Podchaser Logo
Home
060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

Released Thursday, 29th April 2021
Good episode? Give it some love!
060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

060 - How to use a cliffhanger with September C. Fawkes

Thursday, 29th April 2021
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello, I'm Emma

0:00

Dhesi and welcome to another

0:03

episode of turning readers into

0:03

writers. If you're brand new

0:07

here, welcome. And here's what

0:07

you need to know. This is a

0:10

community that believes you are

0:10

never too old to write your

0:13

first novel, no matter what

0:13

you've been up to until now, if

0:17

you're ready to write your book,

0:17

I'm ready to help you reach the

0:21

end, I focus on helping you find

0:21

the time and confidence to begin

0:24

your writing journey, as well as

0:24

the craft and skills you need to

0:28

finish the book. Each week I

0:28

interview debut authors, editors

0:32

and industry experts to keep you

0:32

motivated, inspired, and

0:36

educated on all things writing,

0:36

editing, and publishing. If you

0:41

want to catch up, head on over

0:41

to emmadhesi.com, where you'll

0:46

find a wealth of information and

0:46

tools to help you get started.

0:53

Before we dive in, this week's

0:53

episode is brought to you by my

0:56

free cheat sheet 30 Top Tips to

0:56

find time to write. In this

1:01

guide, I give you 30 ways that

1:01

you can find time to write in

1:05

the small gaps that appear

1:05

between the various errands and

1:09

tasks and responsibilities that

1:09

you have in your day to day

1:12

life. I know you might be

1:12

thinking that you don't have any

1:16

time to spare, but I can

1:16

guarantee these top tips will

1:19

give you writing time you didn't

1:19

think you had. If you thought

1:23

writing always involved a pen

1:23

and paper or a keyboard. Think

1:26

again. If you thought you needed

1:26

at least an hour at a time to

1:30

write your manuscript. I help

1:30

you reframe that you won't be

1:34

disappointed. Get your free copy

1:34

of 30 Top Tips to find time to

1:39

write by going to emmadhesi.com/

1:39

30 Top Tips. Okay, let's dive in

1:47

to today's episode September C.

1:47

Fawkes approach to editing has

1:51

been described as thorough,

1:51

precise and kind. She has worked

1:55

in the fiction writing industry

1:55

for over eight years, and has

1:59

been editing stories for even

1:59

longer than that. She has edited

2:03

for both award winning and best

2:03

selling authors, and has worked

2:06

on manuscripts written for

2:06

middle grade young adult and

2:10

adult readers. With most of her

2:10

experience being in the genres

2:13

of fantasy and science fiction.

2:13

Previous to freelance editing,

2:18

she was mentored by a creative

2:18

writing professor, and award

2:22

winning international best

2:22

selling author and a

2:24

professional editor. So let's

2:24

delve into today's episode where

2:29

September gives us a one on one

2:29

tutorial on the different types

2:34

of cliffhanger there are and

2:34

when and if you should use them

2:39

to let's find out more. Well,

2:39

welcome, September. Thank you so

2:42

much for joining me on the

2:42

podcast today. It's really great

2:45

to have you here.

2:46

Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here.

2:49

And so I'd love to

2:49

just start with our unit. You

2:52

know, what was your journey to

2:52

writing to publication to

2:55

editing? How did you get to

2:55

where we are now?

2:57

Yeah, so

2:57

I'm kind of one of those I feel

3:01

like it's a little cliche,

3:01

always wanted to work in this

3:04

industry always wanted to write

3:04

or edit. And really, I wrote my

3:10

first story when I was like

3:10

seven and I was like hooked, and

3:13

I edited it to has like, in

3:13

fact, my mom was really smart.

3:17

So she kept it, we still have it

3:17

and I have an amoled binder It

3:21

was about chickens or something

3:21

because we own chickens. But

3:23

anyway, I had like blocked out

3:23

like lines I have, you know

3:28

changed or whatever so has like

3:28

all this stuff crossed out and

3:31

like things are misspelled. But

3:31

anyway, so that was kind of my

3:34

first experience with that and I

3:34

was kind of hooked after that.

3:38

Um, sometimes I feel like people

3:38

get this idea though that you

3:40

have to have quote like always

3:40

wanted, you know, to be in this

3:43

industry to be successful. I

3:43

don't feel that way at all. But

3:47

I kind of was interested in that

3:47

all growing up from that from

3:51

that first time and knew this is

3:51

kind of my planet was I wanted

3:55

to work in this industry with

3:55

have with that said I didn't

3:59

have a lot of you know, any kind

3:59

of professional training or

4:03

anything like that going on.

4:03

Luckily now we have so much

4:06

stuff on the internet, like even

4:06

this podcast back, which I feel

4:10

like wasn't that long ago. But

4:10

even just like when I was

4:12

growing up, I didn't have access

4:12

to a lot of those things on the

4:15

internet wasn't, you know, on

4:15

there, I didn't know where to

4:17

look. So like I did it. Like I

4:17

would write and my friends would

4:22

share stories and things all the

4:22

time. But I still felt like as I

4:27

became an adult I wanted to get

4:27

serious into it. In some ways. I

4:30

feel like I still had to start

4:30

at the beginning because I

4:33

didn't have all that, you know,

4:33

I don't have any training or

4:36

mentorship. I shouldn't say I

4:36

didn't have any you know,

4:39

because obviously, I took

4:39

English classes and stuff

4:43

growing up, but I still had a

4:43

lot to learn. So from there, I

4:48

went to college and I got my

4:48

degree in English. And so that's

4:52

when I kind of started getting

4:52

more of a sense of kind of

4:56

professional or industry and

4:56

what's expected and I became the

5:01

managing first I was the fiction

5:01

editor. And then I was the

5:03

managing editor of their

5:03

literary journal. So I kind of

5:06

did that and had that

5:06

experience. And then after

5:09

college, I started working as an

5:09

assistant for New York Times

5:14

bestselling writer, his name is

5:14

David Farland. He also does

5:18

freelance editing. So, um, after

5:18

working for him for a while, he

5:22

had me start going through

5:22

manuscripts, um, first, you

5:26

know, and then he kind of go

5:26

through after, so I kind of got

5:29

more editing experience with

5:29

that, I started my blog. And

5:35

that's been a great little

5:35

project where I just share my

5:38

ideas about writing or what I've

5:38

learned about writing on the

5:40

hire. And from there, I started

5:40

doing my own freelance editing

5:46

services. So now, I've worked

5:46

for myself that way, and I edit

5:49

people's manuscripts that way.

5:49

So it's kind of the basic

5:52

journey, I guess. I don't know

5:52

if you have any additional

5:55

questions or anything about

5:55

that, but that's kind of my

5:59

story. Yeah.

6:00

Cool. Yeah, no,

6:00

we'll do I'll follow up on that

6:03

a bit. Later on, we'll get

6:03

further along. But you mentioned

6:06

your, your website there. I

6:06

know, you've got two websites.

6:11

One is predominantly your blog,

6:11

which we'll come to. But the

6:14

other one is sort of more for

6:14

your, the editing work that you

6:19

do people specifically looking

6:19

for an editor, you also have

6:22

this great page on that website

6:22

called writing tips. And when I

6:27

was looking through it, I love

6:27

what I love about it is you've

6:30

broken it down into different

6:30

sections. So you might have you

6:35

know, how to write the beginning

6:35

of your book, How to brainstorm

6:38

how to write about characters or

6:38

write dialogue, such a useful

6:42

index such a useful resource,

6:42

and what prompts you to put it

6:46

all together like that? So was

6:46

there a sort of a crying demand

6:49

for it?

6:51

Um, I think

6:51

just, I thought would be

6:54

helpful. Okay. Well, I will say

6:54

part of it's also for me, as I

6:58

like to have these things

6:58

organized on a website. So I can

7:01

just go click and look for what

7:01

I'm looking for wherever I'm at.

7:05

But I just thought it would be

7:05

really helpful to have things a

7:07

lot of things that were

7:07

organized by topic, just when

7:10

we're kind of scrolling through,

7:10

you know, on a website. Okay,

7:13

here's the topic that I'm

7:13

looking at, here's different,

7:15

you know, things that I can

7:15

click on. A lot of them are,

7:19

well, most of them are really

7:19

are articles that I've written

7:22

from my blog. But I do have some

7:22

other articles in there that I

7:25

often refer people to that maybe

7:25

already explained something

7:28

that, you know, I haven't

7:28

written something on, or they've

7:31

already done a good job on

7:31

explaining it. So I'll send them

7:34

there. Some of them are just

7:34

articles, like when I'm editing

7:37

that I might suggest to people

7:37

who are working on certain

7:40

things. And I just think that's

7:40

kind of a helpful way to learn

7:44

more about the craft, and like,

7:44

have it organized in that way

7:48

you can go on there, you can

7:48

learn more about the craft and

7:51

kind of help. I mean, it's great

7:51

to have an editor, but you also

7:54

need to know like the craft

7:54

yourself, obviously. And it's

7:57

good to be like a self editor

7:57

too. So the idea for that is

8:01

just to make it more accessible.

8:01

And so people can look up, like

8:04

whatever topic they're

8:04

struggling with, they can go

8:07

read about it. And hopefully, I

8:07

mean, I feel like there's a lot

8:10

of stuff on there. But I keep,

8:10

you know, keep updated and keep

8:13

trying to add to it. So there's

8:15

There's more there

8:15

is there's a lot of stuff. And

8:17

I'm gonna link specifically to

8:17

that page for people I really

8:19

think people should go and take

8:19

a look at it will be a real,

8:22

just one of those tabs you can

8:22

have open on your desktop. So

8:25

you can refer to that regularly.

8:25

I think it's great. But they do

8:30

have your blog, as we've

8:30

mentioned before, and it's a

8:34

fantastic blog, because a prize

8:34

winning an award winning blog

8:39

today, yeah...

8:40

Well, yeah,

8:40

it's funny about that. So it's a

8:43

Writer's Digest, which if people

8:43

don't know, it's a pretty well

8:47

known magazine for fiction

8:47

writing. They do awards every

8:51

year. And it's funny because I

8:51

had this dream that maybe

8:54

someday, you know, when soared.

8:54

And I guess I want it but I

8:58

didn't know, I don't know how

8:58

that happened. And so it wasn't

9:02

till like months and months

9:02

later, I found out on accident

9:07

that I had won. And so that was

9:07

really exciting for me. So yeah,

9:11

I did win the Writer's Digest

9:11

award. So that was fun,

9:14

exciting. So

9:16

Well, I'm not

9:16

surprised. It's really great.

9:18

And I am on your mailing list.

9:18

And and I got, you know, an

9:24

email come through to tell me

9:24

about the most recent one, which

9:27

is about cliffhangers. And we

9:27

were chatting just before we

9:31

press record that that is not

9:31

often you see something written

9:35

about cliffhanger. So I was

9:35

really intrigued to to read it.

9:38

And it seems that they're quite

9:38

contentious that some people

9:42

love to have a cliffhanger in

9:42

the book at the end of the

9:44

chapter perhaps. And then others

9:44

really don't like it at all. So

9:48

I wondered what your opinion was

9:48

on it. You know, is it ever good

9:51

to use a cliffhanger or

9:51

generally they should be

9:55

avoided? What do you think?

9:56

Yeah, yeah,

9:56

it is funny because I have

9:59

talked to people that have Very

9:59

strong feelings about Cliff

10:01

fingers, which is a little I

10:01

think it's a little funny, but I

10:04

mean, I can get it. You know,

10:04

people don't like having to wait

10:08

or whatever. Um, but I'm

10:08

actually I actually like Cliff

10:12

fingers. Both definitely, you

10:12

know, as somebody who's working

10:16

on a project to make it better.

10:16

But also, I don't know, even as

10:20

an audience member, I like them.

10:20

And I like to hate them

10:23

sometimes. Because you're kind

10:23

of like, oh, why do I have to

10:25

wait, you know? And so sometimes

10:25

I wonder for some people, my Do

10:29

you really absolutely hate them?

10:29

Or do you like to hate them? I

10:32

don't know. But people usually a

10:32

lot of people have strong

10:34

feelings about them. Um, one of

10:34

the common things that people

10:38

say about cliffhangers is that,

10:38

you know, it's good to have a

10:41

cliffhanger to get the audience

10:41

to start the next chapter, or

10:44

turn the page or start the next

10:44

episode. And that's absolutely

10:48

true. I mean, obviously, if

10:48

you're going to suddenly cut

10:51

something off that somebody the

10:51

audience really wants to know,

10:53

and you cut away from the

10:53

narrative, they're going to want

10:56

to see what happens next. And,

10:56

um, so it is really effective

10:59

that way, but I kind of feel

10:59

like saying, that's the only way

11:02

it's effective. I feel like

11:02

that, to me, that feels a little

11:05

shallow. I feel like there's

11:05

more to it than that. And I

11:08

mean, you could just add a bunch

11:08

of tried to add a bunch of

11:11

cliffhangers and then still have

11:11

enough be a great story, you

11:14

know, and so, um, I feel like,

11:14

another good way to use them is

11:18

when you have a cliffhanger, I

11:18

guess the audience a second to

11:22

pause and think about what's

11:22

happening, or what they think is

11:25

gonna happen. And so like maybe

11:25

a good example of this as if

11:29

you're writing like a murder

11:29

mystery, you know, and they're

11:31

about to figure out who the

11:31

murderer is, maybe they're about

11:36

to mask them, you cut away. So

11:36

there's a cliffhanger that gives

11:39

the audience a second to kind of

11:39

pause and think, who do I think

11:43

is under the mask who do I think

11:43

is the murderer. And usually,

11:47

like, the cliffhanger is going

11:47

to come out of like, every, you

11:50

know, obviously a powerful moment, because we want to see what happened that what happens

11:52

next. And so sometimes I feel

11:55

like the audience will just want

11:55

to keep, you know, pushing

11:58

reading through it, which is

11:58

okay, we want them to feel that

12:01

way. But when you have a

12:01

cliffhanger, they're forced to

12:03

kind of stop and think for

12:03

themselves. And so that's an

12:07

example of like, you know, maybe

12:07

thinking, like predicting we

12:11

think is going to happen, but

12:11

sometimes a certain cliffhangers

12:14

when you stop it makes people

12:14

kind of self evaluate, or I

12:18

guess ask themselves like, what,

12:18

what would I do next? Or how

12:21

would I get out of the

12:21

situation. And I think those two

12:24

things are really effective.

12:24

They also, um, in that sense,

12:28

you're, you're inviting the

12:28

audience to participate in the

12:31

story. So sometimes I feel like

12:31

one thing I have to watch out

12:34

for is we might write stories,

12:34

that audience feels more like a

12:38

spectator, as opposed to feeling

12:38

like they're kind of like

12:41

they're in the story. And so I

12:41

feel like if you put the

12:44

cliffhanger in the right spot

12:44

like that, they're being asked,

12:47

they're being invited,

12:47

participate more by pausing and

12:50

thinking, What's going to happen

12:50

next. Beyond that, I think

12:54

they're also good for like, and

12:54

really emphasizing a moment of

12:58

suspense or shock, or wherever

12:58

you put it, because that's a

13:02

moment the audience has to sit

13:02

with that a little bit longer.

13:06

And obviously, if you have it,

13:06

like at the end of the chapter,

13:09

even just that whitespace, of

13:09

flipping, flipping over to the

13:12

next chapter, you know, it just

13:12

kind of adds emphasis to

13:16

whatever you made a cliffhanger

13:16

about.

13:19

Oh, yeah, yeah. I

13:19

hadn't thought about it in that,

13:22

that way, that it's not just

13:22

about getting them to turn the

13:25

page, but actually to have a

13:25

moment to where Have a think and

13:29

pause and get almost more

13:29

involved with the story? Because

13:32

they're thinking about it. Yeah.

13:32

You mentioned in the article

13:36

that there are the four types of

13:36

cliffhangers with that be sort

13:41

of two of them, or whether

13:41

they're more times,

13:44

I'm kind of

13:44

Yeah, well, so I will say if you

13:49

go read up on cliffhangers,

13:49

people will categorize them

13:52

differently. So, I mean, this is

13:52

the way that I categorize them.

13:56

And it's kind of based on

13:56

structure. So um, and story

14:01

structure, you know, you're

14:01

going to have the rising action,

14:03

the climax and the falling

14:03

action. That's kind of the basic

14:06

structure. And that will be true

14:06

of the whole plot. But it's also

14:10

true, like on smaller things,

14:10

like within a scene, you're

14:14

going to have like a climactic

14:14

moment, or within you know, an

14:19

act. So maybe the beginning,

14:19

middle and end, there's going to

14:22

be a climactic moment within,

14:22

you know, it's kind of like I

14:25

think of it as like a Russian

14:25

nesting doll that you have the

14:28

smaller you have smaller shapes

14:28

and size, the bigger shapes

14:31

anyway, so the climactic moment

14:31

is sometimes called like a

14:35

turning point because it turns

14:35

the direction of the story. So

14:40

it really can turn two ways you

14:40

can either have like a

14:44

revelations, like new

14:44

information enters the story,

14:48

that changes our understanding

14:48

or direction of it. The second

14:51

way is an action, you know,

14:51

something happens that changes

14:54

the direction of the story. So

14:54

um, even on a scene level,

14:59

you're gonna have Ideally, if

14:59

you have things structured well

15:02

and you have a plot that keeps

15:02

moving, there's going to be a

15:05

turning point or climactic

15:05

moment in each scene. So for

15:10

example, if I'm writing an

15:10

example would be like if I'm

15:14

writing a murder mystery story,

15:14

the climactic moment of the

15:18

whole story is probably going to

15:18

be when we figure out who the

15:21

killers. But if I'm just looking

15:21

at a scene, you know, maybe the

15:26

opening scene is when they first

15:26

discovered the dead body, well,

15:29

the climactic moment of that

15:29

scene will probably be will be

15:33

when the dead bodies discovered.

15:33

So that kind of creates a

15:37

climactic. That's a turning

15:37

point, right? Everything's going

15:39

fine, we found a dead body Well,

15:39

now we need to kind of deal with

15:43

that. So keeping that in mind,

15:43

so cliffhangers, I feel like get

15:48

down to knowing where to cut

15:48

away in the narrative. Because

15:53

sometimes I feel like we get

15:53

this idea of Oh, I just need to

15:55

throw in something, I need to

15:55

throw something in really

15:58

shocking. And then cut away. And

15:58

like that can work. I'm not

16:02

saying it can't work. But

16:02

ideally, if you have a great

16:05

plot, and you have your

16:05

structure there, you're going to

16:08

have lots of great moments like

16:08

that What matters is when you

16:11

choose to cut away from the

16:11

narrative. So with that in mind,

16:15

I kind of have a broken down

16:15

four ways based on that. So the

16:20

first one I call like, a pre

16:20

point, cliffhanger. So that's

16:23

going to be before the turning

16:23

point. So um, an example I'll

16:29

give, I think a lot of people

16:29

have seen Scooby Doo. Scooby Doo

16:32

as an example, right? I think

16:32

most of us are familiar with the

16:35

general format of those

16:35

episodes, basically, the Mr.

16:38

Gang goes out, they find you

16:38

know, there's a ghost or there's

16:41

a banshee or something. And

16:41

towards the end of the episode,

16:45

they're gonna mask it and see

16:45

who it is. So, um, the unmasking

16:49

is gonna be like the climactic

16:49

moment the turning point. So a

16:54

pre point cliffhanger is gonna

16:54

be okay, Fred's about to pull

16:58

off the mask, and then we cut

16:58

away to a commercial. And so

17:02

that kind of works in the sense

17:02

that, well, the audience is

17:04

really invested, they're

17:04

anticipating a certain outcome,

17:07

we want to know who the ghost

17:07

is, or whoever, and then we cut

17:11

away. So that plays into the

17:11

example I gave earlier. Well,

17:14

now we have to sit for a second,

17:14

and maybe we'll think about who

17:17

we think it is, or whatever. So

17:17

I would call that a pre point.

17:21

Um, the next one I would call a

17:21

climactic cliffhanger. So when

17:26

you get to the climactic moment,

17:26

the turning point, sometimes in

17:30

some stories, there will

17:30

actually be more than one

17:32

turning point. So a common thing

17:32

that happens in a story is near

17:37

the climax of the whole story,

17:37

there will be like a character,

17:41

the protagonist will have a

17:41

realization that then allows

17:44

them to decide like take an

17:44

action to defeat the antagonist,

17:49

sometimes those can be reverse,

17:49

but, you know, they realized

17:52

something, okay, this is what I need to do to defeat the antagonist. So that's actually

17:54

two turns, the realization and

17:58

the action. So you can create a

17:58

cliffhanger by cutting those in

18:02

half. So you could have the

18:02

character has the realization,

18:06

boom, cliffhanger. And then when

18:06

we come back, he'll take the

18:09

action. And so that kind of

18:09

works in that you have kind of a

18:14

sense, you know, maybe what the

18:14

character is going to do next.

18:17

And we'll have to kind of sit

18:17

with that for a second. So it's

18:20

kind of possible to cut it like

18:20

during the climactic moment that

18:24

way. Um, the next one, the third

18:24

one I call the post point, so

18:30

meaning that it happens just

18:30

after the claim the climactic

18:33

point or turning point. So going

18:33

back to our Scooby Doo example,

18:37

you know, in this scenario, you

18:37

know, Fred goes over to the

18:41

ghost unmasks the ghost. Oh, we

18:41

see it to George, the

18:44

electrician, you know, I'm just

18:44

making this up. The next

18:47

question we come to is, well,

18:47

why, you know, why did George do

18:52

this? What's the motivation?

18:52

What, what are the ramifications

18:55

of this? What are the characters

18:55

going to do now? And so you can

18:59

cut away, right when we realize,

18:59

Oh, it's George, the

19:02

electrician, and that can create

19:02

a good cliffhanger to you know,

19:06

it's a little bit different,

19:06

because we've passed over the

19:08

turning point. But now we have

19:08

new questions about well, what's

19:12

next? Why did he do it? What was

19:12

his motivation? And so in a

19:15

situation like that, um, the

19:15

audience is waiting for, you

19:19

know, like an explanation,

19:19

they're waiting for meaning, or

19:23

what's gonna, you know, what's

19:23

the new direction going to be,

19:25

and so you can cut away right

19:25

there to kind of leave them

19:28

sitting with that. Um, then the

19:28

fourth one, I call the post hook

19:35

cliffhanger. So the idea is so

19:35

the stick you know, rising

19:39

action, climax or turning point

19:39

falling action. If you're

19:43

working in anything smaller than

19:43

the whole story, like if you're

19:46

working with scenes, this is

19:46

gonna repeat itself. You know,

19:51

we're gonna have a scene that

19:51

has rising action climax,

19:54

falling action, the next scene

19:54

is gonna have rising action,

19:56

climax, falling action. And so

19:56

what happens pins here with the

20:01

post hook. Usually, at the

20:01

starting of the scene, you're

20:04

gonna have like a hook,

20:04

hopefully anyway, right? We all

20:07

like hooks. And, um, what you

20:07

can do is you can cut right

20:11

after a hook to create a good

20:11

cliffhanger because a hook is

20:16

usually going to be in this

20:16

situation, usually, it's gonna

20:20

be something like unexpected

20:20

that disrupts what's going on or

20:23

what the characters are trying

20:23

to do. Or might be like laying

20:27

down the stakes, like, what's

20:27

that risk, like, Okay, if we

20:31

don't do this, then this terrible thing is going to happen. And so you can have

20:32

either of those, and then a cut

20:37

away right after that create a

20:37

great cliffhanger. Because now

20:40

you know, we've had the hook, we

20:40

want to know, what's going to

20:43

happen, what's I guess I would

20:43

say, what's the rising action

20:45

going to be? What are they going

20:45

to do? And so it's possible to

20:48

cut right there. I feel like we

20:48

see this a lot in series. And a

20:53

lot of I don't know, you could

20:53

just look at a lot of movies

20:56

like Pirates of the Caribbean

20:56

Marvel does stuff like this,

20:59

where you have like, the whole

20:59

story. There's like the falling

21:02

action, you know, everyone's

21:02

Okay, we say everyone or

21:05

whatever. And then there'll be

21:05

like an additional scene where

21:08

you see, like, the bad guy is

21:08

still alive, and he's planning

21:12

something evil, or, you know,

21:12

someone else is alive. And

21:16

they're like, Hey, we you guys,

21:16

we need to go do this. Now

21:18

there's this other issue. And

21:18

then it like cuts off. And so

21:22

basically, what's happening

21:22

there is we had the whole story,

21:25

we've got the climax, we've got

21:25

the falling action. And then we

21:28

just barely hit a new hook for a

21:28

new, like rising action, which

21:33

is probably going to be the next

21:33

installment, you know. And so by

21:35

ending the book right there,

21:35

like that's a good way to end a

21:39

book if you want to end on a

21:39

cliffhanger, because, um, the

21:42

audience still gets like the

21:42

full story, and they just get

21:45

like a hint of what's gonna come

21:45

next. Whereas if you were to

21:49

just like actually, like cut off

21:49

the book, like a climactic

21:52

moment, or just after it, it

21:52

probably wouldn't be very

21:55

satisfying. So if you want to

21:55

end a book or story with a

21:59

cliffhanger, it's probably

21:59

better to, you know, kind of

22:02

wrap up that plotline, and then

22:02

just give enough of a hook or a

22:05

hint of what's going to happen

22:05

next. And then it. So basically,

22:10

like, I guess the idea with this

22:10

is sometimes we think I got to

22:14

add, I got to add all these

22:14

cliffhangers or I got to add

22:17

something really shocking. But

22:17

the thing is, is when you have

22:20

these pieces together, those

22:20

things are already there, you

22:25

just have to know where to cut

22:25

it. And so those are like the

22:28

four places where you could cut

22:28

away, you might cut to another

22:31

plotline. Another viewpoint. I

22:31

mean, if you're doing

22:33

television, I mean, most people

22:33

are doing books listening, I'm

22:37

more into the books, but you

22:37

know, cut to commercial,

22:40

whatever. But um, it's it's

22:40

gonna create, I guess, I feel

22:45

like it won't create better

22:45

cliffhangers with less mistakes

22:48

that can come up when you're

22:48

just trying to throw and clear

22:50

fingers. Yeah, so those are the

22:50

four types.

22:53

I think that's

22:53

amazing. Because it's, when you

22:56

when you when you describe it to

22:56

us like that we got is I'm sure

23:00

there'll be a lot of listeners

23:00

going, Oh, yeah, there'll be a

23:04

little aha moment going on.

23:04

Yeah, it's not about having to

23:07

create this false big moment is

23:07

actually it's already there in

23:12

the script. It's the editing of

23:12

the book and positioning or when

23:15

you as you describe it, that

23:15

cutaway of the narrative, and

23:19

just looking for the right point

23:19

to do that. That's brilliant.

23:22

And also, then you've got then

23:22

you do have moments of those big

23:27

cliffhangers. And also the

23:27

smaller ones as well. And so you

23:30

can vary, I guess the pace with

23:30

the difference in cliffhangers

23:34

as well.

23:36

Yeah, I

23:36

think so too. I think one thing

23:38

to be kind of careful with, if

23:38

you are just like, gonna throw

23:42

on Clifffingers, which I'm not

23:42

gonna say is always bad, because

23:45

sometimes you get like a great

23:45

idea for a cliffhanger. And then

23:47

you can work into the story, you

23:47

know, but what one thing to be

23:50

aware of is where a lot of times

23:50

they go wrong is when

23:53

cliffhangers writers are just

23:53

like throwing in the club

23:56

fingers to just try to get you

23:56

to keep reading. And like they

24:00

don't deliver on what's

24:00

promised. You know, so like, um,

24:04

you know, we could end a scene

24:04

will not end but we could have a

24:07

character come into his house

24:07

and his loved one is like lying

24:10

there bleeding, you know, we're

24:10

like, oh, no. And then you cut

24:13

away to create a cliffhanger.

24:13

And then when we come back, oh,

24:17

it's just catch up. She just has

24:17

ketchup all over her. You know,

24:20

it's kind of a letdown. And so

24:20

you want to make sure that I'm

24:24

most I would want to say always,

24:24

but there's always exceptions.

24:28

You want to deliver on whatever

24:28

you're saying your cliffhanger

24:31

is because if you're not

24:31

delivering on those promises,

24:35

and it's a letdown too many

24:35

times, then obvious is gonna

24:38

start having a problem with

24:38

that, you know, and you kind of

24:41

feel cheated, like, Oh, they

24:41

just threw that in there so that

24:44

I would keep reading you know,

24:44

and it feels more shallow. I'm

24:47

not gonna save that's always

24:47

wrong to do because in certain

24:52

genres, I feel like it can be

24:52

effective. Like I think we've

24:55

all seen. Well, I think I've

24:55

seen scary jumpy movies. You

25:00

know, where maybe there's like a

25:00

babysitter walking down a dark

25:03

Hall and there's like creepy

25:03

music, we're waiting for

25:07

something to pop out, you know.

25:07

And then, um, maybe like, we cut

25:12

away or something, and we come

25:12

back and like the phone rings,

25:15

and we're like, oh, you know,

25:15

that's it. And like, but

25:18

sometimes it works in situations

25:18

like that, because it sets the

25:21

tone and a place with the

25:21

audience expects, they don't

25:25

know, when it's gonna be

25:25

something terrible when it's

25:27

not, you know. And so you can

25:27

kind of do some of that, that's

25:31

where I would say you're kind of

25:31

breaking the rule intentionally

25:34

to kind of play around with the

25:34

audience and what they expect.

25:38

But even a lot of times in a

25:38

situation with that, you know,

25:41

say, okay, so I'll go back to

25:41

their example, we see, you know,

25:44

the protagonist goes and sees

25:44

his loved ones covered in blood

25:47

cuts away comes back, oh, let's

25:47

actually catch up, let's kind of

25:51

a letdown. But what happens is,

25:51

the audience kind of relaxes

25:54

right then. So what would be

25:54

good is then you can then bring

25:57

in something, you know, really

25:57

scary, oh, then a monster came

26:00

out and, you know, attack her.

26:00

Because we're not the audience

26:03

isn't expecting because they're

26:03

like, Oh, it was just catch up.

26:06

And then bam, you know, and then

26:06

they're like, Oh, so you can

26:10

play around with them in

26:10

different ways to kind of break

26:13

different roles and create those

26:13

effects. But generally speaking,

26:17

I think I'm paying attention to

26:17

those turning points do you have

26:21

in your scenes, or where

26:21

whatever level you're working

26:24

at, and cutting around those is

26:24

probably the safest best way to

26:27

go?

26:29

Oh, love it. No,

26:29

it's not going to change tack

26:33

slightly. Oh, and just to say, I

26:33

will, I'll link to that blog

26:36

post directly so that people

26:36

could go and kind of digest it,

26:40

as well, because there's a lot

26:40

in there. But I am going to

26:44

change tack a little bit. And

26:44

I'd love to just kind of learn a

26:46

little bit more about you know,

26:46

you, you what you do and your

26:50

editing work. And one of the

26:50

questions I get asked a lot is,

26:55

okay, what are the types of

26:55

editing? First of all, because

26:58

there's, we know that there's

26:58

quite a few different types. I

27:01

wonder if you could just walk us

27:01

through? I think it's three or

27:04

four different types, and then

27:04

the ones that you focus on?

27:08

Yeah, okay.

27:08

So yeah, there are different

27:10

types of editing, I will say,

27:10

just as a kind of heads up is, I

27:15

have found certain people

27:15

sometimes define them slightly

27:18

differently from each other. And

27:18

I feel like there's a lot of

27:20

things in the writing industry

27:20

like that, like, like, no, this

27:23

is called the inciting incident

27:23

notice, you know, so I'll go

27:26

through, you know, the way I

27:26

understand it, but it's worth

27:30

keeping in mind when you're

27:30

looking around that somebody

27:32

might have a slightly different

27:32

definition. And that doesn't

27:34

mean they're wrong or terrible.

27:34

But anyway, so um, there's

27:39

constant editing, as sometimes

27:39

called developmental editing.

27:43

And that's going to be more like

27:43

the big picture stuff. So like

27:46

character, you know, character

27:46

arcs, plot, theme, maybe world

27:51

building, all those big picture

27:51

things about like, what the

27:55

story actually is, that's how I

27:55

think of it like, What the What

27:58

is the story at what is the

27:58

actually, you know, what is it?

28:02

What's happening in it? What's

28:02

the content of it? How does it

28:05

play out, like big picture

28:05

things, and then below that,

28:09

you're gonna have a line

28:09

editing, and align editing is, I

28:14

think a bit more of the way the

28:14

story is being told. So like,

28:18

maybe, you know, sometimes

28:18

they'll be like, okay, I feel

28:21

like this chapter needs more

28:21

voice in it, or this pacing is

28:25

too fast, or, you know, these

28:25

descriptions are long or boring,

28:29

or I'm trying to think of, you

28:29

need a cliffhanger, maybe, you

28:35

know, so it's gonna be more

28:35

about like, how the author's

28:38

telling the story, and, you

28:38

know, help them with ideas of

28:42

how they can tell it better.

28:42

With books, we're going to be

28:45

talking, you know, we're going to be dealing with the way it's actually written on the page to,

28:47

you know, maybe you have too

28:50

much passive voice or whatever.

28:50

And so looking at the actual

28:54

writing and how to make that

28:54

better. Um, after that you have

28:59

copy editing. So this is going

28:59

to be this is often what people

29:02

think of when they think of

29:02

editing. This is where you're

29:04

going to look for things like

29:04

typos and punctuation and

29:08

grammatical errors, and things

29:08

like that, and tighten that

29:12

stuff up. Maybe sometimes

29:12

wordiness, sometimes put

29:16

wordiness more with line

29:16

editing. But anyway, and then

29:19

after that, you also have, I

29:19

guess you have proofreading.

29:24

Sometimes I see people kind of

29:24

put those together, but they're

29:27

slightly different. So proof

29:27

editing usually happens after

29:31

copy editing. And it's kind of

29:31

the last thing where we just,

29:34

you just go through the whole

29:34

manuscript, make sure, you know,

29:38

look, dry, check for typos,

29:38

again, all those types of little

29:42

things before it's ready to be

29:42

published or printed or

29:45

whatever. So those are the four

29:45

different types that I would

29:49

break down.

29:49

Mm hmm. And do you

29:49

do? Do you do all four of those

29:54

or do you focus on one more than

29:54

another?

29:56

Yeah, so I

29:56

mostly do content and line

29:59

editing. I can do um, I mean, I

29:59

can't do the other two, but I

30:05

can't do i do do copy editing

30:05

sometimes? Not as much. I just,

30:10

there's just a lot of little

30:10

little things to look at with

30:13

that, which is fine. But I'm

30:13

more interested in, you know,

30:16

let's get down. What is the

30:16

story? How do we make the story

30:19

itself better? And how do we

30:19

tell the story better and more

30:23

effectively, that's really where

30:23

I like to focus on the most. So

30:26

that's really what most of my

30:26

work ends up being. I

30:29

occasionally do copy editing, I

30:29

only take on so much at a time

30:33

of copy editing, just because

30:33

it's really I find it hard to be

30:37

focused on all the commas and

30:37

all the, you know, periods in

30:41

the right spot for so like that

30:41

hyper focus for so long, because

30:44

I'm trying to catch everything.

30:44

The other stuff is demanding in

30:48

its own way. But it's kind of

30:48

more, it's more interesting to

30:53

me. And I don't have to be like,

30:53

I guess so perfect. watching all

30:56

the little comments and thoughts

30:56

and everything. I like talking

31:00

about the story, I like helping

31:00

writers see how they can tell

31:03

the story more effectively, what

31:03

works, what doesn't. And I like

31:07

teaching those concepts to when

31:07

I work with them.

31:10

Yeah, that's one

31:10

thing I have learned about

31:13

working with an editor, which I

31:13

didn't expect at all, was how

31:17

much of a craft lesson it is. So

31:17

every time I send my book for an

31:21

edit, it comes back with the

31:21

teaching that you just

31:23

mentioned. And I learned so much

31:23

that I'm then able to carry on

31:27

into my next manuscript. And

31:27

then that gets edited. And I

31:30

learned more, and I hadn't,

31:30

hadn't kind of seen it from that

31:34

point of view until it happened.

31:34

And it's, it's invaluable is

31:37

absolutely invaluable. Because

31:37

so you know, if someone is

31:42

listening out there is going to

31:42

go with a traditional deal. If

31:47

they managed to get one, that's

31:47

great, you know, the, the

31:49

publisher is going to deal with

31:49

all of those different layers

31:51

of, of editing, for those that

31:51

ended up or choose to go down

31:57

the self publishing route. What

31:57

from your point of view? Do you

32:00

think? Because editing is an

32:00

investment? Undoubtedly,

32:04

especially when you're just

32:04

starting out? From your point of

32:07

view? What do you think is the

32:07

most important edit that an

32:11

indie author should prioritize?

32:11

Would it be the developmental

32:15

would it be the copy editing

32:15

lancing? What What do you feel

32:18

is the most important?

32:20

Oh, well, I

32:20

feel, um, I kind of depends

32:23

where the writers act, you know,

32:23

and their skills. I, to me, I

32:27

think content and line editing

32:27

contents, obviously, really

32:31

important, because if the story

32:31

isn't effective, then it doesn't

32:36

matter how it's written. But on

32:36

the other hand, if it's not

32:39

written very well, that nobody's

32:39

gonna care about the story. So

32:43

it's kind of, to me, it's kind

32:43

of a balancing act between those

32:46

two things. Um, if you were on,

32:46

I mean, say, because it can be

32:50

an investment, if you were on a

32:50

tight budget, I would say, you

32:56

probably want to get content and

32:56

development, edit editing, and

32:59

that, usually, when I do that,

32:59

it's cheaper than online

33:02

editing, right? Because or copy

33:02

editing, because in those I'm

33:04

going through each one and

33:04

checking each thing, whereas

33:07

concept developmental, I'm

33:07

looking at the big picture. So I

33:11

can look at the big picture and

33:11

tell you, you know, these are

33:14

the things you need to fix in

33:14

the story. If somebody is, you

33:17

know, tight, financially, I

33:17

guess, or they want to just get

33:21

the most out of their money or

33:21

decide prioritize, well, I might

33:25

would do sometimes they'll be

33:25

like, Hey, I'm gonna give you a

33:27

content edit. And then for a

33:27

line issues, as opposed to going

33:31

through each line, I will add

33:31

some sections in my critique

33:35

letter about overall issues

33:35

related to lines that you can

33:39

then apply through. So that I

33:39

don't have to comb through

33:42

everything. Another option I

33:42

would maybe say is, you know,

33:46

I'll do a content developmental

33:46

edit, and then maybe we can do a

33:49

section of line editing, so that

33:49

you can see what needs to be

33:53

improved. And you can apply that

33:53

through the rest. Okay, um,

33:57

ideally, you know, I would say,

33:57

get both content and light

34:01

editing and copy editing. And,

34:01

you know, but that can't I

34:04

understand that that can be

34:04

quite an investment. But I do

34:07

think content in line I think,

34:07

is pretty important. Most people

34:12

I work with don't have terrible

34:12

grammar and punctuation. And I

34:18

think, I mean, I'm not but you

34:18

guys, but like, if I see a

34:22

comment on the wrong spot, it's

34:22

not going to ruin the story for

34:25

me, you know? And so ideally, I

34:25

would say get all of them. But

34:28

if you have to prioritize, I

34:28

think content and line editing

34:32

is probably the place to go in

34:32

my opinion.

34:35

That's good advice

34:35

for everyone. And no, just in

34:39

terms of you and what you work

34:39

with, what you what you enjoy

34:43

working with. Are there any

34:43

particular stories and or genres

34:47

that you like working with? Or

34:47

are you happy to kind of try

34:50

everything and anything?

34:52

Yeah, so

34:52

most of my experiences with

34:55

fantasy and science fiction and

34:55

even thinking about that the

34:58

other day even more Fantasyland

34:58

stuff. fiction, but that's the

35:02

those are the genres that I

35:02

really love to work with. I've

35:05

done adult, why middle grade for

35:05

any of those I have worked

35:09

outside of those genres. I've

35:09

done just general fiction, and

35:13

I've done memoirs, and a few

35:13

other things. But mostly, that's

35:17

where most of my work is, is

35:17

science fiction and fantasy.

35:20

That's kind of where I guess my

35:20

expertise is, that's where I've

35:24

done a lot of that type of

35:24

stuff. And I'm really okay with

35:28

working for any kind of age, you

35:28

know, middle middle group, I

35:32

mean, I don't do picture books,

35:32

early young readers, so I

35:34

wouldn't be able to help people

35:34

with that. But middle grade

35:37

young adult, and adult I have

35:37

all worked in. And I'm really

35:41

people of all levels. I've

35:41

worked with people who have had

35:44

bestsellers, and I've worked

35:44

with people who are, you know,

35:47

brand new, or people who are

35:47

just getting into writing that

35:51

they just want some help with?

35:51

So all different levels I've

35:54

helped with? So in that regard,

35:54

I'm usually pretty open. Yeah.

36:00

Um, do you have any

36:00

advice for particularly new

36:02

writers? So say they've written

36:02

their first manuscript, and

36:07

they've done all their

36:07

revisions. But is there anything

36:10

kind of that they can do in

36:10

terms of of editing, or

36:14

revision, that you from

36:14

experience, you've seen sort of

36:17

common mistakes that people make

36:17

or common areas for improvement?

36:20

Shall we say that we can work on

36:20

ourselves before hiring an

36:24

editor so that when we do make

36:24

that investment, we're, we're

36:27

getting the best, the best that

36:27

we can out of that editor?

36:30

Yeah, so

36:30

one of the common problems I see

36:33

that I feel like actually

36:33

doesn't get talked about very

36:35

much, very much, excuse me,

36:35

which is why I'm gonna bring it

36:38

up. And it's a best way I

36:38

explain it is, a lot of writers

36:45

tend to want to look backward

36:45

and their story, meaning they

36:48

want to look at what happened to

36:48

the character previously, what

36:52

happened before the story

36:52

started, they want to look at

36:54

the backstory, how we got to

36:54

this point, and those things all

36:58

have a place. But a lot of times

36:58

writers and I think part of this

37:01

is from like, maybe the writer

37:01

hasn't yet completely figured

37:04

out what the story was when they

37:04

started writing it. And so it's

37:07

helpful for the writer to look

37:07

at, okay, where was this

37:10

character before? How did we get

37:10

here, or what happened before,

37:13

this isn't going to be so

37:13

interesting. And what happens is

37:17

like, when I sit down the

37:17

manuscript, like, I feel like

37:20

we're kind of living in the past

37:20

a little bit, sometimes writers

37:24

will start like in the present, and then they'll go into the past for a while, which isn't

37:26

always wrong. But it starts to

37:30

kind of feel like the writers

37:30

focusing more on the past. And I

37:33

think of it as like, they're

37:33

looking backward to how what

37:36

happened before the story

37:36

started, or what happened

37:38

previously, the audience

37:38

actually wants to look forward,

37:43

present or forward, right? We

37:43

don't usually want the story to

37:45

mostly be in the present, you

37:45

can always break rules. And then

37:49

they want to anticipate what's

37:49

going to happen, because that's

37:51

what's gonna make them want to

37:51

keep reading, they want to see

37:54

Oh, what's the outcome? What's

37:54

this going to be? What's this

37:56

going to be? And so um, my

37:56

friends has a lot of new

37:59

writers, they tend to look at,

37:59

well, how did we get here? How

38:02

did this character become this

38:02

way? The audience likes more of

38:05

this is where we are now, here's

38:05

some things that here are some

38:08

stakes on the line and what

38:08

could possibly happen. And the

38:11

thing is about the future is

38:11

the, you know, we don't know

38:15

what could happen hasn't

38:15

happened yet. And so it's more

38:18

interesting, and it draws the

38:18

audience in, because it's like,

38:21

Okay, I'm trying to think of an

38:21

example, if she gets invited to

38:25

this party, you know, she can

38:25

meet this guy she has a crush

38:28

on, or if she doesn't, then it's

38:28

going to create another issue.

38:33

I'm just throwing an example.

38:33

And so when you have something

38:36

that has like, okay, yep, this

38:36

one element that has two

38:39

different outcomes for the

38:39

future, we're certainly more

38:43

interested in seeing what

38:43

happens in the present, because

38:46

we want to see what ends up

38:46

happening. And so it gets the

38:49

audience to anticipate the rest

38:49

of the story. So they'll want to

38:54

keep rooting and they'll want to

38:54

know what happens. And once they

38:56

start caring about that more,

38:56

they're going to be a little

38:59

more interested in what happened

38:59

before, if that makes sense.

39:04

Okay, so yeah, that's one of the

39:04

things that I would say probably

39:07

easier said than done but

39:11

front loading, you

39:11

know, sometimes I've heard that

39:13

phrase use that, like in the

39:13

beginning of a story. The waiter

39:18

piles, everything, the whole

39:18

history of the character, and

39:21

everything that led them up to

39:21

this point, and then move on. Is

39:24

that was that what you're talking about? Or is it something different?

39:27

Well,

39:27

sorry, repeat clarify what you

39:30

mean.

39:30

So I've heard this

39:30

term front loading when you

39:33

Front Load the story with

39:33

everything that's happened to

39:37

the character up until the point

39:37

that we start the actual book,

39:41

or you know, and so we get their

39:41

characters whole back history,

39:44

their family, their schooling,

39:44

everything. And in that first

39:49

chapter or two, before we start

39:49

the story, is that the same

39:53

thing that you're you're talking

39:53

about now, or is it two

39:56

different things?

39:57

Yeah, well,

39:57

kind of depends how how it's

40:00

done. Um, I guess ideas, you

40:00

don't want to spend too much

40:05

time just talking about like the

40:05

past and the backwards, you want

40:09

to be anticipating what could

40:09

happen when you're writing it,

40:13

it's okay if you as a writer

40:13

know that. But if you're putting

40:16

in like a huge encyclopedia

40:16

entry about, you know, this

40:19

character, how they were born,

40:19

and then grew up and all this

40:23

stuff before the story actually

40:23

starts, it's usually very hard

40:26

to pull that off and be

40:26

interesting. It's not

40:28

impossible. So you know, cuz I

40:28

know people are gonna be like,

40:31

Well, someone, so did this, and

40:31

it worked. Like, yeah, it works.

40:35

But a lot of times, it's

40:35

difficult to pull that off. It's

40:38

more interesting. Usually, if

40:38

you start in the present. And

40:42

then when, like, if you've heard

40:42

the term stakes, I think of

40:46

stakes as like, potential

40:46

outcomes, you know, if this

40:49

happens, then this happens. So

40:49

if you can put something like

40:52

that in it, that's a little more

40:52

interesting. And then you can

40:56

kind of weave in some of the

40:56

background stuff as you move

40:59

forward in the story. That kind

40:59

of make sense. Yeah, yeah. So I

41:03

mean, I wouldn't say I wouldn't

41:03

say it's always wrong to start

41:06

the other way. But it's very

41:06

difficult to pull off,

41:09

especially if you're a newer

41:09

writer. And it's usually more

41:12

interesting if you get the other way.

41:14

Yeah. Yeah. Gosh,

41:14

you've given us so much today.

41:19

And I stole the stuff about

41:19

cliffhangers. And then you know,

41:23

about the, the sort of those

41:23

common mistakes that you've seen

41:27

those problem areas, you've

41:27

given us a lot of to think about

41:30

and a lot to kind of work on for

41:30

our own manuscripts. And thank

41:33

you very much. If any of our

41:33

listeners are kind of interested

41:37

in finding out a bit more about

41:37

how they can work with you,

41:40

what's the best way of doing that?

41:43

Yeah, so

41:43

um, you can find me if you're

41:46

interested in editing services,

41:46

you can go to Fawkesediting.com,

41:49

it's kind of just where I have

41:49

all my editing services, info,

41:53

my blog articles and everything

41:53

is just Septembercfawkes.com But

41:58

if you can't remember, like, if

41:58

you can't remember my name, for

42:00

some reason, you can also get to

42:00

it by going to write better with

42:04

an editor.com, and that's gonna

42:04

pull up all my blog articles or

42:08

some other references and things

42:08

you can look at on there. Other

42:11

than that, I'm on most social

42:11

media platforms, Facebook,

42:14

Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr. I

42:14

don't know that all of them. But

42:19

anyway, so you can also find me there.

42:21

But yeah, in

42:21

September, it's been so lovely

42:24

speaking to you and finding out,

42:24

you know all about what you do.

42:28

Thank you very much for your time.

42:30

Thank you for having me.

42:34

Well, thank you so

42:34

much for joining me today. I

42:37

hope you find that helpful and

42:37

inspirational. Now, don't forget

42:42

to come on over to facebook and

42:42

join my group, turning readers

42:46

into writers. It is especially

42:46

for you if you are a beginner

42:50

writer who is looking to write

42:50

their first novel. If you join

42:54

the group, you will also find a

42:54

free cheat sheet there called

42:58

three secret hacks to write with

42:58

consistency. So go to

43:02

Emmadhesi.com/turning eaters

43:02

into writers. Hit join. Can't

43:08

wait to see you in there. All

43:08

right. Thank you. Bye bye.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features