Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
All the media.
0:05
Hi everyone, and welcome to the show. It to be
0:07
James today, and I'm joined by Dr mau
0:09
Zani, who's an activist and scholar with thirty
0:12
five years of experience advocating
0:15
against genocide and for freedom and Burma
0:17
and one of the founding members of
0:19
the anarchist activist platform Forces
0:21
of Renewal Southeast Asia. Welcome to
0:23
the show, doctor Zigney.
0:25
Yeah, thank you so much. Yeah, yeah, it's.
0:27
A pleasure to have you here. So and
0:29
also I should mention Nobel Peace Prize
0:31
nominee as of as yesterday
0:34
or the day before the congratulations on that also.
0:37
Yeah, thanks so much. It happened in January,
0:40
before the deadline. And
0:42
so I just released the announcement,
0:45
you know for the Burmese New
0:48
Year you know occasion,
0:50
because yes, you know, the country has been
0:53
torn apart by you
0:55
know, armed revolutions, genocide,
0:59
the racism, anti
1:02
Muslim violence, and
1:04
so thought like this may be a
1:07
tiny sliver or positive
1:10
thing. And so if activists
1:12
want to have, you know,
1:15
there's some sustenance for
1:19
their grassroots revolution, here's somebody
1:21
who's who has been grassroots for
1:23
thirty five years. So that's why I
1:25
released it, but that's you know, the
1:28
secondary anyway.
1:30
Yeah, I know, it's if it can
1:32
get the world to look at what's happening
1:34
and pay attention, then I think it's a
1:36
good thing. So one thing
1:38
I wanted to ask you about today to start off
1:40
with, is something that when
1:43
I talk to people in the US and the
1:45
UK about the revolution and
1:47
the cure in Meamba, the context of
1:49
like ultranationalists Buddhism is
1:52
one that is very hard, I think
1:54
for people who don't have a great
1:56
understanding of how that works to understand.
1:59
So I was wondering if we could start off with
2:01
you explaining like this,
2:04
this long and painful history
2:06
of like ultra nationalist Buddhism in Myanmar
2:09
and how it's empowered the
2:11
genocide of Muslim people and
2:13
also the hunter Today.
2:16
Well, when we talk about you
2:18
know, ultra nationalism or various
2:20
strengths of nationalism, I
2:23
think we need to periodize
2:26
or put in different historical periods
2:30
because you know, the term
2:32
nationalism was
2:35
a progressive, emancipatory,
2:39
ideological umbrella
2:42
when the local
2:44
society or primarily
2:47
Buddhist and also other people,
2:49
but the majority political
2:52
systems were built on the
2:55
foundation of Buddhism
2:58
in Burma, you know, like different king But
3:01
when when we
3:03
were under the British for one hundred and twenty
3:06
four years the
3:09
war, you know internally
3:11
warring Buddhist kingdoms,
3:14
you know, like Rakine and Morn
3:16
and Burmese and Sean, they
3:19
all at Buddhist kingdoms, and
3:21
they formed
3:24
this oppositional ideological
3:27
identity as you
3:29
know, nationalists Buddhists
3:32
that would confront the alien
3:35
colonial British rule. So in that
3:37
sense, you know, nationalism
3:40
was not a bad thing at all
3:42
because it was you know, primarily
3:45
for emancipatory struggle.
3:49
But then like you know, then fast forward
3:51
post colonial independence
3:54
period nineteen forty eight
3:56
onward. Right when when
3:58
the British rule was removed at
4:01
the end of the Second World War three
4:04
years after the
4:06
the oppositional Buddhist nationalists,
4:09
you know, umbrella identity collapse,
4:13
right, So Rakines want to full
4:16
ground their ethnic city given
4:19
that the main oppositional
4:23
commonality, the colonial
4:26
colonialism, was no more. And
4:28
so that's when the you know, ethnicity
4:31
was reinjected, you know, into
4:33
the ideological formation.
4:36
And and interestingly,
4:39
as you would know as well, the
4:42
end of the Second World War was followed
4:45
by the Cold War right. And
4:47
on the one hand, like you've got you know, godless
4:50
communists, atheistic Russia,
4:54
a Soviet Union and in China. And
4:56
then on the other hand, you know, uh,
5:00
essentially Christian West, you know,
5:02
or at least allegedly Christian West.
5:05
And in that context,
5:08
the alternationalism was
5:12
essentially encouraged
5:15
by the by the United
5:18
States and allies. You
5:20
know, like if you that this is nothing new. If
5:22
you look at the rights
5:24
of like a socialist governments
5:28
across the Middle East, you know, primarily
5:30
Muslim Middle East, you
5:32
would find like the rights of Muslim brotherhood
5:35
and you know what we call today
5:37
fundamentalist Islamicist,
5:39
right, but you know, the
5:42
Buddhists with at
5:45
no centric orientation,
5:48
we're encouraged you
5:50
know, by the United States through
5:53
grants and aid. The
5:56
same way like you know, the right of you
5:58
know, fundamentalist is Islam was encouraged
6:01
or or Midwifi with
6:04
the US money. Because
6:07
the see that this is important because
6:10
through the eyes of the Coal war strategiest
6:13
the only way that egalitarian
6:18
leftist ideologies
6:21
could be confronted was
6:24
through this the faith
6:26
based ideology.
6:28
So I don't
6:30
want I'm not saying
6:32
that the Burmese nationalists
6:35
and also nationalists were not responsible
6:38
for their own growth. But
6:40
I also what I'm saying is that
6:42
there was a larger global
6:45
context in which this monster
6:48
was hatched. Yes, and and
6:51
and so, but even
6:53
you know, like the going back to the nineteen
6:56
thirties, after the Wall Street collapse,
6:58
you know, then, like you know, the the
7:01
recession pervaded across
7:03
the world, and colonial economies
7:06
like Burma with massive agric
7:08
cultural explorer economy, the
7:11
British founded expedient
7:15
to basically turn
7:17
to a religious divide
7:19
and rule. And like
7:22
you know, the Burmese Buddhist laboring
7:25
classes were pitted against
7:27
the Indian laboring
7:30
classes of different religions,
7:33
but that was more like the Buddhist nationalists
7:35
and non nationalists versus you
7:38
know, like what we were called today migrant
7:41
laborers from India, you
7:43
know, under the because when we were part of
7:45
British Empire. After the British
7:47
left, the Muslims
7:50
began to be scapegoaded. Uh.
7:53
And then finally, I think, like the we
7:56
cannot understands, as you know very well,
7:59
the nationalists or alternationalism
8:01
without some kind of political
8:04
organization, and that
8:07
organization is what we call Burmese
8:10
political or state, whether
8:13
it's controlled by the civilian elected
8:16
politicians or the military
8:19
military as an organization.
8:23
Political state's always there,
8:25
whether it's you know, fascism
8:28
in Nazi Germany or Italy or
8:30
Japan or like
8:32
you know, the genocidal Mimma
8:35
about fifteen years ago. State
8:38
was the engine. Actually, it's
8:41
not the people that were
8:43
generating this toxic ideology.
8:45
It was the state that was inventing,
8:49
manipulating and mobilizing towards
8:52
their sinister end.
8:54
Right yeah. And it's the divide
8:56
and rules strategy and the full I
8:59
guess the falling back to these
9:01
kind of colonial methods
9:03
of rule is something that I
9:05
guess I want people to understand is still happening
9:09
in Burma or Myanmar.
9:11
Right.
9:11
We see the military
9:14
that the junta doing it right now, right
9:16
like attempting to ferment inter
9:18
ethnic conflicts to prevent
9:21
the formation of a popular front or a coalition against
9:23
against their rule.
9:25
Right, Yes, I think the
9:27
here the one observation
9:29
I want to make is, you
9:31
know, independence from
9:33
Britain, a restoration
9:36
of say, like you know, modern form
9:39
of a sovereignty to Burmese
9:41
people was not a
9:43
clean break from
9:46
the colonial past, because
9:49
the state in Burma as it
9:52
exists or it has existed
9:54
over the last seventy plus
9:57
years, remains colonial
10:00
state. It was an instrument
10:02
of economic exploitation
10:06
or racialized or ethnicized
10:09
administration. And
10:11
all the security laws
10:15
and you know, ordinances
10:17
and whatnot, they
10:19
were formulated with
10:22
the interest of the ruling colonial
10:25
interests or power like
10:27
at the time British and what
10:29
the what independence did
10:32
was really transfer
10:34
of this internally racialized
10:38
entity we call state
10:42
from the white men's hand to the
10:44
brawn men's hand, you know, the
10:47
Burmese. So when
10:49
you the state wasn't
10:52
actually finding
10:55
it difficult to foment racial
10:58
or inter we don't use it term
11:00
race here, like inter ethnic conflict
11:03
or inter religious conflict.
11:06
The state itself embodied
11:08
this divide and rule outlook
11:12
because it remains internally
11:14
colonial, you see what I mean. And
11:18
so so I think that it
11:20
isn't simply the
11:22
policies of the you know, X
11:24
y Z regimes that have rude
11:27
Burma since independence, but the
11:29
state itself is
11:32
conducive to or
11:34
you know, supportive of this
11:36
kind of inter religious
11:39
and inter ethnic contest
11:43
because there there are no
11:46
principles of equality
11:48
as as ethnic or religious
11:50
communities or there
11:52
there there was no sense of you
11:56
know, horizontal or vertical
11:59
fairness among the political
12:01
class and the majoritarian
12:03
agrarian communities, and
12:05
so the state isself problematic.
12:08
Yeah, that's why, like you know, when
12:11
al san Suci came to you
12:13
know, semi power, because the
12:15
military is still controlled or backseat
12:18
drove for a regime, she
12:20
found it really difficult to
12:23
maneuver because she was
12:25
straight jacketed in this you
12:28
know internally colonial shell.
12:31
Yeah. Yeah, and then so so think
12:34
of course, like you know, you're it's correct
12:37
what the military is doing now, say in
12:39
Racine State where
12:41
they committed genocide against
12:43
Rhinia Muslims. You know, they drove
12:46
out, you know, close to eight hundred thousand
12:48
raw hingers of genocidally
12:51
across the border to Bangladesh
12:53
in two thoyd and seventeen and also
12:56
sixteen. They
12:58
are now and
13:00
training and you know forcively
13:03
conscripting able
13:05
body young Rhinjia men into
13:09
their ranks and to fight
13:11
the progressively
13:13
militarily stronger kind
13:16
Buddhist Ara army. That's just one
13:19
area. But you know, if you look at
13:21
other regions like shun Stay for
13:23
instance, there's extremely
13:26
complex ethnic contestations
13:29
happening, right, So what like political
13:31
scientists call like a horizontal
13:34
violence is taking place, and so it's
13:36
like there are multiple conflicts
13:40
at work, you know. But
13:42
of course, like the military is number one,
13:45
you know, problem maker, but there
13:47
are also lesser evil
13:51
forms of like political and ethnic
13:54
conflicts taking place.
14:06
Yeah, I think, yeah, very much against shan states.
14:08
I think particularly complicated
14:11
and interesting as we look at
14:13
the situation now in
14:17
the different like both in the liberated
14:19
areas or the areas without control of the
14:23
like NAPI or state that they may still be controlled
14:25
kind of in a sense by other kind
14:28
of like pseudo states. I guess, are
14:30
you familiar with this? There's
14:32
this argument. I think it's probably like
14:34
articulated. I'm sure you are articulated,
14:37
most notably by James
14:39
C. Scott of like and
14:41
he looks at the example of me and MA has
14:43
been rightly criticized in some areas of
14:46
like the mountains as an
14:48
area where people can I guess,
14:51
choose to opt out of the
14:53
state or to be like where
14:55
the state is not completely consolidated, I guess,
14:57
and never has been.
14:59
Ye. I know, I know Jim's work,
15:01
you know, like the the he
15:04
divides people into valleys
15:06
and uh, you know mountains. You know
15:09
what's interesting is like you know, it's
15:11
it's it's a lot more complex
15:13
than this, you know, the
15:16
the dualistic understanding
15:18
of like hill people versus plain people,
15:20
because you know, like even in
15:23
the in the hills that there
15:25
are you know, highlands and and
15:27
and there are plateaus and you know the
15:30
you know and so. But also
15:32
I think like that I find
15:35
it more useful to look
15:37
at this not through
15:39
geographic lens, but through the colonial
15:41
lens, because you've got the colonial
15:44
state, because like you know, Jim is essentially
15:46
anti statist. But as
15:48
a matter of value, yeah, I I
15:50
I I am with him, you know, because I'm
15:53
bent on u the
15:55
anarchism as my value, you know. But
15:58
analytically, I think, but
16:02
given the fact that the colonial
16:05
state continues to live on and
16:08
continue to haunt the Burmese
16:11
society, I think,
16:13
like the way I look at it is like you
16:15
know, center and perifheree, right,
16:19
irrespective of the altitude.
16:22
I mean, at this point, like altitudes
16:24
no longer really strategically
16:27
important because you know, we're we
16:30
live in the age of drones, and
16:32
like you know, MiG twenty nine
16:34
and f sixteen mountains
16:37
are no longer cover you see what I
16:40
mean, right.
16:40
Yeah, Yeah, the construct
16:42
of the mountains as like nonstate
16:45
space or a place where you can go to choose to
16:48
be nonstate. I think like it's
16:50
interesting to hear young Bama PDFs
16:53
fighters now be like, oh, I
16:56
chose to go to the mountains, even though it
16:58
sits very much alongside that can only analysis
17:00
that you had of like the wild
17:03
people or like quote unquote
17:05
savagery, right, which or when
17:07
I speak to Bama people who are
17:10
like twenty one now who joined the PDFs eighteen
17:12
seventeen after the coup, they
17:15
had all been very much indoctrinenty
17:17
with the idea of non Bamar people
17:19
as quote savage as or wild people who lived
17:22
in the quote mountains or jungles, and
17:24
like choosing to go there to escape the state.
17:27
I think it's really interesting to hear like
17:30
that analysis reproduced in their
17:33
storytelling of their own lives.
17:36
Yeah. I mean, I think you
17:39
know that it has been in
17:41
the Burmese political psyche.
17:44
You move away from the center and
17:47
you are more autonomous and you
17:50
are you know, freer from
17:52
the right. You know, the
17:54
reach of the center, right, because
17:58
we still have this center
18:01
peripheree mentality. Yeah, I mean, you
18:03
know, culturally, yes, you're absolutely right.
18:06
Uh, the the way people in the center,
18:08
like the group that I belong
18:11
to, Burmese Buddhist majority, we
18:13
look down on people that are on the peripheree,
18:16
right, that the way people dress. I mean
18:19
it's also like you know, the
18:21
rural and urban divide as
18:23
well, you know, the even
18:26
like those who grew up in the
18:28
in the non majoritarians, you
18:31
know regions that you know what I call that the
18:33
peripheys of the Burmese colonial
18:35
state. When they settle in
18:37
Rangoon or Mandale or or you know
18:39
major urban areas, Uh,
18:43
they they begin to dress. They
18:45
they begin to I mean, they necessarily
18:47
adapt to the
18:49
the the Burmese way of life,
18:52
the majority dominant you
18:54
know, customs and whatnot, and
18:58
so so I still stick with
19:00
the you know this whole colonial
19:02
relations the organizationally
19:05
and psychologically. The
19:08
Yeah, I mean also like that
19:10
we have the vocabulary if
19:12
you want to oppose a central state
19:15
or the central regime, we
19:17
say we take refuge in the forest,
19:20
right, and we take refuge
19:22
in the forest or under the tree against
19:25
the scorching sun or
19:27
like pouring monsoon rain right
19:31
or the evil center
19:33
right, and so so it's all
19:35
built in. It's in the language even
19:38
you know, like organizing
19:40
an armed revolt or going
19:42
underground is described
19:45
as taking refuge
19:47
in the forest the jungle, you know,
19:50
and and and what's what's interesting
19:52
though, is like you know, from the state's
19:54
perspective, if you're taking
19:57
refuge in the in the
19:59
jungle, of course, like that's
20:01
treason us and you know that is
20:04
uh an act of criminality.
20:07
But if you if you use
20:09
that language, or if you if
20:12
you do exactly the same thing literally
20:14
physically, if you're a Buddhist
20:16
monk, you know, you
20:19
you are considered holier
20:22
than monks that continue
20:24
to live in the city, you know what I mean. So
20:27
you go, you know, the forest monks
20:29
versus like a city town
20:32
or village monk. Right. So this
20:35
is quite a fascinating linguistic
20:39
you know twist here on
20:41
one hand, like you know, but from the revolutionaries
20:44
perspective, if
20:47
you're in the jungle, you
20:50
grow certain aura around
20:53
you. You're in the jungle, right, and
20:55
you don't you don't wear genes
20:58
or you don't look like city people. But you're
21:00
worrying, you know, like the
21:03
fatigue, army fatigue and you know, jungle,
21:06
the paraphernalia. And
21:09
as a revolutionary that's like, you
21:11
know, that's I check with our time, you
21:13
know what I mean. Revolutions start
21:16
or organize around jungles,
21:18
you know, I mean, so it has nothing
21:21
to do with altitude, you see what I mean?
21:23
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's just yeah.
21:25
I like that periphery colonial model. So
21:38
I wonder, like, I think people who
21:40
listen to this will both be very
21:43
much like amenable to anarchism
21:45
and see the problems that state
21:47
societies create, and also
21:49
to the revolution in Memma and
21:52
to the young people, and then not to young people
21:54
who are fighting it. I wonder like, how
21:57
do we build a
21:59
future for me that doesn't replicate
22:01
this colonial corporaphery model, that doesn't
22:04
the scene quannon of the state that's centered
22:06
in Napidor is like the it's
22:09
this use of violence to control and this colonial
22:11
relationship, right, So how do we not replicate that
22:13
in the post revolution future?
22:16
Well, I think you know, there's a danger
22:19
in what should I say,
22:21
the romanticizing the
22:24
mini states or substates. Right
22:29
if establishing
22:31
autonomous states does
22:35
not confront the
22:37
colonial nature of the state
22:41
from which these meaning states you
22:44
know, emerge as oppositional entities.
22:46
In other words, whatever
22:49
administrative structures that
22:52
you know, the the the
22:55
current armed revolutionary organizations
22:59
set up, they need to
23:01
first make
23:03
sure they don't replicate that the
23:06
internally colonial nature
23:08
of the state that they have been
23:10
fighting and to some
23:12
degree of like success at
23:15
this point in history, right, because
23:20
the coloniality is
23:23
very much connected with
23:26
the idea of pure ethnic
23:28
identity, you see what I mean, Yeah,
23:31
and in this day and age, I mean
23:33
you know whether I mean you've been to current state
23:35
and other places in Burma and and you
23:37
know in the Middle East at Curtis and so. But
23:40
they're they're they're always
23:42
like, you know, the idea of
23:45
pure ethnic identity,
23:47
right, even if you're a revolutionary But
23:49
but but the truth, the truth
23:52
is, you know, even small
23:54
places you will find Muslims and
23:56
Hindus and Christians or people
23:58
with different migratory histories
24:00
and class background. You flettened
24:03
them into a single ethnic
24:05
identity, right that well, that
24:08
that that in and I mean self
24:10
perception, we are a new Kurrent
24:13
state or Karany state
24:15
or Kachin state, right, even Kachin
24:18
the late the term label the
24:21
label Katchin in the north. You
24:23
know, they have about like the three or four major
24:26
groups there and and some
24:28
resent being referred to
24:30
as Kirtchin, but they go along
24:33
because they are against the more
24:35
evil central Burmese
24:37
Buddhist state, right right, so
24:39
so so so so that's why when I when
24:41
I explain to you, you know, at the outset
24:44
of this the conversation, this
24:47
like your Buddhist identities merged
24:50
as an oppositional umbrella, anti
24:53
colonial identity
24:56
against the British when that common
24:58
oppressors has gone home,
25:01
and then we start fighting each other, you know what I mean.
25:04
So number one is like, you know, that is
25:07
very very important. These
25:09
new entities do not define
25:12
their political organizations
25:14
along any idea of
25:16
like you know, blood and soil.
25:19
Yeah, and that's
25:21
very very important. Otherwise we
25:24
we we replicate what
25:26
we fought against. Right. And secondly,
25:31
I think no military
25:33
organizations should control administrations.
25:38
But at the moment, you know, with
25:40
the exception of the Grand National Union,
25:43
most other ethnically organized
25:46
armed resistance organizations
25:48
and Burma, when
25:50
they set up administrations,
25:53
you know, administrators are guys who are
25:55
you know, like carrying
25:57
like AK forty seven or some of the
26:00
weapons. You see what I mean, because
26:03
like what they need to do is as
26:05
soon as like that they have secure
26:07
any like an ancestral
26:10
region, what they need to do is they
26:12
need to separate law
26:14
and order maintenance from
26:17
the defense. Yeah, And
26:19
the reason we have
26:21
gotten into this bloody
26:24
mess is because the military
26:27
did not separate law and order
26:29
administration as a civilian function
26:32
function from the national
26:35
defense. So the
26:38
current progressively militarily
26:41
successful ethnic resistance organizations
26:45
have to demilitarize
26:48
self consciously and as a matter
26:50
of policy their new
26:52
administrations. So these
26:54
two things, you know, move
26:57
away from blood and soil
26:59
idea year of identity and
27:02
demilitarized and civilianized
27:05
the administration.
27:07
Yeah, do you have hope? Like I
27:09
find when I talk to especially
27:13
younger people in the PDF, who are most people, ma, like,
27:16
maybe it's easier for them to see
27:19
the obviously colonial
27:21
relationship and the way that these
27:24
constructs have harmed them and prevented
27:26
them from finding solidarity with people of other ethnic
27:28
groups. That's something that like sometimes
27:31
they will articulate to me, right that like, you
27:34
know, we were told these people were
27:37
bad and evil and savage and they're not and there are
27:39
allies in this fight against dictatorship.
27:41
Do you think that that's replicated in the
27:43
in the leadership of eros,
27:46
like that that idea that this blood
27:48
and soil nationalism has been this
27:51
blood soil identity, I should say, is
27:53
something that's like big, problematic
27:56
and devisive and will always be so, or like
27:58
do you not see that applicated so much?
28:02
Well, there is still you know,
28:04
the old conservative
28:07
orientations
28:09
in these ros with
28:12
respect to two things, the
28:15
acceptance of you
28:18
know, younger generations
28:21
into policy making circles,
28:24
right, And then the other
28:26
one is the half
28:28
of the population of these ethnic
28:30
communities have remained marginalized.
28:34
That is war men, if you
28:36
you know, I mean, on one hand, it
28:38
does make sense that you know, men
28:40
with guns and men with like you know, the
28:43
fifty years of revolutionary experience
28:46
are going to play leading role. But
28:49
these guys have to make us conscious
28:52
effort in changing
28:55
their own value system, which
28:57
is like, you know, bring in new
29:00
generations with
29:03
more progressive ideas
29:05
into policy making circle leadership
29:08
circle, and bring
29:10
in women. And you know, I
29:13
wish I understand I know more about the
29:15
Kurdish revolutionary organizations.
29:18
My own very limited understanding
29:20
is that you know, gender equality,
29:23
I mean, for the for the islam orphobic
29:26
crowd, it might be quite
29:28
shocking, But the Kurdish revolutionary
29:31
organizations are you know, much
29:34
more gender equal. Yeah
29:38
then like you know white democratic societies.
29:41
Yeah, that's right. And I think their analysis,
29:43
if I can sort of summarize
29:47
like appost thought very is
29:49
that colonialism begins
29:51
in the patriarchal family, and
29:53
that the first colonized subject is to the
29:55
women. And therefore, if we can't decolonize
29:58
our familia and community relations, we
30:00
have little hope of deconalizing ourselves
30:02
as a group or as a society. So they're analysis
30:04
rest in the same place as yours does. And
30:07
I think that there's I think
30:09
increased solidarity
30:11
and communication between the Kurdish
30:13
freedom movement and the resistance movements in
30:16
mem which I hope can only do good
30:18
for that. Like, especially with regard
30:20
to gender relations, it was interesting to see
30:23
the Kereni K and DF Battalian
30:25
five issued a statement which said
30:27
that like they had a long way to go
30:29
in terms of gender relations, and they looked to the
30:31
Kurdish model of example of where they can get
30:33
to, which at least it gives me hope
30:36
that these things can get better.
30:39
Yeah. I mean KNDF is a remarkable
30:42
you know organization,
30:44
Karr natural defense organization, right,
30:46
Karenny Keranny. I mean they
30:48
are led by very progressive sort
30:51
of like you know, the semi anarchist
30:55
type young people.
30:57
Yeah, you know, the city
31:00
and gender discrimination are
31:04
self consciously avoided
31:06
and discouraged. Yeah. So
31:08
so basically other we
31:11
we cannot we cannot have a
31:13
successful revolutionary movement,
31:16
you know, just by trying
31:19
to you know, take power
31:21
from the center. You know, there has to be
31:24
you know, it's an rebellion. It's
31:26
different from a revolutionary movement.
31:28
Revolutionary movement involves
31:31
a shifting fundamentally
31:34
the non progressive
31:37
values and outlooks. Right. That
31:39
that is what something that needs to happen,
31:41
and that that, in my view, uh
31:45
is a deeply you
31:47
know, intellectual psychological
31:51
process. But I think I think
31:53
like the the
31:55
that is happening, you know, and so the
31:58
so that that that ideological
32:02
progressive shift is
32:05
it is going to hit the ceiling
32:09
at some point because you've
32:12
got old men in a decision
32:15
making positions who
32:17
are not who haven't bought
32:19
in entirely the
32:22
need to shift their
32:25
value system. And then partially it's not
32:27
simply ideological, it's
32:29
also self interest. When
32:31
you're when you're the when you're the boss
32:34
for twenty five years, you know,
32:36
you're a little like autocredit tyrant,
32:38
you know what I mean. Organization,
32:41
So shifting the you know, giving
32:44
women and younger generation spaces
32:47
me you know, you
32:50
shutting up fifty percent of the time
32:52
and letting the other you know,
32:55
people speak fifty percent, you
32:57
know, like they're they're no no more like monologue
32:59
for one, you see what I mean. So
33:03
even like you know, the airtime,
33:05
you have less airtime, that's like
33:07
you're less. That's your self interest
33:09
your airtime, you know, let
33:12
alone economic and other interests.
33:14
This is just like talking in
33:15
the in in a meeting, you
33:18
see what I mean. I've been through like some of
33:20
some of the meetings and stuff, and so you
33:22
know, like guys think that only they have
33:25
important things to say, you
33:27
know, especially military matters or big
33:29
items. Okay, like women talk about
33:31
welfare of children and
33:34
you know widows kind of shit.
33:36
Yeah, yeah, this very sort
33:38
of still like separate spheres gender
33:40
model that I know. Yeah, I have hope for the
33:43
young generation, but I
33:45
remember one of the guys I met,
33:47
he told me that, like he
33:50
said, he said, like three years ago,
33:53
I had some gender problems and I didn't
33:56
understand what he meant, and he was like, I thought that women could
33:58
do things that men could do, and now I realized
34:00
I was wrong. And they were telling me that
34:02
the police wouldn't
34:05
there there was a taboo to walk underneath
34:07
a woman's lunch.
34:11
Yes, so yeah, so they hung them around their
34:13
protest camps when they were in Yangon fighting
34:15
the police, and that the police wouldn't come in, so
34:18
that they were like, oh, this is when I realized that
34:20
sexism hurts everyone. So I think
34:22
it's yeah, we I have hope for that
34:24
generation. I think it's It's been
34:27
one of the things that has given me so much hope
34:30
for the world in general as I've
34:32
been covering the revolution in the Amma, is
34:34
to see people reconstruct
34:37
and change their identities in
34:39
a progressive and inclusive way and
34:42
people, you know, people in this countries and the
34:44
UK as well, are so stuck in their
34:47
sort of regressive identities, and to see
34:50
young people there acknowledged that sexism,
34:52
homophobia, these these racist and
34:54
inter ethnic like hierarchies
34:57
are damaging everyone has. It's
34:59
given me a great deal of hope for the future.
35:03
Yeah. I share your optimism. And
35:06
part of it is, you know, the
35:08
progressives or people
35:11
or younger people or like older people
35:13
with progressive outlooks.
35:15
I mean, everything is constructed,
35:18
you know, like if you change the material situation
35:20
in terms of you know who's making
35:23
decisions or you
35:25
know under what conditions decisions
35:27
are made. I think like people
35:29
are able to shift their thinking,
35:33
you see what I mean. I
35:35
mean, And so I
35:37
think like that, but definitely
35:40
that political leadership is very important,
35:43
you know. I mean I don't I don't believe in
35:45
this like a van Goddess idea
35:47
of like a group of men, uh
35:50
you know, you know, guiding guiding
35:52
the herd. Right. But
35:54
at the same time, I think like these
35:57
older men should meet
36:00
the younger generations halfway.
36:03
Yeah, And I'm not saying like okay, all right,
36:05
you know, like you know, like, don't trust
36:08
anyone above forty because I'm
36:10
six years I just don't want to be trusted. And
36:14
but yeah, I mean, I'm sixty and I
36:17
can take shit from eighteen year
36:19
old junior friend or colleague
36:21
who tell me you're full of shit. And
36:24
here's the reason I listen, right, So
36:27
I assume, like other people
36:29
my age, my generation, will be
36:31
able to do the
36:34
adjustment right and especially
36:36
for the better and the But
36:39
I think that there are
36:42
really articulate young
36:44
people and women, yes,
36:47
whose voices need to
36:49
come to the full, like you know, like people
36:52
the people be I mean, like, we don't
36:54
live in isolation anymore, like in the nineteen
36:56
sixties and seventies and eighties, Burma
36:59
was very isolated, and so you know,
37:02
and so the ideological currents
37:05
do not reach within
37:07
the Burmese society, so
37:10
that the type of religions or
37:12
religions I mean Christianity,
37:15
the type of Christian practices outlook
37:18
whatnot remain like extremely
37:20
conservative compared with like you know, even
37:23
like a conservative like Christian country
37:25
like US A uh
37:29
and uh. But now, like
37:31
you know, with we live in the social media
37:33
internet age, and so you know, young people
37:37
you know use the term like
37:39
intersectionality, you s. I mean
37:41
they start to see like race, class, gender
37:44
and other issues you know, like
37:46
inter intersecting and
37:48
then producing or reproducing or
37:51
ending like different forms
37:53
of uh you know, repression and
37:56
you know, exploitation and whatnot.
37:59
We still have a very very long way
38:01
to go. We can't shift. But
38:04
that's not not to say that you know,
38:06
we shall feel like discouraged, but
38:09
we we We won't
38:11
see instant changes.
38:15
No, yeah, but I think over time, Yeah,
38:18
I have an deal of a great deal of optimism
38:20
for the future of me Emma, Doctor Sanny.
38:23
It's it's been really great talking.
38:25
Where can people, especially people who are
38:27
interested in your work and in
38:29
the future of Memma, how how can they follow
38:32
along with your work and with these
38:34
struggles to create a more equal
38:37
and just in democratic
38:39
in the non state sense Burma.
38:42
I mean one. I mean I use social
38:44
media, especially like you know, Facebook
38:47
a lot. And I began like
38:49
consciously writing in Burmese
38:52
language because I
38:54
don't need to inform the world, because
38:56
the world knows the ship that's going on
38:58
in Burma. And and
39:01
so I think the uh
39:04
my, Facebook's okay. But if
39:06
people read like English or
39:09
even like you know, other languages,
39:11
you know, our own mother tongue. Uh.
39:14
The the Forces of
39:16
Renewal Southeast Asia four
39:18
c dot com CEO. It's
39:21
a good platform we encourage
39:24
and actually we seek out
39:26
uh you know, very radical ideas
39:29
in multiple languages. Burmese
39:32
or or Chin or Karani
39:34
or whatever language they want to use. We
39:37
don't censor anyone. They
39:39
can say anything as long
39:41
as they're not advocating fascist
39:44
them or violence or like, you know,
39:47
things like that. And so yeah,
39:49
I encourage to take a glanset
39:51
our you know, Southeast Asia Network
39:54
of Anarchistic Activists
39:56
and Scholars.
39:58
Yeah.
39:58
Yeah, it's a great website and clear a link
40:00
to it in the description. Thank you
40:02
so much for your time this evening. We really
40:04
appreciate it.
40:11
It could happen here as a production of cool Zone
40:13
Media. For more podcasts from cool Zone
40:15
Media, visit our website coolzonemedia dot
40:17
com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,
40:19
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
40:22
You can find sources for It could happen here, updated
40:24
monthly at coolzonemedia dot com
40:26
slash sources. Thanks for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More