Podchaser Logo
Home
A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

Released Wednesday, 22nd November 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

A Nuclear Power Plant in Your Backyard? Future Reactors Are Going Small

Wednesday, 22nd November 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

First, the bad news. SAP

0:02

Business AI won't generate amusing holiday

0:04

cards, but it will personalize career paths

0:06

for your people and let you know which suppliers are best

0:08

so you can be ready for the next opportunity. Revolutionary

0:11

technology, real-world results. That's

0:13

SAP Business AI. Hey, Future of Everything

0:16

listeners. A quick note before we get into

0:18

this episode, which is all about the future

0:20

of nuclear power.

0:22

We want to hear from you. Do you think the

0:24

US should build more but smaller nuclear

0:26

power plants to provide electricity? Why

0:29

or why not? Let us know. Email

0:32

us at foepodcast at wsj.com.

0:35

Thanks for listening. Now, onto the show.

0:41

What do you think of when you hear the words nuclear

0:43

power plant? If you're like me,

0:46

you may have picked up a lot of what you think

0:48

you know about nuclear energy from... ♪ The

0:52

Simpsons ♪ That's

0:57

right. The Simpsons was probably my

0:59

first introduction to nuclear power. From

1:02

Homer's day job as a nuclear safety inspector.

1:04

Nuclear, it's pronounced

1:07

nuclear. To Smilin'

1:09

Joe Fission. Your atomic tour guide to the strange

1:12

and exciting world of nuclear power.

1:15

Though, shockingly, the show

1:17

isn't exactly scientifically accurate.

1:19

Don't! The US Office of Nuclear

1:21

Energy actually published a brochure with

1:23

a section titled, Four Things the Simpsons

1:26

Got Wrong About Nuclear.

1:28

Did you know nuclear waste isn't a glowing

1:30

green liquid? And, surprise,

1:32

surprise, Homer Simpson is not

1:34

a model safety inspector.

1:37

Ah! It's my problem! We're doomed!

1:40

Sector 7G is now being- One thing

1:42

the show did get right is the size

1:44

of the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant. It

1:47

looms over the town's skyline. The cooling

1:49

towers are really big, like

1:51

they are in real life. But what if a

1:53

nuclear reactor could be shrunk down to

1:55

fit into a small warehouse? Instead

1:59

of the large- concrete domes that you typically

2:01

think of for containment, we've gone to a very

2:03

small steel containment vessel.

2:06

Jose Reyes is the chief technical officer

2:08

and one of the co-founders of New Scale Power,

2:11

a company that's working on a new generation

2:14

of nuclear power generators. The

2:16

reactor vessel sits inside the containment vessel. We

2:18

pull a vacuum in the containment and we

2:20

immerse it in a pool of water. That's

2:22

the whole design. It's basically a reactor inside of a steel

2:25

thermos bottle underwater. The very

2:27

first nuclear reactor ever built during

2:29

the Manhattan Project in the 1940s fit

2:32

under the football field at the University of Chicago.

2:35

But now, most nuclear power plants are

2:37

like the Alvin W. Vodle electric

2:39

generating plant in Georgia, which

2:41

takes up four times as much land

2:44

as New York City's Central Park and sports

2:46

cooling towers that stretch 60 stories

2:48

into the sky. And it needs

2:50

a lot of staff. When the plant's

2:52

newest reactor comes online next year,

2:55

more than 1,600 people will be working

2:57

on site daily. This

3:00

is our highway where we operate. That's

3:04

Jordan Danielson, a test engineer

3:06

at New Scale Power.

3:07

He works at one of their test sites at Oregon State

3:09

University in Corvallis, a

3:12

small college town nestled along the west

3:14

bank of the Willamette River. Sort of

3:16

feels like a hangar almost. Like what

3:18

is this, like 60 feet or more?

3:20

No, probably around 50 something. 50 feet?

3:23

All right.

3:24

There are cables and wires going everywhere

3:26

like spaghetti, drills and wrenches

3:28

scattered on work tables. This prototype

3:31

is not nuclear powered, but it gets put through

3:33

its paces to make sure a real reactor

3:35

would be safe in the event of an accident. We

3:38

have around 500 or so data channels just

3:41

for temperature measurement. Some

3:43

of our temperature instruments get pulled and

3:45

removed and replaced with brand new fresh

3:47

calibrations every two or three tests

3:50

because we're here testing accident

3:52

scenarios. So it's pretty violent transitions,

3:55

pretty extreme conditions. 76 feet

4:01

tall. That's less than half the

4:03

size of some of the most advanced nuclear reactors

4:05

currently in operation. Because

4:07

Jose Reyes says New Scales' big plan

4:10

is to build small. We

4:12

wanted to develop something that was easy

4:15

to manufacture, could actually be manufactured

4:17

in a factory as opposed to on-site, could

4:20

be transported easily, and that we could reduce

4:22

the cost. And it was more

4:24

of a plug-and-play kind of a design. From

4:28

the Wall Street Journal, this is the future of

4:30

everything. I'm Danny Lewis. Today

4:33

we're looking at small modular nuclear

4:36

reactors because the future of energy

4:38

is electricity. And while

4:40

wind and solar have come a long way, we'll

4:43

need more options to feed our need for power.

4:46

How might small nuclear power plants fit in?

4:48

And can they help make the grid greener?

4:51

Stick around.

4:58

First, the bad news. SAP

5:01

Business AI won't help you generate cubist

5:03

versions of your family's holiday photos. But

5:05

it will help you understand which supplier is best

5:08

to help you roll out your plant-based packaging in Southeast

5:10

Asia, or identify the training your junior

5:12

project manager needs to rise up the ranks and

5:15

automate repetitive tasks while you focus

5:17

on big innovations. So you can

5:19

be ready for the next opportunity. Revolutionary

5:22

Technology. Real-world results. That's

5:25

SAP Business AI.

5:36

There was a lot of fear of nuclear

5:38

weapons following World War II, as heard

5:41

in a promotional cartoon released by General

5:43

Electric in 1953. But

5:46

there was also a lot of promise around nuclear power. Because

5:55

here in fact is the answer to a

5:57

dream as old as man himself.

6:00

A giant of limitless power at man's

6:02

command. Depicting atomic

6:04

power's potential as a literal giant

6:07

of energy, GE's cartoon

6:09

painted a picture of an atomic-powered future

6:11

with limitless technological potential.

6:13

The future supplying of electric power

6:16

to entire cities is far from

6:18

impossible, while nuclear

6:20

power in locomotives, submarines,

6:24

ships, and even

6:26

very large airplanes may all

6:28

but revolutionize future transportation

6:31

on land, sea, and air.

6:34

While nuclear power plants and submarines

6:37

do exist, the use of atomic

6:39

energy never became as widespread

6:41

as that promo predicted. In part,

6:43

because the nuclear energy industry figured

6:45

the best path forward was to build

6:48

a small number of very large power

6:50

plants.

6:52

Traditional nuclear power plants, the

6:54

type that we've been building and operating for

6:56

the past 40, 50 years, and the gigawatt

6:58

scale, the large beasts, right?

7:00

Yacopo Buongiorno is a professor of nuclear

7:02

science and engineering at the Massachusetts

7:05

Institute of Technology. He

7:07

says the thought was that big centralized

7:09

power plants would provide plenty of cheap electricity.

7:12

In practice, building them was complicated.

7:16

A lot of the cost overruns

7:18

and schedule delays that we've seen

7:21

in the construction of these large gigawatt

7:24

scale reactors

7:26

were associated with the inability

7:29

to manage large construction sites

7:31

and very complex supply chains. Now,

7:34

that may be changing.

7:35

In the past several years, you have a lot of investors

7:38

that are coming into this space. Jennifer

7:40

Hiller covers energy for the Wall Street Journal.

7:43

Like, Bill Gates and Sam Altman

7:45

and people like that have become interested

7:48

in this area, and they're

7:50

looking for carbon-free power

7:52

sources and seeing a

7:54

need as you try to reduce

7:56

greenhouse gas emissions.

7:59

of TerraPower, which is developing

8:02

slightly scaled down nuclear reactors.

8:04

And Sam Altman, the co-founder of chat

8:07

GPT creator OpenAI, is

8:09

a major investor in another nuclear energy

8:11

startup called Oklo.

8:13

Small reactors have always been

8:15

around. There's always been like a contingent

8:18

of people in the nuclear power world

8:20

who see a use case. But

8:22

there's also been an interest just broadly

8:25

from the investment world

8:27

in building difficult things

8:30

like rockets or an

8:32

electric vehicle company. And I would put

8:34

nuclear reactors into the same category.

8:37

The difference now is that companies designing

8:40

small modular reactors say they're trying to

8:42

build equipment, not infrastructure.

8:45

Fundamentally, what we're trying to do is

8:47

build smaller plants

8:51

that we can build more of

8:53

in a factory quality controlled

8:56

setting to really get

8:58

the cost down to a

9:00

repeatable, predictable range.

9:04

Clay Cell is the CEO of Xenergy.

9:07

It's another company developing small modular

9:09

nuclear reactors.

9:10

Can we create something that is smaller,

9:13

that is appropriate

9:15

for incremental growth in the grid,

9:19

that we can simplify,

9:21

that we can build in a factory,

9:23

shrink rapid, skid mount

9:26

it, ship it out to the site

9:28

and assemble it in a period of months

9:31

rather than

9:32

construct it in a period of decades.

9:35

The U.S. government also

9:37

sees this approach to nuclear power as an

9:39

important tool in a future that relies much

9:41

more on electricity. The 100

9:44

gigawatts provides 20%

9:47

of our nation's electricity, approximately. There's

9:49

93-V operating nuclear reactors. Later this year,

9:52

there will be 94. Those gigawatt-scale

9:54

plants are really helpful for that base-flow

9:57

of power. for

10:00

nuclear energy in the U.S. energy department.

10:02

She runs the office overseeing and promoting

10:04

the nuclear power industry. If you can

10:07

scale down the size, the complexity

10:10

of these devices, you can start building nuclear

10:12

reactors more like airplanes than

10:14

airports,

10:14

and you get better economies of scale,

10:16

ideally, by saving

10:18

on time and going over

10:20

budget and things of this nature, because

10:23

it's more predictable than an on-site construction.

10:26

That's the electricity that's always there when

10:28

you go to turn on the lights or plug in your phone,

10:30

day or night, no matter the day of the week

10:33

or time of year. Huff says

10:35

nuclear energy is becoming an increasingly

10:37

important part of the U.S. government's plan to

10:39

power the country with low-carbon electricity.

10:43

You may be asking yourself, how is

10:46

nuclear energy low-carbon? Essentially,

10:49

nuclear power reactors generate electricity

10:52

from heat. All of the commercial

10:54

nuclear power plants in the U.S. use the

10:56

energy released by nuclear fuel to heat up

10:58

water and generate pressurized steam.

11:01

That steam turns turbines to generate

11:03

electricity. Or it could be used

11:06

for industrial purposes. We'll get back

11:08

to that in a bit, but unlike coal

11:10

or natural gas, nuclear reactors

11:13

don't release carbon into the atmosphere.

11:15

As

11:16

countries, regions, businesses

11:19

contemplate

11:20

their future plans for reducing

11:24

carbon emissions,

11:25

there is one technology

11:27

that they've got to consider. That's

11:30

Jakopov Buongiorno, the MIT researcher.

11:32

It's an incredibly dense

11:34

energy source. So you don't

11:37

need a big supply chain that continuously

11:39

feeds the power plant with fuel

11:41

the same way that you would with coal, for

11:43

example. Also, the machine

11:46

itself, the reactor, is very,

11:48

very compact.

11:49

But Wall Street Journal reporter Jennifer

11:51

Hiller says conventional nuclear power

11:54

plants also come with some disadvantages

11:56

in the energy market.

11:58

Natural gas became so... so inexpensive

12:01

in the U.S. that you had nuclear

12:04

reactors having to compete. And

12:06

that really helped kind of unwind

12:09

the economics of conventional

12:11

nuclear power. Nuclear power plants

12:13

generate plenty of cheap electricity once

12:15

they're up and running.

12:16

But building the plant itself is really

12:19

expensive. Most of them are custom

12:21

built for a specific location, which

12:23

takes a lot of capital investment.

12:26

Compare that to natural gas, which is

12:28

cheap and plentiful in the U.S.

12:30

Natural gas power plants also cost

12:33

less upfront to build. And

12:35

there's also the safety question, especially

12:38

after disasters like the meltdown at the Fukushima

12:40

Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan

12:42

in 2011. It's unclear

12:45

whether anyone was directly killed or

12:47

sickened by radiation exposure from the accident,

12:50

but more than 160,000 people were displaced and at

12:54

least 30,000 people still haven't

12:56

returned.

12:57

Broadly speaking, nuclear power

12:59

tends to be pretty safe. But when they

13:01

do have an accident, it can be big and

13:04

catastrophic. And there's the added concern

13:06

about nuclear waste, which can take thousands

13:09

of years to decay. But some

13:11

advocates for nuclear energy say smaller

13:13

reactors would help here because they use

13:15

less fuel to begin with. While

13:18

advanced safety systems need less human intervention.

13:21

This is what Jose Reyes is trying to do at

13:23

NewScale. The real aha

13:25

moment for me was when I worked for

13:27

the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna.

13:30

He served as a technical expert on passive

13:32

safety systems. And I kept hearing

13:35

the same thing. We can't afford the large

13:37

thousand megawatt reactors. They're just too

13:39

expensive. We don't have the grid to support

13:41

a thousand megawatt. They wanted something smaller.

13:44

So he started working on the design for

13:46

a smaller power plant that could still supply

13:48

the consistent levels of carbon free electricity

13:51

that makes nuclear energy so attractive.

13:54

One that doesn't need hundreds of acres of

13:56

land or cooling towers that stretch

13:59

hundreds of feet in the air. new

14:01

scale isn't the only company designing small

14:03

modular reactors for the global energy market,

14:06

but it is the first company to have one of its

14:08

designs certified by the US Nuclear

14:10

Regulatory Commission. One

14:13

of our modules will produce about 77 megawatts electric. Just

14:16

by about 60,000 homes can

14:19

be powered by one module. We can power

14:21

all of Corvallis here. It's a lot less electricity

14:23

than a conventional nuclear power plant would generate.

14:26

But Reyes and his team designed their system

14:28

to be able to string together multiple reactor

14:31

modules to generate a similar amount of electricity.

14:34

Our 12th module plant is 924 megawatts. A

14:37

conventional large plant, pressurized water

14:39

reactor, is about 1,000 megawatts. So we're

14:42

comparable, but we're in a much smaller footprint.

14:45

And each of those modules can operate

14:47

independently, meaning a new scale

14:49

plant could start producing electricity and

14:52

start making money once the first

14:54

module is installed. Reyes

14:56

says this also makes the plant safer. That's

14:59

because its cooling systems rely on passive

15:01

systems to prevent meltdowns, like

15:04

recirculating steam to keep the nuclear fuel

15:06

submerged in water. Unlike

15:08

conventional nuclear power plants, which

15:10

require offsite power to run their cooling

15:13

systems during emergencies. If

15:15

you have a hurricane come through, it knocks

15:17

out the grid. Commercial nuclear power plants today,

15:20

they would have to shut down.

15:21

A nuclear meltdown happens when the chain

15:23

reaction that produces heat goes out of control,

15:26

generating more heat and pressure than the system

15:29

can handle and melting down

15:31

the reactor's components. That

15:33

can cause an explosion and release radioactive

15:35

materials into the environment. The

15:38

Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires

15:40

all existing nuclear plants in the U.S.

15:42

to be able to draw electricity from the power grid

15:45

in order to prevent this during an emergency shutdown. But

15:48

Reyes says that's not the case for new scale,

15:51

simpler reactors.

15:59

full power, close to full power, and then

16:02

whenever the dispatcher calls and says, okay,

16:04

we need power to help restore this section of the

16:07

grid, we can provide that power.

16:09

But that's a couple steps into the future, because

16:12

no one has yet built a working small modular

16:15

reactor in the US. And there

16:17

are other questions to answer about what it will

16:19

take to build the new atomic age. More

16:22

on that after the break.

16:31

The Wheel. A Big Idea.

17:09

We've talked about how building smaller nuclear

17:11

reactors could make them cheaper and easier

17:13

to build. So how about replacing

17:16

the sheer amount of electricity a single

17:18

large power plant can generate? We're trying

17:21

to just think completely different about nuclear.

17:23

Instead of economies of scale,

17:26

let's go for economies of volume.

17:29

Ex-Energy CEO Clay Sell says

17:31

small modular reactors can help because

17:33

they can be installed wherever electricity

17:35

is needed.

17:37

That makes geographic locations

17:39

more available to us, whether it's

17:42

replacing a coal plant that has suffered

17:45

from suburban encroachment or

17:48

whether it's siding a plant next

17:51

to a data center or next to an industrial

17:53

facility.

17:54

A recent US Energy Department report

17:56

estimated that a first-of-a-kind small

17:58

modular reactor like those X-Energy

18:01

and NuScale are designing, could cost

18:03

as much as $3 billion to build. That's

18:06

a lot of money,

18:08

but it's a lot less than the $30 billion spent

18:11

building the two new reactors at Georgia's

18:13

Vodal Nuclear Power Plant.

18:15

CEL says to make the economics work and

18:17

to avoid being priced out by cheaper fuels

18:19

like natural gas, nuclear energy

18:22

will have to expand beyond municipal

18:24

power grids to industry.

18:27

I mean, what is the petrochemical industry

18:29

other than applying heat

18:32

and pressure to crack molecules and then recombine

18:34

them, right? And a lot of that pressure is

18:37

produced through steam.

18:38

And so there's a huge

18:41

market for steam

18:44

on the U.S. Gulf Coast and in other

18:46

industrial applications, and today that

18:48

market is met with by

18:51

burning natural gas.

18:52

Earlier this year, X-Energy partnered

18:55

with Dow Chemical and the U.S. Energy Department

18:57

to jointly develop a four-unit modular

19:00

nuclear facility at an industrial plant. Those

19:02

units will provide steam to a specific

19:05

plant, their seed drift plant

19:07

in Calhoun County, Texas. It

19:09

will also provide electricity to the

19:11

plant, and the excess

19:14

electricity will be sold and injected

19:16

into the Texas grid. CEL says

19:18

tapping this market can expand the demand

19:20

for nuclear energy in the future.

19:23

We can't decarbonize the economy

19:25

just by, you know, getting electric

19:27

vehicles and planting solar

19:30

farms and wind parks.

19:32

He hopes small modular reactors will

19:34

one day power everything from chemical plants

19:36

to hydrogen generators to server

19:39

farms used to train artificial intelligence.

19:41

But Wall Street Journal reporter Jennifer

19:44

Hiller says building a lot of small

19:46

nuclear reactors instead of a few

19:48

big ones may not solve the scale

19:50

problem on its own. That was the argument,

19:53

essentially, for building larger plants,

19:55

and that did not work in terms of driving

19:58

costs down on the large reactor.

19:59

front. And so they're sayi of

20:02

building large, we

20:03

wil and that

20:05

will drive the c

20:10

is just a question. We do to

20:13

that yet.

20:14

Plus, Hiller nuclear

20:17

reactors will sti stringent

20:20

regulatory her safe.

20:23

You do have to anci

20:25

of can you

20:27

really put sma the

20:30

country is every comm welcoming

20:33

of smaller reac

20:35

are still risks associat

20:39

have been at least 34 ser accidents

20:43

worldwide since

20:46

study by researchers from the

20:49

University of British small

20:53

modular reactors w even

20:55

more radioactive wast plants.

20:59

Some countries are use

21:01

of nuclear energy, inc which

21:04

shuttered its last n April.

21:06

At the same time, r solar

21:10

wind and geothermal as

21:13

nuclear costs remain u

21:15

of the key criticisms

21:17

you else

21:20

gets a whole bunch c decade.

21:23

And meanwhile you nuclear

21:26

reactor again, de

21:28

promises, no

21:30

fully funct nuclear

21:32

reactors have bee yet.

21:35

And while their benef on paper, they

21:37

still have in the real world.

21:40

I am c But

21:43

let me say up front t a

21:45

lot of high. And so

21:47

eve taken with a grain of sol Giorno

21:51

again,

21:51

the recert early

21:54

projects are absolu

22:00

for this industry. Credibility

22:02

with investors, confidence in themselves

22:05

that they can deliver. So if these early

22:07

projects are going to be again massively

22:10

late and massively more expensive than

22:12

the industry has advertised, then

22:15

it's going to be a real tough proposition

22:17

to go back to the investment community

22:19

and say, what, please give me another $15-20 billion, because

22:22

now I'm going to scale up.

22:24

Cost and demand are still issues that these

22:26

companies have to address. NuScale

22:28

was planning to build its first small modular

22:31

reactor in the U.S. at the Idaho National

22:33

Laboratory. The hope was to start

22:35

generating electricity by 2029, but

22:38

the project was canceled earlier this

22:40

month when it became clear there weren't enough customers

22:42

signed up. NuScale says it

22:44

does have other similar projects in the works,

22:47

including one with standard power to build two

22:49

reactors in Pennsylvania and Ohio

22:51

by 2029. Even

22:54

so, Buongiorno says nuclear power still

22:56

shows a lot of promise in replacing fossil fuels.

22:59

Some coal and natural gas plants could

23:01

even be retrofitted with small nuclear

23:03

reactors to pump out clean energy.

23:06

They're almost ideally suited to

23:08

be replaced by these small modular reactors.

23:11

You get to reuse a lot of the infrastructure

23:13

that already exists at that site. So mission

23:16

lines don't care where the electricity is coming from.

23:18

Not to mention all the other infrastructure

23:20

that's already built at these sites, like

23:23

roads, plumbing, and power lines. Buongiorno

23:26

says replacing old fossil fuel plants with

23:28

nuclear power could also keep well-paying

23:30

jobs in these communities too.

23:32

Coal-fired plants here in the United States

23:35

are typically located in areas which are going to

23:38

suffer mightily if those

23:40

assets go out of business and they're not replaced with something

23:43

else that employs local and

23:45

provides well-paid jobs, and nuclear small modular

23:48

reactors can do that.

23:49

Plus, he says that having a range of

23:51

energy sources, solar, wind,

23:54

and nuclear, for example, will make

23:56

the power grid more stable and resilient

23:58

in the long run.

23:59

especially as the need

24:00

for electricity in the U.S. continues

24:03

to grow. Bongiorno

24:05

says the nuclear power industry has its best

24:07

chance to really take hold now and

24:10

help lead the way into a future of plentiful,

24:12

carbon-free electricity.

24:15

They're very much

24:16

under the microscope at the moment. And

24:18

this is their time. This is their moment. It's

24:21

their chance. It's exciting. And

24:24

the ball is in their core, so to speak.

24:27

The Future of Everything is a production of

24:29

The Wall Street Journal. Stephanie Ilgenfritz

24:32

is the editorial director of The Future of Everything.

24:35

This episode was produced by me, Danny

24:37

Lewis. Our fact-checker

24:39

is Aparna Nathan. Michael Laval

24:41

and Jessica Fenton are our sound designers and

24:44

wrote our theme music. Katherine

24:46

Milsop is our supervising producer. Aisha

24:49

Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott

24:51

Salaway and Chris Simphly are the deputy

24:53

editors. And Filana Patterson is

24:56

the head of news audio for The Wall Street Journal. Like

24:59

the show? Tell your friends. And

25:01

leave us a five-star review on your favorite platform.

25:04

Thanks for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features