Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:13
So, hello and. I'm
0:15
Lari Numminen, the host of Wonderful Work, a
0:17
podcast where we hear that voices
0:19
and insights that make business operations
0:21
just a bit more wonderful. In
0:24
this episode, we get to hear from Stig-Martin Fiskå.
0:27
Stig-martin is an entrepreneur at heart,
0:29
having started his first company at the age
0:31
of 16. Stig-martin
0:34
has created several successful companies
0:36
in the technology space and is now the head
0:38
of artificial intelligence data
0:40
interna, Internet of Things, Industry
0:43
4.0 at COG in the Nordic.
0:45
Welcome to the show, Stick Martin.
0:48
Thank you Lari. Good to see you and good
0:50
to invited.
0:51
Yeah, you, you have an absolutely amazing
0:53
background and, um, love
0:55
to go into the, the realm of, of your current
0:58
work, but in this show we do like
1:00
to start from the very top and get to know
1:02
our guests a bit better to begin. let's
1:05
start from, from some interesting questions. tell
1:08
us something wonderful about yourself
1:10
or something surprising most people don't know about you.
1:13
Sure, Sure. So let's, let's get a little bit
1:15
of personal, uh,
1:17
touch going there. Uh, when
1:20
I met my wife, uh,
1:22
uh, and we'd agreed to cook
1:24
every day, every second. In
1:26
between us and for the first six months
1:29
we didn't create the same dish ever.
1:32
Great complet with different unique dishes. Uh,
1:34
for six months there we're going. So that tells
1:36
you something about both, uh, interest
1:38
and in, in, uh, foodie,
1:41
uh, department, but also I
1:43
would say a bit of a competition going on
1:45
there.
1:46
Absolutely. And I, I would be amazed
1:48
that if I could do the same dish, uh, or,
1:50
you know, more than a week at a time,
1:52
but it's, it's great to have you here. Stigma.
1:55
When you were a child growing up, what did you want to
1:57
become?
1:59
Yeah, good question. I, I, I thought
2:01
about that and, uh, I, I can't really remember
2:03
from like really young age, I have
2:06
to say. Um, uh,
2:08
I'm not good at looking backwards. I'm better
2:10
at looking forward, but,
2:13
um, Uh,
2:15
I don't think I thought too much about it until
2:17
I entered my teams. Uh, and then
2:19
I just wanted to, you know, I thought it would be a good idea
2:21
to copy my dad and become a lawyer. Uh,
2:24
but at the same time, I, I thought,
2:27
you know, making your own money was
2:29
a good thing. Um, and I'm not
2:31
really sure. Where that came from,
2:34
honestly. Um, but I didn't see a blocker
2:36
in creating your own company. Uh, so
2:38
as a, as a relatively young guy, uh,
2:41
set up my own company with some fellow, people
2:43
from school and, uh, and got going,
2:45
making my money. So I guess you could say that
2:48
I've been an entrepreneur. But
2:50
we didn't use that word. We didn't think about
2:52
it at as, at the time as anything. And
2:54
startup certainly wasn't a word at that time.
2:58
absolutely. Um, now,
3:00
like your father, you did study law in
3:02
university, you also studied philosophy.
3:05
Uh, how did you end up then working in technology?
3:08
Yeah, it's a bit of the background,
3:11
so, uh, act
3:13
actually when I was 15, 16 or something
3:16
like that, I. Uh,
3:18
had a lot of American friends, um,
3:21
growing up in what used to be there or still
3:23
is, I guess the old cap capital of
3:25
Norway in Stavanger. Uh,
3:28
and, uh, this American friend
3:30
of mine from the international school in Stavanger,
3:32
he was, uh, showing me this
3:35
webpage that he created, uh, as a project,
3:38
Netscape Gold, three hour
3:40
or something like that. we're
3:42
talking way back. And
3:45
then, and, uh, I thought, well, if he can,
3:47
then I can. And I didn't really
3:49
have much, uh, interest in internet
3:51
and computer at the time. My dad bought the 4
3:54
86 and, uh, and
3:56
uh, I think there was even some kind of early
3:59
surround sound bought to that, uh, computer
4:01
and everything. Um, but
4:03
he was a bit disappointed that I didn't care much
4:06
to use it. Uh, but. I
4:08
think the link between someone showing
4:10
me something with building and me
4:12
being a Lego fan at the time, uh,
4:16
got me creative,
4:19
the creative part going so, uh, so
4:21
I reversed engineered at
4:23
that time, the largest online website
4:25
in Norway and that's
4:28
how I got going in technology. And I figured.
4:31
If people thinks this is magic, then
4:33
why don't I just make some money on that?
4:35
Uh uh, and
4:37
then, uh, I also reversed, open
4:40
source, uh, cms, reversed
4:42
engineer that. So I learned, you know, databases
4:45
and that stuff, uh,
4:47
and made some money. But I thought this, I can't live
4:49
this, this isn't serious work. I'm just playing.
4:52
Nobody taught me anything. There's no degree. And
4:54
at that time there was no, there was.
4:57
Tutorials online or anything like that. Right.
4:59
So, uh, so yeah, I thought I had to
5:02
get serious and then go to law school. I
5:04
was really bored in law school. Uh,
5:07
you're not allowed to be creative. You're
5:09
not allowed to build things, uh, in the same
5:11
manner that I like to do it. Philosophy.
5:15
That was great, and I could think out loud
5:17
and do the things I, I love to do. So, So
5:20
back in, uh, I think during
5:23
the law school, uh, years, uh,
5:25
I found some fellow. Tech
5:27
people that, uh, struggled
5:29
getting a job after their, uh,
5:32
um, computer science degree
5:34
because this was.com or after
5:36
the.com and,
5:38
uh, I joined them, uh, part-time.
5:41
Really, I didn't think that this would be something
5:44
I'd do outside the, other than outside the studies
5:46
and, and now I ended up being part of that industry
5:48
from there.
5:50
And that's remarkable. I I have to say that there's not
5:52
many times in, in history when there's
5:54
gonna be computer science majors
5:56
who are looking for a job. So you, you, it sounded
5:58
like you were in the right place at the right time. Yeah.
6:00
Um, at the kind of disruptive
6:03
early days of, of technology and, and
6:05
reverse engineering. Uh, there's
6:07
many other ways that you can learn things, but, but
6:10
that, that does sound like it's really learning from the
6:12
source. Um, Stick.
6:15
Martin, In this episode we are gonna talk about advanced
6:17
technologies, but before we get into those
6:20
topics, let's talk about kind of
6:22
the foundations here. Uh, many
6:24
of the listeners will be in business operations
6:26
in the Nordics, and these leaders will
6:28
have organizations with different levels of data
6:31
maturity. Right. Um,
6:33
what is your take on data, digital
6:35
maturity, uh, what are the foundations,
6:38
do you think? Is it about the people or the technology
6:40
or about.
6:42
Well, of course there's a, there's a,
6:45
there's a balance between all. But I, I
6:47
mainly these days I think it's, uh, it's
6:49
people that's the focus. And, and
6:51
why do I say that? Because I think if
6:53
we implemented the technology and what it allows
6:56
us to do today, we would've a
6:58
ramped up much, much faster than we
7:01
are doing today. So, so it's about knowledge,
7:03
it's about, uh, People
7:05
knowing the art of the possible.
7:08
Uh, and like you mentioned
7:10
today, you wouldn't find any, any computer
7:12
science people or, or, uh, majors,
7:14
uh, looking for jobs were lacking
7:17
people who has the knowledge lacking people
7:20
who knows the realms
7:22
of the possible. and also I'm
7:24
afraid that a lot. Where
7:27
we used to be and still are, is
7:29
run by it, which isn't
7:32
really about digital to me. There
7:34
is a difference there, uh, when we enter into
7:36
the business and the actual operations
7:38
of things and not just the support function. So
7:41
very much about culture, very much about people
7:43
and knowledge, I would say. And
7:45
that's, that's where we are. The technology
7:49
is in many cases
7:51
already far beyond what most people
7:53
can imagine.
7:55
Absolutely. And I, I like the word that you used
7:57
the art of the possible. I think some people
7:59
are realist and they, they see the, the cup half
8:01
full. Um, they see
8:03
bad data and legacy. It
8:05
systems a lot of problems when it comes to digital.
8:08
Um, now do
8:10
you have any advice how you can kind of advance
8:12
digitalization in those kind of realms?
8:15
Yeah, it's a, it's a good question and, and honestly,
8:18
uh, there are no silver bullets. Uh,
8:20
and we're still in early days. Organizations
8:23
are very different. Uh, I I,
8:26
back to like the, it thought it's about standardization
8:30
and, and buying off the shelf, which
8:32
is a lovely expression that people love,
8:34
uh, to, to use. But
8:36
in reality, they're, they're all
8:38
in bits and pieces. There is no standardization.
8:40
There is no way to do this because it's
8:43
been thought about as it, uh, and
8:45
not about the, the actual business
8:47
and operations and, and, and data.
8:50
Data didn't used to be sexy. Now it is sexy
8:53
again. Uh, to, to
8:55
be quite blunt, I think, uh,
8:58
people haven't understood what they did
9:00
about the data before. Uh,
9:02
There are many ways to look at this. So some, some
9:05
tendon, A very traditional way to look at it is,
9:07
is to do what we call data modernization.
9:10
It's bringing these systems together,
9:12
uh, and bringing, bringing,
9:15
uh, the data up to up to par, so
9:17
to say. Uh, making sure that the CRM
9:19
talks with the, the other parts and,
9:21
and, and so on and so forth. That
9:24
tends to be very
9:27
heavy. Uh, projects, um,
9:30
and it needs to be done to some level of
9:32
extent. But what
9:34
we used to fail, uh, early on in
9:36
industry here is to do that for three years or
9:38
something and spend a lot of money, moving
9:41
data and cleaning up data. And
9:43
we didn't really think about the business outcomes
9:46
at the same time. So what I
9:49
would recommend. You
9:51
have to do this in, in several work streams,
9:53
but I definitely will recommend leading
9:55
by the use cases and, and where
9:57
you can see, you can create early on
9:59
benefits optimization,
10:01
new revenue streams, whatever, whatever
10:04
it is, and then build
10:06
a foundation just good enough
10:08
to start showing those results. and
10:11
the way I'd like to set this up, cuz that. Focus
10:15
from the end result downwards
10:17
all the time, drive it that
10:19
way. It's painful sometimes. Uh,
10:22
and it sure does not always solve everything
10:24
at the first, uh, try. But you
10:26
learn so much more and you keep focused
10:28
on the outcome. The other advice would be
10:31
get the organization involved. Don't
10:33
treat it as a classical IT project where
10:35
you just outsource it. Uh,
10:37
I know a lot of people are in housing this stuff
10:40
today. That
10:42
could be good. Uh, but you also need someone
10:44
who's done it before, who has the drive
10:46
and the incentives to just get things
10:49
done and not get the sucked
10:51
up by the internal politics and, and
10:53
meetings. Uh,
10:55
so having that push from an external,
10:58
uh, party that's. You
11:00
know, actually it's a good thing that costs money to use
11:02
consultants because that creates the incentive
11:05
to get something done And
11:08
at the end of the day, what I see a lot of people
11:10
are also trying to do is transform their
11:12
organization around data driven. Hmm.
11:15
And that's the third part. So bring the organization,
11:17
not just the techies, not just the,
11:20
the people who are used to driving technology
11:22
projects, but bring the forefront
11:24
of business development forefront of,
11:26
of, uh, of the, whoever runs the process
11:29
inside the company, into this and
11:31
get their hands dirty. It's the only
11:34
way to learn. So
11:36
let's,
11:37
uh, double down on that. You mentioned data driven,
11:39
uh, approaches. Um, Can
11:42
a leader develop a data
11:44
driven culture in people, or does it
11:46
need to come from somewhere outside?
11:49
It's a, again, no silver
11:52
bullet. I don't have a, finished answer here,
11:54
but honestly, depending
11:56
on your organization, so if you're Spotify,
11:59
Sure you can do it because you have the,
12:01
you have the incentives. You started from the right spot. You're
12:03
digital native, so, so
12:05
to speak, and all of that. Most cases,
12:08
I would say no, you either need to hire,
12:10
uh, you probably both need to hire, uh,
12:12
some of, uh, some people's been there before
12:14
and knows what it means. Uh,
12:17
and then you need some, some help to lift
12:19
the organization. It's about upskilling, it's
12:21
about getting your hands dirty. Uh,
12:24
and, and also what
12:26
is data driven. Uh,
12:29
when I speak to sea level or VP
12:31
or whatever, uh, they define
12:33
it completely different and. Again,
12:36
back to what I mentioned about the realm of possibilities.
12:38
If you have never done data driven, how
12:40
can you, uh, measure the outcome? How
12:42
can you measure where you're going? How can you measure
12:45
the KPIs if you're succeeding or not? So
12:47
I think you need some help there. And I think
12:49
the, the, the right mix is, is,
12:51
uh, getting some people in that onset
12:54
and has done it before. That would be ideal.
12:56
You won't find many of those in the market, to be honest,
12:59
So I think you need some external, uh, help as well.
13:01
But, uh, Yeah,
13:03
that balance is important.
13:06
and that's a very interesting point, and when
13:08
you reflect on it, um, a lot of companies
13:11
might think that they're data driven, but they're actually data
13:13
informed. So it's like everyone
13:15
will have a different perspective and view on things, but,
13:17
but bringing people onto the same page about
13:20
what your definitions and goals are usually
13:22
is a good starting point. Um,
13:24
Steve Martin, you've worked a lot across
13:26
the Nordic region. Um, do you
13:28
have any kind of observations, juicy observations
13:31
you'd like to share about the digital maturity,
13:33
uh, or confidence uh, across
13:35
your work?
13:36
Sure, sure. Actually, in,
13:38
and we've done some studies on this in the Nordics
13:40
as well, and, and then quantify the
13:42
maturity. Interestingly
13:45
enough, what we see is that there's being
13:48
overspend a lot of money in this area,
13:50
in the Nordics, but the results aren't coming.
13:53
Uh, so the, the return on investments
13:55
isn't really there yet. actually that,
13:57
uh, one of the things that I
13:59
get met the most with, with my fancy
14:02
title of artificial intelligence.
14:04
And when I meet clients, uh, and, and,
14:06
uh, look into. New
14:09
possibilities, uh, together with them.
14:11
One of the first things they meet me with is saying,
14:13
We're not gonna have any ai, ai, we
14:16
don't want any ai. We're not
14:18
there. Which first of all, tells
14:21
me that they don't know what AI is, which
14:23
is fine. Uh, you need to define that as
14:25
well. But, uh, uh, there
14:28
was a period. Let's
14:30
say three, five years ago where AI
14:33
fair dust could be just, uh, sprinkled
14:35
over anything and you still can't to some, uh,
14:37
to some extent to get some funding and VCs
14:39
in there and stuff like that. Uh,
14:42
but then also broke the trust around
14:44
this. so a lot of, uh, top
14:46
leaders. Uh, kind
14:49
of burnt themself, I think, on this stuff. I'm
14:52
seeing that the market,
14:55
the latest during Covid,
14:57
I would say the last part of the covid, they're
15:00
starting to ask the right questions. And
15:02
a lot of things starts by asking the right questions,
15:06
and I think, um, they're now
15:08
asking, How can I be
15:10
successful? What is the right scope
15:12
of this stuff? And, and where should I really
15:14
start? So we're
15:17
starting to right. Ask the right question. We're
15:21
still thinking a little bit of this, like a project,
15:23
an IT project. We'll started
15:26
in January and we finish in April. And,
15:28
uh, and then it, it should, uh, uh, you know,
15:30
get a, give an uplift. And
15:33
I think that's where we need to get in the Nordic.
15:35
A lot of, a lot of companies, a lot of leaders
15:37
haven't understood that yet. Uh,
15:40
that, uh, essentially
15:43
whatever you're doing in your company, Is
15:46
already, uh, a process.
15:48
It's already run by algorithms, but
15:50
the algorithms are way too often us.
15:54
So I do this this way
15:56
today because I've done it that way, or that
15:58
actually works. Uh,
16:01
and, and honestly that is the same thing
16:03
as ai, cuz that's what AI can do. It can take
16:05
that process, that recipe, but
16:09
automate. Maybe do it faster, maybe
16:11
do it at a 1% smarter,
16:13
and then by keep reinvesting
16:16
and, and tuning this and, and by
16:18
the end of, uh, you know, two, three years,
16:21
maybe it can do it a hundred percent faster and
16:24
with a lot better results. Uh,
16:27
and, and that's the transformation part, uh,
16:29
where people don't get, they, they can't run this as
16:32
a project. It's a, it's a change, continuous
16:34
change. Those, uh,
16:36
discussions starring
16:39
barely in the Nordics, but we're, we're
16:41
lagers for sure in the Nordics. Okay.
16:44
Let,
16:44
let's bring people up to speed. Let's, let's,
16:46
let's start from the foundations, uh,
16:48
and, and get them going. Mm-hmm. Um,
16:51
now let's demystify a, a artificial
16:53
intelligence a bit. You, we talked about very
16:56
interesting topics there, but let's, let's go to the core
16:58
basics of it. Yes. How would you explain
17:00
artificial intelligence to your friends
17:02
and family? Yeah, it's a
17:04
good question. And the first thing I, I try to do
17:06
is to take away this thought
17:08
about Terminator or, or
17:10
this, uh, almighty, uh,
17:13
entity that's, uh, that's the know-it-all
17:16
and all that stuff. It. There
17:19
we will invent that, but that's not
17:21
really what we're talking about in, in this
17:23
context. Uh, but we're
17:25
talking about applied ai and
17:28
we're talking about the, like I mentioned,
17:30
the processes and the recipes that we
17:32
follow in our companies today
17:34
and in our society today. That's what we're talking
17:36
about. We're talking about taking
17:39
what is. Common
17:42
daily tasks. Uh,
17:44
re reputable tasks, preferably,
17:47
and, uh, making them automated. That's what we're
17:49
really talking about. And driving a bit
17:51
more on insights. So there are two
17:53
types, main types of applied ai.
17:56
It's either taking a process
17:58
and, and making it automated or it's
18:00
doing something with more insights.
18:02
So understanding and processing. Um,
18:05
large amounts of data, and I'm, by large
18:08
amounts, I don't necessarily mean Google
18:10
amounts, but you know, if,
18:12
if you, if you come, um, to
18:15
a larger Excel sheet, then at least
18:17
I start losing control. So I think it's
18:20
murdered that someone helps me, uh,
18:22
digest that for me. And that's, that's basically
18:25
the first parts of, of what I'm,
18:27
I'm, uh, thinking about in ai. Uh,
18:29
and I try. Explain that to people,
18:32
but AI can be a lot more of those things.
18:34
But for the purpose of a business, uh,
18:36
leader, It's applied AI and
18:39
it's about automating and making the things
18:41
you do smarter and faster today.
18:43
Uh, could also be creating new revenue
18:45
streams in some extreme cases. Actually,
18:47
we do see a little bit about that then in, in
18:49
the nordex already, which is really cool. Yeah,
18:53
and I think those, those use cases,
18:55
sometimes they, they bring out their excitement,
18:57
but then for, for many companies, they, they kind
18:59
of create the hype as well. Yes.
19:01
Um, For many companies, machine learning
19:04
and applied AI is literally just taking
19:06
away the boring, repetitive tasks or
19:09
even parts of tasks in
19:11
processes that most people will
19:13
not see. Then end result of it. And it's
19:15
a lot less exciting than, than the movies
19:17
and science fiction may, may have your peer.
19:19
Mm-hmm. Um. You've already hinted
19:21
at these, and I'm interested to know what
19:23
are the kind of most, uh, who should be most interested
19:26
in, in a large or organization
19:28
about artificial intelligence?
19:31
I think, I honestly think it, it's
19:33
the whole layer of things and that there,
19:36
this is gonna be a little bit like when internet
19:38
arrived and people said, uh, you know, that's a
19:40
fat And we're
19:42
still in those early days, uh,
19:45
of, of an infancy of internet around
19:47
AI and, and data driven. Organizations.
19:50
So the C level should definitely
19:52
be interested. The CFO should be extremely
19:55
interested as this is about optimizing
19:58
current operations. It's about taking down
20:00
the risks. so a CFO should love this, a
20:02
CEO. So should also
20:05
be very mindful because it can run
20:07
off your business and you can refocus your resources
20:09
on new investments, uh, using
20:12
people less on the, let's
20:14
say, mundane tasks,
20:16
if that's a, if that's a phrase we can use,
20:19
but it also can bring a lot of insights. So
20:21
the CEO and the CEO should all care
20:23
for that because he can bring
20:26
you insights to, of your own organizations
20:28
and where to optimize. So,
20:31
so those are the, those are the top
20:34
level ones. And then of course, everyone else
20:36
as well.
20:38
And, uh, those make a
20:40
lot of logical sense. I think what the kind
20:42
of audiences we often talk to are business operations
20:44
where finance, procurement,
20:47
there's a lot of, uh, functions that have a lot of
20:49
repetitive work. And, and in those
20:51
cases, the, like you said, the process are,
20:54
are some things that can be streamlined
20:56
or automated or in some
20:58
cases replaced. Um, if
21:00
you have enough volume and if it's a big
21:02
enough problem, then this could be something that
21:05
can impact the whole company. But the, the,
21:07
the financial leadership is definitely one that,
21:09
that, that takes a lead. Um,
21:12
what are some of the common mistakes you see in
21:14
adopting ai?
21:17
Oh. Um, I think the most, most
21:19
common one is that they hire,
21:21
uh, internally, and I'm not against that
21:23
at all. And having internal resources
21:26
that you work with is hands on and have understanding,
21:28
but they hire some, typically the
21:30
data scientists, one or two, maybe three,
21:32
maybe four, uh, data scientists,
21:34
and, and they. Then they just,
21:36
uh, they
21:39
just place them somewhere, uh,
21:41
to, to, uh, figure out some AI
21:44
So that's, that's a very common mistake. And, and
21:46
still thinking about this as a, fairy
21:48
dust that just will, uh, will appear.
21:50
And, and the answer to that is, it's
21:53
a whole line. Uh,
21:56
capabilities and, and, and,
21:58
uh, knowledge that's needed, uh,
22:00
not the least about your current
22:02
operations and current business. Uh,
22:05
so a data scientist can do a lot of good things,
22:07
but they need a whole team around them with the
22:09
also other technical capabilities. You can't
22:11
just do it with a data scientist alone.
22:14
Uh, so that's, that's a very common. The
22:17
other one is the one I spoke about and I alluded to earlier,
22:19
that people drive them as it
22:21
projects rather than a change
22:24
of doing business, a change of running my
22:26
company. Um,
22:28
so they, they think about it as something they ramp
22:30
up and then should ramp down and then it's just
22:32
there. Um, that's not
22:34
gonna happen. Uh, there are some
22:37
edge cases that, that you can say
22:39
that it can be used, but most of
22:41
the time making yourself data driven
22:43
and. AI is about
22:45
the continuous change, which
22:48
I'm sure most leaders don't like because,
22:50
you know, another one of those So
22:53
those are, those are the main common ones. Um,
22:56
uh, the third, the third one, uh,
22:58
which is coming more and more now because
23:00
we're getting past the two first one. Uh,
23:03
Or that the, the business, uh,
23:05
side of the, of the operations
23:07
isn't involved enough, they're putting
23:10
this on a team that's either internally
23:12
but outside of the daily operations
23:15
and daily business model. Uh, or,
23:17
uh, or with someone like me who's
23:19
a consultant and, and they put it, uh,
23:22
uh, as an outside project or an outside
23:24
team, you have to integrate it properly.
23:26
Uh, you have to. Use the
23:28
momentum about some of these cases to
23:31
train your organization, uh, in
23:33
a different way of thinking, in a different way
23:35
of operating. Uh,
23:37
so that that's coming more and more clearly that
23:40
then they, that we need to get past
23:42
that as well.
23:43
Yeah, and it's kind of, it's not magic
23:45
dust. bad process doesn't become
23:47
a good process just with the amount of AI you put
23:49
into it. But it's a good advice that like,
23:51
you know, when it comes to hiring data
23:54
scientists and so forth, it's often better
23:56
to just start
23:58
with the core foundations. Is this
24:00
a big enough business problem we, we can solve
24:02
and, and assembling a team, whether it's
24:04
external talent or internal talent to,
24:06
to work on it.
24:08
Yeah. And, and, and I think, you
24:10
know, sometimes, and this is also
24:12
the fault of the industry, uh, that I represent.
24:15
We, we go to large, uh,
24:18
and we're, we're, we're shooting for huge
24:20
numbers or huge changes. Uh,
24:22
find those few nuggets where we can spin,
24:25
spin and show change, uh,
24:28
at a pace where, where your organization
24:30
is comfortable, but at the same time
24:32
getting pushed a bit. so, so find
24:35
those. Nuggets where you can,
24:37
uh, prove ease relatively easily
24:39
with, I don't know, six to nine
24:41
months, a max kind of, uh, timeline
24:44
to have some really outcomes and start telling that
24:46
story and start building around
24:48
it, onboarding more and more people and, and use
24:51
cases around that, that,
24:53
that's a better advice than saying, you
24:55
know, I'm, I'm gonna change the way I do things
24:57
from the, from today to tomorrow. Never
25:01
gonna work.
25:01
Yeah.
25:02
Incremental improvements that can be stacked
25:04
is always gonna be better than a radical
25:06
re-engineering of things, uh, with a bit
25:08
of tech thrown into it. Um,
25:11
stigma. Martin, let's talk about your new role or
25:13
your role at cognisant. Many of people
25:15
know Cognisant, uh, as a leader
25:17
in the technology consulting space. Your
25:19
focus is really broad, uh, if I'm
25:22
honest, and your, your flavor to what you
25:24
do across the Nordics. Uh, it has different
25:26
spins, You work on ai,
25:29
Internet of Things. Industry 4.0
25:31
and, and other aspects. you,
25:34
you touched on the idea of hiring data
25:36
scientists into your organization, and it's certainly
25:38
something that, you know, in your role, you are doing
25:41
a lot of hiring. Um,
25:43
now do you think every company
25:45
needs to be hiring machine learning experts
25:47
or, what kind of advice can you give
25:49
companies and leaders in organizations
25:52
about the talent war that's ongoing or at the.
25:55
Yeah, It's a
25:57
really hard question. I
25:59
wish I knew the answer to that one. Um, Cause
26:02
it's the same for us, right? We need, we need to attract
26:04
to talent and, and, and the war is really
26:06
there. depends
26:08
on the size and the scope of your company, but
26:11
I, I think, uh, You
26:13
if you're anything but a local shop, uh,
26:16
at the end of the day, I honestly
26:18
think you need to, to actually at some
26:20
point invest around, uh, machine learning
26:23
or something similar around data. Um,
26:26
if that means that you need to hire all these people.
26:30
Probably not, not for everyone. The,
26:32
the main reason would be that it's,
26:34
it's going to be hard for you to find that talent.
26:37
I think one of the things we need to
26:39
do is to recognize that this
26:42
is all emerging and I
26:45
try to bet more and more on,
26:47
on the young and upcoming actually.
26:50
And not just because there's a war on
26:53
talent, but also because they
26:55
have the mindset of, I'm jumping into
26:57
this to learn now, which is
26:59
a very good mindset, Yeah.
27:02
Uh, and I think that's very important and
27:04
I, I. I would give them a
27:06
chance and sit really close to,
27:08
to the young and hungry ones, uh,
27:11
and try to, you know, uh, coach them Uh,
27:15
but they will, they will really quickly
27:17
understand a lot of things. They are very hungry,
27:20
um, and they have a lot to prove, and
27:22
I would use that energy to, to,
27:24
to help me in this. Uh, that's for sure. Don't
27:27
ask for the one with 15 years of
27:29
experience every time, it's,
27:32
it's this joke, right? where, uh, uh,
27:35
basic, uh, CV ask is
27:37
I want a candidate that has worked with the
27:39
Power BI for 17 years and
27:41
then Power Bay was just invented
27:43
in 2015. So, and
27:46
that happens all the time. Uh,
27:49
and I, I don't think our associates,
27:51
uh, are done learning and I don't
27:53
think anyone will be. And I certainly
27:55
need to learn every day cuz
27:58
this is moving really, really fast. So, uh,
28:01
Get a grasp, get your fingers dirty again.
28:03
I think I get back to that all the time. Uh,
28:05
don't do a PowerPoint presentation thinking
28:08
that you now can hire the right people. Uh,
28:10
don't go to a, uh,
28:13
one of these, uh, breakfast shows or something
28:15
like that and, and think that you can now
28:17
you know what you're doing because you don't. So,
28:20
so get some, uh, people to spar with you. I think
28:22
that's, uh, best advice and then articulate.
28:27
Outcomes and goals you really and value
28:30
you want to create. Uh, a
28:32
lot of the talent is very focused on
28:34
value. Well, how can they
28:36
be part of something and how can
28:38
they, uh, be
28:41
changed and, and contribute to the
28:43
society in a, in a meaningful way
28:45
through their work? Uh, and then they're
28:47
really, really hungry to. to be
28:50
challenged and to learn and to use their skills.
28:52
Um, so those are, those
28:54
are things you will have to answer
28:57
if you get to get to the right talent.
28:59
Yeah. And, and I, I think that what you
29:01
touched on there, it is really a global, uh,
29:04
war and talent where the likes of
29:06
the Googles or Microsoft or Cognisant,
29:08
really large players will have the same
29:11
opportunity to, to address that talent,
29:13
whether they're living in Norway or living in
29:15
the Nordics or anywhere in the world. Um,
29:17
the. The need is
29:20
real. it's the game of every company to
29:22
really apply what they're doing to
29:24
this global challenge. Um,
29:26
now I have to say that, you know, working
29:28
in such a large organization, you have a pretty
29:31
unique view on technology. Uh,
29:33
like you said, Cognisent has over three and
29:35
350,000. Colleagues,
29:38
and you probably have access to all the tools, all
29:40
the fancy stuff, everything. Microsoft, Google,
29:42
anyone provides, all the software imaginable.
29:45
So, um, not many Nordic
29:47
businesses will have that same, uh, access,
29:50
uh, for investments and resources and tech.
29:52
Um, what kind of, if
29:54
you're advising Nordic businesses and
29:57
looking really at the future, looking, looking
29:59
at what's, what's coming up next, what kind
30:01
of key trends would you anticipate, uh,
30:03
for the next year and. Yeah.
30:07
Uh, it is true. We do get access
30:09
and exposure to a lot. Uh,
30:12
and, uh, I make a point of, of,
30:14
uh, stepping into it myself as well. Uh,
30:16
cause like I said, learning every day.
30:19
Um, I think, I
30:21
think the key trends is going to be that we're
30:23
going to have, uh, a more
30:25
somber approach to a lot
30:27
of these things we are going to, and
30:29
the clients are going to the market and
30:32
the whole are going to. Um,
30:34
have to realize and have a sober approach to
30:37
the fact that these people and these processes
30:39
don't necessarily exist today. Uh,
30:41
and then you'll see some people, uh, or companies
30:44
being totally disrupted, um, and.
30:47
And be marginalized. Um, so that's one
30:49
trend you'll see. Another trend is, is
30:51
from the software vendor side.
30:54
So you spoke about the Microsoft and the Googles
30:56
and the Amazons of the world. So
30:59
you're also going to see that we are getting
31:01
disrupted from the inside. They
31:03
can't grow unless, I mean, data
31:06
engineers, there aren't not enough data engineers. So
31:09
that's one area where, where, uh, I,
31:11
I would guess that, uh,
31:13
our big, uh, global software
31:16
vendors will go in and try
31:18
to take away some of that pain. So you don't need
31:20
so many data engineers because they can't grow
31:22
if, if the market doesn't have enough data engineers.
31:25
So you'll see areas. Where we
31:27
have invested in people and skills that will
31:29
disappear, be disrupted and probably
31:32
way faster than than anyone
31:34
ever seen before. and,
31:36
and that will actually not just be within, you
31:38
know, my field and my, my, uh,
31:40
area. It will also be outside
31:43
of that field. So doctors will be
31:45
disrupted because AI will
31:47
enter their domain. Lawyers will, uh,
31:49
be disrupted because AI is the. So
31:52
on and so forth. So knowledge
31:54
work will be very,
31:57
very disrupted in the next coming,
31:59
uh, five to 10 years. So even
32:01
less, I think. We
32:04
will get used to have to change our
32:06
way of thinking and our way of doing work
32:08
and what life much faster than we're
32:10
used to today. And, and again, that will
32:12
spur a lot of debates, a lot of, uh,
32:15
legislation around these areas because
32:17
if it threatens jobs, that's when politicians
32:20
usually, uh, get their act together and start creating,
32:22
try to create some kind of a balance or, or
32:24
something. So those are the really
32:27
big, big trends I think that we'll see. Uh,
32:29
and then of. Lastly,
32:31
you will find AI in places
32:33
where you never thought you, uh, found
32:36
AI before. And not only in,
32:38
in, in old factories and, and,
32:40
uh, autonomous cars driving the roads,
32:42
which people, some people still don't believe
32:44
is happening, but is actually happening. Uh,
32:47
but you'll find it in the dentist office.
32:50
You'll find it with teachers, uh,
32:52
and, and you'll find it probably plumbers
32:55
and, and construction builders will also,
32:57
cuz I know they're looking into this right now so
33:00
that, that all of those things will happen. Uh,
33:03
but at the end of the day, it's
33:07
already happening right now. If
33:09
you look at how dependent you become on your
33:11
smartphone and how driven that
33:13
is actually by analytics and uh,
33:15
ai and how much we
33:18
give it consent to run our life, either
33:20
consciously or unconsciously. And,
33:23
and that's what's gonna happen. We are going to
33:25
get this increased curve
33:27
or usage everywhere, and no
33:29
one, including people like me,
33:32
will have the full over. Uh,
33:35
and then we'll just look back at some point and say,
33:37
Whoa, we
33:39
really changed. We
33:42
as humans really, really changed and,
33:45
and, uh, yeah. So it's
33:47
exciting. Yeah,
33:48
and I, I think you can see those changes
33:50
with what you've mentioned just now with, with
33:52
the internet. It's, it's a progress that
33:54
happened first slow and then very
33:56
fast. Yeah. With smartphones, things happened
33:59
very slow and all of a sudden
34:01
you don't even realize that you've been a part
34:03
of the change. So people have a hard
34:05
time imagining. Short term
34:07
changes, but then in the long run, if you put perspective,
34:10
AI is likely not gonna change anything
34:12
in your life until you realize that it's already
34:14
changed it. Exactly. Um,
34:17
now if you're a business leader and
34:19
you wanna build a business case for investing in
34:21
ai, you wanna stay ahead of the curve, uh,
34:24
what kind of tips would you have?
34:27
Yeah, if you really wanna invest and
34:29
back to my, uh, I know I'm repeating
34:31
myself, but, but get your hands dirty.
34:34
I, I, I was lucky enough, I've been lucky
34:36
enough to meet a lot of, cool people,
34:38
uh, in my job. And, uh,
34:40
I was, uh, also lucky enough to meet, uh,
34:43
the chief business officer of Google some years
34:45
ago, and I asked him that question, How
34:47
do you stay on top of all of this stuff in
34:50
the most disruptive or one of the most disruptive
34:52
organization that that exist? Uh,
34:55
and he, I, I will never forget his answer because
34:57
it was so somber. Um, and
34:59
so, uh, realistic,
35:02
uh, he said anyone
35:04
that comes up to me will have to draw it on the whiteboard
35:07
until I understand it. So
35:10
j just spend some time and actually
35:12
invest in understanding. You
35:14
don't have to be the coder, you don't have to
35:16
understand Python and machine learning to
35:18
do it, but you have to understand
35:20
the concepts and, Uh, you
35:22
can't, again, realize the realm of possibilities
35:25
if you have no clue what,
35:27
where, where it is, and it's all darkness.
35:30
Um, I hope we'll see more.
35:34
Education or courses for
35:36
leadership and, and mid
35:38
management around technology in this area
35:41
so they can, uh, understand better how
35:43
to, to roll with it. I'm
35:46
a little bit surprised how little there is actually
35:49
other than the seminars and stuff that's more
35:51
on a hallelujah level, um,
35:53
and height level. Um,
35:56
and then, and then I think find
35:59
some trusted partner. Uh,
36:03
and I don't necessarily mean being
36:05
a consultant company. Us actually,
36:07
I mean, look at
36:10
your. Uh,
36:12
neighbor or your, even your peers and
36:14
competitors, what are they doing?
36:17
Go together and, and talk about
36:19
these issues together. Um,
36:22
go to someone who's doing something completely
36:25
different than you, but you know, they've come a bit further
36:27
than you and have a conversation
36:29
and, and start engaging. And
36:31
I think partnering in that
36:33
sense. It's underestimated,
36:37
uh, not just, of course in AI that's relevant
36:39
and everywhere, but you
36:41
have to get the grips with the fact that there are
36:44
too few resources and the ones
36:46
who get them will accelerate at some
36:48
point really, really fast if they succeed
36:50
at, when they succeed. So
36:53
partnering up is going to be way
36:55
more crucial, than people are thinking about today.
36:58
Um, and then don't
37:01
do everything. Try
37:04
to see if there's some, what, what is
37:06
unique for you, uh, and is, what is your
37:08
area of, uh, where you can excel
37:11
and then leave everything else to standard
37:13
stuff, right? Don't, don't
37:16
try to do all, all things. But
37:18
partnering, I think is number one, honestly.
37:21
Partnering makes sense. When you think about it, it's, it's
37:23
like any change. You, you don't want to go at
37:25
it alone, especially if you're inexperienced.
37:28
Um, and yeah, I, I
37:30
can see that there is an increasing amount of, um,
37:33
educational resources you can follow, but until
37:35
that's widely available, then yeah. And accessing
37:37
people who've been there, who've learned some from
37:39
some of the mistakes just makes sense. You
37:42
skip some of the bad stuff. Um,
37:44
stick Martin, uh, we're getting to the end of the interview
37:46
here. But I, I do wanna ask, um,
37:48
do you have any recommended resources listeners should follow?
37:53
Yeah, so, I, I actually,
37:55
um, I use um, medium
37:57
to com quite a lot. Uh,
38:00
there are several, uh,
38:02
areas around there where you can follow. So that
38:04
depends a little bit on the level you are at. Of
38:06
course, a lot of that can be very,
38:09
Uh, detailed. Uh, but there are some
38:11
high level stuff that you can follow and,
38:13
and read, uh, and keeps you updated.
38:16
Uh, and a lot of it is also sharing about
38:18
what's gone wrong. I think that's important. Uh,
38:21
I would also recommend those who just want to get
38:23
a. For its grasp to invest
38:26
in, in, uh, in the
38:28
chief, uh, decision officer
38:30
of Google's YouTube, uh,
38:33
series. It's free and all of that stuff.
38:35
And it's, it's, she's made it
38:37
into something that's quite. Um,
38:40
tangible and understandable, uh,
38:42
and it doesn't require you to,
38:45
spend hours and hours. It's quite easy
38:47
to get it, and it's, I would say very
38:49
good, very up to date. And she touches
38:51
on what's important and tries to
38:53
take away the, hype basically.
38:57
So that would be a, a good advice. And
38:59
then there are good pod podcasts
39:02
out there, uh, interference from from
39:04
Finland as as one which I
39:06
actually follow. Uh, and then leadership
39:08
posts, podcasts, uh, which you can listen
39:11
to in between. I think that's a very
39:13
useful, uh, useful way
39:15
of looking at it and. I
39:17
know that's outside. Uh, um,
39:19
but for perspective, I think it's also
39:22
useful to, to read the Hararis
39:25
books. Uh,
39:27
the human, uh, Davis is
39:29
the, is the latest one I believe. Uh,
39:32
and it gives you perspectives on, on,
39:34
on where we're going. It's very thought provoking
39:37
and not necessarily correct in every way,
39:39
but it gives you perspective and it touches on a
39:41
lot of the things that will change
39:44
us as a society around this. And, and
39:46
it also gives you the perspective on,
39:49
on how thoroughly, um,
39:53
through and through the change. So
39:55
I think that's very helpful. Um,
39:58
so that's from a leadership, uh, angle, but
40:00
I.
40:01
Stig-Martin, that sounds great. I think that was a,
40:03
a good variety of, uh, resources
40:05
there. We'll make sure to include in the show notes
40:08
of the podcast when it's released. Um,
40:11
so Stigma Martin Stu Tuck, it's
40:13
been absolute pleasure, absolute
40:15
pleasure to hear your insights. It's time to wrap
40:17
up here. So this has been The
40:19
Wonderful Work Podcast produced by Work Fellow.
40:22
Um, thanks for your time. Subscribe
40:24
and stay tuned for more views and insights that make
40:26
the world of business operations just a bit
40:28
more wonderful. Goodbye
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More