0:01

Welcome to Verdict with Ted Cruz

0:03

and part two of our three part

0:05

series with James Comer talking

0:07

about all of the financial crimes

0:10

that the Biden crime family is now

0:12

being accused of. They are on defense

0:15

and the big question now is will Hunter

0:17

Biden be forced to answer questions

0:19

under oath? And how much trouble is he

0:21

now put the president in, especially

0:24

in light of a re election campaign. It

0:26

is part two. Make sure if you miss part

0:29

one you go back and listen. But here

0:31

is what James Comer had to say about

0:33

the financial crimes being committed.

0:36

All right, So, how many phone calls do we know

0:38

about between Joe Biden

0:40

and various international business associates

0:43

of Hunter, And how many meetings do we know

0:45

about between Joe Biden and various international

0:48

associates of Hunter.

0:49

Well, Devin Archer, in his transcribed

0:52

interview, testified that there

0:54

were at least twenty, now at

0:56

least twenty, could be anywhere

0:58

from twenty to one hundred, but he said at

1:00

least twenty. And now we

1:02

know that Joe had lunch

1:05

with some of these people.

1:05

We didn't know we had.

1:07

Lunch with the Russian oligarch

1:09

who had sent Hunter Biden three and a half

1:12

million dollars while Joe Biden was

1:14

vice president, the same Russian oligarch

1:16

who when Joe Biden became president, was

1:19

the one oligarch he left off the sanctions

1:21

list when Russia invaded Ukraine.

1:24

So okay, just a lot.

1:25

Of them say that again because I think it's

1:27

important for our listeners and

1:29

our viewers. The

1:31

Democrats, the White House, the corporate

1:33

media, they all say there's no evidence of coruption,

1:36

no evidence corruption, and no evidence of Joe Biden's

1:38

corruption. Just say what you just said

1:40

again, because that is

1:43

completely contrary to the talking points

1:45

on the other side.

1:47

One of the things we found out when we interviewed

1:50

Devin Archer was that Joe

1:52

Biden actually had

1:54

lunch with the

1:58

female oligarch from Russia,

2:00

the former mayor of Moscow's wife,

2:03

the wealthiest lady in Russia.

2:06

She had sent Hunter Biden three

2:08

and a half million dollars while Joe Biden

2:10

was vice president, and we have no

2:12

idea what the Bidens did to

2:15

receive the three and a half million dollars. That's one of the questions

2:17

we would ask Hunter Biden in

2:19

his deposition. So we didn't

2:22

know Joe Biden acts like he had never met her,

2:24

but Archer said, yeah, they had. They had a very

2:26

long lunch or dinner, like

2:29

like several hours.

2:30

Do we know where they are, Unner, do we know that?

2:33

I think it was Cafe Milano, but I'm not

2:36

one hundred percent certain. And

2:38

when Joe Biden became president, and

2:41

when Russia invaded Ukraine, he

2:44

announced sanctions against all

2:46

the oligarchs in Russia

2:48

except one, the lady

2:51

who had sent Hunter Biden three and a half million

2:53

dollars.

2:53

And in the updated because they've updated

2:55

these sanctions throughout this war with Ukraine,

2:58

have they ever then asked added her name

3:01

to that list, because several times they've

3:03

updated and added new people to that list, or

3:05

has she been protected to date by

3:08

the Biden crime family.

3:10

She's been protected today.

3:12

So look, there's an important thing to underscore.

3:14

And we've talked about this at length on Verdict.

3:16

Bribery, as everyone knows who listens

3:19

to this pod, requires

3:21

a quid pro quo Latin for this

3:24

for that. And so you need this

3:26

the payment, the benefit, and

3:28

you need it in exchange for that. And

3:30

that is typically a government either

3:33

an affirmative failure or declining

3:36

to do something that because

3:39

of the payment, in this instance three

3:41

and a half million dollars from a Russian

3:44

oligarch to Hunter and again,

3:47

and James jump in if anything I'm saying

3:49

is wrong, But there's no

3:51

indication Hunter did anything of value,

3:53

has any expertise in anything relating to Russia,

3:56

has any services, has any skills

3:58

performed, did anything that someone

4:00

would pay three and a half million dollars for. We

4:03

do know that along with

4:05

the payment, this Russian oligarch has

4:10

lunch or dinner with Joe Biden

4:12

while he is vice president, So that

4:14

is directness, direct

4:16

access, direct conversation to Joe,

4:19

Hey, you know I'm giving your son three and a half million

4:21

dollars. You know, we don't know he said that, but

4:24

it'd be kind of weird in the conversation that

4:28

if either she or Hunter didn't tell

4:30

Daddy, Hey, this is the person that gave me three

4:32

and a half million dollars. Particularly

4:34

if this is not proven.

4:37

Although we know the laptop makes reference

4:39

with regard to China to ten percent

4:41

for the big guy, and to the

4:43

extent that there is a pattern of Joe

4:46

profiting directly off of Hunter's

4:48

revenue, he would have a real

4:51

reason to care about the three and a half million. But

4:53

the thing that is new that is connected here

4:56

is that when Joe becomes president and he puts

4:58

in sanctions on Russian oligarchs,

5:01

the one person that is miraculously

5:03

left off is

5:06

the oligarch that gave Hunter three

5:08

and a half million dollars. So that's a second

5:10

example of a quo. We've talked

5:13

quite a bit about the firing of Victor Chokin.

5:15

Victor chokn was the Ukrainian prosecutor

5:18

who was investigating Barisma. The

5:20

oligarch that owned Borisma paid

5:22

Hunter a million dollars a year, and Joe

5:24

Biden got him fired. That's a quo that

5:27

would, I believe, support

5:30

a bribery claim. This is a second

5:32

quo that could support a bribery

5:35

claim, which is not listing

5:37

someone for sanctions who otherwise should

5:39

be listed, and who would have been listed, but

5:42

for the payment to your family

5:44

member. That qualifies as bribery

5:46

as well. Is what I'm saying.

5:48

Accurate, it's accurate.

5:50

I wish you were on the oversight committee to help

5:52

me with all that, Senator.

5:55

New Year's is coming, and you don't have to

5:57

wait until New Year's to get on with your

5:59

New year's resolutions. Yeah, you can get

6:01

a head start. Why wait till January

6:04

the first, when right now you

6:06

can do what I and many others

6:08

did this last year. Boost your testost

6:11

from levels up to twenty percent

6:13

over ninety days with the Male

6:15

Vitality Stack from our friends at

6:17

Chalk. Now, the patriots at Chalk are here

6:19

are helping real men just like you, take

6:22

back your right to proudly

6:24

maximize your masculinity by boosting

6:26

Testostrom levels up to twenty percent over

6:28

ninety days. So get rid of

6:30

that weakness and complacency. Maybe you

6:32

want to work out, maybe you want to go running, maybe

6:34

you want to play sports, and you just feel

6:37

like you're not yourself anymore, Well you

6:39

can fix that with a Male Vitality

6:41

Stack manufactured right

6:43

here in the US of eight. Chalk's natural herbal

6:45

supplements are clinically proven

6:48

to have game changing effects on your energy,

6:50

your focus, your mood. So

6:53

check them out. Go to chalkcchoq

6:55

dot com. That's choq

6:58

dot com. Use promo code Ben You'll

7:00

get thirty five percent off

7:03

for life at chalkschoq

7:05

dot com. Plus they will deliver on a schedule,

7:07

so you never have to worry about

7:10

not having that mal vitality stack when you need

7:12

it. Choq dot com that's cchoq

7:15

dot com promo cood been for thirty

7:17

five percent off. I

7:20

have a question for both of you, and I

7:22

go back to when I was on the Bush campaign,

7:25

even as someone younger, there was

7:27

a very clear warning that was given to us,

7:30

and it was explicit, be careful

7:32

who you meet with. Be careful

7:34

about any meeting on the clock or off

7:36

the clock with anybody that could be nefarious.

7:39

And I remember that meeting because

7:41

it was such a important line.

7:43

Here is there any

7:46

reason and I want to know more about

7:48

the background of this of this oligarch

7:51

and this woman, richest woman in Russia

7:54

connected directly to Vladimir Putin.

7:56

You don't get the job as the mayor of Moscow without Vladimir

7:58

Putin's explicit picking you and

8:01

consent and being in that world.

8:04

Would this be a meeting that our US

8:06

government would have warned against, like

8:08

you don't meet with this type of person.

8:11

You certainly don't do business with this type

8:13

of person. You don't take three and a half million from

8:15

this type of person. I mean, would that not be

8:17

some sort of conversation that would have happened.

8:20

Of course, Listen, this is freaking

8:22

weird. This is weird.

8:24

This is not something that, oh,

8:26

this is typical what people in government do.

8:28

You don't run around having

8:30

dinner with Russian oligarchs. That that is

8:33

a strange thing to do. I don't

8:35

know anyone else in government. I don't know anyone else

8:37

in the Senate. I don't know anyone else in the House who

8:39

does that. I don't know anyone else.

8:41

Getting millions of dollars from

8:44

foreign countries. It's freaking weird. James,

8:47

I'm gonna go out on a limb. Have you

8:49

received millions of dollars from any foreign country?

8:52

No?

8:52

But I keep expecting the associated priss

8:54

or Washington boast.

8:55

To write that, But no, I have done.

8:57

Look the closest I've

8:59

come is I got changed once at a Chinese

9:01

restaurant for dinner. Like that

9:04

is nuts, who the hell?

9:06

But like it is weird? I mean, I mean,

9:08

look, you know your four hundred and thirty

9:11

four colleagues. I know my nine and nine colleagues to the best

9:13

of my knowledge, none of them

9:16

none other than Bob Benendez, who is under indictment.

9:18

So let me set him aside because he's under indictment

9:21

for this. That's actually

9:23

a pretty powerful point. The only person

9:26

I know who did something

9:28

like this is currently being prosecuted

9:30

for receiving brides because Bob

9:33

Menendez, it is alleged, did government

9:35

favors for Egypt, was paid tens of thousands

9:38

of dollars, was paid in gold bars, and

9:40

they're trying to put him in jail. Well,

9:42

where is the indictment for Joe

9:45

Biden? Because it's Joe Biden that's

9:48

performing the government favors, And the

9:51

closest analog I can find

9:53

to someone who has done conduct similar

9:56

to what Joe Biden did, although not as

9:59

brazen, not as large

10:01

scale, not as lucrative, not involving

10:04

as many countries, the closest

10:06

analogy is Bob Menendez to Joe Biden.

10:08

And if they're indicting Bob Menendez, why

10:11

on earth are they not indicting Joe,

10:13

And why are they not indicting Hunter for

10:15

bribery? I get the tax claims,

10:18

but we've talked at length

10:20

about this. At the

10:22

end of the day, this is not about Hunter

10:25

Biden. If his name was Hunter Smith

10:28

and he was some corrupt, messed

10:30

up guy with substance abuse problems,

10:32

none of us would be talking about it. He would be prosecuted,

10:35

he'd face consequences. But it's

10:37

not his life. It's not

10:39

his personal demons that matter. It

10:42

is when you have the Vice

10:44

president of the United States and then the President of the

10:46

United States selling official

10:49

favors in a corrupt way to foreign

10:51

oligarchs. There is a reason

10:54

the Constitution specifies

10:57

bribery as a ground

10:59

for impeachments.

11:01

I agree.

11:02

Well, one of the things that I wanted to get

11:04

in here on the on the tax crimes that he was

11:06

indicted on, that's from

11:08

his W two from

11:10

Baristma, so that that's like the most

11:13

obvious thing. He he got a W

11:15

two from Barisma, and whether he was supposed

11:17

to be on the board

11:20

or not, whether it was ethical or not, it

11:22

wasn't illegal firm to be on the board. He gets

11:24

a W two, which that's on the up

11:26

and up. He just didn't pay

11:28

taxes on it. He failed to pay taxes

11:30

on the millions of dollars he got from Barriskma

11:33

that's listed on his W two. What

11:35

he's never been pressed

11:38

on are these millions

11:40

of dollars in loans and

11:43

all these fake ride offs that he had in

11:45

these show companies. I mean, he probably

11:47

owes six or seven million

11:50

more dollars that he hasn't been prosecuted

11:52

on yet.

11:55

The most obvious James.

11:57

Tell us about the fake write offs

11:59

because because that's something it doesn't get discussed much.

12:02

Yeah, well, you know, so in these shell

12:04

companies, so he would wire you

12:06

know, say you got a.

12:06

Five million dollar wires, then he would wire

12:09

different you.

12:09

Know, maybe five

12:12

million dollar wires to five different shell

12:14

companies, and then he would

12:16

take half that money and wire it

12:18

to various Biden family members. You keep the

12:20

other half in the shell. And he

12:23

would pay for basic living expenses,

12:25

and he would pay for things like prostitutes

12:27

and drugs, and he would right them off

12:30

as a business deduction.

12:32

So at the end of the day, he did.

12:35

Prostitutes and drugs were business deductions

12:37

for Hunter Biden.

12:38

Yes, that was that was part of the indictment

12:41

in California. That was one of the things.

12:43

He joined a sex club in

12:45

California and paid for it

12:47

out of a shell company that he claimed was his law

12:49

firm Aasco. Now think about

12:52

this, his law firm was

12:54

paying his sex club membership, and

12:56

on his taxes he put down

12:58

that it was a golf Cotry club membership

13:01

so he could ride it off.

13:03

You know, Ben, I feel bad when I was at a law firm,

13:05

they didn't pay for my parking. Yeah, I

13:07

apparently need one hell of a bonus structure

13:09

over there. Fundamentally

13:11

differently, one hell of a write

13:14

off there.

13:16

For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile

13:18

has been America's only Christian conservative

13:21

wireless provider. They stand

13:23

behind their values and they stand behind

13:26

exceptional service. They're an

13:28

example of putting the cause a head of

13:30

profit, and that is why I am

13:32

proud to partner with him. Starting

13:34

today, Patriot Mobile is extending their Black

13:36

Friday deal with the Every Friday

13:38

Matters deal, and you can

13:41

get a free smartphone

13:43

when you switch today. Patriot Mobile

13:45

offers dependable nationwide coverage,

13:47

giving you access to all three

13:50

major networks, which means you get

13:52

the same coverage you've been accustomed to without

13:55

funding the radical left. Now,

13:57

when you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're supporting

14:00

free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity

14:02

of life, are veterans and first responders,

14:05

and more than just that, they are

14:07

actually a one hundred percent US based

14:09

company with customer service teams that

14:12

make switching easy, so you

14:14

can keep your same number you have right now,

14:16

you can keep your existing phone, or

14:19

for a limited time, get a free smartphone

14:21

from Patriot Mobile. Go to Patriot

14:23

Mobile dot com slash ferguson

14:25

or call them ninety seven to two Patriot use

14:28

the promo code Friday seven to six.

14:31

That's Friday seven to six. Again,

14:33

get a free smartphone with promo code Friday

14:35

seven to six. That's the limited time offer.

14:37

Join me make the switch today at Patriot

14:40

Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's

14:42

Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson

14:44

or nine to seven to two Patriot. Go

14:47

back to Joe Biden for a second, and I

14:49

want to play for you another montage of

14:51

Joe Biden, uh

14:53

consistently saying there's nothing,

14:56

there's no there, there there's nothing wrong here.

14:58

I wasn't involved. And he also

15:01

says the media has investigated

15:03

this and no one's found any wrongdoing.

15:06

Here's the president in a montage in his own

15:08

words.

15:09

Every single solitary, serious

15:13

investigator, including your

15:15

network and others, have looked at this have

15:18

said there's absolutely zero basis

15:21

to the accusation. That I acted

15:23

anyway inappropriately, or that

15:25

my son did. Every major

15:28

national, international, and local news

15:31

operations looked into it has said it's

15:33

a lie. This is a president's

15:35

flat line. So there's not been a sentilla

15:37

of evidence point out anything's wrong.

15:39

There's not a single solitary anywhere.

15:42

There's not been one sintilla to evidence

15:45

that my son ever interfered, that I ever

15:47

asked me anything, that I ever got involved

15:49

in anything. I mean, come on, this

15:51

is so the

15:54

guys are amazing.

15:56

So you think that everything that happened

15:58

was kosher.

15:59

You know, there's not one single bit

16:01

of evidence, not one little

16:04

tiny.

16:04

Bit, not one tiny

16:06

bit of evidence. Is the president a

16:08

liar? Based on everything

16:10

that you've seen and the idea

16:12

that everybody's invested in this, they found nothing.

16:15

Now the news media is reporting on some of this,

16:17

so they're not even backing him up anymore.

16:19

So I got to say, you know, Joe

16:21

Biden is particularly fond of saying there's

16:23

not a sentilla of evidence, And

16:26

I couldn't help thinking of my favorite movie,

16:28

The Princess Bride. You keep

16:30

on using that word. I do not think it means what you think

16:32

it means. I'm not sure

16:34

Joe knows what the word sentilla means.

16:37

So so let me just ask you directly, James,

16:41

what is the most compelling

16:43

evidence that you are aware

16:45

of right now of

16:48

corruption by Joe Biden.

16:50

Well, the fact that we've found five

16:53

payments to Joe Biden

16:55

that we trace the source of the payment

16:58

directly from his family's influence peddling scheme.

17:01

So when Joe Biden says that

17:03

he's never benefited from

17:05

his family's influence pedling scheme,

17:07

that is a lie. We have two

17:10

hundred and fifty thousand dollars. That's a quarter of a

17:12

million dollars, which for the

17:14

self proclaimed poorest guy in Congress,

17:16

that's that's a.

17:17

Lot of money.

17:18

Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars directly

17:21

to Joe Biden's back pocket from.

17:23

His family's influence pedling seams. They want

17:25

to say it was.

17:26

A loan repayment, which that's a whole nother

17:28

story. If if you pay me back

17:30

two hundred fifty thousand dollars, Senator,

17:33

then somewhere before you pay me back,

17:35

I should have a check to you for two hundred

17:37

and fifty thousand dollars.

17:38

They don't have that. But let's sen You know, I don't want to get.

17:40

Into so let's let the two fifty

17:43

give us the details of the two fifty. When was

17:45

it paid, from whom and where

17:47

does it look like the money came from.

17:49

Two hundred thousand dollars came from

17:51

Jim Biden and Sarah Biden

17:54

to Joe Biden. That money came directly

17:56

from that America ORPS Health company

17:58

that was an influence peddling scheme led by

18:00

Jim Biden. Okay, then forty thousand

18:03

dollars went from uh,

18:06

Jim and Sarah Biden to Joe

18:08

Biden. That came from China. That

18:11

was the ten percent of four hundred

18:13

thousand dollars. That was the company that

18:15

Babolinski said was gonna be ten

18:17

percent held for the Big guy. Uh,

18:19

they got four hundred thousand dollars.

18:21

Wow, hold on, I got I gotta stop you there,

18:23

because that's I'm following this pretty

18:25

closely, and that to me is

18:27

something new. So so I'm

18:29

aware of the ten percent for the Big Guy that

18:32

that was in the information on Hunter's laptop.

18:35

What I was not aware

18:38

of is that you now

18:40

have a payment from China

18:43

and direct evidence, by the way, not circumstantial

18:45

direct evidence of a ten percent

18:48

payment straight to Joe Biden. Is that right?

18:50

To elaborate on that because the fact

18:52

that the big guy is being paid

18:54

ten percent.

18:55

The exact amount, the exact.

18:58

Percent, not nine percent

19:01

exactly what was reflected what Mabolinski

19:03

told us, that's pretty compelling.

19:06

So just to explain that again, it's it's important

19:08

not to miss this point.

19:09

If you'll remember the WhatsApp message where

19:12

Hunter Biden was shaking down the Chinese

19:15

actionals saying, we expect you to

19:17

fulfill your commitment, the commitment that was made

19:19

while Joe.

19:19

Biden was vice president.

19:21

He said, my dad's sitting here beside me,

19:23

and we're gonna unleash our wrath

19:25

on you if you don't. Five days

19:27

later, five business days later, five

19:30

million dollars pops into the Biden

19:33

account.

19:34

They immediately wire four.

19:36

Hundred thousand dollars to this shell

19:38

company that was supposed to

19:40

be the company that Joe

19:43

Biden was going to be ten percent owner of.

19:45

According to Babolinski, from

19:48

that four.

19:48

Hundred thousand dollars, they start wiring

19:51

different wires to different

19:53

Biden family members and different shells.

19:55

This has caused Monday laundry, and it's confusing

19:57

to explain, and that's bite his un Anyway,

20:01

they.

20:01

Wire money to Jim Biden

20:04

from that four hundred thousand, and he writes

20:06

Joe a check for forty thousand dollars.

20:09

Forty thousand is ten percent of four

20:11

hundred thousand in that particular

20:13

shell that Joe Biden was supposed

20:15

to have a ten percent ownership in. That

20:18

money came directly from China. That

20:20

cary gaining evidence.

20:21

How close is the time period between

20:23

the WhatsApp the

20:26

five million dollar payment, the four hundred thousand

20:28

dollars payment, and the forty.

20:29

Thousand dollars payment, I mean

20:31

a month, So.

20:32

This is all really closely

20:34

compressed.

20:35

This is all. And remember you when

20:37

you transfer money to an account,

20:40

you have to keep it in there at least twenty

20:42

four hours, so

20:44

so you know a lot of times you

20:46

say, oh, there's two or three days difference, Well maybe

20:48

the bank wouldn't make it available. A lot

20:50

of times when you deposit money in the bank will

20:52

say your funds may not be available for

20:57

twenty four hours or forty eight hours or

20:59

until next one. So they

21:02

got the money to Joe about as quick as

21:04

you could do it in banking

21:06

terms, going through that many different account.

21:09

So then here's my question.

21:11

We've talked about the

21:13

tax issues with Hunter Biden

21:15

and James Biden.

21:17

I think there's some more questions there.

21:19

But if all of this is

21:21

happening in money is running through to the

21:23

president or then vice president.

21:26

What are the liabilities that we don't know about?

21:29

And I'm talking from a tax standpoint

21:31

for the President of the United States and America,

21:33

because what we do know is there's money

21:36

flowing in, then they claim its loans

21:38

and there's claiming, there's repayment of loans, but we don't

21:40

see the reclaimant payments, So is

21:42

that a tax issue for the president? Second

21:44

one I have is this if the

21:47

bank accounts, these shell companies

21:50

were acting as piggybanks

21:52

for Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family.

21:55

We've also heard there were payments being

21:57

made for things that benefited the vice

21:59

president and the president then through things

22:01

that were done at their houses, his house home

22:04

improvements, remodeling.

22:07

What other benefits was President

22:10

Joe Biden receiving through this money

22:12

that wasn't directly coming to his bank account

22:14

and would that be a tax issue in theory for

22:16

the President of United States of America.

22:18

I think so.

22:19

So a lot of these show companies had

22:21

credit cards. So we got the bank

22:24

account and it'll say, all right, we spent fifteen

22:28

thousand dollars this month on our City Bank

22:30

card or our Chase card or whatever.

22:33

We have to subpoena the credit

22:35

card companies and start going down these bank statements.

22:37

I mean, this is stuff, This investigation

22:41

so big and so complex and so complicated.

22:44

I mean, we're moving as quickly

22:46

as we can for a little old congressional

22:48

staff. This is stuff the IRS and the

22:50

FBI and the Department Justice for better

22:53

suited to do. But we're doing the best we can. So

22:55

we know from the laptop there

22:57

were things Hunter Biden was paying for a

22:59

value for Joe, like a new roof and

23:01

a cell phone bill and things like that.

23:04

But the two hundred and fifty.

23:05

Thousand on a second, did you just say Hunter

23:07

Biden paid for a new roof for Joe Biden.

23:10

According to the laptop.

23:12

According to the laptop, And remember there's

23:14

message from Hunter Biden to Hunter Biden's

23:17

daughter saying, unlike Dad,

23:19

I won't make I won't make you have

23:21

to turn over fifty

23:24

percent of your salary to me. So

23:26

there's lots of references in the laptop

23:29

where Hunter Biden was complaining about having.

23:31

A pay for stuff for dad, for Joe Biden.

23:33

That's why we wanted to depose him. That's

23:35

why we wanted to ask that was one of those questions.

23:38

Let's go to the deposition. Were you

23:40

surprised that Hunter

23:42

defied the subpoena and refused to sit for

23:44

the deposition.

23:46

I wasn't because I felt

23:48

like that indictment was done to

23:50

protect him from this deposition.

23:52

Really, because you've been dined. Yes, you've

23:54

been diicted him for two.

23:55

Things, the line on

23:58

a gun application and

24:00

his basic failure to pay

24:02

taxes on his W two income. I

24:04

mean, those are the two things that you really can't

24:07

tie to Joe Biden.

24:08

But the money laundering you can.

24:09

Tie to Joe Biden, the

24:12

the loans, the tax evasion

24:14

on that, the securities fraud, even

24:17

the even the problems with prostitutes

24:20

and possible human trafficking and all

24:22

that. You can tie that to Joe because some of that

24:24

was at at Joe's house. Apparently there's

24:26

lots of things.

24:27

That hold on A second, James, you said possibly

24:29

human trafficking. What

24:31

what? What is the evidence we have of that.

24:34

There's a suspicious activity

24:36

report filed against

24:39

an escort service in Florida,

24:41

and the suspicious activity report is

24:43

on the escort service. But Hunter Biden is

24:46

a subject of that suspicious

24:48

activity report because he was a

24:50

big customer and send him money to and

24:52

from the bank notified.

24:55

And this is public not because of us.

24:57

You're not supposed to leak these activity

25:00

but it's out there. It's out there on the internet. I think it

25:02

was in that Marco

25:04

Polo report, but we know

25:07

it's it's real. And what it

25:09

said was the bank

25:12

notified, I think it was JP Morgan notified

25:14

the treasury. That we believe is our client

25:16

is operating an escort service

25:19

and the two prostitutes

25:21

that they're paying are here illegally,

25:23

one from Russia, one from Ukraine.

25:26

I mean, you can't make this stuff up.

25:28

And we don't know if they were human

25:30

traffic, We don't know if. All we know is

25:32

they're not here legally, and we're

25:34

pretty sure they're and

25:37

engaged in prostitution, which is illegal in

25:39

Florida. And they list like

25:41

the two or three names of people that were

25:45

spending a lot of money there and Hunter Biden was

25:47

at the top of list, which is another reason they

25:49

filed the star because then you Russia

25:51

and Ukraine human trafficking

25:54

and at the time he was living in Joe Biden's

25:56

house, they were sending the prostitutes

25:59

to him. He was going there, so

26:01

they were sending them across state lines,

26:03

which.

26:03

Is you know, is

26:05

there evidence that they were sending the prostitutes

26:08

to Joe Biden's house.

26:10

All we know is Hunter was living there

26:13

at the time. We don't know if he was going to the hotel

26:15

or whatever. But I'm just telling you what JP

26:18

Morgan said. Okay, I mean

26:20

this is so let.

26:21

Me ask you about more. Let me ask you

26:23

about the deposition. So Hunters refused to

26:25

testify. What happens next in the

26:28

next week, two weeks, three

26:30

weeks, four weeks.

26:31

What happens next, Well, we're

26:33

gonna have to issue contempt of Congress

26:35

charges.

26:36

We'll run that through the Oversight Committee

26:39

and.

26:40

Tell people how that was. What are the mechanics

26:42

of what has to happen.

26:44

I was hoping Jim Jordan would lead that through

26:46

the judiciary, but it looks like we're going.

26:48

To do it through the House. Oversight Committee. There's

26:50

a lot of paperwork that's going to have to get done.

26:52

Remember, we've got a new Speaker of the House, all

26:55

new staff rolling in. Uh

26:57

he kept some of McCarthy's staff on till

26:59

the end of the year. We got new staff

27:02

coming in. So we're going to try to get all this

27:04

accumulated as quickly as possible

27:06

and then have a committee here and then hopefully

27:09

mark it up on the floor. But there's a lot

27:11

of legwork that has to be done, a lot

27:13

of documentation that has to be accumulated,

27:16

and we're doing this at a time when we're

27:18

shifting a lot of people

27:21

in the Speaker's office in one thing center, a lot

27:23

of people don't realize I have subpoena

27:25

authority, but the.

27:26

Speaker has to sign off on it. That's something

27:28

that Darryl.

27:29

Olysis talked about, and Trey Gowdy's talked

27:31

about and Jason Chafits, but you know, former

27:33

Republican chairsh

27:36

the Speaker's General Counsel has

27:39

to sign off on it because if it goes to

27:41

court, they're the ones that represent.

27:44

In court. It's the Speaker's General

27:46

Council.

27:47

So there's you know, there's some bureaucracy

27:49

involved in these subpoenas.

27:51

There's some bureaucracy involved in.

27:53

The contempt of Congress, but we plan on moving

27:56

forward to that and we're working on it as we speak.

27:59

Let me talk to you about you, Kra and your

28:01

four oh one k It has been a crazy year

28:03

with our economy. It's been a crazy year on

28:05

Wall Street. And if you are

28:08

in retirement or getting close to retirement

28:10

planning for it, then you know the stress

28:13

of what happens when you see

28:15

those dollars disappear and you know

28:17

that there's not a lot of time left

28:19

to make up those losses. That is

28:21

where people turn to gold to

28:24

help diversify their portfolio.

28:26

Now, there are a lot of companies that

28:29

sell gold. The one that I use

28:31

is a gust of Precious Metals because they

28:33

help me protect my retirement, they

28:35

help me diversify, and they answer

28:37

all of my questions and have a plan

28:40

that's right just for me. Now here's

28:42

the other thing about Augusta Precious Metals.

28:44

They do a one on one web conference

28:47

with each and every person so

28:49

that you can ask them and they answer

28:51

every question that you have because they

28:53

understand everybody's goals.

28:56

Everybody's portfolio, everybody's

28:58

retirement account is different, so

29:00

they shouldn't be treated like they're

29:02

all the same. That's what makes

29:05

Augusta Precious Metals

29:07

so unique.

29:07

Is a company.

29:08

You can call them and you can sit down

29:10

with them and do a one on one web conference,

29:13

and you can also get the free investor's

29:15

guide on gold. Go answer your questions

29:18

and talk to you about how to protect your hard earned

29:20

dollars by using gold in

29:22

your IRA or your four oh one K the

29:25

number eight seven seven four,

29:27

the number four gold IR. That's

29:30

eight seven seven the number four

29:32

gold ir A or

29:35

online at Augusta Precious

29:37

Metals dot com. That's Augusta

29:40

Precious Medals dot com or eight seven

29:42

seven the number four gold

29:45

ir A.

29:47

Congressman, We're not done yet, Senator.

29:49

This is the best part about having James Comer

29:51

with us for this three part series.

29:54

I'm going to tell you right now.

29:55

Please share this part two, and if

29:57

you miss part one, go back and listen

30:00

or watch it. It is on x formerly

30:02

known as Twitter, on Facebook, and on YouTube.

30:05

We ask you to share this on social

30:07

media wherever you can. If you're

30:09

on Instagram or Facebook, it doesn't

30:11

matter. Share Part one and

30:14

Part two of this series

30:16

with James Comer, and we will be back

30:18

with you for Part three on Friday,