Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Welcome. It is Verdict with Center. Ted
0:03
Cruz ben Ferguson with you, Senator.
0:06
Nice to be with you as always. And
0:08
there is new intel coming out that the Biden
0:10
administration may be welcoming a whole
0:12
lot of refugees from Gaza as
0:15
part of their new plan.
0:16
Well, that's exactly right. There's breaking news
0:18
that the Biden White House is considering allowing
0:20
refugees to come from Gaza, which would
0:22
be an enormous national security
0:25
thread. It makes no sense at all. We're going to
0:27
talk about that and examine what they're talking about.
0:30
We also now have new data
0:32
on the cities that the Biden administration
0:34
is flying illegal immigrants too all
0:36
over the country. We've got numbers and breakdown. We're
0:39
going to get into that. And finally, we're
0:41
going to talk about a new bill that I've introduced. It's
0:43
a bipartisan bill designed to
0:45
limit kids access to social media,
0:47
and in particular to stop young kids from getting
0:49
on social media and to protect kids
0:51
from all the negative influences that can be found
0:53
on social media. We're going to discuss that as well.
0:56
Yeah, I want to talk to you real quick about what's happening
0:59
in is right now. In a way
1:01
that you can help and have a significant
1:04
impact. It's been over six months since that
1:06
first brutal attack by Hamas on
1:09
our brothers and sisters in Israel, and since
1:11
then the attacks on Israel have actually
1:13
increased, with Iran and its proxies
1:16
launching that massive attack of hundreds
1:18
of drones and missiles. That is
1:20
where your help is needed. The International
1:22
Fellowship of Christians and Jews
1:24
is on the ground now addressing
1:26
all the urgent needs, and that's why
1:29
I'm partnering with IFCJ and I
1:31
want you to join me because your life
1:33
saving donation can help provide
1:35
security needs like placing actual
1:38
bomb shelters in communities
1:40
in Israel that need it the most.
1:43
When the sirens go off, people have fifteen
1:46
seconds or less to give to
1:48
safety. IFCJ has helped
1:50
renovate as well as install nearly
1:53
three thousand bomb shelters to date.
1:55
As Israel enter people live with
1:58
the harsh reality of care every day.
2:00
Your support will help address emergency
2:02
security needs such as food and
2:05
utility equipment for bomb shelters, flag
2:07
jackets, and other essentials
2:10
for the people of Israel. So if you want to
2:12
help, this is a way to help, and we're
2:14
asking listeners to get fifty dollars or
2:16
any amount to help provide life saving
2:19
aid. All you have to do is visit
2:21
support if CJ
2:24
dot org. That's one word,
2:26
support IFCJ dot org,
2:29
Support if CJ
2:32
dot org center. Let's talk about
2:34
this plan. And I'm still
2:36
trying to get my head around what the play
2:38
is here politically, except that they're
2:41
trying to signal to young people that are on these college
2:43
campuses, Hey, we're not in favor
2:46
of Israel by any means, stick
2:48
with us. And then while all that's
2:50
going on, they signal that we're going to allow a bunch of
2:52
refugees to come to America.
2:54
Why.
2:55
Look, it is absolutely crazy. The
2:57
White House has put out a
2:59
store. Here's the CBS headline,
3:01
quote, white House considers welcoming
3:04
some Palestinians from war torn Gaza
3:06
as refugees. And what CBS
3:09
reported is quote the Biden administration is
3:11
considering bringing certain Palestinians to
3:13
the US's refugees, a move
3:15
that would offer a permanent safe haven to some
3:17
of those fleeing war torn Gaza, according
3:19
to internal federal government documents obtained
3:22
by CBS News in recent
3:24
weeks, the document show senior US
3:27
officials across several federal agencies
3:29
have discussed the practicality of different
3:31
options to resettle Palestinians
3:34
from Gaza who have immediate family members
3:36
who are American citizens or permanent
3:38
residents. One of those proposals
3:41
involves using the decades old United
3:43
States Refugee Admissions program
3:46
to welcome Palestinians with US
3:48
ties who have managed to escape Gaza and enter
3:51
neighboring Egypt. According to the interagency
3:53
planning documents, top US
3:55
officials have also discussed getting additional
3:57
Palestinians out of Gaza and
4:00
processing them as refugees if they have American
4:02
relatives. The document show the
4:04
plan would require coordination with Egypt, which
4:06
is so far refused to welcome large numbers
4:09
of people from Gaza. So understand
4:12
this, Egypt,
4:14
which is a direct
4:16
neighbor of Gaza, is saying we
4:18
don't want these refugees here. And by the way, the reason
4:20
the refugees don't want the Egyptians
4:23
don't want them there is they're afraid of terrorism.
4:25
They're afraid that there are too many Hamas
4:28
terrorists that are part
4:30
of the so called refugees, and they
4:33
don't want them committing acts of terrorism
4:35
and violence in Egypt, and
4:38
yet the Biden administration is saying,
4:40
well, heck, we'd love to have them here, like
4:43
like this is a
4:45
level of insanity. In the wake
4:48
of October seventh, and the wake of
4:50
this grotesque terror attack
4:52
that murdered twelve hundred Israelis, that murdered
4:55
Americans, that raped women
4:57
and little girls, the reaction of
4:59
the Biden w light house is well, we need
5:01
to welcome more of these folks into America.
5:03
Yeah, And the timing of this is incredibly
5:06
questionable. You look at what the crackdowns
5:09
that were finally seeing on college campuses
5:11
right now, Senator, we're saying hundreds
5:14
that have been arrested, for example Columbia,
5:16
other universities where this is happening as
5:18
well, And the timing seems to be in
5:20
essence perfect, like, hey, we're still
5:22
with you guys. I know you guys are kind
5:24
of getting rid of your encampments and you're getting
5:27
arrested, but just know we
5:29
really are on your side.
5:32
Well, it really is remarkable how
5:34
terrified that the so called
5:36
mainstream Democrats are of ticking
5:39
off the radical left in their party. The
5:42
Democrat Party has a problem right now.
5:44
It has a hard anti Semitism
5:46
problem. There is literally a pro Haamas
5:49
wing of the Democrat Party.
5:52
And we've
5:54
talked about this before. It's not just the
5:56
squad, it's not just the radicals.
5:59
Joe is terrified of
6:01
them. Chuck Schumer is terrified of them.
6:03
Nancy Pelosi is terrified
6:05
of them. And they are really they're
6:08
really setting the agendas. Why Joe
6:11
Biden has so
6:13
so carefully avoided
6:15
speaking out with any clarity
6:18
on the topic because he wants
6:20
he wants the votes of
6:22
the anti Israel, the anti Semitic protesters.
6:25
He's trying to to to get support
6:27
from them, and he
6:30
and the other Democrats view that as a major
6:32
portion of today's Democrat Party.
6:34
What does the oversight look like and
6:36
can they go around Congress completely
6:38
to allow refugees in from
6:41
from guys as specifically, how
6:43
many could this be? How big
6:45
could this program get?
6:47
Well, we don't know the answers to that right now.
6:49
I will tell you in the Senate the
6:51
chances of their being meaningful oversight
6:54
is is really quite low. The
6:58
The White House gave a statement
7:00
to CBS on Tuesday night that
7:03
said the US has quote
7:05
helped more than eighteen hundred American citizens
7:08
and their families leave Gaza, many of whom have
7:10
come to the United States at President
7:12
Biden's direction. We have also helped and will continue
7:15
to help some particularly vulnerable individuals,
7:17
such as children with serious health problems and children
7:20
who are receiving treatment for cancer, get out of harm's
7:22
way and receive care at nearby
7:24
hospitals in the region. The statement
7:26
went on to say that the US quote categorically
7:29
rejects any actions leading to the forced
7:31
relocation of Palestinians from Gaza or
7:33
the West Bank, or the redrawing of
7:35
the borders of Gaza. The best pass forward is
7:37
to achieve a sustainable ceasefire through a
7:39
hostage deal that will stabilize
7:42
the situation and pave the way to a two
7:44
state solution. So the
7:46
White House, remember, these are internal
7:48
documents from the government
7:50
where they're discussing plans. Hey, how
7:52
many refugees can we bring from Gaza
7:55
to America? And you've got US
7:57
officials going back and forth on different programs
7:59
they can used to do that. It's
8:02
not clear who chose to leak those
8:04
documents or what
8:06
their motivation was. The motivation could well
8:08
be what you suggested it could have been a political decision
8:11
by the White House to show
8:13
some love to the pro Hamas
8:16
wing of the Democrat Party, and that
8:18
may well have been part of the motivation. But
8:21
in terms of oversight, look, the sad thing
8:23
is in the Senate. As long as Chuck Schumer is
8:25
the majority leader, he has
8:28
zero interest on oversight on this question.
8:30
The Democrats have zero interest on oversight
8:33
on this question. Remember, just a couple of weeks ago,
8:35
I forced a vote on the Senate floor
8:37
to block the
8:40
Biden administration from giving additional
8:42
billions of dollars to Iran to the
8:44
Ayahtola. And by the way, Iran
8:47
funds ninety percent of a MAAS. So
8:49
it was a very simple amendment, stop giving money
8:51
that goes to Hamas to kill Jews
8:54
and to kill Americans. And
8:58
every single Democrat at
9:00
but one voted no. That's where
9:02
they are so on bringing people
9:05
from Gaza who could be terrorists, who could
9:07
endanger the safety of American citizens
9:09
here. It does not surprise
9:12
me that's what this administration is talking
9:14
about doing, because it's clear that's
9:17
where their sympathies and their loyalties
9:19
lie.
9:19
And the rhetoric's going to be exactly what you described,
9:21
Senator. They're going to say, look, there's
9:24
a lot of people that are innocent, you should be
9:26
compassionate and loving, and those
9:28
that need, you know, for humanitarian
9:30
reasons. But seventy
9:32
two percent of Palatinians believe quote
9:34
that Hamasa's decision to launch
9:36
the October seventh attack was correct,
9:39
which goes back to what you were saying a moment
9:41
ago about other countries in the regions,
9:43
saying we don't want these
9:45
refugees here because we're afraid about terrorism.
9:47
Well, if seventy two percent of Palatinans believe
9:49
that Hamas's decision to launch the attack was
9:52
the right decision, then we have a real concern
9:54
about who may be coming into this country.
9:57
Well, that's exactly right. And by the way, the polling
9:59
your sighting. That's the results
10:02
of the latest polls by the Palestinian Center
10:04
for Policy and Survey Research, and
10:07
it was conducted in the West Bank and the Gaza
10:09
Strip between November twenty second and December
10:12
second of two thousand and three,
10:14
and that period witnessed
10:17
the October seventh launch. So this was
10:20
a little bit over a month after October
10:22
seventh, and I
10:25
got to tell you those numbers seventy
10:28
two percent. The sample size of the poll was twelve
10:30
hundred and thirty one adults, of
10:32
whom seven hundred and fifty were interviewed face
10:34
to face in the West Bank and four hundred and eighty one
10:36
in the Gaza Strip in one hundred and twenty one randomly
10:39
selected locations. And
10:41
so if you look at this, and we also
10:43
know in the Gaza Strip, residents
10:46
were interviewed in twenty four shelter locations,
10:48
of which twenty belonged to UNRA, the
10:50
UN agency that Hamas
10:53
terrorist worked for and
10:55
for to governmental institutions. A total of
10:57
two hundred and fifty interviews were covered in these shelters.
11:00
Is another twenty one were conducted in the homes of relatives
11:02
and friends of displaced people from
11:04
the North and the numbers
11:08
findings indicate that a majority of respondents
11:10
believe that Hamas's decision to carry out the offensive
11:13
is correct and believe
11:15
that the attack came in response to quote,
11:17
settler attacks on the al Asqua
11:20
Mosque and West Bank residents and for the
11:23
release of Palestinian prisoners. Those
11:26
numbers, and it goes on to say the poll
11:28
says it is worth noting that there are significant
11:30
differences between the attitudes of the residents
11:32
of the West Bank compared to the Gaza Strip in terms
11:35
of the correctness of Hamasa's
11:37
decisions, as the attitude of
11:39
Gazans tend to show a greater degree of skepticism
11:42
of that decision. I'll tell you the
11:44
videos I've watched of October seventh,
11:46
when Hamas terrorists are coming back to
11:48
Gaza, and they're coming
11:50
back to Gaza and they're bringing Israeli
11:52
hostages. They're bringing women, they're bringing
11:54
children that are beaten, that are bleeding. Some
11:56
of them have gunshot wounds, some of them have
11:59
have, you know, very very serious
12:01
injuries. They're dragging them out
12:04
of the truck into the truck.
12:06
Uh.
12:06
Some of them have have injuries that are
12:08
consistent with with with violent
12:12
forcible rape. They're they're bleeding,
12:14
uh from from their bleeding
12:18
from where they would being the victims of those
12:20
kinds of attacks. And the
12:22
reactions ben of
12:25
Palestinians and gaza Is. You
12:27
see hundreds of them cheering
12:30
in celebration as they are watching
12:32
these hostages dragged out clearly
12:36
suffering serious abuse. And
12:38
and we're not talking just the Hamas terrorists.
12:40
We're talking just in the town square
12:42
when they come back that the reaction
12:45
is cheering. Who
12:47
the hell in their right mind would say,
12:49
you know, what we really need is
12:52
the people committing these atrocities, the people
12:54
cheering on these atrocities. We need
12:56
them here in America. That sounds like a great
12:58
idea.
12:59
Yeah.
13:00
And then the other question I have for your
13:02
final question on this is we've seen
13:04
this administration be incredibly deceptive
13:06
towards the American people, towards the taxpayers.
13:09
We've seen them fly flights at which we're
13:11
going to talk about in a minute, into
13:13
random cities in America without
13:16
giving notice to those cities. I'm
13:18
assuming if they want to start importing people
13:20
from Gaza, they would use the same exact tactics
13:23
as they've been using all over the country in the middle of
13:25
the night.
13:27
I think that is absolutely right. They would
13:29
do it surreptitiously, they would hide it. That's
13:31
how they've handled this border invasion.
13:34
They lie about it. Alojandro Majorca still
13:36
says our southern border is secure. They're perfectly
13:38
happy to lie about it. And listen.
13:41
From day one, the Biden administration
13:43
has undermined Israel and has sent money
13:47
to people who hate us and people who want
13:49
to kill us. They've sent billions of dollars to Iran,
13:51
They've sent hundreds of millions of dollars to
13:54
Gaza that in turn has an
13:56
almost almost certainly
13:59
flowed to Hamas. And
14:01
they want to continue doing that. That that is
14:03
their commitment, and so I think I
14:06
think this threat is real. These people are zealous.
14:08
These are also people who look at
14:11
the viciously anti Semitic
14:13
protests at Columbia and Yale and NYU
14:15
and UCLA and say, you know what,
14:18
we're with those folks, and we need more people
14:20
like them.
14:22
And it's really.
14:25
I think this is really revealing
14:28
a divide that is frightening and scary,
14:31
and it's not a divide that
14:33
normal people in their normal lives encounter.
14:36
It is the radicals who are more
14:38
and more taking over the Democrat
14:40
Party. And Ben I want to dig
14:42
a little bit more into these poll results because they're
14:44
deeply concerning. So the results of the poll,
14:46
as you noted's seventy two percent of
14:49
the public believe that Hamas's decisions to decision
14:52
to launch the October seventh attack was correct.
14:55
A majority fifty three percent believe
14:57
that Israel's war objective is to destroy
15:00
the Gaza Strip and to kill or expel
15:02
its residents, and forty two percent
15:04
believe it is to take revenge on Hamas and
15:06
the resistance and to destroy them. A
15:09
majority believes Israel will fail to
15:11
achieve these goals. Eighty
15:13
five percent have not seen any videos
15:16
showing atrocities committed by Hamas
15:18
against Israeli citizens. On October seventh
15:21
and over, only seven percent
15:24
say Hamas committed atrocities against
15:26
Israeli civilians. Let me repeat
15:28
that, because that is horrifying.
15:31
They did a poll of Palestinians
15:34
in the Gaza Strip in the West Bank and
15:36
only seven percent will
15:39
admit that Hamas committed atrocities
15:41
against Israeli civilians. So they're
15:44
truthers who are denying October seventh
15:47
even happen. Seventy
15:49
percent seven zero percent of
15:51
West Bankers and half of Gazans
15:54
expect Hamas to emerge victorious.
15:59
That is deeply frightening.
16:01
And the Biden administration is
16:04
talking about wanting to
16:06
bring to America a group of people
16:08
of whom ninety three percent of
16:10
them deny that Hamas
16:13
committed atrocities against civilians, which
16:15
is indisputable. They filmed it and
16:17
put out the videos. They're very proud of it,
16:19
and yet that this
16:21
population is so radicalized
16:24
that they don't believe it's true.
16:26
Yeah, great point there. I want to talk
16:28
to you real quick about your morning routine.
16:31
If you are like me, you start your morning off with
16:33
coffee. The question is how good is your coffee
16:35
and is your coffee woke. There's
16:38
a lot of woke coffee companies out there,
16:40
and if you're like me, I say no more wokeness.
16:42
I'm done with it.
16:43
I'm not giving my money to companies that hate
16:45
my values and fight against me. Well,
16:47
Blackout Coffee is the coffee I'm drinking
16:50
now every morning I'm on the radio seven
16:52
am. I've got to be up, I've got to be awake,
16:54
I've got to be alert, and I'm not going to
16:56
start my day off with an average or bad cup
16:58
of coffee. I want a premium cup of coffee
17:01
and that's what I get every single
17:03
morning from Blackout Coffee. I
17:05
want you to try Blackout Coffee, not just
17:07
because they're one hundred percent committed to conservative
17:09
values from the sourcing of the beans
17:12
to the roasting process, as well as their
17:14
customer support and shipping. They
17:16
embody the true American values
17:19
that we all love and hold dear. And
17:21
they accept no compromise, which
17:23
is the part I really love on taste and or
17:25
quality. I want you to try it, and
17:28
I'm going to save you twenty percent off
17:30
your first order. Right now,
17:33
go to Blackoutcoffee dot com slash
17:35
vertict. Use the coupon code verdict
17:38
for twenty percent off your first order. Now, if you
17:40
love traditional coffee, you're
17:42
going to be great. But if you like flavor coffee,
17:45
oh my gosh, they have got some
17:47
amazing flavor coffee,
17:49
including a cinnamon coffee that's just phenomenal.
17:52
You travel check out their instant
17:54
coffee. I travel with it. It is
17:56
also top notch. So upgrade
17:59
your coffee and get rid of the woke agenda
18:01
of many coffee companies. Blackoutcoffee
18:04
dot com slash verdict. That's
18:06
Blackoutcoffee dot com slash verdict. Can
18:08
use the coupon code vertict for twenty percent
18:10
off your first
18:13
order.
18:13
Be awake, not woke.
18:14
That's Blackoutcoffee dot com slash verdict.
18:17
Senator, I want to pivot to something we just
18:19
mentioned a moment ago, and that was, there's
18:23
real consensus and the polling data
18:25
that Biden's border policy and
18:27
specifically when it comes to safety
18:29
and national security issues, is
18:31
disastrous. But we're learning now
18:34
more about internal
18:36
Department of Homeland Security data revealing
18:38
the forty five plus US cities
18:41
that hundreds of thousands
18:43
of migrants have flown into via
18:46
the Biden administration's per mass
18:49
parole program that they refused
18:51
to disclose the public where all
18:54
of these illegal immigrants are being dropped
18:56
off, and you apparently have no right
18:58
to know who they are or even where
19:00
they're coming from.
19:01
Well, that's exactly right, Ben, and we did a
19:03
pod on this topic when when
19:05
the story first broke about the Biden administration's
19:08
program that wasn't just dealing
19:10
with illegal immigrants who crossed the border and
19:12
stream across our southern border, but actually
19:14
was arranging flights to come
19:17
in for illegal immigrants to come into cities
19:19
all across the country. And at the time, the Biden administration's
19:21
position was, we're not going to tell
19:23
you where they're coming. We can't tell you because
19:26
it's a national security risk, and so they
19:28
refused to tell us. Well, we now have data
19:31
from DHS that
19:33
that covers an eight month period, so it is
19:36
from January through August of twenty
19:38
twenty three, and there are
19:40
about two hundred thousand illegal immigrants
19:42
who flew into the US using the program.
19:45
And we have the breakdown.
19:47
Let me give you the top fifteen cities and how many
19:49
came. The number one city the Biden administration
19:51
flew people illegal immigrants into was
19:53
Miami, Florida ninety
19:55
one, eight hundred and twenty one. The
19:58
number two city, Fort Lawerdale,
20:00
Florida, sixty thousand,
20:02
four hundred and sixty one. The
20:05
number three city, New York City fourteen
20:07
thousand, eight hundred and twenty seven. Number four
20:10
You're in my hometown Houston, Texas
20:12
seven thousand, nine hundred and twenty three. Number
20:14
five Orlando, Florida six
20:17
thousand and forty three, Number six
20:19
Los Angeles, California three thousand,
20:21
two hundred and seventy one. Number seven Tampa,
20:23
Florida three thousand, two hundred
20:25
and thirty seven. Number eight Dallas,
20:27
Texas two thousand, two hundred and fifty six.
20:30
Number nine San Francisco, California
20:32
two thousand and fifty two, Number ten Atlanta,
20:35
Georgia one thousand, seven hundred
20:37
ninety six, Number eleven, Newark,
20:39
New Jersey, one thousand, four hundred
20:41
ninety eight, Number twelve, Washington,
20:43
d C. One thousand, four hundred and seventy two,
20:45
Number thirteen, Chicago, Illinois,
20:48
four hundred and ninety seven, Number fourteen,
20:50
Las Vegas, Nevada, four hundred eighty three,
20:53
and number fifteen. Rounding out the top fifteen
20:56
Austin, Texas with one hundred
20:58
and seventy one. And so
21:00
those are now what's striking. They're
21:03
sending the vast majority of the illegal
21:05
immigrants in this program to Florida and Texas.
21:07
Florida is getting hammered. Just
21:10
Miami and Fort Lauderdale have over one hundred
21:12
and fifty thousand that are
21:14
going there. And actually blue cities and blue
21:16
states get relatively few, so
21:19
they're really hammering Florida
21:22
and Texas. That's one
21:24
obvious conclusion of this. A
21:27
second conclusion, Look,
21:31
the White House is trying to spend well, no,
21:33
no, these are not illegal immigrants because we're
21:35
letting them in using legal authorities. Well,
21:37
I can tell you that that in
21:39
litigation. Here's what DHS
21:42
wrote in response
21:44
to a subpoena quote. DHS said all
21:47
individuals paroled into the United States
21:49
are by definition inadmissible,
21:51
including those paroled under the CHNV
21:54
processes, which is what this program
21:56
is. And to give you
21:59
a sense of the
22:01
numbers on this program,
22:04
CBP says at least four hundred
22:06
and four thousand illegal immigrants have flown to the
22:08
US using this program, and the
22:10
breakdown we know of one hundred
22:13
and fifty four thousand Haitians, ninety
22:16
five thousand Venezuelans, eighty
22:19
four thousand Cubans, and sixty
22:21
nine thousand Nicaraguans.
22:24
This is again the reason why
22:27
they were trying to hide this. It's also the
22:29
reason why they have not been informing
22:31
state we're talking about governors or
22:34
local municipalities of who they're bringing
22:36
in, because they knew there would probably be a
22:39
lot of people that would say, no, we don't want
22:41
to deal with this, No, please don't drop them off
22:43
here.
22:45
Well, that's right, and it's interesting also,
22:47
So the number three city was New York City, and
22:49
then the number again was fourteen, eight hundred
22:51
and twenty seven, so it was a lot less than went to Miami
22:53
or Fort Lauderdale. What's interesting,
22:55
though, is is we know that the
22:58
mayor of New York, a liberal Democrat who
23:00
has declared at a crisis, said it's an emergency,
23:02
said illegal immigration is destroying
23:05
New York City. He has blamed
23:08
what he called that madman from
23:10
Texas, and as we've
23:12
talked about, I'm actually
23:14
disappointed that he's talking about Greg Abbott, not
23:16
me. I wonder what I have to do to qualify
23:20
for that insult from the mayor of New York City.
23:23
But Texas has sent to New York
23:25
City roughly ten thousand illegal immigrants.
23:27
So if he's blaming that
23:30
mad man, well, Joe Biden has sent
23:32
fourteen, eight hundred and twenty seven and that's
23:34
just using this one program that doesn't measure
23:37
the other thousands that Biden has sent
23:39
that crossed the border illegally on the southern border,
23:41
and that Biden put on a bus or a plane. But
23:44
yet the Democrat mayor of New York can't actually
23:46
blame the person responsible, which
23:48
is Biden and for that matter, Chuck Schumer
23:50
and every other Democrat in Congress.
23:52
Will this change that moved the needle
23:54
at all? Do you think?
23:55
Because we know where may Adams has now been
23:57
saying, and we know about even in places like
24:00
Colorado where they're having to get rid
24:02
of people in law enforcement for goodness sakes,
24:04
and letting people go in New York to cover
24:07
for the cost that it is to take care
24:09
of all of these illegal immigrants. At
24:12
least seeing the disclosures and the
24:14
number of people involved, could this move
24:16
the needle a little bit?
24:18
Well, ask yourself this, how
24:20
many of the home newspapers where this data
24:23
were reported actually covered
24:25
it, How many of them covered it on the front page, How many
24:27
of them had a headline. I feel confident
24:30
that the New York Times in New York City does
24:32
not have a headline Biden administration
24:35
flew fourteen, eight hundred and twenty seven
24:37
illegal immigrants to New York City that I
24:39
would be surprised if you can read it anywhere
24:43
in the New York Times, and if you look at
24:45
newspaper by newspaper. I certainly
24:47
haven't read it in the Chronicle and Houston, Houston was
24:49
number four. It may have been covered to the Chronicle.
24:52
I haven't searched it. But but you
24:54
know, the media doesn't want to cover these numbers.
24:57
You know that Democrats don't want to admit
24:59
these numbers, and so their plan is going to be
25:01
the same as their plan consistently has been,
25:03
which is, ignore the crisis, pretend it's
25:06
not happened, count on the silence and
25:08
complicity of the media to cover
25:10
this up. Because I got to say, if
25:12
you live in any of those fifteen cities, you
25:15
ought to be pissed off. And by the
25:17
way, you know, I gave the numbers
25:20
of the biggest group that has been flown in
25:22
our Haitians, and it was at least
25:24
one hundred and fifty four thousand Haitians. We've
25:26
talked about. One of those Haitians
25:28
was flown to Boston, Massachusetts, and he
25:31
was just recently arrested for
25:33
raping a fifteen year old girl who
25:36
was severely mentally handicapped.
25:39
And I got to say, if you're the parents of that
25:41
girl, and the Biden administration
25:44
literally flew the rapist
25:46
from Haiti to Boston
25:48
and then released him where
25:50
he attacked your daughter, I
25:53
can't imagine the frustration
25:56
at the utter insanity of that policy.
26:00
A couple of years ago, I hit forty,
26:02
and my, oh my, is after forty
26:05
different than before forty. The
26:07
problem is men's testosterrum levels
26:09
are off a cliff historically, and in fact
26:11
they're at an all time low. And it
26:13
isn't just that it's
26:16
an all time low. It's that many people
26:18
are like, all right, I don't want to give
26:20
up having a blast by playing sports.
26:22
I don't want to feel tired and fatigued
26:24
every day at around ten
26:27
thirty or eleven. When you have kids,
26:29
as you know, you're even more tired.
26:31
Well, that is exactly why I want you to know
26:33
about the patriots at Chalk Choq.
26:36
They are helping real American men just
26:39
like you and I take back our right to
26:41
proudly maximize our masculinity by
26:43
boosting testosterum levels up to twenty
26:46
percent over ninety days
26:48
now. I've been taking the Chalk Male Vitality
26:50
Stack for over a year now, and I can tell
26:53
you plain and simple it works.
26:55
It's manufactured right here in the US of A. Chalk's
26:58
natural herbal supplements are clinically
27:00
proven to have game changing effects
27:03
on your energy, your focus,
27:06
and your mood. So maximize
27:08
you're masculine today by going to Chalk Choq
27:11
dot com.
27:12
And if you use the.
27:13
Code vertict, you're going to get a massive
27:15
discount on any subscription for
27:17
life. Now, why do they call it a subscription?
27:20
It's very simple because then they send
27:22
your supplements every month automatic.
27:25
But you don't have to worry because you
27:27
can cancel at any time.
27:30
It's just to make it more convenient so you
27:32
don't forget. So go to chalk choq
27:35
dot com, don't forget. Use
27:37
the promo code vertict for a massive discount
27:39
on any subscription. Subscriptions
27:41
are cancelable at any time choq
27:45
dot com. That's choq dot com
27:48
promo code vertict for a lifetime
27:50
saving on any subscription limited
27:52
time offer. Finally, Senator, I want to
27:54
get into something else. It's a very
27:56
important piece of legislation that you're
27:58
working on, and I have actually
28:01
seen a little bit of this be talked about
28:03
on social There are some people that
28:05
don't actually think they understand the intent
28:08
of what we're trying to accomplish when it comes
28:10
to protecting kids on social
28:12
media. So explain why this
28:14
legislation is something that parents really
28:17
need to know about.
28:18
Well, this is legislation I introduced this
28:21
week, and it's bipartisan legislation.
28:23
I teamed up with Brian Shotts, who's a Democrat
28:25
from Hawaii, and the bill
28:27
is called the Kids Off Social Media Act, and
28:29
it does several things Number
28:31
one, it prohibits children under
28:33
thirteen from accessing
28:36
social media. So kids, there's no reason
28:38
for an eight or nine year old to be on TikTok
28:41
or to be on social media. And there
28:43
are a lot of harmful things, I'll
28:45
tell you. Listen, you and I are both parents,
28:47
and any parent who is dealing
28:49
with I'm dealing with teenagers. Your kids are not teenagers
28:52
yet, but but if you blink, they will be. Any
28:56
parent dealing with teenagers or adolescents
29:00
out to deal with phones and social
29:02
media is one of the greatest challenges
29:05
because phones are really a portal for kids
29:07
to access all sorts of harmful content.
29:11
And so this bill says if you're under thirteen,
29:13
you can't be on social media. And then it says
29:15
for kids younger than seventeen, big
29:18
tech companies are prohibited from
29:21
using algorithmic boosting
29:24
to send messages to them. So we know
29:26
right now, there's been a lot of testimony in the Senate that
29:28
big tech companies send messages
29:31
to our kids, to our teenagers that
29:33
are really harmful. They send
29:35
messages that undermine their body image,
29:37
they send messages that encourage self
29:39
harm, they send messaging that increases
29:42
suicidal ideation, they send
29:44
messaging that increases
29:48
increases their feelings of depression and
29:50
anxiety. They send messages encouraging
29:53
dangerous behavior. They send messaging
29:55
pushing radical beliefs, things like Prohamas
29:58
beliefs. And so this bill says as if you're
30:00
under seventeen, big tech cannot
30:03
target using algorithm
30:05
boosting to send messages that
30:08
are addicting and that are harmful.
30:11
And then the bill also includes a
30:13
separate bill that I had introduced previously,
30:16
and I introduced it with John Fetterman. It was also
30:18
bipartisan, and my
30:20
separate bill was called the Eyes on the Board
30:22
Bill, and the Eyes on the Board Bill,
30:24
which is now part of this bill, says
30:28
that any school that receives federal
30:30
funds has
30:32
to block social media on campus.
30:34
And the basic idea is, while our kids are in school,
30:37
they ought to be listening to teacher, They ought to be doing school
30:39
work. They don't need to be posting on Instagram
30:42
while they're in school. For
30:44
older kids, they can do that when they get home,
30:46
but at school they ought to be focused on the school
30:48
work.
30:49
Yeah, they should be. And this is legislation
30:51
that you mention is bipartisan. Here what
30:54
does it look like the chances of this moving
30:56
forward since it is a bipartisan piece of
30:58
legislation.
31:00
So I'm actually quite optimistic. We
31:03
are likely to have a markup in the Senate
31:05
Commerce Committee next week. I'm the ranking
31:07
member, the senior Republican on the Commerce Committee,
31:10
and I think it is very likely
31:12
to pass the Commerce Committee with overwhelming
31:15
bipartisan support. I think there's a good chance it'll
31:17
pass unanimously, and
31:19
I think there is a good prospect of this bill
31:21
being passed into law. There are two other bills
31:24
called Coosa and Kappa, that are both
31:26
dealing with things like online predators
31:28
targeting kids, and I think there's
31:30
a real possibility of all three of these bills
31:33
being put together and brought to
31:35
the Senate floor, and I'm hopeful we can pass all
31:37
three of them.
31:38
We'll keep you updated on it.
31:39
It's so important, especially preventing children
31:41
under thirteen from having access
31:43
these social media sites and also,
31:45
as you mentioned, programming those algorithms for teens
31:48
younger than seventeen.
31:50
This is really important.
31:52
Job well done, and we'll keep everybody updated
31:54
on how this looks moving forward.
31:57
Well, that's right, and you look, I'll say something
31:59
also as apparent. I mean, I mean, these are hard
32:01
issues. And one of the things I talk to a lot of
32:03
parents, I don't know a parent who disagrees on
32:05
this issue. And that's true, right
32:07
or left, that's true regardless of politics.
32:10
We're all worried about our kids. I mean, it's really
32:12
it's hard to be a teenager right now. The
32:14
pressures on our kids. You and I
32:17
didn't have these kind of pressures when we were teenagers.
32:19
It's really tough.
32:20
Is what is.
32:23
All of the influences that are pounding our
32:25
kids. And it's hard to be a parent right now. And one of
32:27
the challenges because some people say,
32:29
well, parents ought to just restrict this. Look,
32:31
it is a hard dynamic when your kid
32:34
when every student in their class
32:37
is on the social media platform, when
32:40
that's how the kids communicate, when that's
32:42
how they schedule playdates, when that's how they interact.
32:45
No parent wants to
32:47
socially ostracize their kids.
32:49
And so a lot of parents will talk to each
32:51
other and say, I wish they were all off of
32:53
it, but I'm not willing to have my
32:55
kid the only one that's not able to interact
32:58
with their peers and have a social life, and that's one
33:00
of the reasons why, you know, it's interesting
33:02
in the Senate the folks that are coming together and supporting
33:04
this bill. So myself and
33:07
Brian Shots and we've all also
33:09
got Katie Britt. We're all
33:11
about the same age. We're all in our forties or
33:13
fifties, we all have kids the same age. I have
33:15
to say the senators that they're in their seventies or
33:17
eighties, they don't quite get
33:19
this issue in the same way that if you're a
33:22
parent, you're dealing with it.
33:23
And so I'm.
33:24
Hopeful that that that we'll see
33:26
some real bipartisan agreement that we
33:28
ought to enhance the tools
33:31
parents have to keep their kids safe.
33:33
Yeah, great point.
33:34
We're going to keep you updated on this legislation
33:36
as it moves forward.
33:37
Don't forget.
33:38
We do this show Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and a
33:40
week in review on Saturdays.
33:42
Hit that subscribe, follow
33:45
or auto download button wherever you're listening to this podcast
33:47
so you do not miss a episode.
33:49
Also, on those in between days, download
33:51
my podcast, The Ben Ferguson Podcasts,
33:53
and I will keep you updated on the latest
33:55
breaking news that is happening
33:58
on those in between days and the Center and I I will see
34:00
you back here on Saturday
34:02
for a weekend review.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More