Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Curious about where your microbial research could
0:02
take you? Take the first step by
0:04
submitting your abstract to ASM Microbe 2024
0:08
and discover a world of opportunities. This
0:10
is your chance to not only
0:13
share your innovative findings, but also
0:15
spark new collaborations, advance your career,
0:18
and contribute to the ever-evolving world
0:20
of microbial sciences. But
0:22
act fast! Abstract submissions close
0:25
on January 23rd. Visit
0:28
asm.org/submit to submit
0:31
your abstract today.
0:33
That's asm.org/submit. I'm
0:59
Vincent Raconiello, and you're listening to
1:01
the podcast All About Viruses. Joining
1:04
me today from South
1:07
America, Daniel Griffin. Hello,
1:10
everyone. Yeah, basically, I'm about 20
1:12
miles north of Venezuela. So that's,
1:14
yeah, I'm a bit south. And
1:16
I guess we're recording this pretty
1:18
late in my time zone at
1:20
the moment. But let's get
1:22
into it, because people will be listening
1:25
to this. Well, I guess, what is
1:27
it? East Coast right after midnight, and
1:29
then everyone else adjusted accordingly. So
1:31
I'm going to start off with a quotation. I'm
1:34
having a little bit of a break, so I've been
1:36
reading the book Dune. So my quotation will come
1:38
from Frank Herbert. The
1:41
beginning of knowledge is the discovery
1:43
of something we do not understand.
1:47
And I sort of like that. It made me
1:49
think of science. It's
1:51
that humility of going into the
1:53
unknown and learning, right? I
1:55
mean, that's what I think this is all
1:57
about. So we will jump right into our.
2:00
We were a little worried,
2:02
I was a little worried, I'll share, that
2:04
we might see one of those little double
2:06
dips where RSV starts to go down and
2:08
then we see another. And so
2:10
we saw that second peak and we're
2:13
hoping in the next week
2:15
or two we really come off that
2:17
high level of RSV. So yeah, just
2:20
keep talking to people about
2:22
this. We have tools this year. We
2:25
have those two different vaccines for adults,
2:27
for pregnant individuals in
2:30
the last trimester. We've got the
2:32
Nersebumab, the passive vaccination. So just
2:34
want to point out, we will
2:37
probably lose over 10,000 adults this
2:39
winter. We
2:42
typically lose 100 to 300 children. So
2:45
if we don't use the tools, we can't get those
2:47
numbers down. I
2:49
also want to move into flu. We may
2:51
be coming off the peak and there's some
2:53
interesting studies that we've seen in the
2:56
past where once we
2:59
get past these holidays and all
3:01
the gatherings, sometimes those numbers
3:03
can come down. A little bit
3:05
of a twist and sometimes a challenge is when all the
3:07
kids go back to school, we can
3:09
again see a little bit of a
3:11
persistence. So we'll see what happens here
3:14
in the coming weeks. But flu activity
3:16
all across the country is
3:18
basically up at pretty significant levels except
3:20
somehow what's going on in Minnesota? How
3:22
are they still in the minimal level?
3:24
I don't know what's going on up
3:26
there, but most of our country, we're
3:28
seeing lots and lots of influenza. And
3:32
what about COVID? We
3:34
are still at over 2,000 deaths a week. And
3:39
I was recently on the Brian Lair show and I just want
3:41
to put this in context. The
3:43
number of folks in hospital has gone up. We've
3:45
got about 30,000 in hospital. That's
3:48
up about 10%. We've
3:50
got about 3,000 in the ICU. That's
3:52
also up about 10% from a week ago. New
3:56
deaths this last week, over 2,000. I
4:00
don't know if people remember, but at one point,
4:02
we were having 2,000 deaths a day in New
4:06
York alone back in the early
4:08
days. But
4:12
2,000 deaths a week in the entire country is still
4:14
way too many. Just start adding up those weeks and,
4:16
you know, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000, 8,000, 8 to 10,000 a
4:22
month. But I
4:24
do think, if we're looking at our
4:26
wastewater data, we do seem to
4:28
be coming off a peak here, particularly
4:31
in the Northeast. Really looks like we're heading down
4:33
and we're seeing things starting to drop in other
4:36
parts of the country. But I
4:38
will point out we're starting to drop from
4:40
this new high set point of 2,500 copies
4:44
per milliliter of sewage. All
4:47
right. I got quite a bit this week
4:50
on children COVID and other vulnerable populations as
4:52
well as long COVID. So let's get right
4:54
into it. I like to
4:56
remind people of the article, coronavirus is
4:59
bad. Comparing it to the flu is
5:01
worse by Roxanne Comsey. February of 2020.
5:04
Can you believe how quickly that came out? Well,
5:07
one of the issues with regard to
5:09
children and COVID is this minimizing of
5:12
COVID in children by comparing it
5:14
to adults. So over 1,000 children,
5:17
we estimate died of COVID here in the
5:20
US. But people say, oh,
5:22
but over a million adults. I don't think
5:24
the fact that over a million adults died
5:26
makes over 1,000 children having died of COVID
5:29
less significant, less troublesome.
5:32
Here we have the article, outcomes
5:35
of SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal viruses among
5:37
children hospitalized in Brazil in this
5:41
population-based retrospective cohort study
5:44
that included children and adolescents
5:46
hospitalized from February
5:48
2020 to February 2023 from SARS. The
5:54
investigators looked at a total of 235,000. 829
6:00
patients that are available results
6:02
of viral tests with SARS-CoV-2
6:04
predominance. And they're going
6:07
to look at competing risk survival.
6:09
And they're going to estimate the probability of
6:12
a fatal outcome. So
6:14
these are folks with acute respiratory
6:16
infections. Not all of them have
6:19
COVID, as you'll see. But
6:22
the fatal outcome for in-hospital
6:24
mortality, so this is children,
6:26
adolescents, in-hospital mortality with SARS-CoV-2,
6:28
6.5%. Co-infection,
6:32
this is something that hopefully people are
6:34
getting more used to looking for. And
6:38
no virus, 2.9%. Influenza, 2.3%.
6:42
Other viruses, 2.1%. And actually
6:44
RSV in the children
6:47
and adolescent, 1.8%. All
6:52
right, what do we do? Well,
6:54
fortunately, we have vaccines and they
6:56
work. The article COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness
6:59
among adolescents was recently
7:01
published in Pediatrics. So
7:03
these are results from a
7:05
nationwide register-based one-to-one matched cohort
7:08
conducted in Denmark, Finland, Norway,
7:10
and Sweden between May 28,
7:12
2021 and April 30, 2023
7:17
to estimate vaccine efficacy
7:19
for primary COVID-19 vaccine
7:22
two-dose schedules among adolescents
7:24
age 12 to 17 years. Cumulative
7:27
incidence of what type of
7:29
efficacy? COVID-19 related hospitalization, that
7:31
was the primary outcome. And
7:34
laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, that's the
7:37
secondary outcome, were compared for the
7:39
vaccinated and unvaccinated at six months
7:41
of follow-up. The study included
7:44
526,966 primary schedule vaccinated adults. Vaccine
7:51
efficacy against COVID-19 related
7:53
hospitalization was 72.6%. It's
7:57
six months of follow-up compared with
7:59
unvaccinated. Estimates were comparable
8:01
when restricting to a period of
8:04
amacron predominance and extending follow-up to
8:06
12 months. And
8:08
they have a really nice figure where you can actually
8:10
look at the different countries and
8:13
the time. So
8:15
Finland, Sweden, Denmark. So,
8:19
Daniel, you said
8:22
adults, but you meant adolescents there. Oh, did
8:24
I say it? So, yes,
8:27
adolescents. Yeah, thank you. Okay,
8:30
not only do vaccines work for kids
8:33
to protect against acute issues, but
8:35
we also have the article that I think a lot of
8:37
people hopefully will find interesting.
8:40
Vaccine effectiveness against long COVID in
8:42
children published in pediatrics.
8:45
So here, the adjusted vaccine effectiveness
8:47
within 12 months was 35% against
8:52
probable long COVID in
8:54
a retrospective cohort study that used data from
8:56
17 health systems that looked
8:58
at 1,037,936 children. I
9:04
also want to talk in the same section about the
9:06
article, socio-emotional development of
9:09
infants and toddlers during
9:11
the COVID-19 pandemic published
9:14
in JAMA Pediatrics. And
9:16
I think people may remember from the early
9:19
days, my suggestion of perhaps we should close
9:21
the bars and open the schools. Well, the
9:24
background of this study, as the
9:26
authors point out, is that the
9:28
COVID-19 pandemic and its related social
9:30
distancing negatively affected children
9:32
and families. Caregiver stress
9:35
increased, which can negatively
9:37
affect infant development and health. Children's
9:40
screen time increased, which
9:43
we have prior studies showing us associated
9:45
with poor language, problem solving
9:47
and social development, daycare and preschool
9:49
closures, along with social distancing, decreased
9:52
peer interactions for young children. And
9:54
they're going to give you links
9:57
to all the different articles supporting that.
10:00
But here, while studies suggest young
10:02
children's social emotional development was affected
10:05
during the pandemic, assessments
10:07
specifically designed to
10:10
evaluate the social emotional development
10:12
changes in screening results over
10:14
time, referrals to early
10:16
intervention have not been examined. Well,
10:18
prior to this, here
10:21
they used specific validated early
10:23
childhood development assessments and
10:25
looked at 60,171
10:29
families and found that
10:31
the pandemic contributed to delays
10:33
in young children's social emotional
10:35
development, particularly during the
10:37
first year of life. That's
10:40
surprising, right, Daniel? Yeah, I
10:42
don't think any of this is surprising. And I
10:45
think, you know, one of the things people always
10:47
talk about, oh, what can we do better? What
10:50
lessons did we learn from this pandemic? And
10:52
we're going to talk about some machine learning
10:54
looking at that next time. But
10:57
I think we really failed our children in a lot of
10:59
ways. So I think that, you know,
11:02
we need to look really closely at that and see
11:04
how we can do a better job next time. All
11:08
right, I will move on to
11:10
COVID, the early viral phase. A
11:12
little bit of a teaser, Vincent. Next
11:14
time I'm going to be discussing a
11:16
preprint out of the David Ho
11:19
Lab with Yossi. Sabo
11:22
is one of the co-authors. I've
11:25
been waiting for this to come out because I've
11:27
been aware of this data now for actually a
11:29
couple of years. You'll see Swarmy to Silence. So
11:32
now that the preprint is out, we'll talk a
11:34
little bit about viral kinetics. But
11:36
let's talk about Paxilovid. So early
11:39
viral phase, you test positive.
11:42
You meet one of the criteria for being high
11:44
risk. NIH treatment guidelines
11:46
recommend Paxilovid. And there's a really
11:48
nice news piece in the New
11:50
York Times by Danny Bloom. I
11:53
have COVID. Should I take Paxilovid? Several
11:56
good points that bear repeating when
11:59
they look at... who is a candidate,
12:01
they note that anyone 12 or older
12:03
who is considered high risk, which encompasses
12:05
a broad swath of persons, the
12:08
CDC includes conditions such
12:10
as depression, obesity, asthma,
12:13
history of smoking. They
12:16
asked Dr. Davey Smith, an infectious disease
12:18
specialist at the University of California, San
12:20
Diego, and I quote, to
12:22
be honest, pretty much if you're an adult in
12:24
the US, you can meet one of these little
12:26
marks. Anyone aged 50 or
12:29
older is also eligible for the treatment
12:31
regardless of health status. The
12:33
older you are, the higher your risk for
12:35
severe illness tends to be. And
12:39
I like this, Pax lovid is intended
12:41
for people with mild or moderate symptoms.
12:43
So my little ad is you don't
12:45
wait for someone to be severely ill.
12:47
Take it as early as possible to nip it
12:50
in the bud and prevent yourself from being so
12:52
sick said Dr. Ziad Ali-Alai,
12:54
the chief of research and development
12:56
of the Veterans Affairs of St.
12:58
Louis Healthcare System. Even
13:01
if you clearly have few symptoms or if
13:03
you've had mild symptoms with COVID before, the
13:05
disease is unpredictable and you may still want
13:07
to consider Pax lovid if you're eligible. Dr.
13:09
Smith said every time someone
13:11
gets COVID, it's basically another game of
13:14
roulette. He said, what
13:16
about Pax lovid rebound? The
13:18
Centers for Disease Control and
13:20
Prevention found no consistent association
13:22
between antiviral treatment and rebounds.
13:25
And as we have some of the CDC. Daniel the... Yes.
13:29
Sorry. No, no, go ahead. There's
13:33
also an article in the Washington
13:35
Post. Yes. By
13:37
Leanna when the under prescribing of Pax
13:40
lovid may be our biggest COVID
13:42
policy failure and that's really good
13:45
also. Okay, excellent. We should let's
13:47
can you throw a link into that for our readers?
13:49
That would be great. Yeah, I will.
13:52
All right. So we will move
13:54
on to a little
13:56
bit about cost and
13:58
access. So I
14:00
was on NPR Monday on the Brian Lehrer show
14:03
and a woman called in showing that her husband had
14:05
been charged $1,683
14:07
for a box of Paxilovit and
14:11
one of the challenges is Paxilovit is now just
14:13
like every other medicine where you go to the
14:15
pharmacy and they run your insurance and If
14:18
you have prescription coverage you end up
14:20
either paying a copay or finding out
14:22
that that this is not covered Now
14:25
there is a link to a program called Paxes
14:27
I don't know who came up with that, but
14:29
it's catchy Paxes
14:34
For those not insured or those with
14:36
Medicare or Medicaid and
14:38
we can leave in a link to Paxes But
14:41
to qualify for free Paxilovit through this program until
14:44
December 31 20 24 patients must be Uninsured
14:49
and do not have a prescription benefit
14:53
Prescription drug benefit at the time they fill
14:55
their prescription Medicare
14:57
beneficiaries Medicaid beneficiaries
14:59
and you can either go to the website,
15:02
which is this Www.
15:05
paxilovit.com/Paxes or you
15:07
can call 1-877-219-7225
15:10
because Really,
15:15
I want to see this happen. I
15:17
don't want to see someone acutely have COVID
15:19
meet criteria Be
15:21
a person who potentially can benefit and then
15:23
have this this financial wall between them and
15:25
the access to the medicine number
15:29
two remdesivir number three
15:31
mondupirivir And then
15:33
convalescent plasma for some folks such
15:36
as those immunocompromised At
15:38
risk of progression who are not eligible
15:40
for other options and Then
15:43
week number two the cytokine storm
15:46
week, right? You're feeling crummy
15:48
the first week and then you feel
15:50
crummy that second week. What is going
15:52
on that second week? This is the
15:54
early inflammatory phase the cytokine storm. A
15:57
period of time when we have studied
15:59
antivirals. The years and years and
16:01
never shown that this is a great time
16:03
to do that. Some soaks steroids at the
16:05
right time, in the right patient, at the
16:08
right dose and to wanted to spend a
16:10
little time to set few questions. Came up
16:12
here right since he made it past a
16:14
sad and your patients feeling crummy they're in
16:17
their early inflammatory face. Do we just get
16:19
everyone steroids? It'll make them feel a little
16:21
better. Better. Remember people,
16:23
after a virus or hasn't increased
16:26
risk of a post viral bacterial
16:28
infection south, we start throwing steroids.
16:30
willy nilly if we're not following
16:32
those pulse oximeter readings, If we're
16:34
not finding the highest risk, folks
16:36
were actually potentially going to harm
16:38
our patient. So be careful with
16:40
the steroids. Let's use them in
16:42
an evidence based manner. Dex.
16:45
The math his own. six know grams
16:47
a day and six days in folks
16:49
with oxygen saturation less than ninety four
16:52
percent and and I cried. Relation guidelines
16:54
recommend it for folks to end up
16:56
in the hospital. We have great recommendations
16:59
American Society of Hematology to help guide
17:01
us and on. Commoners. Support.
17:04
From. Disappear still in the first
17:06
ten days. Immune modulation. Avoid
17:09
unnecessary and a box and unproven
17:12
therapies. And as promised, I've actually
17:14
got quite a bit here. Late
17:16
phase passed on cove It and
17:19
so. Just. To put this
17:21
simply and I don't know how many
17:23
times has bears repeating task or long
17:25
covered. This. Is a thick.
17:27
It is not just in people
17:29
set up, some people have very
17:32
low serotonin levels or low cortisol
17:34
levels or evident seven laden viral
17:36
reactivation, suppers, herpes, very day or
17:39
muscle damage with bought a condo
17:41
dysfunction and a number of papers
17:44
showing ongoing immune to Sparks. So
17:46
this week the paper long cove
17:48
it manifests with see Sell. This
17:51
regulation. Inflammation and an
17:53
uncoordinated adaptive immune response to
17:55
size Curry to was published
17:57
in Nature Immunology. This paper.
18:00
Really require some time. Complicated
18:02
cars, a solid background and
18:04
immunology to fully understand or
18:06
share. Share an overview and
18:08
perhaps Vincent I can discuss
18:10
the implication Sell The authors
18:12
explain that they used to
18:14
make essays and sorority too
18:16
Deeply characterize the global and
18:18
Sars committee specific communities in
18:20
the blood of induce hustle.
18:22
it's clear, long covered and
18:24
non long covert clinical trajectory
18:26
eight months post index it
18:29
they sound that long covered
18:31
individuals exhibited. Systemic inflammation.
18:33
Immune. This regulation of his
18:35
by global differences in T
18:38
cells subset distribution implying ongoing
18:40
immune responses as well as
18:42
by sex specific perturbations inside
18:44
a Linux subsets long coveted
18:46
individuals displayed increase frequencies of
18:48
Cd for positive T self
18:50
police to migrate to inflame
18:52
tissues and exhausted Sars can
18:55
to specific Cd a positive
18:57
P self. Higher levels of
18:59
Sars can be to Etti
19:01
bodies and he miss coordination
19:03
between. Their Sars can be too
19:05
specific t and be Cel responses
19:08
their analysis suggested and improper crosstalk
19:10
between the cellular and euro adaptive
19:12
immunity and markova it which can
19:14
lead to a me in this
19:16
regulation. Inflammation. And clinical
19:19
symptoms associate with this debilitating
19:21
condition. Every figures complicated with
19:23
multiple panels and are supplemental
19:25
figures as well, But for
19:27
example, in figure one, we
19:29
see elevated P Central Memory.
19:32
T. Effective memory. Peripheral.
19:34
Teeth like you'll a helper and
19:37
sleep and flicker helper T Rags.
19:40
In. Figure two: We see increased
19:42
homing receptor expression perhaps associated
19:44
as I say, with migration
19:47
to inflamed tissue am. In
19:49
figure three, we see that Sars
19:51
can to specific city a positive
19:54
t Sell some individuals on Kobe
19:56
Praful express the exhaustion markers such
19:58
as Ctl A full. War. And.
20:01
Figure for we see this
20:03
excessive production of anti Ah
20:06
receptor binding domain antibodies and
20:08
secure fires. We.
20:11
See that in Long Cove it I'll
20:13
for his up. I'll. Five is
20:15
down so lots of differences and
20:18
is all seems to be seems
20:20
to make biological sets. But is
20:22
this data mining survey? Repeat this
20:25
Indifferent cohorts am and what are
20:27
the diagnostic or therapeutic implications. Daniel
20:30
I'm. The. Easy to
20:33
these figures. Third, Dot. Plots
20:35
Reach.is a patient right? Yes!
20:38
Is. Huge overlap between the non
20:41
cove it any. Other
20:43
popular control population, right? So yeah,
20:45
and there are some patients who
20:48
clearly have higher. of
20:51
of whatever they're looking at anti are B D
20:53
for example but then there are many patients whose
20:55
and they are be the are the same as.
20:58
In the control population self. I
21:00
don't think it's every one that having the same
21:02
issue is. this is in fact the issue. Just
21:05
sit. You know that's. One of the test things and
21:08
I think you know as a clinicians we look
21:10
at this and we wanna see two different groups
21:12
like you know like we saw with that data
21:14
to U Penn with low Sir Tony we want
21:16
to see like a whole group of people or
21:19
the people with low cortisol as we saw it
21:21
as a Mount Sinai Yell Studies We wanna see
21:23
the two groups really separate up. And I think that's
21:25
one of the challenges. Where we're starting to see
21:28
that the two groups are biologically difference
21:30
and for we're not really getting that
21:32
distinction. And yes, I actually think this
21:34
goes wrong with the line that long.
21:36
Kobe is probably a number of different
21:39
processes going on, and not every long
21:41
covered patient has the same mechanism driving
21:43
their issues. I would be very
21:45
interested to know is. The. Dots.
21:48
Are. The same patients who are similar
21:51
to the controls. And.
21:53
In each of the as says that they
21:55
do right so anti are be deeds speedy
21:57
one ctl a fourth is it always This.
22:00
Impatient that's higher or is it a
22:02
mixed bag in which case would be
22:04
very difficult to know what's going on.
22:06
Yeah I would love that too but that would
22:08
be great. Like a know they're sorta comparing your
22:10
the the blue dots to the red dots but
22:13
yeah be great as some way to turn on
22:15
like that third dimension as you know. Give us
22:17
give us a red green or something we can
22:19
see which person is which. And
22:22
and am hoping you know as we get
22:24
a better understanding of the different drivers. For
22:26
different people that's going to drive us know
22:29
someone has us serotonin have like six or
22:31
eight. I'm gonna come up with a plan
22:33
if someone has a cortisol which is in
22:35
a certain area someone as evidence of mass
22:38
cell activation are histamine driven symptoms. Or maybe
22:40
we can get a better subtlety here of
22:42
what might be a way to address each
22:45
individual said it is throwing stuff at these
22:47
debilitated people and potentially making them feel worse
22:49
at times. And. The next one
22:51
I guess I will talk about
22:54
is a couple a couple investigations
22:56
looking at vaccination to prevent long
22:58
covered and vaccination to treat log
23:00
cove it and so the first
23:03
is the article the effectiveness of
23:05
covered nineteen vaccines to prevent lol
23:07
coded symptoms Staggered covert study of
23:09
data from the Uk, Spain and
23:11
Estonia published in the Lancet for
23:14
Spear Trade Madison year The investigators
23:16
conducted a staggered cohort study I
23:18
to the starting them at different.
23:20
Times is different Cohorts am.
23:23
using. Primary care records from
23:25
the you case I'm
23:27
from Catalonia, Spain am.
23:30
From. Dystonia. Am.
23:33
And they end up finding that
23:35
compared with and vaccinated individuals overall
23:37
hazard ratios for long covert symptoms
23:39
in people vaccinated with the first
23:41
dose of any covered nineteen vaccine
23:44
ranged from zero point four nine
23:46
to seventy one. Soothing about us
23:48
at Twenty Nine fifty one percent
23:50
reduction and consistently was associated with
23:53
a reduced risk of persistent symptoms
23:55
after a cool vid insects. it.
23:58
Now I'll. Even. Thanks to some
24:00
other studies as well. Not. What about
24:03
vaccination as a therapeutic for a
24:05
long covert sammy? Discuss the pre
24:07
prince impact of covered nineteen vaccination
24:10
on symptoms and immune see on
24:12
types in vaccine. I have individuals
24:14
who upon covered. Recently posted on
24:16
Med Archives Am is a number
24:19
of August authors there. We have
24:21
Hundred Feet. Bradley of hundred Be
24:23
Bradley. Sorry about that. Connor Am
24:25
Key goes in. There are Harlan
24:28
Krumholz isn't there? I see Daniel
24:30
Griffin misspelled in their. I'm
24:32
I'm leaving the like discusses. I'll
24:35
even a a link to a thread posted
24:38
by Akiko he was socket it's in a
24:40
walks through the spread of say this was
24:42
at this was a challenging study to i'm
24:44
to enroll Forks what we were looking for
24:46
here. Miss. Participants with long
24:49
cove it who had not been
24:51
vaccinated, who had then agree to
24:53
be in the study and then
24:55
they would go ahead and they
24:57
would get a coded vaccine doses
24:59
and then later they would get
25:01
a second covered vaccine dos or
25:03
before they got their vaccinations. Are
25:05
we reflect blood saliva? They would
25:07
do a survey, get their first
25:09
dose, they do another survey, it's
25:12
second dose again blood sly The
25:14
survey and then we found out
25:16
about three months more blood saliva.
25:18
Service and to be a lot of
25:20
stuff that that gets done here. lots
25:22
of pretty multi color said years but
25:25
I'm going to jump right to figure
25:27
two of what what was really happening
25:29
as far as just symptoms when you
25:31
ask people how you doin Hey during
25:34
the two weeks, six weeks and twelve
25:36
weeks am someone we look at. Two
25:38
weeks we about forty three percent feeling
25:40
better. Six. Weeks Seventy nine percent.
25:43
Twelve Weeks. We actually lose a few
25:45
and we're down to sixty two percent.
25:47
Twenty percent, Fourteen, and Nineteen percent say
25:49
they're about the same. And this is
25:51
what I want to point out is.
25:54
At. Two weeks, seven percent were worse.
25:56
When we go to Six weeks, seven
25:58
percent were worse And. We're twelve
26:00
weeks nineteen percent were worse. So
26:03
not everyone felt better. We actually had some
26:05
people feel worse soaps when I would love
26:07
to do it. Will go a little further.
26:09
Insists his be able to tell ahead of
26:11
time. Rabbit is here we are. We're encouraging
26:13
people. You. Know hey most
26:15
people get better he sixty percent
26:17
but some people actually are feeling
26:20
worse So jumping to figure for
26:22
this is the in our analysis
26:24
as the vaccination response to immune
26:26
system changes to antibodies against a
26:28
D V and other viruses response
26:30
to covered night seemed vaccination. I'm
26:32
and you do see a little
26:35
bit of a difference for not
26:37
really we're not really seeing a
26:39
big difference here in those that
26:41
are prove those for worse. Supplementary
26:44
figure to auto everybody analysis
26:46
and I think this is
26:48
a big one that as
26:50
it is probably the second
26:52
but but several here where.
26:54
The. Idea that auto etti body
26:57
is somehow related and may
26:59
be changes and ness we
27:01
really don't see an any
27:04
changes Auto antibody levels really
27:06
stay stable what's going up
27:08
his the am this anybody
27:10
levels seen am now this
27:13
one. I liked as
27:15
it might predict responders to vaccination
27:17
am. So here we have figure
27:19
five the results of examining plasma
27:22
factors that are enriched those who
27:24
improved after vaccination versus those who
27:26
did not. So the heat map
27:28
shows that soluble i'll six receptor
27:30
elevated at baseline and after the
27:33
vaccine in those who improved in
27:35
contrast interfere a beta and the
27:37
sillier in your troth exact to
27:39
were elevated in those who did
27:41
not improve after max. Said
27:44
maybe ways for us to tell ahead of
27:47
time. I'm who's gonna who's couldn't get better
27:49
now. Plasma. Levels of
27:51
interference. Alpha to and beta
27:53
Cncs. I'll. Eleven. As.
27:56
C F stem cell Factor were
27:58
consistently higher in those. Who
28:00
did not improve after vaccination.
28:02
While soluble I'll Six receptor
28:05
was consistently higher in those
28:07
who reported health improvement after
28:09
vaccination. So. You know
28:11
this will undergo it's peer review and
28:13
will come out hopefully better than is
28:15
currently but starting to see maybe some
28:18
of the biology and hopefully helpless as
28:20
last thing I want to do is
28:22
increase someone who's debilitate by long coveted
28:24
go get a vaccination and have them
28:26
feel worse. And what we're seeing here
28:28
is that that is a risk. Why
28:30
people are feel better but some people
28:32
are worse. All right and as I
28:34
say have been finishing up every episode for quite
28:37
awhile And me to keep this when short because
28:39
we are already tell you we've got a lot
28:41
coming next next week. No
28:43
one is safe until Every one
28:45
Is safe. Were in the middle
28:47
of January, we're getting to the
28:49
end of our Microbe Tv fundraiser.
28:51
November, December, January will double your
28:53
donations up to a potential maximum
28:55
donation of twenty thousand dollars of
28:57
Stop What You're Doing Good A
28:59
Parasite supporters.com and Click. Donate even
29:01
a small amount. Every bit helps
29:03
us continue our work. Is.
29:06
Time for your questions. For Daniel, you
29:08
can send years to Daniel at my
29:10
group.t V. Joanne Rights.
29:13
As a question, about the boosters, I've had each
29:15
vaccine that has been offered six or seven. I
29:17
can't remember em up to date. At
29:19
my last shot in October. Twenty
29:22
Twenty Three. Would. Like to get
29:24
another at the end of January, which he
29:26
four months out. Of. Seventy A
29:28
with C O P D, diabetes, heart
29:30
disease, etc. As not, had
29:33
Cozad. And. I'm hoping not to get
29:35
it. I mask indoors. My thought is I would.
29:37
Like. To keep my immune system primed as much as
29:39
possible with you think of my plants. You
29:43
makes a lot of sense. Sounds like you
29:45
been listening to Twist On You know. What
29:47
we've talked about with the vaccines is that
29:49
each time you get a booster. In.
29:51
Own call it a new vaccine called a booster,
29:53
but each time you get one of these shots
29:56
for we estimate three or four months you're gonna
29:58
get an elevated level of those eighty. It
30:00
is. You're going to get that extra level
30:02
of protection. I'm anybody's contract. That's just what
30:04
they do now as a public health policy.
30:07
I don't think we're going to be able
30:09
to convince everyone that hey in this new
30:11
world now the Cove it is with us.
30:13
You need to get a shot every four
30:16
months, but I think certain individuals will will
30:18
wanna do that. It makes sense. These are
30:20
licensed vaccines at certainly something you and your
30:22
am this you can discuss and I certainly
30:25
understand the science and the thinking behind that.
30:28
Ellen. Rights of friend of Mine who
30:31
completed the initial series of three. vaccinations,
30:34
Has contracted cove it five times
30:36
twice in the past ninety days.
30:38
As as possible. The. Meantime her
30:41
partner with whom she shares a bad has
30:43
never had it. It affects lows at once
30:45
in the past claims and made her feel
30:47
worse feel so lost her hair during a
30:50
previous insects and occasional numbness on the left
30:52
side of her face, ongoing pain in the
30:54
right calf. This time her
30:56
doctor recommended she go to urgent
30:58
care for coded vaccination despite her
31:00
debilitating fatigue and headache, Was. This
31:03
good advice. He.
31:05
The first, my heart goes out to
31:07
people like this. Unfortunately there are people
31:09
who have repeated in sections to see
31:12
this ghost or not fully recovered after
31:14
these and sanctions on it was talked
31:16
about how devastating am losing your hair
31:18
can be an and is tough right
31:20
as as we talked about that articles
31:23
and each time you get covered it's
31:25
Russian roulette. You know people who it
31:27
was a mild case a weathered the
31:29
storm. Three. Months later on take care
31:31
of them in the hospital because something about you
31:33
know maybe their genetics ah who knows what but
31:36
each time can be different so a mild case
31:38
does enough li mean the next time you get
31:40
cove it is gonna be mild as well as
31:42
some is a tough thing you know if he'll
31:45
say i to patch love it and it was
31:47
worse or what was worse Where you continue new
31:49
the has. You. Covered nitin'
31:51
out with this been without packs live in
31:54
really don't get to do that. He.
31:57
Has a challenge is an in
31:59
a Wendy? Get that next. Vaccines
32:01
are familiar. Last question, I'm a really
32:03
frustrating for folks to get cove ed
32:05
and we're recommending wait nine days before
32:08
you get that vaccine and then they
32:10
get cove it again and this sort
32:12
of wondering how to ever get that
32:14
ninety days I'm This is where we
32:16
gotta start talking about behavioral modification was
32:19
possibly going on. What are the exposures
32:21
five covered in Saxons Am is? We're
32:23
spending a little time trying to figure
32:25
out of the some way that mitigate
32:28
that exposure com and actually get vaccines.
32:30
Is that are getting boosted with the infection
32:32
and all the risks that come with that.
32:36
Laurie. Rights and this is
32:38
about access. Road. To few
32:40
days ago about my sister's difficulty getting packs.
32:43
Love it! As it turns out, he needs
32:45
to fill out an application with access. Pfizer,
32:47
Evidently subsidized the cost for eligible
32:50
patients. Hopefully others may benefit from
32:52
this information. So this is what
32:54
you also mentioned about our axon.
32:56
Thank you. And
32:58
finally, Kathleen. Rights Kathleen is a
33:00
hair stylist and Dallas, Texas. Has
33:03
been listening to Twist since twenty twenty
33:05
and is a big fan. Friend of
33:07
mine recently tested positive for covert on
33:09
December twentieth. She. Cleared or infection.
33:11
And yes, he did get to
33:14
take packs loaded. Today is January
33:16
Eleven since he tested positive again.
33:18
This. Is the fastest we infection I
33:20
have ever thought possible. I know you
33:23
can have multiple infections, however it seems
33:25
to meet this immediate green sexy may
33:27
indicate know short period of a release
33:29
immediately after and and sexton any. I'm
33:32
not a scientist, but I do have
33:34
a large load in the common sense
33:36
department. Story continues to keep my attention
33:38
in my concern. Yeah.
33:41
now this is against is the frustration
33:43
and and our what one of our
33:45
earlier he mows right about to is
33:47
some individuals not even getting then you're
33:49
thinking i just i target at least
33:51
i will get a for the next
33:53
three months well unfortunately people are getting
33:55
reinfected some folks with insane months i
33:57
get covered many get it again and
33:59
verifying it It's a reinfection
34:01
because it might even be a different variant.
34:03
So very, very frustrating.
34:07
That's Twiv weekly clinical update with
34:09
Dr. Daniel Grissom. Thank you, Daniel.
34:12
Oh, thank you. And everyone, be safe.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More