Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Welcome. It is Verdict with Ted Cruz Weekend
0:03
Review, Ben Ferguson with you. These are the
0:05
big stories that you may have missed that we talked
0:07
about this week. First up, a
0:10
major report the media is not talking
0:12
about. It involves the president's
0:14
brother, Jim Biden, and he may
0:16
have been making more money than anyone
0:18
selling access to his brother, even
0:20
more than Hunter Biden. So who is
0:23
paying him and whether they get in returned will break
0:25
it all down for you. Also, you
0:27
know what's happened on college campuses.
0:30
You've seen the protesters, So who's
0:32
paying them? It's clearly organized, and
0:34
how much are they getting paid. We've got
0:36
the financials and we'll have that for you in
0:38
a moment. And finally, new legislation
0:41
it's bipart of san that Senator Cruz wants
0:43
you to know about that deals with keeping
0:46
your kids safe and your grandkids
0:48
safe on social media. It
0:50
is Verdict. We can review and it
0:53
starts right now. Sinaer.
0:56
One of the reasons why I just I love doing this
0:58
show with you is we get to talk about it issues
1:00
that the media is not covering. The last one's
1:02
a great example, but there's also one that
1:05
needs to have everyone listening,
1:08
share on social media, and
1:10
that is this new report out that it wasn't
1:12
just Hunter Biden that was getting in on the
1:14
action of selling access to daddy. Jim
1:17
Biden was getting in on the action
1:20
and actually may have been a bigger offender
1:23
based on what we're finding out. Jim
1:25
Biden is now being accused of being in business
1:27
with Katari officials, the actual government
1:30
and Hunter Biden. Yeah, he leverages
1:33
ties to his dad. We've seen that. But
1:35
Politico has a new report out that
1:37
says that Joe Biden's brother
1:40
was winning business deals with business
1:42
partners that were directly linked and tied
1:44
to foreign governments, those that
1:46
were actually tied to terrorism. According
1:49
to the outlet, Jim Biden, the President's
1:51
brother, was in business with Katari officials
1:53
to fund his healthcare venture. That
1:56
would be quote some of
1:58
the closest known link between
2:00
a Biden relative and a
2:03
foreign government.
2:05
Well that's exactly right. This was a bombshell
2:07
report that came out three days ago in Politico.
2:10
The title of the report is quote fund manager
2:12
indicates Jim Biden was in business
2:14
with Katari officials, and Politico
2:17
explains, quote new details
2:19
about Jim Biden's foreign fundraising efforts
2:21
are spilling out into a Kentucky bankruptcy
2:24
court, where recent testimony indicates
2:26
that President Joe Biden's brother partnered
2:28
with the Katari government officials
2:31
in his quest to find money for a US
2:33
healthcare venture. The sworn testimony
2:35
by fund manager Michael LeWitt, a
2:37
former business partner of Jim Biden's,
2:40
a test that two companies that facilitated
2:42
the efforts were part owned
2:46
by members of the Katari government. One
2:48
company named in the testimony partnered directly
2:51
with Jim Biden the multi year fundraising
2:53
efforts. The second company provided financial
2:55
backing for a series of loans that
2:57
a hospital chain paid Jim Biden
2:59
to rank. According to documents
3:01
and testimony LeWitt submitted
3:04
in the course of the federal bankruptcy proceedings.
3:07
If substantiated, the alleged
3:09
arrangements would constitute some of
3:12
the closest known financial links
3:14
between a relative of President Joe
3:16
Biden and a foreign government.
3:19
It's also about following
3:21
the money. Yes, we're hearing
3:23
now that this money that was
3:26
coming in was not
3:28
just going to Jim Biden, but it
3:30
was also going into the pocket
3:33
of the now president of the United States
3:35
of America, this
3:37
testimony that came out in this bankruptcy,
3:41
these documents, and now this
3:44
individual that did business with the Bidens. He
3:46
said, Look, at first, there was a bridge loan
3:49
to amer Corps that coincided with a
3:51
payment from America Corps directly
3:53
to Jim Biden. The report says
3:56
Biden said in testimony in February
3:58
that the roughly six one hundred thousand
4:01
dollars payments that he received from Americrps
4:04
around the time where his role was
4:07
in arranging quote loans and many
4:09
other services quote unquote, and
4:12
then in March of twenty eighteen,
4:15
Jim Biden transferred two hundred thousand
4:17
dollars of the payments
4:19
in question to then his brother
4:22
Joe Biden.
4:24
Well, look, that is exactly
4:27
right, and you needn't understand, Cutter
4:30
has some of the most problematic foreign
4:32
policy of any country on Earth. And
4:35
so this is you know, it's amazing
4:37
the Biden crime family. In that phrase, I
4:39
got to say a while ago it sounded like hyperbole.
4:42
It no longer sounds like hyperbole because the entire
4:44
Biden family is engaged
4:46
in a business where they only do business
4:49
with our enemies. They somehow never seem to do
4:51
business with Canada. They never do
4:53
business with the United Kingdom. They never do business
4:55
with France or Spain or Japan.
4:58
They only do business with Russia.
5:00
They do business with Ukraine.
5:03
They do business with communist
5:05
China. Let
5:07
me read from this political art
5:10
article because it lays out quote.
5:12
In June of twenty seventeen, Cutter's
5:15
neighbors, led by Saudi Arabia, ganged
5:17
up and cut diplomatic ties with the country,
5:20
citing its alleged support for terrorism.
5:23
The ensuing financial and physical blockade
5:25
through the country, a peninsula that juts out
5:27
from Saudi Arabia into the Persian Gulf, into
5:30
a sustained crisis. In
5:32
response, the country's rulers began showering
5:35
well connected Westerners with gifts and
5:37
financial benefits, sometimes in the form
5:39
of investment funding. The Qatari
5:41
influence offensive strengthened the country's
5:44
ties to the US and Europe, but also led
5:46
to corruption scandals, including
5:48
the European parliaments sprawling
5:51
Cuttergate fiasco. Around
5:54
the time of the blockade, Jim Biden was embarking
5:56
into a foray into the healthcare business, in which
5:58
he worked closely with the truck hospital
6:00
chain, AmeriCorps. And by
6:03
the way, when Jim Biden was raising
6:06
money, he pitched himself
6:09
very directly as
6:11
so. For example, here's what Jim Biden
6:13
said in a draft letter to official at
6:15
Cutters sovn Wealth Fund. He
6:18
said, quote, my family
6:21
could provide a wealth of introductions and business
6:23
opportunities at the highest level that
6:26
I believe would be worthy of the interest of
6:28
his excellency on behalf
6:30
of the Biden family. I
6:33
welcome your interest here.
6:36
That's how he was pitching it, and
6:39
it resulted in payments
6:42
of roughly six hundred thousand dollars
6:44
from AmeriCorps that he received, and
6:47
Jim Biden transferred two hundred
6:49
thousand dollars of those payments directly
6:52
to Joe Biden. Now understand
6:54
who Cutter is. Also, do you know where
6:56
the leaders of a MOSS live? Where's
6:59
the Cutter?
7:01
There?
7:01
You go that they live as billionaire
7:03
as they live in incredibly lush,
7:06
opulent apartments, They fly private
7:08
jets. Cutter gives them sanctuary, Cutter
7:10
supports them, Cutter protects them. This
7:13
is the same Hamas that carried out October seventh.
7:15
This is the same Hamas that murders
7:17
Israelis and murders murders
7:20
Americans, and yet the Biden
7:22
administration consistently refuses
7:24
to sanctioned Cutter, refuses to stand up to
7:26
Cutter, and suddenly we discover
7:29
that the Biden family
7:32
has been bought
7:34
and paid for.
7:35
By the way, can you go
7:37
back and read that one line, because I do think
7:39
it's an important one.
7:40
Holy, let me read a different line,
7:43
which is Jim Biden presented a presentation
7:47
on behalf of AMERICRPS, saying that AMERICARPS
7:49
was seeking thirty million dollars in financing
7:52
to acquire hospitals. Do
7:54
you know how the presentation described
7:56
Jim Biden.
7:58
I'm gonna guess Joe Biden brother.
8:02
It described him as totally separate person
8:04
with no connection to the vice president
8:06
of the president. No, no, that actually is not correct.
8:10
I'm gonna read you what it said. This is a quote
8:13
Jim Biden quote, brother and
8:16
campaign finance chair of
8:19
former Vice President Joe Biden.
8:22
So it ain't complicated. Why do you want
8:24
to give him money because he's
8:27
Joe's brother. And by the way, the
8:29
money you give him, he'll give to Joe.
8:32
Why is this not on the six o'clock
8:34
news Ben.
8:36
Because it indicts the president United
8:38
States of America and a paid a play scheme that
8:40
would bring down I would argue any other presidency
8:44
look.
8:45
In any normal sense, that
8:48
would be right. But
8:52
if you look at at this
8:55
these documents, these documents are
8:57
being ignored by the media.
9:00
So, for example, Lewett wrote
9:02
to Jim Biden to express confidence
9:04
that his funds would be repaid immediately
9:07
for its loans to AmeriCorps with money
9:09
from Dubai. According to an email that emerged
9:12
the bankruptcy litigation, quote, nothing
9:15
else changes in terms of what I will be
9:17
doing re AmeriCorps since
9:19
I will be just as responsible
9:21
for the Dubai dollar dollar
9:24
dollar three dollar signs with
9:26
the added worry
9:28
of being driven
9:31
around the desert.
9:32
L Ol. Wow.
9:35
I mean I'm sitting here and I say wow,
9:37
and I mean it rarely am I speechless, But
9:40
I go back to that sense. I wanted you to
9:42
read again where the pitch
9:45
is to his excellency. I mean they're saying, hey,
9:47
do business with us. You guys need access.
9:50
You're in trouble. This is how
9:52
you get the Biden family on your team
9:55
again. It's just going to cost you millions
9:57
of dollars in quote business.
10:00
Yet, let's speak clear the
10:02
entire pitch. It was
10:05
not about Jim Biden's financial
10:07
acumen. It's not about what
10:09
he knew about healthcare. As far as we can tell,
10:11
he didn't know a damn thing about healthcare. Here's
10:14
what he wrote. I'm going to read it again. The
10:16
draft letter from Jim Biden read, in part, quote
10:19
my family. It's not even me my family,
10:22
And who's my family mean? He means his brother. It's
10:24
just like Hunter Biden when he says my father.
10:27
They're all talking about Papa Joe. My
10:30
family could provide a
10:32
wealth of introduction and
10:34
business opportunities at the
10:36
highest level that I believe would be worthy
10:39
of the interest of his excellency.
10:41
And his excellency are both capitalized on
10:44
behalf of the Biden
10:47
family. I welcome
10:49
your interest here.
10:50
Yeah, meaning I'm speaking on behalf of my brother.
10:53
Just like Hunter Biden said, I'm sitting here
10:55
next to my father to the Chinese
10:58
Communist. If you do not give me five million dollar dollars
11:00
right now, my father will retaliate. It
11:02
wasn't just Hunter, it was Jim.
11:04
It was the entire family. And I
11:06
want to underscore why
11:08
didn't they do business with the French, or the British
11:11
or any friends. The Japanese, the Canadians
11:13
know. It was only enemies of America.
11:16
It was only countries that provide comfort
11:19
and shelter to Hamas and terrorists
11:22
to murder Americans. That was their
11:24
business strategy is find people
11:26
who hate America, find countries who
11:28
are enemies of America, but who need favors
11:31
from Joe Biden, and
11:33
go get hundreds
11:36
of thousands or millions of dollars from them.
11:38
Yeah, and this comes, by the way, two weeks
11:40
after James Biden it came out in court
11:43
documents as well apparently
11:45
secretly negotiated one hundred and forty million dollars
11:47
settlement deal in twenty twelve between a
11:49
US company and the Saudi Arabian government
11:52
quote due to his relationship with then
11:54
Vice President Joe Biden. Court documents
11:57
revealed, and no one talked about
11:59
that story either on the nightly news. As you mentioned
12:01
a moment ago.
12:02
Look, it reminds me of mel Brooks's movie
12:04
History of the World Part one, where he says
12:06
repeatedly, it's good to be the.
12:08
King, It's good to be the king.
12:10
That's how the Biden family
12:12
sadly approaches government.
12:14
Now, if you want to hear the rest of this conversation,
12:17
you can go back and listen to the full podcast
12:19
from earlier this week. Now
12:22
onto story number two, Let's
12:25
go back and look at the hierarchy of this, just
12:27
to put it in perspective. In
12:30
the hours after the attack on Israel,
12:32
you had to call out the United States government.
12:34
Yeah, the Biden administration repeatedly,
12:38
and I want you to go through that quickly in a second, but
12:40
you had to call them out for
12:43
basically holding Israel to a
12:45
standard they're not holding hamas to
12:47
which is if Israel responds and protects
12:50
itself and anyone dies that they're somehow evil.
12:52
You then have a White House that's doubled down
12:54
on that. You then have people like Alamo
12:57
mar and others in the Senate and the Democratic
12:59
Party that have done the same exact thing. You
13:01
then have that trickle down to the
13:04
presidents of these universities. And we saw
13:06
them go before Congress and
13:09
none of them, by the way, got fired. Some of them aren't presidents
13:11
anymore, but they still got their six figure salaries,
13:13
are still in doctrinate kids on campus. None
13:15
of them didn't lost their access to the
13:17
university, which they've taken away from
13:20
even some Jewish professors this week. So
13:22
then that trickles down into the base professors,
13:24
which we just played a moment ago, which then trickles
13:26
down to the students that can hate Jews, and
13:29
then it trickles down into the outside non
13:31
students who are the protesters that are there. And
13:34
yet you could fix all of this the way that we've
13:36
seen in Texas this week, the way we've
13:38
seen it in Florida this week, where these protesters
13:40
come out in those universities in those states and they said, we're not putting
13:43
up with this crap. So this is all being
13:45
done and organized and allow by
13:47
the universities, by law enforcement,
13:50
by Democrats who are locally elected, and
13:52
they could stop it all in a matter of days, but they're
13:54
saying no, No, let's keep going and let's
13:56
keep this growing.
13:58
I want to read something that was tweeted by Carol
14:00
Markowitz. Now. Now Carol Markowitz is a
14:02
columnist at the New York Post, and
14:04
she said something online that I think was really
14:07
quite powerful. She said, quote,
14:09
a lot of Jewish friends, especially
14:12
those who are finally awake after October
14:15
seventh, say things like,
14:17
quote how is this America? Or
14:20
quote it's so scary that
14:22
this Jew hatred is happening everywhere,
14:27
But it's very much not America.
14:31
And it's absolutely not
14:34
happening everywhere.
14:38
In South Florida, Jews
14:41
wear the dinner plate Megan David's
14:43
and no one says one word.
14:46
In rural Michigan churches
14:48
put pray for Israel on the signs
14:50
outside. I'm not naive.
14:53
Obviously Jew haters can and do live
14:55
anywhere. But they're only
14:57
thriving, open, proud
15:02
in blue areas. And
15:04
I'm not going to let people ignore that. A
15:07
lot of liberal Jews are trying to
15:09
parse things right now. They imagine
15:12
that they are still of the left, but
15:15
just on this one tiny little
15:17
thing, their right to exist, they
15:19
disagree. No,
15:22
my friends, it's a house
15:24
of cards and you're pulling
15:26
the one from the very bottom. The
15:29
whole left ideology
15:31
is corrupt, and you're going
15:33
to have to face it. You
15:36
can't spread the blame around. The hatred,
15:38
the rage, the violence, the dehumanization
15:42
is all coming from one side.
15:44
Yours a second example.
15:47
It is an op ed that was written in JNS.
15:49
It was written by Jonathan Berniski. It's
15:51
entitled Jewish Democrats Wake
15:54
Up, and it says at the outset
15:56
quote, the antisemitic right is
15:58
a fringe phenomenon, while the anti Semitic
16:01
left is mainstream, powerful
16:03
and shaping America's future. And
16:06
I'm just going to read the beginning of this because it's really quite
16:08
powerful.
16:08
Quote.
16:09
This is addressed to you, my fellow Jews, since
16:12
most of you are Democrats. You've
16:14
heard from liberal colleagues that
16:16
Tucker Carlson, whose show
16:19
you've never watched, has been
16:21
flirting with anti Semites. You've
16:23
been told by liberal friends that Candice
16:25
Owens, whose show you've never
16:27
watched, has been picking fights
16:30
with Ben Shapiro, whose show
16:32
you've never watched. From
16:35
CNN and MSNBC. You
16:38
know that a pack of guys with citronal a tiki
16:40
torches march through Charlottesville
16:42
while shouting the Jews will not replace us.
16:46
And that's why you've convinced yourself that
16:48
there are far more anti Semites
16:51
on the right than there are on the
16:53
left. I wish to
16:55
pose several questions. How
16:58
many of the thousands of individuals who got gathered
17:00
in Times Square on October eighth, twenty twenty
17:02
three, and chanted resistance
17:04
is justified and glory to
17:07
our martyrs are registered
17:09
Republican voters and planned to cast their ballots
17:11
for Donald Trump. How
17:14
many of the individuals who barricaded
17:16
Jewish students inside Cooper Union's
17:18
library on October twenty fifth, twenty twenty
17:21
three, pounded on the doors and carried
17:23
signs that read Zionism, hands
17:25
off our universities are
17:28
registered Republicans and planned
17:30
to cast their ballots for Donald Trump. How
17:33
many of the thousands of individuals who rallied
17:36
in Manhattan on December twenty fifth, twenty
17:38
twenty three and carried banners
17:40
emblazoned with the words quote
17:42
by any means necessary and quote
17:45
resistance until return are
17:48
registered Republicans and planned to cast their ballots
17:50
for Donald Trump. How
17:52
many of the thousands on thousands of individuals
17:55
who assembled at Columbia University
17:57
on February second and shouted
17:59
Globe Belies, the Intifada, and
18:01
death to the Zionist State are
18:04
registered Republican voters and planned to cast
18:06
ballots for Donald Trump. How
18:09
many of the individuals who amassed in Dearborn,
18:11
Michigan, on April fifth and yelled
18:14
death to America and death to Israel
18:17
are registered Republicans and planned to cast
18:19
their ballots for Donald Trump. How
18:22
many of the thousands of individuals who blocked
18:24
traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge
18:26
and other cities on April fifteenth and carried
18:29
the flag of Hesbela are
18:31
registered Republicans and planned to
18:33
cast their ballots for Donald Trump. How
18:36
many of the hundreds of thousands
18:38
of individuals who have participated
18:41
in the thousands of anti Zionists
18:43
and Prohamas protests across
18:46
the country since October seventh are
18:49
registered Republicans and planned to cast their
18:51
ballots for Donald Trump? And then he answers
18:53
it. He said, the answer to every
18:55
question posed above is
18:58
close to zero, if
19:00
not none,
19:02
He goes on. Yet, we've
19:04
been told by reporters and commentators at
19:06
August publications and news
19:09
networks, leaders of esteem nonprofits,
19:11
academics at prestigious colleges and universities,
19:14
and career civil servants at major
19:17
three letter federal government agencies
19:19
that anti Semitism is solely a problem
19:22
of the right. Yes, fringe
19:25
right wing anti Semites are a problem.
19:28
They should be considered a threat, but
19:30
they are on the fringe.
19:33
And because these fringe elements
19:36
continue to be the near exclusive
19:38
target of the less so called
19:41
quote quote fight against anti Semitism,
19:44
it's more imparent than ever
19:46
that our elites are purposely
19:49
engaged in a partisan game.
19:52
This next paragraph is the most important
19:54
paragraph in the op ed. Right
19:57
wing anti Semites are
20:00
kuks and grifters. Left
20:03
wing anti semites are
20:06
college professors, newspaper
20:08
editors, Hollywood stars,
20:11
a growing number of Democratic members
20:13
of Congress, and quite a few Biden
20:16
administration officials. They
20:18
have immense cultural
20:20
and political influence, and they
20:23
are decisively shaping the future
20:25
of America. I
20:28
don't know how you can dispute one word
20:30
that was written there, and that is a point
20:32
that explains why these universities
20:34
are sick, why
20:37
these college students are being fed
20:39
poison, why the
20:41
administrators are afraid to stand
20:44
up to the bigoted lies, why
20:46
Democrat politicians are celebrating
20:49
the bigoted lies. AOC and
20:51
ilhanum Omar are going and
20:53
cheering on the anti Semites,
20:56
and why even
20:58
so called mainstream Democrat politicians
21:01
like Joe Biden stand happily
21:04
by while the squad cheers
21:06
on the anti semis.
21:08
Senator, last question, I want to ask you
21:10
about what's happening on college campuses.
21:13
Is we talked about following the money and
21:16
we now know who's behind it.
21:19
Isn't there an obligation now for people
21:21
that went to these universities to stand up and say,
21:24
not only do we think at Columbia the president
21:27
should resign, but you're not getting another dime for me
21:29
until we see significant changes.
21:32
You look at Robert Kraft, the Patriots owner.
21:34
He really came out and did some interviews.
21:36
He didn't just stop the flow of money
21:38
and their buildings and named
21:40
after him at Columbia, he has
21:42
been a massive donor. He said they're not getting
21:44
another dime of my money. And he
21:46
didn't just say it, He went out and explained
21:49
it and challenged others to do the same thing.
21:51
We need people to do that. Yes,
21:54
all over the country in a big way.
21:56
Absolutely yes. And you look at
21:59
Robert with Columbia. You look at
22:01
Bill Ackman with Harvard. Bill Ackman played
22:03
a pivotal role in Claudine Gay stepping
22:06
down. You look at Mark Rowan with Penn
22:09
Mark played a pivotal role. These are all
22:11
very very successful leaders
22:13
in business who've been massive, massive,
22:16
multimillion dollar donors to these universities
22:18
who've taken leading roles speaking out
22:21
and saying what is happening is disgraceful,
22:23
the anti semitism, the radicalism
22:26
that you were allowing, the DEI
22:28
oppression. And by the way, this anti semitism
22:31
is the fruit of DEI, the
22:34
introversy.
22:34
They don't know what de I stands for.
22:36
Explain, it is diversity, equity and inclusion,
22:38
and it is the vehicle within the
22:40
universities where they teach this nonsense.
22:43
They teach this racism, They teach
22:45
that Jews are oppressors and Palestinians are
22:47
victims. Look, here's an illustration and
22:49
let's play this as our final clip. Ilhan
22:52
Omar talking about the protest.
22:54
Give a listen. How do you think this will
22:56
translate to the Jewish students who are facing anti semitism
22:59
here on campus.
23:00
So I actually met a lot of Jewish students
23:02
that are in the encampments, and
23:05
I think it is really unfortunate that
23:07
people don't care about the fact
23:10
that all Jewish kids should
23:12
be kept safe and that we should not have
23:14
to tolerate anti semitism
23:17
or bigotry for all Jewish students,
23:20
whether they are progenocide
23:22
or anti genocide?
23:24
What utter garbage. Whether they
23:26
are pro genocide or
23:28
anti genocide, Understand what she's saying.
23:31
If you're not protesting in favor
23:34
of Hamas, then
23:36
you are a pro genocide
23:38
Jew. Now, Israel
23:41
is not remotely committing genocide.
23:43
In fact, they go to extraordinary lengths
23:46
to avoid civilian casualties. They
23:48
are killing terrorists. Do you know who is trying
23:50
to commit genocide?
23:52
Hamas? Hamas.
23:54
When they entered on October seventh, they
23:56
were only murdering Jews. They were looking
23:58
for Jews. They were murdering them because they are
24:01
Jews. That is genocide when you are trying
24:03
to wipe out a people.
24:05
Market attacks the other day, they weren't targeting
24:07
anyone building. They were just targeting any part
24:09
of Israel.
24:10
Any Jew. Like we started off with a Columbia
24:12
organizer. He wants to kill Zionis, by which
24:15
he means Jews. She's
24:17
saying, and this is where the
24:19
left it is Orwellian, they turn things
24:22
upside down. You know who
24:24
is pro genocide Hamas, the
24:26
same Hamas she supports, the same
24:28
Hamas the protesters support. You
24:30
know who is anti genocide?
24:32
Israel?
24:34
Israel has tried to save the lives of
24:36
civilians. Hamas is also ironically
24:39
pro Palestinian genocide.
24:41
Why because they put Palestinian civilians
24:43
in harm's way and they want them to die
24:46
because they know the useful idiots
24:49
will use the deaths of those Palestinian
24:52
civilians to attack Israel. That
24:55
is the sad reality of
24:58
cultural Marxism. This
25:00
is the fruits of this poison that
25:02
has taken over our institutions.
25:05
As before, if you want to hear the rest of this
25:07
conversation on this topic, you
25:09
can go back and dow the podcasts from
25:11
earlier this week to hear the entire thing. I
25:15
want to get back to the big story number
25:17
three of the week you may have missed. Finally,
25:19
Senator, I want to get into something else. It's
25:21
a very important piece of legislation
25:24
that you're working on, and I
25:26
have actually seen a little bit of this be
25:28
talked about on social There are
25:30
some people that don't actually think they understand
25:33
the intent of what we're trying to accomplish
25:35
when it comes to protecting kids on
25:38
social media. So explain why
25:40
this legislation is something that parents really
25:43
need to know about.
25:45
Well, this is legislation I introduced this
25:47
week, and it's bipartisan legislation.
25:49
I teamed up with Brian Schotz, who's a Democrat
25:51
from Hawaii, and the bill
25:53
is called the Kids Off Social Media Act, and
25:55
it does several things. Number
25:57
one, it prohibits children under the
25:59
thirteen from
26:02
accessing social media. So kids, there's
26:04
no reason for an eight or nine year old to be
26:06
on TikTok or to be on social media.
26:08
And there are a lot of harmful things.
26:11
I'll tell you. Listen, you and I are both
26:13
parents, and any parent who is
26:15
dealing with I'm dealing with teenagers. Your kids
26:17
are not teenagers yet, but if you blink,
26:19
they will be. Any
26:22
parent dealing with teenagers or adolescents,
26:25
how to deal with phones and social
26:28
media is one of the greatest challenges
26:30
because phones are really a portal
26:32
for kids to access all sorts
26:35
of harmful content. And
26:37
so this bill says, if you're under thirteen,
26:39
you can't be on social media. And then it says
26:41
for kids younger than seventeen, big
26:44
tech companies are prohibited from
26:47
using algorithmic boosting
26:50
to send messages to them. So we know
26:52
right now. There's been a lot of testimony in the Senate that
26:54
big tech companies send messages
26:57
to our kids, to our teenagers that
26:59
are really harm that they send
27:01
messages that undermine their body image,
27:03
They send messages that encourage self
27:05
harm. They send messaging that that
27:08
increases suicidal ideation, They
27:10
send messaging that that increases
27:14
increases their feelings of depression
27:16
and anxiety. They send messages encouraging
27:19
dangerous behavior. They send messaging
27:21
pushing radical beliefs, things like Prohamas
27:24
beliefs. And so this bill says, if you're
27:26
under seventeen, big tech cannot
27:29
target using algorithm
27:31
boosting to send messages that
27:34
are addicting and and and that are harmful.
27:37
And then the bill also includes a
27:39
separate bill that I had introduced previously,
27:42
and I introduced it with John Fetterman. It was also
27:44
bipartisan and and my
27:46
separate bill was called the Eyes on the Board
27:48
Bill, and the Eyes on the Board Bill,
27:50
which is now part of this bill, says
27:54
that any school that receives federal
27:56
funds has to
27:58
block social media on campus. And the
28:00
basic idea is, while our kids are in school,
28:03
they ought to be listening to teacher, they ought to be doing school
28:05
work. They don't need to be posting on Instagram
28:08
while they're in school. For
28:10
older kids, they can do that when they get home,
28:12
but at school they ought to be focused on the school
28:14
work.
28:15
Yeah, they should be. And this is legislation
28:18
that you mention is bipartisan. Here, what
28:20
does it look like the chances of this moving
28:22
forward since it is a bipartisan piece of
28:24
legislation.
28:26
So I'm actually quite optimistic. We
28:29
are likely to have a markup in the
28:31
Senate Commerce Committee next week. I'm
28:33
the ranking member, the senior Republican on the Commerce
28:35
Committee, and I think it is
28:38
very likely to pass the Commerce Committee
28:40
with overwhelming bipartisan support.
28:42
I think there's a good chance it'll pass unanimously,
28:45
and I think there is a good prospect of this
28:47
bill being passed into law. There are two
28:49
other bills called Kosa and Kappa
28:51
that are both dealing with things like online
28:53
predators targeting kids, and I
28:56
think there's a real possibility of all three of
28:58
these bills being put together
29:00
and brought to the Senate floor, and I'm hopeful
29:02
we can pass all three of them.
29:04
We'll keep you updated on it. It's so important, especially
29:06
preventing children under thirteen from
29:08
having access these social media sites.
29:11
And also, as you mentioned, programming those algorithms
29:13
for teens younger than seventeen. This
29:16
is really important. Job well done, and
29:18
we'll keep everybody updated on how this looks
29:21
moving forward.
29:23
Well, that's right, and you look, I'll say something also
29:25
as a parent, I mean, I mean, these are hard issues
29:27
and one of the things I talk to a lot of parents,
29:30
I don't know a parent who disagrees on this issue.
29:32
And that's true, right or left, that's
29:34
true regardless of politics. We're
29:36
all worried about our kids. I mean, it's really it's
29:39
hard to be a teenager right now. The pressures
29:41
on our kids. You and I didn't have these
29:43
kind of pressures when we were teenagers. It's really
29:45
tough is what is
29:49
all of the influences that are pounding our
29:51
kids. And it's hard to be a parent right now. And one of
29:53
the challenges because some people say,
29:55
well, parents ought to just restrict this. Look,
29:57
it is a hard dynamic when you're kids,
30:00
when every student in their class
30:03
is on the social media platform, when
30:06
that's how the kids communicate, when that's
30:08
how they schedule play dates, when that's how they interact,
30:11
No parent wants to
30:13
socially ostracize their kids,
30:15
and so a lot of parents will talk to each
30:17
other and say, I wish they were all off of
30:19
it, but I'm not willing to have my
30:21
kid the only one that's not able to interact
30:24
with their peers and have a social life. And that's one
30:26
of the reasons why, you know, it's interesting
30:28
in the Senate the folks that are coming together and supporting
30:30
this bill. So myself and
30:33
Brian Shotts, and and and we've all also
30:35
got Katie Britt. We're all
30:37
about the same age. We're all in our forties or
30:39
fifties, we all have kids the same age. I have
30:41
to say the senators are there in their seventies or
30:43
eighties. They don't quite get
30:45
this issue in the same way that if you're a
30:48
parent, you're dealing with it.
30:49
And so I'm.
30:50
Hopeful that that that we'll see some
30:53
real bipartisan agreement that we ought
30:55
to enhance the tools parents
30:57
have to keep their kids safe.
30:59
As all day. Thank you for listening
31:01
to Verdict with Sentner, Ted Cruz, Ben
31:03
Ferguson with you don't forget to deal with my podcast,
31:06
and you can listen to my podcast every other day. You're not
31:08
listening to Verdict or each day when you listen to Verdict.
31:10
Afterwards, I'd love to have you as a listener
31:13
to again the Ben Ferguson podcasts
31:15
and we will see you back here on Monday
31:17
morning.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More