Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
It's like, shouldn't you be a better actor
0:02
if you're acting for God and not just because
0:04
you want to get a part on a soap so
0:07
you can buy that condo?
0:09
Welcome
0:15
to You're
0:20
Wrong About, I'm Sarah Marshall, and
0:22
today we are talking, I am both
0:25
sad and happy to tell you about
0:28
Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes.
0:31
This week we have a trifle of
0:33
an episode for you, a bit of a layer
0:35
cake, if you will. First
0:38
you're going to hear this introduction I'm giving you right now,
0:40
then
0:40
you're going to hear a conversation between
0:43
me and living
0:45
legend You're Wrong About former co-host
0:48
and forever co-founder Michael Hobbes
0:51
about Sound of Freedom, a movie that
0:53
a lot of you have been asking or
0:55
wondering what both of us think
0:57
of this summer. And then after
0:59
that, you're going to hear a re-release of
1:01
our human trafficking episode from 2019. Sound
1:05
of Freedom is a movie that represents some
1:08
of the most powerful and insidious myths
1:10
of human trafficking, many
1:13
of them the ones we also see weaponized
1:15
by QAnon. As
1:17
a result, it's a movie that
1:20
strives to put its
1:22
audience through kind of an emotional ringer and
1:25
our goal in doing this episode for you is
1:27
to
1:28
talk about a piece of media that's working
1:30
with that subject matter, but not to
1:33
make you the listener, do that kind of
1:35
thinking or
1:36
have that kind of an experience
1:39
with what we're making. We want to bring you a
1:42
safer way to experience
1:44
what's going on in the culture right
1:47
now. So we're talking about all
1:49
of the aspects of human trafficking, child
1:51
trafficking, child sexual abuse
1:53
and trafficking
1:55
that
1:55
we are seeing represented in
1:58
the fictional world of the this film
2:00
where Jim Caviezel is a great action hero,
2:03
but to the greatest extent of our abilities,
2:05
we're not
2:06
dwelling on difficult
2:09
topics and imagery. And we're really
2:11
trying to get into the minds of the people making
2:13
and consuming this film.
2:15
So hopefully that makes the experience as
2:17
easy as it can be. And the same is true
2:20
in the episode that we
2:22
then are bringing to you in re-release. What
2:24
we're really trying to talk about is how
2:27
we hide the truth from ourselves and how we can do
2:29
a better job of looking at it. This
2:32
was a really fun conversation for me to
2:34
have. I think talking about it
2:36
with Mike is the only way I could have been persuaded
2:38
to discuss it. And if you wanna hear a little
2:41
bit longer version of our conversation with more
2:43
of our evergreen topics
2:45
coming up, then you can hear that on Patreon
2:48
or Apple Plus subscriptions, if you like.
2:51
Also on Patreon and Apple Plus
2:54
for you guys, if you wanna check it out, is
2:56
a little concert film we made
2:58
when we did one of our springtime shows. This
3:01
one was at the Bell House in Brooklyn. We had
3:04
just an amazing time, did some
3:06
fun outfit changes. We
3:08
had a little bit of splatter, we had music,
3:11
we had
3:12
laughing and crying reported
3:14
by many audience members. And if
3:17
these were live shows when we were touring a few
3:19
months ago that you wanted to see, but
3:21
couldn't for whatever reason, then
3:24
this is our attempt to just bring the show
3:26
into your living room. Rest assured that
3:28
you will be watching tiny
3:31
little versions of us acting it all
3:33
out for you anew, as if in
3:35
a flee circus.
3:41
Thank you so much for listening. Enjoy
3:43
the episode.
3:44
Thank you. I
4:00
love most to torture them with the topics
4:02
they like least and with me
4:04
today is Michael Hobbs. I
4:07
only get 15 minutes out of the Downtown Hotel at a time. I've
4:10
been imprisoned. Thank you for letting me have
4:12
this time together. You're actually calling me with
4:14
a Canadian quarter
4:15
in the lobby.
4:19
An operator voice is going to cut in at any moment. Someone
4:21
is singing, God, I hope I get it. I hope
4:24
I get it right next to you.
4:28
You did say when we were texting
4:30
about this that you like it when the worst
4:32
moral panics just stick around forever. I
4:35
feel like that's what we're back to talk about. I
4:38
mean, I don't like it, but I'm just like, what
4:40
do you know? What do you say? Check it out.
4:42
Here it is. Nothing
4:44
ever dies. Nothing ever dies,
4:47
which also means that all the great things
4:50
will never die. Question mark.
4:53
Maybe as
4:54
long as Netflix leaves them up. Michael Hobbs
4:57
for people who don't know, you
4:59
are the daddy of this show. You are
5:02
the alpha and omega. You are
5:04
the very modern
5:06
model of a very major debunker
5:09
in general. I don't know musicals, but yes,
5:11
that's how I introduce myself. I'm the alpha and omega. You
5:14
are wrong about. Yes. How have you been doing?
5:16
What have you, what are you up to these days?
5:19
Well, I'm having a very weird week because I have
5:21
like very severe carpal tunnel in my hands.
5:23
I can't like do anything with my
5:25
hands, but like my life as
5:27
a podcaster means that I can like talk
5:30
into the internet to unlimited extents
5:32
now, regardless of my hands.
5:35
So this is actually perfect that you got in touch that we
5:37
can just like talk about stuff. Like luckily
5:39
that's my job. My job does not technically
5:41
require any hands. I never thought of it
5:43
that way, but that's true. My
5:45
hands are just like, like primly folded
5:48
in my lap and I can just like talk into my little microphone.
5:50
I feel like I want, I want to just like give
5:53
you an introduction for people
5:55
who like, I don't know, need to spend
5:57
more time with your Irv or for people
5:59
who don't.
5:59
It's just nice to hear things you already like
6:02
described to you. We started this show
6:04
specifically in 2018 because,
6:07
well,
6:07
I don't know if you started it because of your love
6:09
of debunking stuff or if that followed more.
6:12
I know that we started it because I had this
6:14
treasure chest
6:15
of stories about women road killed
6:17
by the media that I had not found other
6:19
outlets to talk about. Yes, the bimbo portfolio.
6:22
Yes.
6:22
Exactly. Yeah. But
6:25
what about you? Stuff that the media
6:27
got wrong and then I think we had the
6:30
naive idea that it's like we're going to do a
6:32
show like setting the
6:33
record straight. We
6:35
realize that it's like no nothing like no one ever
6:37
just stops lying like these stories
6:40
never stop circulating. So it's like, oh, we just have
6:42
to keep doing the same episode over and over
6:44
again to debunk the same bullshit forever.
6:48
Yeah, I got that's really
6:50
true. It really speaks to
6:52
like how 2018 2018 felt at the time.
6:56
And this is just a function of every year being
6:58
worse than the last at this point
7:00
in history. But at the time it felt
7:02
like the cutting edge of how bad things could
7:05
be. And now you look back and you're like, oh,
7:08
I know about
7:10
your younger self.
7:11
Do you remember the 2016 memes
7:13
that were like, oh, when is this year going to be over?
7:15
Like can't wait to say goodbye to 2016. And
7:18
it just has been worse. Like what did we think
7:20
was coming? Every year
7:21
has been worse. But it was fun
7:23
because you could do a little Twitter macro of
7:25
it. You could get the start of this year. I was
7:28
Charlize Theron looking cute and
7:30
young adult. And at the end I was Charlize Theron
7:32
in Mad Max very road. I know. And
7:35
now
7:35
we're just like, it's just going to be like this forever. One
7:38
of the things that emerged that was
7:40
already brewing when we started this show,
7:42
but that has been incredibly relevant to
7:44
the past five years of American life has been
7:47
the overlap
7:48
in the overlapping worlds
7:51
of over the top theories
7:54
about child sex trafficking and
7:56
claims about how human trafficking
7:58
slash sex trafficking. happens
8:01
up to and including all those signs in bathrooms.
8:04
Yes. Especially the ones that
8:06
say, no, the signs of human trafficking. And
8:08
then don't say what the signs of human trafficking
8:11
are. There's a joke about
8:13
this in Jamie Loftus's raw
8:15
dog. And once you notice it, you never stop
8:17
noticing it. They're like, no, some signs.
8:20
OK, bye. Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean, most
8:22
people interpret that to mean like a child who has a different ethnicity
8:24
than their parents. Because God knows that
8:27
never happens in America. Yeah, exactly. Like
8:29
the whole point is to fuel like people calling the cops
8:31
on people who look different from them. Yeah. So
8:34
in a way, the posters are
8:36
work is intended. Right,
8:38
exactly. They're working as intended
8:41
to support the conservative American agenda of calling
8:44
the police at random on
8:46
mixed race families. Yes. But that's
8:48
not what they're claiming to be doing importantly.
8:51
And when we talk about like how
8:53
to live effectively in a post-apocalyptic or mid-apocalyptic
8:55
world, I guess, because what we're now in,
8:58
I would say, I don't know
9:00
if people are using that term, but I think it's correct. I
9:03
have been trying to go see a lot of summer
9:05
movies, partly because it is so goddamn
9:07
hot
9:07
in Portland. What is it like in Seattle? It
9:10
is 94 degrees right now and it is noon. So
9:14
we're like a preaching a peak of 105 in a few hours. I
9:18
don't know how you guys do it. It's bad here, but it's not
9:20
it's not inland Portland bad. We don't do
9:22
it. People die.
9:24
But the other night I went to see the
9:26
Road Warrior, the second Mad Max
9:28
movie. It came out in 1981. And
9:30
this also leads me to the fact that this movie
9:32
I found so inspiring and really made me think,
9:35
made me think about what I'm trying to do with this very show
9:37
of ours is that this
9:40
movie stars Mel Gibson and he's really good at playing
9:43
the Road Warrior. And also, oh my God,
9:45
is
9:46
he, you know, a mainstream
9:48
anti-semite culture maker for the ages and for
9:50
the today's. No
9:54
one ever really gets canceled, do they? It's
9:56
pretty incredible. You can
9:58
call someone
9:59
sugar tits. on tape and
10:01
be uncancelled like four years later and say like much
10:03
worse things that I don't want to say. My mom
10:06
has given up on Mel Gibson. So you know,
10:08
that's something. He's lost the
10:10
Carol vote. But it's true. I
10:12
mean, you like, maybe your star
10:14
falls. Maybe you feel like you've
10:16
lost everything. But what that probably means is
10:18
that you've lost a little bit of
10:21
your power and safety in the world as you know
10:23
it. And I don't think anything can ever really take Mel
10:25
Gibson down. And it's
10:27
interesting to sort of work our way to our
10:29
inevitable topic today.
10:32
VML Gibson, which is of course,
10:35
sound of freedom. Yes. But
10:37
I reached out to you last week.
10:39
And I was like, do you want to re-release
10:41
our human trafficking
10:42
episode? Because it came out a while ago.
10:44
It's a really wonderful piece of work by
10:47
you. And because human trafficking
10:49
is like, it feels like it's just always, you know,
10:52
it's always somewhere in the news. But it feels like
10:54
it's having a spike this summer. And part
10:56
of that is both allowing the
10:59
success of, and then driven by the success
11:01
of, sound of freedom. And
11:03
I was like, do you want to talk about sound of freedom as
11:05
well? And I was like, no. Absolutely
11:09
not. Yeah. You were like, yes, if I don't
11:12
have to prep for it because I'm incredibly busy.
11:14
And I was like, I know you are incredibly busy.
11:16
But also like,
11:18
you should avoid seeing sound of freedom if you
11:20
can. I think that's good.
11:22
Yeah, it just pumps me out so much. Well, it should.
11:25
I feel like the whole moral conundrum
11:27
of the kind of work that we're doing is like,
11:30
it puts you in a position where you just have to fucking repeat
11:32
yourself constantly. And
11:34
nothing has changed. This isn't a real thing.
11:36
All of these organizations are extremely sketchy.
11:39
The underlying conditions in America
11:42
that drive things like youth sex work
11:44
have not changed. It's all the same kind of stuff.
11:47
But then some new
11:47
thing happens. And what is the stuff,
11:50
by the way? Well, just like, it's mostly, I
11:52
mean, as we get into in the episode, it's mostly just like, a
11:54
lot of it is just like runaway kids that
11:57
end up on the street and they don't have anywhere
11:59
to sleep. and they don't have any options.
12:02
And so they end up agreeing to
12:04
have sex with somebody for a place to stay
12:06
that night. And under the law, which defines
12:09
any trading of anything of value
12:11
for sex by a child as human trafficking, that
12:13
is technically human trafficking. I will have sex with you if you let me
12:15
stay on
12:16
your couch. That technically is human trafficking.
12:18
So when we get these statistics, they're like, human trafficking
12:20
is all over the place. And then we get these sort of
12:22
police driven crackdowns.
12:25
But we don't need to arrest these
12:27
kids. We just need to give them shelter and we need to
12:29
give them a safe place to stay and
12:31
safe adults to be around and resources.
12:34
We can't send in Liam Neeson and solve
12:36
a social problem like kids
12:39
who are forced to sleep with somebody for money because they
12:41
have no other option. Although
12:43
wouldn't it be amazing if there
12:46
is a Liam Neeson movie where
12:48
he takes over a government
12:50
agency because he's so good at
12:53
typing in shorthand and infrastructure
12:55
and he it's like a drama movie
12:57
about him or like creating a new filing
13:00
system for them, which then enables
13:02
them to do really helpful stuff. This
13:04
is our spec script.
13:05
Just like Liam Neeson takes over an administrative
13:08
agency. Yeah, it's called organized.
13:14
It's called mate. No, it's called methodology
13:17
queen. It's called methodology queen. Or
13:20
it can be called methodology
13:21
king because Liam Neeson
13:23
demanded a rewrite. Yeah. And ultimately it's going to be heteronormative.
13:26
We need to keep the gender roles straight. Yes. We don't
13:28
want to confuse anybody. Unfortunately,
13:29
Neeson's people needed
13:32
that. Yeah. And sound of freedom to give
13:35
people an introduction. I feel like
13:37
this is like very big in the news right
13:39
now. This came out on July 4th.
13:41
It was the only new movie
13:44
to come out that weekend. So
13:47
it had a good pre-sale head start
13:49
and then it also got to be the number one
13:51
movie in America that weekend through
13:53
scheduling luck, which got
13:56
it off to a really good start. It has since
13:58
made,
13:59
according to Bob. box office mojo. It
14:02
hasn't been released internationally yet. So
14:04
domestically and in general, it's grosses 172,813,722
14:06
dollars. God,
14:13
I didn't know movies made that much money anymore.
14:16
This one does. Yeah. And
14:18
I think for a while it was ahead of Mission
14:20
Impossible, the new Mission Impossible movie,
14:23
Dead Reckoning,
14:24
part one. That's bleak. We
14:26
should be spending our money on like a Scientology
14:29
weirdo, not a trafficking weirdo. Yeah.
14:32
Well, let me tell you, I like yesterday, I was like,
14:34
okay, Sarah, you're recording this tomorrow.
14:36
You're recording at noon. You can't see the movie
14:39
tomorrow morning. You have to do it tonight.
14:42
You have to go to the theater and
14:44
just see this stupid movie. And
14:46
so I gritted my teeth and I went
14:48
to the theater and then- Wait, you saw the
14:50
movie? You saw Sound of Freedom? Yes.
14:53
What? Sarah. Yes. However,
14:56
I got to the theater and I was like, I
14:59
can't yet.
15:00
I need to do something for me. And so I saw Mission
15:02
Impossible, Dead Reckoning. Did you really?
15:04
Did you do a double feature with that and the trafficking
15:07
movie? Yeah. And then I got two junior
15:09
whoppers. And let me tell you, those
15:11
junior whoppers are very junior. They're
15:13
not in charge of anything. They're so small.
15:15
Did you theater hop or did you pay
15:17
for both tickets? Well, I have a regal
15:19
unlimited membership. So each
15:22
movie cost me 50 cents technically,
15:24
which is part of how I
15:26
feel less gross about seeing Sound of
15:28
Freedom. Yeah, fair. Yeah. Really
15:30
marginally supporting it. Well, God, what
15:32
was it like? Well, first of all, Mission Impossible,
15:34
Dead Reckoning part one was great. Okay.
15:37
Oh, it's part
15:38
one? I did not even know this. Yeah, they're doing like a Deathly
15:40
Hallows thing with it. But what you need to know
15:42
is that there's this whole great action
15:44
chase sequence in the end on the Orient
15:46
Express.
15:46
Fuck, dude, those movies are
15:48
so dumb and I love them so much. Listen,
15:51
Ethan Hunt has to jump
15:53
a motorcycle off of like an Alp
15:56
in order to
15:57
parachute into a train.
16:00
Love it. Give it to me. It's so good.
16:02
I cannot wait. So I saw Mission Impossible
16:05
Dead Reckoning Part 1, and I was like,
16:07
well, that was...
16:08
I saw a good movie today, no matter
16:11
what happens. And I went to see Sound
16:13
of Freedom, the movie that has made 172 million dollars
16:17
to give people a little more context. Sound
16:19
of Freedom
16:21
was made by its director,
16:23
Alejandro Monteverde, in 2018.
16:25
It stars
16:28
Jim Caviezel, who many
16:30
of us know is the guy who played Jesus and
16:32
Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ,
16:35
a movie which, while he was filming,
16:37
the word on the street is that he was struck by lightning
16:40
twice while they were making that movie. Oh,
16:43
OK. That doesn't sound real, but OK. Yeah. And, you
16:45
know, The Passion of the Christ is an interesting one because
16:47
like,
16:48
I didn't see it because I like
16:51
non-religious horror movies famously, but
16:53
I remember when it came out, there was this
16:55
kind of a public debate about like, is it anti-Semitic?
16:59
Yeah, I remember that too. Well, technically, but like probably
17:01
in actuality. But there was like plausible deniability.
17:04
Yeah. Which of course now they're no
17:06
longer is due to the direct statements of
17:08
Mel Gibson himself. But it's like, it
17:10
feels like a classic,
17:13
like the tea party stuff as well, how
17:15
like stuff that happened in the
17:17
aughts, that there was plausible deniability
17:19
around, then kind of is coming out
17:21
now as like completely,
17:24
explicitly linked to fascism,
17:26
which unfortunately for the director, this
17:28
movie is with the intention
17:31
of basically everyone, but the guy who
17:33
made it actually, I think. There
17:36
is a weird thing in American culture now where like it
17:38
constantly happens that you say something and everybody's like,
17:40
you're crazy. That's way out of line. And
17:42
then like a
17:43
year later, it's just like factually confirmed.
17:45
And you're like, wait a minute, this, what
17:48
I was saying was true, but you're still yelling at me and I don't
17:50
know why. So what is it actually
17:52
about? Is it like a kind of normal three
17:54
act structure action movie? There
17:56
is, okay. So I'll tell you what it's about. And then we'll talk
17:58
about kind of what's behind.
17:59
it because that was the order that I learned this in. So
18:02
it is based on the true story,
18:04
according to our opening title card, of
18:07
Tim Ballard, who works for Homeland
18:10
Security. And he busts
18:12
this guy who looks like I wrote in my notes,
18:15
Mr. Gumby, because he looks like
18:17
Mr. Gumby from Monty Python. And
18:19
he has big greasy bangs and he is
18:22
charged with possession of
18:24
a ton of
18:25
child images. And
18:28
here's the first thing about this movie is
18:30
that I went in thinking of it as
18:32
a Christian movie because people
18:34
have debated this and in this variety write-up,
18:37
they're like, it was called a Christian movie by NPR
18:39
without explanation. And I was like, well, it is a Christian
18:42
movie because they talk about God
18:44
and it's distributed by Angel Studios. And there's
18:46
this recurring tagline of God's children
18:49
are not for sale, which is
18:51
the actual tagline of Operation
18:53
Underground Railroad, which is
18:55
the
18:55
organization that, you know, who's
18:59
recently ousted leader this
19:01
movie is about. So like, I think
19:04
it's like,
19:05
it's fair to say that this movie is part
19:08
of a Christian agenda, even without direct
19:10
directorial intent. Yeah, that's
19:12
one of those like, I'm not crazy for saying this. Like,
19:15
it seems quite like,
19:17
plainly in the text of the film. And also
19:19
like, I've been on our Underground Railroad's
19:21
website at various points of the years and like, yeah,
19:23
it's also quite explicitly Christian. Right. Because
19:25
they're not screaming it throughout the movie. It's
19:29
like they can call you
19:31
accusatory and illogical
19:33
for noticing it, which is, I
19:35
think, a really frequent tactic. And so because
19:38
I was expecting Christian media because
19:40
it's distributed by Angel
19:43
Studios, I was immediately
19:45
shocked by how not unpleasant
19:47
it is to watch. Because the thing about
19:49
Christian media, I feel like you'll agree, is
19:51
that like, if a production company is
19:53
Christian,
19:55
they literally assume that the godliness
19:57
of their work means they don't have to worry about acting.
20:00
or audio or editing or anything.
20:03
Yeah, it's like porn. It is. Get
20:05
me in, get me out. We're all here for the same
20:07
thing.
20:07
Yeah, don't need to spend too much time
20:09
like tweaking the levels. Yeah. Right.
20:12
And like, would you say it's like really remarkable the
20:14
like amateurishness of like media
20:17
produced by extremely wealthy Christian
20:19
organizations? Yeah, I mean, there's no
20:21
reason for it to be good, right? Because there's no
20:24
actual, like they're not selling it in like the marketplace.
20:26
They're basically just gonna make it. It already makes money before
20:28
it comes out. And then it doesn't have to
20:30
like turn a profit through ticket sales. They just like then
20:32
distribute
20:32
it to mega churches or whatever. Right.
20:35
And then it gets seen by literally
20:38
a captive audience in fact. Right.
20:40
It's like those restaurants in like super touristy areas
20:43
where it's like the food doesn't have to be good because
20:45
you're paying for the fact that it's like next to the fountain
20:47
or whatever. Because your kids are cranky and they
20:49
need chicken tenders. And we have all
20:51
these little cups of marinara sauce
20:54
and you want them.
20:55
And it's also interesting because like you could argue
20:57
that the glorification of God
20:59
is a reason to make something good.
21:02
Sure. And yet people aren't doing that.
21:06
It's like, shouldn't you be a better actor if
21:08
you're acting for God and not just because
21:10
you
21:10
want to get a part on a soap so
21:12
you can buy that condo?
21:15
It's kind of disappointing that the movie isn't terrible.
21:17
I was kind of hoping that it would be like laughably bad.
21:20
I know. And so many things like this are.
21:23
So many things you watch and you're like, ugh,
21:25
but like I was impressed from the beginning
21:27
that this is a film
21:29
made by a filmmaker. Like
21:31
this feels like it's made by somebody who cares
21:34
about cinema. And as a
21:36
result,
21:37
it is very overbearing and
21:40
it is made in a way where there's like enough
21:42
art and enough intelligent filmmaking going
21:45
into it that it is like, you can feel also
21:47
the manipulativeness of it. Where
21:49
like there's enough skill going into it that you
21:52
like literally cannot not care.
21:54
Okay. Right. Because like the camera
21:56
spends,
21:58
I would say at least.
21:59
15% of its
22:02
time lingering on the extremely traumatized,
22:05
sometimes crying faces of
22:07
these very talented
22:09
child actors. And there's two
22:12
little kid main characters who this movie
22:15
is about, who are a brother and sister,
22:17
who are eight and 11 for
22:19
most of the movie, and who we
22:22
like open looking at the little girl, like
22:24
playing the drums with her flip-flops.
22:28
She has a single dad household,
22:30
which
22:31
seems like part of why any of this happened,
22:34
but she was singing in the marketplace
22:37
and
22:38
this polished, hot
22:40
lady saw her and came by and
22:42
was like, hello, daddy,
22:44
I just wanna take
22:47
your daughter to an audition for this
22:49
modeling agency, so she can
22:51
be paid a lot to model and have a great future.
22:54
And oh my goodness, your son just came home.
22:56
Hello, cutie. So it is like the
22:58
version of
22:59
trafficking that essentially doesn't exist. Yes. That's
23:01
like the airport poster version of trafficking, where
23:04
it's like you're lured through like their charming
23:06
wiles. Yes, like a complete
23:08
stranger, like sees your child on the
23:10
street,
23:11
either just grabs them or goes through like a
23:13
somewhat more complicated
23:15
scooping up. And then
23:17
she'd
23:18
like bring them to an audition and then
23:20
come back to pick them up at seven and the dad
23:22
comes back at seven and the audition room
23:24
is empty. And
23:27
his children have been spirited away and they're put
23:29
in a shipping container. Of course,
23:31
got the aesthetics. And
23:33
shipped to Columbia. And this is
23:35
in Honduras
23:36
that the first part is happening. Okay. Jim
23:39
Caviezel finds out about all this. Okay,
23:41
and then he like goes in and like rescues
23:44
the kids, I guess. He saves the
23:46
brother and then he spends the rest of the movie
23:49
trying to spend the sister because it
23:51
also occurs to me,
23:53
and I'm not saying this in an accusatory
23:55
way, I'm just saying this in like a noticing
23:58
way that like making movies.
23:59
about rescuing little girls from child
24:02
sex trafficking by some really evil
24:04
guys allows you as
24:06
the hero to be obsessed with a little girl.
24:08
Yeah. You know,
24:10
and also, I mean, I haven't seen the
24:12
movie obviously, but there's also this element of like wallowing
24:15
and like, it's like you're, you're conjuring up
24:18
the worst crime that you can think of and then
24:20
like solving it. It feels like very
24:22
cheap catharsis to me.
24:23
Yes. And we open on
24:26
Jim Caviezel's character. He has this younger partner
24:28
and his partner is like traumatized
24:30
by the material they have to review because they've done
24:32
this bust on Mr. Gumby. And
24:35
this is where they find out about the two Honduran
24:38
kids who the movie is about. And
24:40
so we see Jim Caviezel decide
24:43
as a rogue Homeland security agent,
24:45
the protagonist
24:47
American needs to
24:50
befriend the pedophile. They've just arrested
24:53
and pretend that he too is a pedophile and get
24:55
the
24:55
guy to like give
24:57
him a child to abuse. Okay.
25:00
And so he bonds with the guy and then he bust him
25:02
at a diner and that
25:05
is how he rescues the little brother.
25:08
And then that leads him to go
25:11
to
25:12
Cartagena to team
25:14
up with a guy played by
25:16
Bill Camp, who is called Vampiro
25:19
and he is an ex-cartel guy who
25:21
buys children so he can set them
25:23
free. Okay. Oh, it's like medical
25:25
debt. Okay. Like Claire Danes with the
25:27
birds and broke down palace. Yeah.
25:30
I saw this was like a 9 30 pm
25:33
screening. And when
25:35
I got my ticket, I was the only one in there and I was
25:37
like, great, I'll be by myself. I can take notes
25:39
and use my flashlight. And then
25:42
10 other people came in, including
25:44
like two different couples,
25:46
as far as I can tell. And then
25:48
like
25:49
some moms and their young kids
25:52
like out to see it. And I was watching it and
25:54
I was like, boy, this, this
25:56
just feels incredibly like a
25:59
bad idea. to bring your little kids to. And
26:01
luckily the kids were like kind of talking
26:03
and tittering the whole time. So I think I were
26:05
mostly bored by it. Okay. But
26:08
it's like, it's so menacing.
26:11
If I watched it as a small child, I
26:13
would be terrified to leave my
26:14
house for a year. Yeah. Also
26:17
those other couples in the theater were definitely podcasters.
26:20
In Portland, Oregon, at least 50% of the people
26:23
seeing this is for podcasts. It's
26:25
also really funny to think of
26:28
someone being like, Hey baby, let's go
26:30
see Sound of Freedom. I really like this girl.
26:33
I'm trying to make the next move. I'm going to take
26:34
her to a movie. Put your
26:36
hand on my leg during Sound of Freedom.
26:39
A movie that encourages a bare minimum
26:41
of cuddling. But
26:44
the filmmaking is all like, it's very
26:46
effective. It's a little bit too effective.
26:48
It's kind of overscored. There's frequent
26:52
use of a menacing child choir
26:54
singing in what sounds like Latin
26:57
or something.
26:59
Can you imagine that? I
27:01
would be very interested to know what
27:03
you think of this movie if
27:05
you ever watch it, which I also hope you don't
27:08
because it's a wildly unpleasant
27:10
experience. You're just watching
27:12
kids being menaced.
27:15
I always feel kind of bad for the tone
27:17
of these kinds of episodes where it sounds like we're sort of laughing
27:20
our way through this story of
27:22
something really horrific happening to children. But
27:24
it's like, I do feel like
27:26
people need to be more aware of the fact
27:28
that the kind of thing that they're talking about in this movie
27:30
essentially does not exist. There's all
27:32
kinds of exploitation of poor people and poor
27:34
children that happens all over the world. Migration patterns
27:38
are a big part of it, but children being
27:40
kidnapped and taken on airplanes
27:41
to other countries, essentially
27:46
hasn't really been a confirmed case of this by
27:48
a stranger. People get kidnapped by their parents as part
27:50
of custody battles all the time, but
27:53
this sort of model of it, what they're
27:55
talking about is just sort of like outlandish.
27:58
And so that's why we're laughing. laughing our
28:00
way through it or why it feels
28:02
kind of campy to us is because this
28:04
is very clearly propaganda aimed
28:06
at getting a specific political outcome.
28:09
It's not something that actually cares for the welfare of children because
28:12
this movement sort of evangelical Christians,
28:14
if you look at what they do rather than what they say,
28:17
this is not a movement that has contributed all
28:19
that much to the actual dynamics
28:22
of why children are being abused. This is
28:24
not a movement that has tried to prevent that in any meaningful way.
28:27
In fact, you could argue the opposite, but that's not even necessary.
28:29
It's like what policies have they advocated
28:32
for? It's mostly like harsher sentences for
28:34
these kinds of stranger danger crimes. It's not really
28:36
like let's clean up the
28:39
people who have power over children and can use that power
28:42
for genuine evil. Well, right.
28:44
And also arguably, I think, and I think we've
28:47
talked about this a lot in the past on the show
28:49
that if you construct this outlandish
28:51
supervillain who you are standing in opposition
28:54
of. Right. So if Tim Ballard, the real life
28:56
leader of Operation Underground Railroad,
28:59
which is hard to say, by the way, yes,
29:02
he receives more leeway in kind
29:04
of doing whatever he wants or needs
29:06
to, including
29:08
taking an annual salary of over
29:10
five hundred thousand dollars when donations
29:13
were declining or
29:14
saying in an official statement that the best
29:16
thing the Trump administration could do
29:19
for the welfare of the children was finish
29:21
building a border wall.
29:22
Great. Of course. You can do whatever you want
29:25
and you can also be part of a faith
29:27
that in many iterations in America,
29:29
you know, talking about fundamentalist Christianity specifically
29:32
protects people who abuse children
29:35
institutionally, sometimes sexually.
29:37
And I think is able to see that as more
29:40
something you can cover up, something you can apologize
29:43
for, something you can push into the shadows because
29:45
no one is being put in a shipping container.
29:48
So it can't be that bad. Yeah, totally.
29:50
Or your queer child running away because
29:53
you have or you know, you kicking them out of the
29:55
home and them ending up in survival
29:57
sex work like you were talking about. You don't
29:59
have to.
29:59
So yourself is connected to, you know,
30:03
something on the scale of this Kim Caviezel thing.
30:05
Right. This is an insight that I have
30:08
like stolen wholesale from doing this show
30:10
with you, how much, how
30:12
much people are acting out basically like their feelings and
30:14
their anxieties and a lot of these moral panics, rather
30:16
than looking at the actual state of, you
30:18
know, the situation, the state of the statistics. I
30:21
feel like there's just a lot of like kind of emotional needs
30:24
going into this typically, especially in these movements
30:26
that they're really only looking at
30:28
the harm of children to the extent that
30:31
they can weaponize that against societal
30:33
others, right? Like this is about the evil
30:35
people that prey on children, but then it's like, as soon
30:37
as it's somebody that is
30:38
any way connected to them, like, Oh, it's the youth pastor actually.
30:40
They're like, Oh, was it really abuse? Like, Oh, I
30:43
don't know if it was that bad, right? Or like, well, you
30:45
kids asking for it, et cetera. It's
30:47
about
30:48
punishing out groups. It's not really about
30:50
protecting children. Right. Yes,
30:53
completely. Yeah. Well, and then to wrap up
30:55
how this movie ends, basically they figure out
30:57
that the little girl they're looking for has
31:00
been sold to a cocaine
31:03
guy, boss who lives in the forest.
31:05
And so interestingly, because this movie was
31:08
made in 2018, Jim Caviezel
31:10
and his friend pose as doctors
31:13
who are coming to inoculate people
31:15
against an epidemic. Oh, so
31:18
everyone will be nice to them now, right?
31:20
Ha ha ha. Throw
31:23
some anti-vax stuff in there. So I'm like light
31:25
anti-vax shit. And so they, they gain
31:27
access to the cocaine compound and
31:30
Jim Caviezel is like, and it's so, it kind
31:32
of speaks to
31:33
what you talk about in this episode. We're going
31:35
to listen to where
31:37
Jim Caviezel like enters the town. This
31:40
is his name is cause Kim Caviezel. There's also a thing,
31:42
his name is Tim in the movie and he's introducing himself
31:44
to the little boy and he's like,
31:46
Tim or Timo Teo. And the little
31:48
boy is like, Oh, and he's like, what? That's
31:50
my name in Spanish, isn't it? And the little boy is
31:52
like, I have a St. Timo Teo medal.
31:55
St. Timo Teo rescues children.
31:57
Oh. And then obviously he gives
31:59
him.
31:59
the medal, his sister gave it to them
32:02
when they were in the shipping container, when they're
32:04
being shipped. They're being shipped. And,
32:06
you know, Tim, he's no longer
32:08
just Tim, he's Saint Tim. Oh
32:11
my God. And also, and I
32:13
feel very comfortable laughing at this, Mira
32:15
Sorvino gets pretty high billing in this movie
32:17
and I was like, oh God, I'm stressed about
32:19
Mira Sorvino's level of involvement in
32:22
this movie. And guess what? She's
32:24
probably in it for 45 seconds. She
32:28
has three scenes, she has
32:29
one line per scene, she's on screen
32:32
for 10 to 20 seconds. Okay.
32:35
Sometimes you wonder if they sign up for these things without like reading the whole
32:37
script or like,
32:40
I want to believe is what I'm saying.
32:42
Right. I really find myself
32:45
empathizing with the director and all this because
32:48
his story is that he saw something
32:50
on the news in 2015, he wanted to
32:52
do something on child sex trafficking
32:55
as he understood it based on the news, which
32:57
Mike, you've pointed out many times
32:58
before is often telling exactly
33:01
the kind of stories that are in this movie.
33:03
And then while writing the script, he found Tim
33:05
Ballard who had left the Department
33:07
of Homeland Security so that he could more
33:09
freely, you know, undertake independent
33:12
and highly publicized raids of
33:14
alleged child
33:16
sex trafficking situations. And
33:18
so the director,
33:19
Alejandro was like, yes,
33:22
I will do a story about this guy. And so they
33:24
did a story based on him. He made
33:26
this movie. It has a happy ending.
33:29
It's like highly emotional. It feels like a very
33:31
earnest attempt to bring
33:33
attention to
33:34
something that the director believes to
33:37
be going on at least.
33:38
So you think he did it totally earnestly? Like he doesn't necessarily
33:41
know all the context around it. He's just like, wow, this is like hurting
33:43
children. I want to make a movie about how bad that is. It feels
33:45
incredibly earnest to me. You know,
33:47
I can't guess intent, but like it has the
33:49
feeling of a very earnest project. And
33:52
what he said, that's interesting because he's come out
33:54
very recently and done interviews and been like, it's
33:56
not a QAnon movie. Like my intent
33:59
was never like.
33:59
when I made this movie QAnon didn't even basically
34:02
exist. But the thing is
34:04
Tim
34:05
Ballard, who the movie is about, and
34:07
Jim Caviezel, who played him, are both
34:09
into QAnon. And so what do you
34:11
do when you make a movie about a guy before he
34:13
gets into QAnon, but then kind
34:15
of as a natural consequence of his belief
34:18
in the existence of highly organized, gigantic
34:22
child sex trafficking rings, or
34:24
his need to believe that they exist in order
34:26
to promote his fairly lucrative
34:28
job where he also gets hero worship
34:30
and sex. There's a Vice article
34:33
that points out there is a painting of Tim Ballard
34:35
where past abolitionists,
34:38
including Harriet Tubman,
34:40
are kneeling in order to
34:42
honor him as he walks down a railroad
34:45
holding a child. Oh, geez.
34:49
So what do you do with this guy who you made a movie
34:51
about because you're like, well, maybe he has some
34:54
troubling qualities, but it's a good story.
34:56
Then it's like, I'm totally on board with
34:59
this conspiracy theory that matches with my
35:01
past beliefs that you made this movie about.
35:03
I will say, I mean, I don't know what happened in this specific
35:06
case, but I will
35:06
say that in general, for conspiracy
35:08
theories to spread, it doesn't just require
35:12
full-on goblins. It also requires a
35:14
lot of rubes. People who
35:16
end up spreading this stuff without really knowing what
35:18
they're doing or don't really look into
35:20
it, or they're like, oh, I think I'm helping. I
35:22
think a lot of the Save the Children rallies
35:25
in the summer of trafficking,
35:26
whatever summer that was, a lot of the people that
35:28
were really well-meaning people and were like,
35:30
my understanding is that kids are
35:32
being kidnapped, hundreds of thousands of kids are being kidnapped
35:35
and sold into sex slavery and I'm a human
35:37
being, that's really worrying. And so they
35:39
show up to these rallies without knowing that it's
35:42
super QAnon and what these people
35:44
are pushing for is these really odious
35:46
policies that
35:46
have nothing to do with kids at all. But
35:48
yeah, a lot of the people who were there were just nice
35:51
people who were like, oh my gosh, I've read about this thing and it seems
35:53
really troubling. Right, and that's like
35:55
the level that this movie is working on as
35:57
well, right? The same way that Save
35:59
the Children.
35:59
became a slogan of kind
36:02
of like a shibboleth of yes, I believe in conspiracy
36:05
theories about QAnon. Yeah.
36:07
And also, I guess to
36:09
QAnon is like such a buzzword now, it's like
36:11
hard to kind of remember exactly
36:13
how it started. And it's worth
36:15
pointing out that kind of originally, you
36:18
know, the main function of QAnon was to
36:20
be like, listen,
36:21
President Trump may seem to
36:23
not know what he's doing, but he is in fact playing
36:26
the long game. Yeah. And he is
36:29
bringing down all of the major child
36:31
sex traffickers. Yeah. And
36:33
the storm is coming and he's going to crack
36:35
down on this international
36:37
conspiracy of elites,
36:40
including the Clintons and the Obamas
36:42
who have been both sexually trafficking children
36:45
and also torturing them
36:47
in order to harvest adrenochrome,
36:49
which is a drug they get high on. And
36:51
when you
36:51
harvest adrenochrome from a child, their
36:53
skin turns red. And that's why sometimes
36:56
you see a woman
36:58
in the Democratic Party wearing Louboutins.
37:00
They're not a brand
37:03
of couture shoe. It
37:05
means that Democrat women
37:08
know how to make shoes and they're making
37:10
shoes out of the children they've killed. I'm not
37:12
kidding. This is part of it. No, I know. I
37:15
love, I always love the links
37:17
between these insane
37:19
accusations of like they're harvesting
37:21
children for parts. And then the evidence of it is
37:23
like a woman's wearing red shoes. Well,
37:27
that applies to like a number, like a large
37:30
number of women on any given day.
37:31
Red is a striking stylistic choice.
37:33
Sometimes people like a color. There's
37:35
only like seven of them. So, you
37:38
know, either they like red or they're
37:41
harvesting something from children that may
37:43
not meaningfully exist. Yes. Yeah. Those
37:45
are the two options.
37:46
And I guess I love the idea that like
37:50
Huma Abadiyan or whoever is like
37:53
going home and it's like,
37:55
all right, kids, don't bother me. I have
37:57
to make shoes. Yeah. I
38:01
got 80 kids in the basement. Keep it down down
38:03
there, come on. I murdered a child
38:05
three days ago and I gotta use it or
38:07
toss it. So I just gotta, you
38:10
know. The thing is he
38:12
got busy and he had more skin than I know
38:14
what to do. Good God. So
38:18
anyway, that's just, it's one of my favorite parts
38:20
of it because it's like, if you were told,
38:23
especially in like the kind of
38:25
high pressure
38:26
emotional appeal way that causes
38:28
people to lose money to phone scams, like
38:31
children are being trafficked right now and you have to do
38:33
something about it. Share this article
38:35
or something, then like you can pass on
38:37
something that includes something that, you know,
38:39
leads to a conclusion,
38:41
such as democratic women
38:44
are making shoes out of the
38:46
children they've killed. That if someone came
38:48
and shouted at you on social media,
38:50
you would, you know, there's a reason they don't lead
38:52
with that part. Right, right. And
38:55
also that kind of stuff is probably not in the movie. Like does the
38:57
movie feel conspiratorial at all? Well, that's the thing.
39:00
I mean, the movie doesn't get into QAnon stuff,
39:02
but it does show how like
39:05
basically taking a form of child
39:07
trafficking that like,
39:09
like the children in a shipping container
39:11
thing, like as far as I know, there has never
39:14
been a case of that occurring. And
39:17
there's a reason that people don't do that,
39:19
right? Yeah, it doesn't make sense. If
39:21
you're trafficking
39:23
children to people who wish to
39:25
abuse them, then like wherever you
39:28
are, there is a gigantic
39:30
number of children
39:32
who you can do that with who are right
39:35
there. Yeah, people do not have
39:37
the skills necessary
39:39
to like import children in large numbers
39:42
because that tends to attract attention and requires
39:44
like all kinds of like upfront funding. And then the main
39:46
thing is if you're looking for like poor
39:49
children who are easy to exploit, we
39:51
have a lot of those here, unfortunately, right?
39:54
You wouldn't import kids from
39:56
Columbia. We have a lot of people who are like undocumented immigrants
39:58
and like really desperate.
40:00
and really vulnerable because they don't meaningfully
40:02
have the protection of the state. And so you
40:04
can just like tell them go do this and I'll give you $500
40:07
and then not pay them. Like there's all
40:09
kinds of very easy ways to exploit people
40:12
domestically and locally. It doesn't require this
40:14
like vast network. And like that's the saddest
40:16
thing about sort of debunking these things is it's
40:18
like the exploitation is happening
40:21
in
40:21
some form, right? And the violations and this
40:23
really horrible shit is happening. But
40:25
it just isn't happening in this up
40:27
in the clouds, vast mustache
40:29
twirling conspiracy kind of way. It's
40:32
much more like quotidian. It's just like asshole
40:35
dudes
40:35
who find like poor, maybe addicted
40:38
teenagers and like try to
40:40
have sex with them by trading something or like beat them up
40:42
or like the sort of the normal shit
40:44
that we've all maybe become like too used
40:46
to. Yeah. Or say, you know, if you're
40:49
addicted to drugs and you need drugs
40:52
and you have a child.
40:53
Yeah. Right. And you can use
40:56
the child in order to get something that
40:59
you need. Like the thing about these conspiracy
41:01
theories is that they require this amazing amount
41:03
of effort and organization on the part of the
41:06
abuser, which I think distracts from the fact
41:08
that
41:09
the fewer resources you have, the more
41:11
likely you
41:12
are to create
41:13
or end up in abusive
41:15
situations for your child or situations
41:18
where abuse is all but inevitable. Right. You
41:20
know what I think about all the time. In
41:22
our Kitty Genovese episode, the
41:26
murder where the alleged case is
41:28
that like people saw this woman being stabbed and like, nobody
41:30
cares because like who cares about being stabbed in
41:32
cities. Then we got all this like decades of like reactionary
41:34
stuff about how bad cities were. In the early
41:36
stages of the murder,
41:38
what people thought it was, was like a domestic abuse
41:40
incident. And like, that's why they ignored it.
41:43
And it's sort of like in some ways, the
41:45
myth is true, right?
41:47
Because it was a form of violence that people were kind of
41:49
turning their heads away from, but it was like
41:51
this every day form of violence. I'm
41:54
just like, I am, I might be like a man to his girlfriend, like shit,
41:56
we're just gonna leave that on its
41:58
own. But then it's like, oh no, they were.
41:59
They were ignoring this kind of more stranger danger
42:02
form of violence. And that is seen as
42:04
like this huge like it says something
42:06
about society. But I guess it says nothing about
42:09
society that we're like, might just be a guy abusing
42:11
his girlfriend. Right. Well, right.
42:13
And then in 1964, you could that's
42:15
the lens. Right. You're like a man abusing
42:18
his girlfriend,
42:19
his wife, none of my business.
42:21
He knows how much to abuse her. Right.
42:24
And how to not kill her. But
42:26
a stranger. Right.
42:28
That's unacceptable. But it's the same, you
42:30
know, they're committing the same violence. Right.
42:32
And the same thing here. It's like this kind of everyday
42:35
like exploitation of children, like kids in horrible
42:37
foster care situations, kids dealing
42:40
with like trauma and abuse. There's not
42:42
the resources necessary in schools, etc. It's
42:44
like there's kind of these everyday forms
42:47
of like hurt and trauma that are
42:49
being imposed on to children. But it's like,
42:51
no, no, no, we want the shipping container. Yeah, we
42:53
want the exotic ones. We want one that
42:55
implies like a finger pointing at some sort
42:57
of societal other that we can do something about.
43:00
Right. That we can have this like
43:01
punitive response to. Whereas
43:03
if it's like, it's their parents or like the soccer coach
43:05
or something like as it's a bit more complicated
43:07
in those cases. And it's like so much of this is people
43:09
trying to look away from these like more everyday
43:12
tragedies that are happening. Yeah. And then, well, and
43:14
also crucially, it's creating this
43:17
problem as the kind of crime that
43:19
is best solved by high profile busts.
43:21
Yeah. Which is what a lot of this movie is about.
43:23
The thing that I was also surprised about by this
43:26
movie, aside from like how watchable it
43:28
is, which I think makes it more dangerous
43:30
is propaganda. I know I'm sorry. I
43:33
was really expecting it to be more like the
43:35
Gerard Butler film plane,
43:38
which I didn't see, but meant to when it came out, where
43:40
it's like guys in the jungle hacking
43:42
through
43:42
vegetation, doing, you know, commando
43:45
stuff. But most of it is a lot
43:47
more like Argo. Oh, yeah.
43:50
Oh, really? Like aside from the really
43:52
heavy, like traumatized child scenes,
43:56
which I think are so effective because they
43:58
show like again.
43:59
Like I think really quite good child
44:02
actors, like acting
44:04
to
44:05
show like someone truly devastated
44:07
by something that then you are left to imagine
44:10
in a way that is pretty haunting. Then
44:13
like the kind of middle part of the movie is
44:15
like, we're setting up a sting operation and
44:17
making a fake resort for pedophiles,
44:20
which we will then get the supplier
44:23
who targeted the little girl at the start of the movie
44:25
to bring like 60 children
44:28
to and will arrest the traffickers
44:30
and save the children. And so that's like the middle part
44:32
of the movie. So it's kind
44:34
of, and there's
44:35
like, there's good mic drops. It's
44:37
got a weirdly good soundtrack aside from
44:39
the overbearing sad strings. So
44:41
they do this bust and then they rescue the little
44:43
girl finally from the like cocaine
44:46
layer. And something that connects to
44:48
stuff that you talk about around this topic
44:50
is that like
44:51
Jim Caviezel infiltrates the jungle as
44:53
a fake doctor. He saves the little girl,
44:56
but he also sees like probably 50 people
44:59
who are working on this coca farm and
45:02
who logically have also been
45:05
trafficked there. And he's just like,
45:07
whatever, I got the little
45:10
girl. Yeah, I feel like these, the ideology
45:12
behind the sort of movements that are pushing
45:15
this is very like laissez-faire. Like they're
45:17
against government intervention unless government
45:19
can send in like law enforcement or like war
45:21
stuff. Like if the government is not doing violence,
45:24
they're against it. As long as the government can do violence,
45:26
they're like, yeah, I'm okay with a little bit of government action. And
45:29
the movie also makes, you'll be thrilled
45:31
to hear statistical claims, both
45:34
in the form of monologues throughout,
45:36
including also a monologue by Bill Camp
45:38
that includes the line, when
45:40
God tells you what to do, you cannot
45:43
hesitate,
45:44
which I think is terrible advice.
45:47
I think when God tells you what to do, you should really
45:49
sleep on it. Yeah, what do you mean? Let's define
45:52
our terms, Bill. Let's think that's true. So
45:55
in the midst of this movie that also
45:57
is making the case that a rogue homelands,
45:59
security officer
46:01
whose department is too conservative
46:04
for his
46:05
needs, conservative in terms of not letting
46:07
him bust people. Why won't anyone care about the
46:09
children? That's always like the premise of these things that like, you're
46:12
like hundreds of children, like innocent children
46:15
are being like kidnapped and murdered. And the whole
46:17
bureaucratic apparatus is like, eh,
46:19
I don't see it. Yeah. He has
46:22
to have a boss who's like, well,
46:24
look, it saved me an American child.
46:26
Yeah. It's just like so
46:29
fundamentally conspiratorial. Just like when
46:31
will someone finally care about the children? I
46:33
know. And I, you know, I hate to
46:35
protest too much at times like this, but
46:37
like, I do care about the children,
46:40
you guys. Yes. We also
46:42
care. SJWs like the
46:45
children. Yeah. Single Jewish women.
46:50
Um, so, so we got statistics as well,
46:52
which is so great. And so at one
46:54
point early in the movie, Jim Caviezel
46:56
remarks that 22 million new
46:59
child pornography images appeared in the
47:01
past year. This is something you specifically
47:02
debunked, I think in a different episode.
47:05
Yeah. Do you remember that? Yeah.
47:08
I mean, we talked about this in our sexting episode that there's
47:11
been a lot of claims about the proliferation of child
47:13
pornography online. My understanding
47:16
is that it all comes back to the definition because of course
47:18
any image of anyone under 18
47:21
is technically child pornography. And
47:23
so as we talked about on our sexting
47:25
episode, like there's a massive proliferation
47:28
basically of like teenagers like sexting
47:30
each other.
47:31
And so sometimes those photos end up in kind of
47:33
the wrong hands and they get, you know, posted on like revenge
47:35
porn websites and it's like awful shit. But
47:38
sometimes it's just like teenagers like sending
47:40
photos to their boyfriend and being like, here's
47:42
my boobs or whatever. And so it's
47:45
a difficult thing to talk about because it sounds like you're minimizing
47:47
child pornography, but it's like the category
47:50
of child
47:51
pornography includes like the really dark
47:53
shit that like sort of conjures
47:55
up in your mind when you hear about this. But
47:57
then also includes like consensual.
48:00
photos of like a 17 year old like texting her
48:02
boyfriend. And so there needs
48:04
to be like some sort of delineation between
48:06
those two things. And like, people do go
48:08
to jail on like child pornography charges for
48:10
like consensually receiving
48:13
photos from like someone they're dating like, you know,
48:15
the guy's 19 and the girl 17. And
48:18
he goes to jail like that. This is an actual thing that
48:20
like, I don't think is like what people have in mind
48:22
when they say like, crack down on child
48:24
pornography. I don't think that's like, like an outcome that
48:27
anybody wants. It would be great if there is
48:29
a Jim Caviezel movie where he like appears
48:31
in your window when you're about to take a topless
48:33
selfie and is like, don't do it, Jessica.
48:35
Hang on. Yeah, Kyle's gonna break up
48:37
with you before winter formal.
48:40
So it's very difficult
48:42
to talk about this stuff on the internet, because it sounds
48:44
like you're saying that like these kinds of horrible
48:47
images don't matter. And like they
48:48
obviously do, but it's just a very broad
48:51
category. And what we see with human trafficking
48:54
is this constant conflation of like
48:56
the kidnapping children, shipping containers, like the
48:59
really the most awful shit that you can like imagine happening
49:01
in a society with things like,
49:03
you know, people from India moved to Dubai
49:06
and they get jobs in like really exploitative working
49:08
conditions. And then we group all of that
49:10
together. And we're like, okay, 40 million people
49:12
get human trafficked every year. But it's like,
49:14
these are really
49:15
different phenomena and require really different
49:17
policies to fix. But it's
49:19
like we now have this giant number that encompasses
49:22
like crimes that are like totally
49:25
different severity, even though they're all pretty bad. Right.
49:27
And I mean, to talk about the child pornography
49:29
statistic, like I think this is part of
49:31
why it's important to talk about
49:34
media like this, because it then puts everybody
49:36
else into the bind of being like, well, I don't want to
49:38
come off as callous to child abuse,
49:40
but like I need to point out that
49:42
this is not a correct statistic. And like one of
49:44
the other ways that it gets inflated is
49:46
that I believe like there are
49:49
a lot of inflated statistics
49:51
on these images specifically floating around
49:53
that don't take into account the fact that a lot of
49:55
these images are duplicates of each other. Right.
49:58
I mean, the number is almost in a sense,
49:59
are
50:01
unnecessary to the point because the fact
50:04
that these images are circulating at
50:06
all,
50:07
you know, kind of genuine instances of
50:10
child pornography, the way that we
50:12
have been taught to think about it, like, that's
50:14
an emergency in its own right. And then you don't
50:16
need
50:17
to kind of add on to that with anything
50:20
that inflates the problem. And I feel like inflating
50:23
the problem really is more useful for getting
50:25
attention, getting money for your foundations
50:28
and passing laws for harsher sentences
50:30
that you might be otherwise incentivized
50:33
to pass partly because it allows you to keep an
50:35
elected position. Right. I do hate
50:37
the
50:37
fact that every time we talk about this, it puts
50:39
us in a position where we have to actually say, like,
50:41
I do think it's bad when children are abused.
50:44
I know. Part of me feels like I know that
50:47
I have to actually say that every time. We
50:49
have to be like, I'm not like you think
50:51
liberals are, where the standard
50:54
liberal, of course,
50:55
loves abusing children and belongs to
50:57
a child abuse hobby league that meets on
51:00
the weekends. Right. Like, yeah,
51:03
I just think it's like what I really object
51:04
to about this whole thing is that the sort of the right
51:06
wing framing of this is always
51:08
like, oh, well, you don't care about kids or whatever. But it's like to
51:11
solve a problem, you have to understand
51:13
the problem. And there's like a deliberate effort
51:16
to not understand the inconvenient
51:19
aspects of child abuse. Right.
51:21
Which is that a lot of it is driven by poverty. A lot of it
51:23
is not like the
51:25
dark evil hiding in a corner. A lot of it is like
51:27
this really everyday stuff. And
51:29
like it just isn't serious to
51:31
try to solve a problem while refusing to look at
51:33
it. Right. But what that does allow you to
51:35
do is to have a movie made about you where
51:38
you are heroically played by the guy who played
51:40
Jesus in the movie directed by the guy who
51:42
played Mad Max.
51:45
And so at the end of this movie, Jim Caviezel,
51:48
they have the closing credits and then they're
51:50
like special message in two minutes and 30
51:53
seconds. And I was like, oh, fuck, I got
51:55
to see this special message. Oh, they actually
51:57
tell you that an ending or like a post credit
51:59
sequence is.
51:59
It's a mid-credit secret.
52:02
Like, stay tuned. No, it's Kim Kavisl
52:04
showing up. He says that more
52:07
people are enslaved now than when slavery
52:09
was legal. Oh, we talked about that one,
52:11
didn't we? I think
52:12
so. I definitely researched that one. It's basically
52:15
if you define modern
52:16
slavery in, like, the
52:18
most broad
52:20
category possible. It's like anyone
52:23
who took a job and the job conditions after
52:25
they start are different than the conditions they agreed
52:27
to. Mm-hmm. Which is, like, most
52:30
of the workforce. Probably many people who
52:32
worked on that film. Yeah, I mean, yes, exactly.
52:35
Like, as the strikes show. And then also the population
52:37
is, like,
52:38
way larger
52:39
now than it was in the late 1800s. So
52:42
there's also that. Yeah. that,
52:45
again, has been debunked, like, 4,000 times. But,
52:47
like, it doesn't matter. It's just going to keep showing up
52:49
on these things. Right. Well, and then that
52:51
made me think about statistics. And I was like, okay,
52:54
what numbers are we talking about? And so in 1860, there
52:57
are about 31 million
52:58
enslaved
53:01
people in America. Mm-hmm. And
53:04
so to compare to that, there have been 6.9 million worldwide
53:06
deaths from COVID in the past few years. And
53:09
I would point out that, like,
53:12
I feel like most of us know someone
53:14
or knows someone who knows someone who
53:17
has died of COVID in America, where
53:19
the number is smaller than that total. Mm-hmm. Right?
53:23
Like, you can think of
53:23
people. Yeah. And I haven't met anyone
53:26
who's disappeared into modern-day slavery, to be honest. Right.
53:30
Not of this nature. Yeah. That's
53:32
always the thing with these is, like, they're so implausible
53:34
on their face. It's like the minute you stop and think,
53:36
which is most of what our show has been. It's
53:39
just like, hey, wait a minute. The stop and think show. The stop,
53:41
stop, drop, and think, which we could have called
53:43
it.
53:44
Let's think about what this would actually require. And,
53:46
like, yeah, it's all, you know, just like
53:48
the definition of trafficking itself. It's
53:50
just sort of fun with definitions. And, again, you
53:53
don't want to downplay, like,
53:54
really exploitative work conditions, especially
53:56
for migrants right around the world. A lot of people are not protected
53:58
by
53:59
domestic labor laws wherever
54:02
they go. But like that's much more an issue
54:04
of just like poverty and exploitation. This
54:07
isn't something you can like repel down from
54:09
the ceiling and like rescue people from in
54:11
the way that this movie kind of wants you to believe.
54:14
It sort of downplays like the actual
54:16
slavery. And then it also plays
54:19
what is going on now and the kinds of solutions
54:21
that we need. Right. And it's also like
54:23
at this time when there's obviously the
54:25
extreme conservative fear
54:27
of encroachment by the
54:30
dream of the theory of the concept
54:33
of black history or social
54:35
justice as a concept
54:38
taught in schools. And it's like, wait, don't
54:40
learn about
54:41
the actual slavery that happened in America
54:44
when read about these imaginary
54:46
children that
54:47
Jim Caviezel is rescuing. They're more
54:49
important. Focus on that. Right. And
54:52
there's also like some when I was
54:54
had not yet resigned myself to seeing Sound of Freedom
54:57
in a movie theater and I was
54:58
trying to see if someone who just put it on
55:00
YouTube, I had a reaction video
55:02
by a crying Russian woman
55:04
that I feel like could be totally authentic or
55:07
like an Astroturf
55:08
plant. Who the heck knows? But it was like this
55:11
woman sobbing, being like,
55:13
well, you are trying to figure out
55:15
what gender you are. This is
55:17
happening. And it's like, I really don't
55:19
think that people are losing so much time
55:22
thinking about their genders that they're failing
55:24
to stop child abuse.
55:26
Also, actual like gay and trans
55:29
people are the best argument against that, because like, I
55:31
don't know one gay or trans person who like doesn't
55:33
give a shit about like broader social issues.
55:36
It's not like, excuse me, I'm trans.
55:38
I can't think about the minimum wage right now. It's
55:41
not like you do one or the other. I
55:44
don't know how many like people you know in like Portland
55:46
and Seattle, but like that's not really the vibe.
55:48
As a Portlander, my friends are
55:50
always saying to me, gosh, Sarah, who's
55:53
the president? I thought I would find out today,
55:55
but then I
55:56
spent too much time thinking
55:58
about my gender. did gender
56:00
all day. Sorry. Oh, damn. Forgot
56:02
to open the nation.com. Oh, man,
56:05
I went on a real gender bender last
56:07
night.
56:08
So yeah, he
56:11
makes this direct appeal to the audience. And
56:13
he's like, hi, you know, this
56:15
movie was made five years ago, but it had
56:18
every possible roadblock
56:20
to come out. And this
56:22
movie is gonna be the Uncle Tom's
56:25
cabin of the 21st century. The
56:28
baton has now been passed to you.
56:31
The
56:31
most powerful person in the world
56:34
is the storyteller. Oh, my God. And
56:36
he's like, this movie needs to stop child
56:38
slavery, but quote, it
56:41
will only have that effect if millions
56:44
of people see it. So like this
56:46
movie ends with a direct appeal, which
56:48
again, I don't even think is the director's
56:51
fault. Right.
56:52
From Jim Caviezel, after
56:54
the studio that it ultimately
56:57
went to was distributing it telling
57:00
you effectively,
57:02
that if you do not support this movie
57:04
and promote it or use the QR
57:06
code on the screen to
57:08
buy a ticket for a stranger
57:11
who can't afford to see it, that
57:13
if you don't help this movie,
57:15
you will be failing to stop
57:18
child sex slavery. Oh, okay.
57:21
That's a lot to put on me. It is a lot to put on
57:23
you. I can turn off motion blurring on
57:25
my parents TV, but the other stuff is gonna be harder. It's
57:29
a lot to put on your cute shoulders. Yeah.
57:31
And so, so that's the movie. And
57:34
then I researched the
57:36
story behind it, much of which I have told
57:38
you, which is that
57:39
after making the movie, both Tim
57:41
Ballard and Jim Caviezel, Tim
57:44
and Jim, Jim, Tim, Tim, Jim, the
57:47
hero of the hour and the guy who plays him
57:50
both became big QAnon endorsers.
57:52
Tim Ballard appears to have been ousted from
57:54
his own organization,
57:56
which has, you know, been criticized
57:59
occasionally.
57:59
because nobody wants
58:01
to criticize the child saving nonprofit
58:04
for seeming to set up
58:06
bus, which they
58:08
video and put online in
58:11
order to imply that
58:13
they're
58:14
kind of going in like a commando
58:16
team and saving large
58:18
rings of victimized girls in
58:21
a way that is misleading at best
58:23
and possibly just fake. Yeah.
58:25
And using misleading statistics and information
58:28
in order to fundraise and also that
58:30
he advised the Trump administration
58:33
on human trafficking. So that's good.
58:35
Also, it's never quite clear
58:36
what they do with people after
58:38
they, quote unquote, rescue them. They
58:40
check them into a river and hope that they
58:43
swim out to sea. Right. Because it's like
58:45
if the if the fundamental driver of this is like basically
58:47
poverty and, you
58:48
know, trauma and abuse and all these other like kind
58:51
of boring structural components,
58:52
like you rescue somebody, but then then what?
58:55
Like they still don't have a house. They still have an income.
58:57
They still they're still dealing with whatever stuff they're
59:00
dealing with, plus the additional trauma of whatever you rescue
59:02
them from. Right. This whole rescuing
59:04
methodology. It's not serious as
59:06
like a way to address this problem.
59:09
It's like a great way to get funding and stuff. And you
59:11
can brag about like the number of kids that you rescue.
59:13
A lot of them, it's like, oh, great. You're just sending them back
59:15
to the home that they were running away from. Right.
59:18
It's like, what are we really doing here? It's sort of like the
59:20
nobody wants to answer the question like and then what?
59:23
No, right. Because the movie is over.
59:25
And the creepy child choir has finished
59:27
singing and you get to go throw out the rest
59:29
of your popcorn. Yeah. And I and
59:32
this is
59:34
I guess ultimately just a
59:36
very sadly predictable outing. I don't think
59:38
there's really anything about this movie that you couldn't
59:40
have guessed
59:41
was going to be in it aside from
59:43
it being like pretty attractive.
59:46
So in the whole mixed experience, five out of 10. Rotten
59:50
Tomatoes. Well, and then the
59:52
Coda. And this is maybe something, Mike,
59:54
that people have been texting you about. They've certainly
59:56
been texting me about it is that
59:58
the headline, which actually,
59:59
I think has been pretty misleading is that
1:00:02
like one of the donors behind this movie
1:00:04
or one of the people who helped fund the movie has been
1:00:06
arrested for child trafficking. And
1:00:09
what in fact happened was that there was a very large
1:00:11
crowdfunding campaign for
1:00:12
this movie. Like I think they crowdfunded
1:00:14
about $5 million. And one
1:00:17
of the many hundreds of people
1:00:19
who donated was a guy named, I
1:00:21
believe, Fabian Marta, who if you read
1:00:24
the charges against him, appears to have
1:00:26
aided a woman he knew
1:00:29
in refusing to return
1:00:31
the children of whom she was the noncustodial
1:00:34
parent. Oh, there you
1:00:36
go. So it's like the kind
1:00:38
of kidnapping, you know,
1:00:40
missing children
1:00:42
case that actually happens, that inflates
1:00:44
the numbers and helps us make it look like stranger
1:00:46
danger if we want to. And the people, I think
1:00:49
Angel Studios
1:00:51
did kind of an amazing job responding
1:00:53
to this news because they were like, yes, it just
1:00:56
shows how widespread child trafficking
1:00:58
really is. Even one of our own
1:01:01
donors. Actually, we're correct.
1:01:03
It's everywhere, including here. Yeah,
1:01:06
that's one that I have deliberately avoided
1:01:08
looking into because I was like, this is too good of a story.
1:01:10
And like, I'm sure the details are
1:01:12
going to ruin it for me. So I'm not going to look
1:01:14
into it. So thank you for fully
1:01:17
ruining it for me. You're welcome. Yeah.
1:01:19
And kind of the interesting thing about this movie,
1:01:21
I think, or one of the ironies is that it seems
1:01:23
to be made by someone working in good faith,
1:01:26
not trying to promote conspiracy theories,
1:01:28
but by not looking hard enough
1:01:31
at the materials he was trying to depict
1:01:33
arguably or, you know, in some
1:01:36
way missing the point, providing
1:01:38
really fertile ground for conspiracy
1:01:41
theories that he himself does not agree with.
1:01:43
Yeah. And then the fact that
1:01:45
it makes a better headline for someone who made
1:01:48
this movie to be a child trafficker,
1:01:50
something actually not relating to child
1:01:52
trafficker as we know it being depicted
1:01:55
in an attempt to discredit this movie, but
1:01:57
still by using the same. misleading
1:02:00
tactics that this movie is using. Right.
1:02:02
It would be great if they did a press conference, but like, oh, we're actually
1:02:04
really disappointed at how you're taking this complex issue
1:02:06
and boiling it down to a one dimensional phenomenon.
1:02:09
I know. Really, Tim? Really? Oh,
1:02:11
OK. Mr. Nuance over here. Jim
1:02:13
Caviezel yells at you about nuance. It's
1:02:17
a bit much like they they get into
1:02:20
the math of like, how much can
1:02:22
you charge per day? And
1:02:24
how many times can you abuse a
1:02:27
child per day each time for profit?
1:02:30
And over how many years? And that's
1:02:32
why it's so profitable. And you're like, it's
1:02:34
not more profitable than drugs. It's
1:02:37
not more profitable than cosmetics. Not
1:02:39
by a long shot. That yeah,
1:02:41
that just doesn't I
1:02:43
mean, the nice thing about this is that
1:02:45
there is, in fact, not a huge market
1:02:47
for like sex with exploited
1:02:49
children. That is one of the things that is good. But
1:02:52
we would we choose to believe in a world
1:02:54
where there is a huge market for that. And that's
1:02:56
really it's I don't know.
1:02:59
It's worrying that like we embrace fables
1:03:01
that tell us that people who would
1:03:03
do that are everywhere when really,
1:03:05
you know, from what you talk about elsewhere,
1:03:08
like it is
1:03:09
hopefully a relief to know that it's really
1:03:12
a much smaller number than are depicted
1:03:14
in stories like these, a smaller number than it would
1:03:16
take to drive the fastest
1:03:18
growing criminal network in the world
1:03:21
are going to do this. Right. Also,
1:03:23
a friend of mine used to be a reporter in a small town
1:03:25
outside of Seattle. And there was a church that said they were the fastest
1:03:28
growing church in the entire state.
1:03:30
And they went from eight people to 12 people in
1:03:32
one year.
1:03:32
50 percent growth.
1:03:35
Those are just kind of like inherently suspect
1:03:38
to me. We are talking about problems that
1:03:40
exist, not because it is so profitable
1:03:43
to abuse children, like profitable on the scale
1:03:45
of a world economy, but just
1:03:47
because there are not sufficient resources
1:03:50
for children and because it isn't like sexy
1:03:52
and commando-y
1:03:54
and exciting to see a movie
1:03:56
about somebody working
1:03:58
on infrastructure and working.
1:03:59
on creating resources for queer
1:04:02
teenagers,
1:04:02
for example, who are one of the prime
1:04:04
victims of this and who, the
1:04:06
prime victims of trafficking as
1:04:09
it actually exists
1:04:10
and who we would prefer
1:04:13
to imply a world or to believe
1:04:16
in a world where it's all heroes
1:04:19
and children in shipping containers.
1:04:22
Jump a motorcycle over that, Tom Cruise.
1:04:27
I would watch it. Tom
1:04:30
Cruise has to jump a motorcycle over a mountain
1:04:32
of paperwork.
1:04:34
And that's how we dramatize him doing the
1:04:36
paperwork. Laptops full of Excel spreadsheets.
1:04:39
Yes. That can be your
1:04:41
biopic. Tom Cruise can play. The
1:04:45
Hobbes ultimatum. As a
1:04:47
person of the same height as
1:04:48
Tom Cruise, I think he is the perfect person to play
1:04:50
me. The resemblance is really striking.
1:04:52
Untrue, but thank you. Not
1:04:56
remotely true. So that's what that's the experience
1:04:59
of watching The Sound of Freedom. I had
1:05:01
a really it was very unpleasant.
1:05:03
I had a bad time. Seems like it
1:05:05
made me sad. It made me cry. I
1:05:08
knew that I was being shown the
1:05:10
worst kind of propaganda and
1:05:12
stories that cause people
1:05:14
to dig deeper into dangerous
1:05:16
and violent and conspiratorial
1:05:19
belief systems. And I was,
1:05:22
you know, also still could not help
1:05:25
being swept away by the tidal wave of
1:05:27
emotion in the movie, which is the worst way to feel
1:05:29
emotional during a movie where you feel
1:05:30
like emotions have been like burgled
1:05:33
out of your potty. Yeah. And
1:05:35
now we're going to hear our
1:05:37
original human trafficking episode. We made
1:05:40
this a couple of years ago. It was
1:05:42
sorely needed then. It's sorely needed now.
1:05:46
Unfortunately, nothing changes. People keep
1:05:48
telling the same lies. Pretending
1:05:51
to fight human trafficking actually
1:05:53
does
1:05:53
seem to be a pretty fast growing
1:05:56
ring of occasional. Yeah. Yeah.
1:05:59
Yeah. I
1:06:01
guess. It's
1:06:09
so easy to traffic people on the East Coast.
1:06:11
I mean, like, I have to go to New Jersey for
1:06:13
a Michael Bolton concert. Come
1:06:24
to You're Wrong About, the podcast where
1:06:27
we teach you how to
1:06:29
succinctly counter your relative's
1:06:32
Thanksgiving Day arguments. Ooh,
1:06:34
that's good. Thank you. The
1:06:36
succinctly is a little
1:06:37
ambitious, considering how long our
1:06:39
episodes have gotten. Yeah. Well, okay,
1:06:41
here's how I think this works. You have probably done, like, 100 hours
1:06:44
of research for this. We're
1:06:46
gonna talk for three to five hours for
1:06:49
an episode that's gonna be an hour
1:06:51
long.
1:06:52
And the people who hear this episode can boil
1:06:54
that one hour down to, you know, five
1:06:56
minutes of impassioned whisper
1:06:58
shouting over stuffing. Yeah, I like
1:07:00
that we've turned our listeners just as insufferable
1:07:03
as we are. Yeah, I think they were already insufferable.
1:07:05
They just, like, were wanting tools to become
1:07:07
even more insufferable, and that's what we're offering
1:07:10
them.
1:07:11
And today we're talking about human trafficking.
1:07:13
Yeah. So can you tell me, what
1:07:16
is your understanding of the term
1:07:19
human trafficking? So I want to try and connect
1:07:21
this to a recent news item. And
1:07:23
this is gonna be something that I vaguely remember, and
1:07:25
you can help me fill in the holes. But
1:07:28
basically, there was some female
1:07:31
conservative politician. Oh,
1:07:33
yeah. Who was it? If you're
1:07:35
going where I think you're going, it was Cindy McCain. It
1:07:37
was Cindy McCain. Okay, so it wasn't a politician,
1:07:39
but she's obviously part of a political family.
1:07:42
She was on a morning talk show, and she
1:07:45
told a story about seeing in an
1:07:47
airport or something like that, what she deemed to
1:07:49
be a suspicious situation with
1:07:51
an adult and a child who she presumed to be
1:07:53
in the act of being trafficked. Yes,
1:07:56
the evidence of trafficking was that
1:07:58
the child was a different ethnicity.
1:07:59
ethnicity than the mother. Okay. We
1:08:02
do not know if it was like a mother of color and a white
1:08:04
kid or a white mother and a
1:08:07
kid of color. Yeah, or like
1:08:09
a two non-white people of
1:08:11
different
1:08:12
backgrounds. But yes,
1:08:14
my guess is that that's not what she
1:08:17
noticed. Right. So my concept
1:08:19
of human trafficking is that, you
1:08:22
know, the posters that you see in airports and stuff,
1:08:24
which is that a white child is
1:08:27
somehow being exploited and
1:08:29
sold
1:08:30
probably for
1:08:31
sex or some other nefarious purposes.
1:08:35
That's my understanding of the Cindy McCain
1:08:37
version. Yes. Okay. This
1:08:40
is going to be a fun episode because this is like a medley
1:08:42
of all of our previous moral panic episodes. Like
1:08:45
there's some satanic stuff, there's
1:08:47
some repressed memories, there's
1:08:49
some bad statistics.
1:08:52
This is like when the carpenters would play a
1:08:54
medley. Take it away,
1:08:57
Richard. Yeah.
1:08:59
Where do you want to start us? Like what point
1:09:02
in time is the best place to begin?
1:09:04
So I think the place to start is that the version
1:09:07
of trafficking
1:09:07
that Cindy McCain is describing,
1:09:10
and that I think a lot of people have in their heads of,
1:09:12
you know, children being kidnapped, forcibly
1:09:15
taken from one country to the other. And
1:09:18
kidnapped in broad daylight, like, sipped
1:09:20
away in a public area. It's
1:09:22
not clear there has ever been a confirmed
1:09:24
case of that. So I have spent
1:09:26
the last two weeks calling human
1:09:28
trafficking organizations, speaking to sex
1:09:31
workers and advocates and people on
1:09:33
the Christian right. I've looked
1:09:35
quite hard and I have not found
1:09:38
a case of a child being taken against
1:09:40
their will
1:09:40
by a stranger on an
1:09:43
airplane. And we'll get into the reasons why. But
1:09:45
I think it's important to note that
1:09:47
like, when it comes to
1:09:50
children,
1:09:50
we are in the middle of a
1:09:52
stranger danger panic. Hooray.
1:09:54
Yeah. Like, Jesus, we just did
1:09:57
this. Like why do we have to go through
1:09:59
this?
1:09:59
through the same panic that we just had.
1:10:02
So to go through a couple of the statistics,
1:10:05
one of the things that's really interesting
1:10:07
is we have these giant estimates
1:10:10
of the prevalence of child sex
1:10:12
trafficking. So I saw one yesterday that said
1:10:14
there's 79,000 children in
1:10:17
Texas alone who are being
1:10:19
trafficked for sex. Another
1:10:21
phrase you hear is sold into slavery,
1:10:24
which again,
1:10:24
you can never say like, there's no
1:10:27
case of this ever happening because it's a big
1:10:29
country and literally everything has happened. And
1:10:31
that word means a lot of things. I
1:10:33
mean, one of the numbers that goes around is this is from
1:10:35
the US Institute Against Human Trafficking. There
1:10:38
are hundreds of thousands and potentially
1:10:40
over a million victims trapped in
1:10:42
the world of sex trafficking in the United
1:10:44
States. Because of the
1:10:47
hidden nature of the crime, it is essentially impossible
1:10:49
to know how many for sure. So
1:10:52
like, we don't
1:10:53
know, but it's more than
1:10:55
a million. We
1:10:57
have no way of knowing, but it's your worst
1:11:00
fear. Yes, exactly. And so
1:11:02
another
1:11:02
number that goes around is that one
1:11:04
in seven runaways are likely
1:11:07
victims of trafficking. That comes from the National Center for
1:11:09
Missing and Exploited Children,
1:11:10
who you may remember from
1:11:12
our Stranger Danger episode for propagating
1:11:14
all kinds of terrible statistics on
1:11:17
children's disappearances. And
1:11:19
so that claim, one in
1:11:21
seven runaways was fact-checked by
1:11:23
a Washington Post column in 2015 that
1:11:27
basically found no evidence for the claim. In
1:11:29
response to this fact check, the organization
1:11:32
added the word likely. So
1:11:34
they used to say one in seven runaways
1:11:36
are victims of trafficking, and now they say one in
1:11:38
seven are likely
1:11:39
victims of trafficking. It's
1:11:42
either a statistic or it's not. That's
1:11:44
like saying this milk is likely 2% fat. Yeah,
1:11:48
and then if they're saying the statistic,
1:11:51
then is that based on any numbers
1:11:53
of any kind, or is it just a gut
1:11:56
thing for someone? So I called up
1:11:58
the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
1:11:59
children. I talked to one of their researchers for more
1:12:02
than an hour. And the
1:12:04
methodology behind this statistic is essentially
1:12:07
when people call the hotline, their
1:12:09
missing children hotline, if there is any
1:12:12
whiff of trafficking, they
1:12:14
market as a victim of trafficking. What
1:12:17
is a whiff of trafficking when it's at home? What's
1:12:19
really interesting is they told me 83%
1:12:23
of their calls are from foster
1:12:25
care facilities or other state
1:12:27
institutions. These are super
1:12:29
at risk kids who have
1:12:31
run away for some period of time. If
1:12:34
the person who calls them says, James
1:12:36
has run away, we think he might be
1:12:39
being trafficked. That's enough. It seems
1:12:41
like this is a system designed to create
1:12:43
false positives, which is weird.
1:12:46
Yes, 100%. And there's
1:12:47
no verification whatsoever. So
1:12:50
if I call, I'm a parent, I say, my kid
1:12:52
has gone missing. I think he might be a victim of trafficking.
1:12:54
He comes back two hours later.
1:12:56
There's nothing to take that off
1:12:58
of the statistics. So we now have
1:13:00
a person who's not a runaway and
1:13:03
not a victim of sex trafficking
1:13:04
being marked as a sex
1:13:06
trafficking victim. They also admitted to me that
1:13:09
the same kids can be counted
1:13:12
infinite number of times a year. So
1:13:14
if I have a really bad relationship with my parents
1:13:16
and they're really abusive, and I'm running
1:13:18
away from them five or six times a year, and every
1:13:20
single time they call and say,
1:13:22
Mike has run away, we think he's being trafficked,
1:13:24
that counts as six trafficking cases, none
1:13:27
of which are confirmed. God, like flood data
1:13:29
is just like, it's so frustrating
1:13:31
to realize that the solution to our
1:13:35
big social problems is just like, well,
1:13:37
we need more ones. And we need more people
1:13:39
who are just fixated on the details
1:13:41
and want to do the grinding,
1:13:44
meticulous work of getting
1:13:46
things right. Like we just cannot
1:13:49
skip that ever.
1:13:49
The answer is always more spreadsheets. I
1:13:53
also think it's important to note that these are not
1:13:55
all reports of runaways in the country.
1:13:57
These are reports of runaways that are reported. to
1:14:00
the National Center for Missing and Exploited
1:14:03
Children. Right, so it's a self-selecting
1:14:05
group. Yeah, there's all kinds of reports of missing
1:14:07
children that get filed to various law enforcement agencies,
1:14:10
maybe different NGOs. There's
1:14:12
all kinds of places you can report a missing child.
1:14:14
So this one in seven statistic only comes
1:14:17
from people who call them. So
1:14:19
it's like if you have the foreign objects
1:14:22
in Muffin's Bureau and people
1:14:24
are calling and they're like, I found a foreign object
1:14:26
in my muffin, or like maybe I did, it could be.
1:14:28
And then American consumers are like,
1:14:30
did you know that like half of
1:14:32
muffins have foreign objects in them? And
1:14:34
it's like, well, that's just the foreign object Muffin
1:14:37
Bureau
1:14:37
statistic. That's a little bit specific.
1:14:39
That's a better explainer than any of the academic
1:14:41
articles I've read on this all week. I
1:14:44
just want to say. I'm just hungry. Yeah.
1:14:48
One of the things that's really interesting about this is
1:14:51
the huge mismatch between
1:14:54
the numbers put out by NGOs
1:14:56
and the actual numbers of
1:14:59
arrests, reports. One of the
1:15:01
numbers I found is that in 2017, the whole year, the
1:15:04
Department of Homeland Security found 500
1:15:06
victims of trafficking nationwide, and that's adults
1:15:09
and children. So we've got numbers of
1:15:11
it. It could be more than 1 million. It's 79,000
1:15:13
children in Texas alone. And
1:15:18
then we've got 500 actual
1:15:20
confirmed victims. So
1:15:22
at that point, it's like if there's such a disparity
1:15:25
between the number of
1:15:26
people being identified by the authorities
1:15:29
and the estimates,
1:15:30
then how are you even getting
1:15:32
the numbers? It
1:15:34
doesn't connect to me based
1:15:37
on anything I know about any other
1:15:39
situation of this kind that you would be able
1:15:42
to have knowledge of these many cases
1:15:44
but not take action on
1:15:46
any of them, especially in a country
1:15:49
where we do not have underzealous law enforcement,
1:15:51
especially where border issues are
1:15:53
concerned. I mean, one of
1:15:55
the things that is central
1:15:56
to, I think all urban legends of this
1:15:58
type, like won't someone say that? save the children is
1:16:01
this idea that we're insufficiently concerned
1:16:04
about it, right? It's like, well, nobody's talking
1:16:06
about the child sex traffic. And you're like,
1:16:08
actually, a lot of people are talking about it. No
1:16:10
one cares about white children. Yeah,
1:16:12
exactly. It's
1:16:15
like, that is the one demographic that
1:16:17
we, I mean, we live in a terrible country
1:16:19
for child welfare across the board, but we
1:16:21
do talk about white children a lot. Yes.
1:16:24
We do do that. So I think to be fair, one
1:16:26
of the people I interviewed
1:16:27
this week was a prosecutor for King County
1:16:29
who prosecutes sex trafficking cases here.
1:16:32
His explanation for why there's this
1:16:34
huge mismatch between arrest numbers
1:16:37
and estimates of the prevalence generally was
1:16:39
that he says these cases are really difficult to
1:16:41
try because
1:16:42
a lot of these people come from very
1:16:45
vulnerable families. A lot of them have drug
1:16:47
issues. A lot of them have mental health issues. They
1:16:49
have criminal histories that the defense team is going to question
1:16:51
them about.
1:16:52
So it makes sense to me that
1:16:54
those numbers would be artificially low. Right.
1:16:57
So they would have lower numbers for this
1:16:59
than for other types of crimes that are prosecuted.
1:17:01
Yeah. Yeah. So
1:17:03
I think it's worth taking that seriously. Although I also, I want to say, you
1:17:05
know, this is a prosecutor, right? He is on
1:17:08
the other side of the tough on crime ideological
1:17:10
divide than we are. He's someone who
1:17:13
believes in trafficking. He believes it's really bad.
1:17:16
I was asking about the kinds of cases that he sees.
1:17:18
And first of all, he's never seen a
1:17:20
trafficking case with a prepubescent child.
1:17:23
He sees lots of abuse cases, but
1:17:25
the idea of children being sold,
1:17:27
you know, trapped in hotel rooms, he's
1:17:30
never seen it. Well, I can see there
1:17:32
being cases of that that aren't discovered
1:17:35
and that I think there's always all
1:17:37
things are possible. And as
1:17:39
you often say, it's a big country. But
1:17:41
you know, the issue here is not that these
1:17:43
things
1:17:43
aren't happening, but that if you
1:17:45
are taking a story
1:17:48
of, you know, this case that
1:17:50
is horrific because it is about
1:17:52
a prepubescent child because it
1:17:54
is about the specific kind of trafficking
1:17:57
and then using that to whip up a
1:17:59
public. sentiment that allows you to
1:18:02
unnecessarily penalize sex
1:18:04
workers, then like, that's the issue.
1:18:07
Not that this thing doesn't happen, but that powerful
1:18:10
people are using the existence
1:18:12
of a certain type of crime to police
1:18:14
a fundamentally different type of crime. Another
1:18:17
thing he said
1:18:17
about this that I thought was really interesting is
1:18:20
that when he deals with underage sex
1:18:22
workers, the vast majority of the clients
1:18:24
don't know they're underage because they're
1:18:27
lying about, you know, you ask a year 18, right? And
1:18:29
she says, yeah, yeah, I'm 18, but she's actually 17. Also,
1:18:32
if you're soliciting sex, like, you're
1:18:34
not going to entice someone to do
1:18:37
an illegal thing with you by telling them
1:18:39
that it's also illegal in a more
1:18:41
dire way. Yeah. I
1:18:44
think, I mean, I think there is
1:18:46
like, you don't want to defend men who are buying
1:18:48
sex with underage people, but it's
1:18:50
also the morality of it to me feels very
1:18:52
different than going into a hotel room where somebody's
1:18:55
in some way chained or bound and having
1:18:57
sex with that person. It's a very different
1:18:59
order of scale.
1:19:00
And I think it just
1:19:02
is not going to help any of us to
1:19:04
see complicated issues as
1:19:07
less complicated than they are. Like, I don't
1:19:09
think that ever improves anything. One of the other
1:19:11
really interesting things this tough on crime prosecutor
1:19:13
said to me was that most of the
1:19:16
actual cases of
1:19:17
quote unquote trafficking that he sees are actually
1:19:19
an extension of domestic abuse. What
1:19:22
this usually is, is people that have
1:19:24
a lot of vulnerabilities, they're leaving the
1:19:26
home because it's abusive or they get, you
1:19:28
know, they start dating somebody at 17.
1:19:29
There's a period
1:19:32
of abuse and then escalation
1:19:35
of the abuse. I actually interviewed
1:19:37
somebody who was homeless
1:19:39
in Portland and she met
1:19:41
a guy who was older than her.
1:19:43
And she says he was the first
1:19:45
guy that was nice to me. She grew up in an abusive
1:19:47
home. This is the start of so many stories.
1:19:50
And so she considered the guy her boyfriend. And then
1:19:52
he said, Hey, you know, do you want to have a threesome sometime?
1:19:55
And maybe we can have a threesome, but
1:19:57
I'm not
1:19:57
part of the threesome.
1:19:59
And you. have sex with this other guy and then it's kind
1:20:01
of like, well, maybe you have sex with this guy, like I
1:20:03
don't really know him, but... But I
1:20:05
need you to do it and I'm
1:20:07
your boyfriend. Yes. So she's still actually
1:20:09
not sure if money was changing hands behind the scenes.
1:20:13
At the time she didn't, but she now considers herself a trafficking
1:20:15
victim because that's basically
1:20:17
what it became, but it was an outgrowth of
1:20:19
all of this other abuse and her extreme
1:20:22
vulnerability. So even
1:20:24
this tough on crime prosecutor guy said that most
1:20:26
of the people that he sees are
1:20:29
ethnic minorities, they have child abuse in the home, they
1:20:31
have very young drug addiction. One of the victims
1:20:33
he's working with now, she was addicted to
1:20:35
hard drugs by 13 because her mother was
1:20:37
a drug addict. He says, when
1:20:39
he sees
1:20:40
sort of suburban kids like the Liam
1:20:42
Neeson myth, it's almost always
1:20:44
because they're queer, that creates
1:20:47
a vulnerability for those kids that kind of pushes them out
1:20:49
of the home
1:20:49
and pushes them into networks where
1:20:52
they're meeting boyfriends or girlfriends that
1:20:54
are able to coerce them because of the lack of self-confidence
1:20:57
that they have, the lack of support
1:20:59
systems that they have. And society kind of hating
1:21:02
them already, which certainly creates a good
1:21:04
substrate for being abused in your personal
1:21:06
relationships. Totally. Yeah. Well,
1:21:09
this is what's so fascinating to me about the way that this moral panic has
1:21:11
perpetuated itself in that if we're
1:21:13
thinking of the sort of, quote unquote, real
1:21:16
cases of human trafficking where teenagers are
1:21:18
coerced or manipulated into
1:21:20
engaging
1:21:20
in commercial sex work by their partners,
1:21:24
that's a very specific form
1:21:26
of abuse.
1:21:27
So why would we
1:21:29
be focusing on this one outcome?
1:21:32
The outcome of being forced into sex work by
1:21:34
a partner? Well, because, yeah,
1:21:36
there's now this army of trainers
1:21:39
that are going into schools. What did
1:21:41
they tell them about? They just told
1:21:43
us to not smoke weed until
1:21:44
we were 25. I feel like I really got off easy.
1:21:49
This is from Shared Hope International. This is their
1:21:51
warning signs that a teenager is being
1:21:53
trafficked. And absences
1:21:55
from class, overly tired in class,
1:21:58
less appropriately dressed. than before.
1:22:01
What? Sexualized behavior.
1:22:03
Oh my god. Withdrawn to press,
1:22:06
distracted or checked out, brags
1:22:08
about making or having lots of money. New
1:22:11
tattoos, tattoos are often used
1:22:13
by pimps as a way to brand victims. Okay.
1:22:16
Tattoos of a name, symbol, money
1:22:18
or barcode could indicate trafficking.
1:22:20
That's so weird. That's
1:22:23
so specific. The barcode one is so
1:22:26
hilarious. Like the barcode one shows up everywhere.
1:22:28
Wouldn't you get that like iPhone scanner
1:22:30
thing at this point? Like no one's
1:22:33
carrying, anyway. I
1:22:35
do not doubt that people have done
1:22:37
this like somewhere.
1:22:40
But again, like this really plays into
1:22:42
the idea that we see a lot in conspiracy theories
1:22:44
that like everyone does it the same way and
1:22:46
there's some kind of national hierarchy
1:22:49
may be involved. And also the barcode
1:22:51
thing is really important because it's this idea
1:22:53
that like the numbers are so big that
1:22:56
you need barcodes to track all
1:22:58
the, like their tubes of toothpaste or something. So it's the
1:23:00
argument that these are functional barcodes
1:23:02
and that the pimps have little like self
1:23:04
checkout scanner guys that they're
1:23:06
using. Like. I also, I know
1:23:08
people at my middle and high school that got barcode tattoos,
1:23:11
but that's because they were anti-capitalist goths
1:23:14
and they got them as a kind of like fuck capitalism
1:23:16
type of tattoo. Yeah, so once again, we
1:23:19
have to suspect goths. Also,
1:23:21
aside from the barcode tattoo thing,
1:23:24
I think the warning signs of trafficking
1:23:26
all sound like being a teenager. Oh, totally.
1:23:29
Right? Like you're tired and you look more
1:23:31
promiscuous than you used to. I mean,
1:23:33
yeah. You know,
1:23:35
Florida just passed a law that every
1:23:37
school has to have an anti-trafficking
1:23:40
curriculum. Really?
1:23:41
Yes. I,
1:23:43
I really, this really bothers
1:23:45
me because I feel like we have
1:23:47
this narrative too that it's like,
1:23:49
that women and girls especially
1:23:52
aren't allowed to care about
1:23:53
staying safe unless the imagined
1:23:56
foe
1:23:57
is like a scary monster. We're not allowed
1:23:59
to talk about keeping.
1:23:59
keeping safe from normal
1:24:02
straight men, especially like
1:24:04
the ones that we marry. We're not allowed
1:24:07
to implicate them in
1:24:08
our fears for ourselves. But if it's about
1:24:10
a monster,
1:24:12
then we can talk about it and we can try and
1:24:14
keep people safe, but only from the monster.
1:24:16
Yeah. Yeah. Right.
1:24:20
And
1:24:20
it's also, it's so telling that these trainings aren't aimed
1:24:22
at boys. Yeah. And I
1:24:24
was going to ask you, have you ever seen like an, are
1:24:26
you being trafficked sign in a men's room? Ooh,
1:24:29
no, I don't think so. And like, aren't boy
1:24:31
children supposed to be being trafficked and
1:24:33
all this? Like, is it only girl children on top
1:24:35
of everything else that this is supposed to be happening
1:24:37
to? Well, this is the thing. It's like
1:24:39
a big sign of moral panic to me is when you hold all of these
1:24:41
contradictory ideas at once. So
1:24:44
oftentimes they'll say like, Ooh, it's, you know, it's usually
1:24:46
somebody close to you that's going to coerce
1:24:49
you into commercial sex work. But then the
1:24:51
next sentence they'll say, Oh,
1:24:53
you know, if there's men standing outside
1:24:55
your school trying to recruit you, don't speak to
1:24:58
them. That seems like common sense advice.
1:25:00
I mean, yeah, that's hard. Another
1:25:03
one of the source list statistics that goes
1:25:05
around
1:25:06
is that 70% of child sex trafficking
1:25:09
cases begin online. This really
1:25:11
is Santa's bag. There's something in here for
1:25:14
everyone. If you're afraid of the internet, if you're
1:25:16
afraid of the migrant
1:25:18
caravan, yeah, it's
1:25:19
great. It's
1:25:21
very diverse. One of the curricula that they're
1:25:23
going to be using in Florida apparently is called My
1:25:26
Life, My Choice. And it's
1:25:28
a 10 session exploitation prevention
1:25:30
curriculum designed to change girls'
1:25:33
perceptions of the commercial sex industry
1:25:36
as well as build self-esteem and personal empowerment.
1:25:38
How many perceptions of the commercial sex
1:25:40
industry do they have going into this training?
1:25:42
Well, this is the thing. It's like some
1:25:44
of the articles
1:25:45
about Florida's new curriculum mentioned
1:25:47
sort of paragraph 17 that
1:25:50
in 2017 there were only 65 human
1:25:53
trafficking incidents and there were zero
1:25:55
reports of minors being trafficked in Florida.
1:25:57
Oh, boy. And so it's like when we talk about what's. actually
1:26:00
endangering teens. Suicide
1:26:02
is now the number two killer of kids
1:26:04
under 18 after car accidents. When
1:26:07
you ask actual kids, and there's a lot of activism
1:26:09
going on around this, they need help with depression
1:26:11
and anxiety. No, no, depression is a sign
1:26:14
that they're being trafficked, actually.
1:26:16
I remember that from the list earlier. We
1:26:19
got the trafficking. Everything
1:26:21
will be fine. I think the counter
1:26:23
argument
1:26:23
to all of this is like, well, what's the harm
1:26:26
in focusing on sex trafficking? What is it really?
1:26:29
What's the problem with teaching kids?
1:26:31
And when it comes to sort
1:26:33
of the damage of this framing, I
1:26:35
think I mentioned on here that my boyfriend
1:26:38
manages a cafe in Seattle. And
1:26:40
one of the things they've been dealing with lately is there's this kid
1:26:42
that comes in who's like 17. And
1:26:45
he comes in sort of 3, 4 PM after school
1:26:47
would be getting out. And
1:26:49
he just sort of sits at the cafe. And
1:26:53
sometimes he's drunk. Sometimes he's drinking
1:26:55
something out of a thermos, and they're not entirely sure if it's alcohol
1:26:57
or not. They're not comfortable calling the cops.
1:26:59
So they've called the school
1:27:02
and sort of tried to get some information about this kid.
1:27:05
He's not homeless, but it seems there's some
1:27:07
reason why he doesn't want to go home. And
1:27:10
they don't really want to pry.
1:27:11
And when you think about
1:27:13
kids that are at risk, what
1:27:16
help is it to go up to that kid
1:27:18
and be like, are you being sex trafficked? Is
1:27:21
that kid at risk of sex trafficking? I
1:27:24
guess that's true if that's the way that you want to frame
1:27:26
it. But that kid's at risk of 100,000 things.
1:27:30
Putting him into this binary frame of it's
1:27:33
sex trafficking or else we don't care is not helpful.
1:27:37
Because if that kid says, I have a new partner
1:27:39
and he coerced me into sex,
1:27:41
well, that's not really trafficking, pal. Sorry.
1:27:44
Right. Or like my parents are abusing me. That's
1:27:46
not really trafficking. So I can't really help you.
1:27:48
Our organization
1:27:49
gives out gift bags to trafficking
1:27:52
survivors. And sorry, your parents
1:27:54
are hitting you and you don't want to go home. But it's
1:27:56
not trafficking. So it's not really our problem. Right?
1:27:59
It's this very narrow.
1:27:59
narrow understanding of
1:28:02
one of the risks. And really
1:28:04
what all of the other constellation
1:28:06
of things that that kid might be going through,
1:28:09
we need to have some way of
1:28:12
gathering information from kids of like,
1:28:14
how can I help? What do you need? And we need
1:28:16
to care about kids when they're not
1:28:19
the victim of the specific big bad that
1:28:21
we've decided to focus on
1:28:23
this decade. Totally. Totally. And
1:28:26
it's also, I mean, this transitions very well into the history of human trafficking
1:28:28
and how this is playing out for adults.
1:28:31
Act two. Yes. So
1:28:33
do you remember the case of Robert
1:28:35
Kraft? No. Do you know who
1:28:38
Robert Kraft is? Is he related to the
1:28:39
Kraft Mac and Cheese fortune? Oh,
1:28:42
not that I know of. I only know one fact about him
1:28:44
because he's a sports person. And so I have
1:28:46
to look up all sports related facts. Yeah. Otherwise
1:28:50
we'll get a bunch of replies about how you said someone played
1:28:52
the wrong position. Yes. Those
1:28:54
are still coming in. Thank you, everybody.
1:28:55
Yeah. That is noted.
1:28:58
So Robert Kraft is the owner of the New
1:29:01
England Patriots. Okay. So last year,
1:29:03
Robert Kraft was arrested in
1:29:06
a massage parlor in South Beach,
1:29:08
Miami. Oh. And this immediately
1:29:11
went into the sex ring trafficking,
1:29:15
evil criminal conspiracy type of
1:29:17
framing. So I'm going to read to you
1:29:20
from the New York Times article that came out. There was
1:29:22
like a feature story that came out right after his arrest.
1:29:25
On the lurid celebrity connection lies the wretched
1:29:27
story of women who the police believe
1:29:29
were brought
1:29:30
from China under false promises
1:29:32
of new lives and legitimate spa jobs.
1:29:35
Instead, they found themselves trapped in
1:29:37
the austere back rooms of strip mall
1:29:40
brothels, trafficking victims trapped
1:29:42
among South Florida's rich and famous. I
1:29:45
don't believe they were told they were going to work in massage
1:29:47
parlors seven days a week having
1:29:48
unprotected sex with up to a thousand
1:29:51
men a year, said Sheriff William D. Snyder
1:29:53
of Martin County. We saw
1:29:55
them eating on hot plates in the back.
1:29:57
There were no washing machines. They were sleeping
1:29:59
on the massage. Oh god. Sheriff
1:30:01
Snyder said he believed at least some of
1:30:03
the women were working to pay off debt owed
1:30:05
for what it cost to bring them to the United States. In
1:30:08
some cases, the women's passports were taken
1:30:10
away. Traffickers cycled women in
1:30:12
and out of parlors every 10 or 20 days,
1:30:15
Sheriff Snyder estimated. That seems like
1:30:17
a lot of turnover. I would never consider
1:30:19
them prostitutes. It was more of a rescue
1:30:21
operation, he said.
1:30:22
Oh my god. Right?
1:30:25
Okay. This is setting off a wuga noises
1:30:28
for you because it should have for everybody
1:30:30
else. Also note, all of the information
1:30:32
in this New York Times story is coming from a single
1:30:35
source. Oh no. Who
1:30:37
is the sheriff? Have they not learned since the
1:30:39
Kitty Genovese fiasco in
1:30:41
the early 60s? Right?
1:30:44
He also, there's a later CNN interview
1:30:47
where they're asking about trafficking
1:30:49
and prostitution and et cetera, and he says, I just
1:30:51
don't understand why women would go and allow
1:30:53
themselves
1:30:53
to be trafficked. This really
1:30:55
speaks to the binary that I feel like a lot
1:30:58
of men in law enforcement believe in about
1:31:00
women, which is that the two
1:31:03
kinds are rescue worthy and
1:31:05
prostitute. Yeah. There's also this great
1:31:07
thing too,
1:31:08
where we build up these perfect victims, but
1:31:10
then it's like, oh, they went and allowed themselves to be trafficked.
1:31:13
Right? So even when we find those stories,
1:31:15
it's like, oh, weren't they kind of at
1:31:17
fault a little bit? They let them
1:31:20
be right? It's like
1:31:20
someone got herself murdered. Yeah. Yeah.
1:31:23
And it's like, oh, that's how women works depending on the category of
1:31:25
person. I mean, I think it's also, so
1:31:28
every
1:31:29
factual claim in what I just said
1:31:32
is false. Great. Every single
1:31:34
one. So first of all, there's this
1:31:36
great Vanity Fair article that comes out months
1:31:38
after this, of course, where they
1:31:40
find that none of the women were from China.
1:31:43
Oh my God. At least got
1:31:45
the country right. How hard is that? I mean,
1:31:47
they were Chinese. Okay. They were already
1:31:49
living
1:31:49
in the United States. Yeah. And then part of
1:31:52
the massage par, they recruited them through advertisements in
1:31:54
Chinese language, magazines and newspapers
1:31:56
in Chicago and LA and
1:31:58
all these other places. It was like a new
1:31:59
normal sort of Craigslist ad that happened
1:32:02
to be in Chinese, like come to Florida, work at a massage
1:32:04
parlor. So none of them were trafficked from
1:32:06
other countries.
1:32:07
They crossed state lines, so I guess they did
1:32:09
violate the Mann Act, which people used to get excited
1:32:12
about in the 1930s. That's such a huge spoiler,
1:32:14
Sarah. We're going to get to the Mann Act. I'm very sorry.
1:32:18
That, to me, is a really important
1:32:20
distinction.
1:32:21
Yes. The number of people
1:32:23
who are brought to the United States against
1:32:25
their will, vanishingly
1:32:27
small. The much more common thing
1:32:29
is somebody wants to come to the United States,
1:32:31
they pay somebody to take them into the United
1:32:34
States, and then they are charged too
1:32:36
much, they are dropped in a place that they didn't agree
1:32:38
to. There's all kinds of structural vulnerabilities
1:32:41
with paying somebody to smuggle you into
1:32:43
a country and those people get victimized at
1:32:45
extremely high rates.
1:32:47
But there is a difference between people
1:32:49
being clubbed, knocked out
1:32:51
in Cambodia, and they wake up in Detroit.
1:32:54
That doesn't happen. Again, I think this distinction
1:32:57
is important because it's based on our unwillingness
1:32:59
to confront the deepest
1:33:01
culprit in all this, which again is economic
1:33:04
insecurity domestically. And
1:33:06
also, I mean, when you think about it economically,
1:33:08
if I'm running a massage
1:33:09
parlor where I'm exploiting young
1:33:12
women and sort of in these terrible
1:33:14
conditions and they're working long hours and I'm not paying them
1:33:16
very much, why the fuck would I
1:33:18
recruit people from other countries? There's so many
1:33:21
desperate people in America. Right.
1:33:23
It's just on the idea that there's a shortage
1:33:26
of people in America who would
1:33:28
do anything for a decent
1:33:31
paycheck, which like, what a weird
1:33:33
thing to believe. Right. It
1:33:35
just doesn't make any sense when it's like,
1:33:37
you can just put an ad in a newspaper
1:33:39
and people will apply for jobs. When terrible
1:33:42
farms, terrible
1:33:43
food processing plants, when they have job openings,
1:33:46
they put ads on Craigslist and people apply.
1:33:48
I mean, look at the, what was it? A
1:33:51
poultry processing plant in Mississippi that
1:33:53
was just raided by ICE and that
1:33:55
was a raid carried out, I think, because the
1:33:57
boss didn't want to pay his workers and it was cheaper
1:33:59
to get paid.
1:33:59
just have them all scooped up
1:34:02
by law enforcement. I mean, those weren't people
1:34:04
who had
1:34:05
been kidnapped and brought to the United
1:34:06
States in order to work
1:34:08
for insufficient wages. They were people
1:34:11
who had taken those jobs voluntarily because
1:34:13
there was nothing else for them and then had their lives
1:34:15
destroyed because of it. And no one had to
1:34:17
take anyone across international
1:34:20
borders to achieve that. Right. And if I'm like an
1:34:22
asshole poultry plant director guy,
1:34:25
why would I spend money on plane tickets
1:34:27
and like reaching tentacles into Guatemala
1:34:30
to like find workers for my low
1:34:32
wage, low skilled jobs? You can
1:34:35
really tell a fake conspiracy
1:34:37
by the fact that it's just economically impossible.
1:34:40
Exactly. Why would you exploit people
1:34:42
in a different country when there are plenty of people you can
1:34:44
exploit in your own county? So I think that
1:34:47
distinction is extremely important. Whenever
1:34:49
we talk about trafficking, we need to be really
1:34:51
clear that there is a huge
1:34:54
difference
1:34:54
between people coming here and people who
1:34:56
are being taken here. And
1:34:58
the reason why it's dangerous
1:35:00
to come here is because there are no laws
1:35:03
that allow people to come here legally. Right. Like
1:35:06
why is there an economy of people
1:35:08
that will take you across the U.S. border for ten thousand dollars
1:35:10
because there's really terrible immigration policy.
1:35:13
Again, we're saying we'll solve this problem if we
1:35:15
strengthen our border or if we make it harder
1:35:18
or more punitive for undocumented
1:35:20
people to come to the United States.
1:35:23
And it's like, no, like that's going to make it
1:35:25
worse because that means that you will owe more
1:35:27
money to someone who's smiling. Exactly. And
1:35:30
they will have even more
1:35:30
justification to work you to death.
1:35:33
One of the other factual claims that the sheriff makes
1:35:35
is that they're working seven days a week
1:35:37
having unprotected sex with one thousand men a year.
1:35:40
It doesn't appear that there was any sex going on.
1:35:43
Like intercourse. Okay. All
1:35:45
right. These cops spent six months
1:35:48
surveilling this massage parlor, which is a huge
1:35:50
waste of their time, by the way. Yeah.
1:35:54
They had all kinds of weird hidden camera shit going on. And
1:35:56
in six months of surveillance, they only found 20
1:35:58
people who got any sex acts, the
1:36:01
vast majority of them were hand jobs, and a little
1:36:03
bit of it was oral sex. There were a couple instances
1:36:05
of oral sex, but there was no sexual
1:36:07
intercourse. There's also, the women
1:36:09
were not living on the premises. Only
1:36:12
one of them was living on the premises.
1:36:15
And it was because she was living kind of far away, so
1:36:17
the owner of the massage parlor would
1:36:19
actually pick her up in the mornings and drive
1:36:21
her to work. And then there was like a car trouble
1:36:23
or something, and her boss was like, hey, you know, do
1:36:25
you mind sleeping
1:36:26
at work for a couple nights, because like it's getting
1:36:28
harder for me to pick you up. So she's like,
1:36:30
yeah, okay. Maybe that's exploitative, like it's
1:36:32
not great, right? Like it's not. We're
1:36:34
talking about something that like, does
1:36:37
connect to things that
1:36:40
happen in our world, right? But
1:36:43
the version of that event that seems
1:36:46
most likely
1:36:47
is supported by America as
1:36:49
it is. Totally. I also, in research
1:36:51
for this story, I also found out about something called, have you
1:36:53
heard of something called rub maps? No,
1:36:55
my first mental image is like, what if you had
1:36:58
a road map or a state map, and you
1:37:00
could scratch and sniff different areas to smell
1:37:02
like their food specialties. So you could have like, you
1:37:04
know, you scratch cans of the city and it smells
1:37:06
like barbecue. I'm sure it's not that,
1:37:08
but wouldn't that be great? Yes. So
1:37:11
rub maps is the apparently Yelp
1:37:14
for massage parlors, where
1:37:16
people can rate different massage parlors, talk about their
1:37:18
experiences.
1:37:19
So there's reviews of this massage
1:37:21
parlor on rub maps, apparently, and half
1:37:24
of the reviews are men complaining
1:37:26
that the women at the massage
1:37:27
parlor won't give them hand jobs, which
1:37:30
implies to me that there's some level
1:37:33
of control in what they're actually doing.
1:37:35
Or like, you could look at that and be like,
1:37:37
okay, like consent could very well
1:37:39
be an issue here, right? Because we
1:37:42
have women who have traveled for
1:37:44
this job, so it is expensive to move, like
1:37:46
it's an expensive economy to be living in, and
1:37:49
this is an illegal trade that we're
1:37:51
looking into, so we could take this seriously and
1:37:53
be like, hey, do you feel pressured
1:37:56
to give hand jobs if someone's
1:37:58
paying a couple hundred bucks?
1:37:59
bucks to get a hang job? Like, are you getting
1:38:02
a fair cut of that? Like, how is that? You
1:38:04
know, obviously the police are not like a union
1:38:06
for sex workers like they are in my fancy,
1:38:09
but you know, these are the questions
1:38:11
that are relevant at this point. So it's like you
1:38:13
don't want to help women. You want to save
1:38:15
women. That's great. Yeah. And there's this there's this great
1:38:17
quote in the Vanity
1:38:18
Fair article where she's talking about
1:38:21
how officers are interrogating one
1:38:23
of the sex workers for apparently hours.
1:38:26
And she's the only one who's had
1:38:28
her passport confiscated. It's
1:38:30
not clear sort of who has it or
1:38:33
why she eventually says that her boyfriend
1:38:35
actually took it and that he had pressured her into working
1:38:37
at the massage parlor. But then she later
1:38:39
recants that and says, I just wanted to get
1:38:41
out of the interrogation and I was telling
1:38:43
them what they wanted to hear. The
1:38:45
author of the Vanity Fair article is talking about this
1:38:48
long interrogation of her and she says,
1:38:50
it was somehow easier for law enforcement officers
1:38:52
in South Florida to believe that the women had been sold
1:38:55
into sex slavery by a global crime
1:38:57
syndicate
1:38:58
than to acknowledge that immigrant women of precarious
1:39:00
status hemmed in by circumstance might
1:39:03
choose sex work. Oh, my God. All
1:39:05
of this goes back to this idea that first
1:39:07
of all, people cannot consent to sex work.
1:39:09
Sex work is inherently exploitative
1:39:12
and that they have to be rescued.
1:39:15
We're getting into like weedy territory,
1:39:17
but I feel like if we're going to talk about like
1:39:19
issues of consent and you
1:39:21
know, can someone consent to sex
1:39:24
work? Like A, yes, I think
1:39:26
that they can. And B,
1:39:28
if you are worried that sex workers
1:39:30
are unable to meaningfully consent
1:39:33
to the vocation that they're in,
1:39:34
then like make it so that they can have another job.
1:39:37
Yeah, yeah. Give them something to do to reasonably support
1:39:39
themselves. Right. Give them better alternatives
1:39:41
if you don't want them to go into sex work. Exactly.
1:39:44
And it's also I mean, I spoke to a really
1:39:45
interesting sex worker in Chicago
1:39:48
who's been doing sex work for years. The way that she got into
1:39:51
it was she had a kid
1:39:52
right after she turned 18. The kid had asthma
1:39:55
and there was this machine that helps him breathe
1:39:58
that she has to rent on
1:39:59
a daily basis. that cost $89 a night. And
1:40:03
she was working at Denny's. She basically
1:40:05
just was barely getting by, or
1:40:07
really not getting by, sort of slowly sinking.
1:40:10
And so one of her customers at Denny's offered
1:40:12
to pay her to have sex with him after
1:40:15
her shift was over. And that
1:40:17
was how she kind of got by for many years. And
1:40:20
since then she has ended up
1:40:22
homeless
1:40:23
at times. She says that was
1:40:25
the most physically dangerous time because
1:40:28
a lot of people target homeless
1:40:30
people for sex work because they know that nobody
1:40:32
is going to believe you. If you say, this guy
1:40:35
raped me, this guy was terrible to me. Since
1:40:38
then she's gotten a day job. She's
1:40:40
gotten a more stable place to live. She still
1:40:43
does sex work, but it's a much smaller
1:40:45
number of clients. And
1:40:47
she also does phone sex, which is a form of sex
1:40:49
work that I had completely forgotten about because there's
1:40:52
been so few movies
1:40:52
about his lately. But what's interesting to me
1:40:55
is when we think about this myth of trafficking,
1:40:58
you could easily cast that guy
1:41:00
in the Denny's as coercing
1:41:03
her into sex, right? Like this is a guy
1:41:05
that offered money to his
1:41:07
Denny's waitress to have sex with him. Like that's
1:41:09
a dirt baggy thing to do. But then when
1:41:11
she talks about the story, she acknowledges
1:41:14
that of course there's an element of coercion there. But first
1:41:17
of all, it was the medical bills that were coercing
1:41:19
her. Right.
1:41:20
And like people are vulnerable
1:41:23
enough working in legal industries where they don't
1:41:25
have unions, you know? Think about what
1:41:27
it's like admitting
1:41:29
to practicing the trade that you're in means that you
1:41:31
got arrested. I mean, it is impossible
1:41:33
to have rights in that situation. Right. I
1:41:36
also think
1:41:37
taking the right wing argument seriously, that
1:41:39
like there's no such thing as consenting to sex
1:41:41
work, it's inherently exploitative. Fine. I
1:41:44
don't agree with that, but like if that is true,
1:41:47
then the question becomes, say you're
1:41:49
a sex worker, you're working in this
1:41:51
massage parlor, it's super exploitative. I'm
1:41:54
now going to go in, I'm going to arrest your boss. I'm
1:41:56
going to shut it down. I'm going to take away your
1:41:58
source of housing, right? because part of the myth
1:42:00
is that they're living there. I'm gonna take away
1:42:02
your source of income
1:42:03
because you're no longer gonna have a job. So
1:42:06
like, you're welcome. I've just
1:42:08
rescued you. Even if you're this right
1:42:10
wing, pull yourself up by your bootstraps person, okay,
1:42:13
then like those people need a bunch of money. Right,
1:42:16
and what if you've just taken their only bootstraps
1:42:18
away? I guess the assumption is that they
1:42:20
have been forced
1:42:21
into sex work and now they don't have to do
1:42:23
anymore because this
1:42:25
corrupt organization that forced them to become
1:42:27
sex workers is gone now. And
1:42:29
so now they can skip
1:42:32
away and do whatever they want,
1:42:33
which is what? Right. Yeah.
1:42:36
There's a survey of sex workers in Britain, all
1:42:38
of whom are foreigners. Only 6% of
1:42:41
them said that they were deceived
1:42:43
anyway by coming to the UK. What
1:42:45
they say is that they went to the UK to
1:42:48
like work at coffee
1:42:49
shops, but either they got
1:42:51
those jobs and the conditions were shitty and they couldn't
1:42:53
pay their rent, or they just couldn't get
1:42:55
those jobs. And so a lot of them sort
1:42:57
of started doing sex work because they didn't
1:42:59
have a lot of other options. Right.
1:43:01
But it's also like, well, what do those people need? Like, how do you
1:43:03
rescue them from sex work? It's like, pay more at
1:43:05
the coffee shops. Like,
1:43:08
right? Right. Have a lower rent. Like, pit,
1:43:10
stop complaining about how much your espresso
1:43:12
costs. Yeah. I
1:43:15
think making an espresso, that's much harder than giving
1:43:17
a hand job too. My God, there's so
1:43:18
many levers on those things. And
1:43:20
this goes back to like the entire history of
1:43:23
this whole thing, that the origin of
1:43:25
trafficking has always been
1:43:27
about saving women, mostly
1:43:30
white women. I've been reading all these historical
1:43:32
documents and they all include the names
1:43:34
of old laws of sort of like how
1:43:36
this works. So there was the precursors to
1:43:39
this. There's something called the 1870 Act to
1:43:41
prevent the kidnapping and importing of
1:43:44
Mongolian Chinese and Japanese females
1:43:46
for criminal or demoralizing
1:43:48
purposes. But only Mongolian
1:43:50
Chinese and Japanese. If you're Laotian,
1:43:53
then you can just fuck off. There's
1:43:57
one in 1875 that has in the... preamble
1:44:01
that it's trying to end the danger of
1:44:03
cheap Chinese labor and immoral Chinese
1:44:05
women. Interesting. Which
1:44:07
then morphs into the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. So
1:44:11
the Chinese Exclusion Act, this
1:44:13
is fabulous, began as
1:44:15
a sex trafficking panic law.
1:44:18
I interviewed a human smuggling expert
1:44:20
who I cannot name because
1:44:22
he's an old friend of mine and his university
1:44:24
will not allow me to name him because
1:44:26
they have weird restrictions. I mean, one of
1:44:29
the things that a human smuggling researcher told me, because
1:44:31
he's looking into the history of this too, is
1:44:33
that every time we've had a resurgence of
1:44:35
the trafficking panic, we've had a crackdown on immigration.
1:44:39
That is classic. That is a stone cold
1:44:41
classic. The extremely important
1:44:43
reframing of human smuggling to
1:44:46
human trafficking is human
1:44:48
smuggling sounds kind of defensible. Right. People
1:44:50
are sneaking into this country because they want to be here. Human
1:44:52
smuggling is how some enslaved people
1:44:55
escaped back in the day. He mentioned this too, that
1:44:57
there's also great stories of people smuggling
1:44:59
Jews out of Europe when the Nazis came to power.
1:45:02
We sort of
1:45:02
understand that to be a much more complicated
1:45:05
concept. But then as soon as you say,
1:45:07
oh, there's trafficking, people are being brought here
1:45:09
against their will, then it's like, oh shit,
1:45:12
we really need to crack down on the borders because they're
1:45:14
not migrants, they're not coming here for jobs, they're being kidnapped
1:45:16
and taken. It's interesting because
1:45:19
it doesn't
1:45:20
criminalize the person who is
1:45:22
trying to cross the border. It
1:45:25
demonizes the
1:45:26
person who is theoretically moving
1:45:29
them, but then it makes them into collateral or
1:45:31
evidence or something. Yeah. This is
1:45:33
what he said too, that the difference between trafficking
1:45:35
and smuggling is that in human trafficking,
1:45:38
the person coming into the United States
1:45:40
is a victim, whereas in human smuggling,
1:45:42
the United States is the victim. Right?
1:45:46
It's a crime against the United States to smuggle someone
1:45:48
in and there is no victim. So what trafficking
1:45:50
does is it allows you to
1:45:53
reframe, oh, some percentage of these
1:45:55
migrants, I'm really worried about that they're not
1:45:57
choosing to come here on their own volition.
1:45:59
not racist, but
1:46:04
I am concerned. What's
1:46:06
really interesting is this whole thing
1:46:08
gets wrapped up in this concept of
1:46:11
white slavery from the early 1900s. Are
1:46:13
you familiar with this? Yeah, just this idea that,
1:46:15
I mean, the classic idea that we have now
1:46:17
in different clothing that, I mean, it's kind
1:46:20
of birth of a nation idea almost in a way, right? That
1:46:22
like white women are constantly being preyed upon
1:46:25
by an ethnic other who wants to
1:46:27
kidnap them and smuggle them and
1:46:29
just do something terrible. There was something called
1:46:32
the 1904 International Agreement
1:46:34
for the Suppression of White Slave Traffic.
1:46:37
That's one of the first times the term trafficking is
1:46:39
used. I was gonna ask when that
1:46:41
started showing up. I'm surprised it's that old.
1:46:44
And it's also, it hasn't changed at all. This
1:46:46
is the same stuff we see now. So there's this great
1:46:48
article by Janie Chung where she talks about the concept
1:46:51
of exploitation creep where
1:46:53
trafficking has always been a bad thing, but
1:46:56
over time we've expanded the term trafficking
1:46:58
to cover more and more and
1:47:00
more human behavior. And it's now there's behemoth
1:47:02
that covers like 50 different
1:47:04
activities. Yeah, so what did it originally
1:47:07
mean? It originally meant, this is what she says in her article,
1:47:09
that the word trafficking denoted
1:47:11
the cross border movement of white
1:47:14
women and girls by forced deceit or
1:47:16
drugs for the purposes of commercial
1:47:18
sexual exploitation. Okay, white women
1:47:20
and girls by forced deceit or
1:47:23
drugs. It's amazing that we were
1:47:25
so transparent. I guess over
1:47:27
a hundred years ago, we were like, this is a
1:47:29
law about white girls. And now
1:47:32
it's like, that's so the unspoken
1:47:34
thing at the bottom of everything, but it's the one thing you're
1:47:36
not allowed to explicitly say. Right, and
1:47:38
it's, I mean, the DNA is all there. I mean, this
1:47:41
is like how bad it gets is in the actual
1:47:44
law, it defines a victim as
1:47:46
a white woman who is a
1:47:48
victim of the
1:47:49
animal lusts of the dark
1:47:51
races. Oh no, no,
1:47:54
no. What's really interesting is- Oh my God. This
1:47:57
is what Janie Chung, this really interesting researcher
1:47:59
told me.
1:47:59
was that a lot of this comes out of the
1:48:02
anxieties over slavery ending
1:48:04
and a huge anxiety over
1:48:06
women's rights. That you have women
1:48:09
who are starting to show up in interracial couples.
1:48:11
Right, and they can't be doing
1:48:13
that on purpose. Right, and
1:48:16
so all of these same gut level anxieties
1:48:18
are there in the very beginning. And
1:48:21
this initial panic culminates in
1:48:23
the 1910 Man Act with
1:48:26
the way that Janie Chung puts it is,
1:48:28
which sought to maintain the morality
1:48:30
and purity of white women by prohibiting
1:48:32
women from crossing
1:48:33
state lines for immoral purposes and
1:48:36
criminalized interracial couples. So
1:48:39
it's like from the very beginning, trafficking
1:48:41
has been a way of talking about basically
1:48:44
like race mingling
1:48:45
that makes us uncomfortable. Huh,
1:48:49
or that interracial relationships
1:48:51
can only exist in the context of sex crime,
1:48:54
right? But like, it's not that we're
1:48:56
criminalizing interracial
1:48:58
relationships, it has to
1:49:00
be a sex crime. There can't be consent,
1:49:02
it has to be someone's being
1:49:05
recruited for nefarious
1:49:07
purposes. Like it's not that we're criminalizing
1:49:09
these relationships,
1:49:10
it's that they don't exist. Right. Jesus.
1:49:12
So what happens over time is eventually
1:49:15
people sort of accept this framing, but
1:49:17
they think that white slavery is too narrow. And
1:49:20
so by 1949, the International Convention to
1:49:23
suppress trafficking in persons and
1:49:25
the exploitation of the prostitution
1:49:27
of others, these names. But
1:49:30
by that point, trafficking has
1:49:32
now expanded to encompass people
1:49:34
of all races, all genders, all
1:49:36
ages, and it can also be transnational
1:49:39
or domestic. Holding hands under a rainbow. So
1:49:42
we already see this good
1:49:44
faith effort,
1:49:45
I think, to be like, well, you know, white
1:49:47
slavery is a pretty bad term, other people
1:49:49
can be victimized. So like we need to expand
1:49:51
the categories of people that can be victimized
1:49:54
by this bad behavior.
1:49:55
So I talked to this researcher named Ron Weitzer
1:49:57
about this, and he says there's then kind
1:49:59
of this period of dormancy, the term kind
1:50:02
of goes quiet for a while. But
1:50:04
then it explodes
1:50:06
in the late 1990s and especially
1:50:08
in the 2000s. And
1:50:10
what's really interesting to me, because I'm trying
1:50:12
to sort of find the genesis of
1:50:15
this, you know, how did we get to
1:50:18
like trafficking becoming a thing? And
1:50:21
what this guy
1:50:21
Ron Weitzer told me was that it's one
1:50:23
of the few times when it's not
1:50:25
a bottom up phenomenon. Stranger
1:50:28
Danger, there really were kids
1:50:29
that got murdered in these horrible ways.
1:50:31
Right. But he says one of the unique
1:50:34
features about human trafficking as a moral
1:50:36
panic is that it's top
1:50:38
down. That there weren't
1:50:39
cases of human trafficking that
1:50:41
sort of captured the public's imagination.
1:50:44
Right, because we should be able to think like,
1:50:46
oh, yes, the
1:50:47
baby Liza case from 1995 that
1:50:51
started. That's the thing. I mean, that's
1:50:53
at the beginning of this conversation. It was like we were
1:50:56
trying to open a kinder
1:50:58
egg with nothing inside of it. I can't think
1:51:00
of even the cases that would have inspired
1:51:02
this. Right. This is what's so interesting
1:51:05
is that in the late 1990s, what
1:51:07
started happening was you will recognize this,
1:51:09
a coalition between neoconservatives,
1:51:13
the Christian right and feminists
1:51:16
to start pushing this.
1:51:17
Those never end well. It's
1:51:20
actually fascinating. I mean, this is another
1:51:22
example, just like we talked about with victims rights,
1:51:25
where basically this argument
1:51:27
that prostitution
1:51:27
is inherently exploitative came
1:51:30
out of this idea that prostitution is fundamentally
1:51:33
about the patriarchy. And it's something that
1:51:35
benefits men. I mean, there are ways in
1:51:37
which that argument makes sense to me. I just don't
1:51:39
take it to that conclusion. Right. And
1:51:42
so a lot of first wave feminists started
1:51:44
pushing this idea of
1:51:47
trafficking because they were losing
1:51:49
the wars over prostitution from the 1970s
1:51:52
and the wars over porn in the 1980s. Yeah.
1:51:56
That the country was getting much more liberal and
1:51:58
this idea of abolishing prostitution.
1:51:59
Constitution wasn't really working the
1:52:02
idea of abolishing porn like especially the you
1:52:04
know, the internet was starting to exist in the 1990s
1:52:07
Hmm. Yeah, I mean we'll talk about this in greater detail
1:52:09
in another episode I'm sure but that Andrea
1:52:12
Dworkin had attempted to pass
1:52:14
anti-porn
1:52:14
legislation in
1:52:17
parts of the US and Canada and it had been really
1:52:19
kind of Had had a couple
1:52:21
of little successes, but it had been a resounding
1:52:24
flop so there was really you know, whatever
1:52:26
happened was repealed and That
1:52:29
this was a movement that couldn't get off the
1:52:31
ground on the terms that were
1:52:33
currently being argued And it's really interesting
1:52:35
because some of the quote-unquote villains
1:52:38
of the sex trafficking panic Are
1:52:40
the heroes of the early sexual
1:52:42
harassment cases that we talked about in the Anita Hill
1:52:44
episode Catherine McKinnon
1:52:47
for example, who's a really important feminist and
1:52:49
a very
1:52:49
complicated figure legally Yes,
1:52:52
exactly And I think yeah tough to tell
1:52:54
the story of sexual harassment without this as an epilogue
1:52:56
and it's tough to tell This story without
1:52:59
sexual harassment the early cases as a prologue,
1:53:02
you know how I feel about heroes and villains
1:53:04
right if you start off seeing everyone is just
1:53:06
like a Person then you don't have
1:53:08
to become so confused when they have
1:53:11
different roles and different movements Yeah,
1:53:13
I think we're getting into the whole problem with with
1:53:16
work as historians Essentially, which is that
1:53:18
you're deprived of these nice Star Wars.
1:53:21
Yeah binaries, right? History
1:53:23
is a non-binary affair. I'm a say So
1:53:27
Because they're kind of losing
1:53:28
these domestic wars what they
1:53:30
do is they reframe pornography
1:53:33
and prostitution as fundamentally
1:53:35
non-consensual acts and
1:53:38
they've reframed them as kind of Politically
1:53:41
neutral things that you know, this this
1:53:43
isn't about prostitutes in America. This
1:53:45
is about poverty in the third world Like this
1:53:47
isn't you know messy political
1:53:48
stuff? What it really is
1:53:50
is, you know, most of the prostitutes in America they
1:53:53
were taken here against their will they're being
1:53:55
Prostituted like a thousand men a year
1:53:57
and 14 hours a day and it's this terrible thing and
1:53:59
all the
1:53:59
sudden, you're not talking about banning prostitution
1:54:02
anymore, right? You've done this shift where
1:54:04
all of a sudden it's like, no, we want to fight poverty.
1:54:07
We want to save girls. We want
1:54:09
to
1:54:10
free people from slavery. And
1:54:12
the prostitution is sort of secondary
1:54:14
or tertiary and people start not noticing
1:54:17
what you're really doing. Okay,
1:54:19
so it turns out... That was a very
1:54:22
serious sigh. I
1:54:30
mean, I think that what I'm
1:54:31
expressing with that particular exhale
1:54:34
is that there were good ingredients
1:54:36
that went into that. It's
1:54:39
like you're watching a
1:54:41
YouTube cake tutorial
1:54:43
and they like put cake ingredients
1:54:45
in and then they just like put in a bunch
1:54:47
of kitchen cleaner and then
1:54:49
they throw it in the oven.
1:54:50
And it's like, what did you think would happen? There
1:54:53
was a moment when it could have been a cake, but then that
1:54:55
moment ended and we can't go back, right? But then that
1:54:58
it starts off as coming from
1:55:00
a place of genuine concern. And yes,
1:55:03
like again, like people shouldn't have
1:55:05
to do sex work against their will. People shouldn't
1:55:07
have to do any kind of work against their will as a
1:55:09
matter of fact. But do you
1:55:11
care about the demographic that you're claiming
1:55:13
this is about? Or are you really just trying to wipe out
1:55:16
sex work and your previous arguments haven't
1:55:18
landed and you need to cultivate the
1:55:20
kind of allies
1:55:20
who will be swayed by this kind of argument.
1:55:23
And you're maybe trying to annihilate something
1:55:25
that shouldn't be annihilated. And the reason that you haven't
1:55:28
been able to so far is some
1:55:30
proof of that. Yeah. And also to give them some
1:55:32
credit, in the same way that the
1:55:34
stranger danger panic illustrated some real needs.
1:55:37
The law at the time didn't really recognize
1:55:40
the idea that you could be coerced, not
1:55:42
through physical force. Someone can
1:55:44
sort of manipulate you into doing something without
1:55:46
putting a gun to your head, right? Or if you're in
1:55:48
a really abusive relationship, you might
1:55:50
find
1:55:50
yourself committing crimes
1:55:53
or doing other things that you wouldn't do otherwise
1:55:56
because you're afraid of sort of the long-term
1:55:58
consequences. There's no immediate.
1:55:59
a threat. But if your husband
1:56:02
is beating you regularly, he doesn't
1:56:04
have to say, I'll beat you if you don't
1:56:06
do this. Yes. And that humans have
1:56:08
tremendous psychological power over
1:56:11
each other, and it doesn't
1:56:13
have to be supported by
1:56:15
a displays of force. It doesn't have to be
1:56:18
supported by the consequences
1:56:21
that we like to think we would have to be facing
1:56:23
in order to do something we don't think that we would normally
1:56:26
do. Right. There's very little legal
1:56:28
recognition, I think, of the fact
1:56:29
that our autonomy is
1:56:32
a very fragile thing. Yeah. And also,
1:56:34
I mean, this also intersects with
1:56:36
a rising generation
1:56:39
of evangelicals. They
1:56:41
also were losing a lot of battle,
1:56:43
right? That the culture was shifting underneath them.
1:56:45
And so what these younger
1:56:47
evangelicals did was they started
1:56:50
getting away from stuff like gay people
1:56:52
and prostitution and, you know, things that
1:56:54
were sort of not going to land anymore.
1:56:57
They went to these issues that they could still get moderate. Yeah.
1:57:00
And so what you have in the late 1990s
1:57:02
is Christian groups that start focusing on global
1:57:04
warming, HIV AIDS globally,
1:57:07
and human trafficking. Right. Africa
1:57:10
is like the center
1:57:12
of the innocent victim industrial complex,
1:57:14
really. Right. Yeah.
1:57:17
Right. And so in the way that Weitzer was talking about in this top-down
1:57:19
push, they find a very good
1:57:21
friend in George W. Bush, who gets elected in 2000.
1:57:24
Oh, it's a Bush joint. Oh,
1:57:28
it was created to suit his
1:57:30
fragile little mind. Yeah. And
1:57:32
so they passed something called the
1:57:34
Trafficking Victims Protection Act,
1:57:36
which as will not surprise
1:57:39
you at all, there's nothing in there about protecting victims. It
1:57:41
extends a bunch of sentences. It creates,
1:57:44
as we've seen with other moral panics, it creates
1:57:47
laws against things that are already illegal.
1:57:49
So it doesn't criminalize anything new. It just jacks
1:57:51
up sentencing for other stuff. Yeah,
1:57:53
exactly. Like it's filling a hole that is already
1:57:56
filled. So the only
1:57:59
actual victims. protection that
1:58:01
it has in the law is the idea of a T
1:58:03
visa, which is a trafficking victim
1:58:05
visa, basically. It sounds like a gift card
1:58:07
for testosterone. But
1:58:11
what's really interesting is, you know, as usual, nobody
1:58:14
digs into the details of these plans.
1:58:17
So the actual T visa,
1:58:19
the way that it works is it's temporary. It
1:58:21
gives you a one year extension
1:58:23
of staying in the United States and it's
1:58:25
conditional on participating
1:58:28
in the criminal trial against your trafficker.
1:58:30
Oh, Jesus Christ. So this
1:58:33
creates an incentive where
1:58:34
even if you're not really a victim,
1:58:37
like you weren't really coerced into sex work, there's
1:58:39
no incentive to say that you were. Because
1:58:41
it's how you get human rights. Yes, totally.
1:58:44
And the thing is, I mean, you know, everybody brags
1:58:46
about this program and how great it is, but
1:58:49
a tiny number of people even get it every
1:58:51
year. It's only 600 people get it every year. And
1:58:53
the fine print for the T visa
1:58:56
is that, you know, it's temporary, but you
1:58:58
can also apply for this thing
1:58:59
called a U visa, which is permanent
1:59:01
residency. But this
1:59:04
is a system for every victim of any
1:59:06
kind of crime. So if you're an immigrant and you're
1:59:08
a victim of domestic abuse, like this is the kind of
1:59:11
visa that you apply for. Yeah. There's 60,000
1:59:13
applications per year and they only give out 10,000
1:59:16
of them. There's already a backlog of 150,000 people.
1:59:19
Oh my God. So we're 15 years.
1:59:21
There's like a 15 year waiting list.
1:59:23
It's like trying to get a new liver, basically.
1:59:26
And like that's as good as it gets. Like that is
1:59:28
as worthy of protection
1:59:29
as you can get as an
1:59:32
undocumented person in the eyes of the
1:59:34
law. You know, the thing that I cannot get over
1:59:37
when we talk about trafficking and the trafficking panic, the
1:59:39
issue that gets the most attention is FOSTA-SESTA,
1:59:42
these laws that passed, I think last year or two years ago. Yeah.
1:59:45
That basically took down any online ads for
1:59:47
sex work. And like famously, I think was
1:59:50
targeted at Backpage. Yeah. And
1:59:52
they're like, they're awful. There's a really good reply all episode
1:59:54
about how bad they are and everybody should go
1:59:56
listen to it. Yeah. I love that reply all episode.
1:59:59
But what's really interesting is there's also local versions
2:00:02
of Backpage that have also been caught
2:00:04
up in the last couple of years, not necessarily under Sesta
2:00:07
Foster, but other basically local laws. So
2:00:09
there's one locally in Seattle called the
2:00:12
Review Board, which was essentially
2:00:14
Reddit for sex workers and
2:00:16
clients, where people could
2:00:18
post ads, people could also post reviews.
2:00:22
The sex workers that I spoke to who had profiles
2:00:24
there
2:00:24
and posted there said that it was really
2:00:27
positive in that if a guy
2:00:30
was a total prick, you could post
2:00:32
on there with his profile and his information
2:00:34
and say,
2:00:35
this is what happened. He showed up drunk, he
2:00:37
hit me, whatever it was. And
2:00:39
the sex workers would then of course say, well, we're
2:00:42
not going
2:00:42
to see that guy anymore. And the men
2:00:44
would post and say like, hey, man, you're making us look bad.
2:00:47
This is bullshit. There was all kinds of stuff on there about
2:00:49
consent and about
2:00:50
it's okay for them to say no. And
2:00:53
it's not okay to coerce them into sex if they say, sorry,
2:00:55
that's not a service I'm offering
2:00:56
or I don't really feel like it tonight. Sorry
2:00:59
about that. And then a couple of years
2:01:01
ago, the cops came in and
2:01:03
shut it down. And so the way that I found
2:01:05
out about this and the way that most people in Seattle found
2:01:07
out about this was there's a big trafficking
2:01:09
raid, we found a sex ring, it's
2:01:12
all trafficking. It's all terrible. It's a ring.
2:01:15
If you call something a ring, it's
2:01:15
automatically so sinister. Right?
2:01:18
Yeah. So some of the women that were posting
2:01:20
on the Review Board were from South Korea. And
2:01:23
so this, of course, got wrapped up in the sort
2:01:25
of they're being brought here against their will
2:01:27
type of
2:01:28
narrative. And they're working 14 hours
2:01:30
a day and they're not making any
2:01:32
money, blah, blah, blah. It's just so weird when
2:01:34
we want to read situations not
2:01:37
at face value for kind
2:01:38
of what we're seeing, but we're like, well,
2:01:40
we have this thing that we really want to find.
2:01:43
Yeah. And we're going to take anything
2:01:45
that to any degree supports
2:01:48
the scenario we want this to be. And
2:01:50
then we're going to say it's that scenario. Like that's a
2:01:52
really bizarre
2:01:53
way to be attempting
2:01:55
to solve social problems. Yes. And
2:01:58
just like barreling forward without. actually
2:02:00
showing any interest in what's actually going on.
2:02:03
So what's fascinating is then later, of course, none
2:02:05
of this shows up in the original news reports or the prime
2:02:07
time specials that ran about this quote unquote trafficking
2:02:10
ring, is that there was no
2:02:12
evidence that anybody was being coerced
2:02:15
into sex, that these quote
2:02:17
unquote 14 hour days that the women were
2:02:19
working, the only evidence for
2:02:21
that was that on their advertisements they would list
2:02:24
their availability as 14 hours. Okay,
2:02:27
they say I'm available for appointments
2:02:28
between 10am and midnight.
2:02:30
Yeah, incredibly, there's no
2:02:33
evidence that any of the quote unquote pimps
2:02:35
were having sex with any of the sex
2:02:38
workers or we're providing them with drugs. They
2:02:40
were kind of like managers or promoters
2:02:42
or like a book agent. They were placing
2:02:45
ads for them. They were helping them with like various
2:02:47
logistics things. They were like actually doing their
2:02:49
jobs. Yeah. And also, I mean,
2:02:51
what some of these sex workers have been telling me is that like the whole concept
2:02:53
of a pimp is, I mean, first of all, racialized.
2:02:56
Secondly, that relationship doesn't really
2:02:59
happen as much anymore because of the internet.
2:03:02
It's relatively easy or easier
2:03:04
to set up dates in places
2:03:05
like hotels or places where there's sort
2:03:07
of enough people around that
2:03:10
if something bad happens, there is help available.
2:03:13
It's not this idea of like exploitative
2:03:15
pimps. Obviously, it happens in the
2:03:17
world, but in general, the internet's
2:03:19
been really good for sex workers to
2:03:21
be able to have much more independence. And
2:03:24
a lot of times the power relationship is actually the
2:03:26
other way around now that the sex
2:03:28
workers will kind of hire men
2:03:30
to do things like screen clients,
2:03:33
to place ads for them, to do things like,
2:03:35
you know, drive me to this appointment, you know, pick me up
2:03:37
at the airport when I come back, etc.
2:03:39
So yeah, so like to have someone around as
2:03:41
a heavy who you are employing
2:03:43
and who is dependent on you. I
2:03:46
mean, that seems like a good system. And so in this
2:03:48
particular case,
2:03:49
the quote unquote brothel owner pimp
2:03:51
dudes, the women were charging 300 bucks
2:03:53
an hour, and the guys were taking 100. So
2:03:57
maybe that's too much. Maybe that's unfair.
2:03:59
Right? Like I don't know the industry
2:04:02
but to me that doesn't seem on the face
2:04:04
of it like an obviously exploitative
2:04:06
number Right and so at the end of this
2:04:08
whole thing What's amazing is the
2:04:11
only people that actually
2:04:12
went to jail. Nobody was charged with trafficking,
2:04:14
of course The only thing that they
2:04:16
got were these second-degree Promoting
2:04:19
prostitution charges one
2:04:21
of the guys one of these quote-unquote pimps who of course
2:04:23
tarred as like the worst You know
2:04:25
chaining people to radiators the worst imaginable
2:04:28
traffickers one of them
2:04:30
does 60 days in
2:04:32
jail and 30 days of community
2:04:35
service you caught the trafficker at the center
2:04:37
of the ring and yeah I mean, thank God they didn't
2:04:39
bring in a disproportionate
2:04:40
punishment just a safe face I
2:04:42
mean, yeah, that's I mean, that's one nice thing about it One of the
2:04:44
other guys that went to jail for 21 months
2:04:47
was a kid who the only thing he's actually
2:04:49
charged with is Helping the sex
2:04:51
workers post ads and picking them up at
2:04:53
the airport when they would travel So
2:04:56
one of the myths of this is that like the traffickers
2:04:59
are moving them around the country and they're being taken
2:05:01
from place to place There's no evidence
2:05:03
that
2:05:03
these women ever traveled
2:05:06
with another person They were going to
2:05:08
other places and a lot of the sex workers told me that this is something
2:05:10
that you do because If you're a new face
2:05:12
in an area like you go to Albuquerque or whatever You
2:05:15
get like a wave
2:05:17
of clients because they haven't seen you before like
2:05:19
modeling. Yeah, exactly It makes
2:05:21
sense to move around also apparently people pay
2:05:23
more in certain cities like New York and LA
2:05:26
that makes sense They're used to paying more for sandwiches
2:05:31
So there's no evidence that they were being taken
2:05:33
anywhere They were just going on their
2:05:35
own to those places to earn more money and then
2:05:38
coming back and this guy would pick them up At the airport. It's just
2:05:40
such bad faith. You know, it's just there We're
2:05:42
like purporting to care about these people's lives
2:05:45
and then we're expressing that by making them harder
2:05:48
Which suggests to me that
2:05:50
that's all we really wanted anyway,
2:05:52
but we just wanted an excuse
2:05:55
To screw over sex workers. Yes. Absolutely.
2:05:57
I mean, I think it's important to note that this website,
2:06:00
the review board, people talk about, you know,
2:06:02
it was a nice positive place, but it was
2:06:04
also, I mean, it's not perfect, right? That the guy is
2:06:06
run by essentially this random dude named
2:06:09
Tahoe Ted. They
2:06:11
say he was kind of a dick. Like he
2:06:13
didn't allow trans sex workers to
2:06:15
post, block people
2:06:17
from creating accounts if they were fat, like anyone
2:06:20
larger. So Tahoe Ted is a shitty guy
2:06:22
who accidentally made a place
2:06:24
better than him. Yeah, that people were able to
2:06:27
use in this positive way. But again, it's like, what
2:06:29
is creating the weaknesses
2:06:31
and the shittiness of that website? It's the criminalization.
2:06:35
If this
2:06:35
was legal, you would have
2:06:37
other websites to choose from that aren't shitty.
2:06:40
And Tahoe Ted wouldn't control the pipeline. Yeah.
2:06:42
And one of the weird things, this is incredible. This
2:06:44
guy, Tahoe Ted, is caught.
2:06:45
He's in all of the local newspapers.
2:06:48
He's a trafficker. He's the ringleader, et cetera.
2:06:51
He eventually pleads guilty to three counts
2:06:54
of promoting prostitution. His sentence
2:06:56
is 30 days of work release, 30 days of community
2:06:58
service. He has to go to a post
2:07:00
conviction sex buyer intervention
2:07:03
course. And then the
2:07:05
guy ended up killing himself because his name
2:07:07
had been dragged through the mud through the newspapers
2:07:09
that he had a day
2:07:10
job while he was doing this. And of course he
2:07:12
lost the day job and nobody was going to hire him because Google
2:07:14
this guy in the first 50 results are all about how he's
2:07:16
a sex trafficker.
2:07:18
Which is interesting because even so
2:07:20
the actual legal systems consequences
2:07:23
weren't that significant for him, but the
2:07:25
way his name had been
2:07:27
destroyed by it. So you don't even
2:07:30
need to penalize someone that harshly
2:07:32
because the media will do it for you. I don't know.
2:07:34
Again,
2:07:34
you don't want to get into a place where you're
2:07:37
defending this model that I do think has
2:07:39
elements of exploitation in it. And it's
2:07:41
a structure that can be used very
2:07:43
exploitatively. So I
2:07:45
don't think any of this is like, all of this is perfectly fine.
2:07:48
Right. But we're saying that it's not
2:07:50
the very specific thing that people are claiming
2:07:52
it to be different from saying it's perfect.
2:07:55
Right. What's amazing about that case
2:07:57
is that it was a five year investment.
2:08:00
investigation. There were four different
2:08:02
law enforcement agencies involved.
2:08:04
So we're talking millions
2:08:06
of dollars. I feel like that's an inappropriate use
2:08:09
of resources. Yes. And it's like,
2:08:11
what are we spending our money on? Think of all the
2:08:14
children that are experiencing domestic abuse during that time.
2:08:17
For what? For a bunch of misdemeanor
2:08:20
arrests and six month sentences and a bunch of
2:08:22
quote unquote victims that left immediately.
2:08:24
All of them
2:08:26
did not participate in the prosecution.
2:08:29
So as soon as it happened, they were quote unquote rescued
2:08:31
and sent to this NGO that was going to provide them services.
2:08:34
All of
2:08:34
them ran away within 24 hours. All
2:08:36
of them did? Yeah. Wow. So to this day, we
2:08:38
don't know where they are. That doesn't imply
2:08:40
to me
2:08:40
the Liam Neeson version
2:08:43
of this trafficking story.
2:08:45
I would love to see though, the Liam Neeson
2:08:47
movie version of all this where Liam Neeson
2:08:49
like raids a fairly stable
2:08:52
home that some sex work is being run out
2:08:54
of and then forcibly takes
2:08:56
a bunch of women to a safe house and then
2:08:59
they all run away. And then he just sits there
2:09:01
sadly having made breakfast for everyone. I
2:09:03
mean, this is another
2:09:05
recurring theme for us that if we create these
2:09:07
sort of bucket categories in
2:09:10
public discourse, we're like, okay, there's
2:09:12
traffickers
2:09:13
and they're this kind of person. And maybe
2:09:16
as the public, we only want it to apply
2:09:18
to this very sinister, very specific
2:09:20
kind of a figure that we're thinking of. But
2:09:23
then once we've created that category
2:09:25
socially, then legally it can
2:09:28
be used however people want. And if there's
2:09:30
one thing that we've learned, you
2:09:32
can take a very scary sounding charge
2:09:34
and then
2:09:35
find ways to sort of pull
2:09:38
that parachute over
2:09:41
like a huge number of defendants.
2:09:43
Yeah. And this is I actually read this fascinating
2:09:46
report by the Greater New Orleans Human Trafficking
2:09:48
Task Force. That was actually like in
2:09:50
the way that bureaucrats do it was like quietly
2:09:53
scathing but like pretending that it's not
2:09:55
scathing. It was kind of like a like salty drug
2:09:57
quotes. Yes, yeah, exactly. And so
2:09:59
What they note is that everything
2:10:02
since 2000 has been about victims, right? Protecting
2:10:04
victims, helping victims. This is the language that
2:10:06
we always hear. What they mention is
2:10:08
that in the entire state of Louisiana,
2:10:11
there's only 291 beds available
2:10:13
for trafficking victims,
2:10:15
and only 46 of those are
2:10:18
actually trafficking beds. The rest of them are
2:10:20
homeless shelters. It's this absurd
2:10:22
duality where it's like trafficking
2:10:23
is huge, it's growing,
2:10:26
it's the most offensive form
2:10:28
of exploitation imaginable, right? It's literally
2:10:30
sexual slavery, but then after
2:10:32
we rescue them, we're sending them to a fucking homeless
2:10:34
shelter. Wow. Okay. And
2:10:37
that there are no actual resources for this most exalted
2:10:39
category of victim. Yeah. And
2:10:42
it's like they talk in there quietly, saltily
2:10:44
about how because all the homeless
2:10:46
shelters are full, it often takes five
2:10:49
or 10 phone calls to find a homeless
2:10:51
shelter for that night. It's like, can
2:10:53
you name 10 homeless shelters in your city?
2:10:55
Like, how do you even do this? Yes.
2:10:57
And that's why I'm so surprised that they're so traumatized
2:10:59
that they don't know what happened to them, but they have
2:11:01
to be calling around homeless shelters
2:11:03
until they, through sheer persistence, find
2:11:06
a bed. Only one of the shelters
2:11:09
serves foreign nationals. A lot of them do background
2:11:11
checks and other document checks. The
2:11:14
Cindy McCain definition of trafficking is that these
2:11:16
people are not from the United States.
2:11:18
Why is this not an emergency to anti-trafficking
2:11:21
organizations? Right. There
2:11:23
are no resources being allocated for
2:11:25
them. There's no real system in place
2:11:27
for taking care of them once they're
2:11:29
saved from their abusers. No one
2:11:32
seems to have much of a plan
2:11:34
of where to put them or how to find
2:11:37
resources for them. It all goes to
2:11:39
criminalization. Yeah. I mean, this is the
2:11:41
darkest
2:11:41
shit that I haven't found in other task
2:11:43
force reports, but I think is really widespread, that
2:11:46
the only forms of housing available to
2:11:48
trafficking victims are long-term housing.
2:11:51
And so all of them have these weird
2:11:54
intake requirements where you have
2:11:56
to be in
2:11:57
before a curfew, you have
2:11:59
to commit to some... sobriety. If I've been
2:12:01
trafficked, I'm not staying sober. You know,
2:12:03
I've got some demons to handle. This
2:12:05
is from the task force report. Required activities
2:12:07
include counseling therapy, life
2:12:10
skills activities, religious activities,
2:12:13
and group or wellness meetings for residents.
2:12:16
And also two out of three of them cut
2:12:18
off your internet and take away your cell
2:12:20
phone. Okay, isn't that what you're supposed to do to
2:12:23
someone when you're trafficking them, though? I
2:12:25
mean, this is the thing. Like, are we going to break their movements and control
2:12:27
their life? Like, are we rescuing
2:12:30
the victims of trafficking by re-trafficking
2:12:32
them? Yes.
2:12:33
And I also read about this thing
2:12:35
outside of New Orleans, where there's a house
2:12:38
for trafficking victims out in a rural
2:12:40
area that is run by the
2:12:42
New Orleans Sheriff's
2:12:43
Department. Oh, God. Where they're also taking
2:12:46
away people's cell phones,
2:12:48
and there's no public transit out there. Living
2:12:51
in a house in rural Louisiana
2:12:53
with no public transportation, where you're being supervised
2:12:56
by the Sheriff's Department sounds like a spiritual
2:12:58
sequel to Get Out. Yes. Warning
2:13:00
signs include that in the training for the kids. Why
2:13:03
are we looking at kids in airports? And like being
2:13:05
isolated in a remote location where
2:13:07
the people who are restricting your movements
2:13:10
have no sense of accountability because
2:13:12
of their own belief and the righteousness of
2:13:15
what they're doing. Like, again, this is
2:13:17
coming back to our, you
2:13:20
know, torch song of all torch songs,
2:13:22
which is the most dangerous
2:13:24
people are the people who
2:13:27
believe in their deepest
2:13:29
heart of hearts, that they
2:13:31
are on the side of what
2:13:33
is right and just. The dangerous
2:13:35
people are the people who think they are good
2:13:38
and who society thinks are good and therefore
2:13:40
who have the kind of power that
2:13:43
lends itself very easily to abuse. Yes.
2:13:46
You're going to love
2:13:47
this. This is the darkest
2:13:49
NGO, Christian NGO thing. Hooray.
2:13:51
Becca Charleston, who's the director of something called Valiant
2:13:54
Hearts, which is a Christian charity
2:13:55
that helps trafficking victims. She identifies
2:13:57
as a victim of trafficking herself. This
2:14:00
is from a Christian website. Charleston
2:14:02
spoke about working with police departments who
2:14:04
set up sting operations. Posing
2:14:06
as potential clients, they create online
2:14:08
posts to lure individuals to a hotel
2:14:10
room. Once the person arrives, law
2:14:13
enforcement officers will give them an ultimatum. Either
2:14:15
they can go to jail or accept
2:14:17
valiant hearts offered to help. However,
2:14:20
many of the trafficked individuals declined the help,
2:14:23
believing initially that it is their choice. Oh,
2:14:26
I'm very curious about the situations that
2:14:28
are being described here. How many
2:14:30
red flags did you wear there in that
2:14:32
photograph? So the people
2:14:35
who are being courted in the sting operations
2:14:37
are sex workers. Yes, and this Christian
2:14:40
organization has taken it upon
2:14:42
itself to make fake ads
2:14:44
and entrap sex workers. Are
2:14:47
they minors or are they just adult, just random
2:14:49
adult sex workers? It appears they're
2:14:51
adult sex workers. There's nothing in here
2:14:53
indicating that it's children. And then
2:14:55
it's just like, you know, you can look at the
2:14:57
founder of this organization and say, you
2:14:59
have been through a real trauma and
2:15:02
maybe that doesn't qualify you to know what
2:15:05
these people in this very broad
2:15:08
group of backgrounds and possible
2:15:10
situations all need. Like
2:15:13
it's not appropriate for individuals to be
2:15:15
able
2:15:16
to join forces with the police in
2:15:18
this way, either, I don't think. No. Like
2:15:21
this is a really weird thing that we kind of accept
2:15:23
as normal in the United States because it happens
2:15:25
so frequently. And especially because
2:15:27
of the severity of the crime, the
2:15:30
knowledge base required of the
2:15:32
person collaborating with law enforcement
2:15:34
doesn't need to be as high. This is one of
2:15:36
those things that shows up that I was talking to this
2:15:39
person who has to remain anonymous, who was on a state
2:15:41
trafficking
2:15:41
task force. What he
2:15:43
found in the state where he was working that cops
2:15:45
would do these quote unquote stings, raids
2:15:48
on massage parlors or whatever. And
2:15:50
they'd sit down with the sex workers
2:15:52
and say like, look, you can
2:15:54
go to jail or you can say you're a trafficking
2:15:56
victim. Those are your two options. If
2:15:58
your choice is between.
2:15:59
and something else, then the something
2:16:02
else would be pretty bad for you to choose
2:16:04
jail first. It's just there's something so
2:16:07
corrupt about the cops
2:16:09
telling people that they're a victim of something. Also
2:16:11
then, if you say, yes, I've been trafficked,
2:16:13
then what then? You go to the fucking homeless
2:16:16
shelter. This is the thing. Okay, so
2:16:18
what if you have a perfectly nice house
2:16:20
that you're paying for with
2:16:21
your sex work that you're just trying to do for
2:16:23
God's sakes? Right. Or if you are
2:16:25
in a bad situation, how is going to a homeless
2:16:27
shelter gonna make that better? Right. I
2:16:30
mean, one of
2:16:30
the really interesting shifts here is that one
2:16:32
of the things that accompanies the trafficking
2:16:34
panic is this idea of ending demand
2:16:37
or like the Nordic model. Is that where you criminalize
2:16:40
client ship? Yes.
2:16:42
Okay. This is like the woke
2:16:44
sex worker criminalization policy now. You
2:16:47
don't wanna arrest the sex workers, but you
2:16:49
wanna arrest the Johns, right? So
2:16:51
it's like you're cracking down on the demand and
2:16:53
you're not gonna like re-victimize sex
2:16:55
workers, which sounds great, right? It sounds better.
2:16:58
I think anytime we call something
2:16:59
the Nordic model, it might be
2:17:01
because it needs more credibility than it actually
2:17:04
is. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
2:17:07
I mean, this is what you find is that, you know, there's been all these studies
2:17:09
of Sweden and Norway now where they invented
2:17:11
the Nordic model. And what they find is that it
2:17:13
doesn't actually make sex workers
2:17:16
any safer because first of all, by criminalizing
2:17:18
people buying sex, you're essentially
2:17:21
taking out all of the like law abiding
2:17:23
people out of the customer pool. It's
2:17:25
like you take away like normal
2:17:27
shoppers and you just have like black Friday people,
2:17:30
like that would be awful. That's
2:17:33
what the other thing that it does is because it's still trying
2:17:36
to abolish prostitution as an institution,
2:17:38
right? So what ends up happening is
2:17:41
even though the sex workers themselves are not
2:17:42
criminalized, the place that they're working,
2:17:45
the brothel, is now a criminal organization.
2:17:47
So they're part of a conspiracy. Exactly.
2:17:50
So they can be written up on racketeering
2:17:52
charges if they had any financial relationship. There's
2:17:55
also what's really interesting is in the
2:17:56
definition of trafficking is a sex
2:17:59
worker. sex worker over 18 that
2:18:01
has been coerced into sex
2:18:03
work through force, fraud, or coercion.
2:18:06
It's kind of a tautology there, isn't
2:18:08
it? But what's interesting is for people under 18,
2:18:11
you don't have to prove anything. All you have to prove is that
2:18:13
they're engaged in sex work because of age
2:18:16
of consent laws. And
2:18:18
I feel quite strongly that children cannot
2:18:20
consent to sex. Like I'm okay
2:18:23
with the principle. However, however,
2:18:26
what I've heard from a lot
2:18:26
of sex workers is that what happens is the cops
2:18:28
will sort of do a bus, they'll arrest a bunch of sex workers.
2:18:31
They'll find one who is
2:18:33
under 18. And that's
2:18:35
kind of like the Eureka moment. Oh,
2:18:38
God. Because once
2:18:40
you find one 17, 16, 15 year
2:18:42
old sex worker, then you have a circle
2:18:45
of people around that person
2:18:47
who you can charge with sex trafficking. Who
2:18:49
could all be 19, 20 years old?
2:18:51
Yes. I interviewed a lawyer
2:18:53
for a sex worker who is now
2:18:56
convicted of trafficking because she drove
2:18:58
another sex worker over state lines.
2:19:01
She was 19, the younger sex worker was 17. Great.
2:19:04
Which also means that you penalize
2:19:07
offering help. Yes. Like
2:19:09
you render it a criminal act
2:19:12
to help someone who's trying
2:19:14
to survive in an industry where maybe they need
2:19:17
a lot of tips that you might have. Like
2:19:19
it just feels very sinister
2:19:20
to me. This is from a report about
2:19:23
the Nordic model and sort of the failure of the
2:19:25
Nordic model. In Sweden, no one
2:19:27
can operate a brothel, rent an apartment,
2:19:29
room or hotel room, assist with finding
2:19:32
clients, act as a security guard or
2:19:34
allow advertising for sex work. This
2:19:37
in turn implies that sex workers cannot work
2:19:39
together, recommend customers to each other,
2:19:42
advertise work from property they rent or own or even
2:19:44
cohabit with a partner since their
2:19:46
partner is likely to share part of any income
2:19:49
derived from sex work. Jesus. You
2:19:51
don't get them on prostitution charges anymore, you
2:19:53
get them on accomplice
2:19:54
charges. Wow. So it's like, let's
2:19:57
be nice to sex workers and indict them
2:19:59
for racketeering.
2:19:59
Instead so like aren't
2:20:02
we woke like isn't this helping? It's like well.
2:20:04
Yeah, really, Norwegia like this is not
2:20:09
That's the most American you've ever sounded
2:20:14
Right and just I think that we
2:20:17
really Just in general like
2:20:19
any kind of legislation that's brought forth
2:20:22
where you look at it You're like now if someone were
2:20:24
to use this in bad faith Yeah,
2:20:26
you could really destroy some lives right and
2:20:29
it's just so weird because if you're saying I'm
2:20:31
doing this to protect The
2:20:33
trafficking
2:20:34
victims who are teen
2:20:36
girls and so in this scenario
2:20:38
I'm going to ruin the lives
2:20:40
of all these teen girls to protect the teen girls
2:20:43
and it's like well You're protecting imaginary
2:20:45
people yeah at the expense of real
2:20:47
people yeah, and the imaginary people don't
2:20:49
even vote
2:20:49
And
2:20:52
also I mean what what all of this does whether
2:20:54
you're criminalizing the sex workers or
2:20:56
the people who purchase sex Either
2:20:58
way it all it has the effect of is driving things underground
2:21:01
And so you know one of the sex workers that I talked
2:21:04
to about trafficking She was saying that
2:21:06
like you know there's now signs in
2:21:08
hotels I'd like know the warning signs of trafficking
2:21:10
oh yeah all of which are warning signs
2:21:13
of sex work right Yeah, oh they keep but do
2:21:15
not disturb sign on their door okay first of all
2:21:17
I always
2:21:17
do that mostly Show
2:21:19
in there but
2:21:21
also if the laws
2:21:23
are taking away your ability to Have
2:21:27
co-workers and some kind of maybe
2:21:29
secure arrangement Then like if
2:21:31
you're if you're losing access to hotels
2:21:33
to them like Jesus Christ where else is there
2:21:36
well? This is what one of the sex workers I interviewed told
2:21:38
me is that like a hotel is
2:21:40
a pretty safe place to be a sex
2:21:42
worker Right because you're in a room
2:21:44
with
2:21:44
we all know hosted in hotel walls are there
2:21:47
security cameras? The
2:21:49
most important thing is that the client
2:21:51
knows that if you scream Someone
2:21:54
will come yeah right and so she says you
2:21:56
know the harder it gets to work in hotels It's like
2:21:58
I'm gonna have sex with people in there
2:21:59
their cars. That's where they
2:22:02
have a lot more power over me. They can drive me where they want
2:22:04
to drive me. I can't necessarily leave.
2:22:07
All you're doing is
2:22:08
making it harder for people to report
2:22:11
this stuff. And if you scream in a car, then maybe
2:22:13
the police come. I think you're
2:22:15
farther away from being arrested yourself
2:22:18
in that situation, which is also important.
2:22:20
Right. So it's like all of this. I mean, there's now states
2:22:22
passing laws,
2:22:22
but it's in there that all hotel
2:22:24
staff need awareness raising training
2:22:27
of this problem for which there is huge and
2:22:29
false awareness
2:22:29
already. Yeah. So what are the signs that
2:22:32
people are being educated to look for? It's
2:22:34
again, it's like, you know, young women checking in by
2:22:36
themselves and like someone with
2:22:38
men visiting their rooms. It's
2:22:40
like it's criminalizing spring break more
2:22:42
than any. But
2:22:45
so this, this, this leads us to the last
2:22:47
aspect of this and this one we asked her, I promise. Oh,
2:22:50
I'm very happy to for you to lead me through all the darkness.
2:22:52
The last form of exploitation
2:22:55
creep, the last widening of
2:22:57
the term trafficking happens under
2:22:59
the Obama administration. Oh, daddy. So
2:23:02
the Obama administration comes in. They, like everybody
2:23:04
else notices that the Bush administration
2:23:06
has spent eight years saying prostitution
2:23:08
is the same as trafficking and we need to eradicate prostitution.
2:23:10
So they're like, well, you know, the real
2:23:12
form of trafficking and
2:23:15
exploitation that's going on in the world is forced labor.
2:23:17
There is ample evidence that forced labor is rampant.
2:23:20
There are a lot of migrant workers. Like conditions
2:23:22
are really terrible. So what we need to do
2:23:24
is expand the definition of trafficking
2:23:27
to pull in
2:23:29
all of these exploited workers, right? Like Indian
2:23:31
construction workers in Dubai and Guatemalan
2:23:34
farm workers in America. Like
2:23:36
we need to include all of these people in this problem
2:23:38
trafficking that everybody's super concerned
2:23:40
about. This seems fairly reasonable to me
2:23:42
and I'm therefore extremely anxious that
2:23:45
in reality it didn't end up working
2:23:47
out as well as I'm hoping. Well,
2:23:49
again, it's like it's this understandable thing
2:23:51
and everybody seems to be working from good motives.
2:23:54
Yeah. But what they do is they first redefined
2:23:56
trafficking and this is now the international definition
2:24:00
But any form of what's
2:24:02
called bonded labor is considered
2:24:04
trafficking. Wow. So,
2:24:07
for this episode,
2:24:07
I had the treat of calling up Joel Best.
2:24:11
Joel Best, our hero! Right?
2:24:14
Yes. He is a researcher, a sociologist,
2:24:16
who studies contemporary urban legends. Oh,
2:24:19
you talked to Joel. I know, it was great. He was like the
2:24:21
coolest. And it was really nice
2:24:23
in that, you know, like with researchers, if they haven't
2:24:25
looked into something, you want to sort of be careful. Like, you know,
2:24:27
I don't want to make you talk
2:24:28
about something that isn't your area of expertise.
2:24:31
And so I called him up and I was like, you know, I'm a little bit concerned
2:24:33
about, you know, human trafficking. Like,
2:24:36
I know it's not something you've looked into. And he's like, oh,
2:24:38
yeah, it's a scam. It's like, okay. It's
2:24:41
like, okay, Joel, tell me why. Is
2:24:43
his middle name is the or what? So
2:24:47
what Joel Best actually mentioned to me was
2:24:49
that, you know, you're a poor Kenyan 23-year-old.
2:24:52
You want
2:24:54
to move to the United States to be a
2:24:56
domestic worker because you're going to make more money being
2:24:59
a nanny in the United States than you would in Kenya.
2:25:02
So you apply for a guest worker visa. You get
2:25:04
the visa, great. But a
2:25:05
plane ticket is $1,500. And
2:25:07
you don't have $1,500. So you take out a
2:25:10
loan from one of these recruitment agents that you can find locally.
2:25:13
And they say, okay, you have to pay us back, you know, 300 extra
2:25:16
bucks a month or whatever. But you'll be making decent
2:25:18
wages. And it's not going to be that big of a deal. That
2:25:21
scenario, that is trafficking. That's
2:25:23
bonded labor. You're paying off a debt. And it's interesting
2:25:25
because we talked about this kind of deal
2:25:27
before as something that could be very easily abused.
2:25:30
Right. But also if
2:25:32
this arrangement doesn't have legitimate
2:25:34
means of existing, then how are people going
2:25:37
to get to the U.S. in the first place? Right.
2:25:40
But also what's really interesting to me is when I started working
2:25:42
on this, I thought that scenario
2:25:44
wasn't bonded labor, that what
2:25:46
then often happens, that like you
2:25:48
get there and the recruitment agent says like, well, I
2:25:50
said it was going to be 300 bucks, but now it's a thousand bucks a month
2:25:53
and I'm taking 90% of your salary. This does happen.
2:25:56
But that actually isn't necessary for it to be trafficking.
2:25:58
Interesting.
2:25:59
of trafficking is simply working to pay
2:26:02
off a debt. That's it. Oh, so it's just
2:26:04
it's, uh, it's in danger, essentially.
2:26:06
Yeah. So it's anyone who has
2:26:08
to pay off a recruitment
2:26:09
fee. It's bonded labor. You're paying off
2:26:11
a bond. Okay. But then what that
2:26:13
does is adding this huge
2:26:16
category of workers. I mean, this is a massive percentage
2:26:18
of migrant workers are operating under some
2:26:20
form of paying off debt because
2:26:23
who in a developing country has money for
2:26:25
a plane ticket? Like this is how people do
2:26:28
this. Right. So now you've
2:26:30
got these numbers that go around about like 40 million
2:26:33
people in the world are trafficked, but
2:26:35
it's like, first of all, 14 million of those
2:26:37
are in
2:26:37
forced marriages, which I'm not
2:26:40
wild about, but are also very different
2:26:42
than sort of modern day slavery. You
2:26:44
also have a huge number of people who are
2:26:46
just paying off debts and like, are some
2:26:49
of those people deeply and darkly exploited?
2:26:51
Yes. But some of them aren't, some of them pay off their
2:26:53
debts and then they go home or they get a visa in
2:26:55
the United States and like whatever. And that
2:26:58
what that means is that you lose
2:27:00
the ability to get real numbers on
2:27:02
the situation. You don't know how many people
2:27:05
are being abused. You're not trying to estimate
2:27:07
how many people are in abusive
2:27:09
situations because it's just the presence
2:27:12
of a contract is the definition.
2:27:14
It's just the,
2:27:14
yes, the contractual form. Yeah. That's a good way to put
2:27:17
it. It's very clear that they're doing
2:27:19
this to get the numbers up, right?
2:27:21
And to pitch the problem as much bigger than
2:27:23
it is. And so the
2:27:25
second thing
2:27:26
that they start doing is that they start talking
2:27:28
about modern day slavery.
2:27:31
This is the way that trafficking
2:27:33
is now portrayed when it's labor
2:27:35
trafficking. So anybody working under these terrible
2:27:37
conditions is considered a modern day slave.
2:27:40
And so in another hallmark of
2:27:42
a moral panic, what you now have
2:27:45
is the term modern day slavery being used
2:27:47
to describe a huge range of activities,
2:27:50
right? That it does include people that are in the worst
2:27:52
working conditions imaginable, right? They're under
2:27:54
rural area. They're not being paid. They're essentially
2:27:57
trapped there.
2:27:58
Those cases exist. They're extremely. prevalent,
2:28:00
like that is a massive problem. But then you're
2:28:02
also using the same term to describe people
2:28:05
as, I borrowed a bunch of money to go
2:28:07
be a nanny in the US for six months, and I paid it
2:28:09
off and I came home. Is calling all
2:28:11
of that slavery? Is this helping?
2:28:14
And what's the logic that says that it is?
2:28:16
I think what's happened,
2:28:17
what's really interesting is as there
2:28:19
is more NGO
2:28:22
activity and more, you know, there's just more awareness
2:28:24
raising campaigns of all kinds these days,
2:28:27
right? Like breast cancer, human trafficking,
2:28:29
there's
2:28:29
all kinds of issues that we are constantly
2:28:31
having somebody tap us on the shoulder and being like, Hey, you
2:28:34
should care about this. And so that has
2:28:36
resulted in this arms race among
2:28:38
NGOs to cast my
2:28:41
issue is more important than these other issues.
2:28:43
So if I say like, you know, there's Kenyans
2:28:46
that are coming to America, they're working as nannies, a lot
2:28:48
of them have to pay off really huge debts.
2:28:50
There's not real complaint mechanisms for them. You're
2:28:52
like, this is the way else comes
2:28:54
to you and says, there are 25 million
2:28:57
slaves in the world and we thought we
2:28:59
eradicated it in 1865, but it's back.
2:29:00
This is a huge
2:29:02
component of modern day slavery rhetoric,
2:29:05
comparing it explicitly comparing it
2:29:07
to the experience of slaves in the United States.
2:29:10
And so when I say to you, we thought
2:29:12
we eradicated slavery, but it's back, that
2:29:15
gives you a specific mental image,
2:29:17
right? And I'm telling you there's more slaves now
2:29:20
than at any time in history, which is one of these numbers
2:29:22
that goes around, which like, yeah, if you're
2:29:24
defining slaves as like a
2:29:26
huge percentage of the workforce in developing
2:29:29
countries, then like, yes, slavery is
2:29:31
back. If you're explicitly equating
2:29:33
it with American slavery, it's like, those
2:29:35
conditions are not common.
2:29:36
Does it also speak to our rescue
2:29:38
fantasies to like, we
2:29:41
would prefer to like rescue someone
2:29:43
who's been
2:29:45
enslaved, to
2:29:47
just, you know, providing resources
2:29:49
for people who are like, you know, I got here and
2:29:51
like, I thought this was a fair deal,
2:29:53
or like, I thought I could pay this off, but
2:29:56
like, it turns out I can't, or like, the interest
2:29:58
on this is really exorbitant.
2:30:00
I mean, I can see how that also would
2:30:03
be harder to get attention for because
2:30:05
exorbitant interest is crucial to
2:30:07
American economies. So it's kind
2:30:10
of rich to be saying that like, it's not
2:30:12
okay when people do it, you know, in this
2:30:14
one situation. So it's like you have to
2:30:16
catastrophize the whole thing. Yeah.
2:30:19
That once again, that we would prefer to be someone's savior
2:30:21
than to be someone's helper. Totally. Totally.
2:30:25
And Janie Chung has this great article where she defines exploitation creep,
2:30:27
where she says another reason why it emerged was because
2:30:30
at the end
2:30:30
of the Bush administration, people were starting
2:30:33
to put more emphasis on forced labor and about
2:30:35
structural systems that were creating
2:30:38
these problems, right? Of the companies don't
2:30:40
know their supply chains. There's really
2:30:42
low wages in a lot of countries. There's
2:30:44
not a lot of labor inspectors. That
2:30:46
was the kind of consciousness that was happening in
2:30:49
the 2000s as, you know, as people really
2:30:51
turned against Bush and his later years of office, they
2:30:53
were also turning on the concept of trafficking and saying
2:30:55
like, well, you know, it's not a secret criminal
2:30:58
enterprise. It's farms in the United
2:31:00
States. Like we know where it is. It's restaurants
2:31:03
and it's hotels like these hotels that
2:31:05
are having like the warning signs of trafficking. It's
2:31:07
like a really big warning sign is that you all
2:31:10
use contractors for all of your cleaning
2:31:11
services and you don't even know what
2:31:13
your employees make. Like your workers are being
2:31:16
trafficked. Yes. Like that's the warning
2:31:18
sign, right? And so there was this
2:31:20
sort of larger consciousness emerging
2:31:23
of like, it's us, right?
2:31:26
Like it's not mysterious. We know exactly what's happening. We
2:31:28
know exactly how and we know how to fix
2:31:30
it. Like there need to be better procedures. There need to
2:31:32
be complaint mechanisms. Yes. The title
2:31:34
of the actual spiritual
2:31:37
sequel to Get Out. Yeah.
2:31:40
I mean, what Janie Chung says at the conclusion
2:31:42
of her article,
2:31:43
recasting all forced labor as trafficking
2:31:46
and all trafficking as slavery, exploitation
2:31:48
creep relabels abuses as more extreme
2:31:51
than is legally accurate in what appears
2:31:53
to be a strategic effort to garner increased
2:31:56
commitment
2:31:56
to their eradication. So
2:31:59
end modern slavery. That's the phrase
2:32:01
you see all the time. We love ending.
2:32:03
We love solving. It's our favorite
2:32:06
thing. Yeah. Totally. And
2:32:08
it's
2:32:08
much sexier than being like, hotels shouldn't have outsourced
2:32:11
cleaning staff. These
2:32:13
procedural things that are like, actually how you
2:32:16
end forced labor. Or like, you know, you let people
2:32:18
unionize. Yes. For God's sake.
2:32:21
Yeah. It takes us back to this
2:32:23
rescue mission. Yeah.
2:32:24
It's not about workers getting rights for
2:32:27
themselves. Right. It's about us finding
2:32:29
the ones who happen to be being exploited
2:32:31
in this terrible, very unambiguous
2:32:34
way and saving them and everyone
2:32:37
who's working conditions while
2:32:39
also terrible, don't fall into
2:32:41
this exact paradigm, can
2:32:43
just go fly a kite.
2:32:44
Yes. I wrote this article last
2:32:46
year about this house painter in
2:32:48
Miami who had suffered really bad wage theft
2:32:50
from his employers. Employers basically said like, I'm
2:32:53
not going to pay you. It's like a year
2:32:55
and a half long process to sue your boss for fucking wage
2:32:57
theft. It was this awful
2:32:59
nightmare. And there was finally
2:33:01
a judgment where his boss had to pay
2:33:04
him and just didn't. And
2:33:06
so we had to start an entirely new process
2:33:08
because one was a civil and one was criminal. And
2:33:11
it's like the place where you're going to find quote
2:33:13
unquote, trafficking, real exploitation is where
2:33:15
there are
2:33:16
not systems for accountability.
2:33:18
And we know where those places are. We know
2:33:20
that maybe better than we know anything
2:33:22
else. Yes. So essentially it's like,
2:33:25
we find this problem. If we're to be
2:33:27
honest with ourselves in any way, we have
2:33:30
to admit that the problem is a structural one and
2:33:32
it deals with the much broader
2:33:34
issue of labor conditions in the United States.
2:33:37
And in order to distract ourselves from that,
2:33:39
we have to create a big bad. Yeah.
2:33:42
The last thing I want to say about this amazing Janie Chung article
2:33:44
is that she describes this
2:33:46
case of 300 Filipino
2:33:48
teachers who came to the United
2:33:50
States to work in Louisiana public schools.
2:33:53
And they came under legal visas. There's
2:33:56
an
2:33:56
H-1B visa where foreign workers can come
2:33:58
over. They paid $6. $16,000 each,
2:34:03
which is four times what they were earning per year
2:34:05
in the Philippines to come over and work as
2:34:07
teachers. And to work as teachers
2:34:10
in public schools in the United States. I mean,
2:34:12
I... Yeah. Oh
2:34:14
my God. Okay. Once they came, the
2:34:16
recruiter charged them again, was like, it's
2:34:19
like Ticketmaster, but they're like, oh, by the way, there's like an
2:34:21
extra thing you have to pay. Like the recruiter treated them
2:34:23
terribly. Yeah, that happened to me with Michael Bolton. It's
2:34:25
not his fault.
2:34:27
And like the recruiter then made them work for an extra
2:34:30
year in the United States and up to a percentage
2:34:32
they had to pay. Like awful, awful stuff.
2:34:35
What's really interesting is they actually came
2:34:37
forward and they filed
2:34:38
a case against the schools and
2:34:40
against the recruiter. And they were both
2:34:42
acquitted because, according
2:34:45
to Janie Chung, who I interviewed, she said
2:34:47
that the jury was like, this doesn't
2:34:49
sound like modern slavery to us. Right. And
2:34:52
it's like, it's not. Like it's pretty... Yeah.
2:34:56
Yes. Yes.
2:35:01
Yes. It's not. It's
2:35:03
not the very overblown thing that it has been described to you
2:35:06
as,
2:35:06
and that's not that Kerry's fault. Right. So
2:35:08
it's like, this is the hole that we've dug with this term
2:35:10
trafficking, where it's like we've gone
2:35:13
to the most extreme exaggeration of
2:35:15
the problem. But then it's like when you describe the actual
2:35:18
conditions that people are working under, which are extremely
2:35:20
common, it's like, eh, I don't know about
2:35:22
slavery. I
2:35:25
don't know. I mean, I don't get paid enough either.
2:35:27
Yeah. Right. Yeah.
2:35:31
It's just, it's only if you compare it to
2:35:33
slavery that it doesn't seem that bad.
2:35:36
Yes. Yeah. We're
2:35:38
setting ourselves up to fail. Mm-hmm. Like, is this
2:35:40
helping at all? Which should be the question
2:35:42
we ask about all these things. Yes. Regardless
2:35:45
of, you know, of so many other factors.
2:35:48
Like, is this actually helping
2:35:50
the actual people who we claim to
2:35:52
want to help? Right.
2:35:54
Which should feel good to us for some reason.
2:35:56
Right. And it's like,
2:35:58
yeah, I'm just going to say the same thing again. I
2:36:01
don't know. I want to be really careful in that one
2:36:03
of the things that I really struggle with this field
2:36:05
is that there's a lot of NGOs and
2:36:07
a lot of philanthropists working on trafficking who
2:36:10
seem really nice. Oh
2:36:13
yeah. There's lots of very nice people who
2:36:15
are
2:36:16
putting their energy behind something
2:36:18
that might be politically ineffective. And
2:36:20
they really care. It's
2:36:23
not evil, but to me it's really naive.
2:36:26
I spent
2:36:26
a lot of time on the phone with this organization Polaris
2:36:28
this week that has the National Trafficking Hotline,
2:36:30
and I sort of confronted them about this, of like, you
2:36:32
have all these signs in airports, yet your website says
2:36:34
that the vast majority of quote unquote trafficking
2:36:37
does not involve movement. And you're
2:36:39
quite good actually at saying on your website
2:36:42
that it's going to be someone you know, stranger danger doesn't
2:36:44
exist. And I'm saying, but now
2:36:46
you have these posters saying if you see something,
2:36:48
say something in airports, and they're like, oh,
2:36:51
but it has our National Trafficking Hotline on there.
2:36:53
We're not telling people to call the cops. Cops
2:36:55
can be abusive. We get it. I don't
2:36:58
think people are going to see
2:36:58
those posters and remember the number. I think
2:37:01
people are going to see those posters and then a week later
2:37:03
they're going to see something quote unquote suspicious,
2:37:06
and then they're going to call the fucking cops. You're
2:37:08
feeding into this myth and you're
2:37:11
not taking seriously the unintended consequences
2:37:13
of every
2:37:14
person in America feeling
2:37:16
empowered to quote unquote save
2:37:19
the children and like snitch on random
2:37:21
neighbors and getting them into contact
2:37:23
with the police. I think this has to do with
2:37:26
the idea of awareness as a universal
2:37:28
right. We have to raise awareness of things.
2:37:31
I want you to take me down this rabbit hole so bad. I
2:37:35
mean, the first thing that comes up for me around that is that,
2:37:38
you know, we're living in a time of awareness sweeps
2:37:40
week perpetually,
2:37:40
right? Like
2:37:42
to get someone to pay attention to something you kind
2:37:45
of do have to sell it. Yeah.
2:37:47
I mean, first of all, if you're trying to raise
2:37:49
public awareness of an issue,
2:37:50
I think we're
2:37:52
in a time when you have to think even more than
2:37:55
in the past, maybe about, you know, if I am needing
2:37:57
to go.
2:37:59
to all these rhetorical lengths to get
2:38:02
people to even pay attention to the thing I'm trying
2:38:04
to tell them about. Am I
2:38:06
changing in some way the nature
2:38:09
of the thing I'm trying to describe in order to try
2:38:11
and beckon people
2:38:12
to listen to me and pay attention to it? Like, am
2:38:15
I
2:38:15
doing a hard sell that
2:38:18
essentially changes my point? And
2:38:20
then if that's the case, then like, what does
2:38:22
awareness become? If you're like looking for something
2:38:24
that you're probably not going to see and then you just seize
2:38:27
on something else that rubs you the wrong
2:38:29
way, but maybe you can't say why. As a
2:38:31
little wrap up thought here, one thing
2:38:34
that's really difficult about this is that you
2:38:36
don't want to sort of over debunk and
2:38:39
take away what really happened
2:38:41
to people. One of the
2:38:43
people who is pushing
2:38:45
for more of these posters in airports is named
2:38:47
Alicia Kazakovits. And
2:38:49
she's someone who like the worst thing
2:38:52
happens to her. Like she was groomed
2:38:54
online, she was kidnapped from her home, she
2:38:56
was confined in a basement, she was
2:38:58
abused, she was filmed. I mean,
2:39:01
it's the worst thing you can imagine.
2:39:03
It's real.
2:39:04
Yeah. And something that shouldn't be able
2:39:06
to happen in a society where children
2:39:09
are being raised. And what's
2:39:11
interesting is some of the kind of anti-trafficking,
2:39:13
debunking type
2:39:15
people I talked to this week, sometimes you get this
2:39:18
sort of tinge of, well,
2:39:20
you know, doesn't this survivor story sound a little
2:39:22
far fetched or like, you know, this internet
2:39:25
slothery stuff of like, well, if she says that she
2:39:27
was kidnapped, the windows in her
2:39:29
bedroom actually locked, the wine was... I mean,
2:39:31
this type
2:39:32
of stuff that I find so gross in
2:39:34
general and especially gross here. Like the grasping
2:39:36
at straws rhetoric of like, let's not admit
2:39:39
that any terrible things are happening. Yes. And
2:39:41
also, you know, I interviewed people for this that identify as
2:39:43
trafficking victims and something really terrible
2:39:46
happened to them. And I'm not going to take
2:39:48
that away from them. Like the worst thing you can
2:39:50
do as a journalist and especially
2:39:52
as a person is to tell
2:39:54
somebody that their pain isn't
2:39:55
real or that it doesn't matter. And
2:39:58
so I think we... We can
2:40:00
all be adults and talk about this in a way that
2:40:02
acknowledges the real pain
2:40:04
of people who have experienced forms
2:40:07
that sort of do fit the stereotypical
2:40:09
narrative, but also that that's
2:40:12
not the only narrative, that we can acknowledge
2:40:14
that there are other forms of abuse that we also
2:40:16
need to take seriously. I think that
2:40:18
we
2:40:18
are struggling to find ways
2:40:21
to say that all kinds of
2:40:23
human experience and trauma are real, but
2:40:25
that there's this certain form
2:40:28
of trauma and this certain form of crime
2:40:31
that is being represented in a really
2:40:34
disproportionate way. That feels
2:40:36
like a headlock that it's hard to get out of. You're
2:40:38
asking me to only think of that
2:40:41
awfulness when telling
2:40:44
you as
2:40:44
some powerful person in society that
2:40:46
you can do whatever you want to maybe these other
2:40:48
people. Right. Well, also, I mean,
2:40:50
to me, I think it has to be possible
2:40:54
to recognize the trauma
2:40:55
of somebody like Alicia Kazakovitz
2:40:58
and acknowledge what happened to her. And
2:41:01
it's possible to acknowledge the trauma of
2:41:03
someone whose boss is stealing from
2:41:05
them for years and has to go through
2:41:07
a long court
2:41:08
trial or someone who is a
2:41:10
homeless teenager that has to engage
2:41:13
in survival sex to get a warm
2:41:15
place to sleep that night. Or someone who's
2:41:17
a sex worker who's getting busted all the time.
2:41:19
Yes. I think it's like it doesn't
2:41:22
have to take away
2:41:22
from one person to acknowledge another
2:41:24
person's pain. And I also, I think
2:41:27
somebody like Alicia Kazakovitz has every
2:41:29
right to advocate for posters at
2:41:31
airports.
2:41:31
Like that is her right. She can use her
2:41:34
experience for anything she
2:41:36
wants to. I also think that sex
2:41:38
workers have the right to talk about their
2:41:40
trauma and the way that this is affecting them. Like interracial
2:41:43
couples that have the Cindy McCain's
2:41:45
of the world calling TSA on them also
2:41:47
have the right to describe their experiences. And all
2:41:49
of those experiences are valid.
2:41:51
And the purpose
2:41:53
of politics and the purpose of sort of adulthood
2:41:56
is to look at these different interests
2:41:58
and look at the way
2:41:59
not the way that they compete with each other, but the
2:42:02
way that they intertwine. And
2:42:04
there are ways to acknowledge
2:42:06
the experiences of people who went through these
2:42:08
terrible things without making
2:42:11
other people's lives worse.
2:42:13
I think that there's also something going on
2:42:15
where the
2:42:16
more dangerous of
2:42:18
a country we become for the
2:42:20
child, the more we preach
2:42:22
about caring for the child. And it's
2:42:24
like, maybe you care about the idea of children,
2:42:27
but why don't you give free lunch to the real ones?
2:42:29
The real ones are hungry. I
2:42:32
think this speaks to the fact that if
2:42:34
you were trying to get help for someone, then
2:42:37
the best way to do it in this society
2:42:39
we live in might to be like, no, no, no, they're
2:42:41
not a criminal and they're not criminalizable
2:42:44
because they fall into this tiny
2:42:46
slice of
2:42:48
humanity called unambiguous victim.
2:42:50
And it's because they're the victim of the crime
2:42:53
of the week. Right.
2:42:55
I think you've ruined Thanksgiving. I think that's pretty good.
2:42:57
Oh, good. Okay. So everybody ruin
2:43:00
Thanksgiving. So
2:43:05
when you fly somewhere, if you see
2:43:07
something, don't say something.
2:43:10
But if you see Cindy McCain,
2:43:11
run. Those
2:43:22
were our episodes. Thank you
2:43:24
so much for listening. Thank you
2:43:26
to Miranda Zichler for editing. Thank
2:43:28
you to Carolyn Kendrick for editing
2:43:31
and producing and for
2:43:33
everything that she does. And
2:43:36
thank you so much to Michael Hobbs for
2:43:38
being the reason the show exists
2:43:41
in the first place. And for agreeing
2:43:43
to talk about this terrible movie with
2:43:46
me. Thank you so much for
2:43:48
listening. Congratulations on
2:43:50
getting through August. We'll see you in
2:43:52
two weeks.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More