Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. This
0:14
is Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. I'm executive
0:16
producer Jackie Howard. It's been five years
0:18
since eight people, seven adults and a teenage
0:21
boy were murdered in four homes in
0:23
Pike County, Ohio. Edward
0:25
Jake Wagner has plenty guilty to eight counts
0:27
of aggravated murder in the depths of the
0:30
Rodent family. Wagner's parents
0:32
and older brother are still facing murder charges
0:34
themselves. An investigators say
0:36
this was an elaborate and long planned
0:38
execution plot to get rid
0:41
of anyone who might stand in the way of custody
0:43
and control of Jack Wagner's child.
0:46
The first alarm was raised when Chris Roden's
0:48
sister in law called nine one at
0:51
seven forty nine. AM listen, kay
1:00
my brother in laws who stays through and look? I
1:03
think the hell out of them? Okay,
1:07
were all hearts? Man?
1:10
Can you counting with county? That's my
1:13
county, it's my county.
1:15
Hugging that okay?
1:18
Okay? I mean you get out of the house, think
1:22
you drive over there? That's like here?
1:24
Okay, what's your name mine?
1:28
What is your brother in law's name? What's
1:31
your brother in law's name? Man?
1:37
Yeah, what's your name? Christ
1:39
Versing, Garry Rose, Fanking,
1:41
Gary Road? First, un
1:44
head, look like the dad think you're Road?
1:47
I think the great said, it's like one husband out
1:49
of them. Okay, if there's anybody else
1:51
in the house, I know.
1:56
Okay. The bard was law school, was got
1:58
here but on her friends he was ill?
2:00
Then in isn't it a landing on the floor. I
2:03
need to get out of the house and starting
2:07
now. Okay. Shortly after that, Kenneth
2:10
Roden's cousin also called nine one
2:12
one, Yeah,
2:14
I need a days come out to post.
2:19
Okay, uh, it's
2:22
all that stuff. It's on the news. I
2:25
just found, just found my cousin was
2:27
again shop wind Okay,
2:30
got mine? So no,
2:34
okay here and
2:37
I don't know what his address is it don't
2:39
he don't have a boss, you don't have a bo Okay,
2:43
I'll be staying out my a very well, no, sir,
2:49
what do you think Kenneth
2:51
Rode? Yeah,
2:57
okay, so ny how does the house? I'm
3:01
out of the house right now. I just went in horror
3:04
and check and
3:07
I again.
3:10
Eight murders in four homes. That's
3:12
a nightmare. For forensic investigators.
3:14
Jeff goot Morgan, professor of forensics
3:17
at Jacksonville State University and author
3:19
of Ldendeath My Feet, joins me. Now, Joe
3:21
Scott, how would you handle a crime scene
3:23
like this over four homes? It's
3:26
I got to tell you, Jackie. I've been on several
3:28
scenes like this are similar to this over
3:32
my career, where you've got multiple bodies
3:34
that are scattered over a large area. To
3:38
say that it is a
3:40
logistical nightmare is
3:42
an understatement because I think
3:45
that most most people, particularly
3:47
U Nancy's fans, can probably
3:50
understand that we're very meticulous
3:52
when it just comes to to one
3:54
body, But just multiply
3:57
that and think
4:00
about everything that goes into literally
4:04
processing each body, because as cruel
4:06
as it sounds, each body or
4:09
a body is a is
4:12
your largest piece of evidence that you have
4:14
at a scene. And without
4:16
that body and without the information that it gives
4:18
up, you're lost. You're loss from
4:20
from Jump Street. So the moment that
4:23
you cross that threshold onto
4:25
that scene, you can
4:28
never get that first step again.
4:31
It only happens once. So you
4:33
have to be prepared mentally and
4:36
physically, and logistically
4:39
and every other way before you ever
4:41
set foot inside there, because
4:43
you're you are the
4:45
individual that is going to be annotating
4:48
everything that's going on within there. Now,
4:50
you know, most of time there's a team of us that go in.
4:53
You're going to have crime scene investigators
4:55
who are collecting you know, fiber evidence
4:58
and all that sort of thing and ballistic
5:00
evidence. And you're going to have probably
5:02
a crime scene photographer who's
5:05
their sole purpose is to actually
5:08
be there and document
5:10
everything photographically because you know, like the
5:12
old saying, you know, a
5:14
single photo, you know, it can speak a thousand
5:17
words. So and that's a moment in
5:19
time that you're having to capture that
5:22
maybe you know, six months later
5:24
or eight months later, in this case, five
5:27
years later, it's going
5:29
to tell you about that frozen moment in
5:31
time, and you have to be very careful in capturing.
5:33
And of course you've got the detective that's there,
5:36
that's the lead investigators. He's
5:38
taking notes and making observations. And
5:41
then there's somebody like myself from the Medical
5:44
Examiner's Office who's the medical legal death
5:46
investigator, and we look
5:49
at these scenes like this and
5:53
we try to determine what exactly
5:56
happened to this individual.
5:58
First off, to bring about their death. But sometimes
6:01
sometimes we can get an indication
6:04
as to what was going on prior to
6:06
death. Then in the midst
6:09
of the death, which is something a
6:11
lot of people don't hear about. It's called perimortem,
6:13
which is in the middle of and
6:15
then of course we document what has
6:17
happened to the body afterwards. And
6:20
so you have to be very careful, Jackie, because
6:23
the case literally can
6:25
be one or lost,
6:27
or solved or unsolved by
6:30
virtue of what you do in that one
6:33
instant in time. And
6:35
it's you know, lawyers,
6:38
people like Nancy, they love to
6:40
use the term you can never unring the bell.
6:43
You can't get that soundback once the clapper
6:45
hits inside of that bell, and that
6:48
certainly rings true,
6:51
pardon the pun. In forensics,
6:54
you can't get that first act because
6:56
if you go in and you step on something,
6:58
or you don't pay attention to everything
7:00
in your environment, you're
7:02
ruined from the absolute beginning.
7:05
Well, speaking of that, just got time
7:07
must be an enemy for year
7:12
at a scene like this over
7:15
for home. It takes a lot
7:17
of time to collect this much
7:19
evidence. Does it degrade?
7:22
I mean, it's the possibility of it degrading in
7:24
the amount of time that it takes, and how many
7:26
people would it take literally to process
7:29
this many crime scenes. Well, okay,
7:32
I'll give you an example. Many years ago, when
7:34
I was working in Atlanta, we had a
7:36
tragedy that occurred there that's been since
7:39
referred to as the Buckhead shooting. And
7:42
we had I don't know upwards, I think
7:44
it was something like sixteen
7:46
bodies. And these bodies were spread
7:48
out all over kind
7:50
of a large area. They were in a
7:53
building, but they were on multiple locations.
7:56
And I've had other mass homicides
7:58
that have taken place, and the best
8:01
way to do that is say, if you take
8:03
body A. Okay, you
8:06
take Body A, and you
8:08
assign Team A to
8:11
that body, and they are solely responsible
8:13
for that body. They don't get involved with anything
8:16
else. Their sole assignment is
8:18
to handle all of the photography, all
8:21
of the trace evidence, all of the
8:23
measurements, anything else
8:26
that comes into play, and of course the examination
8:28
of the body. And you know, to your point,
8:31
that creates a kind
8:33
of a steadiness, if you will, because you've set
8:36
the framework you know you're talking about, how you
8:39
know, it doesn't matter what we do that the old
8:41
hands on the clock never stop moving forward,
8:43
do they. And so you can't freeze
8:45
time. You can't say, oh, I want to do over time
8:48
out. It's not like a ball game. Time
8:51
is ticking off that clock. So everything that you
8:53
have in that environment does in fact begin
8:56
to degrade, whether it's blood evidence,
8:58
what a strong wind comes along and blows
9:01
away fiber, or if you've got something, say,
9:03
for instance, that's outside the home, there's
9:05
a rainstorm that comes up and you haven't
9:08
accounted for it. Will rain is one of the worst
9:10
enemies, you know for an investigator.
9:13
But you know, there's even something that's that's
9:15
more um, that's
9:17
more critical than that sometimes, and that's
9:20
that's the effect that time has
9:22
on a body. Because you know,
9:25
we hear about all these terms, and you hear this one
9:27
overarch theme and death investigation.
9:29
It's called the post mortal interval. We talk
9:32
about it all the time. And
9:34
that's that's a very significant thing because
9:36
you know, one of the biggest questions people ask
9:38
me as a medical legal death investigator
9:41
is you know, well, hey, Morgan,
9:44
when when did this person die?
9:47
Well that's a central piece of the puzzle,
9:50
isn't it. And when you have a
9:52
multitude of bodies, you know, at
9:54
a scene, the sequencing of
9:57
all of that, When did they die, in what
9:59
order did they die? How long have
10:01
they been here in this particular state,
10:03
Were they originally killed here,
10:06
were they migrated somewhere? So
10:09
all of that stuff comes into play. And the one
10:11
denominator, the common denominator relative
10:14
to that is time, and then
10:16
you place all your other factors in place. So
10:19
you have to be very attuned
10:22
to this as you move down this line.
10:25
And one of the most important elements
10:27
here is that you
10:30
may have actually heard of before. It's
10:32
an odd terms called algor mortise,
10:34
and what that means is it's actually
10:37
the postmortem cooling of the body.
10:40
You know, how at what temperature is
10:42
the body when you get there as an investigator,
10:44
and by measuring that
10:47
temperature, you can actually
10:49
there's a formula we can plug that into
10:52
to get an idea as to what
10:54
at what rate is the body decreasing
10:57
in temperature. You know, our body temperature
10:59
in life as ninety eight point six. You
11:01
know, as an average, everybody's not at
11:04
that, but you use that as an average
11:07
and you kind of measure that as you move
11:09
through time, and if we should say we show
11:11
up at a scene and we've got a body that's
11:13
at I don't know, ninety five degrees
11:16
okay, Well, dependent upon the environment
11:19
that they're in, we can kind of
11:21
get a guestament that that person's been down
11:24
roughly anywhere from three
11:27
to maybe four and a half hours. Now, you can't
11:29
really tie it down contrary to with see on TV,
11:31
you can't tie it down any closer than that. But that time
11:33
element is very important.
11:36
And here's why, because
11:38
once you're at the scene
11:41
and you're with the body, if a
11:43
body has taken on room
11:45
temperature at that point, it's pointless to take
11:47
the body temperature other than initially because
11:50
that means that you're outside of a twelve hour
11:52
block. Because at the twelfth hour after
11:54
death, all of the energy that we've
11:57
generated in life is
11:59
gone, it's dissipated. So
12:01
it's real important that once you get there, you
12:03
get an initial body temperature and
12:05
that will give us an idea. And you say, well, Morgan,
12:08
that's that's kind of I don't understand that. Well,
12:10
let me give you a great example. Let's
12:12
say the police actually apprehend
12:15
somebody or they're questioning somebody, and
12:17
they have what's called an alibi for where
12:19
they were, or they say they have an alibi. They
12:22
say, well, I last saw them, you know, you
12:25
know, two hours ago, but you know,
12:28
based upon science a temperature, this
12:30
person's been dead for at least six hours, so
12:32
you can kind of with science you
12:34
begin to chip away at that alibi and you say, no,
12:37
you can't see them two hours ago, because I know that they've
12:39
been dead for at least six or seven hours at this
12:41
point. So that's why it's so important. And
12:44
then you get an idea about the sequencing. You
12:46
know, you get a mass casualty event,
12:49
which in this little area
12:52
is you
12:54
look at that and you think, well, in what order
12:57
did these people die? Is there is there any
13:00
variables in the postmortem, the
13:03
postmortem changes that have taken
13:05
place, the stiffness of the body otherwise
13:07
known as ryger mortis or you
13:10
know algor mortis with the body temperature,
13:12
or postmortem lividity, libra
13:14
mortis, the settling of the blood. So
13:17
all of these things are essential when we're trying
13:19
to tell this tale of
13:21
what happened in a mass
13:23
casualty event. And this is, like I said,
13:26
a mass casualty event, because you know, you look
13:28
at someplace like, let's
13:30
just take a big metropolitan area where
13:33
maybe New York or Chicago.
13:36
Now though it is a tragedy, if
13:38
you have eight people dead and one
13:40
of those locations, they're
13:43
going to view that as as
13:45
a mass casually, but it's not going to be as
13:47
impactful there to the resources as
13:50
it is in some place like say rural
13:52
Ohio or another rural
13:54
location in America. Its
13:57
it puts a great strain on the resources
14:00
and how you can respond and how you have to
14:02
process it because, as you can imagine,
14:04
in a in a tiny, little
14:06
Appalachian village
14:09
town, they're not going to have the same
14:12
crime scene investigators or the same
14:14
type of technology for instance,
14:16
that say somebody in a large metropolitan
14:19
area has You're gonna have to wait.
14:21
You're gonna have to wait and call the state police,
14:23
and state police are gonna have to show up. And what's
14:25
happening that entire time, Well, time
14:28
is bleeding off that clock. It's
14:31
just kind of whittling away and going forward
14:33
and forward, and the further you move
14:36
out down that timeline, more
14:39
evidence it's lost, more information is lost,
14:41
and so it's critical to get there as quickly as
14:43
your possible can. Crime
14:56
stories with Nancy Grace Joe
15:00
the Pike County Sheriff at the prime
15:02
Charles Readers said that these
15:05
individuals their lives were taken in the most
15:07
horrific way he'd ever seen, execution
15:10
style. You came in like thieves in the night
15:12
and took eight lives, some
15:14
being children, the
15:19
most horrific way I've
15:22
ever seen in my twenty plus years. We
15:29
are getting closer. We
15:32
will find you. The
15:35
family and the victims will
15:38
have justice one day. We
15:41
are coming. The autopsies revealed
15:43
powder burns on the skin of some of the victims.
15:46
What can you tell us about how these victims
15:48
died? I can tell you if
15:51
what the investigators and sheriff
15:53
are saying, there's a level
15:56
of brutality involved in this case
15:58
that I think that would probably
16:00
classify this is making it very very
16:02
personal because if you're just going
16:05
out to simply execute
16:07
somebody, and I think the example people use
16:10
many times it's like a mob hit,
16:13
for instance, that a lot of people are familiar
16:15
with because of modern media or
16:18
news or maybe movies. You just see somebody
16:20
simply shooting somebody in the back of the head and then
16:23
walking away. There's there's almost an
16:26
economy in the way somebody would do
16:28
that. But when you begin to see what
16:31
I classify as uber violence
16:35
at a scene, then
16:37
that breaks it down
16:39
and kind of ties it back to a
16:42
personal nature. Because isn't
16:46
one stab wound, isn't one beating, isn't
16:48
one bullet? Isn't
16:51
that sufficient to the task? Why
16:53
do you have to go down this road and get
16:55
yourself involved in something like
16:58
overkill? Which gives
17:00
you, I think from a profile
17:02
in standpoint, it gives you a rule at
17:04
least it begins to form a picture
17:07
of the type of person that the police
17:09
might be looking for in a case like that, somebody
17:12
that you had a proverbial axtagron.
17:15
Let's take a listen to what WLWU
17:17
Team News five reporter Brian Hemrick
17:19
had to say about the autopsies when they
17:21
were released. The coroner's preliminary report
17:24
shows Christopher Roden's senior was
17:26
shot nine times, including five
17:28
times in the phase, three in the torso, and
17:31
once in the arm. He appears to be the
17:33
only one of eight with defensive wounds, indicating
17:36
he may have been awake when the attack happened
17:38
and was most likely the first one
17:40
killed inside the same trailer.
17:42
Gary Roden was shot three times in the
17:45
head and face, including one shot
17:47
that left a muzzle stamp on his temple, indicating
17:50
a point blank shot. Next
17:52
to her, A couple shot while in their
17:54
bed with their week old baby between
17:57
them, another child on the floor.
18:00
Frankie Rodin was shot three times in the
18:02
head and face. His girlfriend, Hannah
18:04
Gilly, was shot five times
18:06
in the head and face. One of the shots was
18:09
through her eye. Both baby
18:11
and the young child left unharmed.
18:14
Just down the road, three more killed Dana
18:16
Roden, Chris Senior's ex wife. She was
18:18
shot five times across the
18:21
forehead and in the temple, then
18:23
up through the chin. Chris Roden
18:26
Jr. He Was sixteen shot
18:28
four times, including two through
18:30
the top of his head, and his sister
18:32
Hannah was shot twice in the head
18:35
and in a trailer a few miles away. Kenneth
18:37
Roden he was shot once through
18:39
the right eye. Given
18:42
what you said about the personal nature of this show,
18:44
the corner said, all but one of the victims
18:47
was shot more than one. Two
18:50
people were shot five times, one person
18:52
was shot nine times, shot
18:55
at close range. The evidence showed
18:58
that a couple of the individuals were awake
19:01
when they were attacked. How would we know that there
19:03
is a certain awareness that people have when
19:06
they are being attacked
19:09
as opposed to just slumbering. And I'm
19:11
glad you mentioned that, Jackie. You
19:14
know, again back to a case that
19:16
I worked many many years ago. I had an entire
19:18
family of eight that were killed
19:20
in a very very small home. I
19:23
mean it was tiny. This house
19:25
couldn't have been more than thirteen hundred square feet
19:28
and there were eight people living in that. Can you imagine.
19:31
And one of the one of the one
19:33
of the decedents
19:35
that actually has always stuck in my mind
19:38
with that case was a young girl that was
19:41
thirteen years old at the time, and she was
19:43
laying on a single
19:45
size bed. You know, just imagine
19:48
a tiny bed that you would put your young child
19:50
in. And she was laying on that bed,
19:53
and she had the covers and I'll never forget
19:55
it, she had my little pony blanket
19:58
that was pulled up so that it
20:00
was right at the level of her shoulders,
20:02
and jack you know, she had a perfectly
20:05
circular defect or bullet hole right
20:07
between her shoulder blades, and you know, her
20:09
little head was still turned to the left
20:12
she was layding face down, turned to the left, with
20:14
her arms resting beneath her head
20:17
and sleeping. She had no awareness
20:19
that that was coming to her. So for us,
20:21
when I see a body like that, in
20:24
the case of the thirteen year old girl, I know
20:26
that she did not have an awareness. Now
20:29
in the hallway though in the
20:31
hallway it was a blood bath.
20:34
You had three siblings that were all laying
20:36
on top of one another in the middle of the hallway.
20:39
There was so much blood. Actually, and I don't want to
20:41
be too graphic, but I actually slipped down
20:43
at that scene in the blood. And
20:46
those individuals, because they were up and fighting
20:48
for their life, they knew
20:51
what was going on. But for that little girl, she
20:54
had no awareness. So as an investigator, that
20:56
might say to me, for instance, that she
20:58
was one of the first people were killed. For
21:01
everybody else, the ones that weren't in bed,
21:03
they never saw it coming. So you
21:06
have to be very very careful when
21:08
you observe individuals at scenes
21:11
in the position in which they are initially
21:13
found, and you have to be very careful as to
21:15
how you document that because again that goes
21:18
back to this idea of
21:20
sequencing the deaths in what
21:22
order, because there are no more living witnesses
21:25
in certainly like a case like we're
21:27
discussing. In the cases I've worked
21:29
many times, there were no living witnesses. All
21:32
you had to go on was what the bodies
21:35
were telling us. We had to
21:37
actually in that case, and people have heard
21:39
the set for years and years. We had to let
21:41
the dead speak to us in that
21:43
moment time and tell us their tales
21:46
through the science that they were living behind in their
21:48
clues. With me today is Jeff
21:50
Scott Morgan. He is a forensics professor
21:53
at Jaxable State University and author of
21:55
Blood Beneath My Feet. For more on this
21:57
case and others, go to crime
22:00
online dot com For crime
22:02
stories with Nan Straith. I'm Jackie Howard
22:08
H
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More