Podchaser Logo
Home
How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

Released Wednesday, 12th October 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

How Do Conservatives Really Feel? with Matt Schlapp

Wednesday, 12th October 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:03

It's such a miracle. The

0:06

man of the queen, the king of the brain.

0:08

Wake up. Wake up. Wake up.

0:12

The political

0:12

division in the country, undeniably,

0:15

deep

0:15

right now. A big question on a lot of

0:17

people's minds. Can Americans come together

0:19

and

0:19

heal. I'm

0:22

Van Jones, and this is

0:24

uncommon ground.

0:28

Welcome

0:30

back to Uncommon Ground. This is show where

0:32

we are exploring what it takes to make

0:34

meaningful change in the country as divided

0:36

as our country has become Now

0:38

look, from the beginning of this show, I have tried

0:40

to bring you voices and

0:43

perspectives of all kind

0:45

of people. All kind of people from a range

0:47

of different opinions, different backgrounds, different

0:49

beliefs. Some of the people that I've brought

0:51

on this program you've heard of,

0:53

some of them you have not. Today,

0:56

I'm bringing you a very big

0:58

name. It's Matt Schlap. Now,

1:00

he is one of the big conservative

1:03

voices in the country, one of the biggest

1:05

conservative voices in the world, honestly. And

1:07

he leaves one of most important conservative

1:10

organizations on the planet the American

1:12

Conservative Union. It's also the chairman

1:14

of the Conservative political action

1:17

coalition or CPAC. And

1:19

so you can Google CPAC and see

1:22

that he is a part of and in the middle

1:24

of every conservative and

1:26

right wing movement, not just the United States

1:28

but around the world. Now, if

1:31

you've heard a match lap and you are

1:33

a liberal or progressive or a Democrat,

1:36

like me, you probably

1:38

mostly only heard all bad stuff or

1:40

we would consider the bad stuff, particularly

1:42

because he did choose to stand

1:45

with Donald Trump in raising

1:47

concerns about the last election. On

1:49

the left, we would call him a purveyor of

1:51

the big lie. That's how we see that

1:53

position. and, you know, he's

1:55

been tough on a number of issues, and he and

1:57

I disagree on most of them.

1:59

But I know the guy.

2:01

actually no

2:04

match lap. He and I have worked closely

2:06

together on criminal justice reform. We've

2:08

actually helped to save the life of some he

2:10

was on death row who's gonna be put to death and

2:12

shouldn't have been. He cares about

2:14

the justice system because it's a part of his commitment

2:17

to Liberty and Justice for all, as he would

2:19

say. And he encourages people in his

2:21

party to do the same. There's a lot

2:23

of hatred, there's a lot of violence. I don't think

2:25

we talk about that enough. There's a lot of violence

2:27

I think the violence I'm

2:29

sadly I don't I don't see ebbing

2:31

anytime soon. And I really worry

2:33

about that. How do we find what what we have

2:35

in common again? had, how

2:37

do we find a national

2:39

purpose? You know, with all the diversity

2:41

and everything else, how do we find that again?

2:43

And I think it's important for

2:46

us as this uncommon ground

2:48

community to actually to listen

2:50

to and hear from people

2:52

who they're public profile of public

2:55

persona may give you one impression,

2:57

but I want you to have a more nuanced

2:59

view. And it's not because

3:01

I agree with match lab.

3:03

As you will see, we don't agree, but

3:06

it's because there's something more important

3:09

in a democracy. than just agreement

3:12

and disagreement. You're supposed

3:14

to disagree in a democracy. In

3:16

a dictatorship, you can't That's the

3:18

whole point. of freedom is

3:20

you you get to disagree with each other. But

3:23

the key is you also have to understand each

3:25

other. You gotta try

3:27

to understand what other person's coming from

3:29

even as you disagree, even as

3:32

you vote against him, even as you march against

3:34

him, you still need to have an understanding

3:36

of where are these folks coming from?

3:39

Why are they coming from that place? And I don't

3:41

think there's anybody on the American

3:43

right who is more important for

3:46

progresses and independence and others

3:48

to understand than someone

3:50

who wield the influence of a

3:52

match lap. You'll hear from him after this

3:54

point.

4:00

Palaton

4:01

isn't just about bikes and treadmills.

4:03

It's a team of instructors ready to motivate

4:05

you twenty four With Peloton,

4:08

there are literally thousands of classes

4:10

ranging from strength training and yoga

4:12

to running and which means Peloton

4:14

is the perfect non judgmental space to experiment

4:16

with new types of movement at a level and pace

4:18

that feel good for you. Super busy, it

4:20

doesn't matter if you have five minutes or

4:22

an hour. If you're an early riser or a

4:24

fan of the evening burn, there's a Peloton

4:26

class that fits into your day. Peloton is

4:28

where you'll find what works for you

4:30

on your schedule wherever you happen to be.

4:32

At home, at the gym, or even outdoors,

4:35

motivation that moves you anytime, anywhere.

4:37

Try the Peloton bike or tread risk free for

4:39

thirty days. Learn more at one Peloton

4:41

dot com. New members only. Term Supply.

4:43

We get support from thumbtack. You

4:46

know how it goes. You sit down at the end of the

4:48

day, look around your home, and all you

4:50

see are the things that you should be taking

4:52

care of. The kitchen sink that sometimes drips.

4:54

The art you still haven't hung, the pet

4:56

hair tumble weeds, just drifting

4:58

along, all the stuff you just haven't

5:00

taken care of yet. But when you download

5:02

thumbtack, it's easier to care for your home

5:04

from top to bottom. It's the app that helps you know

5:06

what to do, who to hire, and when. So whether

5:08

you've got little fixes or big projects.

5:11

You can book a top rated local pro, care for

5:13

your home, and sit back and think, hey,

5:15

this place is pretty nice. Download thumbtack

5:17

and start a project today.

5:22

Match slap. Good to see you, brother. Welcome to Uncommon

5:24

Ground. Great to be with you, man. you

5:26

know, the last time we were together

5:28

in public, I was at CPAC, but we

5:30

both caught some flag from that, but I think we had a good

5:32

time together. But the last time I actually

5:34

saw you we were in a prison

5:37

in Pennsylvania trying to help people

5:39

behind bars turn their lives around. That's

5:41

right. CPAC prison, which

5:44

was kind of a crazy sounding idea

5:46

and then everyone took credit for it after we

5:48

did it because it was it was quite a memorable

5:50

experience. And for me, I I marked that in my

5:52

life as one of the the last great

5:54

moments, you know, when we had that big

5:56

bipartisan coalition working

5:58

on criminal justice stuff and at a very, very

6:00

high level. And I think a lot of people

6:02

probably don't know that about you. You take this

6:04

stuff very personally. You show up behind

6:06

the scenes. And I'm

6:08

very scared about the country

6:10

coming apart I want to give you a

6:12

chance to say just who you are, where you're from,

6:14

where you grow up, and your your everybody here's your

6:16

name. It's like, you you have no origin

6:18

story though for people on the progress side. And

6:20

then I wanted to just bump through some issues to see

6:22

if we might find it's not common ground. Just

6:24

a little bit better understanding of each other.

6:26

Why we seem to be coming apart? I welcome

6:28

the opportunity, Van. I consider you a friend. I

6:30

think we probably do disagree on a ton of

6:32

things, but there's a human decency that

6:34

connects people and politics that

6:37

we can't forget. And I think there's almost

6:39

an intentional desire to forget

6:41

anything that brings us together, any

6:43

bonds. So if the extent to which

6:45

we can put some of that to the side,

6:47

I think, would be really useful. I'm not

6:50

probably not very articulate. I'm talking about

6:52

myself. I I kinda grew up all over

6:54

the country. I was born in Cleveland. I was

6:56

raised in Houston. I was an oiler spanned

6:58

as a kid. Burnsville,

7:01

New Jersey. And then finally,

7:03

I ended up in Kansas. And which doc

7:05

Kansas? I consider Kansas my

7:07

home. you know, I had

7:09

a a little bit of an interesting childhood.

7:11

My father died in his forties. He

7:13

was an alcoholic. He he

7:15

had been successful but kinda fizzled

7:17

out in life. He and I did not have a good relationship.

7:20

And I always kinda had to figure out

7:22

my own way And so

7:24

I'm probably too prideful

7:27

over the fact that I've

7:29

developed into the man I am. Praised

7:31

the wrong word. My

7:33

Biblical teaching. I know that that's a

7:35

that's a deadly sin, but I I'd

7:37

certainly take stock of

7:39

the fact that I've had to create

7:41

a life for myself in many ways

7:43

and take care of the people that I love.

7:46

And I think that kind of self reliance,

7:48

even though God's a big part of that, is

7:50

an important part of who I am. And

7:52

one of the reasons why I get

7:54

so chafed about the politics of

7:56

today is everybody's always trying to ascribe

7:58

to me the worst motives when I

8:00

actually think throughout my life, I've tried to be

8:02

there for my loved ones, try to take care of

8:04

people. tried to be decent, and

8:06

I think that's more important than anything that

8:08

comes in politics. And so

8:10

I'm probably too thin skinned when

8:12

it comes to some of these things get thrown around,

8:14

the isms and everything else that get thrown in

8:16

your face because it hurts. It

8:18

really If it didn't bother you, you

8:20

wouldn't care. but it it it's worrisome,

8:22

you know, and I don't like it. You know, I think

8:24

a lot of people in public life,

8:26

people have no idea, you know,

8:28

where we come from. They have no idea

8:31

why we do what we do. We just

8:33

become either, you know, people to give applause

8:35

to or just images on people's

8:37

artboard. you know, your your life is

8:39

interesting. You go through these challenges and it

8:41

helps build you into the person

8:43

you are. I think I am people

8:45

are surprised because I'm pretty amiable in

8:47

friendly, but I'm I'm stubborn

8:49

as a, you know, a wall of rock

8:51

on certain things and most of that is

8:53

because that's how I those are those

8:55

are the the kind of tactics I had

8:57

to develop to survive as

9:00

a child and and

9:02

kinda get to where I am. And it's

9:04

funny because my sister always get so mad at Twitter

9:06

when people say these really terrible

9:08

things and she's like, you don't know the

9:10

first thing about who my brother is that I

9:12

always tell her it's like, SIS, give it a

9:14

wrap. Oh, go to Twitter to

9:16

try to seek justice. Hey,

9:19

I've I've got a twin sister. She's the same

9:21

way. She gets so mad. But, you know,

9:23

I think you you mentioned the isms or whatever. I

9:25

mean, you get you get called everything out of the

9:27

sun. White Supremacist, white nationalists,

9:29

all these different things. Why does it

9:31

bother you? because of a conflict with my dad,

9:33

because that was one of the things we had conflict

9:35

over. He was from a generation where he probably

9:37

had more Archie bunker views

9:39

on questions of race and differences

9:41

culturally. You know, he was a New

9:43

Yorker and he was tribal

9:45

and

9:46

he was for his tribe and the other

9:48

tribes weren't as good and I mean, that racially

9:50

and religiously and ethnically.

9:52

And he and I had a lot of division over

9:54

that. And I remember getting the big fights

9:56

around the Christmas date

9:59

table and the Thanksgiving table, and he'd

10:01

have his jokes, which I didn't think were

10:03

funny. And, you know, so it's, like, that's

10:05

just too high as part of who I

10:07

am. And maybe that's generational.

10:09

Maybe that's just because of what

10:11

my faith taught me. But, you know, what I realized

10:13

today is for too many people, it

10:15

doesn't matter.

10:16

what you think in your heart,

10:18

what

10:18

matters is what you look like and what they can

10:21

land Puna as. And I always used to say

10:23

to folks like when places like CNN

10:25

and MSNBCs to ask me to be on it, I

10:27

was on in many cases daily

10:29

for years. And I always used to

10:31

say, they don't just want white. They want, like,

10:33

really white. Like, white hair. These

10:35

wear white shirt. You know, it's,

10:37

like, and go full on and

10:39

go full on the sky as wide as possible

10:42

because it it's an easy thing to lampoon

10:44

your your punchy white

10:46

haired you

10:49

know, pink skin guy and we're

10:51

gonna need to say what's in your heart.

10:53

And I just think one of the things I

10:55

admire about you is the fact that

10:57

for whatever reason, you've had a really good

10:59

career, which is great. But the

11:01

you seem to be beyond where a lot

11:03

of people can't get beyond, which is

11:05

I gotta get more Twitter followers or I gotta be

11:08

clever in my response. I probably

11:10

fall victim of trying to still stay

11:12

in that world. And I really will try to do

11:14

the right thing. Why is that? Well, because

11:16

you wanna look at myself in the mirror, I

11:18

wanna be proud of what I look at, and I want

11:20

my kids to be proud of what they

11:22

look at. And when I fall short of that and

11:24

I do, I don't feel very good about myself. So I

11:26

think it's kinda basic. I think it's simple. Part

11:28

of the reason I wanted to have you on is,

11:30

you know, I do know

11:32

you. And yet, we we vote different. We

11:34

see things different. And the part part of the

11:36

value I've had in our friendship is

11:39

you help me understand how

11:42

folks on the other side feel about stuff.

11:44

You know, the things that that your

11:46

team is not just mad about, but even

11:48

scared about, and that

11:50

helps me do my job a little

11:52

bit better. So part of what I wanna do is

11:54

just to give you the opportunity.

11:57

So for instance, some of the stuff that that's in

11:59

the news you know, say the the rate on

12:01

Marlago. Okay. Now by the time this

12:03

ears, we'll we'll know a lot more.

12:05

But when that went down,

12:08

On my side of the table, I think

12:10

we felt like, well, I mean, I worked in

12:12

White House, so I left with the budget stuff. They come to

12:14

my house, but it landed very

12:16

differently. I think for the

12:18

conservatives. I think I heard conservatives talking about

12:20

Gestapo. I heard conservative talking

12:22

about a lot of stuff. When something like that

12:24

happens, you know, former president gets

12:26

raided. how does that

12:28

land for you personally and and and that

12:30

the people that you care about? And

12:32

and and how would you prefer personally like

12:34

that like that you have? Conservatives

12:36

are very, very concerned

12:38

with kind of a police state

12:40

and the power of the

12:42

government to kind of just mess up your life

12:44

Willie Nilly. And they they're very

12:47

strong into protections when

12:49

it comes to those things. You know, conservatives

12:52

believe that eventually things will get so bad

12:54

where because of their political

12:56

views, they they all find themselves

12:58

on the wrong side of the

13:00

law. And I think that for

13:02

Republicans. And that's a different universe than

13:04

conservatives. I mean, let me be clear,

13:06

you know, it's not all the same. The

13:08

belief was that because

13:10

the national government's based in Washington

13:12

DC, almost all of the federal

13:14

prosecutions take place in Washington

13:16

DC, and then Of course, you have this southern

13:18

district of New York in these places. You know,

13:20

they're just no longer favorable,

13:22

but specifically in the swamp in this area where I

13:24

live, I I'd be honest with you, I think they

13:26

could indict me for almost anything they

13:28

wanted to if they really wanted to. And that's

13:30

scary. It shouldn't be that way in this country.

13:32

And I think It shouldn't be because of your

13:34

politics. When you say you're scared about

13:36

your country, you for me, if you

13:38

wanna put your finger on what I'm the most

13:40

scared about, is that there's a

13:42

increasing desperation from

13:44

a lot of red state people that they

13:47

can't get fairness from their

13:49

government. And when the government does, look, you

13:51

can like Trump or don't like Trump. I know

13:53

for you, you dealt

13:55

with Trump on issues that you could find

13:57

you know, common ground on like you're talking about.

13:59

And you took a lot of guff because you

14:01

were willing to say, okay, I can go over there and try

14:04

to get the thing done that I want done with

14:06

this guy who people hate. But, you

14:08

know, you can't hate a guy so

14:10

much that you would do

14:12

things with police power that you wouldn't do with

14:14

someone else. So you can have Hillary Clinton

14:16

or Barack Obama taken information

14:18

they shouldn't have taken. They didn't have the proper

14:20

custody and information. everyone says, oh, this must

14:22

have been mistakes, and she wasn't trying to

14:24

do anything wrong. She's certainly not, you

14:26

know, involved in espionage or

14:28

anything like that. So, like, you know, you try to get the documents back.

14:30

You try to figure out is there a way to recreate

14:32

the record. Hillary Clinton

14:34

famously was looked at by James Comey. You

14:36

know, the left and the right, they might have

14:38

a lot of commonality on whether James Kony

14:41

handled that right, because the Lucer looked bad

14:43

from my point of view. He seemed pretty hand

14:45

handed to me on how he handled it. in the

14:47

end, he was trying to make a point

14:49

that she had done some things wrong with the chain

14:51

of custody of these things. But

14:53

he knew he wanted to be shy of

14:55

indicting her especially why she's running

14:57

for president. And this is the one of the things

14:59

we've lost with humility, which is there

15:01

should be a humility about the federal government

15:03

in certain areas too. And one of them is, look, if you

15:05

run for president, or if you've been

15:07

president, we ought to be awfully careful before it looks

15:09

like we're just going after the guy who's no longer

15:11

in power because that's what they do in these third

15:13

world countries one of the reasons why these people

15:15

run for president forever fan is because when they stopped

15:17

running for president, they were put in

15:19

prison. And I

15:21

think America's starting to look like that. We were chanting

15:23

locker up to her. They're chanting

15:25

lock him up to Trump. Are

15:27

we gonna get to the point with the loser of

15:29

the election? is gonna soon to be

15:31

indicted by that next, you know,

15:33

attorney general. That is that that is not a

15:35

good place for this country. So look, the the

15:37

reason I wanted you say all that especially,

15:39

you know, the comparisons between,

15:41

you know, he'll be Clinton in her server or

15:43

whatever versus Donald Trump is I

15:46

think a lot of people who are liberals and

15:48

progressives, you don't hear that

15:50

comparison. In other words,

15:52

what you're saying is you think there's

15:54

an unfair justice system. You

15:56

feel that you might be targeted by

15:58

it. You're seeing some things that

15:59

seem hypocritical to you. and

16:01

that makes you worry, like, hey, where's this

16:04

going? And that resonates with a lot of stuff that

16:06

we say on our side. I'll be honest with you.

16:08

Let me tell you where I think I'm going. I

16:10

think there's a decent chance I'll be in

16:12

prison. I really do. I think if I continue on

16:14

this course and if I've seen as

16:16

kind of a pugnacious conservative, and

16:18

I live in a blue jurisdiction.

16:21

I think it's a matter of time

16:23

before, you know, they really want

16:25

to get me find can find something on

16:27

everyone. You know, there's that famous colleague

16:29

of Stalin who said,

16:31

show me the man, I'll find the crime. I mean,

16:33

that's kind of where we are. So once

16:35

again, it goes back to this idea of

16:37

what's the commonality on

16:39

a criminal justice system that's out of whack

16:42

is it's not just maybe

16:44

poor people in cities

16:46

that can be a victim of it.

16:48

Anybody who runs a foul of

16:50

overpowering Leviathan can be the

16:52

victim of it. And I think we're in a very,

16:54

very dangerous position where I don't

16:56

think it's getting better as good of is

16:58

the work as you've done. I think it's getting worse. I

17:00

mean, I think we have some real achievements on

17:02

criminal justice form, especially at the state level. I think

17:04

it's still rolling. But, man, I just I

17:06

think at the federal level, we are in

17:08

a dangerous place. I see

17:10

it somewhat differently in that

17:12

I mean, what's missing from your story if

17:14

you're progressive with missing from your story is found

17:17

Trump taking responsibility for

17:19

his side of it. In other words,

17:21

I think conservatives in general believe a lot of

17:23

personal responsibility, that kind of stuff. And in

17:25

this situation, Trump has done

17:27

stuff that, you know, you can

17:29

draw some distinctions between what he did and what hill what

17:31

Hilli Clinton did. Or how do you know what the truth is?

17:33

That's the other piece, which is

17:35

we used to have common idea

17:37

of truth. There was real journalism. You could

17:39

kinda I think it's broken up. So, like,

17:41

where do you Yeah. You know, how do you get that

17:43

the boss and strikes. Right? How do I even

17:46

know Van? How do I know what's in those

17:48

ten legal boxes of

17:50

documents? How do you know it even? Well,

17:52

and and unless it was, like, video tape from beginning

17:54

to end and then you could say, well, the video tapes were

17:56

doctored. So so we are in this big

17:58

trust

17:58

collapse. And I think

18:00

that that's very dangerous for a Democratic

18:02

Republic. The thing that should scare everybody

18:04

is that when you say when we say the United

18:06

States is the oldest democracy in

18:08

the world. Oh, wait. Hold on a second. We're only

18:11

like two hundred fifty years old. We

18:13

had ten thousand years of human civilization.

18:15

and and the oldest The

18:17

democratic Republic is even three hundred years

18:20

old, that means these must be very

18:22

hard forms of government to hold

18:24

to. because they've been democracies in the past. So

18:26

this is a very fragile system.

18:28

It's a it's a miracle in human history what

18:30

we've been able to achieve. to

18:32

have a Democratic Republic with, you

18:34

know, every color, every faith, every kind

18:36

of human being ever born in one country. And

18:39

we actually have been able to make it work for

18:41

this long. but it requires

18:43

some trust. And to

18:44

your point, if you're liberal,

18:46

you say,

18:47

look, I'm scared. I'm

18:49

scared the Republic's gonna take over. I'm scared the Republic's gonna

18:51

take away my rights. I'm scared the

18:53

Republic's gonna, you know, cook

18:55

the planet with fossil fuels

18:57

and don't care. I'm scared to they're

18:59

gonna take away women's rights to choose. I'm scared to rip

19:02

up and ruin my life. But

19:04

what you don't always think about is there's

19:05

fear on the other side. you

19:08

know, match lap is no easy,

19:10

you know, pushover. This is a big

19:12

dude. And one of the most powerful people in the country. And he

19:14

thinks he might wind up in jail. Now,

19:16

I don't know that we have those conversations

19:18

with this is literally one of the

19:20

most powerful people in the country is not sure he

19:22

can trust America not to put him in jail for

19:24

his political views. Now, how do

19:27

we get into that situation where

19:29

there's that much fear and lack of trust on either

19:31

side? And is there anything you think we

19:33

could do to start to heal that because you can't run a

19:35

Democratic Republic of both sides and the other sides, homicide.

19:37

You know, there was there was a point in

19:39

the swamp where, you know, we could have

19:41

a party at our house and

19:43

we could invite pretty much anyone in politics and

19:46

nothing was out of bounds. Everything

19:48

was fine. And then at a at a know

19:50

where that that's ended. Like,

19:52

we noticed that, like, we didn't get invited to

19:54

these things anymore, and the White House

19:56

correspondent's dinner was no longer, like, a

19:58

safe zone to go and

20:00

get mocked in a good

20:02

natured way and, like, it just kinda all dried

20:04

up. And, you know, someone asked

20:06

me over the course of last week,

20:08

attorney friend of mine, like, who's

20:10

who's responsible, and who's at fault, and

20:12

we started going through, like, Richard Nixon,

20:14

and New Gingrich, and Jim. Right? Like,

20:16

I love history, but I don't know how useful all that

20:18

is. I think that The point is is

20:20

this, which is of all those

20:22

countries you talked about that were around for about

20:24

two hundred and fifty years, some

20:27

shaped man or formed there was some kind of

20:29

citizenship and they had some kind

20:31

of voice in their government. I'm sure it wasn't

20:33

very perfect. But the difference with ours

20:35

was is it wasn't based on, you

20:37

know, a specific ethnicity or

20:39

a certain country, like we weren't all from France

20:41

or we weren't all from Great Britain. It was a it

20:43

was a little bit of a hodgepodge, of course,

20:45

mostly white Western European. I

20:47

get that completely and

20:49

mostly Christian. overwhelming Christian.

20:51

And then there's a native population. So without

20:53

getting into all the complications of what

20:55

makes America, we were unique

20:57

and that everybody almost everybody came here

21:00

from other places and tried to figure

21:02

out how we're gonna put a government

21:04

together. And I think what made

21:06

us so exceptional in the beginning

21:08

was a diverse

21:10

experience, at least to the extent to which I

21:12

described. That

21:12

doesn't seem to be a strength anymore. It seems

21:15

to be our weakness, which is no one trust

21:17

any bun. There's a

21:17

lot of hatred. There's a lot of violence.

21:19

I don't think we'd talk about that or not. There's a lot

21:21

of violence. And I think that violence

21:24

is I'm sadly. I I don't I don't

21:26

see ebbing anytime soon. And

21:28

I really worry about that. How do we

21:30

find what what we have in common

21:32

again? How do

21:34

we find a a national purpose, you know,

21:36

with all the diversity and everything else. How do

21:38

we find that again? You know, I well, I

21:40

spent some time with them commenting again.

21:42

How do we find a national

21:45

purpose, you know, with all the diversity and

21:47

everything else. How do we find that again? You

21:49

know, I I spent some time with my daughter.

21:51

We have these CPACs all over the world. We get

21:53

a CPAC. In Israel, we had a CPAC

21:55

in Hungary. I took my daughter

21:57

to Paris. We have it the worst. I

21:59

mean, even

21:59

in Israel, we hate

22:02

each other. We hate each other more

22:04

than I see in these, certainly, these other

22:06

European countries. We just the animosity

22:08

levels are off the charts.

22:10

how do you to, say, a progressive suppose,

22:12

you know, just make somebody up. You got a twenty

22:14

seven year old African American

22:16

lesbian or something. And she says,

22:19

Look, I don't think that

22:21

if Matt Slapp and his

22:23

crew were in charge, that I would

22:25

be safe. I

22:26

think I wouldn't have rights. I think

22:28

I would be vulnerable. I don't I don't think match lap

22:30

would protect my voting rights. I don't think match lap

22:32

would stick up for me, you know, if if

22:34

I was being fired for being a lesbian

22:37

or or something like that. Like, I

22:39

think Matt Slaps trying to get power to hurt

22:41

me. First of all, did you did you understand why

22:43

somebody might feel that way? Yeah.

22:44

Of course. I think

22:46

that I

22:48

could argue the opposite. You

22:50

know, I don't want her to be safe. I

22:52

mean, where does she live? No offense.

22:54

Does she live in Los Angeles? Or

22:56

San Francisco or New York Chicago, where crime is

22:59

skyrocketing. I don't think it's American

23:01

to be this unsafe in the streets and to have

23:03

this kind of chaos in the streets. you

23:05

know, as far as her sexual preferences or whatever

23:08

else, I think most people

23:10

with my political views

23:12

believe in

23:13

freedom. and people

23:15

have right to live their life. Our

23:18

demarcation is, you have the

23:19

right to be who you want to be as an adult, as

23:21

long as you're not hurt a kid or something.

23:23

but you don't have the right to go to someone of

23:26

faith, someone

23:26

who has strongly held Christian views

23:29

or or

23:29

whatever views they are and tell them that

23:32

they can't have those views because

23:35

somehow that damages their ability to live

23:37

their life. And that's where the that's where

23:39

the the respect and the trust has

23:41

to happen. the conservative Christian

23:43

in America doesn't wanna have to be

23:45

told that they can't have the full expression of

23:48

their religious views. and

23:50

the person that wants to live their life

23:52

as a member of

23:54

the LGBT queue community doesn't want

23:56

to have Christians when they're elected

23:59

to office somehow bring the

24:01

moral police down on

24:03

the decisions

24:03

they're making. And I I actually don't think

24:06

it's that hard because We

24:08

do this mostly as a society anyway,

24:10

which is people have the right

24:12

to teach their kids, their

24:14

religious views, And I don't

24:16

think it's right for the state or anybody else to come in and tell their parents

24:18

that that they're they're teaching them

24:20

hatred and intolerance if they're teaching

24:23

them what they believe biblical truths. And I

24:25

think for most people that look, most of the people

24:27

I know in the LGBTQ community

24:29

are Republicans. But I think there's an

24:31

increasing view from those

24:33

folks is it's a little bit of the lead me

24:35

alone caucus. It's like, hey, why don't you just let

24:37

me live my life and Let

24:39

me tell you, I think for most conservatives

24:41

in America today, they're

24:43

the ones

24:44

who are saying, hey, would you just leave me

24:47

alone? you won't even

24:47

leave me alone if I wanna put up my tramp flag. Let me put

24:49

up my tramp flag if I wanna put my pro

24:51

life sticker on. Let me put my pro life

24:54

sticker on I'm not telling you what you

24:56

gotta do, but leave me alone. Don't make

24:58

me feel like I'm a

25:00

pariah because I have these

25:02

views and believe it or not,

25:04

van, for A lot of Republicans in this country when it

25:06

comes to the treatment by corporate America, which

25:08

is now so hostile to these

25:10

viewpoints, professional sports, which is so

25:12

hostile to these viewpoints. they

25:14

feel like they're

25:14

the hunted for having their views.

25:16

And by the way, the worst thing that's happening in

25:18

our country is people who have my

25:21

views in I probably would be like this,

25:23

except I just kinda got pushed in front of

25:25

everything. But they're

25:27

hiding their views because they feel like

25:29

if they express them, that

25:31

they'll be told that their bigots or their

25:33

haters. And so what you have is a lot

25:35

of non expression of

25:37

people's views. That's not making those

25:39

views ebb. that's making those views get

25:41

a harder edge to them. And I don't

25:43

think it's a healthy thing at all. I think

25:45

I think our founders were right. The

25:47

reason why we believed

25:48

in free speech in this country is because

25:50

the more people have the chance to speak

25:52

even if it's hateful. the more they

25:54

felt like a good population would

25:57

root

25:57

out the bad ideas and embrace the good. I

25:59

think a couple of things and just response to what you what

26:02

you said. This trying

26:04

to set the the the table in

26:06

the right way so that, you know, people can have

26:08

freedom. I think I think human freedom

26:10

and human dignity is the common ground

26:13

for for all sides. If there's any common

26:15

ground left, it's just the idea. Freedom is good,

26:17

dignity is good, how do you get there? you know,

26:19

as a person of faith that to be shared that I'm processing

26:21

your catholic, but there's this

26:23

challenge around can

26:25

we

26:25

have a a situation where someone can use their

26:28

religious ideas to

26:30

discriminate against

26:30

someone else. That's how it lands on our side.

26:32

So for instance, you know, back in

26:35

the day, they would

26:37

say, well, God separated the

26:39

races. And the curse of ham,

26:41

they would go in the bible and say,

26:43

you know, the children of ham were cursed and the

26:45

curses is, you know, they could just make that up. It's it's

26:47

black skin. So you guys are the children of

26:49

ham. God separated us.

26:51

So they were using Christianity to

26:54

justify segregation. And I think at this point,

26:56

everybody would say, well, that was an

26:58

abusive scripture. and you

27:00

can't say, well, I'm a Christian, therefore, and I'm gonna let a live

27:02

person come into my store. So

27:04

that's where it gets tricky when we when we

27:07

wanna defend people's religious freedoms, including my own religious

27:09

freedoms. And at the same time, we do want, say,

27:11

a lesbian couple to be

27:13

able to get a cake made at

27:15

a bakery or something like that.

27:17

I think there's gradations of differences there. So,

27:19

like, if you're running a store, like, what

27:21

are you gonna ask people like who they sleep

27:23

with before they come in the store? No.

27:25

Of course, that's impractical, I wouldn't even

27:28

consider doing that. But I

27:30

think the question on the cake, the reason

27:32

why the cake was such an

27:34

important point is

27:36

that baker in Colorado, he

27:38

had strongly held views where

27:40

he felt like marriage

27:42

is between a man and a woman. and

27:44

he didn't wanna be forced to be complicit with

27:47

going against

27:47

his views. And his his

27:50

belief was that couple should just go someplace else

27:52

to get their cake mediate He

27:54

didn't wanna hurt them. He didn't have any any animosity. But

27:57

he was religiously convicted

27:59

not to

27:59

participate in any way with

28:02

that wedding. I think that is clearly within

28:05

his rights under the first amendment

28:07

to decide what cake he's

28:09

gonna bake and what cake he's

28:11

not gonna bake. I think it would have been different. If it's just

28:13

a gay customer coming in and saying, hey, I

28:16

want a cake, and he says, hey, I heard you were

28:18

at a gay bar. I don't wanna give you any cookies.

28:20

I mean, That's not what this was. This an

28:22

endorsement that he thought, an implied

28:25

endorsement of a marriage between

28:27

two people of the same gender.

28:30

So you know, there are gradations of difference

28:32

here. I think that there are people in our society

28:34

that are trying to create the

28:36

flashpoints. And

28:37

I think that we've gone way too far

28:40

in the flash points, which is my

28:42

guess is that baker, I

28:43

don't know them, never met them,

28:45

but my guess is the baker is

28:47

probably not the evil person he gets portrayed as some

28:49

kind of hater. I think all he was saying is,

28:51

could you please just leave me

28:54

alone, let me run my bakery, let

28:57

me make my own religious decisions.

28:59

And so I think this is what

29:01

we were able to do as a country for a long

29:03

time. Now one of the reasons why we were able to do it for

29:05

a long time did have discrimination.

29:08

And I think we've changed a

29:10

lot of these ideas on how

29:12

to treat people who had different ideas

29:14

and wanna live their life in a way that's different

29:16

from where you wanna live your life.

29:18

And I just think we have to figure

29:20

out a way to continue to do that. And yes, there's

29:22

gonna be times when someone says, boy,

29:24

this hurts. You know, the the level of

29:26

protection is not where I want or that boundary is not

29:28

where I want it. But do you

29:31

wanna rip hard a whole society in a great

29:33

country because we have

29:35

differences and that's what I just really don't

29:37

wanna do.

29:40

Do you hear

29:42

that that? It's

29:44

a

29:44

little space for mindfulness.

29:47

Become is a meditation podcast

29:49

in fifteen minutes or less. Become

29:52

your space to unwind. Listen

29:54

exclusively on Amazon music

29:57

or Simply tell your echoed device,

29:59

Alexa, play the podcast, become.

30:02

The

30:02

new exclusive series beneath tells the

30:04

tale of a motley crew of scientists and

30:07

scavengers who wanted to solve the mysteries

30:09

of the Titanic. They went looking for

30:11

answers at the bottom of the ocean, but

30:13

quickly discovered they were unprepared for the

30:15

horror that they unearthed. Over

30:18

a century after its sinking,

30:20

lingering questions about unaccounted for

30:22

passengers and smuggled treasure

30:24

continued to cloud our understanding of

30:26

the Titanic. beneath utilizes

30:28

captivating storytelling with chilling

30:30

audio and spectacular sound

30:32

design to transport you into the depths of the

30:34

ocean to join the team

30:36

seeking answers. but instead of treasure. They uncover an

30:38

ancient hunger that should have been left

30:40

untouched. What transpires next

30:42

is a bone chilling nightmare. as

30:44

each member of the team tries to stop a runaway curse

30:47

before it destroys them all.

30:49

binge listen to beneath exclusively

30:51

by joining One Re Plus in Apple

30:53

Podcasts. or the one rep.

30:57

We can

30:59

go back and forth

30:59

on on this stuff. I think for me the most important

31:02

thing is that you

31:04

know,

31:04

you you are

31:06

a major conservative leader.

31:09

You're

31:09

saying things that twenty years

31:11

ago, ten years ago, I think would

31:13

have probably been applauded by

31:15

people on the progressive side because

31:17

you're you're saying, listen, people

31:19

have the right to get married. They have the

31:21

right to do these things, but there are some

31:24

things that you want to protect on your

31:26

side. That's not the same as

31:28

saying, I hate all gay people.

31:30

And so disagree with you. I I think that if

31:32

you if you hang out the shingles, if, you know,

31:34

and you're a public corporation or those

31:36

things, I think you gotta serve everybody the same. You

31:38

see it some somewhat differently. but I do

31:40

wanna point out, this is a much better conversation

31:42

than even in twenty twelve, the

31:44

best president we've ever had Barack Obama was

31:46

afraid to say, that

31:48

he was for marriage equality ten years ago. So we

31:50

have moved, you know, I think in a positive

31:53

direction. And I do think these things

31:55

get heated there's fear on both sides. But let

31:57

me let me just just say one thing to to

31:59

put maybe an end to that part of the

32:01

conversation. The modern American state has

32:03

done a lot of progressive things in

32:05

in the rule of law I don't agree with, but

32:07

that doesn't mean that I want to

32:10

force somebody to have a view that

32:12

they simply just don't agree with. I think that's not

32:14

gonna get us very far. You know, all this

32:16

stuff is gonna be coming to a head

32:18

in the elections. And I

32:20

wanna just move over to that. I'm

32:22

very concerned about twenty twenty four. I

32:25

think we've come to a place where

32:27

all these issues are very polarized and very very

32:30

closely felt

32:31

and I think Republicans

32:34

don't

32:34

trust Democrats

32:36

to cast our votes

32:38

fairly without cheating. And I don't think

32:41

Democrats, trust Republicans,

32:43

to count our votes, fearably and

32:45

without cheating. And so you've got this

32:48

standoff now where I think

32:50

Republicans have come to

32:52

feel that Democrats just cheat all the

32:54

time. And they're gonna stuff ballots and

32:56

they're gonna do stuff that's that's,

32:58

like, unfair. And

32:59

I think

33:00

on our side, we say, well, hold on a second.

33:02

We see these moves to get

33:04

pro

33:04

Trump people in positions of power in terms

33:06

of securities of state and governors. We see

33:09

these laws coming out and you can't even

33:11

bring water to somebody standing in

33:13

line. We think that they are trying to be in

33:15

a position to gerrymandering everything else,

33:17

to dilute our vote, to suppress our vote,

33:19

and even to steal our vote. And

33:21

that is a very dangerous situation because

33:23

what it could mean is that after

33:25

twenty twenty four, once or the other just won't

33:27

accept the result. Going

33:30

forward, how do we get

33:31

to a place where we at

33:33

least have the most fundamental

33:35

part of our democracy

33:37

are respected, which is a

33:39

cheat free election where people respect

33:41

the outcome of the vote. Yeah.

33:43

I mean, I think, you know, there are some proposals that are being

33:45

thrown out by conservatives, which mirror

33:48

what they do in a lot of other countries, a

33:50

lot of European countries like

33:52

have a national holiday on election day. Like,

33:54

don't give anybody the excuse so I had

33:56

to get to work for the reason why they couldn't

33:58

vote and make it easy for people to

34:00

vote. And so you this idea

34:03

where I think it's easy

34:05

to, I would say,

34:05

mischaracterize the Republican position

34:08

where We don't want too many people to vote. We wanna make it a little

34:10

bit hard to vote because, boy, if everybody

34:12

really voted, we'd get killed. We'd just

34:14

get swamped because our positions aren't popular

34:18

and I don't think that's right. I do think we have an electoral

34:20

college system, and people can argue whether they like or

34:22

don't like that. But under

34:24

that system, I'd be very

34:26

open to making it as pain free and as

34:28

easy for everyone to vote. I

34:30

would much rather have every

34:32

legal person vote. Be

34:34

told they had to vote. Then this system that we

34:36

have right now, where one

34:38

side can mischaracterize my side is

34:40

we're trying to prevent legal, lawful

34:42

voters from voting. And the other

34:44

side is so radicalized

34:48

in fear of whoever candidate I might be supporting that.

34:50

I don't think it's all the democrats that are

34:52

cheating, by the way. I just think that there was

34:55

a very unfortunate four hundred

34:58

seventeen million dollar program

35:00

under very

35:00

loose rules in these cities

35:03

that

35:03

allowed for people

35:05

to have great questions. And I think, you know,

35:07

as long as you're a registered voter and

35:09

as long as you follow those election laws,

35:11

you're having this increasing and

35:13

pervasive idea that Figuring out who

35:15

the winner is of an election is just too

35:18

complicated. It's too murky and that is

35:20

wrong. Democracy's all over the world have figured

35:22

this out and I think we better figure

35:24

this out and If it means I gotta

35:26

give a little bit on the fact that there's a

35:28

holiday, which I I hate giving out more federal

35:30

holidays, I think we have enough. But if that's what we

35:32

gotta do to restore, this,

35:34

maybe maybe, you know, you and I have talked about this,

35:36

maybe there are some standards we could maybe

35:38

there's some kind of coalition that could be

35:40

put together to say, look, this

35:42

is what we have to do for everybody to have confidence. I can just tell you

35:44

this from the bottom of my heart

35:46

and maybe for your audience, so just think I'm

35:48

really full of

35:50

it. But I I know for myself, I will participate in

35:52

nothing that has its

35:54

goal

35:54

trying to peep people of

35:56

color from casting their

35:58

lawful vote. Why do I feel that

35:59

way? Well, I think there's a moral

36:02

question. But, you know, I'm

36:03

a Abraham Lincoln Republican. Our

36:05

whole party was started. to

36:07

give these people the vote to make sure back

36:09

in the eighteen sixties that former slaves got their

36:12

full civil rights. Now maybe maybe

36:14

those Republicans didn't think a

36:16

black man and a white man were the same. I'm not gonna tell you

36:18

that they had the same views as

36:20

people do today, but they

36:22

did understand that

36:24

they were created by god, they were human beings, and they deserved their full civil

36:27

rights. And I think my

36:29

party, the extent to which it

36:31

participates in anything that

36:34

would, you know, make it harder or

36:36

deny people their ability to write

36:38

because of racial reasons or anything else. I think

36:40

we'd be a short term party. I think

36:42

we'd be headed for, you know, it's a bad

36:44

strategy. It's too easy to discover. Well,

36:46

I think what I what I would say about that is

36:48

that, you know, this

36:50

rash of of Republican

36:52

bills that are really in

36:54

really pushing in the opposite direction what you're saying.

36:56

You're saying and I look, I

36:58

agree with you. I would like to see

37:00

more people come into

37:02

the system and vote because I think, you know, voting

37:04

is an important act of

37:07

of ownership of yourself and ownership in

37:09

and having ownership stake in your country.

37:11

And I also think that it would

37:13

be good for everyone to have more

37:15

confidence in it because we we we've

37:17

agreed that we want that confidence. I

37:19

think that what cuts the other way is that

37:21

you had a bunch of Republican bills that got

37:23

passed that seemed to be more restrictive, that

37:26

seemed to say, Well, we'd

37:28

like to election outcome in twenty twenty, and

37:30

so now we're gonna make it harder. Again,

37:32

the Georgia bill that says, you can't bring water to

37:34

somebody standing in line and other

37:36

bills like that. And now you said you wouldn't want somebody doing something

37:38

like that for racial reasons, but

37:40

maybe it's not racial reasons anymore. Maybe it's

37:42

just pure partisan reasons or some

37:44

other reason

37:46

I still think illegitimate reasons to make it harder to vote. How do

37:48

you respond to that concern? I don't

37:51

fear everyone voting. That is

37:53

not what I fear. What I fear

37:56

is what happened last time and

37:58

let's not re litigate it, but what

38:00

we did last time

38:02

is because big cities are dominated now by one party. You know, I did

38:04

the Florida recount fan. I don't know if you

38:06

did in two thousand. But, you know,

38:08

that was the right model. People can

38:10

say was the wrong come, but the model was

38:12

in air through every court was you will

38:14

have a Democrat observer and a

38:16

Republican observer, and then the

38:18

county official adjudicating that

38:20

ballot. If both people got to watch, they could

38:22

tape it. Right? More transparency

38:24

is what you need, by the way, it's

38:26

easy for Republicans to complain because we're not getting the beneficiary of any

38:28

description in the big cities, which I

38:30

think was on display unfortunately in

38:33

two thousand twenty. But, you know,

38:35

what happens in these Democrat primaries?

38:38

Right? If you're going to

38:40

allow local officials to

38:42

decide when they use voter ID, when they

38:44

don't use voter ID when a poll

38:46

is open, when a poll is closed,

38:48

who's considered a lawful voter, who

38:50

isn't a lawful voter, what'll happen

38:52

when that's your team versus your team? and one

38:54

guy's in the machine and the other guy's the

38:56

outsider. I think that's gonna be very good for

38:58

that outsider. And I just think we ought to

39:00

have a set of rules. I think that'll be

39:02

very clear I don't think they should be

39:04

written by Republicans. And I

39:06

think we ought to follow those rules each and every

39:08

time. And if we do that and if they're

39:10

fair minded, and the courts will play a role, I think will

39:12

increase their confidence in those

39:14

results. And if my team loses all

39:16

those races, That'll

39:18

be on

39:18

me. We'll we'll have to deal with the fact that we're not popular. I

39:20

just don't think that's the case. I see it

39:23

differently in the following way. first

39:25

of all, these blue cities that are so

39:27

well organized with corruption. Like, I've lived

39:29

in a bunch of them. III have our

39:31

time to get people to vote one time, let alone

39:33

twenty. I just don't accept premise that what you're seeing is corruption as

39:36

much as incompetence in terms of

39:38

how long it takes to to to get the

39:40

votes counted. I think it's important

39:42

for my audience to hear, look,

39:43

you if you're progressive, you probably

39:46

never thought about the fact that it takes a long time for

39:48

folks to to get turned to in the

39:50

big cities. as a possible sign of some kind of disrupt corruption

39:52

of malfeasance. It's important for us

39:54

to

39:54

understand how stuff looks to other people.

39:56

You you do realize I don't really

39:59

fault.

39:59

I keep saying the big cities. Uh-huh.

40:02

I think that they're the host for a lot

40:04

of activity that shouldn't be happening. And

40:06

I do think so. I think

40:08

it's ironic. I think some of these cities

40:10

that are probably very diverse cities. I do think it's a lot of woke billionaires that

40:12

are funding things that I think are

40:14

not helpful to having

40:16

free and fair elections. I hope more woke billionaires

40:18

will give money for voting voter mobilization.

40:20

So please don't listen to my friends.

40:22

I know for legal voter mobilization as

40:25

well. I'm all four. Yeah. But but

40:27

what do you think about the people

40:29

who are denying the election

40:31

outcome grabbing for the state security

40:34

state roles and the government's role, that scares the crap

40:36

that's right now. You wanna win a number one thing

40:38

that scares the crap out of Democrats and progressives

40:40

is the idea that people who

40:42

don't believe the last election was fair, deliberately putting themselves in a

40:44

position to be in a governor's chair or

40:46

secretary's state chair to determine and put

40:49

maybe put their thumb on the

40:51

election. I mean, and you've hearing people now, conservative

40:53

saying maybe the state legislature should be able

40:55

to just send their own delegates.

40:57

I mean, how Can you understand

40:59

how that stuff just scares the crap out of us? I

41:01

can understand in a country that's

41:04

had a really troubling racial

41:06

history with

41:08

voting. I can understand why people of those

41:10

racial minorities would worry that

41:12

it's just the same people doing it to them

41:15

again. Of course, I would understand that.

41:17

Look, this is this is our birthmark as a country.

41:19

I mean, we got it all wrong on that

41:22

stuff. And people can argue over whether

41:24

it was

41:26

what they had to do to get the thing launched and they were gonna fix

41:28

it later or whether there's just no way to fix the country

41:30

because it started off with that racial

41:32

birth defect. But, you know,

41:36

my party had

41:36

a lot to do with fixing those problems. And I'm

41:38

not gonna be put on the defensive

41:40

for the owning all

41:43

these bad racial policies

41:46

that kept blacks from voting and

41:48

other people from voting. By the way, the

41:50

Republicans were the ones that

41:52

pushed through and

41:52

franchise it for women to vote too. So, like, we actually have a

41:54

good history on a lot of these questions. It doesn't

41:56

mean every Republican did the right thing. It doesn't

41:58

mean that everything we did was right.

42:01

But, you know, there's a lot of pushback to get to

42:04

Democrats who now are trying to say that there

42:06

are always the good guys, and I don't

42:08

think that's a very fair read of history. And I would say

42:10

this, that we know that as

42:12

Republicans were gonna get accused of racism to be

42:14

the first thing out of the box

42:16

every time. Why

42:18

don't

42:18

we just have a set of rules that you always have to follow? Just follow them.

42:20

And we should

42:20

have followed them last time. And they could be

42:23

easier rules, by the way, then, you

42:25

know, you talk about they made the rules tougher in Georgia because

42:27

that's what that's the reaction to, oh

42:29

my gosh, these big city mayors are gonna just

42:31

be willy nilly with the laws. we have to

42:33

make it harder for them to do that. Actually, the

42:36

right answer to that, if we were all

42:38

dealing squarely with each other, would

42:40

be, look, make it

42:42

very easy to vote, make it all

42:44

very transparent, but then

42:46

nobody can try to

42:48

change those rules to benefit their

42:50

candidate, I think that's where we gotta get to.

42:52

You said some stuff I disagree with and some

42:54

stuff I do agree with, but your your

42:56

bottom line I

42:56

think any fair minded person would have to agree with that if there's if

42:59

there could be a grand bargain on

43:01

voting where there was

43:03

a sense that We're not

43:05

making it harder for anybody who can lawfully vote to

43:08

do so. And the rules are

43:10

transparent, and everybody knows what they are and they

43:12

don't change. I

43:13

think that's That's common

43:15

ground. Let me just ask you a

43:16

couple just quick questions, just lightning round

43:18

type question. You mentioned going overseas. You

43:20

know, Victor Orbon scares the

43:23

heck out of most progressive. Why do you think

43:25

conservatives like Victor Orban of all people? And would you

43:28

wanna live in a country like Hungary? Which he that

43:30

was controversial part of

43:32

Victor Orban's public policy

43:34

goals is to use the tax

43:36

code to incentivize people to have kids and

43:38

be married. And marriage is up

43:40

something like thirty percent, abortions

43:42

have dropped, by half

43:44

because when someone gets pregnant, by the way,

43:46

she doesn't even have to be married. But when a woman

43:48

gets pregnant, she has an immediate drop

43:51

in her taxation level. to the point that

43:53

if she has three or four kids, she never pays taxes for rest of her life.

43:55

I don't know. They're looking at declining birth

43:57

rates throughout Europe. He's just trying to

43:59

reverse that trend.

44:02

because he knows it'll help the economics of the country. And I think people

44:04

don't understand that he wants to

44:06

keep a country in his Judeo

44:10

Christian tradition. and people view that as racist. And

44:12

when Jews wanna have the state

44:14

of Israel and keep it

44:16

mostly Jewish, you

44:18

know, I don't think that's racist. I think there's okay

44:20

for people to wanna maintain their

44:22

identity as a country. The way I

44:24

see that one is that, you know,

44:26

Jewish people were almost exterminated, and they really needed to to have a,

44:28

they call it, a homeland and a homestead.

44:31

It's a unique example. I

44:33

agree. example. Yeah. And I think that

44:35

the the reason I don't like Victor Orbon is because

44:38

another way to deal with declining birth rates is

44:40

just to have

44:42

immigration and let people come to the country, you know, free free flow

44:44

of capital and labor has been good for free

44:46

markets. And, you know, he has immigration.

44:48

His point is is that

44:50

You want it to be legal and approved. This is argument we have

44:52

in this country, which is I view what's

44:55

happening at the southern border as

44:57

an abomination and unconstitutional

45:00

illegal immigration, yet at the same

45:02

time as you know America takes

45:04

more legal immigrants than anybody. So

45:06

it's like it's it's not a question of

45:08

do you not agree with having

45:10

any immigrationists? Does that

45:12

country get to set those immigration levels?

45:14

Can you understand why a guy

45:16

like the oribi. He seemed like he basically wants white babies and not

45:18

brown babies in his country

45:20

and seems to be an authoritarian,

45:22

like, watching conservatives like him a

45:24

lot would

45:26

be scary. Yeah. And I also think there's just a European

45:28

history, which is hard to ever get

45:30

through with what happened,

45:32

obviously, during World

45:34

War two. And it's this it's a similar question we face in this

45:36

country van. This is really the

45:38

question. With the good parts in the bad

45:40

parts of our history and our bad parts are really bad. I

45:42

don't want a

45:44

sugar coke. Can we get to a

45:46

place

45:46

where we understand our history

45:48

and we want to improve in the

45:50

areas we were so bad?

45:53

And the same question is for Europe. They made

45:55

a lot of terrible decisions. And

45:58

the people of Hungary, I'm sure

45:59

their histories you know, they're not proud of every aspect

46:02

of their history. They have the

46:04

right to set their course as

46:04

a country. Should they be a racist course? Of course

46:07

not. Should it be anti Semitic? of

46:09

course not. If that's really what this is all about is like

46:12

a white race, then of course, I

46:14

don't wanna like propel the notion that it's

46:16

good to have a white

46:18

race, but the

46:18

Hungarians also can't help what they look like. And what

46:20

they're simply saying is is that they're a tiny

46:22

little country of nine million people. They wanna

46:25

retain their Hungarian identity. think

46:28

they want to encourage people there to get married.

46:30

Now you don't have to be white or

46:32

Hungarian or Christian to be in Hungary. And by

46:34

the way, this tax credit would go to you no

46:36

matter what your religion is or you but have be

46:38

Hungarian citizen. And I, you

46:40

know, who are we to tell the

46:42

Hungarians know

46:44

you know, you're just too little and you should be swamped by

46:46

having a bunch of illegal immigration and

46:48

the whole idea of being Hungarian will just

46:51

slip away. I I don't they

46:53

have a different experience in America. We all came

46:56

from other almost all of us came from other

46:58

places. And some of us

47:00

against our will,

47:02

and that's We have a unique country that once again, just like

47:04

Israel's unique, America's very unique.

47:06

It's hard to put it within the European

47:08

context for these countries. I agree, which is why

47:10

it's so weird for people in the United States to be

47:12

cheerleading so hard for for this one guy. Let me

47:14

just say one quick thing. Abortions down

47:16

fifty percent not because the

47:18

outlawed abortion. Abortions down

47:20

fifty percent because he's being welcoming

47:22

to that unborn child in

47:24

the tax code. Get beyond race for

47:26

a minute and think about that no matter what

47:28

color that child is, I think that that's a good thing. Maybe

47:30

we ought to replicate that. Maybe we ought

47:32

to make it easier for for young

47:35

mothers to accept this

47:38

life. I'm still old fashioned enough to be in

47:40

the Clinton camp on abortion,

47:41

the original Clinton camp, which said, you know,

47:43

Safe, Legal, and

47:46

Rare. think still that's where the vast majority of most Americans are, and I

47:48

wish we had more policy to move things

47:50

in that direction. But

47:54

last thing, should

47:55

Donald Trump run again in twenty twenty four?

47:57

What's your view? I don't

47:58

know. I should ask you, but look,

48:02

I think everyone should run for

48:04

president who wants to run for president. Sure. Sure.

48:06

I have talked to him about this, so I don't

48:08

have any inside information, but look, I

48:10

think he's gonna I don't know if

48:12

he's made that decision. I sure think he's weighing in heavily to do it. In my view,

48:14

to Rhonda Santos or anybody else who

48:16

wants to run against Kamala Harris or

48:20

whoever's running, If you feel like God's

48:22

called you run for president, just go do it. If you suck at

48:24

it, you're gonna do really bad. If

48:26

you have the gift, you

48:29

just might get there. And I think things

48:31

are tumultuous enough in American politics that I

48:33

think it's very possible that Donald Trump could be back

48:35

in the White House. And I also think it's very possible that a Democrat could

48:37

be in the White House, so we don't even know we're not even

48:40

talking about their name.

48:42

And maybe the thing we still

48:44

got going as a country which is like it's a

48:46

live game. It's a live game and and you're

48:48

one of the best people playing it on your

48:50

side and Like, I

48:52

I appreciate our friendship. I appreciate our

48:54

relationship. I learned something from me

48:56

every time we talk, and I just think it's

48:58

so one portant for people. You learned how crazy

49:00

bars. That's like a dumb

49:02

thing. I know you guys have

49:04

been crazy

49:06

before. No. No. Just just really let

49:08

I think that what's happening now is

49:10

that people are down their own algorithmic

49:14

rabbit holes we aren't going each

49:16

other's houses, you know, we don't do

49:18

anything together. And so we just go

49:20

based off the sound bites and whatever it's trending

49:22

on Twitter. and I'm kicking away from this

49:24

conversation a lot of hope in

49:26

that I do think we it may be

49:27

the case that strong democrats strong

49:30

progresses. stronger

49:32

service strong Republicans might be closer to a deal

49:35

on

49:35

voting that would make the next election go down

49:38

better. I don't whoever

49:40

wins I just want the election to be the end of the contest

49:42

and not the beginning of the controversy. Well

49:44

well, why don't I why don't I make

49:46

two kind of soft challenges here. Number one,

49:50

Let's get back to a prison. Good. I think that had a big impact on

49:52

people. Yeah. I love that. And number two,

49:54

let's put the right heads around

49:56

if if I'm not motivated by

50:00

racism. and you're not motivated by cheating, then why

50:02

can't people get around a table

50:04

and say, actually, this is

50:05

what a squared deal

50:06

looks like because we gotta get there.

50:08

Let's do it. last time we shook hands on something, we made a pretty big

50:11

difference in this country. Let's do it again. We'll do it

50:13

with somebody. That's true. Alright, brother. Oh, god bless you. God bless

50:15

you. God bless you too for having your

50:17

patience. We see the

50:20

beauty of hope. That

50:22

spirit is so beautiful. Those

50:26

who

50:26

become American citizens love

50:28

this country even more, and

50:30

that's why the statue of liberty lifts her

50:33

to welcome him to

50:35

the golden building.

50:43

I think that

50:46

was a very,

50:48

very important conversation.

50:50

I had a whole bunch of stuff I get into

50:52

with them. I didn't get a chance to as far as, you know, critical race theory and

50:54

a whole bunch of other stuff. But it

50:56

used to be the case that it

50:59

wasn't unusual for a

51:01

strong progressive like myself and

51:03

a strong conservative like him to talk

51:05

and to go back and

51:07

forth. And so I bring folks on that I

51:10

don't agree with, but I think I do

51:12

understand. I

51:14

understand how there's a section of people in this country who

51:16

do feel that tables have turned

51:18

against them. And whether you're talking about

51:20

the tables have turned against them in

51:23

terms of the LGBTQ stuff or the

51:26

demographics of the country

51:28

or who counts and who doesn't

51:30

when it comes to

51:32

the culture whether it's it's it's it's what's being taught in schools

51:34

that they feel that the tables have been turned against

51:36

them. Now, I call that progress

51:38

because I

51:40

like most of the cultural

51:42

direction of the country, like a lot more

51:44

than where it was twenty, thirty, fifty, hundred

51:46

years ago. But for for them,

51:49

it's hard And I think when they

51:51

push back, it's easy

51:54

to lump them all in the same bucket. The people who

51:56

are like, absolute, horrible,

51:59

racist, Nazis, kinda get lumped

52:01

in with people who may have a

52:03

different mix of views. So I

52:05

took some encouragement from the

52:08

conversation because

52:10

on voting, which I think is really key

52:12

there may be more room for a deal than we know. You know,

52:15

democrats have tried to get the voting rights

52:17

act restored and a bunch of other

52:19

stuff, but it was more

52:22

a progressive wish list and it didn't

52:24

get anywhere in the Senate. And so now we've got

52:26

the same crappy voting system that we

52:29

we don't like because of voter suppression on the

52:31

left. On the right, they don't trust it because of

52:33

their view of voter fraud, and

52:36

nobody's happy. conceivable

52:38

that we could actually come together

52:40

and get something done.

52:43

That's not impossible. and that's what I love

52:45

about the American system. It started off, you

52:48

know, the founding reality was ugly

52:50

and unequal. with

52:52

slavery and exclamation, native marriage, everything else, but the

52:54

founding dream was pretty beautiful. We hold this

52:57

truth to be self evident that

52:59

all it created equal. So,

53:01

you know, as we try to close the

53:04

gap between the ugliness of the

53:06

founding reality and the beauty of

53:08

the founding dream,

53:10

we've got have to sometimes talk to people we don't agree with and try understand

53:12

them and look for some common

53:14

ground. I saw some patches of common ground

53:16

on boating that I promise

53:20

you I gonna follow-up on and keep you informed

53:22

about. But I'm gonna go back into another prison

53:24

with MashLab and we're

53:26

gonna find some folks

53:28

to help and we're gonna keep

53:30

looking for ways to make the country

53:32

better. And if somebody is right

53:34

wing is match lap and somebody is left wing is

53:36

is myself can do that, I bet you can

53:38

find some people in your own life,

53:40

some people maybe you blocked on your Facebook

53:42

page, my school, or some people in

53:44

your family, you stop

53:46

talking to a three Thanksgiving ago. So maybe reach out

53:48

to and maybe there's some kind of a

53:50

breakthrough or miracle in your own life

53:52

that's available. I

53:54

hope so. I appreciate you giving us some time oncoming ground,

53:56

and I'll see you next week.

54:03

Uncommon ground with Dan

54:06

Jones is an Amazon original

54:08

production. It's produced by magic labs

54:10

media and Wonder

54:12

Media Network, Our producers are Teddy Alexander, Maisha

54:14

Dyson, Grace Lynch, Taylor

54:16

Williamson, Adeyswa Ag Bonais,

54:19

and Lindsay Credible. Our managing producers are Laura Dee

54:21

and Eliza Mills. Our executive producers are

54:24

Jenny Kaplan and Morgan Jones.

54:26

Our theme music was composed by The

54:28

Grand Mess.

54:30

publicity for the show is led by Alice Zoe,

54:32

Andy Littendorfel, Didier Morese,

54:34

Chantelle Winters, and Sam Pepe

54:36

Rich. Special thanks to his Janet

54:40

Carter, Alex John Burns, Kevin

54:42

Mcdonald, Drew Swinderman, Reanna

54:44

Jones, Eric Carter, Trevor

54:46

McNeil, Gary McAllen,

54:48

Joe McMillan, Step Walk

54:50

Team, Vanessa Reppert, Ty Jacobson, Marshall Lilly, and Chris

54:54

Jacob.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features