Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
True crime enthusiasts, it's Rabia Chaudhry and
0:02
Ellen Marsh. You are invited to join
0:04
us on Rabia and Ellen Solve the
0:06
Case, a true crime talk show. Grab
0:08
a front row seat as we, along
0:11
with our special celebrity guest, dissect our
0:13
favorite true crime cases every other Thursday.
0:15
Between those episodes, join us as we
0:17
talk about current true crime headlines in
0:19
our About Damn Crime series. Skip the
0:22
ordinary and dive into extraordinary investigations and
0:24
conversations with us. Subscribe now on your
0:26
favorite podcast platform and let's unravel these
0:28
captivating stories together. Hello
1:05
everyone and welcome to episode 354 of
1:07
the True Crime All the Time Unsolved podcast.
1:09
I'm Mike Ferguson and with me as always
1:11
is my partner in true crime, Mike Gibson.
1:13
Gibby, how are you? Hey, I'm doing good
1:15
about you. I'm doing great. I've had a
1:17
really good week. It was
1:19
my youngest birthday this week.
1:21
So we went down, had dinner with
1:23
her and my oldest. I
1:26
was also talking on TCAT about, you
1:28
know, going to a local school this week for
1:31
a leadership program being
1:33
a presenter. And it
1:36
was all about a true crime and true
1:38
crime podcast. It was very interesting. It sounded
1:40
like it was. Yes, I enjoyed it very
1:42
much. Let's go ahead
1:44
and give our Patreon shout outs. We had
1:46
Andy Diamond. Hey Andy. Farrah Brennan.
1:48
What's going on Farrah? Depressed God. Hey,
1:51
depressed. Stevie Ups. What's going on Ups?
1:53
Or UPS. I like that UPS because
1:55
you know I'm an UPS. That's
1:58
why I thought it could be that. I'm not sure. Latiana,
2:01
Lily White. Hey Latiana. Brenda, Pavy.
2:03
Hey Brenda. Jodie R. What's going
2:06
on R? Dory liked the fish
2:08
jumped out at our highest level.
2:10
Well thank you Dory. Wylie Smith.
2:13
Hey Wylie. Deb Medick. Thanks
2:15
Deb. Ashley Barnett. There's
2:17
Barnett. Charlotte Upton. Hey
2:19
Charlotte. Mamie M. Or
2:22
as I call it, M. Just
2:24
M? Yeah. And
2:26
last but not least, Ryan Whitecotton jumped out
2:28
at our highest level. Hey thanks Ryan. Appreciate
2:30
that. And then if we go back into
2:32
the vault. This
2:34
week we selected Rhonda Fritz. That's who I thought
2:37
it was going to be. Is that who you
2:39
thought? Yeah. So you hit it right on the
2:41
head. I did. Right on the head, right? Yeah,
2:43
thanks Rhonda. So we appreciate the new Patreon support
2:45
and the continued support. We also had a Patreon
2:47
merch winner for February and that was Cheryl Ann
2:50
Reed. Man, that's who I thought too. I am
2:52
on top of it. You're on fire. Yeah. Gibbs,
2:55
we have an episode out right now on
2:57
True Crime All The Time where
2:59
we're talking about the murder of 14 year
3:01
old Reena Vert. Reena
3:03
was a victim of
3:05
severe bullying. So we're
3:07
headed to Canada in November, 1997.
3:11
She was badly beaten by a group
3:13
of teens who disliked her. Two
3:15
members of the group, Kelly Ellard
3:18
and Warren Glowatsky, followed Reena
3:20
after the attack and murdered
3:22
her. It's a, it's a very
3:24
brutal episode. It is. Because
3:27
what happened to Reena was especially
3:30
nasty, but it's an
3:32
episode about teens and
3:34
bullying and kind of
3:37
following or falling in line
3:39
with others and not
3:41
making your own decisions and
3:43
the right choices. So it's
3:46
definitely an episode worth listening to. I just
3:48
don't understand why things have to go that
3:50
far. No, no. It was tough for us.
3:53
All right, buddy. Are you ready to get into
3:55
this episode of True Crime All The Time
3:57
Unsolved? I am. We're talking about the murder
3:59
of Nen that crinkle on
4:01
July 14th, 2017. First
4:05
responders found the body of Nanette
4:07
Crinzel, insider home after it was
4:09
destroyed by a fire. Investigators
4:12
soon discovered that Nanette was
4:14
shot in the head before
4:16
the fire started. Cover
4:19
up. Yeah. That's what comes to
4:21
mind immediately, right? There was
4:23
a murder, then there was a
4:25
fire, but the fire was set
4:28
most likely to cover up the murder. Yeah. Nanette
4:31
Crinzel was born on July 26th, 1967
4:33
in New Orleans, Louisiana. She
4:38
worked as a preschool teacher and
4:40
was able to retire in her forties.
4:43
She loved children and animals and
4:45
said that her pets were like her children.
4:48
I think a lot of people will say that. Their pets
4:50
are their babies too.
4:52
Absolutely. I think my wife
4:54
is saying it now that the kids
4:56
are gone to college. You
4:58
know, the little Maltese is that's,
5:01
that's her baby. Coming up with her
5:03
probably right now. Very
5:05
nice to be able to retire in your
5:07
forties. I was thinking the same
5:10
thing. Uh, it's not
5:12
happening much today. And
5:14
I think it's going to get worse as
5:16
time goes by. It just seems like
5:19
we're having to work longer and longer.
5:21
Part of that might be because we're living longer
5:24
and longer. I say that's, that's part of
5:26
it. Then that was
5:28
married to Steven Crinzel, the
5:30
district 12 fire chief and St. Tammany
5:33
parish, then that and Steve
5:36
lived in a small rural town called
5:38
the Cone, which is about 50
5:40
miles north of New Orleans. Steve
5:42
told people that he was dazzled
5:45
by Nanette when they first met in 1994. He
5:49
was married at the time and had
5:51
a young son, but he and Nanette
5:53
got married the following year and moved
5:55
into the home he built in Lecombe.
5:58
You know, some people, they just get dazzled. It
6:01
happens. You see someone
6:04
and you're blown away. And
6:06
I don't know how this all played out. He was
6:08
married at the time. Obviously he got a divorce. I
6:11
don't know if it was specifically because he
6:13
was dazzled or what. It
6:16
may have been. You were dazzled by your wife. Oh,
6:19
absolutely. The first time I saw her,
6:21
I knew that I was dazzled. Better
6:25
than being beat dazzled. No, at one point I
6:27
thought I was beat dazzled. Okay. Steven
6:30
Nanette lived on a wooded 100
6:32
acre property. There's
6:34
a dream. That is man, to
6:36
have just a bunch of land. No
6:40
one around you. You can
6:42
do whatever you want. Steven
6:44
installed nine security cameras near the
6:46
gate and on the outside of
6:48
the house to help Nanette feel
6:51
safer. The couple also owned 30
6:54
guns and Nanette knew how to use
6:56
them. The couple liked to practice
6:58
target shooting on the property and that's something
7:00
you can do if you've got a hundred
7:02
acres. You know, you can shoot
7:05
guns out there. You can ride four-wheelers. You
7:07
could do a lot of different things, but
7:09
you could also see why maybe
7:12
someone wouldn't feel all that safe.
7:14
It's not like living in a neighborhood where
7:17
you're surrounded by people. You're
7:20
surrounded by houses. You're not
7:22
surrounded by anything but woods. Kind of
7:24
like that movie, Cabin in the Woods.
7:26
Yeah. Yeah. You never know. Could be
7:28
a little scary. Yeah. Steve was at
7:30
the fire station and Nanette was
7:33
home alone on July 14th, 2017. Detectives
7:37
found grainy surveillance footage from
7:40
outside a local fast food
7:42
restaurant that they believe shows
7:45
Nanette's vehicle going through the
7:47
drive-through at breakfast time. This
7:50
was supported by her cell phone data
7:52
and a credit card purchase. All right.
7:54
So she scooted out, got some breakfast.
7:57
Nothing wrong with that. No, but it's
7:59
also... Two thousand seventeen
8:01
right so please have a
8:04
lot of information at
8:06
their fingertips cell
8:08
phone data we got surveillance footage
8:11
obviously we have credit card. Information
8:14
detectives also said that
8:16
there's surveillance footage from
8:18
another property on the
8:20
road where net lived showing her
8:23
car heading back to the house
8:25
at nine eleven am. Her
8:27
phone record show an outgoing call
8:29
to kmart about a prescription
8:31
refill at ten oh three am.
8:34
So here came are very often anymore no
8:37
i thought they had all gone out of business
8:39
and maybe they all have by now i don't
8:41
know i know all the ones
8:43
around here yeah. A detective
8:45
told the family that in the early
8:47
afternoon the net called a local number
8:50
he sat down with the person she called woman
8:52
said it must have been a
8:54
miss dial because. She didn't
8:56
know net or see what
8:59
i think you know what all of this
9:01
is allowing detectives to do is to put
9:03
together a pretty good time. Of
9:06
the nets whereabouts and what
9:08
she did who she called
9:10
things like that. This
9:12
early afternoon calls a little strange
9:15
yeah i think so but people
9:17
miss dial all the all the
9:19
time or maybe wasn't miss
9:21
dial and you don't know
9:23
why that number was dialed. A
9:25
neighbor called nine one one
9:27
around two thirty pm and
9:29
reported smoke coming from net
9:31
and steve's home first
9:34
responders found the net. Her
9:36
dog and two cats dead
9:38
inside the home the net was
9:41
found on her back on the
9:43
primary bathroom for her
9:45
dog was beside her heartbreaking but we
9:47
know how dogs are they
9:49
just stay with their owner.
9:53
All the way so loyal and i know
9:55
this is hard for a lot of people because
9:59
in our show. we talk
10:01
about death a lot. Most
10:03
of the time we're talking about the death of people.
10:06
Yeah. Which is always sad, it's
10:09
always tragic, but when
10:11
animals are involved as well, it
10:13
becomes that much more tragic and
10:16
it can be tough to handle. Steve told
10:18
people that his cousin called him to
10:20
tell him what happened. He arrived
10:22
30 minutes later and saw
10:24
that his wife was dead and his
10:27
home was completely destroyed. 30 minutes,
10:31
that completely changes your life.
10:34
Yeah. From the time that you get
10:36
the phone call to the time you
10:38
get home and your life will never be the
10:40
same. And the fact that fire was involved
10:43
and being a firefighter, I think
10:45
that adds another layer there, right?
10:47
I mean, because I'm sure he's wishing that
10:50
he could have somehow been there. Because
10:52
he could have done something probably more
10:54
so than most of
10:57
us who know very little about
10:59
firefighting. Then that's autopsy
11:01
took place the following morning and
11:03
that was when investigators learned that she
11:05
didn't die in the fire. Then
11:08
that had been shot in the head. Fire
11:10
investigators soon learned the fire was
11:12
arson and the arsonist
11:15
made efforts to destroy video
11:17
evidence. The cameras outside the
11:19
house fed into a
11:21
digital video recorder in the
11:23
living room which was doused with an
11:25
accelerator. The video footage was stored
11:28
on the recorder, not online.
11:30
And investigators couldn't recover any
11:32
data from the DVR. Even
11:35
the FBI was unable to
11:37
get any video from it. Kind
11:40
of strange, but they couldn't recover
11:42
anything. Well, fire is pretty
11:45
rough on electronics.
11:48
It actually doesn't surprise me all that
11:50
much. Although they have a lot of
11:52
great technology, but you know if
11:55
the if a fire completely burns down a
11:57
house it's probably gonna do some pretty good
12:00
damage to DVR as well. Now
12:03
it's really great to have
12:05
a lot of cameras and all that.
12:08
Obviously, if you could store that
12:10
online, that would have been
12:12
a better solution. For sure. Because
12:15
you can't just get rid of that the same
12:17
way that you can get rid of a physical
12:20
recorder where everything is kept. Yeah. Once it's
12:23
on the cloud, it's on the cloud. Whatever
12:25
the cloud is. Yeah. We still don't know, but
12:28
it's there. It's there somewhere above us. I
12:30
think. Steve told the police
12:32
that the cameras at the front
12:34
gate were controlled by a wireless
12:36
device connected to the internet, but
12:39
they frequently stopped working. The wireless
12:41
device stopped working the day before
12:43
the fire and needed a reset.
12:46
Steve attended a council meeting that night
12:48
and was tired. So he didn't reset
12:50
the device on his way back to
12:52
the house. This means that
12:54
the gate cameras didn't record any video
12:56
on the day of the fire. Another
13:00
second location in the house was
13:02
also doused with an accelerant. It
13:04
was the window of the primary bedroom.
13:07
And it was said that one of the cats
13:09
found near the window had accelerant on its body.
13:12
A fire damaged gun of the
13:14
same caliber as the murder weapon
13:16
was found near the spot where
13:18
Nanette's body was found. During
13:21
the July 15th search, fire
13:23
investigators left behind the destroyed
13:25
DVR and the two
13:28
cat carcasses. On July
13:30
17th, Steve hired a private fire
13:32
investigator who found the cats and
13:34
a shotgun in the wreckage. The
13:36
scene was resecured on July 19th
13:39
after firearms testing revealed the
13:41
two guns seized during the
13:43
initial search. Didn't match
13:45
the bullet found in Nanette's head. The
13:48
Net's 40 caliber Springfield handgun
13:50
was recovered during this search.
13:53
Detectives later told the family that this
13:55
gun could not be ruled out as
13:58
the murder weapon. So there's a lot
14:00
going on here and it was a
14:02
little confusing, right? We've got a number
14:04
of searches. I'm kind of
14:06
surprised that initially the cats
14:09
were left behind. The DVR was
14:11
left behind. Obviously at some
14:13
point, maybe in the re
14:16
securing and that search, the DVR was
14:18
taken because we know it was tested.
14:21
They found out that they, they couldn't get anything
14:23
off of it, but that was
14:25
at least four days later. Yeah.
14:28
I'm surprised they found that shotgun in
14:30
the wreckage too. And it all
14:32
of that wasn't found right away.
14:34
Yeah. I thought that was very strange.
14:37
Now what's not strange is
14:39
that Steve was one of the first suspects.
14:42
That shouldn't come as a shock to anyone.
14:44
He's the husband. Right. He's going to
14:46
be looked at. He's also a
14:48
firefighter. So if anybody knows how
14:50
to start a fire,
14:53
how to use accelerants, it
14:55
would be him. Sure. According to
14:57
people, the net's father, Dan
14:59
Watson reported that she wanted out
15:02
of the marriage after she learned
15:04
Steve had an affair, then
15:06
that told a friend. She knew about the affair
15:08
on her birthday in 2015. And
15:12
Steve has admitted to cheating on the
15:14
net with a colleague, but he claimed
15:16
he and the net had worked through
15:18
it. People do that all the time. They
15:21
do. And sometimes they can't. And
15:24
it ruins a relationship,
15:26
you know, beyond repair. Steve
15:28
was also on duty at the firehouse
15:31
when the fire started. Potential
15:33
alibi. Yeah. And potentially
15:35
a very good alibi, at
15:37
least for actually
15:39
starting the fire. Right. We talk
15:42
about that all the time. What does an alibi
15:44
do? Well, it could
15:46
mean that there's no possible way you could
15:48
have been at the murder scene. Does
15:50
it mean that you didn't plan it?
15:53
She didn't hire somebody? No, obviously it
15:55
doesn't mean that. In August,
15:57
2018, a sheriff's detective. told
16:00
in the Nets family is quoted by
16:02
WWL TV. His
16:04
cell phone was plotted by the FBI.
16:07
He goes to the fire station. He's
16:09
around the fire station. Several
16:12
people at the fire station accounted for
16:14
him throughout the day, went
16:16
and met some people at Outback and
16:18
was plotted back to the fire station
16:20
before he got the call that his
16:23
house was on fire. Steve
16:25
also passed a polygraph. So
16:27
things are looking good for Steve. Yeah. I mean,
16:30
I think they are looking pretty good for Steve.
16:32
We don't know what questions were asked. I
16:35
would think that one of
16:37
the questions asked on
16:39
a polygraph would be, you know,
16:42
not just, did you start
16:44
the fire? Did you murder your wife?
16:46
But did you have anything to do
16:48
with it? Did you hire someone, you
16:50
know, something along those lines, although
16:53
never publicly named as a person
16:55
of interest, another individual
16:57
often referenced in connection with
16:59
this case is Steve's
17:02
brother, Brian, family and friends
17:04
said, Brian blamed the net and
17:06
Steve for not helping him evade
17:08
arrest when he got into an
17:10
accident while under the influence, he
17:12
asked them for help getting his mother's
17:14
vehicle out of the ditch. Okay.
17:17
I can see why maybe you'd
17:19
be upset about that, but to
17:22
shoot someone in the head and then burn
17:24
the whole house down. Well,
17:26
she got some major anger issues, right?
17:29
Doesn't make sense. Brian has at
17:31
least 15 convictions for
17:33
different crimes, including battery on
17:35
a police officer. The
17:37
net started discussing her concerns about Brian
17:40
with her family in 2011. That
17:44
year, Nanette told her father, Dan
17:46
Watson that Brian threatened to burn
17:48
the house down. Now that
17:50
sounds a little bit incriminating. And
17:52
she believed that Brian would be a
17:54
danger to them. Once he was released
17:56
from prison, she wrote per
17:58
WWLTS. When he
18:01
says, I will start your house on fire and
18:03
kill you when you come out. That
18:05
is a serious threat to me. Uh,
18:07
great. Very serious. I think
18:09
that's a serious threat to anyone. Anytime
18:12
that you say you're going to
18:14
kill someone, that is something that
18:16
should be taken very serious. Yeah.
18:19
I wonder if she was scared being out there. The
18:21
net wrote in another email, he
18:24
put cameras showing all areas of the
18:26
house and on a monitor up 24
18:28
seven. It records
18:30
as well, have pepper spray
18:33
at both doors and of
18:35
course the gun. So, you know,
18:37
you said no wonder she
18:39
was afraid. I think
18:41
maybe this does kind
18:43
of dovetail into why
18:46
Steve had so many cameras.
18:49
I think he was worried about his brother. I
18:52
think Nanette was worried about his brother. Now
18:55
it does sound like they were fairly prepared.
18:58
Yeah. I mean, I think one way to help
19:01
calm your nerves is to have a bunch of cameras
19:03
up so you can be aware of
19:05
what's going on in your surroundings. And then of course
19:08
they felt they had a defense system inside
19:10
their house. Yeah, they were armed. I mean,
19:12
30 guns is a lot. It is a
19:14
lot. Dan told WWLTV
19:17
that Nanette said to him, so
19:19
long as I have my guns
19:21
and the cameras and I'm at
19:23
home, I'm safe. About
19:26
two months before she died, Nanette
19:28
texted her sister, Kim Watson. He
19:30
threatened to set the house on fire,
19:32
rape me and kill us. Real
19:35
winner of a brother-in-law there. Yeah. Wow.
19:38
So we said, right, Brian was one
19:41
of the main reasons why they had
19:44
so many security cameras, so many
19:46
guns. Nanette and Steve
19:48
also had a geofence that
19:50
signaled Brian's probation officer. If
19:53
he came within 1000 feet of the home. So
19:56
this is getting pretty serious.
19:58
The level of. their concern. Yeah.
20:01
To install one of those. Because
20:03
that's very specific just to him.
20:06
Yeah. You're nervous. And for
20:08
good reason, I think they had good reason to
20:10
be nervous. Steve later recorded
20:12
the conversation with Brian's probation
20:14
officer in which the officer
20:16
admitted the GPS tracking function
20:18
on Brian's ankle bracelet was
20:21
never turned on according
20:23
to WWL TV. You know, for
20:25
the system to work, you
20:27
have to turn it on? Yeah. It's like most things.
20:29
Yeah. I
20:31
have found over my
20:33
50 years that most things don't
20:35
work when they're not turned on.
20:37
Yeah. It's a strange phenomenon. Yeah,
20:40
we're going to put this on your ankle, but don't
20:42
let anybody know. I'm really not going to turn it on.
20:44
Or maybe they made them think that they're turning it on, but
20:46
never turned it on. Who knows? Like
20:50
somebody made a clicking noise, like they
20:52
were pressing the button, but they didn't
20:54
actually press the button. It's
20:56
on now. True crime
20:59
all the time unsolved is brought to
21:01
you by progressive insurance. Hey, TKAD listeners,
21:03
whether you love true crime or comedies,
21:05
celebrity interviews, news, or even motivational speakers,
21:07
you call the shots on what's in
21:09
your podcast queue, right? And guess what?
21:12
Now you can call the shots on
21:14
your auto insurance too. Enter the name
21:16
of your price tool from progressive. The
21:18
name of your price tool puts you
21:20
in charge of your auto insurance by
21:22
working just the way it sounds. You
21:24
tell progressive how much you want to
21:27
pay for car insurance. Then they'll
21:29
show you a variety of coverages that
21:31
fit within your budget, giving you options.
21:33
Now that's something you'll want to press
21:35
play on. It's easy to start a
21:38
quote and you'll be able to choose
21:40
the best option for you fast. It's
21:42
just one of the many ways you
21:44
can save with progressive insurance. Quote today
21:47
at progressive.com to try to name your
21:49
price tool for yourself and join the
21:51
over 28 million drivers who trust progressive,
21:53
progressive, casualty insurance company and affiliates price
21:55
and coverage match limited by state law.
21:58
In the world. weeks
22:00
before she died, Nanette texted her
22:02
sister saying that her
22:04
concerns about Brian and Steve's lack
22:06
of action were quote, coming
22:09
to a head Steve's
22:11
lack of action. Meaning
22:13
what? She thought he should do more with
22:15
his brother's threats. Well,
22:17
according to Kim, Nanette said,
22:20
if he doesn't start protecting
22:22
me from Brian and his
22:24
family, I'm kicking him out. So
22:26
I would say, yeah, she wanted
22:29
him to do something about Brian.
22:32
I don't know what he was going to
22:34
do. I don't know what he was supposed to do. Dan
22:37
Watson noted that the Friday before the
22:39
fire, Nanette said she was going to
22:42
have a long talk with Steve to
22:44
see if they could make amends and
22:46
come to a resolution about their marriage.
22:49
So, yeah, I think Steve is
22:52
on the radar a little bit. I'm sure
22:54
the polygraph and the fact
22:57
that they could put him at the fire
22:59
station probably eased a little
23:01
bit of concerns on the part of police
23:03
about him. You definitely have
23:05
to be concerned about Brian as
23:07
a possible suspect. Once
23:10
all of this is learned, right, you know,
23:12
the emails, the threats,
23:15
the I'm going to burn your house down
23:17
and kill you and all of that, you're
23:19
going to have to look into it. Yeah.
23:22
And they did, but it
23:24
really didn't pan out because surveillance footage
23:26
showed that Brian was at his mother's
23:28
house on the day of the murder. The
23:31
police also looked into Steve's son,
23:33
Justin, because Nanette claimed on Facebook
23:35
that he owned multiple guns, that
23:38
he was out of state at the
23:40
time of the murder. Now, to me,
23:42
owning multiple guns shouldn't really put you
23:45
on the suspect
23:47
list, but he is part
23:49
of the family. So you are going to look at,
23:51
you know, members of the family and things like
23:53
that. But so far, it seems
23:56
like the three people that
23:59
maybe they They looked at nothing
24:01
really stood out. They couldn't put them there
24:04
at the time of the fire, the time of
24:06
the murder. The coroner announced
24:08
that Nanette was shot in the head
24:11
before the fire started on
24:13
the day of her memorial service, which took
24:15
place a week after she was killed. And
24:18
Nanette's immediate family, they didn't get
24:20
this news from the authorities. Instead,
24:23
another family member read
24:25
a news article and called
24:28
them. I think it's a little rough to
24:30
learn something like that about
24:33
your loved one that
24:35
way. I agree with you. I think it'd be
24:37
really difficult. Dan Watson told
24:40
WWLTV that he was angry
24:42
because he met the coroner
24:44
several days earlier to submit
24:46
a DNA swab for the
24:48
official identification and no one
24:50
told him about it then. Despite the fact
24:53
that the coroner had known about the gunshot
24:55
wound since July 15. And
24:57
I get it. I understand why he would
24:59
be angry. Now, is there a reason why
25:01
they would want to hold that information back?
25:04
We talk about that all the time, but then they
25:06
let it out to the media. So
25:08
obviously at a certain point, that wasn't
25:11
the concern. Why they
25:13
didn't tell the family beforehand. I don't
25:15
know. Just out of courtesy,
25:17
they should have. You would think if
25:20
they're going to tell the media, according to
25:22
WWLTV on the night of the
25:25
memorial service, Stephen formed the family
25:27
that the sheriff's office was leaning
25:29
towards a suicide theory. And
25:32
I guess I could see why
25:34
maybe they might start to lean
25:36
that way. If you've looked
25:39
into a number of people and
25:41
you can't so far put
25:43
anyone at the scene, would
25:46
you then start to think that way?
25:48
And I could see why maybe you would,
25:52
because we do know there was
25:54
a gunshot wound. What I
25:56
don't understand is why someone
25:59
would. Take their life and
26:01
then also feel as though they need
26:03
to set the house on fire right
26:06
also don't believe that most
26:08
people who would choose to do that would
26:12
harm their animals. Yeah i
26:14
don't think so either so some
26:16
of that other stuff doesn't
26:18
seem to line up with
26:21
a suicide there to me at least.
26:24
The net sister kim who is
26:26
a prosecutor in iowa reached out
26:28
to a homicide investigator she knew
26:31
and forensic pathologist comis
26:33
been. They traveled to
26:35
louisiana in september two thousand
26:38
seventeen to conduct a
26:40
third autopsy steve had already
26:42
agreed to an additional exam before
26:44
this. Dr bennett was not
26:47
allowed to perform physical tests on
26:49
the remains but he in the
26:51
homicide investigator viewed the net remains
26:54
reviewed x rays and previous tests
26:57
as well as crime scene photos.
26:59
Dr bennett agree that the net
27:02
death was a homicide because there
27:04
was no soot in her airways
27:07
no blistering on the parts of her body
27:09
exposed to the fire and
27:12
a lack of blood around the
27:14
body. So she didn't have any soot in
27:16
their lungs because she's
27:18
already dead. Yes she wasn't breathing by
27:21
the time the fire started i think
27:23
is what they're saying on
27:25
september thirteen the corner officially
27:27
announced that the net death
27:29
was a homicide. St
27:31
tammany parish sheriff randy smith scheduled
27:33
a press conference for the following
27:36
day in a news release
27:38
the sheriff wrote at this time the
27:41
sheriff's office investigation. Does
27:43
not necessarily support the
27:45
corners conclusion in this
27:47
case okay so
27:49
that is pretty interesting the
27:52
corner is saying
27:54
homicide the sheriff is coming out
27:57
and saying well we don't really
27:59
think that's correct. But at
28:01
the press conference, he said, we
28:03
have worked this case and we
28:05
will continue to work this case
28:07
tirelessly and aggressively as a
28:09
homicide. And we have since day one.
28:12
But yet they don't agree with the findings. Yeah,
28:14
I thought that was a little strange, but they're
28:16
going to work it that way, even though they
28:19
don't agree. So if they don't agree, what
28:21
does that mean? They're still leaning towards maybe
28:24
a suicide? I'm
28:26
guessing. What else could it be? I don't
28:28
know what else it could be. In the
28:30
press conference, Sheriff Smith formally cleared
28:32
Steven Crinzel as a person of
28:34
interest saying at this time, our
28:37
initial primary person of interest
28:39
in this investigation, the victim's
28:42
husband has been cleared. Steven
28:44
Crinzel has been cooperative with
28:46
this investigation from the beginning.
28:49
And that's a big deal because you don't
28:51
have to do that. If you're not 100%
28:53
sure, you don't
28:56
have to come out and formally clear
28:58
somebody. But in doing
29:00
so, you're making a really big
29:02
statement. You are. Like
29:04
we've investigated this guy up and down
29:07
and we can unequivocally
29:09
say he didn't do it because
29:12
you know, for a fact, if later on
29:14
he's taken to trial, that's
29:17
going to come up for sure. That the sheriff
29:19
came out and cleared him. Steve
29:21
returned to work in November, 2017, but
29:24
the fire district board voted to
29:27
launch a civil service investigation and
29:29
the allegations that he misused
29:31
fire district property and
29:34
had an affair with a subordinate. According
29:36
to people, the internal review
29:38
found that Steve had improper
29:41
relations with two female employees
29:43
and allegedly stole AC units
29:45
from ambulances. Okay. Doesn't
29:49
mean he shot his wife, but not
29:51
something you want to hear as someone being the fire
29:53
chief. No, these are things that are
29:55
going to get you in trouble for sure. I'm
29:58
assuming they had. type
30:00
of regulation against having
30:02
relations with a subordinate, most
30:05
places do. I mean, this is,
30:07
you know, separate from
30:09
him cheating on his wife. That's
30:12
bad. But most places, I don't
30:14
think care about that. They're not going
30:16
to fire you for cheating on your wife. No. But
30:19
if you're doing the cheating with someone who works
30:21
for you, they will, or could. And
30:24
to be accused of allegedly stealing AC
30:27
units from the ambulance is why? Why do
30:29
that? I don't even know what
30:31
those are and what you would use them for
30:33
or do with them. I mean, I
30:36
understand what an AC unit is, but. Sure.
30:38
There's probably a market for him,
30:40
but why tarnish your reputation? I'm
30:42
sure the guy was making pretty good money. I
30:45
would think. WWLTV reported
30:47
that Steve said she
30:50
was not his subordinate and that
30:52
the relationship occurred in 2015. Steve
30:57
eventually retired in September, 2018 after he was
30:59
demoted and disciplined. So
31:03
they didn't fire him. It allowed
31:05
him to retire, but I'm sure he didn't
31:07
get as much in retirement as he probably
31:09
would have. I don't know. What
31:11
a rough year and a half,
31:13
right? You got to go
31:15
through losing your wife, losing
31:18
your pets, losing your home, losing
31:20
your home, not
31:22
knowing who did it. And then on top
31:24
of that, being accused of it and trying to clear
31:28
yourself. And then after all that, you
31:30
know, basically being forced out of your
31:32
job. And your reputation
31:34
was kind of tarnished. Yeah. You
31:37
know, along those lines, but some
31:40
of that he did to himself. It
31:42
sounds like to me. Right. You know, when
31:44
it comes to the work
31:47
stuff, if that is true,
31:49
then well, you did that.
31:51
And most likely the work stuff
31:53
probably maybe wouldn't even have come
31:56
to the surface if it wasn't for the fact that his
31:58
wife was murdered. Yeah, because he did. admit
32:00
to cheating. Right. And maybe
32:02
that got back and that's what was
32:04
the catalyst for some of that stuff.
32:07
In November 2018, Steve told people
32:09
he believes the killer was waiting
32:11
for Nanette when she came home
32:13
from picking up breakfast. He said
32:16
she was most likely gone for
32:18
about 30 minutes and came
32:20
straight home from the restaurant. She
32:22
most likely would not have turned on their
32:25
alarm system while she was at home during
32:27
the day. I can see that. You know,
32:29
you're running out, going to get some breakfast.
32:31
Why reactivate the alarm? You know, I'll just, I'll
32:33
turn it off. I'm up. Just get
32:35
some stuff done. I'll come back. No big deal.
32:37
30 minutes. And
32:39
I don't think that most people who
32:42
are home during the day probably turn
32:44
their alarm systems on. I think most
32:46
people, it's used when
32:48
they're away from home and
32:51
some people probably turn it on maybe at night
32:53
when they're sleeping. Yeah. I mean,
32:55
I'm not too worried about it. I don't turn
32:57
mine back on. I figure if they get across
32:59
the moat, maybe they deserve to come
33:02
on in. And the alligators
33:04
and the pit with the sticks
33:06
in it, covered up by leaves. You got
33:08
a lot of stuff going on. I do. Good thing I
33:10
gave you that map on how to get to the front
33:12
door. Yeah. The postal guy is, which one?
33:16
You're on your fifth one now. Steve
33:18
told people, I have suspected
33:20
every single person in my life or
33:23
people we knew on a peripheral of
33:25
our life. And I have to trust
33:27
that the police by investigating
33:29
them and eliminating them, that
33:32
they know their job. So it's down to
33:34
the individual that did it is probably going
33:36
to be somebody that I'm not
33:38
thinking of. I have a feeling it's
33:41
got to be somebody that we
33:43
know either directly or indirectly. And
33:45
I have thought about this in a number of
33:48
cases where, you know,
33:50
let's say there's an unsolved murder of
33:53
a spouse. Well, you have
33:55
a spouse left and if
33:57
they're not involved, wouldn't you almost drive
33:59
them? yourself up a
34:01
wall. Just thinking
34:04
constantly who could have done this?
34:06
Is it a friend? Is it
34:09
somebody that I see all the time?
34:11
Are you looking at people differently
34:14
wondering if they're a killer?
34:17
And I'm thinking you probably are. Then
34:19
that's family questioned if the police
34:21
authenticated the surveillance video of Brian
34:23
at his mother's home on the
34:25
day of the murder. They were
34:27
told that a meeting in August
34:30
2018 that the time displayed on
34:32
the DVR corresponds with the current
34:34
time. WWLTV noted that
34:36
Steve installed the cameras in
34:38
his mother's home. I don't know if
34:40
I feel real solid about that though.
34:43
Not that Steve installed them, but basing
34:46
everything on the time and what
34:49
it says later on. Yeah. Because
34:51
those can be manipulated, I assume.
34:54
In October 2019, the Net's sister,
34:57
Lisa Watson, discovered emails from
34:59
one of her father's accounts,
35:01
which further supported the belief
35:03
that she was deeply afraid
35:05
of Steve's brother, Brian. In
35:08
May 2017, the Net wrote, Brian
35:10
is capable of anything, and
35:12
someone that has nothing to lose is
35:15
full of hate, uses drugs, and
35:18
makes threats, is a loose cannon. Sounds like
35:20
it. And all of those statements are true,
35:22
right? When you have nothing to lose, you
35:25
can be a very dangerous
35:27
person. A loose cannon. By
35:30
2019, the authorities had still not released
35:33
the cause or origin of the fire.
35:35
All they would say was that it was
35:37
set intentionally. I'm surprised they haven't
35:39
released more information at that time. Yeah.
35:42
You know, a lot of time has passed. The only
35:44
thing I can think of is that maybe
35:46
they're holding some stuff back in
35:49
case they do find
35:51
a suspect and they
35:53
want to have something to corroborate
35:56
when interviewing someone. That's the only thing I can
35:58
really think of. The St. Tammany
36:01
Parrish Sheriff's Office has received criticism
36:03
for how they handled the case.
36:06
In 2019, the Sheriff's Office
36:08
made a high-profile arrest related to
36:11
Nanette's case, but the individual
36:13
who was arrested was not
36:15
a suspect in the murder. Jerry
36:17
Rogers, an investigator with the Office
36:19
of the Inspector General for
36:21
the U.S. Department of Housing and
36:24
Urban Development, was arrested on
36:26
September 16, 2019 for criminal defamation. He
36:31
was arrested for criticizing the
36:33
St. Tammany Parrish Sheriff's Office
36:36
and allegedly leaking information about
36:38
the case. I don't know
36:40
how you get in trouble for criticizing the case, but
36:43
I understand how you would get in trouble if
36:45
you leaked information that the public
36:47
wasn't aware of that somehow was germane
36:50
to the case. Yeah,
36:53
I don't think you should be arrested
36:56
for criticizing the Sheriff's Office legally, but
36:58
in a news release, the Sheriff's Office
37:01
said Rogers used a fake name to
37:03
create an email account to
37:05
send messages to Nanette's family. The
37:07
letter claimed that the case
37:10
had been weaponized against Sheriff
37:12
Smith's reelection campaign and that
37:14
Jerry Rogers was uncooperative and
37:17
threatened to end his life when he was arrested.
37:19
Part of the news release
37:21
said, as reported by WWLTV,
37:24
the emails contained false information
37:26
regarding the ongoing investigation as
37:29
well as derogatory statements regarding
37:31
the lead investigators and others
37:33
closely involved in the investigation.
37:36
Rogers is a former employee of the Sheriff's Office.
37:38
He worked there from 1998 to 2009 and left
37:40
of his own accord. So maybe he had an
37:46
ax to grind, maybe he didn't like some of
37:48
the people there, but again,
37:51
just criticizing on its own. Right.
37:54
That I don't understand how
37:56
you can get in trouble for really, if
37:59
you don't work there. anymore. But when
38:01
you get into creating fake
38:04
email accounts, emailing
38:06
the family directly, okay,
38:09
now you're getting into an area where
38:12
maybe you could get in trouble for
38:14
doing some stuff like that.
38:16
A little Jermaine Jackson? You
38:20
just like to say that word. Sheriff
38:23
Randy Smith said, Roger's comments led
38:25
the family to lose trust and
38:27
confidence in the investigation. And I
38:30
could see how that could happen,
38:32
but I still don't understand how that
38:35
part alone is criminal. Now,
38:37
Dan Watson told WWLTV after
38:39
the arrest, Randy Smith
38:41
caused us to lose confidence in
38:44
this investigation. And I think that's
38:46
across the board for every family
38:48
member. So he's kind of
38:50
disagreeing with the sheriff, right? He's
38:52
saying, no, it wasn't these emails
38:55
from Jerry Rogers. It
38:57
was you, right? And your investigation
38:59
that caused us to lose trust.
39:02
Going back to these emails from
39:04
Rogers, one quote from
39:06
one email read, all detectives
39:09
are pissed that Dumbo Sheriff
39:11
brought in person with zero
39:13
homicide experience to take over
39:15
case. Some of Roger's
39:17
emails questioned the qualifications of
39:20
lead detective Daniel Buckner. Rogers
39:23
called him a stone cold rookie.
39:25
Okay. I get that the sheriff's
39:28
office is not going to be happy. No. But
39:30
those comments alone can't lead you to
39:32
get arrested, right? There's got to be
39:35
some other part of it, something
39:37
to do with the
39:39
leaking of information, not
39:42
just criticizing. There's no way.
39:44
Yeah. Because I don't think those
39:46
are interfering with the investigation.
39:49
I think it's just criticizing
39:52
parts of the investigation. A
39:56
sheriff's office spokesman said Buckner has
39:58
led four homicide investigations. and
40:00
assisted with dozens more per
40:03
WWLTV. Sheriff Smith said, it
40:05
is our duty to diligently investigate
40:08
any claim or possible lead that
40:10
may further any open or active
40:12
investigation. In this particular instance,
40:15
our investigators were able to
40:17
uncover the malicious, surreptitious and
40:19
criminal actions of an individual
40:21
whose intent was motivated by
40:23
his efforts to defame, create
40:26
distrust and otherwise prey on the
40:28
emotions of a victim's family. Pretty
40:31
strong word. Very strong words.
40:33
Some good words too, surreptitious. I
40:36
use that at least three
40:38
or four times a day, I'm sure. Yeah. Rogers
40:41
was arrested after Sheriff Smith, fired
40:44
Sergeant Stephan Montgomery, one
40:46
of the lead detectives on the case
40:48
for breach of confidentiality. Montgomery was
40:51
fired on August 20th, 2019. Sources
40:54
close to the case told
40:56
WWLTV that Montgomery was talking
40:59
to Rogers and Rogers
41:01
emailed the net sister, Kim
41:03
Watson, with concerns about the
41:05
investigation. Well, they found the leak then. Yeah,
41:08
they found the leak. I'm still finding it hard
41:11
to find the criminal action around
41:14
what Jerry Rogers did. He got
41:16
some information from somebody else and he sent it to the
41:18
family. Wow, he didn't either. The
41:20
St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office said it
41:23
opened the investigation into the leak
41:25
because the family member contacted them
41:27
with concerns about the email. Montgomery
41:30
issued a statement to
41:32
WWLTV and the
41:34
Times-Picayune in September, 2019. He
41:38
said he was assigned to a
41:40
high profile homicide investigation in
41:42
December, 2018 and
41:45
was tasked with obtaining digital records
41:48
and other evidence that was overlooked. He
41:50
wrote that they were told to think
41:53
outside the box and leave no stone
41:55
unturned. You gotta be careful with
41:57
that think outside of the box saying you
41:59
can get a get you in trouble sometimes. Well, because
42:01
you don't know how somebody else is going
42:04
to take it. The team reached
42:06
out to other law enforcement agencies
42:08
and tech firms for guidance. Montgomery
42:11
wrote, I recently learned that a
42:13
federal agent I had apparently conferred
42:15
with created a fake email address
42:18
and was sending bits and pieces
42:20
of case sensitive information wrapped
42:22
in conspiracy theories to the
42:25
victim's families, as well
42:27
as political camps. Due to
42:29
this leak, my employment was terminated
42:31
because the emails allegedly defamed the
42:34
agency and the investigation. So
42:36
now things become a little more clear.
42:39
If this guy was conferring
42:42
with Jerry Rogers in
42:44
a professional capacity, then
42:46
it does change things. It does. Brian
42:49
Trainor, an attorney who represents Rogers,
42:51
wrote a letter to the sheriff's
42:53
office because of the
42:55
internal investigation into former Sergeant
42:57
Montgomery, as reported by
43:00
WWLTV, Trainor wrote that after
43:02
a conversation, his client was left with
43:04
the impression that someone obtained
43:07
his private email accounts via
43:09
a subpoena or search warrant.
43:11
Rogers reviewed all the emails that
43:13
were forwarded to the net sister,
43:15
and he can say with certainty
43:17
that none of the information contained
43:20
in the emails came
43:22
from any active member of the
43:24
St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office. Rogers
43:27
was merely a conduit of information
43:29
to the family and regrets his
43:31
choice of words and portrayals of
43:34
certain members of the agency. Trainor
43:37
said he was not aware of
43:39
Rogers using a false identity and
43:41
noted that any communication between Rogers
43:43
and Montgomery was communication between law
43:46
enforcement professionals with the goal of
43:48
trying to solve a crime. WWLTV
43:51
also reported that the sheriff's
43:53
office issued an arrest for
43:56
Nanette's sister, Wendy Watson. died,
44:00
Wendy went to the property to
44:02
look at a memorial she thought
44:04
Steve erected at the site. Steve
44:07
called the sheriff's office on her
44:09
for trespassing. Wendy said, I
44:11
was told from inside sources that he was
44:13
doing it to shut me up and
44:15
to get me to stop talking about him and
44:18
to retaliate against me for things I
44:20
have said to the media and things
44:23
I have said on social media. You
44:25
know, that's too bad, you know, that
44:28
you have this tension or issues
44:31
between family members, you know, it's
44:33
her sister, it's his wife, but
44:36
because of this murder, you
44:38
know, they aren't going to be able to get along.
44:41
Well, it also seems like there's a lot
44:43
of retaliation going on, whether
44:45
it's, you know, the sheriff's office,
44:48
the family, Sheriff Randy
44:50
Smith denied this allegation on November
44:52
8, 2019. A judge
44:55
ruled there was no probable cause
44:57
to arrest Jerry Rogers and he
44:59
was released from bond. That's
45:02
the price. No, I'm not surprised either.
45:04
I mean, I think the sheriff's office
45:06
was upset and I
45:08
get why they were upset, but it
45:10
didn't seem legally to me
45:13
at least as a lay person
45:15
that this guy should have been
45:17
arrested for what he had done. I
45:19
don't really agree that he should have
45:21
done what he did, but was it
45:24
illegal? I thought that was a pretty
45:26
gray area there. His attorney,
45:29
Brian Trainor, said the state attorney general
45:31
still had the right to accept the
45:33
charges. The case was turned over to
45:35
the attorney general after the 22nd
45:38
judicial district attorney recused his
45:40
office because Rogers wife worked
45:42
there. In 2020, Jerry
45:45
Rogers filed a lawsuit against
45:47
Sheriff Randy Smith and two
45:49
deputies. His lawsuit stated that
45:51
he was strip searched, jailed, and
45:54
forced to post $3,500 in Bail.
46:00
The been strip searched. For. That ban
46:02
strip search sir have a quite a
46:04
few times too many times you may
46:06
have a lot a lawsuit sometimes by
46:08
outlawing thing thera. Long. For
46:11
law enforcement. Depositions.
46:13
Reveal that the Da's office
46:15
mourn Smith and detectives. It
46:17
would be unconstitutional to arrest
46:19
Rogers for criminal defamation, but
46:22
Smith ordered the arrest Anyone.
46:24
So. Now comes out this year He was
46:26
told by the D a don't do this.
46:29
It's. Not gonna fall. So to
46:31
me, that really does kind of lead
46:33
into the area of retaliation. They were
46:35
mad. They. Want to shut the
46:37
sky up? Or they wanted to? You
46:40
do something to him for the things
46:42
that he had done. In. January
46:44
Two thousand Twenty Two, The public
46:47
Learn that in October two thousand
46:49
Ninety. The. F B I ask
46:51
for a full investigation. Into
46:53
a possible criminal conspiracy at
46:55
the sheriff's office. There.
46:57
Is a lot going on? At
47:00
the St. Tammany. Parish.
47:02
Served soft. Sounds. Like it's
47:04
a busy place. But. Here's my
47:06
class. We've. Talked about all of
47:09
these things going on. Couldn't.
47:11
Really be that not all this stuff didn't
47:13
take away from the investigation because I would
47:15
find that hard to believe. Yeah, I think
47:17
it had to take away from investigation. The.
47:20
Infighting, The. Retaliation.
47:23
You're spending time. On.
47:26
These other things and it's tell taking
47:28
away it has to take away. I
47:30
would think from. Really? Trying
47:32
to get them to the bottom of what
47:34
happens and than that current all right where
47:36
your focus should be. According to
47:38
Debbie Debbie Ltd, the Sheriff's Office
47:40
provides a letter from the F
47:42
B I dated February eleven: two
47:45
thousand twenty that said. D.
47:47
O J supervisors determine the
47:49
caption matter did not warrant
47:51
further investigation. On May
47:54
seventeen, Two Thousand Twenty two,
47:56
a Federal judge ruled that
47:58
deputies illegally arrested Juri. Rogers.
48:01
In August 2023, the US Court
48:04
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
48:06
ruled in support of Rogers' lawsuit,
48:08
and his lawsuit was settled on January
48:11
9, 2024 under confidential terms. So I'm sure he did
48:17
pretty well. I'm thinking he did. The
48:19
court backed him up all the way, so
48:22
they kept ruling that the sheriff's
48:25
office was in the wrong. In
48:27
July 2022, WDSU
48:30
reported that the sheriff's office is
48:33
no longer the lead investigator, and
48:35
the St. Tammany DA's office
48:37
took over the case a year and a
48:40
half earlier. Now, why is that? Because
48:44
somebody high up lost
48:46
faith in their ability.
48:49
Yeah. I mean, there was
48:51
the FBI talking about a
48:53
possible criminal conspiracy at
48:55
the sheriff's office. They
48:57
arrested this guy, Rogers, for sending
48:59
some emails. I mean, what's
49:02
going on over there? I think when you
49:04
have the FBI, the DOJ, a case
49:07
at the Supreme Court, I
49:09
think you have to stop and say, hey, we
49:12
need to pull this case out of there, take
49:14
control of it, because I don't know what they're
49:16
doing. Rogers, high profile
49:18
arrest, although it was related
49:20
to Nanette's case, it
49:22
didn't further the investigation into finding
49:25
the real killer. If anything, like
49:27
I said, I think it hurt
49:30
the investigation. It shifted, or
49:33
the focus should have been. Yeah,
49:35
it shifted the focus. It caused
49:37
resources probably to be diverted. Nanette's
49:39
case remains unsolved over six
49:42
years later. I think it's
49:44
a tough case to solve. Anytime
49:47
you have a crime
49:49
scene that is basically destroyed
49:51
by fire, you're going to lose
49:53
a lot of evidence. That's true. I mean, I
49:56
hate to say it, but fire is
49:58
a good way to ... Destroy
50:00
evidence yeah i think
50:02
that's what the individuals probably trying to
50:05
do yeah i'm thinking
50:07
they were hoping that the body
50:09
was destroyed to know i wondered
50:11
about that because. We
50:14
discuss this in cases before it
50:17
does take a very very hot fire
50:20
to completely burn a body
50:23
but you could be right that could have been
50:25
part of the hope. The
50:27
killer because they had to
50:29
have known if it doesn't it's
50:32
going to be really easy to determine that
50:35
net was shot in the head now
50:37
if the body burns even
50:40
if it doesn't burn completely. But
50:42
if it burns to the point
50:44
where the skulls not intact maybe
50:47
then you don't even know
50:50
or can't prove that
50:52
she was killed maybe they just
50:54
wanted to. Cover up the
50:56
evidence but i do think it will
50:58
be a difficult one to solve not possible but
51:01
difficult for investigators and prosecutors
51:04
to charge anyone with her
51:06
murder. They weren't even leaning
51:08
towards the fact that it
51:10
was murder the sheriff's office
51:12
the corner was they were saying
51:14
homicide but the sheriff's office
51:16
kept saying that they were. Investigating
51:18
it as a homicide but they didn't
51:21
agree that it was a website they
51:23
were convinced no which i thought was
51:25
a very strange statement to
51:27
make. Look
51:29
at steve we talked about him they
51:32
were very adamant
51:34
in ruling him out now does
51:36
that come into question. The
51:39
more you learn about what was going on
51:41
at the sheriff's office and i
51:44
hate to put too much on them but obviously
51:47
there was some stuff going on there i got
51:49
the case taken away from them and they were
51:51
in my niche so. Does
51:53
them ruling him out as a suspect
51:56
look differently after learning
51:58
all of the things that. it that
52:01
happened later on. I
52:03
don't know if it does. Maybe it does. Maybe
52:05
it doesn't. I think, you
52:07
know, Brian, there's no
52:09
doubt that Nanette was scared of him.
52:11
I think Steve was worried too. You
52:15
don't set up that elaborate
52:17
of a system with
52:20
a geofence specifically for one
52:22
person, unless you're very worried
52:25
about that one person. Absolutely. You have to
52:27
be worried. Nine cameras. I
52:29
think we said that's a lot of
52:31
cameras, 30 guns. I
52:33
mean, you don't need 30 guns for one person, but
52:36
maybe they just like to collect guns. Some people do,
52:38
but you know, all you
52:40
have to do is go back and kind
52:42
of look at some of those emails that
52:44
Nanette sent to her dad, sent to her
52:46
family. And if Brian really
52:49
said some of those things, which
52:51
I don't know why she would lie about
52:53
that stuff, but I'm going to
52:55
set your house on fire. I'm going
52:57
to rape you and I'm going to
52:59
kill you. You know, it's threatening
53:01
and scary to receive an email like that.
53:04
And then you have to take a look at his
53:07
alibi. It sounded to me
53:09
that it was largely based on
53:11
kind of a
53:14
timestamp of a surveillance
53:16
video recording system. Was
53:18
that time correct? Was it not correct?
53:20
Were they able to validate
53:22
that? I don't know because it wasn't
53:25
in the, the research. Right. They've
53:27
never come out and said like they
53:29
did with Steve, Hey, we've ruled him
53:32
out. He couldn't have done
53:34
it. I mean, I'm thinking, you know, I
53:37
did something wrong this upcoming Monday.
53:40
And I don't change the time on
53:42
my DVR set up
53:44
camera system. It's going to have
53:46
an incorrect time. Right. Because
53:49
it's going to show it's going to be an off an hour. It's
53:52
going to match up what's on the film
53:54
and what's on the device.
53:57
But that's incorrect. If I
53:59
don't manual. change it because of daylight savings.
54:02
Well, so that's one example. The other
54:04
example would be to manually
54:07
change it prior
54:09
to doing something. Yeah. And then
54:12
change it back to being
54:14
correct afterwards. Good.
54:17
To, to throw it off and basically
54:19
say, now I don't know how
54:21
you would do that. I'm not a tech wizard and
54:23
maybe they'd be able to tell that you did it,
54:25
but at the time
54:27
that they believe the murder
54:29
and the fire started that
54:32
time on the video, you
54:34
were there at your mom's house. But
54:36
maybe it wasn't really that time. I don't know.
54:38
Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself and that's, we
54:40
would have to see the equipment and the
54:42
technology behind it. Yeah,
54:45
really. Yeah. No idea how all that works.
54:47
And then I think outside
54:50
of that, then you're
54:52
looking at possibly a,
54:54
a, a stranger. Maybe.
54:56
Yeah. That saw on the
54:58
net that morning at the restaurant or,
55:00
you know, had seen her before, had
55:03
staked out, had learned their patterns.
55:06
It could happen, but are
55:09
you ever going to catch that person?
55:11
I think it'd be very highly unlikely.
55:13
Yeah. I agree. But that's it
55:15
for our episode on the
55:17
murder of the net. Krentzel, we got some
55:19
voicemails. You want to check those out? If
55:21
it's germane to this episode. It is very
55:24
germane. Okay. And Tito. And
55:26
Tito. Hi,
55:28
my name is Penny calling from the
55:30
Kansas city, Missouri area. I
55:32
was just calling because I just got them
55:35
listening to your story about Robert Copeland
55:37
and I of course was looking him
55:39
up because I always want to see
55:42
what these people look like. And
55:44
I inadvertently typed in the
55:47
name Richard Copeland and
55:49
it pulled up a story about a man
55:51
from Indiana who had abandoned his family
55:53
like 25 years ago. And
55:57
then was found. I didn't get to
55:59
read the whole. But I believe he was arrested
56:01
and put in jail So I
56:03
just thought it was interesting because it
56:05
happened so long ago and it makes
56:07
me wonder if Robert
56:10
Copeland didn't know that story and
56:14
potentially Tried to do
56:16
the same thing Based on
56:18
the same last name. I don't know.
56:21
Anyway, it was just the thought you
56:23
guys are great I'm not on any
56:25
team. Love you both. Keep your
56:27
own time picking All right,
56:30
great voicemail, you know who knows
56:32
but this is what we experience all
56:34
the time Gibbs we talk about it
56:36
sometimes where we're researching
56:38
something and You
56:41
see a case that is
56:43
in the same area or kind of
56:45
a branch off of the case You're
56:47
actually working on that's just
56:50
as bad or very similar or even worse
56:53
Happens all the time all the time interesting
56:55
though. Yeah could be we don't know Hey
56:58
boys, it's Sydney again up in Idaho
57:00
and I I'm
57:02
catching up on unsolved. I haven't listened
57:04
any new episodes I'm because I've been
57:06
catching up on on salt and I
57:08
got to the episode about Debbie wolf
57:11
and boy Do I have opinions on that
57:13
because for what I heard that? They
57:16
the police said that they must
57:19
have her jacket for a barrel
57:22
The first thing I did was I reached out
57:24
to my dad who is a professional diver He
57:26
is a certified diver. He died off the West
57:28
Coast for 15 years as
57:30
a hard-eyed diver down in the water Picking
57:33
up sea urchins and sea cucumbers No,
57:38
absolutely not it is murky as hell
57:41
but I promise you there is no way
57:43
you can mistake a 55-gallon
57:47
barrel for a jacket Home
57:49
and I may be so angry this morning. So
57:51
so angry. Anyway, I just thought you would like
57:54
that input That
57:58
angered me a lot so Anyway, love
58:00
the show. I'll be catching up momentarily. Anyway,
58:02
have a good day, boys. Thanks
58:05
for the voicemail. We always love to get
58:07
information from people who have
58:09
that type of specific knowledge. And I
58:11
think that was a case that angers
58:14
a lot of people. Like the
58:16
things that they said, they just don't make
58:18
sense. And when things don't
58:20
make sense, people get angry. And I
58:22
get that. And frustrated. And
58:24
frustrated. Yeah. That's it
58:26
for another episode of True Crime All The
58:29
Time Unsolved. So from Mike and Gibby, stay
58:31
safe and keep your own time keeping. Pluto
59:09
TV is TV the way it should be.
59:12
Free. With over 300 channels,
59:14
thousands of movies and TV shows costing zeros
59:16
of dollars. So if you want to watch
59:18
shows like Ghost, The Walking Dead, CSI, Star
59:20
Trek, or The Price is Right. Well, the
59:22
Price is Right. It's free. Or
59:25
Sonic the Hedgehog, Anchorman, The Legend of Ron
59:28
Burgundy, or Mean Girls. Won't cost you a
59:30
thing. Because everything is free. All
59:32
you have to do is download the app. Which, by the
59:34
way, is also free. Pluto
59:36
TV. Stream now.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More