don't think. I think it's, again, when

31:37

you were talking about, you

31:39

know, What kind of like led me

31:39

down the path, or what did I

31:42

have to uncover about myself? That's something also that

31:44

I discovered is that I like,

31:47

I personally like having

31:47

that public facing role.

31:50

I, I find it both like

31:50

terrifying to go on live

31:53

TV and live radio, but also

31:53

really like exciting and, uh, a

31:57

real, like, I dunno, a feeling

31:57

of accomplishment after it.

32:01

And also like a, just a sense

32:01

of like, you know, I watched

32:04

Chicago Tonight for a long time.

32:07

And it felt like, well,

32:07

I can be on there.

32:09

Like I knew stuff about

32:09

Illinois' finances.

32:11

I know stuff about

32:11

Chicago's finances.

32:13

I can speak to these issues. And the way that I got into

32:15

it actually was from the

32:18

first job I had in Chicago

32:18

at the Center for Tax and

32:21

Budget Accountability. I worked with somebody

32:22

there who unfortunately

32:24

has since passed away. Her name was Kathy Miller.

32:28

And I first get into this job

32:28

and she's like, Amanda, you

32:33

need, you need to introduce

32:33

yourself to this reporter.

32:37

You're now the person who studies pension. This person has a

32:40

pension question. You need to call them up

32:42

and you need to introduce

32:44

yourself to them. And I was terrified of doing

32:45

that, and very resistant.

32:50

It was like, no, no, no. I'm a researcher.

32:53

I want to sit in my little corner over here and sit on my computer

32:55

and crunch these numbers.

32:57

I don't want to call anyone. No.

33:00

But I was also, you know, new

33:00

to a job, new to this career.

33:04

And it was just like, I don't, I don't know, I guess I have to do this.

33:07

And call that person up and

33:07

introduce myself and then had

33:12

to do a public presentation to

33:12

the League of Women Voters, the

33:17

Illinois League of Women Voters. Again, another time where

33:18

it was like very terrifying,

33:21

and I very much felt like,

33:21

I don't know what I'm doing.

33:24

I'm not capable of this. But was just kind of like

33:25

shoved into doing that.

33:28

And then found like, okay,

33:28

I survived, I can do that.

33:31

And I really, I enjoy talking with people. I enjoy giving

33:33

public presentations. That's a very long-winded

33:35

answer of how I came

33:38

to do these things.

33:39

It's really fascinating. Do you do some of these

33:42

as a way to build your

33:45

brand or, you know, make

33:45

yourself more attractive

33:49

as a potential employee to

33:49

other organizations as you

33:52

move along in your career?

33:54

Hmm, that's a good question. I mean, definitely somewhat.

33:58

Like, I think one of the

33:58

valuable things that I

34:02

have, I think is the network, the network that I built in Illinois.

34:06

And I think some of those

34:06

connections though, are

34:09

like a two-way street,

34:09

especially with reporters.

34:12

So I can provide analysis to

34:12

them or help answer a question,

34:18

but sometimes reporters can

34:18

help me with, Hey, I saw this

34:21

news story that's referencing

34:21

some pending legislation, I

34:25

can't figure out what the actual bill number is. Can you tell me what that is?

34:29

Or, Hey, read a story

34:29

about this lawsuit, I

34:32

can't find a case number. Like, can you tell me

34:33

what the case number is? And so I think, yes, it's

34:35

definitely something I

34:38

can market or is valuable

34:38

about myself, but I've

34:40

also found I really like

34:40

collaborating with journalists.

34:43

And I really like this, kind

34:43

of relationship that scholars

34:47

can have with journalists as

34:47

like partnerships, not just

34:50

a kind of one way street, but

34:50

a real kind of partnership.

34:54

Earlier, you

34:54

were mentioning since you

34:57

finished your dissertation,

34:57

unlearning some things

35:00

or rediscovering hobbies.

35:04

I'm curious now, how

35:04

would you describe your

35:07

relationship to work? How large of a role does

35:08

it play in your life?

35:11

That's a really good question. And, yeah, you, you kinda

35:12

like pose this question, I

35:16

think in one of your other

35:16

interviews and I've been

35:19

thinking about it since then. And I still don't

35:22

have a good answer. But I think, for me, it

35:24

not only was I finishing

35:28

the dissertation, but I was

35:28

finishing the dissertation

35:31

during a pandemic. And finishing the dissertation

35:33

during the pandemic and

35:37

working from home and

35:37

working really remotely.

35:40

And so I think, perhaps,

35:40

with a lot of people, there's

35:43

a rethinking of like, What

35:43

is my relationship to work

35:47

if I'm working from home? And, I don't have a kind of

35:48

separation between my home

35:54

life and my work life, right? Like, it's easy to have your

35:56

job, or your, or your work

35:59

kind of creep in and take over. And I think it's really

36:01

important, to the extent that

36:04

it's possible, right, that

36:04

we, that we're kind of like

36:07

privileged to be in a position

36:07

that we can have something

36:09

of a work-life balance to

36:09

really kind of maintain that.

36:12

Which is not a

36:12

good answer at all.

36:14

I would say my work is

36:14

interests, but I also think it's

36:18

really important to kind of have

36:18

my identity not solely be my

36:23

career or not solely be my job.

36:27

What questions

36:27

should someone who's out of grad

36:31

school, and they're thinking

36:31

about pursuing maybe another

36:37

master's or a PhD or some other

36:37

advanced degree that differs

36:41

from what they studied before.

36:44

What, from your experience,

36:44

were, were some of the questions

36:48

that helped you decide to go

36:48

that urban planning, excuse me,

36:52

urban planning and policy route

36:52

after that geography experience?

36:57

I think the

36:57

first question is Why.

37:00

Why is someone doing it? What's your goal? What are you hoping

37:03

to accomplish with it? I think there's lots of

37:04

professional master's programs.

37:07

So I think for some people there can be a kind of real practicality of, I

37:09

got my undergrad in X and

37:14

I really want to pursue a

37:14

job as an urban planner.

37:17

And I've noticed that everyone

37:17

who does urban planning has

37:21

a master's in urban planning. So I really need to get that.

37:24

I want to pivot my career. And that's why I'm kind

37:25

of pursuing a master's. I think for PhD, I think

37:28

there's maybe a little less

37:31

like practicality, like

37:31

career question, but I think

37:34

it's important to reflect

37:34

on like, why ... Why do

37:37

you want to pursue this? What are you hoping

37:37

to get out of it? And reflect on too some of the

37:39

opportunity costs with going

37:43

back to grad school, right. It can oftentimes be a

37:44

pause in your career.

37:47

It can have long lasting

37:47

impacts on your kind

37:49

of salary over time. So I think reflecting on

37:51

like, Why are you going?

37:54

What's motivating you? What are you hoping

37:55

to get out of it? And then I think very

37:57

practically for somebody who's

37:59

interested in a PhD is, What

37:59

financial kind of resources

38:05

are going to be available

38:05

to you in your PhD program?

38:08

One of the key pieces of

38:08

advice that I got as an

38:11

undergrad was, Don't go into

38:11

a PhD program if they're not

38:15

offering you financial support. So if you're not going to be a

38:17

funded PhD student in a program,

38:20

don't pursue that program.

38:23

Were there

38:23

any books or Ted talks or

38:25

anything that you, you saw

38:25

or read as you were kind

38:30

of considering a different

38:30

field of study that might

38:34

be helpful to somebody else?

38:38

Sometimes I like to listen to the podcast, How I Built This.

38:41

The NPR one?

38:42

Yeah, The NPR one. Cause that often, like, I don't

38:43

know that that like inspired

38:47

me or helped me, but I find

38:47

that like an interesting one.

38:50

You hear people kind of talking

38:50

about how they built their

38:53

company and some of like the

38:53

pitfalls that they went through

38:57

in their kind of trajectory.

38:59

So I'd like to,

38:59

to wrap up with which I'll

39:02

completely acknowledge is

39:02

a pretty selfish question,

39:05

but as I've been listening

39:05

to you, I've been realizing

39:09

how ill-informed I am.

39:11

And how part of that is that it

39:11

seems so hard to find sources

39:16

related to public finance

39:16

that aren't hyper-partisan.

39:20

You know, t he headline is,

39:20

They spent $13 per donut

39:23

at this whatever meeting. So I'm curious, what advice do

39:25

you have, aside from following

39:30

the work that your organization

39:30

is doing, for people to get a

39:34

better understanding of what

39:34

revenue is being collected,

39:39

and how it's being spent, and

39:39

how effective all of this is?

39:45

Yeah, that's a great question. Again, this is one of

39:46

the challenges of... with public finance.

39:49

Again, I think there's like a really high bar to kind of get in.

39:54

Unfortunately it's easy

39:54

to sensationalize numbers.

39:57

So, I like your example

39:57

of, Oh, they spent $12 per

40:01

donut at a meeting, right. You can really like

40:03

sensationalize that.

40:06

Using Illinois as an example,

40:06

using Illinois' long-term debt

40:09

and saying, This debt equates

40:09

to $30,000 per resident.

40:14

And I think often times, people

40:14

don't realize debt, it's a

40:18

long-term obligation, right. It's something that's not going

40:19

to be paid off in one year.

40:22

So I think maybe one easy

40:22

tip or practical thing is,

40:26

If you're reading a news story and it's got like some scary number in it, some big

40:28

number, try and take a step

40:31

back and think of like, What

40:31

is actually being discussed?

40:35

Is this a short-term, is

40:35

this something that actually

40:38

gets paid off in a year? Or is it, again, if it's,

40:39

talking about debt, these

40:42

are long-term obligations.

40:45

The other thing is, if people

40:45

are interested, trying to get

40:49

involved in your local city or

40:49

your state's budget process.

40:53

Right. So when the budget cycle is

40:53

happening, kind of trying to

40:57

get involved, seeing, like,

40:57

what does the city council

41:00

do with the budget process? What do they vote on?

41:03

What are the biggest

41:03

sources of revenue?

41:05

And you can identify those,

41:05

some through budget documents.

41:09

All cities and states

41:09

put out budget documents.

41:12

Ask your local representative,

41:12

your city council member

41:15

like, I'm trying to understand

41:15

this; help me make sense?

41:17

Where do my property taxes go? Where does my income tax go?

41:21

Help me understand

41:21

where my money goes.

41:25

All right. Well, thank you, Amanda,

41:25

for joining me on the show.

41:28

This was wonderful.

41:29

And thanks for having me.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features