Podchaser Logo
Home
The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

Released Thursday, 8th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

The Brilliant Mr. Feynman

Thursday, 8th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Marriott. Town

0:03

Place Suites by Marriott has all the

0:05

comforts of home. Cook up a meal

0:07

in a full kitchen, unpack

0:09

and stay organized with the in-room alpha

0:11

closet system, plus bring your pet and

0:13

have your best friend by your side.

0:16

Town Place Suites by Marriott has all the

0:18

amenities you need to feel at home during

0:20

your stay. Find the comforts of

0:22

home at Town Place Suites. Go

0:25

there with Marriott Bonboy. Freakonomics

0:31

Radio is sponsored by Capital One.

0:34

Capital One offers commercial solutions you

0:36

can bank on. Now more than

0:39

ever, your business faces specific challenges

0:41

and unique opportunities. That's why Capital

0:43

One offers a comprehensive suite of

0:46

financial services, custom tailored to your

0:48

short and long-term goals. Backed by

0:51

the expertise, strategy and resources of

0:53

a top 10 commercial bank, a

0:56

dedicated team works with you to

0:58

support your success and help achieve

1:00

your goals. Explore

1:02

the possibilities at

1:05

capitalone.com/commercial. On

1:11

July 16th, 1945, a

1:14

team of US scientists based

1:21

in Los Alamos, New Mexico, conducted

1:23

what their leader, J. Robert Oppenheimer

1:26

had named the Trinity test. They

1:28

were detonating a new kind of bomb

1:30

way out in the desert, a couple

1:33

hundred miles from the secret lab at

1:35

Los Alamos where they had created it.

1:38

The US president, Harry Truman, seemed

1:40

to fully grasp the magnitude of

1:43

this moment. It is

1:45

an atomic bomb. It

1:47

is a harnessing of the basic power of

1:49

the universe. Oppenheimer

1:51

had put together a dream team

1:53

of experienced physicists, many of them

1:56

recent refugees from Nazi Germany, also

1:59

playing a- minor but important

2:01

role, was a 24-year-old

2:03

physicist from Queens, New York, named

2:05

Richard Feynman. Years later,

2:07

here is how Feynman described watching

2:10

the Trinity test. Okay,

2:12

time comes, and

2:14

this tremendous flash, so

2:16

bright, and I see this purple

2:18

splotch on the floor of the truck, and

2:20

I says, that ain't it. That's

2:23

an after image. So I turned back up and

2:25

I see this white light changing into yellow and

2:27

into orange. The clouds form, and then

2:30

they disappear again. And then finally, a big

2:33

ball of orange that starts

2:35

at the rise and billows a little

2:37

bit and get a little bit black around the edges, and

2:39

then you see it's a big ball of smoke with flashes

2:41

on the inside of the fire going out, the heat. All

2:44

this took about one minute. Finally,

2:46

after about a minute and a half, suddenly

2:49

there's a tremendous noise, bang, and

2:53

then rumbles like thunder. And that's what convinced

2:55

me. Nobody had said a word during this

2:57

whole minute. We're all just watching quietly. So

2:59

this sound released everybody, because the solidity of

3:02

the sound at that distance meant that it

3:04

really worked. The man who

3:06

was standing next to me said, what's that? I

3:08

said, that was the bomb. Yes,

3:15

that was the bomb. Just

3:18

a few weeks later, the U.S. dropped one of these new atomic bombs on

3:21

Japan, President Truman. A short time

3:23

ago, an American airplane

3:26

dropped one bomb on Hiroshima and

3:32

destroyed its usefulness to the enemy. That

3:35

bomb has more power than 20,000 tons of

3:39

TNT. With

3:42

this bomb, we have now added a new

3:44

and revolutionary increase in destruction. Hiroshima

3:50

was destroyed. Tens of thousands of

3:52

Japanese were killed. Three

3:55

days later, the U.S. dropped a second

3:57

bomb on the port city of Nagasaki.

4:00

Again, the carnage was extreme.

4:03

Six days later, Japan surrendered, putting an

4:06

end to World War II. The

4:09

U.S. victory was, of course,

4:11

welcome. But Richard Feynman

4:13

was among those who wondered about the

4:15

cost of the victory. My

4:17

first reaction after I was finished with this

4:19

thing was, it's useless to make anything. Feynman

4:22

thought that with the existence

4:25

of nuclear weapons, it was

4:27

only a matter of time before we humans

4:29

would wipe ourselves off the Earth. I

4:32

remember being in New York with my mother in

4:34

a restaurant, right after, immediately after. I

4:37

would see people building a bridge, and

4:39

I would say they don't understand. I

4:41

really believed that

4:43

it was senseless to make anything, because it would all

4:45

be destroyed very soon anyway. He

4:49

would take in a view, and he would automatically

4:51

visualize destruction from a

4:54

bomb. That's Michelle Feynman,

4:56

his daughter. His entire

4:59

being was permeated by his effort at

5:01

the war, and I don't think that

5:03

it was a happy time at all.

5:06

His father had died, his wife had

5:08

died. He would look

5:10

at people building things and think, why

5:13

bother? For five years

5:15

after the war, Feynman taught physics

5:17

at Cornell University. He

5:20

was depressed and restless. He had a

5:22

hard time engaging in his work, a

5:24

problem he'd never had before. Winters

5:26

in upstate New York were long and

5:29

cold. He needed to get away. A

5:32

friend of his said, what are you doing this summer?

5:34

And he said, oh, I was going to go to

5:36

South America. And he said, fantastic, come to Brazil. He

5:38

had to learn Portuguese quickly. That

5:41

trip lasted six weeks, but Feynman

5:44

returned shortly after for his sabbatical

5:46

year to teach at the

5:48

Brazilian Center for Research and Physics in Rio.

5:51

At least part of his salary was paid by

5:53

the U.S. State Department. Feynman

5:55

had grown up near the beach in Far

5:57

Rockaway, Queens in New York City. The

6:00

beaches in Rio were a little bit

6:02

different from the beaches in Queens. More

6:05

samba music, more sun, more fun.

6:09

Feynman wrote a letter to his

6:11

physicist friend Enrico Fermi. I

6:13

get lots of ideas at the beach, he

6:16

said. So when his

6:18

sabbatical was over, Feynman

6:20

happily left Cornell for good and

6:22

took a position at the California

6:24

Institute of Technology. California was

6:27

kind of a fresh start for him. He had

6:30

open sky and sunny

6:32

weather and maybe because of his

6:35

time in Los Alamos and

6:37

really enjoying the rugged countryside,

6:39

that probably set him on

6:42

a path that he knew he liked

6:44

the West. Caltech

6:47

is in Pasadena, a picturesque and

6:49

relatively old city just northeast of

6:51

downtown Los Angeles. It's

6:53

still got flourishes of old world

6:56

wealth and flourishes of

6:58

California hippie too, with the

7:00

Caltech nerd vibe snuggled comfortably

7:03

between them. It seemed

7:05

like a good idea for us to

7:07

spend some time in Pasadena to get

7:09

a better feel for Richard Feynman. We

7:12

will be driving by the house where I grew

7:14

up and then we're going

7:16

to the cemetery and we will see where

7:18

my parents are. Pasadena

7:20

is known as the city of

7:22

roses. It hosts the Rose Bowl

7:24

parade. So we will hear about

7:26

some Feynman roses. Caltech

7:28

was a hero right up to the end.

7:31

And some thorns. He was an

7:33

old fashioned sexist. The curious,

7:35

brilliant, vanishing Mr. Feynman, part

7:38

two of our series begins

7:40

now. This

7:51

is Freakonomics Radio, a podcast

7:53

that explores the hidden side

7:55

of everything with your

7:58

host, Stephen Gertner. Part

8:08

2, The Brilliant Mr. Feynman,

8:11

Chapter 4, Feynman the

8:13

scientist. Richard

8:16

Feynman joined the Caltech faculty in

8:18

1950, and he stayed there until he

8:20

died 38 years later. For

8:22

most of that time, he wasn't well known

8:24

to the wider public, but he

8:26

was a bit of a celebrity in

8:29

Pasadena. Especially among his fellow academics, he

8:31

stood out for his wit,

8:33

which had some sharp edges, for

8:36

his bongo playing, and also

8:38

for the van he drove. It's

8:42

a Dodge Tradesman van,

8:45

and it's the extended version. It

8:48

gets horrifying gas mileage. It's

8:50

super loud. It puts out clouds

8:52

and clouds of hellish hydrocarbons when

8:54

it runs, and it's incredibly

8:56

long and uncomfortable to drive. That

8:59

is Seamus Blackley, who is best known

9:01

for having helped create the Xbox for

9:04

Microsoft. He never met

9:06

Richard Feynman, but he has been a

9:08

fan since he was a teenager, which

9:10

is why today he is the keeper

9:12

of Feynman's old van. We

9:14

visited him at the garage in Pasadena where he

9:16

keeps it. So think of like a

9:18

70s plumber who painted

9:21

his truck this horrible two-tone beige.

9:25

And that's what Dick Feynman decided

9:27

to buy when he got his Nobel Prize. On

9:30

the sides of the van are some

9:32

painted patterns that have been mistaken

9:35

for hieroglyphics and Native

9:37

American symbols. If you don't

9:39

know what they are, it looks like the homeless guy has

9:41

drawn on the side of this van. Most

9:44

people don't give it a second look, but if you're driving

9:46

somewhere and a physicist sees it, they freak out and run

9:48

at you, and like you almost kill them and stuff. So

9:51

the van was a... So

9:55

context is my parents like to

9:57

camp and not go to a

9:59

campground. go to kind of

10:01

the road less traveled.

10:04

If you go to like a fork in the

10:06

road and you see one side is kind of

10:08

pristine and the other side looks treacherous, oh, we'll

10:10

go to the treacherous side. And

10:12

at some point when I think I was in

10:14

first grade or so, we got this cool van

10:16

and they got it all set up for camping.

10:19

My mom was very careful and

10:21

thoughtful about how things should work

10:23

out. There was a table that could be removed.

10:25

The seats would go flat so somebody could sleep

10:27

there and then my brother could sleep in the

10:30

back and then I had a hammock that was

10:32

in the front and curtains

10:34

and so we were good to go.

10:37

And then funny enough, they

10:40

had this van decorated in

10:42

a custom paint job and they

10:44

decided to put Feynman diagrams on

10:47

it. And what is a Feynman diagram? So

10:50

symbols that my father

10:52

came up with to express, I

10:55

don't know, light. I'm not sure. I'm a doctor,

10:57

a physicist about that. I'm

11:01

John Preskill. I am

11:03

the Richard P. Feynman Professor of

11:05

Theoretical Physics at the California Institute

11:07

of Technology. So

11:09

picture this diagram. There are these two lines, both

11:12

with arrows on them. And

11:14

then there's a line connecting the two. So

11:17

it looks like one rung of a ladder and

11:20

the line going across is the

11:22

wiggly line. That's the photon that's being emitted by

11:24

one particle and absorbed by the other. Now

11:27

we could add more photons. So now add another rung

11:29

to the ladder. Now we've got the

11:32

one line with an arrow on it, solid

11:34

line, let's say going up. Now

11:36

another line with the arrow going down.

11:38

That's the electron and the positron. Now

11:41

there are two rungs. There's a wiggly line and then

11:43

another wiggly line and that's another

11:45

Feynman diagram. The electron and

11:48

the positron can collide with one another

11:50

and that can give rise to particles

11:53

of light, photons, but then those

11:55

photons convert to other particles like

11:58

quarks and anti-quarks. interact

12:00

with other particles like

12:02

gluons and so on and

12:05

to keep track of all those things that can

12:07

happen and how to quantitatively

12:09

evaluate how all those different

12:11

processes contribute to the total

12:13

rate. That's a pretty complicated

12:16

problem. Feynman diagrams can help

12:18

you organize that type of

12:20

computation. These visual

12:23

simplifications made quantum electrodynamics easier

12:25

to work with even four

12:27

trained physicists. Here is the

12:29

science writer Charles C. Mann.

12:33

These are incredibly difficult and unwieldy for

12:35

99.999% of the human race and that

12:40

0.001% that could work with them was Julian Schwinger. Julian

12:43

Schwinger and Richard Feynman had a lot in common.

12:45

They were both born in 1918, both grew up

12:47

in Jewish

12:50

families in New York, Schwinger in

12:52

Manhattan, Feynman in Queens, and

12:54

they both became pioneers in quantum

12:56

electrodynamics. Feynman's mother liked

12:59

to point out to her son

13:01

just how smart this Schwinger boy

13:03

was. Schwinger was an extraordinarily

13:05

brilliant guy, but brilliant in a different

13:07

way. People always talked about them as

13:10

being competitive. It was

13:12

clear when we spoke to Schwinger that

13:14

he had that kind of barbed

13:17

respect that you have for a

13:19

worthy adversary. He clearly wasn't

13:22

all that fond of Feynman. Feynman also spoke

13:24

about it and he said that he thought

13:26

that people like us made a bit too

13:28

much of their rivalry and he said it

13:30

was more like two people running a race,

13:33

but it's fundamentally a

13:35

friendly competition because they're both

13:37

pushing each other. In

13:39

1965 when Feynman was

13:41

awarded the Nobel Prize in physics, he

13:44

shared it with Schwinger as well

13:46

as the Japanese physicist, Sidney

13:48

Thierry Tominaga. I'd asked

13:50

him to explain what he'd done to win

13:52

the Nobel Prize and he started

13:55

talking about quantum electrodynamics and

13:58

of course I really couldn't understand this. I'm

14:01

Christopher Sykes. I was a documentary

14:03

filmmaker for many years for the

14:05

BBC and Channel 4. I

14:07

found myself at some point saying, was

14:10

it worth the Nobel Prize? Which

14:14

did produce, I have to say, a

14:16

really classic response. I

14:18

don't understand what it's all about or what's

14:20

worth what. And if the people in the

14:22

Swedish Academy decide that X, Y or Z

14:24

wins the Nobel Prize, then so be it.

14:28

I won't have anything to do with the Nobel Prize. I

14:30

don't like honours. I appreciate

14:33

it for the work that I did and for

14:36

people who appreciate it. And I notice a lot of

14:38

the physicists use my work. I

14:40

don't need anything else. I've already got the

14:42

prize. The prize is the pleasure

14:44

of finding this thing out. I

14:46

don't believe in honours. And that's

14:48

why we called the finished film the pleasure of finding

14:51

things out. The story goes

14:53

like the first call was

14:55

3 a.m. or something, and I'm

14:58

sure that was very exciting. And

15:00

then I think reality, you know, he put the

15:02

phone down and then it started ringing

15:04

with press and so forth.

15:06

And then I think the reality of, oh,

15:10

I don't really want all this.

15:12

Does that come with, you

15:15

know, then he said to a

15:17

reporter, hey, time out. Can

15:19

we off the record? Can I

15:21

ask, is it possible for me

15:23

to what's the word, reject

15:26

this? And the reporter said,

15:28

no, no, that's not

15:30

something that's going to happen. I

15:32

mean, look, he was disdainful of all

15:34

of these honorific types of things. I'm

15:38

Stephen Wolfram and I do

15:40

science and technology. I

15:44

mean, I would probably go further than him

15:46

and say any field for which there is

15:48

a prize that's defined is a field that

15:50

already has had its best days behind it.

15:52

It's a field that barely has a name

15:54

that's going to have the most fertile moment.

15:57

I happen to get one of these MacArthur awards.

16:00

and the very first batch of those things.

16:02

Paiming took me aside and said, look,

16:05

just don't make this mean that

16:07

you think people have big expectations

16:09

for you. He was almost

16:11

like prizes are a damaging thing to

16:13

people, particularly early in their careers. One

16:17

of the things that my father taught

16:19

me beside physics was a

16:21

disrespect for respectable,

16:24

for certain kinds of things. For example, when I

16:26

was a little boy in a rotograph view, that's

16:28

printed pictures and newspapers first came out in the

16:31

New York Times, and he opened a picture, and

16:33

there was a picture of the Pope with everybody

16:35

bowing in front of him. And he'd

16:37

say, now look at these humans. Here's one human standing

16:39

here, and all these others are bowing. Now what is

16:41

the difference? This one is the Pope, and those are

16:44

the, or maybe he hated the Pope anyway. And

16:47

he'd say, the difference is epaulettes,

16:49

of course, not in the case of the Pope,

16:51

maybe it was a general. It was always the

16:53

uniform, the position. This man has the

16:55

same human problems he eats, he didn't like anybody

16:58

else. He goes to the bathroom. He's a

17:00

human being. Why are they all

17:02

bowing to him? Only because of his

17:04

name and his position, because of his

17:06

uniform, not because of something he especially

17:08

did. He,

17:10

by the way, was in the uniform business, so he

17:12

knew what the difference was with a man with a

17:14

uniform on, and the uniform on. It's the same man

17:16

for him. To

17:20

be clear, Richard Feynman did

17:22

not refuse or reject his

17:24

Nobel Prize. He attended

17:26

the ceremony in Stockholm, and

17:29

by the looks of the many photographs

17:31

in the archives at Caltech, he

17:34

very much enjoyed himself. We visited

17:36

those archives with his daughter, Michelle.

17:39

She came across something else that was

17:41

interesting. So I love

17:43

this. Everything that he was

17:45

sort of like, I don't like honors, and

17:48

I, you know, can I return this prize?

17:50

All of that. This is

17:53

so, like, it's such a

17:55

lovely, lovely thank you. This

17:58

paper she found is her father. Nobel

18:00

Prize acceptance speech. Some

18:02

background. Feynman had been outwardly cranky

18:05

about the award, even complaining

18:07

about the fact that he'd have to rent a

18:09

tuxedo. But apparently he had

18:12

a change of heart. Your

18:14

Majesty, your Royal Highnesses,

18:16

ladies and gentlemen, the work I've

18:18

done has already been adequately rewarded

18:21

and recognized. Imagination reaches

18:23

out repeatedly, trying to achieve some

18:25

higher level of understanding until suddenly

18:28

I found myself momentarily alone before

18:30

one new corner of nature's pattern

18:32

of beauty and true majesty revealed.

18:35

That was my reward. Then,

18:37

having fashion tools to make access

18:40

easier to the new level, I

18:42

see these tools used by other

18:44

men straining their imaginations against further

18:46

mysteries beyond. There are my

18:48

votes of recognition. Then

18:50

comes the prize and a deluge

18:53

of messages from friends, from relatives,

18:55

from students, from former teachers, from

18:57

scientific colleagues, from total strangers, formal

19:00

commendations, silly jokes, parties, presents, a

19:02

multitude of messages in a multitude

19:04

of forms. But in

19:07

each I saw the same two common elements.

19:10

I saw in each joy and I

19:12

saw affection, you see, whatever modesty I may

19:14

have had has been completely swept away in

19:16

recent days. The prize was

19:18

a signal to permit them to express and me

19:20

to learn about their feelings. Each

19:23

joy, though transient still, repeated

19:26

in so many places amounts to a

19:28

considerable sum of human happiness. And

19:31

each note of affection released thus one

19:33

upon another has permitted me to realize

19:35

the depth of love for my friends

19:37

and acquaintances, which I had never felt

19:39

so poignantly before. For

19:41

this, I thank Alfred Nobel and the many

19:44

who worked so hard to carry out his

19:46

wishes in this particular way. And

19:48

so, you Swedish people with

19:51

your honors and your trumpets and your

19:53

king, forgive me. For

19:55

I understand that last such things provide

19:57

entrance to the heart. by

20:00

wise and peaceful people, they can

20:02

generate good feeling, even love among

20:04

men, even in lands far beyond

20:06

your own. For that

20:08

lesson, I thank you. After

20:15

the break, what was Feynman like as

20:17

a professor? Not in the

20:19

catalog, no grades. What

20:21

was it? It was Feynman standing in front

20:23

of the blackboard saying, ask me anything. I'm

20:26

Stephen Dubner, and this is Freakonomics Radio. We'll

20:28

be right back. Freakonomics

20:36

Radio is sponsored by NetSuite. Your

20:39

business gets to a certain size and

20:41

the cracks start to emerge. Things

20:43

you used to do in a day are taking a week.

20:45

If this is you, you should know these three numbers, 37,000,

20:47

25, and 1. That's

20:53

the number of businesses which have upgraded

20:55

to NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite

20:58

turns 25 this year. That's

21:00

25 years of helping businesses do

21:02

more with less, close their books

21:04

in days, not weeks, and

21:06

drive down costs. One, because

21:08

your business is one of a kind.

21:11

So you get a customized solution for

21:13

all of your KPIs in one efficient

21:15

system with one source of proof. Manage

21:18

risk, get reliable forecasts, and

21:20

improve margins. Everything you

21:22

need to grow all in one place. Right

21:25

now, download NetSuite's popular

21:27

KPI checklist designed to

21:30

give you consistently excellent

21:32

performance absolutely free at

21:34

netsuite.com/freak. That's

21:36

netsuite.com/freak to get your

21:39

own KPI checklist, netsuite.com/freak.

21:48

Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Fidelity.

21:50

With Fidelity Active ETFs, the investing

21:52

potential is in the name, active,

21:55

because instead of just writing the

21:57

index, Fidelity Active ETFs seek to...

22:00

outperform it with an expert team working

22:02

behind the scenes. Fueled by

22:04

industry-leading expertise and robust research

22:06

capabilities, Fidelity Active ETFs shift

22:09

with the market, pursue upside

22:11

potential, and adapt to volatility.

22:14

And while you can get the potential outperformance

22:16

of an actively managed fund, you can still

22:19

buy and sell it on your terms just

22:21

like any other ETF. Take

22:23

a more, well, active approach

22:25

with Fidelity Active ETF. Learn

22:28

more at fidelity.com slash

22:30

Active ETF. Before

22:33

investing in any exchange-traded fund,

22:35

you should consider its investment

22:37

objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.

22:40

Contact Fidelity for a prospectus, an

22:42

offering circular, or if available, a

22:45

summary prospectus containing this information. Read

22:47

it carefully. While Active

22:49

ETFs offer the potential to outperform

22:51

and index, these products may more

22:53

significantly trail an index as compared

22:56

with passive ETF. Fidelity

22:58

Brokerage Services, LLC, Member

23:01

NYSE, SIPC. Chapter

23:08

5. Feynman the Professor.

23:12

The word most commonly attached to Richard Feynman

23:14

would seem to be genius. That

23:17

is the title of the definitive Feynman

23:19

biography, published in 1992 by James Glick.

23:24

Feynman himself did not like the

23:26

label. He maintained there was nothing

23:28

exceptional about his intelligence. So

23:31

how did he become a giant

23:33

of theoretical physics? Here's

23:35

how Feynman put it in a

23:37

BBC documentary called Fun to Imagine.

23:40

You, as be of an ordinary person, by

23:43

studying hard, would get to be able to

23:45

imagine these things like I imagine. Of course,

23:48

I was an ordinary person who studied hard.

23:51

There's no talent, a special miracle

23:55

ability to understand quantum mechanics or

23:57

a miracle ability to

23:59

imagine. electromagnetic field

24:02

that comes without practice

24:04

and reading and learning and study. He'd

24:06

take an ordinary person who's willing to

24:08

devote a great deal of time and

24:10

study and work and thinking and mathematics,

24:12

then he's become a scientist. The

24:16

physicist John Preskill. Feynman

24:18

officially taught an undergraduate

24:20

class at Caltech only

24:23

for two years and

24:25

those were captured by some now

24:27

famous books called The

24:30

Feynman Lectures on Physics. They're

24:32

three big red books. Feynman

24:36

worked very hard on that. He thought

24:38

very deeply about how to

24:41

organize the material and

24:43

they're rather extraordinary. I think I

24:45

didn't really appreciate them until I

24:48

was a more senior physicist. When

24:50

he gave a talk or a lecture he

24:52

was kind of mesmerizing and

24:54

really grabbed your attention. I

24:57

have the privilege of calling your attention

24:59

today to what is probably one of

25:02

the most far-reaching generalizations of the human

25:04

mind. And while

25:06

he spoke things would

25:08

seem extraordinarily clear and obvious and

25:10

many people had the experience that

25:12

then afterward when you tried to

25:15

reconstruct the arguments you'd

25:17

find it very difficult. Somehow

25:19

he made it seem easy but

25:21

there were nuances that he

25:24

made seem natural when he spoke of

25:26

them but then when you tried to

25:28

follow the path again we're actually very

25:30

subtle. And what

25:32

is this law of gravitation? It

25:35

is that every object in the universe attracts

25:38

every other with a force proportional to

25:40

the mass of each and

25:42

varying inversely as a square of the distance between

25:45

them. If you like mathematics you can write that

25:47

same thing as an equation.

26:00

really put everything into it. The filmmaker

26:02

Christopher Sykes. I turned

26:04

up at Caltech for this lecture and

26:06

I have to say it was extraordinary

26:08

because Feynman, I came in

26:11

and there were about, I don't know, 16

26:13

or 20 students all

26:15

wearing shorts and trainers with their feet up

26:17

on the tables and stuff and none of

26:19

them were taking any notes. Feynman

26:22

was lecturing and I couldn't

26:24

of course understand anything, it was

26:26

in a really high level quantum

26:28

physics. But to the end he looked

26:30

up at the clock and he said, look we've only got

26:32

eight minutes left and this

26:35

particular problem we're talking about, he said,

26:37

there's two ways of tackling it. One's

26:39

very elegant and clear

26:42

and easy and the other one is just

26:44

incredibly messy. He said, but we've only got

26:46

a little time left so I'll just deal

26:48

with the incredibly messy one. I

26:51

thought, well this was great. Although

26:54

that was the only official undergraduate

26:56

class that Feynman taught at Caltech,

26:58

there was an informal class of

27:01

which he taught for many years.

27:04

It was not in the catalog, it

27:06

was not documented anywhere, the freshman called

27:08

it Physics X, it was intended especially

27:11

for freshmen and by word

27:13

of mouth it would

27:15

become known that Feynman

27:18

was going to be in a certain

27:20

classroom at a certain time and

27:23

that you could come and interact

27:25

with him. Not in the

27:27

catalog, no grades, what

27:30

was it? It was Feynman standing in front of

27:32

the blackboard saying, ask me anything. And

27:35

there were rules, the rules

27:37

were, don't ask me

27:39

about coursework, don't ask me how

27:41

to do this problem in such and such a

27:43

course, don't ask me about somebody's paper, I

27:46

haven't read it, I don't care about it, don't

27:48

ask me about somebody's theorem, I don't know that

27:50

either, I can't tell you. Ask

27:53

me about trying to understand something.

27:56

Doesn't matter what it is, everything

27:58

is interesting. My colleague,

28:00

Kip Thorne, remembers that

28:04

when he was a freshman, that must have been around 1958,

28:07

he heard the rumor, he

28:10

went to the rumored room at the rumored

28:12

time, and finally was there, and he says,

28:14

okay, what do you want to talk about

28:16

today? And somebody

28:19

says, oh, let's talk about

28:21

waves on Mars. Where that came

28:23

from, I have no idea. So he starts

28:25

to talk about waves on Mars. Well,

28:27

let's say there's not really water on Mars, but

28:29

let's suppose there is, maybe there were oceans before,

28:32

but the gravity is different than Earth. So

28:34

that means water waves will propagate at a

28:36

different speed, and he worked that out. But

28:39

another thing, the atmosphere is thinner, so there's

28:41

less wind, and that's not going to work

28:44

up such high waves blowing across the surface

28:46

of the water. How high will the waves be?

28:48

And he worked that out. And

28:50

Kip came away from this enormously inspired, you

28:52

know, that you can just look at nature,

28:55

and you ask questions, and you can

28:57

calculate answers. Seamus Blackley. I

29:00

don't think Feynman was trying to teach students

29:04

who were not going to

29:06

understand what he was saying. He wasn't trying

29:08

to reach out in an inclusive way and

29:11

elevate everyone, okay? Caltech

29:14

is very hard on their undergraduates, right? There's

29:16

like a Lord of the Flies f***ing thing

29:18

going on. In the 60s, it was even

29:20

worse. It's a cultural thing that Caltech

29:22

struggles with to this day. And

29:25

those lectures are built for those people who are

29:27

going to go somewhere. And those are the people

29:29

that Feynman was interested in. I

29:32

don't mean to make him out to be such a prick,

29:34

but I think that he was really interested in the really

29:36

bright students who asked really bright questions, and I'm thinking about

29:39

stuff. Now that said,

29:42

he obviously spent a huge amount of time in

29:44

his career communicating

29:46

ideas in a very clear

29:48

way to general

29:50

audiences. But I think those

29:53

are two separate things. I

30:02

think a kind of pseudoscience, that social

30:04

science is an example of a science which is not

30:06

a science. They follow the forms.

30:10

You gather data, you do so and so

30:12

and so forth, but they don't get any

30:14

laws. They haven't found anything. Maybe

30:17

someday they will, but it's not very well developed.

30:19

But what happens is at an

30:21

even more mundane level, we get experts

30:24

on everything. It sounds like they're

30:26

sort of scientific. There's

30:28

all kinds of myths and pseudoscience all over

30:30

the place. Stephen

30:32

Wilkman. His distaste for

30:34

social science came from the fact that

30:36

it just is not a bedrock kind

30:39

of field. I'm sure if he

30:41

was talking about that or about economics or something like

30:43

that, he would say, what is

30:45

this? Is it something where you have axioms

30:47

for how people work and then you're trying

30:49

to figure out the consequences? That's kind of

30:51

more like the way he was doing physics.

30:54

There are these underlying laws of physics and then

30:56

we're working out their consequences. Well,

30:58

at Caltech, he was a hero right up to the

31:00

end, admired by

31:03

his colleagues and

31:06

by the students. I don't know who worshipped

31:08

him more and that

31:11

he was an extraordinary person

31:14

and thinker was appreciated. Now, he

31:17

was a bit of a narcissist. He

31:19

was a show off. He

31:22

did it in a way which maybe irritated some

31:24

people, which was also charming. It's

31:27

not like he tried to hide it. He

31:29

thought pretty highly of himself. I mean, he

31:31

did want to have quirks and

31:33

to have stories about him.

31:36

He really wanted to create this persona. Lisa

31:41

Randall and I am a physicist

31:43

professor at Harvard. I do theoretical

31:45

particle physics and cosmology. This

31:48

sounds kind of obnoxious, but if you're smart enough

31:50

to do particle physics, you're probably smart enough to

31:52

do other jobs where you make a lot more

31:54

money, you get a lot more prestige in other

31:56

ways. So your currency is... how

32:00

important you're considered and what you've accomplished

32:02

and what people think of you. So

32:05

for some people that's more important than others.

32:08

He's a born performer. He clearly

32:10

liked the adulation. You know,

32:12

I think he was a decent guy. And

32:15

what was really interesting is to read

32:17

these pages and pages sometimes of letters

32:19

that people wrote. That's

32:22

Michelle Feynman again. The

32:25

letter is, hello, my

32:27

name is Gary Vership. At

32:29

the present time, I'm a junior at UC

32:31

Berkeley and I'm majoring in physics. I would

32:33

be interested in hearing your views on the

32:35

present fields of research and physics as of

32:38

now I'm interested in either plasma, space, or

32:40

low temperature physics. I would appreciate it

32:42

very much if you could send me some

32:44

information on your current research efforts. My

32:46

address in Berkeley is... All

32:49

right, so then he says, I'm sorry, but

32:51

neither you nor I have the time it would

32:53

take for me to expound my views on

32:55

the research being done in physics. And

32:58

I am interested in all fields. I

33:01

mean, it's honest. I

33:04

don't think he's being mean. It's

33:06

just, I'm going to tell you like it

33:08

is. You

33:11

ask me, I'm going to tell you

33:13

I don't have time to solve all your problems.

33:15

And just FYI, I'm interested in everything. He

33:20

didn't have a lot of judgment with people, you know. So

33:23

he went to a topless bar and he

33:25

liked watching the girls and he liked drawing

33:27

them. And, you know, he would have conversations.

33:29

And at some point people

33:32

were trying to shut the place down because,

33:34

I don't know, they'd had enough of it

33:36

or something. And so he showed up in

33:38

court and said, no, no, this is a

33:40

fine place. I go here all the

33:42

time. Everything's above board. And it

33:44

could have been also true that the neighbors

33:46

were right about all of their concerns because

33:49

ultimately the place did shut down. My

33:51

point is that he had his own moral

33:54

compass, which he

33:56

was very strongly committed

33:59

to. We had a lot of

34:01

artist friends that I think were incredibly

34:04

attractive to him because they were

34:06

just three thinkers. I

34:14

grew up right here. Richard Feynman would come

34:16

in and sit right here and my dad

34:19

would sit over there. Feynman was

34:21

an ordinary dude. You meet him, you thought he

34:23

was like some dude off the street in New

34:25

York. My

34:28

name is Alan Zorthian

34:30

and I am an architect. My

34:33

dad was J'Ryer Zorthian. He

34:36

was an artist. That was his

34:38

main profession. He was very good at

34:40

it. My father met

34:44

Richard P. Feynman in

34:46

the mid-50s when Feynman was playing

34:49

bongos at a party

34:51

and my dad needed to

34:54

make a big splash so he was dancing

34:56

around. And they became good

34:58

friends. The friendship

35:00

continued until Richard's death in 1988 and they were

35:02

very close. The

35:09

Zorthian Ranch is in the hills above

35:11

Pasadena. The land is steep and

35:14

scrubby. It looks a lot like where they

35:16

used to shoot MASH, the old TV show

35:18

with Alan Alda, which is actually not far

35:20

away. The ranch

35:22

itself is a sprawl of

35:25

farm animals and shaggy dogs,

35:27

sculptures and mosaics and

35:29

buildings quite a bit past their prime. In

35:32

its heyday, when J'Ryer Zorthian was

35:34

holding court, the ranch

35:36

was known for its bohemian vibes

35:38

and wild birdies. Richard Feynman

35:41

spent a lot of time up here.

35:43

He and Zorthian had a special relationship.

35:46

They would argue that they liked to express

35:48

their opinions. One of the

35:50

things they're talking about was that you scientists

35:52

don't appreciate beauty. It's

35:55

a friendly type argument. It went until very

35:57

late in the evening and then he went

35:59

home. and he started thinking about it and

36:02

he called my dad up and said, well look, I

36:04

think the problem is I don't understand what you do

36:06

and you don't understand what I do. So why don't

36:08

we educate each other and then

36:10

they started doing this thing and they were serious.

36:12

They did it. They decided, I

36:14

don't remember, every other Sunday I think it was,

36:17

Feynman would come up, my dad did the

36:19

first one, he was going to teach Feynman

36:21

how to draw. Because Feynman was interested in

36:23

art and so he came up, he

36:25

said my dad was a good teacher. My dad was good, he was positive

36:28

and stuff. So he started to

36:30

learn to draw and he eventually became very good.

36:32

And then he tried to teach my dad something

36:34

about physics and my dad didn't learn a damn

36:37

thing. Feynman liked the idea that my

36:39

dad could give women to pose nude too. So

36:41

my dad would send him models and

36:43

stuff like that. When

36:47

you read Feynman's own books, you see

36:49

that he was completely enamored with women.

36:52

He tells story after story of chasing

36:54

women in ways that ranged from

36:56

comic to cruel. In

36:58

the beginning, he had been madly in love

37:01

with Arlene, his first wife. But

37:03

she died from tuberculosis in her 20s

37:05

and it's unclear if he ever fully

37:07

recovered from that. He wrote her a

37:10

love letter two years after she died.

37:13

I'll bet you were surprised that I don't

37:15

even have a girlfriend except you sweetheart. But

37:18

only you are left to me. My

37:20

darling wife, I do adore you. I

37:23

love my wife. My wife is dead. P.S.

37:27

Please excuse my not mailing this, but

37:29

I don't know your new address. He

37:33

did get remarried to Mary Louise Bell,

37:35

whom he met while teaching at Cornell.

37:39

They were, by all accounts, a horrible match.

37:41

The marriage lasted just four years. In

37:44

their divorce, Bell claimed that she

37:46

was subjected to a variety of

37:48

cruelties, including violence. For

37:52

years Feynman had cultivated

37:54

a reputation as a

37:56

womanizer of the worst sort. James

37:58

Glick in his book, genius, reports

38:01

that Feynman routinely slept with

38:03

undergraduates and the wives of

38:05

graduate students. Here's Charles

38:07

Mann. He was an old-fashioned sexist.

38:10

Every woman that we ever talked to about

38:12

this would say this, but they would also

38:14

say things ...

38:17

I know a female physicist

38:19

who, the way she put it

38:21

was this. Feynman would do

38:23

these sexist things like, saying, would you

38:25

give me a cup of coffee? You know, these

38:27

classic sexist tropes. But she said, I

38:30

never met a person who helped

38:32

me understand the physics better. She

38:35

said, ultimately, I'm a physicist, and that's

38:37

what counts. Yes, this was annoying, incredibly

38:40

annoying. I wanted to slap him. But

38:42

when he talked to me about physics,

38:44

I loved it. Lisa Randall.

38:47

When I was entering the field, I went out

38:49

of my way to learn the physics of people and

38:51

to learn as little about their personality as possible.

38:54

I have to say, many times when I found

38:56

out about the people, I was disappointed. I just

38:58

felt like I didn't want to know it. I

39:00

just wanted to focus on the physics itself. Look,

39:02

you can try to justify him, but the fact

39:04

is he was proud enough that it becomes the

39:06

centerpiece of his book. I do

39:08

think we give people a free pass for things they

39:11

do to women in ways that we don't give them

39:13

a free pass and things that happen to other people.

39:15

I mean, look, I've been to Caltech recently. I really

39:17

like being there. It's really fun. When

39:19

I took the PSATE, I did very well. I

39:22

was sent a pamphlet that said, literally, what's a

39:24

nice girl like you doing in a place like

39:26

Caltech? I thought, wow, that is one place

39:28

I do not want to go. You

39:32

know, it's very interesting in this day and

39:34

age because growing up in the age of

39:36

the women's movement, a lot of other movements,

39:38

a lot of it was about not

39:40

focusing on your identity, being just considered

39:43

like anyone else. Today's

39:45

identity politics is very much the

39:47

opposite. So it's very confusing. to

40:00

read his own obituary. I'm

40:03

Stephen Dubner. This is Freakonomics Radio. We'll

40:05

be right back. Freakonomics

40:16

Radio is sponsored by LinkedIn. When you're

40:18

hiring for your small business, you want

40:20

to find quality professionals that are right

40:22

for the role. That's why you have

40:24

to check out LinkedIn Jobs. LinkedIn

40:27

Jobs has the tools to help find

40:29

the right professionals for your team, faster

40:31

and for free. LinkedIn has a vast

40:33

network of more than a billion professionals,

40:36

which makes it the best place to

40:38

hire. It gives you access to professionals

40:40

you can't find anywhere else. LinkedIn

40:42

does all that while making the

40:44

process easy and intuitive. Hiring is

40:47

easy when you have that many quality

40:49

candidates. So easy, in fact, that 86%

40:52

of small businesses get

40:54

a qualified candidate within

40:56

24 hours. Post your

40:58

job for free at

41:00

linkedin.com/freak. That's linkedin.com/freak to

41:02

post your job for

41:05

free. Terms and conditions

41:07

apply. Freakonomics

41:10

Radio is sponsored by Read Write

41:12

Own. Building the Next Era of

41:14

the Internet, a new book by

41:16

entrepreneur and investor Chris Dixon. Behind

41:19

every piece of software is a

41:21

constellation of small, seemingly mundane decisions

41:24

that can have a profound downstream

41:26

impact on how we relate to

41:28

our digital world. These

41:30

choices can decide the economics of

41:32

digital services online from the internet

41:34

to virtual worlds. Read Write

41:37

Own traces the history of the

41:39

internet through three major design eras

41:41

that democratized information, publishing and most

41:43

recently ownership from early networks and

41:45

the proliferation of decentralized digital communities

41:48

to the rise of massive social

41:50

networks run by internet giants. Read

41:52

Write Own is an analysis of

41:54

how today's internet came to be

41:57

and a call to action for

41:59

building. its next era. Order

42:01

your copy of Read, Write,

42:04

Own online today or go

42:06

to readwriteown.com to learn more.

42:12

Edward Jones who knows that just like

42:15

life financial planning isn't only about long-term

42:17

goals. It's about the moments big and

42:19

small along the way and when it

42:21

comes to achieving everyday financial goals Edward

42:24

Jones works hard to connect you with

42:26

someone you can trust professionally and personally. That's

42:28

why they created their free financial advisor matching

42:30

tool to help you find a financial advisor

42:33

in your community. When you take the quiz

42:35

and get your matches don't expect just

42:37

a list of resumes. You'll also see

42:39

each financial advisor story in personal interest and

42:41

when it's time to meet for the first

42:44

time they'll focus on your story

42:46

asking questions to understand where you're

42:48

headed and why because Edward Jones

42:50

knows that at the end of

42:52

the day behind every financial goal

42:54

is a life goal and that's

42:56

what really matters. To learn more

42:58

and find your financial advisor partner

43:00

take the quiz at match.edvardjones.com Chapter

43:07

6. Feynman the parent. Michelle

43:11

Feynman still lives in Pasadena not far

43:13

from the house where she grew up.

43:15

I was a shy seven

43:18

or eight year old I didn't relish

43:20

the idea of telling a friend no I

43:22

don't really want to spend the night at

43:24

your house and so

43:27

somehow my dad and I had this conversation

43:29

and he said well I got an idea

43:32

we'll have a code if you

43:34

say so-and-so wants to know

43:36

if I can spend the night I'll

43:39

say no I'm sorry not tonight

43:42

and then I'll be the bad guy and if

43:44

you say is it all

43:46

right or if I ask

43:49

with myself as the first you know I'm

43:51

wondering if I can is it okay if

43:53

I spend the night something like that then

43:55

I'll give you an honest answer and maybe

43:57

it's yes maybe it's no but at least

43:59

we know where we are. And honestly,

44:02

he nailed it every single time. We're

44:04

speaking with Michelle in the garden of

44:06

the hotel in Pasadena, where the Freakonomics

44:09

crew is staying. We

44:11

chose this hotel, the Huntington, because

44:13

it is where Michelle's parents were

44:15

married. On September

44:17

24th of 1960, Richard Feynman

44:19

took Gwyneth Howarth to be his third wife.

44:23

She was from West Yorkshire, England. How did

44:25

they meet? They met

44:27

on a beach in Switzerland,

44:31

because she had aspirations to travel the

44:33

world. And she

44:35

thought a fun way, she liked children,

44:37

and a fun way would be to

44:39

be an au pair and to live

44:42

in people's houses and take care of

44:44

their children and see the world. So

44:46

she went to France and

44:48

then to Switzerland and met my

44:50

dad. I think he was

44:52

there for a conference, and apparently

44:55

he said kind of a

44:57

joke. He was like, oh,

44:59

you could come to California and take care of me.

45:02

And then the next

45:04

day he saw her again

45:06

and said, you know, that

45:08

wasn't, I'm sorry, that was out of

45:10

line. And she said, no, no, I'll

45:13

come to California. I'd love to. I'd love to come

45:15

to America. And that sounds great. They

45:18

rented a house, completely a platonic

45:21

relationship. He was in the front of the

45:23

house. He was in the back, I guess.

45:26

At some point he realized that

45:28

he was falling in love with her. And

45:30

he thought, no, no, too

45:33

soon, too fast, too impulsive. So

45:36

he went to a calendar and he paged

45:38

forward about six months. And he

45:41

marked the date on the calendar and said,

45:43

if I still feel the same way on

45:45

this date, I will ask her

45:47

to marry me. The

45:49

Pasadena freeway is right near here. And

45:52

the story is they hopped on the

45:54

freeway right after the wedding and they

45:57

ran out of gas. I mean, it's

45:59

a good litmus challenge. for a relationship, you

46:01

know, how is this going to work? And

46:03

to my mom's credit, she just laughed.

46:06

And, okay, I guess this is how it's going

46:08

to go. And they were, you know, they

46:10

were in it. The

46:12

Feynman's had two children, Michelle, whom they adopted

46:15

in 1968, and

46:17

Carl, who was born to the couple six

46:19

years earlier. Today, Carl is

46:22

a computer scientist living near Boston.

46:25

When I was 17, I didn't get along with my

46:27

parents great, which was

46:29

basically the period when I was deciding where to

46:31

go for college. I

46:33

wanted to go to one of the schools where

46:35

they taught AI. And

46:38

that was MIT Carnegie Mellon or Stanford.

46:41

MIT was my first choice, and

46:43

MIT was the furthest one away. It

46:46

was on the other side of the country. So

46:49

I wanted to get away from my parents and, you know, be

46:52

an independent, faraway guy. So I moved there.

46:55

I almost immediately regretted it being

46:57

so far away because my

46:59

relations with my parents were then improved.

47:03

But by then I was committed, and by the time

47:05

I graduated, I had decided that I loved Boston. So

47:08

I stayed out here. He

47:12

was a nice man who would tell you how the world worked. We'd

47:15

go for walks after dinner. We'd

47:17

go out on the streets or in the nearby golf

47:20

course. And we'd talk about everything under

47:22

the sun. He'd

47:24

tell me wonderful stories about his time

47:26

at the Manhattan Project. You

47:28

know, when I was a teenager, he

47:31

would repair his car a lot. He

47:33

would always dive right in. He didn't know anything by

47:35

car repair. So we'd

47:39

dive right in, and then he'd sit back and

47:41

look at it with his hand on his chin and theorize. And

47:44

then dive back in again and, you know,

47:46

usually make things worse. He

47:48

did take me to one football game. And

47:50

after what he said, so what do you think? And I said,

47:52

I really didn't like that. I

47:54

don't think I want to go to any more football games. And

47:57

he was like, oh, thank God. I

48:01

was very into science, I read science fiction,

48:03

I threw lots of pictures of spaceships. I

48:06

was that kind of kid and you know he

48:08

thought that was great and took me

48:10

to Hughes Aircraft to their

48:12

rocket factory and stuff like that. It was great as a

48:14

little kid. I was in

48:16

that world I wanted to be you know one of

48:18

those cool people with the short-sleeved white shirts and the

48:20

black ties. Yeah we had a

48:23

rocket scientist living across the street. Well

48:27

he enjoyed being a father

48:29

and so we have Gwyneth to

48:31

thank for that because she gave him

48:34

a stable family life. That

48:36

is Ralph Leighton. He is a longtime family

48:39

friend who was Feynman's writing partner

48:42

and drumming partner. Carl and

48:44

Michelle were delights to

48:46

him and he learned that

48:49

each of them liked different

48:51

things about him. So Carl

48:53

responded to certain things and Michelle responded

48:55

to other things. I

48:57

could just see the happiness and

49:00

fun when I came over for

49:02

my Wednesday evening proper meal.

49:05

I was a stay-at-home dad and a lot of

49:09

Feynman's philosophy came out with

49:12

our kids. You know just

49:14

one little saying which I kept

49:17

thinking of is don't take advantage

49:19

of your position. So

49:21

you never say because I said so. It's

49:25

better to have that philosophy of ignorance

49:27

like oh yeah that's an interesting

49:29

question. I don't know the answer to that. Let's go

49:32

find out. So

49:35

he was on the curriculum commission and

49:37

so they all looked at textbooks and

49:39

decided that you know this one should

49:41

be approved and this one should not.

49:44

My mom talked about how passionate he was

49:46

about it. She said he would be in

49:48

the basement and it was like an explosion

49:50

from down below because he would just be

49:52

incensed by the inane math problems

49:55

like you know Johnny sees a star

49:57

of 3,000 degrees. He

49:59

sees a star of 3,000 degrees. another star of 6,000 degrees.

50:02

What's the total number of... When

50:05

would you ever need to know

50:07

any of that in nature? You just wouldn't. But

50:10

he had a collection of good math textbooks, so

50:12

I would go down to his study and just, you know, read these

50:15

math textbooks for high schoolers when

50:17

I was a little kid. So I learned a lot of math that way.

50:20

When I was doing math in high school, my

50:22

dad would look over my shoulder and say, oh yeah,

50:25

I go, hang on, I got a good way you

50:27

could do that. I can think of five ways, and

50:29

let me just show you one. And

50:31

so I would take it to school

50:33

and go check this out. And the

50:35

teacher did not share my

50:38

enthusiasm and said, well,

50:41

no. I mean, yes, you got the right answer, but

50:43

no, that's not what we're doing here. And

50:45

so at a certain point, my dad had

50:48

enough and went to go see the teacher.

50:50

And I don't think

50:52

the teacher knew who he was. My dad

50:54

was really, really trying to play it cool

50:57

and just be sort of, you know, I'm

50:59

Michelle's dad. And at

51:01

some point, the guy said something like, you

51:03

should try reading a math book. And

51:07

I can just imagine my dad sort of

51:09

holding it all in. And then at that point,

51:11

it just couldn't. He just pulled

51:13

himself up and said, sir, I

51:16

have written math books.

51:19

And then I think the

51:21

counselor told the teacher who my dad

51:23

was. And the next day, I was

51:25

not in that

51:28

class anymore. He didn't mind being

51:30

a confused old man, would be

51:32

in a restaurant, and he'd look at the menu and get

51:34

out his glasses and be confused in front of the waiter

51:37

and take a long time. And now

51:39

the confused old man will look through the menu. You know,

51:41

he didn't mind being that. And

51:43

you know, at other times, well, he did some

51:46

pretty impressive stuff. And

51:48

he wasn't afraid to say, yeah, I did some pretty impressive stuff.

51:51

When my brother went to

51:53

MIT, he met a like

51:55

minded person, Danny Hillis. Danny

51:57

and Cheryl Handler were starting

52:00

a company called Thinking Machines. I

52:03

worked with him later at Thinking Machines

52:05

Corporation, and he was clearly very

52:07

into computation by that point. Very

52:09

interested, all over it. There

52:13

are some things that a computer does much better

52:15

than a human, and you'd better remember that if you

52:17

kind of compare machines to humans. He

52:19

felt like physics was kind of tapped out, that

52:21

he was past the point of making

52:24

contributions because both he changed and the

52:26

field had changed. And

52:28

so he was more interested in computing. The

52:31

machine we were building was called the connection machine. It's

52:33

a very strange computer. And

52:36

he figured out a way to get it to do cosines

52:39

and logarithms and other transcendental functions.

52:42

It was very poor at multiplication, but

52:44

it was very good at addition and shuffling bits around.

52:47

And he figured out a way to do transcendental

52:49

functions without multiplication,

52:52

just by using the patterns of the bits to do

52:55

something extremely clever whose details I no longer remember. In

53:00

1978, Feynman was diagnosed with

53:03

abdominal cancer. For

53:05

the next decade, he had multiple

53:07

treatments, including surgeries. It

53:09

was suggested that his cancer may

53:11

have been caused by exposure to nuclear

53:13

radiation at Los Alamos. Feynman

53:16

refused to consider that

53:18

possibility. Ralph

53:20

Layton. I got a

53:22

call from the LA Times wondering

53:25

if he was near death. And I

53:27

said, well, he's for the moment

53:30

doing pretty well, but have you

53:32

written up his obituary already? And

53:35

they said, yes. And I said, oh, wow,

53:37

would you mind sending it? Could I show

53:39

it to the chief? And

53:42

the guy said, OK, but I'm not changing

53:44

a word of it. And

53:47

so Feynman got the obituary from the

53:49

LA Times. He was able to read

53:51

his own obituary. You can find it

53:53

online. And in

53:55

the first paragraph or second paragraph,

53:57

he mentioned he had this reputation.

54:00

for skirt chasing or some kind

54:03

of description of that and Feynman shook his

54:05

head and was pretty

54:09

sad that that would be something mentioned

54:11

so soon because I think he kind

54:13

of played it up just to look

54:15

like you know scientists aren't all nerds

54:17

and you know can't get anywhere

54:20

or whatever. I think there

54:22

was a lot of sort of image making and

54:24

then he realized it kind of went too far

54:26

but he couldn't change it because the

54:29

LA Times guy said my condition is I'm

54:31

not changing a word. A

54:33

few months later in February of 1988 Feynman

54:35

died with his family close by. Here

54:37

were his last

54:41

words. I'd hate to die

54:43

twice it's so boring. You

54:48

know there was something on a blackboard right

54:50

after he died they preserved the blackboard for

54:53

a while took pictures and it said what

54:55

I cannot create I do not understand. He

54:58

liked to construct things from the

55:01

ground up. That's basically

55:03

it. By

55:06

this time Gwyneth Feynman was

55:08

also sick with cancer. So

55:12

this is Mountain View Cemetery where

55:14

my parents bought

55:18

a plot. They were sick fairly

55:22

early in my life. They took the

55:25

whole responsibility of all

55:27

of that very seriously and they

55:29

did their will and they bought

55:32

a plot where they liked the

55:35

surroundings and thought this was a beautiful

55:37

area. Yep

55:45

in loving memory and then

55:47

it says Feynman, Richard

55:49

P and Gwyneth M and

55:51

he has the dates 1918 to

55:54

1988 and she's 1934 to 1989. You

56:03

know, sooner or later, everyone's going

56:05

to lose their parents. I'm

56:07

lucky because there's all

56:09

this material that I

56:11

can just, what did his voice sound like?

56:14

Let me listen to it. You know, I have those recordings.

56:16

When I read his books, I can hear

56:19

his voice again. Well,

56:23

there's a lot of stories about it, but it's getting late, so we'll let

56:25

it go at that. Next

56:35

time on Part Three, The

56:38

Vanishing Mr. Feynman. I

56:40

said, have you ever tried sulcipe and mushrooms? And

56:43

he said, no. And I asked, would

56:45

you like to? Feynman

56:47

quit drinking when he was young, and

56:49

as much as he was interested in

56:51

different states of consciousness, he didn't want

56:53

to do drugs out of fear it

56:55

would damage his favorite toy, his brain.

56:59

But when he knew the end was near, he

57:01

took a trip or two. We'll

57:03

hear about that, and what

57:05

would Feynman think about how science

57:07

works today? One of

57:10

the sad things that's happened is

57:12

that the search for

57:14

truth has become politicized. That's

57:17

next time on the show. Until then, take

57:19

care of yourself, and if you can, someone

57:21

else too. Freakonomics

57:24

Radio is produced by Stitcher and Renbud Radio.

57:27

You can find our entire archive

57:29

on any podcast app or at

57:31

freakonomics.com, where we also publish transcripts

57:33

and show notes. We

57:36

make some other shows too, The Economics

57:38

of Everyday Things, No Stupid

57:40

Questions, and People I Mostly Admire. You

57:42

can get all of them on your

57:44

favorite podcast app. Just look

57:46

for the Freakonomics Radio Network. This

57:49

episode was produced by Zach Lipinski.

57:52

Special thanks to Richard Tai and Elisa

57:54

Piccio from the Caltech Archives,

57:57

to Christopher Sykes and the BBC for the audio

57:59

from their Feynman documentaries, to

58:01

the Library and University Archives at

58:04

the University of California Santa Barbara

58:06

for their recording of Feynman's Los

58:08

Alamos from Below lecture, to the

58:10

Esalen Institute for audio from Feynman's

58:13

Tiny Machines talk, and

58:15

to James Glick, author of the

58:17

Feynman biography Genius. Also,

58:19

big thanks to Nicholas Osorio and

58:21

MusicMind for all the recording help

58:24

in Pasadena. Our staff

58:26

includes Alina Kullman, Eleanor Osborne, Elsa

58:28

Hernandez, Gabriel Roth, Greg Rippin,

58:31

Jasmine Klinger, Jeremy Johnston, Julie Kanfer,

58:33

Murek Baudic, Morgan Levy, Neal

58:35

Carruth, Rebecca Lee Douglas, Ryan Kelly,

58:37

and Sarah Lilly. Our

58:39

theme song is Mr. Fortune by the Hitchhikers.

58:42

All the other music you've heard today was

58:44

composed by Luis Guerra. As always,

58:47

thank you for listening. Oh,

58:50

that was fun. I haven't talked about Dick Feynman

58:53

for a long time. A

58:59

Preconomics Radio Network. The hidden

59:02

side of everything. Three

59:12

great words. Free fries Friday. Especially

59:14

when they're used in that exact

59:16

order. Get a free medium fries

59:18

with one dollar minimum purchase. You

59:21

can start your day off right. When you find a professional on

59:23

Angie to get your plumbing right You

59:29

can start your day off right when

59:32

you find a professional on Angie to get

59:34

your plumbing right first. Connect

59:37

with skilled professionals to get all your

59:39

home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You

59:41

can do this when you Angie that.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features