Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
The NBA's version of
0:07
March Madness, which really means the
0:09
night to night jockeying for playoff
0:11
positioning in both the West
0:14
and the Eastern Conference. Plus
0:17
a deep dive on the intricacies
0:20
of voting Most Valuable Player,
0:22
Coach of the Year, and other year
0:25
end award categories, and
0:28
a Pat Bev story as only
0:31
Chris Haynes can tell it all.
0:33
Coming up next on the latest edition
0:36
of This League Uncut.
0:52
Welcome to this league,
0:53
to the
0:55
rule of twenty four hour NBA news,
1:00
Chris Haynes, Cork
1:03
Stein. It's some time this
1:09
leagueln Cut is underway. In on fire.
1:13
This should be a good one. Hey,
1:15
everyone, welcome in to another
1:18
edition of This League Uncut.
1:21
Mark Stein here with Chris Haynes.
1:24
March Madness is fully
1:27
underway. But I'm
1:31
not sure that either one of
1:34
your co hosts on
1:36
this trusty podcast can
1:40
bring too much insight to you.
1:43
On the collegiate front, I
1:46
am an absolute NBA snob
1:48
who once Cal State Fullerton season
1:50
is over, my college season is over. So
1:53
my college season ended March
1:55
ninth. I do not fill out
1:57
a bracket. Chris Haynes, how
2:00
is your bracket looking.
2:02
There's nothing on it. I haven't filled out
2:04
a bracket. I don't think
2:07
I ever have. I just, you
2:10
know, it's cool to see all the hoopla surrounding
2:13
March Madness and seeing all these contests
2:15
and all that stuff, and I like to
2:17
hear about it. I like to hear about how everybody's
2:19
bracket is. But I've never participated
2:22
in one. I did want two years ago,
2:24
a few years ago, I wanted to start
2:26
a trend with my wife. She
2:28
doesn't watch college basketball at all. I
2:30
wanted to start a trending with her and
2:33
where we would you know,
2:35
have our bracket and the winner of the bracket would
2:37
would make the other do something that the other one
2:40
once done. But we never got
2:42
that off the ground. So but yeah,
2:44
I mean it's fun for everybody else, but I just
2:46
never really got involved into it.
2:48
Yeah, we're kind of I probably should move on because
2:50
we're people love
2:52
this time of year so much, and I do not do
2:55
not want to bring people down.
2:56
We're we're being with a couple
2:58
of grints.
2:59
And so look when my school's in
3:01
it. You know, cal State Fullerton
3:03
has made the NCAA Tournament four times
3:05
in school history, three times in the twenty
3:07
first century. Whenever we
3:09
make it, the three times we've made it, most
3:12
recently, I was
3:14
there and proud to be in attendance. The first
3:16
time we made it, I was just
3:18
a young kid, so still years away
3:20
from actually attending cal
3:22
State Fullerton. But yeah,
3:26
let's just politely say that neither one of us
3:28
is a college hoops expert. So let's move
3:30
on to the NBA's
3:33
version of March Madness,
3:35
which certainly isn't
3:39
known for capturing the
3:41
nation's attention with the same fervor.
3:43
But for our
3:46
jobs, this is a very important time of year
3:48
because what's really happening. There's
3:51
the jockeying for playoff seatings, which
3:53
is a night to night scoreboard watch that
3:55
is very important. Last night,
3:57
we're recording this on Friday afternoon. Last
4:00
night I was watching
4:04
Utah in Dallas to play the Mavericks
4:06
and just a stunning result the Sacramento
4:09
Kings on the second night of a back to back. But
4:11
even so, you would have never expected
4:14
Sacramento to lose at Washington,
4:17
but the Kings did, and the Mavericks,
4:19
with a win over the tanking
4:22
Utah Jazz, were able to move up and take
4:24
the number six spot, which is not
4:27
just surprising, but look, it's only
4:29
one night, it's only one game for both
4:31
teams, but leading into next
4:33
week in your neighborhood, in your backyard,
4:36
the Mavericks play the Kings in
4:38
a huge two game baseball
4:40
series. Huge for the purposes
4:43
of that race for number six. In
4:45
the West. The two kinds of March madness that I'm
4:47
really focused on. It's the jockeying for the seedings
4:49
like that, and then the MVP race.
4:51
This is when the MVP race really
4:54
comes in to focus. We'll get to the
4:56
MVP stuff in a minute, but you
4:59
know, I know you're not even gonna be there. You're on the
5:01
road next week, so you are gonna miss I
5:03
mean, these are two huge games the way I look
5:05
at it. Really in the West, we're talking
5:07
about three races. Really in the West,
5:10
you could even say maybe four, because
5:12
the Houston Rockets insane. Even
5:14
after losing Alpa
5:17
and Shngoon, the Rockets have won
5:19
seven in a row. Okay, some of
5:21
that is favorable schedule, but the
5:23
Rockets have kind of thrust themselves into
5:26
the playing race when it was thought that their
5:28
season was over. So we got these three races
5:32
in the West, the race
5:34
for the number one seed thunder
5:36
Nuggets, Timberwolves. Then
5:39
there's this battle for four or five with
5:41
the Clippers and the Pelicans, and the Pelicans
5:43
had got within a half game
5:46
I think, or at least got within one game
5:48
of the Clippers, and now
5:50
the Pelicans are dealing with the terrible
5:53
news that Brandon Ingram just went down with a hyper
5:55
extended knee and will be out for at least
5:57
two weeks before he's evaluated again.
6:00
Could have been worse THI yeah, for sure,
6:02
that was Yeah, that looked bad.
6:05
It looked bad. So yeah, I mean, if it's only a
6:07
matter of weeks and if Ingram
6:10
can indeed come back, not to say he'll be back
6:12
in two weeks, but reevaluated in two weeks,
6:15
certainly that was best case
6:17
scenario news for the Pelicans. Then
6:20
we got this race from six through ten
6:22
and again if we want to extend it even a little further,
6:25
nine, ten, eleven, because Houston is now
6:28
decided that their season is not over and
6:30
even without Shnghu and the Rockets are still
6:32
trying to steak into the
6:34
play in zone. If
6:36
I had to ask you,
6:39
you know, who do you think gets the
6:41
sixth seed in the West, which
6:44
is so important because it keeps you out of the
6:46
play in tournament. So you got Dallas, Phoenix,
6:49
and Sacramento. Those really are the
6:52
three teams in battle for
6:55
six through eight. Then
6:57
the Lakers and the Warriors. It just doesn't look like
6:59
they're to be able to lift themselves out of the nine
7:01
to ten range. So you
7:04
know, if you asked me before last night, I would have
7:06
said Sacramento. But that was a bad loss
7:08
for the Kings, who on top of everything, the Kings
7:10
have also lost Kevin Herder in definitely
7:13
to a separated shoulder.
7:16
It's tough. It's tough. I mean,
7:18
you got the Mavericks playing playing
7:20
really well, the Pelicans
7:23
with the brandon ingram you whether how to ask going the effect
7:27
the rest of their season. Phoenix,
7:30
you just I can't get a firm
7:32
grasp on if they're
7:34
legit or not. They're good, they're
7:36
a threat, but you know, well
7:39
they play it consistent enough basketball. Who
7:41
is last threats to get into
7:43
that sixth spot? I don't know. So if
7:46
I had to guess the
7:48
Pelicans suffering that injury, Phoenix
7:51
being kind of hit and miss,
7:55
the Kings, I
7:57
will probably lean towards saying
8:00
I'll probably give the ads to Dallas. They're
8:03
playing really good basketball right now. I
8:06
had Jason Kidd on my Bleacher
8:08
Report live stream.
8:09
I was just gonna say, that's the reason, that's the reason you're
8:11
picking the Mavericks at six, because you on
8:13
your live stream.
8:15
No, I'm looking at I'm looking at that stile,
8:17
I'm looking at the Pelicans. I'm looking at the Suns
8:19
and the Kings, and the Dallas
8:22
Mavericks are playing better ball than all three of those
8:24
teams. So I think
8:26
I have to go there. I just don't have
8:28
the comp Like, I don't know camp
8:30
Pelicans sustain what they've been doing.
8:33
Potentially possibly the Suns
8:35
again, they you know, they've been hit and
8:37
miss. And the Kings right now, I don't know what. I
8:39
don't know what's going on. So I think
8:41
Dallas is probably the easiest bet
8:44
right now. But you know, I don't know for
8:46
sure, but I like the way they're playing.
8:49
One thing about the Mavericks, man, they're athletic. Now
8:51
they got that aerial threat, you got
8:54
Kyrie and Lucas. Seems like they figured
8:56
out a good balance of how to
8:58
attack angst each other.
9:01
So they're looking good right now. But yeah,
9:03
I am. I am kind of pissed
9:06
at the fact that I won't be able to
9:09
be in attendance for the MAVs Kings
9:12
Matt Day next week.
9:14
The schedule is bizarre
9:17
that basically on
9:19
Monday night, Dallas
9:22
and Sacramento are both playing, the Mavericks
9:25
are in Utah,
9:27
and then Tuesday night, on the
9:29
second night of a back to back for both teams,
9:31
the Kings will host the Mavericks for the first
9:33
time. I think you will be in
9:36
far away Milwaukee, your second
9:38
home to cover Lakers
9:40
at Bucks on Tuesday night. Miss second,
9:43
you will miss the first of those games. But then
9:46
there's two days off. The Mavericks have
9:48
two full off days in Sacramento,
9:51
and then the teams play again on
9:54
Friday night. Now, Sacramento
9:56
has already won the first two meetings in Dallas,
9:59
and so the Kings only to win one of these two
10:01
games to clinch the head to head tiebreaker.
10:04
But again, there are so many interesting
10:06
little intricacies
10:10
when we look at this race,
10:12
and just just to hit you with a few of them,
10:15
because this this actually shocked me. My
10:17
sub stacking pal Tom Ziller came up
10:19
with this one, which I was not aware of.
10:21
Only three teams in the league this season
10:24
have lost to Charlotte,
10:27
Detroit and Washington. Charlotte,
10:31
Detroit and Washington. Only three teams
10:33
have lost at least once two
10:36
those three teams at the bottom
10:38
of the.
10:39
Standings are these are these good
10:41
teams.
10:42
Only one of them is Portland Brooklyn.
10:45
And
10:48
sorry, sorry, I didn't know you. I did
10:50
not want to do trivia time.
10:52
Yeah, I did want to do trivia, but I
10:55
might have got I might have gotten
10:57
sacer Midal because you said Zilla.
10:59
Yeah, yeah, probably
11:01
that's that just happened. But like, if
11:04
Sacramento doesn't get
11:06
the sixth seed, they're really
11:08
going to point to those losses to
11:11
the Hornets, Pistons, and Wizards
11:13
at what probably cost them. And
11:15
now when you go to Tankathon and you
11:18
look at remaining strength of schedule, Phoenix,
11:21
with twelve games to go, has
11:24
the second hardest remaining schedule in
11:26
the league in terms of opponent winning percentage
11:28
five seventy four. Sacramento is third
11:31
thirteen games left for the Kings a
11:33
five sixty two opponent
11:35
winning percentage. Dallas is all the
11:37
way at number twenty two. The
11:39
Mavericks remaining schedule. In
11:42
their final twelve games, the opponent winning
11:44
percentage is four to seventy seven
11:46
and Dallas needs a nine to three
11:49
finish to get to fifty
11:51
wins. So it's funny that you were
11:53
talking about the Pelicans before because I had basically,
11:56
you know, the Pelicans have been so good
11:58
since February, first of the
12:00
best teams in the league, with Zion
12:02
Williamson playing as
12:05
well as he ever has and most importantly
12:07
just playing just being out there. Zion
12:09
Williamson, as we're recording this,
12:12
has played in fifty eight games.
12:14
His career high is sixty one, so
12:17
he is on pace to set
12:19
a career high in games play.
12:23
People will obviously point to the fact
12:25
that his rebounding numbers are still
12:28
sub part. Zion is only
12:30
pulling down five point eight rebounds
12:32
per game, that is a career low, but
12:35
the balls in his hands more. He's up
12:37
to five assists a game. Scoring's
12:39
a little bit down. His minutes are a little bit down. He's
12:41
only playing thirty one minutes
12:43
a game compared to thirty
12:45
three minutes the previous
12:48
two seasons, and there was a season
12:50
in there that he lost completely to injury.
12:53
But they've cut his minutes down just a
12:55
little bit, and they're getting the
12:57
most all around productive
12:59
play that the Pelicans have ever had
13:01
for Zion Williamson, and he's headed for a
13:03
career high in games played and his
13:06
first playoff appearance. But I had the Pelicans,
13:08
I basically had just considered them. They
13:10
were going for fourth in the West
13:12
to try to bump the Clippers down. And now
13:15
with this brandon Ingram injury, that
13:17
could drag the Pelicans
13:20
back down with the MAVs
13:22
and the Kings and the Suns in
13:24
the six to eight race, because
13:27
the Mavericks, as
13:29
of the Friday standings were only a game and
13:31
a half behind New Orleans. I mean, this is what I'm talking
13:34
about. This is again, It's not the
13:36
kind of March madness that leads to office
13:38
pools all over the country and
13:41
commercials on your TV all day long.
13:43
But every night in the NBA you
13:46
have to dial into the standings because
13:48
weird stuff is happening and things are changing.
13:51
A couple of weeks ago, Stein, you
13:53
know, talking about the Sacramento Kings. I
13:56
don't have the numbers on me at hand right
13:58
now, but you know they struggle against
14:01
lower level opponents, and
14:03
they exceed against the high level
14:05
opponents. So my brother, who Mark
14:08
Kings, who covers the Kings for the Sacramento
14:10
Observer newspaper, he
14:13
asks, Dearon Fox a couple
14:15
of weeks ago, does it concern
14:18
you guys that you guys
14:20
don't seem to play
14:23
with the ferber needed and energy
14:25
level needed to beat these lower
14:27
level opponents, but then you guys rise
14:30
to theication against high
14:32
echelon teams. And Fox
14:35
said, yeah, there is a concern. You know, we
14:37
definitely need to
14:39
take our opponents seriously. But uh, you
14:42
know, on the other end, you know, we're playing good
14:45
against high level teams. So if
14:47
we get in the playoffs, I guess we'll
14:49
be playing good because
14:52
all the days of the playoffs. So
14:55
Kings just want to get into the playoffs. They feel like they would
14:57
be in a good shot. They just got to get
14:59
past the the Washington's and the Toronto's
15:02
and the Charlottees. Once they get past
15:04
that, they feel like they'll be in good shape
15:07
when they have to face Denver and OKC
15:10
in Minnesota.
15:12
Well, I'm not sure that I can
15:15
echo that pretty optimistic
15:17
view from the Yaron Fox, but look, he is correct
15:20
what you cited about your brothers reporting
15:23
and just the Kings in general. Look,
15:25
it is true there are only eight teams
15:27
in the league with winning records
15:30
against five hundred or better opposition,
15:33
and the Kings are one of those eight teams. The Kings
15:35
are twenty two and twenty one against
15:37
five hundred or better opposition, And again
15:40
that's true, there are only eight such teams.
15:42
Sacramento can feel good about
15:44
being one of those eight. But like I said,
15:47
if they end up seventh
15:49
or eighth or just and look,
15:52
if they end up seventh or eighth, they're gonna have to go
15:54
through the playing round, and that playing round
15:57
is brutal. They're
15:59
really going to rue the fact that they
16:01
dropped games to the Charlotte
16:04
Hornets and the Detroit Pistons and
16:06
on Wednesday night in Washington to
16:08
the Wizards, like you just you know,
16:10
those are particularly damaging
16:13
losses. And no
16:16
bracket here but scoreboard
16:18
watching, and I feel like I click on the
16:20
NBA standings like ten
16:22
times a day looking for hints,
16:25
clues, trends
16:29
that might tell us what's going to happen next,
16:32
because I mean, this is another crazy stat.
16:34
The Chicago Bulls thirty
16:37
four and thirty five before they lost
16:39
Thursday night to Houston, so
16:42
that loss dropped the Bulls to thirty four
16:44
and thirty six. But Chicago
16:48
is now flirting with getting over five
16:50
hundred if the Bulls can
16:52
finish eight
16:56
and four, which is
16:58
probably optimistic given their injury
17:01
woes. No Zach Lavine, no
17:03
Patrick Williams, obviously no Lonzo
17:05
Ball, although this week our guy
17:07
Casey Johnson and Chicago reported
17:09
that there's some kind of the
17:11
first rumblings of positivity about
17:14
Lonzo coming back next season, which I think, obviously
17:16
people would love to see. But if let's just say
17:18
the Bulls can muster an
17:21
eight and four finish, if they do,
17:24
that will give the NBA nineteen
17:26
teams with a winning record this season.
17:29
That would be a single season record. There
17:31
has never been more than nineteen
17:33
teams in the NBA with
17:36
a winning record in one season. I mean, even with
17:38
eighteen, that would tie the records. I mean not just
17:40
think about that that it's a thirty team league and
17:43
there's a chance that nineteen of the
17:45
thirty teams are going
17:47
to post a winning record this season.
17:49
It just kind of also shows you what the
17:51
bottom of the league the Charlottes, the Detroits,
17:54
the Washingtons, the San Antonios have just
17:56
been so bad and
17:58
have struggled so much. You got through Portland
18:00
in there as well. Whereas in Memphis,
18:03
I think Memphis, which has had
18:05
this hollacious string of injuries,
18:07
obviously John Morant only playing in nine
18:09
games, the Grizzlies play super
18:11
hard and are a tougher out, But these
18:14
the bottom five have just been such
18:17
bottom feeders that it's certainly contributed
18:20
to the possibility that night. I
18:22
can't believe nineteen teams in the league the
18:24
winning record, it's probably gonna end up eighteen. I
18:26
don't think Chicago really has
18:28
an eight and four finish in them, but let's see, let's
18:30
see if they can surprise us.
18:32
I have a question for you regarding
18:34
that. So the eighteen and nineteen, whatever
18:37
number it is, do you think
18:40
the play in format has anything to do with
18:42
that?
18:43
Well, I
18:46
think yeah. I mean, I guess you would have to say more
18:48
teams are trying. You know, teams
18:51
that are in range of
18:53
the tenth seed certainly have
18:55
more incentive to play
18:59
all the way through the eighty two game finish
19:01
line. And that's one of the things that the league definitely
19:03
prioritized and why the league loves
19:07
the playing tournament because you know, the
19:10
NBA loves to put out
19:12
lines that say, so, what is it now? Eleven
19:15
teams in the West, and
19:18
this is actually, you know what, it's actually low for this
19:20
season. Normally at this point
19:22
in the season, you know, the league
19:24
would love to say there are still twenty four or
19:26
twenty five teams who are still alive,
19:29
and it really is only
19:31
there are only twenty one teams available
19:34
for the twenty postseason spots. In the
19:36
West, you know, again, Utah
19:39
has you know, they are not trying to
19:41
win games right now, Memphis, Portland,
19:43
San Antonio, they're already out of it. So in the
19:45
West, Houston has made
19:47
this unexpected surge that
19:50
they're still in the play in mix. But
19:52
in the East, you know, we know
19:54
our ten teams. Mathematically,
19:57
you could say Brooklyn is still in the race
19:59
for the number ten seed, but the
20:01
Nets were four and a half games
20:04
behind number ten Atlanta entering
20:06
Friday's play and the Nets
20:08
have been trending in the wrong direction since
20:11
December. So again, mathematically,
20:13
the Nets are still in the race
20:15
for a top ten spot. But I
20:17
really think in the East, our
20:20
top ten is decided, and again
20:22
in the West, I think most people
20:24
thought that the top ten was
20:26
decided until the Rockets kind
20:29
of went on this late surge, and I have to say, like
20:32
Coach of the Year, I don't think emy
20:34
Udoka is gonna win, but to have
20:36
Houston this competitive
20:39
this late in the season, he
20:42
should at least be mentioned. You know, Coach
20:44
of the Year I
20:47
think is probably I
20:49
would say Orlando's Jamal Moseley, Oklahoma
20:53
City's Mark Dagnault, and Minnesota's
20:55
Chris Finch. I think they're probably at the
20:57
top, But I would say Willie
20:59
Green in New Orleans, Emi Udoka,
21:02
and Houston JB. Bickerstaff
21:04
in Cleveland. I think these guys deserve
21:08
shout outs too. And then you
21:10
know Joe Missoula kind of like Jason
21:13
Tatum's MVP case. The
21:15
Celtics are so good that in a weird
21:17
way, that's probably gonna work against Joe
21:19
Miszoula in the Coach of the Year chase.
21:23
When it comes to Coach of the Year, we typically
21:25
see teams that overachieve
21:28
in surprise and win more
21:30
than they were supposed to. It's it's
21:33
rarely given to a
21:35
team with the runaway best record.
21:37
But I guess we'll see. I guess we'll see how it plays
21:40
out.
21:41
All right. So I'm glad you brought that up.
21:43
I agree with what you said just now, and
21:46
it reminds me of a conundrum
21:48
that I've been thinking
21:52
about contemplating over the last couple of days.
21:54
So this new award has been around for last
21:57
few years, the Clutch Player
22:00
of the Year award. Right, So,
22:06
just like all other awards, different
22:08
writers or different coaches
22:10
or who's ever voting, they
22:13
have different requirements, They're looking at different things,
22:15
they evaluate the game differently, they're looking
22:17
at different metrics, so to each his
22:19
own. But with this clutch
22:23
award, right, so you got leaders,
22:25
you have players who are the leaders
22:27
in clutch points. I believe Steph
22:29
is number one. I want to
22:31
say DeMar Derozi number two, Damian
22:34
Lillard maybe three. But
22:36
my question to you Stein, obviously
22:41
there's value in having the most
22:43
clutch points, but
22:47
are you really clutch if
22:50
your team doesn't make the playoffs,
22:53
Because the way I'm looking at it, I would
22:55
look at it. Yeah, clutch points definitely
22:58
you have to have. You have to be top five
23:00
clutch points. But then I'm looking at your
23:02
team as well, and
23:04
so how how do you think most
23:06
people are how do you evaluate
23:09
that role?
23:10
Stan normally, as you know, I
23:12
like to think that I've got an answer for anything
23:15
you're gonna ask me. But it's interesting, I have not
23:17
officially voted since twenty seventeen.
23:20
The Clutch Award did not exist
23:23
when I did it, So I have to confess I haven't
23:25
given huge thought to
23:28
the Clutch Player of the Year, which is now heading
23:30
into year two, I believe because
23:33
I never had to do it before, and so I
23:35
didn't, you know, and then last season, I
23:39
just remember Dearon Fox was a runaway
23:42
candidate in that award, Like it was just so obvious.
23:44
Fox's clutch numbers were jump
23:47
off the page, and so it was so obvious that
23:49
he was gonna win. But there
23:51
has been a lot of Derozen talk in
23:53
the Clutch Player of the Year conversation.
23:56
And you know, your point is obviously
23:59
valid because the Bulls, whether
24:01
or not they can get to forty two
24:03
and forty at best, they're
24:05
going to be a playing team, so they might
24:07
not even make the playoffs. And then yeah,
24:10
there's your you know, there's your
24:12
conundrum. Should DeMar DeRozan be
24:14
the Clutch Player of the Year if
24:17
the Bulls don't even make the playoffs
24:20
and ballots have to be turned in April
24:22
fifteenth this year is not only National
24:24
Tax Day, April fifteenth
24:26
is also the day that voters
24:29
have to turn their ballots in the day after
24:31
the regular season, so the ballots
24:33
for all the regular season awards will
24:35
be turned in before the
24:38
play and round takes place, so we won't
24:40
even know if the Bulls are
24:42
a playoff team. I tend
24:44
to think DeRozan is going to win it. There's just been
24:46
I just keep hearing his name for
24:49
this award more and more. But I
24:52
don't know that I have a great answer on this one.
24:55
Yeah, that's that's one that I'm stuck
24:57
with. And I haven't voted in the last few
24:59
years, but I will vote this year.
25:02
You will, so one there will be There
25:04
will be one official end
25:06
of season awards ballot cast by
25:08
the cast of this league uncut.
25:12
Yes, I'll represent both of us.
25:14
I haven't did much digging on
25:17
numbers in stats and metrics yet,
25:20
but I'm just trying to figure out
25:22
for this award,
25:26
should winning be a high priority
25:28
or not because you
25:30
can score a ton of points in
25:32
the clutch and your team still
25:35
loses. You
25:37
know, you can score a lot of
25:39
points from the five minute mark to
25:41
the two minute mark, but the last two minutes
25:43
or the last one minute you
25:45
go over.
25:46
Well. Look, I think winning and success
25:49
should and has to be a priority. If we're
25:51
talking about clutchness, can't we make
25:53
the case that the Bulls have been shorthanded
25:56
all year long, no Lonzo
25:58
ball at all, barely
26:01
any Zach Levine,
26:03
and so DeMar de Rosen has had to
26:06
carry a huge load without
26:09
the two guys that were supposed
26:12
to start next to him in the backcourt. And
26:16
I would say he's been clutch enough to deserve
26:18
it, even though the Bulls are again
26:21
just a thirty four and thirty six team.
26:24
Okay, I'm not disqualifying Jamar. I'm
26:27
not. I'm trying to for the first time
26:29
having to vote and evaluate this
26:32
award process, Like I'm trying to figure
26:34
out, like what do I really value
26:36
or what should be valued when it comes to this
26:38
award. So, using your
26:40
example, you're saying, hey, Jamar
26:43
is doing a hell of a job with the team
26:46
that he has available because a lot of their big guns
26:49
haven't been able to suit
26:51
up. Okay, now, take a player who's
26:53
averaging thirty
26:57
five for the season, is clearly
26:59
probably the best player in the league, but
27:03
his team hasn't shown up.
27:06
He had key players injured, But
27:09
you can make a case that he's the MVP because
27:11
he's the best player. So I don't I
27:13
don't know that that Like, I don't know that I buy
27:15
credence to that argument stint of
27:18
a person that is doing you. You play
27:20
with what you have, You play with
27:22
what you have. I don't know that I'm evaluating based
27:25
off of who's not in the
27:27
lineup. You play with what you have
27:29
and the results speak. So
27:32
again, I'm not disqualifying tomorrow. I'm trying
27:34
to figure out, Okay,
27:36
how do I evaluate this
27:40
award? How do I evaluate, like
27:43
what really matters?
27:45
I'm glad that you voting and not me.
27:50
I'm trying, you know, I want to you know, I want to
27:52
do my due diligence, that's all. This
27:55
is just a tough one because if
27:57
you you know, you could be clutched on again
27:59
said you can be clutched, but your
28:01
team is not in the playoff picture. I'm
28:04
like, were you clutch enough, Like
28:06
I don't know, I'm just thinking out loud. Just think it out loud.
28:08
Look, clutch is a hard one. And again
28:11
I'm fully admitting here that I
28:13
haven't studied it super
28:15
closely or formulated what my
28:17
philosophy would be on it because I've never
28:19
had to do it. Whereas MVP,
28:22
even though I have not voted, this will be the seventh
28:24
year in a row that I haven't officially voted.
28:27
But I do have a
28:29
better idea when it comes to what I consider
28:32
the six traditional
28:35
individual awards that I've always
28:37
voted on MVP Coach
28:39
of the Year, Rookie of the Year, Defensive
28:42
Player of the Year, most
28:45
Improved Player of the Year, and
28:47
six Man of the Year. So I'm much
28:50
better versed in those
28:52
six and I'm gonna let you figure
28:55
out Clutch Player of the Year. You
28:59
you can come up with formula, you
29:01
can come up with you.
29:02
I appreciate that.
29:03
This league uncut formula, unclutch
29:05
Player of the Year MVP.
29:07
Now I did earlier this week, I did
29:10
a whole tvessay for
29:12
Bally Sports Southwest on the MVP
29:15
race. I really feel as
29:17
we've now moved inside a
29:19
month to GOO basically,
29:22
as of Monday, there were four
29:24
full weeks left in the regular season,
29:26
so we're almost down now to
29:29
three full weeks left in the regular
29:31
season. My feeling at
29:34
this point, I think only
29:36
three guys can win MVP. I think Jokers
29:39
in the lead. SGA
29:42
is his closest pursuer, and if
29:45
the Thunder end up with the number one
29:47
seed in the West, that is certainly
29:49
going to help SGA's case and maybe
29:51
sway some votes away from the Joker. And
29:54
then I think Luca is the only other candidate
29:57
who could get in there and
29:59
real realistically, even though the Mavericks
30:01
had a slew of injuries
30:04
for the first part of the season before
30:06
the trade deadline, before they changed their
30:09
roster. And you know, this
30:12
speaks to some of what you were talking about with the Clutch
30:14
Player of the Year award. You know, should Luca be
30:16
punished for that that he was playing with
30:18
such a severely understrength
30:21
roster around him, because Lucas gonna
30:23
win his first scoring title. But
30:26
typically, you know, I hear a lot
30:28
of talk the question gets posed often in
30:30
Dallas. What seed do the
30:32
Mavericks have to be for Luca
30:34
to win the MVP Award? And I have to say,
30:36
in my experience, at least voters
30:39
my age, or what I would consider my
30:42
generation, I never really
30:44
heard voters focusing
30:46
on the seeding, whether a team was fourth, fifth,
30:48
sixth, seven, third. The
30:51
bar always was fifty wins. Does
30:53
a player have fifty wins to
30:56
be in the MVP conversation? And Dallas,
30:58
as I mentioned before, the Mavericks would
31:00
need a nine to three finish to get
31:03
to fifty wins. But there are then the two
31:05
very recent examples that people
31:08
cite of MVPs who
31:10
were not on teams that won fifty.
31:12
One of the Jokers two MVPs, they
31:15
didn't win fifty. I'm
31:17
pretty sure that was the year though he had to play a lot
31:20
without Jamal Murray. And
31:22
then Russell Westbrook is the even
31:24
more prominent example because
31:27
Westbrook won MVP on a forty
31:30
seven win Thunder team the year
31:32
after Kevin Durant left, and
31:34
of course, Russell Westbrook averaged a triple
31:36
double. He was the first player to average
31:39
a triple double going all the way back
31:41
to the Big O Oscar Robertson, and
31:43
with forty seven wins and a triple double
31:45
average, that was enough for
31:48
Westbrook to get through
31:50
and win the MVP.
31:52
So I think for the
31:54
most part time for me, I
31:57
would speak for me, and I think a lot of voters feel
31:59
this way. That you know, winning is big,
32:01
winning is its significant. That's why most
32:05
should I say most Without knowing the numbers,
32:08
I would say a lot of MVPs
32:10
have come from teams who hold
32:13
the number one seed in either conference
32:15
whatever. So with that
32:17
being said, winning is important. But
32:20
there have been seasons where
32:23
as you mentioned, the Joker won with a team
32:25
that was in the high
32:27
forties and wins Russell Westbrook
32:30
his year. But I think those years
32:32
right. Whenever an MVP
32:34
comes from a team that's in
32:36
the forties in the win category,
32:39
typically, to me, that means
32:41
that there just wasn't a clear cut
32:46
another MVP candidate out there,
32:49
Like it was open. It's wide open, just
32:52
like this one. I think it's pretty open.
32:54
Yeah, I think the
32:56
favorite right now is the Joker,
33:00
but there's room. Like we see
33:02
scenarios if this played out,
33:04
if this played if this situation played
33:06
out this way, if
33:08
this other situation over in the East plays out
33:10
that way, then we can see this player
33:13
leap fraud the
33:15
Joker hypothetically, right, so we
33:17
see scenarios of which where
33:20
things can happen, you know, But
33:23
a lot of times when again, when you see players
33:26
that win from the team
33:28
from the mid forties and in the victory category,
33:31
a lot of times there's just not a clear cut
33:34
MVP opponent out there prospect,
33:36
I should say, so, I think that's the case.
33:39
But this year, yes, I think the Joker is
33:42
his to lose. There's
33:44
still time for him to lose it. I don't
33:46
know if he's going to lose it though, And
33:49
Luca, I don't
33:51
know. Stein I would like to give
33:54
Tatum, show Tatum some love over there,
33:57
what they're doing with Boston. You know, I
33:59
know he's not probably
34:01
in people's most people's
34:03
top three.
34:04
Yeah, how mad is he?
34:06
I wouldn't say he's mad. He
34:08
he he gave credit to
34:11
the Joker. He he actually
34:14
called him out, unprompted, called
34:16
out the Joker, said what he's doing, he's
34:18
having an unbelievable year. You can't
34:20
dismiss him. He
34:23
called out SGA as well. So
34:25
his problem is just like with a lot of other
34:28
players, it's that like he
34:30
wants to know, how are you judging? He said,
34:32
because for a long time the trend
34:34
has been the MVP is
34:37
mostly coming from the team with the best
34:39
record, and
34:42
he was like, and then something changed, He
34:44
said, so what is it now? You know? So,
34:46
and that's hard, Like, that's hard to answer
34:48
because each voter has their own
34:50
different set of requirements
34:53
that it takes to get their vote. So you know that
34:56
that's that's what he's frustrated about. But
34:58
he gave credit and
35:00
he acknowledged those two in
35:02
particular. He definitely
35:04
believes he should be in a conversation though.
35:06
All Right, I've got to do a little bit of clarifying
35:09
here because I made the mistake of trusting
35:11
my memory, which, as
35:13
you know and as listeners of the show, no, probably
35:16
never a good idea at this point because my
35:18
memory continues to fade by
35:21
the day. So it was actually the second
35:23
of Jokic's MVPs
35:26
in the twenty one to twenty two season
35:29
that the Nuggets only
35:31
won forty eight games and Jokic
35:34
won the MVP. Yokic beat out Joe
35:36
l Embiid in the twenty
35:39
twenty one to twenty two MVP race, and
35:42
the Nuggets did not have fifty
35:44
wins. They were only a six seed, So
35:47
why did Yokic win MVP
35:49
that year. It wasn't just because he
35:52
averaged twenty seven and fourteen
35:54
and eight. The Nuggets played
35:57
the twenty one to twenty two season without
36:00
Jamal Murray at all. Murray missed that
36:02
entire season, and also
36:05
they were largely without Michael Porter Junior.
36:07
So that's why again the two
36:10
times it's only happened
36:12
twice since the
36:14
early eighties. Before
36:17
Westbrook in twenty seventeen and
36:20
before the second of Jokic's
36:22
two MVPs, you had to go all
36:25
the way back to the early eighties for
36:27
an MVP who did not play
36:29
on a fifty win team, and that was Moses
36:31
Malone in Houston early nineteen
36:34
eighties. After that, every MVP
36:37
to Tatum's point came from
36:39
a fifty win team. The
36:42
two exceptions in
36:44
that forty ish year span. The two exceptions
36:47
Russell Westbrook on a forty seven
36:49
win Thunder team averaging a triple
36:52
double for the season, the first triple
36:54
double since Oscar Robertson,
36:57
and then Nikola Jokic on
37:00
a forty eight win Denver team. Okay,
37:02
fine, they were seeded sixth if you want to focus
37:04
on seedings, but they won forty
37:06
eight games, playing the entire season
37:09
without Jamal Murray his main
37:11
sidekick. So that's why Russ
37:14
and Jokic won those MVPs.
37:17
And look, I feel sympathy for Tatum
37:19
because he's had a great season, He's had a great
37:22
leadership season. And I'm
37:24
sure this isn't fair. I said similar stuff
37:26
when we were talking Coach of the Year about
37:29
Joe Mizzoula. But the Celtics
37:31
have been so good that,
37:33
just as an observer, I think it's going
37:35
to work against Tatum
37:38
in MVP voting because when you look
37:40
at Tatum's team, not only does he have an All Star
37:42
next to him and Jalen Brown, you've
37:44
got Porzingis and Drew
37:46
Holliday, former All Stars
37:48
that are flip flopping between third
37:51
and fourth best player in the league. Derek White
37:53
as your fifth best player is he's an
37:55
incredibly valuable
37:57
player as your fifth best guy.
38:00
And so I think, both for Tatum and MVP
38:02
discussion and Missoula in
38:04
Coach of the Year discussion, Boston
38:07
has such quality in its top
38:09
five to six guys and we haven't
38:12
even gotten to Al Horford as the
38:14
sixth man. Old head. My
38:17
suspicion is. It's probably going to work against
38:19
him.
38:19
Peyton Critch is pretty good too. Uh
38:22
yeah, no, it probably will. And I
38:24
think he could largely understand that. He just
38:26
wants to like, Okay, what's the criteria?
38:29
What do you guys? How are you guys evaluate?
38:31
Well, and look, he's asking the
38:33
question that voters
38:36
have been asking for decades. There is
38:38
no criteria. Yeah, you
38:40
know, you've seen the ballot, you get it. You know there
38:43
is no listed criteria. It is an
38:45
eye of the beholder. Every single
38:47
voter can bring their own rules to
38:49
it, and so there are no rules, and
38:51
it really does change season
38:54
to season, and every voter has their
38:56
own criteria. So that does complicate
38:58
the process. And I do certainly
39:01
understand Jason Tatum's frustration.
39:15
Did I tell you about my running
39:18
with Pat Bev a few days
39:20
ago? Starn? No, you did
39:22
not, So do
39:24
you remember recall because I did this,
39:27
I think we were doing this podcast then we
39:29
might we might have missed it. So
39:33
when Pat Beab was with the Lakers,
39:36
when he had just signed with the Lakers, so I was doing
39:38
media day for NBA TV, and
39:41
you know, you get to when
39:43
I'm doing media. When I'm doing media day for NBA
39:45
TV or TNT, they'll
39:48
arrange for players to come over and
39:50
spend some time with me and give me some interviews.
39:52
So that year I got Lebron
39:55
to come over. I got a d and
39:58
they had just signed Pat Bev and I got Pat and
40:01
so there was a question that NBA
40:04
TV needed me to ask players
40:06
about Lebron. So the question
40:09
was I had to ask each player who came over,
40:11
what's your fondest memory of
40:13
Lebron James? No,
40:15
no, no, no no. The question
40:18
was what is
40:20
your best highlight moment by
40:23
Lebron James. So everybody had to come
40:25
and say, hey, it was the time he blocked
40:27
equal dollars shot in the finals,
40:30
it was the posterized
40:32
dunk over Jason Terror whatever.
40:36
So I asked everybody. Everybody's cooperating.
40:39
Then I go to Pat Bell. I asked
40:41
Pat Bell, same question, was
40:43
your favorite highlight of Lebron James? And
40:46
Pat Bev says the
40:48
block I had against him last year. So
40:51
he talked, he's talking about
40:55
he knew what he knew what I met with my question, but
40:57
he goes, he flipped it. Talk about
40:59
the block he had against Lebron. That was the best
41:01
highlight you've seen of Lebron.
41:04
So and this
41:06
is where I have to take some blame
41:08
for this because this is where me and Pat
41:10
kind of got into it. So I go Lebron.
41:13
Lebron's the last player I
41:15
get on media day, and
41:19
I told him what Pat Bev said.
41:21
But the way I said it, I was like, Hey, Bron,
41:23
I'm asking players this question
41:27
and everybody's saying this. And
41:29
then I said, in this food, Pat Bev is
41:31
going to say, Hey, the highlight I like
41:34
the most is when
41:36
I blocked him last year. And
41:39
so that went on. Lebron laughed.
41:41
It was whatever, it was right, funny
41:43
moment, and I'll
41:46
tell you why I take some blame. I got
41:48
too comfortable, That's what it was. I just got too comfortable.
41:50
Anyways, about
41:53
three weeks later, the Lakers
41:55
come to Sacramento and
41:58
they played the Kings, and
42:02
after the game, I forgot who won or not. After
42:04
the game, I'm going to the Lakers. I was doing this.
42:06
I was doing something. I believe it was destroyed
42:09
with the earn. So I didn't have time to go in the
42:11
Lakers locker room after the game, and
42:13
so I was like, dang, okay, it's late.
42:15
I know the Lakers are probably gone. Let me go in there.
42:18
So I go in the Lakers' locker room and
42:21
Pat Bead is only there. Nobody
42:23
else is there. And so I looked
42:25
in there all right, seeing nobody was in there.
42:28
Then I took off. Pat
42:30
bad was like, come call me a food of my
42:32
face. Come call me a food of my face.
42:35
And I'm like, what like, I'm not
42:37
thinking nothing, thinking nothing, nothing, But it didn't hit
42:39
me. I'm like, oh, oh okay.
42:42
So I go in there right, so it's
42:45
me and Pat. So Pat was
42:47
like, you calling a grown man a fool.
42:49
You call a grown man of fool on TV? I
42:52
said, Pat, you know I didn't mean it like that. Pat,
42:54
you know that's not the way I intended it. No, man,
42:57
you don't call no grown man of fool. You know he talking
42:59
like Pat, I apologize.
43:01
You took it like that, But I didn't mean
43:03
no disrespect. I got too comfortable,
43:06
blah, you know that's what Nah. Don't
43:08
don't don't give me that apology here. You
43:10
know you said that on TV. Apologize
43:13
on TV? I said, Pat bro I'm
43:15
into it here, man. You can take
43:17
my apology or not that's it,
43:19
man, I slipped up and got too comfortable.
43:21
That's on me, all right, all right,
43:24
And so you know, walk we go our separate
43:26
ways. I leave, and so Pat ends up
43:28
talking about it on the on his
43:30
podcast by probably a month later, say
43:33
yeah, I had to check Chris Haynes and blah blah blah
43:35
whatever. So it's funny whatever. I even shared
43:37
the clip. I even shared the clip. So
43:39
anyways, I say all that to
43:41
say that was what two years ago, year
43:44
and a half ago, when he was with the Lakers.
43:46
So he's in Sacramento last week
43:50
and it's pre game and every
43:52
all the players are shooting shooting out on the court
43:54
before the game. Pat bears out
43:56
there shooting for the Bucks Bucks
43:58
Kings game. And
44:01
he gets done shooting and
44:04
he walks by me. I'm
44:06
sitting down front road.
44:09
He walks by me. You ready to cut
44:11
work for a fool? I'm like, what
44:15
you say? You're ready to cut work for a fool? You
44:17
know I got money over here, you know TNT and I may
44:19
pay you what you should be paid. I got
44:22
money over You're ready to cut work for a fool? Okay,
44:24
Well, if you're ready, you know where to find me. He
44:27
took off. Sam
44:33
ain't been sitting next to me at this time, Like Sam
44:36
was that passed Wayam offered me a job.
44:42
You know, we made that offer to Draymond Green, which
44:44
you know last season I think I think
44:47
clinched me a podcast Executive of the year
44:49
war. But we offered that lopsided trade to
44:52
Draymond Green come on our
44:54
podcast and will come on yours.
44:56
And Draymond Green did join
44:59
us on this league uncut, but I
45:03
don't think he feels like he needs us.
45:09
We haven't been invited to fulfill our
45:11
half of that trade. So basically we got we
45:13
got a Draymond Green appearance. We didn't
45:15
have to trade anything. Do we dare?
45:18
Do we dare? Do you want to? I
45:20
mean, I don't even know if Pat BEV would want
45:22
me, but maybe he would want you to come on his pod
45:24
and then he comes on our pod. Should we should
45:27
we make that trade offer?
45:28
Well, we were talking about dra Ma. I
45:30
don't I think it's safe to say. I don't think he's
45:32
holding us to the other end of that
45:34
that deal. I think I think his long
45:37
gone is forgotten about, I
45:39
think.
45:39
Which makes it an even better trade for us.
45:43
I think, Okay, I'll be in Milwaukee
45:46
early next week. I'll bring it
45:48
up the PET. I know Pat does
45:50
his He
45:53
has a co host he does his pod with,
45:55
and they usually when I see
45:57
them, they usually do their pod when
46:01
together.
46:01
Yeah, I think you have to. I think I think you have to
46:03
be in person to be on his podcast.
46:06
Yeah, yeah, I think so. I
46:08
think. So it's start. You know, I only see you
46:11
twice a year, if that so,
46:13
I don't know, if you know, that would be
46:15
hard for both of us to be there.
46:17
Well, because let's not forget that
46:20
you've been to Dallas once this season. I saw you
46:22
for about seven minutes total, and
46:24
then you were assigned to a second Mavericks
46:26
game and somehow you got switched off it.
46:29
Yeah.
46:30
Maybe I'll see you in the playoffs hopefully.
46:32
But we did. We did get to spend time together at
46:34
the All Star weekend.
46:35
That was cool. That was cool. That was cool. Yeah
46:38
we did.
46:39
Yeah, Well that's a good question. Will we Will
46:42
we end up in the same place. I mean, you obviously
46:44
have no idea yet where you're going for the playoffs.
46:46
Yeah, and.
46:49
You know, I have to be honest traveling
46:52
for the playoffs, I just don't know how
46:54
much of that I'm really doing my
46:56
old age, but we'll see, we'll see what happens.
46:58
We'll see what the matchups are. Let's before
47:00
we go, So, as you mentioned,
47:02
you have Lakers at Milwaukee
47:06
and then Tuesday.
47:07
And then I have Tuesday and then the
47:09
next day I'm joining the NASAs
47:12
on his podcast, Oh live
47:15
the next day that Wednesday.
47:17
But is it the analysis podcast podcast?
47:20
That's all right, analysis. So
47:22
I'm looking forward to Uh,
47:26
I'm looking forward to getting with my other cousin doing
47:29
our pod together.
47:30
Man. Unbelievable.
47:34
Unbelievable. Yeah, all
47:37
right, So we will have plenty to talk about
47:39
next week when we do this again. We're working on
47:41
some special guests as well.
47:44
Were we're in talks. We're
47:46
in talks with three prominent guests.
47:49
I don't want to spoil who they are, but
47:52
hopefully at least one will come to Fruition
47:55
very very soon. That's going to do it for
47:58
this edition of this
48:00
League. Uncut, Stein
48:02
and Haynes will be back with you again.
48:04
We'll be back together again very
48:07
very soon. Until then, remember, please
48:10
leave us a five star review. Please remember
48:12
to rate and review the show. Follow
48:15
us via Apple podcasts
48:17
or Spotify podcast wherever you
48:20
get your pods, and thank you everyone
48:22
so much, and
48:25
that'll do it for us. See you next time.
48:29
This League Uncut is an iHeartRadio production
48:36
Chris Hanes and Mark Stein
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More