Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Why is it that so many podcasters
0:02
and podcast guests are doing stuff
0:05
that doesn't work is often
0:07
boring and may even be damaging
0:10
to their personal brand and professional
0:12
future? Welcome to Podfluence,
0:14
the podcast that helps coaches and
0:16
speakers build professional authority
0:18
through podcasting. In
0:20
this episode, we're gonna take a look at some of the
0:23
bad advice out there and some of the things
0:25
that I see people doing
0:27
and have probably even done myself from time
0:29
to time. That doesn't work, especially
0:32
as a podcast guest who is
0:34
looking to build authority, become
0:37
known, and maybe even get invited back onto
0:39
some of the best podcasts. Okay,
0:54
let's start the show. Now. I can remember
0:57
being on my way home one time on the bus
0:59
that I've taken many times, passing through
1:01
the city center of Valencia where I live,
1:04
and we reached a stop by the train
1:06
station and everyone else
1:08
on the bus got off except for me
1:10
and the driver. Now the urge
1:12
to get up and get off the bus was so.
1:16
I almost did thinking, well, this
1:18
must be the final stop. Maybe for
1:20
some reason there had been no announcement
1:22
from the driver, and the driver wasn't telling
1:25
me to get off. I convinced
1:27
myself to stay put. The doors closed, the
1:29
bus carried on. We trust
1:32
the wisdom of the crowd, even
1:34
at times when we shouldn't. And
1:37
I see and hear it all the time
1:39
in podcasting. In
1:41
continuing with my series on the seven
1:44
deadly sins of podcasting, we Reach
1:46
number three, ignorance or what? Lack
1:48
of awareness. It's
1:50
an especially important one for podcasters because
1:53
most of us get into it without a clue
1:55
what we are doing at first, and
1:57
many will make the same mistakes that
1:59
I, myself and countless others. Of
2:02
thinking that if you're having fun and
2:04
enjoying it, then your audience will
2:06
too. I know I've said that and
2:08
I've heard many other people say it too.
2:11
This is a wild and unfounded
2:13
assumption, but I'm not gonna suggest that
2:15
you shouldn't enjoy your podcast experiences.
2:18
But let's take a look at the list so far. So
2:21
number one in our list of seven Deadly
2:23
podcast sins was gluttony, self-indulgence.
2:27
Number two was selfishness.
2:29
Number three is then ignorance
2:32
or lack of awareness that still
2:34
leads us with 4, 5, 6, and seven to
2:37
come and they will be following pretty
2:39
soon. So
2:41
we are not quite even halfway on
2:43
the list yet, but this issue may
2:45
be the one that I hear most commonly from
2:47
the podcasters that I speak with on
2:50
a daily basis. Whilst it's true
2:52
that you don't know what you don't, Ignorance
2:55
may allow for some short-term bliss,
2:57
but in the long run it becomes
2:59
painful. We don't want to put
3:02
in the work. We hate the long-term
3:04
process, and we just want
3:06
to sit down and hit record, but
3:09
that's rarely a recipe for
3:11
magic. It's more like the ingredients
3:13
for a casserole of mediocrity
3:16
that you'll be eating for every
3:18
meal. And maybe I need to ask
3:20
my friend Simon Lancaster for some
3:23
help with my metaphors here. So
3:25
he is ignorance bliss. Well, ignorance
3:27
allows others to take advantage of
3:29
us and it allows us to think that we're doing great
3:31
when we might actually be failing. Choosing
3:35
not to learn the ropes or receive
3:37
any feedback on what you do or
3:39
how to improve it is gonna culminate
3:42
in one massive reality check
3:44
that will pull the rug from under you, and
3:46
make you feel like the fool you hadn't
3:49
realized you were, if you don't hit
3:51
pod fade before them. I've
3:54
had some similar experiences in public
3:56
speaking. It can be humiliating
3:59
and most people will lose their
4:01
drive and maybe even quit after
4:03
an experience like that. So, how
4:06
do our brains work against us?
4:08
Well, our brains are complicated
4:10
things, but that doesn't always mean
4:13
that we are complicated beings.
4:15
The brain uses a lot of energy each
4:18
day, about 20% of
4:20
our energy reserves even in a resting
4:22
state. Certainly more
4:24
when we start to tax it. So it should
4:26
come as no surprise that
4:28
our brains like to conserve energy
4:30
by taking shortcuts or perhaps
4:32
what we can more technically call heuristics.
4:35
Some heuristics are constructive and save
4:37
us a lot of time, but many
4:40
need to be corrected and lead
4:42
to getting mired in fallacious thinking,
4:45
and sometimes to arguments and
4:47
even fights if they're left unchallenged.
4:50
We can't be expected to constantly
4:52
remember that we have received programming
4:54
throughout our lives that dictate
4:56
our norms and values from family,
4:58
from school, environment, government, peers,
5:01
and media, and more. Transcending
5:04
our programming is often viewed as
5:06
an act of defiance by those
5:09
who either prefer to accept their programming
5:11
as correct or are too fearful
5:14
or unaware to change it. What are the
5:16
effects of influence them? Robert
5:19
Cialdini talks about authority
5:21
as being one of the key drivers
5:23
of influence and even cites some
5:25
quite terrifying examples of experiments
5:28
that were done where people were prepared
5:30
to deliver what they believed were fatal
5:33
electric shocks in a staged simulation
5:35
to a subject who was an actor because
5:38
the person in a white coat conducting
5:41
the experiment told them to. Not
5:44
everyone did, but most did. And it
5:46
was in large part down to a mix of
5:49
Cialdini's weapons of influence, which
5:51
also likely included a blend of
5:53
consistency as they had
5:55
agreed to take part and maybe
5:57
consensus as well, because it seemed
5:59
like everyone around was okay with this and
6:01
it was normal. It is honestly
6:03
amazing and just a little scary, just
6:06
how much we will go along with consensus
6:08
and orthodoxy just because everyone
6:11
is okay with it and there doesn't
6:13
seem to be sufficient reason or always
6:15
to question it. This is one reason
6:17
why cults teach adherence techniques
6:20
like thought stopping. Because if you actually
6:23
start to think rationally about
6:25
what you're being told and question
6:27
the voice of authority, you will probably
6:29
end up coming to your senses and leaving.
6:32
Potentially stirring up similar ideas
6:34
in others. People are generally
6:37
much quieter when they're
6:39
not asking questions. We
6:41
move on then to the art of the con, and
6:43
most cons happen when
6:45
some element of trust has been
6:47
established and our reason to question
6:50
what is happening or why is happening has. Turned
6:53
off for a while, but we're
6:55
regularly conned in other ways too. Media
6:58
and politics mostly drive the narratives
7:00
of popular discourse, past
7:02
behavior, and our sense of who we are causes
7:04
to act in ways that try to stay consistent
7:07
with that identity. we follow
7:10
the crowd because it seems like they must be
7:12
right. If everyone else is doing it, we
7:14
should too. Guess what? This
7:18
is a long-winded way to get to my point. I
7:20
apologize, but I feel like
7:22
it was a necessary diversion. As podcasters
7:25
and podcast guests, the
7:27
vast majority of us follow the
7:29
crowd and do what we see others
7:31
doing. Sometimes we see
7:33
guidance and if we are fortunate, Or
7:36
thorough enough, we may find help
7:38
that actually works for us. Any
7:40
podcast coach worth their salt
7:43
will tell you there is a shit
7:45
ton of bad podcasting advice
7:47
out there, and some is from
7:49
seemingly successful people who we may
7:52
think we can trust. Fantasy versus
7:54
reality then. We often
7:56
get taken in by the idea of things.
7:58
It's a bit like getting a dog. The idea
8:00
for many of us is a nice idea. Dogs
8:03
are wonderful, but the reality
8:05
is one of daily walking in
8:07
all weather conditions, picking up poop,
8:10
lots of poop. Vet
8:12
bills, dog food, dog
8:14
friendly hotels on your holidays, or dog
8:17
sitters, chewed furniture, fur
8:19
all over the place, and a very distinct
8:22
dog smell that you never used
8:24
to have at home. And did I mention the
8:26
poop? That dog
8:28
and its wellbeing are your responsibility,
8:31
and if you are not a particularly responsible
8:33
person already, you are probably not
8:35
going to suddenly transform into
8:37
one when the dog arrives. More
8:40
likely the dog will have a less
8:42
than optimal existence that it's ignorant
8:44
owner thinks is just fine.
8:48
So it's not just about us. Ignorance may
8:50
be bliss for us, but it can be painful to
8:52
others. Like my friend, let's
8:54
call him Fred. Everyone else calls him
8:56
Dan, but we'll call him Fred, who publishes
8:59
his unedited podcast conversations
9:01
with no intros, a poor
9:04
quality microphone, an untreated
9:06
room, and untreated audio.
9:09
He's an interesting and very intelligent
9:11
guy. I want to listen
9:13
to his conversations, but sometimes, It
9:16
takes so long to get
9:18
to the point in his episodes that I
9:20
give up or the sound is so
9:22
bad that I find something with better
9:24
quality to listen to. I
9:27
can't really say he's ignorant of this.
9:29
He knows and really he doesn't
9:31
care enough to fix it. For me,
9:33
that's like having the best information
9:36
and delivering it in the most boring
9:38
lecture style that you can manage. Only
9:41
the most committed people will wade through
9:44
it. What Dan is
9:46
ignorant of is that podcasts
9:48
also need to be entertaining
9:51
and not like you've just accidentally landed
9:53
in someone's zoom room. I've said many
9:55
times before, but your enjoyment
9:58
of a conversation does not equate
10:00
to good content, and your
10:02
use of controversial opinions or
10:04
strong language doesn't necessarily
10:06
make you edgy or compelling to listen
10:08
to. Do you
10:10
have any idea how many people
10:13
out there call their podcast something like
10:15
Real Talk? It's not
10:17
the hook point that you think it is. Ignorance
10:20
really is no excuse as a podcast
10:23
guest. So ignorance will hurt you
10:25
as a podcast guest too. If you don't
10:27
keep a check on certain things like who's show
10:29
you're going on, what's their style of
10:31
interview, whether the conversation will
10:34
be edifying, will the show get
10:36
cut or promoted? Will you sink
10:38
or shine? Do you give longer
10:40
answers than are needed? Are
10:42
you really listening to the questions
10:44
being asked and staying aware
10:47
and present with the interviewer? Have
10:49
you curated your message in
10:52
the right way for that audience? Do
10:55
you know what the win is for you appearing
10:57
on the show or for the host? There's so
10:59
much to consider. One
11:02
time I agreed to do a show where it seemed the primary
11:04
product of the show was built around marijuana
11:07
edibles and there were
11:09
other guests that I didn't know about as well.
11:11
The one just before me was a
11:13
Donald Trump loving gun toting, woke
11:16
hating, redneck. And let's
11:18
just say I was in the virtual waiting room,
11:20
wondering what the fuck I had got myself
11:22
involved in. The interview
11:25
ended up being great and a lot of fun, but
11:27
when I look back, Fun
11:29
did not translate into professionally useful,
11:32
and I'm not in podcasting just
11:34
to have fun. Looking
11:37
back, agreeing to that interview for
11:39
me was a mistake, although
11:41
thankfully, not a very painful or costly
11:43
one. The most significant cost
11:45
was the time. I could have spent that time doing
11:47
something to advance myself professionally.
11:50
I needed to be more careful about
11:52
what and who I was giving my time to
11:55
and how it may affect my professional.
11:58
I'd fallen into the trap of thinking that going on
12:00
any slightly relevant podcast at all
12:02
would give me a boost. If I look at
12:04
my stats from such things, there have really only
12:06
been two shows that I guested on that
12:08
gave me major boosts to things
12:11
like my email list, which is my main call to action.
12:14
And I realize that if I did more of
12:16
those shows and less random stuff,
12:19
I would probably see much greater results. In
12:21
fact, there's no probably about it. So
12:24
do you just start or start right. This
12:27
is a hard question to answer and there's a lot to be said
12:29
for just diving in and getting started. I
12:32
would have to go with the diplomatic
12:34
answer, which is that it depends. Depends
12:36
what you are looking to achieve by going on podcasts.
12:39
If you are all about just having fun, carry
12:41
on as you are, doesn't really apply if
12:44
you're seeking to generate more business and build
12:46
professional authority. Then you would
12:48
do well to get more strategic
12:50
and prepare yourself well. I'm
12:53
not a big advocate of the expression how you do
12:55
anything is how you do everything, but it is useful
12:58
in terms of how we think about things. Again, a heuristic.
13:01
So since we have been talking about heuristics
13:03
running in general tendencies, if you do
13:06
tend to half ass things, you're probably gonna do
13:08
that with your podcast interviewing. What
13:10
about the resistance? Well, it always surprises
13:13
me how often people resist the idea
13:15
that you need to work at podcasting
13:17
and learn how to make a good show that
13:20
has a specific objective for the audience.
13:23
Just as much as being a podcast guest,
13:26
people often think that they are more interesting
13:28
than they really are, or that they know enough
13:30
to be the expert, or they have the
13:32
personality to be the next big thing. But
13:35
there are things that work and things that
13:37
just don't. I would hope
13:39
that unless you are a very experienced
13:41
speaker, you would get some help in coaching
13:44
before doing something like a TED Talk. It
13:46
would be see arrogance to think you
13:48
didn't need it and would likely
13:51
lead to regret when your less
13:53
than great talk is splashed around the internet
13:55
and top of search results when somebody Googles
13:58
you. Your professional image
14:00
needs to be curated, and I know some people
14:02
don't like this idea, but it's the. If
14:05
you want to be seen in a certain way
14:07
by your audience, you need to do as much
14:10
as you can to curate that image
14:12
and act in accordance with it. Speak
14:14
accordingly, and even dress
14:16
accordingly. People are desperate
14:19
to put you into a little box and identify
14:21
you as one thing, even though you
14:23
are many things. Your curated
14:26
image should be authentic to who you are,
14:28
but not to the point where you are presenting
14:30
a confusing image of who
14:32
you are and what you are about. Not
14:36
looking, sounding, or feeling right is gonna hurt
14:38
you professionally and may already be doing
14:40
that. You're gonna get boxed and labeled
14:42
whether you like it or not, whether
14:44
it's right or wrong, and you should do your
14:46
best to make sure you end up getting filed in
14:48
the correct box in the mind of your
14:50
listener. Now writing this episode
14:53
has been a bit of a challenge for me. First, to keep it
14:55
on track, which I only just about managed.
14:57
I think. Secondly, the time commitment
14:59
to actually do the writing and put the put
15:02
it in together, and then Covid,
15:04
which at the time of writing I was still trying to recover
15:06
from. But I believe more than ever, the professional and
15:09
expert podcast guesting requires
15:11
a professional approach, and that perhaps
15:14
a version of something like Toastmasters or
15:16
public speaking programs is needed
15:18
to help with this. I'm still noodling
15:20
on what that might look like. In the meantime,
15:23
please keep learning from the podcast
15:25
pros who are my guests on the
15:27
podcast. Amazing people
15:29
like Bob Gentle, Lee
15:31
Carter Jason Cercone
15:34
on those shows, we discuss a lot of these issues
15:36
around charisma, authenticity, and personal
15:38
branding, and I'm sure you will find that valuable
15:40
too. Now, various things have been getting in the way
15:42
of my publication schedule as happens
15:44
when you are doing a podcast and working in
15:46
a full-time job. So I apologized for
15:48
a lack of regularity. I've been doing
15:50
my very best to try and get episodes out more
15:52
regularly, so the schedule has been a little
15:54
bit off. I am still promising four
15:56
episodes a month. I will try
15:59
to release them on Mondays as much as possible.
16:01
My next show is gonna be an interview with Tim Reid,
16:03
a very experienced podcaster
16:05
from down and under. Who has an
16:08
incredibly successful podcast and knows a thing or three
16:10
about being on podcast, running a podcast,
16:12
and building influence and persuasion. He has
16:15
built up a big business through his
16:17
show and had a lot of fun speaking
16:19
to him, so make sure you don't miss that. We'll
16:21
be continuing the seven deadly sins
16:24
of podcasting with number four in
16:26
a couple of weeks. So make sure you are subscribed
16:28
to the show and we'll see you back again
16:30
very soon. Where if you're going, whatever
16:33
you're doing, have an amazing day. Go and
16:35
make great things happen.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More