0:02

Acast powers the world's best

0:04

podcast. Here's show

0:06

that we record. Hi.

0:11

I'm Cara Neverson, and I'm Vanessa

0:13

Bennett, and we're the hosts of the puberty

0:15

podcast. It's a show that weaves

0:17

together scientific research, parenting

0:20

strategies, and hilarious stories

0:22

to help adults who are raising kids through

0:24

adolescence. First, we lay

0:27

the groundwork for how puberty has changed,

0:29

and then we get into the tricky

0:31

territory of how to talk about it

0:33

with kids. Listen to us on

0:35

Acast or wherever you get your podcast.

0:38

Buckle up and enjoy the ride.

0:43

Acast helps creators launch, grow

0:46

and monetize their podcast everywhere,

0:49

acast dot com.

0:54

And some.

1:38

Welcome to my Young Church. Jacob Anika is staring with

1:40

you guys. We decided that we're going to do

1:43

a show today. Mhmm. We have discussion

1:45

earlier and did I tell you, oh, great

1:47

show. I believe we show a lot of times. This

1:49

one just

1:50

Asia. How's that for

1:52

honest? The most ridiculously honest

1:55

show in America. There

1:55

will be spicy takes though.

1:57

Of course. Hot cakes and

1:59

hotcakes all night long.

2:03

Alright. Anyways, let's get started. Well,

2:06

this is a story that just

2:08

reinforces what I covered last

2:10

Wednesday in regard to the Federal Reserve

2:13

having zero interest in regulating the bank

2:15

system. So let's talk about it. whole

2:19

tranche of banks has

2:21

been under regulated for

2:23

five years

2:24

now. AND PEOPLE ARE VERY CONCERNED

2:26

ABOUT WHEN YOU LIST THE HOOD, WHAT'S UNDER

2:28

THE HOOD, SINCE THE REGULATORS CLEARLY

2:31

HAVE NOT BEEN ON TOP OF THEIR JOB.

2:34

You lift the hood and you find a Gilotti, and

2:36

that's what senator Elizabeth Warren is concerned

2:38

about while she was speaking at

2:41

ON CBC NEWS FACE THE NATION, OF COURSE.

2:43

SHE BROUGHT UP THE SPECIFIC ISSUES IN REGARD

2:46

TO THE REGULATION OF

2:48

MIDSIZE BANKS while also

2:50

talking about the lack of

2:52

regulation and oversight coming from the Federal

2:55

Reserve. In fact, your new piece in the New

2:57

York Times There is some evidence

2:59

that the Federal Reserve knew that Silicon

3:01

Valley Bank in particular was in trouble

3:04

for over a year before its collapse

3:06

but did very little about it.

3:08

Now in twenty twenty one, a Fed

3:10

review of the growing bank found

3:12

serious weaknesses in how it was handling key

3:15

risks. Supervisors at the Federal Reserve

3:17

Bank of San Francisco, which oversaw Silicon

3:19

Valley Bank, issued six citations.

3:22

Those warnings known as matters

3:25

requiring attention and matters requiring

3:27

immediate attention, flagged that the firm

3:29

was doing a bad job of ensuring that

3:32

it would have enough easy to tap cash

3:34

on hand in the event of trouble.

3:36

Now in the lead up to the twenty eighteen

3:38

deregulation of midsize banks,

3:42

the argument was that we'll just we

3:44

don't need government oversight. We can just

3:46

rely on the Fed to do the oversight. But

3:48

at the time, Jérôme Powell,

3:50

the Chair of the Federal Reserve, made it clear that

3:52

he actually had no interest in regulation

3:55

or oversight. In fact, wanted to pull back

3:58

on regulation and oversight. So

4:00

Congress did the deregulation knowing

4:02

full well that there would be no cops

4:05

on the beat when it came to miss management

4:07

of funds at mid sized banks

4:09

like Silicon Valley Bank. And the

4:11

bank, of course, didn't fix its vulnerabilities even

4:13

after being notified by the Federal Reserve. I mean,

4:15

they sent got a few letters. And they're like, yeah,

4:17

whatever. By July of twenty twenty

4:20

two, Silicon Valley Bank was in full supervisory

4:22

review. Getting a more careful

4:24

look and was ultimately rated deficient

4:27

for governance and controls. It

4:29

was placed under of restrictions that prevented

4:31

it from growing through acquisitions. So

4:33

whoa. Whoa. You're not

4:35

allowed to merge with another bank, very

4:37

not body. You've been very, very bad, but

4:39

that's pretty much it.

4:41

Yeah. So look, guys. It's just

4:43

time to tell you how the game's actually

4:45

played. So when they're deregulating,

4:48

everybody says, oh, no. Everything's

4:51

gonna be fine, fine, So

4:53

you remember they deregulated banks

4:56

under two hundred and fifty billion dollars.

4:58

Again, the Silicon Valley Bank is in

5:00

that group, and they said everything's gonna be totally fine. Everything's

5:02

gone. No nonsense. No nothing. Everything's

5:04

fine. Then when something inevitably

5:07

blows up and, like, the Bernie Sanders,

5:09

Elizabeth Warren, us. It's the Noomi

5:11

parent, etcetera. We're right all along. The

5:13

deregulation was a disaster, and it led

5:15

to a collapse. Right? They

5:17

then turn around and go. Well, I mean,

5:20

everybody saw this coming. And they look at the

5:22

regulators. They had all these

5:24

warnings and stuff. And so, well,

5:27

Then you just think, wait a minute. First,

5:29

you said nobody can see it coming.

5:31

Then you saw it, you say that everybody can see it

5:33

coming. So what's the game that's being played here?

5:35

The game is when you do an article

5:38

like this at the New York Times after

5:40

the collapse, you're trying to

5:42

show that it's an exception to the rule.

5:44

Oh, it turns out with Silicon Valley

5:47

Bank, not the other banks, not

5:49

deregulation or but a Silicon Valley

5:51

Bank, they had a couch above me,

5:53

bunch of notices, and the Federal Reserve

5:55

was about to work on it. But hey, look, let's hold them

5:57

accountable. They did not quickly enough, etcetera.

6:00

No, it's not an exception. If deregulation

6:02

screws things up almost every time

6:05

for these colossal

6:05

companies. Yeah. Let me jump in there real quick because

6:08

let's also just be absolutely

6:10

clear about the fact that we

6:12

elect members of Congress and the

6:14

whole point of government. The whole point of

6:17

government. I think what everyone can agree

6:19

on is to keep people

6:21

safe, safe from corporate

6:23

greed, safe from risky maneuvers

6:25

by banks, say from any

6:28

type of national security threat, we

6:30

didn't elect members of the Federal Reserve.

6:33

The Federal Reserve was not originally

6:35

created to regulate the banking

6:37

system. So, like, the idea

6:40

that, oh, Congress can just

6:42

deregulate? And Federal

6:44

Reserve chair Jerome Powell

6:46

who is a big fan of deregulation and

6:49

loves to loosen, you know, any type of

6:52

restrictions when it comes to the bank. He said, idea

6:54

that that guy is gonna do the appropriate oversight

6:56

is ridiculous, and they knew that. They knew

6:58

that. The banks knew that. Which

7:00

is why they went along with this whole

7:02

charade in the first

7:03

place. Okay. Can I just prove it with it? Be

7:05

on a shadow of a doubt here. So do you

7:07

know the San Francisco border reserve federal

7:11

reserve board in San Francisco is

7:14

supposed to regulate Silicon Valley Bank because

7:16

it's in its region. Okay? You wanna

7:18

know who was on the board of

7:20

the San Francisco Federal Reserve?

7:22

Greg Becker, the CEO of

7:25

Silicon Valley. It's amazing. It's

7:27

amazing. So he chose not

7:29

to regulate himself. Interesting. Of course.

7:32

Of course. Right? But, like,

7:34

when progressives point out, hey,

7:37

these bankers regulate

7:39

themselves through the Federal Reserve. No

7:41

one got elected. This is absurd. And

7:43

forget that no one got elected. These

7:45

are literally the banks on the

7:47

boards, including the major banks

7:50

in New York, are on the board of the Federal

7:52

Reserve overall. In New York, the most

7:54

important one. Right? It's

7:56

absurd that they would regulate. Of course,

7:58

they allow for maximum risk to

8:00

make maximum profit in the short term.

8:03

If it blows up later, that's your goddamn problem.

8:05

Not their problem. They already took the money home. Now

8:07

do you see that in the press all the time. Of

8:09

course not, because this is look, the next

8:11

time there's a conversation about regulation and deregulation.

8:13

Come back to the Young Turks. We'll show you

8:15

everybody will tell you, oh, no. There won't

8:17

be any problems at all when we deregulate.

8:20

And after it blows up, oh, nobody could have seen

8:22

this coming. But actually, this one was everybody could

8:24

have seen coming because it was the exception. It's

8:27

never the exception. It's definitely the rule.

8:29

All these folks that are in giant corporate

8:32

interests are lying to

8:33

you. That's just the reality of it.

8:54

Now, just to buttress Shank's point,

8:56

in fact, reinforce this point, why don't we go

8:58

to the conversation that senator Warren had

9:00

with Margaret Brennan over at Face the Nation

9:03

because that conversation was

9:05

incredible. It really was. How dismissing she

9:07

was, and I'm talking about the host here,

9:10

of the impact that deregulation had

9:13

on the collapse of Silicon Valley

9:14

Bank. So let's take a look at one portion of that conversation

9:17

right now. The reason that

9:19

I'm calling right now for changes

9:21

in the Fed in its regulatory approach

9:24

and changes in commerce so that we

9:26

roll back the authorization

9:29

to lighten those regulations. Well, I I

9:31

know there's just you on the way to the regulation.

9:35

You're talking about a tweak in twenty eighteen

9:37

to Dodd Frank. And I know Barney Frank, one of

9:39

the authors of that original regulations is

9:41

a dispute with you in regard to what actually

9:44

happened here. But I I wanna talk about

9:46

the now, call it a twink. Well,

9:48

senator, though, I I wanna ask you about what Congress

9:51

can do now because it would be

9:53

up to Congress to lift the

9:56

FDIC

9:57

insurance levels for those deposits

9:59

above two hundred and fifty thousand

10:01

dollars. Now get a

10:03

load of that deflection. Right? So Elizabeth

10:05

Warren's there to talk about the impact

10:08

that twenty eighteen deregulation had

10:10

and how she wants to reverse that

10:12

in the very least. Margaret Brennan, of

10:14

course, brings up Barney Frank, who was

10:16

one of the original Architects of

10:18

the incredibly weak sauce Dodd Frank

10:20

Regulations following the two thousand eight collapse.

10:23

What Brennan failed to mention is

10:25

what Barney Frank has been up to since

10:27

his career in, you know,

10:29

congress ended. Where did it? What what is

10:31

he doing now, Jake? Oh, that's right. He's a lobbyist.

10:34

Who works on behalf of the banking sector. Weird.

10:37

Oh my god. So Weird. Weird that

10:39

you wouldn't mention that Margaret Brennan Now

10:41

it's not just that, guys. I now that's two

10:44

interviews in a row, I was seeing a Margaret Brown. One with

10:46

Bernie Sanders, one with Elizabeth Warren, where

10:48

she was so dismissive of the

10:50

guests. So I I haven't watched all

10:52

of our interview. So fair is fair. But

10:54

I'm gonna keep an eye on it because my

10:56

guess is and we'll see if it's true or not. When

10:58

corporate Democrats and corporate Republicans are on there,

11:00

she's going to be incredibly genteel

11:02

and polite. Right? But Warren comes

11:05

in here and goes, hey, maybe we should regulate the banks.

11:07

She said, whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Cut her off like twelve

11:09

times in six minutes. It was incredible to

11:11

watch. And she's so dismissive

11:13

with progressive. She has this like the

11:16

classic mainstream media sneer like, oh,

11:19

guess what regulation? There's a tweak

11:21

of a there's no big deal. Hey. Hey. Focus

11:23

now. Okay? What are we doing now?

11:26

And it's like she wasn't driving towards

11:28

how do we make sure that this doesn't happen again?

11:30

She's just like, chasing

11:32

the news of the day with,

11:34

like, hey, what further tweaks are we gonna

11:36

make? There's never a conversation in mainstream

11:39

media about, hey, are we doing this all wrong?

11:41

Is it right to have the bankers sit on the

11:43

board of the institution

11:45

that's supposed to regulate them? Is that insane?

11:48

Right? Because you cannot ask those questions

11:51

on CBS. If you ask that question, you're

11:53

gonna be in a world of trouble. All

11:55

these corporate interests protect their own.

11:57

And it's kinda disgusting to watch. Anyways,

12:00

look guys, bottom line is they

12:02

would blame everyone in Silicon

12:04

Valley

12:05

Bank. They will pretend its exception

12:07

and they won't fix a goddamn thing. That's my opinion.

12:10

Go ahead. They're

12:10

not gonna fix anything. So let's just be clear about that.

12:12

So anyone who is nervous about where their money

12:14

is, I mean,

12:16

Look, if you're under the FDIC insured

12:18

limit of two hundred fifty thousand dollars,

12:21

you're gonna be fine. That money is guaranteed

12:24

by the federal government. Anything above

12:26

that, you're playing with fire considering

12:28

I mean, this is gonna keep happening.

12:30

If we're gonna keep these mid sized banks

12:32

deregulated and they're if there's no cop on

12:34

the beat checking to make sure, and not

12:36

just checking to make sure that there isn't

12:39

mismanagement, but actually enforce seeing

12:42

actionable items to ensure that they

12:44

write their rums. This is gonna keep happening. Right?

12:46

Which is why Margaret Brennan's focus in that interview

12:49

wasn't on the regulations. It was on,

12:51

should the should the FDIC increase the

12:53

cap for depositor? Should they increase the

12:55

cap? How much should they increase the cap by? How

12:58

about we fix the system? So

13:00

it doesn't kind of get to point where the FDIC

13:02

has to come in and make all these depositors

13:05

whole because of mismanagement and risks

13:07

taken by the

13:07

banks. How about that? So this I

13:09

agree a hundred percent. And this requires it's hasn't

13:12

been a nuance, but understanding the game that's being

13:14

played. So do I agree that

13:16

the caps should be raised from two hundred and fifty

13:18

thousand? Yes, I do. Okay? Is that one

13:20

of things they're working at? Yes. By the way, is

13:22

that likely to pass? Some sort of increase

13:24

in the cap. Yes. That's a rare thing that

13:26

is likely to pass. Why? Because

13:29

not only does it protect the depositors and the citizens,

13:31

that's why I agree with it. But

13:33

it mainly also protects the banks. So

13:36

then you don't have to regulate the banks because

13:38

you allow the government to be even a

13:40

bigger backstop to the banks GOHEAD

13:42

BANKS TAKE EVEN BIGGER RISKS SO YOU CAN MAKE EVEN

13:44

BIGGER PROFITS. AND IF YOU COLAPS,

13:46

DON'T WORRY THE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO COVER

13:48

A MILLION dollars ARE five million or ten million

13:51

as Elizabeth Warren talked about when

13:53

the banks collapse. The better

13:55

route, you could do that, and think you should do that.

13:57

But the better route on top

13:59

of that is also regulate so

14:01

they don't take insane risk. Right.

14:04

But they're never gonna do that because that's

14:06

money and money that's funneled to

14:08

corrupt

14:08

politicians. And that's exactly what Warren

14:10

said later in the interview

14:13

where she's like, yes. I agree with exactly

14:15

what you said. I agree with raising the FBI

14:17

see insured limit. However,

14:19

we need regulations, but it's

14:21

very clear that there is much of an appetite

14:23

for that type of conversation on Face

14:26

the Nation, which is a shame. Finally, if

14:29

you're not as concerned about your

14:31

mid sized bank collapsing as you should

14:33

be in my opinion, You should be concerned

14:35

about your data in the very least because apparently,

14:37

let's go to graphic five here. According to person

14:39

familiar with the matter, executives at the firm,

14:42

Silicon Valley Bank, were told of cybersecurity

14:44

problems both by internal employees and

14:46

by the Fed, but ignore the concerns

14:49

because they don't care. Anything

14:51

that might cut into their

14:53

profits? They're not gonna do anything

14:55

about it unless they're forced to do something about

14:58

it. And that's the thing they're not forced

14:59

to. I'm gonna say one last time, guys, it isn't

15:02

about greed. Everybody always says, oh, they got

15:04

greedy. No, greed is built

15:06

into the system. You'll have

15:08

to maximize profit. So if those

15:10

guys weren't greedy and took excessive

15:12

risk and didn't ignore the Fed and the internal

15:16

folks tell them there's massive problems, they

15:18

would have been fired and replaced by

15:21

other guys who would have been maximum

15:23

greedy because that's what the corporation demands.

15:26

Look, I'm in business. Everyone

15:28

in business demands a maximum

15:31

profit. You can't just say, hey,

15:33

you know what? I'm only gonna make a little bit of profit.

15:35

That's why the government has to be the cop on the

15:37

B that says, no, you're not allowed to do that

15:39

because that'll endanger the whole economy. It'll

15:41

endanger the citizens. But whenever you

15:43

say that, you get a roar back

15:46

both by corrupt politicians and mainstream

15:48

media saying, no. Oh, deregulation's

15:51

gonna make us richer. I mean, it'll be

15:53

perfectly fine. It'll be totally safe for

15:54

everyone. No one could see it coming. Well,

15:58

why don't we take a break? When we come back,

16:00

we'll have a monster segment dedicated

16:03

to the possibility of Donald Trump getting

16:05

did his incitement to more violence

16:08

and how some in the right

16:10

wing have actually decided not to

16:12

take the bait when it comes to incitement

16:14

of violence that more coming

16:16

up. Don't miss it.

16:35

Alright. Back on t by t. Jake and Anna

16:37

with you guys. Also, Chris Birch. Remember

16:39

on YouTube, gifted five memberships

16:42

for other folks. So Chris, a bit of

16:44

an American hero as usual today. We appreciate

16:47

CASPER?

16:48

WELL,

16:48

LET'S GET INTO THIS POSSIBLE

16:50

ARREST OF DONALD TRUMP. IT'S A BIG STORY.

16:53

LET'S DO IT.

16:54

Enforcement said they're ready for any possible

16:57

unrest if that does happen. And speaking of that,

16:59

you know, we have this video that we just got moments

17:01

ago. This is the New York Police Department.

17:03

They're installed AND SECURITY CAMERAS ON LIGHT

17:05

POST THAT IS OUTSIDE THE MINHAD IN

17:07

CRIMINAL COURTHOUSE.

17:10

AUTHORITIES ARE PREPARING FOR POTENTIAL

17:12

outbreaks of violence following news

17:15

that former president Donald Trump

17:17

might get arrested and indicted

17:20

in connection to the hush money payments

17:22

that were paid to adult actress, Stormy

17:25

Daniels, and the lead up to the twenty sixteen

17:27

presidential election. Now when

17:29

Trump heard of the news, he began

17:31

riling up his supporters and encouraging

17:33

them to not only get rowdy and violent

17:35

on his behalf, but to protest,

17:38

and he did that in multiple posts on social,

17:40

truth social. We'll get to those comments in

17:42

just a second. But let's back up and

17:44

try to kind of figure

17:47

out what this potential arrest could be

17:49

about, when it's likely to happen,

17:51

if it happens, and whether

17:53

this is an open and shut case. Now at

17:55

the center of this case is the one hundred and thirty

17:57

thousand dollars that Donald Trump paid

17:59

adult entertainer Stormy Daniels during

18:01

the twenty sixteen presidential election. They

18:04

had met each other back in two thousand

18:06

six when Melania Trump was pregnant

18:09

and engaged in a sexual

18:11

rendezvous. NOW SHE

18:14

HAD SHARED HER STORY ON sixty

18:16

MINUTES AND WE KNEW THE DETAILS ABOUT THAT.

18:18

BUT APPARENTLY TRUMP DECIDED

18:20

TO pay her a

18:23

hundred thirty thousand dollars to kind of

18:25

keep that story under wraps, so it wouldn't

18:27

hurt him during the presidential election. At least that's

18:29

the theory. Now if

18:32

Trump is eventually indicted, it

18:35

will be for falsifying business records

18:37

in the first degree, which by the way, that alone

18:39

is just a misdemeanor. But it becomes

18:42

a felony if he falsified

18:44

records in order to commit another

18:46

crime. In order to elevate it to a

18:48

felony, the defendant needs to have created the

18:51

fake records with an intent to commit

18:53

or conceal another crime. Here

18:55

it's unclear whether the Manhattan District

18:57

Attorney's Office plans to argue

19:00

that there's a second crime. If the grand

19:02

jury does not vote IN FAVOUR OF PROSECUTING

19:04

IT AS A FELONY, IT COULD DIRECT THE

19:07

PROSECUTOR TO FILD A MYSTIMINER CASE INSTEAD

19:09

AND THIS COULD ALL JUST BE BIG NOTHING BURGER.

19:11

BUT WITH ALL OF THAT

19:13

SAID, DONALD TRUMP HAS COMPLETELY

19:15

LOST IT AND IS TRYING TO

19:18

GET HIS SUPPORTERS to protest,

19:20

which is why authorities in Manhattan

19:22

are preparing for it with metal barricades and

19:25

with surveillance

19:25

cameras. So what do you think about

19:28

this so far, Jane? Yeah. So this

19:30

is political, but not in the way that

19:32

the right wing thinks it is. So let me

19:34

break it down. IT

19:36

TOOK FIVE YEARS FOR THE MANHATTAN DA'S

19:38

OFFICE TO CHARGE DONALD TRUMP

19:40

WHO WAS A COCUS SPREADER OF MICHAEL COLLEN

19:43

AFTER THEY CHARGE THEM CONVICTED

19:45

HIM AND SENT HIM TO PRISON. SO WHAT THEY

19:47

WAIT AROUND FIVE YEARS FOR, THIS IS

19:49

THE ONE CASE THAT I WAS SAYING ALL LONG

19:51

IS OPEN A SHUT. THERE'S NO QUESTION. They

19:53

he paid the hush money. It was violation

19:55

of campaign finance laws, and they falsified

19:57

the records. There's absolutely there's overwhelming evidence

20:00

to that effect, and they already convicted as coker

20:02

spirit. Right? They waited around for permission

20:05

from both Democratic and Republican

20:08

establishment figures. Bingo. Because

20:10

Republicans don't give a damn about Democratic establishment,

20:12

but they do care about their own donors, they

20:14

wait for permission from their own donors. Democrats

20:16

wait for permission from their donors and

20:19

Republican donors. And so

20:21

finally, Albert Bragg got that permission when

20:23

the Koch brothers, Murdoch, and everybody else

20:25

turned on Trump. So he's now, like, oh,

20:27

I have been waiting, waiting, waiting, waiting,

20:29

waiting, oh, you I have

20:31

permission. I'm gonna go forward now. Now

20:33

now that's that's your take on it.

20:35

Right? Like, obviously, you don't know for sure, but

20:37

think that your take on it is absolutely correct. don't

20:40

know if it has to do with donors. I think it has

20:42

more to do with the political appetite

20:44

on both sides -- Hundred percent. -- political

20:46

appetite among establishment politicians

20:49

on both sides to finish

20:51

Trump. Yeah. I don't want you to mistake what

20:53

I'm saying. Anne is absolutely right. It's not like

20:56

Albert Bragg is gonna get paid by Republican

20:58

and Democratic donors for this. Yeah. It's

21:00

No. It's groupthink. It's conventional wisdom.

21:03

For Democrats, they're they're the cowards

21:06

and the weaklings in this play that you

21:08

see. The national theater

21:10

of politics. And so they wait for permission

21:13

in the group think of, like, oh, Republican is also

21:15

great. Okay. Finally, we can do something. Right?

21:17

And so that's why Brad didn't do anything for all this time

21:19

and neither did his predecessor. So now

21:21

what is the play here? What is what are they gonna do?

21:23

Are they gonna finally actually end item? Yes.

21:25

It looks like they're gonna finally end item. Right?

21:28

Is he going to actually go to prison? No

21:30

way. No. Because this is political,

21:33

they're trying to hurt his chances Right?

21:36

And distract him and smear him

21:38

and said, now the thing is the right wing's thinking,

21:40

what do you mean? That's exactly what we think. No,

21:42

guys. He actually did do it. The

21:45

real problem is that there's no quality here.

21:47

If you had done it, you'd have gone to prison five

21:49

years ago. How do I know? Michael

21:51

Cohen, relatively regular guy, went to

21:53

prison five five years ago. Yeah. Right?

21:55

There's no question about it. They

21:57

cover for the elites, and Trump

21:59

is part of the elites. But

22:01

now that the elites have turned on Trump, they're

22:03

saying, okay, you can prosecute him

22:05

like a regular person. Yeah,

22:07

exactly. The difference here is

22:09

that for the first time, in

22:11

my opinion, and I think in your opinion as well,

22:13

you have the Republican establishment

22:17

playing along with it even though you might

22:19

see on media, you know, on in

22:21

the news, whatever, Twitter, social media,

22:24

they're they're pretending like they're so outraged by this.

22:26

But it's really important to understand

22:28

the Republican establishment always hated

22:30

Donald Trump, but they were

22:32

terrified of his base. NOW

22:35

THEY THINK THEY CAN MANUFACTURE A

22:37

SITUATION IN WHICH AND I

22:39

THINK IN THEIR MIND THEY GENUENTLY THINK, LIKE, NO,

22:41

NO, TRUMP IS LOSING IT. HE'S LOSING SUPPORT OF

22:43

MENG HIS BASE. Now is the time that we try to

22:45

finish him. I think that's really behind it. And

22:47

if you watch the reporting on

22:49

this, whether it's cable news, network

22:51

news, if you read the reporting on it, all the reporters

22:54

are like, we don't know where this came from.

22:56

You know, we're trying to figure that out. We're still trying

22:58

to crack that nut. Trying to figure out why Alvin

23:00

Bragg is to decided to really aggressively pursue

23:02

this all of a sudden, the

23:05

political landscape has changed a little bit

23:07

in regard to Donald Trump and the way the

23:09

Republican establishment feels about him. Now

23:11

remember, people have already faced

23:14

some pretty serious consequences for the hush

23:16

money payments to Stormy Daniels. And of course,

23:18

the argument is that the one hundred and

23:20

thirty thousand dollars was essentially

23:23

a campaign contribution in

23:25

violation of campaign finance

23:28

laws. Now in August

23:30

of twenty eighteen, Michael Cohen, Trump's

23:32

personal lawyer at the time, pleaded guilty

23:34

to eight charges of tax evasion, fraud, and

23:36

campaign finance violations in connection

23:39

to his payments to Daniels and Karen

23:41

McDougal. She was another woman

23:43

who had sexual relations with

23:45

Trump and THEY KILLED HER STORY

23:47

BEFORE IT COULD BE PUBLISHED IN THE NATIONAL

23:49

INQUIRER. AND

23:52

DURING HIS GUILTY PLEA, MICHAEL KONE

23:54

says in federal court he was directed

23:56

to violate campaign law. At the direction

23:59

of an unnamed candidate, gee, I wonder

24:01

who that was. That same candidate directed

24:03

him to pay a hundred thirty thousand dollars in hush

24:05

money, which the candidate later

24:07

reimbursed. He has sentenced to three

24:09

years IN PRISON AND THAT AFTER HE WAS

24:11

FOUND GUILTY AFTER HE PLAYED TO GUILTY. NOW LET'S

24:13

GET TO TRUMP BECAUSE HE'S ENCOURAGING PEOPLE

24:16

TO PROTEST. So

24:19

in his first truth social post,

24:21

he wrote this. Now illegal

24:24

leaks from a corrupt and highly and

24:26

highly political Manhattan district attorney's

24:28

office, which has allowed new records to be set

24:31

in violent crime and

24:33

whose leader is funded by George Soros,

24:35

indicate that with no crime being

24:37

able to be proven and based on

24:40

an old and fully debunked by numerous

24:42

other prosecutors. None of this is true, by the way,

24:44

fairytale. The far and away

24:46

leading Republican candidate and former president

24:49

of the United States of America will be

24:51

arrested on Tuesday of next week, meeting

24:53

Tuesday of this week. Protests

24:55

take our nation back. In subsequent

24:58

true social posts, he said something similar.

25:00

Basically, protest, protest, take to the streets.

25:03

And that's a call to a supporters

25:05

to do something similar to what they did

25:07

on January

25:07

sixth. Let's keep it real. Right? Yeah. So

25:10

look on the Trump protest

25:13

angle. First of all, there's nothing wrong with protesting.

25:15

And if he was just asking people to go peacefully

25:18

protest, there'd be no problem at all. Number

25:20

one, the context is we already know that

25:22

the last time he asked people to protest, they

25:24

broke down the doors, somebody got shot,

25:26

cops got killed, etcetera. He knows

25:28

that context as well as we do. And remember

25:30

during that time, he was very happy that they

25:32

were doing it, including channing

25:34

about murdering his vice president, his own

25:37

chief of staff said he was totally fine with it. So that's

25:39

an important piece of context. The other thing is,

25:41

as you read those deranged posts on

25:43

true social, it

25:46

it to me and I know, like, when

25:49

we get into race, everybody catches feelings.

25:51

Right? But it kinda read like called

25:54

to the clan. And the reason why

25:56

I say that in this context is because he's constantly

25:58

like, oh, and then other people

26:00

get to do anything they want. In the streets

26:02

and they ride and they do this and,

26:04

you know, and there's no retribution. And

26:07

he's calling for retribution against the

26:09

others. And it's interesting because he's

26:11

not just talking about his case. He's constantly

26:14

referring to how the others are going to

26:16

ruin America. How they you gotta

26:18

do something, and you gotta give them retribution

26:21

before they touched their beloved leader, etcetera.

26:24

And And when you read it in that context, you're

26:26

like, oh, yeah, he's barely even talking about his

26:28

own case. He's mainly trying

26:30

to attack the

26:31

lids. Because he's incredibly I

26:33

know you're gonna hate to hear this and everyone's gonna

26:35

get upset because they think I'm in

26:38

favor of what he's doing. I'm not. But

26:40

this is this is what he does and

26:42

it's pretty smart messaging. Right?

26:44

Because what he's doing is exploiting the

26:47

frustrations that people might be feeling

26:49

in Manhattan nor other big cities as

26:51

a result of increasing crime.

26:54

And he's saying, like, oh look at them. Coming

26:56

after me over this old thing,

26:59

that didn't go anywhere years ago

27:01

when it was first reported, but

27:03

they're letting all this other crime happen. Right?

27:05

That he's doing it yes

27:07

to to to stir up hatred to

27:09

stir up

27:10

anger. That's what he does, and he does it well.

27:12

Yeah. And so part of what he's referring

27:14

to is, you know, when there was

27:16

a a Black Lives Matter protest and,

27:18

you know, some buildings got

27:21

burned, etcetera. For the for white

27:23

Republicans, that was an enormously triggering

27:25

event. They wanted massive retribution

27:28

for what happened there. And so that was I

27:30

I think it's also early to January six. But bottom

27:32

line here is, look, he's

27:35

getting to use the establishment

27:38

not getting permission to prosecute a

27:40

member of the league for five years against

27:42

them. Said why did they wait five years? Yep.

27:44

Why there's all this crime now? All of a sudden, they do

27:46

it five years later. Because they were waiting for

27:48

goddamn permission to prosecute someone

27:51

who is clearly a criminal. There's no way

27:53

to hear. Because they because they didn't

27:55

give him look, guys, look, think about what the analyst

27:57

said about the reporters. WHAT A REPORT IT SHOULD

27:59

HAVE BEEN ASKING ON LONG IS FOR THE MANHATTAN

28:02

DA'S OFFICE IS SCREAMING IT, YOU

28:04

JUST PUT AWAY IS COCUSPERATOR. We

28:07

all know that. We've got you no

28:09

one denies that. Mhmm. So

28:11

why aren't you going after the coker's beard

28:13

or Donald Trump? IT'S A MASSIVE

28:16

AND OBVIOUS VIOLATION OF THE LAW.

28:18

THE REASON THEY DON'T IS BECAUSE HE WAS UNTOUCHABLE,

28:21

CUSE HE WAS PART OF THE ESTABLISHMENT and

28:23

the elites never, ever, ever

28:25

faced justice. Right? So,

28:27

anyway, this is all Sherad. Look,

28:29

here, just real quick, give you a sense

28:31

of what I keep saying that it's so obvious, Michael

28:34

Cohen gives the money to

28:36

the national enquirer who gave the money to Stormy

28:38

Daniels and the other lady Okay? Karen

28:40

McDougal. Karen McDougal. And

28:42

then he goes back to the Trump organization

28:44

and goes, okay. Now give me the money. Reimburse

28:47

me. Yeah. And so he gave them a hundred thirty

28:49

thousand. There's other expenses got to about

28:51

hundred and eighty thousand. Right? So they're

28:53

like, okay. We gotta take in the effect

28:55

the taxes. Because Michael Cohen's

28:57

illegally paying her with his money.

29:00

And then when he gets income, he has to pay taxes

29:02

on it. So they double it, and then they gave her

29:04

sixty thousand dollar bonus on top or

29:06

a crime well done. This is a Trump organization.

29:09

Was it was it well done? Apparently not.

29:11

So then he got four hundred and twenty thousand

29:13

dollars to reimburse him for the payment.

29:16

Right? SO THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION

29:18

IS THEN CLEARLY GIVING AN ILLEGAL

29:20

CAMPAIGN DONATION TO DONALD TRUMP AND

29:23

LYING ABOUT IT saying that it was a retainer

29:25

for you for Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen, the person

29:28

who received it now says, oh yeah, we were definitely

29:30

lying. It was not for a

29:31

retainer.

29:32

Right. It was to cover up this problem

29:34

on the campaign, and so there's

29:36

no question he didn't.

29:39

And that's what's so frustrating

29:42

about the establishment and the and their

29:44

love for the elites and then how they're above

29:47

the law. And that's why at the end of the day, they're gonna

29:49

try to hurt him in this election But he's

29:51

still among the elites. They're never gonna put

29:53

in a person who's in the elites in

29:56

jail. It's never gonna

29:57

happen.

29:57

Like it's so obvious to everyone

30:00

with a pulse that this

30:01

is politically motivated. At this point,

30:03

at this late juncture, like,

30:06

It's obvious that it's political. And

30:08

so you have all these different people

30:10

coming out. Senator Lindsey Graham can't believe I agree with

30:12

him, but I do agree with him. Think this is gonna help

30:14

Trump. I don't think it's gonna hurt him politically. Yeah.

30:17

I I don't care what it does politically. Yeah.

30:19

The reason I'm in favor of it, even though it's

30:22

this laid and it's obviously political

30:24

and blah blah blah and all the things that we've said

30:26

is, I I want somebody to enforce

30:28

the law equally for the first time in my life in

30:30

America. The only rich people

30:33

who ever get convicted are people

30:35

who stole from other rich people. Exactly.

30:37

You try to defraud or

30:39

steal money from Goldman Sachs, and you go

30:41

to jail. You go to jail for a long

30:44

time. You rob regular Americans,

30:46

you're celebrated. So this is,

30:48

you know, this is a one hundred

30:50

percent violation of the law. I want

30:52

him to get arrested. I want him to

30:55

face justice. And, you know, maybe

30:57

once they go to the

30:58

jury, maybe there's nothing they could do, but

31:00

that's really wishful thinking. Well,

31:03

let's move on to the fun

31:05

part of this story because there is a fun

31:07

part and involves, of course, for

31:09

the governor, Rhonda Santos. Florida

31:31

governor Ron DeSantis' initial

31:33

silence over the weekend in response

31:35

to the possibility of Trump getting arrested

31:38

led to a lot of right wing pressure

31:40

for the Florida governor to say something,

31:43

to do something, to protect Daddy Trump.

31:45

NOW HE FINALLY REACTED TODAY AND

31:47

MAN, IT IS A DOZY. BUT

31:50

BEFORE WE GET TO THAT VIDEO, HERE'S

31:52

HOW THE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED ON

31:54

GOVERNOR Ronda Santis Jason

31:56

Miller tweeted the following. Thank

31:59

you, Vice President Mike Pence, and

32:01

Vimpik Ramishamy. FOR

32:04

POINTING OUT HOW RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING

32:06

TO DIVIDE OUR COUNTRY IN THE NAME OF PARTIES AND PARL

32:08

TO POLITICS AND THEN HE WRITES RADIO

32:11

SILENCE FROM RON DeSantis.

32:13

AND Nikki Haley. OKAY, SO IT STARTS OFF

32:15

THAT WAY. THEN YOU'VE GOT MR.

32:18

ALFA MAIL SEBASSION GORCA WHO SAYS

32:20

So is DeSantis going to say anything?

32:23

When are you gonna protect daddy? When are

32:25

you gonna protect him? The alphamales are

32:27

back? They have others, you know,

32:29

there's pressure pressures. I you have Cernovich

32:32

who, you know, took

32:34

it a step further and actually

32:37

wrote WHAT Ronda Santis SHOULD

32:39

SAY, LIKE HERE'S A Script JUST SAY THIS.

32:41

OKAY, I WILL NOT EXTRA DIGHT A PRESIDENTIAL

32:44

CANDIDATE TO A SOROS DA who

32:46

allows violent criminals to roam free until

32:48

there has been a proper legal review conducted

32:51

under Florida law. If

32:53

law full, then extradition may

32:55

occur, but not one day sooner.

32:57

It's all pretty hilarious. And then finally,

33:00

a guy named Stu Peter says,

33:02

if Rhonda Santos, is the conservative

33:04

hero he projects himself to be. He

33:06

should refuse to honor the arrest warrant

33:09

for president in x SILD

33:11

TRUMP AND SEND THE FLORIDA NATIONAL

33:13

GUARD TO MARALAGO TO ENSURE TRUMP'S

33:15

PROTECTION. PERIOD ANYTHING LESS

33:17

PROVES TO SANTAS' FRAUD. Now

33:19

finally, today, Florida

33:21

Governor Ron DeSantis responded to

33:24

the story about Donald Trump potentially

33:26

getting arrested and indicted soon and

33:28

here's what that look like.

33:30

I don't know what goes into paying

33:33

hush money to a porn star to

33:35

to secure silence over some type

33:37

of alleged affair. I just I can't speak to

33:39

that. But what I

33:41

can speak to is

33:43

that if you have a prosecutor who

33:46

is ignoring crimes happening

33:49

every single day in his jurisdiction

33:52

and he chooses to go back many, many

33:54

years ago to try to

33:57

use something about porn

33:59

star hush money payments, that's

34:01

an example of pursuing a

34:03

political agenda.

34:06

I I mean, I don't know anything about getting

34:08

my d wet when my my wife's pregnant and

34:10

I'm paying hush money payments. I know I know nothing

34:12

about that. I know nothing about that.

34:14

Testing pervert who's, you know, messing around

34:16

on his pregnant wife. But I will say Alvin

34:19

Bragg Sorrow's funded yada yada

34:21

typical when talking points.

34:22

Yeah. So before I break down the politics

34:24

of the right wing reaction, let's have fun.

34:27

To be clear, Donald

34:29

Trump did not sleep with,

34:32

as far as we know, McDougall or

34:34

Stormy Daniels until after

34:37

Melania had delivered. So couple months

34:39

after he delivered

34:40

-- Oh, interesting. -- I thought that she was pregnant

34:42

when you were pregnant. No.

34:43

Slap with Stormy Daniels. And I'll tell you what. Okay.

34:45

Okay. So she delivers,

34:47

and apparently, at that point, they

34:50

are not having relations. So he immediately

34:52

goes to MacDougall a couple months later. Class

34:54

a couple of months later, he goes to the Stormy

34:56

Daniels because, I mean,

34:58

Melania is probably in bed taking care of their

35:00

baby, so he's gotta go get laid

35:03

elsewhere. And but she's

35:05

While she was pregnant, he sexually

35:07

assaulted a reporter from people

35:09

magazine while she was in the building.

35:12

Allegedly. What

35:13

Melania? Allegedly, the

35:15

reporter saying, yeah, I went to go interview them.

35:17

Melania is super pregnant. We go to another room

35:19

and he grabs me

35:21

you know, just like he describes in the

35:24

famous accent holiday. No.

35:25

I know I'm saying allegedly because he hasn't been convicted

35:27

of it, and we just have to cover

35:29

our bases. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'll just

35:31

let me just tell you. Super believable story.

35:34

Yes. Dozens of people have had similar

35:36

stories about Trump. So imagine that,

35:38

guys. Imagine that. If

35:41

you're a woman, you're pregnant, and your husband

35:43

is grabbing at other women who's just

35:46

interviewing you guys, and then thinks,

35:48

ah, well, she already had the baby. I'm gonna go

35:50

sleep with cornstarts. Okay. Anyway, that's who Donald

35:52

Trump is. Just to understand that. And that's why DeSantis

35:55

taking that shot. Don't look, I No. I loved

35:57

it. I thought that was great. Finally, Desantis grows

35:59

a set. Like -- Yeah. -- you know. But

36:01

again, it was thought slight job.

36:04

It was a good job. It was a pretty big job.

36:06

You know what Donald Trump would have said. Donald Trump would

36:08

have said, listen, if the Sanders had

36:10

done the porn star, I like, oh, you know, the baby's

36:12

barely out, and then here comes meep

36:14

ball, and he's gotta get a porn star.

36:16

He didn't even use a condom. What's

36:19

he doing? It's ranges. I

36:21

wouldn't do it. Would you do it? Would you

36:23

do it to your poor, poor wife? Okay.

36:25

But that's what said. This dentist

36:27

was, like, subtle. Like No. I know you're right. --

36:29

can't compare DeSantis to Trump when it comes

36:31

to that type of communication. Like,

36:33

Trump's a bull in a China shop he doesn't

36:36

care. just says it. Right? Whereas, Rhonda

36:38

DeSantis is trying to be cute. He's trying to be clever.

36:40

He's trying to be subtle. But

36:42

for relative to

36:44

previous DeSantis jabs at

36:46

Trump, this was the best. Yeah. So we're gonna

36:48

get to Steve Banner's reaction to DeSantis, which

36:50

is awesome. But so now the politics of it.

36:53

So look, Gorka and Miller

36:55

are huge Trump

36:57

loyalist. So, of course, they're gonna hit DeSantis

36:59

on this and say, you better back the big guy, otherwise,

37:02

you know, the base will turn

37:04

on you. Guys like Stu Peter's are

37:06

just knucklehead, MAGA, guys. Oh,

37:08

just genuinely like, oh, let's go fight.

37:10

Let's go and make sure that there's wireless if they come

37:12

out for the beer leader. Total Otter knuckleheads,

37:15

certification, which is an interesting one. Because

37:17

he's actually backing DeSantis. Mhmm.

37:19

And so a lot of the Republicans who

37:22

are now backing DeSantis are

37:24

playing this game. They're disdanced. They're

37:27

like, oh, DeSantis should say, I will

37:29

not extradite as if, like, Yeah. Like

37:31

You know, it's a Russia or Bahamas or,

37:33

you know, France is asking

37:35

for no. It's of course, you

37:38

said Florida sends it to to New York

37:40

if the New York is looking for criminal

37:42

that they just indicted. Right? Well, I say

37:44

I will not extradite because they're

37:46

telling the Sandoz how to play the

37:48

bass. Remember the bass

37:50

likes Donald Trump. So you have to

37:52

baby him a little bit and say you're protecting

37:55

him. But then actually hit him with

37:57

these jobs. Yeah. So you see

37:59

it very clearly in the

38:02

in the guys who are trying to nudge

38:04

Trump out while not appearing to

38:07

nudge Trump out. So

38:10

there were Trump loyalists who, of

38:12

course, did not take kindly to Rhonda

38:15

Santos' response to

38:17

this whole mess. And two of those individuals

38:19

were Steve Bannon and Mike Londell enjoy.

38:23

Governor DeSantis, you're better than this. That

38:25

was a weasel approach. And don't give me the don't

38:27

don't throw anything about the porn star. Don't need to

38:29

hear it from you. Okay? Don't need to

38:31

hear it. Okay? Mike

38:33

Glendale, the election crime bureau

38:35

reports, sir.

38:38

Well, first of all, DeSantis is

38:40

the Trojan horse we thought he was. I just

38:42

wanna put that out there. How disgusting

38:44

he is. He remember everybody.

38:46

He met with dominion lawyers on

38:49

finding figuring out a way to make it easier

38:51

to sue people for defamation like

38:53

my pillow and my Glendale. If

38:56

they arrest our our great president Donald

38:59

Trump, hands down he

39:01

he wins the twenty twenty four

39:03

election. You know,

39:06

for all the Republicans out there, you cheer

39:08

for the circus. Sometimes the circus is gonna come to

39:10

your home. That's what you're watching right there.

39:12

Now all of a sudden, and Ron DeSantis. He's

39:14

mingle in with Dominion lawyers and

39:16

like all these other

39:18

accusations. Oh, it's delicious. It's

39:20

still wishes. Yeah.

39:21

So I get two things out. First of all, I like Steve

39:23

made me like, I don't need to hear it. I

39:25

don't need to hear

39:26

it. Not from you, buddy. Okay. Not

39:28

from you. You know what that means? That means

39:30

shh. Of course, all of us,

39:32

republicans are dirtbags. We don't

39:34

talk about how other republics are dirtbags

39:37

because we're all dirtbags. Steve

39:39

Bannon stole from his own supporters just like

39:41

Donald Trump did. Right? And then he had to get pardoned

39:43

by Donald Trump for that same theft. He's

39:45

like, I don't need to hear it. Oh, don't don't tell the

39:47

audience. Don't tell the right wingers what criminals

39:50

we are. Right? But what's super interesting

39:52

is that Most Republicans

39:55

agree with Mike Glendale when he says,

39:57

if you arrest them, Trump is more likely

39:59

to win. Yeah. You know why? Republican

40:01

voters like

40:02

criminals. As No. That's how

40:04

I I don't think that's what it is. So, like, come on. Just

40:06

being just like, fair, Jake. It's not because they

40:09

love them. You're rich. No. You're not being

40:11

very, being purposely inflammatory and

40:13

ridiculous. No. What they well,

40:15

they'll see Trump is like some sort of

40:17

victim. Right? Yes. As someone who's

40:20

being targeted politically poor

40:22

guy. We gotta stick up for

40:23

him. No. But Anna, we're saying the same thing. So

40:25

let me explain Are we? Yeah. We are. Because

40:28

Yes. If you ask the right

40:30

winger, they will say, no,

40:32

he's being set up politically and this is outrageous

40:35

and he's the victim. But they

40:37

never address the actual

40:39

substance. They never say, oh, he didn't

40:41

pay the hush money. You know, he didn't sleep with Stormy

40:43

Daniels. It isn't a campaign finance

40:45

violation. Or on any

40:47

of the laws that he's broken. They have

40:50

a thousand excuses. The reality is

40:52

they don't care that he's a criminal

40:54

because he owns the lips. So they're

40:57

they're like, okay, you wanna steal from us, Steve Bannon,

40:59

you wanna by the way, Donald Trump, you

41:01

wanna take hundreds millions of dollars from us

41:03

and not give one cent to the January sixth

41:06

Defendance, we don't mind.

41:08

Okay. So I'll amend from they like criminals,

41:11

but they don't mind criminals at

41:13

all as long as they're criminals on their

41:15

side. Okay. So you think hundred percent

41:17

of Republican supporters of Donald

41:19

Trump's all know that he

41:21

committed crimes and they purposely

41:24

are not addressing it. No.

41:25

You're you're No. You're doing

41:27

exaggeration. You're saying a hundred percent. I didn't say a

41:29

hundred percent. Yeah. Okay. But you you majority.

41:32

You guys slice of Yes. I will general

41:34

look, guys. Here. Al Franklin does

41:37

a kitting photo with

41:40

somebody, and the democrats immediately

41:43

get rid of them strong under the bus. The

41:45

slightest slidest inf in

41:47

in fraction for a Democrat, and you're gone.

41:50

All the Democrats will hate you and throw you

41:52

overboard. Republicans, like, oh, I come into

41:54

this crime. I come into that crime. I come into this. Time.

41:56

And each time every not every

41:58

most Republican voters go. Oh, I didn't see

42:00

it. I don't see it. I don't see it. I don't oh, no. Victor. Victor.

42:02

Victor. Victor. Steel for me. Sure. Go

42:05

ahead. Steel for me. Victor. Victor. Victor. There's

42:07

you can commit almost eighty crimes as

42:09

a Republican. As long as you're on the

42:11

lips, The MAGA BASE will love you.

42:13

Do you remember what the coverage was like on right wing

42:15

outlets as Trump was getting impeached?

42:17

The first time. First time you got impeached.

42:19

When he engaged in a quid pro quo

42:22

withheld, congressionally appropriated

42:25

military funding from Ukraine, unless

42:28

Zalenski announced some sham investigation

42:30

into Biden in order to hurt Biden's chances

42:32

of getting elected in twenty twenty. Do you remember that?

42:35

Okay. Do you think right wing media was actually

42:37

reporting the facts of that impeachment trial?

42:40

Yes. So I hear what you're saying. So

42:42

they're partly only see the prop again.

42:44

Do I think And they believe the prop again

42:46

-- Yes. but but at the same time -- Yeah.

42:48

-- do I think No. Come on. Hold on. Hold

42:51

on. Okay. If if a Democrat had

42:53

slept with a porn star -- Mhmm.

42:55

-- a couple months after their wife

42:57

delivered, and then paid hush

42:59

money and in violation of campaign finance

43:01

laws. What do you think Republicans would say? Well,

43:04

Republicans say back to them. Drive

43:06

them out of politics right now. Right?

43:09

Trump says, oh, no. It's totally fine. My

43:11

point to you, Jake, well, first of all, right wing

43:13

media would be talking about that in that's

43:15

all they would be talking about. And yeah, they would believe

43:17

it because right wing media would be covering it

43:19

constantly. The argument that I'm trying to

43:21

make is you don't know what's in the heads of

43:24

every single Trump

43:25

supporter. So when you generalize like

43:26

this No. No. I hear what you're saying. I

43:28

wouldn't let let me just say it this way. Let me say

43:30

it this way. I would hate If the

43:32

right wing generalized about every

43:34

progressive and

43:35

said, oh, progressives absolutely love

43:38

crime, they can't get enough of it. Look

43:40

at Well, Anna, you think they don't? They do that

43:42

twenty 472

43:43

hundred percent. Do that. Yeah. Okay. So

43:45

what am I crying again about generalizing

43:48

correctly about them? Correctly.

43:50

Okay. Okay. Look, guys. Look, yes,

43:53

I get it. Right? I'm the guy

43:55

who says all the time. Right wing media lies

43:57

to the right wing voters. And the right wing voters

43:59

don't actually have real information. So

44:01

Anna is totally right about that. At the

44:04

same time, the raising right wing

44:06

media lies to them is because the audience

44:08

wants to be lied to. You just

44:10

saw it in the Fox News material

44:12

in the Dominion lawsuit. They're like, oh, we're so

44:14

afraid of our audience. Sorry. We're up hurry

44:16

up a lie. They love the lies. They love the

44:18

lies. You don't think they couldn't figure it

44:20

out. If a Democrat did the same exact thing,

44:22

they'd have figured it out. WE

44:25

GOT TO TAKE A BREAK. WHEN WE COME BACK,

44:27

MAYBE WE CAN GET TO TRUMP'S REACTION

44:29

TO RON DeSantis. WE'LL SEE IF WE HAVE TIME

44:31

FOR

44:31

THAT. BUT LET'S TAKE break, we'll come right back.

44:52

Alright. Back on TYT Jink and

44:55

Anna, and also Paul generity. He

44:57

just became a member by hitting the join

44:59

button below the video on YouTube. We appreciated

45:01

everybody else who can do TYT dot com

45:03

slash join. Come to do the show with us.

45:05

CASPER. Let's do

45:06

it. I don't know what

45:09

goes into paying hush money

45:11

to a porn star to to secure

45:13

silence over. Some type of alleged

45:15

affair. I just I can't speak to that.

45:18

But what I can speak to is

45:21

that if you have a prosecutor who

45:24

is ignoring crimes happening

45:26

every single day in his jurisdiction

45:29

and he chooses to go back many, many

45:31

years ago to try to

45:34

use something about porn

45:37

star hush money payments, that's

45:39

an example of pursuing a

45:41

political agenda.

45:43

THAT WAS FLORIDA GOVERNOR RON DeSantis' REACTION

45:46

TO HEADLINES INDICATING THAT THERE IS SOME

45:48

POSSIBILITY THAT DONALD TRUMP could be arrested

45:50

and indicted in charges tied

45:52

to hush money payments that

45:55

were paid to Stormy Daniels in

45:57

the lead up to the twenty sixteen presidential election.

46:00

The argument is that it was an

46:02

illegal campaign contribution, and

46:05

he is potentially facing charges

46:07

as result of that. Now, Anyone

46:11

with the polls can notice that Ron DeSantis

46:13

started off that statement with a bit of

46:15

a jab toward Trump. And

46:17

look at that, Trump apparently has a pulse because

46:19

he didn't like that reaction. He

46:22

wrote on truth social, Ron DeSink Desmondias

46:24

will probably find out about false

46:27

accusations and fake stories sometime in

46:29

the future as he gets older,

46:31

wiser, and better known when he's

46:33

unfairly and illegally attacked by a

46:35

woman, even classmates that are under

46:38

age or possibly a man. I'm

46:40

sure he will want to fight these misfits

46:43

just like I do. So he

46:45

also, quote, truffed a

46:47

might as touch post that

46:50

apparently said that Ron DeSantis

46:52

had partnered with underage girls and

46:54

was drinking while he was a teacher

46:57

at a Georgia school. That was something that

46:59

Donald Trump also attacked him on earlier.

47:01

We had done a story on that as well. But

47:04

it's clear here that he's trying to imply

47:06

that Ron DeSantis is,

47:09

you know, messing around with underage

47:11

girls is is possibly

47:16

gay but is hiding it. Now none of that

47:18

stuff is true as far

47:20

as we know, but it doesn't matter. If

47:22

you jab Trump, he's gonna come at you ten

47:24

times harder, and that's what he what he did here.

47:27

Yeah. So look, Constantly,

47:30

Rhonda Santos is using

47:33

a p shooter or ABB gun and

47:35

Trump pulls out a Bazooka. And

47:38

launches. So did this

47:40

say this jab in the normal political

47:42

world was a pretty good one, got chuckles,

47:45

people are talking about it. It's got headlines.

47:48

But then Trump comes back with,

47:50

I think, you might be a pedophile and

47:52

gay. Okay.

47:55

Now if a Democrat did that, they'd be instantly

47:57

eliminated, and they would have no credibility,

48:00

etcetera, and the Democrats themselves would

48:02

hate them. Right? When a Republican does it,

48:04

they're like, we'll see. We'll

48:06

see. Right? I the base might love

48:08

it and think that's it. I knew it. DeSantis

48:11

is a rhino pedophile groomer,

48:13

and groomer is a word that Trump

48:15

used before in relation shipped to Rhonda

48:17

Santos using the same picture when he was a

48:19

teacher, etcetera. I'm

48:22

curious to see what Republicans are gonna do.

48:24

They've never needed evidence before. So

48:27

are they gonna need evidence that the scientists did

48:29

any of these things? That the Sandoz is

48:31

gay. I mean and

48:33

and I like slept with underage girls. They

48:35

need it. They know it. They've never needed

48:36

evidence. So maybe they'll believe it right away. But

48:38

it's a Republican, so they might not believe

48:40

it right away. I'm not sure. One

48:43

thing that's been pretty clear to me so

48:45

far and I could be wrong or things could

48:47

change is it doesn't seem like the

48:50

Republican base, meaning the ordinary

48:53

voters ever really abandoned Trump.

48:55

They've always been pretty hardcore supporters

48:58

of Trump. They've been loyal to him. The only

49:00

change I've seen in political landscape is

49:03

the elites or the Republican establishment has

49:05

kind of moved away from Trump. So

49:08

that's what I find kind of interesting about

49:10

this entire debacle, this entire Drama

49:13

PLAYING OUT BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND RON

49:15

DeSantis, BUT THERE WAS ALSO AN

49:17

INTERESTING REACTION TO TRUMP

49:19

WANTING HIS SUPPORT ORDERS TO GO OUT

49:21

THERE AND PROTEST AGAINST

49:24

THE MANHATON DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POTENTIALLY

49:26

ARRESTING TRUMP FOR THE HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS.

49:29

For instance, when he was encouraging people

49:31

to protest, Marjorie Greene tweeted

49:34

about this and said, no. We

49:36

don't need to protest ABOUT THE COMMUNIST

49:39

DEMOCRATS PLANNING TO ARREST PRESIDENT

49:41

TRUMP AND THE POLITICAL WEAPONIZATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT

49:44

AND ELECTION INTERFERENCE. THESE IDIATES ARE

49:46

SEALING THEIR OWN FATE IN twenty twenty four

49:48

BECAUSE THE SILENT MAJORITY HAS TWO FEELINGS

49:50

RIGHT NOW. ABOUT THE CURRENT REGIME,

49:52

I'M GUESSING SHE'S REFERING TO BIDEN. Yep.

49:55

Fear and anger. That is the most

49:57

powerful combination when election time

49:59

comes, and the Democrats are

50:01

driving that force with their own corrupt

50:03

actions. So she's trying to discourage

50:06

people from doing anything stupid and crazy.

50:08

But she's not the only one. You

50:10

know, Ali Alexander, who

50:12

was one of the organizers of

50:15

the riots that took place on January sixth,

50:17

also discouraged people from protesting

50:21

and specifically pointed out the fact, let's go

50:23

to graphic nine here. I love

50:25

Trump. Stop the steel will not

50:27

be physically protesting, meaning we're not gonna

50:29

protest Trump potentially getting arrested. We

50:31

decline. We'll be focused on the one

50:34

thousand plus families still suffering

50:36

post January sixth. And

50:39

you also have Jesse Kelly who

50:42

argued the last time Trump's biggest fans

50:44

protested on his behalf, he

50:46

left them all to rot in jail without

50:48

so much as a penny from him in

50:50

legal fees, not a penny shame

50:52

on him for this, do not

50:54

go to a blue area in protest

50:56

for this man, ignore this.

50:59

Yeah. So those

51:01

last two were very accurate. I

51:03

certainly don't agree with those guys on anything else,

51:06

but it's absolutely true. Donald Trump raised

51:08

hundreds of millions of dollars for

51:10

legal defense and never spent

51:13

a dime on any of the January six

51:15

riders. He says that their patriots and

51:17

political prisoners he talked about it

51:19

in this context too. Like, oh, they're gonna

51:21

you know, okay. I can't believe nobody's sticking out

51:23

for them. Why don't you stay stick out for them? Why

51:25

don't you pay their legal defense? The money that you

51:27

raised, because you're a crook. You're

51:30

such an obvious crook. Right?

51:32

But, no, it's not obvious to the right wing.

51:35

So Marjorie Taylor Green here being

51:37

the theoretically, the

51:39

calming voice. McCarthy did something similar.

51:42

But listen to what she says there, that she actually

51:44

accidentally said one of the most true

51:46

things at American politics. She said

51:48

that the

51:50

the fear and anger that is

51:52

the most powerful combination when election

51:54

time comes.

51:55

That's all they lean on for that campaigning. Exactly

51:58

right, Anna. The only thing that Republicans

52:00

ever use is fear and anger.

52:03

Fear and anger. Be afraid and get

52:05

really angry. Be afraid and get really

52:07

angry. Now, that's

52:09

why why do Republicans do that? Because

52:11

they don't actually wanna pass any laws that help

52:13

you. So they have to get you to

52:15

vote, not for yourself, not

52:18

something that's gonna help you and your family. So

52:20

they have to create fear and anger towards others

52:23

so you vote against

52:24

them. That's why volcanism is centerpiece

52:26

of everything they do. Right? What

52:29

project are they offering to

52:32

voters to their supporters to

52:34

actually improve their lives. All

52:36

they do is instill fear. All they do

52:39

is lie about things that are being done at

52:41

school. It's all meant to scare

52:43

voters into supporting

52:45

them because they're the ones who are allegedly gonna

52:47

protect them from the big big bad scary

52:50

CRT the big bad scary

52:52

drag queens or whatever it is that they're fear mongering

52:54

about at any given moment. But anyway,

52:56

we'll see how this all plays out. It's just really interesting

52:59

to see someone like Marjorie

53:01

Green of all people trying

53:03

to, like, calm things

53:06

down, turn the temperature down as

53:08

is trying to turn the temperature up and get people to

53:10

take to the streets and protest his, you

53:12

know, a potential upcoming

53:15

arrest. Alright. We gotta take a break.

53:17

That does it for the first hour. We're gonna completely

53:19

switch gears when we come back. There was a fascinating

53:22

conversation between Chris Wallace and Eva

53:24

Languria in regard to the Latino

53:27

vote. Why is it that a larger

53:29

percentage of Latino voters have

53:31

switch sides to vote for

53:32

Republicans. We'll talk about that and more

53:34

coming up. Don't miss it.

53:55

Acast powers the world's best

53:57

podcast. Here's the show

53:59

that we recommend. It's

54:02

the question that's on everyone's mind. How

54:04

do you live a good life? How much do work?

54:06

Health? Relationships matter? What about

54:08

happiness? Meaning money and love? What if

54:10

you're alone or anxious, ill, or in pain?

54:13

These are the questions we explore weekly

54:15

on the top ranked Good Life Project podcast

54:18

hosted by me, award winning author,

54:20

four time industry founder and perpetual seeker

54:23

Jonathan Fields. Every week, I sit

54:25

down with world renowned experts, iconic

54:27

writers and researchers And while everyone from

54:29

Olympic gold medalist to world shaking activists,

54:32

A List celebs, musicians, and more all

54:34

with a single goal. To help understand

54:37

what it truly takes to live a good life

54:39

and to feel a little less alone along

54:41

the

54:41

way. Listen to the good life project podcast

54:44

wherever you get your podcast. Acast

54:48

helps creators launch, grow,

54:50

and monetize their podcast everywhere,

54:53

acast dot com.