Podchaser Logo
Home
Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

BonusReleased Thursday, 4th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

Bonus Episode: a Peer Health Educator discusses Forever

BonusThursday, 4th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

Reading Forever by Judy Blume left us with

0:10

a lot of questions . In this special

0:12

bonus episode of these Books Made Me we're

0:14

talking to an expert in teen sexual

0:16

health . We hope you'll enjoy this interview

0:19

with a peer health educator . All

0:22

right , if you can just introduce yourself .

0:25

Hi , my name is Cora and I'm a

0:27

second year undergraduate student at Vanderbilt

0:30

University in Nashville , tennessee , but I

0:32

grew up here in Prince George's

0:34

County and you had

0:36

a job working for Planned

0:39

Parenthood . Can you talk a little bit about what

0:41

your role was with Planned Parenthood

0:45

has a program

0:47

called Peer Health Educators

0:49

, and not just

0:51

in DC but in multiple

0:54

areas . So the PPMW

0:57

of DC worked

0:59

with the Planned Parenthood

1:01

of Charlotte and other peer educators

1:04

around the country to create programming

1:06

that would serve to educate

1:09

our peers on sexual

1:11

health matters , relationship matters

1:13

, what it looks like to be in a healthy

1:15

relationship , what some

1:17

red flags are , what

1:19

Planned Parenthood provides , birth

1:22

control methods , sdi prevention

1:24

and testing methods and

1:26

overall , just to create

1:29

a more open conversation about

1:32

sexual health and romantic relationships

1:35

.

1:35

So I think Judy Blume was trying to make something digestible

1:38

for teens that focused on sexual

1:40

health and romantic relationships by writing

1:43

this book Forever . How

1:45

well do you think she succeeded in that ?

1:48

Well , the relationship that's modeled in

1:50

Forever is not great . There's

1:53

constantly

1:55

pressure , even after

1:58

they have sex

2:00

, from Michael . There's

2:02

constantly this sort of power dynamic

2:05

that has been

2:07

modeled for centuries in heteronormative

2:09

relationships that we're trying to sort

2:12

of break down today . And

2:14

in the sexual health component

2:17

like , she spends

2:19

chapter 15 talking about um

2:22

, the main character's visit to a planned

2:24

parenthood to get consulting

2:26

on birth control , and she really wants to go on the

2:28

pill . And she talks about

2:30

how there was

2:32

like a group counseling session where

2:35

they gave all this information

2:37

and then there was private counseling where they asked

2:39

some questions , which were not

2:43

all the questions that you would probably be asked

2:45

today . You'd probably be asked more

2:47

about . You know , do

2:50

you have migraines with aura Like ? If

2:53

so , that affects what kind of hormone

2:55

you should avoid

2:57

when considering birth control . And

3:00

there's a

3:02

walkthrough of the physical

3:05

pelvic exam , which I

3:07

think was very helpful

3:11

. It may feel a little bit strange

3:13

and out of place to put it into a story

3:15

, but I think the walkthrough

3:18

can be helpful . However

3:21

, I feel

3:23

that doctors

3:25

today generally

3:27

, at least at Planned Parenthood

3:30

, are a

3:32

little bit less invasive and

3:34

not only tell

3:36

you should try to relax , but

3:40

say this is how it

3:42

should feel and if it doesn't

3:44

tell us , because that's

3:46

not normal and sort of stressing

3:49

that aspect of like you shouldn't

3:51

feel pain .

3:54

Do you think that that version of

3:56

a visit to Planned Parenthood

3:58

tracks with what a visit to Planned Parenthood

4:00

would look like for a teen if they went today

4:03

?

4:05

I think somewhat . I think the

4:07

format of group counseling and then private

4:09

counseling may still

4:11

be a thing at some Planned

4:14

Parenthoods , where they

4:16

give sort of information

4:19

in this larger

4:21

groups setting so that it creates

4:24

this environment of this is not

4:26

shameful and this is a , you

4:28

know , a normal and regular

4:31

thing that should be talked about . But

4:34

I think , based on how

4:36

the Planned Parenthood workers are

4:38

portrayed , I think they

4:41

are much different today . Everyone

4:43

I've come into contact with who works

4:45

at Planned Parenthood is much more

4:48

supportive and sort

4:50

of aware of the feelings

4:52

involved and talks

4:55

more about that explicitly

4:58

and how to sort of break down the

5:00

stigma and

5:03

shame to

5:05

make sure consent

5:08

is clear and

5:10

the patient or

5:12

student is actually

5:15

comfortable with what's going on .

5:18

So Catherine gets to Planned Parenthood

5:20

because her grandmother gives her some

5:22

information about Planned Parenthood

5:24

and makes it clear that this is an option for her

5:27

. Is that a typical

5:29

way that most young people find their

5:31

way to Planned Parenthood ?

5:33

Definitely not . I

5:36

think hearing it from two generations

5:39

removed is not very

5:41

typical , especially with the political climate

5:44

today . I think one

5:46

of the goals of the peer educator program

5:49

is to make social media presence larger

5:51

. We

5:54

helped run a social media account

5:56

and tried to get information

5:59

out digitally , which

6:01

I think is how a

6:03

lot of teens

6:06

receive it nowadays is through sponsored

6:09

ads , through Instagram or referral

6:12

from friends , or

6:14

actually a lot of colleges

6:16

, especially private colleges , make

6:19

it clear that Planned Parenthood is an option

6:21

or they have a center

6:23

at the actual college . That's pretty

6:25

similar to Planned Parenthood or partners with

6:27

Planned Parenthood . So it's

6:29

much more common to hear it from either

6:32

the same generation or one generation

6:35

removed , rather than directly from

6:37

a family source .

6:40

When Catherine goes to Planned Parenthood she

6:42

is still a minor , but she does not

6:45

need parental consent to be there . Is that an

6:47

accurate depiction of how an

6:49

appointment at Planned Parenthood would work for a teen

6:52

today ?

6:53

Yes , absolutely . I don't

6:57

remember . There is an age where

6:59

you don't need a parent , and I think it

7:02

may be 14 or 15 . I can't quite remember

7:04

, but

7:07

it's kind of like

7:09

if you're allowed at a public pool alone

7:11

, then you're probably allowed to go

7:14

to Planned Parenthood and have

7:16

everything that's discussed there , everything

7:19

you do there , completely confidential

7:21

real

7:32

focus on preventing teen pregnancy ?

7:33

Is that the primary focus for most teens going to Planned Parenthood ? Should it be

7:35

, and how well did the book hold ?

7:36

up on that front . I would say it is definitely the

7:38

primary consideration for

7:40

teens who visit Planned Parenthood , which

7:43

is part of why the

7:46

people who visit Planned Parenthood are

7:48

disproportionately female , and

7:51

that should definitely

7:54

shift , like a lot . Most

7:56

of our peer education was about

7:58

healthy relationships , both

8:02

romantic , sexual and completely

8:06

platonic , like family relationships and

8:10

STIs , which

8:12

is incredibly

8:14

important to focus on , because

8:16

if your main focus is pregnancy

8:18

, like Catherine , you

8:20

may go on the pill or

8:23

some sort of birth control um

8:25

and then discontinue

8:28

a birth control method that was

8:30

preventing STIs , like using

8:32

condoms .

8:35

Which I think is what happens in the book

8:37

is that they start with

8:39

condoms as their primary birth control

8:41

method and

8:44

of course he complains about them and

8:47

pressures her to look

8:49

into other methods , which she does in

8:51

close to Planned Parenthood . But after

8:53

she decides

8:55

on another birth control method , it seems like they abandon

8:57

the condoms pretty quickly and it's

9:00

never really brought up again . He

9:03

also has a history of contracting

9:05

an STI . Specifically

9:08

, he got gonorrhea from his first

9:10

sexual encounter with a

9:12

girl on the beach . He

9:16

did not disclose that to Catherine until

9:20

she found out via making

9:22

a joke about VD . Is

9:25

that appropriate in a relationship

9:28

?

9:29

Absolutely not . That violates

9:31

consent , because consent needs

9:33

to be informed , and

9:35

if you're not offering

9:37

that information and being transparent

9:40

with your partner , then you are not

9:42

asking for consent

9:44

. And

9:47

that is something that Planned Parenthood teaches a lot

9:49

today and something that I

9:51

was surprised wasn't brought up in

9:53

her appointment Um

9:55

, her private consultant she

9:57

was . She said , um

10:00

like

10:03

so what

10:05

birth control methods have you been using ? And

10:07

she said , oh , we've been

10:09

using a rubber condom

10:11

. And she says and

10:13

you're unsatisfied with this

10:15

method ? And she's like I

10:18

don't know .

10:20

And so I think for context

10:23

he blames the condom when

10:25

he can't finish

10:27

the first time that they have

10:29

sex and then

10:31

it's a very unsatisfying first

10:33

encounter for both of them . I think so

10:36

with STIs . This book was written 50

10:38

years ago and Judy Blume did include

10:41

in a preface that

10:43

had she written it later

10:46

she obviously would have focused more on

10:48

HIV AIDS prevention

10:50

, but in the 70s it just wasn't

10:52

front of mind as a concern

10:54

for teenage relationships

10:57

. Michael did have

10:59

the experience with gonorrhea . He says

11:01

he was treated but then he doesn't disclose

11:03

it , which you've said is problematic . What

11:06

is the sort of healthy relationship

11:09

model for disclosure

11:11

of previous sexual encounters

11:14

, sexually transmitted

11:16

infections and diseases ? What

11:18

would sort of be the healthy way

11:20

of approaching a new sexual relationship

11:22

with someone as a teenager ?

11:25

I think that's one of the harder questions

11:27

, just because people

11:30

are so afraid especially

11:32

teens of it

11:34

ruining the mood and

11:38

they're so focused on how

11:41

they are perceived and how they're coming across

11:43

that they

11:45

don't want to risk that

11:47

by disclosing

11:50

information that is unsexy

11:53

unsexy and but

11:55

that that is a hump that people need to get

11:58

over and that is something

12:00

we need to talk about and that needs to

12:02

be modeled in media like books and

12:04

shows is

12:06

, before anything

12:08

, before you kiss someone

12:11

, like like , if you have HSV-1

12:14

or if you get cold sores

12:16

and that is something that's not talked about

12:18

at all , despite over

12:21

50% of the population having

12:23

HSV-1 .

12:24

And that's herpes simplex virus .

12:26

One yes , and which is

12:28

oral herpes correct ? It's commonly

12:31

known as oral herpes . It can appear other

12:33

places , but it is most

12:35

commonly found on or inside

12:37

the mouth and

12:39

usually it is only spread when

12:42

there is a lesion , but can

12:45

be spread when there aren't lesions

12:47

. So that information should

12:49

be disclosed , especially , um

12:52

, because if you

12:54

meet someone on a dating app and you

12:56

go on a date and like

12:59

you have no idea that could be immunocompromised

13:01

or not

13:04

disclosing that you have HSV

13:06

one to your partner like

13:08

before you kiss , like if it's about

13:11

to happen , say like

13:13

, just to be clear , I have this

13:15

, um , this is

13:17

how it's typically spread , and then letting the

13:19

partner make a decision from there . And

13:22

similarly for for any

13:24

sexual encounters , like

13:26

you should talk , have a talk before anything

13:29

progresses to any sexual

13:32

activity about you

13:34

know when the last time you got tested was

13:36

, and ideally you should get tested

13:39

like at

13:41

least once a year , depending on

13:43

how many partners you have .

13:45

And because there are STIs that can be

13:48

dormant for a while before showing

13:50

up on tests . Is that correct ?

13:52

Yeah , that's correct and , like

13:54

for HSV-1 and 2

13:56

, if you don't request

13:59

a blood test , they often won't automatically

14:02

test for them and they

14:04

won't , you know , show up

14:06

unless you like , have lesions and

14:08

they swab the lesions . So you

14:10

also want to be clear on , when

14:13

you go get STI testing

14:15

, what exactly you're getting tested

14:17

for , what's not covered , and

14:20

be clear with your partner what the

14:23

specifics of your test results , and

14:25

there's also STIs , where a partner can

14:27

have it without knowing and be asymptomatic

14:30

, but then pass a symptomatic

14:32

case to the other partner .

14:34

Is that ?

14:36

accurate . Yes , that is also accurate .

14:39

How has that well

14:41

backtrack ? So obviously

14:44

medical treatments for a lot of

14:46

STIs have improved a lot in

14:48

the 50 years since Judy Blume wrote

14:50

this book . Again , hiv

14:52

wasn't even on her radar at the time and

14:55

it went from you know within

14:57

a decade of writing this becoming pretty much

15:00

an automatic death sentence for somebody if you

15:02

got that diagnosis , to now a

15:04

very treatable thing with PrEP that

15:07

many people are able

15:09

to live healthy lives with an

15:11

undetectable viral load . But

15:13

how does that blur the lines around consent

15:15

and disclosure ? Now

15:18

that there are treatments and

15:20

herpes the same way you can have sort

15:22

of symptom-free it's managed Do

15:26

you need to disclose ? What sort

15:28

of calculations do you make about

15:30

disclosure with a new partner ?

15:32

If you have a history of an STI

15:34

but it's treated and it's , you

15:36

have an undetectable load or you're in some

15:39

type of remission or yeah

15:41

, we talked about this a lot

15:43

in Planned Parenthood

15:46

and it

15:48

it absolutely still

15:50

should be brought up , even though

15:52

it's difficult , because

15:55

, again , there is

15:57

still always a chance

15:59

. And having that conversation and

16:01

starting the foundation of

16:03

a sexual relationship with open

16:05

communication in

16:07

general is a very

16:09

great way to start off in

16:20

general is a very great way to start off and like , even if you

16:22

are , you know 99.9% sure that you won't pass anything

16:24

to them , still talk to them about it . At the very least you

16:26

are informing someone else

16:28

, even if immediately

16:31

they're like turned off or scared or

16:33

run away , like , yes

16:36

, that sucks , but they were probably not

16:40

the right partner for you and they're

16:42

better off for having known

16:45

the information that you gave them and

16:47

the transparency they gave them , because they will

16:49

carry that forward in their future relationships

16:52

. Yeah , so

16:54

, even though it is you may feel

16:56

like it should be a calculation , it

16:58

still should be disclosed .

17:02

There's also in the book several

17:06

other moments where

17:08

the information

17:11

conveyed might be things that teens

17:13

worry about with sex . But

17:17

Catherine and Michael's

17:19

sort of interpretation of things maybe

17:21

isn't entirely accurate and then

17:23

it doesn't quite get corrected in the book . One

17:25

of the interludes

17:27

that we were kind of

17:29

scratching our heads about is that when

17:33

they are preparing to have intercourse for the

17:35

first time , they

17:37

comment that they know that she

17:39

might bleed from that because she

17:42

has not , to her knowledge , had her hymen

17:44

break yet . They get

17:46

very concerned about this to the degree

17:48

that they won't do it on the bed

17:50

because they're afraid of staining it . So they

17:52

get a towel and put it down

17:55

on the floor on an area rug

17:57

with a busy pattern , so that if she

17:59

bleeds through the towel no

18:01

one will notice the stains . We

18:03

were kind of laughing at that because it

18:06

seemed like they were imagining

18:08

like hemorrhaging happening when

18:11

the hymen is broken . But

18:13

that's not really what

18:16

happens . So do

18:19

you think that there's a responsibility of the author

18:21

in a situation like that ? She's

18:24

presented something that might be a very authentic

18:26

misconception by teens , but

18:28

then it's not corrected , other than

18:30

that we don't see that she like hemorrhages out

18:32

all over the floor , but then they keep using

18:35

towels and having sex on the floor , which is really weird

18:37

. Do you think that the author has a responsibility

18:40

to somehow

18:43

insert accurate information in there

18:45

, or is her responsibility to depicting

18:47

something faithful to the mindset

18:49

of the characters ? Do you have an opinion

18:51

on that ?

18:54

I think you can still be faithful to

18:56

the mindset of the characters and

18:58

like it seems

19:01

almost unfaithful to not

19:03

mention it afterwards , because if it was

19:05

such a big concern , catherine's

19:07

obviously going to think about it afterwards

19:09

like , oh , that is not what I expected

19:12

. Even

19:22

if she doesn't outright say it to Michael , she is

19:25

still thinking it common misconceptions

19:27

and then sort of sweep

19:30

over it without saying

19:32

what actually happened or

19:35

making it clear that that was a misconception

19:38

in the first place .

19:41

As a young adult today , a book like

19:43

this . Do you think that

19:46

it holds any appeal

19:48

for people

19:51

the age of the main characters to read , or

19:53

do you think it's too dated to hold

19:55

any appeal at all ? Do you think that there's any

19:58

kind of like expiration date that should be placed

20:00

on a book that includes really

20:02

quite detailed medical information ? I

20:04

mean , I've never read a book where you

20:07

have a chapter that is just a pelvic exam

20:09

. You

20:14

have a chapter that is just a pelvic exam , but there's some value to depicting that in a frank

20:16

way , because that probably at the time kids didn't have internet . They wouldn't have

20:19

been able to learn about that other

20:21

than through someone that had experienced one

20:23

, and obviously in the 70s probably

20:25

a lot of women weren't comfortable talking

20:27

to their daughters about that . Catherine

20:30

has the privilege of having a very like , progressive

20:32

and open-minded grandmother and

20:34

parents , but that probably wasn't

20:37

the case for a lot of teens . So do you feel like

20:39

there's some type of expiration date on a book

20:41

like this or do you feel like it holds up

20:43

for some

20:45

facet of the young

20:47

adult experience ?

20:55

the young adult experience I can see that it would probably be appealing for preteens and

20:58

sort of younger adolescents going

21:00

into puberty . But

21:02

beyond that , I do feel that

21:04

one the

21:06

conversation around sex has become

21:09

a lot more open , and not

21:11

necessarily always in the best

21:13

ways . There is a lot of sexual

21:17

activity , you know , modeled

21:19

in TV shows and even

21:22

video games and movies .

21:24

And we did sort of bring that

21:26

up because we heard that they

21:28

were looking to make a

21:30

Netflix series about this book

21:32

. I mean , it would be a , I think , a loose adaptation

21:35

I think

21:37

they were . It

21:39

had been assigned to a director

21:42

who was

21:44

planning to rework it from a

21:46

the perspective

21:48

of two black teens and

21:52

at one point we were talking

21:54

about like well , what , what is

21:56

, what would that look like ? Now ? Because

21:59

this is doesn't line up , you know , with

22:01

modern anything , and

22:03

we , we came to the conclusion

22:06

that it would look like euphoria . But

22:09

you know , I think , again from what you're saying

22:11

, like that would not be the healthiest set

22:13

of behaviors depicted

22:16

, but maybe somewhat

22:18

more accurate to some teens'

22:21

experience than this book would be , at this point

22:23

, more accurate to some

22:25

teens experience than this book would be .

22:27

at this point I

22:32

think I think that's correct . I don't think that this book models very many

22:34

common experiences among young adults and teens

22:37

today , and I think

22:39

it is shows

22:41

, unfortunately , you know , shows like

22:44

Euphoria and 13

22:48

Reasons why do depict some

22:51

more likely experiences

22:54

, but still usually unrealistic

22:56

and either

22:59

sort of well

23:01

, usually dramatized . And I

23:04

think it's important

23:07

that there is media that

23:09

, if they represent inaccurate

23:11

or experiences

23:14

that are so experiences

23:18

with a subject that is really taboo , there

23:21

should be some sort

23:23

of like disclaimer or educational

23:26

content or just

23:29

something included to

23:31

make it clear that you know

23:33

this is not what everyone goes through

23:35

and is something

23:37

important to learn about from

23:39

your own perspective

23:42

and what

23:44

it would mean to you . And

23:47

I think that's that individuality is

23:49

always often lost in in

23:51

sexual experience depictions

23:54

in modern media and

23:56

past media . So

23:58

I worry that the

24:01

teens who would read this book would probably

24:04

like most

24:06

likely not

24:08

take the information to

24:10

heart as much because it

24:13

wouldn't align with their modern

24:15

day experiences , whereas

24:18

younger kids might internalize

24:20

it more because it's something they haven't experienced

24:23

yet and they like think about and

24:25

that could be absolutely

24:28

harmful if there's there aren't proper

24:30

disclaimers or footnotes or corrections

24:34

, because you're

24:36

feeding misinformation to those

24:39

who are uninformed .

24:41

What are the best ways for a

24:43

teen to get accurate sexual

24:45

health information today in a way

24:48

that is somewhat

24:50

private for them ? Because I think that this book

24:52

did serve that purpose , probably for a lot

24:54

of girls in the seventies , where , even

24:56

if they couldn't check the book out , they were reading

24:58

it in the stacks to get information that they

25:01

didn't have a way to get otherwise . What

25:03

would something similar be today

25:05

? That would be an accurate

25:08

way for kids to get information that

25:10

is centered on the teen experience

25:12

and , you know , not like WebMD .

25:16

Honestly , I think one main

25:19

medium that could be used more is

25:21

podcasting . There

25:24

are several great podcasts

25:27

by like sex therapists and

25:29

pelvic floor physical therapists

25:31

on Spotify and

25:33

Amazon music and those

25:37

are typically pretty private

25:40

histories . You don't often

25:42

have your parents looking at your Spotify

25:44

history in your own account . I'm not

25:46

even sure how to do that with

25:49

a shared family plan and

25:51

most teens listen

25:53

to so much music and podcasting

25:56

anyway that it would

25:58

be too much information for any

26:00

sort of helicopter parent

26:03

to sift through . And

26:05

advertisements for that on social

26:08

media would be really helpful . I

26:11

think the sponsored ads

26:14

on social media like

26:17

I've been seeing a ton about

26:19

PrEP recently and usually

26:21

they're really short and they give you

26:24

know a snippet of information and

26:26

have an area for you to learn

26:28

more . But there are so many of them that you

26:30

see that like it adds , it

26:33

compiles information together over

26:35

time , um and de-stigmatizes

26:38

the subject . Subject and

26:40

I mean this

26:43

isn't as private . But I think it is important

26:46

to have these conversations

26:48

in schools , which

26:50

I know is heavily

26:54

controversial . But

26:57

opening that line of communication or

26:59

at least giving resources

27:01

for students to ask questions and

27:03

creating an environment

27:06

where students feel safe to ask questions

27:08

is really important

27:10

so that students can get

27:13

help outside of the

27:15

home when you know

27:17

they might not have the means of transportation or

27:19

the time to otherwise

27:21

go to somewhere like Planned Parenthood and

27:24

get counseling .

27:27

One thing I've noticed with all

27:29

the ads about PrEP and I've seen

27:31

them too , I think it's we've

27:33

been commenting recently how often the ads

27:36

are about PrEP when we're watching

27:38

shows on apps

27:40

that we don't have premium subscriptions to

27:42

, but all of those ads

27:45

seem to be focused on people

27:48

in their like , late 20s or 30s

27:50

, who are , you know , they're living a nice

27:52

life and they're going to clubs and they're

27:54

, like you know , meeting

27:57

someone at a paint and sip , and so they're kind of

27:59

depicting this like very rosy , like nice life

28:01

, but everyone is a lot older

28:03

. Of

28:05

depicting this like very rosy , like nice life , but everyone is a lot older , and so

28:07

, at least to me , it seems like those ads are targeting a very different

28:10

demographic . Is there , is

28:12

there , stuff specific to teens being

28:14

done , or is that something

28:16

where marketing folks

28:19

are kind of scared because

28:21

it's minors ? You know it is a political

28:25

hot button now

28:27

sexual health . Do

28:29

you see that there are targeted ads for teens

28:31

? I mean , as a young adult and a teen

28:34

, are you seeing ads that are targeted to you ? Are

28:36

you seeing the same kind of generic ads that I'm seeing

28:38

that are you know , they're really focusing

28:41

on the 30 , something who is

28:43

living their best life with

28:46

prep , you know .

28:48

I'm seeing a mix of both

28:50

. So I have seen some some

28:53

of the same ads with teens , but

28:55

I think that is also definitely

28:57

something that marketing avoids

29:00

. I think there are maybe sneakier

29:06

ways or subtler ways that

29:08

they could make it clear

29:11

to teens watching the ads that like this

29:15

is something that affects them , and

29:17

you know places

29:20

that are already under

29:22

fire do also provide

29:25

that advertising , like Planned Parenthood They'll

29:27

send out , you know , sponsored posts

29:29

of just information

29:31

, like not selling anything , and

29:34

I think like that's really

29:36

important . But I

29:38

think there are also some

29:40

some people are still excluded from that based

29:43

on their social media usage

29:45

, what they look up online

29:47

. That can

29:49

reinforce some

29:52

cultural stigmas , I think . So

29:56

there may be better

29:58

ways of advertising on

30:01

billboards or something that's

30:04

not personalized ads based

30:06

on some algorithm .

30:09

You mentioned that school-based

30:11

sexual education is really important

30:13

. Can you talk a little

30:15

bit about what your experience with school-based

30:17

sexual education as a

30:20

kid growing up in

30:22

a pretty progressive

30:24

blue area

30:27

where it's maybe not as politically

30:29

fraught as it might be somewhere else

30:31

?

30:32

Yeah , I mean

30:34

it wasn't great . I

30:39

went to Prince George's County's

30:41

public schools and in middle

30:43

school we had like a unit

30:45

in health class in sixth

30:47

and seventh grade and we were supposed to in eighth grade

30:49

. Like we had to get our parents to sign

30:51

the form , which is another problem , like

30:54

parents have to consent for their students to

30:56

receive sexual education , but

31:02

we didn't even do that unit

31:04

in eighth grade . Um , in

31:06

sixth grade I remember watching

31:10

some Mickey mouse video from

31:12

the fifties about periods and

31:15

like all the boys sniggering

31:17

and um

31:20

. I remember our textbook in seventh grade

31:22

had a very heavy focus on STIs

31:24

. Um , which

31:26

I thought was was

31:28

great Um . But

31:31

there is also a question

31:33

that I don't know the answer to of you

31:36

know how to most effectively

31:38

teach that without

31:40

fear mongering ? And a lot of the textbook

31:42

was like fear mongering . Um

31:45

, and I think

31:47

STIs were definitely a heavier focus

31:49

than pregnancy , which I also think is

31:52

good Um , because it sort

31:54

of balances , you

31:57

know , the concerns that most , most people

31:59

initially have um growing

32:02

up in the U S ? Um in

32:04

high school I took my

32:07

gym credit and health credit over the summer and

32:10

I remember pretty much the

32:13

same thing , like being

32:16

told you know to wear some sort

32:18

of physical barrier , although , like

32:21

, female condoms weren't really mentioned

32:23

and

32:25

there wasn't really there weren't really given

32:28

alternatives to just

32:30

the regular condom . And

32:33

there

32:35

was there was talk in

32:37

the textbook about like , like

32:40

peer pressure and not

32:44

giving into pressure , but

32:47

there wasn't really a specific

32:49

address of the power dynamics

32:52

that go into sexual pressure and

32:54

consent in a

32:56

sexual or romantic context

32:58

, and I

33:00

think that is something that's extremely

33:02

important for minors

33:05

to learn in schools .

33:07

All right . Thank you so much for appearing

33:09

on the podcast today and talking to us a little bit

33:11

about your experience as a young adult

33:14

sexual health educator . Thank you

33:16

. Well , that's it for this bonus

33:18

episode of these Books Made Me . Join

33:20

us next time when we'll discuss a book in which

33:22

our main character works in her family's motel

33:24

. If you think you know which book we're

33:26

tackling next , follow us on Instagram we

33:29

are at these Books Made Me and

33:31

drop a comment on our guests . Our next read

33:34

post .

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features