Podchaser Logo
Home
Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Released Wednesday, 31st January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Squishmallows With Guns - FY24 Q2 earnings, Teams worldwide outage, 1st-run experience redesign

Wednesday, 31st January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It's time for Windows Weekly. Paul Therat is here. Richard

0:02

Campbell is here. Actually, Richard is

0:04

in London, but that's

0:06

okay. He's still with us. They're

0:08

going to talk about the earnings, learnings,

0:11

Microsoft's quarterly earnings, lots of

0:13

Windows news, AI news, even

0:15

gaming news. It's a big

0:17

jam-packed, fun-filled episode of Windows

0:19

Weekly coming up next. Podcasts

0:26

you love. From people you trust. This

0:29

is Truth. This

0:37

is Windows Weekly with Paul Therat and Richard

0:39

Campbell. Episode 866 recorded Wednesday, January 31st,

0:41

2024. Squishmallows

0:48

with guns. Windows

0:51

Weekly is brought to you by

0:53

our friends at ITProTV, now called

0:55

ACI Learning. I know

0:57

you already know the name ITProTV from many,

0:59

many years on our network. Well,

1:02

now they're part of ACI

1:04

Learning, which means ITPro has

1:06

expanded its capabilities, providing more support for

1:09

IT teams. ACI Learning gives

1:11

it all to you. They

1:13

cover all your team's needs

1:15

in audit, cybersecurity, and information

1:17

technology with the best, most

1:19

engaging, most entertaining, most informative

1:22

training. They'll provide you with a personal account

1:24

manager to make sure you aren't wasting your

1:27

team's time or your time. Your account

1:29

manager works with you to ensure your team only

1:31

focuses on the skills that matter to

1:34

your organization specifically so that you can

1:36

leave the unnecessary training behind. And

1:39

I have to tell you, ACI Learning has kept

1:41

all the fun and all the personality of ITProTV,

1:44

yet they have amplified their robust solutions for

1:46

all your training needs. Your

1:48

team will be entertained while they are

1:51

informed, while they train, short form content,

1:53

easy to digest, and there

1:55

are now up to 7,200 hours of content to choose from. That's

2:00

that's that's pretty amazing visit

2:02

go dot aci learning comm slash twit for

2:05

teams that fill out ACI's form You can

2:07

get a free trial and up to 65%

2:10

off an IT pro enterprise solution

2:12

plan go ACI

2:14

learning comm slash twits Hello

2:18

windows and dozers winners

2:20

and dozers. It's time

2:22

for Windows weekly. Whatever. You know who you are That's

2:25

because this is the show where we cover

2:27

the latest news from Microsoft and you're dying

2:29

to learn those learning earnings All

2:32

to yourself Paul. Thorat is here He's

2:35

gonna take the role of Mary Jo Foley. I

2:37

guess today with the earnings learnings from

2:40

torat.com This used to

2:42

be Mary Jo's job now you got to do

2:44

it I'm sorry Richard

2:50

Campbell's also here. Well, he's not here. He's there. He's

2:52

over The over

2:55

the pond in sunny old

2:57

England How

2:59

sunny is sunny old England mister not a

3:01

sunny at all. Yeah, yeah, and you're crying

3:04

out loud. It's great grim Wait,

3:06

I made it to the whiskey exchange today. So

3:08

I have a thing to show not so bad

3:12

No, it'll be a little show-and-tell later on right But

3:15

first I guess earnings. Yeah Yeah,

3:19

we're in earning season again my least

3:21

favorite time of the quarter How

3:26

I forget this is part of how I cope

3:28

with things I just forget and then I sit

3:30

down and I look at my Feed I'm like,

3:32

oh god Microsoft Google Intel and

3:34

what's going on is this bunch of

3:36

stuff? So obviously we'll start

3:38

Microsoft They're doing okay.

3:41

The little startup that could from

3:43

Albuquerque is along a long

3:46

way Yep,

3:49

it's fun. There are a lot of people

3:51

who don't know that Microsoft's first corporate headquarters

3:53

was in. Yeah I wish they were

3:55

still there that building is labeled

3:57

right? It's got a big plaque on the

4:00

side of it. Oh yeah, so when you're washing a laundry

4:02

next door and buying a crack on the other side of

4:04

it, you have a place you can look at it. It's

4:06

nice. It's a nice

4:08

central Ave. It's

4:11

nice. They ran their contents was there,

4:13

right? And they wanted to

4:15

do it out there basic. That's

4:18

right. Well, I did do. I did do. Yeah,

4:20

for me, I used to live in Albuquerque, so it was a big

4:22

deal. You know, I had to run down there one day to find

4:25

out, you know, to look at this place. And I was like, really?

4:27

This is it, huh? It's too bad. It's

4:30

probably a little nicer now, but last

4:32

time I was there. I remember one

4:34

of the MVP summits when Bill

4:36

was there, somebody had found had

4:38

had an original manual for

4:41

the Altair basic. I think it was the second

4:43

version, the 16 K version. And

4:45

the back page of it literally said, if you

4:47

need support for this, call Bill

4:50

Gates and a phone number, right?

4:52

Like seven digits. So,

4:55

you know, he certainly waved his left. Let

4:58

him come up on the stage and he looked at it

5:00

and signed it for him. And he was moved like he

5:02

was emotional about it. Super cool. Bill was

5:04

the other guy. No, I can't know.

5:06

I'm sorry. I would have been like, so I

5:08

can call you now, right? Yeah, probably said, did

5:10

you lie with this? Give

5:13

me back my paper tape. By

5:16

the way, my Altair is running right

5:18

now. It's solving the advent of code

5:20

problems. Nice. Some year

5:22

it'll be done. No, it's

5:24

not. It's playing a little game with

5:26

itself. We're going to give it the quantum competing

5:29

upgrade. Ooh. Ooh.

5:31

Wouldn't it be funny to ask a

5:34

large language model inside that Altair? You

5:37

could ask it questions. All

5:40

right. So Microsoft's earnings came out.

5:42

Give us the yesterday. Give us

5:44

the top line. Broad stroke. Broad

5:46

stroke. Okay. Like I

5:48

said, basically almost $22 billion in profits and $62

5:50

billion in revenues. Those

5:54

figures are both up double digits. Revenues

5:57

are up 18% year over year. You're

5:59

going great. Great. No big

6:03

changes with the top three business units, or

6:06

the only three, I should say. Intelligent

6:08

Cloud's phone number one, 26 billion in revenue

6:10

basically up 20% year over year. This is

6:13

Azure, right? Productivity and

6:15

business processes, Microsoft 365 essentially is

6:17

almost 20 billion in revenues, up

6:19

13%. And

6:21

then more personal computing closed the gap a bit

6:24

because of Activision Blizzard, which we're gonna get to.

6:28

16.9 billion in revenues, up 19%. If

6:31

you pulled Activision Blizzard out of that business, oh,

6:35

how we'd laugh. The

6:38

rest of that, but they're looking pretty good. So

6:42

yeah, this all these kind of,

6:45

I have some bullet points here, but the

6:47

more interesting stuff to me is going

6:49

back and rereading the transcription

6:53

of the call they have with

6:56

analysts after the announcement.

6:58

And obviously everyone's asking questions about

7:00

AI. How are you gonna pay for this? How's

7:02

this working? What are you gonna be profit? How's

7:04

this all working out? So there's a bunch of

7:06

interesting stuff in there. Did

7:08

they actually answer any of those questions? If I don't

7:11

know what they want. No, well, no they do. I

7:13

mean, no, it's actually, this

7:16

is the second time in the past year where

7:18

I felt like their answers were actually really

7:22

clear. And not off skating anything

7:26

in any major way. So

7:31

I mean, I will also say whatever it's worth, such

7:34

an adult, I think he's a little bit wooden, but

7:37

man, that guy can speak quite eloquently

7:39

about AI. He loves

7:41

it. And I think

7:43

that says a lot about him

7:45

as a person, but also why

7:48

the company is so serious about this. It's very

7:50

clear he understood. This is the best he's made,

7:52

right? Yeah,

7:56

but let's, if you don't mind, let's

7:58

start with Activision. Blizzard because I found this

8:01

to be kind of interesting. Last

8:03

summer I ran some numbers on what

8:05

Microsoft would look like if Activision Blizzard

8:08

had been part of the company already, right? And

8:10

now that they are, I'm delighted to report that the

8:13

thing I wrote last July was really accurate, like

8:15

it's within like a half a percentage point, you

8:17

know. And the broad

8:19

strokes on that is that the

8:22

impact on more personal computing is huge.

8:25

The impact on Microsoft

8:29

as a company, not so huge,

8:31

right? Because Microsoft is

8:33

humongous, right? We saw 62 billion, right? So I

8:36

don't remember the exact numbers, but in that year I

8:39

looked at revenues from Activision Blizzard

8:41

were in the two, maybe 2.4 billion

8:43

range. You know, Microsoft were talking 60 billion.

8:45

So you can see it's a kind

8:48

of a smaller deal. But this

8:52

billion here, a billionaire, you might actually

8:54

show up on the balance sheet, right?

8:56

Like it's a lot to make a

8:58

dent. Yeah. So more personal

9:00

computing had really almost 20% growth this

9:02

quarter. Microsoft gaming. Yep. Huge, right?

9:07

And it's all because of this, right? And so

9:09

this, this is the deal.

9:11

Microsoft also, speaking of clarity, explaining

9:14

great detail how they're paying for

9:16

the costs associated with this acquisition.

9:18

I don't mean the $69 billion

9:20

exactly. I'm talking more about the 10,000 people

9:23

that came into the company

9:25

when they bought this other company, all

9:27

the redundancies, the layoffs and all

9:31

the, you know, the reorgs and all that stuff. And so

9:33

they, there's actually kind of a neat little bit in there

9:35

where they kind of talk about all that and that the

9:37

deal is within this

9:40

fiscal year, those costs are all going

9:42

to even out. The big takeaway

9:44

for me going forward is that this

9:47

business, within a business, Microsoft gaming right

9:50

now is operating at about 38% higher

9:52

costs than

9:55

they were like a year ago. And it's

9:58

because they laid offs it on like 2000. from

10:00

Activision already. Yeah. Yeah. And

10:02

from other parts. Yeah, right. So, you know, this

10:05

is a typical situation

10:07

where you kind of bring this company in house in

10:09

this case, right? It's not a separate organization. So

10:11

you have all these redundancies all over that part

10:14

of the company. So the whole marketing edge is

10:16

going to change, the HR group is changing. Yeah.

10:18

So hopefully they pick the best from the best

10:20

and kind of go for it in that fashion.

10:22

And, you know, unfortunately there will be layoffs probably

10:24

more in the future as well. But the

10:27

goal is within the next, what did I say, five

10:29

months, for this to kind of iron out and then

10:31

this thing will be like a net win going forward,

10:33

I guess. You know, the question is

10:35

like, are we going to leave the game teams

10:37

intact? Because it doesn't

10:40

seem like they've been really great with game

10:42

development teams. So

10:44

without, yeah. Right.

10:46

So without knowing explicitly, and again,

10:50

I don't remember the exact number, but

10:52

Activision Blizzard across their 10,000 employees

10:54

had several dozens of whatever the

10:56

number was of their own studios,

10:58

right? Right. And Microsoft also has

11:00

many, many studios of their own.

11:03

And some of them might be

11:05

some facilities consolidation too. Yeah.

11:07

And I think they'll, it's possible that

11:09

the big studios that worked under

11:12

Activision Blizzard, you know, the studios

11:14

responsible for Call of Duty, etc.

11:16

will probably be the

11:18

same, you know, that's the most part. Well,

11:21

in their case, I mean, I wouldn't, I mean,

11:24

Call of Duty is a cash cow, but

11:26

you have to ship a product to make

11:28

that money on it. World of Warcraft and

11:31

Diablo. Now that's some serious cash cowage. They

11:33

get monthly returns and you have

11:35

to produce a certain amount of content. So I mean, if

11:37

I was Satch's reporting

11:40

to Satch about how this thing is going, it's

11:42

like, is that team intact? Are they in track

11:44

to keep folks engaged? I mean,

11:46

World of Warcraft's gotten a lot of pressure

11:48

from the Sony

11:51

Final Fantasy Online product. So

11:53

they're, they've got every

11:55

need to be more efficient and

11:57

to keep growing the pattern. It's

11:59

hard to. be a new world of Warcraft. It's

12:01

about keeping the existing market. I

12:04

mean, depending on the

12:07

studio, depending on the product, they're

12:09

probably going to want to keep it, you know, where

12:11

they are geographically, in

12:14

roughly the same, you know, situation they were before,

12:16

right? And you would think that a

12:18

company like Microsoft, and there's a lot about software developers,

12:20

no, you disrupt that team, it's

12:22

years to get back to the same product. And

12:24

you may never actually get back. Yeah, I mean,

12:26

it might break the product. There's also a fear

12:29

with Call of Duty, it's already been broken and

12:31

that, you know, we're just going to lose it

12:33

broke it before they got their hands on it.

12:35

So now they need a reboot. Yeah,

12:38

maybe. I mean, yeah, we'll see. I mean,

12:41

they've needed a reboot since they wrapped up,

12:43

I don't know, the initial set of black

12:45

ops games, maybe. So whatever that was 10

12:47

years ago, it's been a while, but this

12:50

is what happened to Halo, right? Like, oh, yeah.

12:52

Yeah. There is a, there is a case story

12:54

for you lose the team and at least you

12:57

lose the heart of the team and now, you

12:59

know, what's the state of those products? But

13:01

that's fine if you're just releasing titles. It's

13:04

another thing when you've got a monthly and

13:06

you're going to watch your mistakes bleed you

13:08

month over month. That's,

13:11

that's really dark. A little graphic.

13:17

It's the thing is imagine that you bought a

13:19

goose, it's lays golden eggs.

13:21

Yeah. Don't screw it up. Yeah.

13:24

Now it's just bleeding. Uh,

13:28

yes. So yes, I mean, we'll see. Uh, I

13:30

mean, this is, I look, I'm a

13:32

simple person. I just want to see Activision games

13:35

on Xbox game pass. That's certainly

13:37

part of the cross marketing and so forth.

13:40

You know, someone who's done a bit of

13:42

M&A and been on the, how do we preserve the culture

13:44

side of the problem? It's like, these are

13:46

the things I would worry about is how do

13:49

I keep these key teams in place? How

13:51

do we, how do we know there's going to be a new call of duty in 24? Yeah.

13:55

Well, one of the ways would be, how about some

13:57

Microsoft stock options? Um, that stuff's going through the roof

13:59

right now. So just, you know,

14:01

that would be one idea. I don't

14:03

know. It

14:05

is interesting though, Microsoft actually spelled out

14:08

how much Activision contributed

14:10

to the growth in the various parts of

14:12

the business. And if

14:14

this thing wasn't happening, um,

14:17

we would be having a very different discussion about

14:19

the future of my personal computing right now. Well,

14:21

very likely they'd be acquired something else. So they'd

14:24

be going into, they would tell the story differently,

14:26

Paul. Like they know how to keep their share

14:28

holders happy. Well, I

14:30

mean, right. But it's, it's, we're

14:33

close enough to when they finally finalized this

14:35

deal that if it hadn't gone through, they

14:37

wouldn't have had a chance to do anything

14:40

by now. Like we would have been witnessing

14:42

what like an ugly holiday quarter looks like

14:44

for a business that's based around gaming,

14:46

which should be doing gangbusters, you know,

14:49

uh, or at least as partially through the gaming. Anyway,

14:52

I thought there, I sort of appreciated the clarity

14:54

on that. Although, you know, it's Microsoft, right? So

14:57

we like, one of

14:59

the things they reported was that they now have

15:01

over 200 million monthly active users on Xbox PC

15:04

and mobile and mobile for the first time.

15:06

Right. 200 million. That's

15:08

a huge number. It's a huge

15:10

number. But of course, my next question, my

15:12

first question was, okay, but what, compared to

15:15

what, like, what was it before? And

15:17

the only thing I could find, because they do this a lot,

15:19

they don't do this quarter over quarter. But

15:21

back in the July quarter, they mentioned that

15:24

the 150 million active users,

15:26

uh, at that time, they were just talking

15:28

across the Xbox ecosystem. And,

15:31

uh, so I guess it went up by

15:33

50, but they also talked about how Activision

15:35

Blizzard brings hundreds of millions

15:38

of users to Xbox. So

15:41

it's like, if anything, you would almost think it

15:44

should be higher, you know, but it is a

15:46

big number. You're right. Um, yeah. So, you know,

15:48

Activision Blizzard has a pretty big reach. Um,

15:51

for a relatively small number of people when you think

15:53

about it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. All

15:55

in all, it was a good buy for

15:57

Microsoft, but I don't know. have

16:00

a great track record with game studios

16:02

except the ones they leave alone, right?

16:05

And they're absolutely not doing that in this case.

16:07

Not this time around. I think that was part

16:09

of the marketing of this purchase though that they

16:12

were going to fix the culture. It was more

16:14

because there was something to fix. Yeah,

16:16

I think that's purely cultural. Right. I

16:18

think that might explain it. Yeah. But yeah.

16:21

And it's not like Bethesda is knocking out the

16:23

part with every game they make either, looking at

16:25

you Fallout 76. But

16:28

that was in Microsoft's fault. Like I

16:31

would hope there's some folks from coming in

16:33

on the ZeniMax level saying, guys, are

16:35

we doing the right thing? Are we building

16:37

the right product? Like are we making people

16:40

happy? Because they've got some great labels

16:42

too that would be well worth to follow.

16:45

The Fallout is an amazing story

16:47

that could be tapped a lot of different

16:49

ways. It should be a series on

16:51

Netflix. I don't understand why it isn't.

16:54

And maybe it will be someday. I mean, Half-Life

16:56

is the same thing. Why has that not happened? Well,

17:01

because everybody that works for Valve is

17:03

extraordinarily wealthy. Oh yeah, that's right. That's

17:06

right. Content middle-aged white guys. Yeah.

17:09

So, the upside to Activision Blizzard and Microsoft

17:12

too is there's a routine set of hungry

17:14

hires looking to get more of

17:16

their stock units

17:18

allocated and you can get them to do stuff. Right.

17:21

But the collective that is Valve,

17:23

everybody's very well paid. Yeah,

17:26

nobody needs another Tesla. Yeah, they're doing okay.

17:29

Yeah. Well, I

17:34

think that's

17:37

mostly it on the gaming part of it. I

17:39

kind of, when

17:41

I go through the earnings, I go kind of back

17:43

to front because I focus mostly on the consumer stuff,

17:45

right? And it's a small part

17:47

of Microsoft in some ways, but it's

17:49

getting more interesting thanks to Activision Blizzard and

17:51

AI. Yeah.

17:54

I think this time next year, the

17:57

conversation about Activision Blizzard will be very

17:59

interesting. Well, under Microsoft's control,

18:01

getting through Christmas season, that's going to be a big

18:03

deal. I can't wait to see what it comes to.

18:05

Are we good or are we bad? I hope it's

18:07

great. I'm looking for it just

18:10

being the same, which would be fine. If

18:13

every one of their major labels ships a

18:15

product in October this

18:17

year, they'll have killed it. That's a win. You

18:20

have described something that Microsoft has never done

18:22

with their gaming business, but yeah, I hope

18:25

that happens too. I mean, unfortunately,

18:27

yeah, we'll see. I don't want to

18:29

get ahead of ourselves here, but yes,

18:31

I hope you're good. I hate to

18:33

say this, but it's like, this is

18:35

very Sanosky-esque. Sanosky was the train's run-on-time

18:38

kind of guy. You want

18:40

someone, it's like, you will make

18:42

the October deliverables for Christmas or

18:44

you will be killed. Oh, that

18:46

does not work at games. I

18:48

don't know, but it is how

18:50

games work without a doubt. You have to write to the

18:52

deadline, which is why you tend to ship lousy software because

18:54

you write to the deadline and we'll fix it in the

18:56

DLC. Okay. Well,

18:59

anyway, I don't want to be gaming to death

19:01

too much upfront because we're going to return to

19:03

this in a moment. Well, at the end of

19:05

the show, actually, but just to round

19:08

out the rest of more personal

19:10

computing, there's a little business called Windows that is also

19:12

part of that. Never heard of it. It's

19:15

kind of an operating system for these big

19:17

devices that you can't barely pocket. Yeah, it's

19:19

like smartphones, but dumber. So,

19:24

will it run AutoCAD? Oh, wait, it's the only thing

19:26

that runs AutoCAD. They've

19:28

had a couple of bad years

19:30

post COVID. And as we're seeing

19:32

with the chipset makers, both on

19:34

PC side and on mobile, it

19:37

looks like things are starting to finally kind

19:39

of come back to normal. Intel

19:41

saw some growth on this side of the

19:43

business. AMD did, again, both companies after months

19:45

and months of quarters and quarters of

19:49

shortfalls. And,

19:52

you know, their Microsoft's revenues from PC

19:54

makers actually grew and grew by double

19:57

digits. So

20:00

last quarter was 4% this year. This

20:02

quarter was 11. And the previous

20:04

two before those two were 12 and 28% decline. So

20:07

you can kind of see how that curve is

20:09

going. That's hard to corner. Yep.

20:12

They keep using this phrase. Things

20:14

are continuing at pre-pandemic levels,

20:17

which is a bit of a stretch. If you

20:19

know anything about pre-pandemic levels, but certainly. I

20:21

don't think we're predicting the demise of the

20:23

PC pre-pandemic too. Well, the

20:25

question, yeah, the question that was whether

20:27

it would ever bottom out. And then

20:29

the pandemic kind of knocked things around

20:31

in the opposite direction. But yeah,

20:34

it looks like we're, yeah, so we're in the

20:36

right trajectory. Certainly. Um, commercial was

20:38

also up commercial windows revenues. I should say

20:40

those are kind of tougher to predict because

20:42

these are just based on. Versus

20:45

cycles that we know nothing about, right? These are

20:47

things that companies keep internal and are basically sacred.

20:49

So, uh, but 9% growth

20:51

is great. Um, and this is a

20:53

business that has seen growth in all four of

20:56

the previous, uh, orders. So they're doing,

20:58

they're doing good. Um, and

21:00

that's basically all we learned about

21:02

windows. Although I'm just going to throw this

21:04

up because I thought this was an odd

21:06

thing. They're Microsoft, like all other companies makes

21:09

these kind of, um, milestone statements, you know,

21:11

they have a quarter, something happens, we've made

21:13

money. And then they, they talk about some

21:15

of the things that they shipped or achieved in the quarter

21:17

and they don't always tie. In fact,

21:19

they often don't tie directly to any revenues of any

21:21

kind. So for example, in Microsoft's case, the one that

21:23

stuck out for me was. Copilot and

21:25

windows is available on more than 75 million

21:28

PCs. This

21:30

is across windows 10 and windows 11, 75 million is

21:33

the thing. Um,

21:36

Copilot and windows is a free upgrade

21:38

that everyone gets automatically. Yeah. Once

21:40

you put it on windows 10, I mean, wouldn't it be

21:42

on hundreds of millions of pins? Couldn't it

21:45

be billion? I'm saying

21:47

potential audience of a billion. Right. I mean, so

21:49

I don't know what to make of that. I

21:51

that's a shockingly small. Any,

21:53

yeah. In any other statements, 75

21:55

billion is huge number. This

21:57

is not one of those. This is a tiny number.

22:00

Yeah, it's very strange. Like

22:04

what the hell? Well, if you just base it on

22:06

a billion and make the math simple, it's

22:09

three quarters of one percent. Seven percent.

22:11

Or 7.5%. 7.5% I

22:13

guess. It's small. So.

22:15

So, a billion to me seems low. There's more

22:18

than a billion Windows 10 devices out there. Yeah.

22:21

I mean, but Windows 10 will guess somewhere around a

22:24

billion and then Windows 11 is the rest,

22:26

whatever that is. A couple hundred million maybe.

22:28

But still, this just seems odd to me.

22:30

I feel like everyone kind of gets this

22:32

and I don't quite get that one. So

22:34

maybe they're measuring actual usage somehow or? Yeah,

22:37

I'm sorry. I think that's a mostly active user

22:39

kind of mindset. Yep. Impossible to

22:42

know. You also get little floating

22:44

factoids like Windows 11 commercial

22:47

deployments were up 2x year

22:49

over year. 2x

22:51

from what? Was it zero last year? We don't even...

22:54

That doesn't mean anything. Yeah. And

22:57

these things are fairly random. No

22:59

big companies are going to ever publicly discuss

23:02

their strategy for rolling out a version

23:04

of Windows internally. Nobody cares. You

23:07

know? So, and I will also point out this

23:09

doesn't impact revenues at all because Microsoft doesn't care

23:11

which version you use either. They get paid the

23:13

same regardless. So. No matter

23:15

what. These are just... I don't know

23:17

what you call this kind of a data. It has nothing to do

23:20

with the bottom line. They're happy annoyances. Yeah.

23:22

Yeah. Just a little thing.

23:24

Yeah. And you can feel them kind

23:26

of cherry picking from around all the data they have.

23:29

Oh yeah. Totally. I've done

23:31

enough investor relations to know with my wealthy investors I

23:33

need to give them a sentence they can say to

23:35

their friends in the clubhouse. Okay. It

23:38

doesn't matter that it's meaningful or it actually

23:40

quantifies anything but it's a sentence they can

23:42

say to their fellow wealthy people. Okay.

23:45

Well, that's definitely... I didn't

23:48

publish this article yet but I coined

23:51

the term non-mot as

23:53

opposed to bond-mot. It's

23:56

a 9-11. Right. happy

24:00

noise headlines

24:03

without definition. Surface

24:06

is circling the drain frankly and I got

24:08

to say this is

24:10

a revenue time was only

24:13

9% in the quarter I say only because

24:15

this was far better than they expected previous

24:17

four quarters were 22 20 30 and 39

24:21

percent shortfalls right it's been a

24:23

brutal couple of years for this business and

24:25

unfortunately the the water that

24:27

is starting to lift windows does not appear

24:30

to be working for surface

24:32

so they don't have a leader well

24:36

he's fighting for him right he's

24:38

so faceless I can't remember you know what that's

24:40

not fair to him I'm sorry that's on me

24:42

I actually don't remember his name that's on me

24:45

he's a nice guy they never played him for

24:47

pano well the guy for sir the surface part

24:49

of panos right so they introduced

24:51

him at that October events and I'm sorry I should

24:53

I apologize I should you were there I don't I

24:55

was there and I'm not a new name but that

24:57

business is now focusing on higher margin premium products which

24:59

I'd like to be the last step you know it's

25:02

kind of like when Lumi a kind of focused you

25:04

know a little bit and then

25:06

when I'm here I am with a surface

25:08

studio to like I'm literally exactly in

25:10

the market well this is what

25:12

expensive thing they made yeah yeah and you

25:15

didn't help them at all Richard I gotta tell

25:17

you they're not doing great no it's too bad

25:19

I'm like sorry I wish you something part of

25:22

that 9% man we sent

25:24

in something yeah what

25:27

it means use of many oh

25:30

no well since that no use of many has since

25:32

moved on because now he's running some of the co-pilot

25:34

stuff oh wow yeah he was kind

25:36

of in there for the two seconds and now

25:38

he's he moved right along holy man because that

25:40

was that was the October gate where they announced

25:43

that you said was taking over for any well

25:46

but but

25:48

this the person I'm thinking it was directly surface

25:50

and use of is not in charge of all

25:52

the stuff right different different people now and

25:56

then the other big one I wanted to kind of talk

25:58

about was just AI because obviously Microsoft is spending between

26:01

10 and 15 billion or at least that's what

26:03

they said one or two quarters ago. I think

26:05

it's actually higher now. And

26:07

there's a couple of interesting points in

26:10

there about AI. And

26:13

I'm going to read a quote from you. I quote you and tell me if

26:15

you come away with the same takeaway

26:18

I did. But obviously everyone asked

26:20

about AI, the cost of AI and you

26:22

know, when you start becoming profitable from AI

26:24

and there's a lot of happy noises there

26:26

too. But buried

26:29

in more personal computing is a business

26:31

I don't discuss too much over time

26:33

because it has never been particularly interesting

26:35

which is search and advertising. And

26:37

this is like you know, Bing, MSN,

26:40

Start and Microsoft advertising, right? The

26:43

past year there's been a lot

26:45

of noise and news about Bing. The

26:48

biggest being that they went to market with the AI

26:50

stuff starting with Bing and then quickly back off from

26:52

that. And as we

26:54

hit the end of the year, the

26:56

brand was now co-pilot and we're not talking about

26:59

Bing anymore. And Microsoft made

27:01

sure that this capability was

27:04

available in multiple places not just on Bing. And

27:06

you know, the market share, usage share of Bing

27:08

didn't move the needle at all. Right.

27:12

Some issues there. So that

27:14

business actually grew by 8%. This is

27:17

the search, news and advertising and

27:19

it said it would have been better except

27:23

the combination of higher search

27:25

volume and the continued unfavorable

27:27

impact from a third-party

27:30

partnership. What do you think

27:32

that was? Yeah.

27:35

I think it had to be OpenAI. Did

27:40

you really say that? You can't say that. They

27:43

did. They're making money. They

27:45

make money off OpenAI. No,

27:48

they do. But that's over in a different part of the

27:50

company. The part that holds Bing,

27:54

they're just paying for it. So

27:56

what they've done is they've driven traffic.

27:58

They've not monetized it effectively. And

28:00

then not paying the bills. So

28:03

that maybe explains or helps explain why

28:06

they went to market so quick with

28:08

Copilot Pro, right? Get people paying for

28:10

it. That will help them

28:12

now. That's part of that revenue, go back

28:14

to the Bing team. Yes. And

28:17

they can also detune the free stuff a bit. You know,

28:19

you'll have more of those error messages. We're sorry, we can't

28:21

do that right now. Are you not kind of thing? It's

28:23

like, you know, maybe if you... Yeah, you hate your request

28:25

for that. Yeah. All

28:27

those things. So if you bought Pro, this wouldn't happen to

28:30

you. That's what I'm thinking.

28:32

Yeah. And then, of course, the other bit

28:34

is how AI impacts the other parts of

28:36

the company. And for the short term and

28:38

possibly long term as well, the big benefits

28:40

to Microsoft are going to come in the

28:43

Azure side, which is intelligent computing, and

28:45

also to Microsoft 365, right? And

28:48

they confirmed this... It

28:51

wasn't like a genius idea I had, but they basically

28:53

came to the conclusion that Copilot Pro

28:55

and Copilot for Microsoft 365 were

28:58

Microsoft establishing higher end SKUs

29:00

for Microsoft 365 essentially. SKUs

29:03

that were much more lucrative. And this is the multi-skew

29:07

strategy that Microsoft Office started back in, I

29:09

don't know, 2000? 2003, the

29:11

latest. Has

29:14

always paid off for them big time. Microsoft tried it

29:16

with Windows. Remember, with Vista and

29:18

7, had several different product versions. They kind of scaled

29:20

that back. So now we have two. It's

29:23

always worked out great for Office. One thing that they've

29:26

seen on the Microsoft 365 side is

29:28

they add these more lucrative SKUs or

29:30

higher end SKUs. They become very lucrative,

29:33

like businesses. Everyone falls for that

29:35

same... Yeah, that upgrade thing. You walk in to

29:37

buy the cheap stripped down car and you walk

29:39

out with the Ferrari or whatever. And

29:42

it's always the thing is you go in thinking you're going

29:44

to buy the lowest SKU. And then there's enough things higher

29:47

up that are add-ons that when you do the math, it's

29:49

like just buy the higher SKU. I literally just did this

29:51

myself. I'm paying for CoPilot Pro. I walked

29:53

in like they could... Yeah, right. And I'm

29:55

like, oh no, 20 bucks a month. Nailed it. So,

29:58

yeah. I'm

30:01

contorting this a bit. I want to be super

30:03

clear about this. Someone asked

30:06

Sacha Nadella about GitHub Copilot specifically

30:08

because he talked so excitedly about

30:11

it. And he was talking

30:13

about how this thing was

30:15

so crucial for that audience. And he's right.

30:17

Of course he is. But he made some

30:19

allusions to productivity. And I

30:22

want to be clear. What he's really talking

30:24

about is Copilot, GitHub Copilot. But I think

30:26

this applies to data. But

30:29

I think this also applies to Microsoft 365.

30:31

So what he says is,

30:33

he's talking about the economic benefit of the

30:35

productivity benefits. And he

30:38

says it's like if you

30:40

took away spell check from Word, I would become

30:42

unemployable. Similarly, it would be

30:44

like if GitHub Copilot becomes core to anyone

30:46

who's doing software development, if you

30:49

take it away, they become unemployable. Microsoft's

30:51

goal clearly is to

30:53

make Copilot from Microsoft 365 slash Copilot

30:56

Pro have the same value. Essential to

30:58

the information worker. It's so essential that

31:01

paying that much money becomes a no-brainer. Right.

31:04

Right. That's the goal. And that's, you

31:06

know, they obviously have

31:09

different ways of monetizing AI

31:11

through Azure and APIs and all that kind

31:13

of stuff. And they have their own platform.

31:15

And they have customers that are using that.

31:19

But as far as selling directly, well, I guess

31:21

those are customers as well. But selling directly to

31:23

businesses using like end user

31:25

productivity software. I think the

31:28

goal is, you know, let's drive it there

31:30

as well. And I think

31:32

they're going to be successful just based on

31:34

my very limited. Well, and plus experience. When

31:36

you talk about M365, they've been trying to

31:38

find ways to surface the graft of solid-hate

31:41

businesses since M365 started. And

31:44

this is the current generation idea. And I think

31:46

it's a pretty good one. Like it's now that

31:49

you're describing the goal and it's leveraging the graph

31:51

to get you to your goal. Who can be

31:53

mad about that? Yes. Now,

31:56

you know, the fear that I raised,

31:58

I guess back in. December or

32:00

whenever that was I'll know I guess it was in

32:02

early January when they announced these products like all of

32:04

a sudden Hey, we're out. You know is

32:07

the same pair. I have now which is that there is

32:09

that? There's a problem

32:11

where the same wave that

32:13

lifted you during the cloud computing wave that's

32:15

starting to lift you now during the AI

32:17

Wave could come back and you know tsunami

32:19

you and That's when you

32:22

under deliver right or Two

32:24

quarters. So now Microsoft has to finally admit

32:26

that actually only some tiny 0.4%

32:30

of whatever our commercial customers have even looked at

32:32

this and you know Well,

32:34

let's get back to your 75 million users

32:36

of compiler, right? Right, right. That's

32:39

said what you're afraid of is that they don't adopt it.

32:41

That doesn't seem to be happening in m365 like Well,

32:45

yes, here's the loudest noises. I heard

32:47

was what 300 seat minimum. Come on

32:50

This is the tier strategy. So years ago.

32:52

This is a conversation actually with Chris

32:54

Capicella when you know Microsoft Office

32:56

was this business that they sold software directly to

32:58

people basically I mean really most people got it

33:00

with a new computer or whatever So they assumed

33:03

it was part of Windows. They didn't realize they

33:05

were paying extra for it Whatever, but people

33:08

acquired office in a certain way Very

33:11

successful. They at one point claimed 1.5 billion users, right?

33:15

And then office 365 came along and Microsoft

33:17

365 and those numbers are relatively smaller actually

33:19

today They're not so horrible and the commercial

33:21

side. It's somewhere in the three to four

33:23

hundred million range I can't I didn't see

33:25

it in this Quarter on

33:27

the consumer side. It's it's under 100 million.

33:29

It's something like 78 million something

33:32

like that It doesn't sound like a big number, right?

33:35

To anybody else do it. Yeah, and in

33:37

back when I had this conversation with Chris

33:39

He you know these numbers were much smaller

33:42

and he said and you know kind of seeing this the future

33:44

that now exists today That you know the thing you have to

33:46

understand is that Some number of

33:49

users doesn't help us if they never buy it

33:51

again, right? So right we didn't get 1.5 billion

33:53

sales one year We got it over, you know 10 years or

33:55

whatever the time frame was and then when you

33:58

look at you know We don't go from 1.5 billion

34:00

to 1.6 to 1.7, we go from 1.5 to 1.5 to 1.5. So we've reached this,

34:02

we've done it. Like

34:08

this is as far as it's ever going. And

34:10

the thing they look at as a

34:13

company is like, how do we induce people to upgrade

34:15

and how do we raise those numbers every year? And it's

34:18

hard. And then the subscription service thing came

34:20

around and changed the game completely. The

34:23

people who pay Microsoft every month, whether they're businesses

34:25

or consumers, are much more lucrative. I mean, this

34:27

is obvious, but you get

34:29

into a situation I see on my

34:31

own site, I'm sure Leo and Twit

34:34

sees on their service, Spotify

34:36

reports this very explicitly every quarter,

34:39

where you have some tiny segment of

34:42

the population paying you and some giant

34:44

segment just getting ads. And that tiny

34:46

segment is worth dramatically

34:48

more money per person than the ad

34:51

supported people. And that's true

34:53

for Microsoft with these tiers. And

34:55

the reason why E3 is so much more

34:57

lucrative to them than E3 is to down

34:59

to whatever else they might have. And

35:02

this is where CoPilot has

35:05

the real chance to change the game

35:08

for them because it just dramatically raises

35:10

the average. So

35:12

even a smaller, like a subset

35:15

of a subset that pays for this

35:17

additional thing is

35:19

going to be a big deal. I think it's going to,

35:21

no, I don't think, I know it's going to be a

35:23

big deal in ways, things like what's

35:26

the paid version of Microsoft Teams called Microsoft Teams Pro

35:28

or something or whatever that is. There's

35:31

the new teams for home and

35:34

school, but parentheses free.

35:38

Right. I mean, you can see the scale, you know,

35:41

but CoPilot is so valuable

35:44

that I, to users,

35:46

you know, I think

35:48

this is, I think it's going to work, you know,

35:50

and where I was sort of, I didn't understand it

35:53

back when I talked to Chris, the numbers were so

35:55

small, I just couldn't understand how this could ever make

35:57

sense. But now that they're bigger, you can see how

36:00

how it makes sense. You can see the growth that Microsoft 365 has, you

36:02

know, a quarter of

36:04

a quarter year of year, whatever for many years. Um, I

36:07

think this is going to jumpstart another, uh, period

36:10

of growth. Yeah, I hope you're right.

36:12

Right. I mean, I'm hoping that, and

36:15

this, this is where I thought the minimum 300 seat

36:17

thing was smart because it means the graph has a

36:19

certain richness in it. You

36:21

want to surface new knowledge about the

36:23

organization to their workers without them being

36:26

miners of that. And it just sort of appears.

36:29

I mean, folks who get out of the smaller

36:31

sets are just not going to get good results

36:33

and make no sense. They're not going to get

36:36

the same results for sure. I, I, that, that

36:38

I don't know anything about. I don't have a

36:40

business. I could even, I couldn't pay more and

36:42

see that because I don't have that kind of

36:44

a business. I, I know very, I kind

36:46

of want to index all the content on

36:48

throughout and see, you know,

36:50

what the machine learning model had to say about that.

36:52

We certainly answered the question, have I already written

36:54

about this is useful, but then it's just a search

36:57

engine. Right. There are a lot of

36:59

people who are more technical than

37:01

I am who write, you know, for publications online

37:03

who have done things like that. And, and that's

37:05

very interesting. People are building, you

37:07

know, one thing as a writer that

37:09

you see in other writing and can't

37:11

stand and try not to

37:13

do as a writer is use the same term repeatedly

37:16

in the same sentence or paragraph. And when you're writing

37:18

about a company, like say Microsoft, you say, well, Microsoft

37:20

did this and blah, blah, blah. And then the software

37:22

giant did that. And then the firm, something, something, and

37:24

then the company you try not to Microsoft,

37:27

Microsoft, Microsoft, right. And

37:30

someone built a little LLM that

37:32

is, or I

37:34

guess that's all I'm really right. That's designed

37:37

to help them overcome that. Right. Right. I

37:40

don't think she even, you know, you saw

37:42

this too. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think she

37:44

trained it. I think she just asked chat

37:46

GPT or co-pilot. Okay. And, but it's a

37:48

good use. It's another way of saying Microsoft

37:50

or the company, you know, yeah, that's a

37:52

great word. If you really on your content,

37:55

I think somebody at the information was doing

37:57

that training on your content. Then

37:59

you could, you know, maybe say how have I

38:01

phrased this in past quarterly reports, sir?

38:03

I have done as recently as

38:05

this past week, I've written thousands of words

38:07

on a topic. And then I

38:10

referenced something, some things I'd written earlier, and then

38:12

I realized I've repeated myself a bunch of times

38:14

not and I don't mean in language. I mean,

38:17

in literal just I'm having a discussion about a

38:19

certain topic and I'm like, I've written about this,

38:22

you know, it's hard when you write as much

38:24

as I do to, it's in your brain. It's

38:26

like when you talk to

38:28

someone you're like, I've, I've told people something's happened.

38:31

Happening. Are you one of those people? I don't

38:33

remember. You know, that kind of, you know, we

38:36

must have what I want. Yeah, that's totally what

38:38

I want. You're repeating yourself Leo.

38:40

Oh, thank you. Yeah. I've always

38:42

told this story 12 times. Thank you.

38:44

Repeating is fine. Skipping is the problem.

38:46

You don't want to be the broken

38:48

record. Did you you haven't mentioned

38:50

yet, Microsoft saying that they're going to put

38:53

co pilot on vision pro. They

38:56

didn't. They knew Microsoft. I mean, Apple

38:58

nerd helmet. Yeah, well,

39:00

good for them. They'll be fun. That's

39:02

one app for the pro. Are there any other they're

39:04

going to do? I don't mean to be, I know

39:06

they're going to do teams, you know, a bunch of

39:08

stuff. I very specifically have

39:10

tried to know the outlook PowerPoint, but

39:13

now I did about this Apple thing.

39:15

Oh, but now that it's popped into

39:17

the marketplace, I just can't generate any

39:19

enthusiasm for it. I am

39:22

trying really hard not to be like that. But

39:24

I just don't care. Good.

39:26

I make you feel like a jerk because if this thing

39:29

takes off, I'm gonna look like a jerk and nobody

39:31

wants to take a jerk. But it ain't

39:34

good. I just don't want to I don't

39:36

want to I just don't see it. PNA

39:38

based Cheerios. I want to let them enjoy

39:40

their cardboard. Actually, I think you could

39:42

because they can't see you Leo just walk

39:44

right up and let her rip. You know,

39:47

what's the difference? Yeah,

39:49

I can't imagine doing product. Where'd my guys

39:52

in the dark? Was hollow lens? I mean,

39:54

they wanted to do productivity and HoloLens too

39:56

did that. HoloLens

39:58

was well, so here's the The two

40:00

phases I remember for HoloLens were the initial

40:02

announcements where they had no idea what anyone

40:04

was going to use this for. If you

40:06

go back and look at that very first

40:08

one from January 2015, they

40:11

showed up a video game, right? At

40:13

the second one, they had a 3D

40:15

version of Minecraft, right? Which

40:17

wasn't the full game, it was just an experience. We stood

40:19

in the room and you could see Minecraft and it was

40:22

a castle on a table and there was a hole in the

40:24

wall and that blew out of it. Yeah, yeah, it was so

40:26

cool. I remember that, yeah. It was really cool, but what the

40:28

heck is- I couldn't wait for it. You're

40:32

talking about a device that's going to sell in

40:34

the hundreds of thousands and who's going to develop

40:38

such a thing. Anyway, the second phase was we

40:42

have threw it out there, we've seen

40:44

what's come back and what we've seen

40:46

is some reasonable-

40:49

I keep calling niche markets, it's not there, vertical

40:51

markets, right? I always cite the

40:54

car makers, instead of walking around a model made of

40:56

clay, you can walk around a model that was made

40:58

in AR space or whatever. But

41:01

Alex came in and was always big on the verticals,

41:03

he didn't want to just fire it up in the

41:05

ecosystem and see what happens. He pursued

41:08

the medical construction vertical and

41:10

things like that. Maybe one

41:12

of the few things you ever get, right? I

41:15

always thought that the demo where you're working with

41:17

wiring and the little guy is in the window

41:19

and he says, not the blue wire, the yellow

41:21

wire. That to

41:23

me always, yeah, that would be useful. I

41:25

could use that. Would I

41:27

pay $3,500 for that helmet so I could use it for 10

41:30

minutes with the one day a year I need it? No.

41:33

No, but it made sense for

41:36

the folks working on jet turbines

41:38

and repairing heavy equipment. Like anything

41:40

where the cost of the equipment

41:42

was so much higher that it's not just the

41:44

$3,500, it's a thousand in Azure you need a

41:47

month to run that thing. I

41:49

think it was expensive infrastructure. Yeah,

41:52

if Microsoft, I don't know how it happened. If

41:54

Microsoft approached the army or the army came to

41:56

them, I don't know. I don't really care. I

41:58

don't think it matters. But if

42:01

that hadn't happened, if they hadn't

42:03

found the one entity in the world that is

42:05

known for spending $12,000 on a hammer or $20,000 in a toilet seat.

42:10

But it's also all consuming, so they ended

42:12

up doing nothing else. Well, you

42:14

know, I honestly, for

42:16

that business, I mean, looking at survival, I think

42:18

it made sense because I don't think the rest

42:20

of it was going to promote anything. I think

42:22

some other verticals could have been out

42:24

there, but I mean, tech

42:27

giants don't like small

42:29

markets. Like it has to be a

42:31

multi-billion dollar business for it to make

42:33

sense. So I don't know that Microsoft

42:35

would have stayed in where, you know,

42:37

the army dangled a gigantic carrot that

42:39

nobody got. So

42:42

they, I think HoloLens would have

42:44

disappeared years ago if that hadn't happened. I just think

42:46

it wasn't going to make, and I

42:48

don't look, the technology was fascinating from the get-go.

42:50

It got way better with the second generation for

42:52

sure. Remember they, we used to have that kind

42:54

of field of view problem. The field of view

42:56

was a bit bigger in the two, but it

42:58

still wasn't good enough. So it wasn't perfect. Yeah,

43:00

but it was demonstrably better. And you

43:02

know, their feeling at the time was like, they'll keep doing, you

43:05

know, every generation will keep seeing that

43:07

we had never got past two. Actually, we have to. Well,

43:10

I mean, I've talked to folks there, like they're

43:12

waiting on hardware. The

43:15

right hardware comes down the line, they'll make another one. Okay.

43:18

Well, okay. Well, yeah, we'll see. I guess we'll

43:20

see. I've heard that too, but it's been a while

43:22

since I heard it. But

43:24

yeah. It's been a while, but

43:26

I mean, I heard it recently is last year. Okay.

43:30

They're still a team. They are kind of in stasis.

43:33

They're kind of hung on the army thing, which isn't

43:35

quite dead yet. They taking care of

43:37

a mitt full of verticals that do use it. And

43:40

everybody wants new hardware, but until they have a compelling story

43:42

for the new hardware, they're not going to pull a trigger.

43:46

Yeah. Okay. I

43:48

mean, I wonder what kind of a human

43:50

being would sit still a part of a business like that

43:52

waiting for something to happen. It's like,

43:54

you know, by the way, is the, yeah. And

43:57

also guy who's got enough money that it doesn't.

44:00

You know do it. Yeah, I think Microsoft guys

44:02

jobs are on the line, right? I give a

44:04

lot of those guys the experts who were working

44:06

on that stuff went to meta You

44:08

know well a bunch of them did without a doubt

44:10

and now I've gone elsewhere Right,

44:12

right because you know I talked to one of them

44:15

I talked to one of them is that dude I'm

44:17

getting a sinus bonus that I can sign a house

44:19

with yeah All I have to do is stick around

44:21

for a year Yeah, and then one way either I'm

44:23

gonna walk out of there with more knowledge about contemporary

44:26

VR than anybody else Tell me the downside to me.

44:28

Yeah, but you know who get the big bucks is

44:30

the AI researchers And that is

44:32

now that is a competitive field right now. Oh,

44:35

yeah, well million dollar Yeah, I mean dollar,

44:37

you know signing bonus This is gonna be

44:39

the side hustle of 2024 how to correctly

44:41

prompt a GPT to get something you want

44:44

You know well I know that

44:46

where the money is to do that the tech

44:48

giants that aren't leading that are trying to catch

44:50

up Yeah, like you who's spending a lot of

44:52

money right now Apple and Facebook Yeah,

44:55

right that's right Right,

44:57

I don't know that Amazon say he's

45:00

seriously still and Microsoft Google or

45:02

in the race It was it's funny you

45:04

could point to any of these companies and say like how would

45:06

they like Microsoft? You know and Google

45:08

obviously strong parallels, but Amazon honestly And

45:11

I think God it could partially

45:13

because so many X Microsoft executives went

45:15

through there as their first stop outside

45:17

the company But there is a

45:19

real Microsoft kind of a vibe to Amazon

45:22

sometimes Isn't there kind of a seal of

45:24

a new shop? Yeah, you know

45:26

like it's it's interesting so I I Can't

45:30

I can't understand what Amazon's doing This

45:32

is a company that has a giant

45:34

consumer ecommerce business in a

45:37

giant cloud computing business And

45:39

this thing lands right in the middle of exactly

45:41

everything that matters to you the most and I

45:43

like doing exactly You know the

45:46

worst number is curse for companies to be

45:48

successful. I think it's really

45:50

makes it hard leading sucks Right chasing is

45:52

something you know how to do yeah Let's

45:56

pause briefly. I know you have more earnings learnings

45:58

and man we have learned much but

46:01

my brain is feeling heavy my

46:03

heart is being sad no no it's

46:05

not happy it's happy. I

46:09

did not buy a Vision Pro but

46:12

Mike and we got one for Mike. Did you

46:14

talk to Elmo online this week is that what

46:16

this is? Yeah Elmo no

46:18

no I did not talk to

46:20

Elmo. Did you hear about Elmo?

46:22

He went online to find

46:24

out how people were doing and what he

46:26

got back was the saddest story of all

46:28

time from everyone who is circling

46:31

the drain emotionally. Oh it's doing well

46:33

right now. Don't ask that question.

46:36

It's a weird thing. You know when people

46:38

ask you how are you doing they're just

46:40

being polite. They're not looking for a dissertation

46:42

on your divorce and everything that's wrong in

46:44

your life you know. Yeah finally we've got

46:46

keep walking. Suddenly it's cutter Elmo just trying

46:48

to feel something. Yeah exactly. Alright

46:52

on we go what other learnings have we

46:54

got for these earnings? I just Elmo.

46:57

Just a couple of companies they'll be more

46:59

next week. I would make

47:01

the point you know Microsoft kept warning us and warning us that

47:03

they were gonna have a tough year in 23 and that's

47:06

why they were laying off and that's why they're doing

47:08

the cutbacks and all they've had

47:11

is record year over year. Well that's

47:13

everybody in the tech industry and they've

47:15

already in this month alone 25,000 tech

47:17

jobs up in smoke. That's just

47:20

bizarre. I'm of two minds here so I there

47:23

are people who would hear what you

47:25

just said. See they could

47:27

have afforded to keep paying these people.

47:29

They should never lay those guys off

47:32

and yikes hold on a second. To

47:34

me the real crime here was that they hired

47:37

too many people during an upswing

47:39

that everyone knew was temporary. But the

47:41

way they did those layoffs didn't cull

47:43

the deadwood either. No it culled the

47:45

most people. You know them and I

47:47

knew them. Yeah I know I should

47:49

have. They got lost. Yep yeah

47:52

but you know what all this proves to me

47:54

it look you'll this is something that would never

47:56

occurred to 30 year old Paul but you know

47:59

20 something years later. This

48:02

just shows me the big tech, these companies, these companies

48:04

that we think we know so well, Microsoft,

48:06

Google, whatever, are just like

48:08

any other big company. Just big corporations. They're

48:10

just that stupid. They're just that stupid. Yep.

48:13

They're just that terrible. And I'm also reminded of the Hansman line,

48:15

we are not organized enough to be as evil as you think

48:17

we are. Yes. That was always

48:19

my thing about Microsoft was, you know, back when they were

48:21

the evil empire, it's like, guys, you

48:24

don't understand how disorganized this company is. There's

48:26

no consistency. It's

48:28

a bunch of little fiefdoms of angry people.

48:30

It's not, you know, it's not

48:32

a giant concerted effort to crush people. Yeah,

48:34

with varying degrees of enthusiasm for the next

48:37

promotion. Yeah. So,

48:40

speaking of other companies, there's terrible as Microsoft.

48:43

Alphabet slash Google, net income of 20.7 billion, revenues

48:46

of 86.3 billion. What's

48:50

the number? I always put this in here somewhere. Yeah. 76%

48:54

of their revenues came from what? Google

48:57

Cloud. No, I'm just kidding. Advertising,

48:59

they're terrible. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Although,

49:02

never going to get past that. Well,

49:04

you know, Google Alphabet, whatever, like Apple, right,

49:06

like Microsoft back in the day when it

49:08

was just Windows, are trying to diversify. And

49:11

they do have two businesses that are going pretty

49:13

strongly. They're still small compared to advertising, but subscriptions,

49:19

platforms, and devices, right? So,

49:21

Pixel and whatever, associate things. 10.5%

49:25

growth, $10.8 billion in the quarter. And Google Rocks is

49:27

the like, it goes under that? Yep.

49:30

And then Google Cloud, which is kind of their, you know,

49:32

their cloud, I guess. That

49:35

stuff's been going pretty well, honestly, $19 billion.

49:38

So, I hope they're

49:40

building in enough infrastructure because they still

49:42

seem very Valley-centric. Yeah. Well,

49:45

so we're talking about $20 billion. I

49:47

mean, just to kind of put those together, right,

49:49

those two things. I mean, more personal computing was

49:51

only 16.9 at Microsoft. Microsoft

49:55

365, productivity and business

49:57

processes, 19.2. So...

50:00

That's not horrible. I'm just saying it's not horrible.

50:03

Compared to the advertising stuff, small. Yeah.

50:06

Because Wall Street, these results were

50:08

not meant favorably. This guy's

50:10

made... I just want to be clear about this. $65.5

50:13

billion in revenue from ads, and Wall Street said, not enough?

50:19

They're just supposed to pay $66 billion. They blew it! Are

50:23

you kidding me? Yeah. This

50:25

world is screwed. That

50:27

is just so mental. It's perverse incentives

50:29

that keep this whole thing churning. That's

50:31

why they laid off people. I mean,

50:33

it's just really... It isn't

50:35

such a... That's just incredible. This stuff blows my

50:37

mind. Yeah. Nuts.

50:40

And

50:42

then we might have talked about

50:44

Intel last week, but I'll just mention it

50:46

quick, because it factors into AMD this week,

50:49

which is that Intel, let's see, last week,

50:51

was... This is for a quarter. It was

50:53

an income of $2.7 billion on revenues of

50:55

$15.4 billion. And

50:58

that was a gain of 10%. It was the first

51:00

time all year that Intel's revenues actually went up year

51:02

over year. And remember at the time, they were saying,

51:05

among other things, like, we're starting to see that PC

51:07

rebound. So this week,

51:09

we got AMD telling a similar

51:12

story, smaller numbers. I

51:15

think a lot of people... You would

51:17

think when Intel is the wounded lion

51:20

stumbling across the savannah, that this younger,

51:22

faster moving is going to overtake... It's not even close.

51:25

Like, AMD, for all of us... Someone

51:27

else puts a paw, knocks them on their

51:29

butts. Yeah. It's much better than AMD. Yeah.

51:31

We're talking... This is $667 million in profits

51:33

on revenues of $6.2 billion. So

51:39

a vastly diminished Intel

51:42

is still almost three times the size of AMD. Like,

51:44

it's... And they're starting to

51:46

turn things around. So... I mean, is the

51:48

number... Other number you want here the TMSC

51:51

numbers? Yeah. Right.

51:53

So I don't know that we'll ever see

51:55

those actually. Well, that's true. We get those.

51:57

I don't have those. But... These

52:00

are companies that come

52:02

from that traditional PC market and they're expanding into

52:04

the data center. I would say,

52:06

again, I bet Intel has a much... Let's look

52:08

it up. Let's see.

52:11

Now I want to find it. AMD's

52:13

data center number was 2.3 billion

52:15

in the quarter. It was up 38%. They're doing

52:18

great, right? Intel, which I

52:20

didn't put into my... No, I said it was

52:22

4 billion. 4

52:25

billion for Intel versus 2.3 for

52:27

AMD. There you go. It was

52:30

basically twice as big, but AMD grew

52:32

38% and data center for Intel down 10%. So

52:38

here you go. Data center is the

52:40

one area where AMD maybe has a

52:42

chance, right? That's

52:45

the bigger business, I mean, ultimately. The

52:49

threat to these companies is not

52:51

just Nvidia or any

52:54

other actual chip maker. It's

52:56

these companies like OpenAI, Microsoft,

52:58

Apple, whatever, Google, they're

53:01

all trying to do their... They're

53:03

trying to kind of rest control away

53:05

from these companies and create

53:07

their own chips. Of course, now

53:09

they're partnering for now, of course, but I think the

53:11

goal is to use the

53:16

fab owners to make their own chips

53:18

and kind of bypass these companies. So

53:20

let's see. It's going to be a

53:22

much more diverse market for

53:24

microprocessors and other chips than

53:27

we've had for 20 years, really. Yeah,

53:30

well, and governments are

53:33

pouring a lot of money into bringing

53:35

manufacturing home because of the threats going

53:38

on in the Southeast. We're

53:40

just going to diversify it

53:42

more and distort profitability. There's

53:45

going to be a lot of... The whole

53:48

motion to get that stuff happening in North

53:50

America again is they're

53:52

heavily subsidized. State-sponsored subsidies? Yeah. Is

53:54

that an accurate term? Well, at

53:56

the same time, I think there's

53:58

a recognition that... You

54:00

make your own chips in your own

54:02

country the same reason that you make

54:04

food for your people and vaccines. Like,

54:06

it is an essential service. It is

54:09

strategically important. And so it doesn't have

54:11

to be efficient. I just want to

54:13

be able to treat an employee of

54:15

Intel the way I would treat like

54:17

a police officer or a mayor and

54:19

say, I pay your salary. But

54:22

if you're looking at TS-17 numbers, like

54:24

they're in the 20 billion quarterly revenue

54:26

range. Like, they're the same size. They

54:29

just don't own any of their chip designs. Right.

54:33

It's a different kind of business, really, right?

54:35

Because before this was like all integrated into

54:37

one company. That's the Intel model. They're still

54:39

trying to do it. Yeah. But

54:42

I would argue more profitable because they are only

54:44

making chips that people pay for. Yeah.

54:47

Right. As opposed to the

54:49

Intel that's running those fabs experimenting with chip

54:51

designs. Right. Yeah. Yeah.

54:56

They're eliminating the biggest

54:58

cost and the biggest risk. Sure. It's

55:01

the foundry model. At the

55:03

same time, it's like this is not where

55:05

innovation is going to come from. It's about

55:07

reducing costs rather than innovation

55:09

making something new. Not

55:11

that either AMD nor Intel has

55:14

made anything profound recently. Wow.

55:17

You don't think that the core alter chips are profound?

55:20

Dun, dun, dun. He

55:23

says leadingly. So sure.

55:25

That's a word. But yeah,

55:28

I mean, obviously these days it's

55:30

about efficiency. So for the fab

55:32

guys, you're looking at smaller and

55:34

smaller processes and Intel, you know,

55:37

Intel's, I don't know enough about hardware

55:39

design to know if this is truly innovative, but

55:41

these kinds of 3D designs that they're working on

55:43

and so forth. Yeah. I mean,

55:45

I would argue the biggest thing that the

55:47

most important thing that TSMC owns is a

55:49

set of skilled engineers in making very small,

55:52

you know, five nanometer chips. And they

55:54

live in a wall that has armed

55:57

guards. Yeah. You know, but

55:59

you know, they're. I know they're building fabs

56:01

in North America. The question is, are they training

56:03

those engineers? Like are they going

56:05

to have people who know how to run those machines

56:07

well enough to get their yields of problems that people

56:09

want? Anyways,

56:13

it's a bad idea. I love the

56:15

hard work about the domestic stuff, but

56:17

we'll see. Well,

56:19

I'm and I'm only pointing out because the earnings

56:22

numbers are going to get harder to read over

56:24

the next few years as this market fragments is

56:26

further and runs under substantial subsidies. For

56:29

the Microsoft guys in the audience, I would just say Microsoft

56:33

used to be the biggest company, the only company

56:35

in personal technology. Now they're an all-sarin, but they're

56:37

the biggest company in the world. So

56:40

there's a bigger pool to

56:42

play with. So I

56:44

think for these companies that meet like

56:46

Intel, for example, dominating their world, struggling

56:50

now, but they could emerge as a not

56:53

the dominant chip maker anymore. They'll be one

56:55

of whatever number. But there's

56:57

a profitable future where maybe potentially I'm not

57:00

saying it's going to happen, but I'm

57:03

sure they're looking at Microsoft and saying, yeah, we want

57:05

that. We also wouldn't mind some regulatory

57:10

ignorance on our

57:12

part. Just stop thinking about us because we're

57:14

not number one anymore. Yeah,

57:17

well, they've definitely played that card a few times. Don't

57:21

look at us. We're the little guy. Yeah,

57:24

a little poor little Intel. We're

57:27

not controlling the market share. I don't know what you're

57:29

worried about. We'll see. Anyway,

57:31

look, we knew what we were. Let us kill

57:33

this competitor by golly. I

57:36

think the constant state of change is what

57:38

keeps things interesting and for people with ADD

57:41

like me, it makes it hard. So we'll

57:45

find balance in here somewhere. All

57:47

right. And that's it for now. I guarantee you next

57:50

week, we're going to have three

57:53

to five more. We hear from Dell

57:55

and HP. So exciting. What about Nvidia?

57:57

We already heard from Nvidia because they're

57:59

the ones. I don't think we have

58:01

this quarter. I think this is not last year, we went up

58:03

700% I think. Something

58:05

like that. Yeah, so by... We were

58:07

in the trillionaire club. Yeah, market cap, they were the biggest...

58:09

Or by... No, I'm sorry. It

58:12

was revenues. By some measure, they were the biggest hardware maker

58:14

in the world last year. They're not really, right? Not by...

58:17

Not objectively, but... They don't even make hardware, do they? Yeah.

58:20

They only... They make their gear. They

58:22

make video cards. What do you mean? Do they?

58:24

Or do they just do reference designs that other

58:27

people make? Oh. Yeah, I

58:29

think they sell the record. They sell their own now? They did

58:31

this at the data center. I'm pretty sure. Yeah. Well,

58:34

I believe so. Well,

58:37

that'll be the fun one. That'll

58:39

be exciting. I like the stragglers. You think you're over it? And

58:41

then you're like, oh, finally. And then they come in and they're

58:43

like, oh, come on. Gotcha again. Come on. Like,

58:46

our quarter ran from April

58:48

17th until... Like,

58:51

what? It's like, why? It's like

58:53

the NBA season. It just keeps getting longer

58:55

and... A little longer, a few more games.

58:58

Exactly. There'll be one

59:00

team starting up for next season that's still playing the

59:02

championship from last year. Exactly.

59:05

Formula ones like that, too. They keep adding

59:08

races. Oh, my God. Right. All

59:10

right. What else? What else

59:13

do you got? You got Windows? You got any

59:15

Windows? I don't know how we do it. We got

59:17

some Windows. Can I use the record? We've given

59:19

the name of the show. It is Windows Weekly. So,

59:21

yeah. Let's do it. Right. Let's

59:24

do it. Why not? Really,

59:26

at this point. It

59:28

seems like... Remember Windows? Remember

59:30

Windows? That was so much

59:32

fun. Now we're all using spatial computing with nerd helmets.

59:35

Yes. Yeah.

59:38

Right. This is more

59:40

like Windows, comma, weekly. So,

59:44

last couple weeks now, we've been getting these insider

59:46

builds, like, after the show. I'm sure that's not

59:48

on purpose, but Thursday,

59:51

Friday, whatever was the best one. Are you sure?

59:53

No, I'm not. I've got Canary, Dev,

59:55

and Beta stuff going on. So, the Canary

59:57

Channel 1 was, to me, the best. the

1:00:00

most interesting and I've been kind of waiting for it to

1:00:02

be interesting. They

1:00:05

were talking, there's a Windows Studio

1:00:07

Effect feature called Voice Clarity, which

1:00:10

I parallel, I didn't know this, but apparently was

1:00:12

Surface Only and he had a very specific Surface

1:00:15

right, one with an MPU, which

1:00:17

they're going to bring to more computers now, basically all computers

1:00:19

with MPUs, I would imagine. Actually, no, I'm sorry. I think

1:00:21

they're going to bring it to all computers. I think it

1:00:23

doesn't require an MPU and they're going

1:00:27

to do it without an MPU. So that's kind of

1:00:29

fun. But the big one to me was

1:00:31

that they're redesigning the first phase

1:00:34

of the Windows Setup process. So if

1:00:36

you know about Windows Setup, I call

1:00:38

the first part of it, which dates

1:00:41

back literally to Windows Vista in some

1:00:43

ways, but honestly beyond that, because it's

1:00:45

really based on the NT Setup from

1:00:47

the 90s. I will call

1:00:49

that the first run experience because I don't really have a name for

1:00:51

it. Most people are familiar with the

1:00:53

out of box experience, which is that graphical thing that everybody

1:00:56

sees. So if you buy a new computer, you fire it

1:00:58

up, Windows logo pops in. That's

1:01:00

the out of box experience. That

1:01:04

changed at the beginning of Windows

1:01:06

11 and it's been updated a few times

1:01:08

since then, but the visual change, the big one came with

1:01:10

Windows 11. So with this

1:01:12

big version of Windows coming this year, whatever it's called,

1:01:15

they're going to change the first phase

1:01:17

of Setup. And I

1:01:19

actually, I ran, I threw it in a VM just to kind of

1:01:21

check it out. And I was like, you know, this

1:01:24

looks awfully familiar. And

1:01:27

the reason it looks familiar is because

1:01:29

it's actually like 10 year old code.

1:01:31

It's the same design

1:01:34

that they use in the Windows 11 installation assistant,

1:01:36

which is something you can download from the, you

1:01:38

know, when you Google download Windows 10, it's the

1:01:40

first choice at the top. It

1:01:43

doesn't look like the stuff that's been in

1:01:45

Windows since, well, Windows 8 really. So

1:01:48

Windows Vista and Windows 7 showed

1:01:51

something that looked like an arrow window over

1:01:53

a colorful backdrop. They styled

1:01:55

it differently between the two systems, but that

1:01:57

thing was actually a bitmap. It

1:01:59

was no real. window there, it was a single image.

1:02:02

And my belief is that because they need this

1:02:04

thing, or needed at the time, this thing to

1:02:06

fit on a DVD, they

1:02:08

had to strip out the bitmaps and they made it kind of

1:02:11

really plain. So starting with Windows 8, it's

1:02:13

just plain purple, but it's an

1:02:15

actual window. And it's drawn

1:02:18

in the least expensive way

1:02:20

possible, if that makes sense. It's probably

1:02:22

literally Charles Petzold's C code with

1:02:25

every window attribute stripped out of it,

1:02:27

so that it's the most basic window imaginable.

1:02:30

It has minimize, restore,

1:02:32

the close buttons, and it has the window button

1:02:34

on the left, and that's it. There's

1:02:36

nothing else going on there. And I think literally it was

1:02:38

done for, like I said, for disk space

1:02:40

purposes. One

1:02:43

of my big tips for Windows is that this process,

1:02:47

this Windows installation media that you create

1:02:50

can also be used to repair Windows. So

1:02:53

instead of creating a recovery drive, you

1:02:55

should just create this installation disk and just put it somewhere.

1:02:57

So if you ever can't put your computer and can't get

1:02:59

into the recovery environment, you

1:03:01

can use this thing to boot the computer and it

1:03:04

works great. But the way

1:03:06

it looked before, it wasn't obvious, the little, there's a

1:03:08

little text thing, it's like one point big and

1:03:10

the bottom is says, hey, you can repair your

1:03:13

computer too. Now it's a

1:03:15

top level option. And I

1:03:18

think what's going to happen, basically, I think they

1:03:20

went back to this older style and they'll

1:03:22

update the language over time, because there's

1:03:24

some weird reversions in here. Like they

1:03:27

actually talk about DVDs. Like if you,

1:03:30

your product key will be found inside the box where

1:03:32

your DVD was. It's like, what are you talking about?

1:03:36

Yeah, it's like, it's crazy, right? But

1:03:38

it's kind of interesting. And I think, I don't know

1:03:40

if they still have that same arbitrary size limit, whatever

1:03:42

a DVD was, 4.7 gigabytes, I think, if

1:03:47

that's a thing. But I know

1:03:49

that the actual size of the Windows

1:03:53

setup, well, it varies

1:03:55

by version, but I think you need like a,

1:03:57

it's an eight or 16 gig USB. drive

1:04:00

to make this thing. So I

1:04:03

don't know what they're doing exactly, but I'm just

1:04:05

fascinated. I document this for the book. Obviously, I

1:04:07

run through this all the time. I see this

1:04:09

stuff not every day, but every

1:04:11

week for sure. And the fact that they're actually

1:04:13

touching something this low level in Windows right now is

1:04:17

very interesting to me.

1:04:20

So that's Canary. And

1:04:22

then yeah, the dev stuff just

1:04:24

might have bug fixes. Nothing

1:04:26

really worth talking about there. But, beta

1:04:29

channel, there's some big news, right? So

1:04:32

same thing with the Windows Studio effect

1:04:34

coming there. They're doing snap layout suggestions.

1:04:36

So they'll look at the windows that

1:04:38

are on your... I'm sure it's AI

1:04:40

powered, it has to be, right? Look

1:04:42

at the windows on screen and like

1:04:44

suggest layouts that make sense for those

1:04:46

applications, which you know, we'll see how good that is. But

1:04:49

the biggest news addresses a long time

1:04:51

complaint in the Windows Insider program, and

1:04:53

I'm hoping and assuming it's going to

1:04:55

come to all the channels, which is

1:04:57

that they will let you un-enroll a

1:04:59

PC from the beta channel

1:05:02

on the fly. You don't have to wait for some future

1:05:04

milestone. You can just check a box, it

1:05:06

will reboot, it will install

1:05:08

the stable version of Windows. You

1:05:10

will lose obviously features that are not there because you

1:05:12

know, it's stable, doesn't have all the features. But you

1:05:14

can actually just go back. You don't have to wipe

1:05:17

out the machine. So I think

1:05:19

that's smart. I think that's the way it should have always

1:05:21

been. By the way,

1:05:23

that's the way Android works. If you test Android betas,

1:05:25

you could just, you know, I mean, I think

1:05:28

iOS probably does the same thing. It's, you

1:05:30

know, there's a nice separation there. It doesn't always work,

1:05:32

I guess. But I mean, the ability to separate

1:05:35

your data and apps and whatever from the system and

1:05:37

just kind of revert to a stable version of the

1:05:39

operating system to me just makes sense. So yeah,

1:05:42

I believe this is a good sign. Well,

1:05:47

and it just be, I mean, when I'm

1:05:50

getting from that, it's like, maybe you were right, Canary will

1:05:52

be 12. Like more than

1:05:54

ever. It's yeah, I really I hope

1:05:56

so. But also the rollback for

1:06:00

beta sort of speaks to 11 is

1:06:02

coming to an end. And so

1:06:04

they're now they're baking changes in a way that are

1:06:06

easy to recover. Right. I

1:06:08

linked to the wrong article for this next

1:06:10

thing, but I will correct that. Um,

1:06:13

our home arm thing. Yeah. So

1:06:16

there have, there are a few, uh, uh, I'm

1:06:18

sorry, a few web browsers that run natively on

1:06:20

windows on RM. I think Firefox is one and

1:06:23

I feel like some of the chromium. Browsers

1:06:26

including edge obviously, uh, are native, but

1:06:28

Chrome to date has remained, you know, X 86. And

1:06:31

so back when windows and RM first

1:06:33

came out, you would run, you would, you'd have to go

1:06:35

manually go find the 32 bit version,

1:06:37

right? Right. Because that was a,

1:06:39

the only one that was compatible. And then for

1:06:42

a while when you could do either, it was actually

1:06:44

the more efficient version, but I think in

1:06:46

windows on RM today, I believe if you just go get it,

1:06:48

you get the 64 bit version, we'd have

1:06:50

that emulation and we don't run 32 bit code

1:06:53

anymore, so that's the one you're going to run, that's what you get.

1:06:55

Um, but they just released to their Canary channel.

1:06:59

The first build of Chrome for, uh, for

1:07:02

windows and RM. So I downloaded it and checked it

1:07:04

as nothing traumatic going on there. It's not like you

1:07:07

all of a sudden everything works faster and better

1:07:09

and whatever, but it is a native version that

1:07:11

is important. I don't know why they're doing it

1:07:13

now, but maybe this is one of the,

1:07:15

you know, many indications that, uh, this

1:07:18

will be the year, I guess we'll see. Yeah.

1:07:21

Well, and I just wonder if it's because Microsoft,

1:07:23

they didn't want Microsoft to just take that market.

1:07:26

Yeah. We've got to build and it's not that hard to

1:07:28

make it. It can't be

1:07:30

Microsoft's doing it. No, I'm sorry. I other

1:07:32

people are doing it. I mean, so, you

1:07:34

know, if, if people, if companies building, uh,

1:07:37

chromium based web browsers can do it, of course, Google can

1:07:39

do it right. So yeah. So

1:07:42

that's good. Um, put it in turn on it.

1:07:44

You got to build out. Exactly. Right.

1:07:46

Just so if you get this to compile, we'll put

1:07:48

it in canary. We'll call it good. Um,

1:07:52

Microsoft edge is I'm clicking.

1:07:55

I'm using this, the wrong links on everything. Yeah,

1:07:57

I know you're doing a great job. I'm doing

1:07:59

good. spend that kind of a week. So

1:08:01

this week, this has been going on

1:08:03

for a long time. I don't know why this is in the news right

1:08:06

now, but there

1:08:09

is a very good chance that what people don't

1:08:12

understand is that something's happening behind the scenes that

1:08:15

they agree to. Because one of

1:08:17

the things, when I started writing the Windows 11 field

1:08:20

guide, I got to the Edge chapters and

1:08:22

I realized there's a lot of cannery

1:08:25

going on here, right? When you first bring

1:08:27

up Edge, you go through these three screens

1:08:29

where you want all your stuff on all

1:08:31

your computers. You're like, yep. You're like, do

1:08:33

you want to import your stuff from Chrome? Yes or no. That's

1:08:36

up to you. But to me,

1:08:38

that's a one-time deal. You do

1:08:40

it once and then you use the new browser, right?

1:08:42

That to me is the point of that. And then

1:08:44

the third screen is like, hey, you want to make

1:08:46

your web experience better. And if you actually look at

1:08:48

the fine print, what you're actually agreeing to is a

1:08:50

lot more tracking. And I think

1:08:53

what Microsoft is doing here is commingling this

1:08:56

notion of we're always, you said yes to

1:08:58

importing stuff from Chrome. You

1:09:01

also said yes to always keeping your thing up to date.

1:09:04

So we noticed you have Chrome on your computer. We're going to

1:09:06

make sure you're always up to date.

1:09:08

And they're starting to do it in new ways to some

1:09:10

people on some computers. This is actually, like I said, it's

1:09:12

gone on for a little while, but the idea is that

1:09:14

you are using Edge and

1:09:16

then you can access tabs that

1:09:19

you would only open in

1:09:21

Chrome. Right in your history. And it's like,

1:09:23

wait, what? So the

1:09:26

issue here, as it is so often the case

1:09:28

with Edge, is that people are like, I didn't

1:09:30

agree to this. Yeah.

1:09:32

Oh, yeah, you did. You just didn't know

1:09:34

what you were agreeing to. Yeah.

1:09:39

The version says that this started after installing some new

1:09:41

update for Windows 11. But you can look this one

1:09:43

up. People have complained about

1:09:46

this for a little while. So I'm not really sure what to say to

1:09:48

this. Other than that, you shouldn't

1:09:50

use either one of these browsers, you idiots. And,

1:09:52

you know, think about it.

1:09:54

What were you thinking? What

1:09:56

are you doing? So I

1:09:58

don't know what's happening there. But anyway. I have not

1:10:00

experienced this and because I don't you know, I would never

1:10:04

Speaking of which this new version Microsoft

1:10:06

Edge last week We

1:10:08

talked about various web browsers. They're

1:10:10

all in the same schedule now, right? Basically. Yeah this

1:10:13

one is only interesting because Microsoft

1:10:16

Edge is going to be used in these managed environments

1:10:18

We have a business and one of the promises I

1:10:20

think it dates back to 20 when they were talking

1:10:22

about what? You know 23 h2

1:10:24

or whatever was that? they

1:10:28

They have kind of a new work experience,

1:10:30

right? That's it's really just profiles with a

1:10:33

different name But they were promising that they

1:10:35

were going to let businesses using enter ID

1:10:37

brand the browser So you could

1:10:39

have like a logo up in the corner? So it's like you

1:10:41

work for throughout comm so you get a little T logo up

1:10:44

there or whatever right that

1:10:46

is finally available so they

1:10:49

have links to the Microsoft

1:10:51

Learn website where you can as a business you

1:10:53

can learn what policies you have to implement what

1:10:55

assets you need so that these things are delivered

1:10:57

down to your users and That

1:11:00

happens and then for for normal human beings

1:11:03

They're changing the way the browser alerts

1:11:05

users about updates like browser updates because

1:11:07

now these things are updated Every

1:11:10

10 seconds. It seems like it's actually I think it's

1:11:12

every four weeks technically now, but Before

1:11:16

if you want it if you wanted to manually find

1:11:18

a browser update you would go into Settings

1:11:21

app like the about interface essentially and it was a oh

1:11:23

this new version It just starts downloading it and I suppose

1:11:25

if you waited long enough and must do something I must

1:11:28

put something up at the corner where it says a you're

1:11:30

out of date Microsoft

1:11:32

Edge has this unique little interface called

1:11:34

browser essentials, which hasn't been too essential

1:11:36

to date honestly But it's getting kind

1:11:38

of interesting and if you ever look

1:11:40

at that in fact, let me just bring it now so I can

1:11:43

see What's in there exactly? this

1:11:45

is where you access things like the

1:11:50

Call the the VPN service that they have is

1:11:52

one of the things that's in there There's

1:11:55

some power and efficiency stuff in there some safety

1:11:57

stuff, which is nonsense. They don't do anything for

1:11:59

you Yeah, Edge Secure Network is the name of the

1:12:01

VPN. So you can do that kind of stuff. I

1:12:04

actually saw for the first time in my life, because I don't

1:12:07

use Edge a lot. I use it mostly just when I'm writing

1:12:09

the book or whatever. But it actually

1:12:11

complained that some of my tabs were taking up

1:12:13

too much memory. Wow. I was like,

1:12:15

oh, look at you. And

1:12:17

so it made some recommend. And I don't use

1:12:20

sleeping tabs. That might have been part of the

1:12:22

problem, you know, whatever. But they're going to start

1:12:24

promoting Edge software updates in this interface. It should

1:12:26

really be telling you how long you've had that

1:12:28

tab open too, right? Yeah. Well,

1:12:31

things like we just talked about Arc,

1:12:33

right? It could just be like, you know what? We're just

1:12:35

turning it off. Yeah. You know, you're

1:12:37

not using this thing, right? Yeah.

1:12:41

I know folks who leave browser sessions

1:12:43

open for days and they leak memory.

1:12:46

Like, they just get worse and worse and worse

1:12:48

and worse. Right. Right.

1:12:51

Yeah. So I mean, memory leak is even

1:12:53

when you close the old pages, the memory doesn't get better. Since you

1:12:55

close all of them, that

1:12:57

whole thing gets junked in. When you reload, you come

1:12:59

in much lower footprint. It's always a double edge server

1:13:01

with Edge because you look at a feature like this

1:13:04

and you think, yeah, I mean, this is logical. It

1:13:06

makes sense. It's helpful, you know, whatever. But it's also

1:13:08

one of like a thousand of these features. And

1:13:10

that's the problem with Edge is there's too much of this stuff, you

1:13:12

know. Just I'm probably never going

1:13:14

to write this article. But if you just look at like

1:13:17

screenshots of Edge, you'll notice like the UI is always in different

1:13:19

places. You're like, what's going on? Let's move it around. You can

1:13:21

figure it out with the hell you want. Not only do they

1:13:23

move it around, but you could go up to the corner and

1:13:26

say, like, I want my profile button up there. No, I want

1:13:28

it down here. I want the workspaces

1:13:30

icon there. No, no, I don't want it there.

1:13:32

Like it's different all the time. And it, you

1:13:34

know, that's the new Microsoft way. And

1:13:39

then I have not seen this myself,

1:13:41

but apparently today they started rolling out

1:13:43

a redesigned version of OneDrive for the

1:13:45

web for consumers. Right. So

1:13:48

onedrive.com, you can see this. And

1:13:50

this is in some ways, it's

1:13:53

kind of similar to what actually you see in OneDrive for

1:13:55

Business. You get this kind of like,

1:13:57

I think they call it for you section up in

1:13:59

the. top and they're trying to anticipate

1:14:04

what it is you're looking for and it's I kind

1:14:07

of wish they wouldn't honestly I when I go to

1:14:09

a site like this if I go to one drive

1:14:11

calm it's very specific I just want

1:14:13

to get into the file system finest specific thing get

1:14:15

the hell out of there and they're

1:14:17

looking at it more of a destination so

1:14:19

it kind of joins yeah start menu in

1:14:21

Windows 11 the Microsoft 365 app

1:14:23

and Windows 11 you know office.com

1:14:27

it's it's you know what

1:14:29

is it what are you doing here like what's your

1:14:31

point and it's like it's trying to do the Facebook

1:14:33

hey here's a picture from last year aren't you excited

1:14:35

haven't I helped you it's like interrupting

1:14:37

me again get it out of the way yeah

1:14:39

exactly I right I didn't come here for yeah

1:14:42

for helpful suggestions I came here to get something

1:14:44

done I had some stuff to do and you're

1:14:46

interrupting me and

1:14:49

then I just threw this under Microsoft 365 even

1:14:51

though we don't have any other stuff but I

1:14:54

think it was Friday Friday the teams

1:14:56

outage teams went out oh yeah like

1:14:58

eight hours right yeah

1:15:02

it was like a conga line online of

1:15:05

people who are like oh my god this

1:15:07

is so nice great yeah nobody can bother

1:15:09

me now you know yeah but

1:15:12

much like that Microsoft hack

1:15:14

from a week or so ago I'm curious

1:15:17

about what happened here right

1:15:19

it's most likely a human-caused

1:15:22

configuration era Microsoft called it

1:15:24

a networking issue at

1:15:26

one point they never really

1:15:28

and if really explained what

1:15:30

I really explained it and and they also when

1:15:33

I went I think it was Saturday morning or

1:15:35

even as late as Saturday afternoon when I looked

1:15:37

at the admin center it

1:15:40

still told me they were looking into several

1:15:42

of these issues but Microsoft was publicly reporting

1:15:44

they solved the problem everything was fine so

1:15:46

it's kind of hard to say but this cascaded

1:15:49

across the entire planet mm-hmm

1:15:53

and they I guess they fixed it it

1:15:56

seems to work to you know work Monday so it's early it

1:15:59

I don't know but I'm confused

1:16:02

about what happened

1:16:04

there and I think I'm going to continue to be confused

1:16:06

because I don't see them ever coming clean about this. They

1:16:08

didn't say anything about nation states or anything like that. It

1:16:10

was just like, yeah,

1:16:14

you know, sometimes Pitsar forgoes bad. Did

1:16:18

you, I don't know if you listened

1:16:20

or saw Steve Gibson's piece

1:16:22

yesterday. He was quoting Alex Stamos

1:16:25

on the Microsoft break. Alex wrote a

1:16:27

piece on it. Not John

1:16:29

Stamos from the. Not John

1:16:31

Stamos. Alex Stamos who.

1:16:33

Paul House? Yeah. No,

1:16:35

Alex is very well known security researcher. He's now

1:16:38

at the Sentinel One, but before that he was

1:16:40

at Stanford's Internet Observatory and you

1:16:42

remember that Zoom brought him in when

1:16:44

they had some embarrassment in

1:16:47

security. Anyway, Stamos really reamed

1:16:49

Microsoft on this email thing.

1:16:51

He said this is not

1:16:53

an issue of, as

1:16:55

we might have thought, the bad

1:16:58

actors getting an email account.

1:17:00

This is far worse. Furthermore, he

1:17:03

pointed out that at least 10 other

1:17:05

companies seem to report this, that this

1:17:07

OAuth failure reached

1:17:10

them as well, right? Yeah,

1:17:12

actually since we talked, there was a second

1:17:14

and then a third update to the story

1:17:16

from Microsoft. In the second update, Microsoft said

1:17:19

that they discovered there were 10 other companies

1:17:22

that had been hacked using the same technique

1:17:24

and they alerted them. That

1:17:26

was the same day that HPE came out and said, hey,

1:17:28

by the way, this happened to us as well. And

1:17:34

the third one, I think the one where

1:17:36

they basically said, yeah, we didn't configure 2FA

1:17:38

on this account. Basically, it was like that

1:17:40

stupid and it's like, it's a couple of,

1:17:42

you know, I don't know.

1:17:44

And my suggestion was it was an internal

1:17:46

OLE account that didn't bother and then somebody

1:17:48

made it public some way and it

1:17:51

hadn't been locked down properly. shows

1:18:00

up, opens a test account, he's got to do

1:18:02

a test VM, whatever. And

1:18:04

I have to do something with it, whatever it might be. And then,

1:18:06

hey Bob, you want to go to lunch? Yep. And

1:18:09

then they take off and then he goes to a different company or different part of

1:18:11

the company. And it's just one

1:18:13

of many kind of ghost or VMs or

1:18:15

accounts or whatever they are out in the world. And I

1:18:17

don't, you know, there's a

1:18:20

version of this where you could kind of

1:18:22

make the argument that Microsoft has these built-in

1:18:24

tools for assessing things and they, maybe

1:18:27

the fact that this is going to

1:18:29

be an unpopular position, I'm not saying

1:18:31

it's mine, but maybe they found it quicker

1:18:33

than basically any other company would have. I mean,

1:18:35

given the complexity of their environments and all the

1:18:37

machines and users and whatever, I mean, and you

1:18:40

know, people like us will be like, how could this happen

1:18:42

to a company like Microsoft? We trust them for

1:18:44

our security, you know, it's easy to get really, you

1:18:47

know, outraged over everything these days. And

1:18:50

generally speaking, their customer-facing stuff is pretty

1:18:52

damn good. That's not what this is.

1:18:55

That's right. That's exactly right. So

1:18:59

I think the one thing we've said all along, we said

1:19:01

this last week, I'm saying it right now, we'll say it

1:19:03

again in the future, is like, I don't, I think there's

1:19:05

more to this story. And

1:19:07

maybe Alex Deimos has some information about that.

1:19:09

You know, maybe there's more to come. I

1:19:11

don't know. I, it feels

1:19:14

a little, I think

1:19:16

the thing that bugs, the one thing I, in the back of

1:19:18

my brain, not being a security expert, but the thing that bugs

1:19:20

me is that they were

1:19:22

in there for so long. Yeah,

1:19:24

it took as long to detect it as it did. And

1:19:27

I think our company sells products for rapid

1:19:29

detection of breaches. That's a little alarming.

1:19:32

Yeah. Now, we are on the cusp of

1:19:34

this AI era and Microsoft is about to

1:19:36

tout someday in the near future. You

1:19:39

were supposed to detect these guys without a machine

1:19:41

learning model. I know. I

1:19:43

know. Right. That's the

1:19:46

reality. Somebody from Russia logged into

1:19:48

an internal test account. That should

1:19:50

be a flag. Deimos was on

1:19:52

CNBC on Friday night. He

1:19:56

says that he believes

1:19:58

that he's a human being. believes it was

1:20:00

flaws in Entra, Active

1:20:02

Directory. And

1:20:05

Microsoft 365, quoting

1:20:08

Alex Stamos, Microsoft's language here plays this

1:20:10

up as a big favor. They're doing

1:20:13

the ecosystem by sharing their extensive knowledge

1:20:15

of Midnight Blizzard, when in fact what

1:20:17

they're announcing is that this breach has

1:20:19

affected multiple tenants of their cloud products.

1:20:22

I mean, it's not

1:20:24

what they said. Joseph, well, Joseph Mann

1:20:26

in the Washington Post has several sources

1:20:28

indicating at least 10 companies were breached

1:20:30

through Entra. Oh, you

1:20:32

think, oh, oh, oh, that's interesting. Okay, so in other

1:20:34

words, it's not that this hacker group used the same

1:20:37

technique to attack all these other guys. No. It's

1:20:39

that they were able to do it within Microsoft's infrastructure.

1:20:42

That's famous. Oh, that's

1:20:44

interesting. Okay. He says, calling

1:20:46

this a legacy tenant is a dodge. The system

1:20:49

is clearly configured to allow for production access. As

1:20:51

of a couple of weeks ago, Microsoft has an obligation

1:20:53

to secure their legacy products and

1:20:56

tenants just as well as the ones

1:20:58

provisioned today. It's not clear why they made my legacy.

1:21:02

Microsoft does, however, offer us some solutions.

1:21:06

They upsell us. He calls

1:21:08

it the cybersecurity chutzpah hall of fame.

1:21:11

Microsoft recommends potential victims of this attack

1:21:13

against their cloud hosted infrastructure. Why

1:21:16

Entra ID protection or Microsoft Purview

1:21:18

audit or Microsoft password

1:21:21

protection for active directory?

1:21:24

Yeah, this is the school hard, you're at bully

1:21:26

tactic. This is what Microsoft, you know, remember when

1:21:28

Microsoft used to sell antivirus. Let me get straight.

1:21:31

You built an operating system that has vulnerabilities and to fix

1:21:33

those, what you're going to do is charge me to

1:21:37

buy other software that fixes this, the

1:21:39

vulnerability. They also turned around and did

1:21:41

give it away in the end. But

1:21:43

I've had the argument about. It took

1:21:45

a lot of pushback. Yeah, I've had

1:21:47

the argument with Microsoft on run as

1:21:49

about the why do you charge for

1:21:51

traditional security? And they said, listen, the

1:21:54

line gets crossed when we're paying people

1:21:56

to watch out for your stuff.

1:22:00

have to pay for. You know,

1:22:02

you get all the software stuff that's included

1:22:05

with every account when it's

1:22:07

actually active monitoring, that's

1:22:09

people that cost money and you pay

1:22:11

monthly for that. Microsoft should pay for

1:22:13

that service itself then because maybe those

1:22:16

guys would have found that. They didn't,

1:22:18

you know, that stuff's expensive, why would

1:22:20

they? Right. Yeah, I mean I'm

1:22:22

wasting, I'm not going to disagree with

1:22:25

them that there's more to this than

1:22:27

meets the eye. There's not even, there's

1:22:29

no evidence that there's an exploit here. I thought

1:22:31

I was cynical, I got to tell you that

1:22:33

stuff you just read, I was like yikes. Oh

1:22:35

it gets worse, can I tell you? It's brutal.

1:22:39

He says 21 years after the trustworthy

1:22:41

computing memo, it's once again time for

1:22:43

some soul searching in Redmond. Oh

1:22:45

god, what the fuck? Get off of that

1:22:48

so much. I should also point out Alex

1:22:50

now works for a company that sells its

1:22:52

own security products at Mill 1. That's it.

1:22:54

So, it just seemed to be 20 years

1:22:56

after the trust cut. What? Dude,

1:23:00

jeez. I mean there is

1:23:02

an argument for it. Drink and relax. You

1:23:04

know. There's also a glass

1:23:06

houses thing here where laws... Be careful

1:23:09

what you, be careful what you...

1:23:11

Well, I will say that the notion that,

1:23:13

you know, Microsoft did say we found other

1:23:15

companies that were being hacked the same way,

1:23:17

I mean, how would they have known that?

1:23:19

How would they have done that? What do

1:23:21

they know? So that is interesting, I didn't

1:23:23

make that leap myself, I will say that, so

1:23:25

that's kind of interesting. Yeah.

1:23:29

Okay, in other words, yeah, we're

1:23:31

all hosting on the same infrastructure,

1:23:33

there's a bug in that infrastructure

1:23:35

that allowed this. He said Azure

1:23:37

AD is overly complex, lacks a

1:23:39

UX that allows for administrators to

1:23:41

easily understand the web of security

1:23:43

relationships and dependencies that attackers are

1:23:45

becoming accustomed to exploiting.

1:23:47

And in many organizations... I don't think

1:23:49

anyone would argue with that. Yeah. That's

1:23:52

true. In many organizations, Azure AD is

1:23:54

deployed in hybrid mode, which combines the

1:23:56

vulnerability of cloud and on-prem. I just

1:23:58

want to be clear. That is

1:24:00

not how Microsoft markets that product. Anyway,

1:24:04

it's worth a read. Take

1:24:08

it with a grain of salt. He's certainly a

1:24:11

little alarmist. It is

1:24:13

a little extreme, but still,

1:24:16

that's an interesting point. We'll

1:24:20

get to the Taylor Swift deepfakes that you've

1:24:22

been waiting for in just a moment. Paul.

1:24:25

Yeah, I'm going to post actually three or five

1:24:27

of my favorite ones. You

1:24:29

know, as

1:24:32

purely as research, you can

1:24:34

literally search Google and

1:24:36

we will deliver them to you. What would see

1:24:39

Twitter is like, well, we're going

1:24:41

to take them down. We're going to hide the

1:24:43

searches. There's this thing called Google. We call this

1:24:45

the Pete Townsend defense, which

1:24:48

was research. Yeah,

1:24:50

it was just research, Your Honor. Well,

1:24:52

no, I was just curious if Twitter taking it

1:24:55

down had any impact and obviously it does not.

1:24:58

Well, personally, it only took it down for like 24 hours. Yeah.

1:25:01

Well, and they didn't take it down. What they did

1:25:03

was just block any searches for Taylor Swift. Yeah, and

1:25:05

all that. All I don't have to do, they don't

1:25:07

have a department that could take it down. That's the

1:25:09

problem. A very sophisticated kind of a thing anyway. They

1:25:11

just put her head on somebody else's body. It's not,

1:25:14

it's not anyway. So

1:25:16

we don't have to talk about that, but we will talk about

1:25:19

deepfakes when we come back. But first, oh,

1:25:22

do you have, do you have somebody

1:25:24

bringing you some whiskey, Richard? No, no, no,

1:25:26

the whiskey's right here. I'm good. Okay.

1:25:30

I can divert, divert attention from you for

1:25:32

a moment. As I tell

1:25:34

everybody about Club Twit, we're very proud of

1:25:36

Club Twit. We started this two years ago and

1:25:39

I would say right now the most involved,

1:25:42

most discerning, most

1:25:44

active members of our community have become members. More

1:25:47

than 10,000 strong and we're really thrilled about that.

1:25:50

And it's come just in the nick of time.

1:25:52

I don't know if you've heard, but many podcast

1:25:54

networks are out of business now. Many podcasts have

1:25:56

shuttered their doors because ad revenue

1:25:59

has declined so dramatically. It's all going to

1:26:01

Google. It's all going to YouTube.

1:26:03

It's all going to Facebook. It's all going to

1:26:05

influencers But we think we

1:26:07

still have a job to do I

1:26:09

think we have a very important job to do and maybe

1:26:11

it was a mistake way back when when I said, you

1:26:13

know We should let the advertisers support this. I liked it

1:26:16

because it made it free And

1:26:19

we were kind of committed to continue to make our

1:26:21

content free, but we would like to do it with your

1:26:23

help I really want our

1:26:25

listeners and viewers to support us by joining

1:26:28

the club Would you consider it's

1:26:30

seven bucks a month? So

1:26:32

and you can give more you can even do

1:26:34

less if you just want this show ad-free That's

1:26:36

two dollars ninety nine cents a month So you

1:26:38

can get individual shows if you want the seven

1:26:40

dollars gets you ad free of everything gets your

1:26:43

shows We don't we actually do have behind the

1:26:45

paywall in the club IOS today

1:26:47

hands on windows with Paul hands on Matt, which

1:26:49

is by the way great Paul you're doing a

1:26:51

great job with that I love it hands

1:26:53

on it's kind of like the the

1:26:56

premium content on the rot.com It's like

1:26:58

it goes a little deeper a little

1:27:00

extra same thing with Micah Sargent hands

1:27:02

on windows the inside the ultimate

1:27:04

What is it untitled Linux show? The

1:27:08

we can't afford a title, you know, that's

1:27:10

the problem We

1:27:13

also have home theater geeks Those

1:27:16

are all club exclusives. There's other stuff

1:27:18

on the twit plus feed you

1:27:20

get the video before and after every show

1:27:22

Anyway, we try to give you some benefits.

1:27:25

But really the real benefit is you're

1:27:27

helping this network continue

1:27:30

Because we think the job we're doing is important if you

1:27:32

would like to help I would just want to invite you

1:27:35

all We'd love to have you in the club twit.tv Club

1:27:39

twit enough said not gonna

1:27:41

not gonna belabor the point Rich

1:27:44

has got his whiskey. I don't know

1:27:46

what Paul's got nice tall cool. Glad I

1:27:48

don't need to go whiskey Yeah Let's

1:27:51

talk deepfakes Just

1:27:54

briefly because I I'm curious What

1:27:57

people's reactions are when they hear something like an

1:28:00

this case Microsoft, because

1:28:02

of all the stuff that's been going on lately

1:28:04

says, you know, we're going to add deep fake

1:28:06

guardrails to our designer AI. This is the thing

1:28:08

that used to be a image

1:28:10

creator from Bing, right? Because we're not using the Bing

1:28:12

name anyway. So

1:28:15

people can't use it to make porn. What's

1:28:17

the first takeaway from that statement? You

1:28:20

mean you could? Right.

1:28:22

I mean, I could have been using it for

1:28:24

this all. You allowed people to make porn with

1:28:26

this before. And now you're like, you know what?

1:28:30

You're kidding me. That's crazy.

1:28:33

So for whatever it's worth, Microsoft

1:28:35

designer couldn't care less. This is kind of like

1:28:37

their Canva thing. But what they're really talking about

1:28:40

here is that image creator thing, right? So it's

1:28:42

built into Microsoft Paint. It's built into Bing.

1:28:44

It's part of, you know, it's from Copilot.

1:28:46

It's from Dali, right? From OpenAI. It's gotten

1:28:49

really good. If

1:28:51

you pay for Copilot Pro like I do, it's a

1:28:53

little faster, I guess, in certain, you know, at certain

1:28:55

times of the day or something like that. I don't

1:28:57

know. But the results are fantastic. I

1:28:59

didn't know I could be using this to make high quality porn, but

1:29:01

now I guess I can't. So I got you. I

1:29:04

was too late to make it. People want to know that, really. Now

1:29:07

what do you use it for? Mostly

1:29:09

for promo graphics, my articles. I had a great

1:29:11

one where I was like, I asked

1:29:14

it to put the Microsoft campus in the middle of

1:29:16

a scene from the Lord of the Rings, which is

1:29:18

beautiful. It's a little Gandalf

1:29:21

standing around. It was beautiful. You

1:29:24

know, stuff like that. Useful things. Right.

1:29:27

Things that will make the world better. Anyway,

1:29:30

so there was a

1:29:32

story, one of those sources say type

1:29:34

stories a couple of weeks ago that

1:29:36

the DOJ and the FTC were kind

1:29:38

of fighting or debating which one of

1:29:40

them would get to investigate the Microsoft

1:29:42

open AI partnership. We now know

1:29:45

that the FTC won that battle. And

1:29:47

it turns out the reason is they're

1:29:49

actually investigating a lot of, well, several

1:29:51

big tech, big

1:29:53

tech slash AI partnerships

1:29:56

to understand the business model, the

1:29:58

goal, what they're doing. You know, Microsoft, I

1:30:01

think, is the most troubling because

1:30:03

there's this notion that it's

1:30:05

sort of acquisition, not acquisition,

1:30:07

and they're, you know, skirting

1:30:09

around some legal requirements and,

1:30:12

of course, some regulatory action that would have happened

1:30:14

if they ever tried to do that. But they're

1:30:16

also looking at Amazon and

1:30:18

Alphabet, both of whom

1:30:21

have certain relationships with

1:30:23

Anthropic, which is probably,

1:30:25

I guess, open AI's biggest competitor, I

1:30:27

suppose. So

1:30:29

yeah, they're just, and, you know, the EU is doing

1:30:31

the same. I think the UK, CMA, is also doing

1:30:33

the same. They're looking at these companies and like, okay,

1:30:36

so what, tell us a little about yourselves. I

1:30:38

don't understand why the DOJ was ever involved. Like,

1:30:41

you don't, DOJ only says that there's a criminal

1:30:43

complaint. Yeah, and maybe

1:30:45

that was the argument. Like, knowing the DOJ

1:30:47

that we have today, they probably were like,

1:30:49

you know, yeah, let's just bring them to

1:30:51

court. I'm sure that

1:30:53

was the... It seems like

1:30:55

they got a lot going on right now

1:30:57

anyway, so... It never has an entity been

1:31:00

so wrong about so many things that it

1:31:02

would ever prevent them from trying and trying

1:31:04

again. So

1:31:06

I don't know, you know, whatever. God love

1:31:08

them, I guess. Now, look, I thought the

1:31:11

open AI, Microsoft relationship deserved scrutiny.

1:31:14

Yes. Does it mean there's criminality

1:31:16

there? Does it mean there's non-competitiveness?

1:31:18

But it's an unusual relationship and

1:31:21

it deserves scrutiny. And

1:31:23

the upside being, if they find nothing

1:31:25

wrong with that, that's a serious indicator

1:31:27

too. It says, okay,

1:31:29

well, these models then seem to be acceptable,

1:31:31

but they did build a unique model in

1:31:33

that relationship and it should be scrutinized. Yep.

1:31:38

Yeah, Dolly,

1:31:41

Midnight Journey, whatever, all these

1:31:43

image creation... When I say

1:31:46

Midnight? What did I say? Midnight

1:31:48

Journey. Midnight Journey. I think that was a TV show

1:31:50

in the 70s. And

1:31:53

yeah, I got a Taco Bell reference in there somewhere,

1:31:55

we'll let it go. Drugs

1:31:58

were definitely involved. It

1:32:01

is all happening now. It's all you know, that's

1:32:03

all kind of amazing Obviously video is the the

1:32:06

final frontier here We're starting to see some interesting

1:32:08

up there like Google showed off a little a

1:32:10

very short clips of some of the kind of

1:32:12

AI Video stuff that they're doing we know there

1:32:14

are Services that

1:32:16

are gonna upscale video games right to

1:32:19

4k from you know SD

1:32:21

quality and and some of that looks

1:32:23

fantastic And now Nvidia has a service

1:32:26

that can convert SDR

1:32:28

videos into HDR right

1:32:30

Wow AI and their special

1:32:32

chipset. So the most is that past

1:32:34

the speckling Yeah We

1:32:37

live in interesting times. I mean there's no doubt about it Now

1:32:41

definitely what it's real. Yeah, that's

1:32:43

happening and Actually, that's

1:32:45

it. So then okay, so we can

1:32:47

return once again to Xbox because that

1:32:49

now is all we ever talk about

1:32:54

So we don't we didn't we haven't

1:32:56

talked about Apple's non-compliance compliance with the

1:32:58

EU DMA. That's this is a very

1:33:01

controversial and big topic out in

1:33:03

the broader tech world today a

1:33:06

lot of people complaining about that stuff

1:33:09

but Right in the middle

1:33:11

of all this Apple like

1:33:13

other companies and that you know allows the list of things

1:33:16

They're gonna change in the EU but less

1:33:18

well Documented they're

1:33:21

actually kind of changing a few things

1:33:23

just worldwide Right and one of those

1:33:25

things is they're gonna allow that thing they wouldn't let Microsoft do

1:33:27

I think it was two or three years ago now and Bring

1:33:30

Xbox cloud gaming or

1:33:32

game a game streaming app

1:33:34

to the store Remember Microsoft tried to do

1:33:36

that back. It was still called project X

1:33:38

project X So the name that

1:33:41

sounds wrong now that I said it project X. I think it

1:33:43

was project X Whatever it was

1:33:45

called They're actually

1:33:47

gonna love us now So Nvidia has GeForce now

1:33:49

Microsoft obviously has a thing there is if stadia

1:33:51

was still a thing this would have been included

1:33:53

but they've done a complete

1:33:55

about face on this and I Don't

1:33:57

think it's like out of the goodness of their heart I

1:34:01

think this is to lighten the

1:34:03

regulatory scrutiny that they're

1:34:05

getting right now because there is no. Version

1:34:09

of this blocking of this type project x

1:34:11

cloud excuse me i know i got there

1:34:13

is no version of the story where apple

1:34:15

comes out looking good here like it

1:34:18

seems so arbitrary. No

1:34:20

one is buying a game on the service right

1:34:22

there they're paying a subscription fee and

1:34:25

just streaming the content like netflix does

1:34:27

or music streaming services like apple music

1:34:29

do so. You

1:34:31

know their attempt to have their literal blocking

1:34:34

of that always seemed i'm surprised

1:34:36

that didn't get a. More

1:34:38

regular or any regulatory pushback microsoft certainly

1:34:40

is very vocal about it at the

1:34:42

time so they can do it

1:34:44

microsoft is not said anything publicly about that

1:34:46

yet. Some i

1:34:49

related epic has claimed that fortnight

1:34:51

is coming back to the

1:34:53

iphone in the you despite their

1:34:55

band of that game i

1:34:58

suppose that's you know we'll see what happens there but right

1:35:00

now i think if you want to play fortnight on an

1:35:02

iphone i believe. What you can

1:35:04

do is use xbox cloud gaming through the browser

1:35:06

right which is how microsoft did the work around

1:35:08

there. And

1:35:10

then because i mentioned the apple

1:35:12

you dma stuff. Microsoft

1:35:16

xbox president Sarah bond came

1:35:19

out against this very vaguely

1:35:22

i mean well not very very concisely you

1:35:24

know she didn't say too too much about

1:35:26

it but. And she

1:35:28

was very polite people have

1:35:30

not been polite to me you

1:35:32

know he's been kind of spoken about it and

1:35:35

then in the middle i would say it actually this

1:35:37

is probably the best. Written

1:35:39

explanation i've seen of why this is

1:35:41

bad which is the founder

1:35:43

and ceo of spotify daniel who of

1:35:45

course jump started what i believe he

1:35:47

is i believe his original

1:35:49

plan is what led to the dma right. This

1:35:52

notion that apple

1:35:55

was abusing their market power and harming

1:35:57

smaller companies and from Europe, interestingly. But.

1:36:00

You. Know they they. He basically wrote this

1:36:03

really long winded tweet. Tweet

1:36:05

Storm used to calibrate where he kind

1:36:07

of explained all of the tactics Apple

1:36:09

is using an older. The. Double speak

1:36:11

and you know, whatever, so it's worth reading.

1:36:13

But. I. Just wanted to point out

1:36:15

that microsoft. Is supportive of.

1:36:18

This is not the this is that one of

1:36:20

those things where someone from Microsoft has these opinions

1:36:22

or not those of my employers that none of

1:36:24

this is the president access the employer but it

1:36:27

my on. Also this is how really she's supposed

1:36:29

to work with that. We. Want everyone

1:36:31

to apply to them as it doesn't make

1:36:33

things harder. But as long as I'm excited

1:36:35

for everyone equally that's fine and someone someone

1:36:37

circumventing it you point and amigo hates you

1:36:39

make me comply With is where they comply.

1:36:42

Yeah. So.

1:36:44

As em out my favorite merger that

1:36:46

is still the Poison Squad where the

1:36:48

invention of the Sta and Were was

1:36:50

like hey you know at all the

1:36:52

companies are pretty formaldehyde in the milk

1:36:55

because any don't have to refrigerated and

1:36:57

sell her for as as else because

1:36:59

it was so much cheaper that way.

1:37:02

As long as you didn't feed is your

1:37:04

children it was fine. Spine like is it's

1:37:06

didn't see that anybody. Else those.

1:37:09

And. So you know it took regulate

1:37:11

to see a camper, formaldehyde and milk

1:37:13

sitter. How much? examine embalming costs. And

1:37:16

I. Start early and

1:37:18

I'm on my. Nice.

1:37:22

As as. A

1:37:25

business came out in an insider built on the

1:37:27

X box but he ever series as console which

1:37:30

is what I use three busier when actually is

1:37:32

about. You

1:37:34

can actually configure the seem to have a

1:37:36

resolution of ten a D P, fourteen forty

1:37:38

or for say, And he took

1:37:40

screenshots. You would get screenshots and as resolutions.

1:37:43

Obviously when you play games or sings a

1:37:45

scaled and. A. Lot of

1:37:47

games on the Sears s and particular do

1:37:49

not play and forte. ah but it's not

1:37:51

going to I'm. support

1:37:53

even screenshots of that resolution so gamer

1:37:56

and where else or wherever he took

1:37:58

screenshots can be ten eighteen going

1:38:00

forward. Now this hasn't hit stable yet, so this is probably

1:38:02

a month or two down the road, but that's

1:38:05

coming. I think the, I would

1:38:07

imagine. Why are they taking features away?

1:38:09

Like what's the thing? Well, so I,

1:38:13

in this case, it might just be,

1:38:15

well, be related to disk storage, honestly.

1:38:17

I mean, one of the, now that

1:38:20

you can semi-seamlessly save everything to OneDrive

1:38:22

from Xbox, you know,

1:38:24

maybe these things take up too much space. I

1:38:26

mean, there's no reason, if you're scaling it, you

1:38:28

said, look, I'm 4k, right? But

1:38:31

the game is only really running at whatever, 1080p we'll

1:38:33

call it. I mean, why, why

1:38:35

capture that in 4k? I mean, it's just

1:38:37

a waste of space anyway. Yeah, that's

1:38:39

fine. Charge up for the space. Yeah.

1:38:42

Maybe they got complaints, you know, we're never going to

1:38:44

find out. You know, you don't, like they're never going

1:38:46

to say. Interesting. And

1:38:49

then related to the topic from, yeah, actually we've come

1:38:51

full circle. So, what we

1:38:53

started with. Yep. So Microsoft announced this

1:38:55

past week, they're leg up 9800

1:38:58

plays across Xbox, Activision Blizzard,

1:39:00

ZeniMax, whatever game

1:39:02

studio. So since

1:39:04

this is about, I think this, you,

1:39:07

I think you, it was over the weekend maybe, or we, you

1:39:09

were texting me about this, you were doing the math and you

1:39:11

were right. You were dead on there by the way. It's

1:39:14

tricky to find out how many employees

1:39:16

Microsoft actually has, right? Yes. But we

1:39:18

know how many people that they know,

1:39:20

honestly. Right. Yeah, exactly. There

1:39:23

were 10,000 people that came from Activision Blizzard.

1:39:25

The total number was around 22,000 in Microsoft

1:39:27

gaming, which is part of

1:39:29

that. Across all units. Yeah, it's not everything, but it's

1:39:31

part of it. So it's about 8%

1:39:34

of that number. You

1:39:37

know, Mike Ybarra, who was

1:39:39

the president of Blizzard and was at

1:39:41

Microsoft before that and left and now

1:39:43

came back as left. You

1:39:45

know, he's, and I don't know

1:39:47

that those things are in any way, any way

1:39:49

related. I was, he was a cool guy, actually.

1:39:51

I didn't know him personally, but I, he was

1:39:53

a guy kind of know virtually or whatever. But

1:39:58

I was kind of happy he was coming back to Microsoft. that

1:40:00

lasted about 13 seconds, so that's the

1:40:02

end of that. Yeah, so it's, you

1:40:04

know, just unfortunately this kind of

1:40:07

thing I feel like was

1:40:10

inevitable, right? I mean, just too

1:40:12

much overlap. It's

1:40:15

interesting, you would think that

1:40:18

the Xbox group would be

1:40:20

leaner and Zenimax, it's

1:40:22

been what, four years? Right.

1:40:24

I expected this to mostly be Activision Blizzard

1:40:26

and it is, but it's like, oh hey,

1:40:28

while we're taking out the trash, let's go

1:40:30

cut that way. I don't know. I don't

1:40:32

know. Yeah, Bobby Kotick, right? Yeah,

1:40:35

the trash, we're gonna need a trash

1:40:37

bag. That layoff costs more than all

1:40:39

the others come by. That's one golden

1:40:42

parachute. The thing is, you know, as

1:40:44

far as these things being small, leaner,

1:40:46

whatever, honestly, back

1:40:49

when Microsoft was a simpler company, what

1:40:52

used to be called at one point MSN,

1:40:54

right, was in this part, like a separate

1:40:57

part of the campus geographically called Red West,

1:40:59

like the Xbox

1:41:01

stuff used to be something called

1:41:03

the Millennium Campus, and then when they were

1:41:05

doing Zoom, that was actually right in the middle

1:41:07

of the campus, but it was like an aircraft-sized

1:41:10

building with, I mean, what

1:41:12

looked like thousands and thousands of people

1:41:14

just doing graphic designs that you could

1:41:17

etch into the back of a, like

1:41:19

a Zoom no one was ever gonna buy anyway. These

1:41:22

things always thought it was great, but they

1:41:24

didn't get the etching. Yeah, you're right. I

1:41:26

mean, so I, these

1:41:28

things always felt bigger

1:41:31

than they needed to be to me, and

1:41:33

I would imagine that, hey, it's exponentially worse.

1:41:35

So, that's a great question.

1:41:37

There's nobody's on campus anymore, right? So it's like,

1:41:39

oh yeah, we've got all these people that just

1:41:41

don't know where they are. Yeah,

1:41:44

right. I would have, right. That makes it even harder. All

1:41:48

right, so that's a

1:41:50

wonderful job. Summing

1:41:52

up. Yeah. How Long before

1:41:55

we see you testifying in front of Congress

1:41:57

on the dangers and evils of video games?

1:41:59

Is that? I. Just around the corner.

1:42:02

Know. I actually I think video so

1:42:04

hit video games are interactive that you know

1:42:06

just sit there like a potato. I

1:42:08

think they help with a mental and

1:42:11

physical dexterity. I. Think the trick

1:42:13

is they can be addictive and you need

1:42:15

to find a balance and that balances different

1:42:17

for everybody. And. I. It's like, you

1:42:19

know, Some people can have

1:42:21

a drink and not be an alcoholic but some

1:42:23

people have become alcoholic, can never have another drink

1:42:25

and I think video games are just like that's

1:42:27

and which evidence really press I have you you've

1:42:30

really given them up rent. Not.

1:42:32

I'm no no, not entirely. So I've been playing

1:42:34

I I I played that a Resident I did

1:42:37

plates rights. I played it enough to realize this

1:42:39

isn't like and again but I played the Resident

1:42:41

Evil game. Fear that the recent i think was

1:42:43

Divers of Evil to the remake on a on

1:42:46

the X box actually did that. But

1:42:48

I know I've been playing through on Black

1:42:50

Mesa which is the bizarre be made version

1:42:52

of Half Life there it'll have like to

1:42:54

see if right there is a very real

1:42:56

possibility that gaming for me going forward might

1:42:58

literally just be. Revisiting.

1:43:00

Games from the past it's are starting

1:43:03

to get remade, enough scaled and that

1:43:05

you know the story I inhaled are

1:43:07

all the time. I mean because honestly.

1:43:10

I'm. Not saying there are no good games out cursor,

1:43:13

good games. but. A lot of the a be

1:43:15

there were some classic. There was a appear

1:43:17

explicit period was it was a thing they there

1:43:19

was coming out all the time and like I

1:43:21

think going back and revisiting some of that stuff

1:43:23

in a kind of a climber way right now

1:43:25

spots. On such a bad idea. I.

1:43:29

Want you to play pal World's. I

1:43:33

have done everything I can block I can

1:43:35

do to block time and from throwing up

1:43:37

an airy my feet. I really was glad

1:43:39

I didn't put it the news. I will

1:43:41

point out it is the third fastest growing

1:43:44

allies as set third fastest lunch and experts

1:43:46

I spoke to my guns. And.

1:43:49

Once I got the attention of people

1:43:51

on pokemon or did. sell

1:43:54

mean we didn't attend know is well

1:43:56

known for vociferously protecting their your and

1:43:58

i don't think that the case not

1:44:00

because it really great why don't look

1:44:03

at this and think Pokemon if no

1:44:05

I mean I you know I

1:44:07

don't know but the bottom line is you're capturing

1:44:09

critters into eggs and I'm pretty sure that's the

1:44:11

one my daughter my daughter heard

1:44:15

a thing called a squish mallow are you familiar

1:44:17

with that's hot right now the squish mallow yeah so

1:44:19

what this thing looks like to me are squish mallow guns

1:44:22

which would be better I did I think the squish

1:44:24

mallow guy should be upset I

1:44:29

would not want to be going up against Nintendo

1:44:32

for this they do not have a

1:44:34

sense of humor in this area whatsoever

1:44:36

they're gonna they'll they'll drag this out

1:44:38

as long and forever it'll be the

1:44:40

best well and more importantly it's a

1:44:42

Japanese company yeah I

1:44:44

know they don't even Japanese companies so

1:44:46

they it's not gonna make international news

1:44:49

nobody's coming to their defense they're gonna

1:44:51

it's gonna be done very Japanese so

1:44:54

I'm pretty sure somebody commits epic you before

1:44:56

this is over Rob Bot in our discord

1:44:58

is pointing out the Nintendo has not yet

1:45:00

sued so maybe they're just rattling

1:45:03

their raffling biding their

1:45:05

time ready

1:45:08

to pound oh boy yeah all

1:45:10

right coming up back the book time I know

1:45:12

you look forward to that including a lovely

1:45:15

new brown liquor pick

1:45:17

of the week and I'm

1:45:19

in the UK what did you

1:45:22

think I did today you're listening

1:45:24

and watching I hope Windows

1:45:26

Weekly with Paul Thrun and Richard Campbell

1:45:30

let's kick off the back of the book with your

1:45:32

tip of the week Paul don't

1:45:35

get another browser if you will please I beg

1:45:37

of you I

1:45:41

just getting set with arc I'm just getting used to

1:45:43

arc I love our partially there is another browser in

1:45:45

here but you know I think you're gonna be okay

1:45:47

with it okay so man None

1:45:50

of these are directly related to Microsoft Windows per

1:45:52

se, although one of them is sort of. but

1:45:54

I think these are all kind of important and

1:45:56

they're all related to things we've discussed recently. So

1:45:58

the tip is. If you have

1:46:01

a does does have it's The tip is

1:46:03

we've been talking about pass keys and what

1:46:05

task is a fantastic but they're also very

1:46:07

hard to. Google has been very aggressive pushing

1:46:09

these and. They've. Added.

1:46:12

Up on Pixel first been coming

1:46:14

to every supported platform for this

1:46:16

to their Google Password Manager. Will.

1:46:19

Now in the same way that they scan your accounts

1:46:21

to see if any are showing up on the dark

1:46:23

web or whatever, they're scanning your chance to see if

1:46:26

any them are for pasties a are not using it

1:46:28

as a movie at their. They. Actually put

1:46:30

links in there. And. You click on

1:46:32

it he goes to the web page for

1:46:34

that. the exact web page for that service

1:46:36

we you can add the passcode is Peter

1:46:38

or the phone or whatever and discusses on.

1:46:40

So for the first set it's just pixel

1:46:43

Devices are supported. Pixel devices. You. Have

1:46:45

to be as and if google password and are

1:46:47

obviously no third party. Not a bad service offense

1:46:49

a good idea. I was looking as am a

1:46:51

Pixel. Very. Interesting a

1:46:53

kind of takes the. The.

1:46:56

As some of the difficult stuff away I think you

1:46:58

know when that a So that's that's neat. It's

1:47:02

gonna come to more devices being Chrome boxer

1:47:04

pcs with chrome and said are so few

1:47:06

are in that sphere we use in the

1:47:08

google password manager I think this is not

1:47:10

same skin upon pasties over the top night.

1:47:12

I think this is good step. To

1:47:15

can help them become more and. More

1:47:19

common like us for people and are also

1:47:22

working with big brands to make sure everyone's

1:47:24

don't ask is. In a good for

1:47:26

them for doing that work an. Absurdity.

1:47:28

They're evil and every other way mess

1:47:30

and as as as blasts I have

1:47:32

started using pasties with your favorite browser.

1:47:35

Or artist and bit order. And.

1:47:38

Are ya? use a bit word and pass

1:47:40

keys and it's been working Great. and

1:47:42

i'm really start to like it it's to

1:47:44

factor for most of my account so i

1:47:46

still larian with a password and they'll say

1:47:48

okay what's your past he give hub does

1:47:50

it that way and i don't i feel

1:47:52

like this is as this isn't i think

1:47:54

it by whatever it's worth i think get

1:47:56

hub actually as best pass implementation of ever

1:47:59

seen down I mean, for consumers,

1:48:01

honestly, the way Chrome does it is really good. And

1:48:04

Chrome also does the thing automatically now in Windows where it

1:48:06

says, hey, do you want to use Windows Hello to authenticate

1:48:09

everything? You're like, yep. And then it

1:48:11

becomes, it's really nice. So that

1:48:13

works, yeah. So that's interesting. I

1:48:15

think the, no, I don't think. I know that the advantage

1:48:18

of putting a passkey in a password

1:48:20

manager is that it makes them portable. Technically,

1:48:23

you're supposed to have a different passkey on every

1:48:25

single device, right? Because

1:48:28

the password manager is in effect your device

1:48:30

and it has its own encrypted storage, etc.,

1:48:32

etc., you can make one

1:48:34

passkey for one online account and then use it

1:48:36

everywhere just by signing into the password manager. So

1:48:40

that too, I think, helps to make this

1:48:44

stuff easier. I was talking to someone from

1:48:46

a company. I can't say

1:48:48

it, but I was, you know, we were kind of,

1:48:50

I was saying, you know, what's needed here is this, there's

1:48:52

no standard for this. So we need a standard for

1:48:54

passkey portability. And he was like, wink, wink. We

1:48:57

know. So one would speculate that

1:48:59

it would be in everyone's best interest to work

1:49:02

on such a thing. Exactly. And if only there

1:49:04

was like an industry organizer, oh, there is. So

1:49:07

yeah, so there are anyway, people are working on it,

1:49:09

good people, etc. So anyway, just know that that's happening.

1:49:11

So that's good. And then a

1:49:14

couple of app picks in a way. One is one

1:49:17

of the problems when you go from like Windows or the

1:49:19

Mac to a, like, say, Linux or Chromebook is that you

1:49:22

lose your ability to do that seamless sync

1:49:24

of like OneDrive or Google Drive or whatever

1:49:26

you're using. Well, Google

1:49:29

Drive works on Chromebook, but the ability to kind of

1:49:31

do that. I want to sync this folder and have

1:49:33

it offline and have it sync automatically when I change

1:49:35

things, yada, yada, yada. And there's

1:49:37

always been 30 part third party services that

1:49:39

do this. And I actually I haven't

1:49:41

looked at this in a long time, but last week I

1:49:44

looked at in sync, not the band, to be

1:49:47

me. Yeah,

1:49:49

because it works across platform, but it also

1:49:51

supports multiple accounts. So for some reason you

1:49:53

had you have like a Microsoft 365 family

1:49:55

account and you have multiple accounts, but usually

1:49:57

like one account to store this and one

1:49:59

account. sort of this because they all get a terabyte of storage.

1:50:01

This is a way to put all those accounts on the same PC

1:50:04

at the same time and do that kind of sync

1:50:06

features. That's kind of

1:50:08

cool. The one major missing

1:50:10

feature is they don't have

1:50:13

the files on demand functionality, right? You

1:50:15

have to sync a folder or not.

1:50:17

You can't just arbitrarily browse your entire

1:50:19

cloud storage and then selectively sync stuff

1:50:21

from there. You have to choose

1:50:23

ahead of time which folder or folders are

1:50:25

syncing. So for most people,

1:50:27

that's not a big issue. And honestly, performance

1:50:30

and reliability is really, really good. Cool.

1:50:33

Yeah. And not

1:50:35

ironically, but coincidentally, because we just talked about

1:50:38

Arc. Arc used to

1:50:41

have a mobile app on iPhone only. It was like

1:50:43

kind of a companion app, kind of a goofy, no

1:50:45

one really knew what it was. That's

1:50:47

been recast as Arc Search, although

1:50:50

in the future, it's just going to become Arc

1:50:52

Mobile, right? And it will be on Android

1:50:54

as well. But for now, it's just iPhone. And it's

1:50:57

their take on search. And it's

1:50:59

basically just a, it's vaguely open

1:51:02

AI slash anthropic based AI

1:51:04

that does browser

1:51:06

things. Like you could type in an address and it will go

1:51:09

to that address. But if you type in a question

1:51:11

like who's going to win the Super Bowl or whatever

1:51:14

the question might be, it will use

1:51:16

AI and do that summary thing. And as

1:51:19

is the case with Arc proper, which

1:51:21

again, this will soon be part of,

1:51:23

there are certain people

1:51:25

will look at this and just be confused

1:51:27

because it is confusing. I know. And it

1:51:29

doesn't work. Yeah. Well, it does it first

1:51:31

of all, it doesn't work properly unless you

1:51:33

make it the default browser. Which I did,

1:51:35

which is really weird. Yeah. Because it's really,

1:51:37

it feels more like a chat GPT client,

1:51:40

really. If you, yeah, if you, well, you

1:51:42

can, okay, but you can do things like, like I said,

1:51:45

you can just, you can browse to an app.

1:51:48

Well, it's that was right.

1:51:50

That's probably going to summary. No, it says browse for

1:51:53

me. And so it's reading six

1:51:55

web pages, including all of the ones. So

1:51:57

here's the details. Look is a nice picture.

1:52:00

Hosts schedule listening options. So

1:52:03

it doesn't bring up a

1:52:05

web page It

1:52:07

brings up a yeah, you have to type you have to type in

1:52:09

a URL now I can go

1:52:11

down and and say see the results

1:52:14

the search so it's really it's it It's

1:52:16

what Google's doing in spades with the knowledge

1:52:18

graph right where that's when you do a

1:52:20

Google search for shoes You get a lot

1:52:22

of information But This

1:52:26

is just like you see like I'm looking for

1:52:28

product reviews. This is customers say dot dot dot

1:52:30

Yeah, I really I have to say

1:52:32

I am with you though. And here's all

1:52:34

the links I'm really I'm with you on

1:52:36

the fact that these the browser company of

1:52:38

New York, which is I know

1:52:40

these are justice I don't even think they're in New

1:52:43

York. But anyway Okay,

1:52:46

they are From

1:52:49

them where they literally travel to New York Yeah,

1:52:54

I think they're from England anyway, right? They're

1:52:56

probably from all over. I Think

1:52:58

it's very interesting. I and even the

1:53:00

search thing is kind of interesting. I agree with you

1:53:04

Data well, here's I wonder

1:53:06

what's more importantly. I wonder how they're gonna

1:53:08

make money because that's sort of thing

1:53:10

I don't really do it that day. They are not

1:53:13

charging a thing for this stuff So

1:53:16

yeah, not yet. I mean they probably will right? I'd

1:53:18

pay for it. I stuff at honestly This

1:53:23

When you look at you look at a company like Google

1:53:25

and say, you know, we got to break this monopoly They

1:53:27

dominate search they've got all this ad and tracking stuff going

1:53:30

on Like how do we do that, you know, and

1:53:32

then you look at the competition that has shown up

1:53:34

and it's Microsoft with edge

1:53:36

doing exactly The same thing or

1:53:38

like a company like brave is the browser is

1:53:40

exactly the same but they're more private more secure

1:53:43

But they have their own little goofy business model,

1:53:45

but it's not gonna change the world,

1:53:47

you know And you're like,

1:53:49

well, nothing changes right and then

1:53:51

you look at arc and you're like, okay, I'm

1:53:54

not saying they're gonna succeed I'm literally not saying that but

1:53:56

you know what this is different and it just

1:53:58

does the web as

1:54:00

we know it becomes a different thing. Look at this. That's

1:54:03

exciting. Here's our Discord chat

1:54:06

and somebody put a link in there because

1:54:08

Arc is my default browser. When I click

1:54:11

it, it doesn't open the browser. It opens

1:54:13

this mini Arc window without

1:54:15

leaving Discord, which I can use to surf. And then

1:54:18

when I close it, I'm back. Just

1:54:21

little things like that really kind of

1:54:24

are great. I'm just fascinated by it.

1:54:26

I wish my problem is I don't

1:54:28

use a Mac and an iPhone. It's better on a Mac.

1:54:30

I don't know. By the

1:54:33

way, it's actually pretty

1:54:35

full feature to Windows. But I don't really...

1:54:39

Even the iPhone app is not there

1:54:41

really, right? It's never going to be Linux because

1:54:43

as you said, it was written in Swift and

1:54:45

that's not a practical... There's

1:54:48

no way to bring it to... Well, there's ways,

1:54:50

but I wouldn't. That's

1:54:52

a lot of resources. Even Windows is goofy. I

1:54:55

mean, that's still a little goofy. But it

1:54:57

does sync the account. So when

1:55:00

I set it up, I love that. It was

1:55:02

a big feature for me of Chrome and Firefox. That's

1:55:04

account syncing and I need cross-platform. I

1:55:08

feel like... No, it's fascinating. I appreciate your turning me

1:55:10

on to this and I'm starting to use it on

1:55:12

the iPhone as a default browser. These things usually go

1:55:14

poorly for me, so I'm super happy to hear that.

1:55:17

Well I'll yell at you later when I... You're

1:55:20

like, I used this Earth thing and it deleted all my dirt.

1:55:23

I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I'm

1:55:27

just asking questions, I think is

1:55:29

what we say. People

1:55:32

tell me that Arc is a great browser. I've

1:55:34

heard. One of the things I like about... People

1:55:38

say... People I know. What they're

1:55:40

doing on the iPhone makes sense

1:55:42

because Safari and all the

1:55:44

other browsers are just like little browsers on

1:55:47

your phone. But really when you open a browser on

1:55:49

a phone, it isn't so much that you want to

1:55:51

go to a web page usually. You

1:55:54

want to get some information. I

1:55:57

think this kind of makes sense. Yep,

1:55:59

I agree. And you can still go to a web page.

1:56:01

It's not. The hurdle they have,

1:56:03

aside from the fact that they're a small company

1:56:05

no one's ever heard of, is that

1:56:07

we are now so many years... I mean,

1:56:10

the web is almost 30 years old. The

1:56:12

iPhone is, what, 16, whatever that number is?

1:56:16

17 years old this year. We have memory.

1:56:19

We do things a certain way, and that doesn't

1:56:21

mean it's the best way. It doesn't mean it...

1:56:23

In inertia. We're very much used to the

1:56:25

status quo, you know? Yeah. So

1:56:28

they've got to overcome that. Well, the bigger problem here

1:56:30

is they're making a product that every other company gives

1:56:32

away for free. Yes.

1:56:35

Well, maybe that's their strategy. But they do it in

1:56:38

a different way. Let's make you want it, and then

1:56:40

you'll pay for it. And

1:56:42

then it gets the shirt acquired, and here we go

1:56:44

again. Let me just try...

1:56:46

What's the weather in Petaluma? And

1:56:50

then you have some choices, but I'm going to hit browse for

1:56:53

me. Yes. I think I... That's

1:56:55

the name of the feature, right? Browse for me. Yeah.

1:56:58

And then you're creating six weather pages

1:57:01

to give me the answer, right? And

1:57:03

a weather map. You

1:57:05

still get the links if you want. It's got today's

1:57:08

forecast. Yeah. Tomorrow's... It's

1:57:10

definitely tripped all the fluff off. It's made a weather app out

1:57:12

of this. Is it sad? Yeah.

1:57:15

Yeah, right. There you go. It's

1:57:17

the face. Sunrise. That's a beautiful way

1:57:19

to put it. It's incredible. They've created a weather app

1:57:21

on the fly. Yeah. now.

1:57:26

Yep. And it's full of information from

1:57:28

those terrible weather sites. Yeah,

1:57:30

but at least we've had that idea

1:57:32

of weather. The weather nazis over at

1:57:34

weather.com never started bombing. But first

1:57:36

watch this video of a flood. Big video of how

1:57:39

you believe that it is snowing in Petaloma. But let

1:57:41

me tell you something. We

1:57:43

are getting an atmospheric river right now,

1:57:45

so it's dumping out. Yeah.

1:57:48

Yeah. So, anyway,

1:57:50

thank you, Paul. I

1:57:52

won't yell at you for... I'm so nervous about

1:57:55

this. No, I'm actually really grateful. Because I

1:57:57

had Tri-Darc. I got the invitation very

1:57:59

early. Like, man. of last year tried

1:58:01

it and went well okay but why should

1:58:03

I switch? That's the hurdle. I think most

1:58:06

people try it and they're like eh you

1:58:08

have to you spend a little time

1:58:10

and it's like okay hold on a second

1:58:12

it's revolutionizing my use of browsers. I mean

1:58:14

it's incredible. That's fascinating. I don't know.

1:58:17

Screens you need to grab do you

1:58:19

like that? That's really cool. Yeah. You

1:58:21

want to try? Yeah. Richard Campbell I

1:58:24

think it's time for you to hello. Hello. Time

1:58:26

for you to tell us about Ronez

1:58:28

Radio. Well I had a great

1:58:31

guest on this week maybe you heard of

1:58:33

her Mary Jo Foe. Oh yay. Can't get

1:58:35

her to come on this show but I'm

1:58:37

glad she's here. Yeah I had her a

1:58:39

great night Simon. In fact we were this

1:58:41

show was already in the can when she

1:58:44

came on around the holidays there. Nice. Because

1:58:47

I really wanted to dig into what she's working on

1:58:49

these days over directions on

1:58:51

Microsoft and the whole licensing conversation was

1:58:53

a fascinating one. A big

1:58:56

piece of direction on Microsoft's

1:58:58

business is helping companies negotiate

1:59:00

better license agreements for themselves and

1:59:03

so like buying stuff from Microsoft

1:59:05

is not a trivial problem and

1:59:07

really while as much as they're

1:59:10

interested in you buying services from them

1:59:12

just this basic concept of do you

1:59:14

know what licenses you have? Now

1:59:16

do you know what licenses you use?

1:59:18

And what areas of growth are you

1:59:21

going to have? And just sort of

1:59:23

build out the landscape of

1:59:25

your license utilization because it gives you

1:59:27

room to negotiate. You know you

1:59:29

may have bought a committed to a set of licenses

1:59:31

for a particular product that did a roll out that

1:59:34

didn't go anywhere. And now you know

1:59:36

you can almost claw that money back. So

1:59:39

there's a way to maneuver here that you don't

1:59:41

pay after a certain size you just don't pay

1:59:43

rack rate for stuff. And

1:59:45

so it's well worth spending several

1:59:48

days. I have talked to folks

1:59:51

that are involved in the licensing for their company

1:59:53

and it's like it's a week of

1:59:56

getting information together to really be able to sit down

1:59:58

and look at your business. negotiate with the licensor

2:00:01

and say, okay, this is what we did

2:00:03

last year. Here's how it actually went. Here's

2:00:05

what we're looking at next year. Here's how

2:00:07

I want to move things around. Like let's

2:00:09

get to a fair number. Uh,

2:00:11

and it was fun to not hide from

2:00:13

licensing. Like the most common conversation on run

2:00:16

is radio. It's like, listen, I'm no licensing

2:00:18

expert, but, and this was a

2:00:20

case where it's like, well, let's, let's talk about

2:00:22

how you really take licensing onto the head. Because

2:00:24

it's the bottom line piece.

2:00:26

This is the probably the largest

2:00:29

single line item in a Cis

2:00:31

Ed men's budget is the software licenses

2:00:33

for the company, even more than the hardware. So

2:00:37

it was great to just nail that down and pound on

2:00:39

it for a while. It's been a good half hour. Nice.

2:00:43

Yeah, really good. All right. What's

2:00:45

your drinking? What

2:00:47

am I drinking? So I mean, I'm

2:00:50

in London. Yeah. So I,

2:00:52

uh, I had to drop by the whiskey exchange,

2:00:54

which is a lovely place just up in Coving

2:00:56

Garden. I walked up there and, uh,

2:00:58

and I thought, you know, I had, I'm going

2:01:00

to go get a whiskey that you probably can

2:01:02

only find in the UK and the floor and

2:01:04

fauna bottles are great for that. And this

2:01:07

particular one is, uh, value

2:01:10

in. Now there's a lot more letters

2:01:12

in the name than this point, which

2:01:14

you actually pronounce with the I disappeared. Like, now

2:01:16

you in the value of in 16. Now

2:01:20

this is a whiskey you've never heard of

2:01:22

because it has no marketed brand, but

2:01:24

it's a very old distillery. It was built in, in

2:01:26

the 1850s. William McKenzie

2:01:29

stood it up in the space

2:01:31

side, Abilur, uh, at this went back then it

2:01:33

was a single set of stills and so forth

2:01:35

today. It's only up to three, uh, wash

2:01:38

and three spirit, although the big, um, no,

2:01:40

no Pete and their, their product, all

2:01:42

their space side, they do most of their aging

2:01:44

and Sherry casts, uh,

2:01:46

and those early days in the 1800s, they were built

2:01:50

right on the train line. And they're kind of

2:01:52

famous for all of their supply came and went

2:01:54

by train. Uh, they had

2:01:56

a major fire in 1950 that totally burned them

2:01:58

down. And then. And

2:02:00

a group of famous distillers,

2:02:02

Buchanan, Walker, Dewers, all came together to

2:02:05

rebuild it because it was actually kind

2:02:07

of an important distillery. And

2:02:09

in fact, those are the folks that merged into a company

2:02:12

eventually known as the Distillers Company with

2:02:14

a bunch of others. In 1925,

2:02:17

the Distillers Company was running it.

2:02:19

And that, of course, became United Distillers, which

2:02:22

eventually becomes the ASIO. We've

2:02:24

heard this story before. And

2:02:27

the Walker in that joint operation that took them

2:02:29

over in 1915 is John Walker, as in

2:02:34

Johnny Walker. Little Johnny Walker.

2:02:36

Little Johnny Walker, right? And

2:02:39

that's where most of the whiskey goes. This is

2:02:42

a place that makes 5 million liters of whiskey

2:02:44

a year, and you don't know who they are.

2:02:46

They've never been a marketed product in

2:02:49

the 170 years that they've operated. And

2:02:52

they've always operated. Even

2:02:54

when they burned down, they did

2:02:57

their processing elsewhere until they had operations

2:02:59

back up and running again. So

2:03:02

I mean, Johnny Walker was a man. He's from the 1800s. We

2:03:05

talked about this in the Mortlock show too, right?

2:03:07

And he bought, he initially was

2:03:09

blending whiskey from distillaries. And over time, he

2:03:11

bought up all the distilleries and he got

2:03:14

control of the value and along with the others in 1915. At

2:03:17

that time, he also owned Klyanesh,

2:03:20

Cardew, Colburn, Talisker, and Mortlock. And

2:03:23

this is what he was making Johnny Walker

2:03:25

from back in the day. And

2:03:28

then when the United Distillers and ultimately

2:03:30

Diageo forms up in 1997, they have an even larger

2:03:33

package. But even before that happened, when it

2:03:36

was United Distillers, in 1991, they

2:03:38

put out, knowing

2:03:41

that almost all of their whiskey was going into

2:03:43

Johnny Walker, but they had barrelmen who

2:03:45

were saying like, there's some really good barrels

2:03:47

here. We should bottle them. And so in

2:03:49

91, United Distillers produced a line of whiskey's

2:03:52

all in the same style bottles. This

2:03:54

is a conventional whiskey bottle with a

2:03:56

little swole neck, but

2:03:59

otherwise a standard shaped bottle. and a yellow label.

2:04:02

And they made 26 of them in their first edition in

2:04:04

1991, of which this is one of

2:04:08

them. This is actually a 91 edition of the

2:04:11

Dalio Inn 16. Some

2:04:13

of these became wildly famous and impossible

2:04:15

to find. The rosebine is hard to

2:04:17

come by. The Mortlock, if you can

2:04:19

find one, is $800. These all initially came out at

2:04:21

30 pounds. This one today was 55 pounds.

2:04:24

So it's gone

2:04:29

up a bit, but not terribly. They

2:04:31

didn't call it Florent Fauna. It was

2:04:33

actually a whiskey

2:04:36

writer named

2:04:38

Michael Jackson, no relation, who

2:04:40

wrote that day. He called it Florent Fauna, but

2:04:43

it's one of those things where the name just

2:04:45

stuck. And so they've

2:04:47

done additional releases since then. It was a 91, it was

2:04:49

a 97, it was 2001. And it's very apparently hip in

2:04:51

the whiskey business, if

2:04:56

the whiskey collector business, to try and have one of every

2:04:59

one of the Florent Fauna. It wasn't a big deal back

2:05:02

in the 90s, but today to find them all is

2:05:04

pretty tough. And the price ranges,

2:05:06

like I said, dramatic. I

2:05:08

am not a whiskey collector, I am a

2:05:11

whiskey drinker. And this drinks

2:05:13

brilliantly. It is

2:05:15

a classic, cherry space side, little

2:05:18

hints of citrus up front, little

2:05:21

bit of shock on the tongue, but

2:05:25

goes very buttery. Just a

2:05:27

glass of caramel that warms you up as

2:05:30

it goes down. And you'll notice I got

2:05:32

this bottle this afternoon. I had a couple

2:05:34

of friends visiting, I was writing it up.

2:05:36

It's almost done, you know, and enough that

2:05:38

they said, you know, we're going to go

2:05:40

to the whiskey exchange and bring a different

2:05:42

one back for tomorrow. Wow.

2:05:45

This is hard to come by outside of

2:05:47

the UK. It does not have an export

2:05:49

stamp on it. This is says a for

2:05:52

the UK stamp. This is not an export

2:05:54

stamp. And that's how the Florent Fauna really

2:05:57

originally intended that being said.

2:06:00

If you go to a

2:06:03

specialist whiskey place, you

2:06:05

know, and I can think of a couple

2:06:07

in San Francisco I have frequented over the

2:06:10

years, you will occasionally find these floral bottlings

2:06:12

for entirely

2:06:14

too much. And you

2:06:16

don't know who they're made, you don't know

2:06:18

them. They're not a well-known brand, but some

2:06:21

of them, and this is one of them,

2:06:23

is outstanding. I've

2:06:27

talked about unicorn whiskeys, that

2:06:30

whiskey you taste once and you'll never taste it again. My

2:06:32

very first unicorn, the one that I realized

2:06:35

the concept of a unicorn was

2:06:37

a dallium. It was in 1972. It

2:06:41

was 30 years old, it was put in the bottle. I

2:06:43

found it in a little whiskey shop. I

2:06:46

found it in a bar in Edinburgh

2:06:48

where they were selling McAllen

2:06:50

12 for 4 pounds. And

2:06:53

here was one that was listed for like 25. I'm

2:06:55

like, what the hell did you pay for 25 pounds for? And

2:06:58

I had a taste of it and it changed

2:07:00

my life. And

2:07:02

then when I researched it further, I realized

2:07:04

there were only 250 of those bottles ever

2:07:07

made. You would taste it something you will never

2:07:09

taste again. It was a unicorn. That's

2:07:12

pretty cool. So besides the floral

2:07:14

and fauna bottling, there are several

2:07:16

other custom ballowings of dallium. You

2:07:19

know, they have Gordon and McPhail, those

2:07:21

kinds of bottlers. Very so often they'll

2:07:24

score a barrel. But if

2:07:26

you really want to taste this whiskey most of the time, you'll

2:07:28

taste it in Johnny Walker Blue. The

2:07:32

dallium, which means the green

2:07:35

veil and it's beautiful. I

2:07:37

want to live there. And it's a proper

2:07:40

space side. It's

2:07:42

in some ways more honest than most,

2:07:45

right? It really was made for the

2:07:47

Scottish market. You

2:07:49

mostly see these whiskey drank beside

2:07:51

a pint of beer in a nice

2:07:54

Scottish pub. You

2:08:00

usually do those cruise things, but I think

2:08:02

we could actually do it with you too.

2:08:04

You know, I have Scottish heritage. I

2:08:07

should really spend a little time. I've

2:08:09

been there years ago when I was a kid, but

2:08:12

my grandfather was a Dunlap. My

2:08:18

middle name is Gordon from him, so

2:08:21

I have every right to go there and

2:08:23

wear that dress. I

2:08:26

recommend we get some rooms at the Kregelache,

2:08:29

we spend some time in the Quaysh, we

2:08:31

take the few unusuals, and then we go

2:08:33

see where they're made. Paul, are you in?

2:08:37

I've been wanting to do this trip for years. Wonderful.

2:08:39

Sounds wonderful. Richard, you probably could make the money

2:08:41

if you put together a package to her. I

2:08:45

brought a dozen of us. I

2:08:48

found a few. Oh, you have that?

2:08:50

Oh, all right. All right.

2:08:52

Well, I've been buying whiskey

2:08:54

for unusual people over the years. Some

2:08:57

names you may know, but I prefer not to

2:08:59

be made. Mostly because I take the

2:09:01

time to go get the specials, go visit the distiller

2:09:03

and talk to the distiller and get the pull up

2:09:05

bottles. But

2:09:08

the Quaysh is one of those very

2:09:10

dangerous places. It's wooden

2:09:13

floor wall ceilings, pot belly stove

2:09:15

on the side, one side big

2:09:17

heavy drapes overlooking the Spey River,

2:09:20

big overstuffed chairs, the owners,

2:09:23

the Spaniels are there for some scritches.

2:09:25

Oh, how fun. And every single

2:09:27

whiskey you've ever heard of and many you

2:09:30

haven't heard of on the walls

2:09:32

ready to go. And

2:09:36

I think I got to wrap up. They're in the

2:09:38

room now. Here comes

2:09:40

another bottle. Bring in the

2:09:42

dallymane. Mr. Richard

2:09:44

Campbell is at Run His Radio,

2:09:46

runhisradio.com.net rocks and he's in the

2:09:48

UK back in

2:09:51

BC next week or you've

2:09:53

got to... No, I'll be in New Zealand next

2:09:55

week. Oh my goodness. The tour begins. No, as

2:09:57

you do. Yeah, have a wonderful trip.

2:10:01

Mr. Paul Therot will be in Mexico City

2:10:03

next week I think. Yes I will. So

2:10:06

we go international next week. Paul Therot of course

2:10:09

is always available everywhere

2:10:11

in the world at

2:10:13

therot.com. thurrott.com and

2:10:16

become a premier member and that way you'll get all

2:10:18

sorts of good stuff. He

2:10:21

also has his books at leanpub.com

2:10:23

including Windows Everywhere and the

2:10:25

Field Guide to Windows 11. And

2:10:28

together they are the Windows Weekly team.

2:10:31

Every Wednesday 11am Pacific, 2pm Eastern, 1900

2:10:33

UTC. We

2:10:35

gather together to talk about

2:10:38

Windows and Microsoft and AI and

2:10:40

brown liquor and all of that.

2:10:43

I hope you will join us. You can watch

2:10:45

live. I mean it's not the best way to watch because you

2:10:47

have to be here at that time. But if you are we

2:10:51

stream it on YouTube. youtube.com/twit.

2:10:54

Of course if you are a Club Twit member you can

2:10:56

live in the Discord and you can watch the streams as

2:10:58

they continue all day long. In

2:11:01

fact if you are not a Club Twit member

2:11:03

please consider joining twit.tv slash club twit. I think

2:11:05

today is the last day for our twit survey.

2:11:08

If you haven't done it yet we want to get everybody

2:11:10

who listens to all

2:11:12

the different shows or any individual show. We want to

2:11:14

make sure you are all well represented. So we need

2:11:16

all the Windows Weekly cohort to go to twit.tv slash

2:11:18

survey24 to take that survey. You

2:11:23

can get the show on the website while

2:11:25

you are there twit.tv slash www. There is

2:11:27

a Windows Weekly YouTube channel dedicated to Windows

2:11:29

Weekly. Great way to share clips.

2:11:32

But of course the easiest way would be

2:11:34

to subscribe in your favorite podcast

2:11:37

client. That way you will get it automatically as

2:11:39

soon as we wrap up

2:11:41

and put it out the window. Thank

2:11:44

you Paul. Thank you Richard. Have

2:11:46

a wonderful week. Safe travels to both of you.

2:11:48

We will see you next time on

2:11:51

Windows Weekly. Hey

2:11:53

I'm Rod Pile, editor in chief of Ad Aster magazine. And

2:11:55

each week I join with my co-host to bring you this

2:11:57

week in space the latest and greatest. news

2:12:00

from the final frontier. We talk

2:12:02

to NASA chiefs, space scientists, engineers, educators and

2:12:04

artists and sometimes we just shoot the breeze

2:12:06

over what's hot and what's not in space

2:12:08

books and TV. And we do it all

2:12:10

for you, our fellow true believers. So whether

2:12:12

you're an armchair adventurer or waiting for your

2:12:15

turn to grab a slot in Elon's Mars

2:12:17

rocket, join us on This Week in Space

2:12:19

and be part of the greatest adventure of

2:12:21

all time. NASA

2:12:30

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features