Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome to 2024. With
0:02
the 2024 election on the horizon,
0:04
the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, and
0:07
numerous other foreign policy and domestic news
0:09
stories, it's never been more
0:11
important to stay informed. The
0:13
DSR network has you covered, with
0:15
experts across all of these stories to
0:18
bring you the analysis and commentary of
0:20
the stories that matter. Later
0:22
this month, the DSR network
0:24
will introduce the TNR daily
0:26
featuring Greg Sargent, formerly of
0:28
the Washington Post, and a
0:30
close friend of the show.
0:33
Don't miss a moment of our coverage.
0:35
Become a member of the DSR network
0:37
today. Members receive exclusive
0:39
bonus content, the opportunity
0:41
to attend DSR live events, a
0:44
members-only Slack community, an
0:46
ad-free listening experience, and more.
0:49
For the month of January, receive
0:52
50% off your first year of
0:54
membership. Visit thedsrnetwork.com/buy
0:57
and enter code
0:59
DSR2024 at checkout.
1:02
That's thedsrnetwork.com/buy and code
1:05
DSR2024. Thank you for
1:07
your support. Hello
1:42
and welcome to Words Matter. Words
1:45
Matter, which you know is one of the
1:47
great pods around because it features
1:49
the one and only
1:52
Norm Ornstein. How are you doing, Norm? I
1:58
am hanging in, persevering, Dan. under
2:00
these difficult conditions in our
2:02
country. Yeah, he said I'm David,
2:04
I'm David Rothkopf, by the way, but I'm just
2:07
a guest here and a fly on the wall
2:09
because I like to hear their conversations. And
2:11
of course, Norm is joined each and
2:14
every week here by Dr. Kavita Patel.
2:16
How are you doing, Kavita? I am so
2:18
happy the three of us have had a
2:21
reunion. So I am truly,
2:23
my emotional state is like a 10 out
2:25
of 10 just for this pod. So listeners,
2:27
beware. We're on charter territory.
2:29
Let's see what we can do
2:31
about that, Norm. We'll
2:34
revisit our emotional state in
2:37
45 minutes. That's right.
2:39
Yeah, it will be one out of
2:41
10. Yeah, because we're here to talk
2:43
about what's going on in Washington,
2:46
one of the most dysfunctional places in
2:49
the world. And
2:52
we could talk about a lot. Looks
2:54
like Ukraine 8 is dying on the vine
2:56
up on the hill. So we'll probably lose
2:58
and Ukraine and Russia will win. Looks
3:01
like the governor of Texas is
3:03
ignoring the Constitution and imposing his
3:05
own national security and foreign policy
3:07
and keeping the federal government out
3:10
of the border despite a Supreme Court ruling.
3:13
And the Speaker of the House supported him
3:15
in doing this, saying he
3:17
backs him, so do a bunch
3:20
of crazy Congresspeople like Representative Chip
3:22
Roy, who's one of the looniest
3:24
of the loony tunes out there.
3:28
The Congress isn't, of course, getting anything
3:30
done of any sort, except
3:32
there are some conversations about
3:34
trying to impeach Joe Biden
3:36
for nothing. But you know something?
3:40
None of these things are the worst news. The
3:42
worst news is
3:45
that somehow, apparently, but
3:47
neither of you guys will believe this because you're
3:50
rational people. Despite
3:52
91 felony counts,
3:55
four indictments, two impeachments,
3:58
being called a rapist by one... judge
4:01
and a fraudster by another, betraying
4:04
the country, leading a
4:06
coup, supporting the
4:09
Russians. And
4:11
I'll be interested in your views on this, Kavita. And
4:14
deteriorating mentally before our
4:17
very eyes, Donald
4:20
Trump not only won the New
4:23
Hampshire Party, but then every
4:26
single living Republican
4:28
on Earth lined up
4:31
behind him. He
4:33
has more diverse,
4:35
unanimous support from within the
4:37
Republican Party than he has
4:39
ever had, even though we
4:42
know he was the worst
4:44
president in U.S. history and is
4:46
a threat to democracy. And
4:49
that's where we are right now. Meanwhile,
4:52
over at the Biden administration, there's
4:54
been a big
4:56
turnover in the Biden
4:59
campaign, which is not a
5:01
sign that they think it's going super well.
5:04
So Kavita, how are
5:07
you feeling now? I'm trying to, look,
5:09
I'm so happy you're here, David. I'm
5:11
still a 10 out of 10, maybe 9.5 out of 10. See
5:14
how much you can, see how much you and Norm
5:16
can wear me down. I'm going to say something about the
5:18
campaign first and foremost, because you're right. Not
5:21
only was there the very public visible action,
5:23
like the announcement of Jenna Malley-Dillon coming in,
5:25
but everybody who's worked on a
5:27
campaign, the three of us who have advised
5:29
campaigns knows that that's just, you know, that's
5:31
that iceberg. That's just what we're seeing above
5:34
the water, knowing that there's an incredible amount
5:36
that's going on below the water. And I'll
5:38
just add to that in the spirit of,
5:40
you know, Washington, D.C. being a small place,
5:43
people who are very close to the governor
5:45
of Michigan, who are also emphasizing she is
5:48
not the only governor, but she is one
5:50
of the most prominent kind of, you know,
5:52
allies and obviously an important state, and
5:55
that she has made personal calls, not just
5:57
to the president, but kind of down the
5:59
rung. to try to say, you
6:01
know, May Day, May Day, not, hey,
6:03
can we do these tweaks? So
6:06
this is, and then I'll just, something that
6:08
I like to give listeners a little bit
6:10
of like the behind the scenes, some of
6:12
the problem that occurs here, whatever we may
6:14
think about, you know,
6:16
Julie Rodriguez, Jenna Malley-Dillon, all of these people
6:18
whose names don't mean so much. The real
6:20
power isn't the person just in charge, it's
6:23
actually their ability to attract talent into the
6:25
campaign. So you can have a campaign manager,
6:27
I'm not saying any of these women are
6:29
incompetent, but you can have a campaign manager
6:31
that might not be the best business person,
6:34
might not be the best data person, might
6:36
not be the best fundraiser. They
6:38
need to be able to bring and attract
6:40
talent in. And I
6:42
don't know if we have seen proof of
6:45
that yet. And I think that's actually probably
6:47
the campaign's biggest problem. In contrast
6:49
to what I'm hearing, and it'd be interesting that
6:51
the two of you are, you know, ears to
6:53
the ground, you have a candidate who is not
6:55
just, you know, mentally unstable, and
6:58
we can talk about all the criteria he's met for that,
7:00
but he has no problem,
7:03
not just leaning in
7:05
to his misogyny, but parading
7:07
it and boosting it. You're
7:10
talking about the other candidate now. Yes,
7:12
the other candidate. You're talking about Donald Trump, I just
7:14
wanna be clear. I'm sorry, I do need to say
7:17
Donald Trump. Sorry, if I made that unclear, I am
7:19
so sorry. So
7:21
what's disturbing is that I have been
7:23
hearing kind of, you know, first
7:25
hand, but people who are involved in
7:27
the Trump campaign are describing the discipline
7:30
they're trying to use. Now granted, their candidate
7:32
is undisciplined, but that
7:34
combination of whatever is happening that
7:36
Trump seems to still be getting
7:38
Republicans to line up, including Ron
7:40
DeSantis, that you
7:43
add that with a campaign that it can actually raise money.
7:46
And then I'll stop talking, but I'm curious to hear
7:48
how both of you react to the fact that the
7:50
majority of what he's raised so far in funds doesn't
7:52
seem to be coming from small donors or his MAGA
7:54
basis. I think I counted, it's like a handful of
7:57
less than 10 big donors. Does
7:59
that mean anything? at all. Well,
8:01
let me ask you one question before
8:03
we go over to Norm, who will
8:05
whittle your mood down to nothing in
8:07
no time. Yeah, I know. But what
8:11
do you hear in the grapevine about the Trump campaign?
8:13
Is it a mess or is it doing well? No,
8:16
hearing, so two things. One that
8:18
they've kind of decided let Trump
8:20
be Trump and not trying to
8:23
figure out, because you can't
8:25
put boundaries around him. So what
8:27
I'm hearing, and I ask very clearly, is
8:29
this coming from Jared Kushner? Is this coming
8:31
from Steve... Where is this coming
8:33
from? And here's what's interesting.
8:35
This time around, everybody, I
8:38
mean, the family is still very central, but they
8:40
have kind of brought in, so
8:42
to speak, more professional
8:44
campaign people who are not
8:47
interested in anything Donald Trump
8:49
has to say, but just interested in holding
8:51
Republican power, and that they're
8:53
much more experienced with digital, all the things
8:55
that Trump never had in 2016. So
8:59
I am hearing that this is a more
9:01
legitimate and well-run campaign. Take that for what
9:03
it's worth, because I think the comparator is...
9:06
If you're comparing to rotten apples, anything
9:09
looks good. So it's hard to know. I
9:12
will say this, that if Biden doesn't
9:15
turn things around, and again,
9:17
as I mentioned, it's not the
9:19
campaign manager who leads, it's who that person brings
9:21
in. If that doesn't turn around
9:23
quickly, the only thing that
9:25
can save Biden is a strong financial performance
9:27
at the S&P and the stocks. And I
9:31
mean, you know this, David, that in the
9:33
history, what since like 19th century, we haven't
9:35
elected a president if the stock market
9:37
has kind of been in decline in that quarter leading
9:39
up to the election. So I think
9:42
that's the only way to overcome this short of
9:44
Biden himself tearing apart the infrastructure, which we
9:47
know he will not do. So... Well
9:51
norm. So
9:54
first, some good news, which will bring Kavita
9:56
back up to a 10 before we bring
9:58
her down to zero. And
10:03
there are a couple of areas I think of good
10:05
news. One is the economy, we have 3.3% growth
10:09
with inflation basically
10:12
coming down to a
10:15
reasonable level. There is every sign
10:17
that we can have a robust
10:20
economy through 2024, and we're starting to
10:23
see some signs of
10:26
a public optimism.
10:29
Consumer confidence is going up, this is
10:31
a big deal. Whether
10:34
it lasts, we don't know, but that's a
10:36
good news out there. Yeah, and the day
10:38
that we were talking about it, we got
10:40
the report on last year's GDP growth, and
10:43
it was 3.3% up, right? So
10:45
that's really substantial. Yeah,
10:47
yeah. That's very
10:49
good news. I think the other good news
10:51
is, at least when you look at and
10:54
dissect the votes that we have seen
10:57
in Iowa and New Hampshire, the
11:01
voters that went to Nikki
11:04
Haley in both places
11:07
include a lot of independents
11:10
and Republicans who say
11:12
that they voted for Haley more because
11:14
they can't stand Trump and couldn't vote
11:16
for him in the fall. Now, whether
11:19
that holds true in this tribal environment,
11:23
I don't know for sure. There
11:25
are signs of weakness for Trump, and
11:27
if you think of Trump as
11:30
the equivalent of an incumbent
11:32
president running for renomination, getting
11:35
50% in Iowa, 55% in
11:37
New Hampshire would
11:41
normally be seen as signs
11:43
of very significant weakness. And
11:46
for Joe Biden, having spurned
11:48
New Hampshire, the Democratic Party
11:51
deciding that they didn't want to make it the first
11:54
primary in the country, not
11:56
being on the ballot and being a write-in
11:59
and getting seven... 70%
12:02
there and a fairly robust vote
12:04
suggests that Democrats are going to
12:06
rally around Biden. None of
12:08
that takes away from a campaign
12:11
that needs very
12:13
serious work. Well,
12:16
but Norm, Norm, Gretchen Whitmer wasn't
12:18
calling the White House because
12:20
things are looking good in Michigan, right?
12:23
Because in Dearborn, Michigan, they
12:25
care about the Middle East policy in
12:28
a way that's a problem, and
12:30
there are other states where young voters
12:32
care about it, etc., etc., etc., right?
12:35
That's some issue. So that's where
12:37
we make the pivot to
12:40
the not so good news. Certainly,
12:44
you know,
12:46
elections rarely become foreign
12:49
policy elections. I
12:51
fear that it will be very significant
12:54
this time around. We can talk more
12:56
about Bibi
12:58
Netanyahu, the
13:01
neo-Nazis in his cabinet, the
13:03
issues going on there, and maybe
13:06
that will turn around. But
13:08
certainly, Biden is suffering at
13:10
both ends there. He is
13:13
going to suffer, as he has
13:15
already, with many young progressives and
13:17
with the Arab American votes, which
13:19
are very significant in Michigan. And
13:22
when he inevitably, we're just starting
13:24
to see the little inching away
13:26
from Netanyahu. And Netanyahu
13:28
has already moved significantly from Biden,
13:31
who gave him an enormous lifeline
13:33
at the beginning of this war
13:36
in Gaza. He
13:38
may lose some support from
13:41
those who are strong supporters of Israel. I
13:44
want to mention... David, I want to, Norm, just
13:46
to underscore something, January 11th, I
13:48
pulled this up, The
13:51
Washington Post, Dylan Wells is a very
13:53
good reporter on this, actually had a
13:55
statistic. Political ads had used the word
13:58
border. hundred
14:00
times since the start of the year,
14:02
more than in any kind of index,
14:04
same time, same place before
14:07
an election in history. And
14:09
I think you add to that, Greg Abbott
14:12
basically saying Texas will not surrender in
14:14
the Rio Grande. And there's
14:16
nothing, like nothing coming from the Biden case,
14:18
like nothing coming from the Biden case. Just
14:21
let me add to that. There is a, because I wrote a
14:23
column on this, which is going to be in the Daily Beast
14:25
today, Donald
14:29
Trump has been very explicit to his party.
14:32
He does not want an immigration deal because
14:35
he wants to run on those border
14:37
issues. And cynical as
14:39
that is, I don't want to make
14:41
progress on the border because I want to run on
14:43
how little progress there is on the border. Everybody
14:47
in his party has said
14:49
yes, sir, including Mitch
14:51
McConnell. Yes. Yeah,
14:56
Mitch basically surrendered
14:58
yesterday. And it's
15:00
clear that the Republicans had a,
15:03
you know, their lunch, the
15:05
Senate Republicans. And
15:07
it turned into a
15:09
shouting fest with the
15:12
radicals like Mike
15:15
Lee and J.D. Vance and
15:18
Ron Johnson screaming at McConnell
15:20
and McConnell, McConnell surrendered basically
15:23
on the border. But even before that,
15:26
Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House had
15:28
said as the Senate was
15:30
getting close to a kind of deal
15:32
where the Biden administration had conceded an
15:34
enormous amount to the Republicans
15:37
on the border, that he
15:39
wouldn't take up any border deal until
15:41
Trump was president. Now I want
15:43
to add one other thing, David, that we should just
15:45
keep in mind. I was reminded
15:47
of this in a column that my
15:49
friend Dennis Aftergot wrote today
15:52
on Taiwan. Trump
15:55
basically gave China a green light
15:57
to invade Taiwan. We
16:00
know why that is, and it's basically very little
16:02
different than him saying in 2016, Russia,
16:05
if you're listening. It is
16:07
China, if you are listening, interfere
16:10
in this election, put as much of
16:12
a finger on the scales as you
16:14
can to elect me, and you're
16:17
going to get the prize you've been waiting
16:19
for for many decades. So
16:21
we've got issues out
16:23
there in the foreign policy
16:25
world. We have foreign actors
16:27
who are going to be
16:29
eager, and that includes, I
16:32
would say, Netanyahu, who would love to
16:35
have Trump back as president, who would
16:37
put no constraints on him or his
16:39
cabinet. There
16:41
are foreign actors who are going
16:43
to do what they can to
16:45
help Donald Trump in
16:47
this case. I'm
16:50
just wondering, what
16:52
will Joe Biden do
16:54
now that Greg Abbott
16:57
has basically dared him to
17:00
send federal troops to
17:03
Texas to engage in
17:05
what could be a violent confrontation
17:07
with the Texas National Guard, which
17:10
is under his control, to remove
17:12
the razor wire from
17:14
the river and to take control of
17:16
that part of the border? And
17:19
if he doesn't do that, if he blinks,
17:22
if he lets Greg Abbott basically say to
17:24
the Supreme Court, up yours, I'm going to
17:27
do what I want to do, that's
17:29
a sign of weakness that
17:31
is really, really troubling and
17:34
not something that's going to give you
17:36
a sense that we have a strong,
17:38
tough leader in the White House. That's
17:41
absolutely true. By the way, there
17:43
is a precedent for handling governors
17:46
like this. Orville Faubus in
17:48
1956 decided
17:51
to ignore Brown v. Board of
17:54
Education, and that
17:56
radical Dwight Eisenhower sent in
17:59
the hundredth of a million dollars. 101st
18:01
Airborne Division to
18:03
assert the primacy of federal
18:05
authority and to ensure that
18:07
the schools were integrated as the courts dictated
18:09
they must be. And
18:12
frankly, if Biden
18:15
doesn't do that, it
18:17
sends a really bad message to other governors,
18:19
right? I mean, can you imagine, Kavita, how
18:22
if he doesn't do that, what does
18:24
Ron DeSantis do next? What
18:26
does one of these other governors do
18:29
next? They just start ignoring the federal
18:31
government and saying, well, the federal government
18:33
has failed, so I have a responsibility
18:37
to come up with my own foreign
18:40
policy, border policy. Now let me
18:42
throw another kind of boomerang, I don't
18:44
know, whatever the analogy is into the
18:46
mix, because at the same time, I
18:48
will commend the Biden campaign for putting
18:50
out, and if you haven't seen it,
18:53
it's the ad with a Texas
18:55
OBGYN talking about how she could
18:57
not obtain the abortion. And
19:00
it basically like that went something like, you know,
19:02
because of Donald Trump overturning Roe v. Wade, you
19:04
know, she said, basically, that like the state of
19:06
Texas, where I practice took away my choice and
19:09
put my own life in danger. And
19:11
I know that Kamala Harris is doing, I think
19:14
they need to give it another, like, they do need a little
19:16
bit more help with their marketing and branding. It's like the reproductive
19:18
health tour. And I think that just
19:20
makes it so polite and sanitized. It
19:22
needs to be the like, you know,
19:24
put the fear of God because, you
19:26
know, basically, it's like handmade tail and
19:28
like Donald Trump is controlling. It needs
19:30
to be something like get the fuck out
19:32
of my uterus. That's the thing. That's
19:35
what I mean. Like there needs to be like, I agree.
19:38
We should turn to for that Nicholas Sturgeon. I
19:43
don't know if you followed the news today. Oh,
19:46
yeah. But her WhatsApp
19:49
about her colleagues in the government
19:51
have been released. And I'm just going to
19:53
give you three of them and then we'll move on. But
19:56
she described Matt Hancock as weaker
19:58
than a nun's piss. She
20:00
described former Prime Minister Liz Truss
20:03
as about as much
20:05
use as a Marzipan dildo,
20:07
which is, I mean, brilliant. And
20:11
referred to Suella Braverman
20:14
as Schittler, you
20:16
know, plus some
20:18
less creative things.
20:21
We need people, we need
20:23
politicians who talk straight, right?
20:25
But that's like, you know, you gotta look,
20:27
I gotta commend like the campaign did something. Okay,
20:29
let's give them praise for that. They should because
20:32
majority Americans agree with Biden on this, right? And
20:34
then you have Kamala Harris who like, you know,
20:36
let's like, you know, I think the three of
20:38
us have all agreed that we have tried
20:41
very hard to like illustrate this woman is
20:43
not only capable, all the things that you
20:45
want in a commander in chief. Here's like
20:47
the one issue that you know, she like
20:49
it's animated about. This is her base.
20:51
She's even during a tour, but they
20:53
call it the like reproductive health tour.
20:56
And it's like a bunch of Planned
20:58
Parenthood people coming the night before. They
21:00
need to shake the masses and like
21:02
get people angry. Like it can't be,
21:05
you know, so anyway, I have two suggestions
21:07
for the White
21:09
House on this one. If
21:12
you were speaking, if you were talking about Joe
21:14
Biden and Jeff Seinz, what would you tell him
21:16
to do? I
21:19
would, I want Joe Biden to travel
21:21
to Texas to meet with the woman
21:23
in that ad and
21:25
go do it right from Texas. Yeah.
21:28
And while you're down there, take on Greg Abbott.
21:31
The second thing I want Biden to do on
21:33
this front is to bring to the White House
21:36
and meet at the White House with OBGYNs
21:39
who have been in
21:41
the operating room and
21:43
basically told you either
21:45
violate your Hippocratic oath
21:47
or you're going to prison. Some
21:50
who have left states where they're
21:52
leaving women without any health care.
21:55
Families of 10 year olds raped and
21:57
forced to carry the their
22:00
fetuses to term, women
22:02
with ectopic pregnancies, serious miscarriages
22:04
who almost bled to death,
22:07
personalize it in that way beyond just
22:09
an ad and use
22:11
the bully pulpit in that fashion. Then
22:13
going back. Well,
22:15
as it was announced
22:18
yesterday that Kate Cox, the woman
22:20
at the center of one of
22:22
these high profile Texas abortion cases,
22:24
would be invited to the State of
22:26
the Union address in March.
22:28
So again, right
22:30
instinct. But that's too late.
22:32
Like this is Texas. I
22:35
agree. You're going to show that you're confronting,
22:37
go to Texas and talk about
22:40
what the Texas law was
22:42
all about and what it's doing.
22:45
And then I want the
22:47
Justice Department to indict Greg
22:49
Abbott. And in
22:52
a perfect world, they would indict DeSantis
22:56
for kidnapping. But
22:59
take on these people who are
23:01
breaking the law. And Greg Abbott
23:03
is an accessory to murder because
23:06
having the Texas guard there and
23:09
the wire there, not letting the
23:11
Border Patrol get down, meant that
23:13
a young woman with two small
23:15
kids drowned in the river because
23:17
they wouldn't let anybody get there
23:19
to try to save them. I
23:22
mean, we've got all kinds of issues. I
23:24
want a president who shows that he's a
23:26
fighter and not just by putting
23:29
out a clever ad. So
23:31
that's my soapbox moment for this.
23:33
Yeah, you are so right, Norm.
23:35
And Kavita's 10 out of 10
23:37
a mood just as inexplicable
23:40
to me. No, I'm
23:42
excited. I want, I want, I say that
23:44
the next, no, I
23:46
think this is great because honestly,
23:50
when I saw the reproductive health tour, I
23:52
was like, this is insane. Like you
23:54
need to, people are angry.
23:57
Your visibility needs to match that degree of
23:59
anger. And so that's, and
24:01
I know it's a nuanced thing. You don't want to
24:03
look like the president's chasing, um, any
24:06
sort of headlines, but he's not, I mean, this
24:08
is like a very, he's got
24:10
the ability. The one thing he has as
24:13
a sitting president is that bully pulpit and you're
24:15
a hundred percent right norm, no matter where he
24:17
goes, the cameras will follow. The press tool will
24:20
follow and with it will
24:22
be every headline covering that. And I don't
24:24
know why we're doing it with like a
24:26
reproductive health. Well, but I, you know, it
24:28
also misses the point of the Trump age.
24:30
Donald Trump has done
24:33
everything wrong, has no good
24:35
ideas. His every instinct
24:37
is a crime, but
24:41
he offers
24:43
unvarnished lunacy in a way that
24:45
the media can't help but cover
24:47
it. So he's getting constant
24:50
coverage. Can't you know,
24:52
the reason he shows up at trials, you would
24:54
think he'd run in the other direction. Why does
24:56
he show up so that he can do something
24:58
crazy at the trial? Why does that
25:00
work? Because it'll get
25:02
attention and he knows
25:04
that with his base, it'll get spun
25:06
like he's a hero, but
25:09
you know, if, if, if you know, one,
25:11
if one candidate is
25:13
showing up in as 50
25:15
shades of gray, and I
25:18
don't mean that in the exciting literary
25:20
way, um, but the, but,
25:22
and the other one is showing up in living
25:24
color, he's got a problem. Well,
25:28
the 50 shades of gray is the chairman
25:30
of the Republican party in the Florida or
25:33
chancellor. Oh, that's the, oh
25:35
my God. Well, it's not where the chancellor of
25:37
the university of Wisconsin, but that's where the whole
25:40
other, you know, start. Yeah.
25:43
Well, you could, you know,
25:45
if we started to list all
25:47
of the, uh, Republicans, including, uh,
25:49
fundamentalist preachers who have engaged
25:52
in sexual misconduct, we'd be, we'd
25:54
have a broadcast all day. Yes.
25:56
We should exclusively devoted.
26:00
Yeah, it's just exclusively devoted
26:02
to Republican sexual misconduct. Although
26:04
really would
26:06
be the most disgusting podcast in the
26:09
history of the world. So I have
26:11
a question, David, because you
26:13
always normed us too, but I feel
26:15
like the reason, and the reason we
26:17
love you and your Daily
26:19
Beast articles and your pod is because you also
26:21
have this deft ability to balance
26:23
with the foreign kind of policy
26:26
issues. We talked about Ukraine, we talked about the
26:28
Middle East. How do normal
26:30
countries, what are people kind of, the
26:33
reason I bring this up is that I was
26:35
gone to London over the winter break. And
26:38
I'm not kidding. So many people said, oh,
26:40
where are you from? And I said, doesn't
26:42
my accent give it away? I'm from the
26:44
United States. And they said, well, we
26:46
didn't want to insult you if you were
26:48
Canadian. You know, there's now kind of the
26:50
backlash and people are like, oh, hey, we
26:52
hear Trump is going to win. Like he's
26:54
going to take it. And
26:57
I'm just curious, like the kind of
26:59
what's your sense of, you know,
27:01
what's the like G7 leadership? You know,
27:03
Modi is doing a jig, like he's
27:05
ecstatic. But what are other kind of
27:07
leaders doing or thinking about this? Biroshi
27:09
Sunak, right? You're just you're playing out
27:12
the economy. You're dealing with the fact
27:14
that his country's crippling
27:16
energy infrastructure. What
27:19
do you make out of that effect on
27:21
kind of the geopolitical stability
27:23
of our country? Well,
27:27
I mean, everybody's, you
27:29
know, dealing with it. There was a story yesterday
27:33
or the day before that the headline
27:36
I can read it for you is Canada
27:38
is preparing for a second Trump presidency. Trudeau
27:41
says Trump, quote, represents
27:44
uncertainty. You've heard
27:48
leaders in NATO say
27:50
the same thing. There's been a lot
27:52
of talk recently that if the US drops the
27:54
ball on Ukraine, that
27:58
UK and France and other. are going
28:00
to have to step up.
28:03
But of course, some countries have their own
28:05
problems, and they're not unrelated.
28:07
You say Modi is supportive of this. There
28:09
is a move on the right, and
28:12
there have been massive demonstrations
28:15
in Germany, because the Germans
28:17
still seem to care about their
28:19
politics, against the rise
28:21
of the far-right AFD party
28:24
there, because he
28:26
knows what happens when these far-right
28:28
parties take control. They've
28:30
been there before. And
28:33
one of the things that's really quite striking
28:35
here is not the
28:38
language of the Biden campaign. It's
28:42
that Americans are not in the streets. It's
28:45
that Americans don't take this seriously.
28:47
We are 10 months away from
28:50
the potential end of democracy, from a
28:52
president who said, I'm going to throw
28:54
my opponents in jail. Who yesterday said
28:57
that if Nikki Haley
29:00
continues to run against her, he
29:03
will launch investigations into her
29:06
and bring out things she doesn't want to
29:08
have come out. He's turning out his own
29:10
people. And what Greg
29:13
Abbott is doing, or DeSantis is doing,
29:16
whatever. You would think that
29:19
we would have a million
29:21
women marching for
29:23
reproductive rights, as you like to refer
29:25
to them, in Washington,
29:28
D.C. every Saturday. You
29:31
would think that, you know, I
29:33
can name a hundred other kinds of groups. And
29:36
we don't. The American public is
29:39
strangely sonambulant
29:41
here. Or am
29:43
I overstating that? No.
29:45
That's medical diagnosis. No,
29:49
you're not overstating it. I
29:51
do think we have
29:53
these trials looming and
29:56
the dynamic around Trump could change,
29:58
in question. including
30:00
the coverage of him, if
30:02
and when we get convictions. And obviously we could
30:04
spend a whole podcast on
30:06
the machinations around
30:09
these trials and the delays.
30:11
It is troubling
30:14
that the DC Circuit
30:16
panel, which heard the
30:18
immunity case, Trump demanding
30:22
total immunity, which he continues to
30:24
talk about, and his
30:26
lawyers saying that if a
30:29
President Trump called the Navy SEAL 6 team
30:32
and said, assassinate my opponent, that
30:34
would be okay. That
30:36
first it would require impeachment and
30:38
removal. Why they haven't
30:41
immediately taken that up, it's going to
30:43
delay the trial in Washington.
30:47
We know that there are
30:49
delays now in Georgia. Whatever
30:54
that dynamic may change, but
30:56
the reality is that Trump
31:00
is without being
31:02
convicted in a media that only
31:04
looks at the horse race and
31:07
treats Trump not as a bizarre
31:12
individual who will put people in
31:14
concentration camps and invoke the Insurrection
31:17
Act and bring out the military
31:19
to shoot at protesters if he
31:21
wins an election, who's calling for
31:23
foreign individuals to help. It's
31:26
all about, well, he's up, he's winning, here's
31:28
what the polls show. So
31:30
the public is not going to pay attention to
31:32
this. And I will mention just
31:34
one other, we talked about the White
31:36
House and the Biden campaign. What
31:39
about the Democratic Senate? Where
31:42
are the hearings on the
31:44
disasters occurring at the border with
31:49
Greg Abbott? Where are the hearings on
31:52
the disasters over women
31:54
in the aftermath of Dobbs? Where
31:56
are the hearings on Trump saying
31:59
outlaws? allowed that he gave favors
32:01
in return for Chinese money when
32:05
he was president. Where are
32:07
the hearings on Jared Kushner and
32:09
his corrupt ties to Saudi
32:11
Arabia and the Emirates that changed
32:13
policy in return for money that
32:15
was coming first to his family
32:17
to bail them out and then
32:20
to this ridiculous $2 billion fund
32:22
that he has? Our
32:24
Senate Democrats are asleep
32:26
at the switch here as well. Not
32:30
just Senate Democrats, but former
32:32
colleagues of Cavitas like David Axelrod
32:34
who are afraid of offending the
32:37
Republicans. Oh no, we don't want to
32:40
invoke the Constitution. It might hurt
32:42
their feelings. What
32:44
the hell? Look, this is the point where
32:46
we have the podcast where we say, hey, everybody,
32:48
if you're a member, you get to listen to
32:50
the rest of the podcast. If you're not a
32:52
member, you should become a member because it's obviously
32:54
a great conversation. You want to listen to the
32:56
rest of it. So what you should do is
32:58
go to the DSR network, click on membership, become
33:01
a member. It's $5 a month. It won't
33:03
be $5 a month forever because on March
33:05
1st, it's going to go up. So
33:08
now's the time to lock in that
33:10
low, low rate and be able
33:12
to hear all of our conversations. Operators
33:14
are standing by. Yeah,
33:18
as they used to be 40 years ago
33:20
when people did it that way. But
33:24
for now, if you are
33:27
not a member, bye-bye. And
33:29
if you are a member, stand by.
33:52
Thank you. you
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More