Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
We
0:00
have a lot of choices to make about our diet,
0:03
add to that doing the right
0:05
thing when it comes to preventing or treating
0:07
a chronic disease, fighting a virus,
0:10
losing weight and suddenly our
0:12
nutrition choices can seem almost
0:14
overwhelming. Well, I'm
0:17
here to help. Welcome to the nutrition
0:19
facts podcast. I'm your host, doctor
0:21
Michael Greager. More than
0:23
ten thousand articles have been published
0:26
on gluten in medical journals, intimidating
0:28
even for me. Today, we have
0:30
a three part series summarizing the best available
0:33
signs on gluten. In
0:35
our first story, we look at how
0:37
we might prevent the inflammation that occurs
0:39
from gluten free diets.
0:42
Over the last decade or so, there's been a growing
0:44
interest in the medical that are shown plant
0:47
based eating beyond just exclusionary
0:49
terms like vegetarian or or
0:51
vegan. Previous such studies
0:54
were somewhat limited because they just split
0:56
people up in either vegetarian or
0:58
non vegetarian. Excluding some
1:00
or all animal foods, but without taking
1:03
into account the quality of plant
1:05
foods, vegans could be live out of
1:07
that. French fries, Oreos, and Coca
1:09
Cola. Enter changes
1:12
in plant based diet quality in total
1:14
and cause specific mortality. The
1:16
first study to investigate the associations
1:19
between changes in plant based diet quality
1:21
and subsequent risk of death. If
1:24
you look at overall plant based diet scores,
1:26
the more you increase your intake of any plant
1:28
foods and decrease your intake of any animal
1:30
foods, the lower your risk of death appears
1:33
to fall. But that's because people were
1:35
adding healthy plant foods like fruits and
1:37
vegetables. If you just look at people who
1:39
ate more processed sugary junk over
1:41
time, their mortality risk goes
1:44
up. The clinical implications
1:46
being the increasing intake of healthy plant
1:48
foods and decreasing intake not just animal
1:51
foods, but also animal crackers could
1:54
lower the future risk of premature death.
1:56
Whereas just reducing the intake of carbs
1:58
in general. Cutting down, not just refined
2:00
carbs and sugars, but healthy high carb foods
2:02
like fruits and whole grains is associated
2:05
with increased overall mortality. Which
2:08
could correspond to years of your life
2:10
being cut short, as well as the risk
2:12
of dying specifically from heart disease, stroke,
2:15
and cancer. Why
2:17
our whole plant food so good for us. Much
2:20
of the benefit may be mediated by
2:22
our microbiome. There are all
2:24
sorts of things threatening our good gut bugs,
2:26
like the over prescription of antibiotics. However,
2:29
the only factor that has been empirically shown
2:32
to be important is a diet
2:34
low in microbiome accessible carbohydrates.
2:37
In other words, prebiotics like
2:40
fibrin resistant starch only found
2:42
one place in abundance, whole
2:44
plant foods. We went
2:46
from high mac diets to big
2:49
mac diets and maybe
2:51
suffering the consequences. Indic
2:53
of dietary fiber, which is the main
2:55
source of macs in the diet, is
2:57
negligibly low compared
3:00
to how we evolved. Such a low fiber
3:02
die provides insufficient food
3:04
for our gut microbes, starving ourselves
3:06
of all the wonderful things they produce for us.
3:09
A low fiber diet is a key driver of microbiome
3:11
depletion, and this loss is implicated in
3:14
the rampant increase of chronic disease eases
3:16
that now plague the modern world.
3:18
We evolve getting perhaps a hundred
3:21
grams of fiber a day. Our
3:23
cut bugs must have been in heaven.
3:26
How do you even get close to that? A
3:28
couple of fruit may only have about three grams.
3:31
Couple vegetables, five grams. Why
3:33
so little? Because fruits and
3:35
vegetables are like eighty to ninety percent
3:37
water. One has to go to the
3:39
drier plant foods to really scale it up
3:41
like beans at fifteen grams
3:43
or intact grains like barley, over
3:46
thirty grams per cup. Many
3:48
people are avoiding common grains these days
3:50
like wheat barley and rye due to gluten,
3:53
but there's a dark side of gluten
3:55
free diets. Now
3:57
if you have a condition like celiac disease,
3:59
well then you absolutely have to avoid
4:01
GlutenFree. But if not, the downside
4:04
dives include the potential for nutritional deficiencies,
4:06
like not getting enough fiber, and toxic
4:09
compounds, for example, the accumulation of
4:11
heavy metals and people on gluten free diets.
4:14
Those following a gluten free diet had significantly
4:16
increased blood mercury levels more arsenic
4:19
flowing through their systems. The arsenic
4:21
is likely due to increased rice consumption
4:24
because rice is major ingredient in
4:26
gluten free foods, but you can certainly choose
4:28
other grains like sore gum. That's my favorite
4:30
rice substitute. And the higher mercury
4:32
may just be because people eating gluten free
4:34
diets were tending to eat more fish for
4:36
some reason. But the reason that ten
4:39
out of ten of those without celiac
4:41
disease or recognized gluten sensitivity
4:44
following a gluten free diet experienced
4:46
a proinflammatory gastrointestinal
4:48
environment is likely due
4:50
to starving your microbial self
4:53
not getting enough prebuyer not
4:55
getting enough fiber because you're avoiding
4:57
grains like wheat. So whatever
4:59
diet you choose for whatever reason, make sure
5:02
you're getting enough
5:03
fiber. In
5:04
our next story, we look at how the effects of gluten
5:07
on our health have been debated for more
5:09
than thirty years.
5:11
In nineteen eighty, researchers in England
5:13
reported a series of women suffered from chronic
5:15
diarrhea that resolved on a gluten free
5:18
diet yet did not have evidence
5:20
of celiac disease, the autoimmune
5:22
disorder associated with gluten intolerance.
5:25
The medical profession was skeptical at
5:28
the time. And even
5:30
thirty years later. So
5:33
much so that much like
5:35
patients who had irritable bowel syndrome Patients
5:37
claiming non cilia gluten sensitivity
5:40
were commonly referred to psychiatrists
5:42
because they were believed to have an underlying mental
5:45
illness. Psychological testing
5:48
of such
5:48
patients, however, found no evidence as they were
5:50
suffering from some kind of psychosomatic hysteria.
5:54
The medical profession has a history of
5:57
dismissing diseases as all
5:59
in people's heads, PTSD, ulcer
6:02
of clients, migraines, ulcer, asthma, Parkinson's,
6:05
MS, despite
6:08
resist from the prevailing medical community
6:10
at the time these health problems have subsequently
6:12
been confirmed to be credible,
6:15
physiologically based disorders
6:17
rather than psychologically based confabulations.
6:21
On the flip side, the Internet
6:23
is right with unsubstantiated claims
6:25
about gluten free diet, which
6:28
has spilled over into the popular press
6:31
to make gluten free diet villain
6:33
du jour with claims
6:35
like seventeen million Americans are
6:37
gluten sensitive. However, it must
6:40
be remembered that this is also
6:42
big business. When
6:45
literally billions of dollars
6:47
or at stake, it's hard to trust
6:50
anybody. So is always
6:52
best to stick to the science.
6:54
What sort of evidence do we have for the existence
6:57
of a condition presumed to be so widespread?
7:01
Not much. The evidence base
7:03
for such claims was unfortunately very
7:06
thin because we didn't have randomized controlled
7:08
trials demonstrating that the entity
7:11
even exists. The
7:13
gold standard for confirming non
7:15
cilia sensitivity requires
7:18
a diet followed by a double
7:20
blind randomized placebo controlled food
7:22
challenge, like you give someone
7:24
a muffin. And they're not
7:27
told if it's a gluten free muffin or
7:29
gluten filled muffin to control
7:31
for placebo effects and see what happens.
7:34
The reason this is necessary is
7:36
because when you actually do this, a number
7:38
of quote unquote gluten sensitive patients
7:41
don't react at all. To
7:43
disguise GlutenFree instead react
7:45
to the gluten free placebo. So
7:47
it truly was in their heads. But
7:50
we never had that kind of level of evidence
7:52
until two thousand eleven
7:55
when a double blind randomized placebo
7:57
controlled trial was published which tested
8:00
to see if patients complaining veritable bowel
8:02
type symptoms who claimed they felt better on
8:04
a gluten free diet despite not having
8:06
celiac disease actually could tell.
8:08
If they were given gluten free bread
8:11
and muffins or gluten containing bread
8:13
and muffins. They started
8:15
out gluten free and symptom
8:18
free for two weeks, and then they were challenged
8:20
with the bread and muffins. Here's what
8:22
happened to the fifteen patients who got
8:24
the placebo. Meaning they started on a gluten
8:26
free diet and continued on a
8:28
gluten free diet, they got
8:31
worse. Just a thought
8:33
that they may be eating something that was bad for
8:35
them made them feel all crampy and bloated.
8:38
This is what's called a no seaboe effect.
8:40
The placebo effect is when you give someone
8:42
something useless and they feel better. The
8:45
no placebo effect is when you give someone
8:47
something harmless and they feel worse.
8:50
But the small group that got the
8:53
actual gluten felt
8:55
worse still. So
8:58
they concluded this non cilia gluten
9:00
intolerance may actually exist.
9:03
It was a small study, though, when even though
9:05
they claim the gluten free bread muffins
9:07
were indistinguishable. Maybe at
9:09
some level the patients could tell, which
9:11
is which. So in two
9:13
thousand twelve, researchers in Italy
9:16
took nine twenty patients that
9:18
had been diagnosed with non celiac immune sensitivity
9:21
and put them to the test. With
9:23
a double blinded wheat challenge by giving
9:25
them not bread and muffins, but
9:27
capsules filled with wheat flour
9:29
or filled with placebo flour. Or
9:32
kind of placebo powder. No flour
9:34
at all. And more than two
9:36
thirds failed the
9:38
test. Like they got worse
9:41
on the placebo or better on the wheat.
9:44
But of those that passed,
9:46
there was a clear benefit to
9:48
staying on the wheat free diet confirming
9:51
the existence of a non celiac
9:54
wheat sensitivity. Now,
9:57
Note, they said wheat sensitivity, not
10:00
gluten sensitivity. itself
10:03
may not be causing gut symptoms
10:06
at all. See, most people with wheat
10:08
sensitivity have a variety of
10:10
other food sensitivities. Two
10:12
thirds are sensitive to cow's milk protein
10:14
as well, then eggs were the most
10:17
common culprit after that. So
10:20
if you put people on a diet
10:22
low in common triggers and irritable bowel
10:24
symptoms, and then challenge them
10:26
with gluten, there's no effect.
10:29
Same increase in symptoms with high gluten, low
10:31
gluten, or no gluten. Right?
10:33
Calling into question the very existence
10:36
of non celiac gluten sensitivity.
10:40
Interesting. Despite being
10:42
informed that avoiding gluten wasn't apparently
10:45
doing a thing for their gut symptoms, many
10:48
participants opted to continue following
10:50
a gluten free diet as they just subjectively
10:53
described feeling better. So
10:55
the researchers wondered if avoiding
10:57
gluten might be improving the
10:59
mood of those with wheat sensitivity and
11:02
indeed. Short term exposure
11:04
to gluten appeared to induce feelings of depression
11:06
in these patients. But
11:09
whether non c lactagloon sensitivity is
11:11
a disease of the mind or the gut,
11:14
it is no longer a condition that
11:16
can be dismissed.
11:19
Finally today, how common is
11:21
gluten sensitivity? Are there benefits
11:24
to does the medical profession
11:26
explicitly advise against people who
11:28
might suspect they may be gluten intolerant from
11:31
just going on a gluten free diet?
11:33
Let's find out. Until
11:36
only a few years ago, almost
11:38
a whole the scientific world maintained that
11:40
the wheat protein gluten would provoke
11:43
negative effects only in people with rare conditions
11:45
such as celiac disease or wheat
11:47
allergies. But by the early part
11:49
of two thousand thirteen, it was largely
11:51
becoming accepted that some
11:53
non celiac
11:54
patients could suffer from gluten or
11:56
wheat sensitivity. And
11:58
indeed a consensus panel of experts
12:00
now officially recognizes three gluten
12:02
related conditions, wheat allergy, celiac disease,
12:05
and gluten sensitivity. So
12:07
what percent of the population should
12:09
avoid wheat? About
12:12
one in a thousand may have a wheat allergy,
12:14
nearly one in hundred may have celiac
12:17
disease. And
12:19
it appears to be on the rise, though
12:22
there's still less than about
12:24
one in ten thousand chance Americans
12:27
will get diagnosed with celiac in any
12:29
given year. How
12:31
common is wheat or gluten sensitivity? Our
12:33
best estimate point is that in
12:36
that same kind of general range,
12:38
slightly higher than one percent, but
12:40
still that's potentially millions
12:42
of people who may have been suffering for
12:45
years, who could have been cured by
12:47
simple dietary means, yet
12:49
went unrecognized and unhelped. By
12:52
the medical profession. Although
12:55
sensitivity continues to gain medical credibility,
12:58
we still don't know how it works or how much gluten
13:00
can be tolerated if it's reversible
13:02
or not and with the long term complications
13:04
might be of not sticking to the diet.
13:07
Considering the lack of knowledge, maybe people with
13:09
gluten sensitivity should be trying
13:11
to reintroduce gluten back into their diet
13:13
every year or so to see if it's still causing
13:15
problems. The reason
13:18
health professionals don't want to see people on
13:20
gluten free diet unless absolutely necessary
13:23
is that for the ninety eight percent of people
13:25
that don't have gluten issues, whole
13:27
grains, including the gluten grains wheat,
13:29
barley and rye, are health promoting
13:32
linked to reduced risk of
13:34
coronary heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity,
13:36
and other chronic disease. You know, just like
13:39
because some people have a peanut allergy
13:41
doesn't mean that everyone should avoid
13:43
peanuts. There's
13:45
no evidence to suggest that following a
13:48
gluten free diet has any significant benefits
13:50
in the general population. Indeed,
13:53
there is some evidence to suggest that gluten free
13:55
diet may adversely affect gut
13:57
health in those without celiac disease or
13:59
gluten sensitivity urology. They're
14:01
talking about this study. They found that
14:04
a month of gluten free diet may hurt
14:06
our gut flora and immune function.
14:08
Potentially setting those on gluten free
14:10
diets up for an overgrowth of harmful
14:13
bacteria in their intestines. Why?
14:16
Because ironically of the beneficial effects
14:18
of the very components we'd send that people
14:21
have problems with, like the FOD map
14:23
fructose that act as probiotics and
14:25
feed are good bacteria, or the
14:27
gluten itself, which may boost immune
14:29
function, less than a week of added gluten
14:31
protein significantly increases
14:34
natural killer cell activity, which
14:36
could be expected to improve our body's ability
14:39
to fight cancer and viral infections. High
14:42
gluten bread improves triglyceride
14:44
levels better than regular gluten
14:46
bread as another example. Ironically,
14:50
one of the greatest threats of gluten free
14:53
diets may be the
14:55
gluten itself. Self
14:57
prescription of a gluten free diet may
14:59
undermine our ability to pick up celiac
15:02
disease, the much more serious form of gluten
15:04
intolerance. The way we diagnose
15:06
celiacs by looking for the inflammation caused by
15:08
GlutenFree celiacs sufferers. But if
15:10
they haven't been eating a lot of gluten, we might miss
15:12
the disease Hence rather
15:14
than being on a gluten free diet, we want celiac
15:17
suspects to be on a gluten
15:19
loaded diet. We're talking four to six
15:21
slices of gluten packed bread a day, every
15:24
day, for at least a month, so we can definitively
15:26
diagnose the disease. Why does
15:28
it matter so much to get a formal diagnosis
15:31
if you're already on gluten free diet?
15:33
Well, it's a genetic disease, so
15:36
you'll know to test the family. But most
15:38
importantly, Many people on
15:40
gluten free diets are not actually
15:43
on gluten free diets. Even
15:45
twenty parts per million can be toxic
15:47
to someone with celiac. Many
15:50
on so called gluten free diets inadvertently
15:52
still eat gluten.
15:55
Sometimes there's contamination in gluten free
15:57
products. So even foods labeled quote
15:59
unquote GlutenFree may still
16:01
not be safe for celiac sufferers.
16:05
That's why we need to
16:07
know. The
16:09
irony editorialized in a
16:11
prominent medical journal of
16:13
many celiac patients not knowing the diagnosis,
16:15
while millions of non sufferers first banished
16:18
gluten from their diets can be considered
16:20
a public health force.
16:23
We would love it if you could share with us your stories
16:26
about reinventing your through evidence based
16:28
nutrition. Go to nutrition facts dot org
16:30
slash testimonials, we may be able to
16:32
share it on social media to help
16:34
inspire others. To see
16:36
any graphs, charts, graphics, images, or
16:38
studies mentioned here, please go to the nutrition
16:41
facts podcast landing page. There
16:43
you'll find all the detailed information you need
16:45
plus linked to all the sources we cite
16:47
for each of these topics. For
16:49
a vital timely text on the pathogens that
16:51
cause pandemics, you can order the ebook,
16:54
audiobook, or a hard copy of my latest book
16:56
how to survive a pandemic or go to
16:58
your local bubble library for that matter.
17:01
For recipes, check out my new how not to
17:03
diet is cookbook. It's beautifully designed
17:05
with more than a hundred recipes for delicious
17:07
and nutritious meals. And of course, all the
17:09
proceeds I received from all the sales of my books
17:11
go to charity. NutritionVax
17:14
dot org is a nonprofit science based public
17:16
service where you can sign up for free daily updates
17:18
on the latest nutrition research via bite
17:20
sized videos and articles, everything
17:22
on the website is free. There are no
17:24
ads, no corporate sponsorships, no
17:26
kickbacks, strictly non commercial,
17:28
not selling in
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More