Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
With a compelling perspective on global
0:02
politics, this is that Patrick Headings
0:05
and show on T and T
0:07
Radio. On
0:10
welcome back to the budget getting
0:12
Son show wherever you are in
0:15
the world. I'm Basil Valentine sitting
0:17
in perpetuating Today Wednesday, the twenty
0:19
Fourth of April, Twenty Twenty Four
0:21
What a great conversation with Robin.
0:24
You know I'm and in that
0:26
first hour. and in case you
0:28
missed it, that brave so is
0:30
in and is Turnbull waiting to
0:33
join the Freedom Flotilla coalition and
0:35
sale with five and a half
0:37
thousand tons of humanitarian aid to
0:39
Gaza. Strongly. Recommend listening to
0:42
that particularly erudite and
0:44
eloquent gentleman. Sometimes.
0:47
It seems like you only
0:49
get bad news, and I'm
0:51
afraid today is one of
0:53
those days. Certainly on the
0:56
home front, the diminutive soon
0:58
to be ousted Prime Minister
1:00
of Great Britain, the on
1:02
a let data Rishi soon
1:04
as has been in Germany
1:07
alongside his equally inadequate counterpart.
1:09
Olaf Scholz. They held a joint
1:12
press conference at which they beat
1:14
the drums for war. Suit.
1:16
And said he will not
1:19
shy away from further public
1:21
spending cuts in other words,
1:23
spending on things like roads,
1:26
hospitals, schools, street lighting, A.
1:29
Disability Benefits. Things.
1:31
That might actually benefit the people of Britain.
1:34
But he's not going to shy away from cutting them
1:36
in order to boost. Military. Spending.
1:39
As he faced questions over how the
1:41
policy is going to be funded, the
1:44
Prime minister is now committed to spending
1:46
two and a half percent. Of
1:49
the United Kingdom's gross domestic
1:51
product on defense by twenty
1:54
thirty, that's an increase of
1:56
more than seventy five billion
1:59
pounds. over the next
2:01
six years compared with current levels.
2:04
However, economists are saying,
2:06
where are they going to find the money? Worth
2:09
remembering as well, that increased
2:11
defense expenditure only ever has
2:14
a detrimental effect on the economy as
2:16
well as standards
2:18
of public life. Money
2:21
spent on defense contractors often
2:24
oversees only a tiny
2:26
proportion of it is recycled into
2:28
what economists call
2:30
the multiplier effect, whereby
2:32
people in receipt of the
2:34
money spend it on other
2:37
goods and services. And similarly,
2:40
so do they. And we
2:43
end up with a
2:45
growing economy, but expenditure
2:47
on so-called defense,
2:50
not quite sure who we're supposed to
2:52
be defending ourselves against the Russian bear,
2:54
no doubt, is one of
2:56
the least effective ways of doing so all
2:59
this on the day when
3:02
the United Kingdom was accused by
3:04
Amnesty International of deliberately destabilizing human
3:06
rights globally. So in other words,
3:09
Sura has decided he wants to spend more
3:11
money on weaponry so
3:13
that we can continue to
3:15
destabilize human rights around the
3:17
world. That seems like an
3:19
excellent place to bring in my next guest,
3:21
Tony Gosling, who is
3:24
a very terrible expert on
3:26
all things military, as well
3:28
as all things United Kingdom
3:30
government. Welcome to the program,
3:32
Tony. Thanks very much,
3:34
Basil. I mean, I do see psychological
3:37
warfare as a key thing for any
3:39
journalist to get their head round and
3:41
understand. I mean, I wouldn't pretend to
3:44
be an expert on battlefield, but I
3:46
think one of the things I've realized
3:49
over the years is you've got to
3:51
watch very, very carefully information coming from
3:53
all sides In order
3:55
to assess what's really going on. And I
3:57
See a tremendous amount of... The
4:00
propaganda gurgles style stuff coming from
4:02
the were specifically about Gaza. And
4:04
once you realize that they're lying
4:06
to you about one thing in
4:08
a you start to realize. You
4:11
can't trust him or or about anything
4:13
and me sooner. This Pm guy. He's
4:15
quite clearly a crash and burn character.
4:17
He's he's not gonna be there and
4:19
prove six months time is is pretty
4:21
much maybe eight months if you'll be
4:23
gone. And so they're doing exactly the
4:26
same as he doing with our Mayor
4:28
here in Bristol in the Uk. Which
4:30
he start at for example, our
4:33
marriage passing through all sorts of
4:35
disgusting horrendous planning commission for these
4:37
Big Fat Cat developers before he
4:39
goes because he knows these not
4:41
standing and he's a bit of
4:43
a loser site thus the stasis
4:45
others. Anyway, back to the the
4:47
soil. Ah as in a
4:49
is interesting. Last week we have this
4:51
announcement by sooner about cutting benefits for
4:53
the are unemployed if that's what he
4:56
was talking about even though he didn't
4:58
admit to it was the benefits of
5:00
being played paid to that employed must
5:02
have the benefits the now paid to
5:05
people who were in work but he
5:07
wants to cut those as well. Idea
5:09
is trying to say that services and
5:11
is that is this will be an
5:14
incentive for people to go to work.
5:16
So I'm basically our economies of filing.
5:18
As you know in the west the
5:20
Chinese have done extremely well. I buy
5:23
a simple fact that they cost of
5:25
living in showing there is so much
5:27
less. I don't have to pay their
5:29
workers anywhere near as much because they
5:32
not paying much for their accommodation. that
5:34
energy that transport all these things are
5:36
in the hands of the the Chinese
5:38
government who am I seeing making the
5:41
infrastructure available pretty much at cost to
5:43
the public and to or manufacturers And
5:45
so we've got a failed model in
5:47
an economic. Model at it through too
5:50
much privatization of our infrastructure in the
5:52
west. and so he says he signed
5:54
with Taking this money away from these
5:56
people. We've got supple, otherwise they'll be
5:58
out on the streets. I'm
6:00
giving it to what is it the
6:03
defense budget so he isis or price
6:05
of Goldman Sachs the build a burgers
6:07
who govern sexual very very close with
6:09
and soon x former employee was Goldman
6:11
Sachs and this is the deep state
6:14
in or this is one time that
6:16
miss expressing occasionally also need to soon
6:18
I can self was asked about it
6:20
a couple of weeks go are really
6:23
running the show soon I will do
6:25
anything they say and everything they say
6:27
is these ethically and sell it to
6:29
the proper. Like a at all
6:31
the austen broken down Austin van
6:34
a used car salesman and thus
6:36
the chronic character uses trust settle
6:38
this stuff to the public and
6:40
people believing it less and less.
6:44
When. Don't live in a
6:46
democracy As you know, Tony, We
6:48
live in an oligarchy, or perhaps
6:50
even a plutocracy. Soon
6:53
as he's worth about five hundred
6:55
and seventy million pounds house and
6:57
he possibly know what is lines
7:00
and live on benefits or even
7:02
on an ordinary wage of twenty
7:04
thirty forty thousand pounds a year
7:06
were you handsomely have to budgets
7:08
to make sense Minutes I think
7:10
it's a. Damning
7:13
indictment of our political system. the
7:15
without even going to the country's
7:17
a general election and the conservative
7:20
parties and install of it he
7:22
was crowned effectively after the downfall
7:25
of this trust somebody who doesn't
7:27
have no objections to somebody having
7:29
that much money but not if
7:32
they're gonna pontificated to the rest
7:34
of us about what we should
7:36
do with what little we have.
7:40
Well. yeah we've had wealthy leaders in
7:42
the past but there's a difference between
7:44
someone who doesn't care about the population
7:46
this post a servant and someone that
7:49
doesn't and seen as is clearly somebody
7:51
whose eyes on his next job so
7:53
yeah i mean i'm family what we're
7:56
going to get it of course as
7:58
a result of all this is
8:00
almost certainly Keir Starmer to be the political
8:02
leader. I mean, I heard from an insider,
8:06
this is probably 18 months ago now,
8:09
someone who works for the civil servants
8:11
trade union, that they were convinced that
8:13
the Conservatives didn't want to win the
8:15
next general election. So Sunak is the
8:18
perfect person. I mean, I don't know,
8:20
we could even speculate about why that
8:22
might be economic troubles, war,
8:24
that sort of thing ahead. But
8:27
Keir Starmer is quite clearly going
8:29
to be most likely candidates to
8:31
be taking over. So this will
8:33
be a kind of coronation, you
8:35
know, it is medieval style stuff.
8:37
But look, in the positive side,
8:41
I do think that a lot of the policies,
8:43
like this benefits policy, they're trying to push through
8:45
are going
8:47
to fail. I don't think they're going to be able to
8:50
do these kinds of changes to
8:52
the system, which will leave so
8:54
many people being evicted from their
8:56
homes, destitute, still going to work.
8:59
And they've created a system where work is no longer
9:01
a route out of poverty. So
9:04
what quite where we're heading is
9:06
difficult to know. But I think
9:08
the political that the belief in
9:10
our political classes has its
9:12
own way of working its way through the system
9:15
to make a bit of a correction
9:18
or a reset. Because people
9:20
just simply don't believe what they're being told.
9:22
And so you can have a policy, you
9:24
can promulgate it all you want, a
9:27
bit like trying to send the commandos as they
9:29
did try to do to Afghanistan, they just refuse
9:31
to go. And so I
9:33
think, to a large extent, a lot of
9:35
civil society in Britain is just going to
9:37
simply fail to comply with a lot of
9:39
the legislation, they're trying to push
9:42
something like this Rwanda business to try and
9:44
stop the migrants is a total joke. It's
9:46
never going to work. It never was going
9:48
to work. And the idea, it
9:50
seems to me, ultimate idea is to discredit
9:52
the democratic political system to
9:55
bring in a fascist system. That's what I think they
9:57
want to try and do. And we're in that kind
9:59
of situation. situation anyway with these big
10:01
mega corporations like Tesco's and Shell
10:04
all making these record profits through
10:06
price fixing because there is no
10:08
regulation. We are living
10:11
in a country now which is pretty
10:13
much run by these
10:15
global corporations anyway. So in a
10:17
way it doesn't all make much
10:19
difference. It would have been
10:21
of course a big difference if somebody like Jeremy Corbyn
10:23
had got in. I don't think
10:25
he was a particularly good leader in terms
10:27
of his
10:30
wisdom as to how to run a political party
10:32
or run a country. He seemed
10:34
to be unable to really
10:37
confront people who were his deepest
10:39
enemies. But of course it would
10:41
have been a serious challenge to
10:43
these big corporations and
10:45
to the sort of fascist
10:48
system that they are slowly
10:50
but surely getting used to.
10:52
And I don't use this
10:54
word fascist in a trivial
10:56
manner or flippantly because I
11:00
see this all around me that the policies
11:02
that are coming through have got really nothing
11:04
to do with the will of the people.
11:06
They are just simply what
11:09
corporate bosses and the financial leaders
11:11
are deciding well we want this
11:13
policy, we want that policy and
11:15
it's pushed through regardless. Indeed
11:18
that's been the case for 45 years since
11:21
the end of the Callahan government in 1979
11:25
and the death of the social contract as
11:28
far as I'm concerned. 45 years of stagnant living standards
11:32
and total disregard for
11:34
the wishes of interests of ordinary
11:36
people when there was a referendum
11:38
of course on Brexit. It
11:41
voted, it went the way it
11:44
did and in such large numbers because so
11:46
many people felt that they were unheard. And
11:48
we now have a situation where we have
11:50
two avowedly, unapologetically
11:54
pro-genocide, war
11:56
mongering, Zionist, neoliberal,
12:00
authoritarian parties with
12:03
barely a cigarette paper between the two.
12:05
I mean, the Labour Party, since
12:09
Corbyn was deposed, has
12:12
moved so far to the right,
12:14
but not in a good way,
12:16
not in terms of the libertarian
12:18
free market right, not
12:20
in terms of restoring the great
12:23
traditions and privileges of the
12:25
people of Great Britain, no,
12:27
in an insidious neo
12:30
con authoritarian right.
12:33
Am I right, Tony? Yeah,
12:36
of course you are. This
12:40
time, the
12:43
key text on this is by Michael Hudson, I
12:45
think, to actually understand what's really going on in
12:47
the world. You have to
12:49
look, I mean, and this is literally, you've
12:52
got two different economic systems at war in
12:54
Ukraine. You've got a
12:56
Western system, which is finance
12:59
capitalism, which means that money can buy
13:01
up political parties, it can buy up
13:03
TV stations, it can buy up anything
13:05
that an oligarch finds irksome.
13:11
And on the other side of
13:13
the coin in Russia and in
13:15
China and the other places, Iran
13:17
as well, you have a government
13:19
that understands that it must keep
13:21
its hands on these infrastructure and
13:23
also it must quite strictly regulate
13:25
the tools of power like the
13:27
political system and
13:31
particularly the mass media. And
13:34
so what Michael Hudson talks, I
13:36
think, in his book is industrial
13:40
capitalism, finance capitalism, or
13:43
socialism is the title of
13:45
it. He just talks you through the history
13:47
of this clash between different ways of doing
13:49
things. And what's happened really in the West
13:51
is the financial oligarchy have taken control of
13:54
the levers of power. I would I mean,
13:56
I've done a lot of research over the
13:58
years, I've done loads of investigations. I've
14:00
just been carrying on doing my
14:02
investigation and confirming really the
14:04
evidence that I've dug up over the
14:07
years about the murder
14:09
of the TV crime
14:11
watch presenter Jill Dando here in Britain
14:14
back in 1999. I
14:17
want to come back to that Tony. I
14:20
want to hear all about that. Sure.
14:23
But the main one of the main topics
14:25
I've looked into over the years is
14:28
the the fourth Reich.
14:31
So we all know about the third Reich in
14:33
Hitler. But I came across this guy, Idris Francis,
14:35
who was a member of UKIP. Then
14:38
he got disillusioned with them at the right
14:40
minute and joined the Brexit party. But he
14:42
passed away soon after. But
14:44
Idris, his uncle, had been
14:46
escorting Nazi war criminals during
14:49
the during the
14:51
Nuremberg trials. And one of
14:53
these Nazis turned to him and
14:55
said, yes, you have beaten us for the
14:57
second time. But next time we will win.
15:00
And you won't know what's happening until it's all
15:02
over. So this was a
15:04
cheeky Nazi at Nuremberg chatting to I think
15:07
he was a captain in the signals
15:09
or the intelligence corps. His
15:11
uncle was and he said this passed down through
15:14
the family. And he'd always been being a bit
15:16
of an anti EU campaigner because
15:18
he has many other people noted
15:20
that in 1941 Walter Funk
15:24
from the Reichsbank and the and
15:26
Hitler's government put together
15:29
a plan for the economic
15:31
management of an occupied Europe
15:34
occupied by the SS and by
15:36
the Wehrmacht. And
15:38
as it was at that point being
15:40
occupied, so they had to have a
15:43
plan to manage it. And this was
15:45
called the Eilr patient Wirrtschaft germannshal plan,
15:48
which is basically the European Economic
15:50
Community Plan. And it was a
15:52
plan that which was resurrected after the war. And
15:55
so what we got with the proceeds
15:57
of the Nazi loot, which was laundered
16:00
through Sullivan and Cromwell, the
16:02
Dulles Brothers law firm in
16:04
New York City after the war
16:07
was a financial empire. This
16:10
money that that come through
16:12
Switzerland mainly and Argentina was
16:15
just invested into big corporations
16:19
by the Nazis after the
16:21
war, many of whom
16:23
are in South America and many of whom
16:25
are in the United
16:27
States as well. But
16:29
the key thing to understand about this was
16:31
that they put Jews in charge of these
16:34
businesses in order to disguise the fact
16:36
that it was Nazi money. In fact, some of
16:38
them may not have known where this law of
16:40
money had come from or cared if you're asked
16:42
to run a business, you don't necessarily say, well,
16:44
where is all this money come from? You just
16:46
get on and run it. But
16:48
that was the idea. I
16:51
want to talk more about the fourth, right?
16:53
I want to talk about the Ukrainian right
16:56
and Dimitro Kolyba declaring today that
16:58
the era of peace in Europe
17:00
is over. But first, we're
17:02
going to take a short break with the
17:04
network. We'll be right back with Tony Gosling.
17:06
Fascinating conversation as always. P
17:09
and T's David Curtin. Rishi Sunak has
17:11
been threatening that he will do this
17:13
and say, oh, we'll do this. We'll
17:15
come out. We'll come out. We'll come
17:17
out of the ECHR. That is not
17:19
anything else. But he hasn't
17:21
done so. And then he say,
17:23
well, if we're elected in
17:26
the general election this year, which
17:28
is highly unlikely, then we may
17:30
come out and we may give
17:32
notice to come out if
17:35
we're reelected in 2024, 2025. By that time,
17:37
another year or two years will have
17:39
passed and another
17:46
hundred thousand or so military
17:48
age men will have crossed
17:50
the channel in small boats
17:52
with not a single flight
17:54
taking off to take some
17:56
bogus asylum seekers to Rwanda.
17:58
David Curtin on In today's
18:00
News Talk, TNT. TNT
18:03
is an independent global news talk
18:05
station that does what others only
18:07
say they do. TNT is a
18:09
live radio and TV broadcaster that
18:11
simply tells the truth. 24
18:14
hours a day, 7 days a week. No
18:16
one in the world does what we do. Crisscrossing
18:18
the globe, providing credible news and
18:20
opinion all day and all night.
18:22
In two and a half years,
18:24
TNT has become a credible and
18:26
exciting platform with brilliant hosts and
18:28
staff. It's a critical time and
18:31
we must continue to call out
18:33
the misinformation and propaganda from mainstream
18:35
media and their powerful sponsors. We're
18:37
now appealing to our many friends
18:39
and supporters around the world to
18:41
go to TNTradio.live and make a
18:43
small donation to TNT while we
18:45
seek the right investors to continue
18:47
our important mission. If
18:50
you're still wearing a cloth or
18:52
surgical mask around in public, you're
18:54
guilty of spreading COVID misinformation. It
18:56
really is that simple. In today's
18:58
News Talk radio, TNT. And
19:02
welcome back to The Patrick Henningsen Show with me,
19:04
Basil Valentine. In for Patrick today, Wednesday the 24th
19:06
of April, 2024. Some
19:11
years ago, I went with Patrick
19:13
to talk by the late author
19:16
Gerard Williams about his newly
19:18
published book called Grey Wolf, which
19:21
documents the flight of Adolf Hitler
19:24
from the bunker in Berlin in 1945
19:26
all the way down to Argentina. Gerard
19:31
then appeared in the History
19:33
Channel TV series Hunting Hitler
19:36
and various other documentaries which
19:38
purports to say that Adolf
19:41
did indeed escape the bunker
19:44
and lived in exile in Argentina
19:46
until the early 1960s. Apparently,
19:50
he was deluded enough into thinking that
19:52
he might make some sort of return
19:54
to power but was kept out of
19:56
the limelight by Martin Borman, who
19:59
ran the Fourth Reich from an
20:01
office in Buenos Aires. There
20:04
is no better person to ask about
20:07
these kind of scourless rumours that undermine
20:09
everything we were taught in school about
20:12
20th century history than my
20:14
guest this evening, Tony Gosling. Tony,
20:16
did Hitler die in Argentina in 1964?
20:21
No, he died in Berlin in
20:23
1945. In fact, the Russians filmed
20:26
his body, his burnt body outside
20:28
the Reich. Well, they said that
20:30
wasn't him. Well,
20:32
they would do, wouldn't they? Look, the guy was
20:35
extremely ill by that
20:37
point in the war. He'd been on
20:39
cocaine related drugs for many, many
20:41
months by that point. And he
20:43
was shaking. He was in pieces.
20:46
And the idea that he would try to
20:48
survive, I don't think he
20:51
was that sort of person. He wanted to die in
20:53
the flames of Berlin. But the interesting
20:56
thing about this, this
20:59
whole myth of Hitler surviving
21:01
was that it started in
21:04
the late 1990s, around
21:06
about the same time as this book,
21:08
Op JB was published by
21:11
Christopher Crichton, which
21:13
talked about Martin Borman surviving the war. Now,
21:15
the thing is, for many, I mean, this
21:17
is this is quite a while, isn't it?
21:19
It's 50 years or so, the 90s
21:22
after the end of the Second World War, many
21:24
people who were in the know about what had
21:26
really happened in the bunker, and who got out
21:28
and who didn't was sort of
21:30
dead by that point, pretty much. I mean, most
21:32
of them were anyway. And
21:34
so Christopher Crichton, his real
21:36
name was John Ainsworth Davis, he was a
21:38
spy from Winston Churchill. Throughout
21:41
the war, in fact, the book Op JB
21:43
is such a rip roaring read, but any
21:45
of your copy
21:48
of it, you'll find it's almost impossible
21:50
to put down. He talks, for example,
21:53
about John
21:55
Ainsworth Davis talks about his role
21:59
in Pearl Harbor. So there was a
22:01
Dutch submarine that had spotted a Japanese
22:03
fleet and radioed through saying, hang
22:06
on, there's a massive Japanese fleet heading
22:08
for Hawaii. And so
22:10
this was round about Christmas time.
22:13
He turned up with to that, see
22:15
that submarine round about the time of
22:18
Pearl Harbor, just after, and
22:20
they gave them a load of Christmas presents.
22:22
But actually, there weren't Christmas presents. They were
22:24
explosives and poison gas in there that killed
22:26
all the people on that submarine because they
22:28
didn't want anybody to survive. But
22:32
particularly during the war, to tell
22:34
the story that they knew and
22:36
they told the Americans that the
22:38
Japanese fleet was coming, and that
22:40
Pearl Harbor was not a surprise
22:43
attack. So there's loads of stuff
22:45
in this book, including the operation
22:47
and support the Irish Free
22:49
State was giving to
22:52
Nazi submarines refueling on the west
22:54
coast of Ireland, for example. But
22:57
but he he went over to over
23:00
to Berlin. And
23:04
this is John Ainsworth Davis, right at the end of
23:06
the war, in a crew
23:08
of commandos trained down at
23:10
Burdam, which is near Haling Island
23:12
with the commandos with
23:15
it led by Ian Fleming. And Fleming came
23:17
out just after us, of course, people know
23:19
the Bond novel author
23:21
was also a officer
23:24
in naval intelligence. And he was extremely
23:27
good officer, apparently. So he took all
23:29
these commandos into Berlin. And just before
23:31
the end of the war, a few
23:34
days before Fleming was brought out
23:36
and John Ainsworth Davis and the
23:38
other commandos brought Borman out from
23:40
Berlin. This was all pre
23:42
arranged because Borman have been working with British intelligence
23:44
towards the end of the Second World War. And
23:48
they were brought along through canals
23:50
through Berlin over space of about
23:52
three days under
23:55
the notions of the Russians into the British sector. Now
23:57
you might say to me, well, of course, the Russians
23:59
are not to allow a load of
24:01
British commandos just to go sort of swanning
24:03
around, they're going to be challenged. And they
24:05
were challenged several times by the Russians, but
24:07
they had a, I
24:11
think her name was Breibanov, who was
24:14
part Russian English, British officer,
24:16
and she had a
24:19
Russian uniform and spoke fluent Russian. So every
24:21
time they would challenge, she would shout at
24:23
them, we are we are pursuing Nazi war
24:25
criminals, I have a direct orders from Marshall
24:27
Zukov. And if you dare stand
24:30
in our way, you'll be court marshals and shot.
24:32
Yeah, so this is the way that they the
24:34
British managed to get Borman out through this route.
24:38
And Andy was handed a place called near
24:40
Verbon in in the British sector was handed
24:42
over to to Desmond
24:45
Morton, who was who was
24:48
Winston Churchill's private secretary. This
24:51
is the way things are done. And in the book he
24:53
talks about, for example, going to
24:55
visit Morton in White Hall.
24:59
And there was a movement behind he turns
25:01
around, it's the king sitting in there, George
25:03
the six. So this was all arranged this
25:06
specific section of MI six was
25:08
all arranged and funded through the
25:10
royal family during the Second World
25:12
War. And this
25:14
is I think, to me is the one of the most
25:16
important books that explain what happened. In
25:19
fact, in his pocket, Borman had adult
25:22
fitness last within testament. And, you know, from
25:24
my point of view, looking at this whole
25:26
story, I would suggest Borman may have been
25:28
the one who shot adult fitness, because they
25:31
didn't want to leave any thing
25:33
to chance he may have committed suicide, he may not.
25:36
But but you know, I would imagine that
25:38
the Borman was under orders to to shoot
25:41
Hitler to make sure he didn't survive. So
25:43
the point is, anyway, he makes it to
25:45
the UK, through Desmond Morton, there's loads of
25:47
embarrassment in Britain, because the Russians are coming
25:49
to visit, and they're going to have a
25:51
load of their KGB people after
25:54
the war in the early 1950s. And
25:57
so Borman was not allowed to be in Britain
25:59
at that point. by which time
26:02
another book picks up the story, which was
26:04
actually published 10 years or so before the
26:06
one I just mentioned, op jb, which is
26:09
Martin Bormann Nazi in exile by Paul
26:11
Manning. Now, Manning was no
26:13
just nobody. He was a CBS
26:15
his main correspondent in Europe during
26:18
World War Two. So anybody
26:20
in the United States listening to the
26:22
radio commentary about what was happening with
26:24
the war in Europe would have heard
26:26
his voice, telling them what
26:28
was going on. He was doing things
26:30
like going on daylight bombing raids with
26:32
the US Air Force over Nazi Germany,
26:35
coming back and giving his reports. But
26:37
his book explains that Bormann was a
26:39
bureaucrat who was taking this laundered money
26:42
and setting up all these businesses. And
26:44
to cap it all, there
26:46
was a Hungarian called Ladislas
26:49
Farrago, who was chasing these
26:51
Nazi war criminals. I mean, one of
26:53
the interesting questions in all of this
26:55
is why weren't the Israelis at this
26:57
point chasing these people? I can explain that too,
27:00
if you want. But Ladislas Farrago was in
27:02
Buenos Aires and he got a couple of shots
27:04
of Bormann in Buenos
27:07
Aires in the early 1970s. So this is
27:09
40, 50, 60, 30 years or so after the war. And
27:15
Bormann was Hitler's deputy
27:17
and Hitler's private secretary was
27:19
born in 1900. So
27:24
that's why I think we
27:26
can be pretty sure. He
27:28
was also, he said anyway, the photographs
27:30
of Bormann from Ladislas Farrago were
27:32
published in the Daily Express one
27:34
Saturday in 1972, front
27:37
page, Martin Bormann is alive. And
27:40
then there was all sorts of things to
27:42
try and cover this up. Oh, we've discovered
27:45
his body, we've discovered his skull in Berlin.
27:49
And then of course, when this book final
27:51
book was published by John Ainsworth Davis, he was
27:53
the key person who got Bormann out. So
27:56
all this nonsense I would say about
27:58
Hitler's some... surviving,
28:01
started to be published and gain currency. So
28:03
this is, I think, very Orwellian, it's an
28:05
attempt to, you know, control history, he who
28:07
controls the past, controls the future,
28:10
he controls the present controls the past,
28:12
this kind of thing going on, and
28:14
all sorts of people put
28:16
up to this. As even the
28:18
very first person who wrote about the
28:20
Hitler bunker, Hugh Trevor Roper from MI6,
28:22
published a book, I think it was
28:24
1946 or 47 about what had happened.
28:26
There was lots of lies in that.
28:29
I recently, you know, discovered, I think
28:31
it's Mark Felton, he does some very
28:33
good YouTube military investigations. He's
28:35
dug up a terrific recent story,
28:37
which is about Bournemouth secretary, and
28:40
how she ended up marrying
28:42
someone from British intelligence and hiding the
28:44
rest of her life up
28:47
in the Wirral near Liverpool, and then
28:49
moving latterly to Cambridge. So she was
28:51
just pretending to be an ordinary housewife,
28:53
where actually she'd been Martin Bournemouth's private
28:55
secretary right the way through the war.
29:00
And I'm
29:02
going to stop you there to redirect to
29:04
the present. The Fourth Reich,
29:07
some people say it's the European Union. Of course,
29:10
it's also this network of companies
29:13
that Bournemouth set up, I agree with you about
29:16
that. The European Union was
29:18
supposed to be the bulwark against
29:20
any future wars in Europe. And
29:24
yet today, Ukraine's foreign minister
29:26
has enthusiastically praised US politicians
29:29
for approving the $61 billion
29:31
military aid package and
29:34
declared that the era of peace
29:36
in Europe is over.
29:39
This is unfortunately being
29:42
echoed by half wits
29:44
like Hamish to Bretton Gordon,
29:47
and various other idiotic
29:49
talking heads in
29:51
the British media. Please
29:54
try and make sense of who on
29:56
earth is calling for war in Europe.
30:00
Well, NATO is calling for
30:02
war in Europe, NATO and
30:06
the EU and the United
30:08
States, because this is
30:10
there. I mean, I think we can
30:12
just see the parallels between the Nazis
30:15
and the Russians when it comes to
30:17
the Soviet Union. Anyway, before World War
30:19
II, a lot of
30:21
the effort for the Nazi war machine was
30:23
thrown at Russia. If you go
30:26
back even further, you can see Napoleon tried
30:28
to destroy Russia. What we've
30:30
got here is an obsession
30:32
with taking down the Russian
30:34
system, and
30:37
particularly the Russian
30:39
mentality. Russia
30:42
itself, as I said, is a
30:44
very strong political system. There's
30:46
lots of gangsterism in the country, but
30:48
Putin is absolutely clear. I am
30:51
number one gangster. And in fact, he
30:53
realizes he could be assassinated at any
30:55
time. So he's set up a very
30:57
genuine system whereby whoever replaces him will
30:59
also be a protector of the Russian
31:02
people and a protector of the Kremlin.
31:04
Now, I mean, our own leaders don't really
31:06
seem to be very interested in protecting their
31:09
own people, just in trying to take out
31:11
the opposition. And
31:14
the way that they took down RT,
31:16
I thought was particularly disgusting and disappointing.
31:19
They've done, of course, the same with
31:21
press TV to make sure these Russian views
31:23
are not heard. They
31:26
had the terrorist attack in
31:28
Moscow, the Krocas theater,
31:30
just a few weeks ago,
31:32
just after the Russian elections. None of
31:34
the coverage of that really, the Russian
31:37
explanation of it was given here in the
31:39
UK. They explained that, oh,
31:41
these guys were here at
31:44
the time of the election and they wanted to do the attack then.
31:47
But the security was too difficult for them. So
31:49
they went away and came back and did it
31:51
afterwards when security was lax. We didn't really get
31:53
any of that coverage here. So what we're getting
31:55
is a very, very one sided version of what's
31:57
going on in the world. And
31:59
to be clear, quite honest, I think they've been planning
32:01
this kind of Third World War for
32:05
decades. I say they,
32:07
I'm talking about even the predecessors, the
32:09
ancestors of the deep state now, they've
32:12
been trying to work this whole thing
32:14
up for many, many years. Look at
32:16
what's been going on. If I could
32:18
just for a minute talk about the
32:20
British in over in Gaza and
32:22
Palestine, you know, the First World War sweeping them
32:24
out of the way, the Ottoman
32:26
Empire, the Second World War,
32:29
implanting this crusader state there.
32:32
But a similar thing has been going on, been
32:34
going on lots of geopolitics in
32:37
Eastern Europe, for example, even the creation of
32:39
the state of Ukraine in the early 1900s
32:41
was just a fiction really,
32:44
it was just made up. They
32:47
decided we're going to have this particular country
32:49
in this particular position, a bit like they did,
32:51
they've been doing, of course, with the Sykes-Picot
32:53
in the Middle East. So this,
32:55
to me, is a very
32:58
clear top down mission
33:02
that the NATO countries particularly,
33:04
but all their hangers on as well,
33:07
are in twitches to
33:09
literally to threaten and take down Russia. Now,
33:11
of course, they can never really do that.
33:13
And the reason, I think, to be honest
33:15
with you, Basil, that they're so, should we
33:18
say, afraid of Russia and they are so
33:20
obsessed by Russia is because
33:22
the main Third World War is
33:24
planned between the United States and
33:26
China. And both
33:29
of those are controlled countries
33:31
by the oligarchy, I believe,
33:34
in different ways, different, obviously different
33:36
emphases on both sides. But
33:39
the Chinese are controlling, I don't know
33:41
how much you know about the origins
33:43
of Chairman Mao being being funded by
33:45
Yale University, his bookshops being
33:47
funded by Yale back in the early 1900s.
33:50
This guy was brought to power by the
33:53
Americans, by the Skull and
33:55
Bones Society. And so
33:57
these two major powers, the Chinese and the
33:59
American, because that's the idea for a third
34:01
world war. The thing is, the Russians are
34:05
a third force.
34:07
You see, if there is a war, a
34:10
third force is going to be still probably
34:12
surviving and may even win from
34:14
a war between China and the United States. The
34:16
Russians may well come out of it really well.
34:18
In fact, as a dominant, that's why they have
34:21
the nations, I think. Okay,
34:23
Tony, the third force, of course, in
34:25
the James Bond books inspector is the
34:27
criminal organization that plays the two off
34:29
against each other. But I want to
34:31
just refer quickly to an article by
34:33
Jeremy Corbyn in today's Guardian. I'm very
34:36
pleased that they published it, given the extent
34:38
to which he was demonized during the whole
34:40
phony anti-Semitism for our go. Our
34:42
leaders seem determined to give war
34:44
a chance, their thirst for conflict
34:47
endangers us all. And he references
34:49
Christopher Clarke's book, The Sleepwalkers, where
34:52
Clarke refuses to pin the blame for the
34:54
first world war, the 1418 war, on a
34:56
single power. Instead,
34:59
he explains how political leaders narrowed
35:01
the prospects for peace one misstep
35:04
at a time and sleepwalked
35:06
into a global catastrophe that left
35:08
around 20 million people dead. I
35:11
don't think they're missteps. I think they're deliberate
35:13
steps. And if it happens again, it
35:15
won't be 20 million dead. It'll be 20, it'll
35:18
be 2 billion dead or more, Tony.
35:22
Well, I can remember, gosh, must be
35:24
15 years ago. And so now reading
35:26
a terrific novel by Dennis
35:28
Wheatley, who was he's an occult
35:31
writer, wrote the great occult novel
35:34
of the 20th century, The Devil Rides Out, which
35:36
was actually made into an excellent hammer film, as
35:38
well. And Wheatley wrote his book, The Seventh
35:41
Seal. It is
35:43
a if anyone has not come across
35:45
Wheatley, it's a terrific yarn about this
35:47
officer that can see the first world
35:50
war coming. He's got inside information about
35:52
how they're trying to get it started. And
35:55
he's frantically traveling around Europe trying to
35:57
stop this first world war. And the
36:00
assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. And
36:03
it's, you know, one of those things that you can
36:05
see, a lot of military people,
36:07
I think, are those
36:09
that understand just what the how
36:12
horrific and horrifying war really is.
36:14
For many of us, we're quite
36:16
prepared to kind of go along
36:18
the bandwagon of, oh, you
36:20
know, Assad has to go, oh, dear
36:22
Godaffi, he's a terrible, nasty man. Godaffi
36:24
has to go. Now, of course, it's
36:26
come around to Putin has to go.
36:28
You know, most military people these days,
36:31
we'll look at that and they'll say, well,
36:33
hang on a minute, because you're not going to just
36:35
get rid of Putin. What are you talking about? You
36:37
know, this is this will will lose if we just
36:39
try and find him, we can lose. So there
36:42
is an air of unreality to this and
36:44
they're pushing along with it anyway. So,
36:47
you know, this this announcement by the
36:50
Ukrainian prime minister about, you know, we
36:52
are bringing war to Europe, where he
36:54
doesn't quite say that, but that's what
36:56
they're doing. They're trying to spread war
36:59
like a disease, like a
37:01
virus throughout Europe. And
37:03
the way they're doing that is they're
37:05
giving the Ukrainians or lending the
37:08
Ukrainians, in fact, all this aid money
37:10
that's going away from the poor in
37:12
Britain that desperately need it to feed
37:14
their kids to Zelensky
37:17
to spend on Western weapons. Of
37:19
course, most of this money is
37:21
coming back to the BAE systems,
37:24
the British arms industry, to people
37:26
like Lockheed Martin Raytheon. And
37:28
it just bounces straight back if it doesn't go
37:31
get lost somewhere along the way and
37:34
get laundered over in Ukraine. It's coming
37:36
straight back here, this cash. And
37:39
so that's what they're trying to do, I think, is
37:41
to boost our economies. And it
37:43
shows you how powerful the arms lobby is by
37:46
getting these arms firms to start
37:48
manufacturing massive amounts of munitions for
37:50
the Ukrainians. The key thing is
37:53
the missiles. I noticed there's another US
37:55
missile, which is even longer range, that
37:57
they're now considering sending to Ukraine.
38:00
This forces the Russians to
38:03
actually come further into Ukraine. The longer
38:05
range your missiles are, the further the
38:08
Russians need to come in in order
38:10
to stop you firing them at Russia
38:12
and Russian cities. And yet
38:14
none of this sort of thing is really discussed in
38:17
the British press. But I can assure you that
38:19
many military minds in the West know this 100%.
38:23
And they know that if we were really to
38:25
take on Russia in any serious way, we'd lose.
38:28
Very quickly, I promised listeners
38:31
at the top of the last hour
38:33
that you know who killed Jill Dando,
38:36
the British BBC journalist shot
38:38
dead on her doorstep in
38:40
leafy Patney. Twenty
38:43
four years ago now, a
38:45
crime for which the entirely innocent
38:47
Barry George was imprisoned for several
38:49
years, and he never got any
38:51
compensation either. That was
38:54
absolutely outrageous. Newspapers
38:56
full of stories that the Met
38:59
Police are reopening this investigation and
39:02
they have a Serbian gunman, a Serbian
39:04
hit man in mind. Can you shed
39:06
any light on this grisly topic, Tony?
39:09
Well, it's good to see this bouncing back
39:11
into the news again, because it is, as
39:13
you say, a horrific miscarriage of justice. And
39:16
right on our TV screens, the
39:19
execution of a TV
39:22
presenter who was
39:24
presenting a crime watch crime
39:26
program, I think it's fair
39:28
to say that say
39:30
back in the 1970s and 80s, anyone
39:32
who was a grass was
39:34
going to get potentially get the
39:37
the lawn was going to get moaned. If
39:41
they were, yes. So but the thing
39:43
is that she's a presenter. She's a journalist
39:45
in a way like Julian Assange. So she's
39:47
not the person who's doing the telling. She's
39:49
the person who's the messenger.
39:52
And so it was
39:54
really extraordinary that she should be
39:57
executed in that way in 1999. But
40:00
there are a couple of journalists
40:02
that I've spoken to over the
40:04
last few years, or sources,
40:06
I should say, one of them, particularly an
40:09
investigative journalist, Don Hale, and
40:11
he has an immense amount
40:13
of information about the British
40:15
pedophile rings. For
40:18
example, I remember him in an interview
40:20
telling me that the people
40:22
that knew most about the pedophile
40:24
rings in London, which were largely
40:27
used for political blackmail, this
40:29
was a big technique of the intelligence services that
40:31
anybody that was looks as if they
40:33
were successful in getting to near power,
40:36
they would be mixed up in
40:38
these pedophile rings, even if they
40:40
themselves weren't particularly interested, the connection with
40:42
it would be so toxic for them,
40:44
they could easily be blackmailed. And
40:47
they'd be secretly filmed and this sort of thing.
40:49
But he said the people that know most about
40:51
this, far more than anyone else on the planet,
40:54
is the KGB. The Russians had
40:56
been following all this right the way through
40:58
the Cold War decades into
41:00
the 1990s and knew everybody,
41:02
all the MPs that were
41:05
involved, all the intelligence officers
41:07
and particularly public servants who
41:09
were so easily compromised.
41:11
So that was partly Don Hale's work,
41:13
but he also worked very
41:16
hard on the acquittal
41:18
of Barry George, which is
41:20
a brilliant thing to do. This guy basically was
41:22
educationally sub normal, and he was fitted up
41:24
by the Metropolitan Police a
41:27
year after Jill's death for
41:29
her murder, with the key evidence
41:31
being one particle of cordyte
41:36
powder, or, yeah, gunpowder of
41:38
some sort, one particle.
41:40
And even the witnesses at the trial said, well,
41:43
this could have come from anywhere, one particle is
41:45
it could have been in that coat pocket when
41:47
he when he bought it second hand, you know,
41:49
it's no way you can say one particle is
41:52
enough to convict the guy, but he was convicted
41:54
anyway. Luckily, I'm
41:57
sure amongst the evidence
41:59
to police. presented to court was
42:01
the fact that he had an untidy flat.
42:05
Well, in which case, both you and I are going to have
42:08
to go to jail, I'm afraid. Look,
42:13
okay, very quickly, the actual
42:15
the actual killers, Jerry
42:18
Korteirai interviewed, and you can still find his
42:20
interviews up on the Daily Express website. He
42:23
had been complaining about the police
42:25
in Dorset and Freemasonry having stolen
42:27
his car. And he he put
42:30
a website up about it. And
42:32
he was told that by contacted
42:34
by these Eastern European mercenaries, we will
42:36
kill these police officers for you. He
42:38
went over to see them in Hungary.
42:40
And guess what, they showed him the
42:42
gun that they use to kill Jill
42:44
Dando. And she had this
42:46
list of pedophiles, she take it to the
42:48
BBC, they've done nothing. So she took it
42:50
to the Met Commissioner Paul Condon, a few
42:52
weeks later, or a couple of months later,
42:55
she was executed on her doorstep. So that's
42:57
what I believe happened is a total failure
42:59
of the police don't take it to the
43:01
Met Commissioner. If you've got information like this,
43:03
take it to journalists, get it out there because
43:05
she couldn't put it on the TV. But
43:07
interesting to see if she tried to do that live,
43:09
that would have been interesting read the lanes out live
43:12
on the BBC. But anyway, she
43:14
didn't do that. And so she ended up dead, I'm afraid.
43:18
Tony explosive story. Thank you so much
43:20
for sharing it with us tonight on
43:22
today's news talk. A fascinating conversation, as
43:24
always. And I look forward to seeing
43:26
you again very soon. Thank you so
43:28
much. Thank you. Tony. Yes,
43:30
Tony. We're going to take a short break now
43:32
when we come back, I'll be joined by State
43:34
of the Union, the host, Brian
43:37
McLean. Yes, that's his name to find out
43:39
what's coming up after the news headlines at
43:41
the top of the hour. And also get
43:43
a bit more information on
43:45
the impending American Revolution
43:47
with anti war protests,
43:49
sweeping universities like no
43:51
time since Vietnam. We'll
43:53
be right back. It's
44:00
on the west coast. Here's those
44:02
pictures that you asked for for your school project.
44:04
First day of school. Cute as a button. How
44:07
long ago? Oh, here's
44:09
grandma Florence. After that flood, wiped
44:12
out the whole neighborhood. Sometimes
44:15
I just cannot believe all the storms
44:17
we've gone through here. I can only hope that we'll
44:20
be able to leave this house to you one day,
44:22
baby. You're our legacy. Planning
44:25
for these disasters will make sure we're
44:27
safe. And it's the best way to protect our
44:29
legacy. Ah, those
44:31
bees smell heavenly. And? You're
44:34
mama real quick. You know what? We should
44:36
make an emergency communication plan. That way we're
44:38
ready this year. Oh, great idea. At my
44:40
dorm, we have emergency kits for earthquakes
44:42
and wildfires, but I'm sure there's something more
44:44
local I can send you at the lane.
44:47
Okay. Smart. I'm coming to
44:49
show you guys. Protect your legacy.
44:51
Plan for natural disasters
44:54
today. Visit ready.gov/plan. Hi,
44:57
I'm Abel. I
44:59
often forget to mention that
45:01
he's an amputee because Abel
45:03
will try any activity he
45:05
can. My arm helps me
45:07
with basically everything. He
45:10
doesn't see what he can't do. He sees what he
45:12
can do. Yeah, this is
45:14
helping. The war ants have just
45:16
given him the ability to do
45:18
all the activities every kid can
45:20
do. When you donate to the warrior, you
45:23
help kids like me. Thank you. This
45:27
is the Patrick Henningsen Show on
45:30
PNP Radio. Welcome
45:33
back to the Patrick Henningsen Show with me, Basil
45:36
Valentine. In for Patrick today, Wednesday the 24th of
45:38
April, 2024. I
45:41
did enjoy my conversation with Tony
45:44
Gosling who referred to the man
45:46
framed, simple as that, for
45:48
the murder of Jill Dando, Barry
45:51
George. Tony used the term educationally
45:53
subnormal to refer to Barry George.
45:55
That's not a term we use
45:57
so much these days. like
46:00
to use special needs, which is
46:02
less denigrating. Barry
46:05
George was indeed special needs. I
46:08
would venture to suggest that somebody
46:10
else who is special needs is
46:12
the Speaker of the House of
46:14
Representatives, Mike Johnson, who was jeered
46:16
by pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia University
46:19
today. Johnson, of course, said that
46:21
it's a biblical requirement to support
46:23
the state of Israel, such as
46:25
his simplistic understanding of
46:27
religion, spirituality and world events.
46:30
And he's also been making idiotic
46:32
noises about a new axis of
46:34
evil consisting of Russia, China and
46:37
Iran, even though, of course, they're
46:40
not responsible for the murder of 15,000 children. That's
46:43
his big ally, Israel. So I'm not
46:46
really sure he was expecting anything
46:48
else. Johnson referred to what
46:51
he called a virus of
46:53
anti-Semitism at colleges nationwide. Johnson
46:56
doesn't seem to be aware of the
46:58
fact that there are thousands of Jewish
47:01
students taking part in these protests. Brian
47:03
McLean, host of State of the Nation,
47:05
joining me now. Why is
47:07
it people like Johnson are so
47:10
blinkered that they can't see what's happening
47:12
right in front of their faces? Well,
47:15
I'm not sure. It really begs that question.
47:17
That's the million question right now. And,
47:20
you know, with the amount
47:22
of apparent astroturfing that I'm
47:24
seeing going on, one
47:27
has to wonder if he
47:30
really is functioning on some
47:32
sort of religious imperative
47:34
or if he's actually
47:38
helping fuel the fire
47:40
and creating this
47:42
media storm that creates headlines
47:45
such as this one. Students
47:47
are scared. Columbia crisis
47:49
spirals as tensions simmer and
47:52
protests continue. I
47:54
agree. The language around
47:56
it is completely over
47:59
the top. all the pictures and
48:01
video i've seen of the process of columbia
48:03
and elsewhere are the
48:05
festival type atmosphere with students
48:08
drumming dancing singing
48:11
listening to speeches making
48:13
cups of tea around their tents yet
48:16
it seems not just the usual
48:20
zionist suspects but even
48:23
democratic operatives like joe scarborough
48:26
chiming in with some nonsense about
48:29
these events which i will say
48:31
again are heavily
48:33
populated by jewish protesters
48:35
are simply anti-genocide they're
48:37
not posing any threat
48:40
to anybody it's one
48:42
of the most blatant and egregious
48:44
cases of persistent misrepresentation i've ever
48:46
seen and of course it deflects
48:49
from the important issues yes
48:52
absolutely uh i
48:54
i was cued into a
48:57
video on uh bassine yosefsx.com
48:59
account this morning and
49:01
it's pretty interesting i would recommend going
49:03
there and checking it out he says
49:06
i saw a video on my timeline
49:08
of people being paid to infiltrate the
49:10
college protests to incite
49:12
hate and chant anti-Semitic slogans
49:15
they call it astro surfing i don't know
49:17
if that's a a typo
49:19
there but astroturfing i believe is what
49:21
he's talking about maybe astro surfing is
49:24
ludicrous speed astroturfing but he goes on
49:26
to say at the end of the
49:28
video the organizer says they
49:31
will go back to the office for
49:33
cocktails and debriefings and
49:35
also mentions a $50,000 amount that
49:39
was paid to organize some of these
49:41
buses so you know i
49:43
think what we're seeing here the media
49:45
optics on what we're seeing here are
49:49
really nothing new and
49:51
there's a massive amount of infiltration happening
49:53
so the people that we see in
49:56
the mass media cartels broadcasts are
49:59
the most salacious ones you can
50:01
imagine, just like what happened at many
50:04
points in the Civil Rights Movement
50:06
in the anti-war Vietnam era, Occupy
50:09
Wall Street, BLM,
50:12
Antifa, Oath Keepers, Proud Boys,
50:15
J6, PACCON, KKK, Ruby Ridge,
50:18
all of these events had
50:20
these type of people at them. If
50:23
they're not federal agents of some sort,
50:25
you've got NGO sponsored people like this.
50:28
Not to mention January the 6th, I
50:30
saw one blisteringly stupid post
50:33
on the X platform likening
50:36
the protests at Columbia and
50:38
other universities to
50:41
Charlottesville in as much
50:44
as they were sort of, I mean, what an
50:46
earth kind of nonsense is that, let's not give
50:48
that any more any more credence
50:50
for just a moment. Mike Johnson
50:52
was booed, I'm glad to say,
50:55
flanked by other Republican
50:57
members of Congress. He's called for
50:59
the resignation of Minish Shafik, Columbia's
51:02
president, accusing her of failing to
51:04
protect Jewish students. I mean, what
51:06
evidence has he got that any
51:08
Jewish students have been harmed in
51:10
any way, shape or form? I
51:13
mean, it's actually a form of
51:16
anti-Semitism itself. This is the irony
51:18
of the thing because Johnson
51:20
is claiming to represent, his
51:23
views represent all Jewish students
51:26
and we know that they don't. Yeah,
51:29
that lack of nuance there,
51:31
I always find that disturbing.
51:34
There are all types of people
51:37
being represented here to include the
51:39
nefarious ones that I mentioned, but
51:41
the fact that those are the
51:43
ones that are used to scaffolding
51:45
the headlines around and the narratives
51:47
around and the other people are
51:49
given no voice whatsoever, that
51:52
is a huge, huge piece
51:54
of this propagandistic gaslighting that
51:57
we're seeing right now. know,
52:00
all activist movements begin on college campuses,
52:03
you could go back to Vietnam and
52:05
look at the the teach-ins that they
52:07
had there. And these things
52:09
often lead to, you know, well they can lead, I
52:11
mean look what happened to Kent State, these sort of
52:13
things can lead to stuff like that, which
52:16
can be used to push the, you
52:18
know, the overall narrative and polarize
52:21
people against each other politically. And
52:24
that's what we're seeing right here, and
52:26
I'm afraid that Columbia University is
52:28
going to be the first snowball
52:31
that builds into an avalanche if,
52:34
you know, if this continues, because this will
52:36
this will probably move to your side of
52:38
the pond eventually, and we'll
52:40
start seeing massive shutdowns of schools if
52:44
this continues. I
52:46
hope so, because for all the attempts
52:48
at deflecting attention from the
52:50
core issue, this is about aiding
52:53
and abetting genocide. There have
52:55
been protests this week all
52:58
the way across the United States, I
53:00
believe, from Massachusetts to California, with scores
53:02
of arrests, particularly at New York University
53:04
a couple of nights ago,
53:07
with police with batons moving in, really
53:09
sort of images of
53:11
fascistic type repression
53:14
of what is supposed to
53:16
be freedom of speech. I thought you had the
53:19
First Amendment. Yeah,
53:21
yeah, unfortunately, you know,
53:24
these college environments, they've
53:26
already radicalized all these young people. These
53:28
young people are so overtly
53:30
radicalized, they're completely game for
53:33
whatever the next hashtag marginalized
53:35
people protest is going to
53:38
be, especially if they get
53:40
free sandwiches, hotel vouchers, and
53:42
cocktails in a debriefing. Oh,
53:45
for once they found a worthy cause with
53:48
Palestine, that much, I will say. Finally, Hesh,
53:50
what have you got on State of the
53:52
Nation after the news? Oh,
53:55
we've got a great State of the Nation
53:57
coming up today. Timothy Shea and I, we're
53:59
going to to be talking about
54:01
the Senate passing this $95 billion
54:03
aid bill. We've got Angela Stanton
54:06
King, Joel Lombardi, Dr. Ron Martinelli,
54:08
Senator Brian Jones, we have a
54:10
Power Pack show coming up. And
54:15
Joe Biden can't wait to sign that bill
54:17
into law, loading not
54:19
just current taxpayers, but
54:21
taxpayers' children with billions
54:24
of unpayable debt. Is
54:26
that the way forward? I don't think
54:28
so. I'm Basil Valentine. Thank you so
54:31
much, Heshia, Brian McPherson. Thank
54:33
you to my previous guests, Rami
54:35
Nauman and Tony Gosling, of course.
54:37
I'll be back tomorrow while Patrick
54:39
is on his James Bond adventures.
54:41
Don't go away, state of the
54:43
nation, right after the news headlines.
54:58
Thank you.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More