Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:27
Welcome back to manhunting, in which Waypoint
0:29
and friends are working through the filmography of Michael
0:31
Mann and examining his themes of labor and craft,
0:33
capitalist oppression, and dudes
0:36
rocking. Today, as always, I'm
0:38
joined by Nextlander's Alex Navarro.
0:40
I'm back, thanks for having me. Our
0:44
other panelist, Dia La Sina, was unavailable
0:46
for this one and we miss having her on this
0:48
one and are thinking of her and her family. So
0:51
today we are talking about Michael
0:54
Mann's 2001 biopic Ali,
0:56
in which Will Smith portrays the legendary fighter
0:58
as a man whose life intersects with
1:01
and is shaped by the great sociopolitical
1:03
forces roiling the world throughout the
1:05
60s and 70s. And
1:08
I will say up front, this
1:10
is a movie I'd only seen once. I think this
1:12
might be the only Mann movie that I've only
1:14
seen once. And I remember at the time being sort of
1:17
mostly surprised that like, wow,
1:19
Michael Mann made a like
1:23
film about the racial
1:26
politics of the 60s, that he, you
1:28
know,
1:29
takes this detour away from like, procedural
1:33
films or crime films and makes,
1:36
in many ways, a
1:38
historic historical biopic,
1:41
but with a real focus
1:44
on the issues of race and class
1:47
and politics of
1:49
the time. And I think that probably
1:52
impressed me unduly. The
1:54
first time I saw it in the context
1:57
of just expectations I
1:59
had of his work.
1:59
at the time, revisiting
2:02
it here, and we were joking about this as we were
2:04
getting prepped for this.
2:07
This feels very much like a movie
2:09
of parts. In fact, in
2:11
some ways, you kind of look at the two halves
2:14
of Ali and see Michael
2:16
Mann basically covering two
2:19
other films that it seems like he just might really
2:21
like and might be
2:24
really informing, perhaps overly
2:26
much, his approach to
2:29
this material. I don't know, Alex. It's like
2:31
when I look at Ali, I see
2:33
Michael Mann very faithfully and respectfully
2:36
nodding
2:37
at Spike
2:39
Lee's 1992 Malcolm X and
2:42
the fighting documentary When We Were Kings.
2:45
Yeah. And when I saw Ali
2:48
the first time, I saw this movie in theaters in 2001 when
2:50
it came out,
2:52
and I had not seen
2:54
either of those things prior to
2:56
that.
2:58
And I was even not even a particularly well
3:00
versed in Michael Mann's filmography at this point, I'd seen
3:03
Heat and maybe like one or two other things, but that was
3:05
pretty much it.
3:06
And
3:07
I even then came away
3:10
from the theaters even you know, the tender age of
3:12
like, 1920 years old, where
3:14
I was not necessarily the most
3:16
forthright critic of films that I would go
3:18
to that bother to go to the theaters to see like, I
3:21
came out of this movie feeling like something was off. I
3:24
came out feeling like
3:26
something in here was just not co hearing
3:28
for me in a way that
3:30
really worked. And I actually
3:32
took me and a long time
3:34
because I have only maybe seen part of this movie
3:36
once since. And it is
3:38
really took this
3:40
watch for me to kind of articulate exactly
3:42
what it was that was bothering me back then.
3:45
And having seen When We Were Kings and having
3:48
seen Malcolm X, and having
3:50
seen also Michael Mann's other nod
3:52
to the 60s in in crime story.
3:55
I feel like the thing I finally landed
3:58
on is that has
4:00
in this movie is an earnest desire
4:02
to apply his kind of filmmaking texture
4:05
to these big momentous
4:08
scenes of newsreel footage, of
4:11
live-action footage, of his boxing matches,
4:14
of all this stuff that Michael Mann clearly saw when
4:16
it was happening, and give it the
4:18
flavor of his filmmaking.
4:20
The problem is that he never finds
4:24
anywhere in the story a way to apply
4:26
that stuff to the rest of the story
4:28
he has to tell around the edges that is not
4:30
just recreations of things he's really seen.
4:33
And ends up falling into these really,
4:35
for him especially,
4:38
kind of disappointing tropes of
4:40
biopics
4:41
to kind of fill out the story and the
4:44
drama of the story that isn't
4:46
just stuff that he knows because he can
4:48
just look at the archival footage and say, this is what
4:50
happened.
4:53
Yeah, it is a perplexing misfire
4:56
in some ways because if you
4:59
told me, I didn't know this film
5:01
existed,
5:02
and you told me that like, oh,
5:04
you know Michael Mann's next project is he's
5:06
working on a movie about Muhammad
5:09
Ali and sort of through the lens
5:11
of like his four greatest fights. Yeah.
5:14
I'd be like, yep, okay,
5:17
that's gonna be amazing. That's like perfect
5:19
match of like director
5:22
and material sounds awesome.
5:24
And yeah, there's Well,
5:27
especially coming off the insider. Like that's the thing
5:29
is that like his last movie being this really
5:32
great dramatic retelling of a thing that
5:34
does have a little bit of live footage to go along
5:36
with it.
5:37
But mostly is him creating a dramatic
5:39
story out of,
5:41
you know, the backroom dealings and the stuff that people
5:43
didn't see.
5:44
Like the way he tells that story,
5:47
he gets the drama out without
5:49
having to resort to too many,
5:51
you know, like true story tropes.
5:54
And here it just feels like I don't know if it was because
5:56
this original screenplay, which him
5:58
and another co writer rewrote.
5:59
or whatever, like just had too much, you
6:02
know, hacky shit in it, and they just never found a way to
6:04
kind of get it back
6:05
to what he wanted it, but like
6:07
it's just a really disappointing attempt
6:09
at turning that story into something cinematic.
6:12
Yeah, and to give
6:14
you... To
6:16
give you sort of the outline of what happens in this
6:18
film, for those who haven't seen it. Like,
6:22
I'm gonna tell you a lot of the stuff that happens in this movie.
6:25
I think one of the issues we're in return to is... This
6:28
is not a movie with an arc. And
6:31
so there's a lot of stuff that happens, and it
6:33
sounds like you can sort of create
6:35
a through line, but the film doesn't actually do
6:37
a great job of bringing one
6:40
out of the material. So
6:42
the film opens with
6:45
his sort of arrival, his
6:47
rapid ascent to the top
6:49
of boxing by taking
6:52
on Sonny Liston, a fight
6:55
for which he was regarded as a terrible
6:57
mismatch.
6:59
You know, Liston, a
7:01
renowned and terrifying
7:03
fighter who dominated his
7:05
age, and it covers the fact
7:07
that Ali, then known as Cassius
7:10
Clay, upset
7:12
him handily in
7:14
in about and quickly
7:16
emerged as the foremost boxer
7:20
of his age, and also
7:22
at the same moment was being
7:26
spiritually tutored by then Nation
7:28
of Islam Minister Malcolm X.
7:31
In his relationship with
7:33
the nation, Ali
7:36
quickly, like increasingly comes
7:38
under their sway and
7:40
their management and as the schism between
7:44
Malcolm X and
7:47
Elijah Muhammad
7:49
begins to like open up
7:51
into a full breach, Ali
7:54
chooses sides, he stays with
7:57
the nation.
7:58
After he chooses sides and and sort
8:00
of turns his back on Malcolm. We
8:02
see the end of that story with Malcolm X's assassination
8:05
in New York. Ali
8:09
is badly shaken by this. He
8:12
has a rematch with Sonny
8:14
Liston, wins
8:17
again and is now undisputed,
8:20
the greatest fighter of his age. And at this
8:22
moment, he is classified
8:24
eligible for the draft during
8:27
the Vietnam War.
8:29
And against
8:33
the advice of many of his advisors and over
8:35
the misgivings of many members
8:37
of the Nation of Islam, Muhammad Ali
8:39
announces that he will not be
8:42
subject to the draft. He refuses
8:44
to serve. And
8:48
he escalates matters by,
8:50
when asked by reporters about
8:53
it, he gives his infamous
8:56
and legendary response as to the
8:59
fundamental reason why he won't
9:01
go, which is that no Viet
9:04
Cong ever called him the N-word. And
9:07
this is a moment that is arrived
9:09
at entirely in his
9:11
head. I think maybe one of the through lines is that in
9:13
a lot of key moments in this, we get a brief,
9:16
very strange moments. We get a brief
9:19
interior monologue that comes and goes
9:22
for Ali. And
9:24
at this point,
9:26
all the forces of politics and
9:29
like
9:30
mainstream boxing conspire
9:33
to try and destroy his career. That
9:36
he is charged with a crime for refusing
9:42
to refusing the draft. And
9:46
all the boxing commissions across the United States further
9:50
strip him of his title and ban
9:52
him from future fights.
9:56
And at this moment with his fortunes
9:58
at their bleakest, the Nation of Islam, also kind
10:00
of abandons him as well and leave
10:02
him twisting in the wind as
10:05
well as substantially broke despite
10:09
having been his business manager for
10:11
years.
10:14
He goes through a long court case. He
10:18
also meets and marries his second
10:20
wife, a
10:22
fellow member of the nation.
10:27
He is sort of delivered by
10:30
the Supreme Court case that gives him conscientious
10:32
objectors status. And
10:35
he is booked for a fight against new
10:38
reigning champion Joe Frazier
10:42
and is demolished
10:44
in that fight as he is out of practice and
10:47
unready for the fight. And as he
10:49
is beginning to renew his challenge
10:52
against Frazier, Frazier himself is
10:55
defeated by a new upcoming
10:57
fighter, George Foreman. And this sets up
11:00
his culminating duel
11:02
Foreman at the Rumble in the Jungle
11:05
in Zaire in 1974.
11:06
He
11:09
goes there.
11:10
While he is over there,
11:13
he begins an affair with the one who will become his third
11:15
wife and also is forced
11:17
to sort of confront the tension between his ideals
11:20
as a member of the Nation of Islam
11:23
and also the fact that he
11:26
is a celebrity working in one of the most
11:28
morally compromised fields
11:31
in sports. And
11:34
so despite many of his beliefs,
11:36
he is also surrounded by enablers,
11:39
by con men. And
11:41
in fact, the Rumble in the Jungle is being underwritten
11:45
by the Mabuto dictatorship in
11:47
Zaire. And we get lots of like ominous
11:50
cross cuts to his CIA handlers
11:52
throughout this film and FBI
11:55
surveillance agents were keeping tabs
11:58
on Ali and all his friends.
12:01
And in this fight that he is, again,
12:03
sort of heavily favored
12:05
to lose, he
12:09
sort of alights upon the legendary
12:11
strategy, the rope dope that
12:13
enables him to allow Foreman to
12:15
effectively punch himself out of the fight. And
12:20
in probably what still rates as
12:22
one of the most brilliant boxing victories in
12:24
history, one of the true master strokes,
12:28
he defeats the odds, he
12:30
defeats this fighter
12:32
who was poised to supplant him.
12:34
And the film ends as
12:37
the heavens open up as they did in the
12:40
aftermath of that fight. And Ali
12:43
is captured at the end of the film, sort
12:45
of at the zenith of his career.
12:48
And for a lot of reasons, that film continues.
12:51
The rest of the story is not as uplifting as the
12:53
one that man chooses to terminate
12:55
here. But
12:58
one reason I stumble over that summary is
13:01
because none of these pieces really fit
13:03
together that well.
13:07
And I think
13:09
let's tackle the opening, honestly, Alex,
13:13
because
13:15
the opening is, I think, one of the first things
13:17
that signals that there's something a little
13:20
off here.
13:21
But to me, it was like interesting,
13:23
but also like, I don't get it.
13:26
And the more thing, but like, so it opens
13:29
on a Sam Cooke concert. Yes.
13:31
And a reenacted Sam Cooke
13:33
concert. And by the way, if Michael
13:36
Mann ever wants to shoot a
13:39
movie where he's reenacting great concerts from history,
13:42
I'm there for that. All this shit is great. Like he
13:44
does this repeatedly throughout the film is
13:46
like showcase musical
13:49
performances of the time. But yeah, it
13:51
opens on
13:53
footage from a
13:55
Sam Cooke concert intercut
13:58
with Ali. jogging
14:00
through the night, preparing for his bout
14:03
with with Liston. And
14:05
having and also having flashbacks
14:08
to his formative years in Kentucky. Yeah.
14:11
Well, so my issue here is not with the
14:14
choice to juxtapose this concert
14:16
against, you know, him doing his training. Like, I think
14:18
it's a nice little style exercise. Butts
14:21
man stretches legs a little bit with his, you know, wanting
14:23
to film a concert here.
14:25
And also, you know, gives a context at the time, you know, like,
14:27
this is the time when the story is taking place. And this
14:29
time when this story is taking place,
14:32
is after Cassius Clay has already become
14:34
a
14:35
fairly well known boxer, not a champion,
14:37
but he's you know, his boxing career is
14:39
already off and going. Now, a standard
14:42
biopic would chant would, at the very
14:44
least, spend the first 10 to 15 minutes
14:46
giving you some childhood, giving you some, you
14:48
know, context for what his family life was like, how did he
14:51
find boxing, all that kind of stuff.
14:53
Anytime Ollie's parents
14:56
appear or family appears in this thing, it
14:59
is purely
15:00
as background flavor.
15:02
Giancarlo Esposito plays his father,
15:05
and there is no context for who
15:07
this man is, or what role
15:09
he plays in Ollie's life
15:12
anywhere in the movie.
15:14
Other than a few glances and a few one off lines
15:16
where it seems like he's getting along famously
15:19
with with Ollie's trainer played
15:21
by Jamie Foxx.
15:23
Like, it just doesn't feel
15:26
like it has any real,
15:28
not only just no notion about like,
15:31
feeling it's important to show
15:33
any of that stuff, but also just no real
15:35
idea of how to make his family
15:38
life part of the connective tissue
15:40
of the story they want to tell. Yeah,
15:43
and I'm, and I also
15:45
feel like there's just so much here that like, you're
15:49
expected to make the connections, and I don't know
15:52
if it's because the film is doing a good job
15:54
visually making the connections, or
15:56
whether it is just because some of these things are
15:59
such like,
16:00
well-worn touchstones. For instance,
16:03
his father has a job painting
16:06
devotional art at churches
16:08
throughout the South.
16:11
And of course, a lot of his business
16:13
is white churches, and he is
16:15
painting blonde hair,
16:18
blue-eyed Jesuses on all these
16:20
churches. And you see a young
16:22
Ali sort of looking around at
16:26
his surroundings, sort of contemplating
16:30
the
16:32
white European faces and features being
16:35
portrayed in all this biblical art,
16:38
and then sort of looking around at the juxtaposition
16:40
between him and his father and the
16:42
white people that surround them. But
16:44
the thing is,
16:47
does this have resonance? Mostly because we're
16:50
all very familiar with
16:52
the notion that a lot of
16:55
Christian art in the United States and
16:57
Europe is fundamentally like
17:00
whitewashing the Holy Land in
17:02
religious history and has
17:04
like a white supremacist purpose
17:06
to it. Like is this film basically just
17:08
drafting off the scene in
17:11
Malcolm X, where he confronts
17:13
the prison chaplain and sort
17:15
of raises this exact question
17:18
of how come all the, you
17:20
know, saints and disciples
17:23
that we see in this art are
17:25
white and we know the Bible even
17:27
talks about the fact that there's indications
17:30
that like these were like
17:33
brown Semitic people.
17:36
But like, does
17:38
man get us there? Or is it just that the
17:41
film exists in the context where we're like, yeah, of course, of
17:43
course that's what this shot means. I
17:45
think that's what he means it to mean.
17:48
But like, it's like you said, like there is definitely
17:50
a degree of if you are not paying rapt attention
17:53
or you do not have this immediate context for
17:55
this kind of stuff, it just kind of feels like window dressing.
17:58
And it's similarly, I think. I think
18:00
it's kind of how the movie handles
18:03
his faith in general, which is to
18:05
say that
18:06
there's a lot
18:07
made about his relationship specifically with
18:09
the nation of Islam, which is fair. I mean,
18:11
that's a big part of what that chunk of his story
18:14
is. But
18:16
there's really not very much in there
18:18
about what Islam actually means
18:20
to Muhammad Ali outside of
18:23
the forces of the nation pushing
18:25
in, you know, pushing him in one direction or pulling
18:27
him away from another. And you
18:30
know, you get a little bit in the scenes with Malcolm,
18:32
who I think is very well played here by Mario
18:34
Van Peebles. Like obviously he's standing
18:36
in the shadow of Denzel Washington's performance, which is
18:39
a very tough one to do legitimately
18:41
one of the greatest biopic performances in any movie ever.
18:44
And he avails himself well here.
18:46
But there isn't a lot
18:48
for Malcolm X to do in this movie
18:51
outside of
18:52
be a sort of tragic figure
18:55
and instructive point for where Muhammad
18:57
Ali goes after his tragic death
19:00
after his assassination. You know, like that
19:02
is there's just not a lot
19:04
of meat to what how he's brought into
19:06
the faith, what Ali like how
19:09
he perceives, you know, Islam
19:11
as like the driving force in his
19:13
life, which it clearly is to some degree, like
19:16
it guides, you know, the women that he chooses
19:19
to pursue. It guides the way that
19:21
he you know, like his his
19:23
conscious beliefs about, you know, like the war
19:25
and all that kind of stuff.
19:27
But then there's also this wall up that's like,
19:29
never really breached as far as
19:31
like, where that really like
19:34
factors in with his life and his what
19:37
it means to him outside of just the influence
19:39
of the nation.
19:41
Yeah, it's I think part
19:44
of it is
19:47
funny there are there are moments where it's
19:52
like, Ali is too frustrating a figure in
19:54
some ways for men to fully wrestle with
19:56
him. Right. Because he is kind of
19:58
an unknowable person.
19:59
because so much of it like, you
20:02
know, he's a showman at heart, you know, and
20:04
like a lot of what he does in the public sphere is
20:07
to rile up his opponents and to get crowds
20:10
behind him.
20:11
But you would hope that a movie like this would be a little
20:13
bit more invested in trying to dig into what's under
20:15
that. And the
20:17
fact that I was thinking about this,
20:20
I think in some ways,
20:23
you could see the film as like one through
20:25
line I can see when I look at this film
20:27
is that... that
20:30
maybe the two most important victories
20:32
he wages,
20:34
our moment he achieves are
20:36
moments where he takes it all inside himself,
20:38
that all the key decisions are being
20:41
made internally without
20:43
the coterie advisors who surround him.
20:46
So like, it is there are a lot of people telling
20:48
him what he could do or what he should do when he faces
20:50
the draft board. Ultimately,
20:53
when he chooses to deny
20:55
the draft, that
20:57
is something that nobody around him really wanted
21:00
him to do. Everyone understood
21:02
that like this was a hugely risky play and
21:06
would have a lot of... Again, like...
21:08
I think
21:10
this is maybe something else that the... I think
21:12
any film would probably struggle to...
21:15
portray here.
21:19
The degree to which this guy was unpopular
21:21
at this time is hard to fathom now because,
21:23
you know, us growing up, this was an American
21:25
saint.
21:26
This is like... This
21:29
is an icon and all these
21:31
things he did were steps in his
21:33
greatness. The film
21:35
struggles to make
21:37
concrete for us, the degree to which
21:40
people hated him for this choice.
21:42
Yeah, and they don't really depict it is the thing. Like
21:44
there's a lot of conversation in the background happening
21:47
about, you know, like the
21:49
way things are going down. But
21:51
like the only time you see him surrounded
21:53
by crowds by and large, it's either
21:56
adoring fans in, you know, the inner city
21:58
or it is being surrounded by... by reporters
22:01
and it is usually like sometimes I'll ask a
22:03
pointed question and he'll give a glib answer
22:05
but like
22:06
you don't really see the impact of what he's
22:09
going through anywhere in this
22:11
movie outside of him having conversation with
22:13
his various wives and his handlers.
22:17
Yeah and and like
22:20
but the other thing is so like he
22:22
makes these two key decisions that
22:24
he keeps to himself which is like I am going
22:27
to fight the draft.
22:28
Right. And the other thing and this is weird because like
22:30
again what connects these two things I don't know like
22:33
these are two greatest opponents one is the US
22:35
government the other is George Foreman kind of a
22:37
weird thing but the other thing he does
22:39
that again nobody fully is prepared for
22:41
him to do is like how he figured out how he's going to fight
22:43
Foreman. None of his like
22:46
he none of his in that pivotal fight
22:48
he's out there alone carrying out a strategy
22:50
that he's never told anyone about everyone
22:53
is baffled by it
22:56
and the sort of through line I can put
22:58
on this is that outside of those
23:00
moments
23:02
all these kind of inexplicable figure
23:05
for the degree to which he lets
23:08
himself be
23:10
buffeted
23:11
by these forces around him and controlled
23:13
by these forces around him and it's very
23:15
disappointing in moments like there like
23:18
there is a I agree I think I think
23:21
like Maravent Peebles is excellent
23:23
in this and there's a moment that is just a gut punch
23:25
which is in
23:26
the in the wake of
23:29
the nation
23:31
sort of having
23:33
tried to lay claim to Ali
23:37
and keep him out of like
23:39
Malcolm's hands
23:41
they run into each other
23:44
you know as their as their two trips to
23:47
Africa sort of overlap and
23:51
for a minute Ali forgets the contacts
23:54
is really excited to see his old friend
23:57
and then like midway through here members oh wait
23:59
I'm not supposed to be fighting
23:59
I'm friends with this guy. The nation doesn't
24:02
want me to be friends with this guy. You and Elijah Muhammad
24:04
shouldn't quarrel. Yeah, and
24:06
just sort of turns his back on him. But
24:09
he's kind of a frustrating figure in those moments
24:11
because it's like,
24:14
it's not,
24:16
he is letting some important
24:18
choices be made for him.
24:20
But the thing that doesn't come through is like, why
24:22
does he let these decisions be made for him?
24:25
Why is he sort of
24:27
a rube when it comes to
24:29
the nation? And the
24:32
ways they manage or mismanage
24:35
him. It
24:37
feels like we never fully explore. Like,
24:39
why does this character who in some ways
24:41
is capable of these moments of being like, I'm
24:44
going to chart my own path, why
24:46
at these other moments is he so suggestible?
24:49
The film doesn't get us at a, what
24:52
is the essential nature of this man
24:55
that has these extremes? And it's possible
24:57
that the conclusion they came to, the
25:00
writers and man is that he is
25:02
simply a capricious individual. And
25:04
there is to a degree, as much
25:06
as you think you can know him,
25:08
you can't. Because in the end, he's going to do
25:11
what he wants to do in the moment
25:13
when he decides it's the right thing to do.
25:16
And I mean, that comes across a little
25:18
bit.
25:18
The problem is that
25:21
the story they are telling around
25:23
that personality does
25:25
not
25:25
really lend itself to
25:28
the kind of heroic sports story they
25:30
are trying to, basically
25:33
to build themselves toward.
25:35
And the lengths that they have to go to, to try and
25:37
make this big triumphant thing at the
25:39
end,
25:40
it just doesn't gel. Like,
25:42
it just doesn't fit together. It feels like,
25:45
well, Ali didn't tell anyone what he was
25:47
going to do. And that was a
25:49
weird move, but it worked. So hey,
25:52
everyone's excited. Like it just has this,
25:54
it doesn't land. It doesn't land
25:56
the way that it should.
25:58
No, it's funny. Because
26:01
it's like there's a number of lenses
26:04
that
26:04
man almost tries to put on him and just can't
26:07
commit to one. And you don't see like what he's
26:09
going for is for an effect of like here's a bunch
26:12
of ways of looking at Ollie.
26:14
But because he never really lights on one,
26:17
he never sort of tries to figure,
26:19
he never arrives on one that seems to have much
26:22
explanatory power for
26:25
the figure that he's making this film about. The
26:28
opening is trying out this notion of like Ollie
26:30
is one of the great artists of his generation. I
26:32
think that that opening gambit
26:34
is entirely, you
26:36
know, we have two things. One is
26:38
like Sam Cooke and the
26:40
cop car is driving by him at night on
26:42
his run. It is the, you know, we're
26:44
brought to mind of all the perils that surround like
26:47
black men, you know, at all points
26:50
in their life. Sam Cooke's, you know, eventual fate
26:52
is a testament to that. But
26:54
also there the other parallel being drawn is
26:59
he is both one of the great
27:01
like
27:02
black artists of this time
27:05
and he is one of the great black political figures of this
27:07
time that he like the film kind
27:09
of is positioning him as both. And
27:11
in a lot of ways, one of the few to make
27:13
it out of this era, one of the few
27:15
one of the few artistic geniuses
27:18
and prophets to survive
27:21
the 60s and 70s. There
27:23
are literally two assassinations in this movie of
27:25
figures of the of that stature and the Malcolm
27:27
X one, you know, they they give some weight
27:30
to. I feel very badly for
27:32
LeVar Burton
27:32
as Martin Luther King Jr. here, who
27:34
is in half a scene and
27:37
then dies and that his death
27:39
scene is really only
27:41
used to explain that the the
27:44
God, what is his name? Sean T. Asgridge.
27:47
Yes, Sean T. Asgridge is there and Joe
27:49
Morton was there. And so like they can
27:51
get a shot of Joe Morton standing over his body.
27:53
One of the most whiplash moments I'd forgotten this
27:55
part is he's he's he's filling in.
27:58
They give you a date and he's.
27:59
filling in, he's filling in,
28:02
uh, uh, Ali
28:04
on what's going on with his case. And
28:06
you're like, you get a date and you're like, why did I get a
28:08
date?
28:10
And then you, then you notice like, Hey, that's
28:12
a, that's a two story.
28:14
Motor court motel. And
28:16
that the fence railing is giving me bad
28:18
vibes. And then like a second later, it's
28:20
like, yep, this is the place. And
28:23
in this film, like it's, and the
28:25
way these are connected is his lawyer, uh,
28:28
a, a civil rights activist, uh,
28:30
and legendary figure, his own right was, was
28:32
there handling his case and
28:34
also, uh,
28:36
you know, Martin Luther King's case
28:38
at the same time, he's there for the assassination. Uh,
28:41
but there are moments where this film
28:44
edges up on the forest, gump
28:46
territory in terms of
28:49
Ali as just the guy who's always
28:51
there. And it does that handles
28:53
like that is, that is the, the connective issue
28:55
between every major civil rights event of
28:57
this era.
28:59
And in case, and then when that connective
29:01
tissue doesn't exist, man
29:04
will be like, I'm going to put some FBI
29:06
agents or CIA agents in the margins
29:08
of these scenes. Looking ominous. This
29:11
is the thing that drives me the most up
29:13
the wall about this movie
29:15
is that, and it's not because he's choosing
29:17
to do this. It's the way he's choosing to do this
29:19
because
29:20
yes, there is a really interesting
29:22
potential undercurrent story to be told
29:25
here.
29:25
About the way that American government forces
29:27
and the way that the government manipulated media
29:30
and manipulated media against figures
29:32
like Ali, who, you know, stood
29:34
in the way of their ultimate ends by,
29:36
you know, being a vocal opponent of the war,
29:38
you know, that they were engaged in and
29:41
the civil rights movement for that matter,
29:43
but they have no
29:46
understanding of how to
29:48
tie those scenes into
29:50
the actual story
29:52
that they are telling.
29:53
Like it every time the CIA
29:56
handler happens or they cut to the FBI
29:58
guys, you know, weren't
29:59
run and tape in a hotel room somewhere,
30:02
it feels completely disconnected
30:05
from what the story is
30:07
that they're actually trying to tell. And
30:10
it feels like they are free-floating pieces
30:13
of a much longer movie that
30:15
mostly got left on the cutting room floor. It's
30:17
bizarre.
30:19
It's like in that scene
30:22
where he's talking to Malcolm for what's gonna
30:24
be the last time.
30:25
Yeah.
30:26
We zoom in on
30:28
a hotel room window where
30:30
CIA observers are reporting
30:33
into their boss on what's going on. The
30:35
boss is on the phone
30:37
in an African palace in Zaire,
30:40
as it turns out.
30:42
And he gets off the phone, he goes down the hall
30:45
to oversee an execution of
30:47
Lumumba and his loyalists
30:50
as Mobutu takes power. And
30:53
it's like just bizarre. And
30:55
then they cut to Mobutu,
30:57
like walking into a room and just
30:59
being like, it's done.
31:00
And everyone's like, okay, so clearly this is
31:02
Mobutu coming to power. They're gonna find some way to
31:04
like tell these stories in parallel. But
31:07
no, we don't see Mobutu again until the
31:09
rumble in the jungle. And it's for a one scene
31:11
bit with the CIA
31:13
guy and General Idi Amin.
31:16
And they're just sitting around a table looking
31:19
sinister. That's it.
31:21
There is nothing else to that story.
31:24
And again, it's like,
31:26
this is a 2001 movie.
31:29
So like, I hope the audience has
31:31
their encyclopedia with
31:33
them or something to figure out why
31:35
these figures are like so important
31:37
or what this legacy
31:40
of intervention means. Cause
31:42
you just aren't going to get it from here. Like Mobutu
31:44
shown adjacent to an execution. Yeah,
31:46
seems bad. But like,
31:50
you don't, the thing that he
31:52
alludes to, doesn't fully sketch out is
31:55
like in the background
32:00
of this of this pan Africanism that
32:03
Ali is embracing,
32:06
you also have a
32:09
like
32:12
pan African establishment of dictatorships,
32:15
with the sponsorship of the CIA, to
32:18
both sabotage political development in
32:20
Africa, to like,
32:23
maintain access to
32:26
resources and like, socioeconomically,
32:29
like kneecap these countries, right?
32:31
And turn them into just like places
32:34
that can be like strip mined, effectively,
32:37
but you don't get that in this film. Well, and the
32:39
thing is, you can't you can't get that in the actual
32:42
story either. Because in the end,
32:45
as much as this movie wants to make
32:47
this this end bit as the
32:49
big triumph, the comeback,
32:51
the reclaiming of what was rightfully his in
32:54
you know, the title that was stripped of him during
32:56
the course of his, you know, his
32:58
years in the desert, shall we say, in
33:01
the boxing world.
33:03
And you know, even the documentary we when
33:06
we were kings doesn't fully
33:08
dig into this aspect either. But
33:10
they least like allude to it more and talk more
33:13
about it
33:13
is the fact that in the end, Ali agrees to
33:16
take $5 million from one of these dictatorships
33:18
from one of these, you know, these
33:20
these forces
33:22
that are working against the kind of Pan
33:24
African sort of you know, movement
33:26
that he wants to be a part of ostensibly.
33:29
And there is
33:32
no
33:32
lip service even paid to the idea
33:34
that there should be a conflict there
33:37
in his thinking in what he's doing. And maybe that's because
33:39
there wasn't one.
33:40
But that's a thing you can tell in that story
33:43
to complicate to like actually add texture
33:45
and complicate what we know
33:48
about
33:48
Muhammad Ali. But this movie has
33:50
neither the wherewithal nor seemingly
33:53
the coherence to make that happen.
33:55
Well, and what's weird is so those those
33:57
arguments are presented by Belinda. his
34:00
wife. Right. The second wife. And
34:03
she is sort of the chorus in a
34:05
lot of this being like, hey,
34:07
why
34:09
are you letting your shady
34:13
fucking manager, Herbert,
34:16
played by Barry Hanley,
34:19
a regular man collaborator.
34:24
But he is very much a
34:26
opportunistic like
34:29
businessman associated with the nation. And
34:33
Belinda points out that when he lost
34:35
his boxing license and
34:37
all this stuff, his
34:38
old manager Herbert was
34:41
nowhere to be found. Neither was the nation.
34:44
So she at one point begs him like,
34:46
hey, if you make your way back
34:48
into the upper echelons of boxing,
34:50
can you please surround yourself with different people? And
34:54
he doesn't. He is a complete,
34:56
you know, all Herbert has
34:58
to do show up and
35:00
all he makes him eat a little bit, a little bit of
35:02
crow and it's not feel bad, but that's about
35:04
it. Yeah. And then later
35:06
in in Zaire, Belinda sort of
35:09
points out that like, hey,
35:11
this is a wildly corrupt
35:13
dictatorship. We're
35:15
at Don King, who's
35:17
putting this together,
35:19
really brilliantly channeled by Michael
35:21
T. Williamson.
35:24
Like she points out that
35:26
this whole thing just stinks to high heaven. It
35:29
seems like one of the shadiest promotional bouts
35:32
that she can imagine. And his response is
35:36
what I am trying to do effectively.
35:38
He says, you
35:42
know, I need, I need
35:45
badasses to get this done effectively.
35:47
I need people who are going to
35:49
be shady, who are utterly without
35:52
shame, who are willing to like
35:54
take these deals because they're the only
35:57
ones who can get it done, which is an interesting
35:59
argument.
36:00
And again, could have been the framework
36:03
for a better film, right? Of
36:05
Ollie has these
36:08
grand visions and ambitions, but
36:10
also at the same time recognizes that
36:12
their intention with the fact that
36:14
however big his star is, he
36:17
is a boxer and has to deal
36:19
with the sorts of people that glam on the boxers and
36:22
everything, all the social progress he
36:24
seeks to make will be done through
36:27
the machinery of the boxing publicity
36:29
world.
36:32
But no, the film just kind of leaves it there where
36:34
it's like, yeah, believes it right on the table.
36:37
What do you want from him? I
36:39
mean, just hang out and let him go have his affair.
36:42
Stop being such a buzzkill. It's
36:44
problematic because it
36:46
like it does leave it on the table,
36:49
but it's also couching a lot of this stuff
36:51
in a
36:52
lot of really leaden dialogue that
36:54
is very heavy on the like biopic. Here's
36:57
your big like trailer moment kind of delivery
37:00
type stuff. There's
37:01
a line in there where she's like, why
37:03
is my Muslim husband being strung up
37:05
on a cross, you know? And it's just like, Jesus
37:08
fucking Christ with this with this writing. Like
37:10
it just it leaves the characters feeling
37:13
like bad caricatures. And it doesn't feel
37:15
like it's actually getting to the root of any of the
37:17
reality of like what these characters were thinking
37:19
and doing at the time. And it just makes it
37:21
feel very like like like filmic in a really dumb
37:23
way, not in a good or interesting
37:26
way.
37:27
Yeah, it's. I
37:34
think one of the things that I like in man's
37:36
philosophy is that he's
37:39
a guy of eclectic interests. If you look at
37:41
like the stuff he's doing, like you're like, where
37:43
did the insider come from? What's what's going on here? Just
37:45
like some some weird left and right turns. You read this article and was like,
37:47
fuck, this is making a good movie. Let's do it. Yeah.
37:51
With Ali, you see sort of the the dark side
37:53
of that, which is that he
37:55
can't figure out. He
37:58
never like sets to. an
38:00
angle of making this movie.
38:03
No. And that lack
38:05
of an angle, that lack of... So
38:08
just before we did this, I ended up watching... I
38:11
watched Malcolm X for the first time in like 20
38:13
years. And as I often
38:15
do, I
38:17
always forget how fun
38:20
Spike Lee's movies are. Yes,
38:22
even no matter how dark the subject matter
38:25
is that he's approaching, he always finds
38:27
a way to bring energy to what he is depicting.
38:30
But also a thing I forget
38:32
is that he
38:35
can be a stylistic chameleon.
38:38
He has his shots that he goes to, the
38:41
dolly shot. Yes, dolly's into the
38:43
iconic Spike Lee shot. Yeah, absolutely.
38:46
But when I go to Malcolm X,
38:48
in so many ways, he is making a
38:51
boilerplate
38:54
old school. We're talking old school, like 1930. I
38:56
watched
38:58
Newt Rockne All-American a few months
39:00
ago. As one does. Yeah,
39:02
as one does.
39:06
And that type of biopic,
39:08
Ali is using some of that framework, but
39:10
repurposing it to tell the life story of Malcolm
39:12
X. And you realize...
39:15
So partly is, I think
39:17
Spike is mimicking the style of
39:19
contemporary film for where the story is at.
39:22
When Malcolm is on the streets
39:24
of Boston and New York, it's a
39:27
1930s biopic slash
39:29
gangster film. Right. Later
39:32
on, it's more of a new wave character
39:34
study. But
39:36
the biopic template that
39:38
he sort of cleaves
39:40
to, it
39:42
solves a lot of problems. It's a bit didactic.
39:46
You have a lot of like, I'm going to show this character
39:48
speechify. I am going to
39:50
show this character have his big moments. I'm going to
39:52
give you some context for all that. Some characters
39:54
are going to speak a little uncomfortably in exposition,
39:57
but it
39:59
also manages
39:59
to convey a whole lot of information in context
40:03
without like burdening it too much. Man
40:05
is a little like you have those you have those clunkers
40:08
of lines in it. But then also
40:10
so much of the film seems like he like
40:12
he's like,
40:13
maybe if I just make this enough of a stylistic
40:16
collage,
40:17
something will emerge.
40:20
Yeah, like, okay, so a couple
40:22
things here. Like I agree with you 100% on Malcolm X.
40:24
He is definitely pulling from like that classic
40:27
framework.
40:28
The difference is that Lee I
40:30
feel like has a complete understanding
40:33
of who this character is, and how
40:35
to tell his story in
40:37
a way that any audience can
40:39
digest and understand. And
40:41
even a white audience that might have had deeply,
40:43
you
40:44
know, rotten feelings about Malcolm X and
40:46
his goodness during the two third dimension
40:49
was not on.
40:50
No, not 100 by no means. And
40:52
I think that that movie went a long way
40:55
to contextualizing who Malcolm
40:57
X was, what his importance was, but
40:59
also who he was as a person underneath what
41:01
everyone perceived him to be.
41:03
That is, in totality,
41:06
a complete look at the man and at least
41:08
as far as anyone has tried to portray
41:10
him up to this point.
41:12
In this movie, and
41:14
it's telling it what I'll get to another
41:16
point here in a second, but it's telling that we haven't really
41:19
talked about this much at all yet.
41:22
Man is relying very much on his
41:24
stylistic bag of tricks to give
41:27
flavor and texture to scenes that people
41:29
already know. And he is hoping and
41:32
praying
41:33
that Will Smith's magnetism
41:36
as Muhammad Ali will carry
41:38
the story forward
41:40
when the script does not have
41:42
the weight underneath it to float it along.
41:45
And
41:46
the problem is,
41:48
while Will Smith gives what I would call a
41:50
completely serviceable and solid
41:53
impression of
41:54
Muhammad Ali, even in the quieter moments,
41:56
I think he's better in those scenes
41:58
than a lot of the other actors.
41:59
are because there's just a little like he's trying
42:02
for something there in those scenes at least. But
42:05
he's never more electric than when he's just doing
42:08
a riff on something that you can see on
42:10
newsreel footage, when he is taking something
42:12
that is literally there for him to
42:14
look at and roll around and make into
42:16
something that he can utter and deliver.
42:19
But when other than that, there is
42:21
just not a lot else to this performance
42:24
to lock onto. I
42:26
remember a
42:28
few years after this Jamie Foxx made
42:30
Ray.
42:31
Yes. And I remember an interview that he
42:34
gave with Terry Grass on
42:36
Fresh Air, I think where he's talking about.
42:40
She was talking to him about like
42:43
being such a convincing Ray Charles
42:46
and he gets to this thing about like the difference
42:48
between doing an impression and channeling and
42:50
he's like he's
42:51
like if you do an impression, no matter how good
42:53
you are, no matter how much you mimic a person,
42:56
you're just still only doing an impression and
42:58
that's going to limit your range. That's going to limit
43:00
what you can do. He's like what I'm doing is channeling.
43:03
Like if
43:05
you look at that performance, you say like,
43:07
that's Ray. It's
43:10
because the impression might be inexact,
43:12
but if the feel of the characters
43:15
is right, you don't care how exact the impression
43:17
is. And Smith throughout
43:20
all of this, it
43:21
feels like he's the embodiment of an actor
43:24
who gets like
43:26
stuck doing an impression
43:28
and can't figure a way out of it. Maybe that's because
43:30
the material isn't there to like to pull
43:33
him out of it, but like I'm astonished
43:35
on the one hand at like
43:38
how well he can
43:40
deliver some of those like iconic moments
43:43
and like speeches and at the
43:45
same time how flat the performance
43:47
seems. Yeah. Throughout so much
43:49
of this.
43:50
And it's I think the scenes where
43:53
it really it was a challenge
43:56
for me to find stuff to like I honestly
43:58
and I I remembered. liking this performance
44:00
a little bit more. But like, watching this movie,
44:03
I feel like I did not.
44:05
I did not gel with it at all. And this one is is
44:07
Jon Voight's Howard Cosell.
44:09
Like, in the scenes
44:12
when they are just, you know, in the chair together doing
44:14
the television interview,
44:16
they are both hitting the notes like
44:18
they are representing the notes, they are playing along
44:21
to the music
44:23
that they have rehearsed over and over and
44:25
over again.
44:26
The second they get off camera, and they're trying
44:28
to, you know, deliver like what is the behind the scenes
44:30
relationship between these two characters.
44:34
Smith pulls back.
44:36
And Voight
44:37
just turns into Nate from heat,
44:39
like his voice, it just kind of gets into this
44:42
low gravel that maybe that is how
44:44
Cosell talked when he wasn't broadcasting.
44:46
But the delivery just feels completely
44:49
different. And not in a way that feels
44:51
natural. It feels like him getting into serious
44:53
acting mode in a really visible
44:56
way. And
44:57
those scenes just fall deeply
44:59
flat in a way that I didn't even remember until
45:01
I rewatched it.
45:03
It's got
45:05
I feel like
45:08
because that was another character that's hard to do. Like,
45:11
they're both characters who are so distinctive.
45:13
Yeah, when news for real footage
45:16
exists that it's tough to imagine like, okay,
45:18
why does this person sound like when they're not playing to
45:20
the camera. But
45:23
yeah, like those are
45:26
those are those are weird moments. And
45:29
the fact that the
45:31
part where he's just like, you know, they're they do the big television,
45:33
they're all boys with his like, all right, Ali,
45:35
you know, they're gonna come for you, right? And
45:38
it just it doesn't feel like the
45:40
conversation those two characters would have
45:42
had not in the way that they are doing it. No,
45:44
no. I
45:47
think the other the other thing that's missing
45:49
here though, is that
45:53
this movie has no fucking antagonist.
45:56
No, it's trying to create one and other
45:58
than the US government it cannot cut
45:59
and see if one. And the reason, and I think
46:02
one reason I can't
46:03
is because the film does not want
46:06
to deal with how mean
46:08
Muhammad Ali could be and how
46:11
much he played into colorism
46:14
when it came to making himself the hero
46:16
of some fights against some, like the fact
46:18
that Joe Frazier shows up in this film
46:21
and they're just buddies. And
46:24
it's like, hey man, like anything you can do for your family?
46:26
Like I know things are hard for you. And it's
46:28
like, and that
46:30
may have been how Joe Frazier felt before
46:33
what happened happened. That
46:36
is not how Joe Frazier ends up feeling about Muhammad
46:38
Ali after the next
46:40
five years of water go under the bridge. And
46:43
it's because like,
46:45
you know, people who follow the fights back
46:47
then will tell you like there were times Muhammad
46:49
Ali was a really hard guy to like because
46:53
like Joe Frazier was a likable fighter
46:55
in a lot of ways and Ali
46:57
made him a joke.
46:58
And like we see allusions to
47:00
it with the fact that like, you
47:03
know, they play up the fact that he called Sunilis
47:05
a big dumb bear.
47:08
It was not the only comparisons he drew
47:11
when he was like building
47:13
up heat behind a fight. And
47:16
so like
47:17
some of what you're dealing with here is
47:19
that as likable as this guy could be, also
47:22
this dude
47:24
knifed a lot of the best black athletes
47:28
of his generation as well, in
47:31
part to like work the crowd and win
47:33
favor, you know, in the media
47:36
fight before the fight.
47:38
And like you can attribute some of that to just the nature
47:40
of competitive boxing and the way that it's sort
47:42
of like swallowed personalities and
47:44
you know, definitely like lifted up people
47:47
who were the most vocal and the most personable,
47:49
but at the same time, yeah, like it just,
47:51
the movie has no real sense
47:54
of why those dynamics
47:56
existed between him and those other boxers.
47:59
You know, like Sonny Liston is basically
48:02
just a cranky asshole who fucking, you
48:04
know, apparently cheats at one point during his match,
48:06
which I looked that up. And I think that's,
48:08
it's somewhat contested as to what actually happened there. Wait,
48:10
wait, what's the bit that?
48:12
Well, there's the bit like where he stings his eyes, remember,
48:14
and like he's talking about like, you know, I can't see, I
48:16
can't see anything during the fight. And
48:19
the movie basically says,
48:21
like Sonny Liston whispers to his eyes like, put
48:23
him on the gloves, put him on the gloves. You know, like basically
48:25
saying whatever the stuff you're using for my cut, just put it
48:27
on the gloves. But I don't
48:29
think that's ever really been established as a hundred
48:31
percent what happened. Like there's some illusions that
48:33
like maybe the trainer accidentally smeared some
48:35
on his glove or something like that. But the movie
48:38
is just like, nope,
48:39
he's a guy who will fucking tell his
48:41
trainer to put,
48:42
you know, some kind of salve on his gloves so
48:44
that, you know, he can get an edge in the fight. And
48:47
I don't, look, I don't know that much about Sonny Liston,
48:49
but that felt like a pretty unfair, like,
48:51
you know, way to sort of just like dump
48:53
that character.
48:55
Yeah. And I think the other thing is,
49:02
the thing you get, the thing that gets
49:04
lost here is
49:05
they're all legendary fighters. Yeah.
49:07
And here they're speed bumps. Like the thing
49:10
you, like again, unless you know
49:12
something about Sonny Liston, you
49:14
do not realize that like,
49:16
oh, you know, if this guy gets a clean shot at you, you'll
49:18
just be dead. You'll be done. Yeah.
49:22
And so like, how do you, how do you plan
49:24
out about against a guy who, if
49:27
he gets one or two of his like signature,
49:29
like punches in on you, that's the
49:32
ball game. Like there is not a, there is not a boxer
49:34
alive who's been able to like stand there and like trade,
49:36
trade blows with this guy.
49:38
That's missing here. Same
49:40
with, like the weird thing is watching this
49:43
after watching when we were Kings, when we were Kings,
49:47
problematic documentary in a lot
49:49
of ways, like this thing, like.
49:52
Like speaking of Spike Lee, boy, they really kind
49:54
of just shove him to the side of that thing just so they can
49:56
talk to George Plimpton and Norman Mailer. Where?
49:59
We were taking turns just one up each
50:02
other on like both
50:04
being full of shit. Yeah. Um,
50:07
and also like
50:09
exoticizing every aspect
50:12
of this. So much. And then the, then the documentary
50:14
is like, yeah. Uh, you know
50:17
the part where Norm, where George Plimpton is like
50:19
a witch doctor told me that, uh, a succubus
50:22
was going to put the trembling hand on
50:24
Foreman and we, we get intercut
50:27
with that, uh, a woman
50:29
performing at the, you know,
50:31
during sound checks for the, for the concerts
50:33
that attend this thing. And they just use
50:35
this one clip of her, uh, like
50:38
over and over again. Yeah. Like
50:39
it's a, like it's a great documentary, but
50:42
like there's an issue of perspective in
50:44
that story, but, but
50:47
the thing, and this is the other thing, there's some things that
50:49
like as good as man is
50:51
you just can't do
50:54
better than some of the like live documentary
50:56
footage. No, when they reenact their
50:59
George Foreman hitting a heavy bag, you
51:01
know what that's still less impressive than
51:03
the documentary footage of George Foreman hitting
51:05
a heavy bag and seeing that thing
51:08
billow out like a flag in the wind.
51:10
Yeah. Just like, just a straight
51:13
up dent in the center of that thing. And
51:15
it is, yeah, it's, it's
51:17
captivating and it's also kind of baffling
51:20
that like man
51:23
chooses to
51:24
discard some of the stuff that actually
51:28
contextualizes why Foreman wasn't
51:30
the crowd favorite, why he wasn't getting
51:33
the sort of, you know, the response that Ali was,
51:35
you know, there wasn't George Foreman, but my,
51:38
it was, it was all Ali boy. And the reason for
51:40
that, by the way, I think they also misspelled
51:42
and all the graffiti in this movie, which is a little vexing,
51:45
but there's
51:47
a whole thing of like,
51:49
most of the people in Zaire did not know that George
51:51
Foreman was black.
51:52
They assumed he was a white champion.
51:54
And then when he did get there, he brought a German shepherd
51:57
with him, who was his dog, which you know, I
51:59
did in
51:59
out of context, you think, okay, sure, a guy brought his
52:02
dog with him, whatever. But in Zaire, it's
52:04
a big deal, because the Belgians use
52:06
German shepherds as police dogs during
52:08
the most brutal times of the occupation
52:11
there.
52:11
And so there was this immediate
52:14
disconnect and kind of offense taken by
52:16
the people of Zaire,
52:17
when he arrived.
52:19
And the movie could use that stuff
52:21
to kind of flavor text why,
52:24
you know, George Foreman is not really getting
52:26
the crowd response and why Ali is able to capitalize
52:28
on that.
52:29
But it just doesn't. It just doesn't treat him
52:32
with even the amount of respect necessary to explain
52:34
why he's the villain of their story. No,
52:36
and the funny thing too, is I remember in, you know,
52:40
again, the theme of like, sometimes Ali
52:42
is less likable guy in some of these
52:44
fights. You get those clips in when
52:46
we were kings of
52:48
George Foreman is
52:50
funny, but he uses the fact he doesn't talk
52:52
as a source of humor. He is
52:55
he leaves very he's very brusque, like
52:57
very short to the point, but like his lines
52:59
can be funny.
53:00
And also, there's just a moment where he talks about
53:03
I just don't want people to be like,
53:04
saying like George Kill,
53:07
that's not what I'm about. He's he's got
53:09
a little bit like the flower child in
53:12
him, where he's like, that's not what he's
53:14
a fighter, but he's not like, bloodthirsty
53:17
for and he doesn't like that he's already a little off put
53:19
by the bloodthirstiness surrounding
53:22
this particular bout. He's a little
53:24
outsourced by it, whereas Ali
53:26
fully leans into it.
53:28
And we get the scene of him like,
53:30
you know, again, just channeling parts of this documentary,
53:33
which uses tons of B roll of him, like jogging
53:35
the streets of of
53:38
the city and like being surrounded by cheering
53:40
children and such and hearing
53:42
that chant. And here's given like,
53:45
really heavy handed musical overlay. And
53:47
like this is his awakening to his
53:49
life's purpose. But it's like, is it
53:52
like is
53:54
like what's being awakened here?
53:56
It's it's not clear. It's
53:58
It's kind of frustrating,
54:01
and I think it suffers from the fact that
54:04
in all these fights, it's just kind of
54:06
like, how's he going to win this one? And at no point
54:09
is he
54:10
appropriately matched with like,
54:13
here is an antagonist. This movie desperately
54:16
needs
54:18
a, like, to
54:20
his, to
54:23
his, like,
54:24
Vincent Hanna, he desperately needs
54:27
Neil McCauley.
54:29
And I think it's just none here.
54:30
There's none here. And I just think I'm part of the
54:33
problem is there just isn't that person, like,
54:35
none of these fighters are people that you can point
54:37
to and
54:38
say like, well, that guy was a piece of shit.
54:40
So of course I want to see Ali, you know, beat him.
54:43
Like that was not the nature of his
54:46
rise of his, you know, his being stripped
54:48
of the title and his comeback.
54:50
And
54:51
when it tries to gesture at other villains,
54:53
the nation of Islam and their influence, the
54:56
US government and the way they are trying to control
54:58
him, you know, Don
55:00
King, who is
55:01
really just kind of there really
55:04
gets admonished once and otherwise is not
55:06
really a big factor in the storytelling
55:09
here.
55:10
Like it just can't seem to commit
55:12
to which one of those it
55:14
wants to make the central point. I
55:17
think the closest it gets is the, you know, the
55:19
sort of tense
55:20
off and on again relationship with the nation of Islam,
55:23
but even there, once he kind of gets back
55:25
into the fold, they don't really talk about
55:27
it that much again. Well, and then he's
55:29
like,
55:30
so the thing they introduced late is
55:32
he meets his, he makes it meets his third wife
55:36
while like in Zaire. Yeah, in Zaire
55:38
waiting for this fight to go off.
55:40
And then in the big confrontation with,
55:44
with Belinda,
55:46
like we get the
55:49
moment where she's like, I will tolerate all
55:51
the casual infidelities, but
55:53
you are humiliating me with this, this woman
55:55
you've taken up with, uh, while we're here.
55:58
And it's like,
55:59
wait, when did that happen? Also,
56:02
when did the whole like, devout,
56:05
you know, member of the nation
56:08
thing like, where did that go? Like we saw So
56:10
what were the infidelities? We didn't get to see
56:12
any of that stuff. It all happened off screen. We see
56:14
a huge fucking deal of like,
56:17
how things with
56:19
Sanji, played by
56:21
Jay Pinkett Smith.
56:23
We see how that falls apart because she's
56:26
simply not in a modest enough Muslim
56:28
for him. And like, she doesn't like,
56:31
uphold the standard he wants to project
56:33
as a like, fairly new
56:35
convert to the nation.
56:38
And it's like, cool, that's it. Okay, that's a big part of
56:40
his character. His second wife like does fit
56:42
that mold. Like this is someone that like does
56:44
sort of agree with the values that he wants to live
56:47
his life by. And hey,
56:49
people change over the years. Clearly he did
56:51
as well. But
56:53
you're just sort of sitting there being like, so
56:55
so way he's having tons of casual affairs. And
56:58
like, so the
57:01
the whole conflict from the first from the
57:03
first act, that's just kind of like done now. Yeah,
57:06
and that nation of Islam stuff doesn't really matter.
57:08
Yeah.
57:09
And I look, if I was if
57:11
I was Belinda, and I was watching this portrayal,
57:14
I would be super fucking mad because
57:16
one, it you know, it doesn't
57:18
resolve itself at all. Like there's no,
57:21
there's no sense of her leaving even. Like
57:23
it is just throw through all the one that fight.
57:26
Yeah, her and the woman that he is
57:28
now taking up with are both cheering
57:30
for him during the course of that fight. And I'm sure
57:32
that's, you know, rooted in some kind of
57:34
history. But like, the way it's portrayed
57:37
here is these women,
57:39
Ali means so much to them that
57:41
it doesn't matter that there is this, you know,
57:43
infidelity that there is this breach of trust
57:46
between at least Belinda and him. Like,
57:49
she just wants to make sure he comes out okay.
57:51
And it's like, I can't fathom that
57:54
really being what's going through her head in that
57:56
moment, there has to be more conflict there
57:59
than just a simple
58:01
like, I want my husband to win
58:03
no matter what.
58:04
Yeah. And it just it
58:06
can't. And I think part of it
58:08
is this this film. This
58:13
film is so admiring of Ali
58:16
that it can't bring it something like the same way
58:18
it evades the fact
58:21
that his relationship with
58:23
his rivals was often kind of toxic
58:25
and awful. It also can't
58:27
quite face up to the fact that like,
58:30
like, like a lot of, you know, capital
58:33
G great men, this is
58:35
a guy whose home life was a mess and
58:37
full of contradictions. And
58:39
all we get is the other
58:42
part is there's so many moments where
58:44
like, something needs to land. And
58:46
unfortunately, because
58:49
the limitations of this Will Smith performance,
58:52
he becomes like Ali just seems callow
58:55
in so many places that happy
58:57
horse shit he spins Veronica
59:00
when they're talking later is he's basically
59:02
trying to be like, yeah, we're gonna have a fair but it's cool.
59:05
Don't worry about it.
59:07
You know, the whole like,
59:09
man, I just want to be the I'm
59:11
a very loving person. I just you know, it makes me the
59:13
best and most loving husband ever
59:15
but also the worst.
59:17
And in that moment,
59:20
you're like, am I supposed to take this guy seriously? Yeah,
59:22
like, am I supposed to? Wow, what a great love
59:25
story this is. Like, this is this is lame
59:27
shit. Yeah. And
59:30
again, I think it's extremely illustrative of
59:32
the non committal way
59:34
that they the whole film approaches how
59:37
they want to present Muhammad Ali.
59:40
It is a is
59:42
a film that feels simultaneously
59:44
adoring
59:44
of him and also afraid
59:47
to actually touch
59:49
any of the more pain points about
59:52
like who he was as a person,
59:54
beyond the stuff that they can kind of,
59:57
you know, they can kind of
59:58
tie together with external factors
1:00:01
like the nation
1:00:02
and the US government and
1:00:05
the way in which his
1:00:08
fall and re-rise in boxing.
1:00:11
All that stuff
1:00:13
is the – those are the dark
1:00:15
moments that they choose to fixate on because anything
1:00:18
else would require a greater understanding of
1:00:20
the man and a more
1:00:21
thoughtful and more willingness
1:00:24
to show the warts of someone
1:00:27
that is seen as so great.
1:00:29
And I have no
1:00:31
disagreement with the idea that Muhammad Ali was
1:00:33
a great figure and a great man and an incredibly
1:00:36
important person for the civil rights movement.
1:00:39
I just think that his story deserves something
1:00:42
more
1:00:43
willing to actually engage with who
1:00:45
he was as a person than what man is willing to do
1:00:47
here. Honest to God, the entire time I was watching
1:00:49
it, especially after watching When We Were Kings, I was like, this
1:00:52
should have been Spike Lee's movie. Not
1:00:55
that I want to box him into the idea of just doing
1:00:57
biopics of prominent black figures, but
1:01:01
I could see him at least
1:01:04
being willing to engage with the aspects
1:01:06
of his character that are
1:01:08
not the most rosy and not
1:01:10
the most showy.
1:01:13
Yeah, and I think it
1:01:15
is in part –
1:01:16
to me it also feels like
1:01:19
there
1:01:19
are so many places in this movie where
1:01:23
it almost feels like you can see –
1:01:26
like if the film had footnotes,
1:01:29
like man would just have a
1:01:31
C,
1:01:32
Malcolm X, 1992, D, Spike Lee. Because
1:01:36
there are just parts where he's like, you know what, I'm
1:01:38
not going into the story because the
1:01:41
definitive version of that on film already
1:01:43
exists, so I'm just going to set
1:01:46
that aside, which is very understandable.
1:01:50
And obviously the
1:01:53
definitive film was
1:01:56
made on that front, but
1:01:58
at the same time it means
1:01:59
that the
1:02:02
the Nation of Islam stuff just kind
1:02:04
of kind of ends up being a damn squib and
1:02:08
and kind of kind of forgotten about
1:02:11
and instead like you know Elijah
1:02:13
Muhammad becomes just yet another kind of charlatan
1:02:15
that surrounds Ali as
1:02:17
as kind of does throughout his career.
1:02:20
The other thing
1:02:25
there's something
1:02:27
that man does repeatedly in this film
1:02:30
so the soundtrack is great.
1:02:33
The license soundtrack is great. Yeah.
1:02:35
The score I have some issues
1:02:37
and there's a move that man makes repeatedly
1:02:39
and every single time it drives it just it
1:02:41
kills it for me.
1:02:44
So he lovingly recreates these
1:02:46
bouts.
1:02:47
Yeah. Like he is from a shooting
1:02:49
perspective he does a great job with it I will
1:02:51
say like the cinematography during the fights. I
1:02:53
was a little off with some of the digital
1:02:56
cinematography they're doing here like the
1:02:58
up close you know handheld camera
1:03:01
you know rapid-fire punches kind of coming at the camera
1:03:03
stuff is like a little overused. Yeah.
1:03:05
I feel like he's trying to get across
1:03:07
like the speed at which it would seem like if you're
1:03:10
a normal mortal in these things and it's just like
1:03:13
you know it looks it looks manageable
1:03:15
from the vantage of like the TV cameras
1:03:18
but if you were if you are in Ali's
1:03:20
shoes the speed of about is
1:03:22
like
1:03:23
lethal.
1:03:24
Totally. He goes that every time and it's
1:03:26
just kind of like
1:03:28
at this point it'd be like like you know what
1:03:30
it is? GoPros don't exist yet but it's
1:03:32
the corniness of like we just put a GoPro
1:03:34
on someone's forehead and we just had them like
1:03:36
do a few boxing drills. Totally.
1:03:38
But for
1:03:41
the most part these fights are like intimate,
1:03:43
they're scary, they're violent,
1:03:46
they're intense. The boxing ring
1:03:48
is a
1:03:50
perfect environment for
1:03:52
cinema right like they're they're over lit
1:03:55
you can you can play it up so it's almost like a black
1:03:57
box theater in terms of
1:03:59
like every
1:03:59
Everyone just disappears outside
1:04:02
the ring because it's so over lit. But
1:04:05
like, yeah, these these fights like generally
1:04:08
look terrific.
1:04:10
But in the big ones,
1:04:13
as Ali begins to like
1:04:16
work it around than his favor,
1:04:18
triumphant music starts to play like like the
1:04:20
score begins to swell.
1:04:22
And it's like, yep, I get it. I'm
1:04:24
supposed to be thrilled. This is supposed to be how this is happening.
1:04:26
But here's the other thing.
1:04:29
It's still a vicious fucking boxing about
1:04:32
like
1:04:33
you can like you can put whatever score you
1:04:35
want, but honestly, you're doing a disservice to
1:04:37
what you're showing, which is this is an intensely
1:04:40
violent, scary sport. And
1:04:43
so the music begins to swell and be so
1:04:45
much more effective. It's like.
1:04:47
Dude, this is just a combat sequence.
1:04:50
Like there's there's no there like
1:04:52
you're trying to impose an arc on something that
1:04:55
this is blood sport
1:04:56
like this is not shot
1:04:58
like Rocky. That's not how this is being this, not how
1:05:00
this film is assembled. That's how these fights are being shot.
1:05:03
And yeah, every time they just try to create this
1:05:05
like here, here's Ali rising the greatness
1:05:07
again, it really undercuts
1:05:10
the great work like man is done
1:05:12
in staging these things.
1:05:13
Yeah, I think the one time I would have allowed
1:05:16
it is kind of the end of the rumble of the jungle
1:05:18
fight, because the big swell of that
1:05:21
Salif Keda song tomorrow, like
1:05:23
I think that I put it this way. I watched
1:05:25
that movie like five days ago and that song has
1:05:28
been stuck in my head pretty much since and
1:05:30
it's a great song. But also the way it swells
1:05:33
in that moment with the rain coming
1:05:35
down and everyone cheering
1:05:36
again in a movie that had a better build
1:05:39
to that moment, it had a better villain and a better
1:05:41
arc to all of this.
1:05:43
That would be one of the most triumphant scenes in sports
1:05:45
cinema. But it just doesn't have any
1:05:47
of those things. And the song is really
1:05:49
the only thing kind of carrying the emotional weight
1:05:52
of it that in like the visual of the rain pouring down
1:05:54
on everyone.
1:05:55
And. Again,
1:05:57
I think that one I would allow, but elsewhere.
1:05:59
where it really does feel overused. And
1:06:02
it feels like as good as a lot of the music
1:06:04
in this movie is, it's deployed
1:06:06
in such a weird way. Like the length
1:06:08
of those different concert scenes, just
1:06:12
the random use of Moby at one
1:06:14
point. You know, I mean, obviously this is Moby phase,
1:06:16
but like it just kinda,
1:06:17
it kinda sticks out from the rest of the soundtrack,
1:06:20
which is very focused on black music
1:06:22
in a lot of ways. And I just,
1:06:24
I don't know, like
1:06:27
I kinda feel like man is just out
1:06:29
of his element here in a lot of ways. And he's trying
1:06:31
to throw things that he knows how to do into
1:06:34
the mix and none of them are sticking the way
1:06:36
he wants. It's, you know, it's like
1:06:38
we've traveled 20 years or so and
1:06:41
he's still got the same things he struggles with in
1:06:43
Crime Story.
1:06:45
Yeah. Which is like,
1:06:47
But he's got much more budget to work with. Right, but
1:06:50
like Crime Story still has all these scenes of
1:06:52
being like, man, wouldn't
1:06:54
it be cool
1:06:56
to be like one of the in crowd at
1:06:58
a black blues club? Wouldn't that be awesome?
1:07:01
Yeah. And it's like, it would, but
1:07:04
like this movie sort of stands with nose
1:07:07
pressed against the glass, you
1:07:09
know, trying to get in there. And
1:07:12
it just, it can't, like
1:07:14
there's too much, there's too much admiration for the
1:07:17
moment, the culture
1:07:20
in man's
1:07:22
take on this. There's too much admiration for
1:07:24
Ali as a figure that it feels
1:07:27
like he can't quite,
1:07:30
every other man protagonist,
1:07:33
the things that make them unbearable are
1:07:35
closely intertwined of things that like make
1:07:37
them the heroes of the story
1:07:40
in some ways. And he even tries
1:07:42
to put some of this in Ali's mouth where he's
1:07:45
like, you know, there's
1:07:49
an inner monologue part where it's like, I'm a man
1:07:52
ready to die for this, to
1:07:54
win this fight. I am willing to die
1:07:57
for this. Then it's shades of like James Khan
1:07:59
and thief.
1:07:59
or whatever, I will
1:08:02
give up everything in order to keep
1:08:05
you from dominating me and such.
1:08:08
But it just doesn't fully
1:08:11
work here. It's an attempt to create a compelling
1:08:14
sketch. But
1:08:18
because the film doesn't show much cost
1:08:21
for that, it doesn't
1:08:22
show much like, here's
1:08:25
the dark side of that persona,
1:08:28
then it doesn't really have much
1:08:30
bite as a virtue either. Yeah.
1:08:33
It feels like in going into
1:08:35
this, man thought Ali was a figure
1:08:38
that fit perfectly into the kind
1:08:40
of driven protagonist, the kind of like
1:08:42
single minded protagonist that he is
1:08:45
very, you know, I'd say largely
1:08:47
dedicated to portraying in the majority
1:08:49
of his stuff.
1:08:51
And I wonder if just somewhere along the way
1:08:53
he realized
1:08:54
he's not that and the
1:08:56
ways in which he is complicated, simply,
1:08:58
they were either eluding him,
1:09:01
or he just couldn't find a way to tell that
1:09:03
story that made sense to him.
1:09:06
So he tried to give it, you know, make it a style
1:09:08
exercise. He tried to make it something that
1:09:10
was a little less, you know, linear and a
1:09:12
little less,
1:09:14
you know, focused on the
1:09:16
singularity of the character, but he
1:09:18
would have needed a better performance to
1:09:20
make that work. And it's
1:09:22
not again, it's not that I think that like Will Smith is bad
1:09:24
in this movie, he's not. But he's
1:09:26
doing a very standard biopic
1:09:29
portrayal of a figure that figure
1:09:31
that I think deserved and needed a
1:09:34
lot more texture than what he was
1:09:36
able to offer.
1:09:38
Yeah, it's, I mean, you see how they
1:09:40
get at Will Smith is the guy to play him because Oh,
1:09:43
yeah, it's an easy call. Oh, yeah. Like,
1:09:46
like, who else? Who are you going to get
1:09:48
to sell
1:09:49
all these rhymes effectively,
1:09:51
the sort of
1:09:54
pre bout gab that
1:09:56
was his trademark like, like
1:09:58
ironically, I think Jamie Foxx.
1:09:59
could have also done it, but Jamie Foxx wasn't quite
1:10:02
at that.
1:10:03
I feel like he, like,
1:10:04
what was it? And he gave him Sunday was 99.
1:10:07
Yeah. So yeah, like he was, you
1:10:09
know, he was a couple of years into like, okay,
1:10:11
he's getting some plum rolls now, but I don't know if he
1:10:13
was carry this movie level
1:10:15
yet. No. And I mean, but you can see
1:10:18
like,
1:10:18
this is certainly one man decides he is because
1:10:22
like Jamie Foxx is given the character
1:10:24
actor role of Bundini
1:10:27
and nails it as far as like,
1:10:29
as far as the film is concerned, like his performance
1:10:32
of Bundini is like
1:10:35
captures why he's like the boon
1:10:37
companion of Ali, no
1:10:40
matter how straight
1:10:42
and narrow Ali strives to be. And also
1:10:45
why he is a bit of a times a
1:10:47
charity case for Ali as well. Yeah. He
1:10:50
gets lost in the world very
1:10:52
easily. But yeah, I mean, you know,
1:10:55
you see how they end up at Smith
1:10:57
as sort of a natural Ali,
1:11:01
but he's so he is so lost
1:11:03
in the impression and the screenplay gives nothing
1:11:07
else to do beyond
1:11:09
that impression that the film ends up
1:11:11
kind of kind of falling flat.
1:11:14
And I think, you know, maybe there's kind of two
1:11:16
legacies, you know, this film seems to have for
1:11:18
man. One is I think
1:11:20
this is his first time shooting
1:11:23
digitally.
1:11:24
Yes, I believe it. And I don't think it looks good,
1:11:27
but man loves it.
1:11:29
No, the scenes here that are definitely digital
1:11:31
camera like the the, you know, Knights on
1:11:33
the rooftop type stuff like him, you
1:11:35
know, like doing his training in the beginning,
1:11:38
like
1:11:39
I can understand why he would have thought
1:11:42
that was an interesting way to shoot
1:11:44
that stuff to make it look a little more gritty
1:11:46
and a little more on the ground than the, you
1:11:48
know, the full on
1:11:50
film stuff. But
1:11:51
digital technology being where it was in 2000 2001.
1:11:55
It just looks grainy
1:11:57
as shit and not in a way that really
1:12:00
really befits the rest of the film.
1:12:02
I like, I was like, what happened to this transfer?
1:12:04
Like the, like the first time I was like, what on earth is
1:12:06
going on here? Did the, like, did they lose the
1:12:09
original? But no, it's just like that
1:12:11
generation, digital cameras got
1:12:13
noisy as hell. Uh, so quickly,
1:12:16
but man comes out of this being
1:12:18
like correctly, these things are
1:12:20
the future. And I suspect
1:12:23
they are particularly learning to man because
1:12:25
as, as D has reminded us a lot
1:12:27
and in other episodes we've done, man
1:12:30
loves shooting in environments that
1:12:32
are just nightmares if you're shooting on film.
1:12:34
Right. And digital
1:12:37
gets you out of that in a lot of cases, digital
1:12:40
opens up possibilities for lighting
1:12:42
and capturing scenes. They're just not open
1:12:45
to someone shooting on film.
1:12:48
And I do feel like in
1:12:51
some ways you could look at, uh,
1:12:54
collateral, which, you
1:12:56
know, we're, we're talking about next as
1:12:59
kind of a correction for what happens
1:13:01
with, you
1:13:05
know, with Ali.
1:13:08
Yeah. Because it tightly
1:13:11
focuses it. Like Ali has a question
1:13:13
of like, what the fuck is this movie about? Who's the antagonist?
1:13:16
What are the characters?
1:13:18
Collateral. That's not a question at all in collateral.
1:13:20
No. Yeah. It is
1:13:22
a complete character study,
1:13:25
uh, through the lens of a relationship over the
1:13:27
course of one incredibly
1:13:29
violent night. Yeah. And
1:13:32
Jamie Fox is going to be one holding this down
1:13:34
and the other half of it, like it is like,
1:13:37
like in the wake of this, I look collateral now
1:13:39
as like a, we are leaving nothing to
1:13:41
chance right. Cause he
1:13:43
realizes like what he's got in Jamie
1:13:46
Fox. Uh, he
1:13:48
like
1:13:49
narrows the focus movie star in the
1:13:51
world to play this other character. And a movie star who I think
1:13:53
it was only becoming truly clear
1:13:55
at that point.
1:14:00
is similarly weird
1:14:02
about authenticity the way man is. And it's,
1:14:04
to me, the strangest thing about this
1:14:06
is this is their only collaboration.
1:14:09
Because I cannot
1:14:11
imagine two creators
1:14:13
who would seem more simpatico
1:14:15
in terms of how they like
1:14:17
to approach their craft, but,
1:14:22
you know, I also- Drew's gotten his pet director at
1:14:24
Macquarie.
1:14:24
It's true. And I also do wonder if maybe
1:14:27
there's a little bit of like two perfectionists kind
1:14:30
of bumping up against one another. I mean, I think man
1:14:32
has, I mean, we'll get into it when we talk about collateral, but
1:14:34
I think man has always been very complimentary about Cruise
1:14:36
and his work ethic and the way that they work together.
1:14:39
But he has never been like, I can't wait to work with
1:14:41
Tom Cruise again. And I'm, you know, I'm wondering
1:14:43
if maybe there were some reasons for that. But,
1:14:45
yeah, collateral is a hell of a movie and I can't wait to watch
1:14:47
it again.
1:14:48
And I mean, it is fair, like, outside
1:14:51
of his cast of like, the
1:14:54
ensemble theater troupe that
1:14:56
he carries with him, throughout a lot of his career.
1:14:59
Shout out to Bruce McGill, also shooting up here again.
1:15:02
Just being
1:15:05
absolutely menacing. Just to hang
1:15:07
out in Africa for a little while. Can you just
1:15:09
deliver this line in French to just scare the shit out of
1:15:11
everybody? Great.
1:15:14
But, outside
1:15:16
of those people who'd like work with man again
1:15:18
and again, I mean, he does not seem
1:15:21
to work with the same leading men very
1:15:23
often more than once. The Chino
1:15:25
is like the rare exception. And Fox,
1:15:29
and Fox, this goes famously
1:15:31
wrong with Miami Vice. Like, arguably,
1:15:34
like man pushes and pushes. And
1:15:36
like,
1:15:37
you know, the question of who is at fault for
1:15:39
what happened with Miami Vice. And
1:15:42
like,
1:15:44
you know, who was difficult to work with
1:15:47
is one we'll probably get into. But
1:15:49
it does seem very likely that in addition to that
1:15:51
like, two perfectionist thing you're talking
1:15:53
about, Alex, it's just like a
1:15:56
man film seems like a hard thing.
1:15:59
to endure
1:16:01
more than once. In
1:16:04
the comments that
1:16:06
the leads in last level, he can't
1:16:09
like enormously proud of it. Also,
1:16:12
it was like they were deployed to a
1:16:15
foreign country for like
1:16:17
months on this shoot and it was not fun.
1:16:20
So I'm curious
1:16:23
if that's part of the explanation for
1:16:25
this. But yeah, I think like Ali
1:16:28
is sort of a mystifying misfire
1:16:31
and
1:16:31
maybe it's partly that it is tough
1:16:33
to make a movie about an American saint, particularly
1:16:35
while he's still alive.
1:16:38
Yeah, yeah, I guess
1:16:40
the version that came out on Blu-ray
1:16:42
around
1:16:44
whatever the last release was, that was the version I
1:16:46
watched, they added a little Muhammad Ali,
1:16:48
you know, birth year 2016 to it
1:16:51
because obviously they couldn't do that while he was still alive.
1:16:54
And I don't know that it needed that
1:16:56
necessarily, like just a little bit of text
1:16:58
on screen at the end to be like, oh, by the way, he's passed
1:17:01
on. We love you, big guy.
1:17:03
It doesn't really affect any aspect
1:17:05
of the story they're telling. It just feels like a weird little
1:17:07
addition. It just makes it feel more like a weird
1:17:10
tribute.
1:17:11
And it's like, the
1:17:13
weird thing is like Spike ends Malcolm X
1:17:20
with black kids from all around
1:17:22
the world doing the I Am Spartacus thing. Yes.
1:17:26
And you're like,
1:17:27
you know what? After three and a half hours, you get to do this
1:17:29
victory lap. Absolutely. Hell yes.
1:17:33
Like bring out Nelson Mandela,
1:17:36
you know, talk about how this legacy lives
1:17:38
on, go for it. And it
1:17:40
doesn't feel just the way that little legend
1:17:43
does. And I think part of it is because
1:17:45
like
1:17:46
in that whole film, like it is an admiring portrait
1:17:49
of Malcolm X, but
1:17:51
like the,
1:17:54
I guess the work that is done for Spike Lee in
1:17:57
making that film is that at
1:17:59
a pivotal moment,
1:17:59
Malcolm X, his later days are
1:18:02
him also
1:18:03
realizing that he's been wrong about a lot of stuff.
1:18:06
And that he has been put in some
1:18:08
boxes by his association with
1:18:10
the nation that he now wants out
1:18:12
of. And sort of the great question is where does his career
1:18:15
go if he's not assassinated? And
1:18:18
so he's sort of given that kind of arc.
1:18:20
But with Ali, it's just
1:18:22
a complete, this
1:18:26
is an American icon. What
1:18:28
do we do with this guy? And the answer
1:18:30
is sadly in Ali,
1:18:33
not very much. Yeah.
1:18:35
Like I will just go on record here
1:18:37
as saying this is my least favorite of the man things we
1:18:39
have watched so far. And as much as I think Keep
1:18:41
is, the Keep is like a much more like
1:18:44
spectacular failure,
1:18:46
there is a spectacular quality to
1:18:48
it. There's something of the director working
1:18:51
what feels like so far outside his wheelhouse
1:18:54
and really just getting stuck
1:18:57
waist deep in it while he's trying to figure out how
1:18:59
to make this movie work and then the studio stuff on
1:19:01
top of it. Like the Keep is a
1:19:03
weird fucking movie. And that's at least
1:19:05
interesting to me. Ali is neither
1:19:08
weird nor interesting nor
1:19:10
exciting really. And I think that
1:19:13
I just it feels like a bizarre
1:19:15
blip
1:19:16
that maybe is a little less of one
1:19:18
as we get into the very late stages
1:19:20
of man's career. But it is.
1:19:23
But at this stage, it feels like the
1:19:25
thing that just works the least.
1:19:28
So next time we are going to look
1:19:30
at 2004 is collateral starring
1:19:34
Fox and Cruz.
1:19:36
And
1:19:38
it's been a it's been a few years since I've seen it.
1:19:41
But certainly I now
1:19:43
appreciate much more how
1:19:45
much this is a return
1:19:48
to familiar themes and stomping
1:19:51
grounds for men as
1:19:54
well as in some ways a response
1:19:56
to the lack of thematic focus that
1:19:59
plagues all of.
1:19:59
collateral is
1:20:02
one of maybe the
1:20:05
most razor-honed
1:20:07
films in
1:20:09
man's career. And
1:20:12
it's another one of those that catch
1:20:14
me on the right day, I would say this
1:20:17
is his greatest work. And so
1:20:19
I'm eager to revisit collateral
1:20:22
in a month's time. Until then,
1:20:24
thanks for listening and subscribing to Waypoint
1:20:26
Plus and putting up with
1:20:29
our extremely specific bullshit, especially
1:20:31
when it is about a
1:20:34
somewhat middling offering in
1:20:37
the
1:20:37
great man's career. But a
1:20:39
good reason to rewatch When We Were
1:20:41
Kings and Malcolm X, that's time
1:20:44
as always time well spent.
1:20:46
Peace. you
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More