Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
support for npr and the following message
0:02
come from makes watch season
0:04
two of the stars original comedy series
0:06
now only on stars and the stars
0:09
app
0:14
actors
0:15
and writers are on strike together
0:17
and it looks like he could last a while there
0:20
are deep divide in hollywood over issues
0:22
including how creative people should be compensated
0:25
in the streaming era how work is structured
0:27
and how artificial intelligence will be used
0:30
production of tv and film has largely
0:32
stopped only a few years after
0:34
an interruption during the early part of covered
0:37
that unsettled viewing habits and delayed
0:39
both movies and shows i'm
0:41
going to homes and today on npr pop
0:43
culture happy hour we're going to explain
0:45
some of what's at stake and the
0:47
different ways that might and and
0:49
how the strike could impact viewers
0:56
support for this npr podcast
0:58
comes from the stars original comedy
1:01
series makes its nineteen
1:03
seventy three feminism is hot
1:05
and minx magazine has hit it's
1:07
peak can the team and bottom dollar
1:09
handle more money fame and
1:11
temptation season two of
1:13
makes premieres friday july twenty
1:15
first only on stars and the stars
1:18
app
1:19
this program is made possible by pwc
1:22
who wants you to know that their technology
1:24
isn't made to solve any problem
1:26
just yours at pwc
1:29
it adds up to the new equation
1:32
learn more at pwc dot
1:34
com slash u slash
1:36
products this
1:37
message comes from npr sponsor noom
1:40
eating is an emotional experience which
1:42
is why managing your weight needs to be a psychological
1:45
one noom uses science and personalization
1:48
to help you manage your wait for the long term
1:50
their psychology based approach helps you build
1:52
better habits and behaviors that are easier
1:54
to maintain the best part you
1:56
decide how noom fits into your life not
1:59
the other way around
2:00
Sign up for your trial today at noom.com
2:03
Joining me today is NPR's
2:05
TV critic Eric Deggans. We're grabbing Eric
2:07
in the airport lounge. So thank you for being
2:09
here. Welcome back
2:10
Yeah, if you hear, you know a musaki
2:13
version of careless whisper, yeah We're
2:16
planes taking off or someone being pulled back
2:18
to security to pick up their phone All right So
2:21
let's talk about the development of what
2:23
is now this double strike by the actors and
2:25
the writers we should stress by the way That this is a double
2:28
strike and not a joint strike These are still
2:30
two separate unions that will negotiate
2:33
two separate contracts The WGA
2:35
represents the writers sag after represents
2:38
the actors These two strikes will
2:40
probably end at different times just
2:42
as they started at different times Sag
2:44
after only went on strike last week.
2:46
The WGA has been on strike since
2:49
May 2nd Both strikes are
2:51
against the AMP TP, which is
2:53
the kind of bargaining group that represents
2:55
the studios and the streamers So like
2:57
Paramount and Disney and also Netflix
2:59
and Apple and so forth Both
3:01
of these unions have been on strike before
3:04
at different times But the last time they were
3:06
on strike at the same time was 1960
3:09
that too was a strike that went to some
3:11
very basic Structural
3:13
issues about at that time the rise
3:15
of television and it led to really
3:17
the whole idea of Residuals
3:19
as we now know them which are payments creators
3:22
or actors get when things are used on a new
3:24
platform like When a movie is broadcast
3:26
on TV or when a TV show is in
3:28
reruns or on cable or on streaming Residuals
3:32
for streaming services though are very limited which
3:34
is true for a bunch of reasons
3:36
one is that companies behind? services
3:40
like Netflix and Disney Plus and Apple
3:42
TV are And
3:44
always have been very very hesitant
3:46
to give out any information
3:49
about how much money they're actually making on
3:51
streaming how many people are actually watching
3:53
and That makes it hard to share
3:56
Revenue with performers and creators
3:58
the way they do on cable and browser
3:59
broadcast and things like that. So for instance,
4:02
according to variety, SAG
4:04
after had a proposal that 2% of the
4:06
revenue from a streaming show would
4:08
be shared with performers, but the studios and
4:11
streamers basically say that's impossible because
4:13
nobody can possibly know how much money a streaming
4:16
show makes. This is where I want to start with you, Eric.
4:19
I've heard you say that you suspect
4:21
a lot of this fundamental conflict,
4:24
this hangup they have is about
4:26
that kind of transparency. Can you talk
4:28
about that?
4:29
Sure. And this is an ethic that
4:31
I think the streaming services imported
4:34
from Silicon Valley, where Silicon
4:36
Valley companies are stingy about
4:38
giving away any kind of information
4:40
that they don't have to about how
4:43
their company is performing. One
4:45
of the first things that Netflix did was
4:47
it refused to share viewership data
4:50
with almost anyone outside the
4:52
company, including the producers
4:55
and showrunners who were making their
4:57
programs. There's a story where
5:00
actors from Orange is the New Black talk about,
5:03
you know, many of them didn't get paid that much. And
5:05
even one of the showrunners said
5:08
that they didn't find out the viewership for the show
5:10
until the day after they had a
5:13
party for the finale
5:15
season. Yeah, supposedly, Genji Cohen,
5:18
the show's creator said, I want to renegotiate
5:20
my contract. So this is information
5:23
that could really help showrunners
5:26
and show creators and writers and
5:28
actors
5:29
negotiate their fees. And if they don't
5:31
know this, it's really hard to figure out
5:33
what a show is worth. When you have a show
5:35
that's a cable or broadcast, everybody
5:38
knows it. Because Nielsen does the
5:40
TV ratings and everybody buys Nielsen
5:42
TV ratings, so everybody knows.
5:44
Right. And I mean, at the beginning of streaming,
5:46
there were creators who said, I like the
5:49
fact that I don't constantly get ratings
5:51
reported to me. I like the
5:53
fact that, you know, I'm not constantly
5:55
being told your show is reliant
5:57
on the ratings that you get, but it didn't take
5:59
very long and I remember Jenji Cohen from
6:02
Orange is the New Black being one of the
6:04
first people who really made this point that you can't
6:06
really negotiate from a position
6:08
of what the value of your work is if nobody tells
6:11
you how many people are watching. The other
6:13
thing that I find so interesting is that when they say
6:15
something like,
6:16
we have no way to tell you how much revenue
6:19
there is from different shows. It's like that, from
6:21
a business perspective, feels to
6:24
me
6:24
like it can't possibly be true. Do
6:27
you know what I mean? Like that's not how businesses
6:29
operate.
6:30
I feel like
6:33
a lot of this does go back to the fact that a
6:35
lot of the people, the actors and writers
6:37
are negotiating with our
6:39
tech companies. It's Apple and Netflix
6:41
and Amazon and Comcast,
6:44
which now owns the whole NBC Universal
6:47
empire. So at the tippy tippy top,
6:49
you're not dealing with people who are primarily
6:52
in a creative business as these folks would describe
6:54
it. You have actors and writers
6:57
and their representatives negotiating
6:59
with people who answer to tech
7:02
executives. And I don't know how you
7:04
solve that. And the other thing that
7:06
is interesting here that makes it even more complex,
7:09
Amazon Prime video, you get access
7:12
to their original content by paying
7:15
for Amazon Prime. But
7:17
Amazon Prime also gives you all these other
7:19
services. So how do you break
7:21
out what percentage of what you pay
7:24
for Amazon Prime goes
7:26
to fund the TV shows?
7:29
Apple TV plus is a different sort
7:31
of paradigm where they're charging
7:34
what I think is probably a low price
7:36
for subscription to that service because
7:39
it's an add on. They're basically creating all
7:41
these shows to suck you into
7:43
the Apple universe
7:45
of products. The real stumbling
7:48
block is that none of these companies
7:50
want to reveal how much money they
7:52
are making or not making on these shows.
7:55
They will resist that. And I think it's
7:57
very possible that
7:58
Netflix
7:59
and maybe one other streamer may
8:02
be the only streaming service that's making
8:04
any money on their shows. And
8:06
nobody wants to admit that because then Wall
8:08
Street will stop investing in the shows
8:11
and the whole enterprise will
8:13
collapse.
8:14
The understanding in creative
8:16
businesses, and this goes for television, it goes for
8:18
film, it goes for publishing even,
8:21
is that to a certain
8:23
degree, and I want to be clear, this does not
8:25
apply across the board, but to a certain
8:27
degree, if you get involved in
8:29
a project and it's a hit and it's really
8:31
successful and more money
8:34
is made off of it by the people
8:36
you made it for, then some part of that
8:38
comes back to you. That's
8:41
what residuals are with a show like
8:43
Law & Order that runs for a billion years
8:46
and reruns all the time. The fact
8:48
that you are on that show and it's successful
8:51
and people keep watching it and they keep showing it, and
8:54
so money keeps coming in that you
8:57
get a chunk of that money. And so
8:59
when the streamers and the
9:01
studios now are saying, we just don't
9:03
have any way of measuring
9:06
that money, their solution is that
9:09
whole thing goes away and you'll just get paid whatever
9:11
everybody gets paid. And there's kind
9:13
of no financial
9:14
benefit for you for
9:16
making something that's a hit, that's really successful.
9:19
And that's a complicated thing for people,
9:21
I think, to swallow. Yeah, I
9:24
do want to ask you about the part of this that's
9:26
playing out in public, because I think this is fascinating.
9:29
There have already been some pretty
9:31
intense moments for the studio
9:33
side on the PR front. The news
9:35
site deadline ran a story where
9:38
some anonymous sources said some pretty
9:40
harsh things about essentially intending
9:43
to drag the dispute out until the
9:44
writers started to lose their houses. The
9:47
AMPTP disowned these comments,
9:49
but obviously
9:50
when you have executives nobody really
9:53
knows in a dispute with the
9:55
people who make people's favorite movies
9:57
and shows, the unions
9:59
would say,
9:59
seem to have a natural advantage. And
10:02
that's true even though, as the unions
10:04
will tell you, these strikes are not really about what
10:06
superstars make, they are about what
10:08
regular working actors and writers make and
10:11
whether those people can build careers and
10:13
earn a living. But how do you
10:15
think the public side of this is
10:17
going to affect what happens?
10:19
Well, what's interesting is that
10:21
we have never been in a media
10:24
environment where the public has had
10:26
more power over what happens.
10:29
Because the streaming services
10:31
are so dependent on
10:33
constant use and
10:35
attention from the
10:38
audience. They can track it and
10:40
they can tell which shows are drawing that attention.
10:43
And if the public decides en
10:45
masse that they're fed up with
10:47
the streaming services because of how they're treating
10:50
the actors and writers and they decide to start
10:52
dropping these services, particularly when
10:55
the original content starts to wane at
10:57
the end of the year. That's going to be another
10:59
crisis point for the industry. Right
11:02
now, the advantage that writers
11:04
and actors have is that they're the public
11:07
face of the industry. And
11:09
so they are the people that folks have been
11:11
welcoming into their homes, or they are the
11:13
people whose stories have been
11:16
entertaining them for years, or they're the people who
11:18
they've gone to see at the multiplexes. And they feel
11:20
like they have a relationship with them.
11:22
So they're able to communicate
11:24
their message much more easily. They can also
11:27
talk freer because
11:29
they're negotiating teams, go
11:31
into a closed room and negotiate.
11:34
But the members of the union can go out
11:36
and speak as just members of the union.
11:39
The studio executives have more responsibility.
11:41
They can't
11:42
do that. And they're all sort of nameless suits.
11:45
And they're making tens of millions
11:48
of dollars a year. And it's hard for
11:50
them to go out there and articulate, hey,
11:52
this is our point of view. But
11:55
they may still be making money. They are
11:57
still getting paid while
11:59
this.
11:59
striking is going on. Right. And
12:02
so they might be able to make it last longer. And
12:04
I'll just say one other thing is that, you know, this story
12:07
that was in Deadline where they said they wanted to drag
12:09
out the strike, it came
12:11
just as the deadline was coming for
12:14
SAG to decide whether or not they were gonna
12:16
go on strike. It seemed like the worst
12:18
possible moment for anybody on the
12:20
studio side to say these things when the
12:22
actors are trying to decide whether they're gonna go out
12:24
on strike.
12:25
Yeah, and I mean, I think that the double-edged sword, right, of
12:27
what we're talking about, which is that a lot of the people particularly
12:30
in SAG are familiar, famous
12:33
people. You've already seen pictures
12:35
of like Mark Ruffalo on the picket line
12:37
and, you know, Bob Odenkirk on the picket line and people
12:39
like that. But the question
12:41
becomes, is that a double-edged
12:44
sword? If it becomes a question of
12:47
the strike being about
12:49
the sort of high-end A-list people
12:51
and how much money they make, because if it becomes
12:53
perceived publicly as being about that, I
12:56
think that's very different from
12:58
if you can kind of make the
13:00
point that a large percentage of people
13:03
in SAG do not work enough
13:05
to qualify for health insurance. They've been talking about
13:07
that. So there is
13:09
this whole other population of people. So
13:12
you kind of want to leverage the PR potential
13:14
of all your famous's if
13:17
you're the union without kind of
13:19
having it turn into rich people versus rich people,
13:21
if that makes sense. Yeah. I
13:23
want to ask you one other thing. You've talked about this as
13:26
long-term fallout from COVID. Tell
13:28
me what you mean by that.
13:29
Yeah. So when the lockdowns
13:31
shut down production way
13:33
back in 2020, the streaming
13:36
services saw this huge influx of
13:39
attention from subscribers. And
13:41
I think that convinced a lot of media companies
13:44
to realign
13:45
all of their efforts towards streaming. So, for
13:47
example, at Disney, we saw
13:50
the ABC Broadcast Network kind of get
13:52
downgraded a little bit. An executive they
13:54
really liked who was heading ABC Entertainment. They
13:56
shifted her to overseeing streaming
13:59
and they put They put ABC's
14:01
broadcast division, supervision
14:03
of it, underneath the guy who was also overseeing
14:06
Hulu. And of course we saw that
14:08
legendary move where Warner Brothers had
14:11
a whole slate of films that they just put
14:13
on the streamer and didn't put in the theaters.
14:16
So that sends a signal to the audience
14:18
to tell them, hey, streaming is the next thing,
14:20
because there's cool stuff there. That's what
14:23
these companies are focused on. And so
14:25
people started to leave and cut the cord
14:27
from cable. And cable
14:30
makes money. And streaming doesn't
14:33
for as many companies. So they were
14:35
basically encouraging their audience
14:38
to leave a platform where they made money and
14:40
go to a platform where they either
14:43
weren't making money yet or might not ever
14:45
make money. And this is what I call sort
14:47
of the long tail of COVID. We're
14:49
still dealing with that. I mean, if
14:52
you look at the amount of cable TV
14:55
that people have in their homes, at one
14:57
point back in the day,
14:59
it used to be like 85% of homes that have cable TV. And
15:02
now it's below 50% and
15:04
it's accelerating. That's one of the big
15:07
problems too, is that
15:08
even
15:09
if people wanted to try and salvage
15:12
the economic model for television, the
15:14
audiences already decided to leave
15:17
the areas of television that make the most money.
15:20
And they're going to this area where
15:22
profitability is very uncertain.
15:24
Yeah, I have the same reaction that
15:26
other people do. When something disappears
15:28
from the library of a streaming service that I
15:31
have, and they move it, let's say to an
15:33
ad supported, streaming service or
15:35
whatever, they move it from Max to
15:37
Tubi or whatever it is. I have
15:39
the same kind of instinctive, like you're taking something
15:42
away from me, but I also
15:44
feel like the future
15:46
may hold some contraction in
15:49
what you get for a flat fee and
15:52
some increase in the cost
15:54
of some of these things as part
15:56
of whatever kind of systemic shift
15:59
we're talking about.
15:59
if it ever happens. As
16:02
a viewer, I'm trying to kind of
16:04
be cognizant of, not
16:07
assuming that the actual issue here is that the
16:09
studios have no money, but
16:12
trying to think about whether my expectations
16:14
for what a streaming
16:17
service subscription looks like and how it works
16:19
and how much it costs and what you get are
16:21
gonna have to change in the future.
16:23
Well, I mean, it's so interesting to me because
16:26
people complain that there's too many TV
16:28
shows out there and they can't keep up with
16:30
what's out there and they don't know what to watch because
16:32
they're just blinded by choice. And
16:34
then when they start yanking stuff off that people
16:36
don't seem to be watching, people complain about that too.
16:40
I think we have too many series because
16:42
they've made all these shows that appeal
16:44
to different constituencies, no matter what
16:47
you pull, there are gonna be some people who like
16:49
it. And so the audience has to
16:51
prepare itself. You are gonna lose shows
16:53
that maybe you like. Hopefully you just
16:55
lose shows that you kind of like and
16:58
the shows that you love will remain,
17:00
but that's gonna happen. And the other thing
17:02
is these streaming services
17:05
started out with low prices to
17:07
suck people into memberships and
17:09
they are gonna get higher. But if the
17:11
payment model changes and actors
17:14
and writers get more money, they're really
17:17
gonna go up. People are not paying
17:20
what it really costs to make
17:22
these shows. That's
17:23
been amortized by a bunch of different things, but
17:25
including by trying to hold
17:28
down costs of production by not paying
17:31
people that much. So once that
17:33
changes, the audience is gonna have
17:35
to pay. So the audience has to get ready for
17:37
higher subscription fees
17:39
and less content. I think
17:41
that's inevitable.
17:42
Yeah, well, ultimately this is sort
17:45
of where we end up. What do you think the possible
17:47
end games are? Because obviously some
17:49
of this feels a little easier to
17:51
resolve. There may be compromises that are possible
17:54
on some of the issues around,
17:56
for example, the structure of writers'
17:58
rooms, the use of AI. and
18:01
from a process perspective, it's possible
18:03
for individual studios and streamers
18:06
to choose to break off from the AMPTP
18:08
and make individual interim
18:10
side deals with the union so they can go back into
18:12
production. That happened in 2007 into 2008 when the WGA was on
18:15
strike. But
18:17
I think that you and I agree that this feels
18:20
like it could be really long and certainly
18:24
stretch out past the kind of Labor
18:26
Day point that people are starting to identify
18:28
as like
18:29
this continuing past Labor Day is when it
18:32
really starts to interfere with
18:34
kind of the release schedule, the longer term,
18:37
kind of what people are going to be able to see and when.
18:40
Yeah, billionaire media mogul
18:42
Barry Diller did an interview where he said he
18:44
thinks if this strike goes into the fall
18:47
that the entertainment industry will fall apart and
18:49
that there has to be some kind of resolution
18:52
around September. I think the industry
18:54
will hang out for longer than that, but
18:56
I do think he has a great point. A
18:59
couple things strike me about this. Number one, I would
19:01
say there has to be some
19:03
sort of solution for paying people more
19:06
and it's going to be a solution that the studios
19:08
hate and that the writers and the actors
19:10
hate too because it's nobody's going
19:12
to get everything they want. And potentially that
19:14
viewers hate as we were just talking about. Yeah,
19:16
it will be some kind of compromise just
19:18
so that the wheels can stay on
19:21
the bus and you can keep going down the
19:23
street. And the question is how much pain does
19:25
each side have to undergo before
19:28
they're willing to bite the bullet and
19:31
do that compromise. The other thing that
19:33
I remember from the previous
19:35
strike in 2007-2008, a
19:38
lot of the agreements that came out of that were
19:40
more focused on DVD and
19:43
types of media that we were familiar
19:45
with then and people couldn't really
19:48
forecast or predict the
19:50
current home streaming business. And
19:53
so my fear is that we will
19:55
come out of all of this, Michigan, with
19:58
a new structure. that doesn't really
20:01
anticipate where media is going to go. Yeah.
20:03
The other thing they got to do, and we haven't really talked about this, is
20:06
artificial intelligence. Yeah. There has to be
20:08
a way
20:09
to control and lock down
20:12
how artificial intelligence is used. I
20:14
don't think that's as big a stumbling block as this other
20:16
stuff that we talked about, but they will have to figure
20:18
it
20:18
out. Yeah. All right. So I think
20:21
we're going to close on this. I think another thing
20:23
that people are really curious about, obviously,
20:25
is how this is going to affect what's available
20:27
for them to watch. We know that late
20:29
night is already shut down. It's looking,
20:31
I would say, increasingly dicey, whether you're going to get
20:34
the Emmy telecast in September, depending
20:36
on how this goes. Certainly, the fall
20:38
season of network shows is an obvious
20:41
jeopardy, or at least starting on time is
20:43
an obvious jeopardy. And there's kind of no
20:45
way, I think, to know
20:48
for sure what it's going to look like when, say, Netflix
20:51
maybe tries to bring in more productions from overseas
20:54
or services try to supplement with reality shows
20:56
or game shows. What are you thinking
20:58
about what people should expect this to
21:00
look like in terms of their viewing habits
21:03
over the course of the strike?
21:05
Yeah, I think barring some sort
21:07
of miraculous resolution in
21:09
the next month or so, the Emmys are not
21:11
going to happen in September. They'll probably happen
21:14
in 2024. The networks
21:16
have already advanced fall schedules
21:18
that are filled with unscripted shows and
21:21
filled with shows that are not affected
21:23
by the current strikes. And so that's
21:25
what they're going to do. So
21:28
all your favorite scripted shows are not going to debut.
21:31
They're not going to have new episodes.
21:33
We're going to see an influx of shows from outside the country.
21:36
The CW, the scripted shows that they have
21:38
that are going to start in the fall
21:40
are off from overseas. So we're going to see that.
21:42
We'll see more content from overseas on streaming
21:44
services too, but it won't measure up
21:46
to the stuff that people are used
21:49
to seeing. And the streaming services are going to
21:51
start to run out of their premium content, I would say,
21:54
by the end of the year. And
21:56
as
21:57
the time keeps going, the coverage is going to look bare for every
21:59
sector.
22:00
of television in January. That's
22:02
when we're gonna start to see some real
22:04
problems. So that
22:07
deadline is when the pain really
22:09
starts to mount and it's going to push people
22:12
to make the kind of compromises that maybe now they're
22:14
not willing to think about.
22:16
And on the film side, you'll start to see, I
22:18
think, the release schedules get juggled
22:21
around the same time, I think, as this stretches into the fall.
22:23
They'll start to potentially change plans
22:25
for movie releases, even with stuff
22:27
that's already out there. Because remember, if
22:30
you do have a big movie that you plan to release before
22:32
the end of the year, if you release it during the strike,
22:34
you're very limited in how you can promote it. Because
22:37
SAG in particular has very particular
22:40
rules about, I mean, both the
22:42
unions do, about how much you can
22:44
do promotion. So if you've got a big movie, you don't necessarily
22:47
want it to come out during the strike, even if you
22:49
theoretically could have it come out during the strike. So
22:52
I'm gonna be very interested to see how it all goes.
22:54
But I think you're right that as this, barring
22:57
a big resolution in the next
22:59
month or so, it's gonna start to get real,
23:01
real messy around the end of the year.
23:03
Well, and the other thing we haven't talked about
23:05
is that right now the unions are not
23:08
asking audiences to stop
23:10
using streaming services or stop going
23:12
to movies.
23:13
But that could change too. Yeah, it absolutely
23:16
could. While NPR will be covering the strike,
23:18
we've got reporters who will continue to follow
23:20
these developments. You can find all that coverage from
23:22
Eric and other people, obviously online and
23:24
on air for however long this all continues.
23:27
Eric, thank you so much for being here. I hope you
23:29
make your flight.
23:30
Thank you so much for having me. And
23:33
it's a measure of how much I really
23:35
wanna talk about this that
23:37
I'm standing here in the middle, listening to Careless
23:39
Whisper come through the music, but I'm talking to
23:41
you about TV.
23:43
All right, bud, thank you so much. Thanks.
23:46
This episode was produced by Mike Katseff and edited
23:48
by Jessica Reedy. Thanks to Mandelit
23:50
Del Barco and Rose Friedman from NPR's
23:53
Culture Desk for their great reporting and editing
23:55
on the strikes. Hello, Come In provides
23:57
our theme music. Thank you for listening to Pop
23:59
Culture.
23:59
happy hour from NPR. I'm Linda
24:02
Holmes and we'll see you all later this week.
24:08
Hi, I'm Daniel Alarcón,
24:11
host of Radio Ambulante, NPR's
24:13
Spanish language podcast. If you want to get closer
24:15
to Latin America, if you enjoy moving, surprising,
24:17
or unique stories in Spanish, then you will
24:20
love our show. You can binge our latest season
24:22
or find more than 150 episodes in our
24:24
archives. Find Radio Ambulante
24:26
wherever you
24:27
get your podcasts.
24:29
This message comes from NPR sponsor,
24:32
Westfield Bank, offering customized
24:34
solutions to empower businesses, agencies,
24:37
and investment advisory firms. Partner
24:39
with a bank that's invested in your success.
24:41
Visit westfield-bank.com
24:43
slash financial-freedom.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More