Podchaser Logo
Home
Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Released Saturday, 13th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Luminous: Your Brain on Shrooms

Saturday, 13th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey, it's Steve. And

0:05

this is luminous a podcast series about

0:08

psychedelic from to the best of our

0:10

knowledge. The

0:13

reason I got so interested in psychedelic

0:15

some the first place and why I

0:17

wanted to do this series is because

0:19

I have a particular obsession of really

0:22

want to understand the nature of consciousness,

0:24

what it is, and where it comes

0:26

from. Is

0:28

it all brain based? some other

0:30

product of all those billions of

0:32

neurons and trillions of synaptic connections?

0:34

Or does the mind have some

0:37

other dimension beyond that three pound

0:39

mass of what goo? And especially

0:41

when you enter the truly weird

0:43

states of consciousness? the kinds of

0:45

transcendent and other worldly experiences you

0:47

get with psychedelics? How do you

0:49

explain what's going on? Can

0:52

you. I wanted

0:54

to get to know the neuroscientists

0:56

on the front lines of psychedelic

0:58

research by they got so obsessed

1:01

and now this is shaped their

1:03

own understanding of the mind and

1:05

reality itself. And I also wanted

1:07

to hear about their own psychedelic

1:10

trips which sometimes they're willing to

1:12

talk about. So can psychedelic unlock

1:14

the mystery of consciousness? Can narrow

1:16

science explain what happens during a

1:19

psychedelic experience? Wisconsin

1:29

Public Radio. This.

1:37

Episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

1:39

Whether. You love true crime or comedy, celebrity

1:41

interviews or news you call the shots and

1:43

what's in your podcast. Q and guess what?

1:46

Now you can call them on your auto

1:48

insurance to with the name your price tool

1:50

from Progressive. It works just the way it

1:52

sounds. Huge help aggressive how much you want

1:54

to pay for car insurance and they'll show

1:56

you coverage options that fit your budget. Get

1:58

your quote today at Progressive. Com to

2:00

join the over twenty eight million drivers

2:02

who trust. Progress Is Progress a casualty

2:05

insurance company, an affiliate present of It's

2:07

not limited by state law. Is

2:13

to the best of our knowledge. I man Dream

2:15

champs and I'm Steve Pulse. And

2:17

this is luminous or series on the

2:20

philosophy and future. As academics. This

2:25

episode your Brain on

2:27

Truman's. So where are you

2:29

taking as this time Steve? Well we're

2:31

going to go down the rabbit hole. Specifically.

2:35

Neural circuits that light up on

2:37

psilocybin and other psychedelics. You

2:40

know, for scientists who study the

2:43

brain, these drugs are tools that

2:45

can open a window into how

2:47

the mind works and possibly into

2:49

the mystery of consciousness itself. For

2:51

some neuroscientists, this it's very first.

3:00

Innocence. I'm grateful. Had this explains,

3:02

but it's it's daily trouble selling.

3:09

You inhale the substance. And

3:13

then within five to

3:15

ten seconds. Everything

3:18

becomes black. The

3:26

visual field. And

3:34

then those hexagonal sort of themselves

3:37

disappear and you go down into

3:39

this tunnel. This black tunnel. And

3:45

the last thing at a mammoth, it's always.

3:59

Interesting to. Of course

4:01

describing his brain on five

4:03

mb audience. Otherwise known as Totes

4:05

and I'm. Risk

4:07

is a pre near and a scientific.

4:09

Investigations Consciousness. For

4:12

years he taught at Caltech and then

4:14

became the Chief scientific officer that the

4:16

Alan Institute for Brain Science. Because

4:19

a striking feature in person. The.

4:21

Former rock climber feet tall and

4:23

skinny and often shows up a

4:25

scientific conferences and red pants and

4:28

brightly colored shirts. recently, he's come

4:30

to believe that psychedelics may offer

4:32

clues about the nature of consciousness.

4:37

We just might also satisfy some of

4:39

his own deep spiritual yearnings. I'm assuming

4:41

there was sort of a personal journey.

4:43

That's part of their say that I'm

4:45

hoping you can even go there. I

4:50

grew up as them. In a

4:52

devout Roman Catholic family and I was

4:54

early on in my life was about.

4:57

it was an altar boy, said all

4:59

the players and Latin all of that.

5:01

but I never had a burning bush,

5:03

I never had a booming voice on

5:05

the sky and I prayed for that.

5:07

I prayed for God to reveal himself

5:09

to me in some way, shape or

5:12

form that never happen. And then over

5:14

the years I lost my Catholic face

5:16

particular being a scientist. But damn I

5:18

never lost that yearning to. Experience

5:20

The absolute. And

5:22

of clause many people claim that

5:24

under various types of substances take

5:26

have so called religious experiences so

5:28

that was probably come to think

5:31

of with the deeper motivation for

5:33

a why did what I did.

5:35

When. Of the things I've always liked

5:37

about Christoph is that he doesn't dodge

5:40

the big existential questions he wants write

5:42

a book called Consciousness Concessions as a

5:44

romantic reductionist where he described his fascination

5:46

with see her, dish or death. The.

5:49

Jesuit priest and paleontologists who believe

5:51

the cosmos is continually evolving toward

5:54

greater complexity and ultimately to the

5:56

omega point when the universe becomes

5:58

aware of itself. What's

6:01

not that surprising that he'd go down

6:03

the psychedelic rabbit hole. And. Yet

6:05

Christoph Clock is in some ways the

6:07

last scientist you'd expect to get interested

6:10

in psychedelic. To explain this, I need

6:12

to go back to the nineteen eighties.

6:18

Justice. had been pretty much a

6:20

taboo subject. Soft

6:23

Lucy for any real scientists to

6:25

touch. But when M Arise and

6:27

other brain imaging technologies came along,

6:30

it was suddenly possible for the

6:32

first time to peer directly into

6:34

the brain. And one of the

6:37

world's most eminent scientists, Francis Crick,

6:39

the Nobel Laureate famous for his

6:41

discovery was James Watson of Dnase

6:44

Double Helix, announced a plan to

6:46

map and neural correlates of consciousness.

6:49

This launched a revolution. And

6:52

Christoph pricks brilliant young proteges from

6:54

Germany was there at the beginning.

6:56

Taking the first crack at this new science.

7:00

It was a match made in heaven. The.

7:05

Accepts while. Couric. Had no

7:07

use for heaven. He was a

7:09

devout dedicated atheist. Practice is very

7:12

famous. story of him to build

7:14

a new college after the war.

7:16

Church or college in their Cambridge

7:18

in honor of Winston Churchill was

7:20

all supposed to be forward facing

7:22

based on science and engineering and

7:24

mathematics. Amended decided to build a

7:26

chapel and he vehemently objected to

7:28

this plan publicly in a let

7:31

us Sir Winston Churchill himself or

7:33

back and said well no one

7:35

would be forced to go to

7:37

It would be privately paid. and

7:39

it would be open to everyone then

7:41

he sent in very famous episode he

7:44

sent him a check for twenty guinness

7:46

saying he proposed established a boss off

7:48

at at the to a certain call

7:51

it it would be open to anyone

7:53

it wouldn't be discriminatory and it would

7:55

be paid by privately mean some that

7:58

endless the that public conversation Francis

8:02

Crick died in 2004, but a few years

8:05

before that, I talked with him about his

8:07

work in this new science of consciousness. He

8:10

just published the astonishing hypothesis, the

8:12

scientific search for the soul, and

8:15

he was pretty clear that, in his view, there

8:17

was no such thing. The mind

8:19

is just a whole bunch of neurons and

8:22

synaptic connections and nothing more. Essentially

8:29

it's a very old idea. It goes back to the

8:31

Greeks. It says

8:33

essentially that all the feelings

8:35

you have and what you see and how

8:37

you feel pain and what you think about

8:39

yourself and your emotions and ambitions

8:42

and so on, basically the

8:44

behavior of the enormous number

8:46

of nerve cells in your head firing

8:49

away and interacting, and

8:51

of course the molecules associated with them. I

8:54

suppose to put it into focus, you

8:56

could contrast that with the view that

8:58

Descartes put forward that there was something

9:01

immaterial, some sort

9:03

of immaterial soul, which was necessary for

9:05

you to be conscious

9:07

and for you to be a person. Do

9:11

you think scientific knowledge will

9:13

gradually replace religious beliefs?

9:16

As we know more and more about how

9:18

our brains work, will

9:20

there be less reason to believe

9:22

in spiritual things? Well, first

9:24

of all, I wouldn't accept the word spiritual, but let's

9:27

forget that for the family. I don't want

9:29

to. Well, I think what you

9:31

call spiritual, I think, is various activities of

9:33

the brain, whereas when people use

9:35

spiritual, they like to think it's something very

9:37

special outside in some way, but let's forget

9:39

that. But

9:41

it sounds like a very kind of physical

9:44

description of what's going on, but it doesn't

9:46

really get at the mystery of what happens

9:48

in the mind. Well, of course,

9:50

it's the mystery we want to get at. The

9:52

problem is, is it approachable scientifically,

9:55

and if it is, how you go

9:57

about it? Mr.

10:00

O'Connor, I have taken this, maybe

10:02

we have some tools and at least we can answer,

10:05

if not every question, about

10:08

ourselves much more than most people

10:10

would think. He knew at the time

10:12

we were still going to church, but we

10:14

got along fabulously well. Actually

10:16

Christophe's views were not quite as

10:18

reductionist as Crick assumed. We sort of

10:21

had this mental mentee, father-son relationship.

10:23

We got up famously well and we

10:25

decided sort of the implicit understanding

10:27

is not to go there. So

10:30

you can kind of agree to disagree. Yes. But

10:32

you said that as you became a

10:35

scientist, as you learned about the way

10:37

the brain works, the way consciousness works,

10:39

that essentially your old faith, your old

10:41

beliefs just didn't hold up. Yeah,

10:44

I don't think you need a supernatural

10:46

explanation in the sense an explanation that's

10:48

outside space and time,

10:50

like the conventional conceit of God.

10:54

I grew up with the idea of a

10:56

soul, that's a soul and the real Christophe

10:58

is the soul and once Christophe's body dies,

11:00

then the soul is going to be resurrected

11:02

in the Ash-O-Tone at the end of time.

11:04

Well, that doesn't really make any sense where

11:06

the souls were, where they were before. It's

11:08

only a finite number of souls. How does

11:10

the soul actually communicate with the body? How

11:12

does my soul make me do something or not

11:14

do something? None of that really coheres.

11:17

And so we don't think, I mean, scientists today, if

11:19

you think about consciousness, you don't think in those terms

11:21

anymore. Francis

11:32

Crick's reductionist views have shaped the

11:34

field of consciousness for the past

11:36

four decades. It's probably what

11:38

most neuroscientists believe today. In

11:41

fact, there's a mantra I've often heard. The

11:43

mind is what the brain does. And

11:46

for the scientists to study psychedelics, that

11:48

tends to be the starting point. And

11:50

yet, psychedelics are

11:52

famous precisely for conjuring up more

11:55

expansive views of consciousness, what

11:57

all the talk's like, of mind at large. Carl

12:00

Jung called cosmic consciousness. I

12:03

mean, you might be able to map the brain

12:05

activity during a psychedelic trap, but

12:07

does that really explain someone's mind-blowing

12:09

experience? It's a question

12:11

Christophe Koch wanted to understand, and

12:14

he knew the only way to do it was

12:17

to go tripping himself. I

12:20

know that you've used psilocybin.

12:22

I know you've used 5MeoDMT,

12:25

coded venom, or probably the synthetic version

12:27

of that. I'd love

12:29

to have you talk about your experiences

12:32

with each of those. I mean, psilocybin,

12:35

what happened when you had that? It's

12:38

a magical experience. In

12:40

both cases, I was outside in

12:42

nature. You

12:47

have this remarkable confirmation. It takes some

12:49

time, one or two hours, and then

12:51

suddenly, the

12:55

world just looks fundamentally different. Ah.

13:03

There's still a tree there, but the tree now

13:05

is, its colors

13:07

are enhanced, the motion is enhanced, you see

13:09

these motion trails, et cetera, but

13:12

everything is so much suffused with a

13:14

sense of connectedness, with

13:16

a sense of beauty, with a

13:19

sense of meaningfulness. Ah. You

13:23

can get totally lost, your attention, focus that

13:25

usually constantly shifts around, goes to your iPhone,

13:28

my site with my boss, and the thing I

13:30

had with my wife, and all of that. All

13:32

of that is gone. Your

13:34

sort of ego doesn't dissolve, but is greatly

13:36

reduced, so it's certainly an ego reduction, and

13:39

you're just focused on the outward world, and

13:41

you discover, or you rediscover, the

13:43

deep beauty of it. Particular

13:46

sort of organic, fractal patterns.

13:50

Blades of grass, the canopy of

13:52

the tree, I was, there was a

13:54

bench with moss, and it was moving about, and

13:56

it was just the most beautiful thing, and

13:58

it became totally overwhelming. by the beauty of

14:01

it. You

14:03

cry but you cry out of joy. You can

14:05

hear sort of the heartbeat of

14:08

the universe. You can actually hear it. You can actually listen

14:10

to it. It's right there. Boom,

14:13

boom, boom, boom. It's the most amazing thing

14:15

ever and the world is just transformed. It's

14:18

one of the most meaningful experiences I've ever had in

14:20

my life. So

14:25

this is the psilocybin experience you're talking about?

14:28

Yeah. So then, I think more

14:30

recently, you've tried 5Meo

14:33

DMT, this very powerful,

14:35

fast-acting psychedelic.

14:38

What happened there? That's

14:41

very different. In

14:44

a sense, I'm grateful I had this experience but

14:47

it's totally terrifying. I

14:57

had this remarkable experience. Some

15:00

people call it the non-dual experience. So I ended up

15:03

in this space. There

15:05

was a bright light of a warming

15:08

blue intensity and I don't know whether

15:12

space had disappeared, collapsed, sort of like

15:14

in a singularity. I couldn't

15:18

look away because there was no away. There

15:20

was no left, right. There was no up,

15:22

down. There was just this point

15:24

of unbearable lightness. There

15:26

was no ego. There was no

15:28

memory. There was

15:31

no Kristoff. There was no dreams. There was

15:33

no fear. There was no desire. There

15:36

simply was no I. I was

15:38

gone. I

15:42

was sitting there with eyes, you know, lotus feet, with eyes wide

15:45

open, being totally blind,

15:47

not seeing anything, not feeling anything, not

15:49

hearing anything. And

15:51

then the other thing, so there was a bright

15:54

light of a warming intensity, there was terror and

15:57

there was ecstasy. There Were three things.

16:00

I'd like tell Em Ecstasy. And

16:02

if you think about it, if you

16:04

go back and read fuck some of

16:06

the knowing cloud some of the mystical

16:08

literature when you think of what the

16:10

word awful full of off, when you're

16:13

supposed the in the presence of something

16:15

overwhelming you're full of off but all

16:17

itself is his combination of Tell I

16:19

and an. Ecstasy to

16:21

very strange thing. I

16:27

like it's last. There

16:30

was no time. It wasn't to

16:32

shock, it wasn't too long, wasn't it

16:34

off of was the first and scan

16:36

about how long as it can last

16:38

know that there was no time for

16:40

that sense. Time had come to start.

16:42

Complete stop so as know space, no

16:44

time know well nobody was just pure

16:46

consciousness. No

16:49

object of leave home and outside

16:51

point of view because I put

16:53

on this beautiful music by this

16:55

Estonian composer. am opt out spiegel

16:57

Him Speeder and this last awfully

16:59

nine minutes and the first thing

17:01

I realized about the external world.

17:04

I heard the ending of that caught. And.

17:14

How long does that lasted Eight and a

17:16

half minutes Weight this whole this whole experience

17:18

objective late was eight and have me from

17:20

the outside bothered with yes and then you

17:22

very quickly you know within five minutes at

17:24

me of cause you're completely confused I said

17:26

what I did I stripped naked I don't

17:29

I had a desire to get fed of

17:31

all my clothes I cried you know you

17:33

going to fetus position and cause it's so

17:35

you know. You've. Just Die is

17:37

psychologically speaking. I know you'll v bond you're

17:39

giving back to the host of her

17:41

living. So it's you. Know it's there are

17:43

two tabs you profoundly. In fact, that isn't

17:46

a single day. I don't think about this

17:48

experience which you strip naked, just stripped of

17:50

all your clothes. A. Yacht mean

17:53

after i came so because the first

17:55

you completely confused yeah I'm even not

17:57

use now contests coming back you realize.

18:00

There. Is an external world present? Yeah. And

18:02

then somehow it was oppressing me so I

18:04

just slipped off with and twenty second my

18:06

tie close into Solas lies and then you

18:08

know you're going to see to isn't you

18:11

cry And you tried. Oh it's it. You

18:13

try to reconnect. I'm I'm as indeed. Someone.

18:15

Gave me something to eat because he says

18:17

this is good, this helps you center does

18:19

to eat something conceal the taste of it

18:21

it's. Would.

18:24

You wanna do this again? No. No,

18:27

I. Mean it as it's a

18:29

it's a near death experience. It's totally

18:31

terrifying and sometimes I'm glad I did

18:33

it because it's an experience. Sets of

18:35

coffee near death experiences pretty I don't.

18:37

typically happens on the battlefield are operating

18:39

table when people us about to suffocate

18:42

a down or something. Yeah.

18:44

It's it's not something you wanna

18:46

experience again now. Do.

18:48

You feel like you came to some

18:50

new understanding of what tests means or

18:52

how you might sort of approach deaths

18:55

in a teacher. A totally

18:57

lost my fear of death. Which. Was

18:59

never suitably pronounced. Yeah. Nine, I'm gonna die

19:01

And I'm gonna. I don't wanna die at

19:04

I'd Now I've when expense life but once

19:06

it will happen. Jordan. That's. Okay,

19:09

So. When it come back to where

19:11

we started by talking about your your

19:13

religious upbringing, the search for the divide

19:15

among you. Wanted to see the burning

19:17

bush which never happened earlier. Is this

19:19

a burning bush Bill and I know

19:22

it's more like a naked singularity and

19:24

the burning. Of course there was no

19:26

booming voice so I did not have

19:28

what some people have a nice when

19:30

a minute see Jesus. Oh on the

19:32

experience. Whatever their religious upbringing is, I

19:35

did not have that. Your whole life

19:37

you've been yearning for. Something.

19:39

Larger, larger, meaning, some sense of the order.

19:41

The universe did any that come through for

19:43

you. Know what?

19:45

I guess what? What you realize it's

19:48

of it comes time says is in

19:50

his Tuck Taco logo. Philosophical said: once

19:52

you understand the meaning of life, you

19:54

don't talk about it anymore. Because.

19:57

you will understand the meaning of

19:59

life in living life, that is

20:01

the meaning of life. There's

20:11

a reason we call experiences like

20:14

these, mind-blowing. They're outside our normal

20:16

understanding of how the mind works.

20:19

You could say, yeah, this is just

20:21

what the brain does when you ingest

20:23

a psychedelic molecule, to get strange sensations

20:25

and all kinds of wonderful and terrifying

20:27

visions. But for a

20:29

scientist like Christoph Koch, this isn't just

20:31

mental theory. It's

20:34

evidence. Coming

20:37

back to your work as a scientist, then, you've

20:39

been studying consciousness, basically your

20:41

whole professional life, trying to understand the

20:43

science of this. Does

20:46

that change anything about how you understand consciousness

20:48

or how the brain works or anything like

20:50

that? Well,

20:52

so once again reaffirms the primacy

20:54

of consciousness, because in that

20:56

space there was no world, there were no object,

20:58

there wasn't even a body. There was nothing except

21:01

for consciousness. So you have to start with consciousness,

21:03

which is very different from the conventional point of

21:05

view, which is also different from the way I

21:07

used to start, for example, with my work from

21:09

Francis Crick. You assume there's a brain. You

21:12

start with physics or biology or neuroscience. And

21:14

then you point at some feature of the

21:16

brain, 40 hertz or this part of the

21:18

brain or those neurons. You say, well, those

21:20

are the ones that are involved in consciousness.

21:23

Then, of course, you get to this hard

21:25

problem. Why these neurons are not those? Why

21:27

40 hertz oscillation or 30 hertz oscillation? But

21:29

here, once again, this reaffirms the point of view. You've got

21:32

to start with consciousness. Okay, so I'm trying to come back

21:34

to sort of how... What can

21:36

we learn about this from... Well, I

21:38

mean, are you... I mean, of course,

21:40

the standard neuroscience model is the brain

21:43

generates consciousness. Fireworks

21:45

in the brain, that's what creates this

21:47

conscious experience. Are you saying that's

21:49

not what you believe anymore? No.

21:52

I mean, are you slightly different language? Because

21:54

I've learned to be careful. The brain, of

21:56

course, is a physical substrate of consciousness. And

21:59

what this... drug did. It went to

22:01

various receptors such as these famous serotonin

22:04

2A receptor and then it did

22:06

something that we have right now

22:08

absolutely no understanding of. For

22:11

MIMO striking, you have this radical experience

22:13

like I had which is not uncommon

22:16

under this 5-MUR and DMT also called

22:18

the TODE. So you expect some radical

22:20

change in the underlying neural basis which

22:23

so far we haven't quite seen. So

22:26

we're trying to still come

22:28

to grips with this given this radical

22:30

change in your perspective during some of these psychoactive

22:33

substances, you would expect an equally

22:35

radical change at the level of

22:37

the brain. So it sounds like

22:39

you're saying, correct me if I'm wrong here, that clearly

22:42

there is efficacy in psychedelics, psilocybin

22:44

say, to treat depression. There are

22:46

lots of clinical trials that suggest

22:49

that we still don't really

22:51

know why. That's entirely correct. But of

22:53

course, we also still don't know why lots

22:55

of other things like deep brain stimulation. Even

22:57

Parkinson's, one of them, it's a very popular

23:00

technique you put in these stimulators in your

23:02

brain, you know, it's a serious brain surgery

23:04

operation and they seem to

23:06

relieve the trauma. Why does it work?

23:09

There are also some hypotheses but we

23:11

don't know. So typically if you look

23:13

at medical history, therapy almost always comes

23:15

before a detailed understanding of why this

23:18

actually works. That's why I'm so excited

23:20

about mRNA, vaccines, etc. because that is

23:22

based on a rational mechanistic causal understanding

23:25

of molecular biology. We're very far away

23:27

of that in the brain because the

23:29

brain is the most complex piece of

23:31

active matter in the known universe. So

23:34

it's going to take us a while to get to that

23:36

level of understanding. That's

23:46

Christoph Paulson, the pioneering neuroscientist at

23:48

the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

23:56

I'm Steve Paulson. And I'm Anne Strangamps.

24:00

up an unlikely origin story

24:02

of psychedelic research, not in a

24:04

lab, but an ancient Tudor manor

24:06

on the edge of an English

24:08

fen where the daughter of

24:10

an eccentric British aristocratic family grew up

24:13

and later jump-started research into altered states

24:15

of mind. Amanda

24:17

Fielding is in her 80s now. We'll

24:20

have her story next. On to

24:22

the best of our knowledge from Wisconsin Public Radio

24:26

and PRX. If

24:32

you want to get a sense

24:34

of the current state of research into

24:36

psychedelics, one of the big international conferences is a good place

24:38

to begin. It's

24:49

2022 and I'm in Harlem just

24:51

outside Amsterdam at one of the

24:54

major European conferences on psychedelics. 1,100

25:01

people are packed in here waiting to hear from

25:03

some of the key players in the field. When

25:20

histories of the modern psychedelic renaissance are

25:22

written years from now, Amanda

25:24

Fielding will be one of the more colorful

25:27

characters. She's

25:32

what you might call the godmother of

25:34

the European psychedelic renaissance. An

25:46

eccentric British aristocrat with a

25:48

rich history of self-experimentation, it

25:50

was Amanda Fielding who helped keep psychedelic research

25:53

alive during the long years when it was

25:55

banned. I've

25:57

been into psychedelics for a very long time.

26:00

long time. I was introduced

26:02

to them in 1965 and then in 1966 I

26:04

met a Dutch scientist of exceptional

26:12

insight and we

26:15

became close friends, lovers and

26:17

worked together for the next 30 or

26:20

so years. And

26:23

so actually what we did with

26:25

ILSD, there was whatever the stones or

26:27

the Beatles paying in Hyde Park which

26:29

was half a mile away and we

26:31

were there doing our studies in psychedelics

26:35

and different levels of consciousness and

26:37

that was just so exciting. What

26:40

was it that made you decide that this

26:42

is what you wanted to do with your

26:44

life, to study psychedelics? Well I

26:47

suppose my background was

26:50

very formative. I

26:52

grew up on the edge of a mall

26:55

in an old Tudor hunting

26:57

lodge surrounded by three moats.

26:59

Three moats and three towers.

27:02

Ancient, beautiful but totally isolated.

27:05

So I moved

27:07

around as a child with no one

27:09

to play with. Except for her family's

27:11

friends. My father's family were close friends

27:13

of William James and

27:15

all the suxie used to visit

27:17

my grandmother and stay

27:19

talking all night. Wow.

27:23

It was, she says, a perfect

27:25

atmosphere for developing an interest in

27:27

mysticism. Because as a child in

27:30

a very beautiful setting, nothing

27:33

much to do but dream about a future,

27:36

I had lots of mystical experiences as most

27:38

children do. When you say, I'm just curious about

27:40

what kind of mystical experiences did you have when you

27:42

were a child? Well there

27:44

was a part of the garden which was

27:47

a mound with the moat surrounding it,

27:49

a very secretive part. And then my

27:51

childhood fantasy, I think I was probably about

27:53

five, six, seven, this

27:56

god figure lived. And

27:58

I used to have kind of mystical

28:00

experiences with him. I

28:03

think a lot of children slip in and

28:05

out of mystical-like experiences

28:07

much more easily than we

28:09

think. And

28:11

I was always fascinated by the mystical

28:13

experience. It was always my passion. At

28:20

16, that passion led her to set out

28:22

on a journey to Ceylon, now Sri Lanka,

28:24

where her godfather was a Buddhist monk. She

28:27

hitchhiked as far as the Syrian border and

28:30

spent time living with Bedouin. Then

28:32

back in the UK, she studied

28:34

classical Arabic, comparative religion, mysticism, and

28:37

she discovered drugs. Then

28:40

at 16, I was introduced to cannabis. I

28:43

thought, this is amazing. And then at

28:45

22, I

28:47

was introduced to LSD. And I

28:50

thought, well, this is absolutely amazing, because

28:52

it kind of creates the ground from

28:54

which you can more easily have

28:57

a mystic experience, but it's not a way

28:59

of life, I felt. In

29:03

the 1970s, Amanda Fielding became

29:06

briefly famous, or infamous, for

29:08

her interest in trepanation. That's

29:11

the ancient practice of drilling a hole

29:13

in the skull in the hope of

29:15

inducing a higher state of consciousness, which

29:18

she did on herself. Now I just

29:20

have to clean up and wait and

29:22

see what happens. But then electric dental

29:24

drill while filming the entire process. Making

29:26

the film of a sort of mantra to

29:29

detach myself from the natural reluctance

29:31

I felt. But her real

29:33

lasting interest has always been the science

29:35

of psychedelics. I

29:38

mean, I realized the

29:40

benefits of psychedelics in 1966.

29:43

And that's when I decided I'd devote my

29:45

life to understanding

29:49

their underlying mechanism so that we

29:51

can use them as

29:53

useful tools. So

29:56

prohibition, which one saw closing in

29:58

on one, was... obviously,

30:01

a disastrous mistake which was

30:03

doomed to complete failure and

30:05

immense human suffering. So

30:09

I saw the end of the 60s

30:11

as the only way really out of

30:13

the taboo to overcome the taboo was

30:16

undertaking the very best scientific

30:18

research to demonstrate the advantages

30:21

they had. For those years

30:23

during prohibition, you must have

30:25

felt like this lone voice in the wilderness. No

30:28

one wanted to do these studies. No one wanted to

30:30

pay for the study. And the danger is your children,

30:32

because then I had two children. Parents

30:37

wouldn't necessarily want their children to

30:39

play with people, etc., etc.

30:41

And bank managers wouldn't give you an

30:43

overdraft. One was considered a weirder

30:47

and maybe a dangerous weirder.

30:49

And the Daily Mail later called

30:52

me Lady Mindbender and things like

30:54

that, which I wasn't at all. When

30:59

did that change for you? Very

31:02

slowly. I was

31:04

compelled to follow this because

31:07

I felt it was true. To

31:09

begin with, I tried to do it through

31:12

finding scientists and doctors to work with

31:14

for 30 years. It's a long time,

31:16

from 66 to 96.

31:19

I did it

31:21

trying to influence influences or

31:23

do research with scientists or do

31:26

it through artworks because I was

31:29

an artist. And then I thought

31:32

as a conceptual artwork,

31:35

I need to become a foundation because

31:37

this is a single female without

31:40

letters after my name. How

31:43

can I train global blood policy and

31:45

open the doors to psychedelic research? But

31:48

suddenly I got the idea, well, if I become a

31:50

foundation, which in England is relatively easy,

31:52

equals a thousand pounds. And

31:55

I liked the word foundation. I didn't

31:57

know you were meant to have money if you were

31:59

a foundation. I became a

32:01

foundation. I

32:12

did a job. I dreamed of the

32:15

root of the dead. The

32:18

root of the dead is the

32:20

short break. Thank

32:22

you. This

32:30

means Amanda Fielding. It's worth reading that

32:32

the psychedelic renaissance is usually told as

32:35

an American story, revolving around

32:37

people like Gordon Lawson and Timothy

32:39

Leary, and more recently Roland Griffiths.

32:42

But some of the pioneering research has also been

32:44

done in the UK, and a

32:46

lot of it funded by Amanda Fielding's foundation.

32:49

For example, one of her scientific collaborators is

32:51

another guy at this conference, David

32:54

Nunt. I mean, I'm a

32:56

piece of the story, but the beginning of the

32:58

new science and I can't stand the writing

33:00

of people I've worked with, James. David

33:02

Nunt is the neuropsychopharmacologist who led

33:05

the Center for Psychedelic Research at

33:07

Imperial College, London. He

33:09

sees his work as part of a long lineage of

33:11

scientists who've studied psychoactive substances. Thank

33:13

you, sir. Thank you, ma'am. Thank

33:15

you, sir. Thank you, ma'am. Thank

33:17

you, sir. Thank you, sir.

33:20

Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. Thank

33:22

you, sir. Thank you, sir. In

33:25

2009, Nunt created an uproar when he

33:27

told an interviewer that LSD and ecstasy

33:29

are less dangerous than alcohol. If you

33:31

tell them that ecstasy is a class

33:33

A delivery harmful when everyone knows

33:35

it isn't, then why should you

33:38

trust the government on anything? Not

33:40

surprisingly, that got him fired from his

33:42

post as the British government's chief drug advisor.

33:45

But it gives you a sense of his commitment to this

33:47

research. So

33:52

I use drugs to explore brain function, and

33:55

I've probably given more different kinds of drugs

33:57

to human beings and anyone alive. And

34:00

there's a class of drug that is used either

34:02

legally or illegally that I haven't studied in humans.

34:05

We started off, and this

34:07

was Amanda's theory that psychedelics would increase brain

34:09

blood flow. And the first

34:11

study we did showed that they didn't think that they

34:13

decreased blood flow, but in one or two specific reasons

34:15

in the brain, which we now know to be part

34:18

of the default blood network. And it was

34:20

completely paradoxical. How could people

34:23

have these wonderful visions, have these experiences

34:25

of floating out of the

34:27

scanner, going to another dimension, going to God?

34:30

How could that happen without the brain being turned on? In

34:33

fact, we were so bemused by that first result

34:35

that we repeated the whole thing, got exactly

34:37

the same results, and then realized we'd

34:40

actually discovered something really important that these drugs don't turn

34:42

on the brain. They actually turn off the brain. But

34:44

they turn off the parts of the brain which keep

34:47

the brain doing what it's always done. And you turn those bits

34:49

of the brain off, the brain can do it. It

34:51

can run free. It can do its own thing. Just

34:53

like taking a conductor away from an orchestra or

34:55

taking a school teacher away from a class

34:58

of kids. And they all do their own thing.

35:00

And from that, some

35:02

interesting observations emerged. You're basically saying you're

35:05

shutting off certain parts of the brain so

35:07

you can access other parts. Yeah,

35:09

you're switching off the control centers of the

35:11

brain so that the brain can do other

35:13

things because the brain is an extremely efficient

35:16

organ. It's 10 times more efficient than any

35:18

known computer. And

35:21

that efficiency comes at a cost. It comes at the cost

35:23

of actually being

35:25

repetitive rather than flexible. And

35:27

what psychedelics do is they break down the processes

35:29

that keep you doing the same thing, thinking the

35:32

same things, and allow connections to

35:34

be made that haven't been allowed since you

35:36

were a baby, really. And

35:38

those connections allow you to see things

35:40

that you've forgotten and to come up with

35:42

solutions to problems that you've not been able to solve and

35:45

think differently about yourself and your life and

35:47

your family. Because it

35:49

turns out when you use them in people with

35:51

depression, people can come out with a different perspective

35:54

on their past and a new way

35:56

of thinking about the future, which is much more positive than it

35:58

used to be. Wonder drugs is

36:00

what you're describing here. I mean, is that fair

36:02

to say? I think the

36:05

use of psilocybin in resistant depression is a

36:07

wonder. I mean, our study showed that

36:09

a single dose of psilocybin is the most

36:12

powerful beneficial effect

36:14

in resistant depression of any treatment that's

36:16

ever been given. Certainly a single dose

36:18

is equivalent to three or four weeks of

36:20

easy to ease over. It is truly

36:22

wonderful, the impact that these

36:24

drugs can have, particularly on people who failed on

36:27

more conventional treatments. So

36:32

it seems like there's some big mysteries as to why psilocybin is so

36:34

effective. Therapeutically, I mean,

36:36

is it changing the brain in

36:39

some way, rewiring? Is it the

36:41

experience, this remarkable experience that then

36:43

people reflect on and somehow it

36:46

changes them? Yeah,

36:50

I think all of the way above. If you're

36:52

at the press conference,

36:56

who's been locked in a set of ruminations

36:58

about your worthlessness and your hopelessness, and

37:01

there's no hope for the future, a

37:03

trip that can show you your brain can change

37:05

in itself can be empowering because you realize

37:07

you are capable of change. That's the

37:09

first thing. But I think there's more to it than that. I

37:12

think for some people, they do get to understand why they're depressed.

37:16

One of the things we're beginning to get clearer is that there's a

37:18

lot of things that are going on in the world. Why

37:21

they're depressed? One of the things

37:23

we're beginning to get clearer is that a

37:25

lot of depressive thinking is about trying

37:28

to stop you dealing with the event.

37:31

It's kind of filling your mind so you

37:33

don't have to confront the problem. You've been abused by

37:35

your father, but you don't want to confront that. So

37:38

you keep thinking about yourself as being a bad person.

37:41

And you know, vividly remember one of our

37:43

patients who said during his trip, he suddenly

37:45

realized why he was depressed because he saw

37:47

his father abusing him, and

37:50

it all made sense. Why would

37:52

the trip kick in that

37:54

memory or that realization? Because

37:57

he has been suppressing that and repressing it.

38:00

you cannot push things back under a psychedelic, because

38:02

the bits of the brain which do the pushing

38:04

back are not working so well.

38:06

So you can access thoughts,

38:08

memories, facts that

38:11

you couldn't access. So

38:13

those kind of insights as to why people at the

38:15

press can be really useful in helping people move on,

38:17

because they can get closure. Can

38:20

you put the current psychedelic renaissance

38:22

in some historical perspective? I mean,

38:25

how does this compare to what we had in the

38:27

60s? I mean, are we on

38:29

the brink of a psychedelic revolution here? No, I think we

38:31

are on the brink of a revolution in terms of therapy.

38:33

This is the biggest innovation.

38:36

It is the most important new

38:40

wave of therapy in psychiatry in the

38:42

last 50 years. Until

38:44

now, everything we've done has been using

38:46

drugs, which are modifications of drugs which

38:48

are discovered in the 50s. So

38:51

it's hugely important for psychiatry. And

38:53

it's even more important now than most

38:56

people might hope for, because most

38:58

traditional pharmaceutical companies have given up on the

39:00

brain. They taste too hard to find new

39:02

treatments. So it's exciting that

39:04

there is help for patients who are getting

39:06

better from traditional medicine. That's up to about

39:09

a third of patients. But of

39:11

course, the sciences move on enormously. And

39:14

science is gonna understand autoconsistence. I

39:17

don't think you can understand autoconsistence without

39:19

psychedelics. So that's a whole new

39:21

dimension of what psychedelics are bringing, not just a third,

39:23

you see, but a country of physicists. That's

39:28

David Nutt, Professor of Neuropsychopharmacology at

39:31

Imperial College London and

39:33

President of the European Brain Council.

39:42

So we've heard from some of the pioneers who

39:45

helped launch the psychedelic renaissance. But if

39:47

you noticed, we began with a question that

39:49

we still haven't answered. For

39:51

all the reasons we've been talking about, we

39:53

began with a question that we still haven't answered. For

39:56

all the research, all the therapeutic promise,

40:00

exactly happens in the

40:02

brain when it's tripping. In

40:04

a minute, British researcher Robin Carr-Harderas

40:06

explains his theory of the entropic

40:08

brain. You're listening to

40:11

Luminous, our series on the history and

40:13

philosophy of psychedelics. I'm Steve

40:15

Paulson. And I'm Anne Strain-Champs. You'll

40:18

find more interviews in our Luminous podcast

40:20

feed and on our website at

40:24

ttbook.org-luminous. And

40:26

that's for the best of our knowledge from Wisconsin

40:29

Public Radio and

40:31

PRX. We

40:36

asked a question at the beginning of this hour. Can

40:39

neuroscience explain what happens in a

40:42

psychedelic experience? I

40:44

mean, if you could somehow peel back

40:47

the skull and look at someone's brain

40:49

while they're on acid or mushrooms, could

40:52

you watch the trip happening in real time? The

40:55

answer is yes. That's

40:59

what British neuroscientist Robin Carr-Harderas has been doing

41:01

for the past 15 years. He

41:04

got into psychedelic science after meeting Amanda

41:06

Fielding, who introduced him to David Knott

41:09

at Imperial College London. And

41:11

since then, Robin has done pioneering

41:13

studies of psilocybin using brain imaging,

41:16

which is pretty remarkable when you think about it.

41:20

I'm just trying to imagine your test

41:22

subjects in an fMRI machine. I

41:25

mean, you have to be absolutely still, and

41:27

they're having this mind-blowing experience as you are

41:29

looking at what's happening in their brain while

41:31

all this is going on. Sounds

41:33

crazy. Well, it

41:36

does. But it can be quite a

41:38

thrill. And you know, we're safeguarding against

41:40

anyone freaking out, having their first psychedelic

41:42

experience and then having it in such

41:45

a... A

41:47

confined environment. Yeah, yeah. And

41:49

so it worked. So

41:51

were there any big surprises as

41:53

you started looking at this brain

41:56

imaging? Yes, Because

41:58

there wasn't much to go on at that time. Hi

42:00

that been some early positron emission

42:02

tomography another son see term pet

42:04

imaging but not much and the

42:06

message with Hannah crude so he

42:08

would seem checked in our psilocybin.

42:11

with the scanner running we would

42:13

look subsequently look at takes in

42:15

the brain blood flow and see

42:17

that it was dropping was dropping

42:19

whose trust and some other was

42:21

actually reduced brain activity. that was

42:23

reduce brain blood flow because it

42:26

isn't quite the ones who on

42:28

relationship between blood flow and brain

42:30

activity. I know it sounds like

42:32

to add detail but it's not

42:34

really a minor one. it's had

42:36

sick quite important. And so

42:38

is one way to think about.

42:40

This is the way our prefrontal cortex

42:43

works. Extent of it acts like a

42:45

filter in a way, so it's

42:47

blocks out certain things that we might

42:49

otherwise sense from our unconscious and others.

42:52

this phrase, the executive function. For

42:54

taxes what allows us to move around

42:56

the world and sort of acts out

42:59

and I guess the question is what

43:01

happens when that system is not know.

43:04

It's not, it's Holly knocked out,

43:06

but it is this regulated so

43:08

the scrambled in it's functioning. It

43:10

is reasonable. What You say that

43:12

this is. The. Locus of

43:14

this is cortex and it's high

43:16

level cortex in the prefrontal cortex

43:18

is typically a part of the

43:21

brain that we think of is

43:23

massively expanded. In humans, people has

43:26

a certain clarity. A vision under

43:28

psychedelic is sort of suggests that

43:30

may be siemenses over shots. And.

43:33

we did to Moss analytical thinking

43:35

and if he just relax that.

43:38

There. Can be this

43:40

broader clearer season. So.

43:42

You've come up with this theory.

43:44

What you call the and tropic

43:47

brain that psychedelic so sort of

43:49

activates this tendency towards I guess

43:51

what you call less regulation, more

43:53

disorder? Is it fair to set

43:55

yet? Psychedelic. seemed

43:57

see increase the already.

44:00

Very complex quality of

44:02

brain activity. During normal

44:04

weight and consciousness, they

44:06

lifted up and say

44:09

another synonym for entropy.

44:11

These are all synonyms:

44:13

complexity, diversity, richness, even

44:16

his information. More information,

44:18

More information. Which. Is

44:20

fascinating because you would think that again.

44:22

going back to the cortex. You think

44:25

that this very analytical part of the

44:27

brain that that's the information processing partners

44:29

are saying actually may be that keeps

44:31

out. And from Asia. Is.

44:34

Sort of suggests that. Although.

44:36

Our information processing during

44:38

normal waking consciousness seems

44:40

very impressive than are

44:42

analytical skills or impresses.

44:45

There. Can be a sort of.

44:47

Compression. As other aspects

44:49

of information held within the

44:51

system things like memory emotion.

44:54

I'm referring to these things

44:56

because these are the things

44:58

that seem see a rise

45:00

in the much under under

45:02

a psychedelic that people have

45:04

insights. Emotion when sites Person

45:07

when sites. Remember.

45:09

things sometimes very remote and

45:11

then shouted. You've. Described as

45:13

as a reset like the brain gets

45:15

jumbled up, it's knocked out of it's

45:18

all way of thinking and it's i

45:20

don't know new neural pathways or or

45:22

or end up. Does. Pretty

45:24

good evidence for that Now

45:26

concrete evidence in terms of

45:29

anatomy of the sprouting as

45:31

new components as neuro, no

45:33

communication, fire, exposure to psychedelics

45:35

something refer to sum up

45:37

the genesis. Is the brain

45:40

actually getting rewired than. Yes,

45:42

it is likely is at

45:44

least as an opportunity for

45:46

rewiring. And there is this

45:48

paradox around plasticity that in

45:50

and of itself it's not

45:52

necessarily a good thing. you

45:55

could use that window of

45:57

malleability or plasticity for sort

45:59

of. Ethically questionable ends

46:01

we could think of things

46:04

like the history of military

46:06

uses, psychedelic surround things like

46:09

mind control. But in psychedelic

46:11

therapy it's about opening of

46:14

creating this openness, this opportunity

46:16

for realize a sin self

46:19

realization done in a very

46:21

nurturing context. So there's some

46:24

fascinating evolutionary questions here. Me

46:26

one is just why would.

46:29

The. Human brain even respond

46:31

to psychedelic substances. let's

46:34

say, mushrooms place with

46:36

psilocybin. We find nature.

46:39

Them. In studies coevolved the human brain

46:41

with mushrooms with this is an accident

46:43

that are ancient ancestors happened to eat

46:45

these and they had these remarkable experiences

46:47

and in you think about that can

46:50

thank you. I do a bit and

46:52

there are theories about sits. Terence Mckenna

46:54

my same asleep had the Circles Stone

46:56

Dates Theory of Consciousness in the Evolution

46:59

of Consciousness This talk about that her

47:01

mom I mean his theory was that.

47:04

Actually consuming mushrooms and maybe

47:06

some other psychedelic substances that

47:08

essentially. Jump. Started human consciousness

47:10

yeah, modern him and then it's

47:13

a it's a fascinating idea. Really

47:15

exciting, spine chilling. Yet.

47:17

Some I'm not sold as I

47:19

just think that it's a bit

47:22

see psychedelic centric, even though it's

47:24

appealing and kind of fun. I

47:26

think probably what's more common is

47:28

the Earth was in a particular

47:31

climactic sort of state or or

47:33

mode. That was hard and it

47:35

required some serious. Ability

47:37

to deal with this hardship. In.

47:39

A thoughtful and fall seeing in

47:42

pubs inventive way. And it was

47:44

days early human see managed to

47:46

ride that period of high stress

47:48

and challenge that have survived. and

47:50

maybe they were the ones. he

47:53

had a bit more of the

47:55

serotonin to a or A services.

47:58

which is what psychedelic Exactly,

48:01

yeah. We know that with a

48:03

high degree of confidence now that these particular

48:06

receptors that kind of locks

48:08

that sit on neurons, brain

48:11

cells, and then the key comes

48:13

in which could be serotonin, an important

48:15

brain chemical, or it could be a

48:17

drug that hijacks and mimics

48:19

serotonin and works in the same

48:22

way as a key. And that's what psychedelics

48:24

seem to do. They're a kind of magic

48:26

in the broad sense key that comes in

48:28

and turns the lock. Why

48:31

are psychedelics so powerful?

48:34

Why can one trip literally

48:37

change someone's life? So to

48:39

answer that, I would feel again to

48:41

the serotonin system and these magic locks,

48:43

the 2A receptors. I

48:45

think that they're special receptors. Humans

48:48

have a lot of them. They

48:51

are disproportionately expressed

48:53

in cortex that humans have so much

48:56

of. And these 2A receptors

48:58

are especially prevalent at the highest level

49:00

of the already

49:02

high level aspect of brain, the cortex.

49:05

And so they're in these

49:08

regions of brain associated with

49:10

consciousness and species specific functions

49:12

like self-reflection, self-consciousness.

49:16

Why are they there is a really crucial

49:18

question and that can help us understand why

49:20

psychedelics are so profound in their action. And

49:23

my feeling is that they're there

49:25

for profundity in a sense. They're

49:27

there for fundamental shifts in

49:30

perspective. And it's only really with

49:32

fundamental shifts in perspective that you

49:35

can have fundamental shifts in behavior.

49:38

I think that's why they're there. That's

49:48

neuroscientist Robin Carhartt Harris,

49:50

previously At Imperial College London

49:52

and now director of the Psychedelics

49:54

Division at UC San Francisco. So.

50:03

After I'd done all these interviews, I thought

50:05

I had a pretty good sense of the

50:07

latest, thinking about the narrow sides of Psychedelic

50:09

Six. And then I started looking into the

50:12

work of Gould Dolan under a scientist at

50:14

Johns Hopkins University and it turns out she

50:16

has a very different idea of how psychedelic

50:19

change the brain. I

50:21

don't want it. looks the

50:23

entire Cecile does neuro imaging.

50:26

That you know just to mail it down

50:28

with. The problem is we're. Going

50:30

to a brain region and saying

50:32

oh, the lights up when we

50:35

get psychedelic now we understand that

50:37

this brain region. Where the set

50:39

of brain regions is responsible for

50:41

the psychedelic experience. I think the

50:43

main problem with that is revealed

50:46

if it's any. If we did,

50:48

It take. So. Here's an

50:50

organism that doesn't have a default.

50:53

Mode network. It doesn't have the

50:55

hypothalamus. It doesn't have. An

50:58

image gilad. it doesn't get. Any rain

51:00

region. And yeah, when you

51:02

give them and be a

51:05

me, it produces the same

51:07

prosocial behaviors. As when

51:09

you give it to a human rights

51:12

and says. What? That's telling

51:14

her is is that there

51:16

is a serotonin transporter. In

51:18

an Octopus brain And that

51:20

Sarah Times function. As a

51:22

in kotor of Sociology is so

51:24

old that even though our last

51:27

common ancestor with an octopus was

51:29

like six hundred and fifty million

51:32

years ago, right like we are

51:34

more closely related to a starfish.

51:37

Me: I to an octopus

51:39

and guess. Who

51:42

Americans and be A. Psychedelic

51:45

say is that been. Binding sites

51:48

which comes down to the molecular

51:50

level. So

51:52

many questions right? she gave em

51:54

Dia may to an octopus. Listen.

51:56

Octopus and ecstasy. even like the.

51:59

Arms. Well

52:01

you'll have to wait to find out

52:03

because that's in an upcoming episode and

52:05

are purchased. You're

52:12

Listen to Luminous Steve series on the

52:14

Science and Philosophy as second Alex. And

52:17

while we're waiting for the

52:19

lowdown on octopuses, there is

52:21

more online at Tt. Book

52:24

that org/luminous. To

52:26

the best of our knowledge is

52:28

produced in Madison, Wisconsin by Shannon.

52:30

Have three Kleiber Charles Monroe came

52:32

Antelope artist is years. Or

52:34

technical director and sound designer his

52:36

job Hart Kids with help from

52:39

Sarah Hopeful Additional music this weekend's

52:41

from High Angle not term, Psychedelic,

52:43

Pedestrians and Arvo Part additional footage

52:45

courtesy of Idea News and Demand

52:47

to see As and. I'm

52:50

Steve Paulson. And I man strain

52:52

champs.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features