Podchaser Logo
Home
#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

Released Saturday, 23rd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

#thisleague UNCUT: Western Conference standings madness and the NBA's MVP race

Saturday, 23rd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:05

The NBA's version of

0:07

March Madness, which really means the

0:09

night to night jockeying for playoff

0:11

positioning in both the West

0:14

and the Eastern Conference. Plus

0:17

a deep dive on the intricacies

0:20

of voting Most Valuable Player,

0:22

Coach of the Year, and other year

0:25

end award categories, and

0:28

a Pat Bev story as only

0:31

Chris Haynes can tell it all.

0:33

Coming up next on the latest edition

0:36

of This League Uncut.

0:52

Welcome to this league,

0:53

to the

0:55

rule of twenty four hour NBA news,

1:00

Chris Haynes, Cork

1:03

Stein. It's some time this

1:09

leagueln Cut is underway. In on fire.

1:13

This should be a good one. Hey,

1:15

everyone, welcome in to another

1:18

edition of This League Uncut.

1:21

Mark Stein here with Chris Haynes.

1:24

March Madness is fully

1:27

underway. But I'm

1:31

not sure that either one of

1:34

your co hosts on

1:36

this trusty podcast can

1:40

bring too much insight to you.

1:43

On the collegiate front, I

1:46

am an absolute NBA snob

1:48

who once Cal State Fullerton season

1:50

is over, my college season is over. So

1:53

my college season ended March

1:55

ninth. I do not fill out

1:57

a bracket. Chris Haynes, how

2:00

is your bracket looking.

2:02

There's nothing on it. I haven't filled out

2:04

a bracket. I don't think

2:07

I ever have. I just, you

2:10

know, it's cool to see all the hoopla surrounding

2:13

March Madness and seeing all these contests

2:15

and all that stuff, and I like to

2:17

hear about it. I like to hear about how everybody's

2:19

bracket is. But I've never participated

2:22

in one. I did want two years ago,

2:24

a few years ago, I wanted to start

2:26

a trend with my wife. She

2:28

doesn't watch college basketball at all. I

2:30

wanted to start a trending with her and

2:33

where we would you know,

2:35

have our bracket and the winner of the bracket would

2:37

would make the other do something that the other one

2:40

once done. But we never got

2:42

that off the ground. So but yeah,

2:44

I mean it's fun for everybody else, but I just

2:46

never really got involved into it.

2:48

Yeah, we're kind of I probably should move on because

2:50

we're people love

2:52

this time of year so much, and I do not do

2:55

not want to bring people down.

2:56

We're we're being with a couple

2:58

of grints.

2:59

And so look when my school's in

3:01

it. You know, cal State Fullerton

3:03

has made the NCAA Tournament four times

3:05

in school history, three times in the twenty

3:07

first century. Whenever we

3:09

make it, the three times we've made it, most

3:12

recently, I was

3:14

there and proud to be in attendance. The first

3:16

time we made it, I was just

3:18

a young kid, so still years away

3:20

from actually attending cal

3:22

State Fullerton. But yeah,

3:26

let's just politely say that neither one of us

3:28

is a college hoops expert. So let's move

3:30

on to the NBA's

3:33

version of March Madness,

3:35

which certainly isn't

3:39

known for capturing the

3:41

nation's attention with the same fervor.

3:43

But for our

3:46

jobs, this is a very important time of year

3:48

because what's really happening. There's

3:51

the jockeying for playoff seatings, which

3:53

is a night to night scoreboard watch that

3:55

is very important. Last night,

3:57

we're recording this on Friday afternoon. Last

4:00

night I was watching

4:04

Utah in Dallas to play the Mavericks

4:06

and just a stunning result the Sacramento

4:09

Kings on the second night of a back to back. But

4:11

even so, you would have never expected

4:14

Sacramento to lose at Washington,

4:17

but the Kings did, and the Mavericks,

4:19

with a win over the tanking

4:22

Utah Jazz, were able to move up and take

4:24

the number six spot, which is not

4:27

just surprising, but look, it's only

4:29

one night, it's only one game for both

4:31

teams, but leading into next

4:33

week in your neighborhood, in your backyard,

4:36

the Mavericks play the Kings in

4:38

a huge two game baseball

4:40

series. Huge for the purposes

4:43

of that race for number six. In

4:45

the West. The two kinds of March madness that I'm

4:47

really focused on. It's the jockeying for the seedings

4:49

like that, and then the MVP race.

4:51

This is when the MVP race really

4:54

comes in to focus. We'll get to the

4:56

MVP stuff in a minute, but you

4:59

know, I know you're not even gonna be there. You're on the

5:01

road next week, so you are gonna miss I

5:03

mean, these are two huge games the way I look

5:05

at it. Really in the West, we're talking

5:07

about three races. Really in the West,

5:10

you could even say maybe four, because

5:12

the Houston Rockets insane. Even

5:14

after losing Alpa

5:17

and Shngoon, the Rockets have won

5:19

seven in a row. Okay, some of

5:21

that is favorable schedule, but the

5:23

Rockets have kind of thrust themselves into

5:26

the playing race when it was thought that their

5:28

season was over. So we got these three races

5:32

in the West, the race

5:34

for the number one seed thunder

5:36

Nuggets, Timberwolves. Then

5:39

there's this battle for four or five with

5:41

the Clippers and the Pelicans, and the Pelicans

5:43

had got within a half game

5:46

I think, or at least got within one game

5:48

of the Clippers, and now

5:50

the Pelicans are dealing with the terrible

5:53

news that Brandon Ingram just went down with a hyper

5:55

extended knee and will be out for at least

5:57

two weeks before he's evaluated again.

6:00

Could have been worse THI yeah, for sure,

6:02

that was Yeah, that looked bad.

6:05

It looked bad. So yeah, I mean, if it's only a

6:07

matter of weeks and if Ingram

6:10

can indeed come back, not to say he'll be back

6:12

in two weeks, but reevaluated in two weeks,

6:15

certainly that was best case

6:17

scenario news for the Pelicans. Then

6:20

we got this race from six through ten

6:22

and again if we want to extend it even a little further,

6:25

nine, ten, eleven, because Houston is now

6:28

decided that their season is not over and

6:30

even without Shnghu and the Rockets are still

6:32

trying to steak into the

6:34

play in zone. If

6:36

I had to ask you,

6:39

you know, who do you think gets the

6:41

sixth seed in the West, which

6:44

is so important because it keeps you out of the

6:46

play in tournament. So you got Dallas, Phoenix,

6:49

and Sacramento. Those really are the

6:52

three teams in battle for

6:55

six through eight. Then

6:57

the Lakers and the Warriors. It just doesn't look like

6:59

they're to be able to lift themselves out of the nine

7:01

to ten range. So you

7:04

know, if you asked me before last night, I would have

7:06

said Sacramento. But that was a bad loss

7:08

for the Kings, who on top of everything, the Kings

7:10

have also lost Kevin Herder in definitely

7:13

to a separated shoulder.

7:16

It's tough. It's tough. I mean,

7:18

you got the Mavericks playing playing

7:20

really well, the Pelicans

7:23

with the brandon ingram you whether how to ask going the effect

7:27

the rest of their season. Phoenix,

7:30

you just I can't get a firm

7:32

grasp on if they're

7:34

legit or not. They're good, they're

7:36

a threat, but you know, well

7:39

they play it consistent enough basketball. Who

7:41

is last threats to get into

7:43

that sixth spot? I don't know. So if

7:46

I had to guess the

7:48

Pelicans suffering that injury, Phoenix

7:51

being kind of hit and miss,

7:55

the Kings, I

7:57

will probably lean towards saying

8:00

I'll probably give the ads to Dallas. They're

8:03

playing really good basketball right now. I

8:06

had Jason Kidd on my Bleacher

8:08

Report live stream.

8:09

I was just gonna say, that's the reason, that's the reason you're

8:11

picking the Mavericks at six, because you on

8:13

your live stream.

8:15

No, I'm looking at I'm looking at that stile,

8:17

I'm looking at the Pelicans. I'm looking at the Suns

8:19

and the Kings, and the Dallas

8:22

Mavericks are playing better ball than all three of those

8:24

teams. So I think

8:26

I have to go there. I just don't have

8:28

the comp Like, I don't know camp

8:30

Pelicans sustain what they've been doing.

8:33

Potentially possibly the Suns

8:35

again, they you know, they've been hit and

8:37

miss. And the Kings right now, I don't know what. I

8:39

don't know what's going on. So I think

8:41

Dallas is probably the easiest bet

8:44

right now. But you know, I don't know for

8:46

sure, but I like the way they're playing.

8:49

One thing about the Mavericks, man, they're athletic. Now

8:51

they got that aerial threat, you got

8:54

Kyrie and Lucas. Seems like they figured

8:56

out a good balance of how to

8:58

attack angst each other.

9:01

So they're looking good right now. But yeah,

9:03

I am. I am kind of pissed

9:06

at the fact that I won't be able to

9:09

be in attendance for the MAVs Kings

9:12

Matt Day next week.

9:14

The schedule is bizarre

9:17

that basically on

9:19

Monday night, Dallas

9:22

and Sacramento are both playing, the Mavericks

9:25

are in Utah,

9:27

and then Tuesday night, on the

9:29

second night of a back to back for both teams,

9:31

the Kings will host the Mavericks for the first

9:33

time. I think you will be in

9:36

far away Milwaukee, your second

9:38

home to cover Lakers

9:40

at Bucks on Tuesday night. Miss second,

9:43

you will miss the first of those games. But then

9:46

there's two days off. The Mavericks have

9:48

two full off days in Sacramento,

9:51

and then the teams play again on

9:54

Friday night. Now, Sacramento

9:56

has already won the first two meetings in Dallas,

9:59

and so the Kings only to win one of these two

10:01

games to clinch the head to head tiebreaker.

10:04

But again, there are so many interesting

10:06

little intricacies

10:10

when we look at this race,

10:12

and just just to hit you with a few of them,

10:15

because this this actually shocked me. My

10:17

sub stacking pal Tom Ziller came up

10:19

with this one, which I was not aware of.

10:21

Only three teams in the league this season

10:24

have lost to Charlotte,

10:27

Detroit and Washington. Charlotte,

10:31

Detroit and Washington. Only three teams

10:33

have lost at least once two

10:36

those three teams at the bottom

10:38

of the.

10:39

Standings are these are these good

10:41

teams.

10:42

Only one of them is Portland Brooklyn.

10:45

And

10:48

sorry, sorry, I didn't know you. I did

10:50

not want to do trivia time.

10:52

Yeah, I did want to do trivia, but I

10:55

might have got I might have gotten

10:57

sacer Midal because you said Zilla.

10:59

Yeah, yeah, probably

11:01

that's that just happened. But like, if

11:04

Sacramento doesn't get

11:06

the sixth seed, they're really

11:08

going to point to those losses to

11:11

the Hornets, Pistons, and Wizards

11:13

at what probably cost them. And

11:15

now when you go to Tankathon and you

11:18

look at remaining strength of schedule, Phoenix,

11:21

with twelve games to go, has

11:24

the second hardest remaining schedule in

11:26

the league in terms of opponent winning percentage

11:28

five seventy four. Sacramento is third

11:31

thirteen games left for the Kings a

11:33

five sixty two opponent

11:35

winning percentage. Dallas is all the

11:37

way at number twenty two. The

11:39

Mavericks remaining schedule. In

11:42

their final twelve games, the opponent winning

11:44

percentage is four to seventy seven

11:46

and Dallas needs a nine to three

11:49

finish to get to fifty

11:51

wins. So it's funny that you were

11:53

talking about the Pelicans before because I had basically,

11:56

you know, the Pelicans have been so good

11:58

since February, first of the

12:00

best teams in the league, with Zion

12:02

Williamson playing as

12:05

well as he ever has and most importantly

12:07

just playing just being out there. Zion

12:09

Williamson, as we're recording this,

12:12

has played in fifty eight games.

12:14

His career high is sixty one, so

12:17

he is on pace to set

12:19

a career high in games play.

12:23

People will obviously point to the fact

12:25

that his rebounding numbers are still

12:28

sub part. Zion is only

12:30

pulling down five point eight rebounds

12:32

per game, that is a career low, but

12:35

the balls in his hands more. He's up

12:37

to five assists a game. Scoring's

12:39

a little bit down. His minutes are a little bit down. He's

12:41

only playing thirty one minutes

12:43

a game compared to thirty

12:45

three minutes the previous

12:48

two seasons, and there was a season

12:50

in there that he lost completely to injury.

12:53

But they've cut his minutes down just a

12:55

little bit, and they're getting the

12:57

most all around productive

12:59

play that the Pelicans have ever had

13:01

for Zion Williamson, and he's headed for a

13:03

career high in games played and his

13:06

first playoff appearance. But I had the Pelicans,

13:08

I basically had just considered them. They

13:10

were going for fourth in the West

13:12

to try to bump the Clippers down. And now

13:15

with this brandon Ingram injury, that

13:17

could drag the Pelicans

13:20

back down with the MAVs

13:22

and the Kings and the Suns in

13:24

the six to eight race, because

13:27

the Mavericks, as

13:29

of the Friday standings were only a game and

13:31

a half behind New Orleans. I mean, this is what I'm talking

13:34

about. This is again, It's not the

13:36

kind of March madness that leads to office

13:38

pools all over the country and

13:41

commercials on your TV all day long.

13:43

But every night in the NBA you

13:46

have to dial into the standings because

13:48

weird stuff is happening and things are changing.

13:51

A couple of weeks ago, Stein, you

13:53

know, talking about the Sacramento Kings. I

13:56

don't have the numbers on me at hand right

13:58

now, but you know they struggle against

14:01

lower level opponents, and

14:03

they exceed against the high level

14:05

opponents. So my brother, who Mark

14:08

Kings, who covers the Kings for the Sacramento

14:10

Observer newspaper, he

14:13

asks, Dearon Fox a couple

14:15

of weeks ago, does it concern

14:18

you guys that you guys

14:20

don't seem to play

14:23

with the ferber needed and energy

14:25

level needed to beat these lower

14:27

level opponents, but then you guys rise

14:30

to theication against high

14:32

echelon teams. And Fox

14:35

said, yeah, there is a concern. You know, we

14:37

definitely need to

14:39

take our opponents seriously. But uh, you

14:42

know, on the other end, you know, we're playing good

14:45

against high level teams. So if

14:47

we get in the playoffs, I guess we'll

14:49

be playing good because

14:52

all the days of the playoffs. So

14:55

Kings just want to get into the playoffs. They feel like they would

14:57

be in a good shot. They just got to get

14:59

past the the Washington's and the Toronto's

15:02

and the Charlottees. Once they get past

15:04

that, they feel like they'll be in good shape

15:07

when they have to face Denver and OKC

15:10

in Minnesota.

15:12

Well, I'm not sure that I can

15:15

echo that pretty optimistic

15:17

view from the Yaron Fox, but look, he is correct

15:20

what you cited about your brothers reporting

15:23

and just the Kings in general. Look,

15:25

it is true there are only eight teams

15:27

in the league with winning records

15:30

against five hundred or better opposition,

15:33

and the Kings are one of those eight teams. The Kings

15:35

are twenty two and twenty one against

15:37

five hundred or better opposition, And again

15:40

that's true, there are only eight such teams.

15:42

Sacramento can feel good about

15:44

being one of those eight. But like I said,

15:47

if they end up seventh

15:49

or eighth or just and look,

15:52

if they end up seventh or eighth, they're gonna have to go

15:54

through the playing round, and that playing round

15:57

is brutal. They're

15:59

really going to rue the fact that they

16:01

dropped games to the Charlotte

16:04

Hornets and the Detroit Pistons and

16:06

on Wednesday night in Washington to

16:08

the Wizards, like you just you know,

16:10

those are particularly damaging

16:13

losses. And no

16:16

bracket here but scoreboard

16:18

watching, and I feel like I click on the

16:20

NBA standings like ten

16:22

times a day looking for hints,

16:25

clues, trends

16:29

that might tell us what's going to happen next,

16:32

because I mean, this is another crazy stat.

16:34

The Chicago Bulls thirty

16:37

four and thirty five before they lost

16:39

Thursday night to Houston, so

16:42

that loss dropped the Bulls to thirty four

16:44

and thirty six. But Chicago

16:48

is now flirting with getting over five

16:50

hundred if the Bulls can

16:52

finish eight

16:56

and four, which is

16:58

probably optimistic given their injury

17:01

woes. No Zach Lavine, no

17:03

Patrick Williams, obviously no Lonzo

17:05

Ball, although this week our guy

17:07

Casey Johnson and Chicago reported

17:09

that there's some kind of the

17:11

first rumblings of positivity about

17:14

Lonzo coming back next season, which I think, obviously

17:16

people would love to see. But if let's just say

17:18

the Bulls can muster an

17:21

eight and four finish, if they do,

17:24

that will give the NBA nineteen

17:26

teams with a winning record this season.

17:29

That would be a single season record. There

17:31

has never been more than nineteen

17:33

teams in the NBA with

17:36

a winning record in one season. I mean, even with

17:38

eighteen, that would tie the records. I mean not just

17:40

think about that that it's a thirty team league and

17:43

there's a chance that nineteen of the

17:45

thirty teams are going

17:47

to post a winning record this season.

17:49

It just kind of also shows you what the

17:51

bottom of the league the Charlottes, the Detroits,

17:54

the Washingtons, the San Antonios have just

17:56

been so bad and

17:58

have struggled so much. You got through Portland

18:00

in there as well. Whereas in Memphis,

18:03

I think Memphis, which has had

18:05

this hollacious string of injuries,

18:07

obviously John Morant only playing in nine

18:09

games, the Grizzlies play super

18:11

hard and are a tougher out, But these

18:14

the bottom five have just been such

18:17

bottom feeders that it's certainly contributed

18:20

to the possibility that night. I

18:22

can't believe nineteen teams in the league the

18:24

winning record, it's probably gonna end up eighteen. I

18:26

don't think Chicago really has

18:28

an eight and four finish in them, but let's see, let's

18:30

see if they can surprise us.

18:32

I have a question for you regarding

18:34

that. So the eighteen and nineteen, whatever

18:37

number it is, do you think

18:40

the play in format has anything to do with

18:42

that?

18:43

Well, I

18:46

think yeah. I mean, I guess you would have to say more

18:48

teams are trying. You know, teams

18:51

that are in range of

18:53

the tenth seed certainly have

18:55

more incentive to play

18:59

all the way through the eighty two game finish

19:01

line. And that's one of the things that the league definitely

19:03

prioritized and why the league loves

19:07

the playing tournament because you know, the

19:10

NBA loves to put out

19:12

lines that say, so, what is it now? Eleven

19:15

teams in the West, and

19:18

this is actually, you know what, it's actually low for this

19:20

season. Normally at this point

19:22

in the season, you know, the league

19:24

would love to say there are still twenty four or

19:26

twenty five teams who are still alive,

19:29

and it really is only

19:31

there are only twenty one teams available

19:34

for the twenty postseason spots. In the

19:36

West, you know, again, Utah

19:39

has you know, they are not trying to

19:41

win games right now, Memphis, Portland,

19:43

San Antonio, they're already out of it. So in the

19:45

West, Houston has made

19:47

this unexpected surge that

19:50

they're still in the play in mix. But

19:52

in the East, you know, we know

19:54

our ten teams. Mathematically,

19:57

you could say Brooklyn is still in the race

19:59

for the number ten seed, but the

20:01

Nets were four and a half games

20:04

behind number ten Atlanta entering

20:06

Friday's play and the Nets

20:08

have been trending in the wrong direction since

20:11

December. So again, mathematically,

20:13

the Nets are still in the race

20:15

for a top ten spot. But I

20:17

really think in the East, our

20:20

top ten is decided, and again

20:22

in the West, I think most people

20:24

thought that the top ten was

20:26

decided until the Rockets kind

20:29

of went on this late surge, and I have to say, like

20:32

Coach of the Year, I don't think emy

20:34

Udoka is gonna win, but to have

20:36

Houston this competitive

20:39

this late in the season, he

20:42

should at least be mentioned. You know, Coach

20:44

of the Year I

20:47

think is probably I

20:49

would say Orlando's Jamal Moseley, Oklahoma

20:53

City's Mark Dagnault, and Minnesota's

20:55

Chris Finch. I think they're probably at the

20:57

top, But I would say Willie

20:59

Green in New Orleans, Emi Udoka,

21:02

and Houston JB. Bickerstaff

21:04

in Cleveland. I think these guys deserve

21:08

shout outs too. And then you

21:10

know Joe Missoula kind of like Jason

21:13

Tatum's MVP case. The

21:15

Celtics are so good that in a weird

21:17

way, that's probably gonna work against Joe

21:19

Miszoula in the Coach of the Year chase.

21:23

When it comes to Coach of the Year, we typically

21:25

see teams that overachieve

21:28

in surprise and win more

21:30

than they were supposed to. It's it's

21:33

rarely given to a

21:35

team with the runaway best record.

21:37

But I guess we'll see. I guess we'll see how it plays

21:40

out.

21:41

All right. So I'm glad you brought that up.

21:43

I agree with what you said just now, and

21:46

it reminds me of a conundrum

21:48

that I've been thinking

21:52

about contemplating over the last couple of days.

21:54

So this new award has been around for last

21:57

few years, the Clutch Player

22:00

of the Year award. Right, So,

22:06

just like all other awards, different

22:08

writers or different coaches

22:10

or who's ever voting, they

22:13

have different requirements, They're looking at different things,

22:15

they evaluate the game differently, they're looking

22:17

at different metrics, so to each his

22:19

own. But with this clutch

22:23

award, right, so you got leaders,

22:25

you have players who are the leaders

22:27

in clutch points. I believe Steph

22:29

is number one. I want to

22:31

say DeMar Derozi number two, Damian

22:34

Lillard maybe three. But

22:36

my question to you Stein, obviously

22:41

there's value in having the most

22:43

clutch points, but

22:47

are you really clutch if

22:50

your team doesn't make the playoffs,

22:53

Because the way I'm looking at it, I would

22:55

look at it. Yeah, clutch points definitely

22:58

you have to have. You have to be top five

23:00

clutch points. But then I'm looking at your

23:02

team as well, and

23:04

so how how do you think most

23:06

people are how do you evaluate

23:09

that role?

23:10

Stan normally, as you know, I

23:12

like to think that I've got an answer for anything

23:15

you're gonna ask me. But it's interesting, I have not

23:17

officially voted since twenty seventeen.

23:20

The Clutch Award did not exist

23:23

when I did it, So I have to confess I haven't

23:25

given huge thought to

23:28

the Clutch Player of the Year, which is now heading

23:30

into year two, I believe because

23:33

I never had to do it before, and so I

23:35

didn't, you know, and then last season, I

23:39

just remember Dearon Fox was a runaway

23:42

candidate in that award, Like it was just so obvious.

23:44

Fox's clutch numbers were jump

23:47

off the page, and so it was so obvious that

23:49

he was gonna win. But there

23:51

has been a lot of Derozen talk in

23:53

the Clutch Player of the Year conversation.

23:56

And you know, your point is obviously

23:59

valid because the Bulls, whether

24:01

or not they can get to forty two

24:03

and forty at best, they're

24:05

going to be a playing team, so they might

24:07

not even make the playoffs. And then yeah,

24:10

there's your you know, there's your

24:12

conundrum. Should DeMar DeRozan be

24:14

the Clutch Player of the Year if

24:17

the Bulls don't even make the playoffs

24:20

and ballots have to be turned in April

24:22

fifteenth this year is not only National

24:24

Tax Day, April fifteenth

24:26

is also the day that voters

24:29

have to turn their ballots in the day after

24:31

the regular season, so the ballots

24:33

for all the regular season awards will

24:35

be turned in before the

24:38

play and round takes place, so we won't

24:40

even know if the Bulls are

24:42

a playoff team. I tend

24:44

to think DeRozan is going to win it. There's just been

24:46

I just keep hearing his name for

24:49

this award more and more. But I

24:52

don't know that I have a great answer on this one.

24:55

Yeah, that's that's one that I'm stuck

24:57

with. And I haven't voted in the last few

24:59

years, but I will vote this year.

25:02

You will, so one there will be There

25:04

will be one official end

25:06

of season awards ballot cast by

25:08

the cast of this league uncut.

25:12

Yes, I'll represent both of us.

25:14

I haven't did much digging on

25:17

numbers in stats and metrics yet,

25:20

but I'm just trying to figure out

25:22

for this award,

25:26

should winning be a high priority

25:28

or not because you

25:30

can score a ton of points in

25:32

the clutch and your team still

25:35

loses. You

25:37

know, you can score a lot of

25:39

points from the five minute mark to

25:41

the two minute mark, but the last two minutes

25:43

or the last one minute you

25:45

go over.

25:46

Well. Look, I think winning and success

25:49

should and has to be a priority. If we're

25:51

talking about clutchness, can't we make

25:53

the case that the Bulls have been shorthanded

25:56

all year long, no Lonzo

25:58

ball at all, barely

26:01

any Zach Levine,

26:03

and so DeMar de Rosen has had to

26:06

carry a huge load without

26:09

the two guys that were supposed

26:12

to start next to him in the backcourt. And

26:16

I would say he's been clutch enough to deserve

26:18

it, even though the Bulls are again

26:21

just a thirty four and thirty six team.

26:24

Okay, I'm not disqualifying Jamar. I'm

26:27

not. I'm trying to for the first time

26:29

having to vote and evaluate this

26:32

award process, Like I'm trying to figure

26:34

out, like what do I really value

26:36

or what should be valued when it comes to this

26:38

award. So, using your

26:40

example, you're saying, hey, Jamar

26:43

is doing a hell of a job with the team

26:46

that he has available because a lot of their big guns

26:49

haven't been able to suit

26:51

up. Okay, now, take a player who's

26:53

averaging thirty

26:57

five for the season, is clearly

26:59

probably the best player in the league, but

27:03

his team hasn't shown up.

27:06

He had key players injured, But

27:09

you can make a case that he's the MVP because

27:11

he's the best player. So I don't I

27:13

don't know that that Like, I don't know that I buy

27:15

credence to that argument stint of

27:18

a person that is doing you. You play

27:20

with what you have, You play with

27:22

what you have. I don't know that I'm evaluating based

27:25

off of who's not in the

27:27

lineup. You play with what you have

27:29

and the results speak. So

27:32

again, I'm not disqualifying tomorrow. I'm trying

27:34

to figure out, Okay,

27:36

how do I evaluate this

27:40

award? How do I evaluate, like

27:43

what really matters?

27:45

I'm glad that you voting and not me.

27:50

I'm trying, you know, I want to you know, I want to

27:52

do my due diligence, that's all. This

27:55

is just a tough one because if

27:57

you you know, you could be clutched on again

27:59

said you can be clutched, but your

28:01

team is not in the playoff picture. I'm

28:04

like, were you clutch enough, Like

28:06

I don't know, I'm just thinking out loud. Just think it out loud.

28:08

Look, clutch is a hard one. And again

28:11

I'm fully admitting here that I

28:13

haven't studied it super

28:15

closely or formulated what my

28:17

philosophy would be on it because I've never

28:19

had to do it. Whereas MVP,

28:22

even though I have not voted, this will be the seventh

28:24

year in a row that I haven't officially voted.

28:27

But I do have a

28:29

better idea when it comes to what I consider

28:32

the six traditional

28:35

individual awards that I've always

28:37

voted on MVP Coach

28:39

of the Year, Rookie of the Year, Defensive

28:42

Player of the Year, most

28:45

Improved Player of the Year, and

28:47

six Man of the Year. So I'm much

28:50

better versed in those

28:52

six and I'm gonna let you figure

28:55

out Clutch Player of the Year. You

28:59

you can come up with formula, you

29:01

can come up with you.

29:02

I appreciate that.

29:03

This league uncut formula, unclutch

29:05

Player of the Year MVP.

29:07

Now I did earlier this week, I did

29:10

a whole tvessay for

29:12

Bally Sports Southwest on the MVP

29:15

race. I really feel as

29:17

we've now moved inside a

29:19

month to GOO basically,

29:22

as of Monday, there were four

29:24

full weeks left in the regular season,

29:26

so we're almost down now to

29:29

three full weeks left in the regular

29:31

season. My feeling at

29:34

this point, I think only

29:36

three guys can win MVP. I think Jokers

29:39

in the lead. SGA

29:42

is his closest pursuer, and if

29:45

the Thunder end up with the number one

29:47

seed in the West, that is certainly

29:49

going to help SGA's case and maybe

29:51

sway some votes away from the Joker. And

29:54

then I think Luca is the only other candidate

29:57

who could get in there and

29:59

real realistically, even though the Mavericks

30:01

had a slew of injuries

30:04

for the first part of the season before

30:06

the trade deadline, before they changed their

30:09

roster. And you know, this

30:12

speaks to some of what you were talking about with the Clutch

30:14

Player of the Year award. You know, should Luca be

30:16

punished for that that he was playing with

30:18

such a severely understrength

30:21

roster around him, because Lucas gonna

30:23

win his first scoring title. But

30:26

typically, you know, I hear a lot

30:28

of talk the question gets posed often in

30:30

Dallas. What seed do the

30:32

Mavericks have to be for Luca

30:34

to win the MVP Award? And I have to say,

30:36

in my experience, at least voters

30:39

my age, or what I would consider my

30:42

generation, I never really

30:44

heard voters focusing

30:46

on the seeding, whether a team was fourth, fifth,

30:48

sixth, seven, third. The

30:51

bar always was fifty wins. Does

30:53

a player have fifty wins to

30:56

be in the MVP conversation? And Dallas,

30:58

as I mentioned before, the Mavericks would

31:00

need a nine to three finish to get

31:03

to fifty wins. But there are then the two

31:05

very recent examples that people

31:08

cite of MVPs who

31:10

were not on teams that won fifty.

31:12

One of the Jokers two MVPs, they

31:15

didn't win fifty. I'm

31:17

pretty sure that was the year though he had to play a lot

31:20

without Jamal Murray. And

31:22

then Russell Westbrook is the even

31:24

more prominent example because

31:27

Westbrook won MVP on a forty

31:30

seven win Thunder team the year

31:32

after Kevin Durant left, and

31:34

of course, Russell Westbrook averaged a triple

31:36

double. He was the first player to average

31:39

a triple double going all the way back

31:41

to the Big O Oscar Robertson, and

31:43

with forty seven wins and a triple double

31:45

average, that was enough for

31:48

Westbrook to get through

31:50

and win the MVP.

31:52

So I think for the

31:54

most part time for me, I

31:57

would speak for me, and I think a lot of voters feel

31:59

this way. That you know, winning is big,

32:01

winning is its significant. That's why most

32:05

should I say most Without knowing the numbers,

32:08

I would say a lot of MVPs

32:10

have come from teams who hold

32:13

the number one seed in either conference

32:15

whatever. So with that

32:17

being said, winning is important. But

32:20

there have been seasons where

32:23

as you mentioned, the Joker won with a team

32:25

that was in the high

32:27

forties and wins Russell Westbrook

32:30

his year. But I think those years

32:32

right. Whenever an MVP

32:34

comes from a team that's in

32:36

the forties in the win category,

32:39

typically, to me, that means

32:41

that there just wasn't a clear cut

32:46

another MVP candidate out there,

32:49

Like it was open. It's wide open, just

32:52

like this one. I think it's pretty open.

32:54

Yeah, I think the

32:56

favorite right now is the Joker,

33:00

but there's room. Like we see

33:02

scenarios if this played out,

33:04

if this played if this situation played

33:06

out this way, if

33:08

this other situation over in the East plays out

33:10

that way, then we can see this player

33:13

leap fraud the

33:15

Joker hypothetically, right, so we

33:17

see scenarios of which where

33:20

things can happen, you know, But

33:23

a lot of times when again, when you see players

33:26

that win from the team

33:28

from the mid forties and in the victory category,

33:31

a lot of times there's just not a clear cut

33:34

MVP opponent out there prospect,

33:36

I should say, so, I think that's the case.

33:39

But this year, yes, I think the Joker is

33:42

his to lose. There's

33:44

still time for him to lose it. I don't

33:46

know if he's going to lose it though, And

33:49

Luca, I don't

33:51

know. Stein I would like to give

33:54

Tatum, show Tatum some love over there,

33:57

what they're doing with Boston. You know, I

33:59

know he's not probably

34:01

in people's most people's

34:03

top three.

34:04

Yeah, how mad is he?

34:06

I wouldn't say he's mad. He

34:08

he he gave credit to

34:11

the Joker. He he actually

34:14

called him out, unprompted, called

34:16

out the Joker, said what he's doing, he's

34:18

having an unbelievable year. You can't

34:20

dismiss him. He

34:23

called out SGA as well. So

34:25

his problem is just like with a lot of other

34:28

players, it's that like he

34:30

wants to know, how are you judging? He said,

34:32

because for a long time the trend

34:34

has been the MVP is

34:37

mostly coming from the team with the best

34:39

record, and

34:42

he was like, and then something changed, He

34:44

said, so what is it now? You know? So,

34:46

and that's hard, Like, that's hard to answer

34:48

because each voter has their own

34:50

different set of requirements

34:53

that it takes to get their vote. So you know that

34:56

that's that's what he's frustrated about. But

34:58

he gave credit and

35:00

he acknowledged those two in

35:02

particular. He definitely

35:04

believes he should be in a conversation though.

35:06

All Right, I've got to do a little bit of clarifying

35:09

here because I made the mistake of trusting

35:11

my memory, which, as

35:13

you know and as listeners of the show, no, probably

35:16

never a good idea at this point because my

35:18

memory continues to fade by

35:21

the day. So it was actually the second

35:23

of Jokic's MVPs

35:26

in the twenty one to twenty two season

35:29

that the Nuggets only

35:31

won forty eight games and Jokic

35:34

won the MVP. Yokic beat out Joe

35:36

l Embiid in the twenty

35:39

twenty one to twenty two MVP race, and

35:42

the Nuggets did not have fifty

35:44

wins. They were only a six seed, So

35:47

why did Yokic win MVP

35:49

that year. It wasn't just because he

35:52

averaged twenty seven and fourteen

35:54

and eight. The Nuggets played

35:57

the twenty one to twenty two season without

36:00

Jamal Murray at all. Murray missed that

36:02

entire season, and also

36:05

they were largely without Michael Porter Junior.

36:07

So that's why again the two

36:10

times it's only happened

36:12

twice since the

36:14

early eighties. Before

36:17

Westbrook in twenty seventeen and

36:20

before the second of Jokic's

36:22

two MVPs, you had to go all

36:25

the way back to the early eighties for

36:27

an MVP who did not play

36:29

on a fifty win team, and that was Moses

36:31

Malone in Houston early nineteen

36:34

eighties. After that, every MVP

36:37

to Tatum's point came from

36:39

a fifty win team. The

36:42

two exceptions in

36:44

that forty ish year span. The two exceptions

36:47

Russell Westbrook on a forty seven

36:49

win Thunder team averaging a triple

36:52

double for the season, the first triple

36:54

double since Oscar Robertson,

36:57

and then Nikola Jokic on

37:00

a forty eight win Denver team. Okay,

37:02

fine, they were seeded sixth if you want to focus

37:04

on seedings, but they won forty

37:06

eight games, playing the entire season

37:09

without Jamal Murray his main

37:11

sidekick. So that's why Russ

37:14

and Jokic won those MVPs.

37:17

And look, I feel sympathy for Tatum

37:19

because he's had a great season, He's had a great

37:22

leadership season. And I'm

37:24

sure this isn't fair. I said similar stuff

37:26

when we were talking Coach of the Year about

37:29

Joe Mizzoula. But the Celtics

37:31

have been so good that,

37:33

just as an observer, I think it's going

37:35

to work against Tatum

37:38

in MVP voting because when you look

37:40

at Tatum's team, not only does he have an All Star

37:42

next to him and Jalen Brown, you've

37:44

got Porzingis and Drew

37:46

Holliday, former All Stars

37:48

that are flip flopping between third

37:51

and fourth best player in the league. Derek White

37:53

as your fifth best player is he's an

37:55

incredibly valuable

37:57

player as your fifth best guy.

38:00

And so I think, both for Tatum and MVP

38:02

discussion and Missoula in

38:04

Coach of the Year discussion, Boston

38:07

has such quality in its top

38:09

five to six guys and we haven't

38:12

even gotten to Al Horford as the

38:14

sixth man. Old head. My

38:17

suspicion is. It's probably going to work against

38:19

him.

38:19

Peyton Critch is pretty good too. Uh

38:22

yeah, no, it probably will. And I

38:24

think he could largely understand that. He just

38:26

wants to like, Okay, what's the criteria?

38:29

What do you guys? How are you guys evaluate?

38:31

Well, and look, he's asking the

38:33

question that voters

38:36

have been asking for decades. There is

38:38

no criteria. Yeah, you

38:40

know, you've seen the ballot, you get it. You know there

38:43

is no listed criteria. It is an

38:45

eye of the beholder. Every single

38:47

voter can bring their own rules to

38:49

it, and so there are no rules, and

38:51

it really does change season

38:54

to season, and every voter has their

38:56

own criteria. So that does complicate

38:58

the process. And I do certainly

39:01

understand Jason Tatum's frustration.

39:15

Did I tell you about my running

39:18

with Pat Bev a few days

39:20

ago? Starn? No, you did

39:22

not, So do

39:24

you remember recall because I did this,

39:27

I think we were doing this podcast then we

39:29

might we might have missed it. So

39:33

when Pat Beab was with the Lakers,

39:36

when he had just signed with the Lakers, so I was doing

39:38

media day for NBA TV, and

39:41

you know, you get to when

39:43

I'm doing media. When I'm doing media day for NBA

39:45

TV or TNT, they'll

39:48

arrange for players to come over and

39:50

spend some time with me and give me some interviews.

39:52

So that year I got Lebron

39:55

to come over. I got a d and

39:58

they had just signed Pat Bev and I got Pat and

40:01

so there was a question that NBA

40:04

TV needed me to ask players

40:06

about Lebron. So the question

40:09

was I had to ask each player who came over,

40:11

what's your fondest memory of

40:13

Lebron James? No,

40:15

no, no, no no. The question

40:18

was what is

40:20

your best highlight moment by

40:23

Lebron James. So everybody had to come

40:25

and say, hey, it was the time he blocked

40:27

equal dollars shot in the finals,

40:30

it was the posterized

40:32

dunk over Jason Terror whatever.

40:36

So I asked everybody. Everybody's cooperating.

40:39

Then I go to Pat Bell. I asked

40:41

Pat Bell, same question, was

40:43

your favorite highlight of Lebron James? And

40:46

Pat Bev says the

40:48

block I had against him last year. So

40:51

he talked, he's talking about

40:55

he knew what he knew what I met with my question, but

40:57

he goes, he flipped it. Talk about

40:59

the block he had against Lebron. That was the best

41:01

highlight you've seen of Lebron.

41:04

So and this

41:06

is where I have to take some blame

41:08

for this because this is where me and Pat

41:10

kind of got into it. So I go Lebron.

41:13

Lebron's the last player I

41:15

get on media day, and

41:19

I told him what Pat Bev said.

41:21

But the way I said it, I was like, Hey, Bron,

41:23

I'm asking players this question

41:27

and everybody's saying this. And

41:29

then I said, in this food, Pat Bev is

41:31

going to say, Hey, the highlight I like

41:34

the most is when

41:36

I blocked him last year. And

41:39

so that went on. Lebron laughed.

41:41

It was whatever, it was right, funny

41:43

moment, and I'll

41:46

tell you why I take some blame. I got

41:48

too comfortable, That's what it was. I just got too comfortable.

41:50

Anyways, about

41:53

three weeks later, the Lakers

41:55

come to Sacramento and

41:58

they played the Kings, and

42:02

after the game, I forgot who won or not. After

42:04

the game, I'm going to the Lakers. I was doing this.

42:06

I was doing something. I believe it was destroyed

42:09

with the earn. So I didn't have time to go in the

42:11

Lakers locker room after the game, and

42:13

so I was like, dang, okay, it's late.

42:15

I know the Lakers are probably gone. Let me go in there.

42:18

So I go in the Lakers' locker room and

42:21

Pat Bead is only there. Nobody

42:23

else is there. And so I looked

42:25

in there all right, seeing nobody was in there.

42:28

Then I took off. Pat

42:30

bad was like, come call me a food of my

42:32

face. Come call me a food of my face.

42:35

And I'm like, what like, I'm not

42:37

thinking nothing, thinking nothing, nothing, But it didn't hit

42:39

me. I'm like, oh, oh okay.

42:42

So I go in there right, so it's

42:45

me and Pat. So Pat was

42:47

like, you calling a grown man a fool.

42:49

You call a grown man of fool on TV? I

42:52

said, Pat, you know I didn't mean it like that. Pat,

42:54

you know that's not the way I intended it. No, man,

42:57

you don't call no grown man of fool. You know he talking

42:59

like Pat, I apologize.

43:01

You took it like that, But I didn't mean

43:03

no disrespect. I got too comfortable,

43:06

blah, you know that's what Nah. Don't

43:08

don't don't give me that apology here. You

43:10

know you said that on TV. Apologize

43:13

on TV? I said, Pat bro I'm

43:15

into it here, man. You can take

43:17

my apology or not that's it,

43:19

man, I slipped up and got too comfortable.

43:21

That's on me, all right, all right,

43:24

And so you know, walk we go our separate

43:26

ways. I leave, and so Pat ends up

43:28

talking about it on the on his

43:30

podcast by probably a month later, say

43:33

yeah, I had to check Chris Haynes and blah blah blah

43:35

whatever. So it's funny whatever. I even shared

43:37

the clip. I even shared the clip. So

43:39

anyways, I say all that to

43:41

say that was what two years ago, year

43:44

and a half ago, when he was with the Lakers.

43:46

So he's in Sacramento last week

43:50

and it's pre game and every

43:52

all the players are shooting shooting out on the court

43:54

before the game. Pat bears out

43:56

there shooting for the Bucks Bucks

43:58

Kings game. And

44:01

he gets done shooting and

44:04

he walks by me. I'm

44:06

sitting down front road.

44:09

He walks by me. You ready to cut

44:11

work for a fool? I'm like, what

44:15

you say? You're ready to cut work for a fool? You

44:17

know I got money over here, you know TNT and I may

44:19

pay you what you should be paid. I got

44:22

money over You're ready to cut work for a fool? Okay,

44:24

Well, if you're ready, you know where to find me. He

44:27

took off. Sam

44:33

ain't been sitting next to me at this time, Like Sam

44:36

was that passed Wayam offered me a job.

44:42

You know, we made that offer to Draymond Green, which

44:44

you know last season I think I think

44:47

clinched me a podcast Executive of the year

44:49

war. But we offered that lopsided trade to

44:52

Draymond Green come on our

44:54

podcast and will come on yours.

44:56

And Draymond Green did join

44:59

us on this league uncut, but I

45:03

don't think he feels like he needs us.

45:09

We haven't been invited to fulfill our

45:11

half of that trade. So basically we got we

45:13

got a Draymond Green appearance. We didn't

45:15

have to trade anything. Do we dare?

45:18

Do we dare? Do you want to? I

45:20

mean, I don't even know if Pat BEV would want

45:22

me, but maybe he would want you to come on his pod

45:24

and then he comes on our pod. Should we should

45:27

we make that trade offer?

45:28

Well, we were talking about dra Ma. I

45:30

don't I think it's safe to say. I don't think he's

45:32

holding us to the other end of that

45:34

that deal. I think I think his long

45:37

gone is forgotten about, I

45:39

think.

45:39

Which makes it an even better trade for us.

45:43

I think, Okay, I'll be in Milwaukee

45:46

early next week. I'll bring it

45:48

up the PET. I know Pat does

45:50

his He

45:53

has a co host he does his pod with,

45:55

and they usually when I see

45:57

them, they usually do their pod when

46:01

together.

46:01

Yeah, I think you have to. I think I think you have to

46:03

be in person to be on his podcast.

46:06

Yeah, yeah, I think so. I

46:08

think. So it's start. You know, I only see you

46:11

twice a year, if that so,

46:13

I don't know, if you know, that would be

46:15

hard for both of us to be there.

46:17

Well, because let's not forget that

46:20

you've been to Dallas once this season. I saw you

46:22

for about seven minutes total, and

46:24

then you were assigned to a second Mavericks

46:26

game and somehow you got switched off it.

46:29

Yeah.

46:30

Maybe I'll see you in the playoffs hopefully.

46:32

But we did. We did get to spend time together at

46:34

the All Star weekend.

46:35

That was cool. That was cool. That was cool. Yeah

46:38

we did.

46:39

Yeah, Well that's a good question. Will we Will

46:42

we end up in the same place. I mean, you obviously

46:44

have no idea yet where you're going for the playoffs.

46:46

Yeah, and.

46:49

You know, I have to be honest traveling

46:52

for the playoffs, I just don't know how

46:54

much of that I'm really doing my

46:56

old age, but we'll see, we'll see what happens.

46:58

We'll see what the matchups are. Let's before

47:00

we go, So, as you mentioned,

47:02

you have Lakers at Milwaukee

47:06

and then Tuesday.

47:07

And then I have Tuesday and then the

47:09

next day I'm joining the NASAs

47:12

on his podcast, Oh live

47:15

the next day that Wednesday.

47:17

But is it the analysis podcast podcast?

47:20

That's all right, analysis. So

47:22

I'm looking forward to Uh,

47:26

I'm looking forward to getting with my other cousin doing

47:29

our pod together.

47:30

Man. Unbelievable.

47:34

Unbelievable. Yeah, all

47:37

right, So we will have plenty to talk about

47:39

next week when we do this again. We're working on

47:41

some special guests as well.

47:44

Were we're in talks. We're

47:46

in talks with three prominent guests.

47:49

I don't want to spoil who they are, but

47:52

hopefully at least one will come to Fruition

47:55

very very soon. That's going to do it for

47:58

this edition of this

48:00

League. Uncut, Stein

48:02

and Haynes will be back with you again.

48:04

We'll be back together again very

48:07

very soon. Until then, remember, please

48:10

leave us a five star review. Please remember

48:12

to rate and review the show. Follow

48:15

us via Apple podcasts

48:17

or Spotify podcast wherever you

48:20

get your pods, and thank you everyone

48:22

so much, and

48:25

that'll do it for us. See you next time.

48:29

This League Uncut is an iHeartRadio production

48:36

Chris Hanes and Mark Stein

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features