Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
bridgestone tires strolled into
0:02
midas and if you roll in, we've
0:04
got an exclusive deal for you get
0:06
$70 back and bridgestone rebates
0:09
plus a $50 reward card with paid
0:11
installation tires at its dot com
0:15
your your capacity to
0:18
be offended is
0:20
not something that need
0:23
or should respect in
0:25
you he
0:26
was calling for twitter to shut
0:28
down trump's account and it was happy
0:30
that it has , very different
0:32
positions of pretty much everybody else
0:35
why did you take up his sleeve university
0:37
as a story story worse
0:39
than anything with abuse in who in
0:43
that such as a conspiracy left
0:45
wing conspiracy to deny the
0:47
presidency have absolutely
0:50
it was absolutely but i think osborne's
0:52
the from can't do that are
0:54
you gonna be mad most
0:58
people in , society
1:01
even if they're nominally religious really
1:03
are struggling to to find
1:05
meaning in in their day to day of of when
1:07
you look at just the the hour by hour increments
1:10
and which life as doled out as
1:12
years passed out of deep sleeper
1:15
or enough enough
1:18
of of dreams in a when the alarm
1:20
goes off in the morning and
1:24
how do you feel about your life and what is
1:26
going to give you moral
1:28
urgency and meaning millions
1:30
, moral of people found it a specific
1:33
moments in recent history
1:35
like swords floyd killing
1:37
was has one of those moments where so
1:40
often enough is enough this those
1:42
my religion
1:52
this you know the you can also guess
1:55
your questions that thrive when
1:57
you join our local communities not
1:59
only
1:59
well you know who whereabouts interview you
2:02
have the opportunity to asked them to your
2:04
questions you have the chance asked
2:07
jordan peterson the cofounder of
2:09
extinction rebellion nigel farage
2:11
douglas murray andrew doyle's
2:13
yes no called simon evans larry elder
2:16
to save it for deal andrew sullivan
2:18
megyn kelly's julia hartley brewer
2:20
lord nigel lawson bret weinstein
2:23
in i have full hour in a man doctor david
2:25
not to me door
2:26
yeah sad flair wife melissa
2:29
chance trevor phillips i am
2:31
hirsi ali
2:32
glenn lowery bridges as
2:34
a cgm record call benjamin
2:36
and so many more plus were
2:39
bouncer interview some of the three
2:41
discuss in the world
2:43
we call name them tissue trust
2:46
me this you barkley
2:49
speaking not just because they're americans
2:52
are locals gives you access to a great
2:54
community of like minded people for
2:56
you can share mean
2:57
then make new and problematic
2:59
friend you also get early access
3:01
to live shows and whereabouts early these
3:03
cells [unk] voss whole so you'll want to
3:05
know about that as well on , higher
3:08
tiers you get monthly support tickles and
3:10
the opportunity to have a meal or a whole
3:12
with us click the link below will
3:15
go to trigonometry told
3:17
locals don't com and
3:19
join the community that trigonometry
3:22
dot local dot com will see
3:24
the hello
3:26
and welcome to a very special
3:28
episode of trigonometry
3:30
one the road from the us
3:33
san francisco's on constance in
3:35
kissing this is show you if
3:37
you want conversations with,
3:40
fascinating people of britain,
3:43
guess today is a a neuroscientist philosophy,
3:45
but and one of america's and
3:46
the world's most prominent public intellectual
3:49
sam harris welcome to trigonometry thanks
3:51
guys in a great beer it is great to
3:53
have the on the south we mentioned the
3:55
usually when we saw the show we ask our guests
3:57
introduce themselves your well known
3:59
and
3:59
the you don't need to do that but what we did
4:02
want to talk to by which is what we've been asking a lot
4:04
of our guest on the strip in the us is
4:06
how are you who you are or because you've
4:09
done things that most people wouldn't do
4:11
of wouldn't want to do would be scared to do calling
4:13
out some ideologies the people are afraid
4:15
to call outs that takes courage
4:18
but it also takes determination that takes
4:20
something why do you have that something
4:22
how did you get it
4:25
it's a hard question as roma i think there
4:28
is one algorithm
4:30
i'm running more than
4:32
most witches
4:35
what i would call intellectual honesty right
4:38
and and and so you're that the burden is not
4:40
to be who you were yesterday
4:43
the burden isn't to join some tribes
4:46
who who you're you'll get social
4:49
reinforcement from for and you know conforming
4:51
to
4:52
the
4:54
though
4:56
and so far as i'm continually just
4:58
trying to figure out what's true
5:00
and was consistent with what i claimed was true
5:02
five minutes ago or five years ago
5:05
the that causes me to just
5:08
bump up against do taboos
5:10
and and blasphemy is an
5:12
ideology is that that
5:15
are more rigid than that right
5:17
a major is it made really it's it's
5:19
i mean even having an identity
5:22
itself is too much
5:24
and now it's like a that you not only can you not
5:26
really conform to a tribe
5:29
you can't really even conform
5:31
the who you were yesterday
5:33
yes your your your master
5:35
value is to be honest and rigorous
5:38
and available to new data
5:40
new arguments and and
5:42
new insights that's a very good
5:44
answer but doesn't answer my question which is how
5:46
did you become that way why are you the i have no
5:48
idea i just my like that was my
5:51
in a factory settings and so from
5:53
very early age
5:55
the
5:56
yeah i guess i showed up as a
5:59
skeptics on many fronts
6:02
or mouse of certainly an argumentative
6:04
the teenager who know that and i live
6:07
in my idea so the
6:09
, that was i was really some
6:12
kind of default and that
6:14
part really hasn't changed
6:16
i don't think i pick my battles better now than
6:18
i used to a me i could use enough i
6:21
could turn any dinner party into a knock
6:23
down drag out debate about the most fundamental
6:26
issues anyone could
6:28
summon and it and it i
6:30
the
6:31
as i get older
6:33
pick my battles more
6:37
that's because i i said the hassle factor
6:40
of touching certain topics in certain ways
6:42
has has become more selling it for me because i
6:44
the twitter wasn't that was the real teaching
6:46
tool for me like i i just
6:48
you know that on the platform as everyone
6:51
did not , aware
6:53
that i was in rolling myself into a psychological
6:55
experiment to which no one had consented
6:57
and and he comes as
6:59
yet unforeseen and
7:02
the
7:03
yeah i just let loose
7:05
at loose at with a on various
7:08
topics and i would you know when i would see some malefactor
7:10
there who was treating mayor other
7:12
people badly more than i had to deal with
7:14
that right then and there have been and
7:18
it's just that the the hassle
7:20
factor
7:21
dealing with the
7:24
the toxicity of it and all
7:26
also just the
7:28
the i'm
7:30
convinced now that i had bottom it's a misrepresentation
7:32
of humanity raise it doesn't seem like a mere
7:34
does he dealing with what someone wrote there
7:37
is not does not in error but
7:39
you're not getting the whole person you're
7:42
getting i am a
7:45
part of them that has been amplified by the
7:48
the frame and into which the conversation
7:50
has been point in a frame has certain
7:52
features that are not helpful
7:55
guide conversations and anonymity is
7:57
got interrupted scouts tastelessness
7:59
scott the a perform
8:01
and of ass back you're doing in front of your crowd
8:04
or some possible crowd or so
8:06
it just it was disastrous for intellectual
8:08
honesty and honesty the
8:11
compassion and
8:13
the
8:15
no theory of mind under actually understand
8:17
taken into account of the extra moment to
8:19
understand where the other person's coming from
8:22
and so as he that there's no principle of
8:24
charities and just the it is really disastrous
8:27
machine for as into manufacturing
8:29
discord
8:30
we had a guest on the show called richard
8:32
grand who made the point that would it does is reduces
8:35
everyone's when avatar
8:38
so if everyone's an avatar what does it matter
8:40
if you attack the miss you gray
8:42
humanize them as you misrepresent
8:45
them because the game is to win right
8:47
is not so i actually have a discussion is
8:49
destroying ultimately to win
8:51
yeah was especially if you're not
8:54
if you're public purse and dealing with people who
8:56
are not public people right because
8:58
they then there's really the is me than it's just a single
9:00
shot the you know lottery
9:03
is not a that there's no ongoing
9:06
future of collaboration or cooperation
9:09
that is is been maintained even
9:12
bag when you have to public people who
9:15
you , or who know both know
9:17
they're going to to each other and realize
9:19
at some point still the the the wheels
9:21
come off rather often too
9:23
surprising degree but
9:26
the a sister
9:29
he is a in the end i think
9:31
it's bad technology which is is is still
9:33
somewhat inscrutable because it seems like it
9:35
should be good and in in and in some ways it
9:37
is good because you're seeing you know
9:39
his ears your seen a lot of smart people
9:42
tell you what the most interest
9:44
them and most worries them on a daily basis
9:47
and in ascending you articles and and
9:49
videos that you and and ss why am i a spy
9:51
can't break my connection to it because i'm
9:53
following so many smart people who are curated
9:56
for me and information diet that i still appreciate
10:00
and then i you know occasionally put my own stuff out
10:02
there just says i got kind of a marketing channel
10:04
but i've i'm doing much less
10:07
in the weeds back and forth with seen
10:09
even public people who i notice
10:12
in , poke me on poke me
10:14
given issue or whatever so
10:16
some
10:17
no go do not have a little store
10:19
in your head when you go to tackle
10:21
these very contentious subjects
10:24
and you know that you're gonna get push button you
10:26
know that you're gonna get flat you know that you're going to get
10:28
misrepresented you know
10:31
thing i really should be doing this
10:33
or what goes through your
10:35
mind before you go out and you made your point
10:39
well again i i i
10:41
think about it more than i used
10:43
to now i'm i used to i used to do it
10:46
very with it as if you're basically
10:48
there was no friction in the system imagine
10:50
was like okay this is like that that
10:53
cartoon meme you know somebody on the
10:55
internet is wrong about something other areas
10:58
i was i guy on twitter and
11:01
the
11:03
for not that guy anymore and i really do
11:06
take my moments and
11:09
there's a cost of that because as the and that you
11:11
you decide to set certain
11:13
at the moment you know cultural moments that
11:15
you sit on the sidelines and i'm
11:22
if i guess i guess i could just distiller
11:24
to have to a lesson here is a gay or
11:26
not
11:28
you don't you don't always need to have an opinion
11:30
about everything racing on always need have a
11:32
strong opinion about everything and
11:35
even if you do have do have opinion
11:37
you don't always have to be the person expressing
11:39
that opinion because very
11:42
likely someone else will write and
11:44
the in a given given those adjustments
11:46
to the the machine a
11:49
you can there's decide
11:51
if is this do i really want to spend the next
11:54
twenty four hours dealing with the aftermath
11:57
of this thing that i'm tempted to tweet
12:00
what to say in some other formats a
12:02
a particular it it it relates
12:04
to the likelihood
12:06
that certain personalities are gonna
12:08
go berserk and then with certain people it's is
12:10
yours is guaranteed that they're going he goes berserk
12:13
so i do i owe yet here's this this
12:16
odious ah opinion
12:18
expressed by a semi
12:20
odious person really
12:22
deserves to hear what i think
12:24
right now
12:26
is it worth the you know this wacky
12:28
that hornet's nest and then dealing with the
12:31
dealing with and been seem to deal
12:33
with
12:34
or to know or to not deal with end of may maybe
12:36
what are you can't deal with the aftermath
12:38
there are some , talked
12:40
about tribalism in the beginning let's something that
12:42
francis and i both the of feel very strongly
12:45
is contributing to much of the divisiveness
12:48
and the way things are going and lox that
12:51
the clay of the shows called trigonometry we once
12:53
explored difficult subject the no
12:55
question that neither him or i awoke
12:57
in the in the concerned opposing that
12:59
ideology has been a big part of what we do but
13:02
the tribalism is that is a is a different
13:04
thing we don't want to be in the and he woke
13:06
try bulgaria try breath and
13:09
the was and the around twenty
13:11
fifteen twenty sixty and very small
13:13
tribe a very smart people are
13:15
which was referred to as the intellectual dark web
13:18
which i remember that time we want doing this would
13:20
just to comedians i remember watching you guys
13:23
have those conversations on paying inspired
13:25
by people i don't think you guys have dances
13:27
but you had the right questions you did have
13:29
the right questions and then over time
13:32
we watched that loose tribal
13:34
very bright people as lose tribes
13:36
of very bright people are we to crumble
13:38
disintegrate rollouts your
13:41
mood happened
13:42
but the first thing and happen is that it was actually
13:46
for some of us more than others
13:47
the tongue in cheek
13:49
label for a tribe it really
13:51
wasn't a none of us are tribal
13:53
people
13:54
really is a a herding cats sort
13:56
of situation and
13:59
i lie savio is a eric weinstein
14:02
coinage which i launched on up a
14:04
podcast we did
14:06
and
14:08
i think an eye contact side i telegraph
14:10
that i thought it was tongue in cheek amazing he probably thought
14:12
it was more in earnest than than i did
14:15
he was always more attached to the label
14:17
the
14:19
and in very quickly they were people who
14:22
sort of join this this
14:24
collection or , were
14:26
said to be in and who's and some of whom i had
14:28
never heard of at that point who up
14:31
you know on a just a little bit of analysis
14:35
reveal themselves to be people who i
14:37
i really don't agree with not not
14:39
just saw on the actual substance of specific
14:41
opinions just just , methodology
14:44
by which they would generate opinions
14:46
or their lack of methodology so
14:50
you know i'm not inclined to name names but there are people
14:52
who
14:54
this is just wrong the saints
14:56
who eat a woo they
14:59
were ever moving in the same lane i was in
15:01
at that point when we were all called id w
15:03
people
15:05
i think the biggest force of fragmentation
15:07
was
15:09
rum and would
15:12
certain people did or didn't do with
15:14
that phenomenon you know and this
15:16
is what i was gonna ask i'd say there were two things
15:18
of fractured her from that looking for making
15:20
from hell with later but right front trump
15:23
was the so let's start with trump the i want to talk
15:25
about covered as although if we thought would trump you
15:27
took it a different view to almost
15:30
everybody i would say in what was described
15:32
as i did w in in the sense that
15:34
you were i think he was
15:36
calling for twitter to shut down trump's accounts
15:39
and it was happy that it happened yet
15:42
that's yet that's different position to pretty
15:44
much everybody else why did you take that plus
15:47
for two reasons why i visited
15:49
the non
15:52
the generic reason is
15:55
this is something i've never gotten a clear answer
15:57
on from any the people who take took the different side
15:59
of
15:59
the many
16:03
many people are ostensibly libertarians
16:05
are at least in a quasi libertarians of if
16:07
they they want a something like a minimum
16:10
of state
16:11
coercion and and control
16:13
they don't want to say a proliferation of laws
16:16
cgm just to to make
16:18
our lives more difficult and
16:20
as far as an orientation you know though i am
16:23
i consider myself a liberal and
16:26
have always voted as a democrat i'm in the until
16:28
until that would this work
16:31
apocalypse a and i i would certainly com
16:33
as of a democrat without much self consciousness
16:35
the
16:37
in i've i've always had a libertarian
16:41
underpinning to my to my
16:43
which is
16:45
the private sector can handle it is probably best
16:47
done their around me just given the level of in
16:49
efficiency and and a poorly
16:51
for the wind incentives you get in a government
16:54
bureaucracy and
16:56
he's milan as people
16:58
should be should have the right to be left alone
17:00
in also as like it's unless somebody is harming
17:03
people or
17:05
the
17:06
you know guilty of fraud you know via the
17:08
i saft for you know stealing
17:11
from people we
17:14
don't need a government involved and the
17:17
yeah my general framework
17:19
and many people sensible
17:22
him in this group ostensibly agreed with that
17:27
so when i look at twitter
17:29
twitter is a company that
17:31
and decide to a mad
17:33
as someone who has started erupted information
17:36
based companies at this point i'm
17:38
just thinking about what about what what's the scenario
17:41
under which i would want the government to
17:43
force me they
17:45
have alex jones on my podcast or
17:47
have donald trump on my podcast should not be able have
17:49
any one i want to my bike as is it conceivable
17:52
that my podcast could grow so big
17:55
or that might you know that any other plaza in up
17:57
in was considered training social media
17:59
platform right new if i could grow so
18:01
big that suddenly the government
18:03
would have an interest in forcing me
18:06
the have people on it
18:08
who for whatever reason i
18:10
object to having on am a saw this is this is
18:12
some ways away in which i am
18:14
the more extreme than than most people on
18:16
the last like i i do think at this point
18:19
in history
18:20
you should be able to have a social
18:23
media platform and exclude
18:25
any specific group he wants interested
18:28
as the way we do it right and
18:31
if you don't like a boycott us right so i got
18:33
i wouldn't have said this in nineteen sixty four when we're
18:35
halfway we have to pass a civil rights act this
18:38
point i think you should have the right to
18:40
be an asshole
18:43
who destroys your reputation and and suffers
18:46
of the the penalties in in
18:48
in the marketplace of ideas rights
18:50
so i think it is he wanted to have a social media network
18:53
for beautiful people right or people are
18:55
you guys are over sixty two and blond
18:57
hair blue eyes rights you know i can't get
18:59
on you should feel free to
19:02
raise money for that enterprise launch
19:04
it and i'll be in or i'll laugh
19:06
when it fails rights to like that this
19:09
now
19:09
under some
19:11
this rule that kind of thing to
19:13
be in a ears are should be illegal you
19:15
know if you're if you're just a normal the
19:18
person now on the last but
19:21
i don't think i think of this moment in history shouldn't
19:24
be but any case i just why look at
19:26
twitter as the accompany
19:28
that as a term as terms
19:30
of service which people like alex jones
19:33
and trump clearly violated me at what your whether
19:35
they in fact violated and
19:38
you service as written i think
19:40
they violated any coherent
19:43
terms of service that twitter should have had read like
19:45
you like you
19:46
knowing leave the able to turn
19:48
your mob
19:50
on a private citizen
19:52
and ruin their lives lives through
19:54
dawson right which is what jones and trump
19:56
were doing it again and again and
19:58
again people every time jones
20:01
was doing it with the sandy hook parents are you literally
20:03
have
20:04
the some you can place in two very different people
20:06
i mean alex jones does not belong in this conversation
20:08
your i'm not interested and know a guy like that but i
20:11
would dispute that i think trump is essentially
20:13
we got alex jones as president of united
20:15
states i don't think a very different people
20:17
i think that is the same phenomenon how much in
20:19
my world because it's just old the level
20:22
of of misinformation disinformation
20:24
line the charlatan
20:26
isn't that the is the the conscious
20:28
fraudulent of everything as
20:30
scale
20:31
the targeting of individuals
20:34
with with with known consequences
20:36
for like like trump every time trump
20:39
singles out a specific
20:41
that isn't
20:42
there's look at this jackass
20:44
who's few trying to wear whatever
20:46
whatever though the claim would be
20:49
that is a human sacrifice
20:52
we know that person's life
20:54
is just never the same again
20:56
because he's turned tens of
20:58
millions of moron on that person
21:01
and innovative vicious more
21:03
ons on i mean like that live in that's that that's the
21:05
core the
21:07
trump phenomenon as it is
21:10
now and has been for many years of really
21:12
since the beginning
21:14
as he you know certainly since he he
21:16
became the front runner and and certainly since he became
21:18
elected and twenty sixteen
21:21
the personality cult i mean it has all
21:23
the dynamics of a personality cult these are not
21:25
reasoning a yes there are some there if you calculated
21:28
people like peter thiel on the margins
21:31
who have some story as to why they would
21:33
back him rights but the core
21:35
of the calls you know which is all be
21:37
the nested with key went on and and
21:40
and of conspiracy thinking
21:42
and the big lie and you
21:44
know is if it's trump can do no wrong right
21:47
his
21:48
that is so it's
21:50
it made it as a venn diagram is just
21:52
it overlaps eighty
21:55
percent without the alex jones phenomenon
21:57
so i just i see them as the same problem i
21:59
see it
21:59
these are these are
22:02
you know if they're not guy actually clinical
22:05
clinically diagnosed herbalist
22:07
psycho pass their pass their best thing these
22:09
are people who are so
22:12
malignant li selfish and
22:14
so careless with respect to
22:16
the consequences of their actions in the lives
22:18
of others that if you if
22:20
you are right if you own a platform
22:23
or you are you know it's your overseen
22:25
a publicly up a publicly company that
22:28
owns company platform
22:29
why
22:32
should the government force you to keep these
22:35
people aren't really what are you should be free
22:37
to say sorry you know not on my watch
22:39
are you going to be having these consequences
22:42
it and would would trump it was a bit after january
22:44
six that was just and that's when it happened i
22:46
thought it happened a year too late by
22:49
amoeba january six finally convinced
22:51
dorsey he should kick from boston
22:53
that mean if that's not going to convince you that
22:55
you know we have that we we had a but at that point we
22:57
had a sitting president who
23:00
for months and months and months and it's
23:02
been a release six or eight months
23:04
innocently months prior to the november
23:07
election would
23:09
not commit to a peaceful transfer power
23:11
then he did
23:14
you know certainly something it'd
23:16
be whether it was everything in his power or just
23:18
a lot he managed
23:21
to see that we did not have a peaceful transfer
23:23
about right and then you
23:25
know so the who's a what's that what's the mob
23:27
gonna do on january seventh and eighth and ninth
23:30
you know to just leave trump on
23:32
the platform either i mean i just thought it
23:34
was it very simple
23:36
decision to kick him off and and
23:38
is it you t totally analogous
23:40
to the alex jones decision may out shows
23:42
is just less consequential but
23:46
minute let their sandy hook parents who
23:48
have had to move ten times
23:51
is their kids were murdered
23:53
the on alex jones
23:55
right and it's and it's all conscious it's obvious
23:57
what it's all it's he could see the consequences
23:59
of that the real time satellite
24:01
he woke up after five
24:04
years and thought oh my god i can't believe
24:06
that in our lives totally inadvertent i released
24:08
a podcast and then it does
24:11
it had this totally unforeseeable consequence
24:13
in the lives of it is grieving
24:15
parents no no he monetize
24:18
their misery when
24:20
did just a blizzard of lies the
24:23
and i rarely get on does it for me a different
24:25
case that i know what i say trump i'm in trump
24:27
is just i hear what you say he got in your
24:29
mind that they're similar my dog the reputation
24:32
washing of having successfully be compressed
24:35
you know he's alex jones okay
24:38
a francaise before you you move us into corvid
24:40
let me try from a different angle sandra because i
24:42
want to explore this intellectual point i do
24:45
you really want to live in a country where
24:48
you have a digital public square which in my opinion
24:50
twitterers we can disagree about that if you want
24:52
but that's my opinion the digital public
24:54
square and you have you have
24:57
that has clearly one sided enforcement
24:59
i i hear what you're saying by
25:01
jill the legitimizing the electoral process
25:04
the trumpeted for and i was concerned
25:06
about that i think you can use in
25:08
the system and that way when
25:10
you see the she gets
25:13
banned and then a story about hunter
25:15
biden gets banned that
25:17
under the guise of a being russian disinformation
25:19
we later learned wasn't russian disinformation
25:22
that's a lot of people seems like i
25:24
said i when we were talking to joe rogan it's putting
25:27
your hand on the scales fear in favor
25:29
of one side in the digital
25:31
public square you add that to
25:33
the banning of trump and lots
25:35
of other people being banned from one
25:37
side predominantly read
25:40
is that is that the world you
25:42
wanna live in where one team gets to just
25:44
ban people who disagrees with off the platform
25:46
it gets to pretend that things that
25:48
are true or not true he gets to shut down
25:50
the sharing of information with people
25:53
who want to make their own democratic choice
25:56
this is a hard question and thereof
25:59
this is have a question individually are like
26:01
one hunter biden laptop story
26:03
is something that still
26:05
don't have a
26:07
full opinion
26:10
about i'd actually don't know what we should have
26:12
done about that i'm as i say i see
26:14
the reason i see both sides of of like
26:16
i can argue either side of it's that the
26:18
sun is out what was leave that t society
26:21
the bias on the platform of so he is
26:23
either twitter is a company they
26:26
can do what it wants right it can
26:28
have it's own terms of service it can change
26:30
its policies they can they
26:32
can change in our can decided that you
26:34
know it can have can point of view or not
26:36
right
26:37
the war
26:38
we have to sees it as some
26:40
kind of crucial
26:43
piece of public infrastructure there
26:45
has to able to do not like that it in terms
26:48
of piece of public interest i think i think people
26:50
who are addicted to twitter seal
26:52
and arrive at
26:54
most you know and know and think it's you know i don't
26:56
think it should should be it
27:01
is odd to say that it's just so it's a
27:03
for small is just mean facebook
27:05
is much much much bigger raise just that
27:07
we have a lot of smart people journalists
27:09
ah , political
27:12
people focus concentrated people focus
27:14
to twitter moves the the conversation
27:16
more than facebook does but it's it's
27:19
it's scale of as much smaller
27:22
i
27:24
know i just feel like
27:27
people to start their own companies which they have
27:29
rights and against our competitors a twin of the many
27:31
people who deal twitter is not is is still
27:34
a failing business right as like is not
27:37
it doesn't work really am and facebook
27:39
is is a much better business
27:41
the
27:44
the nothing stopping facebook from
27:46
becoming stickier for
27:48
intellectuals and journalists and and
27:50
incident is attracting
27:52
more the conversation over there i
27:56
don't know is it is isn't extreme move
27:58
to say
28:00
you
28:01
the
28:02
you can't
28:04
you can't be biased right like who's
28:06
who's gonna say that the behind behind the scene
28:09
of that is a law in
28:11
the end there and therefore
28:13
it's a gun therefore is it's jail
28:15
time for the person who wants to keep breaking
28:17
the law i think just imagine imagine
28:19
twitter the twitter board if i were you
28:22
everyone gets what they want you know everyone who's everyone
28:24
who's this opinion guess when they won't use we're
28:27
going to win a commander the and and
28:29
and in for something like
28:33
a zero by a state and twitter
28:35
insofar as as possible and
28:37
if if the employees and the board
28:39
to say sorry we we have a point of
28:41
view we want we want to have we
28:44
we don't like these people and we like these people
28:46
the
28:48
what is now you just break up the company
28:50
you to say it dot you know a minute i
28:52
thought why i thought i should have happened with twitters
28:54
i thought jack dorsey should deleted
28:57
the mail you're literally thought he should would have got the nobel
29:00
peace prize this is an america has
29:02
added a point or leaders rights
29:05
the
29:07
the
29:08
yeah i don't so
29:09
his were should there should they be forced
29:12
to be impartial
29:13
i'm very skeptical that of that
29:16
should they be cajoled by
29:18
unhappy people like yourselves
29:21
or likely oh that
29:23
the
29:24
the trump fans to one
29:27
now or argument yeah i'm i'm se so
29:30
yeah yes i think
29:31
if
29:33
they were going to be employees the
29:35
first to admit as it may be impossible
29:38
to do this impeccably race like a psych the
29:40
in until we have perfect artificial
29:42
intelligence is just gonna be impossible
29:45
to be
29:46
truly consistent with your terms of service
29:48
because
29:50
you're always going to be able to find example
29:52
of the saying that was not appropriately
29:54
moderated yeah but if
29:56
we all know that it's that laptop with donald
29:58
trump junior this will batteries
30:01
are done that's all i'm asking area or
30:03
have zip a desert so let's take that
30:05
these
30:08
i think it was totally appropriate
30:10
the viewed from
30:14
the a
30:15
the existing in aid in aid to
30:18
domain that was orthogonal
30:20
to partisan politics ice my
30:22
criticism of trump is totally
30:24
non partisan right there is absent
30:26
there's literally nothing
30:28
i say about trump
30:30
that i can say about any other republican right
30:32
and i think lose cheney is a total hero right
30:35
so that's so and i don't agree with her politics
30:37
at all or like liz cheney is a religious
30:40
maniacs by my lights right and
30:43
in in that sense
30:46
a terrifying political figure like i
30:48
like site like the the old me who was
30:50
just worried about the are christian theocracy and
30:52
in the united states would
30:55
have just revolted
30:58
at everything she would say attempt
31:00
implement as a politician this
31:04
moment she's you know
31:06
is she has no bigger fan than
31:08
me because of how
31:10
she's dealing with the trump's and online the trump phenomenon
31:12
is not a matter of political partisanship
31:15
here's a he is just a sweet an heiress
31:18
the phenomenon edits
31:22
again is is it is analogous to have an elector
31:24
alex jones president eyes days it's
31:26
it's a it is
31:29
it's not a matter of his part like i probably agree
31:31
with half of his policies are more than half
31:33
his policies is not a matter of policy is
31:36
a matter of having someone who's totally unfit
31:39
the have power
31:40
given more power than any person in
31:42
a generation
31:43
and he and he's unfit for
31:47
every possible way is like
31:49
is not is not that he's just a
31:52
few screws loose like every screws loose
31:54
every screw that you would want totally
31:56
crank down
31:58
his lose or nonexistent and him
32:00
the
32:01
and so yeah so it's
32:03
the debt as my arguments tiger so some argument
32:05
is that it was appropriate for twitter
32:08
the heads of big tax and
32:11
journal and the heads of journalistic organizations
32:13
you feel that they were
32:15
in the presence of something
32:17
like a a once in a lifetime
32:20
moral emergency right
32:22
this is not the same thing as not liking
32:24
george bush you know our
32:27
not like and john mccain or not like mitt romney
32:30
for their politics this was
32:33
here's a guy who
32:35
is capable of anything
32:38
that he's not he is not ideological
32:41
he's again his leaves a black hole
32:43
of selfishness right his his he's
32:45
just as so there's no telling what he's going
32:47
to do
32:48
the
32:50
and we can not afford to have four
32:52
more years with this guy right and
32:55
and so
32:56
the
32:57
so what what should
33:00
well intentioned people do
33:02
who have a lot of power and these various ways you know you're
33:04
running a new york times your uneasy and and you're running
33:07
twitter what should
33:09
they conspire to do
33:11
the night of it it's those functions oil
33:13
i mean that trump is therefore is met on
33:15
with your mum from unless adelaide that that's what
33:17
don't know that that's the perverse thing is totally
33:20
their fault air b c and is
33:22
cnn gave us from roman oh no
33:24
the horse the in and gave us from mark burnett gave
33:26
us trump i mean that is it is is one person
33:29
could have
33:31
not done what he did and and
33:33
it's sort of closed door this whole phenomenon it was
33:35
mark burnett
33:38
the
33:40
yeah no says by giving him the attention
33:43
they have a he was he was great ratings in over
33:45
a year for he is a whole run up to
33:47
two twenty sixteen election
33:50
oh yeah know there's no one has clean
33:52
hands here but it at the eleventh
33:54
hour when it's when
33:57
who knows how this elections gonna go
33:59
know who knows what the capacity for
34:03
the disinformation at the last minute
34:05
to to tip the balance is
34:08
then what do you do
34:10
with the hunter biden laptop story
34:13
when we already know we we know
34:15
how this played out and twenty sixteen with
34:17
that hillary clinton email a
34:19
, conference where where call me and it in
34:22
his in an an of scrupulously
34:24
felt like he had to come before the cameras i
34:27
think ten days out from the election
34:29
and say you know was we're gonna
34:31
open up this gonna open again
34:33
with god as the winners laptop
34:35
the
34:37
we could see him in the again her failure
34:40
to become president was over determine she was a
34:42
an appallingly bad candidate
34:46
internet is tracking the poll numbers you could like
34:48
that was that was the killing
34:50
hello to her candidacy right that
34:53
that
34:53
final moment and this was a this
34:55
was a highly analogous situation
34:58
this was we're going open up this laptop from
35:00
hell and the new
35:02
news cycle for who who knows how
35:04
long
35:06
there's gonna be just just
35:09
conceivably just a nuclear bomb
35:11
of a in october october surprise and
35:15
we're going to get four more years of trump if we
35:17
actually give this a fair hearing the sam
35:19
you can't do that some solely you
35:21
gotta realize that you've got
35:24
a big fan and numbers the single all when
35:26
we're all equal before the law yeah and on way
35:28
and the other thousand dollar but i know it is not a lot
35:30
but if this is if you accept the my my
35:33
supposition that this is the public square than
35:35
it is the law it is if
35:37
it is the public square than it is worn
35:39
out you are arguing is not the public square which is fair
35:41
enough yeah right that find seal why
35:43
don't we move on because i think we've we've done and of yeah certainly
35:45
an opening up a lot of mr personality
35:47
on our he has gotta have that we're not
35:50
know but i'll just say just finally i do
35:52
so again it's
35:54
like a coin toss for me the hunter biden laptops
35:56
and to the i do understand
35:59
how
36:01
corrosive it is
36:03
for and institution like the
36:05
the new york times
36:06
the show obvious bias and
36:09
inconsistency and
36:11
there's honesty in how they it
36:13
was like they couldn't even frame it honestly assault
36:15
my god it's not like is
36:17
like the way i would frame it is
36:19
the
36:21
i don't care what's in hunter biden
36:23
so i'm a little a hunter by an at that point one hundred by literally
36:26
could have had had the corpses
36:28
of children in his basement
36:30
i would not have cared rights like isn't there's
36:32
nothing further it's hunter
36:34
biden race on his side is not joe
36:36
biden by even if
36:38
job like even that whatever
36:40
scope of joe biden corruption is
36:43
likely to if we could just go down that rabbit
36:45
hole endlessly and and understand
36:47
he's getting kickbacks from hundred bivens deals
36:50
in ukraine or wherever else writes for
36:52
china it is
36:55
the infinitesimal
36:57
compared to the corruption we know
36:59
trump is involved in psych it's like
37:01
it's like a firefly to the sun rights
37:03
camilla either this just
37:05
it doesn't even it doesn't even stack up against
37:07
trump university trump
37:09
university as a story
37:11
is worse than anything that could
37:13
be in in hunter bivens laptop in my
37:15
view right now that's not the
37:17
doesn't answer the people who say is still
37:19
completely unfair
37:22
do not have looked at the laptop
37:24
in a timely way into of shutdown that
37:26
scene of the new york post's twitter account
37:28
like that that's a just a conspiracy left
37:31
wing conspiracy to deny the
37:33
presidency to donald trump absolutely
37:36
it was absolutely right but
37:38
i think it was warranted right and i'm and
37:40
again is a coin toss as to whether or not some
37:42
i'm sorry for take it comes on radius or i
37:44
was the one that said we should move on but you said
37:46
something i really struggle for that which is
37:49
the years ago for the kids in the basement you
37:51
know not for the kids in the basement of
37:54
uninterrupted and democracy you're
37:56
saying you're content
37:58
with the left wing can
37:59
the receipt to prevent somebody being democratically
38:02
re elected as president would know i'm i'm
38:04
content was as but the thing is not left
38:06
wing press oh liz cheney is not left when
38:09
i lose cheney usually done everything
38:11
in her valerie to prevent somebody no way i'm
38:13
a crime is like is no tip for does not it's a
38:15
conspiracy the site is it was a conspiracy
38:17
out the open it does but it doesn't matter of was again
38:20
it doesn't matter what parts conspiracy what
38:22
pours out in the open up as a side
38:25
people get together and talk of and talk about
38:27
what should we do with about this phenomenon
38:29
or is it is like it though it was an asteroid
38:32
hurtling toward earth
38:33
and and we gotten a room together
38:36
with all of our friends and to had a conversation about what
38:38
we could do to deflect its course
38:41
right that a conspiracy a
38:43
like some of our conversational be in public some of
38:45
it would be in private we have a massive
38:47
problem we have an existential threat
38:50
rights politically speaking i
38:52
consider trump an existential threat
38:54
to our democracy right now so i'm going to destroy
38:56
the world very likely destroyed
38:58
by marker seen the process of protecting democratization
39:01
but that doesn't destroyed nods you art
39:03
art
39:05
i'm not
39:06
when i'm not suggesting that no point was i suggesting
39:09
we should stuff ballots
39:11
know our nose or brashly break
39:13
the machinery of democracy but
39:16
the
39:17
oh a political opinion is
39:19
already been is
39:22
completely inundated with
39:24
misinformation biased takes
39:27
half truths and outright lies right
39:29
like and amps or just the amplification
39:31
of of bad or misleading information based
39:33
on the algorithm so
39:38
this is like is is already there's
39:40
an avatar
39:42
of opinion
39:43
right and now the question
39:45
is
39:47
you know what can you do with your own
39:49
biases and your own is
39:51
it the as had to to get the out
39:53
some you think is actually better not just
39:55
for yourself personally but for the world
39:58
rice like i have like it is i'm
40:00
completely on conflicted in
40:03
in
40:04
the came
40:05
that a true that is a first from
40:08
term was bad and a second trump
40:10
term would be bad
40:12
and
40:13
it literally doesn't matter what was
40:16
a what what else was on the menu
40:18
like literally of of pick up pick a random
40:20
american better than trump
40:23
in the in the oval office likely lose
40:25
the likelihood that you're gonna get someone is worse than
40:27
trump
40:28
the a be given what i consider that the
40:30
a is bad about trump
40:32
his
40:33
the minutes
40:34
on your of one in a million right like you're
40:37
just not you're not gonna get you're not gonna
40:39
get worse than trump if you pick a random and
40:41
you know hillary clinton for all for flaws
40:44
was not worse than trump joe biden for us joe
40:46
biden we should have known joe biden
40:48
was going to just be tomatoes in office
40:50
not worse than drunk
40:53
the camo harris not were like elegance or
40:55
and any and again it's not just a a
40:57
marginal call is just
40:59
these are people who are
41:02
normal politicians or
41:04
so much more constrained why
41:06
predictable machinery
41:09
right
41:09
the like is there such a less
41:13
the opportunity there too
41:16
destroy institutions that we have to
41:19
rely on right is with with any of those
41:21
people in charge including a random person
41:23
in charge of random person who's going to be terrified
41:26
at the responsible the office and default
41:28
to expert opinion you know across
41:31
the board
41:32
the
41:34
no trump is again trump is an alex jones
41:36
level figure for me an office and
41:38
so you know is it's an alley like a smaller
41:40
problem is due to just for some billionaire
41:43
to buy the new york times and give it
41:45
alex jones to run right out in
41:47
a norm of a catastrophic loss
41:49
and mistake but that's a smaller problem
41:52
the getting from religion
41:54
hey francis do you
41:56
like journalism course thirty
41:58
five or journalist them superman what
42:01
superman superman's isn't
42:03
a real person francis he's an alien
42:06
you know a journalist a more important is
42:08
the fictional nice if , was
42:10
fictional more did frederick nature
42:13
throw about superman avoid
42:15
is known as the names in his
42:17
seminal work thus spoke zarathustra
42:20
published in i you know he for it but still
42:22
widely closes his eyes are both students
42:25
and intellectuals annoyed annoyed
42:27
francis i feel as if i have no clue who
42:29
you really are but if you do
42:32
like journalism that you have to check out the
42:34
epoch time the home fans
42:36
are not most media organizations
42:38
produce any government
42:41
prices a political policy
42:43
said to sell said story sounds of the facts
42:45
and yet read as as close to the truth
42:48
is they can truth articles the free
42:50
from the influence of the exact corporate
42:52
media and socialist corporate communist forces
42:54
as well the pope times believe
42:56
the more facts you have at your disposal
42:59
the better able you off to preserve your
43:01
voice here's what the read here's what about
43:03
them saw the coast present a factual
43:05
picture of the news from a conservative an
43:07
american perspective i feel the
43:09
pope times is the only public places
43:12
out there that gives me personal information
43:14
about stories in the news the
43:16
other rabbits and public places belatedly
43:19
report with liberal political biases
43:22
go to see focused see i
43:24
am dot c s forward slash
43:26
trigonometry and click the link that
43:29
he pokes said v p
43:31
c said , am
43:34
not a yes slashed trigonometry
43:37
the last was some gun was which he is
43:39
it really about trump is
43:42
i think could you agree that
43:44
with trump
43:45
the reason he's great cities because
43:47
he is a symptom of the system
43:50
whereby people ordinary people feel
43:52
that their voices on being heard
43:55
they realize that you know washington is
43:57
a machine that doesn't particularly care about
43:59
them they were betrayed time off
44:02
the time many times by the democrats many
44:04
times by the democrats who said that they were representing
44:06
ordinary working people like the labour
44:08
party were my country and
44:10
i felt that these politicians them
44:13
into so why not vote for trump
44:15
what else have we got to lose your when i
44:17
think that
44:18
explains
44:20
most of the his support answer
44:22
on his success yeah about it but i
44:24
think i think we should be
44:27
honest about how
44:31
the
44:33
both uninformed and
44:35
nihilistic by turns that
44:37
attitude is press like
44:39
and it's not
44:42
i mean that that is like the this
44:46
the clearest eruption of santa
44:48
toes you know in our lifetime
44:50
right it's just like list under the was just
44:53
learn it all down on some level like you the
44:55
the skies are wrecking ball we hate
44:57
the elites we hate the so called experts
45:00
go fuck yourselves we're just gonna
45:02
enjoy it's just watching this thing
45:04
venus in a swing through
45:07
everything you care about and
45:09
and
45:10
you know just
45:12
sounds of explosions are gonna be a just
45:14
give us pleasure right like that's like that's where
45:17
we are with tens of millions
45:19
of people in this country
45:21
that's a vet you know that is a
45:24
the
45:25
the very scary basis from
45:27
which to try them
45:30
in cooperate at scale and
45:32
and
45:35
produced political outcomes that are actually gonna be
45:37
good right and and any candid extremes
45:39
amplify each other as a that trump
45:41
is i'm in know that there was no greater goad
45:43
to woke ism than trump isn't
45:46
right and so it like and in i i
45:48
put myself you know in second place
45:51
the nobody
45:53
you know of the although i price been
45:55
a little bit less time on it and then some people
45:57
we can name in my
45:59
in the revulsion i feel too
46:02
the the extreme left
46:05
activism right a masters it's
46:07
in the air is is dishonest is it
46:09
can possibly be
46:12
and it's
46:13
the dishonesty is harder to parse for
46:16
smart people smart ethical people find
46:18
was happening on the last more confusing
46:21
than was happening on the rights of like these people as
46:23
we live and and soap and i spend much more time
46:26
focused on the less than less than i do on trump
46:28
or on the right because know
46:30
in this interview seven hundred
46:33
yards on abroad or not or gave us
46:35
gave bulldozer by trump revolves and is
46:37
and strong word what why did on
46:39
did feel exactly the same thing and you know why
46:41
we talked about my bus before i come from a society
46:43
the seen some of these i guess being implemented
46:46
now why do you feel
46:48
revulsion a very a very
46:50
emotion about this ideology because
46:54
it's some
47:00
one it is destroying institutions
47:02
that i actually care about like
47:04
when a white supremacy and
47:06
far right lunacy is
47:08
not affecting institutions
47:12
that matter you know v by
47:14
my lights right if you
47:16
could argue that it affected the scene on the
47:18
white house and and the us government to some
47:20
degree at the margin and again and think i
47:24
think the allegations of
47:26
trump's racism or his
47:28
alignment with the far as
47:30
far and wide to present i think that's been massively
47:32
exaggerated by the last and most
47:35
of most of the claims is
47:37
where have i have to actually have no doubt that he's actually
47:39
racist but most of the public
47:41
claims to his racism i think they're obviously
47:43
false and and in in are inconsistent
47:45
and so ,
47:47
sent a message you have to be intellectually honest
47:49
even as you derive dangerous
47:53
people and extremes
47:55
so
47:57
the
48:00
the let's of on the left has
48:03
you know as i'm sure you pointed out many times on on
48:05
your show me it has it has captured
48:07
institutions as captured in academia
48:09
is captured journalism is captured science
48:11
to an amazing degrees captured hollywood
48:14
it's
48:16
and for reasons that are understandable
48:18
because you know it is hard to figure
48:21
out what's wrong with black lives
48:23
matter as as a movement as well as
48:25
like it's you look at every
48:28
it's every it's it's perfectly
48:30
the engineered to
48:32
this you get past the the
48:35
the blood brain barrier and just the
48:38
cash to all the right ethical
48:40
receptor sites race i guess just this is
48:43
this , of course
48:45
i care about either work
48:47
of course racism of is racism is
48:49
disgusting i would the last
48:51
thing i would want to be as a racist of course
48:54
i acknowledge that little the legacy
48:56
of slavery and and just how hard
48:58
fought all of our civil rights gains have been in the
49:00
united states of , i don't
49:02
want be the the
49:04
of minority groups feeling victimized much
49:06
has been has i
49:08
won fair hiring practices are easy to
49:11
see his check all the boxes on
49:13
the boxes to
49:15
have a good liberal conscience you
49:19
know sort of person and you beer
49:22
confronted by the a black lives
49:24
matter as a social phenomenon and the protests
49:26
over george floyd in all that
49:28
it is very hard to see
49:31
that your in the presence of a
49:33
completely dishonest
49:36
moral panic right because
49:38
there's so many point of contact with real grievance
49:41
or potential points of contact with real grievance
49:43
and
49:45
the
49:46
the yeah it's it's
49:48
hurry to parse therefore more interesting
49:51
and is awesome more consequential in my
49:53
world that is vitiate in the new york times
49:55
and princeton university and
49:58
science mag
49:59
and as i guess just if
50:02
some
50:04
so
50:05
it's a full on moral panic out there
50:07
and and what's more you have this layer of smart
50:09
people who think all of that's been
50:11
exaggerated rights not really happening is just a
50:13
few college campuses two kids
50:15
iran on the onto college campuses
50:18
it's just like in of eighteen people at yale
50:20
you know lambasting
50:23
nicholas christakis
50:25
and
50:26
everyone else is really just a bystander
50:28
to this and as it's some
50:32
it's all been exaggerated
50:34
the kernel of truth there is it really is
50:36
it a is still a minority people who actually believe
50:38
this stuff but you know you only need
50:40
something like five or eight percent of really
50:43
energized activists minority
50:46
to
50:47
completely co op the conversation and that's
50:49
what has been accomplished and but it's
50:51
not just the is there a minority their an
50:53
exceptionally powerful one oregon so
50:55
you you know they're the ones who dictate coaches
50:58
they're the ones who set the tone they're
51:00
the ones who gonna who it in
51:02
create newspapers hundred percent
51:04
so that's the real problem isn't it but the
51:06
question i want to ask you is
51:10
where do you think this is gonna go where do you think this is gonna
51:12
wind up because he's more positive about it on
51:14
a rabid pessimists right where
51:16
do you suggest and ago
51:19
why i think of
51:22
if i had to bed i think
51:24
the vapors of
51:26
workers and will magically
51:28
disappeared as certain point i think it's i
51:30
think it's just whether we're going to have
51:33
one example of
51:35
the park or c or
51:38
you know i just one own goal that is
51:40
so spectacular see that everyone
51:42
will just all the sudden
51:44
pretend that they were never woke in woke in a whether
51:46
it's gonna be that serious alien moment would eat
51:49
and eat and point to and your timeline
51:51
or is just going to be this magical dissipation
51:53
those i you know where people start making
51:56
much more sense on these topics
51:58
i had a bad
51:59
we think that's gonna happen
52:02
then i don't think it's good so i and i think it's gonna happen
52:04
in some short order i don't think
52:06
we're gonna be having this conversation in
52:10
five years i will i will that would be very surprised
52:12
or heavens composition five years and that can
52:14
account me it again guess is an optimist a on
52:16
that front as really could be
52:18
wrong but i would be surprised
52:24
the one caviar i would i
52:26
would put their is
52:28
we get four more years of trump than that goes
52:30
completely out the window medicaid or for of we get somewhere
52:32
years of trump or a trump alike
52:35
phenomenon is just as provocative
52:37
to the last then it and that
52:40
calculation changes but if
52:42
we got into this got a normal
52:44
residency and twenty twenty four in
52:46
a web do democrat or republican
52:51
i think the woke thing has just become
52:54
so
52:56
i'm pragmatic
52:58
and
52:59
the
53:01
yeah i just i just don't i don't see how
53:04
people
53:05
begin aging out of it
53:07
in some short order mean it's somewhat analogous
53:09
to the may submit a much bigger
53:11
phenomenon but it is analogous to the
53:15
the child sexual abuse satanic
53:17
panic thing we had and i don't have you
53:19
guys had an in england and you know we just
53:21
had the catholic church yeah that's
53:25
, which is the tree out ruzicka true version
53:27
of any of these concerns yes but
53:32
the i mean and est on or of you know the story that
53:34
dumb
53:35
the the journalists lawrence right
53:37
the toll on my bike as but is a
53:39
he he wrote a book on on this and
53:41
but when he was doing the new yorker
53:43
article it became it became he was so is this real
53:46
research in l satanic panic phenomenon
53:48
and mrs in the eighties in the states
53:50
and to be out of the front for those who are too young
53:52
to have to remember that i'm in the allegation was
53:54
that it satanic
53:57
calls and infiltrated preschools and
53:59
they just
53:59
the very
54:03
the spirit or a away had decided
54:06
to get access to kids so
54:08
they could form human sacrifices and
54:10
duty ritual abuse and it
54:12
was now happening as scale in american
54:14
society and we , this
54:16
mass uprising and it was who
54:19
knows what was
54:20
you truly at the bottom other than
54:22
been a weather is
54:24
certain real rock lyrics were getting
54:26
into the heads of teenagers and spawning
54:28
a a a generation of devil
54:30
worshippers you know who could to curtail the we
54:32
would clearly have a problem on our hands and
54:35
, lawrence right in
54:37
kind of
54:39
getting on board on to this phenomenon
54:41
went to a seminar run
54:43
by law enforcement
54:46
at the i musharraf wasn't my been in texas
54:48
where he's liver many years
54:51
there's disappear in a seminar for
54:54
young journalists run by law enforcement
54:57
and he remembers that moment where the
54:59
the the sheriff
55:02
some leo
55:07
said to the group
55:09
last year
55:10
this two thousand children
55:13
were murdered
55:14
in ritual sacrifices by satanic
55:17
cults in this country
55:19
the heck of a cop says and
55:21
it it took lawrence you have five seconds
55:24
understand that there's been no
55:26
year in american history where there have
55:29
been fifty thousand murders of any kind
55:31
right and that yet here we have a cop
55:33
the same that that fifty
55:35
thousand kids have been kill it is fifty thousand
55:37
and missing mean i murdered gets rights
55:42
so what what explains that level
55:44
of confusion and arrangement right like
55:46
so what we're in a moment like the and his
55:48
the question yeah we were gonna ask you about that and i'm
55:50
really glad you phrased in
55:53
that way some because i was
55:55
a big fan of the new at this movement
55:57
not a francis and i am not none
55:59
none the three of us are religious her
56:02
i was a big admirer i'm are still am
56:04
a big admirer of yours richard dawkins i've
56:06
read many of his books however
56:11
is it possible
56:12
is it possible that people like
56:14
us the think in the way that we
56:16
do have forgotten
56:19
that thing i think it was a chest the some he said
56:21
this the when you still believe in god you don't believe
56:23
in nothing you believe in anything is
56:25
it possible that this new religion and i suddenly
56:27
she worked as a religion is
56:29
a product of a society that has led gov
56:32
that has religion a religion used to follow
56:33
i
56:36
think it's the
56:39
short answer is probably not because
56:41
i think many of the woke are you
56:44
know religious by my life so many was
56:46
certainly claimed to be religious is not like you have a
56:48
a bed of at an of polling researching
56:51
with exists on as be interesting to run these balls
56:53
but yes yes
56:56
loss of faith has been
57:00
ramping up in up in
57:02
him as a brilliant and all
57:05
the secular democracy is
57:08
what is still not in is a you don't have a minority
57:11
of people a daughter majority of people identified
57:13
as atheists right and as in the minority that identify
57:16
with atheists are still
57:17
don't a single digits because acres atheism
57:20
is a concept is just as got bad
57:22
pr , with it's it's
57:24
have something like twenty to twenty
57:27
five percent of the so called nuns
57:29
who are again these are not people identify as easy as
57:32
that these people who would say they're not identified
57:34
with any specific church be
57:36
so of most people who are you
57:38
know at least nominally christian and least
57:40
nominally to care about the christian it
57:43
in in in the us at this moment and he's
57:45
have something like the house
57:48
who are you know eerie really will
57:50
check many or most of the all the boxes
57:52
to too attached to their beliefs
57:57
there's more than area it's
57:59
if you
57:59
the asked if you're a is it and
58:02
say against a lot of people are on the christian right
58:04
but of many them are are
58:07
our whoa core awoke adjacent in
58:09
arms like i just was on van
58:11
jones his podcast right now he's not
58:16
these much walker then i
58:18
they are any of us think
58:20
he's probably said some rational
58:24
pragmatic things we didn't actually tongue probably
58:26
a some of it's gonna take on the of the
58:28
obama line of like like these
58:31
say listen kid zelig this is not in
58:33
their bigger problems than seat
58:35
pronouns are wary eye on the how he touched it
58:37
but
58:40
still he's like
58:42
in he someone who's coverage of black lives
58:45
matter
58:46
i would have been of many critical
58:48
things to say about an end
58:52
again the topic didn't come up at he's you know he someone
58:54
who if you ask him
58:57
do you think jesus will be returning to
58:59
earth to raise a living and dead
59:03
i'm pretty sure he would say yes
59:05
right and any and you'd be surprised
59:07
at the nub as a number of
59:09
the percentage of sober
59:12
nine bible thumping people
59:14
would say yes to that question
59:16
the i was i've been
59:18
amazed at it like that the people who
59:20
i who i would
59:23
that a lot of money would be i would be
59:25
skeptical of that t saves they they
59:27
they might be christian they might be
59:29
like listen i love the bible it gives me
59:32
a great moral frame where he is my kids the great
59:34
work moral framework of the treaty and his
59:36
visit this visit the traditional identified where this
59:39
where this super important to me
59:41
the
59:42
that's kind of as far as a goes right
59:45
like i'm not going to make medical
59:47
magical claims about slain
59:50
saviors were literally gonna come down
59:52
from work at whereas haven't exactly given
59:54
that we have multiple
59:58
telescopes up there you did there beaming
59:59
if you know
1:00:01
handed billions of of years worth
1:00:03
of of information
1:00:06
i'm amazed
1:00:09
at the number of people who will bite
1:00:11
the bullet on the core doctrine
1:00:13
and say i think jesus is gonna come back
1:00:15
and raise the dead wrote
1:00:18
some surely you have to agree in a society
1:00:20
which is becoming ever more atomizer unable
1:00:22
to disclose we gotta show got it off for many
1:00:25
of these people are awoke right how you can't
1:00:27
say you can't the punchline can't they will
1:00:29
they lost their religion another their that is
1:00:31
a they have a vacuum of ethical
1:00:33
and and existential
1:00:36
vacuum that are filling with wealth
1:00:38
as now there's i age i would grant you that
1:00:40
it's and
1:00:41
the dollars your point yeah i'll grant you that it's
1:00:44
drawing
1:00:45
a lot of
1:00:47
why these spiritual quasi
1:00:49
religious energy
1:00:51
from
1:00:53
the fact that
1:00:54
most people in our society
1:00:58
the even if they're nominally religious
1:01:01
really are struggling to
1:01:03
to find meaning in in their day
1:01:05
in their day to day about it when you look at just the
1:01:07
finity the hour by hour
1:01:09
increments at which selena life as doled out
1:01:11
us are you get up in age
1:01:13
as your as cast out of
1:01:16
you know do deep sleeper or
1:01:18
he noted that phantasmagoria
1:01:20
of of dreams you
1:01:22
know when you alarm goes off in the morning and
1:01:27
how do you feel about your life and what
1:01:29
is gonna give you moral
1:01:31
urgency and meaning it
1:01:34
lot of the millions and
1:01:36
millions of people found it as
1:01:39
a specific moments in our in our a
1:01:41
recent history like and real the george
1:01:44
floyd the only was certainly one
1:01:46
of those
1:01:47
moments where that okay this is
1:01:50
enough is enough like this is my
1:01:52
religion right up and
1:01:54
and add some
1:01:56
it's understandable and it is yes it
1:01:59
does have a really
1:01:59
this dynamic
1:02:01
the
1:02:03
there's a religious dynamic and it's it's it's call
1:02:05
it religious
1:02:07
the to just basically say
1:02:10
actually it it in an invidious statement about
1:02:12
religion is basically say like with all the things
1:02:14
i don't like about religion is tribalism is dogmatism
1:02:17
it's his immunity to
1:02:19
good arguments a good evidence right the fact
1:02:21
that it can't be reasoned with
1:02:24
really because it's just chuck reason out the
1:02:26
door a you know initially or plan
1:02:28
and what has brought back in the name of reason is
1:02:30
functioning under that
1:02:32
the
1:02:33
the the for the new physics of just
1:02:35
casuistry like like we already know that
1:02:37
god exists and we know the bible's perfect
1:02:39
we know the koran as perfect as a within that
1:02:41
frame now we're going to get really reasonable
1:02:44
like you know st thomas aquinas or
1:02:47
st augustine the
1:02:51
that's all the stuff about really
1:02:53
that religion that i find that
1:02:55
so obviously wrong and so easy
1:02:57
to see once you're not indoctrinated into that
1:03:00
religion a
1:03:02
lot of that this explains
1:03:05
what is happening politically we're
1:03:07
on the far left and the far right
1:03:13
some but you i
1:03:16
think all of us have got to admit that in a society
1:03:18
we're becoming ever more demise where people are becoming
1:03:20
more isolated
1:03:23
religion organized religion it
1:03:26
was a bond it was a community people could
1:03:28
go they can meet other people they
1:03:31
could feel connected and so
1:03:33
when people are disconnected they gonna look
1:03:35
for ways to connect with someone
1:03:37
else and what better way to do that was then with
1:03:39
in i support this political movement blm
1:03:42
the oh you know what do you share
1:03:44
the same immutable characteristics as me
1:03:46
you know i'm gay or on blackford
1:03:48
said to have sex with in because was so
1:03:51
desperate because will literally
1:03:53
program to form communities that
1:03:55
we're going to have this ideology which is going
1:03:57
to enable us to created community
1:04:01
yeah and and on the
1:04:03
woke sided has this with
1:04:05
as a precursor and christianity but
1:04:07
it's it's some
1:04:10
somehow in a pure form now it
1:04:12
is inverted the live
1:04:15
lives value structure is such that
1:04:17
in , the that the lower status
1:04:19
you are the higher status you
1:04:22
you come out and only ones the calculation
1:04:24
has been done in dungeons
1:04:26
and dragons with that sort of the new dies
1:04:28
were like that the of the least powerpoints
1:04:30
you have in our youth you know
1:04:33
that the more you find yourself winning and
1:04:35
so that the victimology of it is some
1:04:38
you know and and that he and the meek
1:04:40
shall inherit the earth i'm is really it is that
1:04:42
those am the
1:04:44
implemented in a very weird way
1:04:47
and , game aside somehow a
1:04:49
in all of the intersectionality details
1:04:52
of it
1:04:53
the
1:04:56
yeah me it's
1:04:57
there's no question people
1:05:00
right tremendous amount of energy and
1:05:03
in a hesitate to say meaning them
1:05:05
is the meaning and scare quotes from
1:05:08
this
1:05:09
that's all i'm a i guess it's a month to steal
1:05:11
man
1:05:13
all of it
1:05:14
in a briefly it'd be it is
1:05:16
again especially on the last
1:05:19
it's genuinely confusing read
1:05:21
like the exit the the the
1:05:24
mad work that the tiny pieces
1:05:26
of misinformation or or just
1:05:28
bus fraudulent assumptions
1:05:31
is doing
1:05:32
it is
1:05:33
it's really impossible to exaggerate
1:05:36
was of the ask most people who like most
1:05:38
people who saw the george floyd
1:05:43
moment i mean it's sam
1:05:45
can i didn't deeds we've
1:05:48
yet to totally understand what happened there because
1:05:50
like you who knows oh man i guess
1:05:52
i just as brackets act as i don't you we still on
1:05:54
a who derek shogun really is and
1:05:56
why he did what did did right so like either
1:05:59
it was a race the murder or it was
1:06:01
a in on his brain malfunction
1:06:03
to like to i i i don't i also look at
1:06:05
a video i don't know what i'm looking at there's just
1:06:07
it isn't
1:06:09
apart from that that the horrible killing
1:06:11
of a person who'd certainly did not need to be
1:06:13
killed in this situation
1:06:17
it
1:06:19
you ask most but most people who saw that
1:06:22
the vast majority people who saw that he
1:06:24
i certainly left of center
1:06:26
would bet their lives
1:06:29
that the lives of their children
1:06:31
and what they saw their was a
1:06:33
a racist lynching
1:06:35
like that was a we're what we have is a white
1:06:38
man killing a black man
1:06:41
cause of racism that i
1:06:43
wouldn't have happened to a white man it wouldn't
1:06:45
have been perpetrated by a black man raises
1:06:47
a hundred percent of the explanatory
1:06:50
variable there
1:06:53
and
1:06:54
not only was that as
1:06:56
unambiguously evil
1:06:59
the sadistic and racists as
1:07:02
it seemed
1:07:04
that happens thousands
1:07:06
of times a year in america
1:07:08
i guess people to estimate how many how many black
1:07:11
people you think get murdered by white racists cops in
1:07:13
america rear
1:07:15
they imagine where we're talking thousands
1:07:17
right so if you believe that
1:07:20
right then what would
1:07:22
you do you , what would we have wouldn't
1:07:24
you to take to the streets when when
1:07:27
everyone says where it was on it where on
1:07:29
was for protesting on tuesday
1:07:32
the course right so it's like so you
1:07:34
don't have to add too many pieces of
1:07:37
your distorting you know
1:07:40
the
1:07:41
pseudo facts
1:07:42
the get to get
1:07:44
people who i otherwise totally understand
1:07:47
two
1:07:49
now so you know all in all
1:07:51
the the predictable pieties on this topic
1:07:54
but the truth is all of that
1:07:56
is wrong right like you know it's you can count
1:07:58
on on two hands
1:07:59
the number of unarmed black
1:08:02
man
1:08:03
get killed every year by cops
1:08:05
the
1:08:06
then you can count more white people who get killed
1:08:08
every year by cops right a are under identical
1:08:11
circumstances up again
1:08:13
i've again i've about this my bike as when he not
1:08:15
go there are those who are interested to look at
1:08:17
them
1:08:19
the episode can we pull back from the brink we
1:08:21
will beautifully get like two hours i talk about
1:08:23
it was was actually one needed to be said in that moment
1:08:25
threat i really congratulate you on that on by
1:08:27
people to gone find that of really very good
1:08:30
so i'm ugly that aside but
1:08:33
the miss so that that the misinformation or
1:08:35
the the faulty assumptions heard
1:08:38
the highest level rises like this is not
1:08:40
it does
1:08:42
the i guess are some people who actually know
1:08:44
what is real here energy
1:08:46
cynically when italy and politics but
1:08:48
mrs hard me to believe that
1:08:51
i'm on my com ela harrison doesn't actually
1:08:53
know the numbers right but
1:08:57
it's not in her political interests
1:08:59
or lin wood she conceives of us are political interest
1:09:01
to
1:09:02
quite she knows the numbers right
1:09:04
the it
1:09:07
anyone it's those it's not many
1:09:09
charitable view is
1:09:11
they're they're very few people who are
1:09:15
consciously
1:09:17
line
1:09:20
the
1:09:21
we're seeking to
1:09:26
using that i know iran may just caught
1:09:28
conscious evil is or is a rare thing
1:09:30
yes and i must be useful idiots
1:09:32
is what i talk about my book yeah yes i
1:09:35
agree with this tag constantine
1:09:37
did you want better mental health
1:09:40
on from what are so we don't have mental
1:09:42
health so how do you deal with mental
1:09:44
health you drink vodka then go out
1:09:46
on the wrestle birth if you leave you
1:09:48
feel better if you die you know
1:09:50
three oh man what about the best feelings
1:09:53
it's roster where it has no feelings
1:09:56
people don't always realize it
1:09:58
physical symptoms or headache
1:09:59
pointing and even issues
1:10:02
can be in the case
1:10:03
the stress and let's not forget
1:10:05
about soon scrolling no sleep enough
1:10:08
sleeping too much on the rethink
1:10:10
and dog very very brutal
1:10:12
much on during using this is worse
1:10:14
than the disease therapy has really
1:10:16
helped me in my life to concentrate
1:10:19
and focus is really important
1:10:21
to have someone impartial who you can
1:10:23
talk to about the tricky issues they
1:10:25
go struggling to deal with therapy
1:10:28
, played a really important role in
1:10:30
helping me to deal with my eighty hd
1:10:32
and become better in all areas
1:10:34
of my life why is she telling
1:10:36
them how we keys drink vodka
1:10:39
few birth or best to help is
1:10:41
customized online therapy
1:10:43
video phone and even more
1:10:46
sessions with your therapist so you
1:10:48
don't have to see anyone on camera
1:10:51
if you don't want to do they are going on with
1:10:53
refunds get ten percent of the first
1:10:55
month of but the help dot com forward slash
1:10:57
three good especially if they're not real mean
1:11:00
he he
1:11:01
the c e o h
1:11:04
oh hey don't com slash
1:11:06
trigger some listen
1:11:08
you've been very generous to the time there's a fifty
1:11:11
other questions we want on your when all going to
1:11:13
get a chance to chance so we'll pick out
1:11:15
from all we do all couple of questions for supports
1:11:17
us all make sure to pick out of a grow up with the question
1:11:19
because that's when i came up a law or
1:11:21
i'm that was before we ask you the final
1:11:23
question if you don't mind a a few more minutes
1:11:26
go for a i wanted will francis
1:11:28
and i both ones that actually talk you we've talked
1:11:30
about these very divisive things and people will have
1:11:32
a different opinion about trump on cove it and
1:11:34
and brexit and all of this stuff whatever you
1:11:36
want to the but one thing that strikes me
1:11:38
is your one of
1:11:40
the see people that we've met who is content
1:11:44
who's happy i can tell how
1:11:48
does how if people
1:11:50
are watching this and they would like to be happy
1:11:52
in spite of all the terrible things that they think
1:11:54
you have these really happening on twitter the
1:11:57
strikes me a francis uses your app
1:11:59
every morning
1:12:01
how do
1:12:03
you and as one in the modern
1:12:05
world get closer to
1:12:07
that point where whatever
1:12:10
is happening at out whatever storms
1:12:12
around the you're calm and peaceful
1:12:14
inside
1:12:16
the first one of the i'm not i'm certainly not always
1:12:19
calm and peaceful but the have you isis
1:12:21
doesn't hurt that has a voice is growing
1:12:23
yes
1:12:26
the truth is so images
1:12:28
of the backstory hear that yogi in my
1:12:30
early twenties i got really into meditation
1:12:33
and i'm , the first psychedelic
1:12:35
so he showed me that it was possible have a
1:12:37
very different experience of the world and
1:12:41
ah and it was and it of mind
1:12:43
that could be explored
1:12:45
this is how you paid attention to experience
1:12:47
rats i owe it prior to psychedelic
1:12:49
i would really just
1:12:52
been kind of waiting for these third person
1:12:54
brain based discussion to deliver
1:12:56
lane all the right answers about you know
1:12:58
what the human mind is and it was was
1:13:00
pretty well established
1:13:03
and still is thought to be well established
1:13:05
in western science and psychological science cognitive
1:13:07
science and , even them
1:13:10
western philosophy that introspection
1:13:13
was a dead end mean they tried to get it off
1:13:15
the ground somewhere around one hundred and
1:13:17
twenty years ago and it
1:13:19
just scenery you come up short
1:13:21
almost immediately i mean the truth is you can't you close your eyes
1:13:24
and you look inside and you can't
1:13:26
even tell you have you have much
1:13:28
less at the brain is doing all of his top like
1:13:30
saying that is is actually delivering your experience
1:13:32
in the world so
1:13:34
and
1:13:37
minutes is just one curious asymmetry
1:13:39
as of cultural wisdom in
1:13:42
the east the you know for
1:13:45
all the failings of what didn't happen civilisational
1:13:47
happen in a in culture
1:13:50
the
1:13:51
there's a lot to be said about that
1:13:55
they didn't lose this strand
1:13:57
of wisdom which is there actually is something
1:14:00
the discovered in a first person
1:14:02
way about the nature of your own mind that
1:14:04
is liberating i think of it you you
1:14:06
suffer by certain
1:14:09
the
1:14:10
machinery a certain dynamics
1:14:13
which you which could either completely
1:14:15
inscrutable to you or can become
1:14:17
more and more transparent
1:14:20
and and in his transparency
1:14:23
less and less operatives on
1:14:25
a moment by moment basis and so did such
1:14:28
retake any the topics we've talked about zoe we do
1:14:30
you have talked about me getting on twitter and
1:14:32
getting really spun up over have been of
1:14:34
somebody saying something about something about something
1:14:36
else that i care about
1:14:39
i talk of your anyone who
1:14:42
things i have trump derangement syndrome
1:14:44
is going to look at me as area you why
1:14:46
talking to this guy about meditations get so worked
1:14:49
up over trump you know what it's like this is it
1:14:51
was , it's a performative contradiction rights
1:14:54
that's actually to miss understand
1:14:56
my
1:14:59
you know emotional relationship to the phenomenon
1:15:01
of trump or like i like like jr your i can
1:15:03
say everything i say
1:15:06
about it's and think about trump
1:15:09
without spending much time
1:15:11
the only in contracted around
1:15:14
trump an epa is up say is the essence say no
1:15:16
time this is much less
1:15:18
time than i otherwise would if i if i didn't
1:15:20
know how to who the
1:15:22
input meditate right now melt the word meditation
1:15:25
can mean many different things saved
1:15:27
people bugs
1:15:29
what did you should mean is
1:15:31
the
1:15:33
the simple recognition of
1:15:37
what
1:15:38
consciousness is like
1:15:40
rider to entanglement
1:15:42
with sought what a world with
1:15:44
three of us are sitting here and
1:15:47
we're having
1:15:49
a and experience of the world
1:15:51
is happening in the you know five sensory channels
1:15:54
there's there's this other
1:15:56
mode or this other aspect
1:15:59
or
1:15:59
in which is
1:16:01
are thinking about
1:16:03
what we directly experience through our senses
1:16:05
right and the from for most people
1:16:07
most of the time the thoughts are
1:16:10
the incessant
1:16:11
and uninspected right and and and
1:16:13
and there are rise in his on notice rosie you
1:16:16
just it just feels like you right
1:16:18
like so you'll say something that i disagree with
1:16:21
and it's that does a voice
1:16:23
in me which says
1:16:25
what's he talking about or i was i mean
1:16:27
really well i got to get the but will he do it but you just this
1:16:30
is that voice that either is
1:16:33
that either feels like a cell
1:16:35
for me in in
1:16:37
nearly one hundred percent of the
1:16:39
the the cases
1:16:41
that is feels like i write that feels
1:16:43
like gonna miss me and
1:16:46
then you're you're told something
1:16:48
about the project of well get
1:16:50
easy you could have an experience haphazardly
1:16:54
or on psychedelic swear that get that
1:16:56
the unification get interrupted by were all
1:16:58
of a sudden
1:17:00
there's just the mind is certainly much
1:17:03
more vast than that right it
1:17:05
doesn't feel like there's a subject
1:17:07
in the head looking out through your
1:17:09
eyes at a world that's not you
1:17:12
and
1:17:13
forever implicated by the glances
1:17:16
of other people and the opinions of other people
1:17:18
and it's just me and hear this cause of in battle
1:17:20
the go trying to
1:17:22
navigate a world that is fundamentally
1:17:25
release potentially hostile to my
1:17:27
interest right like that subject object dichotomy
1:17:30
where it's just like , the man and
1:17:32
about trying to steer it in
1:17:34
oh did the to send safeties
1:17:37
and knock over the falls emotionally
1:17:41
that suddenly relaxes
1:17:44
again it it matters what a now vegas maybe
1:17:46
i'm talking about psychedelic because it's
1:17:48
it's more mora replicator
1:17:50
bowl for people depending on what
1:17:52
drug you've taken back and relax
1:17:54
and one or another way of an md amaze
1:17:56
really just the relaxing of the the emotional
1:17:59
toll
1:17:59
of all that without the deep
1:18:02
d pyrotechnics of of
1:18:04
changing your perceptions
1:18:06
if you sell as they are so as i've and you can have
1:18:08
a a real much more
1:18:10
fundamental transformation how you perceive the world
1:18:13
that waivers the case the
1:18:16
just so happens that are are nervous systems are perturb
1:18:18
all pharmacologically or
1:18:20
just by happenstance way this could happen to you
1:18:22
just because it happens to you rights
1:18:25
and people have those stories there's
1:18:29
vast testimony on this topic that you
1:18:31
can it you can experience
1:18:33
you are mine
1:18:35
as a much vaster place and you tend
1:18:37
to experience it
1:18:40
as and
1:18:41
the
1:18:44
then when you come back from one of the those experiences
1:18:46
you might become interested in what is
1:18:48
it that trims it down so reliably
1:18:50
to of reliably to this experience of confinement
1:18:53
where you feel like just
1:18:55
me here feeling uptight again
1:18:57
right you know what what's what's that about
1:19:03
virtually a hundred percent of of
1:19:05
that is
1:19:06
what it's like to be you identified
1:19:09
with thought and then if you're
1:19:11
if you're identified with thought habitually you
1:19:14
were at the mercy of whatever you happen to
1:19:16
think about prices as just like thursday
1:19:20
never i've
1:19:23
the mirror and money and alger i've drawn
1:19:25
somewhere is just a is really a is
1:19:27
like the most boring person
1:19:29
in the world comes to the front door of your house
1:19:32
and takes you hostage for your father's
1:19:35
you from room to room the tell you the same
1:19:37
stories over and over again you can't shut him
1:19:40
up and you can get away from
1:19:42
him
1:19:42
it's just and
1:19:44
that's your life right and you're
1:19:47
you're thinking about the past about what you could have said
1:19:49
or should have said are almost thirty thinking about the future
1:19:51
what what's this what's you know he has gonna
1:19:53
go and most of the shooters you you
1:19:55
visualize never happened the wave
1:19:58
is obsessed about them in the first place so
1:20:00
that ninety nine percent of yourself talk
1:20:03
his
1:20:05
amir at best it's neutral
1:20:08
with respect was emotional toll on him and as really
1:20:10
of elements some people have you
1:20:12
convince some people have people have happy self
1:20:15
talk and that's enough
1:20:18
so hard to get through to them because they really don't
1:20:20
think of themselves as ever suffering
1:20:22
much psychologically right they they they're very
1:20:24
confident they love the people in our
1:20:26
lives a level of back
1:20:28
they're not
1:20:29
really conflict they don't have regrets and disappointments
1:20:32
that they're friendly and they're not you know not worried
1:20:34
about anything and they just want to get
1:20:36
up and do it again tomorrow we haven't so much
1:20:38
fun dot people like that psychopaths
1:20:41
guess what is most
1:20:43
people are not like that ramos the flow chart are
1:20:45
sensitive to this criticism of the default
1:20:48
witches most
1:20:50
of what you're saying to yourself isn't making
1:20:52
you happy and worse
1:20:55
it's it's predicated
1:20:57
on a fundamental illusion
1:20:59
the
1:21:01
so photo identification with this
1:21:03
this subset of your of your mental
1:21:05
experience which is this again that this
1:21:08
discursive thought and
1:21:10
when you break that identification there's
1:21:13
as much more space there and
1:21:15
the past and any
1:21:19
the d
1:21:20
it is in saw it isn't in identification with
1:21:22
thought that the past and the future
1:21:25
exert their weight on the prison
1:21:27
like is a good work
1:21:30
that's because when it work
1:21:31
processing everything we experience
1:21:33
in the present
1:21:35
brutus scrim of discursive thought
1:21:38
we don't we never actually make satisfying
1:21:40
contact with the present we rarely do
1:21:42
and and those moments where we do
1:21:44
this was peak peak experience moments
1:21:48
what has made it it be a peak is
1:21:51
breaking the spell of thought for long
1:21:53
enough for is just a lead and some
1:21:55
of the breeze of or awareness
1:21:57
that is always and it's always there
1:22:00
we just don't we were
1:22:02
blocking it continually would have an open the door
1:22:04
the window
1:22:07
and some
1:22:11
meditation really is again
1:22:13
there are many different techniques are dirt to may have wasted
1:22:16
to describe and frame it in the end
1:22:18
is actually not even a practice
1:22:21
you're doing is not and it is in the end
1:22:23
it is something your ceasing to do mirrors
1:22:25
is is just
1:22:27
nine distraction your seem to be distracted
1:22:30
by thought you're you're starting to notice
1:22:32
the themselves as appearances
1:22:34
in consciousness and
1:22:37
noticed as empty as appearances they
1:22:40
don't have force they don't have
1:22:42
emerged from and of emotional force is not like you
1:22:44
be suddenly become an idiot you can't figure
1:22:46
out what you want to eat for dinner you know how to how
1:22:48
to find your car or i'm you
1:22:50
can see even think and you can plan
1:22:53
the
1:22:54
the moment you
1:22:57
begin to suffer
1:22:58
you because you be years your new default
1:23:01
is to become interested in his i guess is
1:23:03
as i game mindfulness alarm you
1:23:07
the started sounding and
1:23:11
then you relax your identification
1:23:13
with the just that just the
1:23:15
the
1:23:16
the physiology of suffering mr tickets
1:23:18
a to bring it back to bombers talk about so
1:23:21
yeah there's a moment where i notice something
1:23:24
that
1:23:26
i find
1:23:28
you know either but i personally annoying
1:23:31
or or the appropriate target of moral
1:23:34
outrage my i don't think we should get raided
1:23:36
or not envisioning psychological
1:23:38
health has been synonymous with never been
1:23:40
angry ever again or never been fearful
1:23:43
every and any idea of negative emotions
1:23:46
are
1:23:48
you know from a from a and enlightened
1:23:51
point of view and my book are still
1:23:53
salient cues relic of i walk
1:23:55
outside this house on the way to my car
1:23:58
and someone physically attacked me on the side
1:23:59
walk
1:24:00
i don't want to be just a puddle
1:24:03
of goo in i'll just be me in
1:24:05
love with the person i let that as not
1:24:07
it's not to say that there's not it does not a possible
1:24:10
state of consciousness it it certainly is
1:24:12
it actually they're they're settling
1:24:14
scenarios where that
1:24:17
that float works right like just being
1:24:19
the guy who's the
1:24:22
beaming unconditional love as your only
1:24:24
response to anything right it's
1:24:27
possible to get out of some physical altercation
1:24:30
because it's are so surprising by someone comes
1:24:32
to mug you and your just in our yard
1:24:34
in your on m the a may and you to same as man
1:24:37
i love you right like that could
1:24:39
either like that could turn out well but
1:24:43
practically speaking
1:24:45
the strikes me is totally appropriate
1:24:47
to
1:24:49
feel
1:24:51
these kind of punk tape neg classically
1:24:53
negative emotions
1:24:55
equip the the real question is
1:24:57
how long do they last and what
1:24:59
are they good for like what like when when is
1:25:01
it
1:25:02
when do you what do you want to cease being angry
1:25:05
so that you can actually function intelligently
1:25:07
in in in my book
1:25:09
that happens very very soon after
1:25:12
the rising of anger and the like you don't you don't want to stay
1:25:14
angry right like a buddy but the initial
1:25:17
the old of anger in
1:25:21
many cases is totally appropriate any it
1:25:23
is the orient in response to you actually need
1:25:25
to respond intelligently to the whatever
1:25:28
, emergency or quasi
1:25:30
emergency is
1:25:32
the
1:25:33
the
1:25:35
once you know how to meditate you
1:25:37
do notice that the half life of negative
1:25:39
emotions is really really breathe mrs
1:25:41
actually impossible to stay angry
1:25:44
or embarrassed
1:25:46
or whatever it is pickier negative
1:25:48
emotion the longer than
1:25:52
some tens of seconds unless
1:25:56
you then you're you're taken in by thought again
1:25:58
about why you should be angry or wife the embarrassed
1:26:01
and
1:26:02
that
1:26:04
your life becomes completely different when
1:26:06
you can get off the right you know i mean the
1:26:08
difference between being angry for ten
1:26:11
seconds the been angry for ten
1:26:13
minutes even in a much less ten hours
1:26:16
or ten days this enormous
1:26:18
ravages you just think of how life arranging
1:26:21
those periods are were years helplessly
1:26:24
motivated the anger
1:26:27
right and in ten minutes is enough to completely
1:26:30
fucked up your life right i'm into say the thing
1:26:32
to your spouse that you can't
1:26:35
have that into ring the bell you can't on ring
1:26:37
you know and images like the like the
1:26:39
see how people's lives run off
1:26:41
the rails because
1:26:44
their minds are out of control and and literally
1:26:47
that everything we see out there
1:26:49
that is producing masses human
1:26:52
suffering and and your existential
1:26:54
risk even area like literally everything
1:26:56
beyond naturally
1:26:59
occurring disasters
1:27:01
the
1:27:02
there's a matter of people's minds been out
1:27:04
of control
1:27:05
we just have we just that were running
1:27:07
terrible legacy code
1:27:09
you know he in a condition of increasingly
1:27:13
the
1:27:15
stabilizing
1:27:19
power amplified by technology
1:27:21
i mean if is getting increasingly easy one
1:27:24
person to screw it up for the
1:27:26
rest of us missile or that the topic of existential
1:27:28
risk as it's own thing which i am
1:27:31
focusing on more and more i think it's
1:27:33
you know it's and it's
1:27:35
neglected to scary to graham
1:27:37
is just they're just not that they're not enough
1:27:40
people thinking about how
1:27:42
we can shore up our civilization against
1:27:45
existential risk and the man made another
1:27:47
was so
1:27:50
much of the daily evidence of
1:27:54
the conflict a needless human misery is is
1:27:57
born of people
1:27:59
been kept the by their thoughts and not
1:28:01
knowing that there's any alternative the
1:28:03
just they're just talking to themselves rather
1:28:05
and it is claiming to know things are they
1:28:07
don't know the in persuaded
1:28:09
by those the inner proclamations
1:28:12
right images like what does it feel like the
1:28:16
have a very strong opinion
1:28:19
that is going to dictate everything you
1:28:22
do next
1:28:23
and
1:28:25
how often is that just and
1:28:27
automaticity that's totally
1:28:29
unexpected that would
1:28:31
be
1:28:32
the
1:28:34
could be completely deflated
1:28:37
just with another which was at a moment's
1:28:39
pause if you only knew how to
1:28:42
do you just take the other side and at ever
1:28:44
forget about meditation for a moment is that the ability
1:28:46
to
1:28:47
skeptical about one zone
1:28:49
opinions like that talk about
1:28:51
an and train skill minister
1:28:53
something that almost nobody has
1:28:56
right know nobody even has it has it as
1:28:59
norm that you could indoors
1:29:01
even in the abstract really why would you want to be skeptical
1:29:03
about your own opinions like this is
1:29:06
what i think
1:29:07
that's why i'm like you i'm always
1:29:09
starting debates around the dinner table because
1:29:11
i'm always testing what i think against what other
1:29:13
people saying and because i'm aware that it's
1:29:16
just thought and they dress refining
1:29:18
but anyway we've got one for some
1:29:20
forgettable thank you so much for go have been
1:29:22
doing wasn't well as at the scene and speak with you
1:29:25
and get a low but of your opinion wisdom
1:29:27
and can i just say if people listen to
1:29:29
this i use europe it's actually
1:29:31
brilliant and it has three my life's the ability
1:29:34
to just sit and meditate for ten minutes every
1:29:36
morning is one of the most if
1:29:38
not the best way to deal with obtrusive
1:29:40
and obsessional thoughts with every time
1:29:42
he comes into the studio and he's all
1:29:45
over the place ago have you meditate the answer
1:29:47
is always now there are so yeah thanks
1:29:49
you know it's berlin and the podcasts making
1:29:51
sense to sam harris and with am with am fan
1:29:53
of like of we talked about during the blm
1:29:56
situation you covered it i thought exactly
1:29:59
the way that to become an you have important conversations
1:30:01
on that i will do a couple
1:30:04
of questions for locals i will ask you buy coverage
1:30:06
because we promised before we do that or above
1:30:08
before we do or final question so was the same
1:30:10
one thing we're not talking about that we really
1:30:12
should
1:30:14
in this conversation or anything side
1:30:16
as a society
1:30:18
the
1:30:22
always touched on pieces of it i'm a
1:30:24
i do think
1:30:27
that
1:30:32
and as a generic level
1:30:35
me that that the problem is always
1:30:37
sell years as cooperation
1:30:39
for us at this point be like like
1:30:42
virtually anything that's going to just happened
1:30:44
to us coughed up by the the hand
1:30:46
of nature we can
1:30:49
figure out how to solve at this point i'm at m and
1:30:51
including it an asteroid hurtling towards
1:30:53
towards as me that this point we have enough tech
1:30:56
and i'm , so sure we have enough people
1:30:58
watching but close that
1:31:01
won't win a we'd have tens
1:31:03
, years right would have some decades to
1:31:06
turn you on a problem that
1:31:08
specific problem
1:31:10
the
1:31:11
the all of our problems on some level of
1:31:13
our our of our own making me if
1:31:15
nothing else is just or
1:31:18
the opportunity costs born
1:31:20
of all of the needless bullshit we get entangled
1:31:23
with based on her own you know you you know
1:31:25
incapacity to cooperate so it
1:31:28
is just it's some
1:31:31
that's the first order of business to business
1:31:34
and the next one to figure out how weekend
1:31:37
have the casual conversations on some level
1:31:40
right like of because get all we have a it
1:31:42
is is a capacity
1:31:44
persuade one another so as
1:31:46
to the engineer in
1:31:49
a forward looking cooperation
1:31:51
or we have violence rather million the
1:31:53
end like of that we just get a have to force
1:31:55
people to do stuff if we can persuade
1:31:57
them to do stuff for their you know they indicate
1:31:59
them to the the epiphany is on their own ins
1:32:03
were politics comes in
1:32:06
the and
1:32:07
more and more
1:32:09
i think we're in a situation where
1:32:12
because of technology
1:32:15
it had some
1:32:17
strangely getting harder and harder to
1:32:20
to get our we are talking that are horizons
1:32:23
due to fuse right was that eight
1:32:25
billion strangers morales
1:32:28
trying to figure out how to cooperate and
1:32:32
suasion is the only good
1:32:34
tool again mean for it me would have to use
1:32:36
force in certain circumstances and i'm in
1:32:38
our as think we should be very
1:32:40
i
1:32:42
don't think pacifism is is
1:32:44
is is a plan their am i think we actually
1:32:46
do need to have are forced game together
1:32:49
to for for the situations where we need it in
1:32:51
up and as individually and collectively
1:32:54
right as level of nation states as
1:32:58
well
1:33:00
i'm be i'm increasingly worried about our
1:33:02
incapacity to converge
1:33:05
on a just
1:33:07
this passionate fan base discussion
1:33:09
the things that are just
1:33:11
so easy
1:33:13
to assess images i usually touch several
1:33:15
topics here but just like
1:33:17
how many people have any
1:33:20
identity get killed by cops every year
1:33:22
in america and decide what are it's like and
1:33:24
how does that relate to the
1:33:26
levels of crime been perpetrated
1:33:28
by people of various identities and like
1:33:30
i was situations are cops actually getting into
1:33:33
and what other reasonable expectations
1:33:35
of people in society where there are four
1:33:37
hundred million guns and like why is a different
1:33:39
when an american suddenly turns around
1:33:41
and reaches into the cab of his pickup truck while
1:33:44
getting arrested
1:33:45
then when that happens in japan right
1:33:47
like whether note where there are no guns rex
1:33:50
this is certain is should be such
1:33:52
an easy conversation to have rights
1:33:55
there should be no like says it's like
1:33:58
the ministers is not even
1:33:59
the
1:34:03
it it is is is hard to think of a simpler
1:34:05
one where the facts are easier
1:34:07
to get and the most of the and most
1:34:09
of the stuff is on years so much of the suffers
1:34:11
on videotape the so easy to parse
1:34:15
repeatable year after
1:34:17
year the
1:34:19
problem that everyone unit like it's in
1:34:21
no one's interest that the problem
1:34:23
the bigger than it is enough smaller than it is
1:34:26
like we want we will all i saw this problem
1:34:29
then we
1:34:31
find an apostle talk about the your
1:34:33
problem is some you meditate too much and you're too
1:34:36
small you can
1:34:38
you think other people are like you but they're not
1:34:40
what know that i i so i know like
1:34:42
there's none of this is foreign to me i know what it's like
1:34:44
to get the mostly hijacked
1:34:46
any or something right whether something
1:34:48
happens right in front of you and your over our
1:34:50
ideas are at it you care about the truth and
1:34:52
so you will get mostly hijacked and
1:34:55
then you will go look at the same here most people
1:34:57
just get a muslim how into yeah yeah
1:34:59
so we and we need that is a
1:35:04
that's certainly a software flaw in
1:35:06
are operating system is not a feature and
1:35:09
the away one to were of summarized this
1:35:11
in the past for people's they have a your your capacity
1:35:14
the be offended
1:35:18
is not something that anyone
1:35:20
need or should respect
1:35:23
in you like that's just not this
1:35:25
is not are you certainly on argument but
1:35:27
it's not even a basis for respect like like
1:35:29
that it like table stakes for any ethical
1:35:32
conversation is more
1:35:34
than just your capacity to
1:35:37
be offended
1:35:38
and
1:35:40
until you understand that like is yours not
1:35:45
you can't play the game we need to play
1:35:47
in order to to ensure an open ended
1:35:51
circumstance of cooperation what a
1:35:53
great now to finish on sam harris thank
1:35:55
you so much for coming on we really recommend
1:35:57
you check out sam's podcast and
1:35:59
berlin app we're gonna ask him a couple
1:36:02
of questions from you for you but for
1:36:04
now sam thank you so much for joining us
1:36:06
regular agony and i don't resent it was
1:36:08
see virus in would another brilliant episode i mean what
1:36:10
be quite like this but he will be a burden
1:36:12
episode as well or or so all of
1:36:14
them go out sometime uk time for those of you
1:36:17
who like your trigonometry on the go aid
1:36:19
social venables a podcast take
1:36:21
care and sees
1:36:25
we disagree we didn't have you hang yourself
1:36:29
and how do you have reflects
1:36:32
on the way you thoughts
1:36:34
and spoke about of it about happy with it
1:36:36
i would you have done a different voice
1:36:46
buy one get one for dollar really
1:36:48
does
1:36:49
we like to call it is
1:36:52
that suspicious subsume a grilled
1:36:55
chicken is good
1:36:56
mccain over forty years
1:36:59
give my one gallon
1:37:01
for is one of the city
1:37:03
and has round that's go through choose
1:37:06
more
1:37:12
me very valid for items
1:37:14
or less of a happy ,
1:37:16
xavier university is handling ohio
1:37:19
nursing shirt and getting individuals
1:37:21
with no nursing network network
1:37:23
, into the profession
1:37:26
what are profession studied biology marketing
1:37:29
or anything in between our abs
1:37:31
and program to prepare you for nursing
1:37:33
practice in if you as sixteen nursing
1:37:36
is your hollen now abs
1:37:45
on to apply
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More