Podchaser Logo
Home
Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Released Tuesday, 5th September 2023
 3 people rated this episode
Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes AND Human Trafficking re-release

Tuesday, 5th September 2023
 3 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It's like, shouldn't you be a better actor

0:02

if you're acting for God and not just because

0:04

you want to get a part on a soap so

0:07

you can buy that condo?

0:09

Welcome

0:15

to You're

0:20

Wrong About, I'm Sarah Marshall, and

0:22

today we are talking, I am both

0:25

sad and happy to tell you about

0:28

Sound of Freedom with Michael Hobbes.

0:31

This week we have a trifle of

0:33

an episode for you, a bit of a layer

0:35

cake, if you will. First

0:38

you're going to hear this introduction I'm giving you right now,

0:40

then

0:40

you're going to hear a conversation between

0:43

me and living

0:45

legend You're Wrong About former co-host

0:48

and forever co-founder Michael Hobbes

0:51

about Sound of Freedom, a movie that

0:53

a lot of you have been asking or

0:55

wondering what both of us think

0:57

of this summer. And then after

0:59

that, you're going to hear a re-release of

1:01

our human trafficking episode from 2019. Sound

1:05

of Freedom is a movie that represents some

1:08

of the most powerful and insidious myths

1:10

of human trafficking, many

1:13

of them the ones we also see weaponized

1:15

by QAnon. As

1:17

a result, it's a movie that

1:20

strives to put its

1:22

audience through kind of an emotional ringer and

1:25

our goal in doing this episode for you is

1:27

to

1:28

talk about a piece of media that's working

1:30

with that subject matter, but not to

1:33

make you the listener, do that kind of

1:35

thinking or

1:36

have that kind of an experience

1:39

with what we're making. We want to bring you a

1:42

safer way to experience

1:44

what's going on in the culture right

1:47

now. So we're talking about all

1:49

of the aspects of human trafficking, child

1:51

trafficking, child sexual abuse

1:53

and trafficking

1:55

that

1:55

we are seeing represented in

1:58

the fictional world of the this film

2:00

where Jim Caviezel is a great action hero,

2:03

but to the greatest extent of our abilities,

2:05

we're not

2:06

dwelling on difficult

2:09

topics and imagery. And we're really

2:11

trying to get into the minds of the people making

2:13

and consuming this film.

2:15

So hopefully that makes the experience as

2:17

easy as it can be. And the same is true

2:20

in the episode that we

2:22

then are bringing to you in re-release. What

2:24

we're really trying to talk about is how

2:27

we hide the truth from ourselves and how we can do

2:29

a better job of looking at it. This

2:32

was a really fun conversation for me to

2:34

have. I think talking about it

2:36

with Mike is the only way I could have been persuaded

2:38

to discuss it. And if you wanna hear a little

2:41

bit longer version of our conversation with more

2:43

of our evergreen topics

2:45

coming up, then you can hear that on Patreon

2:48

or Apple Plus subscriptions, if you like.

2:51

Also on Patreon and Apple Plus

2:54

for you guys, if you wanna check it out, is

2:56

a little concert film we made

2:58

when we did one of our springtime shows. This

3:01

one was at the Bell House in Brooklyn. We had

3:04

just an amazing time, did some

3:06

fun outfit changes. We

3:08

had a little bit of splatter, we had music,

3:11

we had

3:12

laughing and crying reported

3:14

by many audience members. And if

3:17

these were live shows when we were touring a few

3:19

months ago that you wanted to see, but

3:21

couldn't for whatever reason, then

3:24

this is our attempt to just bring the show

3:26

into your living room. Rest assured that

3:28

you will be watching tiny

3:31

little versions of us acting it all

3:33

out for you anew, as if in

3:35

a flee circus.

3:41

Thank you so much for listening. Enjoy

3:43

the episode.

3:44

Thank you. I

4:00

love most to torture them with the topics

4:02

they like least and with me

4:04

today is Michael Hobbs. I

4:07

only get 15 minutes out of the Downtown Hotel at a time. I've

4:10

been imprisoned. Thank you for letting me have

4:12

this time together. You're actually calling me with

4:14

a Canadian quarter

4:15

in the lobby.

4:19

An operator voice is going to cut in at any moment. Someone

4:21

is singing, God, I hope I get it. I hope

4:24

I get it right next to you.

4:28

You did say when we were texting

4:30

about this that you like it when the worst

4:32

moral panics just stick around forever. I

4:35

feel like that's what we're back to talk about. I

4:38

mean, I don't like it, but I'm just like, what

4:40

do you know? What do you say? Check it out.

4:42

Here it is. Nothing

4:44

ever dies. Nothing ever dies,

4:47

which also means that all the great things

4:50

will never die. Question mark.

4:53

Maybe as

4:54

long as Netflix leaves them up. Michael Hobbs

4:57

for people who don't know, you

4:59

are the daddy of this show. You are

5:02

the alpha and omega. You are

5:04

the very modern

5:06

model of a very major debunker

5:09

in general. I don't know musicals, but yes,

5:11

that's how I introduce myself. I'm the alpha and omega. You

5:14

are wrong about. Yes. How have you been doing?

5:16

What have you, what are you up to these days?

5:19

Well, I'm having a very weird week because I have

5:21

like very severe carpal tunnel in my hands.

5:23

I can't like do anything with my

5:25

hands, but like my life as

5:27

a podcaster means that I can like talk

5:30

into the internet to unlimited extents

5:32

now, regardless of my hands.

5:35

So this is actually perfect that you got in touch that we

5:37

can just like talk about stuff. Like luckily

5:39

that's my job. My job does not technically

5:41

require any hands. I never thought of it

5:43

that way, but that's true. My

5:45

hands are just like, like primly folded

5:48

in my lap and I can just like talk into my little microphone.

5:50

I feel like I want, I want to just like give

5:53

you an introduction for people

5:55

who like, I don't know, need to spend

5:57

more time with your Irv or for people

5:59

who don't.

5:59

It's just nice to hear things you already like

6:02

described to you. We started this show

6:04

specifically in 2018 because,

6:07

well,

6:07

I don't know if you started it because of your love

6:09

of debunking stuff or if that followed more.

6:12

I know that we started it because I had this

6:14

treasure chest

6:15

of stories about women road killed

6:17

by the media that I had not found other

6:19

outlets to talk about. Yes, the bimbo portfolio.

6:22

Yes.

6:22

Exactly. Yeah. But

6:25

what about you? Stuff that the media

6:27

got wrong and then I think we had the

6:30

naive idea that it's like we're going to do a

6:32

show like setting the

6:33

record straight. We

6:35

realize that it's like no nothing like no one ever

6:37

just stops lying like these stories

6:40

never stop circulating. So it's like, oh, we just have

6:42

to keep doing the same episode over and over

6:44

again to debunk the same bullshit forever.

6:48

Yeah, I got that's really

6:50

true. It really speaks to

6:52

like how 2018 2018 felt at the time.

6:56

And this is just a function of every year being

6:58

worse than the last at this point

7:00

in history. But at the time it felt

7:02

like the cutting edge of how bad things could

7:05

be. And now you look back and you're like, oh,

7:08

I know about

7:10

your younger self.

7:11

Do you remember the 2016 memes

7:13

that were like, oh, when is this year going to be over?

7:15

Like can't wait to say goodbye to 2016. And

7:18

it just has been worse. Like what did we think

7:20

was coming? Every year

7:21

has been worse. But it was fun

7:23

because you could do a little Twitter macro of

7:25

it. You could get the start of this year. I was

7:28

Charlize Theron looking cute and

7:30

young adult. And at the end I was Charlize Theron

7:32

in Mad Max very road. I know. And

7:35

now

7:35

we're just like, it's just going to be like this forever. One

7:38

of the things that emerged that was

7:40

already brewing when we started this show,

7:42

but that has been incredibly relevant to

7:44

the past five years of American life has been

7:47

the overlap

7:48

in the overlapping worlds

7:51

of over the top theories

7:54

about child sex trafficking and

7:56

claims about how human trafficking

7:58

slash sex trafficking. happens

8:01

up to and including all those signs in bathrooms.

8:04

Yes. Especially the ones that

8:06

say, no, the signs of human trafficking. And

8:08

then don't say what the signs of human trafficking

8:11

are. There's a joke about

8:13

this in Jamie Loftus's raw

8:15

dog. And once you notice it, you never stop

8:17

noticing it. They're like, no, some signs.

8:20

OK, bye. Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean, most

8:22

people interpret that to mean like a child who has a different ethnicity

8:24

than their parents. Because God knows that

8:27

never happens in America. Yeah, exactly. Like

8:29

the whole point is to fuel like people calling the cops

8:31

on people who look different from them. Yeah. So

8:34

in a way, the posters are

8:36

work is intended. Right,

8:38

exactly. They're working as intended

8:41

to support the conservative American agenda of calling

8:44

the police at random on

8:46

mixed race families. Yes. But that's

8:48

not what they're claiming to be doing importantly.

8:51

And when we talk about like how

8:53

to live effectively in a post-apocalyptic or mid-apocalyptic

8:55

world, I guess, because what we're now in,

8:58

I would say, I don't know

9:00

if people are using that term, but I think it's correct. I

9:03

have been trying to go see a lot of summer

9:05

movies, partly because it is so goddamn

9:07

hot

9:07

in Portland. What is it like in Seattle? It

9:10

is 94 degrees right now and it is noon. So

9:14

we're like a preaching a peak of 105 in a few hours. I

9:18

don't know how you guys do it. It's bad here, but it's not

9:20

it's not inland Portland bad. We don't do

9:22

it. People die.

9:24

But the other night I went to see the

9:26

Road Warrior, the second Mad Max

9:28

movie. It came out in 1981. And

9:30

this also leads me to the fact that this movie

9:32

I found so inspiring and really made me think,

9:35

made me think about what I'm trying to do with this very show

9:37

of ours is that this

9:40

movie stars Mel Gibson and he's really good at playing

9:43

the Road Warrior. And also, oh my God,

9:45

is

9:46

he, you know, a mainstream

9:48

anti-semite culture maker for the ages and for

9:50

the today's. No

9:54

one ever really gets canceled, do they? It's

9:56

pretty incredible. You can

9:58

call someone

9:59

sugar tits. on tape and

10:01

be uncancelled like four years later and say like much

10:03

worse things that I don't want to say. My mom

10:06

has given up on Mel Gibson. So you know,

10:08

that's something. He's lost the

10:10

Carol vote. But it's true. I

10:12

mean, you like, maybe your star

10:14

falls. Maybe you feel like you've

10:16

lost everything. But what that probably means is

10:18

that you've lost a little bit of

10:21

your power and safety in the world as you know

10:23

it. And I don't think anything can ever really take Mel

10:25

Gibson down. And it's

10:27

interesting to sort of work our way to our

10:29

inevitable topic today.

10:32

VML Gibson, which is of course,

10:35

sound of freedom. Yes. But

10:37

I reached out to you last week.

10:39

And I was like, do you want to re-release

10:41

our human trafficking

10:42

episode? Because it came out a while ago.

10:44

It's a really wonderful piece of work by

10:47

you. And because human trafficking

10:49

is like, it feels like it's just always, you know,

10:52

it's always somewhere in the news. But it feels like

10:54

it's having a spike this summer. And part

10:56

of that is both allowing the

10:59

success of, and then driven by the success

11:01

of, sound of freedom. And

11:03

I was like, do you want to talk about sound of freedom as

11:05

well? And I was like, no. Absolutely

11:09

not. Yeah. You were like, yes, if I don't

11:12

have to prep for it because I'm incredibly busy.

11:14

And I was like, I know you are incredibly busy.

11:16

But also like,

11:18

you should avoid seeing sound of freedom if you

11:20

can. I think that's good.

11:22

Yeah, it just pumps me out so much. Well, it should.

11:25

I feel like the whole moral conundrum

11:27

of the kind of work that we're doing is like,

11:30

it puts you in a position where you just have to fucking repeat

11:32

yourself constantly. And

11:34

nothing has changed. This isn't a real thing.

11:36

All of these organizations are extremely sketchy.

11:39

The underlying conditions in America

11:42

that drive things like youth sex work

11:44

have not changed. It's all the same kind of stuff.

11:47

But then some new

11:47

thing happens. And what is the stuff,

11:50

by the way? Well, just like, it's mostly, I

11:52

mean, as we get into in the episode, it's mostly just like, a

11:54

lot of it is just like runaway kids that

11:57

end up on the street and they don't have anywhere

11:59

to sleep. and they don't have any options.

12:02

And so they end up agreeing to

12:04

have sex with somebody for a place to stay

12:06

that night. And under the law, which defines

12:09

any trading of anything of value

12:11

for sex by a child as human trafficking, that

12:13

is technically human trafficking. I will have sex with you if you let me

12:15

stay on

12:16

your couch. That technically is human trafficking.

12:18

So when we get these statistics, they're like, human trafficking

12:20

is all over the place. And then we get these sort of

12:22

police driven crackdowns.

12:25

But we don't need to arrest these

12:27

kids. We just need to give them shelter and we need to

12:29

give them a safe place to stay and

12:31

safe adults to be around and resources.

12:34

We can't send in Liam Neeson and solve

12:36

a social problem like kids

12:39

who are forced to sleep with somebody for money because they

12:41

have no other option. Although

12:43

wouldn't it be amazing if there

12:46

is a Liam Neeson movie where

12:48

he takes over a government

12:50

agency because he's so good at

12:53

typing in shorthand and infrastructure

12:55

and he it's like a drama movie

12:57

about him or like creating a new filing

13:00

system for them, which then enables

13:02

them to do really helpful stuff. This

13:04

is our spec script.

13:05

Just like Liam Neeson takes over an administrative

13:08

agency. Yeah, it's called organized.

13:14

It's called mate. No, it's called methodology

13:17

queen. It's called methodology queen. Or

13:20

it can be called methodology

13:21

king because Liam Neeson

13:23

demanded a rewrite. Yeah. And ultimately it's going to be heteronormative.

13:26

We need to keep the gender roles straight. Yes. We don't

13:28

want to confuse anybody. Unfortunately,

13:29

Neeson's people needed

13:32

that. Yeah. And sound of freedom to give

13:35

people an introduction. I feel like

13:37

this is like very big in the news right

13:39

now. This came out on July 4th.

13:41

It was the only new movie

13:44

to come out that weekend. So

13:47

it had a good pre-sale head start

13:49

and then it also got to be the number one

13:51

movie in America that weekend through

13:53

scheduling luck, which got

13:56

it off to a really good start. It has since

13:58

made,

13:59

according to Bob. box office mojo. It

14:02

hasn't been released internationally yet. So

14:04

domestically and in general, it's grosses 172,813,722

14:06

dollars. God,

14:13

I didn't know movies made that much money anymore.

14:16

This one does. Yeah. And

14:18

I think for a while it was ahead of Mission

14:20

Impossible, the new Mission Impossible movie,

14:23

Dead Reckoning,

14:24

part one. That's bleak. We

14:26

should be spending our money on like a Scientology

14:29

weirdo, not a trafficking weirdo. Yeah.

14:32

Well, let me tell you, I like yesterday, I was like,

14:34

okay, Sarah, you're recording this tomorrow.

14:36

You're recording at noon. You can't see the movie

14:39

tomorrow morning. You have to do it tonight.

14:42

You have to go to the theater and

14:44

just see this stupid movie. And

14:46

so I gritted my teeth and I went

14:48

to the theater and then- Wait, you saw the

14:50

movie? You saw Sound of Freedom? Yes.

14:53

What? Sarah. Yes. However,

14:56

I got to the theater and I was like, I

14:59

can't yet.

15:00

I need to do something for me. And so I saw Mission

15:02

Impossible, Dead Reckoning. Did you really?

15:04

Did you do a double feature with that and the trafficking

15:07

movie? Yeah. And then I got two junior

15:09

whoppers. And let me tell you, those

15:11

junior whoppers are very junior. They're

15:13

not in charge of anything. They're so small.

15:15

Did you theater hop or did you pay

15:17

for both tickets? Well, I have a regal

15:19

unlimited membership. So each

15:22

movie cost me 50 cents technically,

15:24

which is part of how I

15:26

feel less gross about seeing Sound of

15:28

Freedom. Yeah, fair. Yeah. Really

15:30

marginally supporting it. Well, God, what

15:32

was it like? Well, first of all, Mission Impossible,

15:34

Dead Reckoning part one was great. Okay.

15:37

Oh, it's part

15:38

one? I did not even know this. Yeah, they're doing like a Deathly

15:40

Hallows thing with it. But what you need to know

15:42

is that there's this whole great action

15:44

chase sequence in the end on the Orient

15:46

Express.

15:46

Fuck, dude, those movies are

15:48

so dumb and I love them so much. Listen,

15:51

Ethan Hunt has to jump

15:53

a motorcycle off of like an Alp

15:56

in order to

15:57

parachute into a train.

16:00

Love it. Give it to me. It's so good.

16:02

I cannot wait. So I saw Mission Impossible

16:05

Dead Reckoning Part 1, and I was like,

16:07

well, that was...

16:08

I saw a good movie today, no matter

16:11

what happens. And I went to see Sound

16:13

of Freedom, the movie that has made 172 million dollars

16:17

to give people a little more context. Sound

16:19

of Freedom

16:21

was made by its director,

16:23

Alejandro Monteverde, in 2018.

16:25

It stars

16:28

Jim Caviezel, who many

16:30

of us know is the guy who played Jesus and

16:32

Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ,

16:35

a movie which, while he was filming,

16:37

the word on the street is that he was struck by lightning

16:40

twice while they were making that movie. Oh,

16:43

OK. That doesn't sound real, but OK. Yeah. And, you

16:45

know, The Passion of the Christ is an interesting one because

16:47

like,

16:48

I didn't see it because I like

16:51

non-religious horror movies famously, but

16:53

I remember when it came out, there was this

16:55

kind of a public debate about like, is it anti-Semitic?

16:59

Yeah, I remember that too. Well, technically, but like probably

17:01

in actuality. But there was like plausible deniability.

17:04

Yeah. Which of course now they're no

17:06

longer is due to the direct statements of

17:08

Mel Gibson himself. But it's like, it

17:10

feels like a classic,

17:13

like the tea party stuff as well, how

17:15

like stuff that happened in the

17:17

aughts, that there was plausible deniability

17:19

around, then kind of is coming out

17:21

now as like completely,

17:24

explicitly linked to fascism,

17:26

which unfortunately for the director, this

17:28

movie is with the intention

17:31

of basically everyone, but the guy who

17:33

made it actually, I think. There

17:36

is a weird thing in American culture now where like it

17:38

constantly happens that you say something and everybody's like,

17:40

you're crazy. That's way out of line. And

17:42

then like a

17:43

year later, it's just like factually confirmed.

17:45

And you're like, wait a minute, this, what

17:48

I was saying was true, but you're still yelling at me and I don't

17:50

know why. So what is it actually

17:52

about? Is it like a kind of normal three

17:54

act structure action movie? There

17:56

is, okay. So I'll tell you what it's about. And then we'll talk

17:58

about kind of what's behind.

17:59

it because that was the order that I learned this in. So

18:02

it is based on the true story,

18:04

according to our opening title card, of

18:07

Tim Ballard, who works for Homeland

18:10

Security. And he busts

18:12

this guy who looks like I wrote in my notes,

18:15

Mr. Gumby, because he looks like

18:17

Mr. Gumby from Monty Python. And

18:19

he has big greasy bangs and he is

18:22

charged with possession of

18:24

a ton of

18:25

child images. And

18:28

here's the first thing about this movie is

18:30

that I went in thinking of it as

18:32

a Christian movie because people

18:34

have debated this and in this variety write-up,

18:37

they're like, it was called a Christian movie by NPR

18:39

without explanation. And I was like, well, it is a Christian

18:42

movie because they talk about God

18:44

and it's distributed by Angel Studios. And there's

18:46

this recurring tagline of God's children

18:49

are not for sale, which is

18:51

the actual tagline of Operation

18:53

Underground Railroad, which is

18:55

the

18:55

organization that, you know, who's

18:59

recently ousted leader this

19:01

movie is about. So like, I think

19:04

it's like,

19:05

it's fair to say that this movie is part

19:08

of a Christian agenda, even without direct

19:10

directorial intent. Yeah, that's

19:12

one of those like, I'm not crazy for saying this. Like,

19:15

it seems quite like,

19:17

plainly in the text of the film. And also

19:19

like, I've been on our Underground Railroad's

19:21

website at various points of the years and like, yeah,

19:23

it's also quite explicitly Christian. Right. Because

19:25

they're not screaming it throughout the movie. It's

19:29

like they can call you

19:31

accusatory and illogical

19:33

for noticing it, which is, I

19:35

think, a really frequent tactic. And so because

19:38

I was expecting Christian media because

19:40

it's distributed by Angel

19:43

Studios, I was immediately

19:45

shocked by how not unpleasant

19:47

it is to watch. Because the thing about

19:49

Christian media, I feel like you'll agree, is

19:51

that like, if a production company is

19:53

Christian,

19:55

they literally assume that the godliness

19:57

of their work means they don't have to worry about acting.

20:00

or audio or editing or anything.

20:03

Yeah, it's like porn. It is. Get

20:05

me in, get me out. We're all here for the same

20:07

thing.

20:07

Yeah, don't need to spend too much time

20:09

like tweaking the levels. Yeah. Right.

20:12

And like, would you say it's like really remarkable the

20:14

like amateurishness of like media

20:17

produced by extremely wealthy Christian

20:19

organizations? Yeah, I mean, there's no

20:21

reason for it to be good, right? Because there's no

20:24

actual, like they're not selling it in like the marketplace.

20:26

They're basically just gonna make it. It already makes money before

20:28

it comes out. And then it doesn't have to

20:30

like turn a profit through ticket sales. They just like then

20:32

distribute

20:32

it to mega churches or whatever. Right.

20:35

And then it gets seen by literally

20:38

a captive audience in fact. Right.

20:40

It's like those restaurants in like super touristy areas

20:43

where it's like the food doesn't have to be good because

20:45

you're paying for the fact that it's like next to the fountain

20:47

or whatever. Because your kids are cranky and they

20:49

need chicken tenders. And we have all

20:51

these little cups of marinara sauce

20:54

and you want them.

20:55

And it's also interesting because like you could argue

20:57

that the glorification of God

20:59

is a reason to make something good.

21:02

Sure. And yet people aren't doing that.

21:06

It's like, shouldn't you be a better actor if

21:08

you're acting for God and not just because

21:10

you

21:10

want to get a part on a soap so

21:12

you can buy that condo?

21:15

It's kind of disappointing that the movie isn't terrible.

21:17

I was kind of hoping that it would be like laughably bad.

21:20

I know. And so many things like this are.

21:23

So many things you watch and you're like, ugh,

21:25

but like I was impressed from the beginning

21:27

that this is a film

21:29

made by a filmmaker. Like

21:31

this feels like it's made by somebody who cares

21:34

about cinema. And as a

21:36

result,

21:37

it is very overbearing and

21:40

it is made in a way where there's like enough

21:42

art and enough intelligent filmmaking going

21:45

into it that it is like, you can feel also

21:47

the manipulativeness of it. Where

21:49

like there's enough skill going into it that you

21:52

like literally cannot not care.

21:54

Okay. Right. Because like the camera

21:56

spends,

21:58

I would say at least.

21:59

15% of its

22:02

time lingering on the extremely traumatized,

22:05

sometimes crying faces of

22:07

these very talented

22:09

child actors. And there's two

22:12

little kid main characters who this movie

22:15

is about, who are a brother and sister,

22:17

who are eight and 11 for

22:19

most of the movie, and who we

22:22

like open looking at the little girl, like

22:24

playing the drums with her flip-flops.

22:28

She has a single dad household,

22:30

which

22:31

seems like part of why any of this happened,

22:34

but she was singing in the marketplace

22:37

and

22:38

this polished, hot

22:40

lady saw her and came by and

22:42

was like, hello, daddy,

22:44

I just wanna take

22:47

your daughter to an audition for this

22:49

modeling agency, so she can

22:51

be paid a lot to model and have a great future.

22:54

And oh my goodness, your son just came home.

22:56

Hello, cutie. So it is like the

22:58

version of

22:59

trafficking that essentially doesn't exist. Yes. That's

23:01

like the airport poster version of trafficking, where

23:04

it's like you're lured through like their charming

23:06

wiles. Yes, like a complete

23:08

stranger, like sees your child on the

23:10

street,

23:11

either just grabs them or goes through like a

23:13

somewhat more complicated

23:15

scooping up. And then

23:17

she'd

23:18

like bring them to an audition and then

23:20

come back to pick them up at seven and the dad

23:22

comes back at seven and the audition room

23:24

is empty. And

23:27

his children have been spirited away and they're put

23:29

in a shipping container. Of course,

23:31

got the aesthetics. And

23:33

shipped to Columbia. And this is

23:35

in Honduras

23:36

that the first part is happening. Okay. Jim

23:39

Caviezel finds out about all this. Okay,

23:41

and then he like goes in and like rescues

23:44

the kids, I guess. He saves the

23:46

brother and then he spends the rest of the movie

23:49

trying to spend the sister because it

23:51

also occurs to me,

23:53

and I'm not saying this in an accusatory

23:55

way, I'm just saying this in like a noticing

23:58

way that like making movies.

23:59

about rescuing little girls from child

24:02

sex trafficking by some really evil

24:04

guys allows you as

24:06

the hero to be obsessed with a little girl.

24:08

Yeah. You know,

24:10

and also, I mean, I haven't seen the

24:12

movie obviously, but there's also this element of like wallowing

24:15

and like, it's like you're, you're conjuring up

24:18

the worst crime that you can think of and then

24:20

like solving it. It feels like very

24:22

cheap catharsis to me.

24:23

Yes. And we open on

24:26

Jim Caviezel's character. He has this younger partner

24:28

and his partner is like traumatized

24:30

by the material they have to review because they've done

24:32

this bust on Mr. Gumby. And

24:35

this is where they find out about the two Honduran

24:38

kids who the movie is about. And

24:40

so we see Jim Caviezel decide

24:43

as a rogue Homeland security agent,

24:45

the protagonist

24:47

American needs to

24:50

befriend the pedophile. They've just arrested

24:53

and pretend that he too is a pedophile and get

24:55

the

24:55

guy to like give

24:57

him a child to abuse. Okay.

25:00

And so he bonds with the guy and then he bust him

25:02

at a diner and that

25:05

is how he rescues the little brother.

25:08

And then that leads him to go

25:11

to

25:12

Cartagena to team

25:14

up with a guy played by

25:16

Bill Camp, who is called Vampiro

25:19

and he is an ex-cartel guy who

25:21

buys children so he can set them

25:23

free. Okay. Oh, it's like medical

25:25

debt. Okay. Like Claire Danes with the

25:27

birds and broke down palace. Yeah.

25:30

I saw this was like a 9 30 pm

25:33

screening. And when

25:35

I got my ticket, I was the only one in there and I was

25:37

like, great, I'll be by myself. I can take notes

25:39

and use my flashlight. And then

25:42

10 other people came in, including

25:44

like two different couples,

25:46

as far as I can tell. And then

25:48

like

25:49

some moms and their young kids

25:52

like out to see it. And I was watching it and

25:54

I was like, boy, this, this

25:56

just feels incredibly like a

25:59

bad idea. to bring your little kids to. And

26:01

luckily the kids were like kind of talking

26:03

and tittering the whole time. So I think I were

26:05

mostly bored by it. Okay. But

26:08

it's like, it's so menacing.

26:11

If I watched it as a small child, I

26:13

would be terrified to leave my

26:14

house for a year. Yeah. Also

26:17

those other couples in the theater were definitely podcasters.

26:20

In Portland, Oregon, at least 50% of the people

26:23

seeing this is for podcasts. It's

26:25

also really funny to think of

26:28

someone being like, Hey baby, let's go

26:30

see Sound of Freedom. I really like this girl.

26:33

I'm trying to make the next move. I'm going to take

26:34

her to a movie. Put your

26:36

hand on my leg during Sound of Freedom.

26:39

A movie that encourages a bare minimum

26:41

of cuddling. But

26:44

the filmmaking is all like, it's very

26:46

effective. It's a little bit too effective.

26:48

It's kind of overscored. There's frequent

26:52

use of a menacing child choir

26:54

singing in what sounds like Latin

26:57

or something.

26:59

Can you imagine that? I

27:01

would be very interested to know what

27:03

you think of this movie if

27:05

you ever watch it, which I also hope you don't

27:08

because it's a wildly unpleasant

27:10

experience. You're just watching

27:12

kids being menaced.

27:15

I always feel kind of bad for the tone

27:17

of these kinds of episodes where it sounds like we're sort of laughing

27:20

our way through this story of

27:22

something really horrific happening to children. But

27:24

it's like, I do feel like

27:26

people need to be more aware of the fact

27:28

that the kind of thing that they're talking about in this movie

27:30

essentially does not exist. There's all

27:32

kinds of exploitation of poor people and poor

27:34

children that happens all over the world. Migration patterns

27:38

are a big part of it, but children being

27:40

kidnapped and taken on airplanes

27:41

to other countries, essentially

27:46

hasn't really been a confirmed case of this by

27:48

a stranger. People get kidnapped by their parents as part

27:50

of custody battles all the time, but

27:53

this sort of model of it, what they're

27:55

talking about is just sort of like outlandish.

27:58

And so that's why we're laughing. laughing our

28:00

way through it or why it feels

28:02

kind of campy to us is because this

28:04

is very clearly propaganda aimed

28:06

at getting a specific political outcome.

28:09

It's not something that actually cares for the welfare of children because

28:12

this movement sort of evangelical Christians,

28:14

if you look at what they do rather than what they say,

28:17

this is not a movement that has contributed all

28:19

that much to the actual dynamics

28:22

of why children are being abused. This is

28:24

not a movement that has tried to prevent that in any meaningful way.

28:27

In fact, you could argue the opposite, but that's not even necessary.

28:29

It's like what policies have they advocated

28:32

for? It's mostly like harsher sentences for

28:34

these kinds of stranger danger crimes. It's not really

28:36

like let's clean up the

28:39

people who have power over children and can use that power

28:42

for genuine evil. Well, right.

28:44

And also arguably, I think, and I think we've

28:47

talked about this a lot in the past on the show

28:49

that if you construct this outlandish

28:51

supervillain who you are standing in opposition

28:54

of. Right. So if Tim Ballard, the real life

28:56

leader of Operation Underground Railroad,

28:59

which is hard to say, by the way, yes,

29:02

he receives more leeway in kind

29:04

of doing whatever he wants or needs

29:06

to, including

29:08

taking an annual salary of over

29:10

five hundred thousand dollars when donations

29:13

were declining or

29:14

saying in an official statement that the best

29:16

thing the Trump administration could do

29:19

for the welfare of the children was finish

29:21

building a border wall.

29:22

Great. Of course. You can do whatever you want

29:25

and you can also be part of a faith

29:27

that in many iterations in America,

29:29

you know, talking about fundamentalist Christianity specifically

29:32

protects people who abuse children

29:35

institutionally, sometimes sexually.

29:37

And I think is able to see that as more

29:40

something you can cover up, something you can apologize

29:43

for, something you can push into the shadows because

29:45

no one is being put in a shipping container.

29:48

So it can't be that bad. Yeah, totally.

29:50

Or your queer child running away because

29:53

you have or you know, you kicking them out of the

29:55

home and them ending up in survival

29:57

sex work like you were talking about. You don't

29:59

have to.

29:59

So yourself is connected to, you know,

30:03

something on the scale of this Kim Caviezel thing.

30:05

Right. This is an insight that I have

30:08

like stolen wholesale from doing this show

30:10

with you, how much, how

30:12

much people are acting out basically like their feelings and

30:14

their anxieties and a lot of these moral panics, rather

30:16

than looking at the actual state of, you

30:18

know, the situation, the state of the statistics. I

30:21

feel like there's just a lot of like kind of emotional needs

30:24

going into this typically, especially in these movements

30:26

that they're really only looking at

30:28

the harm of children to the extent that

30:31

they can weaponize that against societal

30:33

others, right? Like this is about the evil

30:35

people that prey on children, but then it's like, as soon

30:37

as it's somebody that is

30:38

any way connected to them, like, Oh, it's the youth pastor actually.

30:40

They're like, Oh, was it really abuse? Like, Oh, I

30:43

don't know if it was that bad, right? Or like, well, you

30:45

kids asking for it, et cetera. It's

30:47

about

30:48

punishing out groups. It's not really about

30:50

protecting children. Right. Yes,

30:53

completely. Yeah. Well, and then to wrap up

30:55

how this movie ends, basically they figure out

30:57

that the little girl they're looking for has

31:00

been sold to a cocaine

31:03

guy, boss who lives in the forest.

31:05

And so interestingly, because this movie was

31:08

made in 2018, Jim Caviezel

31:10

and his friend pose as doctors

31:13

who are coming to inoculate people

31:15

against an epidemic. Oh, so

31:18

everyone will be nice to them now, right?

31:20

Ha ha ha. Throw

31:23

some anti-vax stuff in there. So I'm like light

31:25

anti-vax shit. And so they, they gain

31:27

access to the cocaine compound and

31:30

Jim Caviezel is like, and it's so, it kind

31:32

of speaks to

31:33

what you talk about in this episode. We're going

31:35

to listen to where

31:37

Jim Caviezel like enters the town. This

31:40

is his name is cause Kim Caviezel. There's also a thing,

31:42

his name is Tim in the movie and he's introducing himself

31:44

to the little boy and he's like,

31:46

Tim or Timo Teo. And the little

31:48

boy is like, Oh, and he's like, what? That's

31:50

my name in Spanish, isn't it? And the little boy is

31:52

like, I have a St. Timo Teo medal.

31:55

St. Timo Teo rescues children.

31:57

Oh. And then obviously he gives

31:59

him.

31:59

the medal, his sister gave it to them

32:02

when they were in the shipping container, when they're

32:04

being shipped. They're being shipped. And,

32:06

you know, Tim, he's no longer

32:08

just Tim, he's Saint Tim. Oh

32:11

my God. And also, and I

32:13

feel very comfortable laughing at this, Mira

32:15

Sorvino gets pretty high billing in this movie

32:17

and I was like, oh God, I'm stressed about

32:19

Mira Sorvino's level of involvement in

32:22

this movie. And guess what? She's

32:24

probably in it for 45 seconds. She

32:28

has three scenes, she has

32:29

one line per scene, she's on screen

32:32

for 10 to 20 seconds. Okay.

32:35

Sometimes you wonder if they sign up for these things without like reading the whole

32:37

script or like,

32:40

I want to believe is what I'm saying.

32:42

Right. I really find myself

32:45

empathizing with the director and all this because

32:48

his story is that he saw something

32:50

on the news in 2015, he wanted to

32:52

do something on child sex trafficking

32:55

as he understood it based on the news, which

32:57

Mike, you've pointed out many times

32:58

before is often telling exactly

33:01

the kind of stories that are in this movie.

33:03

And then while writing the script, he found Tim

33:05

Ballard who had left the Department

33:07

of Homeland Security so that he could more

33:09

freely, you know, undertake independent

33:12

and highly publicized raids of

33:14

alleged child

33:16

sex trafficking situations. And

33:18

so the director,

33:19

Alejandro was like, yes,

33:22

I will do a story about this guy. And so they

33:24

did a story based on him. He made

33:26

this movie. It has a happy ending.

33:29

It's like highly emotional. It feels like a very

33:31

earnest attempt to bring

33:33

attention to

33:34

something that the director believes to

33:37

be going on at least.

33:38

So you think he did it totally earnestly? Like he doesn't necessarily

33:41

know all the context around it. He's just like, wow, this is like hurting

33:43

children. I want to make a movie about how bad that is. It feels

33:45

incredibly earnest to me. You know,

33:47

I can't guess intent, but like it has the

33:49

feeling of a very earnest project. And

33:52

what he said, that's interesting because he's come out

33:54

very recently and done interviews and been like, it's

33:56

not a QAnon movie. Like my intent

33:59

was never like.

33:59

when I made this movie QAnon didn't even basically

34:02

exist. But the thing is

34:04

Tim

34:05

Ballard, who the movie is about, and

34:07

Jim Caviezel, who played him, are both

34:09

into QAnon. And so what do you

34:11

do when you make a movie about a guy before he

34:13

gets into QAnon, but then kind

34:15

of as a natural consequence of his belief

34:18

in the existence of highly organized, gigantic

34:22

child sex trafficking rings, or

34:24

his need to believe that they exist in order

34:26

to promote his fairly lucrative

34:28

job where he also gets hero worship

34:30

and sex. There's a Vice article

34:33

that points out there is a painting of Tim Ballard

34:35

where past abolitionists,

34:38

including Harriet Tubman,

34:40

are kneeling in order to

34:42

honor him as he walks down a railroad

34:45

holding a child. Oh, geez.

34:49

So what do you do with this guy who you made a movie

34:51

about because you're like, well, maybe he has some

34:54

troubling qualities, but it's a good story.

34:56

Then it's like, I'm totally on board with

34:59

this conspiracy theory that matches with my

35:01

past beliefs that you made this movie about.

35:03

I will say, I mean, I don't know what happened in this specific

35:06

case, but I will

35:06

say that in general, for conspiracy

35:08

theories to spread, it doesn't just require

35:12

full-on goblins. It also requires a

35:14

lot of rubes. People who

35:16

end up spreading this stuff without really knowing what

35:18

they're doing or don't really look into

35:20

it, or they're like, oh, I think I'm helping. I

35:22

think a lot of the Save the Children rallies

35:25

in the summer of trafficking,

35:26

whatever summer that was, a lot of the people that

35:28

were really well-meaning people and were like,

35:30

my understanding is that kids are

35:32

being kidnapped, hundreds of thousands of kids are being kidnapped

35:35

and sold into sex slavery and I'm a human

35:37

being, that's really worrying. And so they

35:39

show up to these rallies without knowing that it's

35:42

super QAnon and what these people

35:44

are pushing for is these really odious

35:46

policies that

35:46

have nothing to do with kids at all. But

35:48

yeah, a lot of the people who were there were just nice

35:51

people who were like, oh my gosh, I've read about this thing and it seems

35:53

really troubling. Right, and that's like

35:55

the level that this movie is working on as

35:57

well, right? The same way that Save

35:59

the Children.

35:59

became a slogan of kind

36:02

of like a shibboleth of yes, I believe in conspiracy

36:05

theories about QAnon. Yeah.

36:07

And also, I guess to

36:09

QAnon is like such a buzzword now, it's like

36:11

hard to kind of remember exactly

36:13

how it started. And it's worth

36:15

pointing out that kind of originally, you

36:18

know, the main function of QAnon was to

36:20

be like, listen,

36:21

President Trump may seem to

36:23

not know what he's doing, but he is in fact playing

36:26

the long game. Yeah. And he is

36:29

bringing down all of the major child

36:31

sex traffickers. Yeah. And

36:33

the storm is coming and he's going to crack

36:35

down on this international

36:37

conspiracy of elites,

36:40

including the Clintons and the Obamas

36:42

who have been both sexually trafficking children

36:45

and also torturing them

36:47

in order to harvest adrenochrome,

36:49

which is a drug they get high on. And

36:51

when you

36:51

harvest adrenochrome from a child, their

36:53

skin turns red. And that's why sometimes

36:56

you see a woman

36:58

in the Democratic Party wearing Louboutins.

37:00

They're not a brand

37:03

of couture shoe. It

37:05

means that Democrat women

37:08

know how to make shoes and they're making

37:10

shoes out of the children they've killed. I'm not

37:12

kidding. This is part of it. No, I know. I

37:15

love, I always love the links

37:17

between these insane

37:19

accusations of like they're harvesting

37:21

children for parts. And then the evidence of it is

37:23

like a woman's wearing red shoes. Well,

37:27

that applies to like a number, like a large

37:30

number of women on any given day.

37:31

Red is a striking stylistic choice.

37:33

Sometimes people like a color. There's

37:35

only like seven of them. So, you

37:38

know, either they like red or they're

37:41

harvesting something from children that may

37:43

not meaningfully exist. Yes. Yeah. Those

37:45

are the two options.

37:46

And I guess I love the idea that like

37:50

Huma Abadiyan or whoever is like

37:53

going home and it's like,

37:55

all right, kids, don't bother me. I have

37:57

to make shoes. Yeah. I

38:01

got 80 kids in the basement. Keep it down down

38:03

there, come on. I murdered a child

38:05

three days ago and I gotta use it or

38:07

toss it. So I just gotta, you

38:10

know. The thing is he

38:12

got busy and he had more skin than I know

38:14

what to do. Good God. So

38:18

anyway, that's just, it's one of my favorite parts

38:20

of it because it's like, if you were told,

38:23

especially in like the kind of

38:25

high pressure

38:26

emotional appeal way that causes

38:28

people to lose money to phone scams, like

38:31

children are being trafficked right now and you have to do

38:33

something about it. Share this article

38:35

or something, then like you can pass on

38:37

something that includes something that, you know,

38:39

leads to a conclusion,

38:41

such as democratic women

38:44

are making shoes out of the

38:46

children they've killed. That if someone came

38:48

and shouted at you on social media,

38:50

you would, you know, there's a reason they don't lead

38:52

with that part. Right, right. And

38:55

also that kind of stuff is probably not in the movie. Like does the

38:57

movie feel conspiratorial at all? Well, that's the thing.

39:00

I mean, the movie doesn't get into QAnon stuff,

39:02

but it does show how like

39:05

basically taking a form of child

39:07

trafficking that like,

39:09

like the children in a shipping container

39:11

thing, like as far as I know, there has never

39:14

been a case of that occurring. And

39:17

there's a reason that people don't do that,

39:19

right? Yeah, it doesn't make sense. If

39:21

you're trafficking

39:23

children to people who wish to

39:25

abuse them, then like wherever you

39:28

are, there is a gigantic

39:30

number of children

39:32

who you can do that with who are right

39:35

there. Yeah, people do not have

39:37

the skills necessary

39:39

to like import children in large numbers

39:42

because that tends to attract attention and requires

39:44

like all kinds of like upfront funding. And then the main

39:46

thing is if you're looking for like poor

39:49

children who are easy to exploit, we

39:51

have a lot of those here, unfortunately, right?

39:54

You wouldn't import kids from

39:56

Columbia. We have a lot of people who are like undocumented immigrants

39:58

and like really desperate.

40:00

and really vulnerable because they don't meaningfully

40:02

have the protection of the state. And so you

40:04

can just like tell them go do this and I'll give you $500

40:07

and then not pay them. Like there's all

40:09

kinds of very easy ways to exploit people

40:12

domestically and locally. It doesn't require this

40:14

like vast network. And like that's the saddest

40:16

thing about sort of debunking these things is it's

40:18

like the exploitation is happening

40:21

in

40:21

some form, right? And the violations and this

40:23

really horrible shit is happening. But

40:25

it just isn't happening in this up

40:27

in the clouds, vast mustache

40:29

twirling conspiracy kind of way. It's

40:32

much more like quotidian. It's just like asshole

40:35

dudes

40:35

who find like poor, maybe addicted

40:38

teenagers and like try to

40:40

have sex with them by trading something or like beat them up

40:42

or like the sort of the normal shit

40:44

that we've all maybe become like too used

40:46

to. Yeah. Or say, you know, if you're

40:49

addicted to drugs and you need drugs

40:52

and you have a child.

40:53

Yeah. Right. And you can use

40:56

the child in order to get something that

40:59

you need. Like the thing about these conspiracy

41:01

theories is that they require this amazing amount

41:03

of effort and organization on the part of the

41:06

abuser, which I think distracts from the fact

41:08

that

41:09

the fewer resources you have, the more

41:11

likely you

41:12

are to create

41:13

or end up in abusive

41:15

situations for your child or situations

41:18

where abuse is all but inevitable. Right. You

41:20

know what I think about all the time. In

41:22

our Kitty Genovese episode, the

41:26

murder where the alleged case is

41:28

that like people saw this woman being stabbed and like, nobody

41:30

cares because like who cares about being stabbed in

41:32

cities. Then we got all this like decades of like reactionary

41:34

stuff about how bad cities were. In the early

41:36

stages of the murder,

41:38

what people thought it was, was like a domestic abuse

41:40

incident. And like, that's why they ignored it.

41:43

And it's sort of like in some ways, the

41:45

myth is true, right?

41:47

Because it was a form of violence that people were kind of

41:49

turning their heads away from, but it was like

41:51

this every day form of violence. I'm

41:54

just like, I am, I might be like a man to his girlfriend, like shit,

41:56

we're just gonna leave that on its

41:58

own. But then it's like, oh no, they were.

41:59

They were ignoring this kind of more stranger danger

42:02

form of violence. And that is seen as

42:04

like this huge like it says something

42:06

about society. But I guess it says nothing about

42:09

society that we're like, might just be a guy abusing

42:11

his girlfriend. Right. Well, right.

42:13

And then in 1964, you could that's

42:15

the lens. Right. You're like a man abusing

42:18

his girlfriend,

42:19

his wife, none of my business.

42:21

He knows how much to abuse her. Right.

42:24

And how to not kill her. But

42:26

a stranger. Right.

42:28

That's unacceptable. But it's the same, you

42:30

know, they're committing the same violence. Right.

42:32

And the same thing here. It's like this kind of everyday

42:35

like exploitation of children, like kids in horrible

42:37

foster care situations, kids dealing

42:40

with like trauma and abuse. There's not

42:42

the resources necessary in schools, etc. It's

42:44

like there's kind of these everyday forms

42:47

of like hurt and trauma that are

42:49

being imposed on to children. But it's like,

42:51

no, no, no, we want the shipping container. Yeah, we

42:53

want the exotic ones. We want one that

42:55

implies like a finger pointing at some sort

42:57

of societal other that we can do something about.

43:00

Right. That we can have this like

43:01

punitive response to. Whereas

43:03

if it's like, it's their parents or like the soccer coach

43:05

or something like as it's a bit more complicated

43:07

in those cases. And it's like so much of this is people

43:09

trying to look away from these like more everyday

43:12

tragedies that are happening. Yeah. And then, well, and

43:14

also crucially, it's creating this

43:17

problem as the kind of crime that

43:19

is best solved by high profile busts.

43:21

Yeah. Which is what a lot of this movie is about.

43:23

The thing that I was also surprised about by this

43:26

movie, aside from like how watchable it

43:28

is, which I think makes it more dangerous

43:30

is propaganda. I know I'm sorry. I

43:33

was really expecting it to be more like the

43:35

Gerard Butler film plane,

43:38

which I didn't see, but meant to when it came out, where

43:40

it's like guys in the jungle hacking

43:42

through

43:42

vegetation, doing, you know, commando

43:45

stuff. But most of it is a lot

43:47

more like Argo. Oh, yeah.

43:50

Oh, really? Like aside from the really

43:52

heavy, like traumatized child scenes,

43:56

which I think are so effective because they

43:58

show like again.

43:59

Like I think really quite good child

44:02

actors, like acting

44:04

to

44:05

show like someone truly devastated

44:07

by something that then you are left to imagine

44:10

in a way that is pretty haunting. Then

44:13

like the kind of middle part of the movie is

44:15

like, we're setting up a sting operation and

44:17

making a fake resort for pedophiles,

44:20

which we will then get the supplier

44:23

who targeted the little girl at the start of the movie

44:25

to bring like 60 children

44:28

to and will arrest the traffickers

44:30

and save the children. And so that's like the middle part

44:32

of the movie. So it's kind

44:34

of, and there's

44:35

like, there's good mic drops. It's

44:37

got a weirdly good soundtrack aside from

44:39

the overbearing sad strings. So

44:41

they do this bust and then they rescue the little

44:43

girl finally from the like cocaine

44:46

layer. And something that connects to

44:48

stuff that you talk about around this topic

44:50

is that like

44:51

Jim Caviezel infiltrates the jungle as

44:53

a fake doctor. He saves the little girl,

44:56

but he also sees like probably 50 people

44:59

who are working on this coca farm and

45:02

who logically have also been

45:05

trafficked there. And he's just like,

45:07

whatever, I got the little

45:10

girl. Yeah, I feel like these, the ideology

45:12

behind the sort of movements that are pushing

45:15

this is very like laissez-faire. Like they're

45:17

against government intervention unless government

45:19

can send in like law enforcement or like war

45:21

stuff. Like if the government is not doing violence,

45:24

they're against it. As long as the government can do violence,

45:26

they're like, yeah, I'm okay with a little bit of government action. And

45:29

the movie also makes, you'll be thrilled

45:31

to hear statistical claims, both

45:34

in the form of monologues throughout,

45:36

including also a monologue by Bill Camp

45:38

that includes the line, when

45:40

God tells you what to do, you cannot

45:43

hesitate,

45:44

which I think is terrible advice.

45:47

I think when God tells you what to do, you should really

45:49

sleep on it. Yeah, what do you mean? Let's define

45:52

our terms, Bill. Let's think that's true. So

45:55

in the midst of this movie that also

45:57

is making the case that a rogue homelands,

45:59

security officer

46:01

whose department is too conservative

46:04

for his

46:05

needs, conservative in terms of not letting

46:07

him bust people. Why won't anyone care about the

46:09

children? That's always like the premise of these things that like, you're

46:12

like hundreds of children, like innocent children

46:15

are being like kidnapped and murdered. And the whole

46:17

bureaucratic apparatus is like, eh,

46:19

I don't see it. Yeah. He has

46:22

to have a boss who's like, well,

46:24

look, it saved me an American child.

46:26

Yeah. It's just like so

46:29

fundamentally conspiratorial. Just like when

46:31

will someone finally care about the children? I

46:33

know. And I, you know, I hate to

46:35

protest too much at times like this, but

46:37

like, I do care about the children,

46:40

you guys. Yes. We also

46:42

care. SJWs like the

46:45

children. Yeah. Single Jewish women.

46:50

Um, so, so we got statistics as well,

46:52

which is so great. And so at one

46:54

point early in the movie, Jim Caviezel

46:56

remarks that 22 million new

46:59

child pornography images appeared in the

47:01

past year. This is something you specifically

47:02

debunked, I think in a different episode.

47:05

Yeah. Do you remember that? Yeah.

47:08

I mean, we talked about this in our sexting episode that there's

47:11

been a lot of claims about the proliferation of child

47:13

pornography online. My understanding

47:16

is that it all comes back to the definition because of course

47:18

any image of anyone under 18

47:21

is technically child pornography. And

47:23

so as we talked about on our sexting

47:25

episode, like there's a massive proliferation

47:28

basically of like teenagers like sexting

47:30

each other.

47:31

And so sometimes those photos end up in kind of

47:33

the wrong hands and they get, you know, posted on like revenge

47:35

porn websites and it's like awful shit. But

47:38

sometimes it's just like teenagers like sending

47:40

photos to their boyfriend and being like, here's

47:42

my boobs or whatever. And so it's

47:45

a difficult thing to talk about because it sounds like you're minimizing

47:47

child pornography, but it's like the category

47:50

of child

47:51

pornography includes like the really dark

47:53

shit that like sort of conjures

47:55

up in your mind when you hear about this. But

47:57

then also includes like consensual.

48:00

photos of like a 17 year old like texting her

48:02

boyfriend. And so there needs

48:04

to be like some sort of delineation between

48:06

those two things. And like, people do go

48:08

to jail on like child pornography charges for

48:10

like consensually receiving

48:13

photos from like someone they're dating like, you know,

48:15

the guy's 19 and the girl 17. And

48:18

he goes to jail like that. This is an actual thing that

48:20

like, I don't think is like what people have in mind

48:22

when they say like, crack down on child

48:24

pornography. I don't think that's like, like an outcome that

48:27

anybody wants. It would be great if there is

48:29

a Jim Caviezel movie where he like appears

48:31

in your window when you're about to take a topless

48:33

selfie and is like, don't do it, Jessica.

48:35

Hang on. Yeah, Kyle's gonna break up

48:37

with you before winter formal.

48:40

So it's very difficult

48:42

to talk about this stuff on the internet, because it sounds

48:44

like you're saying that like these kinds of horrible

48:47

images don't matter. And like they

48:48

obviously do, but it's just a very broad

48:51

category. And what we see with human trafficking

48:54

is this constant conflation of like

48:56

the kidnapping children, shipping containers, like the

48:59

really the most awful shit that you can like imagine happening

49:01

in a society with things like,

49:03

you know, people from India moved to Dubai

49:06

and they get jobs in like really exploitative working

49:08

conditions. And then we group all of that

49:10

together. And we're like, okay, 40 million people

49:12

get human trafficked every year. But it's like,

49:14

these are really

49:15

different phenomena and require really different

49:17

policies to fix. But it's

49:19

like we now have this giant number that encompasses

49:22

like crimes that are like totally

49:25

different severity, even though they're all pretty bad. Right.

49:27

And I mean, to talk about the child pornography

49:29

statistic, like I think this is part of

49:31

why it's important to talk about

49:34

media like this, because it then puts everybody

49:36

else into the bind of being like, well, I don't want to

49:38

come off as callous to child abuse,

49:40

but like I need to point out that

49:42

this is not a correct statistic. And like one of

49:44

the other ways that it gets inflated is

49:46

that I believe like there are

49:49

a lot of inflated statistics

49:51

on these images specifically floating around

49:53

that don't take into account the fact that a lot of

49:55

these images are duplicates of each other. Right.

49:58

I mean, the number is almost in a sense,

49:59

are

50:01

unnecessary to the point because the fact

50:04

that these images are circulating at

50:06

all,

50:07

you know, kind of genuine instances of

50:10

child pornography, the way that we

50:12

have been taught to think about it, like, that's

50:14

an emergency in its own right. And then you don't

50:16

need

50:17

to kind of add on to that with anything

50:20

that inflates the problem. And I feel like inflating

50:23

the problem really is more useful for getting

50:25

attention, getting money for your foundations

50:28

and passing laws for harsher sentences

50:30

that you might be otherwise incentivized

50:33

to pass partly because it allows you to keep an

50:35

elected position. Right. I do hate

50:37

the

50:37

fact that every time we talk about this, it puts

50:39

us in a position where we have to actually say, like,

50:41

I do think it's bad when children are abused.

50:44

I know. Part of me feels like I know that

50:47

I have to actually say that every time. We

50:49

have to be like, I'm not like you think

50:51

liberals are, where the standard

50:54

liberal, of course,

50:55

loves abusing children and belongs to

50:57

a child abuse hobby league that meets on

51:00

the weekends. Right. Like, yeah,

51:03

I just think it's like what I really object

51:04

to about this whole thing is that the sort of the right

51:06

wing framing of this is always

51:08

like, oh, well, you don't care about kids or whatever. But it's like to

51:11

solve a problem, you have to understand

51:13

the problem. And there's like a deliberate effort

51:16

to not understand the inconvenient

51:19

aspects of child abuse. Right.

51:21

Which is that a lot of it is driven by poverty. A lot of it

51:23

is not like the

51:25

dark evil hiding in a corner. A lot of it is like

51:27

this really everyday stuff. And

51:29

like it just isn't serious to

51:31

try to solve a problem while refusing to look at

51:33

it. Right. But what that does allow you to

51:35

do is to have a movie made about you where

51:38

you are heroically played by the guy who played

51:40

Jesus in the movie directed by the guy who

51:42

played Mad Max.

51:45

And so at the end of this movie, Jim Caviezel,

51:48

they have the closing credits and then they're

51:50

like special message in two minutes and 30

51:53

seconds. And I was like, oh, fuck, I got

51:55

to see this special message. Oh, they actually

51:57

tell you that an ending or like a post credit

51:59

sequence is.

51:59

It's a mid-credit secret.

52:02

Like, stay tuned. No, it's Kim Kavisl

52:04

showing up. He says that more

52:07

people are enslaved now than when slavery

52:09

was legal. Oh, we talked about that one,

52:11

didn't we? I think

52:12

so. I definitely researched that one. It's basically

52:15

if you define modern

52:16

slavery in, like, the

52:18

most broad

52:20

category possible. It's like anyone

52:23

who took a job and the job conditions after

52:25

they start are different than the conditions they agreed

52:27

to. Mm-hmm. Which is, like, most

52:30

of the workforce. Probably many people who

52:32

worked on that film. Yeah, I mean, yes, exactly.

52:35

Like, as the strikes show. And then also the population

52:37

is, like,

52:38

way larger

52:39

now than it was in the late 1800s. So

52:42

there's also that. Yeah. that,

52:45

again, has been debunked, like, 4,000 times. But,

52:47

like, it doesn't matter. It's just going to keep showing up

52:49

on these things. Right. Well, and then that

52:51

made me think about statistics. And I was like, okay,

52:54

what numbers are we talking about? And so in 1860, there

52:57

are about 31 million

52:58

enslaved

53:01

people in America. Mm-hmm. And

53:04

so to compare to that, there have been 6.9 million worldwide

53:06

deaths from COVID in the past few years. And

53:09

I would point out that, like,

53:12

I feel like most of us know someone

53:14

or knows someone who knows someone who

53:17

has died of COVID in America, where

53:19

the number is smaller than that total. Mm-hmm. Right?

53:23

Like, you can think of

53:23

people. Yeah. And I haven't met anyone

53:26

who's disappeared into modern-day slavery, to be honest. Right.

53:30

Not of this nature. Yeah. That's

53:32

always the thing with these is, like, they're so implausible

53:34

on their face. It's like the minute you stop and think,

53:36

which is most of what our show has been. It's

53:39

just like, hey, wait a minute. The stop and think show. The stop,

53:41

stop, drop, and think, which we could have called

53:43

it.

53:44

Let's think about what this would actually require. And,

53:46

like, yeah, it's all, you know, just like

53:48

the definition of trafficking itself. It's

53:50

just sort of fun with definitions. And, again, you

53:53

don't want to downplay, like,

53:54

really exploitative work conditions, especially

53:56

for migrants right around the world. A lot of people are not protected

53:58

by

53:59

domestic labor laws wherever

54:02

they go. But like that's much more an issue

54:04

of just like poverty and exploitation. This

54:07

isn't something you can like repel down from

54:09

the ceiling and like rescue people from in

54:11

the way that this movie kind of wants you to believe.

54:14

It sort of downplays like the actual

54:16

slavery. And then it also plays

54:19

what is going on now and the kinds of solutions

54:21

that we need. Right. And it's also like

54:23

at this time when there's obviously the

54:25

extreme conservative fear

54:27

of encroachment by the

54:30

dream of the theory of the concept

54:33

of black history or social

54:35

justice as a concept

54:38

taught in schools. And it's like, wait, don't

54:40

learn about

54:41

the actual slavery that happened in America

54:44

when read about these imaginary

54:46

children that

54:47

Jim Caviezel is rescuing. They're more

54:49

important. Focus on that. Right. And

54:52

there's also like some when I was

54:54

had not yet resigned myself to seeing Sound of Freedom

54:57

in a movie theater and I was

54:58

trying to see if someone who just put it on

55:00

YouTube, I had a reaction video

55:02

by a crying Russian woman

55:04

that I feel like could be totally authentic or

55:07

like an Astroturf

55:08

plant. Who the heck knows? But it was like this

55:11

woman sobbing, being like,

55:13

well, you are trying to figure out

55:15

what gender you are. This is

55:17

happening. And it's like, I really don't

55:19

think that people are losing so much time

55:22

thinking about their genders that they're failing

55:24

to stop child abuse.

55:26

Also, actual like gay and trans

55:29

people are the best argument against that, because like, I

55:31

don't know one gay or trans person who like doesn't

55:33

give a shit about like broader social issues.

55:36

It's not like, excuse me, I'm trans.

55:38

I can't think about the minimum wage right now. It's

55:41

not like you do one or the other. I

55:44

don't know how many like people you know in like Portland

55:46

and Seattle, but like that's not really the vibe.

55:48

As a Portlander, my friends are

55:50

always saying to me, gosh, Sarah, who's

55:53

the president? I thought I would find out today,

55:55

but then I

55:56

spent too much time thinking

55:58

about my gender. did gender

56:00

all day. Sorry. Oh, damn. Forgot

56:02

to open the nation.com. Oh, man,

56:05

I went on a real gender bender last

56:07

night.

56:08

So yeah, he

56:11

makes this direct appeal to the audience. And

56:13

he's like, hi, you know, this

56:15

movie was made five years ago, but it had

56:18

every possible roadblock

56:20

to come out. And this

56:22

movie is gonna be the Uncle Tom's

56:25

cabin of the 21st century. The

56:28

baton has now been passed to you.

56:31

The

56:31

most powerful person in the world

56:34

is the storyteller. Oh, my God. And

56:36

he's like, this movie needs to stop child

56:38

slavery, but quote, it

56:41

will only have that effect if millions

56:44

of people see it. So like this

56:46

movie ends with a direct appeal, which

56:48

again, I don't even think is the director's

56:51

fault. Right.

56:52

From Jim Caviezel, after

56:54

the studio that it ultimately

56:57

went to was distributing it telling

57:00

you effectively,

57:02

that if you do not support this movie

57:04

and promote it or use the QR

57:06

code on the screen to

57:08

buy a ticket for a stranger

57:11

who can't afford to see it, that

57:13

if you don't help this movie,

57:15

you will be failing to stop

57:18

child sex slavery. Oh, okay.

57:21

That's a lot to put on me. It is a lot to put on

57:23

you. I can turn off motion blurring on

57:25

my parents TV, but the other stuff is gonna be harder. It's

57:29

a lot to put on your cute shoulders. Yeah.

57:31

And so, so that's the movie. And

57:34

then I researched the

57:36

story behind it, much of which I have told

57:38

you, which is that

57:39

after making the movie, both Tim

57:41

Ballard and Jim Caviezel, Tim

57:44

and Jim, Jim, Tim, Tim, Jim, the

57:47

hero of the hour and the guy who plays him

57:50

both became big QAnon endorsers.

57:52

Tim Ballard appears to have been ousted from

57:54

his own organization,

57:56

which has, you know, been criticized

57:59

occasionally.

57:59

because nobody wants

58:01

to criticize the child saving nonprofit

58:04

for seeming to set up

58:06

bus, which they

58:08

video and put online in

58:11

order to imply that

58:13

they're

58:14

kind of going in like a commando

58:16

team and saving large

58:18

rings of victimized girls in

58:21

a way that is misleading at best

58:23

and possibly just fake. Yeah.

58:25

And using misleading statistics and information

58:28

in order to fundraise and also that

58:30

he advised the Trump administration

58:33

on human trafficking. So that's good.

58:35

Also, it's never quite clear

58:36

what they do with people after

58:38

they, quote unquote, rescue them. They

58:40

check them into a river and hope that they

58:43

swim out to sea. Right. Because it's like

58:45

if the if the fundamental driver of this is like basically

58:47

poverty and, you

58:48

know, trauma and abuse and all these other like kind

58:51

of boring structural components,

58:52

like you rescue somebody, but then then what?

58:55

Like they still don't have a house. They still have an income.

58:57

They still they're still dealing with whatever stuff they're

59:00

dealing with, plus the additional trauma of whatever you rescue

59:02

them from. Right. This whole rescuing

59:04

methodology. It's not serious as

59:06

like a way to address this problem.

59:09

It's like a great way to get funding and stuff. And you

59:11

can brag about like the number of kids that you rescue.

59:13

A lot of them, it's like, oh, great. You're just sending them back

59:15

to the home that they were running away from. Right.

59:18

It's like, what are we really doing here? It's sort of like the

59:20

nobody wants to answer the question like and then what?

59:23

No, right. Because the movie is over.

59:25

And the creepy child choir has finished

59:27

singing and you get to go throw out the rest

59:29

of your popcorn. Yeah. And I and

59:32

this is

59:34

I guess ultimately just a

59:36

very sadly predictable outing. I don't think

59:38

there's really anything about this movie that you couldn't

59:40

have guessed

59:41

was going to be in it aside from

59:43

it being like pretty attractive.

59:46

So in the whole mixed experience, five out of 10. Rotten

59:50

Tomatoes. Well, and then the

59:52

Coda. And this is maybe something, Mike,

59:54

that people have been texting you about. They've certainly

59:56

been texting me about it is that

59:58

the headline, which actually,

59:59

I think has been pretty misleading is that

1:00:02

like one of the donors behind this movie

1:00:04

or one of the people who helped fund the movie has been

1:00:06

arrested for child trafficking. And

1:00:09

what in fact happened was that there was a very large

1:00:11

crowdfunding campaign for

1:00:12

this movie. Like I think they crowdfunded

1:00:14

about $5 million. And one

1:00:17

of the many hundreds of people

1:00:19

who donated was a guy named, I

1:00:21

believe, Fabian Marta, who if you read

1:00:24

the charges against him, appears to have

1:00:26

aided a woman he knew

1:00:29

in refusing to return

1:00:31

the children of whom she was the noncustodial

1:00:34

parent. Oh, there you

1:00:36

go. So it's like the kind

1:00:38

of kidnapping, you know,

1:00:40

missing children

1:00:42

case that actually happens, that inflates

1:00:44

the numbers and helps us make it look like stranger

1:00:46

danger if we want to. And the people, I think

1:00:49

Angel Studios

1:00:51

did kind of an amazing job responding

1:00:53

to this news because they were like, yes, it just

1:00:56

shows how widespread child trafficking

1:00:58

really is. Even one of our own

1:01:01

donors. Actually, we're correct.

1:01:03

It's everywhere, including here. Yeah,

1:01:06

that's one that I have deliberately avoided

1:01:08

looking into because I was like, this is too good of a story.

1:01:10

And like, I'm sure the details are

1:01:12

going to ruin it for me. So I'm not going to look

1:01:14

into it. So thank you for fully

1:01:17

ruining it for me. You're welcome. Yeah.

1:01:19

And kind of the interesting thing about this movie,

1:01:21

I think, or one of the ironies is that it seems

1:01:23

to be made by someone working in good faith,

1:01:26

not trying to promote conspiracy theories,

1:01:28

but by not looking hard enough

1:01:31

at the materials he was trying to depict

1:01:33

arguably or, you know, in some

1:01:36

way missing the point, providing

1:01:38

really fertile ground for conspiracy

1:01:41

theories that he himself does not agree with.

1:01:43

Yeah. And then the fact that

1:01:45

it makes a better headline for someone who made

1:01:48

this movie to be a child trafficker,

1:01:50

something actually not relating to child

1:01:52

trafficker as we know it being depicted

1:01:55

in an attempt to discredit this movie, but

1:01:57

still by using the same. misleading

1:02:00

tactics that this movie is using. Right.

1:02:02

It would be great if they did a press conference, but like, oh, we're actually

1:02:04

really disappointed at how you're taking this complex issue

1:02:06

and boiling it down to a one dimensional phenomenon.

1:02:09

I know. Really, Tim? Really? Oh,

1:02:11

OK. Mr. Nuance over here. Jim

1:02:13

Caviezel yells at you about nuance. It's

1:02:17

a bit much like they they get into

1:02:20

the math of like, how much can

1:02:22

you charge per day? And

1:02:24

how many times can you abuse a

1:02:27

child per day each time for profit?

1:02:30

And over how many years? And that's

1:02:32

why it's so profitable. And you're like, it's

1:02:34

not more profitable than drugs. It's

1:02:37

not more profitable than cosmetics. Not

1:02:39

by a long shot. That yeah,

1:02:41

that just doesn't I

1:02:43

mean, the nice thing about this is that

1:02:45

there is, in fact, not a huge market

1:02:47

for like sex with exploited

1:02:49

children. That is one of the things that is good. But

1:02:52

we would we choose to believe in a world

1:02:54

where there is a huge market for that. And that's

1:02:56

really it's I don't know.

1:02:59

It's worrying that like we embrace fables

1:03:01

that tell us that people who would

1:03:03

do that are everywhere when really,

1:03:05

you know, from what you talk about elsewhere,

1:03:08

like it is

1:03:09

hopefully a relief to know that it's really

1:03:12

a much smaller number than are depicted

1:03:14

in stories like these, a smaller number than it would

1:03:16

take to drive the fastest

1:03:18

growing criminal network in the world

1:03:21

are going to do this. Right. Also,

1:03:23

a friend of mine used to be a reporter in a small town

1:03:25

outside of Seattle. And there was a church that said they were the fastest

1:03:28

growing church in the entire state.

1:03:30

And they went from eight people to 12 people in

1:03:32

one year.

1:03:32

50 percent growth.

1:03:35

Those are just kind of like inherently suspect

1:03:38

to me. We are talking about problems that

1:03:40

exist, not because it is so profitable

1:03:43

to abuse children, like profitable on the scale

1:03:45

of a world economy, but just

1:03:47

because there are not sufficient resources

1:03:50

for children and because it isn't like sexy

1:03:52

and commando-y

1:03:54

and exciting to see a movie

1:03:56

about somebody working

1:03:58

on infrastructure and working.

1:03:59

on creating resources for queer

1:04:02

teenagers,

1:04:02

for example, who are one of the prime

1:04:04

victims of this and who, the

1:04:06

prime victims of trafficking as

1:04:09

it actually exists

1:04:10

and who we would prefer

1:04:13

to imply a world or to believe

1:04:16

in a world where it's all heroes

1:04:19

and children in shipping containers.

1:04:22

Jump a motorcycle over that, Tom Cruise.

1:04:27

I would watch it. Tom

1:04:30

Cruise has to jump a motorcycle over a mountain

1:04:32

of paperwork.

1:04:34

And that's how we dramatize him doing the

1:04:36

paperwork. Laptops full of Excel spreadsheets.

1:04:39

Yes. That can be your

1:04:41

biopic. Tom Cruise can play. The

1:04:45

Hobbes ultimatum. As a

1:04:47

person of the same height as

1:04:48

Tom Cruise, I think he is the perfect person to play

1:04:50

me. The resemblance is really striking.

1:04:52

Untrue, but thank you. Not

1:04:56

remotely true. So that's what that's the experience

1:04:59

of watching The Sound of Freedom. I had

1:05:01

a really it was very unpleasant.

1:05:03

I had a bad time. Seems like it

1:05:05

made me sad. It made me cry. I

1:05:08

knew that I was being shown the

1:05:10

worst kind of propaganda and

1:05:12

stories that cause people

1:05:14

to dig deeper into dangerous

1:05:16

and violent and conspiratorial

1:05:19

belief systems. And I was,

1:05:22

you know, also still could not help

1:05:25

being swept away by the tidal wave of

1:05:27

emotion in the movie, which is the worst way to feel

1:05:29

emotional during a movie where you feel

1:05:30

like emotions have been like burgled

1:05:33

out of your potty. Yeah. And

1:05:35

now we're going to hear our

1:05:37

original human trafficking episode. We made

1:05:40

this a couple of years ago. It was

1:05:42

sorely needed then. It's sorely needed now.

1:05:46

Unfortunately, nothing changes. People keep

1:05:48

telling the same lies. Pretending

1:05:51

to fight human trafficking actually

1:05:53

does

1:05:53

seem to be a pretty fast growing

1:05:56

ring of occasional. Yeah. Yeah.

1:05:59

Yeah. I

1:06:01

guess. It's

1:06:09

so easy to traffic people on the East Coast.

1:06:11

I mean, like, I have to go to New Jersey for

1:06:13

a Michael Bolton concert. Come

1:06:24

to You're Wrong About, the podcast where

1:06:27

we teach you how to

1:06:29

succinctly counter your relative's

1:06:32

Thanksgiving Day arguments. Ooh,

1:06:34

that's good. Thank you. The

1:06:36

succinctly is a little

1:06:37

ambitious, considering how long our

1:06:39

episodes have gotten. Yeah. Well, okay,

1:06:41

here's how I think this works. You have probably done, like, 100 hours

1:06:44

of research for this. We're

1:06:46

gonna talk for three to five hours for

1:06:49

an episode that's gonna be an hour

1:06:51

long.

1:06:52

And the people who hear this episode can boil

1:06:54

that one hour down to, you know, five

1:06:56

minutes of impassioned whisper

1:06:58

shouting over stuffing. Yeah, I like

1:07:00

that we've turned our listeners just as insufferable

1:07:03

as we are. Yeah, I think they were already insufferable.

1:07:05

They just, like, were wanting tools to become

1:07:07

even more insufferable, and that's what we're offering

1:07:10

them.

1:07:11

And today we're talking about human trafficking.

1:07:13

Yeah. So can you tell me, what

1:07:16

is your understanding of the term

1:07:19

human trafficking? So I want to try and connect

1:07:21

this to a recent news item. And

1:07:23

this is gonna be something that I vaguely remember, and

1:07:25

you can help me fill in the holes. But

1:07:28

basically, there was some female

1:07:31

conservative politician. Oh,

1:07:33

yeah. Who was it? If you're

1:07:35

going where I think you're going, it was Cindy McCain. It

1:07:37

was Cindy McCain. Okay, so it wasn't a politician,

1:07:39

but she's obviously part of a political family.

1:07:42

She was on a morning talk show, and she

1:07:45

told a story about seeing in an

1:07:47

airport or something like that, what she deemed to

1:07:49

be a suspicious situation with

1:07:51

an adult and a child who she presumed to be

1:07:53

in the act of being trafficked. Yes,

1:07:56

the evidence of trafficking was that

1:07:58

the child was a different ethnicity.

1:07:59

ethnicity than the mother. Okay. We

1:08:02

do not know if it was like a mother of color and a white

1:08:04

kid or a white mother and a

1:08:07

kid of color. Yeah, or like

1:08:09

a two non-white people of

1:08:11

different

1:08:12

backgrounds. But yes,

1:08:14

my guess is that that's not what she

1:08:17

noticed. Right. So my concept

1:08:19

of human trafficking is that, you

1:08:22

know, the posters that you see in airports and stuff,

1:08:24

which is that a white child is

1:08:27

somehow being exploited and

1:08:29

sold

1:08:30

probably for

1:08:31

sex or some other nefarious purposes.

1:08:35

That's my understanding of the Cindy McCain

1:08:37

version. Yes. Okay. This

1:08:40

is going to be a fun episode because this is like a medley

1:08:42

of all of our previous moral panic episodes. Like

1:08:45

there's some satanic stuff, there's

1:08:47

some repressed memories, there's

1:08:49

some bad statistics.

1:08:52

This is like when the carpenters would play a

1:08:54

medley. Take it away,

1:08:57

Richard. Yeah.

1:08:59

Where do you want to start us? Like what point

1:09:02

in time is the best place to begin?

1:09:04

So I think the place to start is that the version

1:09:07

of trafficking

1:09:07

that Cindy McCain is describing,

1:09:10

and that I think a lot of people have in their heads of,

1:09:12

you know, children being kidnapped, forcibly

1:09:15

taken from one country to the other. And

1:09:18

kidnapped in broad daylight, like, sipped

1:09:20

away in a public area. It's

1:09:22

not clear there has ever been a confirmed

1:09:24

case of that. So I have spent

1:09:26

the last two weeks calling human

1:09:28

trafficking organizations, speaking to sex

1:09:31

workers and advocates and people on

1:09:33

the Christian right. I've looked

1:09:35

quite hard and I have not found

1:09:38

a case of a child being taken against

1:09:40

their will

1:09:40

by a stranger on an

1:09:43

airplane. And we'll get into the reasons why. But

1:09:45

I think it's important to note that

1:09:47

like, when it comes to

1:09:50

children,

1:09:50

we are in the middle of a

1:09:52

stranger danger panic. Hooray.

1:09:54

Yeah. Like, Jesus, we just did

1:09:57

this. Like why do we have to go through

1:09:59

this?

1:09:59

through the same panic that we just had.

1:10:02

So to go through a couple of the statistics,

1:10:05

one of the things that's really interesting

1:10:07

is we have these giant estimates

1:10:10

of the prevalence of child sex

1:10:12

trafficking. So I saw one yesterday that said

1:10:14

there's 79,000 children in

1:10:17

Texas alone who are being

1:10:19

trafficked for sex. Another

1:10:21

phrase you hear is sold into slavery,

1:10:24

which again,

1:10:24

you can never say like, there's no

1:10:27

case of this ever happening because it's a big

1:10:29

country and literally everything has happened. And

1:10:31

that word means a lot of things. I

1:10:33

mean, one of the numbers that goes around is this is from

1:10:35

the US Institute Against Human Trafficking. There

1:10:38

are hundreds of thousands and potentially

1:10:40

over a million victims trapped in

1:10:42

the world of sex trafficking in the United

1:10:44

States. Because of the

1:10:47

hidden nature of the crime, it is essentially impossible

1:10:49

to know how many for sure. So

1:10:52

like, we don't

1:10:53

know, but it's more than

1:10:55

a million. We

1:10:57

have no way of knowing, but it's your worst

1:11:00

fear. Yes, exactly. And so

1:11:02

another

1:11:02

number that goes around is that one

1:11:04

in seven runaways are likely

1:11:07

victims of trafficking. That comes from the National Center for

1:11:09

Missing and Exploited Children,

1:11:10

who you may remember from

1:11:12

our Stranger Danger episode for propagating

1:11:14

all kinds of terrible statistics on

1:11:17

children's disappearances. And

1:11:19

so that claim, one in

1:11:21

seven runaways was fact-checked by

1:11:23

a Washington Post column in 2015 that

1:11:27

basically found no evidence for the claim. In

1:11:29

response to this fact check, the organization

1:11:32

added the word likely. So

1:11:34

they used to say one in seven runaways

1:11:36

are victims of trafficking, and now they say one in

1:11:38

seven are likely

1:11:39

victims of trafficking. It's

1:11:42

either a statistic or it's not. That's

1:11:44

like saying this milk is likely 2% fat. Yeah,

1:11:48

and then if they're saying the statistic,

1:11:51

then is that based on any numbers

1:11:53

of any kind, or is it just a gut

1:11:56

thing for someone? So I called up

1:11:58

the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

1:11:59

children. I talked to one of their researchers for more

1:12:02

than an hour. And the

1:12:04

methodology behind this statistic is essentially

1:12:07

when people call the hotline, their

1:12:09

missing children hotline, if there is any

1:12:12

whiff of trafficking, they

1:12:14

market as a victim of trafficking. What

1:12:17

is a whiff of trafficking when it's at home? What's

1:12:19

really interesting is they told me 83%

1:12:23

of their calls are from foster

1:12:25

care facilities or other state

1:12:27

institutions. These are super

1:12:29

at risk kids who have

1:12:31

run away for some period of time. If

1:12:34

the person who calls them says, James

1:12:36

has run away, we think he might be

1:12:39

being trafficked. That's enough. It seems

1:12:41

like this is a system designed to create

1:12:43

false positives, which is weird.

1:12:46

Yes, 100%. And there's

1:12:47

no verification whatsoever. So

1:12:50

if I call, I'm a parent, I say, my kid

1:12:52

has gone missing. I think he might be a victim of trafficking.

1:12:54

He comes back two hours later.

1:12:56

There's nothing to take that off

1:12:58

of the statistics. So we now have

1:13:00

a person who's not a runaway and

1:13:03

not a victim of sex trafficking

1:13:04

being marked as a sex

1:13:06

trafficking victim. They also admitted to me that

1:13:09

the same kids can be counted

1:13:12

infinite number of times a year. So

1:13:14

if I have a really bad relationship with my parents

1:13:16

and they're really abusive, and I'm running

1:13:18

away from them five or six times a year, and every

1:13:20

single time they call and say,

1:13:22

Mike has run away, we think he's being trafficked,

1:13:24

that counts as six trafficking cases, none

1:13:27

of which are confirmed. God, like flood data

1:13:29

is just like, it's so frustrating

1:13:31

to realize that the solution to our

1:13:35

big social problems is just like, well,

1:13:37

we need more ones. And we need more people

1:13:39

who are just fixated on the details

1:13:41

and want to do the grinding,

1:13:44

meticulous work of getting

1:13:46

things right. Like we just cannot

1:13:49

skip that ever.

1:13:49

The answer is always more spreadsheets. I

1:13:53

also think it's important to note that these are not

1:13:55

all reports of runaways in the country.

1:13:57

These are reports of runaways that are reported. to

1:14:00

the National Center for Missing and Exploited

1:14:03

Children. Right, so it's a self-selecting

1:14:05

group. Yeah, there's all kinds of reports of missing

1:14:07

children that get filed to various law enforcement agencies,

1:14:10

maybe different NGOs. There's

1:14:12

all kinds of places you can report a missing child.

1:14:14

So this one in seven statistic only comes

1:14:17

from people who call them. So

1:14:19

it's like if you have the foreign objects

1:14:22

in Muffin's Bureau and people

1:14:24

are calling and they're like, I found a foreign object

1:14:26

in my muffin, or like maybe I did, it could be.

1:14:28

And then American consumers are like,

1:14:30

did you know that like half of

1:14:32

muffins have foreign objects in them? And

1:14:34

it's like, well, that's just the foreign object Muffin

1:14:37

Bureau

1:14:37

statistic. That's a little bit specific.

1:14:39

That's a better explainer than any of the academic

1:14:41

articles I've read on this all week. I

1:14:44

just want to say. I'm just hungry. Yeah.

1:14:48

One of the things that's really interesting about this is

1:14:51

the huge mismatch between

1:14:54

the numbers put out by NGOs

1:14:56

and the actual numbers of

1:14:59

arrests, reports. One of the

1:15:01

numbers I found is that in 2017, the whole year, the

1:15:04

Department of Homeland Security found 500

1:15:06

victims of trafficking nationwide, and that's adults

1:15:09

and children. So we've got numbers of

1:15:11

it. It could be more than 1 million. It's 79,000

1:15:13

children in Texas alone. And

1:15:18

then we've got 500 actual

1:15:20

confirmed victims. So

1:15:22

at that point, it's like if there's such a disparity

1:15:25

between the number of

1:15:26

people being identified by the authorities

1:15:29

and the estimates,

1:15:30

then how are you even getting

1:15:32

the numbers? It

1:15:34

doesn't connect to me based

1:15:37

on anything I know about any other

1:15:39

situation of this kind that you would be able

1:15:42

to have knowledge of these many cases

1:15:44

but not take action on

1:15:46

any of them, especially in a country

1:15:49

where we do not have underzealous law enforcement,

1:15:51

especially where border issues are

1:15:53

concerned. I mean, one of

1:15:55

the things that is central

1:15:56

to, I think all urban legends of this

1:15:58

type, like won't someone say that? save the children is

1:16:01

this idea that we're insufficiently concerned

1:16:04

about it, right? It's like, well, nobody's talking

1:16:06

about the child sex traffic. And you're like,

1:16:08

actually, a lot of people are talking about it. No

1:16:10

one cares about white children. Yeah,

1:16:12

exactly. It's

1:16:15

like, that is the one demographic that

1:16:17

we, I mean, we live in a terrible country

1:16:19

for child welfare across the board, but we

1:16:21

do talk about white children a lot. Yes.

1:16:24

We do do that. So I think to be fair, one

1:16:26

of the people I interviewed

1:16:27

this week was a prosecutor for King County

1:16:29

who prosecutes sex trafficking cases here.

1:16:32

His explanation for why there's this

1:16:34

huge mismatch between arrest numbers

1:16:37

and estimates of the prevalence generally was

1:16:39

that he says these cases are really difficult to

1:16:41

try because

1:16:42

a lot of these people come from very

1:16:45

vulnerable families. A lot of them have drug

1:16:47

issues. A lot of them have mental health issues. They

1:16:49

have criminal histories that the defense team is going to question

1:16:51

them about.

1:16:52

So it makes sense to me that

1:16:54

those numbers would be artificially low. Right.

1:16:57

So they would have lower numbers for this

1:16:59

than for other types of crimes that are prosecuted.

1:17:01

Yeah. Yeah. So

1:17:03

I think it's worth taking that seriously. Although I also, I want to say, you

1:17:05

know, this is a prosecutor, right? He is on

1:17:08

the other side of the tough on crime ideological

1:17:10

divide than we are. He's someone who

1:17:13

believes in trafficking. He believes it's really bad.

1:17:16

I was asking about the kinds of cases that he sees.

1:17:18

And first of all, he's never seen a

1:17:20

trafficking case with a prepubescent child.

1:17:23

He sees lots of abuse cases, but

1:17:25

the idea of children being sold,

1:17:27

you know, trapped in hotel rooms, he's

1:17:30

never seen it. Well, I can see there

1:17:32

being cases of that that aren't discovered

1:17:35

and that I think there's always all

1:17:37

things are possible. And as

1:17:39

you often say, it's a big country. But

1:17:41

you know, the issue here is not that these

1:17:43

things

1:17:43

aren't happening, but that if you

1:17:45

are taking a story

1:17:48

of, you know, this case that

1:17:50

is horrific because it is about

1:17:52

a prepubescent child because it

1:17:54

is about the specific kind of trafficking

1:17:57

and then using that to whip up a

1:17:59

public. sentiment that allows you to

1:18:02

unnecessarily penalize sex

1:18:04

workers, then like, that's the issue.

1:18:07

Not that this thing doesn't happen, but that powerful

1:18:10

people are using the existence

1:18:12

of a certain type of crime to police

1:18:14

a fundamentally different type of crime. Another

1:18:17

thing he said

1:18:17

about this that I thought was really interesting is

1:18:20

that when he deals with underage sex

1:18:22

workers, the vast majority of the clients

1:18:24

don't know they're underage because they're

1:18:27

lying about, you know, you ask a year 18, right? And

1:18:29

she says, yeah, yeah, I'm 18, but she's actually 17. Also,

1:18:32

if you're soliciting sex, like, you're

1:18:34

not going to entice someone to do

1:18:37

an illegal thing with you by telling them

1:18:39

that it's also illegal in a more

1:18:41

dire way. Yeah. I

1:18:44

think, I mean, I think there is

1:18:46

like, you don't want to defend men who are buying

1:18:48

sex with underage people, but it's

1:18:50

also the morality of it to me feels very

1:18:52

different than going into a hotel room where somebody's

1:18:55

in some way chained or bound and having

1:18:57

sex with that person. It's a very different

1:18:59

order of scale.

1:19:00

And I think it just

1:19:02

is not going to help any of us to

1:19:04

see complicated issues as

1:19:07

less complicated than they are. Like, I don't

1:19:09

think that ever improves anything. One of the other

1:19:11

really interesting things this tough on crime prosecutor

1:19:13

said to me was that most of the

1:19:16

actual cases of

1:19:17

quote unquote trafficking that he sees are actually

1:19:19

an extension of domestic abuse. What

1:19:22

this usually is, is people that have

1:19:24

a lot of vulnerabilities, they're leaving the

1:19:26

home because it's abusive or they get, you

1:19:28

know, they start dating somebody at 17.

1:19:29

There's a period

1:19:32

of abuse and then escalation

1:19:35

of the abuse. I actually interviewed

1:19:37

somebody who was homeless

1:19:39

in Portland and she met

1:19:41

a guy who was older than her.

1:19:43

And she says he was the first

1:19:45

guy that was nice to me. She grew up in an abusive

1:19:47

home. This is the start of so many stories.

1:19:50

And so she considered the guy her boyfriend. And then

1:19:52

he said, Hey, you know, do you want to have a threesome sometime?

1:19:55

And maybe we can have a threesome, but

1:19:57

I'm not

1:19:57

part of the threesome.

1:19:59

And you. have sex with this other guy and then it's kind

1:20:01

of like, well, maybe you have sex with this guy, like I

1:20:03

don't really know him, but... But I

1:20:05

need you to do it and I'm

1:20:07

your boyfriend. Yes. So she's still actually

1:20:09

not sure if money was changing hands behind the scenes.

1:20:13

At the time she didn't, but she now considers herself a trafficking

1:20:15

victim because that's basically

1:20:17

what it became, but it was an outgrowth of

1:20:19

all of this other abuse and her extreme

1:20:22

vulnerability. So even

1:20:24

this tough on crime prosecutor guy said that most

1:20:26

of the people that he sees are

1:20:29

ethnic minorities, they have child abuse in the home, they

1:20:31

have very young drug addiction. One of the victims

1:20:33

he's working with now, she was addicted to

1:20:35

hard drugs by 13 because her mother was

1:20:37

a drug addict. He says, when

1:20:39

he sees

1:20:40

sort of suburban kids like the Liam

1:20:42

Neeson myth, it's almost always

1:20:44

because they're queer, that creates

1:20:47

a vulnerability for those kids that kind of pushes them out

1:20:49

of the home

1:20:49

and pushes them into networks where

1:20:52

they're meeting boyfriends or girlfriends that

1:20:54

are able to coerce them because of the lack of self-confidence

1:20:57

that they have, the lack of support

1:20:59

systems that they have. And society kind of hating

1:21:02

them already, which certainly creates a good

1:21:04

substrate for being abused in your personal

1:21:06

relationships. Totally. Yeah. Well,

1:21:09

this is what's so fascinating to me about the way that this moral panic has

1:21:11

perpetuated itself in that if we're

1:21:13

thinking of the sort of, quote unquote, real

1:21:16

cases of human trafficking where teenagers are

1:21:18

coerced or manipulated into

1:21:20

engaging

1:21:20

in commercial sex work by their partners,

1:21:24

that's a very specific form

1:21:26

of abuse.

1:21:27

So why would we

1:21:29

be focusing on this one outcome?

1:21:32

The outcome of being forced into sex work by

1:21:34

a partner? Well, because, yeah,

1:21:36

there's now this army of trainers

1:21:39

that are going into schools. What did

1:21:41

they tell them about? They just told

1:21:43

us to not smoke weed until

1:21:44

we were 25. I feel like I really got off easy.

1:21:49

This is from Shared Hope International. This is their

1:21:51

warning signs that a teenager is being

1:21:53

trafficked. And absences

1:21:55

from class, overly tired in class,

1:21:58

less appropriately dressed. than before.

1:22:01

What? Sexualized behavior.

1:22:03

Oh my god. Withdrawn to press,

1:22:06

distracted or checked out, brags

1:22:08

about making or having lots of money. New

1:22:11

tattoos, tattoos are often used

1:22:13

by pimps as a way to brand victims. Okay.

1:22:16

Tattoos of a name, symbol, money

1:22:18

or barcode could indicate trafficking.

1:22:20

That's so weird. That's

1:22:23

so specific. The barcode one is so

1:22:26

hilarious. Like the barcode one shows up everywhere.

1:22:28

Wouldn't you get that like iPhone scanner

1:22:30

thing at this point? Like no one's

1:22:33

carrying, anyway. I

1:22:35

do not doubt that people have done

1:22:37

this like somewhere.

1:22:40

But again, like this really plays into

1:22:42

the idea that we see a lot in conspiracy theories

1:22:44

that like everyone does it the same way and

1:22:46

there's some kind of national hierarchy

1:22:49

may be involved. And also the barcode

1:22:51

thing is really important because it's this idea

1:22:53

that like the numbers are so big that

1:22:56

you need barcodes to track all

1:22:58

the, like their tubes of toothpaste or something. So it's the

1:23:00

argument that these are functional barcodes

1:23:02

and that the pimps have little like self

1:23:04

checkout scanner guys that they're

1:23:06

using. Like. I also, I know

1:23:08

people at my middle and high school that got barcode tattoos,

1:23:11

but that's because they were anti-capitalist goths

1:23:14

and they got them as a kind of like fuck capitalism

1:23:16

type of tattoo. Yeah, so once again, we

1:23:19

have to suspect goths. Also,

1:23:21

aside from the barcode tattoo thing,

1:23:24

I think the warning signs of trafficking

1:23:26

all sound like being a teenager. Oh, totally.

1:23:29

Right? Like you're tired and you look more

1:23:31

promiscuous than you used to. I mean,

1:23:33

yeah. You know,

1:23:35

Florida just passed a law that every

1:23:37

school has to have an anti-trafficking

1:23:40

curriculum. Really?

1:23:41

Yes. I,

1:23:43

I really, this really bothers

1:23:45

me because I feel like we have

1:23:47

this narrative too that it's like,

1:23:49

that women and girls especially

1:23:52

aren't allowed to care about

1:23:53

staying safe unless the imagined

1:23:56

foe

1:23:57

is like a scary monster. We're not allowed

1:23:59

to talk about keeping.

1:23:59

keeping safe from normal

1:24:02

straight men, especially like

1:24:04

the ones that we marry. We're not allowed

1:24:07

to implicate them in

1:24:08

our fears for ourselves. But if it's about

1:24:10

a monster,

1:24:12

then we can talk about it and we can try and

1:24:14

keep people safe, but only from the monster.

1:24:16

Yeah. Yeah. Right.

1:24:20

And

1:24:20

it's also, it's so telling that these trainings aren't aimed

1:24:22

at boys. Yeah. And I

1:24:24

was going to ask you, have you ever seen like an, are

1:24:26

you being trafficked sign in a men's room? Ooh,

1:24:29

no, I don't think so. And like, aren't boy

1:24:31

children supposed to be being trafficked and

1:24:33

all this? Like, is it only girl children on top

1:24:35

of everything else that this is supposed to be happening

1:24:37

to? Well, this is the thing. It's like

1:24:39

a big sign of moral panic to me is when you hold all of these

1:24:41

contradictory ideas at once. So

1:24:44

oftentimes they'll say like, Ooh, it's, you know, it's usually

1:24:46

somebody close to you that's going to coerce

1:24:49

you into commercial sex work. But then the

1:24:51

next sentence they'll say, Oh,

1:24:53

you know, if there's men standing outside

1:24:55

your school trying to recruit you, don't speak to

1:24:58

them. That seems like common sense advice.

1:25:00

I mean, yeah, that's hard. Another

1:25:03

one of the source list statistics that goes

1:25:05

around

1:25:06

is that 70% of child sex trafficking

1:25:09

cases begin online. This really

1:25:11

is Santa's bag. There's something in here for

1:25:14

everyone. If you're afraid of the internet, if you're

1:25:16

afraid of the migrant

1:25:18

caravan, yeah, it's

1:25:19

great. It's

1:25:21

very diverse. One of the curricula that they're

1:25:23

going to be using in Florida apparently is called My

1:25:26

Life, My Choice. And it's

1:25:28

a 10 session exploitation prevention

1:25:30

curriculum designed to change girls'

1:25:33

perceptions of the commercial sex industry

1:25:36

as well as build self-esteem and personal empowerment.

1:25:38

How many perceptions of the commercial sex

1:25:40

industry do they have going into this training?

1:25:42

Well, this is the thing. It's like some

1:25:44

of the articles

1:25:45

about Florida's new curriculum mentioned

1:25:47

sort of paragraph 17 that

1:25:50

in 2017 there were only 65 human

1:25:53

trafficking incidents and there were zero

1:25:55

reports of minors being trafficked in Florida.

1:25:57

Oh, boy. And so it's like when we talk about what's. actually

1:26:00

endangering teens. Suicide

1:26:02

is now the number two killer of kids

1:26:04

under 18 after car accidents. When

1:26:07

you ask actual kids, and there's a lot of activism

1:26:09

going on around this, they need help with depression

1:26:11

and anxiety. No, no, depression is a sign

1:26:14

that they're being trafficked, actually.

1:26:16

I remember that from the list earlier. We

1:26:19

got the trafficking. Everything

1:26:21

will be fine. I think the counter

1:26:23

argument

1:26:23

to all of this is like, well, what's the harm

1:26:26

in focusing on sex trafficking? What is it really?

1:26:29

What's the problem with teaching kids?

1:26:31

And when it comes to sort

1:26:33

of the damage of this framing, I

1:26:35

think I mentioned on here that my boyfriend

1:26:38

manages a cafe in Seattle. And

1:26:40

one of the things they've been dealing with lately is there's this kid

1:26:42

that comes in who's like 17. And

1:26:45

he comes in sort of 3, 4 PM after school

1:26:47

would be getting out. And

1:26:49

he just sort of sits at the cafe. And

1:26:53

sometimes he's drunk. Sometimes he's drinking

1:26:55

something out of a thermos, and they're not entirely sure if it's alcohol

1:26:57

or not. They're not comfortable calling the cops.

1:26:59

So they've called the school

1:27:02

and sort of tried to get some information about this kid.

1:27:05

He's not homeless, but it seems there's some

1:27:07

reason why he doesn't want to go home. And

1:27:10

they don't really want to pry.

1:27:11

And when you think about

1:27:13

kids that are at risk, what

1:27:16

help is it to go up to that kid

1:27:18

and be like, are you being sex trafficked? Is

1:27:21

that kid at risk of sex trafficking? I

1:27:24

guess that's true if that's the way that you want to frame

1:27:26

it. But that kid's at risk of 100,000 things.

1:27:30

Putting him into this binary frame of it's

1:27:33

sex trafficking or else we don't care is not helpful.

1:27:37

Because if that kid says, I have a new partner

1:27:39

and he coerced me into sex,

1:27:41

well, that's not really trafficking, pal. Sorry.

1:27:44

Right. Or like my parents are abusing me. That's

1:27:46

not really trafficking. So I can't really help you.

1:27:48

Our organization

1:27:49

gives out gift bags to trafficking

1:27:52

survivors. And sorry, your parents

1:27:54

are hitting you and you don't want to go home. But it's

1:27:56

not trafficking. So it's not really our problem. Right?

1:27:59

It's this very narrow.

1:27:59

narrow understanding of

1:28:02

one of the risks. And really

1:28:04

what all of the other constellation

1:28:06

of things that that kid might be going through,

1:28:09

we need to have some way of

1:28:12

gathering information from kids of like,

1:28:14

how can I help? What do you need? And we need

1:28:16

to care about kids when they're not

1:28:19

the victim of the specific big bad that

1:28:21

we've decided to focus on

1:28:23

this decade. Totally. Totally. And

1:28:26

it's also, I mean, this transitions very well into the history of human trafficking

1:28:28

and how this is playing out for adults.

1:28:31

Act two. Yes. So

1:28:33

do you remember the case of Robert

1:28:35

Kraft? No. Do you know who

1:28:38

Robert Kraft is? Is he related to the

1:28:39

Kraft Mac and Cheese fortune? Oh,

1:28:42

not that I know of. I only know one fact about him

1:28:44

because he's a sports person. And so I have

1:28:46

to look up all sports related facts. Yeah. Otherwise

1:28:50

we'll get a bunch of replies about how you said someone played

1:28:52

the wrong position. Yes. Those

1:28:54

are still coming in. Thank you, everybody.

1:28:55

Yeah. That is noted.

1:28:58

So Robert Kraft is the owner of the New

1:29:01

England Patriots. Okay. So last year,

1:29:03

Robert Kraft was arrested in

1:29:06

a massage parlor in South Beach,

1:29:08

Miami. Oh. And this immediately

1:29:11

went into the sex ring trafficking,

1:29:15

evil criminal conspiracy type of

1:29:17

framing. So I'm going to read to you

1:29:20

from the New York Times article that came out. There was

1:29:22

like a feature story that came out right after his arrest.

1:29:25

On the lurid celebrity connection lies the wretched

1:29:27

story of women who the police believe

1:29:29

were brought

1:29:30

from China under false promises

1:29:32

of new lives and legitimate spa jobs.

1:29:35

Instead, they found themselves trapped in

1:29:37

the austere back rooms of strip mall

1:29:40

brothels, trafficking victims trapped

1:29:42

among South Florida's rich and famous. I

1:29:45

don't believe they were told they were going to work in massage

1:29:47

parlors seven days a week having

1:29:48

unprotected sex with up to a thousand

1:29:51

men a year, said Sheriff William D. Snyder

1:29:53

of Martin County. We saw

1:29:55

them eating on hot plates in the back.

1:29:57

There were no washing machines. They were sleeping

1:29:59

on the massage. Oh god. Sheriff

1:30:01

Snyder said he believed at least some of

1:30:03

the women were working to pay off debt owed

1:30:05

for what it cost to bring them to the United States. In

1:30:08

some cases, the women's passports were taken

1:30:10

away. Traffickers cycled women in

1:30:12

and out of parlors every 10 or 20 days,

1:30:15

Sheriff Snyder estimated. That seems like

1:30:17

a lot of turnover. I would never consider

1:30:19

them prostitutes. It was more of a rescue

1:30:21

operation, he said.

1:30:22

Oh my god. Right?

1:30:25

Okay. This is setting off a wuga noises

1:30:28

for you because it should have for everybody

1:30:30

else. Also note, all of the information

1:30:32

in this New York Times story is coming from a single

1:30:35

source. Oh no. Who

1:30:37

is the sheriff? Have they not learned since the

1:30:39

Kitty Genovese fiasco in

1:30:41

the early 60s? Right?

1:30:44

He also, there's a later CNN interview

1:30:47

where they're asking about trafficking

1:30:49

and prostitution and et cetera, and he says, I just

1:30:51

don't understand why women would go and allow

1:30:53

themselves

1:30:53

to be trafficked. This really

1:30:55

speaks to the binary that I feel like a lot

1:30:58

of men in law enforcement believe in about

1:31:00

women, which is that the two

1:31:03

kinds are rescue worthy and

1:31:05

prostitute. Yeah. There's also this great

1:31:07

thing too,

1:31:08

where we build up these perfect victims, but

1:31:10

then it's like, oh, they went and allowed themselves to be trafficked.

1:31:13

Right? So even when we find those stories,

1:31:15

it's like, oh, weren't they kind of at

1:31:17

fault a little bit? They let them

1:31:20

be right? It's like

1:31:20

someone got herself murdered. Yeah. Yeah.

1:31:23

And it's like, oh, that's how women works depending on the category of

1:31:25

person. I mean, I think it's also, so

1:31:28

every

1:31:29

factual claim in what I just said

1:31:32

is false. Great. Every single

1:31:34

one. So first of all, there's this

1:31:36

great Vanity Fair article that comes out months

1:31:38

after this, of course, where they

1:31:40

find that none of the women were from China.

1:31:43

Oh my God. At least got

1:31:45

the country right. How hard is that? I mean,

1:31:47

they were Chinese. Okay. They were already

1:31:49

living

1:31:49

in the United States. Yeah. And then part of

1:31:52

the massage par, they recruited them through advertisements in

1:31:54

Chinese language, magazines and newspapers

1:31:56

in Chicago and LA and

1:31:58

all these other places. It was like a new

1:31:59

normal sort of Craigslist ad that happened

1:32:02

to be in Chinese, like come to Florida, work at a massage

1:32:04

parlor. So none of them were trafficked from

1:32:06

other countries.

1:32:07

They crossed state lines, so I guess they did

1:32:09

violate the Mann Act, which people used to get excited

1:32:12

about in the 1930s. That's such a huge spoiler,

1:32:14

Sarah. We're going to get to the Mann Act. I'm very sorry.

1:32:18

That, to me, is a really important

1:32:20

distinction.

1:32:21

Yes. The number of people

1:32:23

who are brought to the United States against

1:32:25

their will, vanishingly

1:32:27

small. The much more common thing

1:32:29

is somebody wants to come to the United States,

1:32:31

they pay somebody to take them into the United

1:32:34

States, and then they are charged too

1:32:36

much, they are dropped in a place that they didn't agree

1:32:38

to. There's all kinds of structural vulnerabilities

1:32:41

with paying somebody to smuggle you into

1:32:43

a country and those people get victimized at

1:32:45

extremely high rates.

1:32:47

But there is a difference between people

1:32:49

being clubbed, knocked out

1:32:51

in Cambodia, and they wake up in Detroit.

1:32:54

That doesn't happen. Again, I think this distinction

1:32:57

is important because it's based on our unwillingness

1:32:59

to confront the deepest

1:33:01

culprit in all this, which again is economic

1:33:04

insecurity domestically. And

1:33:06

also, I mean, when you think about it economically,

1:33:08

if I'm running a massage

1:33:09

parlor where I'm exploiting young

1:33:12

women and sort of in these terrible

1:33:14

conditions and they're working long hours and I'm not paying them

1:33:16

very much, why the fuck would I

1:33:18

recruit people from other countries? There's so many

1:33:21

desperate people in America. Right.

1:33:23

It's just on the idea that there's a shortage

1:33:26

of people in America who would

1:33:28

do anything for a decent

1:33:31

paycheck, which like, what a weird

1:33:33

thing to believe. Right. It

1:33:35

just doesn't make any sense when it's like,

1:33:37

you can just put an ad in a newspaper

1:33:39

and people will apply for jobs. When terrible

1:33:42

farms, terrible

1:33:43

food processing plants, when they have job openings,

1:33:46

they put ads on Craigslist and people apply.

1:33:48

I mean, look at the, what was it? A

1:33:51

poultry processing plant in Mississippi that

1:33:53

was just raided by ICE and that

1:33:55

was a raid carried out, I think, because the

1:33:57

boss didn't want to pay his workers and it was cheaper

1:33:59

to get paid.

1:33:59

just have them all scooped up

1:34:02

by law enforcement. I mean, those weren't people

1:34:04

who had

1:34:05

been kidnapped and brought to the United

1:34:06

States in order to work

1:34:08

for insufficient wages. They were people

1:34:11

who had taken those jobs voluntarily because

1:34:13

there was nothing else for them and then had their lives

1:34:15

destroyed because of it. And no one had to

1:34:17

take anyone across international

1:34:20

borders to achieve that. Right. And if I'm like an

1:34:22

asshole poultry plant director guy,

1:34:25

why would I spend money on plane tickets

1:34:27

and like reaching tentacles into Guatemala

1:34:30

to like find workers for my low

1:34:32

wage, low skilled jobs? You can

1:34:35

really tell a fake conspiracy

1:34:37

by the fact that it's just economically impossible.

1:34:40

Exactly. Why would you exploit people

1:34:42

in a different country when there are plenty of people you can

1:34:44

exploit in your own county? So I think that

1:34:47

distinction is extremely important. Whenever

1:34:49

we talk about trafficking, we need to be really

1:34:51

clear that there is a huge

1:34:54

difference

1:34:54

between people coming here and people who

1:34:56

are being taken here. And

1:34:58

the reason why it's dangerous

1:35:00

to come here is because there are no laws

1:35:03

that allow people to come here legally. Right. Like

1:35:06

why is there an economy of people

1:35:08

that will take you across the U.S. border for ten thousand dollars

1:35:10

because there's really terrible immigration policy.

1:35:13

Again, we're saying we'll solve this problem if we

1:35:15

strengthen our border or if we make it harder

1:35:18

or more punitive for undocumented

1:35:20

people to come to the United States.

1:35:23

And it's like, no, like that's going to make it

1:35:25

worse because that means that you will owe more

1:35:27

money to someone who's smiling. Exactly. And

1:35:30

they will have even more

1:35:30

justification to work you to death.

1:35:33

One of the other factual claims that the sheriff makes

1:35:35

is that they're working seven days a week

1:35:37

having unprotected sex with one thousand men a year.

1:35:40

It doesn't appear that there was any sex going on.

1:35:43

Like intercourse. Okay. All

1:35:45

right. These cops spent six months

1:35:48

surveilling this massage parlor, which is a huge

1:35:50

waste of their time, by the way. Yeah.

1:35:54

They had all kinds of weird hidden camera shit going on. And

1:35:56

in six months of surveillance, they only found 20

1:35:58

people who got any sex acts, the

1:36:01

vast majority of them were hand jobs, and a little

1:36:03

bit of it was oral sex. There were a couple instances

1:36:05

of oral sex, but there was no sexual

1:36:07

intercourse. There's also, the women

1:36:09

were not living on the premises. Only

1:36:12

one of them was living on the premises.

1:36:15

And it was because she was living kind of far away, so

1:36:17

the owner of the massage parlor would

1:36:19

actually pick her up in the mornings and drive

1:36:21

her to work. And then there was like a car trouble

1:36:23

or something, and her boss was like, hey, you know, do

1:36:25

you mind sleeping

1:36:26

at work for a couple nights, because like it's getting

1:36:28

harder for me to pick you up. So she's like,

1:36:30

yeah, okay. Maybe that's exploitative, like it's

1:36:32

not great, right? Like it's not. We're

1:36:34

talking about something that like, does

1:36:37

connect to things that

1:36:40

happen in our world, right? But

1:36:43

the version of that event that seems

1:36:46

most likely

1:36:47

is supported by America as

1:36:49

it is. Totally. I also, in research

1:36:51

for this story, I also found out about something called, have you

1:36:53

heard of something called rub maps? No,

1:36:55

my first mental image is like, what if you had

1:36:58

a road map or a state map, and you

1:37:00

could scratch and sniff different areas to smell

1:37:02

like their food specialties. So you could have like, you

1:37:04

know, you scratch cans of the city and it smells

1:37:06

like barbecue. I'm sure it's not that,

1:37:08

but wouldn't that be great? Yes. So

1:37:11

rub maps is the apparently Yelp

1:37:14

for massage parlors, where

1:37:16

people can rate different massage parlors, talk about their

1:37:18

experiences.

1:37:19

So there's reviews of this massage

1:37:21

parlor on rub maps, apparently, and half

1:37:24

of the reviews are men complaining

1:37:26

that the women at the massage

1:37:27

parlor won't give them hand jobs, which

1:37:30

implies to me that there's some level

1:37:33

of control in what they're actually doing.

1:37:35

Or like, you could look at that and be like,

1:37:37

okay, like consent could very well

1:37:39

be an issue here, right? Because we

1:37:42

have women who have traveled for

1:37:44

this job, so it is expensive to move, like

1:37:46

it's an expensive economy to be living in, and

1:37:49

this is an illegal trade that we're

1:37:51

looking into, so we could take this seriously and

1:37:53

be like, hey, do you feel pressured

1:37:56

to give hand jobs if someone's

1:37:58

paying a couple hundred bucks?

1:37:59

bucks to get a hang job? Like, are you getting

1:38:02

a fair cut of that? Like, how is that? You

1:38:04

know, obviously the police are not like a union

1:38:06

for sex workers like they are in my fancy,

1:38:09

but you know, these are the questions

1:38:11

that are relevant at this point. So it's like you

1:38:13

don't want to help women. You want to save

1:38:15

women. That's great. Yeah. And there's this there's this great

1:38:17

quote in the Vanity

1:38:18

Fair article where she's talking about

1:38:21

how officers are interrogating one

1:38:23

of the sex workers for apparently hours.

1:38:26

And she's the only one who's had

1:38:28

her passport confiscated. It's

1:38:30

not clear sort of who has it or

1:38:33

why she eventually says that her boyfriend

1:38:35

actually took it and that he had pressured her into working

1:38:37

at the massage parlor. But then she later

1:38:39

recants that and says, I just wanted to get

1:38:41

out of the interrogation and I was telling

1:38:43

them what they wanted to hear. The

1:38:45

author of the Vanity Fair article is talking about this

1:38:48

long interrogation of her and she says,

1:38:50

it was somehow easier for law enforcement officers

1:38:52

in South Florida to believe that the women had been sold

1:38:55

into sex slavery by a global crime

1:38:57

syndicate

1:38:58

than to acknowledge that immigrant women of precarious

1:39:00

status hemmed in by circumstance might

1:39:03

choose sex work. Oh, my God. All

1:39:05

of this goes back to this idea that first

1:39:07

of all, people cannot consent to sex work.

1:39:09

Sex work is inherently exploitative

1:39:12

and that they have to be rescued.

1:39:15

We're getting into like weedy territory,

1:39:17

but I feel like if we're going to talk about like

1:39:19

issues of consent and you

1:39:21

know, can someone consent to sex

1:39:24

work? Like A, yes, I think

1:39:26

that they can. And B,

1:39:28

if you are worried that sex workers

1:39:30

are unable to meaningfully consent

1:39:33

to the vocation that they're in,

1:39:34

then like make it so that they can have another job.

1:39:37

Yeah, yeah. Give them something to do to reasonably support

1:39:39

themselves. Right. Give them better alternatives

1:39:41

if you don't want them to go into sex work. Exactly.

1:39:44

And it's also I mean, I spoke to a really

1:39:45

interesting sex worker in Chicago

1:39:48

who's been doing sex work for years. The way that she got into

1:39:51

it was she had a kid

1:39:52

right after she turned 18. The kid had asthma

1:39:55

and there was this machine that helps him breathe

1:39:58

that she has to rent on

1:39:59

a daily basis. that cost $89 a night. And

1:40:03

she was working at Denny's. She basically

1:40:05

just was barely getting by, or

1:40:07

really not getting by, sort of slowly sinking.

1:40:10

And so one of her customers at Denny's offered

1:40:12

to pay her to have sex with him after

1:40:15

her shift was over. And that

1:40:17

was how she kind of got by for many years. And

1:40:20

since then she has ended up

1:40:22

homeless

1:40:23

at times. She says that was

1:40:25

the most physically dangerous time because

1:40:28

a lot of people target homeless

1:40:30

people for sex work because they know that nobody

1:40:32

is going to believe you. If you say, this guy

1:40:35

raped me, this guy was terrible to me. Since

1:40:38

then she's gotten a day job. She's

1:40:40

gotten a more stable place to live. She still

1:40:43

does sex work, but it's a much smaller

1:40:45

number of clients. And

1:40:47

she also does phone sex, which is a form of sex

1:40:49

work that I had completely forgotten about because there's

1:40:52

been so few movies

1:40:52

about his lately. But what's interesting to me

1:40:55

is when we think about this myth of trafficking,

1:40:58

you could easily cast that guy

1:41:00

in the Denny's as coercing

1:41:03

her into sex, right? Like this is a guy

1:41:05

that offered money to his

1:41:07

Denny's waitress to have sex with him. Like that's

1:41:09

a dirt baggy thing to do. But then when

1:41:11

she talks about the story, she acknowledges

1:41:14

that of course there's an element of coercion there. But first

1:41:17

of all, it was the medical bills that were coercing

1:41:19

her. Right.

1:41:20

And like people are vulnerable

1:41:23

enough working in legal industries where they don't

1:41:25

have unions, you know? Think about what

1:41:27

it's like admitting

1:41:29

to practicing the trade that you're in means that you

1:41:31

got arrested. I mean, it is impossible

1:41:33

to have rights in that situation. Right. I

1:41:36

also think

1:41:37

taking the right wing argument seriously, that

1:41:39

like there's no such thing as consenting to sex

1:41:41

work, it's inherently exploitative. Fine. I

1:41:44

don't agree with that, but like if that is true,

1:41:47

then the question becomes, say you're

1:41:49

a sex worker, you're working in this

1:41:51

massage parlor, it's super exploitative. I'm

1:41:54

now going to go in, I'm going to arrest your boss. I'm

1:41:56

going to shut it down. I'm going to take away your

1:41:58

source of housing, right? because part of the myth

1:42:00

is that they're living there. I'm gonna take away

1:42:02

your source of income

1:42:03

because you're no longer gonna have a job. So

1:42:06

like, you're welcome. I've just

1:42:08

rescued you. Even if you're this right

1:42:10

wing, pull yourself up by your bootstraps person, okay,

1:42:13

then like those people need a bunch of money. Right,

1:42:16

and what if you've just taken their only bootstraps

1:42:18

away? I guess the assumption is that they

1:42:20

have been forced

1:42:21

into sex work and now they don't have to do

1:42:23

anymore because this

1:42:25

corrupt organization that forced them to become

1:42:27

sex workers is gone now. And

1:42:29

so now they can skip

1:42:32

away and do whatever they want,

1:42:33

which is what? Right. Yeah.

1:42:36

There's a survey of sex workers in Britain, all

1:42:38

of whom are foreigners. Only 6% of

1:42:41

them said that they were deceived

1:42:43

anyway by coming to the UK. What

1:42:45

they say is that they went to the UK to

1:42:48

like work at coffee

1:42:49

shops, but either they got

1:42:51

those jobs and the conditions were shitty and they couldn't

1:42:53

pay their rent, or they just couldn't get

1:42:55

those jobs. And so a lot of them sort

1:42:57

of started doing sex work because they didn't

1:42:59

have a lot of other options. Right.

1:43:01

But it's also like, well, what do those people need? Like, how do you

1:43:03

rescue them from sex work? It's like, pay more at

1:43:05

the coffee shops. Like,

1:43:08

right? Right. Have a lower rent. Like, pit,

1:43:10

stop complaining about how much your espresso

1:43:12

costs. Yeah. I

1:43:15

think making an espresso, that's much harder than giving

1:43:17

a hand job too. My God, there's so

1:43:18

many levers on those things. And

1:43:20

this goes back to like the entire history of

1:43:23

this whole thing, that the origin of

1:43:25

trafficking has always been

1:43:27

about saving women, mostly

1:43:30

white women. I've been reading all these historical

1:43:32

documents and they all include the names

1:43:34

of old laws of sort of like how

1:43:36

this works. So there was the precursors to

1:43:39

this. There's something called the 1870 Act to

1:43:41

prevent the kidnapping and importing of

1:43:44

Mongolian Chinese and Japanese females

1:43:46

for criminal or demoralizing

1:43:48

purposes. But only Mongolian

1:43:50

Chinese and Japanese. If you're Laotian,

1:43:53

then you can just fuck off. There's

1:43:57

one in 1875 that has in the... preamble

1:44:01

that it's trying to end the danger of

1:44:03

cheap Chinese labor and immoral Chinese

1:44:05

women. Interesting. Which

1:44:07

then morphs into the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. So

1:44:11

the Chinese Exclusion Act, this

1:44:13

is fabulous, began as

1:44:15

a sex trafficking panic law.

1:44:18

I interviewed a human smuggling expert

1:44:20

who I cannot name because

1:44:22

he's an old friend of mine and his university

1:44:24

will not allow me to name him because

1:44:26

they have weird restrictions. I mean, one of

1:44:29

the things that a human smuggling researcher told me, because

1:44:31

he's looking into the history of this too, is

1:44:33

that every time we've had a resurgence of

1:44:35

the trafficking panic, we've had a crackdown on immigration.

1:44:39

That is classic. That is a stone cold

1:44:41

classic. The extremely important

1:44:43

reframing of human smuggling to

1:44:46

human trafficking is human

1:44:48

smuggling sounds kind of defensible. Right. People

1:44:50

are sneaking into this country because they want to be here. Human

1:44:52

smuggling is how some enslaved people

1:44:55

escaped back in the day. He mentioned this too, that

1:44:57

there's also great stories of people smuggling

1:44:59

Jews out of Europe when the Nazis came to power.

1:45:02

We sort of

1:45:02

understand that to be a much more complicated

1:45:05

concept. But then as soon as you say,

1:45:07

oh, there's trafficking, people are being brought here

1:45:09

against their will, then it's like, oh shit,

1:45:12

we really need to crack down on the borders because they're

1:45:14

not migrants, they're not coming here for jobs, they're being kidnapped

1:45:16

and taken. It's interesting because

1:45:19

it doesn't

1:45:20

criminalize the person who is

1:45:22

trying to cross the border. It

1:45:25

demonizes the

1:45:26

person who is theoretically moving

1:45:29

them, but then it makes them into collateral or

1:45:31

evidence or something. Yeah. This is

1:45:33

what he said too, that the difference between trafficking

1:45:35

and smuggling is that in human trafficking,

1:45:38

the person coming into the United States

1:45:40

is a victim, whereas in human smuggling,

1:45:42

the United States is the victim. Right?

1:45:46

It's a crime against the United States to smuggle someone

1:45:48

in and there is no victim. So what trafficking

1:45:50

does is it allows you to

1:45:53

reframe, oh, some percentage of these

1:45:55

migrants, I'm really worried about that they're not

1:45:57

choosing to come here on their own volition.

1:45:59

not racist, but

1:46:04

I am concerned. What's

1:46:06

really interesting is this whole thing

1:46:08

gets wrapped up in this concept of

1:46:11

white slavery from the early 1900s. Are

1:46:13

you familiar with this? Yeah, just this idea that,

1:46:15

I mean, the classic idea that we have now

1:46:17

in different clothing that, I mean, it's kind

1:46:20

of birth of a nation idea almost in a way, right? That

1:46:22

like white women are constantly being preyed upon

1:46:25

by an ethnic other who wants to

1:46:27

kidnap them and smuggle them and

1:46:29

just do something terrible. There was something called

1:46:32

the 1904 International Agreement

1:46:34

for the Suppression of White Slave Traffic.

1:46:37

That's one of the first times the term trafficking is

1:46:39

used. I was gonna ask when that

1:46:41

started showing up. I'm surprised it's that old.

1:46:44

And it's also, it hasn't changed at all. This

1:46:46

is the same stuff we see now. So there's this great

1:46:48

article by Janie Chung where she talks about the concept

1:46:51

of exploitation creep where

1:46:53

trafficking has always been a bad thing, but

1:46:56

over time we've expanded the term trafficking

1:46:58

to cover more and more and

1:47:00

more human behavior. And it's now there's behemoth

1:47:02

that covers like 50 different

1:47:04

activities. Yeah, so what did it originally

1:47:07

mean? It originally meant, this is what she says in her article,

1:47:09

that the word trafficking denoted

1:47:11

the cross border movement of white

1:47:14

women and girls by forced deceit or

1:47:16

drugs for the purposes of commercial

1:47:18

sexual exploitation. Okay, white women

1:47:20

and girls by forced deceit or

1:47:23

drugs. It's amazing that we were

1:47:25

so transparent. I guess over

1:47:27

a hundred years ago, we were like, this is a

1:47:29

law about white girls. And now

1:47:32

it's like, that's so the unspoken

1:47:34

thing at the bottom of everything, but it's the one thing you're

1:47:36

not allowed to explicitly say. Right, and

1:47:38

it's, I mean, the DNA is all there. I mean, this

1:47:41

is like how bad it gets is in the actual

1:47:44

law, it defines a victim as

1:47:46

a white woman who is a

1:47:48

victim of the

1:47:49

animal lusts of the dark

1:47:51

races. Oh no, no,

1:47:54

no. What's really interesting is- Oh my God. This

1:47:57

is what Janie Chung, this really interesting researcher

1:47:59

told me.

1:47:59

was that a lot of this comes out of the

1:48:02

anxieties over slavery ending

1:48:04

and a huge anxiety over

1:48:06

women's rights. That you have women

1:48:09

who are starting to show up in interracial couples.

1:48:11

Right, and they can't be doing

1:48:13

that on purpose. Right, and

1:48:16

so all of these same gut level anxieties

1:48:18

are there in the very beginning. And

1:48:21

this initial panic culminates in

1:48:23

the 1910 Man Act with

1:48:26

the way that Janie Chung puts it is,

1:48:28

which sought to maintain the morality

1:48:30

and purity of white women by prohibiting

1:48:32

women from crossing

1:48:33

state lines for immoral purposes and

1:48:36

criminalized interracial couples. So

1:48:39

it's like from the very beginning, trafficking

1:48:41

has been a way of talking about basically

1:48:44

like race mingling

1:48:45

that makes us uncomfortable. Huh,

1:48:49

or that interracial relationships

1:48:51

can only exist in the context of sex crime,

1:48:54

right? But like, it's not that we're

1:48:56

criminalizing interracial

1:48:58

relationships, it has to

1:49:00

be a sex crime. There can't be consent,

1:49:02

it has to be someone's being

1:49:05

recruited for nefarious

1:49:07

purposes. Like it's not that we're criminalizing

1:49:09

these relationships,

1:49:10

it's that they don't exist. Right. Jesus.

1:49:12

So what happens over time is eventually

1:49:15

people sort of accept this framing, but

1:49:17

they think that white slavery is too narrow. And

1:49:20

so by 1949, the International Convention to

1:49:23

suppress trafficking in persons and

1:49:25

the exploitation of the prostitution

1:49:27

of others, these names. But

1:49:30

by that point, trafficking has

1:49:32

now expanded to encompass people

1:49:34

of all races, all genders, all

1:49:36

ages, and it can also be transnational

1:49:39

or domestic. Holding hands under a rainbow. So

1:49:42

we already see this good

1:49:44

faith effort,

1:49:45

I think, to be like, well, you know, white

1:49:47

slavery is a pretty bad term, other people

1:49:49

can be victimized. So like we need to expand

1:49:51

the categories of people that can be victimized

1:49:54

by this bad behavior.

1:49:55

So I talked to this researcher named Ron Weitzer

1:49:57

about this, and he says there's then kind

1:49:59

of this period of dormancy, the term kind

1:50:02

of goes quiet for a while. But

1:50:04

then it explodes

1:50:06

in the late 1990s and especially

1:50:08

in the 2000s. And

1:50:10

what's really interesting to me, because I'm trying

1:50:12

to sort of find the genesis of

1:50:15

this, you know, how did we get to

1:50:18

like trafficking becoming a thing? And

1:50:21

what this guy

1:50:21

Ron Weitzer told me was that it's one

1:50:23

of the few times when it's not

1:50:25

a bottom up phenomenon. Stranger

1:50:28

Danger, there really were kids

1:50:29

that got murdered in these horrible ways.

1:50:31

Right. But he says one of the unique

1:50:34

features about human trafficking as a moral

1:50:36

panic is that it's top

1:50:38

down. That there weren't

1:50:39

cases of human trafficking that

1:50:41

sort of captured the public's imagination.

1:50:44

Right, because we should be able to think like,

1:50:46

oh, yes, the

1:50:47

baby Liza case from 1995 that

1:50:51

started. That's the thing. I mean, that's

1:50:53

at the beginning of this conversation. It was like we were

1:50:56

trying to open a kinder

1:50:58

egg with nothing inside of it. I can't think

1:51:00

of even the cases that would have inspired

1:51:02

this. Right. This is what's so interesting

1:51:05

is that in the late 1990s, what

1:51:07

started happening was you will recognize this,

1:51:09

a coalition between neoconservatives,

1:51:13

the Christian right and feminists

1:51:16

to start pushing this.

1:51:17

Those never end well. It's

1:51:20

actually fascinating. I mean, this is another

1:51:22

example, just like we talked about with victims rights,

1:51:25

where basically this argument

1:51:27

that prostitution

1:51:27

is inherently exploitative came

1:51:30

out of this idea that prostitution is fundamentally

1:51:33

about the patriarchy. And it's something that

1:51:35

benefits men. I mean, there are ways in

1:51:37

which that argument makes sense to me. I just don't

1:51:39

take it to that conclusion. Right. And

1:51:42

so a lot of first wave feminists started

1:51:44

pushing this idea of

1:51:47

trafficking because they were losing

1:51:49

the wars over prostitution from the 1970s

1:51:52

and the wars over porn in the 1980s. Yeah.

1:51:56

That the country was getting much more liberal and

1:51:58

this idea of abolishing prostitution.

1:51:59

Constitution wasn't really working the

1:52:02

idea of abolishing porn like especially the you

1:52:04

know, the internet was starting to exist in the 1990s

1:52:07

Hmm. Yeah, I mean we'll talk about this in greater detail

1:52:09

in another episode I'm sure but that Andrea

1:52:12

Dworkin had attempted to pass

1:52:14

anti-porn

1:52:14

legislation in

1:52:17

parts of the US and Canada and it had been really

1:52:19

kind of Had had a couple

1:52:21

of little successes, but it had been a resounding

1:52:24

flop so there was really you know, whatever

1:52:26

happened was repealed and That

1:52:29

this was a movement that couldn't get off the

1:52:31

ground on the terms that were

1:52:33

currently being argued And it's really interesting

1:52:35

because some of the quote-unquote villains

1:52:38

of the sex trafficking panic Are

1:52:40

the heroes of the early sexual

1:52:42

harassment cases that we talked about in the Anita Hill

1:52:44

episode Catherine McKinnon

1:52:47

for example, who's a really important feminist and

1:52:49

a very

1:52:49

complicated figure legally Yes,

1:52:52

exactly And I think yeah tough to tell

1:52:54

the story of sexual harassment without this as an epilogue

1:52:56

and it's tough to tell This story without

1:52:59

sexual harassment the early cases as a prologue,

1:53:02

you know how I feel about heroes and villains

1:53:04

right if you start off seeing everyone is just

1:53:06

like a Person then you don't have

1:53:08

to become so confused when they have

1:53:11

different roles and different movements Yeah,

1:53:13

I think we're getting into the whole problem with with

1:53:16

work as historians Essentially, which is that

1:53:18

you're deprived of these nice Star Wars.

1:53:21

Yeah binaries, right? History

1:53:23

is a non-binary affair. I'm a say So

1:53:27

Because they're kind of losing

1:53:28

these domestic wars what they

1:53:30

do is they reframe pornography

1:53:33

and prostitution as fundamentally

1:53:35

non-consensual acts and

1:53:38

they've reframed them as kind of Politically

1:53:41

neutral things that you know, this this

1:53:43

isn't about prostitutes in America. This

1:53:45

is about poverty in the third world Like this

1:53:47

isn't you know messy political

1:53:48

stuff? What it really is

1:53:50

is, you know, most of the prostitutes in America they

1:53:53

were taken here against their will they're being

1:53:55

Prostituted like a thousand men a year

1:53:57

and 14 hours a day and it's this terrible thing and

1:53:59

all the

1:53:59

sudden, you're not talking about banning prostitution

1:54:02

anymore, right? You've done this shift where

1:54:04

all of a sudden it's like, no, we want to fight poverty.

1:54:07

We want to save girls. We want

1:54:09

to

1:54:10

free people from slavery. And

1:54:12

the prostitution is sort of secondary

1:54:14

or tertiary and people start not noticing

1:54:17

what you're really doing. Okay,

1:54:19

so it turns out... That was a very

1:54:22

serious sigh. I

1:54:30

mean, I think that what I'm

1:54:31

expressing with that particular exhale

1:54:34

is that there were good ingredients

1:54:36

that went into that. It's

1:54:39

like you're watching a

1:54:41

YouTube cake tutorial

1:54:43

and they like put cake ingredients

1:54:45

in and then they just like put in a bunch

1:54:47

of kitchen cleaner and then

1:54:49

they throw it in the oven.

1:54:50

And it's like, what did you think would happen? There

1:54:53

was a moment when it could have been a cake, but then that

1:54:55

moment ended and we can't go back, right? But then that

1:54:58

it starts off as coming from

1:55:00

a place of genuine concern. And yes,

1:55:03

like again, like people shouldn't have

1:55:05

to do sex work against their will. People shouldn't

1:55:07

have to do any kind of work against their will as a

1:55:09

matter of fact. But do you

1:55:11

care about the demographic that you're claiming

1:55:13

this is about? Or are you really just trying to wipe out

1:55:16

sex work and your previous arguments haven't

1:55:18

landed and you need to cultivate the

1:55:20

kind of allies

1:55:20

who will be swayed by this kind of argument.

1:55:23

And you're maybe trying to annihilate something

1:55:25

that shouldn't be annihilated. And the reason that you haven't

1:55:28

been able to so far is some

1:55:30

proof of that. Yeah. And also to give them some

1:55:32

credit, in the same way that the

1:55:34

stranger danger panic illustrated some real needs.

1:55:37

The law at the time didn't really recognize

1:55:40

the idea that you could be coerced, not

1:55:42

through physical force. Someone can

1:55:44

sort of manipulate you into doing something without

1:55:46

putting a gun to your head, right? Or if you're in

1:55:48

a really abusive relationship, you might

1:55:50

find

1:55:50

yourself committing crimes

1:55:53

or doing other things that you wouldn't do otherwise

1:55:56

because you're afraid of sort of the long-term

1:55:58

consequences. There's no immediate.

1:55:59

a threat. But if your husband

1:56:02

is beating you regularly, he doesn't

1:56:04

have to say, I'll beat you if you don't

1:56:06

do this. Yes. And that humans have

1:56:08

tremendous psychological power over

1:56:11

each other, and it doesn't

1:56:13

have to be supported by

1:56:15

a displays of force. It doesn't have to be

1:56:18

supported by the consequences

1:56:21

that we like to think we would have to be facing

1:56:23

in order to do something we don't think that we would normally

1:56:26

do. Right. There's very little legal

1:56:28

recognition, I think, of the fact

1:56:29

that our autonomy is

1:56:32

a very fragile thing. Yeah. And also,

1:56:34

I mean, this also intersects with

1:56:36

a rising generation

1:56:39

of evangelicals. They

1:56:41

also were losing a lot of battle,

1:56:43

right? That the culture was shifting underneath them.

1:56:45

And so what these younger

1:56:47

evangelicals did was they started

1:56:50

getting away from stuff like gay people

1:56:52

and prostitution and, you know, things that

1:56:54

were sort of not going to land anymore.

1:56:57

They went to these issues that they could still get moderate. Yeah.

1:57:00

And so what you have in the late 1990s

1:57:02

is Christian groups that start focusing on global

1:57:04

warming, HIV AIDS globally,

1:57:07

and human trafficking. Right. Africa

1:57:10

is like the center

1:57:12

of the innocent victim industrial complex,

1:57:14

really. Right. Yeah.

1:57:17

Right. And so in the way that Weitzer was talking about in this top-down

1:57:19

push, they find a very good

1:57:21

friend in George W. Bush, who gets elected in 2000.

1:57:24

Oh, it's a Bush joint. Oh,

1:57:28

it was created to suit his

1:57:30

fragile little mind. Yeah. And

1:57:32

so they passed something called the

1:57:34

Trafficking Victims Protection Act,

1:57:36

which as will not surprise

1:57:39

you at all, there's nothing in there about protecting victims. It

1:57:41

extends a bunch of sentences. It creates,

1:57:44

as we've seen with other moral panics, it creates

1:57:47

laws against things that are already illegal.

1:57:49

So it doesn't criminalize anything new. It just jacks

1:57:51

up sentencing for other stuff. Yeah,

1:57:53

exactly. Like it's filling a hole that is already

1:57:56

filled. So the only

1:57:59

actual victims. protection that

1:58:01

it has in the law is the idea of a T

1:58:03

visa, which is a trafficking victim

1:58:05

visa, basically. It sounds like a gift card

1:58:07

for testosterone. But

1:58:11

what's really interesting is, you know, as usual, nobody

1:58:14

digs into the details of these plans.

1:58:17

So the actual T visa,

1:58:19

the way that it works is it's temporary. It

1:58:21

gives you a one year extension

1:58:23

of staying in the United States and it's

1:58:25

conditional on participating

1:58:28

in the criminal trial against your trafficker.

1:58:30

Oh, Jesus Christ. So this

1:58:33

creates an incentive where

1:58:34

even if you're not really a victim,

1:58:37

like you weren't really coerced into sex work, there's

1:58:39

no incentive to say that you were. Because

1:58:41

it's how you get human rights. Yes, totally.

1:58:44

And the thing is, I mean, you know, everybody brags

1:58:46

about this program and how great it is, but

1:58:49

a tiny number of people even get it every

1:58:51

year. It's only 600 people get it every year. And

1:58:53

the fine print for the T visa

1:58:56

is that, you know, it's temporary, but you

1:58:58

can also apply for this thing

1:58:59

called a U visa, which is permanent

1:59:01

residency. But this

1:59:04

is a system for every victim of any

1:59:06

kind of crime. So if you're an immigrant and you're

1:59:08

a victim of domestic abuse, like this is the kind of

1:59:11

visa that you apply for. Yeah. There's 60,000

1:59:13

applications per year and they only give out 10,000

1:59:16

of them. There's already a backlog of 150,000 people.

1:59:19

Oh my God. So we're 15 years.

1:59:21

There's like a 15 year waiting list.

1:59:23

It's like trying to get a new liver, basically.

1:59:26

And like that's as good as it gets. Like that is

1:59:28

as worthy of protection

1:59:29

as you can get as an

1:59:32

undocumented person in the eyes of the

1:59:34

law. You know, the thing that I cannot get over

1:59:37

when we talk about trafficking and the trafficking panic, the

1:59:39

issue that gets the most attention is FOSTA-SESTA,

1:59:42

these laws that passed, I think last year or two years ago. Yeah.

1:59:45

That basically took down any online ads for

1:59:47

sex work. And like famously, I think was

1:59:50

targeted at Backpage. Yeah. And

1:59:52

they're like, they're awful. There's a really good reply all episode

1:59:54

about how bad they are and everybody should go

1:59:56

listen to it. Yeah. I love that reply all episode.

1:59:59

But what's really interesting is there's also local versions

2:00:02

of Backpage that have also been caught

2:00:04

up in the last couple of years, not necessarily under Sesta

2:00:07

Foster, but other basically local laws. So

2:00:09

there's one locally in Seattle called the

2:00:12

Review Board, which was essentially

2:00:14

Reddit for sex workers and

2:00:16

clients, where people could

2:00:18

post ads, people could also post reviews.

2:00:22

The sex workers that I spoke to who had profiles

2:00:24

there

2:00:24

and posted there said that it was really

2:00:27

positive in that if a guy

2:00:30

was a total prick, you could post

2:00:32

on there with his profile and his information

2:00:34

and say,

2:00:35

this is what happened. He showed up drunk, he

2:00:37

hit me, whatever it was. And

2:00:39

the sex workers would then of course say, well, we're

2:00:42

not going

2:00:42

to see that guy anymore. And the men

2:00:44

would post and say like, hey, man, you're making us look bad.

2:00:47

This is bullshit. There was all kinds of stuff on there about

2:00:49

consent and about

2:00:50

it's okay for them to say no. And

2:00:53

it's not okay to coerce them into sex if they say, sorry,

2:00:55

that's not a service I'm offering

2:00:56

or I don't really feel like it tonight. Sorry

2:00:59

about that. And then a couple of years

2:01:01

ago, the cops came in and

2:01:03

shut it down. And so the way that I found

2:01:05

out about this and the way that most people in Seattle found

2:01:07

out about this was there's a big trafficking

2:01:09

raid, we found a sex ring, it's

2:01:12

all trafficking. It's all terrible. It's a ring.

2:01:15

If you call something a ring, it's

2:01:15

automatically so sinister. Right?

2:01:18

Yeah. So some of the women that were posting

2:01:20

on the Review Board were from South Korea. And

2:01:23

so this, of course, got wrapped up in the sort

2:01:25

of they're being brought here against their will

2:01:27

type of

2:01:28

narrative. And they're working 14 hours

2:01:30

a day and they're not making any

2:01:32

money, blah, blah, blah. It's just so weird when

2:01:34

we want to read situations not

2:01:37

at face value for kind

2:01:38

of what we're seeing, but we're like, well,

2:01:40

we have this thing that we really want to find.

2:01:43

Yeah. And we're going to take anything

2:01:45

that to any degree supports

2:01:48

the scenario we want this to be. And

2:01:50

then we're going to say it's that scenario. Like that's a

2:01:52

really bizarre

2:01:53

way to be attempting

2:01:55

to solve social problems. Yes. And

2:01:58

just like barreling forward without. actually

2:02:00

showing any interest in what's actually going on.

2:02:03

So what's fascinating is then later, of course, none

2:02:05

of this shows up in the original news reports or the prime

2:02:07

time specials that ran about this quote unquote trafficking

2:02:10

ring, is that there was no

2:02:12

evidence that anybody was being coerced

2:02:15

into sex, that these quote

2:02:17

unquote 14 hour days that the women were

2:02:19

working, the only evidence for

2:02:21

that was that on their advertisements they would list

2:02:24

their availability as 14 hours. Okay,

2:02:27

they say I'm available for appointments

2:02:28

between 10am and midnight.

2:02:30

Yeah, incredibly, there's no

2:02:33

evidence that any of the quote unquote pimps

2:02:35

were having sex with any of the sex

2:02:38

workers or we're providing them with drugs. They

2:02:40

were kind of like managers or promoters

2:02:42

or like a book agent. They were placing

2:02:45

ads for them. They were helping them with like various

2:02:47

logistics things. They were like actually doing their

2:02:49

jobs. Yeah. And also, I mean,

2:02:51

what some of these sex workers have been telling me is that like the whole concept

2:02:53

of a pimp is, I mean, first of all, racialized.

2:02:56

Secondly, that relationship doesn't really

2:02:59

happen as much anymore because of the internet.

2:03:02

It's relatively easy or easier

2:03:04

to set up dates in places

2:03:05

like hotels or places where there's sort

2:03:07

of enough people around that

2:03:10

if something bad happens, there is help available.

2:03:13

It's not this idea of like exploitative

2:03:15

pimps. Obviously, it happens in the

2:03:17

world, but in general, the internet's

2:03:19

been really good for sex workers to

2:03:21

be able to have much more independence. And

2:03:24

a lot of times the power relationship is actually the

2:03:26

other way around now that the sex

2:03:28

workers will kind of hire men

2:03:30

to do things like screen clients,

2:03:33

to place ads for them, to do things like,

2:03:35

you know, drive me to this appointment, you know, pick me up

2:03:37

at the airport when I come back, etc.

2:03:39

So yeah, so like to have someone around as

2:03:41

a heavy who you are employing

2:03:43

and who is dependent on you. I

2:03:46

mean, that seems like a good system. And so in this

2:03:48

particular case,

2:03:49

the quote unquote brothel owner pimp

2:03:51

dudes, the women were charging 300 bucks

2:03:53

an hour, and the guys were taking 100. So

2:03:57

maybe that's too much. Maybe that's unfair.

2:03:59

Right? Like I don't know the industry

2:04:02

but to me that doesn't seem on the face

2:04:04

of it like an obviously exploitative

2:04:06

number Right and so at the end of this

2:04:08

whole thing What's amazing is the

2:04:11

only people that actually

2:04:12

went to jail. Nobody was charged with trafficking,

2:04:14

of course The only thing that they

2:04:16

got were these second-degree Promoting

2:04:19

prostitution charges one

2:04:21

of the guys one of these quote-unquote pimps who of course

2:04:23

tarred as like the worst You know

2:04:25

chaining people to radiators the worst imaginable

2:04:28

traffickers one of them

2:04:30

does 60 days in

2:04:32

jail and 30 days of community

2:04:35

service you caught the trafficker at the center

2:04:37

of the ring and yeah I mean, thank God they didn't

2:04:39

bring in a disproportionate

2:04:40

punishment just a safe face I

2:04:42

mean, yeah, that's I mean, that's one nice thing about it One of the

2:04:44

other guys that went to jail for 21 months

2:04:47

was a kid who the only thing he's actually

2:04:49

charged with is Helping the sex

2:04:51

workers post ads and picking them up at

2:04:53

the airport when they would travel So

2:04:56

one of the myths of this is that like the traffickers

2:04:59

are moving them around the country and they're being taken

2:05:01

from place to place There's no evidence

2:05:03

that

2:05:03

these women ever traveled

2:05:06

with another person They were going to

2:05:08

other places and a lot of the sex workers told me that this is something

2:05:10

that you do because If you're a new face

2:05:12

in an area like you go to Albuquerque or whatever You

2:05:15

get like a wave

2:05:17

of clients because they haven't seen you before like

2:05:19

modeling. Yeah, exactly It makes

2:05:21

sense to move around also apparently people pay

2:05:23

more in certain cities like New York and LA

2:05:26

that makes sense They're used to paying more for sandwiches

2:05:31

So there's no evidence that they were being taken

2:05:33

anywhere They were just going on their

2:05:35

own to those places to earn more money and then

2:05:38

coming back and this guy would pick them up At the airport. It's just

2:05:40

such bad faith. You know, it's just there We're

2:05:42

like purporting to care about these people's lives

2:05:45

and then we're expressing that by making them harder

2:05:48

Which suggests to me that

2:05:50

that's all we really wanted anyway,

2:05:52

but we just wanted an excuse

2:05:55

To screw over sex workers. Yes. Absolutely.

2:05:57

I mean, I think it's important to note that this website,

2:06:00

the review board, people talk about, you know,

2:06:02

it was a nice positive place, but it was

2:06:04

also, I mean, it's not perfect, right? That the guy is

2:06:06

run by essentially this random dude named

2:06:09

Tahoe Ted. They

2:06:11

say he was kind of a dick. Like he

2:06:13

didn't allow trans sex workers to

2:06:15

post, block people

2:06:17

from creating accounts if they were fat, like anyone

2:06:20

larger. So Tahoe Ted is a shitty guy

2:06:22

who accidentally made a place

2:06:24

better than him. Yeah, that people were able to

2:06:27

use in this positive way. But again, it's like, what

2:06:29

is creating the weaknesses

2:06:31

and the shittiness of that website? It's the criminalization.

2:06:35

If this

2:06:35

was legal, you would have

2:06:37

other websites to choose from that aren't shitty.

2:06:40

And Tahoe Ted wouldn't control the pipeline. Yeah.

2:06:42

And one of the weird things, this is incredible. This

2:06:44

guy, Tahoe Ted, is caught.

2:06:45

He's in all of the local newspapers.

2:06:48

He's a trafficker. He's the ringleader, et cetera.

2:06:51

He eventually pleads guilty to three counts

2:06:54

of promoting prostitution. His sentence

2:06:56

is 30 days of work release, 30 days of community

2:06:58

service. He has to go to a post

2:07:00

conviction sex buyer intervention

2:07:03

course. And then the

2:07:05

guy ended up killing himself because his name

2:07:07

had been dragged through the mud through the newspapers

2:07:09

that he had a day

2:07:10

job while he was doing this. And of course he

2:07:12

lost the day job and nobody was going to hire him because Google

2:07:14

this guy in the first 50 results are all about how he's

2:07:16

a sex trafficker.

2:07:18

Which is interesting because even so

2:07:20

the actual legal systems consequences

2:07:23

weren't that significant for him, but the

2:07:25

way his name had been

2:07:27

destroyed by it. So you don't even

2:07:30

need to penalize someone that harshly

2:07:32

because the media will do it for you. I don't know.

2:07:34

Again,

2:07:34

you don't want to get into a place where you're

2:07:37

defending this model that I do think has

2:07:39

elements of exploitation in it. And it's

2:07:41

a structure that can be used very

2:07:43

exploitatively. So I

2:07:45

don't think any of this is like, all of this is perfectly fine.

2:07:48

Right. But we're saying that it's not

2:07:50

the very specific thing that people are claiming

2:07:52

it to be different from saying it's perfect.

2:07:55

Right. What's amazing about that case

2:07:57

is that it was a five year investment.

2:08:00

investigation. There were four different

2:08:02

law enforcement agencies involved.

2:08:04

So we're talking millions

2:08:06

of dollars. I feel like that's an inappropriate use

2:08:09

of resources. Yes. And it's like,

2:08:11

what are we spending our money on? Think of all the

2:08:14

children that are experiencing domestic abuse during that time.

2:08:17

For what? For a bunch of misdemeanor

2:08:20

arrests and six month sentences and a bunch of

2:08:22

quote unquote victims that left immediately.

2:08:24

All of them

2:08:26

did not participate in the prosecution.

2:08:29

So as soon as it happened, they were quote unquote rescued

2:08:31

and sent to this NGO that was going to provide them services.

2:08:34

All of

2:08:34

them ran away within 24 hours. All

2:08:36

of them did? Yeah. Wow. So to this day, we

2:08:38

don't know where they are. That doesn't imply

2:08:40

to me

2:08:40

the Liam Neeson version

2:08:43

of this trafficking story.

2:08:45

I would love to see though, the Liam Neeson

2:08:47

movie version of all this where Liam Neeson

2:08:49

like raids a fairly stable

2:08:52

home that some sex work is being run out

2:08:54

of and then forcibly takes

2:08:56

a bunch of women to a safe house and then

2:08:59

they all run away. And then he just sits there

2:09:01

sadly having made breakfast for everyone. I

2:09:03

mean, this is another

2:09:05

recurring theme for us that if we create these

2:09:07

sort of bucket categories in

2:09:10

public discourse, we're like, okay, there's

2:09:12

traffickers

2:09:13

and they're this kind of person. And maybe

2:09:16

as the public, we only want it to apply

2:09:18

to this very sinister, very specific

2:09:20

kind of a figure that we're thinking of. But

2:09:23

then once we've created that category

2:09:25

socially, then legally it can

2:09:28

be used however people want. And if there's

2:09:30

one thing that we've learned, you

2:09:32

can take a very scary sounding charge

2:09:34

and then

2:09:35

find ways to sort of pull

2:09:38

that parachute over

2:09:41

like a huge number of defendants.

2:09:43

Yeah. And this is I actually read this fascinating

2:09:46

report by the Greater New Orleans Human Trafficking

2:09:48

Task Force. That was actually like in

2:09:50

the way that bureaucrats do it was like quietly

2:09:53

scathing but like pretending that it's not

2:09:55

scathing. It was kind of like a like salty drug

2:09:57

quotes. Yes, yeah, exactly. And so

2:09:59

What they note is that everything

2:10:02

since 2000 has been about victims, right? Protecting

2:10:04

victims, helping victims. This is the language that

2:10:06

we always hear. What they mention is

2:10:08

that in the entire state of Louisiana,

2:10:11

there's only 291 beds available

2:10:13

for trafficking victims,

2:10:15

and only 46 of those are

2:10:18

actually trafficking beds. The rest of them are

2:10:20

homeless shelters. It's this absurd

2:10:22

duality where it's like trafficking

2:10:23

is huge, it's growing,

2:10:26

it's the most offensive form

2:10:28

of exploitation imaginable, right? It's literally

2:10:30

sexual slavery, but then after

2:10:32

we rescue them, we're sending them to a fucking homeless

2:10:34

shelter. Wow. Okay. And

2:10:37

that there are no actual resources for this most exalted

2:10:39

category of victim. Yeah. And

2:10:42

it's like they talk in there quietly, saltily

2:10:44

about how because all the homeless

2:10:46

shelters are full, it often takes five

2:10:49

or 10 phone calls to find a homeless

2:10:51

shelter for that night. It's like, can

2:10:53

you name 10 homeless shelters in your city?

2:10:55

Like, how do you even do this? Yes.

2:10:57

And that's why I'm so surprised that they're so traumatized

2:10:59

that they don't know what happened to them, but they have

2:11:01

to be calling around homeless shelters

2:11:03

until they, through sheer persistence, find

2:11:06

a bed. Only one of the shelters

2:11:09

serves foreign nationals. A lot of them do background

2:11:11

checks and other document checks. The

2:11:14

Cindy McCain definition of trafficking is that these

2:11:16

people are not from the United States.

2:11:18

Why is this not an emergency to anti-trafficking

2:11:21

organizations? Right. There

2:11:23

are no resources being allocated for

2:11:25

them. There's no real system in place

2:11:27

for taking care of them once they're

2:11:29

saved from their abusers. No one

2:11:32

seems to have much of a plan

2:11:34

of where to put them or how to find

2:11:37

resources for them. It all goes to

2:11:39

criminalization. Yeah. I mean, this is the

2:11:41

darkest

2:11:41

shit that I haven't found in other task

2:11:43

force reports, but I think is really widespread, that

2:11:46

the only forms of housing available to

2:11:48

trafficking victims are long-term housing.

2:11:51

And so all of them have these weird

2:11:54

intake requirements where you have

2:11:56

to be in

2:11:57

before a curfew, you have

2:11:59

to commit to some... sobriety. If I've been

2:12:01

trafficked, I'm not staying sober. You know,

2:12:03

I've got some demons to handle. This

2:12:05

is from the task force report. Required activities

2:12:07

include counseling therapy, life

2:12:10

skills activities, religious activities,

2:12:13

and group or wellness meetings for residents.

2:12:16

And also two out of three of them cut

2:12:18

off your internet and take away your cell

2:12:20

phone. Okay, isn't that what you're supposed to do to

2:12:23

someone when you're trafficking them, though? I

2:12:25

mean, this is the thing. Like, are we going to break their movements and control

2:12:27

their life? Like, are we rescuing

2:12:30

the victims of trafficking by re-trafficking

2:12:32

them? Yes.

2:12:33

And I also read about this thing

2:12:35

outside of New Orleans, where there's a house

2:12:38

for trafficking victims out in a rural

2:12:40

area that is run by the

2:12:42

New Orleans Sheriff's

2:12:43

Department. Oh, God. Where they're also taking

2:12:46

away people's cell phones,

2:12:48

and there's no public transit out there. Living

2:12:51

in a house in rural Louisiana

2:12:53

with no public transportation, where you're being supervised

2:12:56

by the Sheriff's Department sounds like a spiritual

2:12:58

sequel to Get Out. Yes. Warning

2:13:00

signs include that in the training for the kids. Why

2:13:03

are we looking at kids in airports? And like being

2:13:05

isolated in a remote location where

2:13:07

the people who are restricting your movements

2:13:10

have no sense of accountability because

2:13:12

of their own belief and the righteousness of

2:13:15

what they're doing. Like, again, this is

2:13:17

coming back to our, you

2:13:20

know, torch song of all torch songs,

2:13:22

which is the most dangerous

2:13:24

people are the people who

2:13:27

believe in their deepest

2:13:29

heart of hearts, that they

2:13:31

are on the side of what

2:13:33

is right and just. The dangerous

2:13:35

people are the people who think they are good

2:13:38

and who society thinks are good and therefore

2:13:40

who have the kind of power that

2:13:43

lends itself very easily to abuse. Yes.

2:13:46

You're going to love

2:13:47

this. This is the darkest

2:13:49

NGO, Christian NGO thing. Hooray.

2:13:51

Becca Charleston, who's the director of something called Valiant

2:13:54

Hearts, which is a Christian charity

2:13:55

that helps trafficking victims. She identifies

2:13:57

as a victim of trafficking herself. This

2:14:00

is from a Christian website. Charleston

2:14:02

spoke about working with police departments who

2:14:04

set up sting operations. Posing

2:14:06

as potential clients, they create online

2:14:08

posts to lure individuals to a hotel

2:14:10

room. Once the person arrives, law

2:14:13

enforcement officers will give them an ultimatum. Either

2:14:15

they can go to jail or accept

2:14:17

valiant hearts offered to help. However,

2:14:20

many of the trafficked individuals declined the help,

2:14:23

believing initially that it is their choice. Oh,

2:14:26

I'm very curious about the situations that

2:14:28

are being described here. How many

2:14:30

red flags did you wear there in that

2:14:32

photograph? So the people

2:14:35

who are being courted in the sting operations

2:14:37

are sex workers. Yes, and this Christian

2:14:40

organization has taken it upon

2:14:42

itself to make fake ads

2:14:44

and entrap sex workers. Are

2:14:47

they minors or are they just adult, just random

2:14:49

adult sex workers? It appears they're

2:14:51

adult sex workers. There's nothing in here

2:14:53

indicating that it's children. And then

2:14:55

it's just like, you know, you can look at the

2:14:57

founder of this organization and say, you

2:14:59

have been through a real trauma and

2:15:02

maybe that doesn't qualify you to know what

2:15:05

these people in this very broad

2:15:08

group of backgrounds and possible

2:15:10

situations all need. Like

2:15:13

it's not appropriate for individuals to be

2:15:15

able

2:15:16

to join forces with the police in

2:15:18

this way, either, I don't think. No. Like

2:15:21

this is a really weird thing that we kind of accept

2:15:23

as normal in the United States because it happens

2:15:25

so frequently. And especially because

2:15:27

of the severity of the crime, the

2:15:30

knowledge base required of the

2:15:32

person collaborating with law enforcement

2:15:34

doesn't need to be as high. This is one of

2:15:36

those things that shows up that I was talking to this

2:15:39

person who has to remain anonymous, who was on a state

2:15:41

trafficking

2:15:41

task force. What he

2:15:43

found in the state where he was working that cops

2:15:45

would do these quote unquote stings, raids

2:15:48

on massage parlors or whatever. And

2:15:50

they'd sit down with the sex workers

2:15:52

and say like, look, you can

2:15:54

go to jail or you can say you're a trafficking

2:15:56

victim. Those are your two options. If

2:15:58

your choice is between.

2:15:59

and something else, then the something

2:16:02

else would be pretty bad for you to choose

2:16:04

jail first. It's just there's something so

2:16:07

corrupt about the cops

2:16:09

telling people that they're a victim of something. Also

2:16:11

then, if you say, yes, I've been trafficked,

2:16:13

then what then? You go to the fucking homeless

2:16:16

shelter. This is the thing. Okay, so

2:16:18

what if you have a perfectly nice house

2:16:20

that you're paying for with

2:16:21

your sex work that you're just trying to do for

2:16:23

God's sakes? Right. Or if you are

2:16:25

in a bad situation, how is going to a homeless

2:16:27

shelter gonna make that better? Right. I

2:16:30

mean, one of

2:16:30

the really interesting shifts here is that one

2:16:32

of the things that accompanies the trafficking

2:16:34

panic is this idea of ending demand

2:16:37

or like the Nordic model. Is that where you criminalize

2:16:40

client ship? Yes.

2:16:42

Okay. This is like the woke

2:16:44

sex worker criminalization policy now. You

2:16:47

don't wanna arrest the sex workers, but you

2:16:49

wanna arrest the Johns, right? So

2:16:51

it's like you're cracking down on the demand and

2:16:53

you're not gonna like re-victimize sex

2:16:55

workers, which sounds great, right? It sounds better.

2:16:58

I think anytime we call something

2:16:59

the Nordic model, it might be

2:17:01

because it needs more credibility than it actually

2:17:04

is. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

2:17:07

I mean, this is what you find is that, you know, there's been all these studies

2:17:09

of Sweden and Norway now where they invented

2:17:11

the Nordic model. And what they find is that it

2:17:13

doesn't actually make sex workers

2:17:16

any safer because first of all, by criminalizing

2:17:18

people buying sex, you're essentially

2:17:21

taking out all of the like law abiding

2:17:23

people out of the customer pool. It's

2:17:25

like you take away like normal

2:17:27

shoppers and you just have like black Friday people,

2:17:30

like that would be awful. That's

2:17:33

what the other thing that it does is because it's still trying

2:17:36

to abolish prostitution as an institution,

2:17:38

right? So what ends up happening is

2:17:41

even though the sex workers themselves are not

2:17:42

criminalized, the place that they're working,

2:17:45

the brothel, is now a criminal organization.

2:17:47

So they're part of a conspiracy. Exactly.

2:17:50

So they can be written up on racketeering

2:17:52

charges if they had any financial relationship. There's

2:17:55

also what's really interesting is in the

2:17:56

definition of trafficking is a sex

2:17:59

worker. sex worker over 18 that

2:18:01

has been coerced into sex

2:18:03

work through force, fraud, or coercion.

2:18:06

It's kind of a tautology there, isn't

2:18:08

it? But what's interesting is for people under 18,

2:18:11

you don't have to prove anything. All you have to prove is that

2:18:13

they're engaged in sex work because of age

2:18:16

of consent laws. And

2:18:18

I feel quite strongly that children cannot

2:18:20

consent to sex. Like I'm okay

2:18:23

with the principle. However, however,

2:18:26

what I've heard from a lot

2:18:26

of sex workers is that what happens is the cops

2:18:28

will sort of do a bus, they'll arrest a bunch of sex workers.

2:18:31

They'll find one who is

2:18:33

under 18. And that's

2:18:35

kind of like the Eureka moment. Oh,

2:18:38

God. Because once

2:18:40

you find one 17, 16, 15 year

2:18:42

old sex worker, then you have a circle

2:18:45

of people around that person

2:18:47

who you can charge with sex trafficking. Who

2:18:49

could all be 19, 20 years old?

2:18:51

Yes. I interviewed a lawyer

2:18:53

for a sex worker who is now

2:18:56

convicted of trafficking because she drove

2:18:58

another sex worker over state lines.

2:19:01

She was 19, the younger sex worker was 17. Great.

2:19:04

Which also means that you penalize

2:19:07

offering help. Yes. Like

2:19:09

you render it a criminal act

2:19:12

to help someone who's trying

2:19:14

to survive in an industry where maybe they need

2:19:17

a lot of tips that you might have. Like

2:19:19

it just feels very sinister

2:19:20

to me. This is from a report about

2:19:23

the Nordic model and sort of the failure of the

2:19:25

Nordic model. In Sweden, no one

2:19:27

can operate a brothel, rent an apartment,

2:19:29

room or hotel room, assist with finding

2:19:32

clients, act as a security guard or

2:19:34

allow advertising for sex work. This

2:19:37

in turn implies that sex workers cannot work

2:19:39

together, recommend customers to each other,

2:19:42

advertise work from property they rent or own or even

2:19:44

cohabit with a partner since their

2:19:46

partner is likely to share part of any income

2:19:49

derived from sex work. Jesus. You

2:19:51

don't get them on prostitution charges anymore, you

2:19:53

get them on accomplice

2:19:54

charges. Wow. So it's like, let's

2:19:57

be nice to sex workers and indict them

2:19:59

for racketeering.

2:19:59

Instead so like aren't

2:20:02

we woke like isn't this helping? It's like well.

2:20:04

Yeah, really, Norwegia like this is not

2:20:09

That's the most American you've ever sounded

2:20:14

Right and just I think that we

2:20:17

really Just in general like

2:20:19

any kind of legislation that's brought forth

2:20:22

where you look at it You're like now if someone were

2:20:24

to use this in bad faith Yeah,

2:20:26

you could really destroy some lives right and

2:20:29

it's just so weird because if you're saying I'm

2:20:31

doing this to protect The

2:20:33

trafficking

2:20:34

victims who are teen

2:20:36

girls and so in this scenario

2:20:38

I'm going to ruin the lives

2:20:40

of all these teen girls to protect the teen girls

2:20:43

and it's like well You're protecting imaginary

2:20:45

people yeah at the expense of real

2:20:47

people yeah, and the imaginary people don't

2:20:49

even vote

2:20:49

And

2:20:52

also I mean what what all of this does whether

2:20:54

you're criminalizing the sex workers or

2:20:56

the people who purchase sex Either

2:20:58

way it all it has the effect of is driving things underground

2:21:01

And so you know one of the sex workers that I talked

2:21:04

to about trafficking She was saying that

2:21:06

like you know there's now signs in

2:21:08

hotels I'd like know the warning signs of trafficking

2:21:10

oh yeah all of which are warning signs

2:21:13

of sex work right Yeah, oh they keep but do

2:21:15

not disturb sign on their door okay first of all

2:21:17

I always

2:21:17

do that mostly Show

2:21:19

in there but

2:21:21

also if the laws

2:21:23

are taking away your ability to Have

2:21:27

co-workers and some kind of maybe

2:21:29

secure arrangement Then like if

2:21:31

you're if you're losing access to hotels

2:21:33

to them like Jesus Christ where else is there

2:21:36

well? This is what one of the sex workers I interviewed told

2:21:38

me is that like a hotel is

2:21:40

a pretty safe place to be a sex

2:21:42

worker Right because you're in a room

2:21:44

with

2:21:44

we all know hosted in hotel walls are there

2:21:47

security cameras? The

2:21:49

most important thing is that the client

2:21:51

knows that if you scream Someone

2:21:54

will come yeah right and so she says you

2:21:56

know the harder it gets to work in hotels It's like

2:21:58

I'm gonna have sex with people in there

2:21:59

their cars. That's where they

2:22:02

have a lot more power over me. They can drive me where they want

2:22:04

to drive me. I can't necessarily leave.

2:22:07

All you're doing is

2:22:08

making it harder for people to report

2:22:11

this stuff. And if you scream in a car, then maybe

2:22:13

the police come. I think you're

2:22:15

farther away from being arrested yourself

2:22:18

in that situation, which is also important.

2:22:20

Right. So it's like all of this. I mean, there's now states

2:22:22

passing laws,

2:22:22

but it's in there that all hotel

2:22:24

staff need awareness raising training

2:22:27

of this problem for which there is huge and

2:22:29

false awareness

2:22:29

already. Yeah. So what are the signs that

2:22:32

people are being educated to look for? It's

2:22:34

again, it's like, you know, young women checking in by

2:22:36

themselves and like someone with

2:22:38

men visiting their rooms. It's

2:22:40

like it's criminalizing spring break more

2:22:42

than any. But

2:22:45

so this, this, this leads us to the last

2:22:47

aspect of this and this one we asked her, I promise. Oh,

2:22:50

I'm very happy to for you to lead me through all the darkness.

2:22:52

The last form of exploitation

2:22:55

creep, the last widening of

2:22:57

the term trafficking happens under

2:22:59

the Obama administration. Oh, daddy. So

2:23:02

the Obama administration comes in. They, like everybody

2:23:04

else notices that the Bush administration

2:23:06

has spent eight years saying prostitution

2:23:08

is the same as trafficking and we need to eradicate prostitution.

2:23:10

So they're like, well, you know, the real

2:23:12

form of trafficking and

2:23:15

exploitation that's going on in the world is forced labor.

2:23:17

There is ample evidence that forced labor is rampant.

2:23:20

There are a lot of migrant workers. Like conditions

2:23:22

are really terrible. So what we need to do

2:23:24

is expand the definition of trafficking

2:23:27

to pull in

2:23:29

all of these exploited workers, right? Like Indian

2:23:31

construction workers in Dubai and Guatemalan

2:23:34

farm workers in America. Like

2:23:36

we need to include all of these people in this problem

2:23:38

trafficking that everybody's super concerned

2:23:40

about. This seems fairly reasonable to me

2:23:42

and I'm therefore extremely anxious that

2:23:45

in reality it didn't end up working

2:23:47

out as well as I'm hoping. Well,

2:23:49

again, it's like it's this understandable thing

2:23:51

and everybody seems to be working from good motives.

2:23:54

Yeah. But what they do is they first redefined

2:23:56

trafficking and this is now the international definition

2:24:00

But any form of what's

2:24:02

called bonded labor is considered

2:24:04

trafficking. Wow. So,

2:24:07

for this episode,

2:24:07

I had the treat of calling up Joel Best.

2:24:11

Joel Best, our hero! Right?

2:24:14

Yes. He is a researcher, a sociologist,

2:24:16

who studies contemporary urban legends. Oh,

2:24:19

you talked to Joel. I know, it was great. He was like the

2:24:21

coolest. And it was really nice

2:24:23

in that, you know, like with researchers, if they haven't

2:24:25

looked into something, you want to sort of be careful. Like, you know,

2:24:27

I don't want to make you talk

2:24:28

about something that isn't your area of expertise.

2:24:31

And so I called him up and I was like, you know, I'm a little bit concerned

2:24:33

about, you know, human trafficking. Like,

2:24:36

I know it's not something you've looked into. And he's like, oh,

2:24:38

yeah, it's a scam. It's like, okay. It's

2:24:41

like, okay, Joel, tell me why. Is

2:24:43

his middle name is the or what? So

2:24:47

what Joel Best actually mentioned to me was

2:24:49

that, you know, you're a poor Kenyan 23-year-old.

2:24:52

You want

2:24:54

to move to the United States to be a

2:24:56

domestic worker because you're going to make more money being

2:24:59

a nanny in the United States than you would in Kenya.

2:25:02

So you apply for a guest worker visa. You get

2:25:04

the visa, great. But a

2:25:05

plane ticket is $1,500. And

2:25:07

you don't have $1,500. So you take out a

2:25:10

loan from one of these recruitment agents that you can find locally.

2:25:13

And they say, okay, you have to pay us back, you know, 300 extra

2:25:16

bucks a month or whatever. But you'll be making decent

2:25:18

wages. And it's not going to be that big of a deal. That

2:25:21

scenario, that is trafficking. That's

2:25:23

bonded labor. You're paying off a debt. And it's interesting

2:25:25

because we talked about this kind of deal

2:25:27

before as something that could be very easily abused.

2:25:30

Right. But also if

2:25:32

this arrangement doesn't have legitimate

2:25:34

means of existing, then how are people going

2:25:37

to get to the U.S. in the first place? Right.

2:25:40

But also what's really interesting to me is when I started working

2:25:42

on this, I thought that scenario

2:25:44

wasn't bonded labor, that what

2:25:46

then often happens, that like you

2:25:48

get there and the recruitment agent says like, well, I

2:25:50

said it was going to be 300 bucks, but now it's a thousand bucks a month

2:25:53

and I'm taking 90% of your salary. This does happen.

2:25:56

But that actually isn't necessary for it to be trafficking.

2:25:58

Interesting.

2:25:59

of trafficking is simply working to pay

2:26:02

off a debt. That's it. Oh, so it's just

2:26:04

it's, uh, it's in danger, essentially.

2:26:06

Yeah. So it's anyone who has

2:26:08

to pay off a recruitment

2:26:09

fee. It's bonded labor. You're paying off

2:26:11

a bond. Okay. But then what that

2:26:13

does is adding this huge

2:26:16

category of workers. I mean, this is a massive percentage

2:26:18

of migrant workers are operating under some

2:26:20

form of paying off debt because

2:26:23

who in a developing country has money for

2:26:25

a plane ticket? Like this is how people do

2:26:28

this. Right. So now you've

2:26:30

got these numbers that go around about like 40 million

2:26:33

people in the world are trafficked, but

2:26:35

it's like, first of all, 14 million of those

2:26:37

are in

2:26:37

forced marriages, which I'm not

2:26:40

wild about, but are also very different

2:26:42

than sort of modern day slavery. You

2:26:44

also have a huge number of people who are

2:26:46

just paying off debts and like, are some

2:26:49

of those people deeply and darkly exploited?

2:26:51

Yes. But some of them aren't, some of them pay off their

2:26:53

debts and then they go home or they get a visa in

2:26:55

the United States and like whatever. And that

2:26:58

what that means is that you lose

2:27:00

the ability to get real numbers on

2:27:02

the situation. You don't know how many people

2:27:05

are being abused. You're not trying to estimate

2:27:07

how many people are in abusive

2:27:09

situations because it's just the presence

2:27:12

of a contract is the definition.

2:27:14

It's just the,

2:27:14

yes, the contractual form. Yeah. That's a good way to put

2:27:17

it. It's very clear that they're doing

2:27:19

this to get the numbers up, right?

2:27:21

And to pitch the problem as much bigger than

2:27:23

it is. And so the

2:27:25

second thing

2:27:26

that they start doing is that they start talking

2:27:28

about modern day slavery.

2:27:31

This is the way that trafficking

2:27:33

is now portrayed when it's labor

2:27:35

trafficking. So anybody working under these terrible

2:27:37

conditions is considered a modern day slave.

2:27:40

And so in another hallmark of

2:27:42

a moral panic, what you now have

2:27:45

is the term modern day slavery being used

2:27:47

to describe a huge range of activities,

2:27:50

right? That it does include people that are in the worst

2:27:52

working conditions imaginable, right? They're under

2:27:54

rural area. They're not being paid. They're essentially

2:27:57

trapped there.

2:27:58

Those cases exist. They're extremely. prevalent,

2:28:00

like that is a massive problem. But then you're

2:28:02

also using the same term to describe people

2:28:05

as, I borrowed a bunch of money to go

2:28:07

be a nanny in the US for six months, and I paid it

2:28:09

off and I came home. Is calling all

2:28:11

of that slavery? Is this helping?

2:28:14

And what's the logic that says that it is?

2:28:16

I think what's happened,

2:28:17

what's really interesting is as there

2:28:19

is more NGO

2:28:22

activity and more, you know, there's just more awareness

2:28:24

raising campaigns of all kinds these days,

2:28:27

right? Like breast cancer, human trafficking,

2:28:29

there's

2:28:29

all kinds of issues that we are constantly

2:28:31

having somebody tap us on the shoulder and being like, Hey, you

2:28:34

should care about this. And so that has

2:28:36

resulted in this arms race among

2:28:38

NGOs to cast my

2:28:41

issue is more important than these other issues.

2:28:43

So if I say like, you know, there's Kenyans

2:28:46

that are coming to America, they're working as nannies, a lot

2:28:48

of them have to pay off really huge debts.

2:28:50

There's not real complaint mechanisms for them. You're

2:28:52

like, this is the way else comes

2:28:54

to you and says, there are 25 million

2:28:57

slaves in the world and we thought we

2:28:59

eradicated it in 1865, but it's back.

2:29:00

This is a huge

2:29:02

component of modern day slavery rhetoric,

2:29:05

comparing it explicitly comparing it

2:29:07

to the experience of slaves in the United States.

2:29:10

And so when I say to you, we thought

2:29:12

we eradicated slavery, but it's back, that

2:29:15

gives you a specific mental image,

2:29:17

right? And I'm telling you there's more slaves now

2:29:20

than at any time in history, which is one of these numbers

2:29:22

that goes around, which like, yeah, if you're

2:29:24

defining slaves as like a

2:29:26

huge percentage of the workforce in developing

2:29:29

countries, then like, yes, slavery is

2:29:31

back. If you're explicitly equating

2:29:33

it with American slavery, it's like, those

2:29:35

conditions are not common.

2:29:36

Does it also speak to our rescue

2:29:38

fantasies to like, we

2:29:41

would prefer to like rescue someone

2:29:43

who's been

2:29:45

enslaved, to

2:29:47

just, you know, providing resources

2:29:49

for people who are like, you know, I got here and

2:29:51

like, I thought this was a fair deal,

2:29:53

or like, I thought I could pay this off, but

2:29:56

like, it turns out I can't, or like, the interest

2:29:58

on this is really exorbitant.

2:30:00

I mean, I can see how that also would

2:30:03

be harder to get attention for because

2:30:05

exorbitant interest is crucial to

2:30:07

American economies. So it's kind

2:30:10

of rich to be saying that like, it's not

2:30:12

okay when people do it, you know, in this

2:30:14

one situation. So it's like you have to

2:30:16

catastrophize the whole thing. Yeah.

2:30:19

That once again, that we would prefer to be someone's savior

2:30:21

than to be someone's helper. Totally. Totally.

2:30:25

And Janie Chung has this great article where she defines exploitation creep,

2:30:27

where she says another reason why it emerged was because

2:30:30

at the end

2:30:30

of the Bush administration, people were starting

2:30:33

to put more emphasis on forced labor and about

2:30:35

structural systems that were creating

2:30:38

these problems, right? Of the companies don't

2:30:40

know their supply chains. There's really

2:30:42

low wages in a lot of countries. There's

2:30:44

not a lot of labor inspectors. That

2:30:46

was the kind of consciousness that was happening in

2:30:49

the 2000s as, you know, as people really

2:30:51

turned against Bush and his later years of office, they

2:30:53

were also turning on the concept of trafficking and saying

2:30:55

like, well, you know, it's not a secret criminal

2:30:58

enterprise. It's farms in the United

2:31:00

States. Like we know where it is. It's restaurants

2:31:03

and it's hotels like these hotels that

2:31:05

are having like the warning signs of trafficking. It's

2:31:07

like a really big warning sign is that you all

2:31:10

use contractors for all of your cleaning

2:31:11

services and you don't even know what

2:31:13

your employees make. Like your workers are being

2:31:16

trafficked. Yes. Like that's the warning

2:31:18

sign, right? And so there was this

2:31:20

sort of larger consciousness emerging

2:31:23

of like, it's us, right?

2:31:26

Like it's not mysterious. We know exactly what's happening. We

2:31:28

know exactly how and we know how to fix

2:31:30

it. Like there need to be better procedures. There need to

2:31:32

be complaint mechanisms. Yes. The title

2:31:34

of the actual spiritual

2:31:37

sequel to Get Out. Yeah.

2:31:40

I mean, what Janie Chung says at the conclusion

2:31:42

of her article,

2:31:43

recasting all forced labor as trafficking

2:31:46

and all trafficking as slavery, exploitation

2:31:48

creep relabels abuses as more extreme

2:31:51

than is legally accurate in what appears

2:31:53

to be a strategic effort to garner increased

2:31:56

commitment

2:31:56

to their eradication. So

2:31:59

end modern slavery. That's the phrase

2:32:01

you see all the time. We love ending.

2:32:03

We love solving. It's our favorite

2:32:06

thing. Yeah. Totally. And

2:32:08

it's

2:32:08

much sexier than being like, hotels shouldn't have outsourced

2:32:11

cleaning staff. These

2:32:13

procedural things that are like, actually how you

2:32:16

end forced labor. Or like, you know, you let people

2:32:18

unionize. Yes. For God's sake.

2:32:21

Yeah. It takes us back to this

2:32:23

rescue mission. Yeah.

2:32:24

It's not about workers getting rights for

2:32:27

themselves. Right. It's about us finding

2:32:29

the ones who happen to be being exploited

2:32:31

in this terrible, very unambiguous

2:32:34

way and saving them and everyone

2:32:37

who's working conditions while

2:32:39

also terrible, don't fall into

2:32:41

this exact paradigm, can

2:32:43

just go fly a kite.

2:32:44

Yes. I wrote this article last

2:32:46

year about this house painter in

2:32:48

Miami who had suffered really bad wage theft

2:32:50

from his employers. Employers basically said like, I'm

2:32:53

not going to pay you. It's like a year

2:32:55

and a half long process to sue your boss for fucking wage

2:32:57

theft. It was this awful

2:32:59

nightmare. And there was finally

2:33:01

a judgment where his boss had to pay

2:33:04

him and just didn't. And

2:33:06

so we had to start an entirely new process

2:33:08

because one was a civil and one was criminal. And

2:33:11

it's like the place where you're going to find quote

2:33:13

unquote, trafficking, real exploitation is where

2:33:15

there are

2:33:16

not systems for accountability.

2:33:18

And we know where those places are. We know

2:33:20

that maybe better than we know anything

2:33:22

else. Yes. So essentially it's like,

2:33:25

we find this problem. If we're to be

2:33:27

honest with ourselves in any way, we have

2:33:30

to admit that the problem is a structural one and

2:33:32

it deals with the much broader

2:33:34

issue of labor conditions in the United States.

2:33:37

And in order to distract ourselves from that,

2:33:39

we have to create a big bad. Yeah.

2:33:42

The last thing I want to say about this amazing Janie Chung article

2:33:44

is that she describes this

2:33:46

case of 300 Filipino

2:33:48

teachers who came to the United

2:33:50

States to work in Louisiana public schools.

2:33:53

And they came under legal visas. There's

2:33:56

an

2:33:56

H-1B visa where foreign workers can come

2:33:58

over. They paid $6. $16,000 each,

2:34:03

which is four times what they were earning per year

2:34:05

in the Philippines to come over and work as

2:34:07

teachers. And to work as teachers

2:34:10

in public schools in the United States. I mean,

2:34:12

I... Yeah. Oh

2:34:14

my God. Okay. Once they came, the

2:34:16

recruiter charged them again, was like, it's

2:34:19

like Ticketmaster, but they're like, oh, by the way, there's like an

2:34:21

extra thing you have to pay. Like the recruiter treated them

2:34:23

terribly. Yeah, that happened to me with Michael Bolton. It's

2:34:25

not his fault.

2:34:27

And like the recruiter then made them work for an extra

2:34:30

year in the United States and up to a percentage

2:34:32

they had to pay. Like awful, awful stuff.

2:34:35

What's really interesting is they actually came

2:34:37

forward and they filed

2:34:38

a case against the schools and

2:34:40

against the recruiter. And they were both

2:34:42

acquitted because, according

2:34:45

to Janie Chung, who I interviewed, she said

2:34:47

that the jury was like, this doesn't

2:34:49

sound like modern slavery to us. Right. And

2:34:52

it's like, it's not. Like it's pretty... Yeah.

2:34:56

Yes. Yes.

2:35:01

Yes. It's not. It's

2:35:03

not the very overblown thing that it has been described to you

2:35:06

as,

2:35:06

and that's not that Kerry's fault. Right. So

2:35:08

it's like, this is the hole that we've dug with this term

2:35:10

trafficking, where it's like we've gone

2:35:13

to the most extreme exaggeration of

2:35:15

the problem. But then it's like when you describe the actual

2:35:18

conditions that people are working under, which are extremely

2:35:20

common, it's like, eh, I don't know about

2:35:22

slavery. I

2:35:25

don't know. I mean, I don't get paid enough either.

2:35:27

Yeah. Right. Yeah.

2:35:31

It's just, it's only if you compare it to

2:35:33

slavery that it doesn't seem that bad.

2:35:36

Yes. Yeah. We're

2:35:38

setting ourselves up to fail. Mm-hmm. Like, is this

2:35:40

helping at all? Which should be the question

2:35:42

we ask about all these things. Yes. Regardless

2:35:45

of, you know, of so many other factors.

2:35:48

Like, is this actually helping

2:35:50

the actual people who we claim to

2:35:52

want to help? Right.

2:35:54

Which should feel good to us for some reason.

2:35:56

Right. And it's like,

2:35:58

yeah, I'm just going to say the same thing again. I

2:36:01

don't know. I want to be really careful in that one

2:36:03

of the things that I really struggle with this field

2:36:05

is that there's a lot of NGOs and

2:36:07

a lot of philanthropists working on trafficking who

2:36:10

seem really nice. Oh

2:36:13

yeah. There's lots of very nice people who

2:36:15

are

2:36:16

putting their energy behind something

2:36:18

that might be politically ineffective. And

2:36:20

they really care. It's

2:36:23

not evil, but to me it's really naive.

2:36:26

I spent

2:36:26

a lot of time on the phone with this organization Polaris

2:36:28

this week that has the National Trafficking Hotline,

2:36:30

and I sort of confronted them about this, of like, you

2:36:32

have all these signs in airports, yet your website says

2:36:34

that the vast majority of quote unquote trafficking

2:36:37

does not involve movement. And you're

2:36:39

quite good actually at saying on your website

2:36:42

that it's going to be someone you know, stranger danger doesn't

2:36:44

exist. And I'm saying, but now

2:36:46

you have these posters saying if you see something,

2:36:48

say something in airports, and they're like, oh,

2:36:51

but it has our National Trafficking Hotline on there.

2:36:53

We're not telling people to call the cops. Cops

2:36:55

can be abusive. We get it. I don't

2:36:58

think people are going to see

2:36:58

those posters and remember the number. I think

2:37:01

people are going to see those posters and then a week later

2:37:03

they're going to see something quote unquote suspicious,

2:37:06

and then they're going to call the fucking cops. You're

2:37:08

feeding into this myth and you're

2:37:11

not taking seriously the unintended consequences

2:37:13

of every

2:37:14

person in America feeling

2:37:16

empowered to quote unquote save

2:37:19

the children and like snitch on random

2:37:21

neighbors and getting them into contact

2:37:23

with the police. I think this has to do with

2:37:26

the idea of awareness as a universal

2:37:28

right. We have to raise awareness of things.

2:37:31

I want you to take me down this rabbit hole so bad. I

2:37:35

mean, the first thing that comes up for me around that is that,

2:37:38

you know, we're living in a time of awareness sweeps

2:37:40

week perpetually,

2:37:40

right? Like

2:37:42

to get someone to pay attention to something you kind

2:37:45

of do have to sell it. Yeah.

2:37:47

I mean, first of all, if you're trying to raise

2:37:49

public awareness of an issue,

2:37:50

I think we're

2:37:52

in a time when you have to think even more than

2:37:55

in the past, maybe about, you know, if I am needing

2:37:57

to go.

2:37:59

to all these rhetorical lengths to get

2:38:02

people to even pay attention to the thing I'm trying

2:38:04

to tell them about. Am I

2:38:06

changing in some way the nature

2:38:09

of the thing I'm trying to describe in order to try

2:38:11

and beckon people

2:38:12

to listen to me and pay attention to it? Like, am

2:38:15

I

2:38:15

doing a hard sell that

2:38:18

essentially changes my point? And

2:38:20

then if that's the case, then like, what does

2:38:22

awareness become? If you're like looking for something

2:38:24

that you're probably not going to see and then you just seize

2:38:27

on something else that rubs you the wrong

2:38:29

way, but maybe you can't say why. As a

2:38:31

little wrap up thought here, one thing

2:38:34

that's really difficult about this is that you

2:38:36

don't want to sort of over debunk and

2:38:39

take away what really happened

2:38:41

to people. One of the

2:38:43

people who is pushing

2:38:45

for more of these posters in airports is named

2:38:47

Alicia Kazakovits. And

2:38:49

she's someone who like the worst thing

2:38:52

happens to her. Like she was groomed

2:38:54

online, she was kidnapped from her home, she

2:38:56

was confined in a basement, she was

2:38:58

abused, she was filmed. I mean,

2:39:01

it's the worst thing you can imagine.

2:39:03

It's real.

2:39:04

Yeah. And something that shouldn't be able

2:39:06

to happen in a society where children

2:39:09

are being raised. And what's

2:39:11

interesting is some of the kind of anti-trafficking,

2:39:13

debunking type

2:39:15

people I talked to this week, sometimes you get this

2:39:18

sort of tinge of, well,

2:39:20

you know, doesn't this survivor story sound a little

2:39:22

far fetched or like, you know, this internet

2:39:25

slothery stuff of like, well, if she says that she

2:39:27

was kidnapped, the windows in her

2:39:29

bedroom actually locked, the wine was... I mean,

2:39:31

this type

2:39:32

of stuff that I find so gross in

2:39:34

general and especially gross here. Like the grasping

2:39:36

at straws rhetoric of like, let's not admit

2:39:39

that any terrible things are happening. Yes. And

2:39:41

also, you know, I interviewed people for this that identify as

2:39:43

trafficking victims and something really terrible

2:39:46

happened to them. And I'm not going to take

2:39:48

that away from them. Like the worst thing you can

2:39:50

do as a journalist and especially

2:39:52

as a person is to tell

2:39:54

somebody that their pain isn't

2:39:55

real or that it doesn't matter. And

2:39:58

so I think we... We can

2:40:00

all be adults and talk about this in a way that

2:40:02

acknowledges the real pain

2:40:04

of people who have experienced forms

2:40:07

that sort of do fit the stereotypical

2:40:09

narrative, but also that that's

2:40:12

not the only narrative, that we can acknowledge

2:40:14

that there are other forms of abuse that we also

2:40:16

need to take seriously. I think that

2:40:18

we

2:40:18

are struggling to find ways

2:40:21

to say that all kinds of

2:40:23

human experience and trauma are real, but

2:40:25

that there's this certain form

2:40:28

of trauma and this certain form of crime

2:40:31

that is being represented in a really

2:40:34

disproportionate way. That feels

2:40:36

like a headlock that it's hard to get out of. You're

2:40:38

asking me to only think of that

2:40:41

awfulness when telling

2:40:44

you as

2:40:44

some powerful person in society that

2:40:46

you can do whatever you want to maybe these other

2:40:48

people. Right. Well, also, I mean,

2:40:50

to me, I think it has to be possible

2:40:54

to recognize the trauma

2:40:55

of somebody like Alicia Kazakovitz

2:40:58

and acknowledge what happened to her. And

2:41:01

it's possible to acknowledge the trauma of

2:41:03

someone whose boss is stealing from

2:41:05

them for years and has to go through

2:41:07

a long court

2:41:08

trial or someone who is a

2:41:10

homeless teenager that has to engage

2:41:13

in survival sex to get a warm

2:41:15

place to sleep that night. Or someone who's

2:41:17

a sex worker who's getting busted all the time.

2:41:19

Yes. I think it's like it doesn't

2:41:22

have to take away

2:41:22

from one person to acknowledge another

2:41:24

person's pain. And I also, I think

2:41:27

somebody like Alicia Kazakovitz has every

2:41:29

right to advocate for posters at

2:41:31

airports.

2:41:31

Like that is her right. She can use her

2:41:34

experience for anything she

2:41:36

wants to. I also think that sex

2:41:38

workers have the right to talk about their

2:41:40

trauma and the way that this is affecting them. Like interracial

2:41:43

couples that have the Cindy McCain's

2:41:45

of the world calling TSA on them also

2:41:47

have the right to describe their experiences. And all

2:41:49

of those experiences are valid.

2:41:51

And the purpose

2:41:53

of politics and the purpose of sort of adulthood

2:41:56

is to look at these different interests

2:41:58

and look at the way

2:41:59

not the way that they compete with each other, but the

2:42:02

way that they intertwine. And

2:42:04

there are ways to acknowledge

2:42:06

the experiences of people who went through these

2:42:08

terrible things without making

2:42:11

other people's lives worse.

2:42:13

I think that there's also something going on

2:42:15

where the

2:42:16

more dangerous of

2:42:18

a country we become for the

2:42:20

child, the more we preach

2:42:22

about caring for the child. And it's

2:42:24

like, maybe you care about the idea of children,

2:42:27

but why don't you give free lunch to the real ones?

2:42:29

The real ones are hungry. I

2:42:32

think this speaks to the fact that if

2:42:34

you were trying to get help for someone, then

2:42:37

the best way to do it in this society

2:42:39

we live in might to be like, no, no, no, they're

2:42:41

not a criminal and they're not criminalizable

2:42:44

because they fall into this tiny

2:42:46

slice of

2:42:48

humanity called unambiguous victim.

2:42:50

And it's because they're the victim of the crime

2:42:53

of the week. Right.

2:42:55

I think you've ruined Thanksgiving. I think that's pretty good.

2:42:57

Oh, good. Okay. So everybody ruin

2:43:00

Thanksgiving. So

2:43:05

when you fly somewhere, if you see

2:43:07

something, don't say something.

2:43:10

But if you see Cindy McCain,

2:43:11

run. Those

2:43:22

were our episodes. Thank you

2:43:24

so much for listening. Thank you

2:43:26

to Miranda Zichler for editing. Thank

2:43:28

you to Carolyn Kendrick for editing

2:43:31

and producing and for

2:43:33

everything that she does. And

2:43:36

thank you so much to Michael Hobbs for

2:43:38

being the reason the show exists

2:43:41

in the first place. And for agreeing

2:43:43

to talk about this terrible movie with

2:43:46

me. Thank you so much for

2:43:48

listening. Congratulations on

2:43:50

getting through August. We'll see you in

2:43:52

two weeks.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features