Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
He was involved in three car
0:03
crashes, two plane crashes. He
0:06
went into no man's land in the First World War
0:08
some 30 times. He got
0:10
so close to the German trenches, he could actually
0:12
hear them speaking in their trenches. He
0:15
once said that there's nothing so exhilarating in
0:17
life as to be shot at without result.
0:21
The Conservatives tried to deselect him, and
0:23
every single thing that he said turned
0:25
out to be right and everything that
0:27
they said turned out to be wrong.
0:58
Andrew Roberts, such a delight to have you on the
1:00
show. You are, of course, the author of many, many
1:02
books, but the one we really want to
1:04
talk to you about is one that
1:06
in internet terms has gone viral and
1:08
continues to sell tens of thousands of
1:11
copies every year, is Churchill walking with
1:13
destiny. And we wanted to spend some
1:15
time, a long time actually, talking to
1:17
you about here in Westminster, where
1:19
we're sitting, about a man who shaped
1:21
the destiny of this country, the
1:23
history of this country, about
1:26
whom actually people of my generation, we've got a couple
1:28
of young guys here, having
1:30
been educated in this country, we know very
1:32
little about. Very little about.
1:35
Well, that's partly because he's not taught in
1:37
the schools any longer. He used to be, but now
1:39
he isn't. You can get
1:42
through your entire history syllabus and only
1:44
learn about Winston Churchill for
1:46
14 seconds on a video. Yes,
1:49
well, we are going to counteract that by
1:51
spending some time doing it. So I suppose
1:53
the best place to start would be right
1:55
at the beginning. We really want to spend
1:57
some time with you talking about Churchill's law.
2:00
life from the beginning to the end. I
2:02
went to Chartwell, which is the house. Yes,
2:06
it's a beautiful manor house in Kent, which he bought
2:08
when he was about 60 and lived into
2:11
the rest of his life. Yes. And when you
2:13
go there, you suddenly realize, uneducated
2:15
as I am, I mean, this guy,
2:18
he lived about seven lives worth of
2:20
lives in like one section of his
2:22
life. We'll get to
2:24
all of that later. But from
2:26
the beginning, where was he born? How did
2:29
he grow up? What was the kind of
2:31
beginnings of Churchill? Well, he was born in
2:33
a much grander place even than Chartwell. He
2:35
was born in Blenheim Palace, which is the
2:37
grandest of all the duke-all palaces, the
2:40
Spencer Churchill's magnificent palace in
2:42
Oxfordshire. And he was born
2:45
there because his grandfather was the Duke
2:47
of Marlborough. And his
2:49
father was a very successful politician, the
2:51
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Randolph Churchill.
2:54
And his mother was an American
2:56
heiress called Jenny Jerome. And
2:59
so, yes, he grew up as
3:01
an upper class Victorian,
3:04
essentially. Not exactly humble
3:06
beginnings. But then he
3:08
actually, having been educated,
3:11
and my understanding is he wasn't a particularly
3:13
successful student. Is that right? Well, actually, he
3:15
made out that he was less successful student
3:17
than he was. In fact, he was pretty
3:19
good at he came in the top third
3:21
of all his classes. He came top of
3:23
history and English quite a lot in his
3:25
classes. So when you read his school reports,
3:28
they're an awful lot better than he
3:30
made himself out to be. But
3:33
he certainly wasn't a class student.
3:35
He wasn't going to go to Oxford or
3:37
Cambridge, for example. And why did he
3:39
do that? Why did he paint himself as intellectually
3:42
mediocre? Surely that's not the
3:44
smartest play, particularly if you
3:46
want to lead a country.
3:49
Well, exactly. He's a very
3:51
unusual person. He has
3:54
autobiography, and this is where he made himself
3:56
out to be a bit thicker than he
3:58
genuinely was. It's the
4:00
most beautifully written book. It's
4:02
called My Early Life. It was published in 1930. I
4:05
do recommend anybody read it. But
4:08
you have to work out the bits
4:10
where he's playing with the reader as
4:12
opposed to just giving them the
4:14
sort of word-for-word accuracy about his life.
4:18
So he was good at school but
4:20
not great. And where did
4:22
he go from there? Because in my understanding
4:24
he tried to go to, I think it's
4:26
Sandhurst several times. It was a third attempt,
4:28
wasn't it, that he got into Sandhurst? That's
4:30
right. And he got in for the cavalry
4:33
rather than the infantry. The cool kids
4:35
went for the infantry. The ones who weren't
4:38
so successful went for the cavalry. His
4:40
father was angry with him about that
4:42
because it was much more expensive to
4:44
put a boy through as a
4:46
cavalry officer. Of course you had to
4:48
buy the horse apart from him. And
4:51
he had this belief
4:55
in himself though that
4:57
drove him all the way through his
4:59
life, this sense of, driving sense of
5:01
personal destiny. His father wasn't kind
5:03
to him. He never
5:06
seems to have appreciated that there was anything
5:08
special about young Winston. His
5:10
mother loved him but saw virtually nothing
5:12
of him in the way that Edwardian
5:15
parents sometimes did, especially the aristocratic ones.
5:17
She was having affairs with the Prince
5:19
of Wales and the Austrian ambassador and
5:22
so on and saw very little of
5:24
him and his younger brother Jack. But
5:27
nonetheless he did do well at
5:29
Sandhurst because he loves everything, absolutely
5:31
everything to do with soldiering. And
5:34
you talk about his parents effectively either
5:36
not being present or not
5:38
being kind to him. Did he
5:40
have formative personalities in his life,
5:42
people who guided him
5:44
when he was younger, inspired him, drove him,
5:46
challenged him? Very much he did,
5:49
yes. The first of which actually was when
5:51
we called Elizabeth Everest who was his nanny.
5:54
He loved
5:56
and worshipped her and she was kind him
6:00
and showed him the love and infection that
6:02
he wasn't frankly getting from his parents. And
6:05
then there was a man
6:07
who was a great orator,
6:10
an American politician called Bert
6:12
Cochran who was one of
6:14
his mother's lovers, who
6:16
also became sort of father figure to him
6:18
after his own father, Lord Randolph, died in
6:21
1895 when his father was 45 and Winston
6:23
was 20. And
6:27
the other thing I wanted to pick up sort of going away
6:29
from the story of his life for
6:32
just one second, you mentioned that he was
6:34
a Victorian and there
6:36
will be a lot of young people who don't really
6:38
know what that means exactly because this was a society
6:41
of people who have different values and
6:43
different viewpoints and different approaches to many things
6:45
to what we have today. What
6:47
does it mean for someone to be
6:50
a Victorian? Well to be an aristocratic
6:52
Victorian in the period
6:54
that he was growing up, which was essentially the 1880s
6:57
and the 1890s meant that you
6:59
were a believer in the Empire. He
7:01
was born in 1874 and
7:03
he believed that the British Empire was a
7:06
good thing for civilisation and the world in
7:08
a way that obviously is not taught in
7:11
any way today. But
7:13
a very milder. To put it very mildly.
7:16
And this had the very positive aspects of
7:19
essentially he thought he was recreating a
7:21
combination of ancient Greece and ancient Rome
7:23
where Britain was going to be able
7:26
to teach the native peoples of the
7:28
Empire development in many, many areas of
7:31
human development. And it had the negative
7:33
side also of course of a belief
7:35
that you were at the very top,
7:38
the apex of the sort of human
7:40
condition that you were racially superior to
7:42
everybody else because you were white and
7:44
you were also racially superior to every
7:46
other white because you were British. And
7:49
this meant that there was a sense,
7:51
you get it very much of course from Darwinism, Charles
7:54
Darwin was still alive whilst Churchill
7:57
was a boy. there
8:00
was a sort of a pinnacle
8:03
and that's key being upper class and
8:05
British and white was at the absolute
8:07
top of the pinnacle. Now what this
8:09
meant was that he had deep responsibilities
8:11
to everybody else. This
8:14
is something that's often misunderstood
8:16
or ignored, but because he
8:19
was this at the top of
8:21
the pinnacle essentially, it was
8:23
his duty to spend the rest of his
8:25
life doing good things for everybody else. Privilege
8:29
had a deep sense of responsibility
8:31
attached to it, which sometimes we
8:33
forget about that aspect of Victorian
8:35
chivalry. And would that, coming back
8:37
to the story now, by
8:39
the way we should say for our American and other
8:41
viewers, Sandhurst is of course the military academy. They're
8:44
West, our West Point. Just better. You're
8:49
going to get all your hay mail now from
8:51
a very angry American to have guns. Yeah.
8:55
So he goes to Sandhurst and is that
8:57
part of why he wants to go into
8:59
a military career, because it is a career
9:01
of service to your country? Yes, very much.
9:04
The ethos of Sandhurst,
9:06
like West Point in fact, is
9:08
this concept of giving back to
9:10
society because of the privileges that
9:12
you yourself have enjoyed
9:15
in life. And he did have
9:17
huge privileges, as I mentioned earlier,
9:20
about his family. However, actually both
9:22
his parents were terrible spendthrifts. They
9:25
spent his inheritance, certainly his mother
9:27
did after his father died. He
9:29
had to work very hard. He
9:31
wound up becoming the best aid
9:33
war correspondent in the world when
9:35
he fought in the Boer War
9:37
in South Africa. So it wasn't
9:39
as though he actually was rich.
9:41
He never was actually. He was
9:43
pretty much broke
9:46
all his life until he wrote the war
9:48
memoirs of the Second World War when he
9:50
was in his early seventies. Wow.
9:53
So money was always
9:55
an issue for him. And you wouldn't think
9:57
that by just a superficial glance at the moment.
10:00
man himself? No, that's because he always bought
10:02
the best of everything and the reason was
10:04
that he was always in debt and
10:07
he could afford things because he was constantly
10:09
getting into debt. There are two points in
10:11
the 1930s where he nearly had
10:13
to sell that beautiful house chart will that
10:15
you visited because he
10:18
was always broke and this is a good thing
10:20
as far as historians like me are concerned because
10:22
what it meant was that he had to write
10:25
37 books and write over 800
10:29
articles and the way of course that's the
10:31
best way to get into the mind of
10:34
a man like Churchill is to read what he
10:36
wrote and as a result we have an awful
10:38
lot of it many millions of words he wrote
10:40
more than Shakespeare and Dickens put together. Wow and
10:42
what's his career in the military successful? It was
10:45
after fashion but
10:48
the trouble was of course he did need to
10:50
make money and be a war correspondent so the
10:52
soldiers always thought of
10:54
him as a journalist and the journalists always thought
10:56
of him as a soldier and that meant he
10:58
could never really get to the top in the
11:01
British Army. The highest he got was to
11:03
be a colonel in the First World War
11:07
but he fought on five
11:10
campaigns on four continents. It was an
11:13
amazing amazing military career. He took part
11:15
in the last great cavalry charge of
11:17
the British Empire at the Battle of
11:20
Omdemen where he charged with
11:22
the 21st Lancers. He went
11:25
into no man's land in the First World War some
11:27
30 times and
11:30
doing trench raids and so on so
11:32
he showed tremendous courage. The
11:36
people talk about his courage and
11:39
they talk about his particularly when it
11:41
comes to his military career and obviously afterwards how
11:43
does that shape the way he viewed war and
11:45
conflict? Well he hated war he
11:48
was not a war monger he was accused
11:50
all his life of being a war monger
11:52
but because he's come up close and personal
11:54
to death seen so many of his friends
11:56
killed from the age of 21 onwards
11:58
he had seen his his close
12:01
friends die in war. He never
12:03
was a warmonger. He believed in
12:06
deterring war by
12:09
military strength and so
12:11
that was his immediate
12:13
feeling about war. However, once
12:16
war had started
12:18
he believed in winning it
12:20
and he was an absolutely
12:22
fascinated by every aspect of
12:24
war. He would go
12:26
out of his way to use
12:28
scientific knowledge to try to ensure
12:30
that Britain was at the absolute
12:33
forefront, the cutting edge of all
12:35
the new war technologies. Of course,
12:37
in a sense he's the godfather
12:39
of the tank which completely altered
12:41
the whole nature of war and
12:43
still has. And Andrew, just
12:45
flesh out the military career for us
12:47
first. So he goes to Sandhurst and
12:49
then what happens from there? And then
12:51
he gets sent off to India, fights
12:54
in the northwest frontier of India where he
12:56
fights against the
13:01
various clans and tribes
13:04
such as the Talib, the grandparents
13:06
essentially of the Taliban and
13:08
the Afridi tribes that were
13:11
attacking the Punjabi farmers.
13:15
So he defended the Punjabis up
13:17
in the northwest frontier. Then he
13:20
went off to Cuba
13:23
and fought on the side of the
13:25
Spanish in Cuba, really more watching than
13:27
fighting but nonetheless on his 21st birthday
13:29
he heard the
13:32
bullets fired. He was tremendously lucky
13:34
that he was never hit. He
13:37
once said that there's nothing so
13:39
exhilarating in life as to be shot at
13:41
without result. And
13:43
he was shot at without result a
13:45
great deal. He then fought
13:47
in the Sudanese campaign, sorry he went
13:49
back to northwest frontier, then the Sudanese
13:52
campaign, what's called the River War in
13:54
1898 when he took part in this
13:57
great cavalry charge. And then he fought in the
13:59
Boer War. in 1899
14:01
and 1900, and then he
14:04
got elected to Parliament. So he had
14:06
fought in all of those wars
14:08
prior to, of course, later on, fighting in
14:10
the First World War. And the Boer War
14:13
in particular, I think, is a moment when
14:15
his courage really comes through
14:17
because there is this incredible story about
14:19
him having to work his
14:21
way through without any – Well,
14:24
he essentially escapes from prison.
14:28
He gets captured after taking
14:31
part in the defence of a train
14:33
which has been ambushed by the Boers,
14:35
the Africans, white South Africans.
14:38
And he gets put in a
14:40
prisoner of war camp in Pretoria
14:42
and then escapes and makes his
14:44
way 300 miles through enemy territory.
14:48
At one point he has to sleep
14:51
down in a mine, and
14:54
the candle gutters out that
14:56
he was given, and you could feel the
14:58
rats scurrying over his face down
15:00
in the depths of his mine.
15:03
And he manages – at another point he's
15:06
actually followed by a vulture. And
15:08
nonetheless, he manages to escape to
15:11
freedom in Mozambique. So
15:13
this is the thing really that A
15:16
tells him that he's got something
15:18
special. He always thought he
15:20
had anyhow, but this actually does
15:23
give him the sense that he's special. And
15:26
also, of course, it makes him a hero of
15:28
the British Empire because he has escaped, and he
15:30
did it in the same week as
15:32
a series of disastrous victory –
15:34
defeats for the British Empire. It's
15:37
called Black Week because there are
15:39
three serious military defeats in one
15:41
week. And the only
15:43
really good news at that time
15:45
was Winston Churchill successfully escaping from
15:47
prison. Wow. 2.0
16:00
will transform a space
16:02
with vibrant galaxies and
16:04
constellations, creating an immersive
16:06
cosmic... Stop, stop, stop.
16:08
Mate, did you just try
16:11
to segue from Winston Churchill to
16:13
the Galaxy Projector 2.0? Thought that
16:15
was good. Did that not work? I
16:17
think it needs a bit of work, mate.
16:19
Let me start. I've got a Galaxy Projector
16:21
2.0 at home and I
16:23
can tell you it has gone down
16:25
incredibly well with my family. We use
16:27
it in the evening to create a
16:30
nice, settled mood and my toddler absolutely
16:32
loves it. The device works great as
16:34
a way to add some magic to
16:36
your home lighting. I've seen people using
16:38
it for immersive game room lighting, home
16:40
cinemas and home nurseries. It projects colourful
16:42
nebulae and stars on your walls, ceiling
16:44
and pretty much any surface, giving any
16:47
room a truly magical atmosphere. With
16:49
its app, you have full control
16:51
over the features, colours, brightness, on-off
16:53
scheduling and much more. Plus, if
16:55
you have Amazon Alexa or Google
16:57
Assistant, you can control it with
16:59
those simply by saying the magic
17:01
words. And even more, the
17:04
Easter sale is on. Don't miss
17:06
it. Go get your Galaxy Projector
17:08
2.0 at
17:10
galaxylamps.co.uk. You can also
17:13
follow the link in
17:16
the description or scan the QR code
17:18
below. And now, back to the interview.
17:21
Wow. So he almost became a
17:23
celebrity of his time then, really?
17:25
Not almost. He was. He was
17:27
the first great modern celebrity, war
17:29
celebrity, as it were. Oh,
17:32
wow. So did that then
17:34
help with his transition into
17:36
becoming a politician? Precisely that,
17:38
yes. He'd already stood for
17:40
Parliament once for Oldham
17:42
in Lancashire and failed
17:45
to get elected. But now, when
17:47
he came back after this extraordinary
17:50
prison escape, his celebrity
17:52
status did help him get elected
17:55
with a decent majority. So he
17:57
was a politician and then he...
18:00
decided to enlist in during the First World
18:02
War during the ball
18:04
during the ball absolutely but he'd
18:06
already fought in the ball so he came
18:08
back in order to stand and
18:11
heard he'd already stood for Parliament before he
18:13
went out to the ball wall and had
18:15
lost and then he went back
18:17
having fought in the ball war and won
18:20
and then I guess what Francis is getting
18:22
at is what happens when World War
18:25
one breaks out he's I'm assuming an MP at
18:27
this point well this is 15 years later of
18:29
course so yes he's a
18:31
he's actually the first Lord of
18:33
the Admiralty so by this
18:35
stage he in 1915 he'd become he'd
18:37
become first Lord of the Admiralty in
18:40
1911 by the time of the outbreak
18:42
of the First World War in 1914
18:44
he was still first
18:46
Lord of the Admiralty and he managed to get
18:48
the whole of the British Expeditionary Force and
18:51
over a hundred thousand men across
18:53
to France without losing a single
18:55
man from German U-boats or any
18:57
other any other disaster so he
19:00
was very successful in that he
19:02
had the British Navy ready for
19:04
the First World War and then
19:07
the catastrophe of the
19:09
Dardanelles struck this
19:12
was largely his fault he was the
19:14
person who believed that if you could
19:16
get the British Navy
19:18
in the Eastern Mediterranean from
19:21
the Eastern Mediterranean up through the Dardanelles
19:24
straits and anchor it
19:27
off Constantinople modern-day modern-day
19:30
anchor that's right you would
19:32
be able through the threat
19:35
of shelling to to take
19:38
the Turkish Empire out of
19:41
the First World War and if that has happened
19:43
it would have been one of the greatest strategic
19:46
victories of modern warfare
19:48
but it didn't and on the
19:50
18th of March 1915 the
19:52
Anglo-French flotilla lost no fewer than
19:55
six ships either destroyed or sunk
19:57
so we had to pull
20:01
back and then they attacked five weeks later on
20:03
the 25th of April 1915 and
20:06
got horribly stuck on
20:08
the on the Glipoli Peninsula
20:10
which is on the western side
20:12
of the strait and in
20:15
the end no fewer than 147,000 men were killed or
20:19
wounded in that campaign and it completely
20:21
wrecked Churchill's career because it had been
20:23
his idea and he that
20:25
decided that he was going to leave
20:27
the government and fight in the trenches
20:29
he didn't need to he was 40
20:31
years old we weren't calling up married
20:33
40 year olds at that stage but
20:35
he did because he wanted a form
20:37
of redemption and and that's
20:40
why he went to join the
20:42
absolutely incredible can you imagine any
20:44
politician doing that today God no is
20:48
the blonde way of putting it but also as well
20:51
in many ways that was facing certain death
20:53
because many men who went to fight in
20:56
World War one didn't come
20:58
back officers in some stretches of
21:00
the same front that he was
21:02
fighting on had a six-week long
21:05
survival rate their
21:07
longevity for fighting
21:09
the trenches was six weeks so
21:12
when he went to fight how long did
21:14
that career last being he was there for
21:16
a year and he was fortunate it was
21:19
it was one of the quieter sides
21:22
of the of the front
21:24
however as I mentioned he went
21:26
on 30 trench raids and
21:28
those were he got so close to the
21:30
German trenches he could actually hear them speaking
21:32
in their trenches so you
21:34
can imagine how dangerous that was
21:36
there was one occasion when the
21:39
German whizbang high explosive shell came
21:41
and hit his dugout and
21:43
decapitated everyone inside it but he
21:45
left five minutes earlier so and
21:49
he said on that occasion that he felt as if he could
21:52
hear invisible wings beating over
21:54
him a real sense that
21:56
he was being kept for something important
22:00
know, in life. And he
22:02
had that sense about him. This is
22:04
why I called my book Walking with Destiny
22:06
because although he, of course, himself said
22:08
that he felt as if he were walking
22:10
with destiny and that all his past life
22:12
had been but a preparation for this hour
22:15
and for this trial, all the way
22:17
through his life he thought he was walking
22:19
with destiny. It wasn't just in May 1940
22:22
when Hitler invaded Europe.
22:27
He was born two months prematurely, which
22:29
in Victorian England could be a death
22:31
sentence. He nearly
22:33
died of pneumonia when he was 11. He
22:36
nearly was involved in three
22:38
car crashes, two plane crashes,
22:41
nearly drowned in late Geneva,
22:43
very nearly died in
22:47
a house fire. It's incredible how close he
22:49
came to death on so many occasions. And
22:52
the event, including of course that time when
22:54
he left the dugout and it got hit.
22:57
And the result was that he
22:59
felt that he was being specially
23:03
kept back for a great occasion. That's
23:06
so interesting. And one of the things I was going to
23:08
ask you, we've got past it now, but I
23:10
can't imagine being somebody in
23:13
charge of tens of thousands of
23:15
men, ships, your
23:17
country's war effort and
23:20
making a cock up that costs
23:22
men lives, that causes
23:25
your country to suffer a defeat
23:27
in a major war in
23:30
public. And then you're
23:32
so gutted by that experience you go
23:35
into the tranchester fight. I
23:37
imagine that's a bit of a setback in
23:39
terms of your self image. I imagine that's
23:41
really difficult to preserve that sense
23:44
of destiny in that moment. He must
23:46
have been distraught. He was distraught. His
23:48
wife said it was the only time
23:50
that he ever seriously considered committing suicide.
23:52
He took up painting, which helped
23:54
in fact helped him emotionally
23:57
and psychologically. But
24:00
yes, I mean people would still even in the 1930s
24:03
so 15 plus years later would still
24:05
shout What about the Dardanelles at him
24:07
when he was making speeches in public?
24:11
in public addresses and In
24:14
one in one in fact funny enough
24:16
he stood for Westminster Just
24:19
just here this constituency and people would shout
24:22
at him. You know, what about the Dardanelles
24:24
and so
24:26
you do have a real sense that
24:28
he was That
24:31
he understood this setback but
24:33
one of the great things about Winston Churchill
24:35
was that he learnt from his mistakes and Never
24:38
in the Second World War when he was permanent in the
24:40
Second World War Never once did
24:42
he overrule the Chiefs of Staff in the way
24:44
that he had done in the First World War in order
24:47
to pursue The Dardanelles expedition.
24:49
So he know he actually learned from
24:51
that mistake and And
24:53
it was a very important lesson to learn of
24:56
course. Oh, sorry go for it I
24:58
was gonna say he talked frequently he
25:00
gave it a term which his
25:02
depression was the black dog Was
25:04
that do you think that stemmed
25:06
from the experience with the
25:08
Dardanelles and Constantinople? The only
25:11
time he ever used that phrase black dog
25:13
He only used it once was in a
25:15
letter to his wife in July 1911 when
25:17
he was talking about a particular
25:20
moment of depression He was not
25:22
a black dog depressive as in
25:25
it didn't suddenly strike
25:27
him for no reason He got
25:29
depressed for the same reason that
25:31
anybody would get depressed under those
25:33
circumstances The classic example being the
25:35
fall of Tobruk in June 1942
25:38
the fall of Singapore in February 1942 These
25:41
are moments when anyone would have got depressed
25:43
He wasn't somebody who had a sort of
25:45
chemical imbalance and as we know with actual
25:47
manic depression Which black dog is a terrible
25:51
terrible disease that
25:53
you you can't? Chair
25:56
over 900 meetings of the
25:58
Defense Committee of the
26:01
cabinet at all times of
26:03
day or night if you are suffering from
26:05
that kind of depression. So it's
26:07
a misunderstanding to think that he
26:10
was a manic depressive. He was.
26:12
He got sad when sad things
26:14
happened. Yeah, precisely. Yes, exactly. Which
26:17
happened a lot in his life. I imagine.
26:19
Because his whole life was a total roller
26:21
coaster up and down the entire time. Well,
26:23
right. And so he fights
26:25
in World War I. And
26:28
World War I, many people have
26:30
argued, Peter Hitchens, who's been on our
26:32
show, he wrote a whole book about it, was
26:35
really the moment when the British Empire
26:37
starts to feel like it's on the
26:39
downslope. Was he aware of
26:41
this at the time? Did he feel this? Did he
26:43
say anything about it? He was acutely aware of it.
26:46
Absolutely he was. And of course, it was in his
26:48
great 1942 speech
26:51
that was made at the Guildhall when he
26:53
said, I did not become the King's first
26:55
minister in order to preside over the liquidation
26:57
of the British Empire. He
26:59
was very, very aware
27:01
that Britain was
27:03
becoming weaker. This
27:05
was obviously clear with regard
27:07
to the Quit India campaign
27:09
in the Congress party
27:11
in India. He was very much stood
27:14
up against Mahatma Gandhi
27:16
in the 1930s. He saw
27:18
the way in which the United States was
27:20
becoming richer and more powerful and
27:22
was likely one day to take the place
27:25
of the British Empire. And he didn't
27:27
like it. He
27:29
preferred the Americans to take over from anyone else, the
27:31
Germans or any fascist power.
27:36
But nonetheless, he didn't like the
27:38
idea of Britain's place in the
27:40
sun being taken by anybody
27:42
else. This was a natural reaction, of
27:44
course, of a British imperialist of his
27:47
age and class and background. Well, quite.
27:49
And so he fights in World War
27:51
I. And what happens then, is
27:53
he, by the way, is he from a public
27:56
perception, you mentioned people continue to heckle him about
27:58
the diad and else, etc. But
28:00
does his decision to go and fight,
28:02
rehabilitate him in the public consciousness? In
28:05
a sense it does, and he does come
28:08
back to become Minister of Munitions for
28:10
the rest of the last part of the First World
28:13
War. And there he
28:15
does a fantastic job, and you look
28:17
at the graphs of output of shells
28:19
necessary and all the various other munitions
28:21
necessary to win that war. And
28:24
they go straight off the charts.
28:26
He works so hard. And
28:28
that's appreciated too. Then he became Minister of
28:31
War and was in charge of demobilisation of
28:33
the army. He did a very good job
28:35
there as well. But he
28:38
also put his reputation, he
28:41
essentially damaged his reputation again because he
28:43
was tremendously in favour of
28:46
strangling, in his words, and he had
28:49
the most extraordinary mastery of the English
28:51
language, as you can imagine, strangling
28:54
Bolshevism in its cradle. He
28:56
wanted to send the British army, or
28:58
at least a proportion of the British
29:01
army, to help the white Russians try
29:03
to destroy Bolshevism. And he's
29:05
been a criticising the North a lot for that. He's
29:07
been attacked. There's just a book last week that was
29:09
published saying how terrible this was. But
29:11
frankly, I think it was a brave
29:15
thing to do. If
29:17
you had managed to strangle Bolshevism
29:19
and you hadn't had Soviet communism,
29:21
about 100 million people would
29:24
be – their lives
29:26
would have been saved, who were murdered by
29:28
communism of various types in the 20th
29:30
century. So actually, I
29:32
think it was a very far-sighted thing to have
29:34
done. But at the time, it was another thing
29:37
that he was accused
29:39
of having been
29:41
disastrously wrong about. When
29:44
we look at his political career, he had a
29:46
very interesting political career because there were many times
29:48
he was actually criticised by
29:50
both the Conservatives and
29:52
Labour. And the Liberals as well, of
29:54
course. He changed sides
29:57
twice as well. He started off
29:59
as a… conservative like his father had been
30:02
and then in 1904 over free trade he
30:04
became a liberal and then
30:06
in 1924 again over free trade he
30:08
went back to the conservatives you know
30:10
he kept his belief but
30:14
the parties changed theirs and he stuck
30:16
to his beliefs but it looked very
30:18
much as though he was just jumping
30:20
ship because each time he jumped ship
30:22
just before that party got into government
30:25
and so he was thought of
30:27
very often as being just
30:30
an opportunist and
30:32
he did make mistakes that's the other thing he wrote
30:34
to his wife when he was in the trenches he
30:37
said i should have made nothing if i had not
30:39
made mistakes he got loads of things wrong we've
30:41
already got the russian
30:43
civil war the gallipoli campaign
30:46
just the biggest of them but he
30:48
was opposed to female suffrage at the
30:50
beginning he was opposed to he wanted
30:53
to bring britain into the gold standard at
30:56
the wrong time at the wrong level as
30:58
it turned out he was in favor
31:00
of the black and tans trying to put down
31:03
the irish uprisings of the
31:05
early 1920s as well which
31:08
horribly boomeranged on the on the
31:10
british and so all in all
31:13
you know he did make mistakes but as i
31:15
mentioned earlier from each of those that i've mentioned
31:17
he learned his lesson we'll be
31:19
back with our guests in a minute
31:21
we've discovered a fantastic way to stay
31:23
on track with your nutritional goals while
31:25
saving time if you're in america and
31:28
you're looking for dietician approved chef prepared
31:30
fresh never frozen meals to fuel you
31:32
on jam packed days then you need
31:34
to take a look at factor factor
31:36
is america's number one ready to eat
31:39
meal delivery service and they'll help you
31:41
eat well for breakfast lunch and dinner
31:43
with nutritious and flavorful ready to eat
31:45
meals delivered straight to your door leave
31:47
the calorie counting to their dieticians and
31:50
leave the planning prepping and cleanup to
31:52
their chefs the food is fresh and
31:54
the ingredient quality is on point the
31:56
meat is from grass fed or pasture
31:58
raised animals free of antibiotics,
32:00
hormones and GMOs. It's
32:02
high quality stuff. To
32:04
try Factor head to
32:06
factormeals.com/trigger 50 and
32:08
use code trigger 50 to get 50% off.
32:11
That's called trigger 50 at
32:13
factormeals.com to get 50% off.
32:16
Now back to the interview.
32:19
So from 1918 he
32:21
returns after the First World War. What
32:23
happens then? From being Minister of
32:26
Munitions to the point that the First
32:28
World War ended, he then
32:30
became Minister of War and Air as well
32:32
and he was the father of the RAF.
32:35
So actually the Royal Air Force was very much
32:37
his idea. And then after that
32:39
in 1924 he became
32:41
the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And
32:45
he was not much of an
32:47
economist frankly but nonetheless he presided
32:50
over the most difficult period because
32:52
it coincided with the outbreak of
32:55
the general strike in 1926. And he
32:57
wanted to be
33:00
as generous as possible to the mine
33:02
workers who led
33:05
that strike. But nonetheless it was a
33:07
terribly difficult period. By 1930 he was
33:09
out of office.
33:13
The Conservatives had lost the subsequent
33:15
general election and he fell
33:19
out with the front bench, with
33:22
the Conservative leadership over independence for
33:24
India and resigned from the
33:26
front bench. And so
33:28
let's go into that because obviously that is you know
33:30
that's a huge part of the story here. Where
33:34
did he lie when it came to
33:36
this particular issue? He very much thought
33:39
that the British should not move towards
33:41
what's called Dominion status which is essentially
33:43
self-government for India. He thought that India
33:45
was the jewel in the crown of
33:47
the British Empire. That if
33:50
you gave the majority Hindu
33:52
population of India essentially
33:56
the power over all Indians
33:59
then it would would be disastrous for
34:01
the Indian princes, which ruled about a
34:03
third of India at the time. Also
34:06
very bad for the Muslim minority in
34:08
India and also bad for the untouchables,
34:12
who he feared would be
34:15
kept down even more than they were
34:17
by Indian society at the time. And
34:20
so he opposed it
34:22
and did everything he could
34:24
to stop Indian self-government but
34:26
failed. And the Indian Self-Government
34:28
Act of 1935 passed against
34:30
his opposition. But
34:35
were his fears actually realised, and
34:37
obviously it was inevitable that India was
34:39
going to self-government, but were his fears
34:41
actually correct as to what would happen?
34:43
Well if you look at Mr Modi's
34:45
way of ruling India at the moment,
34:48
and especially where the princes, where the
34:51
Muslims and where the untouchables are in
34:53
Indian society, actually Churchill makes it had
34:55
a bit of a point frankly. And
34:57
Andrew it strikes me that this isn't
34:59
strictly a Churchill question, but I think
35:01
it's important to flesh this out for
35:03
all of us, including myself to understand.
35:05
Francis said something which may or may
35:07
not be true, but you know Indians
35:09
and self-governance was inevitable. Which begs
35:11
the question really, why
35:14
was the British Empire at this
35:16
point starting to essentially decline
35:19
and all of these
35:21
conversations about self-governance here, independence there,
35:23
why were they taking off? The
35:26
major problem for the British Empire after
35:28
the First World War was a financial
35:30
one. It was broke, it
35:32
had spent an enormous amount of money fighting
35:35
that war, and compared
35:37
to countries like America it had
35:40
no resources. It had
35:42
sold off a lot of its assets during
35:44
the war to continue fighting the war. It
35:47
was also morally demoralised
35:49
because of the loss of
35:51
an entire generation of essentially
35:54
young men who'd been killed, three
35:56
quarters of a million of them in
35:58
the war. It
36:01
got bigger actually physically up until
36:03
1921, but
36:05
it was hollowed out essentially. And
36:08
then when the threats to India
36:11
started, it seemed
36:13
very much that the whole organisation
36:15
essentially was being run by more
36:18
of wilderness of mirrors really
36:20
than an empire of the kind that
36:25
had been there 20 years previously.
36:27
Was there also a rising cynicism from the
36:30
working classes to the upper classes because of
36:32
the debacle of the First World War, lions
36:34
led by donkeys etc? There was a very
36:36
strong, yes, that was an important aspect was
36:39
that although the actual officers
36:42
in the trenches themselves had been
36:45
incredibly brave and the working classes
36:47
admired their officers of
36:49
their own units who
36:52
died in greater proportion than the
36:54
working classes did in
36:56
that war, also the high
36:59
officers, the generals who
37:01
had come up with the
37:04
grand strategy were not respected
37:06
because of the disastrous grand
37:08
strategy that was adopted. Now
37:11
there are a lot of historians and to
37:13
an extent I'm amongst them that tries to
37:16
look at any other kind of grand strategy
37:18
that could have won that war frankly. But
37:21
nonetheless, yes, there was a sense
37:23
that the
37:26
officer class had let the working
37:28
classes down, but not the officer
37:30
class in the trenches, but the
37:32
ones back in the chateau. So
37:35
the empire is morally weakened,
37:39
financially bankrupt, not
37:42
bankrupt but… And also one other aspect
37:44
of it which I didn't mention also
37:46
strategically outmaneuvered because you
37:49
have Japan in the Far
37:51
East, Italy in the
37:53
Mediterranean and Germany all coming up in the 1930s
37:55
and all of course… with
38:00
each other in the anti-Comintern Act of 1937
38:04
and posing three separate threats to
38:06
the British Empire in three separate
38:09
geographical areas. So a
38:11
very difficult position. Churchill is in the
38:14
Conservative Government. He resigns over India. This
38:16
is 1931, did you say? 1930.
38:21
And this is just
38:23
about Hitler and his Nazi party
38:25
are about to take over in Germany. So how does the next
38:27
few years play out in the early 30s? Well, the
38:30
whole of the 1930s can be
38:32
seen really as one decade of
38:34
what he called the trawling tides
38:36
of drift and surrender. When
38:39
the locusts ate, he was
38:41
opposed to Adolf Hitler and
38:43
the Nazis. He
38:45
made the most magnificent speeches warning
38:48
about exactly what was going to
38:50
happen. He tried
38:53
to stop it from happening and
38:55
no one listened to him. He was ridiculed.
38:57
He was shouted down in the House of
38:59
Commons. He was attacked in
39:01
the press. They tried to take
39:04
away his seat. The Conservatives tried
39:06
to deselect him for his parliamentary
39:08
seat. On the basis he
39:10
was warmongering? On the basis that
39:12
he was warmongering, exactly. And every
39:14
single thing that he said turned out
39:16
to be right and everything that they
39:18
said turned out to be wrong. And
39:21
you see that long time
39:24
from the accession of
39:26
Adolf Hitler to becoming
39:29
the Chancellor of
39:31
Germany in January 1933, then
39:33
through obviously the anti-Semitic laws
39:35
that he passes, the remilitarization
39:38
of the Rhineland in 1936, the
39:41
Anschluss of 1938, the
39:45
Munich Crisis, of course, over the Sudetenland in 1938,
39:48
and then the horrors of marching
39:50
into Prague in the March of
39:52
1939. And by
39:54
the end of 1939, After
39:57
a whole decade of Churchill saying, this
39:59
is what is going to happen, Apa
40:01
Finally when he was proved right on
40:03
the fifteenth of March, Nineteen Thirty nine
40:05
Now everybody else has proved wrong. Finally,
40:07
the British people did actually start listening
40:09
to Winston Churchill. Andrew I wanted
40:12
to ask a question which is. How
40:15
many of those people were just
40:17
incorrect and read the situation wrong?
40:19
Which we can all do. And
40:21
how many of them were. Nazi.
40:23
Sympathizers not many Nazi since
40:25
sizes frankly there was some.
40:27
Of course the producing in
40:30
the Fascists was A and.
40:33
With her. Party but was
40:35
never neglect full force. It never got anybody
40:37
elected to parliament. Unite. Under. It's
40:39
own nine hundred say nam. As
40:42
theme am. but a lot of
40:44
people were good natured people who
40:47
fit for the best bits force
40:49
in the first were born, didn't
40:51
wanna see another wolf. Couldn't believe
40:53
that the Germans would ever start
40:56
another war. They were people who
40:58
couldn't believe that Hitler could be
41:00
so evil is still want another
41:02
war. They lot of them were
41:05
christians who believes that the phrase
41:07
appeasement was actually a positive thing.
41:09
I'm there with people who thought
41:12
that. A business was much
41:14
more important than the Germans, would
41:16
never go to war and and
41:18
destroy the capitalist economy and so
41:21
it was stored. Really The numbers
41:23
of people who were willing to
41:25
just assume that the government was
41:28
right and that's Winston Churchill was.
41:30
it was an insane warmonger. Are
41:33
under you alluded to earlier and on
41:35
I'm on Sundays. Be someone was born
41:37
in the Soviet Union, I'm likely to
41:39
bring the South naturally. but for a
41:42
you mentioned turtles press in some our
41:44
fascism in the threat of Nazis I'm
41:46
in Germany and you also earlier talked
41:48
about the his presence. When it comes
41:51
to the other terrible ideology that came
41:53
out of the early twentieth century, it's
41:55
during the thirties. the true horror of
41:57
the communist regime in Soviet Russia is.
42:00
The thing to became. Difficult
42:02
to ignore. Let's put it like this and Churchill
42:04
is one of the people who is openly speaking
42:06
about this and the too soon as he not
42:08
Cf. And. Again, there are quite a
42:10
lot of people here and in England and in
42:12
the west more broadly who would quite like So
42:14
the know that. That's why is
42:17
exactly no No, he was the
42:19
leading voice of and communism in
42:21
that British politics in the Nineteen
42:23
thirties. Some of his greatest speeches
42:26
were given about the the horrors
42:28
of than what had been unleashed
42:30
by and Lenin and Trotsky and
42:33
he personally attack starting on and
42:35
so on. And
42:37
he was a
42:39
i'm. A I'm
42:41
a great and communist and of
42:43
course this am continued all the
42:45
way up until he recognized the
42:48
it's the greatest threat as a
42:50
more immediate threat at least was
42:52
from the more dangerous threat was
42:54
from Hitler and at that point
42:56
he was in favor of having
42:59
an alliance with the reasons but
43:01
the trouble is that Poland was
43:03
in between Russia and and Germany
43:05
and so the only way in
43:07
which the Russians could be brought
43:10
to bear. In an anti
43:12
nazi envelop Months essentially was it's
43:14
supposed greets of it's which of
43:16
course they would not do. They.
43:19
Fought against the Russians in Nineteen
43:21
Twenty and Twenty One and that
43:23
they didn't want some Russian troops
43:25
on their soil and understand be
43:27
say when one sees the rest
43:29
as an European history say it
43:31
was a incredibly difficult than situation
43:33
at the time at But Turtle
43:35
deed Full see the a Nazi
43:37
Soviet Packs of August, Nineteen Thirty
43:39
Nine and of course when Hitler
43:41
did invade Russia, A Turtle was
43:44
the first person to say we
43:46
must immediately ally with Russia even
43:48
though he knew. That Stalin had
43:50
done the most appalling crimes including
43:52
of course killing the Polish and
43:55
officer corps cut scene in nineteen
43:57
forties. So. you very much a
43:59
pragmatist He had to be. In
44:01
wartime, realpolitik, if you're to survive, is
44:04
the only way to go forward. To
44:07
give him his due, of course after the
44:09
Second World War, he was also the first
44:11
person to have the guts to actually say
44:13
that what Stalin was doing
44:16
in Eastern Europe was a threat to
44:18
democracy there. And he
44:20
was in his great Iron Curtain
44:22
speech in Fulton, Missouri on the
44:24
5th of March 1946, the first
44:26
person to actually warn against Stalin.
44:30
And let's just touch on
44:32
Neville Chamberlain, because he's painted now
44:34
as this weak, myopic, slightly pathetic
44:36
figure. Is that unfair? Very unfair,
44:38
yeah. He was a very tough
44:42
and in his day incredibly popular
44:44
politician. He
44:46
probably would have won a landslide victory at any
44:48
time had he called a general election in 1939
44:50
or late 1938. He,
44:56
as a domestic politician, had been a really
44:59
tough minister in the government.
45:01
He'd been a senior minister for 20 years.
45:04
He was the son of Joseph Chamberlain, one of the
45:06
great Victorian politicians. So,
45:08
yes, no, it's wrong to think of
45:10
him as some kind of weak, vacillating
45:12
character. It might have
45:14
been better if he had been, by the way, because
45:16
he might have been able to have been pushed off
45:18
the policy of appeasement, which he clung on to even
45:21
after it became obvious that
45:25
it wasn't working. When he came
45:27
back from Munich and waved
45:29
a piece of paper in the air,
45:31
he truly believed that he had
45:34
personally, through his own diplomacy, managed
45:36
to save peace for his time
45:39
and told the cabinet as much.
45:42
He was a very vain man in that sense. And delusional
45:45
as well. Well, ultimately, yes, because by
45:47
the time of the move into Prague
45:49
in March 1939, he still had
45:52
to be forced into giving the guarantee.
46:00
to Poland, which they gave on
46:02
the 1st of April 1939, which
46:04
of course was the trigger that started the Second World
46:06
War. So, Andrew, if you
46:09
wasn't motivated by weakness, what
46:11
was the basis of the policy of a
46:13
piece? Well,
46:15
first of all, it was the
46:17
sense that we couldn't fight Italy,
46:19
Japan and Germany all at
46:21
the same time without any allies. The
46:24
Americans were in full-on isolationist
46:27
mode. The America First Movement
46:29
was tremendously powerful at that
46:31
time. The
46:35
Russians at the time, of course, from the August of
46:37
1939 onwards were allied to the
46:41
Germans. Yes. The French didn't
46:43
want to go to war at all. And
46:47
so we saw the strategic
46:50
danger of actually going to war
46:52
against three big powers right the
46:54
way around the world, from
46:56
the Far East to the Channel,
46:58
essentially with no allies. And
47:01
so that was one of the major
47:03
reasons behind appeasement. The other one, and
47:06
this we have to give Neville Chamberlain his due,
47:08
was that major advances were
47:10
being made in terms of radar
47:14
and the latest
47:17
types of hurricane and spitfire. And we
47:19
needed to make as many as we
47:21
possibly could before war broke out. In
47:24
that period of the year between Munich
47:26
and the outbreak of war, between the
47:28
September of 1938 and the September of
47:30
1939, we did
47:33
build enough hurricanes and spitfires to
47:36
win the Battle of Britain in 1940.
47:39
Now, we didn't know that that was going to happen,
47:41
of course. It was pure luck, frankly. But
47:43
it was very much a
47:45
plan to try to create
47:48
as much as we could in terms
47:50
of armaments. It's worth pointing
47:52
out, of course, that the Germans created much more
47:54
in that year than we did. But
47:56
nonetheless, that was an important aspect of it as well.
48:00
I have to say I suddenly find myself
48:02
rather persuaded by the argument for appeasement,
48:04
particularly on the first point. If you've
48:06
got a, yes, the British Empire, but
48:09
as we've discussed, bankrupt and morally quite
48:11
weakened, no allies. Well,
48:14
no, the thing was that, of course, they should have
48:16
got allies. They should have done much more. The
48:19
Chamberlain government was totally uninterested in trying to
48:21
persuade the Americans. It was totally uninteresting
48:23
in trying to get the Russians on
48:26
board. That would have been difficult because the
48:28
Russians wanted the Baltic states, and
48:30
we were in no position as a democracy to
48:33
hand over the Baltic states in the way that
48:35
Hitler obviously could do. We
48:37
should have been rearming so much earlier in
48:39
the 1930s, getting all
48:41
the latest cutting edge
48:45
weaponry, and also
48:47
obviously making much
48:49
more of a
48:52
forward movement in Europe
48:54
itself. I mean, we didn't send any
48:56
troops to the
48:59
European continent until
49:01
after the war broke now. Yes. I guess
49:03
where I was going with my question is
49:05
I can see why maybe some of Churchill's
49:08
arguments were falling on deaf ears, because the
49:11
argument that we have no allies, we're
49:13
one, yes, empire, but we've got
49:15
all these challenges we're going to have to fight off. It's
49:18
much wiser to avoid a fight at any
49:20
cost almost. It must have been
49:22
quite difficult for Churchill to try and make inroads
49:24
against that. It certainly was, and
49:27
the key moment, of course, comes in Munich
49:29
because had the Czechs fought
49:32
at in 1938 and
49:35
the French and British invaded or attacked at
49:37
least in the West, firstly,
49:40
there's a chance that Hitler might have fallen
49:42
anyway. Some generals said they were
49:44
going to overthrow him. Secondly,
49:46
there's no certainty
49:48
that he would have been able to have won
49:50
that war, a 1938 war. By
49:53
1939, and certainly by 1940, he had the entirety of the German Reich up. to
50:00
mobilization point and of course was able
50:02
to steamroller Poland and then in the
50:04
May 1940
50:06
crushed the British and French in the
50:09
West. Andrew, I got
50:11
told this and maybe this is completely wrong
50:13
but Hitler also had quite a favorable impression
50:15
of the British. He
50:17
quite liked us. He
50:19
ideologically... I wouldn't brag about that. No,
50:22
it's important, it's a very important aspect of this.
50:26
No, he didn't like us because
50:28
he was jealous of our empire
50:30
but he was impressed by our
50:32
empire and the way in which
50:35
very, very small numbers of British
50:37
troops managed to essentially run the
50:39
Indian empire. There were...
50:42
There was only a few thousand,
50:45
tens of thousands in an empire of 300 million
50:48
people in India. So
50:51
it was... In that sense
50:53
he was impressed. He was also impressed by the
50:55
sheer scale and size of the empire which he
50:57
would be because it was the largest empire the
50:59
world had ever seen. But
51:02
he didn't like the British, no. In
51:04
fact when he went on rant he
51:07
would rant against... Well certainly Winston Churchill
51:09
as you can imagine but also the
51:12
British as a people. And
51:14
so Neville Chillingman
51:16
has pursued this policy of appeasement.
51:18
He's becoming quite obvious to everybody
51:20
that this isn't going to work.
51:23
How does his political career end
51:25
considering he's his tough uncompromising character?
51:28
Neville Chamberlain's career ended in a
51:30
debate called the Norway
51:32
debate over the defeat that the British and
51:35
French had suffered in Norway. And
51:37
it was held on the 7th and 8th of May 1940 and because
51:39
so few conservatives and natural
51:47
supporters of the government actually
51:49
turned up to vote for
51:51
Chamberlain even though he did win an 81 seat
51:55
majority, usually
51:57
the majority was much bigger than that. And
52:00
so he was forced to resign on
52:03
the morning of the 10th of May
52:05
1940. When
52:07
Churchill became the Prime
52:10
Minister on the 10th of May 1940, he
52:12
was called by King George VI to go
52:15
to Buckingham Palace in the evening and
52:17
that was the same day that Adolf
52:19
Hitler, purely by coincidence,
52:22
invaded the Low Countries and
52:25
Holland and Belgium, ultimately obviously
52:27
also to invade France. We'll
52:30
be back with our guests in a minute,
52:32
but first let me tell you about these
52:34
superbeat heart tubes we've been using here at
52:36
Trigonometry Towers. If you're looking for a way
52:38
to turn your snacking habit into an easy
52:41
way to support your health without sacrificing flavour,
52:43
then heart tubes may be the
52:45
perfect solution. I really love that
52:47
the tubes have replaced my mid-morning
52:50
coffee. Because the tubes support healthy
52:52
circulation, you not only get blood
52:54
pressure support, but you also get
52:56
heart-healthy energy which comes, importantly, without
52:59
the crash. Paired with a healthy
53:01
lifestyle, the antioxidants and superbeets are
53:03
clinically shown to be nearly two
53:05
times more effective at promoting normal
53:08
blood pressure than a healthy lifestyle
53:10
alone. Double your potential with Superbeets
53:12
Heart Tubes, get a free 30-day
53:14
supply of Superbeat Heart Tubes
53:16
and 15% off your
53:18
first order by going to getsuperbeets.com
53:21
and using promo code
53:24
TRIG. That's getsuper. b-e-e-t-s.com
53:26
code TRIG. Now back
53:29
to the interview. And
53:32
he wasn't a young man, by the way, when he
53:35
became leader of this country, was he at that
53:37
point? He was 65, which is
53:39
the retirement age. And
53:43
he said of that day, of
53:46
that evening, that he felt as
53:48
if he were walking with destiny and that all of
53:50
his past life had been but a preparation for this
53:52
hour and for this trial. And in a
53:54
sense it was. All of the things he'd done in
53:56
the First World War, all of the amazing
53:59
jobs, that he'd held up till that
54:01
point. He held all but
54:04
one of the great offices of state. His
54:09
whole career up until that point had
54:11
in a way been a preparation and
54:14
the extraordinary thing was
54:16
that when he was only 16 years
54:18
old as a schoolboy at Harrow
54:20
he told his best friend Merlin
54:23
Evans, there shall be great upheavals,
54:25
great struggles in our lives, I
54:28
shall be called upon to save England and save
54:30
the Empire. He said that when he was
54:32
only 16 and then half a
54:34
century later exactly that happened. So
54:36
I mean what a
54:38
story. I mean it sounds like something out
54:40
of a film really which is why so
54:43
many people have made movies and
54:45
TV series about him. So he's 65
54:47
years old, he assumes a man to
54:49
a leader. Britain to
54:51
be honest it doesn't look like we're going
54:53
to win. No
54:55
it looks very much like we're
54:58
going to lose. In the first
55:00
two weeks we are pushed off
55:02
the continent and the German Blitzkrieg,
55:04
a completely new form of warfare
55:06
in which their bombers and their
55:09
tanks and their infantry all
55:11
work together in a
55:13
seamless hole to cut through
55:16
the Ardennes and essentially get
55:18
to the Channel port by the 20th of
55:20
May 1940
55:23
and force the British
55:26
Expeditionary Force to to
55:28
re-embark at Dunkirk very nearly captures the
55:30
whole of the, Hitler could have captured
55:32
the whole of the British Expeditionary Force
55:35
if he hadn't executed his hold order
55:37
of the 24th of May
55:39
and by the 4th of June the
55:41
British Expeditionary Force minus 40,000 men who
55:44
are captured back in Britain.
55:46
Again the Russians are allied to the Germans,
55:49
the Americans aren't involved, the French have essentially
55:51
been knocked out of the war, we look
55:53
as though we've lost. And
55:56
what sustained him and I think
55:58
I know the answer to this question through
56:00
those incredibly dark moments when it looked
56:02
like Britain was going to fall. His
56:05
self-belief, his belief in destiny, not
56:07
just his own personal destiny but
56:09
national destiny as well. He
56:12
believed that Britain was
56:15
specifically going to see it through
56:17
and to win. He had
56:20
a belief in himself and
56:22
his country that was
56:24
not going to be essentially
56:26
affected by the situation on
56:28
the ground. He made speeches
56:32
giving the British people reason to hope.
56:35
Frankly, they weren't great reasons when one
56:37
looks at them logically and rationally but
56:39
it wasn't a logical and rational moment,
56:41
frankly. It was one in which you
56:43
had to have self-belief and
56:46
he did have that. And one of the things we haven't
56:48
touched on so far but I think it's the
56:50
right moment to touch on is
56:52
you've actually talked about him having
56:54
different roles within government prior to
56:56
this moment in which he actually
56:59
does very well. So he's clearly
57:01
a competent not just leader who
57:03
gives speeches and inspires people but
57:05
actually competent at administration and management
57:07
and running departments. Why
57:09
is that? Why is he so good?
57:11
Well, absolutely. He runs huge departments. The
57:13
Ministry of Munitions was the biggest government
57:16
department in the world at the time
57:18
of the number
57:20
of people. It had well over one and a
57:22
half million people working for it. He
57:25
was a chancellor of the Exchequer
57:27
and therefore in charge of the entire British
57:29
economy for five years. These are big areas.
57:33
The First Lord of the Admiralty at the time
57:35
with the British Navy was easily the biggest navy
57:39
in the world as well. So he
57:42
was good at these big things and
57:44
the reason was that he was a
57:46
real micromanager. He got down into the
57:49
basics of everything. He would visit the
57:52
depots constantly. He would meet people
57:55
below the top level. So he
57:57
actually knew what people on
58:00
the shop floor thinking and
58:04
saying. He was somebody who was so
58:06
energetic, you know, every morning bounced out
58:08
of bed early in order to get
58:11
the job done. And this was partly
58:13
obviously because of his ambition. He wanted to
58:15
do well in each of his jobs and
58:18
therefore get promoted, but also because he was
58:20
a parental perfectionist when it came to the
58:22
duties that he was given.
58:24
And was he a good people person? Oh,
58:27
wonderful. Actually wonderful. He had any
58:29
number of sort of top tips for how
58:32
to get
58:34
on with people. He was
58:36
immensely charming, very
58:39
funny man. And so he was able to
58:41
put people at their
58:45
calm. He was
58:47
very, very calm in crises as
58:49
well, which people hugely appreciated,
58:52
especially considering how many crises he was
58:54
involved in in his life. He was
58:57
a very much
59:00
a people person is the exact right way
59:02
of putting it. Yeah, he would, if he
59:05
felt that people weren't connecting
59:07
with each other, he would make sure that
59:09
they turned up, he'd give parties, he would
59:11
give them Swedish milk punch,
59:13
which is a rather disgusting sounding
59:15
drink nonetheless. And it was something
59:18
that he would give them
59:20
and he would make sure that people met
59:24
other people important for them and so on.
59:26
He was very, very good when it comes
59:28
to everything to do with networking. That's very
59:30
interesting. He was a connector. So how does
59:32
he bring this to bear? Britain looks
59:35
like it's about to lose. The British
59:37
expeditionary force has been forced back to
59:40
Britain having lost
59:42
tens of thousands of soldiers
59:44
captured, no allies to
59:46
speak of at the time. Iraq is not
59:49
involved in the war. Germany seems
59:52
incredibly powerful with these new tactics.
59:54
The Soviet Union is maybe not
59:56
allied. Maybe
59:59
not. aggression. But anyway,
1:00:01
it doesn't really matter too
1:00:03
much. It's supplying grain and
1:00:05
oil and soil. What
1:00:09
does social do? Well, I think one
1:00:12
very important point to point out is
1:00:14
of course that although
1:00:16
we don't have foreign allies, we
1:00:18
do have the Empire. So
1:00:20
we have the millions of people
1:00:23
who join the Indian
1:00:25
army, which becomes the largest volunteer army
1:00:27
in the history of mankind, still is
1:00:29
to this day. We
1:00:32
have the Australians who are
1:00:35
superb fighters, as are the New
1:00:38
Zealanders. The Canadians are
1:00:40
superb fighters, but also are able
1:00:43
to ship huge amounts of grain
1:00:45
and so on across the Atlantic
1:00:47
to Britain
1:00:50
to keep feeding Britain. All three
1:00:52
of those, sorry four of those,
1:00:55
and also troops from the Caribbean
1:00:58
countries fight in North Africa and
1:01:00
in various other parts of the
1:01:02
world, Burma and so on.
1:01:06
And finally also fight
1:01:08
in Italy and Europe. So
1:01:10
the Empire is a huge,
1:01:13
huge supporter of Britain in
1:01:15
its hour of need in 1940 and 1941, whilst Britain
1:01:17
is fighting
1:01:20
for its life. And how willing are these,
1:01:22
we've alluded to the fact that by this
1:01:24
point, the Empire is starting to break down
1:01:26
and it's inevitable that it
1:01:29
will collapse eventually as it does. How
1:01:31
willing are the Indians to go and sign up and
1:01:33
fight in a war that... This is the
1:01:35
amazing thing. They're incredibly willing. The
1:01:38
New Zealanders, Canadians and Australians
1:01:40
all declare war on the
1:01:43
same day that the war
1:01:45
breaks out, 3rd of September.
1:01:48
The Maoris, for example, have their chiefs come
1:01:50
together and declare war against Germany, even though
1:01:52
they're on the other side of the world
1:01:54
from Germany. The Indians, of course, Was
1:02:00
it my the Viceroy part? You
1:02:02
know nobody forces them to sign
1:02:04
up and they do so in
1:02:07
them millions to were to fight.
1:02:09
This is this is a eighteen
1:02:11
months will say before the Japanese
1:02:14
attack in in Pearl Harbor. So
1:02:16
yes it's a it's a Great
1:02:18
Imperial, a family essentially that comes
1:02:20
together to us to try to
1:02:23
cite the horrors of fascism. And
1:02:25
how much is that was a loyalty to
1:02:27
Britain and how much of that was. A
1:02:31
look over what what Germany were doing
1:02:33
and going. this is an evil that
1:02:35
nice to be defeated of us. Absolutely
1:02:38
yeah and and of course it would
1:02:40
be both. You know is that makes
1:02:42
perfect sense has netted sir and it
1:02:44
is up and to Munich a loss
1:02:47
as the rest of the empire wasn't
1:02:49
interested in getting involved in a European
1:02:51
war. But once it became clear from
1:02:53
Munich on woods and especially as I
1:02:56
keep coming back this idea of the
1:02:58
of the read miniaturize a soon as
1:03:00
Prague have been that moment where he
1:03:02
moves in super senior and Moravia and
1:03:04
then takes a whole of the rest
1:03:07
of Czechoslovakia in the March. Nineteen Thirty
1:03:09
Nine That is the clear signals to
1:03:11
the whole world that Hitler is not
1:03:13
just insisted in trying to get Germans
1:03:16
back into the rice as he had
1:03:18
been claiming for years and that all
1:03:20
he wanted to do was rip up
1:03:22
the Versailles treaty, know he was taking
1:03:25
Slavs into the right as well and
1:03:27
say that was the moment at which
1:03:29
your stadiums, Canadians, New Zealanders, And so
1:03:32
on. All recognized that hit that
1:03:34
was exactly the kind of evil
1:03:36
com crash that hit at Sir
1:03:38
Winston Churchill of the morning about
1:03:41
so. They
1:03:43
then. Started to fight
1:03:45
the germans. a moot point did
1:03:47
we see the germans start getting
1:03:49
pushed back as if it looks
1:03:51
like it was a more fair
1:03:53
fight. An isolate. The
1:03:56
seat didn't look inevitable. For.
1:03:58
The first name is Cool Sweet Victory. Britain.
1:04:01
On the fifteenth of September Nineteen
1:04:03
Forty, it became clear that the
1:04:05
Oriented won the battle of loss
1:04:07
against the law suffer. And
1:04:09
dirt And the invasion therefore wasn't
1:04:11
going to take place. We didn't
1:04:14
know it wasn't gonna take place
1:04:16
really until the June of nice
1:04:18
if we won when the Hitler
1:04:20
invaded Russia. But it's but it
1:04:22
became pretty clear because you can't
1:04:25
invade across twins two miles of
1:04:27
so was Us unless you have
1:04:29
air superiority or we establish that
1:04:31
obesity in that a Operation Overlord
1:04:33
in June nineteen Forty four going
1:04:36
the other direction and they didn't
1:04:38
have operational. An. Air
1:04:40
superiority because they lost the Battle
1:04:42
of Britain. That was the first
1:04:44
point but then it's an awesome
1:04:46
till the November ninth and Forty
1:04:48
Two. So a fool to and
1:04:50
a half years after the Battle
1:04:52
of Britain that the Germans start
1:04:54
to get serious, be defeated on
1:04:56
land and that happens in North
1:04:58
Africa the middle of El Alamein
1:05:00
him that at the end ninety
1:05:02
Forty Two. And. How
1:05:04
much so that was? Because. The.
1:05:07
Americans then got involved. A
1:05:10
lot because we're very fortunate that
1:05:12
the Americans. Gave Us
1:05:14
in the Sand A essentially
1:05:16
the Sherman tanks am. With
1:05:18
which we fools and the battle
1:05:20
know sam as El Alamein and
1:05:22
also of course in the same
1:05:24
months and they demonise In Forty
1:05:27
Two, the Americans also landed a
1:05:29
quarter of a million men in
1:05:31
North West Africa and in Morocco
1:05:33
and and. And. Elsewhere on
1:05:35
the northwestern coasts there was another, but
1:05:37
the Americas not involved in the war's
1:05:39
a combination of this point is it
1:05:41
in November? Nineteen Forty Two it is.
1:05:44
So. I'm yes he goes if
1:05:46
that is of course this is why
1:05:48
this one has been attacked this and
1:05:50
will. This is if this is an
1:05:52
amazing thing about America is that although
1:05:55
it wasn't attacked by Germany, yes it
1:05:57
it's and Hitler didn't declare war against
1:05:59
Americans or. Eleventh as December Nineteen,
1:06:01
Forty One Four days after
1:06:03
Pearl Harbor, the Roosevelt Administration
1:06:05
took the most incredibly statesman
1:06:07
like decision to put Germany
1:06:09
first. It's cool, the Germany
1:06:12
First policy. And they
1:06:14
and will be decided to do
1:06:16
was to even if they hadn't
1:06:18
been attacked by Germany. They.
1:06:20
Only been attacked by Japan in
1:06:22
the Pacific, they nonetheless had seventy
1:06:25
percent of their resources concentrated on
1:06:27
defeating Germany. And this is because
1:06:29
of great statesman said by the
1:06:31
Roosevelt administration by General Marshall and
1:06:33
by General Eisenhower and others who
1:06:36
came up with what's called the
1:06:38
Germany First policy and them. And
1:06:40
the fact is that a on
1:06:42
the clouds of it's in the
1:06:45
great military think it's if you
1:06:47
are taxed by two enemies, you
1:06:49
take out the strongest. One first
1:06:51
and that Hitler was much stronger
1:06:53
than Japan. Whenever I
1:06:55
think about Pearl Harbor I
1:06:57
always see is. A
1:07:00
good. Teacher Listening to Do by
1:07:03
the Japanese You've got the Americans.
1:07:05
They're not involved at this stage
1:07:07
in. There. Was super power.
1:07:10
Why? He than what I. Am
1:07:13
because of the old embargo as
1:07:15
the fear was goods to pounds.
1:07:17
A sense either Japanese empire was
1:07:19
essentially just gonna run out of
1:07:22
oil. And the way to
1:07:24
smash that was to take on
1:07:26
the Americans and or steal the
1:07:29
the oil this the and Netherlands
1:07:31
East Indies.season. And the
1:07:33
only way to do that was
1:07:35
to attack America. And it was,
1:07:38
of course, and it ultimately incredibly
1:07:40
stupid and suicidal as into a
1:07:42
dumb because you can't invade America.
1:07:44
America isn't an invader bull country
1:07:46
and that's also why it was
1:07:48
a stupid and indeed literally suicidal
1:07:50
for at all fit into declare
1:07:53
war on America on the eleventh
1:07:55
of December, nineteen Forty One. But
1:07:57
Sam posters these countries did that
1:07:59
and. And what would
1:08:01
happen to them He and and you're
1:08:03
coming back to Churchill. I imagine when
1:08:06
he's taking over ninety forty, the war
1:08:08
looks like. Is. Unwinnable at
1:08:10
this point or close to. He's giving all
1:08:12
the speeches, is trying to marshal the defense
1:08:14
of Britain. Number.
1:08:16
One of the top of is
1:08:18
less or certainly closer would have
1:08:20
been how do I get the
1:08:22
Americans to help us That's why
1:08:24
on the Americans did help enormously.
1:08:26
They sent over in the a
1:08:29
man do know from Nineteen Fourteen
1:08:31
the summer of Nineteen forty, huge
1:08:33
numbers of rifles, millions of rounds
1:08:35
of ammunition, an enormous amounts of
1:08:37
military help, and then they passed
1:08:39
the least that the Lend Lease
1:08:41
Act which allowed us to buy
1:08:43
enormous amounts of munitions from them
1:08:45
as well. As so so,
1:08:47
the Americans did how what they obviously
1:08:50
didn't want to do at that. Time.
1:08:53
Was to actually I get involved
1:08:55
in in the in the hot
1:08:57
war in the and because they
1:08:59
hadn't been attacked. And
1:09:01
yet when? At of
1:09:03
Hitler did declare war on them.
1:09:05
Then they took this say credible
1:09:07
decision. This Germany first decision and
1:09:09
they landed all those men Could
1:09:12
have a million men in the
1:09:14
Western theater as opposed to just
1:09:16
concentrating on the Japanese. coffee Did
1:09:18
fight back very much against the
1:09:20
Japanese. You have got a canal
1:09:22
you have said about Midway by
1:09:24
Nineteen Forty Two, but the lion's
1:09:27
share of the American resources goes
1:09:29
to citing hits or in the
1:09:31
West. So.
1:09:34
It. Was Churchill happy with the situation where
1:09:36
he was getting supplies you got lend lease
1:09:38
or was he's dying down the door trying
1:09:40
to get the American? So I actually get
1:09:43
Kinetic Li involved. Turtle.
1:09:45
Very much on seats and
1:09:47
the to be Knesset claim
1:09:49
involved of course, but M
1:09:51
C recognize that he couldn't
1:09:53
effect internal American domestic political
1:09:55
opinion. Or beyond
1:09:57
making speeches. Three Americans,
1:10:00
Constantly getting his ambassador to
1:10:02
try to encourage the Americans
1:10:04
to give more help am
1:10:07
and thus making sure that
1:10:09
Americans saw the war in
1:10:11
the correct size illogical terms
1:10:14
which will obviously without. A
1:10:16
civilization and and democracy on one
1:10:18
side, against their fascism and frankly
1:10:20
evil on the other. When
1:10:23
you told a story about. Churchill.
1:10:27
Is. Was sixty five years old the
1:10:29
told it must have taken on him.
1:10:32
Both physical and emotional must
1:10:35
have been. In. So.
1:10:37
It. It must have been almost unbearable.
1:10:40
Well. That's why I mean you sixty five
1:10:42
years old when he became prime minister nineteen
1:10:44
forties, who was in his early seventies by
1:10:46
the time of. The.
1:10:49
End of the in and he
1:10:51
was extraordinary brave during the Second
1:10:53
world war he go up on
1:10:55
to the arms. On. To
1:10:58
the room so vital indeed of
1:11:00
a building that stuff behind us
1:11:02
there are the Air Ministry. he
1:11:04
go up on the roof during
1:11:06
the blitz, he undertook hundred and
1:11:08
ten thousand miles of flights outside
1:11:11
the United Kingdom, not a slight.
1:11:13
Also shit perjure is by sit
1:11:15
outside the United Kingdom, sometimes within
1:11:17
the radius of the of the
1:11:19
lucifer he would he have four
1:11:21
separate bouts of pneumonia, one of
1:11:24
which very nearly killed him in
1:11:26
Carthage in Nineteen Forty. Three and
1:11:28
so he really was serving tremendous
1:11:30
physical courage. But that is Winston
1:11:32
Churchill. You see, this is the
1:11:34
great thing he he sued as
1:11:37
much physical courage as he had
1:11:39
so moral courage throughout his career
1:11:41
and list stance on his the.
1:11:44
The things that people say about him that he
1:11:46
was an alcoholic and he was. Permanently.
1:11:48
Drunk A said sir I caught
1:11:50
humbling that I'm well now you
1:11:52
couldn't really have run that as
1:11:54
sex mobile. Frankly, the and I've
1:11:56
gone through all of these and
1:11:58
sled these meetings. The Cabinet and
1:12:00
the War Cabinet if you are permanently
1:12:03
drugs. He did drink a hell of
1:12:05
a lot of that's one thing to
1:12:07
remember I see has a right not
1:12:09
serines capacity for alcohol he would he
1:12:12
would drink our most lumps times and
1:12:14
certainly most in the times he didn't
1:12:16
get completely plastered but he did have
1:12:18
a whiskey and soda is that would
1:12:20
start at about six o'clock in the
1:12:23
evenings and then goes through on but
1:12:25
some. His private secretary and. As
1:12:27
in bonds, a few. Brown told me
1:12:29
that these were what he called mouth
1:12:32
was so very very little whiskey, large
1:12:34
amounts of that of soda. and there
1:12:36
was a a friend of his cool,
1:12:38
Cp Scott. He said that Winston Churchill
1:12:40
couldn't have been an alcoholic because no
1:12:42
alcoholic could have drunk that Nazis. That's
1:12:46
or into seats are I mean the I
1:12:48
guess the obvious counterpoint to your argument that
1:12:51
he couldn't have ten dollars, meetings, etc was
1:12:53
that Hitler promptly was on all sorts of
1:12:55
drugs the entire war and also was teetotal.
1:12:58
And of cool. So so Hitler was on
1:13:00
the other end of the area of the
1:13:02
spectrum. As it works, I'm. Hitler
1:13:04
would be the in frames athena different
1:13:06
ways that they did. they acted hits
1:13:09
and at the beginning as meetings would
1:13:11
set out what he wanted the meeting
1:13:13
to discuss then that he would listen
1:13:15
quite a lot. He was quite good
1:13:17
listener. in fact we know from these
1:13:20
your conferences which were all taken down
1:13:22
by the stenographers every word the of
1:13:24
who sunset and eastern their preference but
1:13:26
then at the end you'd some up
1:13:29
and not change his mind at all
1:13:31
He would he would have listened to
1:13:33
his generals but. Then he would not
1:13:35
have taken their point of view. We.
1:13:37
Turtle, it was very different make he
1:13:39
didn't start off saying what he won't
1:13:42
eat, He would listen to what they
1:13:44
have to say and if the arguments
1:13:46
were better than his arguments, he would
1:13:48
change his mind. And that obesity is
1:13:50
the much more democratic, much more grown
1:13:52
up, frankly and much more useful and
1:13:55
little successful way of getting about a
1:13:57
meeting. Will Fly You mentioned that one
1:13:59
of them. The lessons he learned from
1:14:01
his earlier mistakes was that his opinion
1:14:03
wasn't always the right one on that. You
1:14:05
are to listen to the professionals, particularly when
1:14:08
it comes to matters of was handed that
1:14:10
manifests itself during World War Two or well.
1:14:12
He would have some of the The Chiefs
1:14:14
of Staff this across the table from him
1:14:17
again not very far from here to say
1:14:19
the there in the Cabinet War Rooms and
1:14:21
they would add in General Addenbrooke, the Chief
1:14:24
of the Imperial General Staff would lean across
1:14:26
and three pencils and hall say no, I
1:14:28
disagree with you Prime Minister. Ahmet
1:14:30
that they would have these arguments. Sometimes they
1:14:32
would be rouse, sometimes they would bang the
1:14:34
table. Sometimes. His concerts would burst
1:14:37
into tears. If he didn't
1:14:39
get his way thought is that
1:14:41
she's the staff all stuck to
1:14:43
their original beliefs as they did
1:14:45
a the say the Sumatra planned
1:14:47
of March nineteen forty three and
1:14:49
various Norwegian and plans as well
1:14:51
and they refuse to change their
1:14:53
minds then and then. Natural never
1:14:55
overruled them and and this turned
1:14:57
out to be the best thing
1:14:59
you know because they did not
1:15:02
make any suits Arrows they were
1:15:04
of course they were mistakes and
1:15:06
and deceit, sons and problems and.
1:15:08
And so on. but the Chiefs of
1:15:10
Staff overrule didn't make the kind of
1:15:12
errors that they would have made his
1:15:14
they had been potty in turtles hands
1:15:16
and as we move towards the end
1:15:19
of the wall when we saw. The
1:15:21
fire bombing of Dresden. How
1:15:23
much was Church was involved in
1:15:26
those decisions when he was one
1:15:28
of the yeah people? Of course
1:15:30
it was. That was an R
1:15:33
A S Bomber Command decision which
1:15:35
was an essentially okayed by the
1:15:37
Chiefs of Staff The address them
1:15:40
one in particular on the thirteenth
1:15:42
and fourteenth says February Nineteen or
1:15:44
forty Five was an easy decision
1:15:46
for the as he starts to
1:15:49
say because the Russians had asked
1:15:51
Bomber Command see smash the Railway.
1:15:53
notes that we're bringing german
1:15:56
forces back from the west
1:15:58
to soar up the defence
1:16:01
of Nazi positions in the East. And
1:16:05
so to attack the railway sidings, which
1:16:07
is what they did in Dresden,
1:16:10
was not a difficult decision to take.
1:16:13
The reason that the losses were so
1:16:15
high, and by the way they're nothing
1:16:17
like as high as pro-Nazi
1:16:19
historians have made out, they're much more
1:16:21
like 20,000 rather than 200,000 people killed
1:16:23
on those raids. The
1:16:28
reason they were so high was
1:16:30
because the galitres of Dresden had
1:16:32
not prepared proper defences in
1:16:35
Dresden. But
1:16:37
nonetheless, I guess what Francis' question is getting
1:16:40
at, and this is
1:16:42
relevant to a more modern context when
1:16:44
we see conflicts that are ongoing currently
1:16:46
where there's a constant discussion about civilian
1:16:48
casualties and war and so on. In
1:16:52
the last year and a half of the war,
1:16:54
the Allies in Britain in particular dropped a hell
1:16:56
of a lot of munitions
1:16:58
on Nazi Germany. To
1:17:01
what extent was there a moral
1:17:03
debate within the British government and armed forces
1:17:05
about that? Or was it just seen as,
1:17:08
look, we've got to win the war, this
1:17:10
is what you do when you're in war?
1:17:12
There was a moral debate. The Church of
1:17:14
England had several bishops who were opposed to
1:17:16
it and who said so in debates in
1:17:18
the House of Lords. This
1:17:20
got very little traction amongst the public.
1:17:22
The public, frankly, who had
1:17:24
taken the blitz, of course, back
1:17:27
in 1940, 1941, and
1:17:29
in the V2 attacks in 1944, were
1:17:32
taking it all over again. They were
1:17:34
very much in favour of giving it
1:17:36
back to the Germans. As it was,
1:17:38
we lost over 50,000 killed civilians and
1:17:44
the Germans lost half a million. So
1:17:46
we gave it back 10 times. And
1:17:48
that, tragically, is war.
1:17:51
That's what happens in war when you start a war
1:17:53
and you try to kill as many innocent civilians
1:17:58
as possible. I mean, obviously, it's not a war. there
1:18:00
is a war going on at the moment in Gaza
1:18:02
where much the same kind of
1:18:05
thing is happening. Very many more
1:18:07
civilians being killed than originally were
1:18:10
killed by the aggressors. But it's
1:18:12
absolutely essential to remember who were
1:18:14
the aggressors. Well, quite. And it's
1:18:16
one of the reasons I brought
1:18:18
in the modern situation. However, I'm
1:18:20
just curious. And to
1:18:23
think about the decision,
1:18:25
was there a – you
1:18:27
alluded to the fact that the general public frankly
1:18:30
wanted to give it back to the Germans. Was
1:18:33
there an element of the aerial bombardment
1:18:35
of Germany that was about punishment?
1:18:38
Not really, no. It was –
1:18:40
that was there. Of
1:18:43
course it was. But actually, when you
1:18:45
look at the graphs of the increase
1:18:47
in munitions productions,
1:18:50
by the August of 1943, all of
1:18:52
the graphs come –
1:18:55
they basically plateau off because
1:18:57
the Allied bombing campaign – it wasn't
1:18:59
just the RAF, of course, it was
1:19:01
also the US AAF – are
1:19:05
able to take out the
1:19:08
factories necessary in
1:19:10
so many cases that mean that,
1:19:12
yes, the Germans continue to increase
1:19:15
military production, but nothing like the same extent as
1:19:17
in 1941, 1942, and the early part of 1943.
1:19:23
So it really is an attempt to hit
1:19:26
the war-bearing factories, the oil
1:19:28
refineries, the tank
1:19:31
production factories, and they're very successful in
1:19:33
that. Was it seen
1:19:35
really as a way of just
1:19:37
expediting the end of this conflict? Precisely.
1:19:40
You try and shorten the war by
1:19:42
any means possible. The
1:19:44
RAF and the US AAF believe that
1:19:46
they could actually win the war just
1:19:48
by smashing German cities. And
1:19:50
if you also – what was called, it's
1:19:52
a rather horrible phrase, but nonetheless, sort
1:19:55
of the bloodless phrase, de-hows –
1:19:58
but if you also, at the same times hitting
1:20:00
the factories, de-house the civilian population,
1:20:03
you make it much more difficult
1:20:05
for them also to work
1:20:07
in the factories to produce the necessary munitions
1:20:10
for the Germans to carry on fighting. So
1:20:12
it was just a very simple and effective
1:20:14
way of bringing the country to its knees?
1:20:16
Yes. And it did it
1:20:18
extremely successfully, and if we had not done it, you
1:20:21
could well have found that the Germans
1:20:24
could have carried on fighting for
1:20:26
many months, indeed possibly even
1:20:28
years longer, and if that had happened, many
1:20:30
more millions of people would have died. And
1:20:33
at what point did they find
1:20:35
out about the concentration camps? Relatively
1:20:40
late on. There
1:20:43
were overflights, of course, where
1:20:45
reconnaissance planes were able to
1:20:47
take, as we discovered after
1:20:49
the war, a very good
1:20:51
photograph of the actual rampant
1:20:53
Auschwitz. There's a
1:20:55
photograph. If you visited Auschwitz
1:20:57
today, you see this allied
1:21:01
photograph. But at the time, they didn't know
1:21:03
what it was, tragically. Then
1:21:07
there were some people in 1942 who
1:21:09
actually came back, very brave Poles that
1:21:11
came back to explain what was going
1:21:14
on. Only by
1:21:16
1944, by the time
1:21:18
of the mass movement of
1:21:21
Hungarians to Auschwitz, the
1:21:23
Western Allies had a pretty
1:21:26
good idea that something truly monstrous
1:21:28
was taking place. Winston Churchill
1:21:30
said to Anthony Eden, you know,
1:21:32
invoke me if necessary, but we
1:21:35
need to bomb the railways going
1:21:37
from Hungary to Auschwitz. The trouble is,
1:21:40
bombing a railway is very difficult, as
1:21:42
we've discovered at Dresden, apart from anything
1:21:44
else. It's
1:21:46
a really tricky thing
1:21:48
to do because it's in a straight line. And
1:21:52
so what happened essentially was
1:21:54
that the Americans didn't want
1:21:57
to undertake the daylight bombings
1:21:59
highly. not producing
1:22:01
and the RAF used to
1:22:03
bomb at night so tragically
1:22:06
that was not done. And
1:22:09
so we're going to the bombings
1:22:11
of Dresden. Was that
1:22:13
the one thing that really ended the
1:22:15
Nazi regime or were there other factors
1:22:18
involved? Oh no, no, no. The thing
1:22:20
that ended the Nazi regime was
1:22:23
D-Day in the West where
1:22:25
you have a million men by
1:22:28
D plus 30 landing on in
1:22:30
Western Europe and Operation
1:22:32
Bragration in the East where
1:22:34
in the August of 19,
1:22:36
July and August of
1:22:38
1944, the Red
1:22:41
Army kills, captures or wounds
1:22:43
over half a million German soldiers, 510,000
1:22:45
German soldiers and then it smashes essentially Army
1:22:51
Group Centre in Belarus and
1:22:53
marches on to Berlin. The
1:22:56
war was not won by the
1:23:00
combined bomber offensive although that did
1:23:02
help enormously. It was won by
1:23:04
fighting on the ground in Europe,
1:23:06
extirpating the Nazi regime in Germany.
1:23:08
Well I'm glad you said that
1:23:10
because my Soviet ancestors were not
1:23:12
accepted. The telling of the
1:23:14
story for us is an attempt and in fact
1:23:16
there are historians who have argued that really Germany
1:23:18
lost the war in the attempt
1:23:21
to capture Moscow which failed and stalled. Yeah,
1:23:24
I mean it's a very interesting historical
1:23:26
discussion. I go into this in my
1:23:29
book The Storm of War. Is
1:23:32
it the failure to capture Moscow
1:23:34
in the October and
1:23:37
November of 1941? You
1:23:39
could argue that it's Stalingrad of course between
1:23:41
August 1942 and the fall in the February
1:23:47
of 1943. Some
1:23:50
would argue that Hitler's
1:23:52
counter-attack at Kursk In
1:23:54
the Kursk salient in the July of
1:23:56
1943 and the failure of that is
1:23:58
the key moment. I'm by
1:24:01
the time of operation Progress even
1:24:03
you know the the German armies
1:24:05
very much wrong the a retreat
1:24:07
but your your your lesson ancestors
1:24:09
can to take great pride because
1:24:11
of the size for every five
1:24:13
Germans killed in combat by which
1:24:15
I don't mean bomb from the
1:24:17
and not that half a million.
1:24:19
Add we meant figure We mentioned earlier that
1:24:21
that half a million. Sorry. That
1:24:24
that for every some items killed
1:24:26
on a battlefield four died on
1:24:28
the Eastern Front year and it
1:24:30
costs the Russians some twenty seven
1:24:32
million people exactly. And and the
1:24:34
reason I bring it up to
1:24:36
his I imagine the for Churchill
1:24:38
the pragmatic necessity of doing a
1:24:40
deal with the devil. Joseph.
1:24:42
Stalin would have been simultaneously a
1:24:45
very difficult and a very simple
1:24:47
decision at once. Is that fair
1:24:49
to say Yes, that is actually
1:24:51
he the moment that he heard
1:24:53
of Hitler's an invasion of Russia,
1:24:55
operation Barbarossa on the twenty second,
1:24:57
as do Nineteen Forty One. He
1:24:59
immediately went to the House of
1:25:02
Commons and declared the alliance with
1:25:04
the with the Soviet Union. I
1:25:06
mean it's an amazing thing seems
1:25:08
to do at this man who
1:25:10
had been a powerful, the most
1:25:12
powerful. Anti communist advocate since nineteen
1:25:14
seventeen since the Russian Revolution comes out
1:25:16
and says i would you said he
1:25:19
makes a joke of it saying that
1:25:21
sets saying that he would make a
1:25:23
positive reference to of the Devil in
1:25:25
the house of Commons the if the
1:25:27
devil was a rare invade Russia. And
1:25:30
and he and he goes to the
1:25:32
House of Commons and says that this
1:25:34
and at Hitler invaded hell than he
1:25:37
would make us has. Positives:
1:25:39
reference to satan and in the
1:25:41
house of commons as silly had
1:25:44
this very much the sense that
1:25:46
he puts his i'm a country's
1:25:48
best interests first and swallows a
1:25:51
sense leave for the remainder of
1:25:53
the war his hatred of communism
1:25:55
and them and is is right
1:25:58
to do so because Of
1:26:00
course, the most important thing is to defeat the
1:26:02
Nazis. And the reason I bring that up is
1:26:04
that I think most even
1:26:07
people like us who are not well educated in
1:26:09
history will be familiar with towards
1:26:11
the end of World War II, Germany
1:26:14
is being enveloped from both sides, and eventually
1:26:16
succumbs, Hitler kills himself, and blah blah blah
1:26:18
blah. What's interesting to me is
1:26:21
there must have been a calculation at some point
1:26:23
where Churchill and the Americans would have gone, we're
1:26:26
going to win this war. And
1:26:29
then we've got another problem,
1:26:32
which is we've won this war with Joseph Stalin,
1:26:34
with whom we've had to do a deal with
1:26:36
the devil, and now the devil is in the
1:26:38
heart of Europe. Well, that comes
1:26:40
by the Yalta Conference, of course, of
1:26:43
January and February 1945. So
1:26:46
they agree
1:26:49
essentially to believe Stalin's
1:26:51
lies about the integrity
1:26:53
and independence of Poland.
1:26:56
That's one of the things
1:26:58
they need to do essentially if they're
1:27:00
to keep the alliance together until the
1:27:03
moment when the Germans are ultimately defeated
1:27:05
in the May of 1945. It's
1:27:08
a very difficult moment.
1:27:10
You can argue, and
1:27:13
historians do, that they
1:27:16
were being deliberately naive, or
1:27:19
they were just following realpolitik, which is what
1:27:21
I believe. If you've
1:27:23
got an alliance with somebody
1:27:25
who is worse than the person you've
1:27:28
got the alliance with, then you have to see
1:27:30
that alliance through. Because I guess
1:27:32
the reason I'm bringing this up is I'm
1:27:34
just curious as a historian what other options
1:27:36
you think there may have been available, because
1:27:38
if you look at it objectively, World
1:27:41
War II was started in defense of Poland
1:27:43
and Eastern Europe from being occupied by Hitler.
1:27:46
All of that territory and way more
1:27:48
ends up falling to a dictator who's
1:27:50
almost as bad. That's right. That
1:27:53
is the ultimate irony of World War II.
1:27:59
There are others. So he
1:28:01
starts believing
1:28:03
that the British Empire needs
1:28:06
to be protected and we
1:28:08
wind up so poor and
1:28:10
poverty-stricken and weak that the
1:28:12
Empire has to be given away. He
1:28:15
is an anti-socialist and yet the
1:28:17
whole of Eastern Europe is dominated
1:28:20
by communism. There are lots of
1:28:22
ironies of the Second World War,
1:28:24
but the central one, which is
1:28:26
that Adolf Hitler had to be
1:28:28
stopped, Nazism had to be extirpated
1:28:31
and destroyed. That's
1:28:34
the one that I think Britain
1:28:37
and the Western powers have
1:28:40
an untarnishable glory in
1:28:42
being the people who
1:28:44
started from the first day of the war
1:28:47
and went on to the last day of
1:28:49
the war. And that's something that Canadians and
1:28:51
Australians, New Zealanders and so on,
1:28:54
Indians are able, I think,
1:28:56
to take great pride along with the
1:28:58
British for. Were there any other options
1:29:00
at Yalta? Could they have done anything
1:29:02
to save people from Europe? There was
1:29:04
this thing called Operation Unthinkable. This wasn't
1:29:06
at Yalta. There
1:29:09
was nothing you could do at Yalta
1:29:11
because by that stage the Soviets had
1:29:13
millions of boots on the ground in
1:29:15
Poland and at least in Europe. But
1:29:17
by the time of Potsdam, of course,
1:29:19
the United States had the nuclear bomb,
1:29:21
but there was simply no way they
1:29:23
could have threatened to use it against
1:29:25
their Soviet allies who had lost 27
1:29:28
million fighting against the human
1:29:31
beings, fighting against the Germans. Against
1:29:36
the Germans. Uncle Joe
1:29:39
Stalin was very popular in the
1:29:41
West, of course. There was simply
1:29:43
no way that the nuclear bomb
1:29:45
could have been threatened against the
1:29:47
Russians. And
1:29:51
of course, you still had to win the war in
1:29:53
the East against Japan. And
1:29:55
the Russians promised to go to war
1:29:57
three months to the day after the
1:29:59
end. end of the war in
1:30:01
Europe and they carried out that promise.
1:30:03
So no, the
1:30:07
opportunities were non-existent, frankly.
1:30:10
And moving over to the war in the
1:30:12
East, some of the most brutal and horrific
1:30:15
fighting was in countries like Burma, where we
1:30:17
suffered horrific losses. How
1:30:19
much was Churchill involved in the
1:30:22
discussions about dropping the nuclear bombs
1:30:24
on Japan? Oh, very closely involved.
1:30:27
It was an Anglo-American decision. Absolutely.
1:30:29
He was as much
1:30:31
in favor of it as
1:30:34
Truman. He had signed the
1:30:37
original agreement with FDR about
1:30:39
the joint decision-making. A
1:30:42
lot of British scientists were,
1:30:44
of course, involved in what
1:30:48
was going on in New
1:30:50
Mexico in creating
1:30:52
the bomb. And
1:30:55
it wasn't until after the war in the
1:30:57
March of 1946 that the Americans
1:31:00
moved to essentially make the nuclear
1:31:02
bomb an American thing and cut
1:31:05
the British out of the decision-making
1:31:07
process. So he thought it was
1:31:09
a necessary evil to get rid,
1:31:11
to bring Japan, essentially
1:31:15
humiliate them and decimate them?
1:31:17
Well, to defeat them, essentially. He wasn't
1:31:20
that worried about humiliation and decimation so
1:31:22
much as their surrender. And it did
1:31:24
take place, of course, within days of
1:31:27
the Nagasaki bomb
1:31:29
being dropped. And
1:31:31
before we move on and we talk about
1:31:33
other things, what was Churchill's impression of Hitler?
1:31:36
Was it someone that he actually, despite
1:31:38
obviously the awful atrocities a man committed,
1:31:40
was this someone that he had a
1:31:43
grudging amount of respect for? No. No,
1:31:45
he thought of Hitler as being completely
1:31:47
useless as a strategist. He thought at
1:31:49
the very beginning of the war when
1:31:51
Hitler was doing extremely well that
1:31:54
maybe he did have a
1:31:56
sort of sixth sense. He worried that
1:31:58
he did. It
1:32:00
soon became very clear when
1:32:02
he made mistake after mistake,
1:32:04
especially in North Africa, the
1:32:06
timing of the invasion of
1:32:08
Russia and then one mistake
1:32:10
after another in Russia, that
1:32:13
actually he was a
1:32:15
pretty useless strategist. And he
1:32:17
made lots of jokes about Corporal Schickelgruber
1:32:20
and what a bad strategist he was.
1:32:22
And in fact, when in July 19, the 20th of July 1944, the Germans tried
1:32:24
to kill Hitler and
1:32:30
blow him up. And Churchill
1:32:32
went on the radio and said, well, we can be pleased
1:32:35
that they failed because of all
1:32:37
the strategic mistakes that Corporal Schickelgruber
1:32:39
is making. So no,
1:32:42
he didn't have a high respect for him. He thought
1:32:44
of him as a common gutter
1:32:46
snipe. He called him at one point,
1:32:48
corkus boss. He
1:32:50
has some absolutely magnificent
1:32:53
phraseology for Hitler,
1:32:55
which he unleashed. Even better phraseology
1:32:58
for Mussolini actually as well. And
1:33:01
was his criticisms, were his criticisms
1:33:03
of Hitler accurate? Yes,
1:33:07
overall, they certainly were because
1:33:09
Hitler, as I mentioned, didn't
1:33:11
listen to many of
1:33:14
his top generals. He had people
1:33:17
like Gerd von Rundstedt and
1:33:19
Erwin Rommel, Erich
1:33:22
von Manstein, Heinz Guderian, these
1:33:25
generals who were
1:33:27
far better strategists than he, people
1:33:29
who had gone to staff college,
1:33:31
who had been officers in the
1:33:34
Great War, and who
1:33:36
were very significant and
1:33:38
impressive commanders in the field. And
1:33:41
they would go and talk to Hitler, as
1:33:43
I say, we have every word spoken in
1:33:46
the Fuhrer conferences. And
1:33:48
Hitler would just stick
1:33:51
to his original ideas about what
1:33:53
he wanted. He also became a
1:33:55
terrible micromanager, much, much worse than
1:33:57
Churchill. Churchill came back. as
1:34:00
the war progressed and was able to see things in
1:34:03
the round, whereas Hitler would
1:34:05
concentrate on where individual regiments
1:34:07
were trying to capture individual
1:34:10
villages deep in Russia, which
1:34:12
was of course a ridiculous way to fight
1:34:15
a war. So when one looks
1:34:18
at the different ways that the
1:34:20
two men dealt
1:34:22
with decision making, they're very, very different. And
1:34:25
do you think part of it as well
1:34:27
why Churchill was a far more competent leader
1:34:29
is the fact that he was much more
1:34:31
emotionally stable than Hitler? No, it wasn't just
1:34:33
that. And by the way, he was a
1:34:35
very emotional man. He burst into tears some
1:34:37
50 times during the Second World
1:34:40
War. He would get very emotional. He wasn't
1:34:42
in that sense a stiff upper-lit Victorian. He
1:34:44
was a much more sort
1:34:46
of regency aristocratic figure who wore
1:34:49
his heart on his sleeve. No, what it
1:34:51
was was that he was far more
1:34:53
intelligent than Hitler. And
1:34:56
he had spent a lifetime thinking
1:34:58
about grand strategy ever since he
1:35:00
had been taught it when he
1:35:02
was at Sandhurst. He heard, of
1:35:04
course, in the First World War
1:35:06
been thinking about and been involved
1:35:08
in grand strategy, not always successfully
1:35:10
as we discover from the Dardanelles,
1:35:13
but nonetheless, that he was
1:35:15
also involved in very successful parts of it. And
1:35:18
he was a person who
1:35:20
wrote a lot of history. One of
1:35:22
the reasons I'm proud to be a historian
1:35:24
was that Winston Churchill was a historian. And
1:35:26
he was able to look at the problems
1:35:28
of the day through the lens of history.
1:35:32
And he also was
1:35:34
somebody who would listen to
1:35:36
his strategists and take
1:35:38
their advice and not overall them.
1:35:40
So he had all of these
1:35:42
enormous advantages that Hitler chose to
1:35:44
throw away. And what did he
1:35:46
make of Stalin? Well,
1:35:48
interestingly, Stalin actually came round
1:35:50
to the Western way of
1:35:53
making war, the deliberative way,
1:35:55
the way the interactive way,
1:35:58
rather than the the
1:36:00
way he started off. At the
1:36:02
time of Operation Barbarossa, he had something
1:36:04
akin to a mental breakdown and went
1:36:06
back to his dutchess and couldn't be
1:36:09
heard from at all until the Polit
1:36:11
Bureau went to him. And
1:36:13
by the way, just to add something,
1:36:15
when they arrived, he thought they were
1:36:18
there to arrest him? Yeah, absolutely, and
1:36:20
to liquidate him, exactly. And so he
1:36:22
was surprised and pleasantly, very pleasantly
1:36:25
surprised when they turned to him and
1:36:27
said, you know, you are our leader
1:36:29
and you've got to save us. And
1:36:32
what he then did was to listen. I mean,
1:36:34
he was a dictator, of course,
1:36:36
but nonetheless, he listened to
1:36:38
men like Zhukov and Rokozovsky
1:36:40
and Ivan Konev and
1:36:43
the great Russian marshals. And
1:36:46
when the great battles that we mentioned
1:36:48
earlier, Stalingrad and Moscow and Kursk
1:36:50
and so on and the Battle of Berlin
1:36:55
were fought, they were
1:36:58
fought by the marshals
1:37:00
interacting in a rational
1:37:02
and logical way with Stalin. And he
1:37:04
didn't go down the hipster route, which
1:37:06
he perfectly easily could have, of course,
1:37:09
because he was a paranoid dictator. And
1:37:12
but just on the Stalin
1:37:14
thing, Churchill and Stalin met on
1:37:16
several occasions at these conferences. What
1:37:18
did you do? We know what
1:37:20
Churchill made of Stalin? I'm afraid
1:37:23
he liked him. It's it's it's
1:37:25
you know, I'm as you can
1:37:27
tell, I'm an admirer of Winston
1:37:29
Churchill. And I'm sorry to say
1:37:31
that he got on very well
1:37:33
with the most evil man apart
1:37:35
from Hitler. I think he
1:37:38
he had a bit of a drinking competition with him
1:37:40
at the Kremlin the first time
1:37:42
they met in the August of 1942. Then
1:37:44
he got on very well within again
1:37:48
in the October of 1944. He
1:37:50
visited Moscow both times, of
1:37:52
course. They also met at Tehran
1:37:54
and Yalta and and
1:37:56
Potsdam. And there
1:37:59
was moment where Stalin
1:38:01
said that he was going to shoot 50,000 German officers
1:38:05
out of hand as soon as they were
1:38:07
captured and Churchill got up from the table
1:38:09
and marched out and refused to interact. But
1:38:13
other than that I'm afraid they got on
1:38:15
well. He believed he could out drink Stalin
1:38:19
in vodka. Very interesting. Well,
1:38:22
Andrew, it's been such an
1:38:24
interesting discussion of the biography of Winston Churchill
1:38:26
and we wanted to bring it a little
1:38:28
bit into conversation about
1:38:30
his legacy and how people talk about
1:38:33
him now. We've obviously seen an attempt
1:38:36
to change narrative, let's put
1:38:38
it like this, or to perhaps
1:38:41
drag his legacy out of the historical context
1:38:43
in which it exists. And as you well
1:38:46
know his statue just down the road here
1:38:48
in Parliament Square was defaced
1:38:50
with the words Churchill was a racist and
1:38:53
all of this. And by the way, based on what you were saying
1:38:55
earlier, I think by the standards of
1:38:57
the modern day a kind of Victorian
1:39:01
racial superiority by our standards today
1:39:04
would be absolutely considered that way.
1:39:06
Absolutely. I don't know. In today's
1:39:12
world his views are
1:39:15
obscene and absurd of course also.
1:39:17
But what he didn't know was
1:39:19
the scientific underpinning that we have
1:39:21
whereby we know that racism,
1:39:25
biological racism is obscene
1:39:27
and absurd. They believed
1:39:29
in a Darwinian form
1:39:31
of scientific racism which
1:39:34
is despicable to us today of course.
1:39:38
But I think to blacken
1:39:40
his memory because of something that
1:39:43
was considered a scientific fact at
1:39:45
the time that he
1:39:47
was living is pretty strange. It's
1:39:49
a sort of unhistorical
1:39:51
way, a historical way
1:39:53
really, of approaching people
1:39:56
in the past. Well this is quite what I was
1:39:58
going to ask you which is we I
1:40:01
don't know what you make as a historian of the
1:40:03
fact that people seem to have forgotten that there
1:40:06
was a different time in which values
1:40:08
were different, scientific understanding were different. I
1:40:11
wonder whether they do genuinely think
1:40:13
that or whether or not it's just
1:40:15
a political thing where
1:40:17
they impose ideological stances
1:40:21
and they know perfectly well that actually
1:40:24
they don't really make much sense logically
1:40:26
but they don't care because they want
1:40:28
to grandstand, want to
1:40:31
use a spray
1:40:33
can to make a political
1:40:35
point essentially. They
1:40:38
know that it is infuriating
1:40:40
and hurtful really to a
1:40:42
generation of people, our grandparents
1:40:44
and parents' generation who remember
1:40:46
the Second World War. It's
1:40:49
also of course very
1:40:51
stupid in a way because the
1:40:54
people who had Hitler won
1:40:57
the war, had Churchill
1:40:59
not been there to ensure that we fought
1:41:01
on in 1940,
1:41:03
had the Germans successfully invaded,
1:41:05
had they managed to establish the
1:41:07
Third Reich in Britain and
1:41:10
elsewhere. The people that
1:41:12
would have come off worst were not
1:41:14
the whites. They ultimately
1:41:16
would have had
1:41:18
a terrible, terrible time, of
1:41:21
course white British people but
1:41:23
compared to their ghastly
1:41:26
time, what
1:41:28
would have happened to non-white people in a
1:41:31
Nazi world would have been far worse.
1:41:34
And I think this is such an important
1:41:36
point because people seem to miss this when
1:41:38
they denigrate Churchill and they say
1:41:40
that he was this evil
1:41:42
man and you
1:41:44
go, really? What
1:41:47
was the alternative? The alternative
1:41:49
was truly horrific. When one
1:41:51
thinks of the way
1:41:53
that the Nazis treated every
1:41:57
non-Aryan people.
1:42:01
And not just the Nazis, you know, the Japanese
1:42:04
killed some 17% of the
1:42:06
Filipinos. For
1:42:09
example, if that had happened in India with the
1:42:11
300 million people in India, that would have led
1:42:13
to the deaths of 15 million
1:42:15
Indians. But fortunately, the
1:42:18
British Empire and the Indian
1:42:21
forces of the British Empire held
1:42:23
the Japanese back in
1:42:25
northeast India, and they didn't manage
1:42:27
to get into India. You
1:42:30
know, it would have been for all
1:42:32
of the subject peoples, the
1:42:35
native peoples, you call them what
1:42:37
you like, of the British Empire,
1:42:39
much, much worse if
1:42:41
Nazism had prevailed. And one of the
1:42:43
reasons it didn't prevail was
1:42:46
Winston Churchill. And what can we learn from
1:42:48
this man, this incredible figure in history? Oh,
1:42:50
so much, so much. I mean, his wit,
1:42:53
his charm, his intelligence, his
1:42:56
quotations, the things he
1:42:58
said about the things that
1:43:01
matter, about politics and about freedom
1:43:03
and liberty in
1:43:05
the world, those are the
1:43:07
most important things. Then there's a
1:43:10
lot of things about life, actually,
1:43:12
and about resilience and the need
1:43:14
for courage. He
1:43:16
said of courage that it was the most
1:43:19
important of all the human
1:43:21
values because it underpinned all the rest. And
1:43:23
you see him again and again
1:43:26
showing his moral courage as well as
1:43:28
his physical courage. And
1:43:31
he gives
1:43:34
an example in his own
1:43:37
life. He is somebody who
1:43:39
is willing to explain
1:43:44
all the time what he's doing. You know, he
1:43:46
wasn't, he never hid his light under
1:43:48
a bushel. He wrote these 37 books,
1:43:51
which are all of them still worth
1:43:53
reading, all of them, which is an
1:43:55
incredible thing considering he started writing in
1:43:57
the 19th century. And
1:44:01
he was somebody who had this extraordinary
1:44:03
foresight. Not only was he able to
1:44:05
tell before the First World War that
1:44:07
the Germans were going to cause a
1:44:10
great threat to the hegemony of,
1:44:14
sorry, the balance of power in Europe, but
1:44:16
before the Second World War and
1:44:19
after the Second World War, he
1:44:21
warned against Nazism and Soviet communism,
1:44:23
the sort of two twin totalitarian
1:44:25
threats of the 20th century. So there is so
1:44:28
much still to learn from him. And the good
1:44:30
thing is that when you write about him, in
1:44:32
the book that I wrote about him, it's just
1:44:34
such fun. Because
1:44:36
every four or five pages or so,
1:44:39
he comes up with a witticism or
1:44:41
an apersu or some kind of insight
1:44:43
that you would draw drops.
1:44:46
And he was also very intelligent with
1:44:48
the way that he dealt with Germany
1:44:50
post-war as well. They didn't
1:44:52
make the same mistakes as they made in 1918. Exactly.
1:44:56
Well, they did split Germany, of course, which
1:44:58
they hadn't done in 1918. They
1:45:00
split Germany into two. But they
1:45:02
made sure that the western half of
1:45:05
Germany was democratic. And
1:45:08
when Stalin tried to suck Berlin
1:45:10
into the Soviet more in 1948,
1:45:13
the British and Americans stopped
1:45:20
them from doing that. And eventually, as
1:45:22
a direct result of that, NATO was
1:45:24
created in the April of 1949. Andrew,
1:45:28
I want to ask you a question that's less
1:45:31
about Churchill and more about what
1:45:33
you see as a historian. Because as we've
1:45:35
been talking, one of the things that has
1:45:37
struck me when we were talking about a weakening
1:45:40
empire and demoralization, it
1:45:43
sort of all sounds quite familiar to me as
1:45:46
I look around and I look at the Western
1:45:48
world today. Are there parallels to be drawn between
1:45:50
the period maybe before
1:45:52
World War II and today's world? I
1:45:55
think there are, yes, absolutely. And we're speaking,
1:45:57
of course, today on the day. that
1:46:00
Alexei Navalny has essentially
1:46:03
been murdered by
1:46:05
a despot. Adolf
1:46:09
Hitler murdered a lot of people
1:46:11
even before the Second World War
1:46:14
broke out. The
1:46:17
way in which Ukraine
1:46:21
has fought
1:46:23
back against Putin's Russia
1:46:26
is an interesting example
1:46:29
of how free people can
1:46:31
fight back, especially
1:46:33
if they've got the help of course of
1:46:37
the free world. And
1:46:39
I do see overlaps between
1:46:41
Zelensky and Winston Churchill. He's been
1:46:44
called Winston Churchill with an iPhone
1:46:47
because he does have this command of
1:46:49
the language and this
1:46:51
tremendous bravery. He, like Churchill,
1:46:53
refusing to leave London in
1:46:55
the Blitz, stayed in Kiev
1:46:58
in those key moments immediately
1:47:00
after the Russian invasion. So
1:47:02
yes, there are overlaps,
1:47:05
but one doesn't want to
1:47:07
ever really
1:47:11
ever put too much emphasis
1:47:14
of the 1930s onto present day. I
1:47:17
know that there are echoes and
1:47:19
there are shadows, but it's
1:47:21
by no means exact. No,
1:47:25
actually I understand why you answered the question the
1:47:27
way that you did, because a
1:47:29
lot of people have made the parallel.
1:47:31
I wasn't suggesting that we are on
1:47:33
the path to another world war actually.
1:47:36
What I meant is more that there is a
1:47:39
kind of – I
1:47:41
don't remember the phrase that Churchill used that
1:47:43
you quoted earlier, but there's a kind of
1:47:45
loss of self-confidence. Sort of drawing tides of
1:47:47
drift and surrender. Quite. It sort
1:47:49
of feels, and it comes back very
1:47:51
much to the cultural conversation we were
1:47:54
having a few moments ago about the
1:47:56
denigration of statues, the denigration of history,
1:47:58
the complete lack of teaching. of history
1:48:00
and Orwell warned about this,
1:48:02
that the way to demoralize a people is
1:48:04
to take away from them their history. Do
1:48:07
you feel that there is
1:48:09
a kind of decay
1:48:11
that's happening in the West? Oh yes, I
1:48:13
certainly do. I think the way in which,
1:48:16
especially in the United States, the pulling down
1:48:19
of statues and
1:48:22
even statues of people who
1:48:25
are obvious heroes, people
1:48:27
who fought against slavery
1:48:30
in the mid-19th century. Even
1:48:35
actually pulling down the statues of
1:48:37
the founding fathers, moving
1:48:40
Thomas Jefferson's statue out
1:48:43
of the New York chamber, for example, council
1:48:46
chamber. This is an
1:48:48
extraordinary form of national suicide.
1:48:51
It's a moral suicide. These
1:48:53
people, yes, of
1:48:55
course they're not great
1:48:59
with regard to slavery, but these people
1:49:01
were in the latter part of the
1:49:03
18th century. You have to see them
1:49:05
in their own terms. What
1:49:07
they did was immensely brave in standing up
1:49:10
against the British Empire, which I've been speaking
1:49:12
in favour of briefly, but they stood against
1:49:14
the British Empire and created
1:49:17
a great nation based on a document
1:49:19
of genius, which has lasted for
1:49:21
a quarter of a millennium. The
1:49:24
idea you pull down these people's statues, as I
1:49:26
say, I think it's a form of national suicide.
1:49:30
Touching on the British Empire, how
1:49:32
do you think we have this discussion
1:49:35
and the way that we frame it and the way
1:49:37
that we talk about it? Is it completely ahistorical? No,
1:49:40
not completely. It's
1:49:42
taught a lot, obviously, in schools.
1:49:45
I hope that people will
1:49:47
read books like Nigel Bigger's
1:49:50
latest book On
1:49:52
colonialism, A Moral Reckoning, where
1:49:54
he tries to put it
1:49:57
into its proper historical context.
1:50:00
Not doesn't have a complete knee
1:50:02
jerk reaction felt essentially all night
1:50:04
on present day identity politics and
1:50:06
if we're much more sense, what
1:50:08
about his and actually listen to
1:50:11
the voices of the past and
1:50:13
try and work out what Nord
1:50:15
coasts and was trying to do
1:50:17
when he went out to be
1:50:19
Vice Boys India. You know the
1:50:22
idea of treating these people as
1:50:24
a as an. Evil.
1:50:27
Is. A I'm. A.
1:50:30
Is a very sort size seeds
1:50:32
and ignorant i think way of
1:50:34
going about it. And. Not
1:50:36
fully agree with you because the reality
1:50:38
is that no one can withstand scrutiny.
1:50:42
Of that these people are subjected
1:50:44
to even guns. In a
1:50:46
million people say you know becomes a whole awful
1:50:48
person because he did this and he did that
1:50:50
line of young children in his bed much he
1:50:52
hates sounds like he hits and he was a
1:50:54
racist an he. Book.
1:50:58
What about the things that he A T. Whatever
1:51:00
precisely precise you got to see
1:51:03
people. I didn't point
1:51:05
away. This is one of the reasons that
1:51:07
turtles probably more popular in America than he
1:51:09
has a here in England. Because people in
1:51:11
America are able to see the would for
1:51:13
the trees they're not obsessed about said. Friday.
1:51:16
Nights Tonypandy and the striking miners
1:51:19
of Nineteen Eleven insists from their
1:51:21
much more interested in the big
1:51:23
picture in the person who helped
1:51:26
create the grand strategy the sam
1:51:28
out when the and the least
1:51:31
the western allies grand sassy that
1:51:33
help when Sigma go. On.
1:51:35
Say you have a of the
1:51:38
and ability in America really to
1:51:40
look at the most important aspect
1:51:42
theorized. not only would nobody but
1:51:44
nobody the able to be look
1:51:46
film as a as as a
1:51:49
hero is constantly look solely at
1:51:51
their wrath feet of clay but
1:51:53
also in our own time a
1:51:55
our great grandchildren again to pull
1:51:58
down our statues for reason. That
1:52:00
we have not the first clue. About things that
1:52:02
we think are scientifically proven Fact:
1:52:04
We're going to have all statues.
1:52:07
Pull. Down because I did a
1:52:09
we allow children to use
1:52:11
some mobile phones. And. The
1:52:13
at the moment that sounds weird but
1:52:15
in one hundred years time that's what
1:52:18
will happen. But unless we learned the
1:52:20
lesson which is of course that you
1:52:22
have to see people in their own,
1:52:24
not in their own time. Andrew, what
1:52:26
haven't we asked you about Social That
1:52:28
we should have them I think. You.
1:52:31
Haven't told me one question which
1:52:33
I am, I'm very interested in
1:52:35
which I'd like to own stock.
1:52:37
which is How was it that
1:52:39
he was the person who was
1:52:41
able to spots adults hits or
1:52:43
and than ah yes the and
1:52:45
lot the gory. quite an area
1:52:47
that the I didn't think that's
1:52:49
what was it about him. What
1:52:52
was the the sort of alchemy? the
1:52:54
special alchemy about him? That. Allows
1:52:56
him to be not only the first person
1:52:58
but for many years in the Nice and
1:53:01
says he's the only person who could see
1:53:03
what Hitler and the Nazis were all about
1:53:05
and therefore warn against them. And the answer
1:53:07
is I think threefold. The. First
1:53:10
was that he was a silo
1:53:12
see might he likes jews? He'd
1:53:14
grown up with jews his father
1:53:16
would like to see been on
1:53:18
holiday with with jews. He recognized
1:53:21
the contribution that Sam the Jews
1:53:23
had made to Judeo Christian civilization
1:53:25
is the support of the Balfour
1:53:27
Declaration in that nineteen seventeen He
1:53:29
was somebody who am therefore had
1:53:32
an early warning system about hit
1:53:34
So in the Nazis that was
1:53:36
not vouchsafed too many as the
1:53:38
other. Upper class English
1:53:40
people as his agent Coulson generation
1:53:43
many of whom were anti semitic.
1:53:46
that's fantastic the second thing and of course
1:53:48
that something that we we should think about
1:53:50
now more than any a time before in
1:53:52
our lifetimes because anti semitism is now on
1:53:54
the rise in a way that it hasn't
1:53:56
been at any other stage in our in
1:53:59
our lives so standing by
1:54:01
Jews as the forefront of civilization
1:54:03
essentially. That is one thing about
1:54:05
Winston Churchill. The next thing
1:54:08
is that he
1:54:10
was an historian and he was
1:54:13
able to place the threat,
1:54:15
the Germanic threat that
1:54:18
Nazi Germany posed in
1:54:21
the context of the
1:54:24
long continuum of British history.
1:54:26
The threat of the Spanish
1:54:28
Armada of 1588, of
1:54:31
Louis XIV at the time of the
1:54:33
Wars of Spanish Succession, which of course
1:54:35
his own great ancestor, John
1:54:38
Churchill, Duke of Morborough, was
1:54:40
instrumental in defeating and
1:54:43
then the threat of Napoleon of the
1:54:46
First World War that he fought in the
1:54:49
trenches. And so he was able to see
1:54:51
these four great threats before in history and
1:54:54
slip Hitler into
1:54:56
the position of the fifth great threat,
1:54:58
which of course he was. Indeed he
1:55:00
was greater threat than any of those
1:55:02
ones before because of the
1:55:04
bomber. And the last
1:55:06
thing was that he had seen true
1:55:12
fundamentalism, fanaticism
1:55:14
in his life. He'd fought
1:55:16
on the northwest frontier, he'd
1:55:18
fought in Sudan, he had
1:55:20
seen in this case Islamic
1:55:22
fundamentalism and he
1:55:24
saw the same tropes in
1:55:26
the Nazis that he had seen
1:55:29
before. This hatred of democracy, this
1:55:32
complete ability to turn reality on
1:55:34
its head. And because he
1:55:36
was able to do that in
1:55:39
a way that the other prime ministers of the 1930s, men like
1:55:42
Ramsey McDonald and Neville Chamberlain and
1:55:44
Fanny Baldwin, who'd never seen fanatics before
1:55:46
in their lives at all, none of
1:55:48
them, he was able to
1:55:51
spot this special thing about Hitler and
1:55:53
the Nazis and to warn and warn
1:55:55
and warn. And just because people didn't
1:55:57
listen to him, he didn't change his...
1:56:01
His message, most politicians, especially today, would
1:56:03
change their message because of what the
1:56:05
opinion polls were saying. He took no
1:56:07
notice of opinion polls. He didn't listen
1:56:09
to what the editorials were saying in
1:56:11
the newspapers. He said what he believed
1:56:14
and he carried on saying it until
1:56:16
he was proved right. You've made a
1:56:18
really profound point there when you compare
1:56:20
it to the present-day politicians, who all
1:56:22
they do is go from school to
1:56:25
university to then doing an internship to
1:56:27
then working in politics. And the
1:56:29
reality is these people, both Labour and
1:56:31
Conservative and Liberal Democrat, have no experience
1:56:33
of the real world. But when you
1:56:36
compare that with Winston Churchill, who experienced
1:56:38
everything the world had to offer and
1:56:40
as a result of that, was a
1:56:42
magnificent leader. I completely
1:56:44
agree with every word here. Andrew,
1:56:47
fantastic. We're going to ask you some questions from
1:56:49
our supporters in a second, so follow us over
1:56:51
to Locals where we'll do that. I
1:56:55
seem to remember him saying the words to
1:56:57
the effect of, we are with Europe but
1:56:59
not of Europe. Churchill was more international rather
1:57:01
than regional imperialist. So what
1:57:03
would he make today of our
1:57:05
politics with the European Union? Francis,
1:57:23
I want to take a minute to give
1:57:25
a special mention to one of the best
1:57:27
podcast interviewers out there. Okay. Be quick though,
1:57:29
mate. Who is it? It's me. No. It's a
1:57:31
certain someone who's funny and smart. Oh yeah? He's
1:57:34
got an incredible knack for creating honest conversations with
1:57:36
fascinating people. Go on. Do you know who I'm
1:57:38
talking about? Is it me? What?
1:57:41
No. It's Jordan Harbinger. Oh. The
1:57:43
Jordan Harbinger show is a perfect
1:57:45
complement to Trigonometry and we recommend
1:57:48
you add it to your podcast
1:57:50
rotation. Yes. Just like Trigonometry, Jordan
1:57:52
hosts weekly mind-baudening conversations with some of
1:57:54
the most fascinating people in the world. But a
1:57:56
key difference that I'm a big fan of is
1:57:58
that... is that
1:58:01
Jordan is focused on pulling
1:58:03
actionable, growth-oriented advice from his
1:58:05
guests. Give Jordan's show a
1:58:07
go today. Search for the
1:58:09
Jordan Harbinger show. That's H-A-R-B-I-N-G-E-R.
1:58:12
On Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you
1:58:14
get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More