0:43

Hey everyone, welcome

0:43

to unfriend TJ. And if this is

0:46

your first time listening, thank

0:46

you for being here. Welcome to

0:49

you. First time listeners, I

0:49

also want to give out, give a

0:53

shout out to our supporters and

0:53

members on buy me a coffee.com

0:59

Thank you so much for being a

0:59

part of the community, it really

1:02

does mean the world to me. And

1:02

if it weren't for you guys, I

1:05

couldn't do this. So, so thanks

1:05

so very much. Just a couple of

1:09

quick side notes before I get

1:09

going here on this episode is,

1:13

if you're not aware of September

1:13

is Cancer Awareness Month. And

1:17

so I have decided to raise money

1:17

for kids cancer research,

1:24

particularly specifically the

1:24

Andrew McDonogh be positive

1:27

Foundation. The B positive

1:27

Foundation has four areas of

1:31

focus. They work with financial

1:31

assistance, cancer research,

1:36

awareness and positivity. That's

1:36

their goal. They help families

1:41

who have kids who are going

1:41

through cancer treatments and

1:45

received diagnoses and stuff.

1:45

And they do some pretty awesome

1:48

things. And I'm very happy and

1:48

grateful to announce that

1:53

founder Joe McDonough Andrews,

1:53

dad will be joining me next week

1:58

for a chat here on the show, he

1:58

started the Foundation in honor

2:01

of Andrew, I'm very much looking

2:01

forward to that. So we're going

2:04

to hear all about his

2:04

foundation, he's going to tell

2:06

his story. And tell us all about

2:06

Andrew and share all of this

2:11

incredible inspiration. He's

2:11

he's really built this thing up.

2:14

And he's helped a lot of people

2:14

and a lot of kids and I want to

2:18

help him do that. So if you go

2:18

to buy me a coffee calm during

2:21

the month of September for every

2:21

coffee, you buy me I will donate

2:26

$1 to the Andrew McDonogh be

2:26

positive foundation to those of

2:30

you who have already taken it

2:30

upon yourselves to do that, I

2:33

want to thank you so very, very

2:33

much. I was very touched by by a

2:38

few people who just stepped

2:38

right up and did that right away

2:41

after a brief announcement I

2:41

made on social media the other

2:44

day. So while here your love and

2:44

your support, and your

2:49

generosity really means the

2:49

world to me. So thank you. Thank

2:52

you very, very much. I also want

2:52

to let you guys know that going

2:56

forward, I'm going to pop a

2:56

little link on my website at

3:00

empowered humans.org You can

3:00

click a button there. And that

3:04

will take you to Instacart

3:04

website. So going forward, I

3:09

will be working with Instacart

3:09

to offer you guys some nice

3:13

discounts. You can find the

3:13

details of what those discounts

3:16

are going to be on my website at

3:16

empowered humans.org Hey, cool,

3:20

we'll see how that works out nothing like getting your groceries delivered right to

3:22

your door. So let's get started,

3:24

shall we? Let's move right along

3:24

and start today's conversation.

3:29

So when it comes to whoa boy

3:29

discussion about COVID It can

3:33

seem nearly impossible to do

3:33

without a heated debate. Right?

3:37

There are endless questions and

3:37

conversations and arguments. But

3:44

questions come up like do masks

3:44

work? And are the shots safe?

3:48

And can we trust what we're

3:48

being told COVID is a source of

3:52

fear. It's a source of full

3:52

blown paranoia, haha, definitely

3:56

a source of anger and anxiety

3:56

and in a lot of cases of

3:59

desperation. But regardless of

3:59

what your opinions are about

4:03

COVID What you've personally

4:03

experienced or even what you

4:08

believe is the best way forward.

4:08

COVID is something that we all

4:13

will live with, probably

4:13

forever. Now, to some degree

4:16

whether we want to where we

4:16

don't, it's there, it's here to

4:19

stay from the looks just like

4:19

the flu just like colds just

4:23

like lots of diseases and things. It happens.

4:24

The COVID is not the C word that

4:28

I'm referring to in the title of

4:28

this episode. The C word I'm

4:32

referring to is choice. Those of

4:32

you who know me know that I say

4:36

this often everything we do say

4:36

act upon think or whatever.

4:42

Everything is a choice. And I

4:42

don't mean that there aren't

4:46

ever things that are beyond our

4:46

control that happen. Obviously

4:49

there are but we always have a

4:49

choice about how we respond to

4:53

them. Always. When it comes to

4:53

the current global climate and

4:56

the way your community or your

4:56

state or your country are

5:00

handling all of this COVID

5:00

stuff. There seems to be an ever

5:04

expanding divide between those

5:04

who believe in choice and those

5:09

who do not. So I'm not going to

5:09

talk at you. I'm not going to

5:13

try to convince you of one thing

5:13

or another because I believe

5:17

that we all have the sovereign

5:17

right to make those choices for

5:20

ourselves and for our dependents

5:20

if we have them. But I you truly

5:25

believe that being human affords

5:25

us that sovereignty there is no

5:30

question we have freewill and

5:30

one thing that I'm a firm

5:33

believer in is remaining open

5:33

minded, remaining aware, while

5:38

our collective and personal

5:38

experience just kind of play out

5:42

what I know today may expand

5:42

tomorrow, right? I mean, my

5:45

understanding of anything or

5:45

yours, anyone's is based on my

5:51

experience, and my awareness up

5:51

to this point right now. And if

5:55

my awareness broadens, or a new

5:55

experience, maybe opens my eyes

6:00

to a different perspective, what

6:00

I know changes. And as a result,

6:04

my belief may shift, right. And

6:04

that doesn't need to be labeled

6:08

like right or wrong, you don't

6:08

need to look back on Oh, boy, I

6:11

was stupid, that was wrong,

6:11

whatever. Because there really

6:15

doesn't need to be any

6:15

attachment to your past or your

6:20

current belief or anything that

6:20

happens in the future, there

6:22

doesn't need to be anything

6:22

attached to that. What we need

6:25

to be or what I need to be is

6:25

open and aware enough to be able

6:29

to say, Hey, isn't that

6:29

interesting? Maybe there's more

6:33

to this than I realized before

6:33

this moment, and maybe there's

6:37

more still that I am unaware of.

6:37

Because I don't know what I

6:41

don't know, yet. And if you can

6:41

be honest enough with yourself

6:46

to accept that, then you can

6:46

also accept that everyone else

6:50

is the same. And if no one else

6:50

knows what they don't know, then

6:55

it makes absolutely no sense to

6:55

get upset with someone who has a

7:00

different opinion than you.

7:00

Because if everyone is just

7:02

operating from where they're at,

7:02

as far as what experiences and

7:07

awareness, they have had up to

7:07

this point, they're making

7:11

decisions based on their own

7:11

personal best understanding of

7:16

whatever it is they're making

7:16

decisions about, right. So we

7:19

can't get upset with people for

7:19

doing that. You might not like

7:22

someone's choices, or agree or

7:22

whatever. But that's what it

7:25

boils down to. And this and this

7:25

has never been more apparent

7:29

than since COVID-19 came into

7:29

the world, right? I mean, we

7:33

can't argue with that. There's,

7:33

there's, it's crazy, there's new

7:36

information coming out all the

7:36

time. And we don't know what we

7:39

don't know. And some things many

7:39

of us will never know, when

7:43

that's okay, we all have a

7:43

choice to care about things like

7:47

where it came from, how it

7:47

originated, how it first spread,

7:50

and all that stuff. And we also

7:50

have the right to make the

7:53

choice to just shrug our

7:53

shoulders and decide that that

7:56

particular information doesn't

7:56

matter to us, we can choose to

7:59

wear a mask or not, we can opt

7:59

to get the shots or not. Based

8:04

on what we understand to be

8:04

true. And in our own best

8:08

interests. It is perfectly okay

8:08

to feel concern, I think for

8:12

someone you care about when they

8:12

make choices that you believe

8:15

could be less than beneficial

8:15

for them. Right. But none of us

8:18

have the right to push our

8:18

beliefs onto other people, even

8:23

if it's with good intention,

8:23

right? Just like religious

8:27

fanatics might try to tell you

8:27

how much you need to find Jesus

8:31

or God or do this or that or

8:31

whatever, so that they can help

8:35

save your soul. Well, that's

8:35

fine. That's their intention is

8:39

good, right? They're doing that

8:39

out of good intention, they

8:42

care, they want to help you. But

8:42

if you're not, you don't agree

8:47

with that. Or you don't have the

8:47

same beliefs or experiences or

8:50

awareness as they do, you

8:50

probably aren't going to respond

8:54

to that in a positive way. If

8:54

you have information on the flip

8:59

side that other people don't, or

8:59

that someone you care about

9:03

doesn't have, and you share it.

9:03

If they're open to that and let

9:08

them just do with it, what they

9:08

feel is right then do that. And

9:13

what they think is right for

9:13

them, once they have that same

9:15

information you do might not be

9:15

what you would do. And that's

9:19

okay. Let people make their own

9:19

choices. So I can't possibly

9:25

cover everything in one episode,

9:25

in great detail. With regard to

9:30

all of this stuff, I'm going to

9:30

go over a whole lot of

9:33

information, I'm probably going

9:33

to forget some stuff. I'm going

9:36

to try not to try and touch on a

9:36

lot of things here. But I am

9:40

going to talk about what I know

9:40

about COVID and offer you that

9:43

information. Just like I was

9:43

just saying there may be things

9:47

that you already know there may

9:47

be things that as a result of

9:50

the research that I've done you

9:50

it may be news to you, it may

9:55

influence your choices. It may

9:55

not. That's okay. But it's you

10:01

know, I'm here to provide you

10:01

with information and offer my

10:05

insights. I am not here to try

10:05

to tell you what you should do.

10:09

So here's what I know. I know

10:09

that it is strongly believed

10:14

that COVID originated in the

10:14

virology lab in Wuhan, China.

10:18

What happened in that lab is we

10:18

I can only speculate, right we

10:24

can only speculate. I think

10:24

probably the everybody who's

10:26

listening to this right now

10:26

wasn't there.

10:29

So we can only try to connect

10:29

the dots base On the information

10:35

that comes to us with regard to

10:35

that there is an ongoing

10:39

investigation. It's been ongoing

10:39

for over three months, an

10:42

official investigation with 18

10:42

Different organizations within

10:46

the intelligence community to

10:46

try to figure out what did

10:51

happen that day or during the

10:51

course of that event, whatever

10:55

the event was, unfortunately,

10:55

that is not been proven to be an

11:02

easy task. China had a in

11:02

February was undergoing a joint

11:08

mission with the with the who,

11:08

not the band, the World Health

11:13

Organization, to investigate the

11:13

Wuhan Institute of neurology and

11:19

what happened there. But China

11:19

has put up some serious

11:24

roadblocks to that

11:24

investigation, making it pretty

11:28

much impossible to move it

11:28

forward. So essentially, what

11:31

they've done is China has said,

11:31

yeah, we'll cooperate, we'll,

11:36

we'll help you with that. And

11:36

then when it comes down to

11:39

actually doing the things that

11:39

will move that investigation

11:42

forward and shed any light on it

11:42

and bring things out into the

11:45

open, something always occurs,

11:45

and it's always on their end. So

11:49

So I know that something else I

11:49

know, there are numerous

11:52

articles and updates all over

11:52

the web about a massive lawsuit,

11:59

what's been referred to as the

11:59

new Nuremberg trials, or

12:02

Nuremberg 2021. Doctor full MC

12:02

fool, Mitch, I'm not sure how to

12:07

pronounce his name, Ryan are

12:07

full MC is heading up an

12:10

international team, comprised of

12:10

1000s 10s of 1000s of lawyers,

12:17

doctors and other medical

12:17

experts to roll out he has

12:21

rolled out a massive legal suit

12:21

against the World Health

12:26

Organization, the CDC, and the

12:26

Davis group for crimes against

12:31

humanity relating to the

12:31

COVID-19 response and

12:35

particularly that the PCR tests

12:35

were knowingly set to a level of

12:39

sensitivity that would ended

12:39

guarantee false positive and or

12:45

false negative results. They're

12:45

undertaking this monumental task

12:49

on a global scale, because they

12:49

believe that they can prove that

12:54

the people and organizations

12:54

involved did this for the

12:57

purpose of convincing the masses

12:57

to take the shot. And it is

13:01

already clear the calling the

13:01

shot. Vaccination violates all

13:09

10 Nuremberg coats to will

13:09

violating one Nuremberg Code is

13:13

punishable by death. By the way,

13:13

if you're not familiar with what

13:17

the Nuremberg codes are, and if

13:17

you want to know more about this

13:22

whole lawsuit thing, I'm going

13:22

to post a video on my site, my

13:27

website empowered humans.org I

13:27

will post a link to a video also

13:32

by Greg Reese of the race

13:32

reports.com. He has a great

13:36

podcast, the race reports.com.

13:36

He's an excellent journalist and

13:40

reporter. He discusses these

13:40

legal proceedings, and he does a

13:45

great job of explaining each of

13:45

the Nuremberg codes. The codes

13:50

essentially define the ethical

13:50

practices of research and human

13:56

experimentation and thus assist

13:56

in determining what constitutes

14:01

a war crime. And these were

14:01

established after World War Two

14:04

for all the things that occurred

14:04

during World War Two, it was

14:08

determined that some sort of

14:08

ethical foundation needed to be

14:13

set when it came to

14:13

experimenting on human beings.

14:18

Okay, so something else I know

14:18

about COVID in November of 2019,

14:25

three lab researchers became

14:25

seriously ill to the point that

14:30

they needed to be hospitalized

14:30

while conducting research in the

14:36

Wuhan lab. So the Wuhan

14:36

Institute of neurology was doing

14:43

this research, which I'll get

14:43

into a bit more in a minute, on

14:48

the virulence of Corona viruses,

14:48

in 2019, and November, during

14:55

the course of all of this

14:55

research happening, these three

14:58

researchers became seriously

14:58

ill. Three months later, we were

15:02

facing a pandemic. Fast forward,

15:02

May of 2021, according to The

15:07

New York Post, Mr. Fauci finally

15:07

admitted to providing funding to

15:14

the Wuhan Institute to study

15:14

whether bat coronaviruses could

15:18

be transmitted to humans and I'm

15:18

quoting, but he emphatically

15:23

denied any gain of function.

15:23

Research know what gain of

15:27

function research means what

15:27

gain of function is, is how to

15:31

increase the virulence of Corona

15:31

viruses, okay?

15:36

They want it to virulence means

15:36

how quickly and effectively a

15:41

virus spreads. So less than two

15:41

months after that. So July of

15:46

2021, the now well known the

15:46

emails started to come out, they

15:53

came into public view, and not

15:53

only becomes very clear that Mr.

15:58

Fauci was covering up funding

15:58

that was expressly for gain of

16:03

function, if you remember back

16:03

in May, he emphatically denied

16:07

any gain of function research

16:07

happening there. So now it comes

16:12

out two months later, because of

16:12

these emails, that he was

16:17

covering up this funding that

16:17

was expressly for gain of

16:22

function research. And not only

16:22

was he covering up that the

16:27

research was being done, he was

16:27

covering up that the money that

16:32

when it was being funded with

16:32

was coming from American tax

16:36

dollars, our tax money, and

16:36

there is so much more to this

16:43

whole story with Fauci, I'm not

16:43

going to go off on a tangent

16:47

here, I want to stay on topic,

16:47

he has been a part of so much

16:52

evil, but it's really the only

16:52

word I can think of it really

16:57

does seem, the more information

16:57

that comes out. And if you read

17:02

through those emails, and I

17:02

have, there was most certainly

17:08

something nefarious going on

17:08

there. I think anyone with a

17:12

couple of brain cells in their

17:12

head and and in their right mind

17:17

with any sort of critical

17:17

thinking skills, can see that

17:21

there was something going on

17:21

there that probably shouldn't

17:23

have been going on. There, I'm

17:23

going to post a link on my

17:27

website, to a great article

17:27

written by Jim Jordan at the

17:31

Federalist and some other

17:31

resources on that. So that if

17:35

you want to follow up on the

17:35

emails and stuff, if you didn't

17:39

do that before, when it first

17:39

came out, it was a lot, it kind

17:42

of came out, it was all over the

17:42

news, and then it went away

17:45

really quickly. That seems to

17:45

happen a lot. But you can still

17:49

get your hands on the emails,

17:49

you can still see lots of

17:52

articles and information about

17:52

what was actually going on. And

17:56

you can connect the dots

17:56

yourself, the information is out

17:58

there if you want to look for

17:58

it. So interestingly, speaking

18:01

of looking for information, I've

18:01

tried to find information on the

18:04

current alleged surge of

18:04

hospitalizations in ICUs, being

18:10

kind of over capacity and stuff

18:10

in hospitals. And there are a

18:15

gazillion mainstream media

18:15

sites, you know, on nightly

18:20

news, etc. Really dramatizing

18:20

the lack of room in hospitals

18:25

that the the hospital workers

18:25

are overworked, they're, they're

18:30

going crazy, they're exhausted,

18:30

there's no beds left, the you

18:34

know it, they're overflowing

18:34

people who need other treatments

18:37

and stuff can't get in, because

18:37

of that, etc, etc. But here's

18:42

the thing, my personal contacts,

18:42

people I personally know who

18:46

work in the medical field, who

18:46

work in hospitals, have all been

18:50

telling me a very different

18:50

story. And so I decided that I

18:55

wanted to find out some

18:55

statistics to share with you and

18:58

figure out what's going on

18:58

because it seems kind of weird

19:01

to me. That, um, you know, if

19:01

you go online, if you go to the

19:05

CDC, if you go to any mainstream

19:05

media website, or you watch TV,

19:11

and you look at the news, and

19:11

you listen to some of the radio

19:14

stations and NPR and all of

19:14

that, you get a very different

19:18

story than what my friends have

19:18

been telling me. So here's some

19:24

information for you. This is

19:24

what I found in part I if I if I

19:29

tell you everything, this is

19:29

going to be a week long episode.

19:33

So I'm going to give you some of

19:33

the bullet points here that I

19:36

feel are significant. If you go

19:36

to covid.cdc.gov. This is what I

19:42

found. And now you can decide to

19:42

use the CDC information and take

19:48

it with a grain of salt. You can

19:48

take it at face value do with it

19:52

what you will, but this is what

19:52

I found. I looked up hospital

19:56

utilization for COVID-19. And

19:56

there is a chart there where you

20:01

can break down this information

20:01

based on the EU us counties I

20:07

only looked in the United

20:07

States, by the way I didn't look

20:09

in other countries only looked

20:09

in the US. You can break down by

20:13

us county reported numbers of

20:13

beds used currently for

20:20

COVID-19. Right and these are

20:20

updated. I believe they were

20:24

updated weekly. It was up to

20:24

date. Anyway, it claimed that it

20:28

was up to date information. So here's the breakdown. of all

20:30

US counties report 3% said that

20:37

over 151 beds were being used

20:37

for COVID-19 patients 3% 8% said

20:46

that between 51 and 150 beds

20:46

were being dedicated to COVID-19

20:51

patients were being used, not

20:51

dedicated used 11% 21 to 50 beds

20:58

11% said 11 to 20 beds and 30%

20:58

said between one bed and 10 beds

21:05

were being used currently for

21:05

COVID-19 patients. 36% of all US

21:13

counties reported 36% said that

21:13

no beds were currently being

21:19

used for COVID-19 patients. So

21:19

36% of all US counties reported

21:27

said that not one single bed in

21:27

their county was being used for

21:32

COVID-19 patients. That does not

21:32

for me paint a picture of a

21:38

crazy insane surge of COVID-19

21:38

hospitalizations and beds not

21:43

being available. Right? That

21:43

doesn't mean that in some areas

21:47

that they're struggling to keep

21:47

up. There's so many other

21:50

variables involved with that,

21:50

you know, the, the size of the

21:54

area, the number of hospitals

21:54

available, etc, etc. So there's

21:59

there's a whole bunch of different information you have to take into account. However, I

22:01

think that this is very telling.

22:05

Here's something else that I

22:05

found. This is reported cases of

22:09

COVID. Okay, so counties, all US

22:09

counties reported 7% Of all the

22:18

counties reported said that, as

22:18

of the last week, over 1000

22:22

cases in their county, were

22:22

reported 7% 43% said between

22:31

109 199 cases were reported. 38%

22:31

said between 10 and 99 were

22:40

reported 6% said less than 10

22:40

were reported. And 4% of all

22:49

counties reported said that

22:49

absolutely no COVID cases were

22:55

reported at all in their county.

22:55

The other data that I looked at

23:00

were COVID deaths. And what I

23:00

found was less than 1% of the

23:08

counties that were that

23:08

reported, had 100 or more deaths

23:13

due to COVID 94% of us County's

23:13

94% had zero, or less than 10

23:23

deaths in the last seven days

23:23

from COVID 94%. I personally

23:30

went on the website did the

23:30

research myself and I will post

23:33

links for you on my website and

23:33

empowered humans.org There is

23:37

not a massive national

23:37

resurgence of COVID cases or

23:42

deaths. Clearly the numbers

23:42

don't lie. So that begs the

23:46

question, why are we being told

23:46

over and over and over again,

23:51

that there is this massive scare

23:51

this new variant is out and and

23:57

oh my god, it's gonna be worse

23:57

than it was before. And there's

24:01

no beds in the hospitals again,

24:01

and yada yada, yada? Why are we

24:05

being told us? It's that's

24:05

clearly not the case. And the

24:09

data shows that. So something

24:09

else that I found that I found

24:14

very interesting. So I'm I'm was

24:14

trying to find information and

24:18

data on on the shots. You know,

24:18

everybody has an opinion about

24:22

the shots, right? whether you

24:22

should or you shouldn't. It to

24:26

me, I just I want to be

24:26

informed. I want to know what

24:29

the deal is, what are the risks

24:29

involved, right in any kind of

24:34

medical procedure, any kind of

24:34

vaccination, whatever the case

24:39

is surgery, even if it's surgery, you want to know what the risks are, right? You're

24:41

trying to mitigate one risk or

24:47

fix something that's broken. But

24:47

in doing that, you are taking on

24:54

new risks, and it's up to each

24:54

of us to decide for ourselves,

25:00

which risk is greater, and what

25:00

makes sense going forward?

25:04

What's the best thing for us to

25:04

do based on the information that

25:07

we currently have? So here's

25:07

some things that I found a

25:11

report in 2015. About chickens.

25:11

Yeah, and that's kind of funny

25:16

chickens. are foreign 2015 about

25:16

chickens vaccinated for Merricks

25:21

disease is currently being

25:21

compared to what we're seeing

25:26

happen with the COVID-19

25:26

variants with this delta variant

25:30

that's become the talk of the

25:30

town lately. So MERIS disease

25:35

was this is this disease that

25:35

that makes sick chickens really,

25:41

really sick and kills it's,

25:41

it's, it's fatal to them. And so

25:47

there was so much of this

25:47

happening, and it was spreading

25:50

so quickly that it was decided

25:50

that they would try to ze

25:56

whoever they are, would try to

25:56

come up with a vaccine vaccine

26:00

to protect the chickens against

26:00

this Merricks disease.

26:05

So what happened is that the

26:05

vaccinated chickens became,

26:12

like, incubators, for more

26:12

deadly strains, or variants, if

26:19

you will, of the disease. And

26:19

instead of eradicating the

26:24

disease, it caused the disease

26:24

to mutate. And some people

26:29

believe that this is what is

26:29

happening with the new delta

26:33

variant. In 2015, this became

26:33

known as the virus boosting

26:37

phenomenon, it was a big deal.

26:37

And if you're someone who at

26:42

that time, who paid attention to

26:42

this kind of thing, you know,

26:45

not everybody's into learning

26:45

about viruses and vaccines and

26:48

stuff like that, but this was a

26:48

big deal. I'll post some some

26:52

articles and information about

26:52

this on the website, too, so

26:55

that you can follow up and learn

26:55

more, if you want to do that.

26:57

What I also find very

26:57

interesting is that currently,

27:02

if you're following any kind of

27:02

alternative news, maybe even on

27:08

the mainstream, Israel,

27:08

currently is seeing a huge surge

27:13

of COVID cases. Israel was one

27:13

of the first areas of the world

27:18

to very quickly become

27:18

predominantly vaccinated, a

27:22

almost 85% of their population

27:22

is vaccinated, that that

27:27

happened very rapidly. And they

27:27

saw a, a serious, sharp decline

27:35

through like, April, or may or

27:35

whatever. In their numbers,

27:40

their numbers were super high,

27:40

like they were seeing average

27:44

cases, new cases of like 8500 a

27:44

day or something. And after

27:50

everyone got vaccinated, that

27:50

dropped nearly nothing, like

27:53

literally double digits, like

27:53

1620, something like that, very,

27:57

very low. So they they

27:57

celebrated, right, it was like,

28:01

whoo, they got vaccinated, and

28:01

now it's gone. Yay. Well,

28:06

unfortunately, they're seeing a

28:06

resurgence, their daily average,

28:12

rolling average, is now

28:12

surpassing what it was at its

28:18

peak back earlier in the year,

28:18

so, so now they're up to like

28:23

9800 or 9600 a day or something.

28:23

They can't figure this out. So

28:30

that could be down to a couple

28:30

of of things that I can see. One

28:35

is that either the vaccines that

28:35

they were given only last for a

28:41

short period of time, and then

28:41

they just kind of wear off, for

28:45

whatever reason, and people kind

28:45

of, you know, hey, they're

28:47

vaccinated. So they're out there

28:47

doing their thing, and they're

28:50

interacting and whatever, and

28:50

not being as careful because

28:53

they think they're safe, and

28:53

they just are inadvertently

28:56

spreading it. Another thing that

28:56

can could be happening, where

29:03

they are incubating like the

29:03

chickens, the the virus, and

29:10

it's mutating, spreading to both

29:10

vaccinated and unvaccinated

29:15

people. And it's coming back

29:15

stronger, and hitting harder and

29:21

moving faster than the original,

29:21

just like with the chickens. So,

29:26

you know, I'm not saying that is

29:26

what's happening. I'm just

29:28

saying that that to me, based on

29:28

what I know, based on the

29:32

information that I have, based

29:32

on my awareness and what I

29:36

understand. Currently, it makes

29:36

sense that those any of those

29:42

scenarios could be what's

29:42

happening. And that stuff that

29:45

we need to know if we're

29:45

considering taking the shots

29:49

ourselves. Like we need to know

29:49

this, this is kind of important.

29:54

And you know, there there's a

29:54

lot of people out there who are

29:57

just adamant that that getting

29:57

vaccinated is absolutely

30:02

imperative for the benefit of

30:02

all people that they believe

30:07

that that getting this this shot

30:07

or shots is how we're going to

30:12

eradicate the virus. And I'm not

30:12

telling you to not get the shot.

30:16

I wouldn't do that. It's that's

30:16

not my place. I again, I that's,

30:21

I'm just giving you information,

30:21

when I am telling you is that

30:25

doing it for anyone's benefit,

30:25

besides your own is futile

30:30

because we now know that it

30:30

doesn't necessarily prevent

30:34

transmission. And I can say that

30:34

with conviction, because despite

30:39

what the media and a lot of the

30:39

government agencies, the

30:43

companies that are saying the

30:43

companies that manufacture the

30:48

shots are now releasing their

30:48

studies and the reports that go

30:54

along with them, I will cover

30:54

some of that in a little bit.

30:58

And there are all these other

30:58

risks involved,

31:02

which I will also cover, and

31:02

then we have to consider the

31:07

chicken study, you know, what if

31:07

this delta VOD variant, as it's

31:14

being called is, this bit

31:14

essentially the same thing or

31:19

something very similar to what

31:19

happened with the chicken study

31:22

that may cause someone to pause

31:22

before jumping in and getting

31:28

the shot they haven't already.

31:28

So there is a very particular

31:36

definition of what a vaccine is

31:36

in the medical world, and

31:43

science in the scientific world.

31:43

And none of the shots that are

31:48

available at the moment, fit

31:48

that definition. They are not

31:54

true vaccines. And I'm not

31:54

attaching any claims or opinions

31:58

to that statement, I only state

31:58

it because this is what I mean,

32:04

you can look at even the CDC

32:04

website, the FDA website, you

32:10

can go on any of the

32:10

manufacturers websites, and you

32:14

can see how the the shots work.

32:14

And none of those descriptions

32:22

fit the definition of a vaccine.

32:22

Okay, so technically, they

32:28

should not be calling these

32:28

vaccines. I mean, in reality,

32:33

it's an experimental treatment,

32:33

it's an experimental drug that

32:37

is still in clinical trials. And

32:37

that's not a, you know,

32:43

conspiracy theory. It's, it's

32:43

that is what it is, is this drug

32:49

is in clinical trials, we are

32:49

the experiment. And that

32:54

information is out there. But I

32:54

think most people don't

33:00

understand it. They aren't or

33:00

aren't aware of it. And

33:04

certainly the mainstream media

33:04

doesn't talk about that. And

33:09

that, you know, that brings us

33:09

back to the Nuremberg codes, and

33:13

the big lawsuits that are

33:13

happening right now. It's it's

33:17

all surrounding that there's not

33:17

an opportunity, during these

33:23

clinical trials, these

33:23

experiments, for the average

33:28

person to provide the necessary

33:28

informed consent to the

33:34

experiment. Most people are not

33:34

aware that that is their kind of

33:41

just giving that by going and

33:41

volunteering for the shot.

33:43

That's it's kind of written into

33:43

the the waivers that most of us

33:50

probably aren't even reading,

33:50

unfortunately, I think people

33:55

are just they're so in fear and

33:55

so concerned about the effects

34:01

of COVID. There, they're not

34:01

looking at all of the

34:07

information in a critical way. I

34:07

think that a lot of this stuff

34:13

is either overlooked. It's not

34:13

some of it is not readily

34:19

available. I mean, you have to

34:19

dig a little bit, it's out

34:21

there. But you do have to, you

34:21

know, focus and do a little

34:27

digging to find the information

34:27

to be able to connect the dots.

34:32

So I met your service, but but I

34:32

think it's it's really, really

34:37

important that we have this

34:37

information, and that we

34:40

understand it. And you know, one

34:40

of the one of the things that I

34:44

think most people will say is

34:44

Well, hey, know now that the

34:48

Pfizer shot is FDA approved,

34:48

surely it's safe, right? Well,

34:53

hey, FDA approved it? Well, for

34:53

one thing, the FDA approves a

34:56

whole lot of things that aren't

34:56

necessarily safe and that lots

35:00

of other countries don't

35:00

approve, because they're not

35:04

safe. I know if you go back to

35:04

some of the earlier episodes of

35:09

unfriend. In fact the first

35:09

couple of episodes in the

35:13

series, the realities of the

35:13

American diet that I did. That's

35:17

very evident. So in late August,

35:17

back to the FDA approval thing

35:22

in late August, the FDA approved

35:22

the Pfizer shot which is now

35:26

being called the commodity shot

35:26

a commodity brand. They approved

35:31

it for people over the age of 16

35:31

And the claim is that it is 91%

35:37

effective in preventing COVID.

35:37

But there are very serious risks

35:46

that the company itself mentions

35:46

on their website and in the drug

35:53

inserts that you get that come

35:53

with the shot. So the two most

35:58

serious side effects

36:02

from the Pfizer shot are

36:02

myocarditis and pericarditis.

36:07

And what that means is that

36:07

after having the shot, you have

36:16

a risk of your heart and the

36:16

surrounding tissues becoming

36:22

very inflamed. And the American

36:22

Heart, Lung and Blood Institute

36:26

say that myocarditis and

36:26

pericarditis, which can be long

36:30

term effects, by the way, can

36:30

cause heart damage over time,

36:34

they can lead to irregular

36:34

heartbeat, and heart failure.

36:39

The Mayo Clinic also says that

36:39

these can lead to stroke because

36:44

your heart is inflamed, it's not

36:44

pumping the blood properly, and

36:49

the blood can then clot in pool

36:49

and lead to a stroke. Okay, so

36:54

on top of that, the Maderna shot

36:54

has not been FDA approved. And

37:00

it comes with its own set of

37:00

very serious risks, alongside

37:03

showing the same risks to the

37:03

heart that the Pfizer shot

37:08

provides. In addition to that,

37:08

there's also chance of heart

37:15

attack, more immediate heart

37:15

attack cola cystitis, which is a

37:19

gallbladder inflammation, and

37:19

nephrolithiasis, which is kidney

37:24

stones, and reportedly also at

37:24

least one woman has died here in

37:28

this country after her liver

37:28

became severely inflamed after

37:32

receiving the shots. So shortly

37:32

after her second shot, she

37:35

didn't feel well, and it turned

37:35

and she died. And it turned out

37:39

that her liver was extremely

37:39

inflamed, and they quote could

37:43

not rule out the shot as the the

37:43

reason for that occurring. So

37:51

then you have the Johnson and

37:51

Johnson shot. Janssen, as that

37:56

one is, is called, that one I

37:56

think stopped for a while I

38:00

don't know if they restarted

38:00

that one in the US or not, I

38:03

know that it was shut down, at

38:03

least temporarily. Clinical

38:08

trials for that particular

38:08

treatment showed only about a

38:12

60% 6% efficacy rate in

38:12

preventing COVID infection. And

38:16

in addition to the most common

38:16

side effects that the other ones

38:19

also have, it seems that there

38:19

were several 100 episodes of

38:23

fainting, directly after

38:23

receiving the shots. So people

38:28

were just literally passing out.

38:28

And they don't know why. And

38:31

that's very clearly stated in

38:31

the inserts on and on the

38:35

company website. They don't know

38:35

why it happened. But it was

38:39

something that happened with

38:39

this particular shot that was

38:42

unique to this particular shot,

38:42

people would just pass out more

38:45

seriously though, blood clotting

38:45

is a very high risk with this

38:49

particular shot, especially in

38:49

women under the age of 50. And

38:54

there are other brands that have

38:54

been rolled out in other

38:57

countries that are showing very

38:57

similar risks. There are other

39:00

brands here in the US, but we

39:00

just don't hear anything about

39:04

them. They're not big enough,

39:04

they're probably don't have the

39:06

funding. Who knows. But across

39:06

the board, there are very

39:11

serious risks involved with

39:11

getting these shots. In fact,

39:17

according to the statistics,

39:17

there is a much greater risk of

39:23

serious adverse health issues,

39:23

which may be long term or fatal.

39:29

From the shots, then there are

39:29

risks of dying as a direct

39:34

result from getting COVID.

39:34

Again, it's just like, you know,

39:38

I've talked about in episodes

39:38

three and four, where we are

39:41

trading one set of issues for

39:41

other issues and the issues that

39:46

we're trading for seemed to be

39:46

more dangerous than the original

39:50

problem. And you know, you'd

39:50

have to be very naive to not

39:54

know that there's a lot of money

39:54

involved with these drugs. Big

39:59

Pharma is a gigantic money

39:59

machine. And they don't always,

40:06

in my opinion, take into

40:06

consideration or put the benefit

40:12

of human health and well being

40:12

ahead of their profits. Just

40:18

seems to be the way that it is.

40:18

And there is one person who is

40:26

pretty much a household name who

40:26

has a huge vested interest in

40:32

vaccines. And that person is

40:32

Bill Gates, if you recall, it

40:39

came out a little bit early on

40:39

when COVID first came out that

40:44

there had been this this meeting

40:44

and these conversations about

40:48

what would happen if a pandemic

40:48

ever occurred, which was kind of

40:52

weird. But what what that is, it

40:52

was called the it was called the

40:58

event to a one, you can Google

40:58

that they actually have a

41:01

website. So it's not like, you

41:01

know, woowoo stuff. This is

41:05

actually something that this is

41:05

real, it actually happened in

41:09

highly suspect event 201, in my

41:09

opinion, it coincidentally was

41:15

conducted in October of 2019.

41:15

Just before all of this

41:19

happened, it involved Johns

41:19

Hopkins Center for Health,

41:24

security, the World Economic

41:24

Forum, and the Bill and Melinda

41:27

Gates Foundation. And what they

41:27

did was they conducted these

41:31

exercises in October of 2019, in

41:31

New York City, to discuss and

41:36

illustrate how best to respond

41:36

to a severe pandemic, I find

41:41

that worthy of raising an

41:41

eyebrow. But you know, I mean,

41:45

it could be a coincidence. I'm

41:45

not saying it's not, but just

41:49

seems a bit weird to me. And

41:49

that's something to take into

41:52

consideration. You know, I mean,

41:52

if we're looking at a medical

41:55

treatment or injecting ourselves

41:55

with an experimental drug, then

42:00

we have to consider everything

42:00

surrounding the development of

42:06

that drug with a critical mind.

42:06

Right, I mean, do we believe

42:14

that these things are being

42:14

created, really for our benefit?

42:20

Do we believe that the risks are

42:20

worth taking to prevent COVID?

42:26

Do we believe that everything

42:26

that we have endured over the

42:30

last nearly two years has been

42:30

just something that happened?

42:36

And that there's no nefarious

42:36

underlying stuff going on? But

42:45

what if there is? What if there

42:45

is, I mean, it could go both

42:49

ways. I'm not saying one way or

42:49

the other, I'm just saying we

42:51

have to consider that this is a

42:51

possibility. And we need to know

42:55

this, our lives, quite literally

42:55

depend on it. So I think it is a

43:02

naive of any of us to turn and

43:02

look the other way and not give

43:08

very serious consideration to

43:08

the things that we know, that do

43:12

have occurred, or to be

43:12

occurring. And you know, this is

43:16

true when it comes to having

43:16

conversations about masks as

43:19

well. You know, I think the the

43:19

general thought process is that

43:26

we should all wear a mask to

43:26

prevent transmission, just in

43:31

case we are sick to other people

43:31

who may be at risk. Well, what

43:35

we've found, what I've found in

43:35

my research, and looking at the

43:39

studies that have now been done

43:39

is that masks may help decrease

43:44

the spread of COVID. By a very

43:44

marginal amount, that means

43:50

might help. But here's the

43:50

thing, according to the studies,

43:57

and the data that I found, masks

43:57

may be marginally beneficial,

44:02

but only if you use them

44:02

properly. And also take other

44:06

precautions. And that is written

44:06

out very clearly on the websites

44:12

that I looked at. And I will

44:12

post links to those websites,

44:15

they have shown no statistical

44:15

evidence in preventing

44:20

transmission. So what does that

44:20

mean? That means that there

44:23

isn't a large enough amount of

44:23

evidence to show that it's worth

44:28

wearing them to be able to state

44:28

Yes, you should wear a mask,

44:33

it's definitely going to help.

44:33

It's it's not according to the

44:37

studies that have been done.

44:37

Now. You know, a year ago, we

44:40

couldn't say that a year ago. It

44:40

was like, Well, we haven't had

44:43

time to really look at this yet.

44:43

Right? But now we have and now

44:47

we know that you have to use the

44:47

mask properly. And honestly,

44:51

most people don't. I see it

44:51

every day. I mean, you need to

44:54

be keeping them either using

44:54

disposable masks, using one time

44:58

throwing them out and then

44:58

grabbing another one. Right? You

45:02

can't touch them. While you're

45:02

you're wearing them and I don't

45:06

know one single person who never

45:06

touches their mask everybody's.

45:10

If I have to put one on I'm

45:10

constantly fiddling with it

45:13

right? They drive me crazy. If

45:13

you use a reusable, do you have

45:18

to wash it after every use,

45:18

allow it to dry you can't I mean

45:21

there are so many things, so

45:21

many variables and so many

45:26

opportunities to contaminate

45:26

them but just day to day, life

45:31

will will render them far less

45:31

Effective. Now in addition to

45:36

that, it says also that you have

45:36

to take other precautions as

45:40

well. So just wearing a mask

45:40

isn't enough to me, the other

45:45

precautions are the most

45:45

important. So here's where I'm

45:50

going to make some suggestions

45:50

for you for sure whether you

45:53

decide to wear a mask or you

45:53

don't whether you decide to get

45:56

vaccinated or you don't, all of

45:56

these things are things that we

46:00

should all do to be healthy and

46:00

well and maintain a strong

46:03

immune system, which is the best

46:03

way to prevent yourself from

46:07

getting seriously ill with

46:07

COVID. Even if you do get it, it

46:12

won't be so bad. So exercising,

46:12

eating well. getting plenty of

46:16

rest, reducing your stress

46:16

level. spending time outside,

46:21

getting some sunshine, reducing

46:21

your alcohol use if you drink,

46:26

don't smoke. If you do smoke,

46:26

please quit. Please just stop.

46:31

Just stop. It's not that hard.

46:31

It's really not if you tell

46:36

yourself it is that's what's

46:36

making it hard. I've done it. My

46:39

partner did it. I know many many

46:39

many people who've done it I

46:42

haven't smoked in many many

46:42

years. But I did smoke for many

46:45

years. I just suddenly decided I

46:45

didn't want to anymore. I didn't

46:51

want to be a smoker I chose to

46:51

be a nonsmoker didn't want to be

46:54

an ex smoker. Right I wanted to

46:54

be a nonsmoker wanted to

46:58

identify now with someone as

46:58

being someone who was healthy

47:04

and chose not to smoke. So

47:04

anyway, stay away from

47:07

pharmaceuticals as much as

47:07

possible, you know, limit your

47:11

intake of any kind of drug

47:11

recreational drugs stay away

47:14

from those set healthy personal

47:14

boundaries, choose to be

47:18

positive and contribute loving

47:18

energy to the world. I know

47:21

many, many people at this point

47:21

who have been touched by COVID I

47:26

think I might have had it early

47:26

on. I think that in January of

47:29

last year, I'm I'm fairly

47:29

certain that I had myself and a

47:33

couple of close friends had a

47:33

terrible what we thought were

47:37

cold with a terrible cough. And

47:37

I hadn't been sick and years.

47:41

And um, you know, now that I

47:41

know what I know. And I look

47:44

back and I think well, I

47:44

probably had COVID I stand very

47:48

firmly in the belief that

47:48

wearing a mask is a personal

47:53

choice. Getting shots is a

47:53

personal choice, trusting

47:58

information that you receive,

47:58

including everything that I have

48:02

said here today is your choice,

48:02

and 100% I believe that these

48:10

things should remain your

48:10

choice. No one should be forced

48:15

or bullied into wearing a mask

48:15

into getting a shot into

48:21

becoming a recluse. No one, you

48:21

can choose to be in fear, you

48:27

can choose to become your

48:27

healthiest you've ever been. You

48:31

can choose to think I'm a quack.

48:31

You can choose to dig a little

48:36

deeper and learn more that all

48:36

of these things are a choice.

48:40

The beauty of freewill is that

48:40

we can peacefully exercise it

48:44

all the time, if we choose to.

48:44

Choice is a very powerful

48:50

seaward. I believe that we are in the

48:52

midst of a global change and

48:59

immense shift in energy and

48:59

function across the planet. I

49:04

believe it's imperative that we

49:04

allow everyone to make their own

49:08

choices to walk their own paths

49:08

and find their own truth COVID

49:13

Afghanistan, the political

49:13

climate, the natural

49:17

environment, these things are

49:17

all showing us the significance

49:23

of our choices. So choose wisely

49:23

in everything that you do my

49:27

friends, I am passionate about

49:27

bringing information and

49:31

awareness to you so that you can

49:31

do just that. I have faith that

49:36

more and more of us are waking

49:36

up. And we are coming together

49:40

to create a more peaceful

49:40

existence for all of us. And I

49:44

think it's going to get harder

49:44

before it gets easier. But this

49:48

is what empowered humans is all

49:48

about and to everyone listening

49:51

even when all this stuff is scary. when shit gets crazy

49:53

out there. You are not alone.

50:01

None of you. We are a community

50:01

who stick together.

50:05

Change starts here. Everyone

50:05

right here with you and me right

50:10

here. And I love every single

50:10

one of you. I'll see you next

50:15

time. Hey, if you enjoy the

50:15

show, be sure to follow the

50:21

unfinished podcast on Instagram

50:21

and empowered humans Inc on

50:25

Facebook. If you'd like to

50:25

connect with me personally, you

50:28

can also do that Donna Marsh on

50:28

Facebook and on LinkedIn. And

50:32

don't forget to share this

50:32

episode It helps create

50:35

awareness and helps our

50:35

community to grow. You can also

50:38

support the show at buy me a

50:38

coffee.com forward slash

50:42

unfriend JD where you can also

50:42

choose to become a subscribing

50:45

member. Doing so will score

50:45

yourself some cool perks and

50:49

maybe even some merch if you'd

50:49

like to dig a little deeper into

50:53

some of the topics I cover here

50:53

on infringed. I also post links

50:56

and resources on my website

50:56

empowered humans.org And I

51:01

welcome you to drop Comments,

51:01

questions and feedback on social

51:04

media buy me a coffee.com the

51:04

platform where you listen or via

51:08

email to Donna at empowered

51:08

humans.org Thanks for listening