Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Your challenge, if you choose to accept
0:02
it, is this. Let's go, let's go! Show
0:04
up on day one, work out with us for 30
0:07
minutes, feel good right away. Yo! Repeat
0:09
five days a week for three weeks. Three
0:12
weeks?
0:12
Five workouts a week. We're a body, and
0:14
we call that a body block. You pick the block
0:16
and you're gonna love the experience. On week four,
0:19
this part is really important. Take the
0:21
week off. Seriously, we mean it. Rest,
0:25
go on vacation, or try something new.
0:27
Maybe some yoga.
0:29
Notice you're not holding on to any tension
0:31
here. Or a dance class. Get sexy
0:33
with it, daddy. You do you, and then
0:36
start again. Be committed to this process. Choose
0:38
a new body block each month. Get
0:40
a new challenge each month. Have fun
0:42
every day. Avoid burnout. You're not
0:44
gonna quit on yourself today. This is how you reach
0:46
your goals. You in?
0:48
There is nothing that we can't do
0:50
if we work together. Sign up for your first
0:52
body block today. Visit body.com
0:55
for a free trial. That's B-O-D-I
0:57
dot com. Are you ready to get started?
1:00
Thanks for listening to the Town
1:02
Hall Review with Hugh Hewitt podcast, bringing to you
1:04
the best voices on the stories and issues that
1:07
matter. Helping make it all possible
1:09
is the generous partnership with the Pepperdine
1:11
Graduate School of Public Policy. Here's
1:13
another piece I'll trust you enjoy.
1:15
We are joined by none other than Lord
1:17
Conrad Black. Lord Black, welcome
1:19
back to America First. Thank you, Sebastian.
1:22
Let me play for you
1:24
a cut I heard from CNN earlier
1:26
today on my friend's radio show from
1:30
Dana Bash, ensconced
1:32
in the corporate media
1:35
headquarters, talking to one of President
1:37
Trump's lawyers, John Lauro. You've
1:40
written a lengthy piece for the New York
1:42
Sun on the newest indictment
1:45
from Jack Smith. Here is President Trump's
1:47
attorney, or one of them, explaining
1:49
the
1:50
problem with the accusations.
1:52
Cut 13. Like
1:55
what? Like what? Tell
1:57
me, what action? interfere
2:00
with ascertaining Arizona's electors.
2:03
The Justice Department could ask
2:05
him a speech. But
2:07
but any alleging is
2:10
speech. But any alleged any
2:12
alleged almost all alleged criminal
2:14
activity has to do with using
2:16
words and his speech. And that's that's
2:19
what you don't you know what is obviously
2:21
the defense that you're going to use and it will be fascinating
2:23
to see how it works out in a court of law. I
2:25
want to move on to another to another
2:28
issue. No no I got to
2:29
tell you though but but you make an interesting
2:31
point because you're saying that asking
2:34
is action. No asking is aspirational
2:37
asking is not action. It's core free speech.
2:40
The press should be defending free speech
2:42
in this case. Let's talk about something else that
2:44
you have repeatedly said.
2:46
Daina Lash did not
2:48
want to continue discuss Dana Bash
2:50
did not want to continue discussing that point. But how
2:53
perverse is it Lord Black
2:55
as the former head of one of the world's biggest
2:58
media conglomerates. To have
3:00
a host on a national cable
3:02
channel try and argue
3:05
that free speech should be criminalized.
3:09
Well it is it is perverse
3:11
and and it is dangerous. But
3:13
that is the corner that these Trump
3:16
haters have backed themselves into. And
3:18
in fairness to them they've been
3:22
conducted to that position by
3:24
the United States government. And by its
3:27
abuse of the of
3:29
its lawful raison d'etre
3:32
of administering
3:34
and executing the laws fairly.
3:37
Because because the department
3:40
has transmogrified into
3:43
an arm of the dirty tricks division of
3:45
the Democratic National Committee. And
3:48
and they're trying to play upon
3:51
this widespread dislike
3:53
of Trump as a man who's seen by
3:56
many to be boorish and a bully
3:58
and a bad. man who
4:00
took every corner on two
4:03
wheels when he was in the private
4:05
sector, and portray him
4:09
as a monster and virtually a gangster,
4:11
a thug, a person who it is no
4:14
one, it is notorious public
4:16
knowledge that he is a thug
4:19
and a gangster and therefore anything that he does
4:21
is apt to be a crime. So we'll
4:24
just overlook the fact, the inconvenient
4:26
fact that you just mentioned that what
4:28
he is being charged with is indeed a
4:30
legitimate exercise of the constitutionally
4:33
guaranteed right of all Americans to free
4:35
expression. And in addition
4:38
to that, he did have a legitimate
4:40
grievance about the changes
4:42
to the voting and vote counting procedures
4:44
prior to the last presidential election.
4:48
And his counsel who was on
4:50
the air trying to make himself heard, I
4:52
saw when he was being respectfully treated
4:55
by another interviewer on another network, said
4:57
that they were going to re-lithigate the
4:59
entire list
5:02
of their legitimate grievances on
5:04
the 2020 election. People would be summoned
5:06
under criminal subpoena and have to explain
5:09
the consequences of a 40 million
5:12
harvested unverifiable ballots
5:15
in an election where 50,000 votes would flip, Trump
5:18
would have won. And that is his complaint
5:20
and it's been stifled by the courts and
5:22
by the media. And now,
5:25
if they ever get to trial with this
5:27
clunker of a case they have, that
5:29
is going
5:29
to come out and it's not going to be easy
5:32
to ignore it. Well, look, this is a
5:34
crucial point. So let's dissect this a little
5:36
bit further. We're talking to Lord Conrad
5:39
Black. The website is Conrad M. Black.
5:41
He is the co-host of the podcast Scholars
5:43
and Science with Victor Davis Hanson and Bill Bennett.
5:46
A new episode just dropped on Friday. Please
5:48
subscribe and listen to it and you can follow him at
5:51
Conrad Black on Twitter. This is
5:53
the court, the case will not be televised.
5:56
We know that it won't be televised, but
5:59
nevertheless.
5:59
it is a platform
6:04
upon which the grievances
6:06
of 2020 may be aired. We
6:10
know this is a judge who looks
6:13
on President Trump inimically, but
6:16
she won't be able to block everything. And it
6:19
goes to my hypothesis that I'd like to test
6:21
with you, that the left has become
6:23
radicalized. The Democrat Party
6:25
of today could not envisage
6:28
having a JFK or a Scoop Jackson
6:31
amongst its ranks today. It truly has become
6:33
an extremist party.
6:34
But my question
6:36
is, are they less
6:39
than intelligent? Because
6:42
it seems to me like a hugely
6:45
potential-owned goal that,
6:48
driven by your hatred of the 45th
6:50
president, you're giving
6:52
him not just a national
6:54
but a global platform to
6:57
actually litigate that which
6:59
he didn't have a chance to litigate after 2020.
7:02
It doesn't seem very strategic, Lord Black.
7:05
I agree. I think it is tactically mistaken. And
7:07
what I don't understand, I honestly
7:10
have no idea how this comes to pass, but
7:13
they claim to want Trump as an opponent,
7:16
and yet they are trying to destroy him. And
7:19
now I know there is this theory that they're so
7:21
diabolically clever that
7:23
they think that in attacking him as they are,
7:26
it will cause the Republican Party to rally
7:28
behind him, and therefore they will have
7:30
the opponent they want. But the trouble
7:33
with that one is I don't think they are that smart, by the way. If
7:35
they were, we wouldn't have Biden as president.
7:38
They would have found someone better than that. And
7:40
Harris as vice president. But
7:43
the problem with it is, in
7:46
persecuting this man, they are going
7:48
to make him more popular, not just to
7:50
the Republicans who like him anyway,
7:53
most of them, but to
7:55
the voters as a whole. And because Trump is clearly
7:57
beating the Senate, being
8:00
persecuted. And as
8:02
time goes by, this will become more and more
8:04
obvious as the cases are
8:07
examined in a little more objectivity.
8:12
And that's going to accrue to his benefit electorally.
8:15
And I think
8:17
they have a real problem here, because at the
8:19
same time the difficulties of
8:23
the Biden family are becoming
8:26
harder and harder to keep under the rug. And
8:28
the old line
8:32
about people living in glass houses. Now,
8:34
my own view, and we've discussed this in previous programs,
8:37
is that they're going to push
8:39
Biden out. They can't do it now. They can't
8:41
push him out of office, because they don't want Harris
8:43
as the president. But they're going to
8:46
push him out. They can't run this guy again. And
8:49
so they are hoping. So will they primary
8:51
him before the election? I
8:54
think, to take a phrase from
8:56
the Watergate era, a long
8:58
row of limousines, except that
9:00
they're not used anymore because they're gas guzzlers,
9:02
but a long row of cars will
9:05
arrive at the White House carrying the powers
9:07
that be in the Democratic Party. And they'll say, look,
9:10
you phrase it any way you want,
9:13
but you can't run again. You can
9:16
blame it on the doctors for more time
9:18
with your family, whatever you want. But it won't
9:20
apply. And Joe will take
9:22
the hint. And I don't mean
9:24
to be disrespectful. The president will take the hint. And
9:28
then they'll try and bring in a new candidate.
9:30
Newsom is the favorite, although he's no
9:32
prize candidate after what he's done in
9:34
California. And they'll just pretend
9:37
that this gong show with Biden and Harris
9:39
didn't happen. But it's a hard
9:41
road they've chosen for themselves. And all
9:43
the time, Trump
9:46
is going to campaign against the spurious
9:49
and obvious shortcomings
9:51
of this political
9:54
indito-rema they've thrown at him. And
9:57
by the way, I... the
10:00
book of criminal code of criminal procedure
10:02
in the United States is anything like
10:04
what it is in countries
10:07
where I know about it in theory I am actually
10:10
a lawyer I haven't practiced for a long time but in
10:12
the civil law jurisdiction of French Canada
10:14
but the the codes always
10:17
provide a great deal with delivery
10:19
exceptions and and the whole
10:21
process of making motions and appealing
10:24
the decision on motions in my opinion is
10:26
going to push all of these things past the election
10:28
which I think they're trying any of this stuff right at
10:30
the election well and and which makes it all the
10:32
more peculiar that they waited two and a
10:34
half years to bring the charges
10:36
and then Jack Smith gives
10:38
a press conference for about two minutes
10:41
after which he takes no questions and he says we
10:43
are in a great rush we have to
10:46
try this case rapidly in
10:48
that case why did you wait for two and a half years
10:50
you know a president Trump you've negotiated
10:53
with President Trump I for one am
10:56
annoyed I'm angry that Chris Christie
10:58
even brings up Abaddon Castello
11:00
because I love Abaddon Castello
11:03
but why is the establishment Republican
11:05
Party the likes of this
11:08
individual find it
11:10
okay to attack the 45th president
11:13
and then to call him stupid
11:15
I'm sure you know that he's not stupid having
11:17
you know negotiated with him and the perhaps most
11:19
telling of all
11:20
his assault and his ridicule of
11:23
the man who was his butler in the White House
11:26
who works for him now at Mar-a-Lago and who's now
11:28
facing more than 300 years in prison I
11:31
well I
11:33
think it's a disgraceful performance by Christie
11:35
and I think his entire so-called campaign
11:38
is a disgrace it's just sour grapes he
11:41
was the most egregious bootlicker
11:44
in the Trump entourage of anybody
11:48
in 2016 and then when
11:50
he for reasons that are speculated
11:52
about wasn't rewarded with any
11:55
performance from the president
11:57
when he became president he
12:00
uh... apostatized and is now
12:02
the wildest and and
12:05
most tasteless of the trump
12:07
accusers and i find former congressman
12:11
and former governor hutchison obnoxious
12:14
i i you know their little people of
12:16
of trivial accomplishments compared
12:18
to what trump is a is
12:21
semi self-made billionaire and
12:23
an undoubted television star and a person
12:25
who put together a mil in miraculous
12:28
formula for being elected president
12:30
and was a good president uh... it
12:33
compared to him who are they but
12:35
christy was it you know i had what a nine
12:37
percent approval rating when he left his governor
12:40
though i think it was a good governor for most of his two
12:42
terms uh... he needs kuhi
12:45
squeezed out of that bridge gate
12:47
business and to be a circumstances and
12:50
it does not lie in his mouth to make allegations
12:52
of dishonesty or stupidity against anyone
12:55
particular since he is so ludicrous
12:57
he's uh... he i don't
12:59
want to harp on anyone's physical characteristics
13:02
but he is and absurd overweight
13:05
man mouthing in plausible
13:08
and extreme allegations against
13:10
someone in in a way that that
13:13
is is is clangorously inappropriate
13:15
of his a problem with trump on
13:17
the issues he should say it if he really
13:20
thinks that trump is an inferior character
13:23
he should say it but say it in in civilized
13:25
terminology not with with an attempt
13:28
to uh...
13:28
to scrape the barrel
13:31
of of uh... uh...
13:33
israel school yard or back alley
13:35
uh... uh... expo that submitted
13:39
disgraceful performance you mentioned
13:41
that the liability that that biden has
13:43
become uh... that that that the
13:46
press the digitization the permutations
13:48
that the top security that the democrats having
13:50
to go through to defend
13:53
him based upon what we've heard coming
13:55
out in the various uh... hunter uh...
13:58
revelations
13:58
uh... tip if by this interview
14:01
between Cuomo,
14:03
Chris Cuomo, and Jamie Raskin, the
14:05
congressman of Maryland, where he
14:07
actually admits something, I think, without realizing
14:10
it, cut nine, play cut.
14:13
I think they've been very honest and open about it, but
14:15
there's nothing else there. I mean, the
14:17
Republicans haven't found anything else there. If there
14:19
were, I'd be very happy to ask questions
14:21
about it. But the only- Well, the payments to the family
14:23
members.
14:25
I'm sure, well, what does that mean? The payments
14:27
to the family members.
14:28
As far as I know, Hunter Biden made a bunch
14:30
of business deals, which is lawful, which
14:33
a lot of family members have done, Republican,
14:35
Democrat, other political
14:38
families, they've done the same thing. And he added
14:40
the money diverted into- The
14:44
fact that they're saying, yes, the
14:46
money was diverted to various
14:48
family members from these foreign corporations,
14:51
can they just get away with saying that and saying
14:53
that that's not a crime and it has nothing
14:56
to do with who their father was, Lord Black?
14:58
Look, I have been one
15:00
of those who's always said that if
15:03
the Bidens are smart enough to get
15:06
some saps to give them money
15:08
just for access to Joe Biden, as
15:11
long as US government policy is
15:13
not altered in respect of the receipt
15:16
of those payments, it's,
15:20
as far as I can see, it's legal. But
15:22
the president lied about it, and
15:24
he's got a lot hanging out in terms of his credibility,
15:27
and it's distasteful, and it's shabby,
15:30
but I don't see the illegality. What I pointed
15:33
out in the piece you kindly mentioned in
15:35
the New York Sun that was posted yesterday that I
15:37
wrote, Victor Sorkin,
15:39
the prosecutor that Joe Biden boasted
15:41
of having fired, has stated,
15:44
and then said right there on the internet, anyone in
15:46
the world can see it, that he was fired
15:49
because of Biden's intervention, and he was fired
15:51
because he was investigating Burisma,
15:53
not the Bidens, but he was going to get
15:56
to the Bidens, and they wanted the
15:58
whole thing shut down before it did get to the Biden. to
16:00
them, and that's why he was fired. And he
16:02
is saying that the
16:04
threat of withholding U.S. government aid
16:07
was made unilaterally by the vice president
16:09
to spare his son and himself
16:12
and his family the embarrassment of their
16:14
corruption in Ukraine being exposed. Now if that's
16:17
true,
16:18
those are not only grounds
16:20
for impeachment, but for removal from office.
16:23
Thanks for listening to the Town Hall Review. Our
16:26
program is coming to you today in partnership with
16:28
the Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy.
16:31
It's America's most unique graduate leadership
16:33
program offered on Pepperdine's breathtaking
16:35
campus in Malibu, California. Learn
16:37
more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu. If
16:40
you're enjoying the podcast, please tell a
16:42
friend to go to Town Hall Review and sign
16:44
up as well today.
16:47
Take as little as three minutes to see if you could
16:49
save on motorcycle insurance with Progressive. Come
16:52
on, you've spent more time than that trying to name your bike.
16:55
Hmm,
16:55
how about the Crusher? I
16:58
guess it's not really crushing anything.
17:00
The Silver Bolt? No. Oh, what
17:02
about Pepper? Mysterious.
17:05
Is it a pet or a condiment? Surprise!
17:08
It's a motorcycle. No, that's stupid.
17:12
Get a quote in as little as three minutes at
17:14
progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance
17:16
Company and Affiliates.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More